Slashdot Mirror


Plextor PVRs Now Support Linux

planetjay writes "Plextor PVRs now support Linux with an open source SDK for their ConvertX PVR external USB TV tuner/encoder This is great news for Linux PVR users who want to use an external device with hardware based MPEG-2 and MPEG-4/DivX encoding in their MythTV or Freevo homebuilt PVR. "Plextor is strongly committed to supporting the Open Source Software movement with free development tools that help speed the creation of next-generation Linux-based video software," said Dirk Peters, director of marketing, Plextor."

172 comments

  1. Kudos by michaelhood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I keep loving seeing these companies lately who are Doing The Right Thing (tm). Here's to hoping clue is contagious.

    1. Re:Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to bet that most people who know you wish you were dead.

    2. Re:Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they don't, just to spite you.

    3. Re:Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. are you on that list?

      -mh

    4. Re:Kudos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A GPL'd driver? No sir, they're not doing the right thing. They're on the right track, but they haven't made it to the station.

      A BSD licensed driver, or a Public Domain licensed (if there even is such a thing) driver with either BSD licensed or GPL'd userland apps would have been more politically correct.

      With a GPL'd driver, you can't have this running on other platforms. At least not legally.

    5. Re:Kudos by LarsWestergren · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here's to hoping clue is contagious.

      Clue IS contagious, but scientists recently discovered that ignorance is radioactive and kills clue every time, I'm sorry to say.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    6. Re:Kudos by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With a GPL'd driver, you can't have this running on other platforms. At least not legally.

      You can use the gpl'd driver as documentation for writing a new driver....
      You just can't cut and paste it.

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    7. Re:Kudos by smartdreamer · · Score: 1
      Mpeg 1,2 and 4 + USB 2 + ALSA + Kernel 2.6 + SDK.
      Now, that's great news! What more to ask? Good prices? :)

      Good to see companies are integrating Linux Kernel 2.6 into products. This brings ALSA, V4L and their benfits to customers.

    8. Re:Kudos by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Didn't you hear that BSD is dead?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
  2. Any advice on hardware encoders? by izakage · · Score: 0

    I've been having trouble choosing a nice hardware MPEG encoder. Any reccomendations on ones that worked well for you?

    1. Re:Any advice on hardware encoders? by planetjay · · Score: 3, Informative
  3. gee by ginotech · · Score: 1, Redundant

    wow, now i actually might go buy the necessary equipment and start using my linux box as a pvr

    1. Re:gee by nmarus · · Score: 1

      Ofcource I've yet to see a company make something compatable with my satalite service. So, in the meantime I'm stuck with the DVR in my Sat Receiver.

      --
      Nicholas Marus
    2. Re:gee by enrico_suave · · Score: 3, Informative

      " Ofcource I've yet to see a company make something compatable with my satalite service. So, in the meantime I'm stuck with the DVR in my Sat Receiver."

      you basically can use almost any DVR with an external satellite set top box. You just route the video/audio output of the STB to the DVR/encoding card and use an IR blaster or serial cable to control the STB (i.e. change the channels at the appropriate time)

      The only rub really would be if it's an HDTV satellite service, as that's a different wrinkle =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    3. Re:gee by hashts · · Score: 1

      I read recently (sorry lost the link) that we can't record HD signals from cable or satellite since they are encrypted. The amount of information from an HD feed is huge and with current technology would take a 6GHz CPU to decrypt in real-time.

      Here's to hoping there will be a solution in the near future but don't hold your breath.

    4. Re:gee by enrico_suave · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I read recently (sorry lost the link) that we can't record HD signals from cable or satellite since they are encrypted. The amount of information from an HD feed is huge and with current technology would take a 6GHz CPU to decrypt in real-time."

      Well not ALL satellite traffic is encrypted. There's a ton of FTA DVB satellite signals out there... even hidef ones (ok they are pbs, but still... mmmmm NOVA...

      There are a few HDTV cards that CAN decode unencrypted QAM signal via digital cable, but that depends on your cable company not encrypting which is hit or miss...

      There's also the possibility of pulling the HDTV content over firewire (and controlling the STB via firewire) and I believe the latest mythtv .17 has some preliminary support for such an arrangement, again depending on if your firewire port is enabled and some other factors on your particular STB (although I'm confused as whether they have to have the firewire port be unencrytped or not, or what the regs are, to be honest...)

      *Shrug* so I guess you're basically right, but it's not out of the question, but there's not a good legal way to decrypt digital cable (or directV/dishnetwork) like using a CableCard in some HDTV's now...

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    5. Re:gee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That defeats part of the purpose. One nice thing about DSS based PVR's (at least the TiVo units integrated with DirecTV) is they record the bit stream directly so there is no digital-analog-digital, and shows with 5.1 sound are not downmixed to 2 channel analog. In short, there's zero quality difference between live and recorded TV.

    6. Re:gee by Nik13 · · Score: 1

      What do you mean stuck with your PVR sat receiver?

      IMHO, it beats all other PVRs hands down. No loss of quality - both for video and audio. I don't know if people using the analog counterparts are blind, don't care about quality or what, but there is NO way I'm putting up with the quality of the analog captures. With sat, I also keep digital sound (AC3 5.1 if present). Even the difference between analog captured audio (even with good card/cables and all) and basic mpeg audio recorded as is (not captured) is just about impossible not to notice. Not to mention (here at least) that cable is much lower quality to start with (and more expensive, bad packages, ...). They also make some models that work with HDTV.

      With a PC based PVR (not only with sat, but also digital cable boxes) you're forced you to use IR blasters, or even worse, some just can't change channels. It's a PITA to setup and , unreliablenot overly reliable.

      With the PC based PVR, you gotta put a PC together, isntall OS and software. Configure it all (including codecs, TV guide, IR blasters, ...), update/patch it like a normal PC.

      My sat PVR works right out of the box (including remote and TV guide). No hassles. The whole thing (not just a PVR but also a sat receiver) cost me like 50$ than a basic hauppauge PCI capture card would have cost me.

      The PC will cost significantly more. Especially if you want a nice HTPC case like D-Vines, a nice remote, quality parts (who wants a PVR that crashes middle of a show?) and all.

      And don't tell me about burning DVDs from low quality analog captures that just aren't good enough to be burned anyways (and I can rip the movies off my PVR in 100% quality and burn them if I cared to anyways). And don't get me started on those extra features that don't belong there (like watch photos at under a half megapixel and bad gamut, when my family all lives >1000km away and have photo galleries to watch online and get 12MP DSLR pics snail-mailed onto DVDRs as well) and other things.

      To complement things I have a HTPC as well. Even if it already has a capture card in it, lots of disk space and everything, I'm not using it as a PVR. It's just NOWHERE as good as the sat PVR is at that.

      Unless you can't get satellite, then I can understand why one wouldn't use that instead.

      --
      ///<sig />
    7. Re:gee by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      there's a lot to what you are saying... it's absolutely true that the satellite PVR, takes the digital stream and writes the digital bits right to the local disk and there's no loss of quality.

      BUT there are other reasons to build a PVR... There are satellite cards out there, and if the satellite companies allowed you to legitimately use your subscription access card with one of these cards, it would be a moot benefit.

      Look, the reason to roll your own PVR has little to do with economics. If you can get a DVR for 5 dollars extra a month on your cable bill, it'll take a while to recoup a PC investment alone...

      So if it's not about economics/being cheap... what's it about alfie?

      It's about freedom. freedom to move content around. Burn DVDs... Let me see you move your favorite show to your smartphone, PDA, PVP, laptop, etc... Freedom to add features at will. Does your satellite DVR let you add movie times, pull in comics, or get slashdot rss feeds? IT's the freedom to tinker...

      You don't get that with your satellite provided DVR, IMHO.

      *Shrug* YMMV

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    8. Re:gee by Nik13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, most HDTV sat programming (in NA) went to secure encryption (nagravision 2) not long ago, so you can't record it (unecnrypted) as easily as before.

