Slashdot Mirror


GlobalFlyer Completes Record-Breaking Flight

ikewillis writes "Steve Fossett has successfully landed the GlobalFlyer in Kansas, completing the record-breaking flight and becoming the first person to successfully circle the earth in a nonstop solo flight. The journey of 37,000 kilometres has taken 67 hours, many of them fraught with anxiety over whether the custom-made GlobalFlyer aircraft had enough fuel for the trip. Fossett managed to touch down at 2:48 p.m. EST, to the delight of mission control staff, a small crowd and a marching band that had gathered at the airstrip to welcome him."

46 of 496 comments (clear)

  1. 67 hours no? by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The friendly article mentioned "The journey of 37,000 kilometres took 67 hours".

    What is unknown is the amount of fuel left when the craft was landed, I'm sure I'm not the only one eager to find out.

    1. Re:67 hours no? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, it'll be interesting to see if it was jsut an instrument error, evaporation, or whatever else.

      Also, I'm interested in their fuel economy in the real world as compared to what they expected.

    2. Re:67 hours no? by ergo98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is unknown is the amount of fuel left when the craft was landed

      One would have to presume that they calculated the necessary amount of fuel beforehand to achieve the lightest flight weight possible. It seems inconceivable that they really lost 2,600 lbs of fuel and still completed the journey fine.

      I see three possibilities.

      -The whole "loss of fuel" thing was a huge publicity stunt that worked wonderfully. Oooh, the anxiety!

      -Their inflight measurements were wrong.

      -They REALLY overfilled it, and had plenty to slop around.

    3. Re:67 hours no? by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot to convert it to metric hours.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:67 hours no? by silvwolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      -The whole "loss of fuel" thing was a huge publicity stunt that worked wonderfully. Oooh, the anxiety!

      Article Link

      "When asked if the Mission Control team had overplayed the seriousness of the fuel shortage, Branson replied: "Incredibly, the thing is, in life truth is often stranger than fiction."

      Branson said he had expected the flight would either be disastrous or boring but "everything that could have happened seems to have happened. There has been a lot of drama.""

      (That was before the landing.)

    5. Re:67 hours no? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

      Remember that at the last minute, they changed the flightplan to take a MASSIVE shortcut by cutting out the northern atlantic route and instead flying directly to Africa and across that way (due to preferential winds apparently) That would have saved a lot of fuel, which probably helped a lot.

    6. Re:67 hours no? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yeah, it'll be interesting to see if it was jsut an instrument error, evaporation, or whatever else.

      Or if it was just hype to add some drama to the flight and keep it at the top of the headlines. Wouldn't be the first time for an artificial crisis.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    7. Re:67 hours no? by Enigma_Man · · Score: 3, Informative

      The chute _was_ necessary to land properly, the info on the Scaled Composites site specifically mentions that. The plane had such a good glide-to-drop-ratio (I forget the actual term for that) that it made it extremely difficult to land. You couldn't get the plane to drop fast enough to land in any sort of reasonable runway, it would just skim over the ground.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    8. Re:67 hours no? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Informative

      The actual requirements are '36,787.559-kilometer minimum distance required for the arbiter of world aviation records, the Paris-based Federation Aeronautique Internationale, to recognize the feat.' There you go.

    9. Re:67 hours no? by Evil+Poot+Cat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think the mission was looking really thin, until he found that fuel powerup over the Pacific. Then it was smooth sailing the rest of the way.

  2. Correction by Zebbie · · Score: 5, Informative
    The post says that the flight took "more than 80 hours," but the first link states the flight took 67 hours.

    Also FYI (37,000 km) / (67 hours) = 343.145285 mph ... pretty darn fast considering they were expecting an average of 285mph.

    1. Re:Correction by KUHurdler · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Do you claim that your trip to work this morning involved moving 30,000 miles?"

      Only on my taxes.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
  3. Can I just be the first to say ... by B3ryllium · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who gives a flying F***!!!? ;-)

  4. Congratulations to Scaled Composites & Steve F by corngrower · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Congratulations to Fosset and the folks at Scaled Composites!. I'll bet he's had enough flying for awhile and he's probably wanting to take a shower and freshen up some right away.

    I'm wondering how much fuel was left when he landed, given that problem with the missing 2600 lb of fuel. The journey took about 68 hours by my calculations, which was considerably below the initial estimate of 80 hours.

    nbc news had this story http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7075972/

    Ya think he might want to take a ship back to the U.K.? He's probably not going to want a milkshake for a few days either.

  5. Sad, isn't it? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    a small crowd and a marching band that had gathered at the airstrip to welcome him."

    A guy flies all around the world, non-stop, solo in a jet aircraft and that's his reception. He should have landed in France, they knew how to welcome Lindy.

    The first person to fly, solo, nonstop around the moon and back will probably be greeted by a kid with a kazoo.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Sad, isn't it? by entrager · · Score: 4, Funny
      The first person to fly, solo, nonstop around the moon and back will probably be greeted by a kid with a kazoo.
      No, they will be greeted by Ashlee Simpson.
    2. Re:Sad, isn't it? by Coffee+Warlord · · Score: 4, Funny

      He landed in Kansas. That was the entire population of the state that came out. :)

    3. Re:Sad, isn't it? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, he decided to land in freakin' Kansas. They don't have many people out there, feewer people who give a rat's ass.

