Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Firefox 1.02 Released

akadruid writes "Mozilla has begun rolling the Firefox 1.02 security update. It has appeared with the little fanfare and without the staggered rollout of 1.01 - have Mozilla sorted their distribution worries?"

43 of 453 comments (clear)

  1. How they solved distribution worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's just say the bandwidth of vulnerable IE users is being put to good use.

  2. 0.04% Faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else notice the speed increase?

  3. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now if only they'd get going on Sunbird. I need a good calendar app.

    1. Re:Cool by Ki+Master+George · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm waiting for their long-awaited IM program to come out. It would be very nice to have a Mozilla-based IM program.

      --
      Before you walk a mile in someone's shoes, you should insult them so you know how they are and what they're doing.
    2. Re:Cool by PolyDwarf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always have to wonder, when I see comments like this, why? I'm being serious for a minute, not sarcastic.

      Why would it be "very nice" to have a Mozilla-based IM client? What would a Mozilla-based IM client offer over any one of the other third-party IM clients (gaim, trillian, etc)?

      Last I looked, I use Mozilla for web browsing, not chatting with friends. I looked at their email client, but found myself saying "ho hum, another email client" and then going back to Outlook. Yes, sue me, I'm a windows user for my desktop.

      I take my car to the mechanic, but I sure as hell wouldn't take my heart attack to him. As old Rosie put it, a place for everything, and everything in its place. Maybe Mozilla should concentrate on finding and patching more holes... They obviously have a few.

      PS - Before I invoke the wrath of Slashdot, I do, in fact, use Firefox for web browsing, not IE.

    3. Re:Cool by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe I want one based on XUL, as part of a XUL-based desktop?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Cool by xigxag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What would a Mozilla-based IM client offer over any one of the other third-party IM clients (gaim, trillian, etc)?

      If you're trying to convince your organization to switch to open-source offerings, it's easier to bring up an integrated solution such as, "We can switch to the Mozilla Suite" than to have to sell three or four different projects like, "We can switch to K-Meleon for browsing, Trillian for IM, Thunderbird for email," etc.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    5. Re:Cool by chrispyman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And this is exactly one of the big reasons many dislike the discontinuation of the Mozilla Suite. Until Firefox, Thunderbird, and the rest start integrating better (act more like a single app with optional components), there really isn't any other apps out there that make up a nice "Internet Suite."

  4. 1.2.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 4, Informative

    But does it stop the bloody pop ups I've had to turn off Javascript to cure?

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:1.2.. by darthpenguin · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you want to block the javascript popups, just use the Adblock extension. Not only can it block images, but also scripts and flash and just about everything else. Combined with wildcards, you can block out everything from most major web advertising places, including most of those nasty js popup scripts.

    2. Re:1.2.. by Tarqwak · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perfect config for me, works on 1.8b suite at least:

      browser.link.open_external 3
      1: Open in current window (default)
      2: Open in new window
      3: Open in new tab

      browser.link.open_newwindow 1
      1: Open in current window
      2: Open in new window (default)
      3: Open in new tab

      browser.link.open_newwindow.restriction 2
      0: Divert everything (default)
      1: Divert target="_blank" etc. but not window.open
      2: Divert everything expect window.open with three parameters

      privacy.popups.disable_from_plugins 2
      0: open allowed (default)
      1: limits their number to dom.popup_maximum (even with popup blocker disabled)
      2: the window is a popup, block it
      3: blocks them even on whitelisted sites

      dom.disable_open_during_load true
      True (default): Block popup windows created while the page is loading
      False: Allow popup windows

    3. Re:1.2.. by jcupitt65 · · Score: 4, Informative

      bugzilla explains how to fix it ... see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17607 9

      - go to about:config
      - right-click and select New/Integer preference
      - make a pref called "privacy.popups.disable_from_plugins"
      - set the value 2

      now plugins are not allowed to make popups. This hasn't been made a public preference, since it is a bit crude and may break some sites. It does fix the flash-popups though.

  5. Best way to upgrade? by jfruhlinger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can anyone explain to me the best way to upgrade Firefox? Updating from 1.0 to 1.0.1 seemed to leave two instances of Mozilla on my desktop. Should I uninstall the old before installing the new? I don't want to lose all my settings/bookmarks/etc.

    jf

    1. Re:Best way to upgrade? by joeljkp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uninstalling the old before you install the new won't get rid of your settings. Those are saved in your home dir (on Win2000/XP).

      You're asking for trouble if you update without installing. I ended up with both 1.0 and 1.0.1 in my Add/Remove Programs (win98), and removing the former broke the latter (and broke its uninstall function). The only way to get rid of 1.0.1 was to reinstall it to restore the uninstaller, then try again.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    2. Re:Best way to upgrade? by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Click the Orange or Blue orb next to the flower in the top right part of your window. I just did it and it auto-updates Firefox to 1.02.