      Decrypting actually isn't so CPU intensive. I used to record/decrypt HD off sat (DVB) easily with a lowly Athlon XP 2000+, and cpu load was rather low. I think memory speed/latency and such might be more of a concern. (AFAIK, some cards can also do the decrypting itself in hardware, you just send it the proper keys)

      As for decoding, you don't need so much speed either. Your video card (well, good ones at least) have some mpeg2 decoding acceleration. Sames goes for some OTA HDTV tuner cards. With a 3GHz PC and a good video card, you can playback 1080i stuff off satellite as is more than easily. (Actually, I can play 1080i easily on a 2GHz PC with a so-so video card in VLC without any problems). At OTA HDTV bitrates it might be a bit more problematic (haven't tried, no feeds available here). 1080p contents in WMV9 (kind of mpeg4 almost sorta ;) - even with DRM) should play fine with a 3GHz CPU supposedly, and mpeg4 usually more cpu intensive than mpeg2 (at same resolution/bitrate).

      With optimized DVB software, fast video card drivers (not necessarily the latest version, some break mpeg2 decoding acceleration), recent video card, using a fast mpeg2 decoder with right settings, using a custom filtergraph worked fine on a 3GHz PC (decrypt/decode/watch real-time, usually mpeg2 @ 13mbit 720p HP@HL), and I've heard claims of it working on even slower setups (found it a bit hard to believe mind you).

      --
      ///<sig />
    9. Re:gee by Nik13 · · Score: 1

      No it's not just about economics. But the Pc based PVRs are also way too much of a PITA and time consuming to setup.

      As for the DVD burning feature, like I had mentionned before, I can't imagine bothering with that. If you watch on PDA/phone or such (especially since recordnig quality hardly matters then), then I guess that can be handy for you. Even if I don't do that or never seen anyone even mention that (other than online), I'll still grant you that.

      As for movie times, comisc, rss feeds and all those extra features, like I had said, I don't see a reason to have that on my TV (thru the TV, whatever). My HTPC alerady does all this, but I still do it right on the PC itself, while the TV does the thing it was intended for - show TV shows and movies. Perhaps the nature of what you watch/follow might change that. Comics wise I only check dilbert (at work) daily :p RSS feeds, nothing beats FeedDemon IMHO. I see absolutely no loss whatsoever not having these in my sat PVR (actually, it has a whole bunch of things like that that I don't use, like weather, interactive games, lotto numbers, ...). Just like I don't miss not having a camera or mp3 player in my cell phone.

      YMMV indeed :)

      --
      ///<sig />
    10. Re:gee by nmarus · · Score: 1

      True, but at least with the PC based PVR I can move my caputure to my laptop or better yet burn to DVD for later viewing.

      --
      Nicholas Marus
    11. Re:gee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      compatable?
      satalite?

      I'm not usually picky on spelling, typos or whatever (punctuation and capitalization too), even on such common and simple words, but when you can't even pronounce them the way they're spelled and sound somewhat like it should... I can live with "Ofcource", at least it sort of sounds OK (Or is that some southern accent?)

    12. Re:gee by dave_f1m · · Score: 1

      Your family all have 12MP DSLR cameras and you can even mention prices of PVR equipment? WTF?

  4. Awesome by SealBeater · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What's nice about this to me is that, since it's USB2 (tech specs aside), you
    can take the space that a pci card would have, put a usb2 card in it's place,
    and have multiple tuners, since mythtv has support for multiple tuners, case
    space considerations are no longer such a factor.

    Now, we just have to see if it's any good.

    SealBeater

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    1. Re:Awesome by lakeland · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or just buy a card with multiple tuners. My pvr500 has two, but I've heard of cards with four! That way you don't have to have an ugly USB device outside the case.

      Not to take away from what Plextor has done though, this looks like it might be the solution for some people.

    2. Re:Awesome by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      How many USB2 tuners could you concievably hook up before you use up all the USB bandwidth?

      The Hauppage 500 has two tuners, for less than the 250, I've been waiting patiently for it to be fully supported by the ivtv module (it was close a month ago when I checked)

      Too bad theres no way to do it with USB 1.1, an xbox + usb tuner would make a kickass (and cheap) myth box.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Awesome by SealBeater · · Score: 1

      Ah, I wasn't aware such existed, awesome.

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    4. Re:Awesome by IoN_PuLse · · Score: 1

      You have a PVR500 working with linux and mythtv? Has it been stable?

    5. Re:Awesome by etnoy · · Score: 0

      Yeah, It's great. But for me there is another good reason. Since my new HTPC I've built, Dell Optiplex GX150, has only a power supply of 110W, an external PVR might be the only solution. I'm not sure, but I doubt that I'll be able to get a decent graphics card into that box.

      --
      Quantum hacker.
    6. Re:Awesome by lakeland · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I have it working. I downloaded a patch to ivtv from somewhere (first hit on google) and it works. Too soon to say if it is stable, because I've only just put it in (to replace a cx88 based tuner).

    7. Re:Awesome by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      That way you don't have to have an ugly USB device outside the case.

      Who cares how many USB devices you have hanging off your backend system? Just use a separate frontend for the living room. My encoder box is in the basement in a closet with 800GB of storage on on it and I just use a diskless Via EPIA M10000 system running MiniMyth on the frontend. It's a much more modular way to go than having to have a big honking box in the living room with the drives and encoders.

    8. Re:Awesome by Sketch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Or just buy a card with multiple tuners. My pvr500 has two, but I've heard of cards with four!

      But does your Myth box have enough CPU power to simultaneously record/encode 4 MPEG4/DivX streams? As far as I know, the Hauppage cards only do MPEG2 which is going to require much more disk space. The Plextor devices encode to MPEG4/DivX in hardware, so you should be able to handle a lot more tuners on one lower-spec box.

      However, USB I/O is rather CPU intensive from what I've seen. I wonder how many you could actually hook up and use simultaneously.

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    9. Re:Awesome by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      That's great if you only have 2 or 4 channels, but I have over 400 TV stations that I want to record every one of them 24x7 in order to watch later.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    10. Re:Awesome by Tombstone-f · · Score: 1

      From what I've heard the .3h ivtv drivers are fairly stable with both the 150 and 500. They also autodetect all the needed settings.

    11. Re:Awesome by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Yeah...I'm putting together an all in one system right now...frontend and backend on same box. But, I'd heard that myth frontend had been ported for the ppc/mac.

      Was thinking of getting a mac mini...setting it up as my frontend for the living room...and putting the pc monster as a backend only into the office. Wonder if anyone has this combo working?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:Awesome by lakeland · · Score: 1

      LOL! Most MBs don't have many USB hubs. Mine has three, but I understand newer machines have four. Say you can fit four of these devices to a USB hub before saturating it, I think I'll be limited to sixteen channels simultaneously. Oh, and you'll have to have a decent RAID setup for recording them all. Aren't you lucky mythtv supports slave servers? :-)

      PS: Crazy as recording 400 channels is, it seems much less crazy now than it did a few weeks ago. I run mythtv for my family to potentially three clients simultaneously, and now the neighbours access it via wifi, so I could easily see the need for half-a-dozen tuners in a machine.

    13. Re:Awesome by lutchann · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't recommend it, but we've had 48 of these encoders running simultaneously at 1 Mbps each on a single USB controller. That's with no audio though, so it's not a useful measurement for a PVR.

    14. Re:Awesome by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Sure they do, i think it is one of the most popular combos since the mini came out. Google will find more. I have mythfrontend installed on my wife's iMac, it works fine.

      The combo I personally use is x86 backend and xbox frontend. The controller for the xbox is a bit of a pain, but otherwise it works well.

  5. Skip Commercials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If it can do that.....I'll buy it.

    1. Re:Skip Commercials? by Vengeance_au · · Score: 1

      Its the software that does the skipping - Myth TV is my poison, and it works great :-)

  6. what harware are you guys using for mthtv? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gonna build a mythtv box to record hdtv and satalite... what hardware should I buy to build one of these bad boys?

    1. Re:what harware are you guys using for mthtv? by planetjay · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Hauppauge PVR-250 is what I used on mine.

  7. Only NTSC tv tuner by rar · · Score: 4, Informative

    The sad thing is that the built-in tv-tuner only supports NTSC, so this product is obviously not targeted for europe...

    1. Re:Only NTSC tv tuner by bjerre · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have a look at the NorthQ 6600 instead.
      http://northq.com/products/tvvideo/nq6600.html

      Same product just cheaper AND it features PAL!

      I have it running on my RedHat at home // chris

      Linux driver and manual is found on their support pages:
      http://northq.com/faq/

      PS If you're attending CeBIT this week they are in Hall 24, Stand B16

    2. Re:Only NTSC tv tuner by JanneM · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, that one doesn't seem to have a tuner at all. Note that the Plextor can use both PAL and NTSC signals as well; it only has a tuner for NTSC, though.

      Interesting piece of kit anyway - thanks for the link.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:Only NTSC tv tuner by lutchann · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are three models of the TV402U: North America, Europe (PAL) and Japan. The difference is the frequency bands that the tuner can receive. Only the NA tuner is supported currently but we'll add support for the PAL and Japan tuners in the next couple weeks.

      The M402U is just like the TV402U but without a tuner, and it's also supported in Linux. Both of these devices can accept NTSC or PAL baseband inputs on the S-Video and Composite ports, regardless of the frequency bands the on-board tuner supports.

    4. Re:Only NTSC tv tuner by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      "he sad thing is that the built-in tv-tuner only supports NTSC, so this product is obviously not targeted for europe..."

      Will this work?

      European version of Plextor ConvertX
      TV Tuner PAL/SECAM
      Video Capture PAL/SECAM (720 x 576, 352 x 576, 352 x 288)
      NTSC (720 x 480, 352 x 480, 352 x 240)
      Video Input S-Video or Composite (RCA connector)
      Audio Input Stereo audio (2 x RCA connectors)
      TV Inputs RF/Coaxial
      PC Interface Hi-Speed USB 2.0
      Power Supply 100 - 240 V, 50/60 Hz

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    5. Re:Only NTSC tv tuner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one and it doesnt tune any cable channels except channel 5 and 6. I have a great cable signal (had the cable guy come out and test) and still the damn thing only tunes channel 5 and 6. I called their tech support (waited on hold for 1+ hours) and they didnt have a clue about their own product. Very disappointing! Anyone know how to fix this? I suspect that since the cable source is HRC there might be a configuration to setup but the device doesnt come with anything to configure for HRC.

  8. Tivo? by Manchot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't all Tivos already Linux-based? And didn't they just recently come out with an SDK for third-party users?

    1. Re:Tivo? by enrico_suave · · Score: 4, Informative

      " Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't all Tivos already Linux-based? And didn't they just recently come out with an SDK for third-party users?"

      They do use linux as the base part of the TiVo, but all the juicy stuff is propietary AFAIK.

      The SDK is for the home media option only, i.e. to develop applications that reside outside the tivo on a PC, and add functionality over the network... which is pretty cool and people are doing cool stuff already with it, but it's not a full blown access to TiVo's innards...

      *shrug*

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  9. What's the easiest? by Kozz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...or is there no easy way to BYOPVR? I mean, I've heard about MythTV and Freevo and all sorts of hardware, etc, and as much as I think Linux can be a great tool, sometimes it's a royal FPITA to get thing configured & compiled right, make everything work. I'm not a kung-fu master sysadmin, just a guy who's done his fair share of ./configure, make && make install.

    If I don't want to fuck around with making sure I've got all the right hardware pieces just perfect, what're my options for buying something pre-built that will work well, no monthly subscription fee, etc?

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    1. Re:What's the easiest? by mjh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try KnoppMyth. I don't know if it crosses your threshold of "easy", but it's definately easier than building myth from soruce.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    2. Re:What's the easiest? by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Informative

      well there's knoppmyth mythtv installer that makes it pretty easy. Pair that with a pvr250 and a nvidia video card and you should be in great shape (I'm reasonably sure in the near future the knoppmyth project will add support for the plextor convertX - I hope)

      If you go to the dark side (windoze) it can be pretty easy... shameless plug check out some of the articles on byopvr.com for some good diy background, recommendations, etc..

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    3. Re:What's the easiest? by bwcarty · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm going to risk saying something positive about Microsoft and say that Windows XP Media Center edition is easy. It's not necessarily cheap, but it works.

      You need a compatible TV tuner (Hauppauge PVR-350), a video card with TV and 64MB or more memory, a software MPEG decoder, a DVD drive, a sound card, and a compatible remote ($35 from pcalchemy.com)

      XP MCE OEM is available from Newegg, the official MS remote is available at pcalchemy.com.

      That's about it. PVR works, the FM tuner on the PVR-350 works, DVD player works, etc.

      There are drawbacks, but if you want something easy, there you go. Plus, the Xbox Media Center Extender just plain works.

    4. Re:What's the easiest? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      I think you meant the pvr250, as I don't think MCE 2005 supports the PVR350 and it's hardware mpeg decoding TV out.

      I mean you might be able to use the pvr350 with mce 2005, but the 350's tv out will lay fallow which is kinda a waste.

      The hauppauge wintv pvr150MCE is a cheaper option, also the ATI e-home wonder is around the same price and MCE2005 certified.

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    5. Re:What's the easiest? by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      What're my options for buying something pre-built that will work well, no monthly subscription fee, etc?

      It's called a TiVo. And you pony up the extra $300 for lifetime guide data.

    6. Re:What's the easiest? by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      Dead easy - buy a Hauppauge Winpvr card. The 250 is pretty cheap. Buy a big-ass hard drive (also cheap) and a DVD burner.

      Run it in Windows with something like SageTV, or whatever your favourite Linux app of the same type is. I've had Sage running for a while now on my Windows box and it does just about everything a dedicated PVR would do, and if I really want to see something on the big TV I can burn it off onto a DVD easily.

      Works fine, and the whole setup cost a couple of hundred dollars.

    7. Re:What's the easiest? by Cylix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just go fetch a DVD Recorder with HD built in.

      They have on screen guide data and schedulers.

      You also get the added benefit of being able to record a dvd in realtime.

      I did a good bit of research on them some time ago and there are some nice models out there. Some of the units are really pricey, but you can get a smaller HD model for 600$.

      Besides pricey, the real drawback to a pre-built, ready to roll-out pvr like some panasonic units is they use EPG (Electronic Program Guide) data. So your guide stream has to be sucked out of the video stream. (I'm not sure if its compatible with PSIP (Digital Television guide data protocol).

      However, it's been months since I've done any investigation and I'm sure things have changed a bit. I'm sure a casual google search will reveal something for you and I do believe there are a few places selling pre-built media boxes with myth and freevo. *I've even seen shuttle controls, but no one sells them that way*

      If open source isn't your thing, you can always go the windows route and try out BeyondTV. However, for all of its features, it only ships with WM9 support for mpeg4 now. (Though I wrote a python script using mencoder to work with BTV to compress using divx) (There was also something off about width/height issues if you weren't using DivX pro)

      Having used BTV and MythTV extensively I can say that MythTV really does a great job competing with a commercial app such as BTV.

      I like both of them a great deal, but I've currently switched to MythTV and probably will remain a mythtv user for a long time.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    8. Re:What's the easiest? by Darby · · Score: 1

      I'm just starting on a MythTV box and I got a pvr 350 for my birthday for it.
      Is that a waste over the 250 as well?
      Also, how low can I go on my lying around machines (would a 400mhz work?)

    9. Re:What's the easiest? by lakeland · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are some companies that will sell you a fine box 100% set up with mythtv for you. To pick one I like, solarpc.com. But if you want to sacrifice an existing box, then have a look at KnoppMyth, which will make installation almost as simple as putting the CD in the drive and hitting install.

    10. Re:What's the easiest? by sjwaste · · Score: 1

      If you want to go the Windows route, get a Hauppauge PVR-150 and a copy of GB-PVR. GB-PVR is not open source, but it is free, and even supports the Hauppauge remote right out of the box (the PVR-150 comes with a remote, the PVR-150-MCE does not, so stay away from that unless you're running Windows MCE and therefore have a remote already). I installed this, a 300 gig HD, and the GB-PVR software on Tuesday. I was going in 15 mins tops.

    11. Re:What's the easiest? by sjwaste · · Score: 1

      a P2-400 might *work* as long as you're using the 350's TV-out (so that you're using its hardware decoding as well). I've read that Myth has early support for this, but it's not fully functional just yet. The 350 uses its own frame buffer from what I understand, so anything wanting to support it has to write its OSD and other visuals directly to this.

    12. Re:What's the easiest? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      GB-PVR looks more or less the same as Snapstream Media's software recorder except it supports less TV tuner cards.

    13. Re:What's the easiest? by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      With the PVR-350, and KnoppMyth, I think the recomendation is to use an 800 mhz processor, but you can find out more at

      Following the FAQ on the left it appears that people have made a 450 mhz processor work with a PVR-350, but he doesn't consider it an out of the box 'just works' solution.

      This doesn't mean that you couldn't build your own platform from the ground up with some other distirbution. However for 'ease of build' I strongly recomend KnoppMyth. That is at the very least based upon my own experience in building my first PVR.

      I would say that the primary difference between going with a PVR-250 and a PVR-350 is that you will not need a video card that can output to a TV if you use the 350. If you already have a video card that can output to your TV, or you plan on sending the output to something other than a TV or device that accepts s-video in, then the 350 doesn't provide you with a significant advantage over the 250.

      But thats just an opinion.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    14. Re:What's the easiest? by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Remember however, that it is the lifetime of the unit, not your lifetime. If it dies, you sell it, or TiVo decides to EOL the hardware, you get to pony up another lifetime subscription for your next device.

      Works for many people however.

      --
      You never know...
    15. Re:What's the easiest? by martin_b1sh0p · · Score: 1

      What're my options for buying something pre-built that will work well, no monthly subscription fee, etc?

      It's called a TiVo. And you pony up the extra $300 for lifetime guide data.


      Actually it's called Interact-TV

  10. Wishful thinking by hashts · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Too bad none of the HDtv cards out there can decrypt signals from Satellite or cable. Of course thats due to the providers forcing you to buy/rent their own PVRs.

    I'd be all over this device if it would work with an HD feed from satellite.

    1. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can. Everything you need to know is here. You will have to sign up and login. :(

    2. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why couldn't you hook your sattelite or cable box up to the HDTV card as if the card was a television. Sure you would have to use something to simulate a remote control but it should work just fine. Surely you don't have to buy a special television to use with your HDTV cable/sattelite box.

    3. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you do have to buy an HDTV. Not sure if that qualifies as special, though.

    4. Re:Wishful thinking by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      In the US, satellite and cable boxes have component or DVI or HDMI outputs. HDTV tuner PCI cards have ATSC or QAM inputs. See the problem?

    5. Re:Wishful thinking by ian+mills · · Score: 1

      Actually the Air2PC card can decode cable HDTV. Assuming they're unencrypted of course. Supported by mythtv.

    6. Re:Wishful thinking by AaronW · · Score: 1

      Apparently there's experimental support for the PCTV HD-3000 card. This card supports NTSC, ATSC, and QAM. Unfortunately there's not much you can do with the encrypted signals. Apparently Comcast transmits all digital channels as encrypted except for the local stations. I have not personally tried the QAM support since it's currently a set of experimental patches against the latest driver code. -Aaron

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  11. PVRs, not PVR's by cduffy · · Score: 1

    Article title got it right, link got it wrong. Incidentally, this exact same error is on a billboard outside my house -- there's a sports star prominently featured, with the text "MVP's [whatever-his-name-is] and Dahill Industries".

    I suppose that if folks who are paying tens of thousands of dollars for billboard space can't get it right, why should I expect /. editors to do any better?

    1. Re:PVRs, not PVR's by cduffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Both forms are correct for modern usages.

      Just because an error is moderately widespread doesn't mean it's no longer an error -- and indeed, there are certainly many dissenting opinions with regard to the acceptability of using apostrophes to pluralize acronyms.

      I never understood the old reasoning behind something like "PVRs." That just doesn't make any sense. "Personal Video Recorderss" eh?

      The acronym is for an individual unit -- a PVR is a personal video recorder, not a "personal video recorders". "PVRs", thus, refers to the plural: "personal video recorders". Quite appropriate.

    2. Re:PVRs, not PVR's by forkazoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Just because an error is moderately widespread doesn't mean it's no longer an error --


      Who says so? do you have their address so I can write a letter of complaint about how they are defining our language? For better or worse, there ain't nobody in charge of English. Usage varies by region and it varies over time. Fexziber to you if you disagree.

    3. Re:PVRs, not PVR's by cduffy · · Score: 1
      Who says so? do you have their address so I can write a letter of complaint about how they are defining our language? For better or worse, there ain't nobody in charge of English. Usage varies by region and it varies over time.
      Note that I qualified my statement: "moderately widespread". Once an error becomes ubiquitous, it's time for le resistance to give in -- but on this one, we're not there yet. If acceptance came at the point of being merely moderately widespread, than their wouldn't be nothing to dis this sentence about. I don't doubt that usage varies by region -- but I'd argue that correct usage is substantially more constant.

      There are a number of widely recognized texts which tend to be frequently referenced by educational institutions -- The Elements of Style being one example -- describing proper use of the language. Over time, as the language changes, texts with surviving authors will be updated, and those which are terminally out of date will fall out of favor. In answering your question, then, this "they" responsible for defining correct use of the English language is a large, disassociated group consisting primarily of English professors and school boards choosing which texts to recognize as authoritative, and the (overlapping) group of those who write texts which may be considered for such status.

      [Moderators, btw: I think this fellow raised a legitimate point, and that (0, Flamebait) is less than warranted. Any chance of avoiding similar moderation for the rest of this thread?]

    4. Re:PVRs, not PVR's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow you must be really fun at parties....errr you are the guy sitting alone in the corner...alone.

    5. Re:PVRs, not PVR's by cduffy · · Score: 2, Funny

      What makes you think I go to parties?

    6. Re:PVRs, not PVR's by whmac33 · · Score: 1

      I was taught in grade school to use the apostrophe to pluralize numbers and letters. So that's the way that looks right to me.

      "A Writer's Reference" Diana Hacker on p 258 states as follows:

      "The trend however, in toward omitting the apostrophe. Either use is correct, but be consistent."

      So 's isn't "wrong". But since the article didn't use the 's then the link should not have used the 's either.

    7. Re:PVRs, not PVR's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was taught in grade school to use the apostrophe to pluralize numbers and letters.

      That's correct. However, the issue isn't numbers and letters, its acronyms. While acronyms are made up of letters, they aren't letters, so the rule is different.

    8. Re:PVRs, not PVR's by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      i think the moderators will ignore us, the thread is now fairly old. I am a bit annoyed about the negative mod, but I'm not concerned, as I have plenty of karma.

      So, this large dissiciated group is sort of like Open Source Language, right? Then, I ain't be wrong, I'm just forking the language! :)

      Heaven help us if I'm supposed to believe my English prof's about how the language works. I remember one day when one of them was consulting an English grammar reference, and declared, "Wow, I never knew we had *that* tense in English!"

      For the life of me, I can't recall the name of the tense. I could probably google it, but don't care. It's what we'd call "Perfect Tense" if we were right-thinking latinophiles.

  12. good stuff by KingOfTheNerds · · Score: 1

    I actually own the ConvertX PVR from plextor. It's very nice actually and I would recommend it to anyone. It's now time to hookup a linux box PVR system, hazah!

    --
    Want to learn about anything sexual? Check out the sex wiki:
  13. but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ANYTHING will support Linux if you try hard enough!

  14. Overloards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one welcome our new Plextor Overlords...

  15. Wishful thinking-Pay TV just wants to be free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Of course thats due to the providers forcing you to buy/rent their own PVRs."

    Oh really? And here I thought it was because of all the "Your signal passed through my body, so it's mine to enjoy without paying" people?

  16. Redundant by tube013 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I submitted this to slashdot about 2 weeks ago. Amazing

    1. Re:Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I submitted this 3 WEEKS AGO! You are the one that is redundant. Amazing.

  17. Any advice on hardware encoders?-Usenet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you can help the guy over on alt.os.linux.suse get his working.

  18. mythtv support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps I'm missing something, but mythtv does not currently have support for this device does it? Or can it be used as a generic v4l device?

  19. 500gb media center. by bullterror · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been using Windows Media Center edition and I'm going to drop it. First off, it's unstable, having to reboot your TV once or twice a week isn't fun especially when if you don't do it you come home to find it missed your shows. Second, the DRM is really a pain in the neck. MS-DVR isn't hard to convert to a better format but it is time consuming because there's always that extra step of making it into mpeg-2. Saving a show off windows media center is actually harder than ripping a CSS encrypted DVD. (I hate to do the typical MS-bashing but I really have been having a lot of trouble with my media center recently.)

    I have been planning on buying one of the plextor units for a while, I like the idea of hardware encoding directly to mpeg-4, and I like plextor products, the have made the most reliable CD burners I've ever owned. I like the linux option, that seems like a good idea, but whatever I do I simply want it to be as versatile as possible, and Windows MCE is not versatile.

    1. Re:500gb media center. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      WEll it's going to take a bit for it to get working in Mythtv, but it shouldn't take long since it already uses proper Linux-specific standards.

      V4L2 (video for linux 2, is the re-done video input thing for Linux 2.6 and provides a standard API thingie for applications to latch into) and Alsa sound stuff.

      So it shouldnt' take long.

      If you want to try out Mythtv ready made check out
      http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/fcmyth.php

      They have pre-made packages and you use yum/apt to install it over the internet. Makes things easier as Mythtv is somewhat difficult to setup anyways.

      But it's VERY versitile, plus you have other tools like VLC/Icecast for video streaming (icecast now supports Ogg Theora video streaming), and mencoder transcoding capabilities from the Mplayer project which is VERY capable.

    2. Re:500gb media center. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have been planning on buying one of the plextor units for a while, I like the idea of hardware encoding directly to mpeg-4,

      Do not be fooled into thinking that DivX = MPEG-4. The output from this device is "DivX Certified", which means proprietary DivX video with MP3 audio in an AVI container. This isn't even remotely like the actual standard MPEG-4 format.

      Yes, it is a very common format, but it is not open and not standard.

    3. Re:500gb media center. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from plextor's site

      The heart of the PX-TV402U is its multi-format encoder chip which converts video to the DivX®, MPEG-4, MPEG-2 and MPEG-1 formats as it is being recorded to the PC.

    4. Re:500gb media center. by lutchann · · Score: 3, Informative

      Everything that comes out of this box conforms to an ISO standard. If the software takes the MPEG4 output and packages it in an AVI with MP3 video, then you have a DivX file. But the hardware itself doesn't output any proprietary video formats.

  20. Hats off to Plextor by dmouritsendk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now this is class, not only are they the first company to release drivers this kind of product for linux, they way they are doing it is truely awesome.

    Released under the GPL(this will probertly be included in the kernel pretty soon i guess?), V4L2 support and code samples.

    I can hardly wait for gstreamer (and it's v4l2 source element) to get a bit more stable/functional, and stuff like gstsharp gets included in the mono stack. I imagine we'll start to see a hole bunch of neat video applications.

  21. as opposed to Hauppauge's lack of support by jbr439 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Plextor gets two thumbs up for this. Hauppauge gets thumbs down for not only not providing open source drivers for their PVR-x50 cards, but for not even supplying proprietary drivers. It's due to what can only be described as amazingly valient work on the part of the IVTV developers (and users) that Hauppauge's cards are usable on Linux systems.

    Luckily for Hauppauge, there is currently nothing to worry about with the Plextor PVR having a MSRP of $199. But if that price ever comes down ...

    1. Re:as opposed to Hauppauge's lack of support by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Hauppauge sort of has its hands tied, because one of the Conexant chips used on the PVR-x50 boards has no open documentation (you have to order a development kit from Conexant for an exorbitant fee, and you're still bound by copyright not to share that documentation).

    2. Re:as opposed to Hauppauge's lack of support by jcross · · Score: 1

      Sure $199 might sounds little steep, but how about $115?!
      http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?desc ription=14-144-502&depa=0/

    3. Re:as opposed to Hauppauge's lack of support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cheaper one you linked to does not have a TV tuner, it's just an encoder.

      Which is fine, if you have an external cable box to do the tuning or whatnot... or backing up old vhs, etc...

    4. Re:as opposed to Hauppauge's lack of support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone know anything about their new PVR-150 card? Most importantly, what's the chipset?

    5. Re:as opposed to Hauppauge's lack of support by jbr439 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hauppauge could provide what NVidia does and break the driver into two parts - a closed source part that contains the "brains" of the driver, and an open source part that provides the "glue" between the kernel and the closed source code.

      Unless there is a valid technical reason for not doing this, I can only assume that Hauppauge does not care about the Linux market. Hence, two thumbs down.

    6. Re:as opposed to Hauppauge's lack of support by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Definitely. I'm ramping up to build a mythbox for myself and I'll definitely support the guys putting out open source.

      Besides, I can spell Plextor!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:as opposed to Hauppauge's lack of support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not exactly true. I'm the maintainer for the WinTV driver for Linux. Hauppauge has approved myself and the other author. They express a lot of interest getting their USB 1.1 tv tuners working under Linux.

      Too bad the NT1003 and NT1003 agreements were a signed NDA.

      Hauppauge actually went back to Nogatech to express their requirements of helping us with a Linux Driver. The problem was with Nogatech's decompression algorithm. Nogatech did not want the source code revealed.

      It was later discovered that Nogatech used ADPCM for decompression.

  22. It seems there a pal version to :p by dmouritsendk · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.plextor.be/products/px-tv402u.asp?choic e=ConvertX%20PVR%20PX-TV402U

  23. Dedicated PVR is better!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's way better to get a dedicated PVR such as a TiVo or ReplayTV. if you really want to you can watch them on the computer via a TV card with video input. You can also control them remotely with computer based IR blasters or via network commands. With multiple outputs you can even watch them on larger TV's at the same time. Also you will never miss a recording because the computer is doing something else!

    Then there are advanced features such as streaming shows from a ReplayTV to another ReplayTV or to your computer. To save something just download and burn shows to your PC's DVD. There is a real nice program you can run on your PC/Linux box to manage multiple ReplayTV's as well! Using a searchable guide you can search for shows on your hi-res PC interface and then setup the recording's. Later you can fire up the PVR and watch them. To me this is the "ultimate way" to MANAGE and then WATCH TV! TiVo's advanced recording mechanism is also a nice feature for some people, how much time do you really want to spend hunting for interesting stuff to watch? Why not delegate that task to the computer?

  24. what about the broadcast flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was about to buy some pvr cards now rather than later so I don't end up with cards with a broadcast flag prematurely enabled in the cards. Don't be so sure that the manufacturers will wait until the deadline to enable the broadcast flag. They may decide to enable the flag during scheduled downtime rather than wait until a date deadline when they may have no deadline (and orders for different hardware to be built on the same equipment).

    What is important is to be able to discern whether this pvr hardware or any of the other pvr hardware has the broadcast flag enabled so you know which ones to avoid.

    One of the things that worried me was the pvr pci cards themselves. I'm no expert on pci technology, so the concern is how long before the cards are obsolete? I have some older computers that use the old slot technology (ISA?), and those cards are now useless. Ended up having to buy new cards. From what I've read, the PCI Express slots are smaller and use serial technology, so they are incompatible with the current pci cards. And after PCI Express? PCI-X?

    What happens to all the pci pvr cards when the motherboards start including PCI Express? They are already adding the slots. It looks like they are mixing the PCI Express with the regular PCI slots, similar to what they did with the old transition to PCI. The irony is that the pvr cards would benefit tremendously from PCI Express. I've been thinking of buying two over-the-air digital cards, one the air2pc and the other the 3000 card (can't remember the rest of the name right now) so that I spread my risks. I've also planned to buy two pvr-350s, for a total of 4 cards. I already am figuring that the limitation with recording from the 4 total cards simultaneously would be the pci bus (raid would eliminate the hard drive i/o bottleneck).

    The reason for sticking 4 cards in one backend for mythtv would be to keep electricity costs reasonable. One of the things I've noticed that many people ignore is the cost of running a computer 24/7. This is the problem with multiple backends for mythtv (and seti@home). If one backend can be used for recording and playback, that keeps the electricity costs at a minimum. Add a second backend and electricity costs double.

    I've been watching the mythtv user list recently, as well as the irc channels for mythtv and knoppmyth so I can figure out where is the best place to buy all of the cards, the air2pc, the 3000, the pvr-250/350. It looks like some places are out of stock on them from time to time. And pricewatch is no help. Being out of stock brings up the original worries, that the cards sell out as they are made without a large stockpile, which makes it more likely that the broadcast flag will appear in cards sooner than the deadline because of the reasons I outlined above and because there is no old stock to work off.

    The card listed in this post would be better than the pci cards if the hardware has all the functionality of the pci cards. The reason being that the connection, usb, would be more likely to outlast pci slots which are being obsoleted by the pci express. As for whether the bandwidth of usb 2.0 is an issue over a pci slot, I can't speak to that. But it keeps the pvr hardware working when the motherboard/computer becomes obsolete and finally fails.

    Thanks, Hollings, and the rest of the Senators for pushing for the broadcast flag. Hope you choke on your campaign contributions and honorariums.

    A list of stores to purchase the pvr-250/350 and air2pc and 3000 cards would be greatly appreciated. More than one reliable source would be appreciated as well. And the ir blaster also.

    Comments about bandwidth requirements on the pci bus would be welcome also. Thanks.

    1. Re:what about the broadcast flag? by schmobag · · Score: 1

      The broadcast flag is only for hdtv. This plextor thing is not an hdtv card, just plain old tv. The hauppage cards aren't hdtv cards either.

      The only hdtv card that will work with linux (and, therefore, with mythtv) is the pcHDTV HD-3000. There are just two problems with it, a little one and a big one. The little one is that they won't be able to sell it after this summer, once the broadcast flag rule takes effect. The big problem is that it can't decrypt cable or satellite signals, so all it's good for is free, over-the-air broadcasts.

      Personally, I'm thinking of sticking with plain old tv (as opposed to hdtv) when I build my myth box in the next year or two. Supposedly the FCC is going to tell broadcasters to switch to hdtv-only broadcasts in about five years so that some broadcast spectrum can be freed up, but I don't really believe it will happen that soon. Can you imagine how pissed people would be to wake up one day and find out that they no longer get tv reception?

    2. Re:what about the broadcast flag? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Informative

      The broadcast flag does not apply to analog capture cards, like the Plextor PVR. You might want to worry about Macrovision and CGMS/A, though. I don't think hardware vendors have much incentive to tell you the truth about DRM "features" in their hardware.

      An analog PVR PCI card uses about 1-2MB/s. An HDTV PCI card uses about 3MB/s. PCI has a capacity of 133MB/s shared among all the cards. USB 2.0 has maybe 40-50MB/s of usable shared bandwidth. You do the math.

    3. Re:what about the broadcast flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm the top poster. Thanks for the figures so I and others don't have to hunt them down searching the mailing lists or web site boards.

      From the figures, one would think that you could fill a pc full of cards without a problem as long as hard drive i/o were taken care of. But one of things pushing pci express is gigabit ethernet. If GigE is pushing the limits pci, adding pvr cards is only going to add to the problem. What happens when you have a few televisions all trying to get recorded broadcasts off the backend through ethernet, and simultaneous recording on a few cards?

      I guess not really a follow up question, just going through the thought process and consideration of bandwidth vs. how many cards to buy.

      Anyone with a working example of two digital cards plus two pvr-250/350 cards in the same backend who can report on any bandwidth issues (fast ethernet or GigE), and who have removed hard drive i/o from the equation by using raid 0 or raid 10 in the backend? What's the performance of recording at least one digital and one or two analog programs and also simultaneously using the backend for viewing recorded programs (or one live program on more than one television? Is it possible/usable? Does adding GigE create a bandwidth problem or relieve a bandwidth problem by enabling multiple simultaneous streams while recording?

      Thanks again for insights.

    4. Re:what about the broadcast flag? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Let's say you're recording four programs and streaming four other programs over Ethernet. That's about 12MB/s, or 10% of your PCI bus.

      Likewise, a single 7200 RPM hard disk should be able to easily sustain 6MB/s of writes and 6MB/s of reads.

      I haven't built a PVR, so there may be other bottlenecks.

    5. Re:what about the broadcast flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The only hdtv card that will work with linux (and, therefore, with mythtv) is the pcHDTV HD-3000.


      From what I've been told on irc, the air2pc card also works.

      The littlThe little one is that they won't be able to sell it after this summer, once the broadcast flag rule takes effect.


      ? So they'll just stop selling the card? From what I"ve seen, the HD-3000 card is being sold by two entrepreneurs as possibly the only thing or one of the few things they sell. Why would they stop? They'll add the broadcast flag to the card and continue selling. Sales will slow, but I really doubt they would grind to a halt. If they were smart and had some funding, they'd run off several years supply in the next few months and then raise the price on the non-flag version after the deadline. The deadline is the manufacture date, not the sale date. So saying they won't be able to sell the card anymore is innaccurate to say the least, and the whole point of my top post, when will they add the flag, and will we be able to find out when they do or only at a later date after we already shelled out money for the card?

      The big problem is that it can't decrypt cable or satellite signals, so all it's good for is free, over-the-air broadcasts.


      I get the networks over the air, so I can make use of one card at a minimum. And in the rural area I was from and may return to, 3 or 4 network stations plus local is available. One of my neighbors was getting digital over the air there, so I can use the card in that circumstance as well. The other problem you allude to is not a problem for some people.

      Supposedly the FCC is going to tell broadcasters to switch to hdtv-only broadcasts in about five years so that some broadcast spectrum can be freed up, but I don't really believe it will happen that soon. Can you imagine how pissed people would be to wake up one day and find out that they no longer get tv reception?


      This is why over the air won't disappear in 5 years. I doubt it will disappear in 10 years. Just because some legislators or agency officials set an arbitrary deadline for the end of television as we know it doesn't make it true. The US population is aging every year, with an increasing proportion of seniors. 5 years from now, do you think legislators will be willing to take the heat from the AARP over losing their 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 year old televisions? Do you think seniors will be worried about digital television when I can't get my parents or other seniors to fix the blinking time on the vcr?

      Seniors have a lot of political power in the US just because they vote. In large numbers. Which legislator is going to take the heat for making their televisions useless? Which one is going to go to an AARP meeting and explain why he needs to make their televisions useless for the greater good of digital tv? Or which one is going to turn into their savior, the one that saved their televisions from becoming obsolete?

      5 years? Won't happen. The bigger problem is the move to pci express for current pvr cards that don't include the broadcast flag.
    6. Re:what about the broadcast flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you need to do with the broadcast flag is XOR it with the evil bit.

    7. Re:what about the broadcast flag? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Note that the Hauppauge PVR-150 is coming out at the end of the month, which appears to be nothing but a reengineered PVR-250.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    8. Re:what about the broadcast flag? by kelnos · · Score: 1

      There's also the Air2PC card, which will do HDTV and is supported under Linux.

      I recently bought a pcHDTV card, and I must say I'm disappointed so far. I don't yet have HDTV capabilities (haven't decided between buying an antenna or paying the $5/mo extra for the HD decoder box from Comcast), and the NTSC tuner is piss-poor. The picture is fuzzy, and the colors are all off (and I still can't get it right, even after hours of tweaking the color settings).

      Note that the Air2PC and the pcHDTV (with driver patches) both support QAM, so it's possible to decode *unencrypted* cable signals. Unfortunately, until we have cablecard-capable hardware, we're not going to be able to decrypt encrypted cable stations. And by the time we have that, we'll have the broadcast flag to contend with...

      I agree that that timetable for the analog->digital TV switchover in the US will probably be extended further, considering that prices for HDTV sets is still generally much more than that for regular sets - and they don't seem to be dropping quickly enough. Most CRT HDTVs will run you 3-4x the cost of a normal CRT TV. Good-sized LCD and plasma TVs are still out of reach for the average consumer (and even above-average consumer). I just don't see US consumers rushing out to replace their TVs, and D/A downconverters are likely pretty expensive too (so people can watch reduced-quality digital broadcasts on their analog TVs).

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
  25. plextor's open source lip service by edudspg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If plextor is so committed to open source why is it I have to take my plextor px-708 drive out of the computer and over to an f-ing ms-dos box to upgrade the firmware? They are just like the wifi companies -- they pay lip service to open source but don't release the details needed to load firmware onto the drive.

    1. Re:plextor's open source lip service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh. Have you ever thought of booting into msdos/freedos on either a floppy or cdrom to upgrade the fw.

    2. Re:plextor's open source lip service by SumDog · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure all devices require you to be in real dos mode to upgrade firmware. There are some Dell laptops that can do live firmware updates while in XP, but that's rare.

      Why couldn't you just use a FreeDOS boot disk? Most firmware today comes with freeDOS boot images

      -Sumdog

    3. Re:plextor's open source lip service by Ziviyr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I actually tried flashing my 716 on freedos and dr dos. each time I got some spew about ASPI stuff.

      I had to install f***ing windows to update the thing. And I still can't make it play DVD video.

      So yeah, Plextor needs to do better to make me think they support Linux/OSS.

      Right now I envision them as Jim Carrey bent over, talking funny while trying to make his buttocks move like a mouth. (very hard to take seriously)

      PLEXTOR, GET YOUR EFFIN' ACT TOGETHER!

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    4. Re:plextor's open source lip service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to rant, at least have the decency to know what you're talking about. You have to use a real-mode OS for technical reasons; modern protected-mode systems like Windows XP and Linux just don't allow the update to work. Secondly both Open Source and Free DOS implementations are available; DR-DOS 7 was released under an OSS licence and FreeDOS is available under the GPL, so there is no need for you to compromise your ever so high standards.

      I notice you rant about having to use the "non-free" DOS to upgrade the firmware, but don't seem to mind that the firmware itself is not Open nor Free. Funny that.

    5. Re:plextor's open source lip service by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      DVD video plays after setting the region for the drive. It just acts broken until you come upon that realization yourself.

      (then you need to reset the drive, see hdparm if you don't want to loose your uptime)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  26. They have donated one of these to the Myth Creator by dcgaber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They donated one of these boxes to the myth creator, and perhaps even more to other developers. They are smart, they want to get to get widespread support out there for their product, and I will maybe add one of these to my next mythbox.

  27. Sat DVR --- dvd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can move your capture to your laptop or burn to dvd just by buying something that can accept SVideo in, and analog audio... That way you have the best of both worlds, amazing quality, then the slightly downgraded quality that's mobile.

    Now that I'm on a HD cable DVR, I have to say (aside from the HD content) I miss my directivo.

  28. Of course,... by robertdh · · Score: 1

    this happens 7 days after I ordered a Hauppauge PVR-350. I'd rather spend my money on someone who actively supports Linux.

    Oh well, that's life.

    1. Re:Of course,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you could always return it, say something about defective drivers or something.

  29. Wish I had mod points... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the parent is noise.

  30. Digital Video by kabz · · Score: 1
    Of course, the PCHDTV guys offer an OTA HD TV solution for Linux.

    The drivers can be tricky to install, but once working, the display is faultless.

    Check out this link to see one in action.

    --
    -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  31. Re:Sat DVR --- dvd ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    S-Video in, analog capturing - amazing quality?
    Slighly downgraded quality?

    Get you eyes checked. Analog capturing, even wih a good card thru s-video, it's blatantly obvious that quality is MUCH lower - it doesn't even compare.

  32. Cable provided DVR + firewire + Mac/PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is fairly easy to capture the MPEG2 stream from my Insight provided DVR/Cable Box. This even works with HDTV. It does not work with HBO, and I haven't tried PPV (doubt it).

    I'm using an ibook G4, a firewire cable, and a free program called iRecord to capture the files. The captured file can be converted for DVD burning using MPEG Streamclip or other software.

    The only downside is the amount of hard drive space used. Some HDTV channels are up to 17mbps. Regular channels are usually around 6mbps.

  33. MPEG4 encoding means ?? by Qwavel · · Score: 1


    This support sounds very good. I want something that supports both Windows and Linux, so this might fit the bill.

    When it says mpeg4 encoding what does it mean? I thought mp4 was just a container format?

    I guess if I'm going to be encoding TV into mp4 then it would be good to find a video card with TV out and hardware mp4 decoder? Any suggestions?

    1. Re:MPEG4 encoding means ?? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      MPEG-4 Visual is a video codec. MP4 is the container for MPEG-4 Visual data.

      I think hardware MPEG-4 decoding is a waste of time, but a VIA chipset supports it.

    2. Re:MPEG4 encoding means ?? by Qwavel · · Score: 1

      Why is hardware MPEG-4 decoding a waste of time?
      From my reading of MythTV docs it seems that hardware encoding and decoding would allow me to get away with a much lesser PC.

      Also, you mention the MPEG-4 video codec. I thought that MPEG4 could use one of several video codecs? And where does XVid fit in? I thought it was one of the MPEG4 codecs?

    3. Re:MPEG4 encoding means ?? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      My impression is that even low-end processors today have no trouble decoding MPEG-4 in software. But I have a G5 and an Opteron, so what do I know?

      There are only two codecs in the MPEG-4 family: MPEG-4 Visual (aka part 2 aka plain MPEG-4) and H.264 (aka part 10 aka AVC). XVid is an implementation of the MPEG-4 Visual standard.

    4. Re:MPEG4 encoding means ?? by Garfunkel · · Score: 1

      Decoding isn't where the benefit of hardware comes in, it's encoding that requires more processing.

      --
      -jay
  34. Easiest for me was to roll my own... by Chuck+Messenger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I tried out MythTV, but, as you would have predicted, it indeed proved to be a FPITA. I also tried out Freevo, which was similarly painful.

    However, what I found was that it was pretty darned easy to write my own pvr app. I use the Hauppauge PVR-250. I can't recall if I needed to install a driver -- seems to me the driver came with my Mandrake. On bootup, you get /dev/video0. Use a utility to set the channel, then try cat'ing that to a file, and you'll get something you can play with mplayer:

    $ ivtv-ptune.pl 10 # tune to channel 10
    $ cat /dev/video0 > someFile
    ^C
    $ mplayer someFile

    (the utility came from the IVTV package -- that's the driver I'm using for the Hauppauge).

    So, as you can imagine, it's quite easy to write a little command-line app which just sits there snarfing stuff off /dev/video0. Which is what I did. The hard part is the programming.

    On that score, MythTV was pretty nice. It uses a MySQL database to store listings which it gets via a free web service provided by Data Direct (or ZapIt, or something like that -- I forgets the details..) You just need to run mythfilldatabase periodically, via cron.

    Then, my little command-line app (which runs continuously in the background) reads the MySQL database, and my own control file, periodically, and refigures what it's going to program and in what order.

    Not for everyone, I admit. But it was surprisingly easy for me to get it all working. And now, I have what _I_ consider to be The Ultimate PVR Which Does Exactly What I Want It To Do (except when it hits a bug, of course...)

    That, to me, is the beauty of Linux!

  35. Looks like the Pinnacle PCTV USB Deluxe? by telemonster · · Score: 1

    The jack layout is similiar to that of the Pinnacle PCTV USB Deluxe. In many regards the PCTV is a total POS, with a high rate of failure. But when it works, the output is actually decent. There is indeed linux drivers, and they do work sometimes (kudos to the author of them). We used a few of them at Defcon to dump all of the video to disk. Upon looking at it, one of them dumped nothing but reptitive block of gibberish.

    The PCTV USB uses the same chipset that the new Tivos do. That is, the Broadcom KFIR-II. The PCTV USB doesn't do MPEG4/DIVX (xvid for life, screw divx). They do MPEG2 and MPEG1. MPEG2 quality being good, MPEG1 not up to par with a good mpeg1 videocd encode job.

    The Pinnacle unit *IS NOT MADE BY PINNACLE*. I wonder if the Plextor is made by the same company that originally made the Pinnacle unit? The jacks look similar in placement and configuration....

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    1. Re:Looks like the Pinnacle PCTV USB Deluxe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know anything about PCTV, but I do know a bit about 'Divx/Xvid'.

      Divx is a type of mpeg4 codec. It's also a propriatory codec...

      One is a standard of sorts, and the other is software.

      2 different things, same name. So your Xvid is compatable with Divx, so it supports Divx.

      Anyways I use the mpeg4 encoder from the libavcodec, which is a multiformat codec software library from the ffmpeg project.

      It is not only faster then both Divx and Xvid, it gives higher quality results, it is completely open source, and supports advanced features such as double pass encoding.

  36. No, it's something totally different by lutchann · · Score: 5, Informative

    The encoder is the WIS G07007SB and the board is based on a WIS reference design with improvements made in-house by Plextor. Both the hardware and the Linux drivers are quite stable.

    1. Re:No, it's something totally different by khkramer · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering about VBI/CC support in the new SDK. If it's possible to grab raw VBI data from, say, /dev/vbi (or parsed text CC data from somewhere else), I'd be really interested in buying several of these devices and doing some hacking to integrate them into the video cluster work we've been doing.

      A quick grep of the source suggests that VBI chunks are getting passed through to v4l2. Is this supposition correct, and has parsing CC out of the VBI stream been something that any folks (inside or outside of Plextor) have implemented/tested much?

    2. Re:No, it's something totally different by lutchann · · Score: 1

      I can't believe anybody is still posting to this or I would have responded sooner. Anyway.

      Yes, there's VBI support in the hardware. The SAA7115 sends the sliced data to the encoder, which passes it though verbatim to the host, so basically any format the SAA7115 recognizes can be decoded.

      VBI is on the list of stuff to implement in the driver, I just haven't got to it yet. I hang out on the V4L mailing list if you have more questions about it.

    3. Re:No, it's something totally different by khkramer · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I'll order a couple of the M402U units and then maybe try to help hack VBI support into the driver.

    4. Re:No, it's something totally different by xpatrikx · · Score: 1

      Hi im dying to get the European PAL support for the tv402U. I've done some hacking in the driver (and gorecord) but I can't seem to get any signal. Is the specs for the tuner available somewhere? I've found some specs for a sony tuner called CXA3555A, is this the tuner in the tv402u? I could help with the driver if I get some specs. Thanks for a nice piece of hardware!

    5. Re:No, it's something totally different by lutchann · · Score: 1

      Wow, stop posting on this article, it's way old! :-) There's a DivX.com forum where we hang out if you have more questions.

      Sony doesn't release the datasheets for the tuner modules in the TV402U. The PAL tuner is totally different than the NTSC tuner. But we're testing the PAL tuner support right now and hope to release it early next week.

  37. Leanware by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I tried using Pocket IE and Pocket media player on my iPaq. I couldn't get Shoutcast streams to play. Not with any combo of PocketPC SW. So I installed Familiar, and everything's groovy. It's amazing that MS SW can't get the horsepower out of HW designed to run it, but Linux can do the trick.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  38. Nice USB.. what about PCI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Nice USB.. But what about people who want to build this into their computer? What if we don't want an extra box taking up space?

    Make this on a PCI card and I'll buy it over a happauge in a second.

  39. Sorry, but how do I edit and archive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What good are any of these hardware MPEG2 or MPEG4 cards? You can't edit these MPEG formats cleanly, and I certainly don't see any easy way to do it in Linux. Plus, what if I don't want MPEG2 or MPEG4? What if I want to archive video in a high quality format and then extract clips for my website in some other codec-du-jour like H.264 someday? You can't expect me to save off a crappy 2 mbit/sec MPEG4 as my "master footage"!

    On Linux we have kino, which works with camcorder-style DV files. I can edit the video I want using kino and save off the new DV files without having to recompress surrounding frames. In other words, the only quality loss is in the initial encode, and with DV it's not *that* much quality loss. (DVCPRO 50 is better still)

    So obviously DV files are the only easy and uber-quality way to do video on Linux (or any format for that matter) in a way that should just work. Then I can transcode later to MPEG2 when I want a DVD or MPEG4 for a website. Can any of these capture cards save video to DV format instead? Or, better yet, raw video?

    It seems like the ultimate solution would be a card that lets me capture video to *any* format--including high quality raw or DV/DVCPRO 50 video. Then, if it has hardware MPEG2/4 encode/decode, that is nice as well, but it should be optional so I can use it at any time in the future, not just during initial capture. Give it library hooks to work with transcode or mencoder.

    1. Re:Sorry, but how do I edit and archive? by Entrope · · Score: 1

      If you want DV, buy a DV device. If you want PVR, buy a PVR device. They intentionally do not target the same needs. DV is lossy compression, so you get hosed if you want to do much per-frame processing, and using DVCPRO50 (which does have higher image quality) requires a lot more from the host computer to capture versus 2-6 Mbps in a PVR.

      "OMG, gcc doesn't support Python and ML! What a travesty! gcc does not serve my needs!"

  40. Stereo pal tuner? by bbn · · Score: 1

    Does this thing come with a stereo PAL tuner? The spec sheets does not say, and neither does it say anything about text tv support, which is usually a big warning about a cheap mono tuner.

    1. Re:Stereo pal tuner? by lutchann · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, the PAL model will do stereo (A2, NICAM, etc), I just haven't written the support for it yet. Similarly with VBI, although it's also coming. (Incidentally, teletext support has nothing to do with stereo reception in the audio decoder other than the fact that they're both "fringe" features that are often omitted from cheap products.)

    2. Re:Stereo pal tuner? by bbn · · Score: 1

      Thanks that sounds great. How about PDC support then? That would be the last missing piece to be able to anything a good video and TV will do.

    3. Re:Stereo pal tuner? by lutchann · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a VBI service? VBI isn't supported yet but it's coming...

  41. The Difference by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    You may not be a geek. You are definitely a gadget guy. One does not necessarily equate to the other. I like to build things for the fun of building them. Even if the end result *MIGHT* not be as good as a pre-packaged product, I always get this let down/cop out feeling when I buy something I know I could have built. I also don't like it when I get a closed system of some kind and mods are nearly impossible. Of course, I don't realy consider myself a geek since most of the geeks I've interacted with on /. have never: built their own memory expansion for their computers, built their own digital devices for regular use (in my case I built a MIDI interface and a digital volume control)

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  42. Committed by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    See my sig.

  43. TiVo Killer? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    How long before extensable PVR's kill Tivo? After all, they can be adding features (e.g. commerical skip) views want that TiVo is busy removing.

    I forsee the day when TiVo is nothing more than a program listing provider to many brands of PVR that contain a TiVo plug-in.

    Of course, I've also thought Apple should be an operating system provider to the most common hardware platform(s).

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  44. Still wrong by megalomang · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless I'm missing something, you can totally port GPL'ed code to other platforms. You just have to distribute the source if you distribute binaries (or a platform with the binaries embedded)

    1. Re:Still wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(or a platform with the binaries embedded)"

      I wonder how many embedded hardware makers that use Linux actually ship the source. I don't have to actually ship the source along with the product, although they do have to make it available. Then again, I wonder how many manufacturers actually do either of the two.

      I don't own a Tivo, but can you get get the source?

  45. I currently run 3 PVRs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Motorola Digital cable box
    pros - records HDTV; can stream these out to my computer via firewire
    cons - always viewing captured video, even live TV, thus, degraded quality over my previous digital tuner
    a few bugs; freezes, resets.


    2. Tivo - good menus user friendly; seemed to have the best quality captures from the digital tuner; polished; uses remote control


    3. Sage TV w/ Plextor PVR (On Win2003 AS).
    Stable; can store shows on DVD easily; they play on my panasonic dvd player. Can access recorded video on laptops all over the house. Uses Freeboard wireless keyboard (could get remote);

  46. HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what, in the flying fornication is up with HDTV availability? Is it that hard to ask for anything higher than 480i on a reasonably-priced TV? Is there no way to get 1080i, or even 480p on a VGA or DVI monitor?

    I can't understand why, in this supposedly "modern" age, there's no plethora of HDTV-capable devices for a reasonable price. Is it that hard to offer these devices, considering standard 640x480 has been a thing of a past for awhile now?

  47. Mac? by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    My question is whether or not they also have support for Mac OS X. This device could be a godsend for someone setting up a Mac Mini as an HTPC. There have been numerous questions and doubts about the Mini's computational prowess (founded or otherwise, I'm not debating that here), and something like this that can encode DivX on the fly and just throw it to the computer through USB2.0 would be great for the Mini. Anybody have any info on this?

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    1. Re:Mac? by lutchann · · Score: 1

      You're in luck. If you want to run OS X on your Mac, Plextor sells a TV402U Mac bundle that comes with the EyeTV PVR software. If you want to run Linux on your Mac, the new Linux drivers support PPC and other big-endian systems just fine.

  48. Re:PVR's, not PVRs by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I was taught in grade school to use the apostrophe to pluralize numbers and letters. So that's the way that looks right to me.

    The point of punctuation is to disambiguate.

    What's more clear:

    "I wish As and Us were more clear"
    -or
    'I wish A's and U's were more clear"
    (e.g. ...in Helvetica)

    As and Us are both words. Coming in without context you'd have no clue these were plural forms. I've been confused by these on store titles in my RSS reader, for instance.

    Any valid acronym rule also needs to acknowledge the existence of mixed-case acronyms.

    For example:

    "A packet may match many rules defining QoSs at the switch"
    "A packet may match many rules defining QoS's at the switch"

    Without a-priori knowledge the reader doesn't know where the acronym stops and the pluralization begins. The apostrophe disambiguates that.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  49. you're right by timothy · · Score: 1

    Yes, this is an error, no matter how often it's made :)

    It was an oversight - literally - on my part; I corrected the error in the headline as submitted, but the small monitor I was reading on at the time made it hard to see (and I missed) the one in the story text, or I would have changed it when setting up the story. Now fixed.

    Cheers,

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  50. its a small world by Grimwiz · · Score: 1

    perusing the site, it seems like this SlashSnippet is news for nerds, news that only matters if you live in North America.

    --
    -- Don't believe everything you read, hear or think