Slashdot Mirror


SanDisk Spins SD/USB Flash Combo

An anonymous reader writes "Flash memory pioneer SanDisk has created an innovative memory card packaging technology that enables memory cards to plug into both SD card slots and USB ports. The new approach eliminates the need to use SD-to-USB adapters when accessing the contents of an SD card on a laptop, PC, or other system that lacks an integrated SD card slot."

188 comments

  1. Really, really cool! by BobPaul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow! That is really cool!

    SanDisk just went from "Cheap with questionable performance" to "Inovitce product designer"

    Just goes to show you that the best ideas really are the simple ones.

    1. Re:Really, really cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      whats "Inovitce" mean?

    2. Re:Really, really cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is truly innovative. I wonder how long it will take for other formats (compact flash, memorytick) to have this capability. I also wonder if its patented technology not that it matters as much on the hardware side. Also, there must be a change in internal layout of the card, does this form factor come with considerably less capacity. 1GB SD (the size used in the article) is fairly cheap nowadays and am curious to see what capacities will be available when this ships. If it is competitively priced I think SanDisk can easily take over the market.

      Does anyone know what percentage of the card actually contains the IC for storage?

    3. Re:Really, really cool! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Cheap with questionable performance"

      What are you referring to? I really haven't had problems with Sandisk.

    4. Re:Really, really cool! by Lindsay+Lohan · · Score: 1, Funny
      the best ideas really are the simple ones
      According to the NYU School of Journalism, the "Top Ten Ideas for 2004" are as follows:

      1. The Legacy Media.

      2. He said, she said, we said.

      3. What the printing press did to the Catholic Church the blogging press does to the media church.

      4. Open Source Journalism, or: "My readers know more than I do." (Dec. 28)

      5. News turns from a lecture to a conversation. (Dec. 29)

      6. "Content will be more important than its container." (Jan. 1)

      7. "What once was good--or good enough--no longer is." (Jan.4)

      8. "The victory of affinity over geography."

      9. The Pajamahadeen.

      10. The Reality-Based Community.

      Yes, I was scratching my head a little after reading that, too.

      But it does underscore one point: the best ideas are not really all that simple.

    5. Re:Really, really cool! by BobPaul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What are you referring to? I really haven't had problems with Sandisk.

      They're SD memory tends to be a fair amount slower than come of the competition. Not a problem if you aren't taking pictures in quick succession, but very noticable on a Palm Pilot. By nature of being SD, they're still faster than the majority of MMC cards but this is a clear instance of "you get what you pay for"

    6. Re:Really, really cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      memory stick? prolly never

      sony suxors

    7. Re:Really, really cool! by mp3phish · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you sure you are using their "Ultra" version? They are about $5-$10 more per card, but well worth the dramatic speed improvement...

      And their standard speed cards are a heck of a pricepoint, no matter what way you look, you can't expect the cheapest/most compatible card on the market to whizz by at flaming speeds... I think you are expecting too much out of them. You should be glad that the SanDisk SD cards are actually compatible with just about anything out there. And their availability is.. just about everywhere locally and online.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    8. Re:Really, really cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats "Inovitce" mean?

      What does "whats" mean?

    9. Re:Really, really cool! by Jozer99 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Everyone knows that Sandisk used to be the neighborhood whore of memory manufaturers, but it evidently went to night school and got a nice job in a book store, so its future looks bright. :D
      </sarcasm>
      Sorry, couldn't help myself. I have no clue what he meant either... :)

    10. Re:Really, really cool! by dalutong · · Score: 1

      I agree. My T3 doesn't record right on my Sandisk SD card. i think it is because it can't transfer data quickly enough. (it's an old SD card, i'll admit)

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    11. Re:Really, really cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And you call yourself a geek. A whats is a unit of phowers, named after Jhames Whatts.

    12. Re:Really, really cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when the T3 first came out (early adopter speaking here), there were all sorts of problems with people's SD cards getting hosed, and from what the majority of the people on the palm developers mailing list were saying, the problems were primarily with Sandisk cards. I've needed to pick up some flash memory since then, and I've avoided Sandisk - if there's a problem with the format in and of itself with a certain device, there's no reason why it should affect one vendor's product more than another's unless there's a problem with the quality of that vendor's product.

      Just my $.02...

    13. Re:Really, really cool! by radish · · Score: 1

      SanDisk Ultra2 is basically the fastest CF card you can buy. I imagine the SD version is equally impressive.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    14. Re:Really, really cool! by RedBear · · Score: 1

      What are you referring to? I really haven't had problems with Sandisk.

      I have seen a great many reports on sites like DPReview forums about older Sandisk cards (pre-Ultra II/Extreme) having extremely poor transfer speeds, not living up to spec, poor reliability, etc. Since the Ultra II/Extreme lines came out they seem to have cleaned up their act and now they are considered the top of the line cards by many people. Their new Extreme III line has just recently doubled the transfer speeds of most types of memory cards to sustained 20MB/20MB read/write, and won some sort of award. Prior to the Ultra II/Extreme cards they had a lot of problems.

    15. Re:Really, really cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "Jhames Whats" or do you just like the letter "t"?

  2. Cool, solves a problem by Lindsay+Lohan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The new approach eliminates the need to use SD-to-USB adapters
    I think this would be great after taking pics, when you've left your camera's cable somewhere else, and you want to email them from a notebook, PC, etc.
    1. Re:Cool, solves a problem by Steve+Embalmer · · Score: 0
      Yes and 1+1=2

      Actually, what she said *was* insightful. In fact, it's almost exactly what PC Mag had to say HERE, here's the quote:

      "Has this ever happened to you? You've just snapped some great pictures, and you want to quickly transfer them to your laptop to e-mail them to friends. But you left your camera's cable somewhere else. SanDisk wants to make that problem go away"
    2. Re:Cool, solves a problem by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      There are laptops that will read any kind of media you want. compact flash,secure digital,smart media,micro drive, multi media card and memory stick.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    3. Re:Cool, solves a problem by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      that's nice.

      So next time I leave my camera cable behind, I'll just go out an buy a new laptop shall I?

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    4. Re:Cool, solves a problem by isorox · · Score: 1

      There are £6 USB card readers that read anything, I always keep one in my laptop bag

    5. Re:Cool, solves a problem by kd5ujz · · Score: 0

      Either that or buy a new camera that will support this new techonolgy. Whatever suits you.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    6. Re:Cool, solves a problem by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way: With this card, I have the ability to transfer photos to just about any computer out there, and I don't have to have anything in addition to just having my camera. No cables, no SD card reader, no laptop, etc. This would be great for those times when someone asks me if they can have a copy of a picture I just took - I can simply take out my card, plug it into their machine's USB, and it will just work.

