Slashdot Mirror


Spam Kings

Michael Gracie writes "Spamroll is a recently launched blog and information resource on spam, phishing, and other internet security issues, the purpose of which is to bridge the gap between information and discussion among technical professionals, and that targeted for end users. As part of the research for Spamroll, I picked up Spam Kings - The Real Story Behind the High-Rolling Hucksters Pushing Porn, Pills, and @*#?% Enlargements, written by Brian McWilliams and recently released by O'Reilly. , With Spam Kings, Mr. McWilliams has put together a book suitable for shelving next to The DaVinci Code and the Bat Book (Sendmail 2nd edition, by Brian Costales and Eric Allman). It is a compellingly detailed account of the burgeoning of spam, spammers, their foes, and the intricate community that intertwines them." Read on for Gracie's review. Spam Kings - The Real Story Behind the High-Rolling Hucksters Pushing Porn, Pills, and @*#?% Enlargements author Brian McWilliams pages 333 publisher O'Reilly rating 9 reviewer Michael Gracie ISBN 0596007329 summary Excellent spam history and reference.

Spam Kings is a pseudo-chronology of the exploits of the biggest spammers of the late nineties and new millennium, following their trail right down to the lunch menu, with the underworld's anti-spam fighters of the day taking the order. The book details the comings and goings of the likes of Sanford Wallace, an early spam king who claimed constitutional authority to send UCE, up to the present-day powerhouses such as Ron Scelson and Scott Richter, whose wealth and influence keeps the heat off of them. [Though Richter's finally gotten some heat where it counts -Ed.] In between, it runs across characters such as Jason Vale, Thomas Cowles, and Rodona Garst, who have all seen some serious time in court and/or jail for their actions, and some, like Brad Bournival, who tangled with the monster called AOL and is still awaiting his fate, and Karen Hoffman, a one time spam hunter who has turned to "the dark side."

But the real (and underlying) story is about two individuals, Susan Gunn, of NANAE fame, and David Hawke, a former neo-Nazi and notorious spammer who continues to elude the massive AOL lawsuit judgments against him.

The antagonists' and protagonists' paths cross often, but they never seem to directly butt heads. What makes the saga so interesting is that their actions affect each other's lives in profound ways, exemplifying the intensely close-knit nature of the spammer and anti-spam communities that surround them, and sometimes, their disloyalties. Furthermore, the lines between spammer and "anti" sometimes blur beyond natural reason, reflecting the deep knowledge of systems and processes each side attains during their trials and tribulations, and the monetary value of that knowledge in the open (if sometimes seedy) market.

What I found most appealing during the read was the relevancy of events that take place throughout, and the meticulous references to the news of the day. I found myself wondering where I was, how much spam I was getting, and whether I could remember receiving any scurrilous product pitches from the characters within. I am now checking old email archives, just for posterity.

The book ends with an epilogue that outlines what is happening in the spam world, right this very moment. CAN-SPAM doesn't seem to be working, other countries have instituted new laws that are, and people of all shapes and sizes may be complicit in the ongoing problem. The epilogue winds up with a "where are they now" for most of the major characters. Many are retired and/or have moved on to new (but not necessarily unrelated) professions, some are still drowning in legal judgments, while some are...educating your children! But you can be sure others have stepped in to take their places; just check your junk mail folder.

The book also contains an excellent glossary of technical and business terms used throughout. If you are a sys admin who saw the term chickenboner or mainsleaze on a help forum, and are embarrassed to ask what that means, then your bases are covered in this book. If you are a regular everyday email user, and are curious what these "blacklists" and "whitelists" are and what they mean to you, the glossary will again prove very useful during and after your read. The work also contains a deep notes section, which I found extremely helpful -- McWilliams conducted in-depth interviews with many of the characters (and they are characters). And let's not forget the center illustration section, complete with numerous photos of the biggest spammers of all time, at work and at play, as well as some gratuitous mug shots (which I am sure is all you really want to see if you despise spam as much as I do).

