Slashdot Mirror


Novell Releasing Hula and 200,000+ Lines of Code

H0ek writes "Seems Novell has announced at LinuxWorld Expo that they will be releasing 200,000+ lines of code to the community in the form of a project named Hula(TM). The project is derived from the Novell NetMail product and provides web-based email and calendaring. Seems our boy Nat Friedman has some info on this, too. If you were fortunate enough to get a MyRealBox email account, you will probably know what NetMail is like."

223 comments

  1. Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by Bad+Move · · Score: 0, Insightful

    yawn

    1. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but 200,000 lines of code! Think about that! Even after you remove all of the lines of "this comment intentionally left blank", you'll still have, what, 20k, 30k lines left? :)

      Seriously, though: if you want webmail, what's wrong with Horde/Imp? I use that at home; it's pretty nice and full featured, if you can get past the configuration.

      --
      "Well, then fire it up and show me what this..." (sigh) ... "coccoon can do."
    2. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by rfinnvik · · Score: 1

      NetMail is also an MTA, a POP3 server, an IMAP server, fancy message store(NMAP protocol) with (at least in NetMail, dunno about Hula) nice support for LDAP/eDirectory and HA/Load Balancing.

    3. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by Drishmung · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Read the article. It supports web mail---and having used MyRealBox I can say it's quite good. But, it also supports POP3, IMAP, LDAP and webcal.

      So, doesn't this now start to sound more like a free Exchange Server replacement?

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    4. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      So, doesn't this now start to sound more like a free Exchange Server replacement? No, I'd say this is like a Exchange Server replacement...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    5. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by Drishmung · · Score: 1

      That sounds like an Exchange Server replacement. It doesn't sound like a free Exchange Server replacement.

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    6. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Do you think Novell would issue the code for a free Exchange server replacement when they offer a commercial version?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it sounds like a free courier replacement. Oh wait... courier is already open source.

    8. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by Penis_Envy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The two are not mutually exclusive. Many vendors do this (open-sourcing a product and selling it commercially.)

      The key is that people want support when they get a product. This way, Novell can capitalize on the development of the product, then sell it to people and support it. It makes sense, really.

      And yes, it looks like an Exchange replacement, as it has integrated mail and calendaring. That's basically why people go to exchange. Add in tasks, contacts, and a few other things, and that's Exchange in a nutshell.

    9. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Maybe I missed something, but does it have the Outlook hooks? That's kinda key to calling it an exchange replacement IMO.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    10. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't even have Evolution hooks, Novell's own OpenSource client ...
      Its just a simplistic webcalendar in the spirit of Horde.

    11. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, thats _sucks big time_ ...

    12. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1
      No, but here is the 100% free (as in beer and freedom) version:

      http://mirror.open-xchange.org/ox/EN/community/

      From the news on their websites it may sound like the Hula release was actually intended to benefit this project.

    13. Re:Web-based email? Oh, that's sooo exciting by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      They are releasing this code and are commiting resources to workk with Mozilla and others to create the "hooks" to email/calandar programs. Their intent is to offer a free/open source replacement to Microsoft Exchange. In their own words this will be a "low end" solution, however they hope it will become more of what Apache is to web servers.

      I agree that they don't want to kill Groupwise, however, Groupwise is in a distant 3rd in the email race (Exchange/Notes 1/2) and "if" they actually put developers behind this and they get the Microsoft Outlook hooks (not the crappy web/dav http hooks mentioned in another post) this will offer a true replacement to Exchange. Will it hook in to a Directory Service? Probably not, will they put development dollars behind replication or any advanced feature? Probably not, but for small offices (under 200) this will be a great solution if they do it right.

      Understand that OpenExchange is NOT a true replacement for Microsoft Exchange. Groupwise is, but it currently requires their client AND Novells Directory to work.

      In short, a major company is trying to create a true open source replacements to Microsoft Exchange. That is great.

      Now I hope they can work with the opengroupware people and create a great product. I hope this product becomes the defacto standard for open source groupware AND then companies like IBM would support it with their blackberries. Have you tried to integrate all these new mobile devices with Qmail or OpenGroupware? The vendors don't support anything but Notes and Exchange. This is very bad. Novell is trying to address it.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
  2. I am not an enterprise admin... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But if I were setting up an IT infrastructure at a 200+ computer office, I'd want to keep e-mail and calendars separate. I know it's probably just me, but I like having a separate calendar program.

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    1. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by nizo · · Score: 2, Informative

      What web based calendar does everyone use? We have been using WebCalendar(spiffy name eh?) and it works ok, but the interface is kinda hokie looking (plus it is waaaaay too busy). Anyone else have any preferences?

    2. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by codepunk · · Score: 1

      So hack the email portion of it out...

      --


      Got Code?
    3. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.

      That's really funny...and so true. Thanks for the chuckle.

    4. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      They're just using CalDav IIRC.

      Besides, if you take out the calendar thing, you could just use, say, qmail and openldap.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    5. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by Telastyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And if I were setting up [another] IT infrastructure at a 200+ computer office, I'd realise that every non-technical user expects calendaring to be part of their messaging system, since y'know their messaging system is used solely to schedule things...

      Though personally, I'd love that messaging system to be IM rather than email, but that is yet to exist nicely [though Exchange supports something like it, but I've not tried it, since... it's Exchange...]

    6. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by Jellybob · · Score: 1
      I really don't think you need to worry too much about having them on seperate servers, from http://hula-project.org/index.php/FAQ#How_well_doe s_it_scale.3F:

      Scalability was the primary design parameter for the original codebase. Anecdotally, people have run 200,000 registered users on a single $4,000 PC, with a 25% concurrency rate (that's over 50,000 concurrently-connected users).
    7. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by Nat+Friedman · · Score: 5, Informative


      You can run the Hula calendar separately from the mailer/MTA. We definitely want to follow the one-problem one-tool rule for people who want that.

    8. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just you. I like being able to mail my meetings. And so does everyone else.

    9. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by augustz · · Score: 1

      From the client perspective you can use as many or few programs as you want. Five IMAP clients on one computer? No problem. Sunbird (standalone cal) support is in the roadmap.

      On the server side folks are looking for an exchange replacement that scales way up.

      They are not looking for an openserver cobled togther set of scripts / programs / configuration directives.

      I don't think the limited combo is going to be a huge problem in the marketplace.

      And you'll be surprised at how enterpise admin folks like server / program consolidation, especially in 200+ computer offices. People have been trained on MS admin interfaces. Cobbled together scripts to 100 different configutation places is just not appealing to them.

    10. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by G-Licious! · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see that rule applied to Evolution aswell.

    11. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by theparanoidcynic · · Score: 1

      What about Jabber?

      --
      Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
    12. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by Nat+Friedman · · Score: 2, Informative


      Yeah, this is a very fair point. You can run separate components of Evolution separately with the -c option, e.g. "evolution -c calendar" gives you only the calendar.

      We have considered splitting Evolution into separate projects a number of times, and it may still happen.

    13. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      We use Novell Groupwise Messenger in the office where I work which seems very similar to MSN Messenger, but can only be used internally.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    14. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh... Lotus Notes has sametime messaging which is built into Notes 6.5 upwards. There's also something similar in Lotus Workplace

    15. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by blackhaze · · Score: 1

      Where is the Outlook Syncronization support for Calendar/Addressbook and shared data? Products like @Mail - http://www.atmail.com/index.ehtml?p=sync&b=11 - Have had this support for sometime.

    16. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Thanks for your response.

      It's a real pain to set up a working MTA with AV and spam filtering. Nice to know you won't have to do it again.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    17. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it builtin in Microsoft Exchance ? If so, it's necessary. If not, it's an useless feature.

    18. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "first usage" wizard of gnome 2.0 insists on getting an e-mail adress before I can press "next" use the program. I was a little confused by this at first.

    19. Re:I am not an enterprise admin... by Penis_Envy · · Score: 1

      Well, there seems to be a fair amount of discussion about ditching outlook and going to thunderbird/sunbird or waiting for evolution on win32. These clients would use open standards rather than microsoft's proprietary protocols. Is there any particular reason why you wish to have outlook connectivity?

      I think the sunbird/thunderbird combination could work quite well. Outlook has a history of horrible security flaws, which should help in convincing companies into using alternative clients.

  3. can't resist and can't succeed by Bad+Move · · Score: 0, Funny

    Loser.

  4. Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by donnz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Licensed as open source under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) and the Mozilla Public License (MPL)".

    See, that's how it's done. Simple really and no need for weeks of backtracking, bullshit and misleading statements.

    --
    -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    1. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by arose · · Score: 1

      They know. They just seem to have other plans...

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by donnz · · Score: 1

      They just seem to have other plans...

      That's what I'm afraid of.

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    3. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by ievans · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're seriously comparing an abandoned webmail program to an entire OS? Patents and possible infringements are not really an issue with this kind of software, and wouldn't be covered by either the LGPL or the MPL anyway.

      I guarantee you the process of clearing the IP for OpenSolaris was a hell of a lot more complicated than for this project.

      There's been no confusion on Sun's part about the release of OpenSolaris. Some very visible people expressed their dislike that OpenSolaris wasn't GPL'd, and that the patent grant is only for CDDL projects (a license that explicitly deals with patents--coincidence?). Ok, fair enough. You can't please everybody. If you don't like the license or the software, don't use it. The paranoia and sour-grapes about the CDDL/OpenSolaris is truly bizarre. Did McNealy kick Perens' dog or something?

