Slashdot Mirror


Wearable PC with an Artificial-Reality Helmet

Roland Piquepaille writes "In this short article, InformationWeek writes that 'two sexy technologies that flamed out five years ago -- wearable computers and artificial reality -- are combined in a new training-development system' for the military. This system, developed by Quantum3D, includes a binocular head-mounted OLED display and head-leg-weapon motion-tracking systems, integrated with a vest-worn tactical visual computer. It runs under Windows XP and is compatible with the 802.11 a/b/g wireless networking standards. It will be used by the infantry to train soldiers, but it looks so complex that I would need intensive training just for using it. Read more for other details and an illustration of the full scary system."

197 comments

  1. Welcome to the Borg ! by JaCKeL+1.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Welcome to the Borg !

    1. Re:Welcome to the Borg ! by a+gremlin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      resistance is futile.....

    2. Re:Welcome to the Borg ! by JaCKeL+1.0 · · Score: 1

      The door was open, I was waiting for it !

  2. platform? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, I'm not as religous a microsoft hater as many here, but is there ANY good reason to have this run on XP?

    1. Re:platform? by glib909 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Games, perhaps?

      --
      Suudsu, that stuff is G-E-W-D.
    2. Re:platform? by hozozco · · Score: 5, Funny

      Having XP in the background gives you something to blame for all the 'friendly fire'. Hey, I'd believe it!

    3. Re:platform? by nuclear305 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Ok, I'm not as religous a microsoft hater as many here, but is there ANY good reason to have this run on XP?"

      Since TFA wasn't all that informational I'm going to take a guess and say:

      1) The military primarly uses Windows (Yes, I know there are exceptions....)

      2) On a system like this I'd imagine a GUI-centric OS is essential, and face it...Windows does this better than Linux. (Note: don't confuse this statement with anything even close to the word 'stability')

      3) In the event of a crash, I suspect on a system like this it's easier to hit the reboot button; rather than dumping the user to a Linux CLI where they have to have some access to a keyboard to restart whatever failed; whereas with Windows it's point-and-click.

      Of course...these are entirely my opinions and I'm sure there are going to be plenty of Linux users to come along and attempt to shoot holes through them.

    4. Re:platform? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say, massive, multi-year, billion dollar contract locking the organization responsible for developing this into a windows-centric licensing agreement?

    5. Re:platform? by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Informative
      The Military uses Windows because the 3 companies on the planet that can stand to do government contracts use Windows and are Microsoft partners. They get all the bids because no one else wants to do the paperwork necessary to do Military contracts. If you look at, say, EDS, it really appears that even for those companies military contracts are more trouble than they're actually worth.

      Windows might have an edge over Linux for an immersive 3D environment simply because more video cards support it. Doing a good 3D environment with information overlays is a complex problem and most of the work that I've seen done has been UNIX/OpenGL based.

      In the event of a crash you'll know you're running Windows. If your crappy linux video driver causes a kernel panic, it's just as easy to hit reset on Linux as it is on Windows. Especially if you use one of the journaled filesystems that have been built into the OS for the past 5 years or so now.

      Anyway, I'd be surprised if the entire reason Windows was chosen over any other OS was due to the contractor's familiarity with it and possibly because they're a "Microsoft Partner." Whether it's the best, cheapest or most secure option they could have chosen probably didn't even enter the equasion.

      The military's not as fickle as the public. If you build a Windows based PVR that has to cost $30 more than a Linux based PVR due to the Windows license, most people will go for the linux based one, all other features being equal. The military will choose and pay for whatever their contractor bids out for them, no questions asked.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    6. Re:platform? by Munk · · Score: 1

      Sure. We will just give this technology to the insurgents, and we can wipe them out while they are busy dealing with blue screens...err...blue eyes???

    7. Re:platform? by enosys · · Score: 1

      Point #3 isn't valid. Linux can be set up so it boots directly into a GUI without the need to type anything, even login info. I don't know about point #2. I find the Windows GUI presents a better mouse interface but I doubt that any of that is applicable in this case because this project will probably need a new custom user interface. Things that work well at a desk might not be convenient here.

    8. Re:platform? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm not as religous a microsoft hater as many here, but is there ANY good reason to have this run on XP?

      You'll find a lot of exotic computer gadgets you find on the net tend to use Windows. I presume it's simply because it's probably cheaper to develop for just one platform, and they choose to use the most common one. Here are some examples of fancy displays and input devices I've found on the net...

      Some of their products may be compatible with other operating systems, but most I looked at have a Windows bias.

    9. Re:platform? by coaxial · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wearable and ubiquitous computing is an academic interest of mine.

      2) On a system like this I'd imagine a GUI-centric OS is essential, and face it...Windows does this better than Linux. (Note: don't confuse this statement with anything even close to the word 'stability')

      The main thing wearable computing provides is augmented reality. These devices are not general purpose machines, and therefore do not feature a traditional WIMP interface. The user doesn't have a mouse, nor a keyboard. He may have a joypad, but that's not exactly the same, the ease of moving a mouse pointer isn't the same. There has been research in finger tracking, so users select options by pointing at where they appear, but they have met with limited success.

      Ideally, wearable computers are context aware, which means they automatically "do the right thing". To achive this, computer vision is needed to find the objects in the realworld, and then overlay a virtual world on top of it. This isn't that easy, since GPS systems don't have the resolution needed, and the camera isn't typically inline with the user's eyes.
      ith the users eyes.

      3) In the event of a crash, I suspect on a system like this it's easier to hit the reboot button; rather than dumping the user to a Linux CLI where they have to have some access to a keyboard to restart whatever failed; whereas with Windows it's point-and-click.

      Never messed with an embedded system in you life have you? When they crash, they reboot automatically. When they're really broken, that's all the machine will do.

      Granted, research systems don't reboot automatically, because the user is the developer, and therefore needs to diagnose the problem. Most of these systems never leave the lab.

      In the end, the are two probable reasons for XP. First, the military may have required it, but I kind of doubt it since these are standalone systems, and not really part of the general computing environment. More likely is, XP is what the company was most confortable with using.

    10. Re:platform? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      only if you are the opposing force not running xp.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    11. Re:platform? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Want to make a bet that the shadowman on the brochure means that somewhere inside this company is a "In case of MicroSoft s*ing us break glass" copy of the source code so that they could roll out a Fedora/RedHat version of this very quickly? or how about a there is a actual install cd hidden somewhere bet?

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  3. Mod Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    -1, Roland

    1. Re:Mod Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this guy the official slashdot whipping boy?

    2. Re: Mod Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did a comment about Roland on one of Roland's submissions get modded Offtopic?

    3. Re:Mod Article by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Informative
      No, he's the plague of Slashdot stories.

      He gets stories submitted to Slashdot for the sole purpose of increasing his ad revenue. I recommend strongly against visiting his blog and contributing to his ad revenue.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Mod Article by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Maybe anti-roland slashdotters can do him one better and post the "ad-free" article in here, like some post "registration free" NYT articles...

    5. Re:Mod Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can also help to spread the R*land P*quepaille blocker firefox extension!

  4. XP, and wireless by Squigley · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article:

    It runs under Windows XP and is compatible with the 802.11 a/b/g wireless networking standards.

    Let the flaming begin.

    1. Re:XP, and wireless by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed, I don't think that I'd like to wear anything Windows-based around my head. I can see the error messages now.

      A fatal exception 0E has occurred at 0137:BFF9A3C0. The current brainy will be terminated.

      * Press any key to terminate the current application.
      * Press CTRL+ALT+DEL to restart your body. You will lose any unsaved information in all applications.