I knocked this puppy off in two quiet evenings. While the type is appropriately sized and spaced, and the material not overly technical, what drove me was the fact that the work was a bit of a "page turner" -- I had a hard time putting in down.

In my opinion, Spam Kings is a publication for both the technology/history buff, as well as the everyday email user still wondering where the heck all those Viagra ads in their inboxes really comes from.

Spamroll is the latest creation of Michael Gracie, who thinks spam and phishing represent some of the greatest threats to ecommerce and online world in general. You can purchase Spam Kings - The Real Story Behind the High-Rolling Hucksters Pushing Porn, Pills, and @*#?% Enlargements from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

127 comments

  1. bat book and DaVinci? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Time to expand your library dude. May I humbly suggest some pr0n?

  2. A Keeper by heauxmeaux · · Score: 0

    This is definitely going to be a keeper. The content will never go out of date, and will always have an audience. Well worth the inflated price. Bah.

    --
    Beat 'Em and Eat 'Em
    1. Re:A Keeper by `Sean · · Score: 1

      Ha. I just bought it because I'm in it (a victim of a spammer sending as my domain).

  3. Here it comes by froggero1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where's the GNAA post?

    --
    ~/.sig: No such file or directory
    1. Re:Here it comes by MMMDI · · Score: 1

      My review buddy actually gave that movie a watch. Check out his thoughts if you're interested.

  4. Future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope to god we can finally rid ourselves as an internet society of these ringleaders, the druglords of the internet.

    1. Re:Future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, I welcome our new Spam Overloards!

    2. Re:Future? by heauxmeaux · · Score: 0, Informative

      In keeping with the drug lord theme, you could read Inside the SPAM Cartel! Who knew?

      --
      Beat 'Em and Eat 'Em
    3. Re:Future? by Vombatus · · Score: 1
      In the same way as we have ridded ourselves of the [drug] druglords?

      /sarcasm

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
  5. This article is a troll for spammers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spammers run the Spamroll website!

    This story wreaks of Piquepaille!

  6. BTW.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You can purchase Spam Kings - The Real Story Behind the High-Rolling Hucksters Pushing Porn, Pills, and @*#?% Enlargements from bn.com. Sla"


    ugh, no comment.

    1. Re:BTW.... by Vombatus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmmm, I heard about it in an email I received recently

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
  7. Suitable for shelving next to The DaVinci Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll put my copy between the unread copies of DaVinci and Atlas Shrugged.

    1. Re:Suitable for shelving next to The DaVinci Code by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Put it between the floor and the fridge if it needs leveling and your copy of Dianetics or anything by Stephen R. Doorknobson is wearing out.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  8. Punishment by downward+dog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else think the best solution to spam is to bring back the stocks?

    No really, I'm serious.

    1. Re:Punishment by stinerman · · Score: 2, Informative

      In all seriousness, that would be considered cruel and/or unusual punishment by the Supreme Court.

      But, of course, it would be fun to see.

    2. Re:Punishment by downward+dog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In all seriousness, that would be considered cruel and/or unusual punishment by the Supreme Court.

      You're right, of course, but sometimes I wonder why some punishments are considered cruel and unusual. Why is corporeal punishment cruel, but solitary confinement and the death penalty are not?

    3. Re:Punishment by fossa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh come on, I receive about 50 spam emails per day (which makes me lucky). It wouldn't take long for it to become "usual".

    4. Re:Punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      along the lines of the unsensible. how the hell is spam a security issue? now i get as much spam as the next guy (at least i assume, i mean across 4 or 5 inboxes only less than 20 a week and i have never seen anyone elses inbox) what is with this hate issue? it is not like they are forceing you to buy stuff. and from the story about a week ago (i think it was 1 in 10 have found a product their life needed) it seems to me that some people are wanting this service. email is just another advertising channel that has very little control over what can be sold (i mean try showing a commercial for ciggeretts or porn on daytime tv) and is easy to access, no wonder it is so popular. now the hate against phishers and other people out trying to take your money (unless by some very stupid way you give it to them then you get what you have had comming) or some other scam i can understand. if some spammer contacted me and had something to sell me that i wanted i would have no poblem buying it. an advertiser's job is to show you products you need/want.