      --
      I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    3. Re:Best way to upgrade? by carpe_noctem · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think the parent is looking to update to the CURRENT latest version, not last year's latest version...

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  6. Auto-update success by Owndapan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I got my auto-update notification in FireFox, ran the "wizard" to update, and am now posting from 1.0.2. Update completed before the /. story was posted! (/. is my normal update notifier) Nice work Mozilla!

    1. Re:Auto-update success by PurpleBob · · Score: 4, Informative

      You lose the scrollbar if you've installed a funky theme that doesn't work with OS X. (It doesn't matter if you're using the theme, unfortunately, just that it's installed.) So try uninstalling your themes.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  7. No need to panic... by mistersooreams · · Score: 5, Informative

    As the version number suggests, this is a pretty minor update. That's not to say that these security fixes aren't important; they are, and they proove once again that open source software can react far faster to new threats than any closed source development model. Nevertheless, it means that the Mozilla Foundation aren't expecting a major download rush. Of course, with Slashdot's intervention, maybe we can take them by surprise.

    Now, how long to the first "Firefox 1.02 ate my boot sector" post?

    1. Re:No need to panic... by Pyro226 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Firefox didn't eat my boot sector, but after upgrading from 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 firefox crashed with an error telling me to restart the computer every time I started it (it being firefox). I uninstalled and reinstalled and, and not only did it work fine, but I still had all of my extensions and bookmarks.

      --
      This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
  8. Disappointed by gnarled · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was really hoping this patch fixed those pop-unders I started getting lately.

    --
    I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal, Clerks
    1. Re:Disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why do people expect feature changes from a security update? The point of these updates is that they ONLY fix the critical problems. They don't screw with anything else to minimize the chance of breaking something.

      If you're looking for new features or enhancements, you'll get that with 1.1. Or you can try the nightly builds. But don't expect any noticable changes in a security/stability update (unless you are suffering from stability problems).

      As for your pop-ups, the latest trend is supposedly to generate them from a Flash embed. You can either not install Flash, or use the Flashblock extension (recommended), or try adblock, or try the hidden preference that is supposed to prevent plugin-generated pop-ups. In the past, a major cause of failure for the pop-up blocker has been the Tabbrowser Extensions (TBE) extension. I don't know whether it still suffers from this problem.

  9. Mozilla 1.7.6 out, too by invisik · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't forget the suite is updated as well...

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
  10. Update? by Transcendent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How it is an update when it acts as a total re-install?

    I love how firefox/thunderbird keep filling up my Add/Remove Programs list in XP everytime there is an "update".

    Not trying to flame, but shouldn't there be a better way?

    1. Re:Update? by Bauguss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      to all those saying how to change your registry or those saying uninstall first.

      This is moronic. We are talking about a program that is getting a lot of attention from a lot of people. Hell, my grandparents even use it.

      That said, my grandparents SHOULD NOT have to uninstall and then reinstall. It won't make sense to them because it is retarded. An update function should be just that. It shouldn't ask all the same questions it did back when you first installed it. It shouldn't ask if you want firefox as your home page. Those things have already been done. I think when you click update it should just do it. It should download, install, and then pop up a window saying it needs to restart the browser. It should then close the browser, and reopen it. (preferably back to the same url you were at when you got the update message)

      Now that I've said that, thanks for the registry edit info. I needed to know that. (the update for Google's Picasa did the same thing)

  11. Just in time... by ShineyMcShine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Firefox was crashing when the address bar received focus. After the upgrade, problem resolved...

  12. Adblock definitions site... by Golgafrinchan · · Score: 5, Informative
    Speaking of which...

    At this site, you can find updated Adblock definitions that you can easily import. Just scroll down to the most recent update, download, and install.

    Ever since I installed these, I've had to manually block something only a couple of times. They work great!

    --
    My userid is prime!
    1. Re:Adblock definitions site... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Geocities never lasts long...

      Here is a mirror to the latest updates 2005-03-20a.txt

  13. Easiest way to update by woobieman29 · · Score: 4, Funny
    On my Wintel laptop was to go to Tools>Options>Advanced>SoftwareUpdate and press the 'Check Now' button. It automatically d/l's the patch and starts the install.

    Hopefully there is a Debian build when I get home so that I can update my MEPIS/Debian box. (Or is that GNU/MEPIS/DEBIAN/Linux?? :-) )

    --
    \/\/oobie
  14. Re:Uninstall first please by tajmorton · · Score: 5, Informative

    Really? Mine worked fine with just installing right over 1.0.1 with Windows XP. Under Linux...no go (of course).
    However, Autopackage works great (if you've have FF installed from Autopackage): http://www.wildgardenseed.com/Taj/autopackage/fire fox-1.0.2.x86.package
    (BTW, if you do try this Autopackage, we'd love some feedback on how it works--taj at wildgardenseed dot com).

    --
    Tell the truth and you won't have so much to remember.
  15. what would be very cool ... by bizitch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Firefox incorporated a bittorrent agent inside the browser for updates. Simple click and launch a bittorrent download - then install followed by some minimal upload time - say 5 minutes of bandwidth

    that would be cool ... heh heh

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  16. Ugh, no zip builds by thegrommit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems there are no official zip builds for formal releases. Asa's blog explains why and suggests that those looking for them "look at the build ID in the final release, and get the same nightly build from the same branch".

    Only problem? The release notes don't specify the build ID, so you have to run the installer first. When you do that, you discover the build ID is 20050317. Only there don't (currently) appear to be any 1.02 zip builds in any of the aviary directories for 20050317.

    Am I missing something?

  17. Solution by Adam9 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go this address: about:config
    Right click anywhere
    Select new, integer
    Name: privacy.popups.disable_from_plugins
    Value: 2

    -- Taken from another /. user

  18. Re:Mirrors by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Informative

    automatic update worked for me.

    options->advanced->software update->check now.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  19. Autodebug by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With Bugzilla and the community, their backend that addresses security bugs is pretty tight. But why is the desktop end limited by the archaic announcement/download/install scenario? I'd prefer to accept subscription to the security bugfix channel, RSS polled every few hours or hundred pages. If it authenticated the patches, I'd get a nonmodal notification message, with "More Info" and "Always Autoapply" buttons in the window. That would make their rapid responses worthwhile. If they could upgrade in the background without slowing down my surfing, with on-demand rollbacks, I'd probably just autoupdate, looking for upgrade notices in my email.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  20. Re:Mirrors by wdd1040 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although the ebuild has propagated to the rsync rotation, the distfile won't go out until a server does its sync once every 2 hours.

    So.... chill.

    --
    wdd
  21. then why bother with autoupdate at all ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful


    You should be uninstalling the old version before you install the new one.

    which bit of autoupdate don't they get ?

    i shouldnt be doing anything other than clicking an update icon,everything should be taken care of
    does Microsoft say "to install SP2 you must uninstall SP1" ? so why do i have to in mozilla ?

    never mind me having to disappear into advanced settings to check updates manually when in IE its on the tools menu, easy to get at if i want to check

    at the moment the word to describe their update process is rubbish

  22. Memory leak by Wolfier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have they fixed the memory leaks in 1.0 yet?
    Having an idle browser leaking 300 MB of memory per day is like a self-inflicted DOS attack.

  23. Big bucks, no whammies, no Slashdot bias.. Beeowww by Proc6 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Let's see those true colors...

    "When ever I access my mail account at https://mail.yahoo.com, [with Firefox 1.0x] the browser crashes when I log out."
    Score: 0 Offtopic

    "I hate those smilie popups which seems to be unblockable, please make them go away. [which is to say Firefox still isn't blocking all popups]
    Score: 0 Offtopic

    "I hope this fixes the problems with this document contains no data."
    Score: 0 Troll

    "Open source software can react far faster to new threats than any closed source development model."
    Score: +5 Informative

    Mmmm gotta love that pure Slashdot fanboi machine. Work in a plug for Linux or Open Source, instant +5. Mention a valid and existing bug with the open source software the post is about, you're an offtopic troll, probably a NAMBLA member or Nazi too. Die!

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  24. Dealing with the two add / remove entries by Jeff85 · · Score: 4, Informative

    A quick Google search revealed that you can also remove an entry from the registry manually with details found at here. I did this myself, installed the 1.02 version, and all seems to be running smoothly.

    --
    Fetch Text URL - Firefox Extension
  25. Filterset.G instructions - important! by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't forget the proper settings you need to get the most out of Filterset.G:

    Recommended Adblock settings for Filterset.G

    [To modify: Tools > Adblock > Preferences]

    Hide Ads x Remove Ads

    Ablock Options:
    Obj-Tabs
    x Collapse Blocked Elements
    x Check Parent Links
    x Site Blocking
    x Keep List Sorted

    --

    The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
    --Aristotle
  26. Re:Mirrors by psi42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And if you're not running firefox with root/administrator privileges, how is that thing supposed to work?

    --
    Defenestrate Windows...
  27. Re:Big bucks, no whammies, no Slashdot bias.. Beeo by lachlan76 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Open source software can react far faster to new threats than any closed source development model."

    Well the story IS about an update.

    Those other comments you show that were modded offtopic are *bug reports*. This isn't where you go to file bug reports.