      On Slashdot, Sun's actions are interpreted as simultaneously clueless and methodically sinister. It's more annoying than anything else, as the collective business wisdom here on Slashdot over the years has been impressively wrong.

      Full disclosure: I work for Sun, but not on anything to do with Solaris. I don't speak for Sun in any way.

    4. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by donnz · · Score: 1

      Well, at the risk of starting a flame war I'll bite :-)

      I guarantee you the process of clearing the IP for OpenSolaris was a hell of a lot more complicated than for this project.

      So what?

      Having done all the hard work why throw it away in what appears to many of us to be a honeypot entrapment wheeze. Remember, we are still smarting from SCO's attacks which were well financed by MS and Sun, the latter has also reached a very lucrative settlement with MS. I think a little paranoia is justified. Just look through Sun's own press releases to see how this initiative was being spun verses reality. You said, "If you don't like the license or the software, don't use it.". I say, fine, but please don't expect people to come jumping to your defence when you misrepresent your actions or not be confused.

      It's more annoying than anything else, as the collective business wisdom here on Slashdot over the years has been impressively wrong.

      No doubt. But we are not alone there.

      I don't speak for Sun in any way.

      So I noticed.

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    5. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Full disclosure: I work for Sun, but not on anything to do with Solaris. I don't speak for Sun in any way.


      Right, you just happen to mindlessly agree with everything Sun does and, hey look surprise, you think Slashdot is always wrong.

    6. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by Xross_Ied · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You're seriously comparing an abandoned webmail program to an entire OS?


      You sir are trolling.

      I know of two colleges in the lower mainland of BC, Canada that are using NetMail in production for the last 4years (provide email to all students). One of these colleges just bought a new portal system that comes bundled with SunOne messaging server (email integrated portal) and they still stuck with NetMail for email. Why? Out of the box it is designed with features that make an admin's life easier (think seamless email quotas, etc).

      w.r.t to the rest of your comments about Sun..
      They still stick to an attitude and culture that is elitiest and down right snotty.
      Reminds me of IBM in the 70s.
      I don't know if Sun will survive; they claim they want to be a services company but still want to sell hardware+software bundles while VARs provide the real services.
      --
      This sig space tolet, reasonable rate.
    7. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Their plans are to _prevent_ patent lawsuits, not cause them. Read this blog entry. In short, the FUD mongers are wrong.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    8. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      From what I understand of the deal, Sun had to deal with SCO for the sake of legally releasing OpenSolaris under the CDDL (you know, lawyers and stuff get in the way sometimes). It had nothing to do with SCO's asinine attacks against Linux.

    9. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by donnz · · Score: 1

      You mean because someone (SunMink? who s/he?) writes a blog saying they promise to be nice the "FUD mongers are wrong". Comeon.

      If Sun wants to extend it's sandpit alittle that's fine. Sun is not doing what they claimed they were doing. The are not making the largest number of patents available to the open source community evah!, they are not "releasing Solaris" to the community at large. End of story.

      Today the news from Sun is all "oh, if you don't like our licence don't use it". Fine, but on flip side of that, Sun, is stop pretending to be doing something you are not.

      Contrast this with Sun's supposed approach being trailed in January thusly - "Contrary to what some pundits expected, Sun will truly open source Solaris in a big way" (The register). This reportage was based on Sun's own press belly thumping press releases, crowing about being the biggest patent / code contributers to the open source community since Eve took a bite out of the apple. Only, that's not the case, is it.

      *Obviously* Sun wants to prevent lawsuits against those good people that give them some code. But really, I found nothing in that blog to reassure me that Sun won't one day turn into another SCO - maybe once all the nice people that work there have gone or Microsoft proxies have bought the last of your $4 shares.

      There are ways of doing this, Sun knows that, they are not stupid, but in this case they have been well and truely rumbled.

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    10. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Abandoned like?

      ROTFL. Its the only food you get dear troll.

    11. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I was interested in java3d recently on my mac os x. I am one real customer of Java products as I licensed Thinkfree office etc. I see Sun on every risky environment etc, having respect to it... not that clueless to bite Sun all the time.

      You guys have better stuff to do instead of trolling slashdot. First of all, make god damn Webstart easier for implementing. You got such a technology while even NASA couldn't find a way to implement it and forced people to download/install Mars stuff by hand.

      Solaris is getting cursing on Slashdot? Eh, all the products I use, pay for gets bad words in slashdot comments. There are people who even downmods my comments about realplayer 10, Omniweb. Just click on my name, see all those cencors (flamebaits)

      If you really work for Sun, you aren't Sun PR manager to reply every Sun comment with false information. Go to myrealbox and see how many users and uptime that "abandoned" programs beta has.

      I don't think you are doing any good to company you work for.

    12. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by ievans · · Score: 1

      I'm not trolling. Fine, it's not an abandoned product. Regardless, comparing the IP issues of such a relatively simple software package with an OS is naive.

    13. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by SunFan · · Score: 1

      You mean because someone (SunMink? who s/he?) writes a blog saying they promise to be nice the "FUD mongers are wrong". Comeon.

      SunMink is Simon Phipps, an executive at Sun who writes on the same level as Groklaw. Not knee-jerk stuff, not OSRM insurance sales pitches.

      Sun is populating OpenSolaris with its own patent portfolio via the CDDL to protect it from litigation. OpenSolaris will have its own IP asset base to put it on par with other patent holders, so, if someone decides to sue, OpenSolaris is very defensible. This is really a good position to be in.

      Sun competes in the real world. They have to face the realities of software patents--for better and worse. They exist among other massive IP holders like Microsoft, IBM, HP, GE, etc. They want to make sure OpenSolaris is given what it needs to survive in a world where patents and "cease and desist" letters are like nuclear weapons. Also, they are taking the mangled and long-worn minefield of UNIX' history, and opening it once and for all. This is not trivial stuff!

      You have to ask yourself what Sun really has to gain by becoming losers like SCO. Is pissing off the world something to gain?!? Let them prove themselves in their actions. Historically, when has Sun ever sued an open source project? Why are they a Red Hat and SuSE reseller? Why is their Java Desktop System supported on both Linux and Solaris? Why does their SunRay server software now run on Linux? Why does their Java Enterprise software run on Linux? Why are Sun selling a million Linux desktop systems to China?

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    14. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by ievans · · Score: 1

      I'm not interested in a flame war, either.

      As somebody else pointed out, Sun's SCO license payment was so they could release Solaris under the CDDL. They didn't say that at the time because they were still in the process of clearing all the licenses.

    15. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      Sun's payment to SCO was to finance FUD about Linux.

      SCO does not own copyrights on any code that appears in Sun's OS. Sun would surely have known this.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    16. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by donnz · · Score: 1

      Let them prove themselves in their actions.

      I think that's the point we are both making.

      It's when action contradict words, honestly Sun's CEO seems to flip flop more often than John Kerry on the FOSS stuff. I certainly hope for some really clear direction and leadership from Sun, they have some really cool stuff, clever and clued up people and certainly the tone seems to have changed over the last week or three. In a way, it is a shame that Sun have let the thunder be stolen from under their feet by Novell and others when they could be in such a strong position WRT FOSS. Sun needs to ask themselves why there has been such a strong reaction to their recent announcements - it is certainly not (at least on my part) because we feel an inherent need to bash Sun.

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    17. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by ievans · · Score: 1

      Not true. The deal had provisions to allow Sun to release Solaris's source under a license that provided indemnification.

      This article describes why Sun needed to get the additional license.

    18. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by donnz · · Score: 1

      From the article:
      Sun is mum on particulars,

      so it doesn't really say "why" at all.

      but it has said it licensed additional rights in a 2003 deal in which it paid SCO $9.3 million.

      Really, this raises more questions than it answers. Maybe it helps explains why CDDL is such an abortive and messy process. I suppose some of those particulars could have been "keep this stuff away from Linux and in no way whatsoever compromise our case against IBM". It seems like a bad deal for Sun and they still end up looking like bad guys :-(

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    19. Re:Released as LGPL - Are you watching, Sun...? by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      It is not clear at all that SCO even owns any rights to sell.

      Sun payed for FUD, pure and simple.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
  5. And the reason? by Infinityis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So what's the rationale behind this? Is it basically the same as catching a fish and throwning it back becasue it was too little? Not enough profits? Are they hoping that open source developers will make as user friendly as Gmail?

    Also, how exactly do they transfer it over to open source? Will company employees still head up the project, or do they just pick some leader in the OSS community and declare a project leader?

    1. Re:And the reason? by Stanistani · · Score: 1

      >Is it basically the same as catching a fish and throwning it back becasue it was too little?

      Catch, beta, and release?

      Seriously, though, I like seeing Corps release code under the GPL, but hope that more large, profitable applications are to follow... imagine the possible extensions and innovation possible.

    2. Re:And the reason? by dameron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is a total stab in the dark but I'm guessing they're really going to be pushing their OpenExchange solution instead.

      -dameron

    3. Re:And the reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would they push that? OpenExchange was something SuSE offered (SuSE didn't even write it, it was someone elses project that SuSE simply bundled)

      they're more likely just going to continue pushing GroupWise

    4. Re:And the reason? by denissmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rumors, and they are really only rumors, are that the new Novell strategy is to migrate the old Netware services, which are a fairly complete and easily managed set of directory, print and Groupware services, to Linux. This is to stave off the inroads that Microsoft has been making in large companies who need these services. Some of these new services will be open source, like this announcement - some may remain proprietary. Basically Novell needs to move its existing clients onto Linux, while keeping them Novell clients. Its a risky strategy, if the rumors are correct, but a wise one. Microsoft has spent 20 years announcing that they have x or y in the pipe that will eliminate the need for a Novell solution, and eventually (like Active Directory) they implement something, this is Novell moving ahead again.