    5. Re:Punishment by norkakn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      because we don't have to look at them silly. And most of them are black anyways, not actual people

    6. Re:Punishment by norkakn · · Score: 1

      I really hope that whomever modded this realizes that I was being half sarcastic and half pointing out how fucked up our reasons are

    7. Re:Punishment by mjfgates · · Score: 0

      Nah, they should just make the spammers buy Internet stocks. Scott Richter, you must go and buy five million shares of InfoSpace... AT TEN DOLLARS EACH!

    8. Re:Punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If anyone spams you with an offer of a shift key, take them up on it. While you're there, see if they have any specials on other punctuation as well...

    9. Re:Punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mods these days need the extra help of sarcasm tags.

  9. wow by meyerj88 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ive never posted this early before

  10. potential audience: zed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "as well as the everyday email user still wondering where the heck all those Viagra ads in their inboxes really comes from."

    that puts the potential readership at zero.

  11. Shelving suggestions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With Spam Kings, Mr. McWilliams has put together a book suitable for shelving next to The DaVinci Code

    So that would be the recycling bin?

    1. Re:Shelving suggestions... by cephyn · · Score: 1

      ditto to parent. davinci code is crap. its dressed up nice, but its still crap.

      --
      Moo.
    2. Re:Shelving suggestions... by bert.cl · · Score: 1

      Funny, I was going to say the exact same thing

  12. Does O'Reilly consider "penis" a profanity? by g0at · · Score: 4, Funny

    or is it supposed to be read as "Spam Kings - The Real Story Behind the High-Rolling Hucksters Pushing Porn, Pills, and Fucking Bullshit Enlargements"?

    Weird title nonetheless.

    -b

    1. Re:Does O'Reilly consider "penis" a profanity? by skitz0 · · Score: 0

      You sound bitter that those enlargement pills didn't work :P

    2. Re:Does O'Reilly consider "penis" a profanity? by g0at · · Score: 1

      Heh. Well, they didn't do much for my fucking bullshit (not to mention my bullshit fucking), that's for sure.

      -b

    3. Re:Does O'Reilly consider "penis" a profanity? by SquadBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Try getting a book with penis in the title a prime spot in Borders. Yes it is sad that this is the case but you can't really blame them for simply playing the game.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    4. Re:Does O'Reilly consider "penis" a profanity? by vurg · · Score: 1

      That is unless Oprah writes it.

  13. Hello, where's the penis? by weharc · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't believe that they have to replace the word penis in the sub-title with "@*#?%". That's political correctness gone overboard.

    1. Re:Hello, where's the penis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't they have at least used a synonym for it that wasn't as "offensive" as penis? Like member?

    2. Re:Hello, where's the penis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can say "porn" but you can't say penis. Cause, y'know, if a little kid sees the book, which of those two words is easier to explain?

    3. Re:Hello, where's the penis? by kaosrain · · Score: 1

      I know, it's absurd. They SHOULD have replaced it with "%#?!$."

    4. Re:Hello, where's the penis? by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      I just assumed it was done to generalize between penis and breast enlargement spam, or to play on the subject-line garbage-characters that spammers use to confuse filters.

    5. Re:Hello, where's the penis? by the+Penis · · Score: 1

      I'm right here. God, would you stop asking alread?

    6. Re:Hello, where's the penis? by dos_dude · · Score: 1

      Now who moderated this funny? Obviously somebody who thinks that a post must be funny if it contains the word 'penis'.

      Well done.

      I guess this also gives us the reason why the publishers chose to not have the word penis on the cover.

  14. 2nd edition? by Mike+Markley · · Score: 3, Funny

    Real geeks know we're already up to the 3rd edition of the Bat Book... ;)

    1. Re:2nd edition? by _Stryker · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes we do, but real geeks that have been around for a little while bought the 2nd edition when it came out and now just use google to find info on things that have changed since then (or just go directly to sendmail.org). That way you can take the money that you save and apply it to other geeky purchases.

    2. Re:2nd edition? by zaphod123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Real geeks have moved on to Postfix or qmail....

      --
      :q!
  15. Spam greatest threats to ecommerce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Like it or not, spam IS ecommerce as long as a certain percentage of idiots respond and pony up the due for the advertised product.

    1. Re:Spam greatest threats to ecommerce by RS_ping · · Score: 1

      Some people love spam!

      (all of .00001% of the population)

      rsmith@pingdata.net

  16. the typical stereotype by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are playing on the stereotype that all spammers live extremely well off their activities, although this may have been true up until recently, and there are still people making huge amounts of money from it - the reason phising and stuff is becoming more common is because the profits from spam are becoming lower

    You can't just pick up a mailing software, buy a list and sit back and watch the money roll in anymore, so the new kids wanting to be millionaires have to result to more devious tactics

    Let's hope this book realises that. Either way it should be a great read on the huge industry that is/was spamming.

  17. Da Vinci Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    With Spam Kings, Mr. McWilliams has put together a book suitable for shelving next to The DaVinci Code and the Bat Book

    It's pretty impressive when even the poster manages to be OT.

  18. I'm in the book by SSpade · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm only mentioned once, but it got your attention... Much more importantly I know a lot of people who are mentioned in the book, what they said to Mr McWilliams, and I know a lot of the reality behind the story it pretends to tell.

    Spam Kings is bad fiction, created by a hack reporter. It bears no resemblance to reality, and contradicts statements that were made by those who were interviewed by Brian McWilliams.

    It's something that should really be serialised by the Sunday Sport or the Weekly World News.

    That a publisher like O'Reilly published it is very sad.

    I'd never heard of spamroll before, which in itself says a lot about it given the business I'm in, but this positive review of a book that's widely accepted to be badly written fiction says a lot about its credibility.

    1. Re:I'm in the book by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      what they said to Mr McWilliams

      And especially what they didn't say to Mr McWilliams, so he filled in the gaps himself.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:I'm in the book by artifex2004 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Spam Kings is bad fiction


      Ah! I was wondering why the submitter deemed it in the same class as [u]The DaVinci Code[/u].

      (Slashdot won't accept underline markups?)
    3. Re:I'm in the book by Eggplant62 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. I watched the story in Spam Kings unfold, having started reading NANAE regularly a month or two after Shiksaa joined in. Most of the material in the book is derived from NANAE postings from fall of '99 up to early '04. Read the book, then google for some of the subject material. You'll find it on NANAE. It's not all fiction, but don't give much credence to the glamourization of Shiksaa and Hawke. Let's call this a badly spun and/or embellished reference.

    4. Re:I'm in the book by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's not much of a book either.

      I skimmed most of it in about a half hour at Borders. Save your money.

      Admittedly I know most of what he wrote about so that likely helped me to skim it.
      I know many of the people interviewed as well, and some of them at least are irritated with what McWilliams said they said.

      Thankfully I am not in the book. At least I wasn't in the index. Heh.

      --
      .
    5. Re:I'm in the book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was kind of voyeuristic to read about my fellow NANAE-ites. Far too few pages were spent on the SLAPP suit and the NANAE Nine than I would have liked. I think it goes too far with 'dramatic liberty' and gets the characterization of some people wrong.

      Anything (like this book) that gets the word out is a Good Thing. I at least give it points for that. Where it really shines though is exposing Davis Hawke and the people like him for the scum of the earth that they are.Maybe a few people who read it wil be inspired to take up their mallets.

      But wayyy too much dramatic liberty.

    6. Re:I'm in the book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Underlining text in HTML is usually considered bad as it makes the text look like a broken link.

    7. Re:I'm in the book by johannesg · · Score: 1
      (Slashdot won't accept underline markups?)

      Actually, it does! ;-)

  19. Next to The DaVinci Code ? by CommieOverlord · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're talking about the shelf I keep in my closet to hide all the books I'm embarrassed to have bought?

    1. Re:Next to The DaVinci Code ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next to Da Vinci Code seems approrpriate, assuming SSpade's opinion is correct: "Spam Kings is bad fiction, created by a hack... It bears no resemblance to reality."

    2. Re:Next to The DaVinci Code ? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      You're talking about the shelf I keep in my closet to hide all the books I'm embarrassed to have bought?

      That's what reviews are for ;-)

    3. Re:Next to The DaVinci Code ? by Wescotte · · Score: 1

      Next to Da Vinci Code seems approrpriate, assuming SSpade's opinion is correct: "Spam Kings is bad fiction, created by a hack... It bears no resemblance to reality."

      I'm about 50 pages away from finishing Da Vinci Code (and will finish it later tonight) but I'm just wondering why you considering it bad fiction created by a hack?

      Eric

    4. Re:Next to The DaVinci Code ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm about 50 pages away from finishing Da Vinci Code (and will finish it later tonight) but I'm just wondering why you considering it bad fiction created by a hack?

      If you've gotten that far and don't see his point, well, then don't worry your pretty little head about it. It's a fine book. Really. Honest.

    5. Re:Next to The DaVinci Code ? by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      Well for several reasons:

      1) The level of the language isn't that great. It's not quite "Billy went to the store. Billy open the door. Billy walked through the door", but it isn't that far off.

      2) The characters are flat and two dimensional. "See Spot Run" had more interesting characters.

      3) The plot was formulaic, predictible, obviously designed to be turned into a thriller movie. The author broke all sorts of rules of good writing, such as the author, acting as god, roughly pokes and prodes at the story and characters instead of letting them develop and flow along naturally. When you need a cliff-hanger chapter ending every two pages there's a problem.

      4) The history. Historical accuracy isn't normally a problem in fiction books, they are after all fiction, it is an immense problem when the author attempts to pass of said inaccuracies as scholarly research and fact.

  20. Read It While You can by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2, Funny
    suitable for shelving next to The DaVinci Code

    So, if this thing is a huge success and still in print two years from now, the Vatican will ask us to stop reading it, right?

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  21. Errata by mfh · · Score: 1

    Please attach a chapter on Wordpress in the next update of this book.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Errata by basilpronoun · · Score: 1

      that's only one error. Better add..
      Erratum: For errata read erratum.

      Now that there's more than one, better change it to:
      Errata: For erratum read errata.

    2. Re:Errata by JimmehAH · · Score: 1

      Gemsites Standards Compliant Open Source CMS

      One could be forgiven for thinking you have an ulterior motive for making this statement :P

    3. Re:Errata by mfh · · Score: 1

      One could be forgiven for thinking you have an ulterior motive for making this statement :P

      I see what you're saying, but I will suggest that what Wordpress did will have an impact on every other CMS out there. It's changed my perspective. I have to be twice as careful about my CMS and so as a result, this action from Wordpress has cost me valuable time rethinking SEO decisions...etc.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    4. Re:Errata by JimmehAH · · Score: 1

      Very true.

      If the developers (of WordPress) were having financial difficulties perhaps they should have tried a fund-raising drive. They accept PayPal donations so it's not as if they're above such a thing.

  22. Spam with trigger words in the pictures by kuriharu · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I get Spams now that have about 2-3 paragraphs of text that are mostly plagurized poetry, then all of the words that trigger spam filters are in the grpahics included in the HTML email. It's a smart tactic (albeit annoying). It really throws off the spam filters. Does anyone else get a lot of these? Anyway to filter them out?

    They change the bogus names and email addresses, of course, but the ads clearly are coming from the same source.

    1. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by chmilar · · Score: 2, Informative

      To begin, disable HTML email!

      E-mail should be plain old text.

      --
      Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
    2. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by blackicye · · Score: 1

      yeah, read and send all your mail in plain text format..

    3. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      yeah, read and send all your mail in plain text format..

      Doesn't everyone have WebPine? It makes it oh so easy to avoid spam.

      Especially when you run it inside Firefox 1.0.2

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      how many people do you know that send you html email?

      my rules are set to roundfile anything with html in it that's not from a known source. (some of my online billpayments send html confirmation emails that I want to see)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by kuriharu · · Score: 0
      yeah, read and send all your mail in plain text format..

      That will keep me from reading the SPAM, but it will still get through the filter. I already do that.

      Thanks anyway.

    6. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by kuriharu · · Score: 1, Informative
      To begin, disable HTML email!...E-mail should be plain old text.

      I agree. It's already set to that. That won't keep the spam from getting in my mailbox, since the messages don't contain any trigger words.

    7. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by kuriharu · · Score: 0
      What email client are you using to set the rules that allow you to do that? I haven't looked at rules setup long enough to see if I can route HTML mail.

      The bigger question is: how do we get filters to stop spams that don't have any trigger words, other than by using black/whitelists? Since there's no words like vi@g.ra or pe!nis in them, they'd be pretty hard to catch.

    8. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you correspond with Windows/Outlook users who aren't geeks, I'd say the odds are almost 100% that you'll get HTML email from them.

      In fact, I even send it myself. As a Mac user, it comes out in pretty fonts, and I actually like things that way.

      What might work is to round file HTML email with images since most people aren't going to send that to strangers. Unless, of course, you've placed a personal ad asking for a picture.

      Then you might wind up throwing away all your responses and wondering why nobody loves you!

      D

    9. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by v1 · · Score: 1

      mail.app (in OS X) has a very nice ruleset in preferences under Rules.

      I had quite a collection of antispam rules that caught 99% of the spam. Then I started using my own mailserver, which subscribes to RBLs. RBLs + a new email address (no more spam fished from usenet posts 10 yrs ago!) means no spam for me, and no filters needed anymore.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    10. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by klipsch_gmx · · Score: 1

      If you correspond with Windows/Outlook users who aren't geeks, I'd say the odds are almost 100% that you'll get HTML email from them.

      Except that Outlook will send the message as multipart/alternative, with the text/html segment as well as a text/plain segment. Usually spam emails are just all text/html.

    11. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by kiddailey · · Score: 1


      If you're using OS X Mail there are alternatives to setting up a ton of manual rules in the prefs.

      Junkmatcher is a good spam matching plugin and SpamSieve is a great Bayesian filter that does any amazingly good job -- even with otherwise legitimately looking mail.

    12. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Just make the html markup codes trigger words for your filters.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    13. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by robogun · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you have to do is run a program that looks at spam a little deeper than just scanning for banned words.
      Windows - run SpamPal
      Linux - run SpamAssassin
      Neither of these cost anything.

      They filter on regular expressions. This gets not only the keyword but all of the misspellings. It also looks for characteristics of spam, including excessive remark tags, presence of Base64 encoding, lack of a plain text section, etc.
      You can also set it up to look for banned spammed-URLS in the body or in the encoded section. Spam Pal renames by default the extensions of attachments that attack Windows systems.
      You can also set up Bayesian filtering. You can ban by country. If you really insist on never ever seeing another spam (at the cost of a few legit emails), run the blackhole filters. You can pick your blackholes.
      There are other options too, don't waste your time constantly fiddling with keyword filters and banning individual email addresses.

    14. Re:Spam with trigger words in the pictures by kuriharu · · Score: 1
      You can also set up Bayesian filtering. You can ban by country. If you really insist on never ever seeing another spam (at the cost of a few legit emails), run the blackhole filters. You can pick your blackholes.

      I've been thinking of doing that. When I look in the headers, I see most of these mails come from Russia or Romaina or someplace like that. I get a lot of mail from Japan but that's about it. So if I ban certain countries (like the entire former Soviet bloc!) then that will probably help.

      I just get curious as to how the next releases of anti-spam software can stop spams that have all of their words in graphics. Most /. readers are hackers so they know the best ways to stop them, but what about average users? This is gonna vex them good.

  23. "Spam Kings" is Crap by Caveman+Og · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sorry, but many of my friends, colleagues, associates, and fellow anti-spammers (as the case may be) who were "profiled" by Brian McWilliams for his book, were dealt a raw deal by this putative "reporter".

    The resulting book does not only not tell the full story, but engages in several rounds of make-believe, inventing situations and supposing events and circumstances which could not have been known by the author.

    His focus on Susan Gunn after she explicitly asked NOT to be included in his book has done naught but damage to her.

    The reader will not know this, however, and think that they are getting a front-row seat on what's really going on out there. McWilliams has done a massive disservice in this.

    Far from telling a true story, this book contains much that is fabricated from the whole cloth.

    I should note that while he was writing this book, I had several contacts with Mr. McWilliams. I am thankful that he chose not to include me in it, but rather disgusted at what he managed distort of what others told him.

    1. Re:"Spam Kings" is Crap by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      His focus on Susan Gunn after she explicitly asked NOT to be included in his book has done naught but damage to her.

      Do you have anything to back this statement up? I'd like to know more about this.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    2. Re:"Spam Kings" is Crap by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I'd like to know more about this.

      I imagine that her wishes would extend to comments about a review of a book that she asked not to be in in the first place.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:"Spam Kings" is Crap by Caveman+Og · · Score: 2, Informative

      You would imagine correctly. Nor am I willing to discuss details of private conversations.

    4. Re:"Spam Kings" is Crap by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      A link would be nice. If it is a link to a post on Slashdot, a link to the post and something showing that person is who she says she is would be nice.

      No offence is intended to Ms. Gunn by this request, however, the nature of Slashdot and message boards in general lend themselves to not only a certain amount of anonymity, but also make it easier for people to pose as someone else, within limits.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    5. Re:"Spam Kings" is Crap by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Then, with all due respect, I will have to take your comment with a grain of salt, as I have nothing further to back up your statement. No offense is intended.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  24. Good? by sparkz · · Score: 4, Funny
    With Spam Kings, Mr. McWilliams has put together a book suitable for shelving next to The DaVinci Code and the Bat Book (Sendmail 2nd edition

    The context implies that this is a Good Place For a Book To Be.
    That strikes me as odd though - I recycled both: "DaVinci Code" for being a bunch of unfounded hokum, and Sendmail (the software, and therefore the book) for being too obfuscated for our simple few-dozen-domains setup (switched to Exim a few years ago, haven't looked back)

    Maybe the implication is that I should do with Spam Kings what I do with spam... trash it (er, I mean, read it thoroughly and believe every word???)

    --
    Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    1. Re:Good? by stev_mccrev · · Score: 2, Funny

      "DaVinci Code" for being a bunch of unfounded hokum

      Totally. All these books I keep buying from the fiction section always turn out to be completely made up!

    2. Re:Good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, I know that, and you know that (and Ringo here definitely knows that), but the problem is that there are a lot of really stupid people who take it seriously and think there is some truth behind it.

      In any event, it really is poorly written sensationalistic mush besides.

    3. Re:Good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize the Da Vinci Code is fiction, so therefore it wouldnt need to be founded on ANYTHING.

  25. Cool by pHatidic · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just bought this book after receiving a series of fascinating emails telling me about it.

  26. Alongside DVC is a warning of crapness by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    DaVinci Code is crappy cyber-fiction. just like most sci-fi is a comlete fabrication not rooted in science, DaVinci code is not rooted in reality either. I would not read DVC again.

    It seems from some posts that Spam Kings is similar. The author has chosen his facts to make a nice read for the tech-non-savvy. I won't be buying - thanks to the warning that it belongs alongside DVC.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Alongside DVC is a warning of crapness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether or not it's rooted in reality doesn't have much to do with how good a book it is. It's called fiction for a reason (DaVinci Code not Spam Kings).