      If he would have landed in Chicago, NYC, or any number of other places, he would have had a huge crowd.

    4. Re:Sad, isn't it? by dustinbarbour · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dude.. We've been to the moon and have sent probes outside of our paltry little solar system. I'd say his reception was about right. The Frenchies only welcoemd Lindbergh as they did because he was the first to go solo across the Atlantic, a MAJOR feat at the time. Going around the world on one tank of gas isn't that incredible when compared to other recent achievements such as SpaceShip One and our Martian rovers.

    5. Re:Sad, isn't it? by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah .. especially as the Space Shuttle goes around the world on one tank of gas .. just happens to be a bloody big tank.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  6. A Great American Hero by yoey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look at what's happened to me,
    I can't believe it myself.
    Suddenly I'm up on top of the world,
    It should've been somebody else.

    Believe it or not,
    I'm walking on air.
    I never thought I could feel so free eee eee.
    Flying away on a wing and a prayer.
    Who could it be?
    Believe it or not it's just me.

    1. Re:A Great American Hero by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 4, Funny

      Believe it or not
      George isn't at home...

      --
      He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
  7. Easy to go faster than that by RedVortex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why didn't he just took off and re-landed right away, it would've been much faster than going around the world just to land at the same spot... DUH !!! Scientists, always missing the obvious... RedVortex

  8. yeah, but by FirstNoel · · Score: 4, Funny

    it will be the best kazoo money can buy...

    --
    "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
  9. I feel...nothing by luchaugh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know, maybe I'm jaded, but these "record breaking" feats just don't seem to capture my attention or imagination. I have to think it would have been so exciting to have lived, say, a hundred years ago when these things were garnering world-wide attention and people like Lindberg became heroes. But nowadays, for whatever, reason... nothing. Nada. Zilch. Somewhat disappointed that I can't seem to get into this. Anyone else feel the same?

    1. Re:I feel...nothing by Kalgash · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Nope. You're just dead inside. Like so many others you have been anihalated by the constant barage of daily 'life changing' events. You now find it almost impossible to get excited about something whose relative excitement level (by your standards) ranks up there with finding out the current terrorist threat level has been upped once again.

      As a result (and to protect your mental faculties) your capacity for true joy has been severely curtailed. Don't worry. There are many like you out there. Jaded, bored and drowning in ennui. The rest of us allow ourselves the opportunatity to be hurt and perhaps even overloaded. As a result we feel real joy when others accomplish great things.

      I don't really know if your type is more prevalant than my type and frankly I think the answer would probably depress the fuck out of me.

      Try to find your wonderment. In your capacity for humanity. For our ability to push boundries and reach for the unknown. For the very real way that despite all of the dangers we pose to ourselves we have so far avoided utter distruction.

      Unless you are willing to risk disappointment you will never know true joy.

  10. Catching up with the Soviets, are we? by Adam.Steinbaugh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wasn't Yuri Gagarin "the first person to successfully circle the earth in a nonstop solo flight" in Vostok 1, back in '61? Hyuk.

    --
    "Mother, should I run for President? Mother, should I trust the government?"
  11. Re:Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only difference between Steve Fosset and myself is millions upon millions of dollars.

    Yeah, that and talent, vision, courage, ability, funding, support, drive, goals, and...well...a record.

    But don't worry, trolling on /. is just as honorable.

  12. Re:Salina, Kansas by Jarnis · · Score: 3, Informative

    VERY long runway.

    And that's where he started (because of the very long runway that was needed for takeoff).

    And by the record rules, you have to start and land from the same airfield.

  13. Sleep? by weston · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The 60-year-old millionaire adventurer stayed awake for almost all of the trip, taking only brief catnaps in the jet"

    A 60 year old staying awake for nearly three days straight is as impressive to me as fuel economy. I couldn't make two full days straight, even when I was 19...

    1. Re:Sleep? by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Funny
      Even more so, a 60 year old going 4 days without going to the bathroom. I'm only 35 and I'm lucky if I can make it 4 hours without having to take a leak...

      I know, I know, they probably had a waste disposal system on the jet. Though it'd be pretty funny if that was one of the things they'd overlooked... "OK, now I'm going to test the Jet's waste disposal system... Aaah... Er... guys... tell me the jet has a waste disposal system?"

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  14. Congratulations most deservedly goes to... by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 4, Informative

    Jon Karkow, my neighbor and project manager/designer and chief test pilot of this little airplane. It was his baby from start to finish. (in addition to all the other congratulations all around!)

    --M

  15. The rest of the story by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    And his luggage will arrive next week -- at the latest!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  16. Around the Earth .. Really??? by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd be one of the first to congratulate him for his flight, but how do you define "Around the earth"?? Especially when:

    a) He was 3000 km shy of the circumference at the equator.

    b) I don't belive he made it into the southern hemisphere.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  17. Re:Mod me down but this is no big accomplishment by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 3, Informative

    Publicity for the same rich guy, in fact. Branson put up all the cash for this little excursion.