      I'd buy one, if my camera used SD cards and not Memory sticks.

    7. Re:Cool, solves a problem by mallardtheduck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Erm... this works with EXISTING cameras...

    8. Re:Cool, solves a problem by beallj · · Score: 1

      SD cards have been around for a while, and many people (myself included) have cameras which used them.

    9. Re:Cool, solves a problem by roseblood · · Score: 1

      Erm... this works with EXISTING cameras...

      Well, none of my existing cameras use SD cards...so... it works with SOME existing cameras.

      None of the PROFESSIONAL grade digi-cams that I'm familar with use anything other than CF/CFII.

      Well, thanks to Google, the EOS 1Ds can use SD or CF/CFII.

      Otherwise it's the Hasselblad H1D with its 40gb "image bank" and the Leaf Valeo 22 with a 10gb "digital magazine" for me. A folding SD card w/ usb gizmo isn't any help for me. [yawn]

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    10. Re:Cool, solves a problem by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      So you're representing what, like %0.000000000001 of the population then?

      I imagine they'll be sad to lose your business.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    11. Re:Cool, solves a problem by roseblood · · Score: 1

      Well, 99.99% of the people out there are satisfied with crap, and will get crap (what % of desktops does MS provide the OS for?)

      This is Slashdot, we should KNOW how to tell crap from gold (at least in our tech toys/tools.)

      Anyhow, I'm not about to dump a quality product (my cameras, or my OSX machine [gold]) for some product that solves a problem that really didn't exist in the first place[crap].

      Really, who was aching to get a SD Card that could plug into SOME USB ports (look at the way this thing folds, it won't plug into 80% of computers that use front mounted USB ports...and if you have to dick around at the back of your machine to plug it in, why is it more convient than just getting the card-reader or USB cord for your camera?)

      [/rant]

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    12. Re:Cool, solves a problem by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, I'm interested in getting it. But not because I have any interest in using it in a digital camera (mine use CF as well).

      But my PDA on the other hand DOES use SD cards, and it would be very, very handy to be able to just pop the memory card out of the PDA when I'm away on a jobsite, copy a few files to/from it, then pop it back into the unit.

      Infact, I'd keep one of these SD cards with me instead of using USB keychain drives. Smaller and handier.

      So perhaps not as useful for digital cameras, but it could be a useful technology for others that don't want to worry about packing around cables or readers.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  3. excellent, elimnates my pc card adapter by pstreck · · Score: 1

    now can get rid of one more thing in my laptop bag! yeah

    --

    Later,
    Phil
  4. Uh? eh? by zoftie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    About time? Seriously its pretty cool, except that canon cameras take compact.
    Oh well, others probably to follow suit.
    p.

    1. Re:Uh? eh? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      except that canon cameras take compact.
      Oh well, others probably to follow suit.


      The newest compact flash memory is REALLY small and thin. I'm not sure this could be possible with the latest variety.

    2. Re:Uh? eh? by Milican · · Score: 1

      My Canon SD300 takes SD memory :)

      JOhn

    3. Re:Uh? eh? by Megor1 · · Score: 1

      Some Canons take the SD media cards such as the PowerShot SD10.

      --
      Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
    4. Re:Uh? eh? by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      About time? Seriously its pretty cool, except that canon cameras take compact.

      Last I looked, Canon were not the only manufacturers of digital cameras - though I have no doubt the Canon fanboi's will argue they're the best.

      The SD format is used in Palm devices as well as cameras from a variety of manufacturers (including Canon). There are also a few MP3 players which use it.

      This is a good move on Sandisks part, and depending on capacity/price could effectively kill the market for "low" end flash drives.

    5. Re:Uh? eh? by radish · · Score: 1

      Most compact Canons (and in fact, most compacts from any manufacturer) use SD. The Canon DSLRs on the other hand to take CF, thankfully. It's cheaper, faster and more reliable.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:Uh? eh? by Airline_Sickness_Bag · · Score: 1
      About time? Seriously its pretty cool, except that canon cameras take compact.
      Oh well, others probably to follow suit.


      Canon sells a couple of SD card cameras, including my PowerShot SD100.


      -asb

    7. Re:Uh? eh? by BenFaremo · · Score: 0

      > About time? Seriously its pretty cool, except that canon cameras take compact.
      Check out the Elph SD300. SD card memory (no bent pin issues like the CF socket), and a nice big 2" screen.

    8. Re:Uh? eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any advantage to Compact Flash? SD is smaller has as much storage and now plugs directly into USB.

    9. Re:Uh? eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Canon's moving toward SD memory. I have a SD300, which is one of the smaller cameras out there.

      Canon's top end 1DMkII and 1DsMkII, two of the larger cameras out there, can use both CF and SD memory.

  5. Nice idea, but at what cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How much more expensive are these going to be than normal cards? USB reader dongles can be had for next to nothing these days!

  6. Re:pendrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many other pen drives plug into an SD slot?

  7. That's actually quite clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I thought my PQI stick was small...

    1. Re:That's actually quite clever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I thought my PQI stick was small...

      hehe...you said your stick was small

  8. I don't get it... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    my camera already has a usb cable, from which I can pull files off the SD card.

    I mean it's a neato little feature/design, but I don't get it *shrug*

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:I don't get it... by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      When you share photos with a friend, do you want to give them your camera? Sure you can e-mail them, but it's often easier just to loan them your SD card, especially if they're still on dialup.

    2. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      maybe b/c you don't travel much...

      I can't remember how many times I've taken pictures on vacations and remote locations, and forget to bring the cable with me. I end up juggling which photos I want to keep and which ones I'm willing to sacrafice. Especially helpful when a friend wants the photo as well, you can upload it to them right there without the hassle of having to get the cable.

      Sure this is great for the camera, but I'm thinking about using this to replace my USB key. so much smaller, I could probably hide it in my wallet.

    3. Re:I don't get it... by geg81 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and you need to carry that cable around, you may lose it on your trip, etc.

      If you get a camera that works with AA batteries and SD (like the Ricoh R1), this means that all you ever need to carry is the camera itself: no cables, no chargers, nothing. Now, that's travel convenience.

    4. Re:I don't get it... by dragonman97 · · Score: 1

      I always use a cheap little USB SD adapter to copy my pictures to my computer - hooking the cable up to my camera draws power from it. It's also very convenient to do it this way, for me, as I have a couple of chips/cards, and I have a case for them, in which I also keep the adapter - and I don't have to take the camera to the computer. The only nuisance is taking the chip out of the camera, but that's not a big deal - the power savings far outweighs this little negative.

    5. Re:I don't get it... by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      my camera already has a usb cable, from which I can pull files off the SD card.

