Slashdot Mirror


Fallout From Japanese Patent On Help Icon

MeridianOnTheLake writes "The Tokyo District Court has ordered the destruction of Ichitaro, a software product that is the only serious competitor in Japan to Microsoft Word, and has been on sale since 1985. The ruling is based on the claim of a competitor, Matsushita, that the use of a help icon to invoke a help function infinges on one of their patents. "We are a global enterprise and we are just following international practice to enforce our IP rights," Kitadeya (Matsushita) said." Here's more on the story, as covered by Bloomberg and The Japan Times.

86 of 372 comments (clear)

  1. Obvious Question by fembots · · Score: 3, Informative

    How about Microsoft? Is it too big to sue?

    A surprising thing is Justsystem shares fell 3 yen, or 0.5 percent, to 600 yesterday - As if nothing happened?

    1. Re:Obvious Question by blackomegax · · Score: 2, Informative

      thats still roughly SIX DOLLARS. i wonder how openoffice is viewed...

    2. Re:Obvious Question by forceflow2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      3 Japanese Yen is roughly 3 American cents...

    3. Re:Obvious Question by forceflow2 · · Score: 2

      Ah, thought he was referencing the 3 yen, my mistake.

  2. Where have I seen that before? by Mr2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Matsushita declined to say whether it thinks any other software vendors may be infringing its patent.

    Gee, do you think there might be any other software out there that uses a help icon? *cough* *coughwindowsmacoswordexcelaccesspowerpointwordper fect--* *sputter* *choke*

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  3. Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Kymermosst · · Score: 3, Funny

    If only someone would sue Microsoft for Clippy, we could finally be rid of the biggest annoyance in Microsoft Office.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Clippy may be liable under EPA guidelines, as it certainly pollutes desktops.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not with Chimpy McFlightsuit in the white house he ain't.

    3. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Maestro4k · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If only someone would sue Microsoft for Clippy, we could finally be rid of the biggest annoyance in Microsoft Office.
      • Personally I think the biggest annoyance by far in Microsoft Office is it's inability to open older versions of it's own .doc format properly, and the fact that Microsoft seems to make sure the current version of the .doc format won't work in older versions nearly every release. Meanwhile you have Wordperfect's .wpd format that hasn't changed since version 6 and works just fine.
      • It's pretty sad when software can't even handle it's own proprietary format properly.

    4. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Maestro4k · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The biggest anoyance is that it's not using a standard format for those files. If it were, not only would you have compatability within the product family; but with other families (Adobe, F/OSS, etc) as well.
      • That's the ideal yes, but at a minimum it should be able to handle it's own proprietary format proprely, something MS Word fails to do. Even if it tried to use open formats, it'd probably screw them up so badly it couldn't open them up properly itself, much less anything else handle them.
      • Frankly I believe Open Office handles older versions of .doc formats better than the current MS Word does.

        Note: I'm not just MS bashing, I use Word a lot myself, and this is a very frustrating bug to deal with. It gets old having to upgrade every time a new version comes out (gotta make sure I can read all the Word documents that come my way), and having to keep older versions around on a backup machine for when the current version opens an older version .doc and it's unreadable without a few hours of formatting.

    5. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I actually hold the patent for Clippy but I'm too ashamed to sue anybody.

    6. Re:Now if only someone had patented "Clippy" by sideshow+Pablo · · Score: 3, Funny
      NO!

      Microsoft didn't take clippy far enough. He should have been intergrated in the OS itself. Users would have to ask clippy for permission to run any applications.

      blink-blink

      "It appears your trying to run an open source program. I know your not a commie so I'll just go ahead and remove that for you."

  4. It's not the thing, it's the method by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Ichitaro would have just used the standard Microsoft (that's the software platform they target) context-sensitive help, none of this would be an issue.

    Instead, they hired on an ex-Matsushita employee and he went on to use the Matsushita patented method for the help system. So they sued, as is their right.

    This is not a problem with the patent system. However what it does bring up is "How much knowledge can you take away from your previous employer, even if all that knowledge is just in your head?" As we gain ground in technology, such to the point that Johnny Bnemonic-style memory expansion is possible, how can patent holders and companies owning "trade secret" IP be protected from information pirates?

    1. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...how can patent holders and companies owning "trade secret" IP be protected from information pirates?
      They can't.

      That is why this is a problem with the patent system.