      Press any key to continue

    2. Re:XP, and wireless by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can't wardrive in here, this is the war room!

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    3. Re:XP, and wireless by dmneoblade · · Score: 1

      My favorite: Fatal execption in module USER. Shouldn't that make the infantry sweat bullets? Also, just me, or is the "thermite battery" sounding like a really bad idea? You know what happens when thermite burns?

      --
      Warning, knife is sharp. Please keep out of children.
  5. mesh or mess by dslmodem · · Score: 1

    using 802.11 technology is sexy. but, it could be a mess w/o proper control.

    --

    ^(oo)^pig~

    1. Re:mesh or mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is where Windows XP comes in.

    2. Re:mesh or mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah the mess part. Yes it does that quite well.

    3. Re:mesh or mess by Uber+Banker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absolutely. Relying on wireless communication for troops just needs the enemy to use a little bit of interference to obselete the system. Relying on HUD identification depends on a lack of simple EMG weapons.

    4. Re:mesh or mess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you missed the part where they said this was for TRAINING so oops guess we dont need to worry bout the enemy interfering huh?

    5. Re:mesh or mess by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      I can see a hundred terrorists dragging mile long extension cords, carrying microwaves into battle against the 802.11b dependant troops.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  6. Too bulky by metlin · · Score: 4, Informative

    After having worked with ubiquitous computing for a while, I can tell you one thing -- that thing is too big and has very bad affordances for it to take off big time.

    On the other hand, look at something that folks like Thad Starner or Steve Mann come up with - better affordances.

    (Mann actually had a different helmet design and changed to the Eye-tap design)

    1. Re:Too bulky by metlin · · Score: 1

      You do realize that a large number of tests for these things *are* conducted by and for the Army?

      In fact, a lot of things that'd have been useless otherwise have been designed better thanks to tests by the Army.

    2. Re:Too bulky by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think somebody should upload this picture to Wikipedia for the "nerd" article. Especially the helmet on the left; that picture is priceless.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    3. Re:Too bulky by metlin · · Score: 1

      Yup! :-)

      Which is what I was pointing out -- he started out with that design and moved on to the Eye-tap design that he has now.

      Using helmets now is almost going backwards.

    4. Re:Too bulky by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      That's fine for providing information overlays (actually it looks really cool, if the mirror can be made smaller and less obvious, and you use one of those phone microphones that hangs at your throat instead of that obvious one he has), but it looks like that's all his current system can do. The system in the article is supposed to be an "immersive" type system, where the entire field of view is replaced by virtual reality. You'd need two large mirrors to do that with his system, pretty much necessitating a helmet. The two systems are for different applications.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    5. Re:Too bulky by MoneyMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you're missing the point.

      This isn't meant to "take off big time".

      It's meant as a training device, specifically designed for military use. The military leads a VERY different life from you and I.

      From the limited information (image) provided, the equipment used here is not significantly, if any, larger or heavier than standard equipment carried in the field by our military on a daily basis. In fact, it looks right inline with what is "humped" on any given day.

      Also, this is meant as a training device, not an augmentation to the standard load. Training devices should be close to, if not a little bit heavier, the weight of what is carried in the field. Using Ultra-light equipment in training makes for exhausted soldiers in the field.

      The HMD looks roughly equivalent to standard issue Night Vision Goggles. The battery pack is MUCH lighter than a standard rucksack (though that could easily remedied :-) ). The weapon looks a bit off. (Hopefully, it's balanced out to approximate a loaded M16).

      The real questions are durability, usability, and cost.
      Durability: When a soldier must dive for cover to avoid being "shot" by the virtual enemy, the HMD shouldn't shatter in his eyes. It should "simply" keep working, as designed.

      Usability: Most military training equipment requires no more than an 8th grade education to operate. (Yes, that is the actual standard)
      Soldiers don't have time in the middle of combat to try and remember which key sequence to push to get the weapon to fire. Press the button and BOOM.

      Cost: This equipment looks to be aimed at small squad tactics. A couple of thousand dollars per soldier is not out of line for this type of equipment. Not budgeted dollars, but actual cost. Budget is a whole different ballgame.

      --
      mm

    6. Re:Too bulky by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Certainly. If you can obtain permission for the picture to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    7. Re:Too bulky by metlin · · Score: 1

      I think you have absolutely no idea of what I was talking about.

      Affordances have nothing to do with skills, it about how intuitive the product is to use - usability at a very intuitive level (you see a glass mug and you realize that the hold is for gripping the mug).

      In fact, especially since it would be used for military applications (training or not), the affordance becomes even more important - because your reactions would be stifled by what is around you.

      And by taking off big time, I was referring to how popular it would be among the folks using it. Not necessarily among the general public.

    8. Re:Too bulky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What in God's name are "affordances"?

    9. Re:Too bulky by metlin · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Too bulky by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the weight is conspicuously absent in the entire article. Troops currently carry too much weight; how much ammuniton of food should they leave behind so they can carry this?

      Who was it who said that a standard test for these systems would be to make the General who comissioned them run 5 miles wearing it?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  7. BSOLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Blue screen of literal death.

  8. A crutch by Staplerh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sounds like a crutch for good, realistic training. From the short article, which leaves a lot of questions in my head:

    Quantum3D Inc., which bills itself as a visual-computing vendor, has announced the availability of the Expedition, a combination wearable computer and artificial-reality gear. The Expedition's target market is developers of so-called immersive training. Their products, in turn, are used to train armed services personnel and emergency-response workers.

    Hmm.. it sounds bulky and cumbersome. Are soldiers really running around with a wearable VR gear - no, they aren't (at least not the line troops).

    Now, I have limited military experience (some basic training and basic courses), but I happen to know that these troops are going to have a crapload of equipment and this will just add an extremely unrealistic element to their training exercise.

    Besides, it will be unreliable and probably add a lot of time to various training exercises. I'm not saying it'll be unreliable just because of Windows XP (although it won't help matters.. BSOD in the middle of an exercise?), but because soldiers tend to crash around heavily with their equipment - and equipment, however sensitive, tends to be broken by technically inept people.

    Looks cool, but I'm sure it will take a few million tax dollars to do an evaluation of this machine by Quantum3D and discover the flaws.

    --
    "There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all."
    - Bob Dylan
    1. Re:A crutch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Being a retired Marine with 20 years experience. The biggest problem I see will be getting them to wear it as My troops as well as myself would take stuff off strip the plates out of our flak jackets, any thing we could do to lighten our load as speed of movement was more important to us than what minute protection the gear provided. Not to mention the lack of being able to hear with a bell on your head and and now they want to further limit your vision. Can't see that as being good. A heads up display on a google for night vision would have been a good thing however especially with full perpheal vision instead of looking thru binoculars mounted on your head. My 2 cents

    2. Re:A crutch by Stickney · · Score: 1

      I've seen and actually used this, some of the developers are profs. (I'm at USMA), and there isn't any "crashing around" while wearing the system. Running is achieved by jogging in place. Sound unrealistic? Yes, it is. But it's better than any video game I've played, and I've played most everything out there. The point is not necessarily to make training more realistic, either; it's to facilitate a training environment where soldiers can practice basic battle drills during a single day and not have to spend hours breaking down and cleaning every weapon fired and re-shining every boot. It adds valuable time to the training that soldiers recieve.

      --
      ...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
  9. "It runs under Windows" by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

    So what would the virtual reality equivalent of the blue screen of death be?

    1. Re:"It runs under Windows" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh god shut the fuck up, please.

  10. Best part of the illustration by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

    (Soldier not included)

  11. Beats the crap out of Laser Tag by fsh · · Score: 0, Redundant

    My favorite part, under the image:
    "Soldier Not Included"

    --
    fsh
    1. Re:Beats the crap out of Laser Tag by Neophus · · Score: 1

      A tvtuner-module should be avaible as extra equipment. Think of the possibilities. Although, i guess we already got vr-glasses who can be hooked up to a telly/tuner.

      --
      Why do i have to be so lazy? :(
    2. Re:Beats the crap out of Laser Tag by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      I would much rather have a Happy Helmet.

      Joy!

  12. Insert Another Quarter by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aren't our soldiers already getting too much "virtual" training before we send them to places like Iraq, so huge percentages are coming back with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Insert Another Quarter by TrickyRaven · · Score: 1

      hey!, it's not 'virtual' training, now it's 'artificial' training... the 'virtual reality' thingie bombed out a few years ago, this is the new and improved 'artificial reality'

    2. Re:Insert Another Quarter by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a difference. "Virtual" reality is synthesized in the helmet, immersing the soldier's senses, responding "just like" reality to their reactions. "Artificial" reality is synthesized in a press conference, immersing the society's senses, responding "just like" reality to its reactions. The virtual one never exists materially, while the artificial one is thrown up all around us - but don't peek behind the scaffolds.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Insert Another Quarter by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      hmm? so you'd rather kill them during training before sending them somewhere? then they'd have crushing stress right there, but they'd still have crushing stress at the warzone..

      or would you like them to get therapy BEFORE going there? might be a good idea but what the hell does it have to do with combat situation training?

      of course it's traumatic. difference with earlier wars is that now it's less of a tabu if you went cuckoo in the head because of the pressure.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Insert Another Quarter by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      I would think that improvments to our medical system over the years probably makes PTS easier to spot. Soldiers have always had it rough with the amount of mental anquish they face. I would think that WWI soldiers would have had it the worst with trench warfare and cases of shell and chemical shock. However, Iraq is a much different situation as there are no front lines and the enemy is hard to distinquish. This is similar to Vietnam. One would think our soldiers would have a similar ratio to that of Vietnam. Perhaps the returning Vietnam soldiers were often under diagnosed. This wouldn't surprise me as returning soldiers have had problems with getting proper medical care after ever war.

    5. Re:Insert Another Quarter by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      No, I'd rather we didn't send them. And when we send them, I'd rather they get real training, whose results are understood. Any training - these soldiers are regularly thrown into situations for which they're not trained. Sometimes because the situation is a new kind of situation, unique to this "counterinsurgency" war, sometimes because we just skipped the training to get more bodies in the field - especially national guard.

      Right - our troops are sissies now, more weakminded. No, it's because the whole catastrophe in Iraq, including the torture, the 100K+ killed Iraqi civilians, NO WMD, forced extended incountry... the list goes on. Are you American? Are you supporting our troops? How, by making weekend-warrior guardsmen into multi-year frontline vets?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Insert Another Quarter by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      no, i'm not american. but i know the situation is not really unique in world history, at all, not even in the last 20 years.

      the modern technology does give advantages into military training, especially training which was impossible before(mock wars and such, in which this tech comes handy). 'virtual' training is every bit real training as any, if you can show the situations from first person perspective while giving a lecture about some tactics and maneuvers it helps a lot, it's not like they're going to dump all the regular training.

      who else then than weekend warriors? just some hicks from hunter clubs? at least they've trained some. remember, it's a WAR after all(and nobody in their right mind should be getting into one, much less volunteering if one wasn't prepared to die and do awful things that wars really are about). and if one does intend to keep fighting then one has to have soldiers.. preferably trained before sending them to the frontline. as a war the numbers really are not so bad(from what they could have been) unless someone was really expecting nobody to die... which someone might have been marketing to get the war done but the reasons of the war are another issue.

      back to the simulation usage - where it comes most useful is peace time usage(with those weekend warriros) as you can at least give some training which would have previously been only available in a theater of war(to get practice for spotting things in battlefield).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Insert Another Quarter by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "And when we send them, I'd rather they get real training, whose results are understood."

      It can be really easy to totally screw someone up with poorly understood training.

      I remember reading about some US special forces outfit (Rangers IIRC?) who as part of their training would undergo regular and extended immersion in cold water. The theory being that they were getting hardened against hypothermia.

      If I recall correctly, it actually had completely the opposite effect so they wound up with a couple of generations of special forces soldiers who were extremely vulnerable to hypothermia. Not good.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    8. Re:Insert Another Quarter by demachina · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Was reading this interesting article today on the extent to which military recruiters are invading high schools and community colleges.

      Anyone still in school who can confirm this is what's its like today?

      - Military recruiters in the lunch room on a daily basis
      - Guest military speakers in classrooms
      - Army and Marine recruiting ads mandatory viewing in classrooms
      - Recruiters telling kids to stay out of college and go in to the military instead because then college is free and you will be able to get jobs once you get out of the military and not if you go straight to college.
      - Do recruiters disproportionately target the poor and minorties

      That has to be great for American competitiveness and the economy when your own government is trying to dissuade kids from going to college in order to prop up sagging recruitment.

      Rumsefeld and General Meyers(Chairman Joint Chiefs) were in front of Congress this week and grilled about the fact that the Army and Marin reserves and guard are now officially missing their recruiting goals. Meyers rationalized one reason is because the Army and Marines were doing such a good job of retaining soldiers there aren't veterans going in to the guard and reserves. I think he forgot to mention a prime retention tool is stop loss which prevents people from leaving the military when their enlistment is over.

      Meyers other proposed solution was hire even more recruiters to hunt down young people and trick them in to the military.

      It will be interesting, if the Bush administration will have to either:

      - Start bailing on Iraq
      - Refrain from starting new wars in Syria and Iran
      - Restart the draft and commit political suicide
      - If they do restart the draft what kind of dodges will they provide for rich, white kids like George W. had in the Air National Guard, trained at great expense to be a pilot and no chance of ever seeing combat and for the most part didn't even report for duty.

      Probably should write a long post about the goal of the military to use video games and simulations to train children to be soldiers and to desensitize them to the consequences of being in a war where people are being killed and you might be killed. Computers are god to the military for that. Has anyone seen a video simulation or game showing dogs eating dead bodies and dragging of limbs, or maybe dead women and children, or people burned half way to charcoal. We really need more of that in video games, actual war footage so kids learn that war is not clean, tidy and heroic. Its brutal, ugly and horrific and lots of innocent people die. If you are a pilot it might not entirely register when you drop bombs you are killing people, often innocent people, but if you end up in the Army and Marines, you may be killing people close up, and one of two things will probably happen:

      - You will regret it for the rest of your life
      - You will start liking it and start doing it at every opportunity, and not be very discriminating in who you kill. In Vietnam it was apparently common for some people in this class to start taking pictures of their kills, building scrapbooks so they could revel in their handwork later.

      --
      @de_machina
    9. Re:Insert Another Quarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a soldier is in combat for 75 days straight
      without a break
      he develops ptsd.

      Thanks mr Fuck YOU BUSH! I'm Leaving the country
      before June, jackass!

    10. Re:Insert Another Quarter by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Uh yeah, that pretty much sums up military recruiting. They focus on the poorer schools (high schools and community colleges) because those people are more likely desperate enough to give uncle sam their permission to get their ass shot off for, you know, any old reason he feels like it.