      I mean it's a neato little feature/design, but I don't get it *shrug*


      What if your camera battery dies?

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    6. Re:I don't get it... by kotj.mf · · Score: 1

      Would you mind giving me a brand/model #? And how much you actually paid for it? Is it SD/MMC only? And what do you mean by "small"? I've got a Zaurus, and I use the SD card for primary storage. Carrying around a little tiny SD adapter would be musch more convenient than carrying the 7-format adapter I currently have. Thanks.

      --
      hang brain.
    7. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the rest of us get rid of an easily forgettable extra we no longer need, you stick to your USB cable... it'll go nicely with grandma's corded phone.

    8. Re:I don't get it... by dragonman97 · · Score: 1

      I was going to say, "It's a no-name item," but then I saw part number, and Googled it.
      It's a "cr-v7-ud"

      http://www.teksave.com/detail.aspx?ID=1126

      This is what mine looks like, though:
      http://www.globalsources.com/gsol/I/PC-ca rd-manufa cturers/p/2000000011008/3000000171745/8835068415.h tm

      The thing is, I bought mine at OfficeMax for $9.99 with a $9.99 mail-in-rebate, so it ultimately cost me whatever the tax was, the $0.37 to send in the rebate form, the interest lost on that money, and the small amount of gas to get it. ;) Ergo, it was quite inexpensive (even less than the $6.50 quoted above). (I bet you can find a similar item on eBay for very little $$$.)

      This (http://www.target.com/gp/detail.html/601-5271140- 6542529?asin=B00005LP0X&AFID=Froogle&ref=tgt_adv_X SG10001) is the case I keep all of it in - so I can have a two spare SD cards (a 16 MB, and a 128 MB, and the reader fits at the top, keeping it all together.

    9. Re:I don't get it... by tepples · · Score: 1

      What if your camera battery dies?

      Doesn't USB provide enough current to power a camera's card reader?

    10. Re:I don't get it... by russellh · · Score: 1

      camera battery life is the main one. card readers are also smaller and less annoying than having to carry around yet another cable.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    11. Re:I don't get it... by kotj.mf · · Score: 1

      That's awesome. Thanks!

      --
      hang brain.
  9. which begs the question, by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Why isn't there a memory card format that's just a USB stub, and a small bit of chip- like a thumbdrive or a diskkey or usb drive or whatever they are called this week.

    how large does a usb key have to be- could it be made to go within a camera?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:which begs the question, by josh3736 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which would bring another interesting application: If the camera's memory card slot is just a USB port, why not plug an external hard drive in? You'd obviously have to find an external power source for the HD, but after that, you've got gobs of storage for your pictures.

    2. Re:which begs the question, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Storage size is important, but is it really that important when all you want is a compact camera. The HD would obviously take more space...and add the powersupple and the previously tiny camera will look like one from the 60's....

    3. Re:which begs the question, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean power supply.....yea...

    4. Re:which begs the question, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When flash makers started putting out their standards, USB was only just coming into vogue, and they all hoped for their standard to reach a monopoly status, as that would mean that everyone would just provide readers for the card, making it cheaper for them.

      Since that hasn't happened...well...

    5. Re:which begs the question, by josh3736 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This would be an option when you're not too concerned about having a compact camera. You could keep the drive and power supply in a backback, for example. Or, if you're taking pictures from your car, you just plug in to the 12 VDC.

    6. Re:which begs the question, by cozinator2 · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Final Table Team - Poker Disc
    7. Re:which begs the question, by josh3736 · · Score: 1
      Damn, meant to put this in my last post... shows me to use Preview.
      how large does a usb key have to be- could it be made to go within a camera?
      See the iStick. 1 5/8 inches long, 5/8 across. 1/16 deep. (actual size) I have a 128 MB stick. It's great. It even came with a credit card-sized holder so I can keep the thing in my wallet.

      (Just a satisfied customer here.)

    8. Re:which begs the question, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's too small... I'd lose it!

    9. Re:which begs the question, by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because until this year, nobody realized that you could make a thin plastic USB connector. If you think about a normal USB connector, it is actually much thicker than your average memory card, with its (relatively) giant metal rectangle. This year, a company called PQI realized that the metal part isn't actually necessary for the plug, and removed it. The result was this. Suddenly USB drives are actually smaller than and just as thin as regular memory cards! It's one of those great ideas that is obvious in retrospect. PQI has patented this design, and I imagine SanDisk has had to license it to create this super-awesome combined card.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    10. Re:which begs the question, by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      yes, exactly like that.. thanks for that.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    11. Re:which begs the question, by Christopheles · · Score: 1

      X's Drive is a product that basically allows this, but without an external power source, and the advantages of still being able to use flash cards. Just get a couple of flash cards for your camera, and carry the hard drive around and it is unlikely you will run out of space.

    12. Re:which begs the question, by magefile · · Score: 1

      OK, it's a great idea. I still don't think it warrants "super-awesome".

    13. Re:which begs the question, by caino59 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i've always wondered about that. given the proliferation of thumb drives, etc....why hasnt someone developed a camera/mp3 player/whatever that accepts storage in the form of a usb thumbdrive?

      i've often thought of a smallish mp3 player, with a screen, minimal built in memory (for the OS) and a usb connect to plug in any usb removable storage device

      opens up a lot of possibilities

    14. Re:which begs the question, by c · · Score: 1
      Why isn't there a memory card format that's just a USB stub, and a small bit of chip

      There is, it just hasn't caught on.

      c.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    15. Re:which begs the question, by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Same reason MS won't make Office documents compatible with OpenSource XML document formats.

    16. Re:which begs the question, by khrtt · · Score: 1

      ...until this year...

      PQI iStick has been on the market for a few years now. Maybe 4 years or so. They went from USB1 to USB2. "This year" started a week ago.

      I don't know if they managed to patent a shieldless USB connector - after all the idea of not installing a shield on a shielded connector is not new, as anyone who has messed with serial D-type connectors will tell you.

      BTW, early PQI iSticks used to sell with an adapter that replaced the missing USB shield, and also served as a protective case, hiding the exposed contacts. You can still order the thing from PQI (for $3.99+s/h or so), but the iSticks you see in a store are not packaged with it anymore.

    17. Re:which begs the question, by MrSellout · · Score: 1

      Something like this? I wonder how picky it is about what's plugged in there.

    18. Re:which begs the question, by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1
      If they were available 4 years ago, they did a good job of hiding them until now. I never saw one in the store until last month and I can't find any reference to them on the Internet before last year. (And of course when I said "this year" I meant "last 365 days or so", you pedant.)

      These days, patents don't seem to be about new ideas anymore, just new (and not necessarily novel) ways of combining old ideas. So are you really surprised that taking the idea of removing a shield and applying it to USB plugs is patentable?

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    19. Re:which begs the question, by koko775 · · Score: 1

      iirc i saw this on TigerDirect ages ago. Not new, but interesting.

    20. Re:which begs the question, by Hangtime · · Score: 1

      My guess is this is what your talking about in your post. Give it two years and we should be seeing these coming out and all the other formats going by the wayside.

      http://www.lexar.com/newsroom/press/press_12_13_ 04 .html
      http://www.lexar.com/image/UFC_penny.jpg

    21. Re:which begs the question, by koko775 · · Score: 1

      Huh? Since when can a company patent the lack of a feature? Or does this patent effectively force companies to include USB shields? Odd.

    22. Re:which begs the question, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't know what you mean by `glory,'" Alice said

      Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't -- till I tell you. I meant `there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"

      "But glory doesn't mean `a nice knock-down argument,'" Alice objected.

      "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less."

      "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."

      "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master -- that's all."

      -- Lewis Carroll, "Through the Looking Glass"

    23. Re:which begs the question, by evilviper · · Score: 1
      could it be made to go within a camera?

      It could be made PHYSICALLY small enough, but the camera then has to be much more complex, becomming practically a full-fledged computer just so it can host USB devices.

      USB isn't peer-to-peer like Firewire. It requires a complex central host to manage everything, probably designed that way by Intel so computers remain a requirement, and "devices" can't operate independant of computers.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re:which begs the question, by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If the camera's memory card slot is just a USB port, why not plug an external hard drive in?

      Let's see: Size, power, reliablity? Perhaps because the camera would crash when it detects a multi-gigabyte card attached?

      Or maybe filesystem incompatibility. Since few cards are bigger than 2GBs, most cameras just use a FAT16 filesystem, which won't work on your 250GB hard drive.

      I have a question for you... If you want to attach a hard drive to a camera, why don't you do it with current cameras, rather than waiting for USB versions? Compact Flash cards are pretty much just normal IDE devices as the host sees them, so if you needed this functionality, you could make simple adapters to do it.

      Besides, I've already replied to the parent, explaining why it's extremely unlikely cameras will be able to use USB memory devices. Don't hold your breath.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    25. Re:which begs the question, by roseblood · · Score: 1

      GRANDPARENT:
      Which would bring another interesting application: If the camera's memory card slot is just a USB port, why not plug an external hard drive in? You'd obviously have to find an external power source for the HD, but after that, you've got gobs of storage for your pictures.

      PARENT:
      X's Drive [me: a portable HDD + card reader] is a product that basically allows this, but without an external power source, [snip]

      ME to PARENT:

      Uhm...the Grandparent wants a device that plugs into the cameras memory card slot.

      ME to GRANDPARENT:
      Dude, you've heard of MICRODRIVES right?

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    26. Re:which begs the question, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen an embeded ARM7 with host and hub USB ports and software USB stack. There is also an embeded 8051 with a host USB port and software USB stack.

    27. Re:which begs the question, by tialaramex · · Score: 1

      It was designed that way because it was not intended primarily as a Firewire killer but as a CHEAP replacement for dumb serial and parallel port hardware.

      USB makes the host complicated (which is fine, it's a PC, it already has an entire 3D rendering infrastructure, and a TCP/IP implementation) and allows peripherals to be very simple, and thus both cheap and easy to use.

      In practice after a few years even the host controller prices have fallen far enough that a $100 printer can be a USB host and run a bidirectional protocol with a USB camera so that the camera provides the printer with a GUI (this technology is called "Pict Bridge" but it's actually just a branding exercise for some simple PTP stuff. There is no reason why the more expensive USB cameras couldn't do the same thing in turn with USB memory sticks, so long as the sticks used only one of the 18 USB storage protocols.

    28. Re:which begs the question, by evilviper · · Score: 1
      USB makes the host complicated (which is fine, it's a PC,

      No, it's fine for things that only make sense connected to a PC. It's not fine for devices that could benefit from being connected to other devices, without a computer in-between.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  10. Great by earthloop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two days after I buy a new laptop with built in SD/MMC slot!

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's good! "Normal" SD cards without the new technology will become really cheap...

    2. Re:Great by geeveees · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I can't believe this... 12 years after I buy a 286 with a floppy drive. Just great!

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
    3. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, this SD/USB flash combo is "neat", but it's probably much cheaper and more practical to get a non-combo SD card anyway.

  11. Mini-SD based, I'd guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is probably actually based on their mini-SD product line. If you look at the picture of the folded unit, it looks very similar to a mini-SD card with a SD adapter next to it (and the USB port sticking out, of course.) Pretty clever.

  12. Sandisk makes all memory types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    including compact flash.

  13. Snap! by lxt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I saw this a few days back on The Register - it's a very neat design, and eliminates this USB reader I've got on my desktop at the moment. The one thing I would be concerned about is how fragile it might be - I can imagine plugging this into my laptop and the connector snapping away from the card, especially given it doesn't have the surrounding metal case around the USB plug. ...still, I suppose that's a risk with most of the USB dongles I carry around, and it hasn't happened yet.

    1. Re:Snap! by macshit · · Score: 1

      The extra clearance required beneath the USB port for the folded-down part of this card could be annoying in many cases -- e.g., I have USB ports on my keyboard that have enough room beneath them for a typical USB key, but it looks like one of these SD cards wouldn't fit; I'd think many laptops would have the same problem.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  14. More inforamtional pictures: by zoftie · · Score: 3, Informative
  15. Re:pendrive by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >> woo. a pen drive, how innovative.

    a pen drive the size of a fricken postage stamp that happens to fit right inside my camera.

    I'm impressed. and looking forward to owning this - I find myself transferring pictures directly from the camera to a PC often, and it wastes charge on my batteries. This won't.

    So yeah, it is innovative.

  16. Intelligent stick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something similar (minus be compatible with SD) has existed for a bit...

    Take a look at pqi1st.com's intelligent stick... sorta nice.

  17. How many USB ports would this actually fit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great idea, but USB ports are often bang-next to other ports, so the other plugs could obstruct it, and front-panel recessed ones may be too near the edge of the recess to fit the extra width of this gizmo.

    1. Re:How many USB ports would this actually fit? by Mao · · Score: 1, Informative

      Use a cheap ass USB extension cord. Problem solved.

    2. Re:How many USB ports would this actually fit? by droopycom · · Score: 1

      Kind of defeats the purpose.

      If you have to carry an extension cord with it, then just carry an SD reader.

      The cheap ass SD reader often come with an extension cord anyway....