  18. Bigger deal for Burt Rutan by ShamanDave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We can debate whether Fosset deserves praise, but I think it's pretty clear that it's a huge accomplishment for Burt Rutan.

  19. In other news.... by tinrobot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. Fossett has just set another record for the longest time spent standing in front of a urinal.

  20. Why the hype? by Macrobat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This really seems to be overhyped to me. It is, at most, an incremental improvement over the status quo. Lindberg crossing the Atlantic was significant because nothing like it had ever been done; but we first orbited the Earth back in the '60s, military aircraft circle the globe in flight constantly, and there has never really been a commercial need for a plane that could go more than halfway around the world at one time. So, yeah, congratulations and all, but this sounds more like a millionaire sailing around the world in his yacht than the next Magellan.

    --
    "Hardly used" will not fetch you a better price for your brain.
  21. Re:Salina, Kansas by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Funny

    How informative. It's unfortunate the war ended 9 years before a B52 ever flew, or that training would have been a lot more valuable.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  22. Re:Mod me down but this is no big accomplishment by Grip3n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Obviously this man has a lot of opportunity in his life. He has obtained enough wealth to do whatever he so chooses, and rather than living a shallow quiet life of no regard, he has chosen to live life to its fullest.

    He has decided to break records, to participate in the production of a machine which would allow a human to do something no other human has done before. He has chosen to make history not just as a man with money, but a man with money who decided to live the adventure.

    Contrast this with the opposite: gather money, buy, sell, rinse and repeat until you die. Is that what you would have rather seen? Would you have congratulated this man on living a life worth living having done that? I doubt it. This man hasn't do that - he has decided to do something more.

    The Richard Bransons in this world are men who have opportunity and take it. They live their lives to a degree that we cannot because of our financial situation. They could easily, EASILY decide to lay back and do nothing at all. These men do not do that, rather they willingly decide to pioneer, to carve a path for the rest of humanity. Whether it is creating extremely efficient aircraft, going into space or more, they are living their lives to its fullest potential.

    Remember: All men die, few men really live.

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
  23. Re:sorry, around the world? since when?! by groomed · · Score: 4, Informative
    Actually, from the global flyer website:
    The FAI's rules state that a record attempt like this must start and finish at the same airfield and cross all meridians of the globe. What's more the course must not be less than the very precise figure of 36,787.559 kilometres (around 23,000 miles) which is equal in length to the Tropic of Cancer. To allow the Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer to catch the vital jet stream winds, the FAI rules don't oblige that record attempts follow the imaginary line of the Tropic itself but simply that the distance flown exceeds it.
    So it seems more or less legit.
  24. Re:Blah by dwlovell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Time is worth more than money. The fact that he spent his own personal time and money to make this happen is a testament to the courage and vision and talent.

    When Universities spend government grant money to do stuff like this, people fall all over themselves to congratulate them. Some guy spends his own money and years of his life to do the same, and suddenly he is some "rich fuck" in your eyes.

    It is obvious that your problem is that you are insecure about your own lack of funds and this is preventing you from congratulating someone who deserves accolades for their hard work. This wasn't some fly-by-night (no pun intended) attempt. This guy has been trying for many years with multiple prototypes and failed attempts. He didn't give up, regardless of how expensive it was.

    Get over the fact that you are not rich and see the value that his research brings to the world. (the same value you would see if this was a government funded research project).

    -David

  25. and one willing to risk his life at it too by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many of his adventures have a big chance in ending in a lethal failure. Yeah he has money, but he is living the dreams of many who do not and inspiring some of them to try to put themselves in the same position.

    Losers rarely want to do what winners have to do.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  26. Radio chatter by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did anyone else catch the radio chatter as he switched over to the Selina tower frequency? Lots of congratulations from airlines, and one

    "Fossett, you're a stud."

  27. Waste Disposal System by jac1962 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder how big his piss can was?

    IIRC, the USAF's U-2S high altitude reconnaissance aircraft piss can held about a quart.

    Sometimes, if we were turning a jet for a second sortie the same day, the crew chief would forget to empty the can (thank God I was an avionics specialist!) after the first pilot had made his contribution. The second pilot would discover this oversight when his urine would fill the can and then back up the tube to overflow in his pressure suit, where it sloshed around for the remainder of the flight. . .

    There is no facility for disposing of solid waste though. Every now and then a mission would abort because the pilot was suffering from "gastrointestinal distress." In the 5th Reconnaissance Squadron's (IYAABYAS!) ops shack, there is plaque high up on the wall, with a roll of toilet paper attached, commerating all those brave U-2 pilots who joined the exclusive "Stratoshitters Club." One guy's name was on there twice. . .

    --
    "I worked hard for it. I deserve it. And I have it," Campbell said. "It's all mine."
  28. Those are Canadian hours by simetra · · Score: 3, Funny

    they're smaller, so more... 80 Canadian hours = approx 67 Regular hours.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou