Slashdot Mirror


Oakland County to go Wireless

y00nix writes "Oakland County, MI has plans to roll out a wireless Internet access program dubbed "Wireless Oakland" covering all 910 square miles inside the county. County Executive L. Brooks Patterson unveiled the plans at last night's State of the County address. Additional press coverage via the Oakland Press, and the The Detroit News." Similar in concept to Philadelphia's plans covered yesterday.

119 comments

  1. big whoop. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Grand Haven, MI has had this for months now.

    Their service has expanded quite a bit and they are planning on covering a 3 county area within 2 years.

    works great, and is not a government run operation as proposed in many other places.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:big whoop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the whole point of this is that it IS government operated...

      You're right, large private wifi networks have existed for years and are available in many places. However, what's highlighted here is a public initiative to provide wifi access: that's why this is noteworthy. If the government were to provide communication services (Internet access) to everyone (an entire county's airwaves), then the US's oft scoffed-at percentage of Internet-connected homes would rise drastically. In America, as in Korea, only old people would use email. It would jump start that whole 'information age' thing.

    2. Re:big whoop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      last time I had government run Cable TV it sucked and was expensive.

      Also the Govt made it illegal for a private company to come in and compete.

      So tell me again why this is good?

    3. Re:big whoop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here, this is /.

      In other words, Government run = good, private industry = bad.

    4. Re:big whoop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grand Haven != a county

      Shut the fuck up.

    5. Re:big whoop. by isdnip · · Score: 1

      Federal law no longer permits exclusivity in cable franchises. If somebody else wanted to overbuild the government-owned cable, they could. It may not be profitable, though -- unless it gets a big market share, it is hard to break even on an overbuild. And it might take effort to get the city to give the rights of way, though I doubt they could refuse forever.

      Telephone systems are also competitive, but telephone cooperatives, common in rural areas, are generally exempt from it. Cable, AFAIK, has no such protection.

    6. Re:big whoop. by Bilzmoude · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "Big whoop"? Comparing Grand Haven to Oakland County? You can put a hotspot in a starbucks in Grand Haven and the entire town will have WiFi. Grand Haven is TINY. Oakland County, on the other hand, is very large, with well over a million people... which equates to a lot more users than the users in Grand Haven. That would be like me saying that I have some sand in my back yard... there's nothing that Grand Haven has to offer... B

  2. Breaking News by mg2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone in Oakland right now is encouraged to help beta test the network. All you need is an 802.11 enabled card, and the SSID is 'linksys.'

    If you're having any trouble, just go ahead and access http://192.168.1.1. Leave the username box blank and the password is 'admin.'

    Thanks.

    1. Re:Breaking News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YEA! Everyone's tax dollars going to a luxury only a small percentage of people can use.

    2. Re:Breaking News by matth · · Score: 1

      Are they using technology that a regular 802.11b card could get on? Or are they using something that frequency hops like Alvarion gear?

    3. Re:Breaking News by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      yeah great! now people dont have to pay $40 a month for broadband internet!!

    4. Re:Breaking News by zaffir · · Score: 1

      I've done most of my wardriving in Oakland County. It's hard to go anywhere and not pick up signal from an access point. And any cluster of housing (subdivision, apartment complex, etc.) is just loaded with APs - most of them unsecure.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    5. Re:Breaking News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oakland county is in the top 5 of America's wealthiest counties. Money for something like this is not a problem.

    6. Re:Breaking News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insecure or unsecured. please pick only one of these two. thx.

  3. First one to infect the service wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Complete control of a large chain of wi-fi zombie PC's in the waiting.

  4. Just What I Need by RGautier · · Score: 1

    More interference.....as if my neighbor's new 2.4Ghz phone wasn't bad enough.. Rich http://www.richgautier.com/

    1. Re:Just What I Need by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      Eh, why did you put your personal page's URL in the comment? I mean, you've got it up there under your name, if you really wanted it twice you could just put it in your signature.

      You know, so we don't get the idea that the URL has anything to do with the topic of the story and comment. Unless that was the point, to get more traffic.

    2. Re:Just What I Need by RGautier · · Score: 1

      Actually, It's been a long time since I'd posted on Slashdot, and just didn't realize. The hit return, sign name, hit return, post URL...was kind of an automatic thing....sorry.

  5. YES!! by voteforkerry78 · · Score: 0

    Swedish gamers have like 5 ping (that's why they win all the Counter-Strike tourneys) under their wireless internet (that's free). This is another benefit of socialism!

    1. Re:YES!! by ghoti · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the servers ping YOU!

      --
      EagerEyes.org: Visualization and Visual Communication
    2. Re:YES!! by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Canuckistan, we know that Soviet Russia never included Sweden

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
  6. That's unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another place getting WiFi. Now are we going to see this on ./ as news every time some city/municipality or whatever gets WiFi? It's getting old really quick.