      Hopefully our species will get on the same page before we wipe ourselves out. Hopefully the agreement we come to in order to coexist has room for some freedom in it...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Insert Another Quarter by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      "preferably trained before sending them to the frontline"

      These helmets are as useful in training an Iowa kid in house-to-house Baghdad counterinsurgency, and ignoring torture at HQ, as Grand Theft Auto is in driving crosstown in LA. The traditional training methods are immersive of both the body and mind, in the overwhelming, unpredictable, unsafe environment in which soldiers operate against guerillas. These helmets are going to get more people killed (soldiers and otherwise), and their surviving lives ruined. Because they'll perpetuate the military fantasy that Iraq (and elsewhere) is a cakewalk, supplying the bravery of being out of range, until the HumVee rolls over an IED on another boring patrol.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Insert Another Quarter by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation 0
      50% Flamebait
      50% Insightful

      TrollMods love the Iraq War. Can't win it, can't lie about it anymore, so the only option is to supress people talking about it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:Insert Another Quarter by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      hmm? they're not useless for training city fighting.
      'simulation' fights are pretty useful, as is using them to show some tactics etc(they are just high tech displays after all)..

      of course there is no such thing as being out of range in a city(with modern firearms).

      such guerilla warfare is nothing new anyways, there's tactics and training for it that really does help in reducing casualties(or increasing enemy casualties - i'm guessing most of the guerillas have had military training, too).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    14. Re:Insert Another Quarter by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Where's the data showing that VR simulations are better than real training? Or even any good at all? The most important part of real training is "skin in the game". How many Madden "football" videogame players are any better at making yards on a real field?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  13. Training to improve training by [cx] · · Score: 0

    "It will be used by the infantry to train soldiers, but it looks so complex that I would need intensive training just for using it."

    By training our soldiers to train to use better training equipment our training will surely improve!

  14. Games? by digidave · · Score: 2, Funny

    Counter-Strike? Oh yeah.

    Wasn't there recently a Slashdot story about people confusing reality with games? Nearly every comment suggested that gamers had that experience at least once... even with Tetris! I think this technology will can that to a whole new level.

    Maybe we ought to have a game where you hunt for Osama Bin Laden and then let loose an army of 17 year olds into Tora Bora.

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    1. Re:Games? by bombadillo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe we ought to have a game where you hunt for Osama Bin Laden and then let loose an army of 17 year olds into Tora Bora

      We already did that. Some how they all ended up in Iraq!

    2. Re:Games? by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points. You deserve a +1 funny.

    3. Re:Games? by Badfysh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect that part of the training is to confuse games with reality. There's a distinct tactical advantage with having soldiers who forget that when you die, you don't respawn...

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    4. Re:Games? by game+kid · · Score: 0
      There's a distinct tactical advantage with having soldiers who forget that when you die, you don't respawn...

      ...and that when you win you don't hear Counter-Terrorists Win! after every operation. I wonder exactly what VRs and games these soldiers use; I'm sure CS and Halo are on the menu once in a while, and it scares me somewhat.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    5. Re:Games? by bigpat · · Score: 1

      out in July

      http://www.emagin.com/3dvisor/

  15. Whoops! by Nifrith · · Score: 1

    This is great! Until someone goes wardriving and takes over your helmet. Then you've _really_ been assimilated.

  16. Ctrl+Alt+Del = ..... by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 4, Funny

    They are training the soldiers to pat their head, rub their tummies and wiggle their toes simultaneously to reboot.

  17. It runs Windows? by flyingsquid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great, now instead of shooting at our troops, our enemies can simply attack them with viruses and spyware!

    1. Re:It runs Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely drive them insane with pop up ads. Only it won't be the enemy it'll be American companies trying to sell them Viagra.

  18. The system's computer is named "Thermite". by Caspian · · Score: 1

    Thermite is the name of a highly exothermic compound involving a mixture of aluminum and another metal's oxide (usually iron oxide, a.k.a. rust). It's also the name of the reaction that occurs when you ignite such a mixture.

    For those who were curious.

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  19. another one? by rich_r · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Christ, I'm getting sick of roland bloody piqualle and his ghey bloody blog.
    Can you filter by submitter?

    1. Re:another one? by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your brain comes with one.

      As much as I do not like Piquepaille's articles appearing ever so often, I cannot understand why you need to keep complaining about it. If you do not like them, just ignore them. As simple as that.

      Atleast some of his articles are vaguely interesting and refer to something or the other you're probably unaware of. Don't like them? Don't read them. As simple as that.

    2. Re:another one? by rich_r · · Score: 1

      Well, considering I've held my tounge thus far, I don't think I can be accused of overly complaining.
      The articles would be interesting if they were is own work.
      If he were an academic, his career would be in tatters. But, since he's a layman, we have to put up with it.
      How much does an auto story-accept flag cost these days?

  20. Do they seriously use Win XP in war situations ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    God help us

  21. Counter-strike by SafteyMan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    i just wanna know if i can play counter-strike with it

  22. Battlefield VR and the Quantum Gate by D4C5CE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looking at the description and the name of the manufacturer, it is interesting to recall that in the history of early CD-ROM videogames, "Quantum Gate" was a "season" of so-called "interactive movies" (VirtualCinema by HyperBole Studios) featuring the idea of VR overlay being (ab)used to turn the actual "soft" targets into something ugly the soldiers would no longer hesitate to shoot.

    1. Re:Battlefield VR and the Quantum Gate by BillX · · Score: 1

      At least the music was good :-)

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  23. Whoooo haaaaaaaa... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Whoooo haaaaaa...
    Whoooo haaaaaa...
    Whoo haaa whoo haaa whoo haaa whoo haaa
    whoo ha whoo ha whoo ha whoo ha
    I can't breathe in this helmet!

  24. Three Fingered Salute by fsh · · Score: 1

    I always imagined the ol' three-fingered salute as just flipping the bird, really.

    Middle finger on delete, thumb on alt, and index knuckle on ctrl.

    Of course, now you get fragged by your teammate, flip him the bird, and oh, shit, now you have to wait for WinXP to reboot...

    --
    fsh
    1. Re:Three Fingered Salute by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Middle finger on delete, thumb on alt, and index knuckle on ctrl." - I'm sticking with two hands, I just tried your method and my hand cramped up!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Three Fingered Salute by fsh · · Score: 1

      not the big knuckle, the knuckle just under the fingernail....

      --
      fsh
    3. Re:Three Fingered Salute by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      you mean the one that drags on the ground :)

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  25. Clippy! by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Hello I'm Clippy. You'll go where I go, eat who I eat and bother who I bother" =)

    1. Re:Clippy! by fsh · · Score: 1

      Click Here for help 'eviscerating your virtual enemies!"

      --
      fsh
    2. Re:Clippy! by oKtosiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who do you want to kill today?

  26. Prior Art by kajoob · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think the patent office may have something to say about this; Steve Jobs has had an Artificial-Reality Helmet for some years now.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    1. Re:Prior Art by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      They're called Macintosh and apparently you don't need to wear them. You just buy the computer and use it regularly to become a stark-raving zealot :) There seems to be something similar called Linux, and it's free. It doesn't come with a computer though.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  27. an army of 17 year olds in Tora Bora? by game+kid · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm glad that hasn't happened ye--oh wait...

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  28. Re:The system's computer is named "Thermite". by fsh · · Score: 1

    Wrong thermite:

    Drill Instructor: "All right, you maggots, I now that you have the Thermite (tm) strapped to your backs, I want you to fire it up!"

    --
    fsh
  29. Screw the military! by __aailob1448 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why don't WE have VR helmets yet? It's been almost 15 years since the primitive arcade ones appeared and yet here we are in 2005 and still nothing.

    This sucks!

    1. Re:Screw the military! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      No kidding. We have the technology, and it would add a whole new layer to games out there now.

