Slashdot Mirror


MythTV 0.17 Released

foobar01 writes "MythTV 0.17 has been released. Changes include Mac OS X frontend support, big improvements to DVB and HDTV support, "timestretch" feature (for changing playback speed but not the pitch so you can watch shows more quickly), firewire capture support for cable boxes with firewire output, and widescreen user interface support. See the changelog for the full list of changes."

61 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Why Apple? by BobPaul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Obviously this relates because of the native Apple Frontend, but is there any other reason this is in the apple section of slashdot? This project is still primarily a linux toy, is it not? (real question).

    1. Re:Why Apple? by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm not really sure, but here's a guess...

      if (product.getDescription().contains("Apple")) {
      setCategory("Apple");
      logger.warn(this.class + " [TODO] -- needs to extend SteveJobsRealityDistortionField");
      }

      Obligatory disclaimer... I own a couple of Apples.

    2. Re:Why Apple? by illtron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well it has always run on Linux. An updated version to run on Linux isn't really as big as an update that will run on Macs is. That said, I'm sure it is newsworthy to Linux people too. Maybe I'm biased, though.

      --
      Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    3. Re:Why Apple? by xenocide2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because some time ago, /. started putting stories in more than one category. For example, this story is in Linux, Apple and what appears to be Television. The only thing the OSX program can't do yet is record; it would be interesting to see a OSX backend that used iCal or something to record shows.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    4. Re:Why Apple? by BobPaul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But does the backend work on the mac as well? As I understand it the front end is just the interface that plays shows recorded by the backend.

      I don't know. Put it in the apple category, but I'm disagree that the primary category should be Apple.

      Just my opinion, I guess.

    5. Re:Why Apple? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 4, Funny
      An honest mythtake...

      You mythpelled "honetht."

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    6. Re:Why Apple? by hunterx11 · · Score: 5, Funny
      If you really owned a couple of Apples, you'd do it this way:
      if([[Product description] rangeOfString:@"Apple"] != NSNotFound) {
      [Article setCategory:@"Apple"];
      NSLog(@"%@%@", self, @"[TODO] -- needs to extend SteveJobsRealityDistortionField");
      }
      --
      English is easier said than done.
  2. Mac Mini Frontend by LinuxOnHal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who's ready for a Mac Mini frontend?

    --
    Trying is the First Step to Failing --Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by SilentChris · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Changes include Mac OS X frontend support"

      "Who's ready for a Mac Mini frontend?"

      Did I miss something? Since when did the Mac Mini not run OS X?

    2. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by interiot · · Score: 4, Informative
      From what I've heard, the horsepower requirements for decoding HDTV are:
      • 480p - XBox Media Center
      • 708p - Mac Mini
      • 1080i - x86 >2.8GHz, or equivalent
      So, the Mac Mini may not be enough in all cases, right?
    3. Re:Mac Mini Frontend by tji · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, Apple does not have an API for MPEG2 acceleration (equivalent to DxVA in Windows and XvMC in Linux). So, you cannot currently benefit from the hardware in your Mac. Hopefully Apple will remedy this situation in 'Tiger'.

      All ATI Radeon cards have hardware offload support.

      Nvidia GeForce4 MX, GeForce FX, and newer cards support MPEG2 accel. All the others did not.

  3. Ooooh... timestretch! by tinrobot · · Score: 4, Funny

    That means I can watch 24 in 18.

    1. Re:Ooooh... timestretch! by ollie_ob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can already watch 24 in 18 if you strip out all the adverts. With timestretch as well, you could be pushing for 24 in 12...

      --
      #define ROSE any_other_name
    2. Re:Ooooh... timestretch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you take out the adverts...

      24 is 18 ...check out the BBC broadcasts if you don't believe me.

  4. Why is this in the Apple section? by SECProto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree, frontend support for the mac was one of the bigger changes, but... it still will not record tv shows on a mac. it can only be used to watch already-recorded shows. Which is not much different than a video player, which is not the only function of MythTV

    1. Re:Why is this in the Apple section? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if you can do other stuff on a Mac mini as well...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  5. Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by Joshua53077 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cool program. This looks like a perfect compliment to the digital lifestyle. If this were part of the iLife suite, I bet a lot of people would jump at it. If Apple had put it in iLife 05, it definitely would have justified the $20 increase in price, and it probably would have sold better and could draw more people to the platform.

    1. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by mboverload · · Score: 4, Insightful
      mythTV is NOWHERE near ready for primetime. It is still a bitch to install and update.

      Hopefully this new version will fix some of these issues, but don't kid yourself. Call me when it comes with a graphical installer and I dont have to edit conf files.

    2. Re:Shouldn't Apple put something like this out? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This post is in agreement with the parent, however, you might notice the 0.17 version number. This kind of tells you that it isn't ready for John Q. Wallet to be using in his living room.

      However, it IS ready for prime time - records stuff from 8:00 - 11:00 perfectly =)

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  6. Native or X11? by illtron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was looking at the site earlier and didn't immediately notice anything saying if it was running as a native OS X app or through X11? I'd be really tempted to check it out at work, but, well...I'll let you guess the rest.

    --
    Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    1. Re:Native or X11? by Dalroth · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a native OSX app using the Mac OSX port of QT. I've run the previous version (0.16) on my iBook. It was a bit unstable and crashed often, but it ran. I suspect 0.17 will be considerably more stable but haven't tried it yet.

      Bryan

  7. Re:timestretch? by Bohnanza · · Score: 4, Informative

    The audio IS "speeded up", but the pitch remains the same. This is fairly easy to do with digital audio.

    --

    -----

    Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

  8. or... by Ooter · · Score: 5, Funny

    "timestretch" feature (for changing playback speed but not the pitch so you can watch shows more quickly)

    Or, if you're from the south, you can slow down the show for easier understanding.

    1. Re:or... by Phillup · · Score: 5, Funny

      if you're from the south, you can slow down the show

      But, does it add the extra syllables?

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
  9. myth by rogabean · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bah! I was going for a quiet weekend... Now I gotta decide whether or not my MythTV box needs an upgrade or not...

    ok what am I saying? Sounds like a fun weekend for me :)

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
  10. been thinking about mythtv for a while... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... but the thought of going from component input to coax irks me a lot (I also like how my non-hd Sony tv is able to 'compress' the DVD output so I get more lines of resolution for example, which I don't think would happen off a wintv pvr-350), what do people here do?

    I'd like to have a mythtv box in the basement, drops in a few rooms and some sort of wireless system to remote control it all from wherever, but if the video quality will drop noticeably it wouldn't really be worth it.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  11. I can do ya one better! by Trolling4Columbine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not watch 24 at all!

    I've got ya beat by 18 hours, plus I haven't suffered through a mindless, repetitive story about a guy who likes to yell at people.

    --
    Socialism: A feeling of discontent and resentment caused by a desire for the possessions or qualities of another.
    1. Re:I can do ya one better! by ewg · · Score: 5, Funny

      I loved that part where that guy had a gun and was pointing it at that other guy.

      --
      org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  12. HDTV. by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So say I buy a HDTV tuner card to avoid future issues w/the broadcast flag. Will I only be able to watch the HDTV content on an HDTV capable monitor?

    Does that mean that I need to have both a regular TV-in card and a HDTV-in card to record both types?

    1. Re:HDTV. by booch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      HDTV will work fine on your regular TV, as long as your PC can output to the TV. That is, the HDTV receiver hardware (I use pcHDTV on Linux, and eyeTV 500 on Mac) is decoupled from the output (I use an ATI video card with TV out on Linux, and the $20 S-Video adapter on my Mac Mini). For HDTV on my plain old TV, I get black bars at the top and bottom of the screen. I'll be getting an HDTV monitor (with DVI) soon, but even with my 3-year-old TV, the HDTV picture looks better than analog TV.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    2. Re:HDTV. by null+etc. · · Score: 4, Informative
      My understanding is that having an HDTV tuner card doesn't get you anything in terms of the broadcast flag, unless you happen to get one that ignores the broadcast flag, which either are or shortly will be illegal to purchase.

      The answer to this at EFF:

      "As EFF describes on our Digital Television Liberation page, recent regulations in the United States will ban the manufacture of DTV-receiving hardware described here after July 1, 2005. While we challenge these regulations in court, the clock is ticking, and it's safest to assume that it will be difficult to get unrestricted DTV receiving equipment in the future the way you can today.

      However, despite the manufacturing ban, existing equipment will continue to work (and to be lawful to possess and operate); it will be immune from the restrictions imposed on future equipment. That means that the equipment you can buy today is more functional and more useful than what you may be able to buy after July 1, 2005."

  13. Not that I should respond to my own post but... by Joshua53077 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After I posted, I remembered that way back Steve Jobs said something to the effect of "People want their computers and TVs to be 2 distinct experiences." Although the mac mini certainly represents several shifts in apple's business model so you never know.

  14. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by EatingPie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been using firewire based HDTV playback/recording on a Mac for a year or so. Had it not been tagged as "Apple," I might have missed this.

    Mistake or not, it works for me!

    -Pie

  15. Totally changes the way you watch TV by PsychoKiller · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just got my MythTV system running 2 weeks ago. I'm still running 0.16 but it's still great.

    I'm using a Pundit-R that sits beside my TV, and it uses a 802.11b wireless card to get programming data.

    Since I've been using it for 2 weeks, it's totally changed the way the wife and I watch TV. We never miss an episode of our favourite shows, and never watch commercials.

    The commercial marking function is like magic, it looks for blank frames in the data stream and flags that as a commercial. I'd say it gets it right 80% of the time, 15% of the time it will include the station ID clip, and 5% it will grab an extra commercial, but I'll just hit forward on the remote to skip it.

    My favourite part is using it to watch a new show that's 'almost' live. I'll set it to record the show, but then start watching it 5-10 minutes after it's started. When I get to the commercials I skip over them, and by the end of the show I'll have hopefully synced up perfectly with the real time stream.

    1. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by PsychoKiller · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used a PVR-350 but then discovered that it sucks for playing DVD's and other things that aren't MPEG-2 format (like if you transcode to divx). They're basically unwatchable, playing at about 5fps.

      I used:
      Pundit-R
      2.4ghz celeron (overkill, but was cheaper than the 2.0 and 2.2's at my local store!?)
      PVR-350 (but would recommend the PVR-250 and the onboard tv out instead)
      160gb hard drive, but should have gone with a bigger one.
      Dual layer DVD burner, but that's not necessary, a DVD-ROM would be fine. My two tips for this are to make sure you get one that the case is compatible with for the eject button, and can handle being vertical.
      512mb RAM but that's overkill too, but I'm running a webserver, frontend, backend, VNC session, etc.

    2. Re:Totally changes the way you watch TV by PsychoKiller · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fedora Core 3 for sure. It's the most popular and there is an apt server for FC3 that is the most up to date.

      I'd get 2 250's and save yourself the $50.

  16. Is there a good mythtv live cd? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did a quick search on google and found one knoppix based live cd but it seemed to be only the front end and still required the backend to be installed some where.

    Is there a standalone CD that I can try out with Mythtv ready to go for my GeForce FX 5700 personal cinema?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Is there a good mythtv live cd? by prowley · · Score: 4, Informative

      Knoppmyth is the whole shebang. I based my dedicated install on it. http://www.mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html

    2. Re:Is there a good mythtv live cd? by masonjd · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you are referring to KnoppMyth then it also installs the backend. You can use the cd to just install the frontend but it will install the both pieces on one computer. That is the way I have done it.

      KnoppMyth definitely makes MythTV more accessible. The entire install and configuration takes about 20 minutes provided that you are using linux compatible hardware. Pretty much if you are using a Hauppauge card then you are set.

    3. Re:Is there a good mythtv live cd? by jarich · · Score: 2, Informative
      I did a quick search on google and found one knoppix based live cd but it seemed to be only the front end and still required the backend to be installed some where.

      Is there a standalone CD that I can try out with Mythtv ready to go for my GeForce FX 5700 personal cinema?

      No. In order to use Myth, you must have an installed system somewhere. There's enough setup to a Myth system, you wouldn't want to use it on a Knoppix boot type cd anyway.

      After you get a Myth server running on your network, you can use the live CD to boot a box for a front-end though. Or you can you run the front-end on the server box.

    4. Re:Is there a good mythtv live cd? by ThogScully · · Score: 3, Insightful

      KnoppMyth is probably the one you're talking about, but it's not trivial to setup. It's much easier than doing it from scratch and so long as you pick hardware that is receiving attention in the forums there, you should be fine, but there's a lot of options and configuration you need to do sometimes. A live CD backend wouldn't help too much, given that.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
  17. Time Savings by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    Re:Ooooh... timestretch! -- That means I can watch 24 in 18.

    Isn't that what's left after skipping all the commercials?

    i watch 7 of 9 in 5

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  18. Is this possible? by scottking · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With Lokitorrents getting taken down today, and left with a rather tasteless warning, I wonder if the MPAA will start looking to litigate the source of illegal content, like MythTV?

    Do you (slashdot readers) think it's a possibility?

    --
    scott king
  19. Have they put in the nagravision decoding algos? by Trigun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That'll get me to move from VDR.

  20. My prediction for the DVR market by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny
    Apple will buy Tivo.

    Disclaimer: I own a DirecTivo. I don't really know why I needed to declare that. I think I just wanted to sound important.

    [1] Tivo is starting to look like it might become "beleaguered" much like Apple was declared during the years 1970 through 2005. Yes, Apple was called beleaguered by the tech media even before it existed.

    [2] Tivo is (I think) Linux based. Making it compilable on BSD Unix is, like, what? Two man hours? What? Different motherborads? Ok, four man hours.

    [3] Steve Jobs wants the Mac to be the center of our digital media warm fuzziness thing where we go for brief respites from the wacky demon haunted world in which we live.

    [4] The Grammys have become dominated by hip hop and gangsta rap. Only a vast array of Mac powered DVRs spread across the nation can protect us from whatever.

    It can't be any more obvious that that! You savvy?

    You heard it here first.

    1. Re:My prediction for the DVR market by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think so. TiVo is great for what it is, but it's really not up to Apple's standards. The user experience is good, but not NEARLY good enough. Plus there's no FireWire support, which would be necessary for an Apple product. Also, no QuickTime, which means no easy way to add support for H.264/AVC.

      But the bigger problem is that TiVo's software is, I believe, encumbered by the GPL. That's a show-stopper for Apple.

    2. Re:My prediction for the DVR market by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't believe it. I would not be surprised to see Apple come out with a DVR, probably when the CableCard 2.0 standard becomes final, but I don't see what it gains Apple to buy TiVo. What would TiVo bring to the table? User interface? Apple's perfectly capable of doing that on their own, and as good as the TiVo interface is, it is beginning to look dated. Apple would want something new. Profits? TiVo is losing money. Affiliation with DirecTV? DirecTV is switching to a non-TiVo DVR. Userbase? Most TiVo customers will probably be looking to upgrade to a HD DVR with at least two tuners some time in the next couple of years, and it won't necessarily be a TiVo. It seems like the only thing TiVo really has to offer Apple is the TiVo name, but Apple's name recognition is at least as good.

      And yes, I have a TiVo too (I even have one of the new HD models).

  21. The Second Rule Of MythTV by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny

    The second rule of MythTV, you *will* fight with Tivo users. :)

  22. Re:Why Apple? - Good for Me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    MythTV allows you to create a network of multiple sources, multiple outputs.

    For example, you've got a big computer in your basement doing all of the capturing, encoding, crunching, etc. It's got gobs of RAM, a Terabyte RAID setup, and it sounds like a fuckin hoover sucking the entrails out of a cat... You don't want to have this in your TV room, or bedroom, but you would like to have a PVR that has access to all of this, and everything on the server (music, photos, whatever).

    MythTV allows you to do this. You can ask it to record on your bedroom box, and it will record on your uber-computer in the basement, but play it when asked to do so on your bedroom screen, and it can even spread the recording duties across multiple computers and TV cards... This is where the Apple thing comes in. Apples are reputed to be quiet--especially the Mini. So, put the Apple in the bedroom, or the TV room, and voila. The Apple itself is not doing the recording (indeed, MythTV relies on vid4linux), it's just looking pretty and playing video. Point is, it's probably easier to buy a quiet Mac than build a quiet PC.

    I suppose that if a compatible video interface is ever made for the Mac, it would work just as well for doing the recording and storing, but it's just not to that point yet.

  23. I think that the bigger news here... by Yonder+Way · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is that a lot of digital/HDTV cable customers will be able to use their digital cable box as a capture device, and plug into the MythTV back end host with firewire. This uses almost none of the host CPU as the cable box is spewing raw MPEG2 over firewire, and MythTV just needs to save it to disk.

    That right there just tripled the number of channels I could record, and gave me HDTV capabilities as well as premium channels.

    I'm one of the people scratching my head over why this was put in the Apple category where few people would see it. Most of the people running Myth are on PC/Linux platform.

  24. Too little too late by zapp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I ran myth for over a year... it served its purpose for a while.

    I have since put XP and Beyond TV on my box. The single biggest contributing factor to dropping Myth was the lack of a standard format. I couldn't view .nuv files on any other platforms. Oh, and good luck trying to transcode something to divx, that took way way way too long.

    Myth: Record to mpeg or avi!

    --
    no comment
    1. Re:Too little too late by gremlins · · Score: 5, Informative

      First if you use IVTV it does record mpeg. But besides that nuv is just an encapsulation for various diffrent encoding formats. So even though it says nuv the underlying encoding format is usally either mpeg2 or mpeg4. Now if you want to view them on other platforms mplayer has a patch to play nuv files. Also you could use winmyth to play them on windows. And if you want to easily convert nuv files to divx you can use nuvexport. Or you could play them through mythweb with mythstreamtv.

      --
      just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
  25. Re:HDTV capture devices which ignore broadcast fla by interiot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Visit the EFF broadcast flag page, scroll down about halfway, and look under the Linux/Windows/Mac sections on the left.

  26. "timestretch" feature (for changing playback speed by imrec · · Score: 2, Funny

    "timestretch" feature (for changing playback speed but not the pitch so you can watch shows more quickly)

    And there are already plans to support blipverts in the next version!

    --
    Note: This sig contains nine S's, nine I's and five O's which... means absolutely nothing.
  27. ...for some definitions of fairly easy by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If by "fairly easy" you mean "there are existing algorithms that do this badly," then you're right.

    If you mean "sounds exactly the same, only faster" then you're wrong. Considering the quality of these things now, I'm not sure I wouldn't rather just let the pitch raise.

    The problem is how to represent pitch. Most of the time, this is done by converting to a frequency domain and doing a shift, or by convolving the signal with a waveform that causes a signal shift (the classical example of this is using a sine wave, as is done for RF encoding). The problem is that this technique is only really good for a signal that doesn't change over time.

    In fact, even the best pitch shifters assume that the pitch can be modeled as function of time and are unable to deal with randomly changing pitches very well. Lots of artifacts are still introduced when dealing with an "instrument" as complex as the human voice (on the other hand, they work great for flutes). Of course, if you don't change the pitch very much, you can get away with less artifacts.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  28. Sony v. Universal by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wonder if the MPAA will start looking to litigate the source of illegal content, like MythTV?

    MythTV merely turns your computer into a VCR. The movie studios lost that battle back in 1984.

  29. Nice software, but... by TeeJS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I never did understand why it's database driven. I first got into MythTV because I wanted to record shows at work (better cable service) and watch them at home - an never have figured out how to do it because of the database integration. I've been told Freevo may meet my needs better, but Myth is so nice...

    1. Re:Nice software, but... by halfelven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Duhhh...
      My first attempt at "networked MythTV": I installed the full MythTV suite on a stationary PC, played with it, works fine. Then i installed mythfrontend only on a laptop, pointed it to the PC, boom! it works!
      No fiddling required. It just works. Just tell mythfrontend to use another backend than 127.0.0.1

  30. Re:HDTV capture devices which ignore broadcast fla by dowobeha · · Score: 3, Informative
    Linux HDTV capture cards:

    pcHDTV 3000
    This card is the successor to the original pcHDTV 2000. Its chipset allows you to record either standard over-the-air NTSC or digital over-the-air ATSC. I believe that drivers are in the works to allow you to record unencrypted QAM channels from digital cable.

    Air2PC
    This newer card allows you to record digital over-the-air ATSC. It allows you to record unencrypted QAM channels from digital cable.

    From what I've heard, there's no clear winner for which of these two cards is better. The pcHDTV 3000 can be purchased at the pcHDTV web site for $189. The Air2PC is on sale here for $169. If you plan to purchase, do so before July 2005. After that date, it's questionable at best whether they will still be sold.

    Search the MythTV user group mailing list archives for more information about these cards and support in MythTV.

    --
    I am concerned about any program, any piece of hardware, any treaty, any law that treats me as a consumer, not a citizen
  31. Re:Apple is gay by dickko · · Score: 2, Funny

    From what I've seen most mac users are very happy to use them, so yep, you're right...

    Hang on, that's not what you were implying...

  32. TV = a huge time waster by rolling_or_jaded · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting thread. I looked into setting up MythTV a few months ago, but a few problems (me being a MS kiddie and knowing zilch about *nix, and being Australian, where the program guides were something of an issue at the time) foiled my attempts.

    My partner and I (yes, a girl! :D) have sinced moved to a new house, and the TV now sits in one of the spare bedrooms. Our antenna has several missing elements, so free-to-air TV is fairly unwatchable... so we download most of the TV we want to watch, and occasionally stream it via the xbox.

    End result? We watch a *lot* less TV. And... it's bloody great. We've gone from, say, 4 hours a night of TV - 28 hours a week, over 9 hours(!) of ads - to maybe 8 hours a week, no ads.

    Break your TV. Cut off the cord. Move it to another room. Give TV a break... it's phenomonal what you can acheive without it - PetRescue is my example.

    Finally, and a little more on-topic:

    "timestretch" feature (for changing playback speed but not the pitch so you can watch shows more quickly)

    So can you slow it down, for the stoners? Damn cartoons are getting too quick for me.... ;)