    1. Re:That's unpossible! by kjamez · · Score: 1

      really. but i do feel bad for the editors taking so much shit over dupes they feel like they absolutely have to mention something that happened yesterday, 'similar in concept'.

      perhaps there is a list online somewhere of all the cities with wifi, without popup ads and whatnot ... just "nothing to see here ... go here: " every time.

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
  7. Yay Government Waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would be angry if my local government did something like this. Wireless networks are something private companies could provide, instead of using government tax dollars that could be better used for schools, roads, and real public projects that would serve the public.

    Wireless Internet is something only a small segment of the population would take advantage of, and most should be able to afford it on their own.

    I love how slashdot cheers big government projects that intrude further in our lives, yet hate big government at the same time. You can't have it both ways.

    1. Re:Yay Government Waste... by XorNand · · Score: 1

      Despite our proximity to Detroit, Oakland County is the 3rd wealthiest county in the US. Coincidently, a couple of weeks ago, I was actually undertaking the task of mapping all the APs in Oakland County using NetStumber and GPSVisualizer. I only mapped about half of my city (Novi) before I wrote it off as an exercise in futility. From my place to the grocery store (about a mile and a half) I found about 40 APs. This plan will be used by more than just a select few. While I don't know enough about the plan to say that it's a great idea, it's not as simple as you write it off as.

      BTW, this is all besides the point anyhow. If you RTFA, you'd see that this isn't going to be funded by tax dollars. The companies involved here will be providing basic access for free and charging those who want faster acccess. The assumption is that the powerusers will be subsidizing the freeloaders. In fact, I believe the county is planning on charging a franchise fee, making this actually a source of income.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    2. Re:Yay Government Waste... by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that if private companies provided the network, it would only cover profitable areas, ignoring areas where usage is lower.

      Then you have to deal with open spectrum managment.. so you let "private companies" put in the network, how many companies do you allow to put up APs? 2 3? all the spectrum is now useless.

      Or better! now you have a single monopoly running wireless, stomping on anyone who puts up an AP in their home. Charging whatever they feel they can get away with, which shrinks the profitable areas even more.

      Data networks are fast becoming "necessary" for everyone to use.. this is the time for govermental bodies to take over the data network, providing it as a service just like they repair the "necessary" roads, water, and sewars

      I have been dealing with issues like these in MN, and the city governemnts are NOT interested in another ricochet.. putting up many many devices all over town, just to go out of business and let the garbage rust.

      Here is the solution to the problem:

      Let the city run the network, provide the infrastructure, and sell time on the network to the private companies who can compete and provide added value services.. and i'm hoping city people start to figure this out, and take over the in-ground fiber as well.

      Why do private companies run around and dig up streets to put fiber in.. that's silly.. the cable should be just part of the base city infrastructure, time on the network is easy to sell.

    3. Re:Yay Government Waste... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Why is it something private companies should be doing though? Wireless networks benefit the population at least as much as public roads do. Allowing everyone free access to the internet would be a great step forward.

      --
      I am trolling
    4. Re:Yay Government Waste... by bobobobo · · Score: 0

      Since when has Oakland ever been a fiscally responsible entity? Remember this is the city that spent millions of dollars to bring over the Raiders, yet never seems to have enough cash for education.

    5. Re:Yay Government Waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Oakland County in Michigan - you're thinking of the city of Oakland, in Almeda County, California.

    6. Re:Yay Government Waste... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article says it is a plan to attract high-tech professionals. That would potentially increase their tax base.

      Also:

      "Many residents would want to keep higher-speed connections, said Bertolini, and would pay a fee for that. The county wants to avoid using tax dollars for the project."

    7. Re:Yay Government Waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod the parent down for flagrant stupidity - he's too preoccupied with his soapbox and tinfoil hat to bother reading the articles, and has missed out on the fact that, as others have already pointed out, this is going to be run by private business and is potentially a source of income for the county.

    8. Re:Yay Government Waste... by drooling-dog · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I would be angry if my local government did something like this.

      I'm just thankful that municipal water systems were put in before the advent of the bottled water industry. Otherwise it never could have happened, and we'd all be showering and washing our clothes in Dasani...

    9. Re:Yay Government Waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow...

      pretty stupid aren't you.

      are you the wierdo that sits on the park bench blurting out things that make no sense? or do you do that only here in slashdot.

      I suggest you stop posting, your karma is at -1 nad has beenther for a long time.

    10. Re:Yay Government Waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oakland County already has the best schools, roads, and real public projects in the area.

      I live in Rochester Hills so I'm looking forward to this :)

    11. Re:Yay Government Waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That comparison does not hold. Everybody needs water to survive, you can't say that about wireless internet access.

      Now that I've utterly destroyed your argument, please come up with something else.

    12. Re:Yay Government Waste... by bobobobo · · Score: 1

      Man you people are dense. I'll make sure to add a /sarcasm or /humor disclaimer next time.

    13. Re:Yay Government Waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly haven't seen a bunch of South Koreans transplanted to an area without internet connection. The fastest way to save their lives is with wireless. Bite it.

    14. Re:Yay Government Waste... by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      I'd be happy to pay tax dollars for this. I guess I trust someone I can vote out of office more than someone who is protected by the high cost of entry into the industry.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  8. Taxes by Space_Soldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will the sales tax rise because of this?

    1. Re:Taxes by rel4x · · Score: 1

      I have yet to RTFA, but I live in Oakland County, and know a bit about L. Brooks Patterson (parents work a bit under him). He seems to be rather excellent at finding well-off companies and individuals to fund this kind of thing. Taxes will probably not rise (L. Brooks = hardcore republican). I can't believe he's doing it, but if there's one thing this man's not, it's stupid.

      --

      Before you mod me funny, think, perhaps I was insightfully funny?
    2. Re:Taxes by Dragoon412 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article points out that they don't want to use tax money to fund this. It's sort of a tradeoff. The county builds towers and the physical infrastructure to run the program, and, in turn, private companies run the whole show in exchange for access to the towers for other ventures.

      I could definitely see someone like Sprint or Verizon getting on board with this.

  9. Do we have to list every cities? by antdude · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Do we have to list every cities that are going wireless? :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Do we have to list every cities? by y00nix · · Score: 1

      It should be noted that this is a COUNTY-wide project, meaning 910-square miles. That is much larger than any city going wireless. Next time RTFA.

  10. The questions that people (may) ask: by akeyes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    (from a related link on the article)

    Q: If I leave Oakland County, will my computer work?

    A: Of course. But you might have to revert back to a wired connection, at least until the whole nation goes wireless.

  11. This is great.! by RexRhino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is great for many reasons:

    1. When the government runs the ISPs, it means that law enforcement can monitor what you browse online. No need for search warrants anymore!

    2. It is not like wireless technology changes or evolves, so I am sure a wireless purchase now will be good for the next 40 years.

    3. Poor people need low-cost wireless access. After all, brand new laptops configured for wireless access are cheap, but that $8 a month fee for internet access is just WAY too expensive.

    4. There are way too many choices. Who actually wants to CHOOSE there ISP, when the government can make all the choices for them. After all, Oakland county does such a great job fixing the roads, lowering crime, and protecting the enviornment... how could they NOT do a better job.

    5. The government can make sure that dangerous information is not accessible. We can make sure that p2p music file sharing is not possible, and since we already require certain websites not be available in public schools and libraries, obviously the ban will also apply to public wireless.

    1. Re:This is great.! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really sucks to read an excellent, "hit the nail on the head" comment like this one and not have any mod points.

      From Slashdot's perspective, so many municipalities have done this that this is hardly news anymore. From the world's perspective, if various government agencies have so much money they're looking to do this kind of thing, it's time to start giving massive tax rebates.

    2. Re:This is great.! by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      1. I highly doubt judges will admit any evidence gathered without a warrant.
      2. Look at the cell phone system in this country. That's owned by PRIVATE COMPANIES. It's a piece of crap compared to systems all over the world. Systems that are more highly regulated by the government.

      3. The $8 that is spent on wireless is $8 that's not spent in the community. If someone in Oakland gives Verizon $8 for wireless, that $8 leaves the community.
      4. RTFA numbnuts, you can choose your ISP. The city sets up the infrastructure and other companies pay the city to provide access and the companies get access for their own systems.
      5. And how can this not happen with a private network? The government already has control over private industry. If they wanted to, they could restrict the Internet. And private companies have already blocked P2P systems. And a lot of them even block ports 80 and 25. So how would the government be any worse?

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    3. Re:This is great.! by reedk · · Score: 1

      Bingo. What this really mirrors is fascism, where the property is proveately owned, but the usage of it is controlled by the government.

  12. They're all copiers... by Manchot · · Score: 1

    In mid-2003, St. Louis turned its downtown into a giant municipal Wi-Fi hotspot. Why is Philly considered to be the archetype, anyway? Oh yeah, St. Louis didn't have to fight a legal battle with Big Telco. And they didn't highly publicize theirs, because in that same week, they announced the closing of sixteen elementary schools.

  13. Oh boy by confusion · · Score: 0

    It's interesting that this is happening in the wealthiest county in Michigan. Of course, since the bottom fell out of the auto industry, that's not saying much.

    I do like this quote:
    "Patterson also wants to help bridge the digital divide by helping lower-income residents get computers if they don't have the means to buy one. Partnering with private businesses and foundations, the county would offer free or low-cost computers to people willing to take training classes."

    I can't WAIT till we have tens of thousands of newly vulnerable and unmanaged computers to be harnessed by the spammers, DOSers and other bad people. Not a valid reason not to do this, but the point is to push out the accessibility to those of lower means, like people who can't afford AV subscriptions, personal firewalls, etc.

    I do think Internet access is becoming much more commoditized and if you're not on it, you are at a severe sociatal disadavantage. Think of all those poor people who don't know the joys of fark and slashdot!

    Jerry
    http://www.syslog.org/

    1. Re:Oh boy by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      Wealthiest county in Michigan doesn't mean a lot, unless it also happens to be the third wealthiest county in the nation, which it is. This is an area with a lot of money. I, as a techinical person (I'm sure you are too), can see the draw of a community that provides basic internet service free. And since it is not paid for with tax dollars it seems like a good plan. Since it is private they could easily boot those found to be spreading viruses, etc. until they get their system cleaned up (just like most university networks).

  14. Land grab begins by rjordan · · Score: 1

    So basically this is the beginning of the grab for wireless monopolies that we will be regretting allowing be established in about 5 years time right?

    --
    "When no-one around you understands start your own revolution and cut out the middle man"
  15. taxpayer dollars by a11 · · Score: 1

    free, I would understand. Low-cost would piss me off. Where is the startup cost for this coming from? the taxpayers. why should they then get charged for using the infrastructure they paid to build. Can't stand it when governments pretend to be corporations.

  16. In other news.... by CypherXero · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, 2568:

    "Alabama considers installing a few 802.11a access points..."

    Yeah, my state is going to be so left out of this one...wait, isn't it like that for everything?

    1. Re:In other news.... by eobanb · · Score: 1

      At the risk of sounding elitist.......possibly because the state of Alabama, instead of producing surplus cash, actually heavily relies on federal funds to subsist. In 2002 the state recieved $100.1 BILLION more in subsidies than it paid in taxes. If every state was like Alabama, the nation would cease functioning at once. Until Alabama and several other Southern and Western states. So to appy this to a technological paradigm; you'll get your wireless internet as soon the state actually has an economy that a wireless network could even benefit.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

  17. I'm in Oakland County by Dragoon412 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...and while I really, really like the sound of this, I'm more interested in seeing what sort of impact this'll have on cable and DSL prices in the area. It seems to me that Comcast, SBC and Wide Open West will have a much more difficult time convincing people to pay $60/month for broadband access when they can get adequate service without wires or hardware for free.

    I don't think this sort of WiFi would have the speed to keep me happy, but I definitely think my parents and most of my family would be perfectly happy with it, and I certainly wouldn't mind seeing it drive my cable bill down $10 or $20/month.

    1. Re:I'm in Oakland County by rjordan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but this is the beginning of the government controlled communications infrastructure and the final elimination of individual value from the internet

      --
      "When no-one around you understands start your own revolution and cut out the middle man"
    2. Re:I'm in Oakland County by Dragoon412 · · Score: 1

      RTFA - the county will build and maintain the infrastructure, and, in return, private companies will run it all and have access to the infrastructure for other business ventures. This is a [i]good[/i] thing.

    3. Re:I'm in Oakland County by ohad_l · · Score: 1

      It'd have to be pretty slow WiFi then. 802.11B, the old, slow standard, is 11Mbps. I don't know about the states, but that's 5 times more bandwidth than the best DSL or Cable you can get in Israel. 802.11G, IIRC, gives you 54Mbps. So while yes, WiFi is slow compared to modern Ethernet, it's not at all slow when compared to ISPs.

      --
      If it weren't for fog, the world would run at a really crappy framerate.
    4. Re:I'm in Oakland County by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As a former resident of Oakland County myself, I don't think that much of the residents will have too difficult of a time affording Comcasts inflated prices. I think that this is a good idea, however it should be done in a county (i.e. Wayne or Macomb) where free or very cheap high speed internet can reduce the "digial divide" (sorry for the of the use of the bad buzz word).

    5. Re:I'm in Oakland County by Dragoon412 · · Score: 1

      I agree - certainly there aren't many people in Oakland county that can't afford broadband, but at the same time, it's a project that's being put into play by the county government, not the state. I think it'd be fantastic for Macomb and Wayne to follow suit, but knowing how corrupt the government in Wayne is, I doubt it'd be successful, there. Macomb, on the other hand, still has a lot of more rural areas (like Romeo) that could benefit from this greatly.

    6. Re:I'm in Oakland County by rjordan · · Score: 1

      what part of that suggests this is a good thing? i thought government controlled communications media != good thing

      --
      "When no-one around you understands start your own revolution and cut out the middle man"
    7. Re:I'm in Oakland County by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      The WiFi itself may be fast, but I doubt you'll be getting a whole 11Mbit straight to the internet for yourself.

    8. Re:I'm in Oakland County by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im in oakland countay also. Broadband is less than $60 a month. For example, here are the prices for Wide Open West

      112kbps Internet
      $ 34.99

      WOW! Internet at 112kbps is perfect for checking e-mail and other routine Internet use and includes 5 e-mail accounts, 3 IP addresses and 10 MB of web space.
      500kbps Internet
      $ 39.99

      WOW! Internet at 500kbps is about 10 times the speed of dial-up and includes 5 e-mail accounts, 3 IP addresses and 10 MB of web space.
      2Mbps Internet
      $ 44.99

      WOW! Internet at 2Mbps is over 35 times faster than dial-up and includes 5 e-mail accounts, 3 IP addresses and 10 MB of web space.
      4Mbps Internet
      $ 54.99

      WOW! Internet at 4Mbps is up to 70 times faster than dial-up and includes 5 e-mail accounts, 3 IP addresses and 10 MB of web space.

    9. Re:I'm in Oakland County by jdhutchins · · Score: 1

      The standards may be 11 and 54mbps, but I highly doubt you'll get that. Those are theoritical maximums, and I don't you'd ever see those speed in actual use. And as someone else pointed out, you don't get that all to yourself, you have to share. Wireless also has higher latency, which forces anyone who wants to play games to stick with a wired connection. Their wireless is better than no internet, but it doesn't beat a wired connection.

    10. Re:I'm in Oakland County by madstork2000 · · Score: 1

      Oakland has a lot of very very rich people, but it too has its share of poverty.

      I live in Oakland, and do ok, but where I am at there are plenty around me who are not very well off. Poverty is real, just like it is in most places. Why should we feel it is "right" or more "just" to roll out a public service in the most economically depressed areas?

      I guess my point is we all have problems, and whereever you look there will be people who need help. If Oakland can give us ubiquitous net access, without raising my taxes appreciably I am all for it. Yes the rich guys in Bloomfield Hills and Birmingham will benifit, but so will folks in the depressed areas of like Pontiac.

      As far as privacy ccncerns with the government running an ISP... No one is forcing you to use the service. If in ten or twenty years it becomes so good and so ubiquitous that COmcast and the DSL providers pull out, leaving the government ISP as the only game in town, we would have a problem. But even then, as long as quantum computing is not a reality, SSH and its descendents will keep the my Internet habits pretty private.

      For the parnoid browser, it is pretty easy to setup apache as a proxy server on a low cost hosting account (if you have your own copy of apache). You might even be able to run squid.

      Anyway, since I live in one of the few rural areas of Oakland, it will probably be a while before I see any of this coming my way.

      -MS2k

    11. Re:I'm in Oakland County by jc42 · · Score: 1

      this is the beginning of the government controlled communications infrastructure and the final elimination of individual value from the internet

      We seem to have yet another person who thinks that the Internet was invented by private industry. Fact is, it was developed nearly 100% with U.S. government funding. Mostly military funding, actually. Private business got involved only when they realized that there was money to be made. This was long after the Internet was designed and built.

      Of course, there was lots of business involvement during the DOD-funded years. As usual, much of the work of building the hardware was subcontracted. And the design was subcontracted, but that was mostly to academia (and a few companies like BB&N). But neither the funding nor the design came from private business.

      Also, the history so far shows that, at least in the US, the commercial Internet has been much more restrictive of "individual value" than the government. Thus, many ISPs routinely block ports 80 and 25. This is done primarily so that your email and web pages have to be stored on the ISPs computers rather than just on your own. This way, they can easily access all of your email and web pages. Unlike the government, they don't need a warrant to do this. Some of them (e.g., msn.com) have even had an item in their contract stating that they own any files on their machine. So, for example, if you put your own music on a web site hosted on the ISP, you have assigned the copyright to the ISP.

      In the US, at least, the laws (attempt to) prevent a government agency from doing this sort of thing to you. Granted, they might do it anyway. But it's illegal, and they can't use such information against you in court, unless they first got a warrant to access your data. The First Ammendment will almost certainly be interpreted by the courts to mean that you have a right to use any port, including ports 80 and 25. It's simply not legal for a government agency to block private communications. A private ISP can block your communication as they wish. They can also intercept your communication and do as they wish with anything they capture. Unless you're a multi-millionaire, there's not a lot you can do to stop them.

      Of course, the Bush administration had been doing their best to give the government the unrestricted power that corporations have ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    12. Re:I'm in Oakland County by rjordan · · Score: 1

      not this old saw again... ignoring the fact that the two objections to my post are mutually contradictory 1) don't worry it is private industry you can trust that 2) don't worry it is government you can trust that the reality is that we have government dependent business monopolies being created which benefit from neither adequate government oversight, nor completely private motives i think this issue is somewhat more complex than you are realising and to believe that cosy relationships with local government (the most corruptible part) don't trump individual liberties is incredibly naive - i am guessing you have no experience of the process of selling to local government

      --
      "When no-one around you understands start your own revolution and cut out the middle man"
  18. Them Commies is gonna ruin America! by Cryofan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Government power should only be used to crush other nations, preferably those who have citizens with high melatonin levels.... /sarcasm

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  19. Yah, those libraries should all be privatized by RGautier · · Score: 1

    The Internet provides a benefit to society that is too large for the government not to subsidize its use in any way, shape or form that it can. Providing free access to the public is a noble cause, and it ranks up there with the concept of the public library. I heartily disagree with your opinion.

  20. Clarification by XorNand · · Score: 4, Informative
    Ok, I need to clarify things: This is NOT being funded by tax dollars. The Detroit Free Press makes this point a bit more clear than the submitter's articles. As I wrote in a reply below:
    "The companies involved here will be providing basic access for free and charging those who want faster acccess. The assumption is that the powerusers will be subsidizing the freeloaders. In fact, I believe the county is planning on charging a franchise fee, making this actually a source of income."
    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    1. Re:Clarification by XorNand · · Score: 1

      Whoops... I guess that the main article source was the Free Press. Well then, in standard /. operating procedure I guess I could just sum things up as "RTFA!"

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    2. Re:Clarification by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

      I wonder how slow the "slower, free" access will be. (I also wish my wifi card hadn't been stolen, I live in Oakland County...)

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  21. Not just every city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You probably don't realize this, but Oakland County is about the size of Rhode Island! This isn't just some city getting wireless, it's like a whole state having free wireless. They would have to have some thousands of APs to do this with 802.11b. That definitely sounds like big news to me.

    aqazaqa

  22. I'm a politician... by MosesJones · · Score: 1

    And I'd like to spend money on an effort that adds little benefit but which sounds good on my re-election campaign.

    A city covered by Wireless, paid for by the tax-payers, because of course, that is the most cost-effective way of getting anything done. Get the government to do it.

    Does anyone honestly think that having city councils doing this stuff makes sense ? Would it make sense for them to provide the phones and electricity as well ? Nice vote winner, but to do the decent investment in Wi-Fi to get good coverage and cope with all the collisions requires a bit more brains than most government organisations I've seen.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:I'm a politician... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      uhh... actually this initiative is to get PRIVATE companies to implement the service. the county will pay for a basic connectivity service and the companies will have premium services that people can subscribe to.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:I'm a politician... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm a politician" .... "requires a bit more brains than most government organisations I've seen"

      Um .... remember engage brain before stepping on pedal ....

    3. Re:I'm a politician... by insert+3+letters · · Score: 1

      Well Sacramento has a Public Utility and guess who's rates barely rose (at about the cost of inflation) and who always had power during the summer of when everyone else had blackouts and insane power bills. I mentioned in the PA thread that Lewisham (in London) does this and its a very good and successful program though with much, much less coverage, and in fact allows me to live here. My phone line can't get DSL (in London for Chissake!) and cable's not an option either). Its either this or an expensive ISDN or T1 as I just can't stand 56K.

  23. I think you meant MELANIN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    racist dumbfuck

  24. New technologies by owlstead · · Score: 1

    The problem with these kind of strategies is that Wi-Fi is only the start of new generation technologies using airwaves. So there is quite a big risk that they will be caught up by new technologies as they go along.

    On the other hand, this is the first step into a universally available internet everywhere - for free. This is especially interesting for people with little money as well. They can pick up a cheap computer, add a wireless PCI card and have internet access in a whiff.

    The other thing is that this would be great on the road. But I do not know how well Wi-Fi works with moving targets. What I do now that there is a huge potential market for services for people that 1) know where they are (GPS) and 2) have continuous internet connections (GPRS, UMTS, Wi-Fi etc).

    Still, with the current market situation, I don't think it is politically correct for the government to provide internet connections. They've got to create more online services first, and then worry about access.

  25. Spend money on real infrastructure by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

    This is a waste of taxpayer money. Broadband internet is readily availale in Oakland County through private providers. Meanwhile, Michigan's roads are abominable. Snow takes days to get cleared from residential streets. I could go on and on. Someone needs to get their priorities straight.

    1. Re:Spend money on real infrastructure by Tsugumi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at least you'll be able to mail for help when you can't see your house from your snowed-in car.

    2. Re:Spend money on real infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's NOT being paid for with taxes.

    3. Re:Spend money on real infrastructure by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      With taxpayer-funded Internet, people won't need to go outside. :)

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    4. Re:Spend money on real infrastructure by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Your point would be valid if in fact this wireless network was being paid for by taxpayer dollars, which, for the record, it is not. I've driven through Michigan many times and have never noticed any real problems with their roads, other than the fact that, just like the entire rest of the nation, a good sixth of them are under some sort of construction/maintenance at all times. But I digress; please shut up.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

  26. It is about ubiquitous access!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Large networks like this are a good idea and only the government has the force to build such a network. Fist off it creates competition for things like GPRS, second of all information is important and should be available to everyone.

    By the way wireless is cheap, you can get a computer adequate for surfing the web for almost free and a wireless card is like 8 US dollars now, so yes the monthly internet fee is a lot of money to some people, because high speed internet is like $50, dial up is $15 and you need a telephone line. Guess what many people use cell phones rather than a landline so that adds to the cost. I know some very poor people who have old pcs but do not have internet because of what it costs.

    Also this is not intended to push ISP's out of business, but rather offer ubiquitous access and they will have a real hard time monitoring online activity without a log on procedure. So if it is truly open that is not a problem.

  27. Last town to get telephone service. by Chatmag · · Score: 1

    One of the last communities without telephone service, Mink, La. finally got hooked up.

    It took over 30 years to hook up the phones, when they just could of gone Wifi and VOIP.

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  28. As a former resident of Oakland County... by chazwurth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    my take is: what's the point? Oakland is one of the richest counties in the U.S.A. Oakland County residents can, for the most part, afford their own internet access. I'd much rather see a project like this in neighboring Wayne county, where it could actually prove a benifit to residents (although home computer ownership is probably far lower in Detroit than it is in any of Oakland County cities).

    --
    The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
    1. Re:As a former resident of Oakland County... by biobogonics · · Score: 2, Informative

      my take is: what's the point? Oakland is one of the richest counties in the U.S.A.

      Patterson is a big name politician who loves technology. Does any one remember if "Automation Alley", which Patterson promoted heavily, lived up to its promises? It's really about attracting business, and expanding the tax rolls.

      As a former resident of Oakland county, I take Patterson with a _large_ grain of salt.

    2. Re:As a former resident of Oakland County... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like Patterson but this is just a ploy.

      Nobody here seems to be mentioning Granholm's state of the State a week or so back where she talked about making Michigan another high-tech state.

      We've heard it all before. Here are some ideas for Michigan politicians: taxes are way too damn high--sales tax went to 6% and we got nothing for it, the roads are as bad as they have always been, and somebody needs to do something about Detroit.

  29. Honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long has it been since the last time search warrants were *really* needed?

  30. WiFi cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This issue will become particularly interesting when T-Mobile launches "at home" in 3Q of '05. The "at home" phones, which will retail for under $250, work seemlessly between 802.11b and GSM. That's right, once you get a good unencrypted WiFi signal your phone will hand off from the GSM network to the WiFi base station and become voice over IP call. The technology works today, I've seen the handset myself. These free citywide WiFi networks will also be dropping the cost of providing cell phone service. That is until the WiFi bandwidth gets congested.

  31. In Oakland County Right Now... by anti_analog · · Score: 1

    ...I pay under $70 a month for internet and basic 70ish channel cable from Wide Open West (formerly SBC), which I find quite reasonable, and it's not a "special 3 month deal" like comcast.
    Though, at my previous residence, also in Oakland County, I paid about $90 for the same service (except it was not capped to 512Kb, but it never got that fast anyway, and they had lots of problem from restructuring). Cursed Bright House Networks (formerly time warner).

    I have no need for silly government wireless, though I imagine wide area wireless is going to become quite common in the next few years, and the government and the telecoms are probably going to be quite interested in getting as many dirty little fingers in that pot (despite what I'm sure is good intentions of lots of people who want to bring about such programs).

    --
    you cannot dodge the quad laser. jumping is useless.
  32. Do they really need it by keybordcowboy · · Score: 1

    I live in Genesee county which borders oakland county and I think we would have been a better choice because if anyone has ever lived in oakland county will know the wealth doesnt stop there. I think most people can afford internet access there.

  33. Which Technology To Use by Barkmullz · · Score: 1


    How do they know which wireless technology to go with?

    I am sure a project like this will cost a lot of money. How can they be sure to get a return on investment when the technology they decide on can be obsolete in a few years?

    --
    Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
  34. Yes! by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    I live one block away from the eastern border of Oakland, *and* I have a bunch of tall trees next to my house. Mwahahahahaaa....

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  35. Increase of jobs in county by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

    I haven't noticed a surge of jobs from the county as I have been looking into it for the past couple of months (I know a couple of months isn't really all that long for a huge rollout like this would be, but I still think that there would be some hiring/firing going on).

    I've been looking to move to that county or a nearby county, and I have been following the jobs on their website, and I haven't seen any job posts for anything network (there was recently a PC Tech position).