      Example: All I've ever wanted for Battlefield 1942 was the ability to have VR goggles so when I fly I can turn my head and see around in the cockpit as kind of a free mouselook while I can still steer with the joystick.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:Screw the military! by AaronGTurner · · Score: 1

      You CAN get them, then are simply a little too expensive for general use. You can get VR goggles (circa $600 for 800x600) and head motion trackers for around $100. To make playing an FPS workable you'd also need a wireless gamepad (to avoid getting wrapped up in the cables when in the virtual world) and voice activation software (e.g. Voice Buddy) for all those additional commands that you can't map to a gamepad.

  30. remember, this is for soldiers by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this isn't for a soccer mom or surfing the net in the food court while the wife is shopping. Its for soldiers, people who are used to carrying around 100 pounds of equipment. I don't think this is going to be that much of a bother for them.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:remember, this is for soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this isn't for a soccer mom or surfing the net in the food court while the wife is shopping.

      Lesbian soccer moms are so hot.

    2. Re:remember, this is for soldiers by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Lesbian soccer moms are so hot.

      True dat.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  31. Not worth it... by RavenChild · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you read the small print on the bottom of Q3D's picture of the Explorer you will see "Soldier not included". You need someone else to operate it after you pay an arm and a leg for it.

  32. Great for Gamers Too!!! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Imagine playing at a laser tag arena with this set up. You don't need the laser tag arena to has props any more. Just use this to superimpose Doom 3 characters over your friends and populate the arena with "ghost bots" (bots in the game without a real physical counterpart in the laser tag arena). Now THAT would be an awesome experience. I've played laser tag once and it was a lot of fun, but it really needed more atmosphere than the arena actually presented (ie. Needed to be more the like the excellent games Doom or Quake). With that said, I still think Quake I was the best FPS ever created. It had great atmospherics so you didn't even have to play the game if you didn't want to. My friends and I just used it as a way to IM each other with a much cooler interface.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Great for Gamers Too!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ARQuake project, on just such an idea, was presented at the Australian 2003 Linux Conference. See this abstract.

  33. Blue Screen of Death by emptybody · · Score: 1

    Will take the place of Friendly Fire as cause of Death of soldiers.

    When will people learn?

    --
    comment directly in my journal
  34. Uh oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Windows XP, AND 802.11* networking? How long until the first soldiers are scarred for life by goatse beamed directly into their helmet?

  35. The Helmet is a good thing ... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Helmet is a VERY good thing, IMHO.

    After all, something needs to protect your head when you keep walking into things because you're staring at a COMPUTER SCREEN instead of the sidewalk.

    1. Re:The Helmet is a good thing ... by burns210 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would rather have a clear plastic panel that covers my eye, and have a projected image hit it. So that the display was transparent, and when not in use, could be looked through with ease... This would also go well when you start writing the display software to overlay map information with what your eye see, so looking with your left eye, you see all real world terrain as you normally would, through your right eye, you see the real world terrain, with computer generated graphics laid on top of that terrain, highlighting known object, friends, targets, etc.

      The closest visually I have seen to this device is the (useless) HUD used in Hackers, the mid-1990s movie. Most consumer HUDs are far too bulky. These really need to be near sunglass weight on the ears/nose/neck, even if they feed of a small PDA strapped to your hip.

  36. ubiquitous computing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ubiquitous computing

    Beowulf cluster... Nevermind.

    1. Re:ubiquitous computing? by metlin · · Score: 1

      That's the term used to refer to such technologies.

      Look up on Google.

  37. Silly name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an ammo tech, I'd say calling it the Quantum3D "Thermite" is damm stupid.

    Thermite is a rather nasty explosive in my mind, and we do not need that kind of confusion. (Though to be honest it's not exactly a common one nowadays.)

  38. BSODs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right.

    I mean, I get BSODs all the time.

    WAIT
    NO
    I WAS THINKING OF WINDOWS 95/98, NOT 2000 OR XP

  39. Total overkill for the average geek... by isny · · Score: 1

    Worlds most expensive form of birth control.

  40. I don't know what's funnier.... by Laebshade · · Score: 2, Funny

    The fact that he has 'accessories' kit or the fact that the caption says "Soldier not included".

    1. Re:I don't know what's funnier.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That soldier not included was obviously a joke.
      Probably pointing fun at the lawers who make us put "do not tie this around your head" warnings on plastic bags.

      (hey, I ordered my Expedition, where is my genuine US miliary personel?)

  41. Why we don't use VR helmets today. by mpesce · · Score: 5, Informative

    Back in the early 1990s I started a company designing consumer VR ware for video games. We did lots of design work, got a few patents (hardware) on our work, then got a big contract from Sega to design key portions of their Virtua VR system - which was an HMD (head-mounted display, the real name for these things) that would plug into the Sega Genesis system to give you full immersion into the game playing world. We worked out all of the technical details, got the prices on the parts down to where it could sell for about $199 retail, and sat back and waited, and waited, and waited. Then Sega killed the project. We never heard from Sega why they killed the project. But, a year later, I heard a lecture from some researchers at SRI, who had done the testing for this helmet on Sega's behalf. Sega wouldn't allow them to release the results, so they did the tests again - on their own dime - and released them. And here's why you won't be wearing an HMD anytime soon:

    1) Binocular dysphoria: when you wear a stereo HMD, your eyes/brain are getting one clue for depth perception (parallax) whereas in reality, there are six different cues for depth perception (focus plane, shadowing, etc) which your eye/brain uses to sort out what's going on in the z-plane of reality. While you're in the HMD, the brain adapts to this. Trouble is, when you take the HMD off, your brain is _still_ adapted to this. Now your brain eventually goes back to normal, but this takes some time, and it varies from individual to individual along a bell-curve distribution. Some people come back almost immediately. Others come back very slowly. That is an enormous problem if you go out and get into a car right away, or - as would be the case with the kids using the Virtua VR - getting onto a bike, walking down stairs, etc.

    2) Torque: The Virtua VR was, like most early VR HMDs, closer to Darth Vader's helmet than to a pair of eyeglasses. That puts pressure onto the neck, and the neck can't really handle more weight than the head's already putting on it. Adding weight adds a lot of torque to the neck's movements, resulting in much more frequent neck strain.

    3) Barfogenics: Although computers are more than fast enough to update images at 30 fps (even the Genesis could do this), the sensors which are used to calculate the yaw/pitch/roll of the head - in order to keep the image aligned with your proprioceptive sense of where your head is - generally don't work nearly as quickly. Most cheaper tracking systems, the kinds you'd find in consumer electronics, have some hysteresis associated with them. And that's bad, because if the image lags the movement by more than 50 msec, almost everyone will end up getting motion sickness. (Technically, this is known as "simulator sickness".) But the sensitivity of people to simulator sickness is also distributed on a bell-curve. Some folks get it very quickly, others don't get it at all.

    So there you have it: Sega was told that they'd be selling a device that would cause kids to ruin their depth perception, would give them neck sprains, and would make them puke. Sega didn't even want to think about those kinds of lawsuits...

    Today HMDs are lighter, but these fundamental issues remain, and remain unresolved. Yes, you can use optical tracking these days, because comupters are much faster with optical processing, but it's difficult to set up. HMDs are lighter, but they're still bad for your eye/brain. And until those problems get resolved, don't expect to be putting your head into an HMD.

    1. Re:Why we don't use VR helmets today. by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      That's such a shame. Means that the only HMDs available will be the $999 ones from tekgear, bought by enthusiasts who say "Damn the risks!" much like early proponants of the aeroplane and motorcar.

      Gah. Rich people. I wish I could afford their toys.

      Are you allowed to tell us more about the specs of your HMD and how you got the price so low? Maybe somebody on slashdot would jump at the chance to resurect your project...

    2. Re:Why we don't use VR helmets today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Binocular dysphoria: when you wear a stereo HMD, your eyes/brain are getting one clue for depth perception (parallax) whereas in reality, there are six different cues for depth perception (focus plane, shadowing, etc) which your eye/brain uses to sort out what's going on in the z-plane of reality.

      No kidding, but remember, this is a Genesis we're talking about. I suspect all this setup did was place 2d sprites in a 3d space, not unlike the original Doom. Or worse, with the 32x, probably crappy flat-shaded untextured polygons, I shudder to think what that would be like an inch from my face). A modern video card and, say, Doom 3 could provide most of the rest of the depth cues like shadowing, but don't think there's anything you can do about depth of focus cheaply. Yeah, I know there's eye-tracking systems but that'd explode the budget pretty good.

      As for the tracking lag issue, I'm sure that can be sorted out if someone really wanted to. With gamers spending $500 on a video card just to wring a few more fps beyond the refresh rate of their monitor, there has to be a market for proper HMDs now if there was a decent HMD with good software support.

      Some other big issues: 320x240 LCD tv screens are NOT going to cut it... that's a big reason why the HMDs that did hit the market never took off. 320x240 isn't very good when it's a small percentage of your field of view, but stuff it right in front of your eye and it's downright useless. I can't imagine even thinking about trying an HMD at less than 800x600 with good anti-aliasing.

      Also consider that even with perfect motion tracking, if your body doesn't feel the movement (such as walking forward or falling), you'll still get sick. Someone mentioned on slashdot a week or so ago that there was a system that put electrodes behind your ears and stimulated your vestibular nerves so you could feel movement, there was even an API available. Now that, with a high quality HMD, could go somewhere...

    3. Re:Why we don't use VR helmets today. by Somegeek · · Score: 1

      Why you got modded Redundant is beond me.

      Intersting, insightfull - thanks. Thats the stuff that I read slashdot for and it was hiding at -1.

      Maybe Sega has mod points here and, no, why would they use Redundant?

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    4. Re:Why we don't use VR helmets today. by mpesce · · Score: 2, Informative

      Display size: NTSC analog broadcast is _essentially_ 320x240 resolution, so it's not really all that bad. Yeah, it sucks for FarCry, but for a scroller - and, in 1993, there were _only_ side scrollers on the consoles - it's more than adequate.

      The tracking issue: I am _positive_ that an EyeToy or iSight could be used as the basis as a very potent tracking system. (I saw demos at SECA research a few years ago which essentially proved this point.) It can be done now, in R/T. I would imagine this is a good use of the PS3's Cell chip. :-)

      The HMD issue: a unary focal plane is not a good thing to use for long periods of time - it makes your eyes weak, because the cornea isn't getting its regular exercise. And any long term use of an HMD produces eyestrain, stereo or not, high-resolution or low. It's a fundamental problem in the design (Robinett, 1992).

    5. Re:Why we don't use VR helmets today. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      and because Virtual Reality is out Argumented Reality is out too? That's pretty pathetic.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:Why we don't use VR helmets today. by NoneExpected · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nice overview.

      I built an HMD for the Army back about 16 years ago. Hmmm maybe more. Called the HELMID program. Helmet Mounted Infantry Display. The results were shall we say less than acceptable. It was weight, weight, weight and weight. And the helmet is a not so good mounting platform, moves too much. The idea was to rifle mount a TV and let the user shoot around corners and over fences without sticking their head out.

      You see a display can not allow any light to escape, if it does then you have lit up the user and he/she is a well lit target for any one else using night vision gear. Very bad. A bullet in the face does not make for an effective soldier.

      This appears to be see through, which means the combiner only reflects a percentage of the image. Which also means the image has to compete with the Sun as in Solar, very tough to do. This display is probably only viewable when the user is looking at a dark surface. The image will be washed out against the sky. You'll need to use stroke graphics for sky viewing.

      A couple of years ago a company started selling one eyed head mounted HUDs for the general aviation market. I asked the salespeople at Oshkosh about all your points, and if they have been getting headaches like the Apache pilots do. Their reaction was interesting, and mixure of "oh my god, some one knows about this and what is he talking about?", I gave them my card and told them I was available for consulting, never heard from them.

      As Bill M used to say, "That eyeball boy ain't changing". The issues are the same, the head can only carry soooo much weight, the sun is bright, and our eyeballs/brain interface is millions of years old and it don't handle mulitple images well.

      Interesing work when you can get it.

      This system is stereo so it should be easier on the eyes/brain. However it'll never see combat if it lights up the user's face.

  42. Hardware behind it all... by Doppleganger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's interesting to that a number of manufacturers are putting out glowing press releases about their involvement with this, including Transmeta. There's a bit more information on Transmeta's site about the actual specs of the wearable system itself.

    And, yes, it can run Linux.

  43. Thermite isn't an explosive, moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. cLIPPY by Uber+Banker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hello. I notice you're attempting to assymilate or eliminate deverse species into your race. It seems like youj're writing a letter...

  45. what's "quantum" got to do with the company? by Avishalom · · Score: 2, Funny

    whenever you encounter a company with the word "quantum" in its name, and you ask yourself why, you should always keep in mind one thing
    Nobody would surrender to the dread pirate Westley

    1. Re:what's "quantum" got to do with the company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WESTLEY
      Well, Roberts had grown so rich, he wanted to retire. So he took me to his cabin and told me his secret. "I am not the Dread Pirate Roberts," he said. "My name is Ryan. I inherited this ship from the previous Dread Pirate Roberts, just as you will inherit it from me. The man I inherited it from was not the real Dread Pirate Roberts, either. His name was Cummerbund. The real Roberts has been retired fifteen years and living like a king in Patagonia." Then he explained the name was the important thing for inspiring the necessary fear. You see, no one would surrender to the Dread Pirate Westley.

      http://www.godamongdirectors.com/scripts/princes s. shtml

  46. ASTROTURFER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, Windows crashes are extremely rare since 2k, but we all know that Linux never, ever crashes.

  47. They had to use low end by Onetrack · · Score: 1

    "The onboard NVIDIA GeForceFX Go 5200 Mobile GPU with 64 MB of frame buffer memory delivers industry-leading image quality and graphics performance." Right. I'm sure someone is bilking the military way, way waaaaaay too much for this industry leading, 2 year old video card.

    1. Re:They had to use low end by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      Dude, for a military procurement, this is a screaming bargain. Those stories about Pentagon buying $600 toilet seats, well some of them are true.

  48. one bullet or piece of frag and the system is by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

    and I dont mean becouse the user is dead eather. one bullet or fragment of metal and all that fancy gear is useless do to system damage.

    I really hope the .gov rememberes the KISS princaple and doesnt adopt this steaming pile of military gear. in the non military role thu it would be cool but very gimmicky.

  49. Yawn.... by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    Wake me when they've got a wearable PC with artificial-reality underwear.

  50. wrong army by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    Uh, I think that's the training instructor for the other side of the Iraq war talking.

  51. Funny by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

    "Soldier Not Included" well, daa!

  52. Its just like in Halo by Tanmi-Daiow · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the Marines in Halo. They all have something like that. They turned out pretty funny, maybe it'll make our army in to a troop of clowns.

    --
    "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive." - C.S. Lewis
  53. But with this training by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    You can produce the next version of America's Army, productise the headset and sell it to 'trainees' who you don't even have to pay to train.

    Then implement the draft! It's genius!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  54. Battery?... by nugunz_101 · · Score: 1

    again, I konw I love to bitch about this, but what are they doing for the battery Life? Of all the things that need to advance in Technology, wut the hell happened to advancing batteries and all that shit?

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country, ask whats for lunch.
  55. One good thing by soldeed · · Score: 1

    In the illustration the vest is available up to XXL. Excellent! I always have trouble finding wearable comuters in my size;)

    1. Re:One good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you tried an xbox?

  56. Mod parent UP ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 Informative !!!!!!

    I've seen this Virtua VR before, and I always wonder why it disappeared, because it was such an inovative product for gaming. These explanations are very good.

  57. Christ, anybody else flashback to 'Beyond 2000'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Australian "tech" show from the mid-nineties? I swear to God, if I'd heard them harping on about "Virgil Reelidee" one more fucking time I'd have...stopped watching...or something. Those presenters miming away to their simulated Virgil Reelidee games, with the headsets and the wireframe "game eenvironmeents"...could it have sucked any worse?

  58. Soldier not included by lashi · · Score: 1

    Remember people, as the illustration says, Soldier not included. Yeah, I know that sucks. I want to buy one with the soldier too. Maybe the next version.

  59. Reminds me of the apple disclaimer: by rune2 · · Score: 1

    Do not eat artifical reality helmet

  60. Artificial or Augmented? by discordance · · Score: 1

    I think Jim Nash has been caught up in the AI hype. Quantum3D is well known for its AUGMENTED REALITY equipment rather than artificial reality helmets.

  61. how to build an HMD by mpesce · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Building HMDs is not rocket science. Back in the early 90s (when I did this kind of research) we used LCD displays purloined from the new portable TVs that were coming on to the market. Sega used 2 320x240 displays (left and right). The focusing system for the eyes (so you don't need to wear glasses, which you can't with most HMDs) is very similar to what you might find in a pair of binoculars. Add an orientation sensor (yaw pitch roll) and that's really just about it. Oh, and you may want a pair of headphones.

    Seriously, this isn't rocket science. We manufactured test HMDs in my garage for a year and a half, using off-the-shelf components. That said, my focal plane can now do things that are downright unnatural - because we used some very odd lensing stages which, well, didn't always work perfectly. ;-)

    But again, these things really aren't safe for any sort of extended use. 20 minutes, a few times a week, is all that anyone could really hope to tolerate without producing unpleasant side-effects.

    All things considered, I think that heads-up displays are far better, because they only add to the real world, rather than substituting something for it. That's where I'd like to see this sort of development go.

    1. Re:how to build an HMD by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      argumented reality is really the way to go, unfortunately the techniques used to make hmds for virtual reality will not translate to public usage of argumented reality due to social issues ("Oh! Look at the cyborg geek!"). Mann's eyetap systems look good, but he doesn't even try to cover them with a sunglass lenses (which is really ironic, he has the best technology for reducing social problems with argumented reality and he wears this stuff in public to deliberately cause social problems - which he calls performance art).

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  62. popup shooter by ingo23 · · Score: 1

    Where else can you shoot popups with M16?

  63. Replacing the Eye by tyman · · Score: 1

    Why the hell would you want to go and replace the human eye. Judging from the illustration it looks like super-soldier-man is going to rely on his OLED screen more than his God-given optical organs.

    Think about it, eyes have almost infinite resolution and our depth perception and perspective will be a hell of a lot better with our eyes than with some
    computer.

    Besides since the camera is mounted on his forehead, his lifetime of spacial judgement training is thrown in the garbage and the soldier will be forever bonking his head on low-lying ceilings.

    1. Re:Replacing the Eye by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Informative
      Think about it, eyes have almost infinite resolution

      No they don't. As far as optical systems go they are pretty poor; chromatic aberration, spherical aberration, they aren't even close to the theoretical performance for an optical system with an objective that size. Human eyes have of the order of 1 arcminute resolution.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    2. Re:Replacing the Eye by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      well whatever, I don't know much about optics so I'll not rebuttal you. But I sure as hell won't be replacing my eye with a USB webcam anytime soon.

  64. Uhhh... by Mr.+KFM · · Score: 1
    "It runs under Windows XP ... full scary system."

    Sounds scary to me.

    --

    If all else fails... RTFM

    1. Re:Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That be great when it BSOD's just when the incoming missile jammer is about to be activated

  65. Anti AD Revenue below; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    A Man-Wearable PC with an Artificial-Reality Helmet

    In this short article, InformationWeek writes that "two sexy technologies that flamed out five years ago -- wearable computers and artificial reality -- are combined in a new training-development system" for the military. This system, developed by Quantum3D, includes a binocular head-mounted OLED display and head-leg-weapon motion-tracking systems, integrated with a vest-worn tactical visual computer. It runs under Windows XP and is compatible with the 802.11 a/b/g wireless networking standards. It will be used by the infantry to train soldiers, but it looks so complex that I would need intensive training just for using it. Read more...

    Here is how InformationWeek describes the system.

    Quantum3D Inc., which bills itself as a visual-computing vendor, has announced the availability of the Expedition, a combination wearable computer and artificial-reality gear. The Expedition's target market is developers of so-called immersive training. Their products, in turn, are used to train armed services personnel and emergency-response workers.

    Among the components are a binocular head-mounted display and head-leg-weapon motion-tracking system by eMagin, and Quantum3D's Thermite tactical visual computer that's worn on a vest. Together, the components are designed to give the wearer accurate simulations of fabricated situations, including visuals, surround sound, and voice command.

    http://www.primidi.com/images/wearable_expedition. jpg

    The above illustration shows all the components of the Expedition. (Credit: Quantum3D Inc.) It comes from this datasheet (PDF format, 2 pages, 901 KB), which includes a description of the realtime visual system -- but please keep in mind that it comes from the company which wants to sell the Expedition.

    The Quantum3D THERMITE Tactical Visual Computer features a man-wearable, light weight, small form factor, superrugged, sealed alloy enclosure with Mil-Spec connectors and conduction cooling that brings the performance and application compatibility of mobile PC workstations to deployed operations in hostile environments. The onboard NVIDIA GeForceFX Go 5200 Mobile GPU with 64 MB of frame buffer memory delivers industry-leading image quality and graphics performance.

    The eMagin binocular OLED head mounted display (HMD) technology is used in Expedition's primary viewing device and provides a 40 degree diagonal field of view and 1.44 megapixels per 24-bit color SVGA microdisplay. With a 200:1 contrast ratio, patented OLED-on-silicon technology to enhance refresh rates, and on-chip signal processing and data buffering, the HMD provides bright, crisp, and flicker-free stereovision capability.

    Quantum3D offers slightly more information in this press release, but doesn't provide a price for the Expedition system.

    Sources: Jim Nash, InformationWeek, February 16, 2005; Quantum3D website

    Related stories can be found in the following categories.

  66. "Thermite" Battery by J_Omega · · Score: 1

    Its capitalized THERMITE for the system, and just Thermite for the batteries... ?

    I thought "WOW! COOL! They figured out a way to control the burn really slowly and are using it to power the system!!!" Guess not.

    FYI, its fun stuff to (carefully) play around with. You just need to grind/sand/file some stuff. Mix 3 parts powdered rust with 1 part powdered aluminum - light with a magnesium strip or sparkler.

  67. bsod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol
    Blue Screen of Death

    It's an oldie but a goodie.

  68. iPod by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Flamed out?

    I'm sorry, but there is a piece of wearable computing equipment in my pocket at all times. I mostly use it for music, as an adress book, and occasionally for a good game of brickout... it's the kind of things a computer can do that are convenient on the go.