    3. Re:How many USB ports would this actually fit? by RFC959 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the USB spec prohibits shieldless connectors and dictates how large a device may be in the immediate area of the connector, so this thing is probably in technical violation of the spec on two counts. I'm guessing that the product wouldn't pass compliance testing and hence the packaging doesn't bear the official USB logo.

  18. Not quite "technology" by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

    ... innovative memory card packaging technology ...

    Umm... no, not really "technology". Innovative? Definitely. New technology? Not really.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  19. looks neat,but ... by mikerubin · · Score: 0

    how easy is it to break/wear out those little hinges ?

    --
    I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
  20. Convenience is good by Eberlin · · Score: 1

    Remember those old cassette tape players in cars? You'd have to buy the cassette-cd adapter thing in order to plug your CD player onto the car's sound system.

    Same general thing here for us folks who don't have those 57-in-1 media card readers. It all sounds like an interim solution until everyone eventually gets those readers built-in, the same way tape decks in cars have now been replaced with CD players.

    Cool product and all, but I think of it as transitional until we all get those media card readers bundled into new machines we buy.

    Now what about an adapter on these memory cards so the punch-card reader can read them in?

    1. Re:Convenience is good by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there are too many standards to "bundle" into the machines you buy.... For a desktop, you can get a 1032801328-in-1 reader. For a laptop, most come with SD readers only (and sony gives you a memstick pro reader, puke)

      It's really not possible to give every computer the readers they want. When will the next time be that you see an xD reader built into a laptop? Until fugi or olympus start making laptops, you probably never will.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    2. Re:Convenience is good by damiam · · Score: 1

      Those "old" cassette players in cars? A friend of mine has a 2001 Prius with a tape deck. Car cassette players are still alive and well for people who don't want to pay extra for a CD player.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:Convenience is good by magefile · · Score: 1

      Maybe instead of "until everything is built in", the GP meant "when we settle on a small enough # of standards that they can be built in".

    4. Re:Convenience is good by khrtt · · Score: 1

      Now what about an adapter on these memory cards so the punch-card reader can read them in?

      How many computers are there still around that have punch card readers?

    5. Re:Convenience is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is offtopic, but...

      That's something I've always wondered about: Are CD players really that much more expensive than cassette players nowadays?

      Of course, this doesn't change the reality that a CD player is often a pricy option on lower end cars.

    6. Re:Convenience is good by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      extra? CD players cost less than 50 bucks 5 years ago ;)

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    7. Re:Convenience is good by Todd+H.+Sals · · Score: 1

      Hell, growing up my dad had an adapter to play cassettes in our car's 8-track player. I kid you not.

    8. Re:Convenience is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That car is 4 years old. In 2005 the only cars that don't come with CD players are low end economy cars like Kia and such. Even the $12000 Scion and $9000 Aveo come with CD players. They are no longer a luxery only or aftermarket only option. Cassettes are the exception, not the rule.

    9. Re:Convenience is good by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      extra? CD players cost less than 50 bucks 5 years ago

      I think he means "extra" as in $500 more when you buy the car new to get the FANCY stereo package (which has the CD player) vs. the "stock" stereo which still defaults to cassette for most car manufacturers. I suspect they only do it because they know nobody wants cassette anymore so it's an easy upsell.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    10. Re:Convenience is good by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      you're probably right.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    11. Re:Convenience is good by Wabin · · Score: 1

      Ugh. And now cars with CD players are a pain in the ass to use with ipods. I am back in the time when I had to use a radio transmitter to play tapes in the car. Why they don't just add a minijack as a standard feature on car radios these days is beyond me.

      --
      Most exciting phrase in science: not "Eureka!" but "Hmm... That's funny..." -Asimov (abridged for \. limits)
  21. PQI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is what PQI tried with the Intelligent Stick - theirs wasn't SD or MS etc but some new format that they were pushing to camera/mp3 player manufacturers. Didn't really take off but It's gotta be the smallest flash drive on the market.

    1. Re:PQI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This stick is truly awesome!
      Even after a year people won't believe it's a memstick until you stick it. USB-wise.

  22. What we really need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but are unlikely to get (universally)...

    are digital cameras and portable mp3 players and digital video cameras and pdas, and cell phones, and ghetto boxes and car stereo decks that will accept a usb memory "drive" instead of compact flash, SD flash, sony sticks that don't work any where else, the next flavors of memory cards for planned obsolescence in the pipeline, etc.

    And the next logical step would be usb 2.0 memory "real" drives that are backwards compatible with current usb 2.0 memory sticks.

    Imagine using a usb 2.0 memory card for all of the above appications. Great for the consumer, nightmare for the memory companies' profits.

    And a question. If a usb memory drive (or whatever its called) can be manufactured at 1 GB without any delays in the size ramp up, why has it taken so long to make 1 GB ram memory for desktops? And why are they still so expensive compared to smaller sizes?

    I ask because I got stuck with one of the Shuttle motherboards that uses three slots for ram, but only has two slots that work unless the memory is the much less popular and much more expensive registered memory used in servers (which I would purchase a server board if I were using server memory). On more than one computer, came with 256 mb standard, bought a second stick with 512 mb as prices dropped, and now to use more memory, need to throw out a stick or use a different computer. And with a slightly older setup, bought two sticks of 256 MB of high performance (cas 2-2-2) memory costing $100 each many eons ago, and now to upgrade more memory, need to throw out one of those sticks to add memory capacity. 1 GB in one slot, 256 in the other, or throw both out.

    I'm seeing the same situation on Pricewatch with 2 GB memory (which may even be 2 x 1 GB sticks in all situations instead of some situations?)?

    1. Re:What we really need... by droopycom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh yeahhh.... I have a vision of a USB pen sticking up on top of my digital camera... just like i would have flash bulbs stiking on top of my old film camera...

      Theres no way you want a generic usb plug on your camera to replace your media. You want your media to fit tightly inside your camera.

      Now, they could put a USB host interface on the camera so that you could transfer your pictures onto your usb pen or your ipod photo or the latest portable media player. But thats something else...

      In this case they could even do without removable media and just have a fixed flash memory inside.

      That would be really innovating...

      F**k ... I just gave away a good idea....

    2. Re:What we really need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't using your imagination. The usb stick can be inserted the same way that batteries are sometimes inserted, say vertically, flat side to your left and right, inside one end of camera. Or the female part of plug can be on the bottom of the main body, pointing to your right or left, on one end of the camera, so when you plug in the usb stick, it lays flat against the bottom of the camera. I'm sure the designers can take it a step further, if they really wanted, where the memory stick would complete the camera bottom or side, so that when the usb memory is in place, it looks like there is no stick. A slot cut out of the bottom of the camera (or side), where when the usb memory is inserted, it completes the contours of a normal camera. When it is removed, a door slides across to close the cutout. Or they ship the camera with one of the small memory drives out there, like the 16 mb sticks that TigerDirect gives away for free or $4.99 with an order.

      Sure, it won't work with a pen camera. But with the vast majority of cameras (based on sales/popularity), manufacturers could easily fit a usb flash drive into the form of a camera where the usb memory completes the form, instead of intrudes out of it.

      If they placed form, function, and usability to the consumer ahead of memory company profits. They may have some profitable deals in place with the flash memory makers, but they will profit more in the long term if usb memory (which appears to have a longer life with usb 2.0 than compact flash, secure digital, and all the other gimmicks for the same memory) becomes ubiquitous throughout electronics.

      Cameras are the killer app for memory. For USB 2.0 memory sticks, it is computers. For cell phones, we don't really have removable memory yet. For pdas, nothing that stands out above the rest. Enable cameras to use USB 2.0 memory, add the ability to digital video cameras (and flat screen tvs), cell phones, pdas and digital music boxes big and small, and they will really see sales take off of 1 GB and larger USB 2.0 drives.

  23. Looks fragile by Doppler00 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know, but when you start introducing mechanical components to memory devices you're asking for trouble. This device looks pretty fragile, the hinges look like plastic, how long could something like this possibly last?

    This looks more like a solution looking for a problem. How difficult is it really to plug a memory card into a USB adapter?

    1. Re:Looks fragile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.
      Internal flash memory card readers are going to be standard equipment on notebooks and even desktop pcs in the not-so-distant future.
      And most readers can read so many formats (SD/MMC/CF/whatever) that compatibility isn't an issue.
      So I doubt there's going to be a market.

  24. Its been done... by Ojamin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Its been done before.

    http://www.pdalive.com/showarticle.php?threadid= 77 39

    1. Re:Its been done... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      hmmm....but that one won't fit in SD based devices that expect the length to be fixed.

      My camera has the SD slot behind the battery door, so I'd have to leave that open while using one of those - wheras the SanDisk one is the same shape as a standard SD card until you want to use it in a USB port.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  25. SD == DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Avoid SD cards at any cost. The wide adoption of SD (which means Secure Digital, and not SanDisk) is the next step towards putting DRM control around our data.
    More info are contained in the official SD and SDIO complete reference, which -surprise- is neither open nor free, and costs big bucks/NDA signing to get.

    My answer is thanks but no thanks, I'll stick with more versatile, cheap and open supports such as Compact Flash.

    1. Re:SD == DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ridiculous statement. 99% of all card readers can not even access the secure area of the SD card. There are less than a handfull of products out there which are even using the secure area of an SD card. One of which is for mobile phones, the other I know if was for some RealAudio product.

      A generic SD card can typically have a much higher throughput than a CF card.

      If you want to reject DRM :) reject the subscription services, not the SD cards.

    2. Re:SD == DRM by GoRK · · Score: 1

      A generic SD card can typically have a much higher throughput than a CF card.

      People who continue to make this type of statement really confound me. Generally speaking, there are various companies out there who make flash memory and another set of companies that buy flash memory and produce memory cards in various form factors. It's one thing to say that a specific interface's maximum throughput is theoretcially better than another's (and I'm not actually sure whether or not the SD interface allows higher bandwidth than CF or not), but it's quite another thing to make a blanket statement like "SD is faster than CF."

  26. Resistance is futile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just give up. This phrase is used "incorrectly" more often than correctly. Once a word or phrase enters mainstream langauge, it becomes accepted as part of that language. No matter how much you fight it, the grandparent's usage of the phrase will eventually be accepted as correct. Maybe tomorrow, maybe a few years from now. You can not stop it. It is inevitable. Use your time to do something worthwhile.

    1. Re:Resistance is futile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This phrase is used "incorrectly" more often than correctly. Once a word or phrase enters mainstream langauge, it becomes accepted as part of that language.

      So whot you are saying is that we should except that apostrophe's can now be placed randomly, merely because lot's of people do it?

      (One big [sic] after all of that, of course).

    2. Re:Resistance is futile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of random apostrophe placement, there is no evidence that language authorities are yielding in their resistance. But many phrases that have come to be used in a misunderstood sense have eventually been accepted as proper language. There's no reason to believe that "begs the question" won't be one of those phrases, given the ubiquity of the "wrong" usage.

  27. Re:Nice idea, but at what cost? by Bishop · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That was my first impression but after thinking about it I changed my mind. Most users are only going to have a few SD cards. Usually just the one they have in their camera and maybe a spare. For these users having an integrated usb reader is very convinient especially if you are on the road and want to transfer pictures to a friend's computer. With regards to cost as you pointed out USB readers are pretty cheap. It probably costs next to nothing to add the USB bit. (A quick check of a local shop shows SanDisk SD cards are just slighly more expensive then similar USB drives.) I would guess that there will be a higher markup for the convinience factor, then the cost of adding the USB.

    If these USB/SD cards become popular I predict that some camera maker will drop the USB interface from their cameras.

    Don't discount the convinience factor. For a few bucks extra I would by a device like this. If only so that I didn't have to remember to bring the card reader.

  28. Looks cool but, by aka_big_wurm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It looks really cool and I want one but they are so small I would worry about losing it unlike my jump drive that takes SD cards.

  29. I'd hardly call this innovative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would hardly call it innovative. I'd call it common sense. Duh, people are having to buy these expensive adapters to connect their memory cards to their computers, why not interface with USB instead of your own connector format. Wow, that's so "innovative".

    1. Re:I'd hardly call this innovative by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      My memory card adapter cost $12.00, installed...

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
    2. Re:I'd hardly call this innovative by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      expensive adapters

      Expensive? Hardly. I picked up a USB 7-1 card reader for about $8 just before christmas.

  30. Re:Should always specify North or South. by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1
    The newest compact flash memory is REALLY small and thin. I'm not sure this could be possible with the latest variety.


    Huh? Seriously, what are you talking about? Can you provide us a link to some pictures of this new "really small and thin" Compact Flash? The form factor is part of the standard, and is significantly larger than SD. Or are you just thinking of xD?

  31. Interesting capacity numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't anyone find it questionable marketing that the label says 1GB, but the USB stick says 512MB ? Take a close look at the big picture

    1. Re:Interesting capacity numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't anyone find it questionable marketing that the label says 1GB, but the USB stick says 512MB ?

      Well it's sold as a 512MB, but if you punch a hole on its side, you can use it as a 1GB.

    2. Re:Interesting capacity numbers by zerOnIne · · Score: 1

      the other 512MB is on the other side.

      --
      09
  32. I want one... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    but it must be with my xD or mini SD card, and operate in the same way or I'm not buying! :)

  33. Will it fit? by Phoex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One problem I've noticed, especially with the 'designer' PC cases is that the front USB ports are impossible to plug anything except a cord into.

    --
    00110100 00110010
  34. Flash Drives - RIP by Oxide · · Score: 1

    A couple of days ago I was telling a friend of mine that these USB flash drives everyone carries at work will soon die and extinct in favour of SD cards.

    Sandisk couldnt prove me any more right.

    This innovation is the KILLER for those flash drives. Flash drives, thanks for a job well done; may you rest in peace.

    1. Re:Flash Drives - RIP by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Those SD cards look pretty fragile, I think USB thumbdrives will live on.

    2. Re:Flash Drives - RIP by ckedge · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but with PC's having razor thin margins, very few vendors are going to start adding $40 multi-card readers in all PCs.

      I've got tons more friends who react with disgust at the idea of trading in their USB keys for SD cards. They're all afraid of loosing the tiny little things. They even think that instead of putting SD readers in all PCs, that all electronic devices should instead use USB keys!!! Bloody morons, they'd rather have a huge clunky camera or mp3 player than go with a superior product.

      Shame everyone doesn't include a little hinged plastic case for their memory cards like I initially got my CF card in - which is great for holding a tiny SD card and making it easier to handle/transport without loosing it. It completely solves the "looks pretty fragile" excuse.

      I *wish* with all my heart that USB keys would go away and I could just use my SD card in not only my camera and mp3 player, but in ANY PC. It's idiotic to have to carry around a card reader when I'm on vacation or travelling.

      But I don't see it happening.

  35. Aw, snap by RichDiesal · · Score: 1

    Anyone else going to feel nervous when you snap the SD card in half in order to get the USB connector loose?

    I mean, I appreciate the innovation here, but wouldn't a USB plug that slid out from the card simply have a better asthetic?

    Not to mention that some USB ports (on the back of computers and even some hubs) are in recessed locations where this card wouldn't even fit in its snapped-in-half state.

    1. Re:Aw, snap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This design makes it less likely to snap off (broken) while connected to the USB port. I guess.

    2. Re:Aw, snap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Aw, snap by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Not really. The top half is just a cover; there's no electronics inside. (That was part of the article I wrote on the 6th that was finally rejected yesterday.)

  36. Re:It's a cartel by Migraineman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The SDA is a cartel, plain and simple. The Host/Anciliary License Agreement (pdf) is truely draconian. In addition to paying the annual extortion fee, you have to agree to license any new developments back into the cartel. You're also prohibited from disclosing any details about SD cards. So once you're a member of the cartel, you pretty much can't work on any open-source SD-related projects. There are even "antitrust guidelines" published by SDA because they're dangerously close to crossing the line.

  37. There's also been a Compact Flash version. by argent · · Score: 1


    Re:Its been done... (Score:1)
    by mabinogi (74033) Neutral on Saturday January ...but that one won't fit in SD based devices that expect the length to be fixed.

    It sure looks like it's the same length as a regular SD card: in fact it looks like it's exactly the same design as the Sandisk one, except instead off a fragile hinged frame around the USB part of the card (that will make it hard to fit the card into some USB sockets where there's little clearance) it's just got a couple of notches to narrow the upper part of the card down to fit in the socket.

    There's also been a CF card that used the same schtick, but it never seems to have made it to the market. I'd been wondering why all memory cards didn't come with some such arrangement... I guess it's like the way canned or bottled coffee didn't make the jump from asian food stores to mainstream groceries until it got a "big name" like Starbucks involved (or why nobody needed multitasking in a personal computer until Microsoft "invented" it).

  38. Is it gonna fit ??? by droopycom · · Score: 1

    The SD card is a bit wider than my usb pen drive, and on my laptop, the usb port are between the power connector and the ethernet connector, and its already pretty tight when i plug the usb pen.

    I'm not sure this is going to fit everywhere....

  39. PQI iStick by khrtt · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ever heard of PQI iStick? It's a memory card that plugs directly into a USB port. It's smaller than any other memory card but xD. The connector has the shaps of the inner part of the USB A-type plug, w/o the shield, so it can plug directly into a USB port. Internally, it's implemented in a way that allows it to work against either a full USB host, or a simplified interface circuit in a consumer device.

    Very nice design.

    They were about 2 years late to market. I don't know of any consumer devices that use iStick flash. Not one. I guess they weren't too good at marketing this to consumer electronics designers either.

    It's too bad, because I have several of those little cards - they are very handy as a flash disk. They are so small I can keep one or two in my wallet. They are smaller than any other USB flash disk because they don't have the shield part of the connector - the whole thing is <3mm thick.

    Good design, bad marketing. Sandisk might do better, since their's works in existing cameras.

    1. Re:PQI iStick by MaynardJanKeymeulen · · Score: 1

      I've had one of those too...
      One day I plugged it into my brandnew, shiny computer and the thing went
      zzzzzap, started smoking, melting and finaly burning
      Since then I prefer my memory sticks to be as large and heavy as possible.

      Disclaimer: I too kept the thing in my wallet, might have been not exactly the purpose.
      The usb port still works, btw

      --
      "The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they make a vacuum cleaner."
  40. Danged Patent System !@#$%^ by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

    Damn it... I had that idea a year ago, though my hinged one folded back a full 180 degrees. My patent is still *pending*. Sad that money can affect our patent system... I guess SanDisk just got there's approved first... kind of like M$ keeps doing. !@#$%^

    What really gets me is how SanDisk can fit a USB2 capable port in there, but those idiots at OQO could only put USB1 in their first device "due to size constraints". WTF?

    1. Re:Danged Patent System !@#$%^ by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

      Moderators: Please mod parent funny!

  41. MMC == SD – DRM by Hal+XP · · Score: 2, Informative

    [Then try MMC]

    --
    I'm a sci-fi vegan: I don't want the aliens to think we have as much right to live as the fried chickens we eat.
    1. Re:MMC == SD – DRM by geekboy642 · · Score: 0

      Correction:
      MMC == SD - DRM - SPEED

      Slow and free?
      *shrug* I can use my OSS box to read my SD cards just fine...where's the problem?

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
  42. Lexar USB FlashCard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another link about the FlashCard: http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000020023447/.

  43. PC card better anyway. by twitter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You will get better performance on a laptop from a PC card adaptor. Once again, your choice of Canon and CF has done you well. Like CF in general, PC cards for CF are also cheaper than SD equivalents. I've got them both and I'm still happier with CF performance.

    At the same time, the folding design is interesting. Cool stuff scandisk.