    Did all their hiring for the project go on a long time ago? I'd love to hop on board a project like this.

    --

    YOU'RE WINNER !
    Another lame blog

  36. not Oakland, CA by krunk4ever · · Score: 1, Funny

    darn! i was read this title thinking this was Oakland, CA.

    1. Re:not Oakland, CA by batobin · · Score: 1

      Me too. I live in Berkeley, about a mile away from the border. It would be nice to have wifi when I take the bus to Safeway.

  37. Re:Oakland - hotbed of WiFi users ? by PasteEater · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess that just goes to show that you don't know much. I live in Wayne County (where Detroit is) and Oakland is like paradise by comparison.

    --
    There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
  38. Slashdot is retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe this. Has everyone one slashdot gone mad? This is a GOOD THING. Anyone can buy themselves a 300$ Walmart PC and a cheapo 30$ wirelees card and access the internet for FREE. How is this bad? Whoever needs broadband can still buy it, everyone else benefits from a free service from the government for its citizens. Instead everone one slashdot cries

    1. Free Internet
    2. ???
    3. Higher Taxes

    On a sidenote, my campus wireless network is way too convenient, plus the university has a monopoly on it. Let's tear it down and get verizon here, so that every student pays them a small fixed amount every month, in addition to tuition.

  39. I only glanced at the fine article... by doormat · · Score: 1

    Does it specify technology? 802.11 or 802.16? I'd guess for the area they want to cover, .16 (WiMax) would be better.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  40. Where's all of this money coming from?????????? by acoustix · · Score: 1

    In a time where city, county, and state governments are strugling to provide the basic services of police, fire fighters, education, roads, etc. I would like to know where all of this money is coming from. This is wasteful spending because IT IS NOT NEEDED! Let the private sector pay for the extra crap. The goverment should be involved in ONLY ESSENTIAL services.

    Everyone bitches about paying higher and higher taxes, but they also want the government to spend money on crap like this? I just don't get it.

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Where's all of this money coming from?????????? by Dantu · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > The goverment should be involved in ONLY ESSENTIAL services.

      The government is involved in all infastructure projects. They may not pay your electric, phone, or gas bill, but some level of government has decided which companies to allow to build lines into your home.

  41. WiFI is for LANs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using WiFi for large areas is just plain stupid. WiMax will provide this service at a fraction of the cost.

  42. I am angry at the government too ! by zymano · · Score: 1

    We need a private army , a private water works, private roads and highways, private parks, privatitze medical research, privatize space research.

    Everything will be great. We know how much private companies want to jump into areas business where they are not guaranteed big profits.

    Mega-dittos !

  43. nice.. by thanew · · Score: 1

    im glad to see more places going wireless... its nice going to the beach here (in california) and being able to grab a wireless signal...

  44. Damn!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oakland County, MI has plans to roll out a wireless Internet access program dubbed "Wireless Oakland" covering all 910 square miles inside the county.

    That's one big program! How long does it take to download?

  45. The Big Picture: Skype by nikster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's say skype runs on my PDA and my smartphone. And wireless is provided for free country-wide.

    => wireless telephony has just become free.

    i would be surprised if the cell operators wouldn't put up a massive lobbying effort against this. in the end, the goverment takes over their business and gives it away for free.

    not that i or anyone else ever having to deal with cingular customer service would mind.

  46. verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is east texas going to be next?
    I sure wish these moonshine swillin' charles lee homos would get an education hereabouts, I guess it'll be another ten years here in east texas before the kkk sobers up enough to quit screwing queers in louisiana on weekends (charles lee + wayne truax, clevland klavern).I just don't know why those two don't get married.Maybe they are swingers.
    Soon to come, polaroids.

  47. benefit to the gangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ha how the gangsta can get directions to there drive by shoting using wifi...oh wait not oakland,ca.

  48. Bikeride by Primal_theory · · Score: 1

    So i can ride my bike 1 1/2 miles with my laptop, sit on the bench out front summerset mall, and get free wireless? im in!

    --
    Your skill in reading has increased by one point!
    1. Re:Bikeride by reedk · · Score: 1

      Yes! And while you're sitting there, you can learn how to spell the name of the mall!

  49. Traffic - will not help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok... so now I can sit in Oakland County's horrible traffic jams and fire up my laptop to view the traffic reports that tell me that from any point in the county its going to take me 30 minutes longer to get anywhere else in the county.

    If you drive around here you have to agree, if you don't drive around here, congratulations.

    Hoorah to Oakland County's overgrowth and subsequent traffic nightmares.

    BTW, there is already a Wireless ISP in Oakland County and we have been operating without county towers or assistance for 5 years.

    Question is... will they allow the wireless provider of choice to use Oaknet fiber for backhaul? *grin*