      --
      I have nothing to hide. So, why are you spying on me?
    5. Re:And the reason? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      They thought a program like this would go great with poor documentation and inadequate maintenance. After reading this slashdot article they figured OSS was the way to go.

    6. Re:And the reason? by Bradac_55 · · Score: 1

      "They're more likely just going to continue pushing GroupWise"

      Exactly, I've managed large Exchange and GroupWise rollouts and I'll pick GroupWise *any* day over Exchange. I've been in love with the NetAdmin backend for years; Active Directory+Exchange is simply a poor step cousin.

      I would also love to see Novell open up parts of GW so that we can get a decent front end that competes with Outlook if they would port NetAdim to their new Novell Linux Server product (Consule1 is Java based and at the mercy of Sun) .
      - Brad

    7. Re:And the reason? by Klivian · · Score: 1

      At my previous job we used for GroupWise some time. But we merged with another company, and had to go for one common solution for several sites. For some reason they chose Exchange/Outlook, but we were luky. This was aproximatly something like a month before "I Love you" struck, about a week or so later we used Notes:-) Never got any experience on Exchange.

    8. Re:And the reason? by Nat+Friedman · · Score: 5, Interesting


      Open source hasn't yet succeeded in building a collaboration server that people can actually use in a variety of settings. We want to fill this gap with Hula.

      We believe that people mainly just want the basics: mail, calendaring, addressbook, maybe shared documents.

      The dominant solutions today -- Exchange and Notes -- are built on a 20-year old design that predates the web. They were intended to be platforms on which you could build tools like expense processing, vacation requests, and other things. This was called "workflow."

      Today, those functions are all done on internal web sites. It's just better. Who wants to build on the Exchnage "platform" if they don't have to?

      But still companies are stuck with these hopelessly big, complex servers, just to do basic email and calendaring. They are expensive, they are heavyweight. They overdeliver.

      So what we want to build with Hula is, in a way, the "Firefox" of collaboration servers. Do the basics, and do them extremely well. Provide an extension system so other people can add things if they want.

      Dave Camp is the maintainer of Hula; he has a lot of experience in open source and we think he'll guide the project well. Many of the Novell engineers behind the original code (notably David Smith and Rodney Price) are working on the Hula project and will continue to work on it.

      We're serious about making Hula work. Stop by #hula on freenode if you want to meet us.

    9. Re:And the reason? by swerk · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a (newish, but still) software engineer at Novell, and I'd like to answer your questions quickly from my little point of view.

      The rationale behind this is that we'd like to put out something that's simple at first but can seed an ecosystem of its own, and, with some luck, one day become "the Apache of collaboration". Netmail was a good fit because there were very few issues IP-wise in releasing the code, and because it's a young and extensible base that has the potential to evolve into a killer enterprise-level system. If we were to open up GroupWise, for example, (if that were even possible, which it isn't) we'd be saying to the world "hey, come on and help out with our finished, mature product", which isn't nearly as stimulating as "hey, come on and help shape the future of collaboration!" The latter may be a smidge optimistic, but that's honestly what we're shooting for, if I understand Nat correctly.

      As for transferring development of Netmail to the open Hula project, here's what I know and (I hope!) am allowed to say: Netmail was a very small team. The Hula team is bigger. So no, we're not just tossing it out and watching to see who in the OSS community should be the project leader. It's still our project, though everybody is free to fork if they decide we're headed in the wrong direction. That does two things: it forces us to stay honest and on the up-and-up with the OSS community, and (as of right now, no turning back) it gives to the world a useful piece of free software that can and will get more and more useful over time.

      There was a joke made in the hallways here (and possibly elsewhere in these comments) in reference to South Park. Step 1: Release Hula. Step 2: ??? Step 3: Profit!

      Step 2 is to play the game right, to give OSS folks what they want and what they need to help us build (or build themselves, if they so desire) a really sweet communications system. Something that there would be demand for at the enterprise level. Right now, Hula is mail and calendar. A year from now, I would be very surprised if it did not include IM, some form of VOIP, and some things I can't even imagine right now. Apache, QT, MySQL, and so on have shown that there is money to be made from a free-as-in-speech, free-as-in-beer tool if: 1) It's good, and 2) An ecosystem develops around it. That money, of course, is what Novell is looking for in the end, and I've got to say I'm pretty excited to see the way we're going after it. Microsoft built a proprietary community around Exchange, and it has dominated collaboration for years. I'm rooting for Hula's free, open community that was officially born today.

      So there's two cents from a rookie Novell programmer.

    10. Re:And the reason? by nine-times · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Of course, we all can't know exactly what the top-execs are really thinking, what's PR and what's for real, but I for one am glad to hear Novell has at least an rookie programmer with that sort of optimism about FOSS. I just hope your attitude is indicative of the general tone over there.

      All public indications are that Novell's participation in open-source communities is in earnest, and they've been releasing some pretty good stuff to GPL (YaST, Ximian Exchange connector, now this). I'm really hoping y'all over at Novell succeed in showing that it's possible to play nice, contribute to FOSS, and still get past that old "2) ????" step and see some profit. It could provide a good contrast to other companies who seem to feel like they need to screw over everyone else and stifle their competition in order to succeed.

      Anyway, have fun storming the castle!

    11. Re:And the reason? by Bradac_55 · · Score: 1

      You were lucky; Lotus Notes is an excellent package if you can afford the price tag. I would recommend it over GroupWise except for the big price tag (your also getting the IBM services and the DB backend for that price). Both of those packages blow's Exchange out of the water on the backend but MS has a much slicker front end via Outlook. - Brad

    12. Re:And the reason? by T-Ranger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wait a couple of months. The decent front end is Evolution, and /. has reported that Novell has hired on staff to do a Windows port.

    13. Re:And the reason? by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >So what's the rationale behind this?

      They're pissing in the groupware well. A competitor makes a lot of money from their groupware product, they're trying to "cut off their oxygen supply" by supplying a free alternative.

      Just like MS destroyed Netscape by giving away IE.

      Just like Sun is trying to devalue MS Office via Open Office.

    14. Re:And the reason? by Bradac_55 · · Score: 1

      Cool I've been using Evolution on Suse Pro/Novell Desktop Linux for awhile now and I really like it.
      I've been hoping they would release a Windows version.

      - Brad

    15. Re:And the reason? by ThinkTiM · · Score: 1

      It was "2) ???" - 3 ?'s are hard enough - don't make it harder.

    16. Re:And the reason? by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1
      As someone at a Netmail site, and with a good amount of experience with Novell products, I'm glad to see this happen, rather than just ditching the product. It prevents all-or-nothing business case situations, and it gives clients some security and Novell some flexibility.

      I hope the result is a lot of work on the Evolution client for Windows, and on the Groupwise backend. Novell is in danger of Exchange getting out ahead of it on the technical underpinnings. Single mailbox restore is pretty critical - single message restore would be even better. Not needing to access post offices via file shares to use the admin tools would be a big plus, etc. Groupwise has been stable because it hasn't gone through a lot of needless rewriting, but it's in danger of falling behind now, I think,

    17. Re:And the reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      opengroupware.org has some of the features that you mention. What are the differences between hula and opengroupware?

    18. Re:And the reason? by eric_brissette · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with opengroupware.org, but it looks like it's a *nix only application.

      It looks like Hula will work on any platfrom that has a current standards compliant web browser available on it.

    19. Re:And the reason? by Whitemice · · Score: 1

      >Open source hasn't yet succeeded in building a
      collaboration server that people can actually use in a variety of settings. We want to fill this gap with Hula.

      I happen to disagree; the OpenGroupware.Org server works for us and lots of other people. Supported in Evolution, Kontact, and supports iCalendar clients like MozCal.

      And they have a general purpose groupware protocol (GroupDAV), WebDAV access to project documents, and an XML-RPC API.

      --
      Using "Common Sense" is being either to arrogant or to ignorant to ask people who know more about something than you.
    20. Re:And the reason? by passthecrackpipe · · Score: 1

      And openxchange doesn't fit the bill because....? There is already a previous relationship that is pretty strong (SUSE, as you well know), a good product, that has seen some serious market usage, and a very solid, functionally complete featureset i.e. everything that is there is there for a good reason, minimal bloat. It is also Open Source.

      Seems to me that openxchange does all the stuff you list, and more. Except that openexchange also potentially competes with edirectory, Ifolder, Iprint, and some of the other stuff coming from Novell. Maybe I am wrong, please correct me.

      --
      People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
    21. Re:And the reason? by Penis_Envy · · Score: 1

      I have to say that I was not very impressed with opengroupware. It is very big and bulky. I was very impressed with at how easily I compiled and installed Hula. One of the goals (it seems) with Hula is to add the iCalendar/groupdav/webdav whatever portion.

      They both have their place, but I like the idea of a more lightweight solution, as all I really desire is calendar, mail, and contacts. There are other products that can fill the collaborative work function.

  6. Why the silly names ? :( by rfinnvik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do people insist on calling these projects such silly names ? :P I've been trying to get my company to go with NetMail, but... Hula ? My boss will just laugh at me:(

    1. Re:Why the silly names ? :( by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Novell exec being asked to open source something significant quoting Timon from The Lion King:

      "what do you want me to do, dress in drag and do the hula?"

      Awww shoot...here come the reps from the rat house in Anaheim. Hopefully they won't sue.

    2. Re:Why the silly names ? :( by natrius · · Score: 1

      From the Hula FAQ: "Novell has indicated that the Hula codebase will form the basis for future versions of NetMail or a NetMail successor product." They're not selling Hula. They're selling NetMail. It's a Netscape-esque kind of thing.

    3. Re:Why the silly names ? :( by killjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Word!.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    4. Re:Why the silly names ? :( by flacco · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why do people insist on calling these projects such silly names ? :P I've been trying to get my company to go with NetMail, but... Hula ? My boss will just laugh at me:(

      just make up an important-sounding acronym:

      High-end Ultimate Life Assistant.

      ok, that sucks. make up your own.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    5. Re:Why the silly names ? :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think Novell should have called it UFIA.

      /got nuthin

    6. Re:Why the silly names ? :( by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

      Their close proximity to Akamai must be wearing off on them.

    7. Re:Why the silly names ? :( by eric_brissette · · Score: 1

      Idunno, I kinda like the name Hula. It'll fit well with the Mambo content management system.

    8. Re:Why the silly names ? :( by swerk · · Score: 1

      Trust me, "Hula" is good, compared to the other names that were considered. (I'm straining my brain to remember, "bongo" was one, I think.) I thought it was a bit silly too, but it's grown on me very quickly. As was pointed out during a presentation where we (here at Novell) were introduced to the concept, it's ridiculously hard to snag a good name that isn't already trademarked. We could do NOCS for Novell Open Collaboration Server/Suite/System, but what if Red Hat snuck up on us and announced ROCS? ;^) Oh, to have had a tape recorder on me during those in-the-hallway chats after the internal presentation...

      Anyway, silly name or no, I've been pretty excited about Hula, and it's sweet to see some excitement over it here on /. as well.

  7. nuts for webmail by eh2o · · Score: 2, Insightful

    hopefully this app will work better than a certain other webmail named after a rodent with a big bushy tail.

    1. Re:nuts for webmail by boomgopher · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do tell, why don't you like our ChewbaccaMail product?


      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    2. Re:nuts for webmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha ha ha HAHAHAHAA AHAA. You are so funny! STAR wars jokes!

    3. Re:nuts for webmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I work at a University that will remain nameless with 20,000+ students using Netmail as it's student email system, and to quote the admin:

      "I could replace it with SquirrelMail, and they'd never notice the difference... except that it would run faster."

    4. Re:nuts for webmail by barc0001 · · Score: 3

      That statement implies you find something drastically wrong with Squirrelmail. Care to let us in on it, or shall we just chalk this up to unsubstantiated FUD?
      I use the Squirrel and find very few issues with it. A couple of people at my company have gone so far as to give up standalone mail clients completely, and just use Squirrelmail, and they have no complaints with it.

    5. Re:nuts for webmail by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The only thing wrong with squirrelmail is that the interface sucks. That and, when I put in the encryption stuff and followed the directions to the letter, I got errors all over my mail windows though the encryption does seem to work.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:nuts for webmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It eats up ram and cpu time like a zombie Reagan chewing his way through an all you can eat buffet of cheap steak and junk bonks. Two or three users was enough to take a trial install on an ultra-60 (dual proc, 1gb ram) to its knees in our experience. And like the other reply said, the user interface is a close adherent of the Mystery Meat Navigation and Angry Fruit Salad Color Scheme design schools.

    7. Re:nuts for webmail by eh2o · · Score: 1

      I used squirrelmail exclusively for about 1 year before I dropped it out of frustration. My job description also requires that I occasionally handle end-user tech support and I can say that Squirrelmail has always been problematic.

      The #1 problem is that it chokes when the number of messages in a folder becomes large, which is all to common these days with the volume of spam, mailing lists, notifications, etc. A common symptom is the inability to login, which requires administrative action or use of another email client to "drain the wound". Secondary issues include improper handling of IMAP errors -- some errors are transient or temporary failures and should be retried, but instead SM prints a cryptic message resulting in yet another call to tech support; also some features and extensions have been chronically broken (sent subfolders) or have a terrible implementations (rbl and spam filters) or rely on ugly hacks to get client-side functionality to run on the server (gpg keys). There are also some quirks, like how the messages which match multiple filter conditions result in incorrect new-message counts for non-terminal matching conditions. Finally I could complain about how the interface sucks, e.g., its difficult to open multiple windows because the frame set names collide. There were also some strange things that I could never quite figure out, like how "Delete and Move Next / Prev" would sometimes move unpredictably either forward or backward in time. And generally, I got really frustrated by how slow everything was due to the http lag (even with the server on the local network), especially when there were a lot of messages to review.

      That said Squirrelmail is a very successful app, and a lot of folks use it. But I've been hoping for something better for a long time. For now I've given up completely on webmail (gmail is not an option for professional use). For a while I used Evolution, and now Thunderbird.

    8. Re:nuts for webmail by richlv · · Score: 1

      you've got something extremely wrong. don't you think nobody would be using it ? :)

      my experience with sm is limited, only approx 20 concurrent users on a 233mhz/256mb system, but i haven't seen any noticeable load on that box.

      the biggest problem i have with sm - upgrading. it's a pia. basically, you have to reinstall & reconfigure every plugin manually if you want to make sure everything will work ok (and having 10 of them isn't the best situation).

      --
      Rich
    9. Re:nuts for webmail by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      SM locks my webserver up if any user with >2000 inbox messages tries to log in. inevitably it hits a PHP timeout. It's not an I/O problem, mail messages are stored in SQL and retrieval is lightning fast in standalone clients. Something about the imap parser is a huge performance drag.

      Luckily there are very few of those kind of users on my system, and they're all savvy enough to shell in and use mutt.

  8. Integration by Albanach · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For a long time I've thought that a calendar server that integrates with Outlook is the missing killer app for open source. Then we hear Evolution will be ported to windows, and an Outlook replacement is suddenly available. With OpenOffice we'll have a complete open source office and groupware suite.

    Of course life is never that simple, and there's a new target for integration - cell phones. PDA sales are declining fast as the cell phone becomes the computer for outside the office. Most rhe big names, Sony, Nokia, Motarola have been offering a calendar for some time and recent ones will happily sync with Outlook. If we can have an open source calendar server that has a good web interface as well as a desktop application like Outlook and a hook into the big name mobile phones, then we'll have all the angles covered.

    1. Re:Integration by embsysdev · · Score: 1

      While PDA sales may be declining, smartphones (those with PDA attributes) are increasing. Besides, a plain phone doesn't sound an alarm when you have a meeting in 5 minutes. Also, web mail is clunky enough on a desktop. I imagine it's horrible on a crappy browser with a 2 inch screen.

    2. Re:Integration by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      SyncML is supposed to be the glue between smart phone and the world

      but good luck with that, my Nokia helpfully converts the XML to somem crazy binary format. I've tried reading the copious 9and I mean copious) docs from the SyncML group and W3. I've captured the binary and chucked it into a HEX viewer but I'm convinced that they've pulled an MS and implemented a format that's the same but different such that I can't decode it (or perhaps it's me)

      I've found SyncML programs that do the ASCII/utf-8 version of SyncML but the phone doesn't like it.

      The only Smarts I wanted from my phone was the ability to auto-feed my ebay auctions into the calendar and set alarms. Even Python for Symbian is locked out of the calendar database. This story hints towards and even bleaker future where I am locked out of tinkering with my own data for want of a, no doubt pricey, certificate :

      But the most controversial aspect of Series 60 v3 has clearly been introduced at the request of nervous operators: certification. Applications without certification won't be able to reach into the address book or use connectivity facilities.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:Integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is already such a solution. It's called Scalix. It has full Exchange mode support for Outlook.

      http://www.scalix.com/

    4. Re:Integration by Torulf · · Score: 1

      I think you are referring to this standard:
      http://www.w3.org/TR/wbxml/

      Hope that page helps you.

    5. Re:Integration by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      read, re-read, understood, no help =)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  9. Novel netmail crashed a lot by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1, Informative

    And I lost several important emails even the guy from Novel tried hard to recover data as his time permitted.

    Hope this step could change it.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    1. Re:Novel netmail crashed a lot by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I used Myrealbox for YEARS and it was ALWAYS beta/unstable as thats why myrealbox is free and clearly stated at www.myrealbox.com. Never seen ONE unplanned downtime.

      Call Novell ANYTHING but never unstable.

      Lazy to find but there was a machine running novell for 4 or more years straight in an university which was -literally- lost.

      BTW, people calling Novell dead, ahem ask Wal Mart what they use. Or what huge airport/ticketing networks use...

      A system not running on your Dell or at your geek friends basement doesn't mean its dead.

  10. a reliable alternative to microsoft outlook by geekschmoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really hope this turns into a reliable alternative to Outlook. Every manager will tell you that they need/rely on Outlook calendering functions.

    And every time the server goes down almost every nerd at the place I work (99% UNIX shop) says something about how we need a unix mail server. But that already exists. We need an open source calender server.

    Does something like this exist already or is it in the works? Last time I looked I couldn't find anything comparable.

    1. Re:a reliable alternative to microsoft outlook by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      We need an open source calender server. Does something like this exist already or is it in the works? Last time I looked I couldn't find anything comparable.

      Exchange stores everything as a message... calendar items, tasks, etc.

      There are already high quality scalable email systems (Cyrus). With PAM/SASL you can link that to an LDAP system (even Active Directory). Cyrus even allows for public folders and granular access control on mailboxes.