    In fact, most people I know have a sofisticated piece of telecommunication computing technology on them most of the time, some of those can even take pictures! We ask them to turn them off in theatres and in class, but you see people outdoors using them quite often.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  69. You're gonna google for Night Vision???!!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh, you meant goggle.

  70. Video specs - Nvidia FX5200 by Wiseleo · · Score: 1

    Nice system, but using Nvidia FX5200 Mobile for its real-time 3d graphics support is a little weird in this day.

    --
    Leonid S. Knyshov
    Find me on Quora :)
  71. Re:Do they seriously use Win XP in war situations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider that warfare consisted of sticks and stones for many thousands of years. WinXP is just a step up. Well, sideways atleast.

  72. 800x600 hmd by edward.virtually@pob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i thought the most interesting thing is that 800x600 oled hmd displays are coming (finally) vs. the currently on market 640x480. of course, how long it takes for the emagin unit to make it into consumer-available (and affordable) technology remains to be seen.

  73. The Graphics on the site: by bferlin · · Score: 1

    Hey... I just realized that I HAD seen that graphic before... isn't that the groklaw backdrop from the top??? Did this guy just lift that graphic from groklaw? http://www.groklaw.net/

    --
    - Brett
    1. Re:The Graphics on the site: by reverius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the "Woodlands" theme from this guy's site: http://www.bryanbell.com/radioThemes/

      He says anyone is welcome to use the themes, or to adapt them for other weblogs (Roland Piquepaille runs Radio UserLand, which the theme was originally for, and Groklaw runs GeekLog).

    2. Re:The Graphics on the site: by bferlin · · Score: 1

      Ahhh. Well there ya go. Just goes to show how versitile the web is. Share and share alike :)

      --
      - Brett
  74. What the heck's going on by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I mean... submitted by Roland Piquepaille and the banner strip across the top of that page has " Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends"

    This is ridiculous... why aren't the editors kicking this guy out??? but then again, at least he's honest sorta about himself... other sneaky types probably are pushing their own ad revenue by making their submissions with a pseudonym slashdot account

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  75. Blah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My tinfoil hat runs cp/m and kicks its ass.

  76. I knew the logo looked familiar by Luciq · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else remember a few years back when Quantum 3D was making voodoo banshee cards?

  77. Re:Do they seriously use Win XP in war situations by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    where have you been? Military's been running Windows for a long long time now. Way back when, it made the headlines when a Navy destroyer (or was that a cruiser) got stuck out in the ocean because the NT computer running the ship crashed.

  78. Money well spent... by Eatmorecake · · Score: 1

    Someone mentioned to me once that the U.S. spends more on our military than almost all others countries put together.

    Anyone know if this is true, or where to get the figures?

    Anyone know how much the Windows XP G.I.Joe is going for?

    --
    Don't you mean.. BIZZARO! ..Signature?
    1. Re:Money well spent... by fgb · · Score: 1

      Of course it's true. Why would any other country spend money on our military?

  79. For more Information, look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For more Information, look here (original press release from Quantum3D):
    http://www.quantum3d.com/press/2005/02-15-05_Exped _Anno.htm
    and here (Quantum3D about Thermite):
    http://www.quantum3d.com/products/Thermite/thermit e.html

  80. Re:one bullet or piece of frag and the system is by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Well, there's a philosophy with the military brass that they HAVE to go high-tech. Reasoning is, America has more money and more high tech than anyone, it's our only true advantage over our adversaries, so we have to keep pushing it and find a technological edge.

    The former Soviet bloc had more troops than us, China has WAY more troops than us, both match us in tanks bombs and artillery, so we needed to develop better stuff than them. To a large degree this has paid off, although the amount of money spent has been tremendous. But things like GPS guided bombs, stealth aircraft and high tech command-and-control systems do give our troops an advantage.

    Even though the military does do stupid things on occasion, give them some credit. If a system is truly unwieldy and flops miserably during testing, it won't get adopted for field use. The fact that they're constantly looking at new high tech stuff, trying to find something useful, means that they will have lot of flops too. But one thing you can say about U.S. military for sure - they're not stagnant.

  81. Cool fineprint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just love the fine-print in the bottom of this picture!

  82. Re:Do they seriously use Win XP in war situations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God help us

    I think you misspelled "Bill Gates"

  83. Re:The system's computer is named "Thermite". by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

    One cute result you get (apart from the light, and the heat, and the screaming if you try it at home) is molten iron. I've seen video of railway engineers using the thermite reaction in a shaped 'bucket' to weld railway tracks together.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  84. difference by goon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is the difference in approach with your kit and say Steve Manns? Admittantly your system is commercial consumer grade where constraints of market and production play a big part in releasing product. But Manns research and production into wearable computers (wearcomp: tapping into his right eye) has been around for ages.

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
    1. Re:difference by mpesce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A single-eye system will produce eyestrain, but I don't know that it will necessarily produce binocular dysphoria. I doubt any studies have been done on this - and quite probably, they should be. Although VR is all fun and games, it's quite closely coupled to our biology, and that makes it very potent.

  85. Re:one bullet or piece of frag and the system is by Nifrith · · Score: 1

    "really hope the .gov rememberes the KISS princaple "
    Are we talking about the heavy metal group KISS? I mean, I wouldn't want the government to adopt a heavy metal band to be apart of the Army. Too much history, y'know?

  86. But, will it run on ... by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

    an Amiga?

  87. Roland Piquepaille blocker firefox extension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Roland Piquepaille blocker firefox extension

    http://rolandblocker.50megs.com

    important: right-click and SAVE AS, do not try to install directly, it doesn't seem to work

    this was a 3-hour hack over "Hello World" xpi by Eric Hamiter and over blockxxx by Tom Christensen

  88. R*land P*quepaille blocker firefox extension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    R*land P*quepaille blocker firefox extension

    http://rolandblocker.50megs.com

    this was a 3-hour hack over "Hello World" xpi by Eric Hamiter [roachfiend.com] and over blockxxx by Tom Christensen [technerve.com]

  89. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you modded up the A.C. "-1 Roland", so mod the extension announcement too!

  90. Re:Roland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roland is timothy's boyfriend, they like to fuck each other's butt with vaseline (which they buy in liters from the blog ad revenue)

  91. Mod Parent +5 SpaceBalls by zoloto · · Score: 1

    This is from SPACE BALLS. He's not off topic, only trying to be funny

  92. Wardriving! by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    Built-in wireless networking? I guess that gives a whole new meaning to wardriving, then.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  93. Actually... by cr0sh · · Score: 2, Interesting
    800x600 resolution HMDs have been around for quite a while - for example, I own a CyberEye CE-200M HMD which uses 800x600 LCDs - very crisp output I might add (though the FOV isn't great). In fact, a ton of money will get you XGA and beyond HMDs. Most consumer and prosumer level HMDs have been *maximum* 640x480, often with very crappy FOVs.

    I think the real nice thing is that this is a recent instance of an HMD using OLEDs instead of LCD or CRT devices. That is the real story on it...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  94. www.oled-display.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More about the OLED/Pled Display technology at http://www.oled-display.net/

  95. Missing the point on the power of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While this could go into the field, the real power of this system is in mission rehearsal. Think about it. You have to storm into a city you've never been to. Get you troups together out at base in the desert, fire up the 3D version of the city, run your mission - PRACTICE it before you go and do it. I can see this saving a lot of lives.

    The enemy is completely familiar with their surroundings - this is the next best way to give our troups the same advantage.

    The other advantage would be, after they run their mission, they can play it back and see where they made mistakes.