    The scandisk SD to PC card adaptor I have works well enough, but I've had problems fdisking a 512 SD card. It worked but it hurt. Cfdisk could not deal with it so I had to use regular fdisk to set up a ext2 partition, which I then was able to format and mount without a problem. At the same time, I've never had similar problems with CF.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  44. "SanDisk Marries Flash with USB" by Maksym · · Score: 0

    50%~ of all marriages in the us end up in divorce!

  45. It would be nice by Jozer99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be nice if they released cards like this in other formats, like CompactFlash.

  46. MemoryStick by bluemonkey123 · · Score: 1

    This would be an amazing idea for Sony. The memory sticks are about the same width as a USB plug so it wouldn't need funky folding parts. Not that I like memory sticks...

  47. Rubbish by roesti · · Score: 3, Informative
    The wide adoption of SD (which means Secure Digital, and not SanDisk) is the next step towards putting DRM control around our data.
    This is totally incorrect. If you're referring to the Secure Digital Music Initiative (SDMI), they gave up on DRM about four years ago when their watermarking scheme was ruthlessly cracked. The group has been totally inactive since May 2001.

    Nowadays, lots of devices use Secure Digital cards, but mostly because of the "cool" factor: they're a lot smaller than Compact Flash cards, and the capacity of SD cards isn't that far behind that of CF cards. I was looking at a couple of MP3 players that use SD cards, and none of them had DRM at all. Just copy your MP3 files to your SD card, whack it in your player, and hit Play.

    Hence, the schism that Secure Digital really means DRM does have a historical basis, but it has little relevance today. The idea that using SD cards in modern devices will smite your with a plague of DRM is just rubbish. For the purposes of keeping digital photos or music, SD is storage, and nothing more.

    1. Re:Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, YOU'RE thinking of SDMI. The parent poster is thinking of SD. The really irritating part of it is that the major retail outlets are complicit in the scheme. I wen to Fry's looking for an MMC card for my phone and found 3, 2 of which were Palm branded and ridiculously marked up in price. ($120 for a 512MB which would fetch closer to $60-$80 online). Best Buy sells exactly one, 128MB for ~$30, CompUSA had only SD. It's worse for me because I need it for my phone, which takes ONLY MMC cards >:(

  48. Re:Nice idea, but at what cost? by Grakun · · Score: 1

    They shouldn't cost too much. Digimaster is making the SD/USB cards for $30/$40(128MB/256MB).

    http://www.everythingusb.com/news/index/5929.htm

  49. What's even worse ... by kiore · · Score: 1

    50% of marriages end in death!

  50. Innovator? No. by bay43270 · · Score: 1

    As DpReview pointed out, they were not first

  51. Any real purpose?! by adeydas · · Score: 1

    It looks great to have a combo car in the horizon but the question that pops in my mind is whether it is really worth it. For one, the cost of an USB to SD cable is almost next to nothing. So if this combo card is real cheap or atleast the same cost of the cards avialable now, then its no problem. However, if it is not, then I wonder who would buy it!

    1. Re:Any real purpose?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Travelling convenience; it's one less thing you might leave in the hotel room when travelling.

  52. Wait and see before getting excited .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SanDisk has always been very bad when it comes to the control part of their memories (no wonder it takes them 8 or 9 tape-outs (yes! 8 or 9) before getting a 99% not-too-bad chip), and they're still cheap, so....

  53. Useful by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

    This is actually something I'll buy once the price settles down. I use an SD card in my Palm (and wife's Pocket PC), but I use a USB thumbdrive on my laptops and desktops (far too many of those). I need to consolidate all my stuff onto one device, so I'm going to go to a Lexmark Jumpdrive Trio, which until Sandisk's new toy was the smallest USB SD card reader. Just a little bigger than a slim thumbdrive, but this new toy means I don't need to carry anything extra.

  54. available at Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. But will it work in a Dell Axim? by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    I am rather hesitant to buy another Sandisk SD card after going through 2 different defective 256 MB SD cards.

  56. SanDisk adaptor by occupied · · Score: 0

    How mean can you be?
    Normally an adapter for about 9 different card standards cost about $9.99, or less.
    But my mom doesn't have such, although she has a digital camera.
    She gets on fine. ..occupied

  57. So which interface is faster? by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

    Anybody know?

    --
    Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  58. Is it used? by pjc50 · · Score: 1

    I've never seen anyone actually using the SD DRM for anything.

  59. Re:Should always specify North or South. by tepples · · Score: 1

    There's a difference between "Type I" CompactFlash memory and "Type II" CompactFlash memory. "Type I" is considerably thinner.

  60. Punch this by tepples · · Score: 1

    My PC's flatbed scanner can read punch cards.

  61. Good for consumers, better for Sandisk by nulltransfer · · Score: 1

    This brings a lot of convenience to people who use SD cards, but I think this may also bring better market share to Sandisk.

    People who use SD cards no longer need card readers, but what happens when they need more SD cards? Do they go out and buy an SD card from a different brand? Probably not, since then they'll need an SD card reader (which they don't have already, or are too lazy to use). So they'll go out and buy the Sandisk SD card which they've gotten used to.

    A good move from Sandisk.

    --

    My dog ate my sig
  62. Chaps kill the troll. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Honestly, read other replies to this nonsense.

    No wonder the post was as an AC...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  63. like this (and its got a fm transmitter as well) by arjovenzia · · Score: 1
    http://www.auspcmarket.com.au/show_product_info.ph p?input[product_code]=MU-MP3CAR&input[category_id] =

    stop, go, next, usb storage, powered from 12v. the all in one usb car sound system. all for 110AUD bargin. (thats 83USD or 44GBP) i just found it avalible in the us @ 60usd. goddam cheap. http://www.merconnet.com/product_info.php?products _id=345&meRrid=8f4007a167e0b13d2a592a4d98265c96

  64. Re:Should always specify North or South. by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1

    Yeah, my camera uses Type I CompactFlash cards only, so I have a couple of those. They're somewhere between 1.5-2x the thickness of the plastic part of the USB connector on my Sandisk Cruzer Mini, and overall considerably larger and thicker than SD cards. As such, I don't see why we should rule out folding USB CompactFlash cards if the SD version proves itself.

  65. Re:Innovator? No... But then Yes, really... by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    No, they weren't the first. But they were the first to make it fit in an SD package... Digimaster's solution is an SD Card with a usb plug hanging out. This means you'll have to leave the door open on most camera's as there's an extra piece extending from the side...

  66. sd usb reader by danidin · · Score: 1

    To be realy COOL, it has to be very small, to have place for a spare sd card, and to have a very low price, I would like to have very low capacity and very cheap sd cards with few megabytes that can replace the low cost 1.44 diskettes