Slashdot Mirror


Is Atlas Holding Hipparchus' Lost Star Map?

cr0kin0le writes "The Farnese Atlas at the Naples National Archaeological Museum may be holding a celestial globe which accurately depicts the long-lost star catalog of Hipparchus, according to a physics professor at Louisiana State University."

37 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Thanks a bunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why the hell did you link Wikipedia in the blurb, now I can't karma whore...

  2. What's up with the modified statue? by Harald74 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the NYTimes.com picture, they added a leaf... Is this some American thing? /European

    --
    A)bort, R)etry or S)elf-destruct?
    1. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably an american thing.

      Remember this is the country that ground to a virtual halt at the sight of half a breast.

    2. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The leaf seems to be real. It's probably the doing of the (very European) Pope Pius the IX in 1857, who thought that naked statues should be covered up. In recent years they have been restored, and the NY Times probably used an old picture - whether or not that was on purpose we don't know.

    3. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by mbyte · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh, i just did a quick google for "Farnese Atlas statue" (as noted under the picture), and the results were without the leaf !! :)

      see here: picture (but beware, it contains nudity, oh the horror !)

    4. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by DoubleEdd · · Score: 3, Informative
      It wasn't uncommon for leaves to be added to statues in relatively modern times (ie Victorian), and perhaps more recently for them to be removed again to reveal the original statue.

      David, for example, suffered this fate.

    5. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by CrankyFool · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why do you think we're encouraging an obesity epidemic in our kids?

    6. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by madaxe42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, this is a European thing. Many old sculptures and statues were modified by the catholic church during past centuries in the name of 'decency'. Fig leaves were typically added, made of alabaster or a similar stone to the original statue, and affixed using concrete. This is also why many statues you will now see in this part of the world lack genitalia, as when the leaves were removed by a more enlightened age of society, the genitals fairly often came with.

      The NYTimes photo is most likely an accurate picture, however is probably a lot older than the picture on the other site, and the fig leaf was removed sometime after the photo was taken.

    7. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by Harald74 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, you have a word for it... That really sums it up, doesn't it?

      We have a quite a few American tourists over here, and I haven't seen anyone freak out over our park full of nude statues. Do narrow-minded and prudish Americans stay at home, while the broad-minded and friendly ones visit Europe in the summer?

      Just asking...

      --
      A)bort, R)etry or S)elf-destruct?
    8. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 4, Funny
      If your kid can't deal with the idea that everyone has a pee-pee down there, maybe you've got him a bit too much sheltered.

      Whoooooh dude. I must have been brought up in a bomb shelter then, 'cause I sure can't deal with the idea that everybody has a peepee down there.

      'Cause....you know...my girlfriend is hiding hers really damn well!

    9. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by Slur · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the prudish Americans are a tiny minority - bordering on a myth, really.

      The media props up this mythical form of being in order to Disney-fy the airwaves and make anyone who lives a normal flawed human lifestyle feel like a depraved piece of shit. This helps to prop up those capitalist endeavors that rely on a cowed populus, such as the snack industry, the advertising industry, and the defense industry.

      The underlying aim of the media is to teach ordinary Americans that they are in constant danger of being demonized as outsiders. They are told they can escape this alienation by joining the mass-consciousness. All they need do is practice the dubious virtues of jingoism and an unquestioning submission to authority and they will be accepted, loved, and embraced by the status-quo. ...They also have a lot to say about the relative value of light-skinned blonde daughters versus black-skinned kinky-haired daughters....

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    10. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by R.Caley · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I have two young children and I absolutely WILL NOT put up with them being shown any nudity without my permission.

      I presume you put blindfolds on them when they shower in case they should happen to look down without asking first?

      I think the outraged reaction to the Janet Jackson things was funnier. After all, the primary purpose of breasts is to be presented to young children. How is someone who spent much of the most delicate period of their post-birth brain development with a breast the size of their head shoved in their face going to be adversely affected by a glipse of nipple?

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    11. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by R.Caley · · Score: 3, Informative
      However, it is shameful for a person to expose his/her body to those who do not have the exclusive marital privilege of seeing it.

      I hope you married a surgeon.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    12. Re:What's up with the modified statue? by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you kidding? They're probably over at the local nudie bar hiding from their wives. Some parts of the bible belt have more interesting strip clubs than Vegas.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  3. Interesting stuff by dn15 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's pretty cool. The scientists/naturalists/etc. of the past may have had a more primitive understanding of the universe, but they weren't stupid. It's amazing to think that they figured out so much about the sky so long ago with so few tools, when today most people don't have a working knowledge that even comes close to matching it.

    1. Re:Interesting stuff by dn15 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That's because most people now have better things to do than look up in the sky at night. Those people of the past didn't really have much else to entertain themselves with.
      Yes, people have much better things to do today. Why waste time learning stuff when you have an Xbox and the next episode of The Bachelorette is almost on?
    2. Re:Interesting stuff by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They could see the sky at the time. There are fewer and fewer locations where you can get a clear view of the sky nowadays between light pollution and particles.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  4. Picture sans leaf by DrInequality · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the FA: picture without leaf

  5. Re: Missing fig leaf! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny


    > Hmm.. Anyone else notice that the statue has a fig leaf over the groin in one photograph, but not the other? Did it fall off recently, or what?

    No, it's just the pre-Ashcroft and post-Ashcroft versions.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  6. Old charts interesting by Ev0lution · · Score: 5, Informative

    A sculpture probably isn't going to show enough detail, but old charts are interesting as they can show stars as being brighter or dimmer than they are today. For example, in the mid 19th century Eta Carinae was the second brightest star in the sky (after Sirius), now it's almost invisible to the naked eye (around 5th magnitude IIRC). The bright stars Castor and Pollux in Gemini were around the same magnitude, now Castor is dimmer (the brighter Pollux is still 'beta Geminorum'). I wonder what Hipparchos might have seen that we dont see now?

  7. Danish porn by koi88 · · Score: 5, Funny


    In the NYTimes.com picture, they added a leaf... Is this some American thing? /European

    Of course The American Version Is The Correct Version. Don't trust Our Media?
    The danish version is just a filthy porn version from this well-known immoral little country.

    --

    I don't need a signature.
  8. the amazing chaldeans by xconfig · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reading this story, the most amazing thing to me was to think of the Chaldeans of Babylon laboriously making observations over at least half a millenium, before Hipparchus came along. Beats the story of Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler and Isaac Newton.

    1. Re:the amazing chaldeans by gilroy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Beats the story of Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler and Isaac Newton.

      Ah, yes, yet another tale wherein the ancient peoples outdo their modern imitators. Except for the whole "found a system of the world wherein the mode of learning is a self-correcting, self-perpetuating mechanism that leads to heights, depths, and breadths of knowledge undreamt of four centuries ago, much less twenty."

      I don't know much about the Chaldeans' observations, so I'll concede that they might have outstripped Tycho. But I'm fairly certain that they did not point out that the planets move in ellipses with the Sun at one focus, or that the orbits of any planet sweeps out equal areas in equal time, or that the period of a planet's orbit is proportional to the 3/2 power of its distance from the Sun (OK, technically, its semi-major axis). So, advantage: Kepler.

      And I am absolutely certain that they did not then note that a universal attraction of each planet for the others actually pulls them off said ellipses and causes a more complex motion -- let alone actually providing a method to correct for this -- oh, and incidentally, crafting a system of mechanics that not only allows one to build skyscrapers and suspension bridges but leads to investigations and methods that eventually discover electromagnetism, relativty, and quantum mechanics.

      So I think advantage: Newton, as well.

      The ancients were not idiots. They were just as smart as we are today. But they knew less than we do about the physical universe and they didn't have a system even remotely similar to science, that allowed a steady and self-correcting accumulation of knowledge. I can honestly not understand the apparently fervent need of many to worship at the altar of mist-enshrouded nameless ancestors, who "have" to be better than the well-documented founders of the modern world.
  9. Knights of the Old Republic by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So there's a star map in Naples?

    Now all I need to do is find all the other Star Maps to locate the Star Forge and defeat Darth Malak.....

    May the force be with me....

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  10. Re:Mystery of the leaf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a real leaf, that was placed on it in the Victorian era by Papal decree, and was recently removed as part of a restoration project, but most news outlets frankly don't want to spend $20 for an updated photo when their old stock still works.

  11. Nice statue. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe the original Greek name was "Grunting Under The Burden of Astronomy."

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  12. Re:LOL!! by LarsWestergren · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look at the little peepee on atlas!!! LOL!!!

    Please, the polite way of putting it is "He's a grower, not a shower".

    Another possible retort is: "Yeah, but did you see what a great great ass he has? Divine!". Note that this can lead to awkward silences in predominantly male enviroments such as Slashdot though.

    Right guys? Guys...?
    *crickets*

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  13. star map in naples by jotux · · Score: 5, Funny

    so does it tell you where Salvatore di Giacomo, Lorenzo Bernini, Gaetano Filangieri, and Enrico De Nicola used to live?

  14. Narrow minded americans by thrill12 · · Score: 3, Funny

    don't even know where Europe lies.
    They probably think its a town in western Penssylvania or something.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  15. Well-known? by pjt33 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe I'm being overly suspicious, but you look to me like a European karma whore. What true American would call Denmark "well-known"?

  16. Re:Actually, the Americans have the better deal by thempstead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Urm, whilst it may be illegal to do those things in _some_ contries in Europe, (in the first case Germany and the second France (i think)), but that does not mean that its illegal to do so all over Europe.

    In the first case it may e considered in bad taste everywhere though ...

    t

  17. fast computing by joke_dst · · Score: 4, Funny

    He calculated, within six and a half minutes, the length of a year That's some pretty fast calculating...

  18. Slahdot is going downhill by Merdalors · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is a good example of how Slashdot is degenerating into irrelevance.

    The Farnese Atlas is an interesting example of [1] lost knowledge being rediscovered, [2] ancient wisdom forgotten during the Dark Ages, and what do we get?

    ... nattering about pee-pees.

    --
    Slashdot entertains. Windows pays the mortgage.
  19. Pius IX was mad as a fish. by aug24 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Among his other acts were the declaration (after a vote, no less) that the Pope was infallible (which, because he, the Pope, was infallible, must be right - right?) and the abduction of a jewish couple's child after the child had been secretly baptised by a servant, on the grounds that a 'christian' child must be brought up by christians. Nutter.

    Incidentally, it has been suggested that his empire-building paved the way for the powerful modern vatican, and was a direct response to the formation of the modern state of Italy, which had removed a lot of the power of the church. So possibly not such a nutter. Nah, only kidding: Nutter!

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  20. Museo Archeologico Nazionale de Napoli & Sex by theycallmerenda · · Score: 5, Informative

    The linked photo is from the Naples Archeological Museum (Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli). The NYTimes photo is from the Griffith Observatory in LA. Hence they're not necessarily the same piece of stone, and the latter may be a copy of the original in Naples. On another porn-related note, the Naples Museum is well known across the world for its beloved "Secret Room," full of sexually explicit artifacts dug up from Pompeii and other Roman sites. That, along with the awesome mosaics, are well worth the trip to Naples. Naples has a bad rap for a being unsafe (and parts of it are) but anyone going to Italy should surely go.

  21. Re:LOL!! by Trick · · Score: 4, Funny

    C'mon -- the guy's got the south pole on his back. That's bound to cause some shrinkage.

  22. Nudity is not porn by CustomDesigned · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Porn is a difficult thing to define objectively. On the subject of defining pornography, an American Supreme Court justice said in frustration, "I know it when I see it, but I can't define it."

    The basis of Christian (Catholic and Protestant) ethics concerning sexual behaviour is the concept of "defrauding". In this context, to defraud someone is to arouse desires that cannot be righteously (or practically, for you libertines) fulfilled. Pornography is the ultimate in sexual defrauding, hence it condemned. Solomon puts it more positively, "I adjour you, awake not my love till it pleases." In other words, don't arouse me until the time is right and we can enjoy it to the utmost. (We don't need to be reminded of how Solomon did not exactly set a good example of sexual restraint. He regretted it afterward.)

    However, the precise stimuli which result in inappropriate arousal is very culturally relative. A Christian family I know was visited by a Christian family from Russia. They met them at the airport, and the American wife gave all of their visitors a big hug. Later, they discovered that this made the Russians very uncomfortable. (This may reflect a particular subculture in Russia, and not Russians in general.)

    My sister spent some years in the jungle in Papua New Gunea. The Christian women there were very few clothes, often going topless due to the climate. This did not seem to provoke the wrong response in the men. (Although I've heard that it does for American boys reading National Geographic.) Strangely, the Papua women were shocked by magazine photos of American women in bikinis. Objectively, the bikinis represented more cloth than what the Papua women wore, but there was something about the facial expression and body language that said "come hither", and thus became pornography.

    One more thing, Eros is exclusive and jealous by nature. Promiscuous behaviour does not contradict this. When that special someone says to us, "I love you!", we are thrilled. When we discover that they are saying the same thing to 10 other people, we are not so thrilled. Some people have expressed the idea that pornography might be appropriate within marriage (or whatever you libertines want to use as a substitute). However, because an image rather than the beloved becomes the source of arousal, it diminishes Eros and cheats both partners.