      So how long before someone modifies Cyrus and/or a mail client to save calendar items as a regular IMAP message? Seems this is quite a bit easier that creating a whole new client/server model for calendaring, although perhaps IMAP isn't designed for this kind of thing.

      You'd still need a service to run regularly and update each user's free/busy info, just like Exchange does -- it's stored in the public folders.

    2. Re:a reliable alternative to microsoft outlook by pierpa · · Score: 1

      your question is widely answered at this link.

      to summarize... yes: there are at least two alternatives: opengroupware + cyrus and suse's opengroupware (cyrus + openldap + comfire). for client side: kontact (korganizer) is desktop ready. it is difficult to enable (and has many flaws at my advice) for workgroup environment, but is a very good for everyday scheduling, overall if integrated with palm (via kpilot).

    3. Re:a reliable alternative to microsoft outlook by blackhaze · · Score: 1

      Checkout @Mail - http://atmail.com/ - This is an Outlook replacement for WebMail, Calendar and Outlook Sync support for Shared data ( Calendar, Addressbook data )

    4. Re:a reliable alternative to microsoft outlook by fejjie · · Score: 1

      Evolution (also by Novell) is an Outlook client replacement that runs on UNIX and is being ported to Win32.

    5. Re:a reliable alternative to microsoft outlook by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      In fact, storing that kind of data in IMAP messages is how Kolab works. (at least, so far as I know)

      IMAP is a very rich protocol for handling mail messages. But calander items, task lists and what not are not mail messages. So you have a meeting stored in IMAP. "Tell me what meetings Bob is scheduled for" requires a linear search through all the messages. So you make a change to a meeting, you have to pass around an entire message. Sure, its all linear store somewhere, but you should have something that is at least moderatly desigined for the data it holds. Indexed fields. Being able to pass around "diffs". Kolab using IMAP is a quick and dirty hack.

    6. Re:a reliable alternative to microsoft outlook by Whitemice · · Score: 1

      >We need an open source calender server.

      http://www.opengroupware.org

      Outlook connectors, DAV access to project documents, iCalendar client supports. And beta but operational support in Evolution and Kontact (via GroupDAV).

      --
      Using "Common Sense" is being either to arrogant or to ignorant to ask people who know more about something than you.
  11. CalDAV vs. webcal:// ? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

    Are they the same thing?

    That is, in iCal which uses WebDAV to store .ics files, I can subscribe to various calendars via webcal:// URLs.

    Is CalDAV the 'official' way of doing this?

    1. Re:CalDAV vs. webcal:// ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Search Google for the CalDAV draft.

      CalDAV has not even been released to the general public, all references to CalDAV clients and servers are currently marketing bla bla.

  12. Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to remind everyone that the Citadel project has a complete, robust, flexible open source groupware server that, unlike Hula, is not abandonware. And, it works today, has developers actively working on it, contains a high-performance standalone messaging engine, does IMAP, calendaring (with support for upcoming versions of Kontact and Evolution built-in thanks to GroupDAV), a nice web-based front end, and all the other stuff you expect. Go check it out.

    By the way, CalDAV is starting to become widely regarded as too cumbersome to implement properly. GroupDAV is the upcoming standard -- not only is it simpler to implement (resulting in fewer buggy implementations) but it also supports all the usual groupware object types -- not only calendars, but tasks, contacts (using vCard), etc. GroupDAV support is currently in beta for Kontact, Evolution, Citadel, and OpenGroupware.org. Go check that out too.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  13. It's Mature Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I see on their Calendar idea mind map, in the lower left is 'Rob Secretary'

    1. Re:It's Mature Too by JimmehAH · · Score: 1

      Looks to me like it says 'Robo Secretary'.

      I don't know which is more mature.

    2. Re:It's Mature Too by Nat+Friedman · · Score: 2, Informative


      That's "robo secretary". It's an idea for a feature. We couldn't think of what to call it.

      See the "robosecretary" part on this page:
      http://www.hula-project.org/index.php/Text_ Interfa ce

  14. How many lines for.. by linuxbeta · · Score: 1

    How many lines for Novell Linux?

  15. And it shows... by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. because if you were, and you tried to roll out an IT infrastructure that did *not* have integrated email and calendaring, you would likely be fired.

    Seriously, if you have worked at any even moderately-sized organization, you would know that this is essential. There are people I work with, who I know would be totally unable to function without this kind of integration. And I don't blame them either - if I had to be in that many meetings / week, I would need it as well.

    1. Re:And it shows... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not saying that the functionality cannot be integrated. I'm saying that the services do not need to be tightly coupled and made into one to acheive that integration.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    2. Re:And it shows... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      It is normally difficult to achieve the level of integration required without this tight coupling. It is not like there is this standard calendar API one could use.

      There is iCal, but all that is good for is the storing / retrieving calendars. That is a starting point for integration, but it is one step on a mile long journey.

      This is why you have all kinds of Open Source PIM suites out there ( Kontact, Evolution, OpenGroupware, etc ), but you can't easily do something like use Thunderbird for your email and Evolution for the calendaring - it just doesn't work. There is too much data that needs to be shared.

    3. Re:And it shows... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      *sigh* It's obvious that I haven't had much dealings with most non-techie exchange-using types, but first of all it would seem to me that it would be easy enough to put the e-mail integration in a calendar application--just use the generic 'mail' command.

      But I'll concede that exchange has created and firmed this association to the point where the level of integration required is more than even the level of integration that a word processor and a spreadsheet need.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    4. Re:And it shows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Says you.

      The hundreds of millions of employees of businesses around the world using Outlook would likely disagree. But as you said, you're not an "enterprise admin," so you've already admitted to having no idea what you're talking about.

    5. Re:And it shows... by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Lotus Notes was the first, and still popular mail,calendar,pim app.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    6. Re:And it shows... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I guess more than a few places are using Sun's calendaring application without attaching it right to email. Notifications go to the email when there is something to do on the calendar server, and it's all java web-based so you can use it from wherever. I don't see any reason they have to be linked, if you can get people to read their email.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:And it shows... by aaronl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amazingly enough, it is in fact quite possible to input this data yourself. Plus, you get to save your company potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars. Just because it is possible to have a calendar without having it tightly integrated with email.

      Also quite interesting, is that I do run a network of a large number of machines, and nobody has ever seen the need to have this functionality. Everything that Outlook does can be done with seperate apps, and can often be done better. If the people you work with are so lazy/busy that they can't switch tasks to their calendar, then they likely aren't able to do their jobs anyway. Either that, or the IT department was completely inept in their implementation. Sounds to me like yet another case of it needing to be that way because that's the way it "always" was.

      In all honesty, the calendar integration with Outlook, Notes, and so many others is just convenient. It isn't at all necessary, as you can do everything within the calendar system and only use email for notifications.

      You only need the integration because Microsoft said so, and since Microsoft said so, it has to be that way. Of course, the Start menu is also the most efficient interface, and nothing could be better than Word for doing on-screen layout. *That* mentality is why software hasn't advanced much in so long.

      I know someone that deals with the occasional week that he has over fifty meetings, sometimes more. He'll sometimes have fifteen in a day. He uses a paper calendar and an appointment schedule for the day. This is possible because people that have that many meetings also tend to have an administrative assistant.

      The silly calendar integration has been a point to keep Microsoft entrenched for years, and the argument still is no better than when it started. There's a million reasons why it isn't necessary, and only one as to why it is.

    8. Re:And it shows... by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      .. because if you were, and you tried to roll out an IT infrastructure that did *not* have integrated email and calendaring, you would likely be fired.

      And this is, from my perspective, one of the major problems with corporate networks these days. Especially when paired with the one-size-fits-all mentality. I would rather they were kept separate as I, personally, have no problem using separate tools or logging on to separate systems.

      The college I work for uses Exchange Server with OWA as the way to access your e-mail - and all of the other gubbins as well. This is fine for people on the main site LAN.
      This is not so good for those of us in external centres on slow connections. We don't need the calendaring, we don't want the calendaring and we don't use the calendaring. However we're still forced to use the overblown full-on Outlook Web Access to check our e-mails via a shared 128K ISDN line. (They won't grant POP/SMTP/IMAP access, and Evolution+Connector still don't have a Windows port - I'd be using that otherwise)

      All we need here is a simple e-mail program. The whole "GroupWare" thing isn't needed, and slows down massively. (The office next door on a broadband connection still complains about the speed)
      But because people think that having it all integrated is the way forward, those of us stuck outside the fast internal network are saddled with a system that makes e-mail slow because it has to handle stuff we don't ever use.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  16. From the same company that brings you... by noblesse+oblige · · Score: 3, Informative
    ... Open Xchange...

    It would be interesting to catch the differences between the two, Open Xchange has a few more collaboration engines in it, namely a project manager and bulletin board.

    In full disclosure we plan on releasing OX in the office sometime soon after their .8 release. Especially now that it looks like they integrate with any IMAP server (freeing us from having to switch to Cyrus).

    --
    Some will always be above others. Destroy the equality today, and it will appear again tomorrow. --Ralph Waldo Emerson
    1. Re:From the same company that brings you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL. Open your eyes, first Novell dropped SLOX and now they dropped NetMail.

      They are just cleaning up their portfolio to have just Groupwise as their premier groupware server.

    2. Re:From the same company that brings you... by Vitriolix · · Score: 1

      there are now more dev's working on this than before... nice definition of "drop"

    3. Re:From the same company that brings you... by noblesse+oblige · · Score: 1

      He might be alluding to the SLOX->NOX migration.

      --
      Some will always be above others. Destroy the equality today, and it will appear again tomorrow. --Ralph Waldo Emerson
  17. Another one bites the dust by McSnickered · · Score: 1

    Looks like myrealbox.com just became myrealslowbox.com. Thanks /.!

    --
    They call me the working man. I guess that's what I am.
    1. Re:Another one bites the dust by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      True, man, KMail has been processing (eg spamassassin) my mail for at least one hour...

      --

      Your head a splode
  18. Wrong password count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look slike someones trying to break in. The 'wrong password' count is climbing pretty steady.

    2652 -> 2702 in about a minute.

  19. Backup? by lanc · · Score: 1



    Erm but you did have backup, didn't you?

    Learn it, HA is not enough, RAID is not enough, do your backups. Do your restoring praxises. Backup you r filesystems, databases.

    Be proactive. Use recent application bases (upgrade your php/sql/javacontainer/java). Set the debugging level high, and read your logs, analyze them. Monitor and control your system. Ah yes, and keep the KISS rule.

    --
    "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
    1. Re:Backup? by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      But I am only a user. And the servers were supposed to be somewhere several miles away from my building. The story was something like that.

      And I got no email for a whole day for several times, at the beginning I was happy, you know, no email no work.

      Then I got an email with only one line from my boss, "What do you think?" Then I replied "What what do you think?"

      Then my boss replied "My new idea, I sent you email. I need your feedback."

      "???...$%^&"

      Then one day later, an email from HelpDesk told me, "Sorry, our email system crashed and some of your data were failed to recover."

      The second time, we had a report due. We have someone cooperate with us 40 miles away. And we use email to communicate. I sent out my version, waited, waited and waited. I became angry and called that guy, "hey, what do you think?"

      "I sent you email several hours ago."

      "???...@#$%"

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  20. Re:Needed! open access app servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called security! I don't want to sync my iFolder somewhere I have no control over.

  21. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny meeting you here, Mr. Plugmeister!

  22. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by fejjie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hula isn't abandonware. It is anything *but*. You have no idea what you are talking about.

  23. Without Outlook connector.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .... You're not gonna be able to get any of these in a MS shop.

    Unfortunate but true.

    1. Re:Without Outlook connector.... by clickster · · Score: 1

      The mail and contacts features already work with Outlook. I'm assuming that they're still working on the Calendaring part.

      http://www.hula-project.org/index.php/FAQ

      Scroll down to the "Clients" area. They have a decent number of clients that work to some degree. Being a new project, I wouldn't expect it to have perfect connectivity to a wide range of clients just yet.

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    2. Re:Without Outlook connector.... by Penis_Envy · · Score: 1

      What are your thoghts on kicking outlook to the curb and using thunderbird/sunbird?

  24. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by trollzor · · Score: 2, Informative

    just don't show your boss the citadel logo on the page

  25. Re:Needed! open access app servers by fejjie · · Score: 1

    iFolder is peer-to-peer. (altho it can also be done via server)

    Hula is more than a webmail front-end, it is also the server.

  26. 200,000 lines of code! by remahl · · Score: 1

    That might sound impressive to a non-technical person. And sure, it is _a_lot_ of code! Only, a lot of code is not an asset, it's a liability.

    A web mail system at 200 KLOC sounds like a nightmare to maintain, both as a developer and as an administrator. I bet this was a corporate project that went horribly wrong somewhere and this is an attempt to cut some losses.

    1. Re:200,000 lines of code! by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      What?

      LOC does not determine how easy a project is to maintain. Design does. If the project is well designed then no matter how big it is it will be easier to maintain. I've worked on a bit of software that probably only had about 5000 LOC and it was a nightmare!

      200K LOC isn't even a particularly big project. The linux kernel has over 30 million.

    2. Re:200,000 lines of code! by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own post but I made a mistake on the SLOC in the kernel 30 million was in an entire distro.

      The kernel has about 4.2 million.

    3. Re:200,000 lines of code! by remahl · · Score: 1

      Of course I don't know how complex this web mail system is, but 200,000 lines _suggests_ a poor design with a lot of redundancy. I mainly object to the use of "200KLOC" in the heading to imply that this is an important project. Sheer code size doesn't mean anything -- design does, as you pointed out.

    4. Re:200,000 lines of code! by JudasBlue · · Score: 1

      Of course I don't know how complex this web mail system is, but 200,000 lines _suggests_ a poor design with a lot of redundancy.

      The two clauses of that sentence don't go together: "I don't know the thing I need to know in order to judge how many lines it should be, so I will assume it is bad."

      Actually, if you look at the product, it is fairly complex and comprehensive and 200KLOC looks very reasonable. It includes an imap system, pop system, interface systems, calendar systems, list managers and a whole host of other crap.

      As for judging things by their LOC, well, I kind of agree with you there, except for the immediate leap that the line count tells you the redundancy. Line count doesn't really tell you anything but line count until you have more information. And as such, shouldn't be touted in headlines one way or the other.

      --

      7. What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.

  27. Outlook integration - OpenConnector.Org by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 4, Interesting
    For a long time I've thought that a calendar server that integrates with Outlook is the missing killer app for open source.

    I thought so too, and started OpenConnector.Org a while ago to fix this.

    An Outlook connector would allow the thousands of Microsoft Outlook users to connect to a CalDAV calendar server or something like Hula

    Although we've come a long way with the OpenConnector project ( we now have a MAPI Message Store that loads, and lots of code to base the Transport Provider off of...) a full Outlook connector is still a lot more work. Most completed commercial connectors, I've heard are developed by a team of fulltime developers, so help is *always* needed. Even simple things like the network protocol library, which requires no knowledge of Outlook or MAPI.

    At any rate, I think it is a good time for internet calendaring, especially with CalDAV coming out with so much support ( OSA Foundation, Oracle, Mozilla, and many others... ), and on track ( 5 drafts in a few months ).

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  28. Still Waiting by JockAMundo · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for the Exchange killer. This look s close, but its still not there. As much as it pains me, I routinely recommend Exchange to my clients that need shared calendaring, shared contacts, a Windows client (no web stuff), and PDA sync. My clients are lawyers, accountants, and insurances agencies. All are huge users of all these features, and I can't just say "Use linux on the desktop". In the real world this all has to work in windows, and the only solution I can find in Exchange/Outlook.

    I wish the hula people good luck, but there is a long way to go to match Exchange in features.

    Let the flame war begin!

    1. Re:Still Waiting by tokamoka · · Score: 1

      Ever looked at Merak Mail Server? It does everything Exchange does (and more), and has the faint whiff of OSS code also. It's capabilities, and relative obscurity over exchange make it *well* worth a look if you're working with MS servers.

  29. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by natrius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's ok to suggest alternatives and all, but if you're going to criticize a project, at least learn something about it. Novell is basing future versions of NetMail on Hula. It's not so much abandoning as it is getting people to help them work on a project for free. Read the FAQ.

  30. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by Myddrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Funny that a standard that is a draft status is "too cumbersome". If you subscribe to the CalDAV development lists you'll see that they are trying very hard to keep the standard quite simple.

    --
    Myddrin
  31. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just checked my myrealbox account for the first time in about a year. over 500 spam messages...

  32. Code is broken/incompleate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I just pulled hula of their svn server and guess what? It doesn't compile. Apparently novel forgot to include definition of atomic_inc and atomic_dec macros. Has anyone else had this problem?

    For the sake of compleatness I'm building this on a nearly fresh fedora 3 box + reacent updates that I use for my daily work (devel). Novel claims no external dependencies are needes as can be seen here: http://www.hula-project.org/index.php/FAQ#Does_Hul a_have_any_significant_dependencies.3F

    1. Re:Code is broken/incompleate? by fejjie · · Score: 1

      This was brought up by Matt Wilson of Red Hat in the irc channel earlier today and I believe the Hula team is addressing the issue

      if I recall correctly, msw said that copying the kernel's asm/atomic.h into the apropriate location (/usr/include/asm or some such?) would fix the problem.

      Matt also had some Makefile.am fixes for systems with kerberos headers/libs in a location other than /usr

      you might try checking the irc channel for better/more accurate info (I'm going on memory of a discussion I skimmed 6 hours ago)

  33. nothing new by pierpa · · Score: 1

    openwebmail does already all of it, and much more, apart from having not being officially tested for heavy use.

    hula hasn't mail filter, so it cannot be considered as desktop replacement.

    gmail has the abstract of the first lines of the message, and nor hula neither any other opensource or closed source webmail application seems to have this simple feature.

    i couldn't see either if hula supports a javascript WYSIWYG rich text editor. or international spellchecking.

    i use openwebmail as desktop replacement (web)mail application so i can have my sent-email folder always synchronized independently if i work home, office or elsewhere.

    i wonder how many lines of code are needed to implement such features in hula or openwebmail.org...

    1. Re:nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mail Filtering is trivially implemented with the NMAP plugin protocol, a slight variant of IMAP

  34. The competition. Was: Abandonware. by Monkius · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It might not be abandonware, but I wouldn't bet my job or life on it.

    More importantly, for the things it claims to do now, Netmail/Hula will have to work very hard to be better than alternatives already out there:

    1. Sendmail, Qmail, Exim do SMTP, variously, *really well*

    2. Cyrus does IMAP *really well*

    3. They do this in a manner that scales horizontally across a cluster--I find Hula's scalability claims an invitation to scrutiny, but I wouldn't put 200,000 email accounts on one box, even if I could

    4. We have a wide variety of webmail solutions, I like Horde/IMP a lot.

    5. We lack, in part, an interoperable calendaring framework, which was the Citadel person's point. But we don't totally lack that either, cf OpenGroupware--and Netmail/Hula appears to be playing catch-up

    --
    Matt
  35. Death?? by sjwt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Or rebirth, think about it, the older usenet gets the less knowen and used it is becomeing these days, soon it wont be worth the time of spamers as only the l33t soto speek will b euseing usenet, and then the signle to noise ratio might rise just enough to have a decent arguemtn over whos the hotest starwars babe =>

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  36. Re:Too much Novell in GNOME? by cwoelz · · Score: 1

    I searched for other groupware servers in Footnotes, and at least OpenGroupware was subject of an article. No bias here. But Planet Gnome marketing really seems to be a little overboard...

  37. Fortunate enough? by oKtosiTe · · Score: 0

    Fortunate enough to have 10 MB of storage? Oooh... Aaah...

  38. native clients and desktop shell integration by flacco · · Score: 1
    there are scads of web-based mail/calendar/project applications. if you want acceptance from the average windows-monkey in business, it will take native clients, and shell integration - right-click context-menu stuff, a "my projects" folder in "my computer", drag/drop everywhere...

    who knows - once evolution is ported to windows, maybe we'll see progress on this front. a cross-platform native groupware client would be a huge win for desktop viability in businesses.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  39. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by Nat+Friedman · · Score: 5, Informative


    Hula is not abandonware. It is a project we have only started to invest in.

    Come by #hula on freenode, count the 20-25 Novell employees there, and then determine for yourself what kind of project it is.

  40. Wrong direction by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    The integration point is not for being bale to email from within the calendar app, it is for being able to import meeting events end invitaitons that people email you *into* your calendar. It is also for other people to be able to quickly and easily see your online state in the calendaring application while they are scheduling a meeting to which they want to invite you.

    There are numerous Open Source packages that do this quite well - there is no need for exchange here. But there *is* a need for the calendaring and mail client to be tightly integrated, and standardized across the company.

    1. Re:Wrong direction by jeffry_smith · · Score: 1

      Not really. IF they use the RFC's for calendar over e-mail (RFC 2445, written by MS, no less; and RFC 3283), you just have something like procmail properly distribute messages to the calendars, and have calendar program use mail to send notices. I've played around with doing this with mh and message-harmonized calendaring (http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/mhc)

      Interoperability depends on standard interfaces. Integration depends on dependencies. Both allow two systems to work together. The former allows ANY two programs to work together, and be upgradible separately (and ensures bugs in one don't cause bugs in the other). The latter creates "dependency hell" and "embrace and extend."

  41. BorderMangler by hendridm · · Score: 1

    I'm still holding out for the coveted BorderManager code. Not as comfotable, maybe, but much more gratifying than toilet paper.

  42. Capitalize on 'em! (was Why on silly names? ) by ediron2 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why do people insist on calling these projects such silly names ? :P I've been trying to get my company to go with NetMail, but... Hula ? My boss will just laugh at me:(
    Ah, you mean silly names like:

    Amiga or apple, bob or beowulf, cairo, dongles, EBCDIC or EULA's, FOSS, GoDaddy (I was the only one at my superbowl party to know what they sold/did before or after their ad), honeypots, intuit, java, the Kompany, lisp or LAMP, macintosh or mozilla, newegg or numega, outlook, python or perl or php-nuke, quark, raid, scsi (whether you pronounce it scuzzy or sexy), twiki or TeX, unix, vax, wifi or windows, x, yahoo, zip or zope?

    (forgive me, I know there are plenty of wierder names... my point is that any new brand name or jargon carries a risk of misinterpretation)

    Based on past experience, do like I do and say you think 'HULA' is an acronym. Better yet, slather on some business jargon or statistics. Your bosses will nod and and pretend to have read about it being the next new thing so they could claim credit for ordering you to use it. That's how I got to implement a LAMP server and a few other FOSS apps long before they'd trust Linux. Or how I got the ok for Numega. 'Raid'ing the important database drives scared one company's leadership until we explained it. One old boss was screamin' mad to find out that 'scuzzy' drives cost *more*. And one of my homebrewing friends got all excited when I mentioned I was helping put together a honeynet. Not that I blame him... free fermentables sound a lot more interesting than getting hacked on purpose.

    Speaking of which, it's beer-fiftynine. Gotta run!
    1. Re:Capitalize on 'em! (was Why on silly names? ) by Ian+Peon · · Score: 1

      A previous manager:

      "Whenever I throw problems at you, like how can I build a collaborative documentation system, you just mutter some wierd word, like Wiki, and have it done by the end of the day!"

  43. Chewbacca doesn't have a tail, you idiot. by wernst · · Score: 1

    At least, none that we can see. ;-)

  44. Makes good sense for Novell by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    If anyone can make a go of the Unix corporate desktop it is Novell. They understand the corporate environment like no other. Releasing this code strengthens their position.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  45. No one will care... Blackberry anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between Blackberry and Good, everyone wants to take Outlook with them. E-mail, calendars, contacts, the works. RIM on Blackberry, Good on Treos and Pocket PCs.

    Exchange is a no brainer. How you extend it is all the rage now.

  46. What sort of user store? (mailbox/maildir/other?) by Penis_Envy · · Score: 1

    What sort of user store do the default MTA and POP/IMAP services use? What store does it use for storing calendar objects and entries?

  47. Re:Too much Novell in GNOME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose this is because OpenGroupware.org actually _has_ the Noodle Evolution connector (as well as Kontact, Mozilla and Outlook connectors).

    Hula currently is just one additional web mail client - we have _meriads_ of that on Freshmeat. The website is little but "will have" "will do" "will have" and little actual "does".

    Granted, they have hired an excellent designer - which is important for Slashdot marketing - but this doesn't change anything about the actual server.

  48. A pity their products suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I maintain a handheld pop/imap client and imho Novell IMAP products are universally terrible at adhering to any standards whatsoever. Their interface is particularly buggy and voilates the RFC3501 (IMAP4rev1) so many times it has the dubious honour of being the only server our client attempts to detect...in order to engage the 20 or so work-arounds in our IMAP parser.

    Perhaps they hope the open source community can fix their crappy code? God I sure wish *somebody* would fix it as it would make my life easier...

    1. Re:A pity their products suck by fejjie · · Score: 1

      like what?

      Being that I'm the author of the IMAP code in Evolution, I've found a few niggles in GW's IMAP code but they have all been resolved and they are quite eager to fix any bugs you can find in their IMAP implementation.

    2. Re:A pity their products suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An author, not the author?

      Of course they're going to be more helpful to you, being the same company you'd hope they were?

    3. Re:A pity their products suck by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      If I was a developer like you, I would bypass this story e.g. ignore the comments. Especially "abandonware" "suck" ones.

      Hopefully Novell guys making this decision read these comments and have a clue who's hands they release that excellent code to.

      Just like Real Networks got their lesson ;)

  49. Re:The competition. Was: Abandonware. by dubl-u · · Score: 1

    It might not be abandonware, but I wouldn't bet my job or life on it.

    Betting your life on the choice of a webmail package? Who do you run servers for, General Zod?

  50. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats the relation to Open-Xchange? Since there are no Novell employees working on that, can we assume that it is abandonware?

    If I ask Novell for a groupware solution for my 500 user company, will they suggest:
    a) Groupwise
    b) Hula
    c) Open-Xchange
    ?

  51. Dear Novell, CEASE AND DESIST IMMEDIATLY... by MrIcee · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... or the Hawaiian Islands will be forced to shut you down for dilution of the word "Hula". For example, uses such as "Hula Calendar" dilutes the calendar of events for hula competitions, such as our Merry Monarch International Hula Competition which takes place in May of each year.

    Mahalo nui loa

  52. Re:The competition. Was: Abandonware. by Monkius · · Score: 1

    Uh, no. But we all bet _something_ on whatever package we do implement.

    I do run mail servers with 10s of 1000s of users, and I certainly think it does matter what we use, don't you think?

    --
    Matt
  53. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets talk about this if Novell _did_ base future versions of NetMail.
    So far it looks like abandonware, just like SLOX.

    Referring to a marketing FAQ or press release list provided by the project itself is no good help ...

  54. Re:The competition. Was: Abandonware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hula and OpenGroupware.org do not compare well. OGo is a complete and highly functional collaboration suite for business use targetted for some hundreds of IT users while Hula seems to be a simplistic webmail solution for hundreds of thousands of users.

    Personally I don't think that Hula will attract a lot of users given that only few of us need to focus on serving 100.000 users ;-)
    Functionality is key in the mainstream.

    Actually Groupware is a really _sucky_ term. It means nothing and all. If you have some IMAP4 server, people call it groupware (Kolab). If you have some personal webcalendar, people call it groupware (Horde, Hula).
    Few actually provide group collaboration features like the conflict detection or appointment proposal in OpenGroupware.org.

  55. It doesn't work yet. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative
    WebAdmin isn't working right now, and won't be working until (they hope) noon tomorrow. I got all excited, emerged subversion, downloaded the source from the svn server, built and installed it... And discovered that there is no WebAdmin. Uhhhh... okay? You can log in as the admin user, but you can't actually do anything with other people yet.

    Hopefully they'll iron this out, and I'll get a chance to update tomorrow and use the thing. I'm absolutely ready to blow away my qmail+vpopmail setup in favor of this sucker. I might have to install a postfix proxy to handle virus scanning, though.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  56. MyRealBox query by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got an account there but it's getting tons of spam.

    Does anyone know if I can request a username change or something? I want to keep my account, but change my e-mail address so all the spam bounces.

    TIA.

  57. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by fejjie · · Score: 1

    I'm not a Novell sales rep, but I'd have to respond to your question with "That depends on the needs of your 500 user company."

    "500 users" isn't enough information to formulate which server software best fits your needs.

  58. shared addressbook and calendar? by rsax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay so I saw the screenshots and from the description it is mentioned several times that this is mail + calendaring. Two questions for anyone involved with this project or whoever has used Netmail.

    1. Does this allow a team to share their schedules, calendars? Can you modify each others?

    2. Does this ship with an addressbook that can be shared with other people on the server? Can you add entries in others?

    1. Re:shared addressbook and calendar? by Whitemice · · Score: 1

      OpenGroupware does, and it all works now, and is GPL.

      http://www.opengroupware.org

      And connectors (working in CVS) are available for Kontact and Evolution. iCalendar clients like Sunbird are supported, and you have DAV access to project documents.

      --
      Using "Common Sense" is being either to arrogant or to ignorant to ask people who know more about something than you.
  59. Re:Too much Novell in GNOME? by fejjie · · Score: 1

    Hula isn't a webmail client. it's a mail/calendar server based on Novell's existing NetMail server software (which is used by a number of companies from what I understand - it's also the server software used by myrealbox.com)

    NetMail is being opened up and relicensed under the LGPL and being renamed to Hula

  60. Re:WOW!!! 200,000lines of CODE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. I hearby donate these infinite lines of code to the Open Source moment: yes # > MyContributionToSociety.py

  61. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So please specify what information you need to give a recommendation.

  62. A more likely scenario by remahl · · Score: 1

    Dear Hawaiian Islands, Please cease and desist from using the word "Hula", a trademark of Novell corp. --Novell Legal.

  63. Who used it? by mi · · Score: 2

    Is it worth making a FreeBSD port for this software?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  64. 2Mail? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    What does this release have to do with Novell's GroupWise, and the Open-Xchange GPL "version"? Does Novell really offer 3 different email servers, each including other groupware features like shared calendars, contacts etc? Are there more in the wings?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  65. JWZ by frithsplot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    has some interesting thoughts on this.

  66. It uses mbox (with indexes) by Penis_Envy · · Score: 1

    Replying to myself:

    http://www.hula-project.org/index.php/Mailbox_File _Structure

    It uses mbox. VERY disappointing. Hopefully there is/will be some sort of plugin structure to get it to support Maildir (without having to use an alternate IMAP store) or a more robust storage format.

    1. Re:It uses mbox (with indexes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please explain why berkely mailbox isn't a robust mail store?

      the only possible problems it has is with conflicting locking schemes, which is a completely irrelevent issue for private storage anyway.

    2. Re:It uses mbox (with indexes) by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      I'm curious why Evolution uses an ass-backwards internal mapping of mail folders to files.
      Folders are not mapped directly to directories; no, a folder name is a prefix for several file names with predefined suffixes, one of them is a directory for subfolders. I didn't try but I guess, God forbid you from creating a folder with one of these suffixes in the name.
      Why it couldn't be made the natural way (a folder is mapped to a directory containing predefined files for contents/indexes, subdirectories are mapped to subfolders), is completely beyond me.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    3. Re:It uses mbox (with indexes) by Oopsz · · Score: 1
      It's open source now, ain't it? ;)

      If someone really wants maildir support, they can add it, or have it added.

      Now, if they would just add a connector that allows the storage of mail in an SQL database...

    4. Re:It uses mbox (with indexes) by Penis_Envy · · Score: 1

      I would disagree that it is completely irrelevant. Locking is a pretty big issue, and mboxes are prone to corruption (especially when they grow to any substantial size) and make life hell for NFS/AFS/Coda home directories. I'm not sure what you mean by "private use" and how that relates.

      Overall, a solution like maildir is a lot more flexible. The only disadvantages that maildir has would be slightly more complex set up (but then again, you don't have to worry about locking) and additional time for backing up. I've been very happy with maildir, and haven't had (knock on wood) any corruption issues.

      gratuitous URL: http://www.qmail.org/man/man5/maildir.html

    5. Re:It uses mbox (with indexes) by Penis_Envy · · Score: 1
      It's open source now, ain't it? ;)

      If someone really wants maildir support, they can add it, or have it added.


      Yes, yes it is. :) It also has a pretty interesting architecture of "agents". I'm wondering if an agent could be written to deliver to Maildirs instead of mboxes.

      Now, if they would just add a connector that allows the storage of mail in an SQL database...


      I don't understand the desire for DB-backed mailstores. Indexed files work just as well, without the added complexity.

      I remember an exchange admin asking me (in relation to iPlanet mail server): "how long does it take to restore the database?" That, in a nutshell, is what I think of db-backed mailstores. Adding complexity with little benefit. I checked out dbmail a while ago, but was amazed at all the problems that project has with very basic functionality. Just a bit ago (the date says 2004-01-12, I'm assuming it's 2005-01-12):

      "2.0.2 Had a tendency to die when authenticating using POP3 or IMAP. Please don't use 2.0.2 and upgrade to 2.0.3."

      Please, tell me what you like about it. It's an interesting and worthwile project, I just fail to see the benefit (other than single store of messages, but I'm sure something could be worked out with plain file setups as well.)

      The features they list don't seem that extravagant. Most file-based setups use lightweight index files of some sort to prevent excessive searching.
    6. Re:It uses mbox (with indexes) by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      1) replication,
      2) easy backup,
      3) easy restore.

      Easy to write queries to back up accounts, domains, or servers at a time. Easy to migrate to a new server. ACID compliance. etc.

      When things get crazy, it's trivially easy to load balance, as well. The project has problems, but I like the direction it's going in. (As for the problems with 2.x, I've yet to migrate; like most administrators I'm rather cautious. Hence, I'm running DBMail 1.x [and apache 1.x, and tried-but-true versions of various other software packages. I belive it's called "The Debian Approach" ;) ] )

  67. hoop! by fons · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing they have a product in the pipeline that will be called "HULA-HOOP".

    Seriously. They are not selling HULA, they are selling NetMail. They don't want mangager-type-people to LIKE the free HULA. They want managers to BUY Netmail.

    The HULA-name is only targetted at us communists.

  68. Re:Abandonware. Try Citadel instead. by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    So, Citadel developer or something calls an application framework, server whatever having latest standards "abandonware" and advertises own product?

    I wouldn't give a shit to that application after reading this. This must be the best way to degrade the product to lowest lame standards.

    http://www.novell.com/products/netmail/ --> "abandonware"

    BTW, we prefer Novell since we can get real support in case some bad thing happen. Imagining to get support from a guy like you... We made a good decision.

  69. random question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this competitive with Mitch Kapor's Rhapsody project?

  70. And in a related story... by Evets · · Score: 1

    And in a related story...

    SCO sues Novell over the use of the number 200,000 which was used in the original unix implementation in a header file.

    IBM is being subpoenaed to discuss licensing issues, and Novel is being ordered to release all 200,000 lines of public code to SCO (whose lawyers apparently didn't know that the code is publicly accessible).

    A Microsoft owned company has already purchased 500 licenses of "litigation protection insurance" from Microsoft to avoid litigation in the future if SCO should win the legal battle.

    Another microsoft company purchased 500 SCO licenses directly from SCO to avoid the potential of litigation, because, as it turns out, 500 licenses is slightly cheaper than the litigation protection insurance.

  71. JWZ on Hula. Bonus track: Insides of Netscape fate by hangel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The DNA Lounge owner comments about the "groupware Hula" (advises/admonishes Nat Friedman on?) and by the ways clarifies about the Netscape-Collabra innards.

  72. The name NetMail... by Szyman · · Score: 1

    ...brings back the memories of Fidonet, doesn't it?

  73. Novell is good, but Netmail was bad by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    Monday night, April 19, we experienced problems on the
    Mail@"Sorry, I removed something here" e-mail system. We were able to bring the system
    online that evening but related problems caused a system
    outage early Tuesday. We brought the vendor on-site. We
    made several attempts at recovery but were unsuccessful.
    At that point we ran a program to identify all folders
    with suspected damage. Approximately five percent of
    accounts were affected. If you are receiving this note,
    you had one or more folders identified as potentially
    damaged.

    As you may be aware, the Mail@"Sorry, I removed something here" system was out of service for
    approximately 3 hours on the morning and early afternoon of
    Wednesday, May 12. A number of folders were adversely affected
    by a server crash that required some time to evaluate the scope of
    the problem and take corrective action.

    A Mail@"Sorry, I removed something here" system outage of approximately one hour during the afternoon of September 28 is being investigated by Office of Information Technology staff members and the product vendor (Novell). During the outage, the system was unavailable for sending or accessing e-mail.

    Recently, you received a message to the campus community from
    XXXXX XXXXXX, Vice President and Chief Information Officer,
    concerning the replacement of the current e-mail system.
    Since your account is on Mail@"Sorry, I removed something here", you are receiving this
    follow-up message about details of the changeover.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  74. An interesting opportunity by alexo · · Score: 1

    With regard to a previous article:

    This and other similar projects give us an interesting opportunity to compare open-source vs. closed (originally) code quality.

  75. As a swede... by sdaf · · Score: 1

    ... I find it funny they call this software "Hula", which is swedish slang for masturbation. :-)

  76. That wasn't Novell by Fished · · Score: 1

    That was a different company, whose name escapes me. This company had partnered with Suse to do SLOX, but I would guess that, in anticipation of Novell releasing HULA and moving to that, they decided to open source it - probably to try to get traction.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1