    2. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by oliverthered · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More to the point, as more and more of the things in the world become patented how are we to protect the people from the patent holders.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If Ichitaro would have just used the standard Microsoft (that's the software platform they target) context-sensitive help, none of this would be an issue.

      It seems a little too convenient that the company being sued is Microsoft's only serious competitor.

      Does anyone else smell the hand of Bill Gates, or is it just me?

    4. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Brandybuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hate to be the one to defend software patents, because I really despise them, but in this case, as in most others, it's the infringing company that's getting hurt, and not "the people".

      p.s. Of course, the people are getting hurt indirectly, as they are thus deprived of a choice in the marketplace.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    5. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by jd · · Score: 5, Interesting
      IIRC, it depends a lot on how obvious the method is (you're not supposed to be able to patent things that are trivial), whether the solution is in the public domain (you can't patent public knowledge) and when the patent was filed with respect to the alledged copy.


      It also depends some on the reason why the patent infringement is coming up now. For example, since the company affected is a competitor to Microsoft, did Microsoft pay Matsushita to launch the lawsuit? IANAL, but there may be a case for appeal, if it turns out that the lawsuit was in bad faith, and/or is an attempt by Microsoft to gain further control of the Japanese office market by paying Matsushita to eliminate the only serious competitor.


      In general, the courts tend to frown on being used subversively as the "enforcers" of a protection racket.


      I'm not saying that this is what is happening. What I am saying is that there are enough suspicious circumstances to warrant a closer look at this, and that the Japanese courts might be persuadable that this isn't as innocent as it appears.


      As for the "what you know" problem - since any work "could" be tainted by any prior experience, it would be impossible for any technical person to be re-hired within the lifetime of any patent they may have come into contact with. AT&T argued a similar line, against the BSDers, arguing that since they'd come into contact with AT&T proprietary knowledge, they were tainted and therefore so was any/all their subsequent work.


      This is one reason I don't agree with the existing concept of IP. Nobody could ever have more than one job, and once they quit/leave/get sacked, they could NEVER be re-employed. IMHO, that is not protecting anybody and is clearly excessive.


      Therefore, it should not be possible to "taint" work with IP, merely by being exposed to it. There has to be a far more material breach, and one which isn't protected against IP claims in some other way (such as being obvious, public domain, etc).

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Maestro4k · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I hate to be the one to defend software patents, because I really despise them, but in this case, as in most others, it's the infringing company that's getting hurt, and not "the people".

      p.s. Of course, the people are getting hurt indirectly, as they are thus deprived of a choice in the marketplace.

      • So ultimately software patents screw over the public no matter what. While Matsushita may be in the right here, software patents are what created the mess and the public still loses. Just even more proof that software patents are bad ideas.
    7. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by shanen · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Gee, the whole topic makes me nostalgic. I was a pretty heavy user of Ichitaro many years ago. I think I started with Version 3, and I definitely remembering having Version 6 on a machine around 1995. However Word was already becoming pretty dominant in the market by then, and I really don't think they would care enough about JustSystems as competition to get involved in this. I think it's just sort of law of the jungle stuff ("jyaku niku kyo shoku" (weak meat strong eat) in Japanese), and probably with some revenge for seasoning. The guy in my office says they're going to appeal, so it's not yet over--but almost.

      Not sure if anyone interested in the trivia, but here's a bit just in case... The old Ichitaro actually had a lot of elements copied from ancient WordStar, but the interface got pretty much tortured to death when they were trying to add a Windows-style menu system. I'm pretty sure some versions had both interfaces. They had originally been almost completely dominant in the software word processor market, but that was back when NEC had the lock on proprietary Japanese hardware. Their foundation was their Japanese input system, which was still better than Microsoft's for many years. That was called ATOK, and was also sold separately for use as an IME replacement. They tried to expand into integrated office suites about the same time Lotus was getting beaten out of that market. Later on they tried to become an ISP with a system called JustNet, but I think they eventually sold it to someone else. (But I did see a few of their boxes in a large computer store just this weekend, when I was visiting Akihabara.)

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    8. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by flyingsquid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Does anyone else smell the hand of Bill Gates, or is it just me?

      Man, Bill Gates is to Slashdotters what Satan is to the evangelicals- this all powerful, ubiquitous incarnation of darkness, whom all evil acts in the world can be blamed on.

      I mean, I'm not saying I disagree with that viewpoint or anything...

    9. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by sharok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In all honesty, given that His Billness's OS is on at least 90% of personal computers in the world, it follows that 90% of whatever happens can be traced back to him, either by intent or by chance.

    10. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is not a problem with the patent system.

      This is a problem with the patent system, for two reasons:

      1. A patent should not be granted unless the idea being patented is not obvious. Having a standardised icon to invoke help is obvious.
      2. A patent should not be granted unless the idea being patented is novel. I don't know when the alleged Matsushita patent was granted, but I was using an icon (a bitmap representation of a question mark, but hey - it may not be pretty but it's an icon) in 1986, and I know I wasn't the first - I'm pretty sure the Xerox STAR office software had a similar system, because that's where I think I filched it from.
      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    11. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by HanB · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It would be acceptable if the court could order the help function to be replaced. But ordering the whole product to be destroyed is the real power of patents in the hands of big companies.

      Admitted, a small company can sue a big company and make a lot of bucks from it, but a big company can handle that. On the other hand a big company can crush it's compatitors.

      In this case it's even worse, a big company orders a small company to do the dirty work for them.

      I bet they threatened them with a patent-lawsuit.

    12. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Viceice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thats why I strongly believe that abstract ideas and concepts should NOT be patentable.

      Allowing a method to do something be patentable is absolutely stupid. Can you imagine if the doctor who developed organ transplant surgery patented all his findings and demanded huge royalties each time a transplant was carried out?

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    13. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by k96822 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Companies seem to forget the crazy idea of not making their employees want to leave to keep their ideas from getting into the hands of the competition.

    14. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by aminorex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that the remaining 10% is pretty much just a reaction formation, I think you can include that as well.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    15. Re:It's not the thing, it's the method by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a problem with the patent system, for two reasons:

      You missed the third reason, which trumps the other two:

      3. A patent should not be granted unless doing so promotes the progress of science or the useful arts.

      That concept is codified as supreme law in the USA, but is a good idea for all nations. It's easy to argue that patents on user interface ideas can almost never benefit progress.

      After all, patents are meant as an enticement for inventors to disclose their inventions to the world, instead of hiding it in the basement using it themselves. The revenue potential from a UI enhancement that's displayed in a customer-facing product is thousands or millions of times greater than if it were kept secret. Therefore, the inventor needed no incentive to disclose the idea, so the fact that it was patentable didn't promote progress in any way.

      I believe that there are whole categories of inventions, including most software and business methods, that cannot be realistically exploited without public disclosure, and which thus deserve no patent coverage.

  5. unfuckingbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this world has gone absolutely fucking insane.

    I'm seriously considering moving to the wilderness. If there's any of that left.

  6. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Open Source the offending software, then let them try to take down SourceForge!

    --
    [o]_O
  7. as if more proof were needed by ChipMonk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is all the more reason to order the destruction of software patents.

    Also from TFA: Does the Japanese patent system have no concept of "prior art"? The patent in question was granted in 1998, but the products in "violation" has been on the market since 1985 and 1987.

    1. Re:as if more proof were needed by stephenisu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Were the infringing features added before 1998?

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    2. Re:as if more proof were needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The patent in question was granted in 1998, but the products in "violation" has been on the market since 1985 and 1987.

      The patent was applied for before 1985, it was only awarded in 1998. I'm not sure with the U.S., but in Japan the patent process is notoriously slow, that "Patent Applied" is mentioned on all new items. It seems to work pretty well as a deterant, as no one wants their ass sued off once the patent IS awarded.

      That said, Just System WAS insisting that the exact same keyboard function which is not patented is prior art, while Matsushita insists that the same implementation in the GUI required a jump of inspiration, thus justifying the patent.

    3. Re:as if more proof were needed by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 3, Informative

      could anyone provide one where a software patent was indeed a good thing for an inovative feature?

      I think the case of spreadsheets, which set precedence for software patents, is a good example of what you're asking. I imagine that software ought to have some of the same qualities of inventing physical things. If an inventor has spent an inordinate amount of time creating something innovative then he or she should be able to reap rewards from it and not have someone come along and rip off their plans and sell it themselves. Inventors should have the option of making a living solely from inventing, otherwise there would be a significant lack of development of technology.

      However, many of the software patents that are being introduced that produce such a backlash are such trivial and unimaginative ideas. They actually don't improve technology, but rather hinder its progress, which is the exact opposite of what the whole patent system is meant to achieve. It's supposed to provide incentive for people to innovate, not create bureaucratic obstacles for them.

      And there is also the fact that software in it's very essence is different from physical objects. Software can be quickly distributed from just a single copy, while physical inventions have to be manufactured one by one. Software evolves much faster, and subjecting the development of ideas for software to the same slow bureaucratic rules that apply to physical objects can hinder the overall efficiency of the development of software. But whatever the case, people have to be able to focus on creating ideas to improve technology as their main occupation for making a living, and patents are supposed to allow them to do that.

  8. For those wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is relatively old news in Japan, and the makers of Ichitaro (Just System) have appealed to a higher court. Until a final ruling is made, Ichitaro will be on sale as usual. The court refused to make a preliminary injunction against the Ichitaro software, which Matsushita had requested.

    That said, the patent itself isn't regarding a Help Icon. It is the function where you first click on the help icon/button, and then on the particular function you need help with.

    In court, Just System insisted that the Matsushita Patent was for a help ICON, which is usuall an item on the desktop, much like a file or folder, whereas the Just System Ichitaro used a button. The second point was that the "help" key on a keyboard already performed said function, and taking the keyboard to a GUI analogy did not require any insight, but was rather an obvious move as more and more keyboard functions were moved to the GUI.

    The lower court found that the "icon" was used loosely and would be found to include the buttons-with-pictures as found in Ichitaro. As for the keyboard-to-gui concept, the court found that it would take more than obvious insight to make the leap, thus it was a valid invention.

    Quite obviously, Matsushita was quite pleased that the court bought their story, while Just System was quite pissed off. By appealing to a higher court though, they did not need to immediately follow the ruling.

    Whether you think this was fair game or not, keep in mind that this is pretty much what Microsoft did too with Win95 and IE. Keep the court case going long enough that the Win95/IE bundle was no longer relevant.

    1. Re:For those wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I forgot to mention.... Matsushita DID offer Just System the right to purchase a patent license to continue using the help feature. The price I am not aware of, but Just System pretty much told Matsushita to shove it.

    2. Re:For those wondering... by Decameron81 · · Score: 3, Funny
      That said, the patent itself isn't regarding a Help Icon. It is the function where you first click on the help icon/button, and then on the particular function you need help with.

      In court, Just System insisted that the Matsushita Patent was for a help ICON, which is usuall an item on the desktop, much like a file or folder, whereas the Just System Ichitaro used a button. The second point was that the "help" key on a keyboard already performed said function, and taking the keyboard to a GUI analogy did not require any insight, but was rather an obvious move as more and more keyboard functions were moved to the GUI.


      This is yet another demonstration of how important patents are in the world of computer software. They are here for a reason and that is to protect those companies that spend their money on research and development. Surely Matsushita spent a lot of their resources in developing this advanced help technology and deserve a lot more than seeing some other company make unauthorized use of it. It doesn't matter wether Just System wrote from scratch their own implementation because they are plainly copying an IDEA, which surely is a great loss for whoever came up with it.

      We should also thank patents because they help make courts throughout the world a better place. When we spend our time fighting for our rights to make exclusive use of certain icons and functions we do not have the time to commit serious crimes. An even further step could be to bring to court more trivial matters like unauthorized clicking of buttons by end users.

      Patents also teach us about the importance of being selfish. Don't get me wrong: usually being selfish is seen as a bad thing; but to some extent you have to worry about yourself as well. I really appreciate it that our governments are starting to realize how important it is to have full control over anything you might have ever thought.

      Ideas need to be protected.
      --
      diegoT
  9. we're not alone by ianmalcm · · Score: 3, Funny
    Proof that the US patent and court systems arent alone in their noncompetitive lunacy.

    Hopefully Nintendo does not sue /. for use of that Linux penguin icon, which is an obvious ripoff of Super Mario 64's snow level character.

  10. Dear Godzilla by stephenisu · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the enclosed envelope is a map of all Japanese Patent Offices.
    They told me to tell you that your mother is a dishonorable dirty woman.

    attatchment [jpomap.png]

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  11. Wait a sec by deusexcrottsma · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those bastards probably stole Clippy, too. Not that I ever tolerated Clippy's presence on the screen. In fact I hated him with a passion. But it's the principle of the the thing. Can't have Clippy ravaged and transmuted into a multitude of Japanese variants. He's the American Satan, not some overseas, sandal-wearing, fish-monger.

  12. Even more filler? by rafael_es_son · · Score: 4, Informative

    By gosh the summary's innacuracy is comparable to Microsoft marketing propaganda. The article does not state clearly "that the use of a help icon" was the cause of the dispute. It does say

    The dispute centered on the way that a help function works in the Ichitaro and Hanako software. The way the software presents information violates Matsushita patent number 2,803,236, which was registered with the Japanese patent office in 1998, according to Matsushita.

    The Gnome pics, now this? filler for nerds, stuff that doesn't happen?

    --
    HAD
    1. Re:Even more filler? by rafael_es_son · · Score: 2, Funny

      Humans have been killing each other since societal organization indirectly caused overpopulation. We must be new here. It must be normal.

      Just humans as usual. ;)

      --
      HAD
    2. Re:Even more filler? by MeridianOnTheLake · · Score: 4, Informative

      The English-language article wasn't as detailed as the Japanese reports. You know how you can hit shift-F1 in MS products and you get the arrow with a question mark which you then use to get help on a subsequent element on the screen... well this is the same except that you can click an icon as an alternative to shift-F1. There are some screen shots at the bottom of this Japanese-language article: http://japan.cnet.com/news/biz/story/0,2000050156, 20080442,00.htm

  13. Destroyed? by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good to see we're still finding reasons to destroy content just like the warmer moments of various regimes throughout time. What a waste.

  14. Re:That sounds a lot like... by F13 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Its contextual help. Applications can also have it in the help menu and on toolbars.

    See msdn for more information

  15. The Japanese by classh_2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Japanese are known for their ability to copy an idea and then "make it better", in their own unique style (e.g. the VCR, automobile, etc.). Let's hope they can break away from that paradigm when it comes to patent law. From the sound of this article though, it looks like that might give the U.S. a run for it's money in regards to IP fascism. *sigh*

    1. Re:The Japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, thanks! While we're are it, Blacks have a good sense of rhythm. Indians smell like curry. Filipinos wear flashy clothes.

  16. Patents must be published by brunos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are forgetting that if you patent something, it is not a trade secret anymore. You don't need Bnemonic style memory: all you need to do is read the patent, which is your legal right. How would you otherwise know what you are not allowed to copy?
    Software patents are just ridiculous.

    1. Re:Patents must be published by JohnFluxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's very dangerous to read patents because while infringing on a patent is bad, infringing on a patent knowingly is double as bad (literally - I seem to remember double damages?). If it can be shown that you even glanced at the patent, whether you thought it applied or not, you are in trouble.

    2. Re:Patents must be published by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      for fuck sake, it's Johnny Mnemonic.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Patents must be published by pmc · · Score: 5, Funny

      We really need some sort of system so that people remember the spelling.

  17. Follow the Money.... by cliffiecee · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just a moment of googling "kitadeya microsoft" and bingo. Here's a snip:

    "Matsushita Electric, in close cooperation with Microsoft, will develop a high-performance personal computer suited to the advanced image-processing demands of the 21st century," said Dr. Yoshitomi Nagaoka, vice president of Matsushita Electric's AVC Company..."



    Who stands to profit if this software is knocked off the market?
  18. Ichitaro is here to stay by pario · · Score: 3, Informative

    I really don't think Ichitaro would disappear from the market anytime soon. Ichitaro used to dominate the word processor market back in the days of MS-DOS, just like Word Perfect did in the United States, and still remains a very important player. Major companies and a number of government branches still rely heavily on Ichitaro because it can produce documents in forms that are specific to the Japanese corporate and governmental culture, which is not possible with Microsoft Word. Just System is a major software company famous for their ATOK kana-kanji conversion system. Kana-kanji conversion systems are essential for Japanese input, and ATOK, with its smart lexical recognition AI engine, has been the unparalleled leader for over a decade.

  19. OH COME ON by Tab+is+on+Slashdot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did it have to be "fallout"?

  20. Japanese Tongue Twister About Patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tokyo tokkyo kyoka-kyoku kyou kyuukyo kyoka kyakka.

    Translation: The Tokyo patent office hurriedly rejected the permission today.

  21. MacOS 7 as prior art? by jeti · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The short description of the patent sounds very much like the help system that appeared in several incarnations on MacOS.
    AFAIK the bubble help gave context sensitive information on GUI elements after activating it with a button.
    Apparently MacOS 7 came out two years before the patent was filed. Here's a screenshot of MacOS 7 with the help icon and a copyright notice.

  22. Re:some interesting ideas on patent law by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "...the associations that collect royalties for musical performances and pay these to the composers."...

    Because what we really need is another RIAA!

    RIAA != ASCAP/BMI/SESAC.

    RIAA are evil bastards who exploit musicians, degrade the art of music, and will be first against the wall when the revolution comes.

    ASCAP et. al, while flawed in execution, are based on a good idea: songwriters should get a cut when someone makes money off a song they wrote. If I sell a CD with a cover of "Tangled Up in Blue", or play it at a gig at my local tavern, these are the guys who make sure Dylan gets his nickel out of the profits. (Google for "songwriter royalties performance mechanical".) However - and this is key - if I'm playing for fun not profit, Bob doesn't get a penny.

    For years I've been suggesting that royalties for copying recordings ought to work the same way - share for free, but if you're selling the artist gets a cut.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  23. Ichitaro and JustSystem by davejenkins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate to say it, but this really is a minimal event for the overall market-- no one I know has used Ichitaro for years. MSWord is fully entrenched here, and will be for the forseeable future.

    In regards to Open Source alternatives such as OpenOffice, they are sorley lacking in Kanji conversion, dictionaries, and layout flexibility. I know that Turbo and Others put effort into this, but progress is slow...

    1. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by nagora · · Score: 3, Insightful
      is really is a minimal event for the overall market

      Being allowed to successfully sue over a help icon is not a minimal event. Bad judgements like these are used as precedents in later cases regardless of the importance of the initial trial. Many a bad law has been formed on the basis of a neighbour's hedge.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I hate to say it, but this really is a minimal event for the overall market-- no one I know has used Ichitaro for years. MSWord is fully entrenched here, and will be for the forseeable future.

      The issue is not Ichitaro. The issue is being able to develop software without having to look over your shoulder at the big corporations with their patent portfolios all the time. If decisions like this are allowed to stand, then small businesses cannot create software - because if anything they produce is any good, they will be sued out of existence by corporations with portfolios they can't match.

      It's my view that software patents should not be allowed at all. But if they are going to be allowed the bar for non-obviousness and novelty has to be very high indeed.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    3. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ichitaro is the standard for documents produced in and used by a lot of ministries and agencies. Our publishing house has to maintain a couple of Ichitaro installs just to deliver stuff to government clients. Yeah, it's been losing ground to MS for years, but it's still a big damn presence.

    4. Re:Ichitaro and JustSystem by BJH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a big difference between being able to type in Japanese, and fully supporting Japanese text.

      For example, does ABiword allow you to set your text to be 20x20 vertical lines, running right to left, with fixed spacing? This is the sort of feature that kept Ichitaro around for a long time when it should otherwise have been dead (for all intents and purposes, it is dead now, but back in the day, there was quite a lot of infighting in government departments between the entrenched Ichitaro users and the upstart Word users).

  24. it has nothing to do with who worked where by jeif1k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how can patent holders and companies owning "trade secret" IP be protected from information pirates?

    Patents are not trade secrets. The fact that someone moved between companies doesn't make the patent claim any more valid.

    Furthermore, the ossified Japanese economy needs to encourage mobility of workers, in particular, high-tech workers. The kind of exchange of knowledge and ideas that brings is essential to a high-tech economy. Even if your argument were valid that this has to do with employees moving between companies, it would still be a bad decision from that point of view.

    What makes this patent particularly vile is that it was filed in 1989 but granted in 1998; this almost certainly constitutes a deliberate abuse of the patent system by Matsushita.

    Most of the "ideas" that companies generate (in particular Japanese companies) were almost entirely developed in academia anyway; it is only companies that can afford to do carpet patenting in order to snare others in their so-called IP. Let's hope that universities will be fighting back aggressively by patenting themselves; once companies face huge patent portfolios without the ability to cross license, then maybe things will change.

  25. cross licensing by jeif1k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microsoft probably has a patent cross-licensing agreement with Matsushita, or at least they may have already forged an agreement (maybe as part of another deal). It actually stands to reason that Microsoft initiated all of this.

  26. Re:Prior Art? by jeif1k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was filed in 1989, which is what counts. The fact that it floated around in the patent system until issue in 1998 shows how good the company is at playing the system.

  27. Publicly disgrace company by tod_miller · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Matsushita, which sells its products under the Panasonic brand

    I certainly won't be buying anything Panasonic for a long while. I hope that by making it a public disgrace for a company to endanger 78% of the installed office environments in Japan (think what loss of productivity would occur if they spread enough FUD to make those people buy thier product, and install it, and learn it?).

    Japan has a very honourable work ethic in terms of employee/employer relations, they value the company, so the political fall out over this may yet to come.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  28. strange definition of competitor by guile*fr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if the 78% figure of the article is accurate, they are not just a competitor of Microsoft. they f*cking own them.

  29. May as well face it, this is the future by serutan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We'll be seeing more and more of these, as the great Land Rush of IP patents continues. Equating intangibles with property is like creating a whole new world, ready to be staked out and fenced off like the American West in the 1800s. Eventually, creating something new and innovative without a battery of lawyers or a big corporation behind you will be as quaint a notion as walking out into the wilderness and setting up a farm.

  30. Erm by jb.hl.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can we please know when the patent was applied for, so we can see if there's any prior art?

    I would have thought that in 1985 Apple would have already had a help icon on their Macs...

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  31. Time to call your broker by iamacat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the most popular word processor can be shut down because of a help icon, it's obvious that any innovators in US and Japan will be sued into oblivion by no-longer innovative companies that wish to maintain status quo. Other countries that don't recognize software patents will write superior, cheaper programs and non-software US businesses will eventually lobby their way into buying them despite patent violations. Remember the thing about outsourcing and foreign sweatshops?

    Time to sell AMZN and MSFT. They are protecting themselves to death.

  32. Screenshots by randalx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The dispute centered on the way that a help function works in the Ichitaro and Hanako software. The way the software presents information violates Matsushita patent number 2,803,236...

    Can anybody get a screenshot of what exactly they are arguing over since it's not just an icon?
  33. One missing fact... ok a few by Foo2rama · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What are Japanese patent laws? And what is the actual patent? No one knows either of these things. Japanese law may not have the "Non-obviousness" or "inventive step" clauses that America does. 2nd if it is an issue of an icon being used to access help a simple fine and software patch to remove the icon and change the access to help to something other then a button/icon.

    The Microsoft/Matshusita link is tenuous, what computer hardware/software company has not worked with Microsoft at some point on a collaboritive project? Sony? IBM? DELL? Compaq/HP? Using the logic that was put forth earlier anyone Apple sues could be construed as being motivated from M$...

    Lets see if anyone can get some real info on this. Instead of conjucture from a few short news blurbs that contradict each other.

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
  34. Some screenshots of the offending icon by MeridianOnTheLake · · Score: 5, Informative

    Scroll down past the Japanese description and you can see some pics of the offending icon in this link: http://japan.cnet.com/news/biz/story/0,2000050156, 20080442,00.htm

  35. It's a shame by RoLi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    3 news stories and none of them explains what the patent really is about.

    Does anybody know?

    1. Re:It's a shame by patio11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      http://japan.cnet.com/news/biz/story/0,2000050156, 20080442,00.htm

      I'll translate about as much as I can without getting into copyright trouble. The patent includes clicking on one icon displayed somewhere on your console, which attaches a special graphic to your mouse cursor. You then click on another icon or function on your console, and it brings up context-sensitive help. This is specifically distinguished from using context-sensitive help by pressing one special key or icon which is in a constant place, and also from each function embedding an explanation of what it does through other means which do not change the state of the mouse cursor.

      The meat of the story is paragraphy #3, although the three screenshots on the front page are understandable even if you don't read Japanese. Due to quirkiness with derivative works law in Japan, tranlating their captions exactly could potentially lead to a lot of trouble. Suffice it to say that the first screenshot shows the offending icon, the second shows the mouse cursor changing as a result of clicking the icon, and the third shows the result of a second click on a generic interface function (an explanation pops up).

    2. Re:It's a shame by Ark42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, Windows 95, and maybe earlier, have this feature, as part of the OS.

      http://ark42.com/freeimage/ShiftF1help.gif

    3. Re:It's a shame by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 2

      Anyone who has a (Japanese) patent on software "modes" should be able to trump this one. Command modes are nearly as old as software. The "infringing" company must not have been able to afford as many lawyers, because the patent registers an idea that is obvious. But then again, I don't know Japanese patent law.

      Just to take stock: software patents give large corporations the power to grind individual developers into paste. Copyright law is beginning to give corporations the power to turn those same guns on their own customers. Both of these facilities have been extended beyond all common sense into weapons for corporations against individuals. All that remains to be done is the creation of law that compels purchase. Not so good.

  36. What would happen if... by fireman+sam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The "icon" used was in fact the ISO or SI (or whatever) standard glyph for "information". You know the one, the white lower case 'i' on a blue background. It isn't help, it is information. Therefore it isn't a help button.

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  37. Parent is not flamebait by kahei · · Score: 2, Informative



    The above gibberish is not a parody of Japanese. It is an actual Japanese tonguetwister.

    Tokyo -- Tokyo
    tokkyo -- patent
    kyoka-kyoku -- 'permissions office'
    kyou -- today
    kyuukyo -- hurriedly
    kyoka -- permission
    kyakka -- rejection

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  38. You know, I'm getting a bit tired of this by wirefarm · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Clippy" is gone.
    There should never be a need for you to see it ever again.
    I haven't actually seen it in years.

    In fact, the only place I ever hear about it anymore is here on Slashdot, where the merest mention of it seems to garner endless chuckles and mod points.
    Can't we just let the damned, detestable, yet mercifully short-lived abomination fade into obscurity with his ill-conceived yet now mostly forgotten friends "MS Bob" and "MS SQL Server"?

    Dead horse, meet stick.

    Thanks for your kind consideration.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:You know, I'm getting a bit tired of this by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone who does a LOT of PC support in addition to my main role as a sysadmin and network designer let me tell you that Clippy (and his often more annoying brothers and sisters) are still alive and well even in Office 2003. YOU may not see them because you or your sysadmin uninstalled him or deactivated him but I can assure you that he's still out there and kicking. Oh yeah and in case you haven't noticed MS SQL Server has a bigger piece of the paid database market then ever. SQL Server 2000 is actually pretty good and from what I've seen of the Beta SQL2005 is going to be even better. It might not be Oracle or DB2 but it's pretty darn good, and it's even affordable =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  39. bah by jerometremblay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Eventually they will go too far and the whole thing will collapse, and we will again be able to do what we want.

    And as things are going, too far might not be very farther.

  40. Prior art? by Handpaper · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It looks like there's thirteen years worth of prior art here:

    Justsystem started selling Ichitaro in August 1985

    Matsushita patent number 2,803,236, which was registered with the Japanese patent office in 1998

    Note the article says 'registered' not 'granted', so it would appear that 1998 was the start of the patent process, which makes a submarine patent look unlikely.
    It is possible, however, that the problematic help system was added after 1998, though the article makes no mention of this.

    If somebody has access to the court ruling and can provide a translation, I'm sure things will become a lot clearer.

  41. *destruction*? by delmoi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All they have to do is take out the help icon and replace it with a menuitem. I'd hardly call that "destruction" (unless they meant the destruction of inventory).

    I hardly think a company would really give up a product like this, most people arn't as lazy as CmdrTaco (who took downhis JavaInvaders game rather then change the name to JInvaders or something to avoid infringing Sun's trademark.)

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  42. Re:Patents are atheistic by KD5YPT · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um... think what you will. But US has a very lousy and restrictive patent/copyright system.

    Regarding intelligent design...

    Intelligent Design have ZERO solid evidence backing it. While Evolution, on the other hand, are backed heavily by numerous evidences. The only things Creationists/Anti-evolutionists managed to do is doubting the existing evidences supporting Evolution. But in the end, the number is still the same.
    Intelligent Design: 0
    Evolution: At least 1

    Start giving the world proof on Intelligent Design, instead of waving the Bible at them and tell them its the truth.

    Bible is good as a moral guidance, not reliable as a scientific writing.

    --
    In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  43. Re:Innovation "No S/w Patents" by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OTOH, that does mean that any wealthy individual could have software development as a hobby. This is rather analogous to the way writing used to be a hobby among certain of the well-to-do. And, interestingly enough, the writers concentrated on an elegant writing style (however they defined it) rather than on sales (which was considered "crass").

    However, since software is much more easily duplicated than manuscripts are, this would be no bar to it's wide distribution and application. And such people would find the GPL to be no obstacle to their use of it, though some of them might prefer BSD.

    We live in a culture centered around businesses, but don't fall into the fallacy that all activity takes place in that context everywhere.

    OTOH, it's true that the writers of Belles Lettres would generally write at a pace that makes Debian stable look rapid. But not all of them, James Branch Cabel wrote a 7 or 8 volumne series (including the noted Jurgen). Most of them are out of publication, but the writing quality is excellent. A bit staid for modern tastes, but still excellent. (Jurgen could not have been written if he was worried about publication. It was banned in much of the English speaking world for being too ... well, too obvious about what he wasn't saying (i.e. sexual references).

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.