  27. for a moment I thought it said by basilpronoun · · Score: 1

    > ... resource on spam, phisting, and other internet ...
    Luckily it doesn't say that but I wonder what that term will eventually get used for.

    1. Re:for a moment I thought it said by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      phisting

      That's when someone emails pretending to be your bank, asks for your account info, and offers sexual services.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  28. That's RIGHT Robin..... by ZoomieDood · · Score: 0

    With Bat-counting... 2+1=3, but occasionally 4, but only when Joker's around.

    But there's that issue of copyright infringment. *I* am the BAT, and I'm not mentioned anywhere inside "The Bat Book".

    But enough of that, Robin. There's a sale on tights at Walmart! To the batcave!

    And then to Borders for a latte... and a 3rd edition bat book.

  29. The blog for Spam Kings by AssFace · · Score: 1

    Note that the author of Spam Kings runs a blog too.

    I was going to make some snide remark of why another spam blog needs to be created when the author of the book this guy is telling us about already has a blog up and running... but I run a spam blog too (anti-spam that is) - so I guess I'd be a bit of a hypocrite there :)

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  30. Susan Gunn by BMcWilliams · · Score: 4, Informative

    Susan Gunn may be feigning unhappiness with Spam Kings in anti-spammer forums. But in a recent conversation with me, she asked whether she could buy a large quantity of books at a discount, so she could give them away to friends. (This is on top of the three copies I've already sent her gratis.) That doesn't seem like the behavior of someone who thinks she's been "damaged" by a book. Unless, of course, she wants the copies to distribute to her team of 15 attorneys. ;-)

    1. Re:Susan Gunn by shiksaa-spamhaus · · Score: 1

      Feigning unhappiness with your hack book? Yes, I did ask to buy some books for my friends so they could see what bullpuckey you wrote. The three copies you sent me I offered to pay for. Your repsonse was "no, i have a bunch of them from the publisher'. Send me a bill and I'll gladly pay for those three - I'm sure they'll make good toilet tissue. You, sir, are a lying snake. Despite being told you wanted background on an article on spam you were writing, you then decided to write a book, for which I refused to cooperate. Despite my telling you emphatically that I did not wish to be in your stupid book, you said you didn't care. I have the emails to prove it, McWilliams. You then had the audacity to want me to correct the errors in the first edition! You're a slimeball and a liar, McWilliams. Plus, you f'ed up so many details it's not even funny. Stop lying about me, Brian, or you will definitely hear from my lawyer. I think you know who he is since you put him in your hack book. People: Do not talk to this so-called journalist because in my experience he lies and he's lazy - so lazy that when I refused to cooperate, he took info from NANAE and even that he managed to screw up. And NEVER presume to know what I'm thinking....if you were truly pschic you would have gotten the facts stait as pertains to me in the book. Actually, I feel sorry for you since you haven't much talent for the written word.

    2. Re:Susan Gunn by BMcWilliams · · Score: 1
      Susan, spare us the grandstanding. If you think I'm such a hack, why did you email me, just last month, to invite me to do a new book about Spamhaus? If you don't like being in Spam Kings, why did you recently email me a photo of you to include in the 2nd edition?

      I know you have mixed feelings about being profiled in the book. I realize you're wary of the Nanae crowd thinking you're a publicity hog. But this bizarre split in your public and private behavior toward me is alarming.

  31. Be specific by BMcWilliams · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Steve, care to produce some specifics about where Spam Kings departs from the historical record? The book is carefully documented/footnoted and is based entirely on fact (court documents, spam samples, chat logs, newsgroup postings, website archives, interviews, etc.). If you really care about getting this bit of Internet history right, you'll submit something to O'Reilly's errata page. Otherwise, your posting just sounds like sour grapes.

    1. Re:Be specific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You want some factual errors. OK.

      Afterburner did have a signature line claiming he handled spam complaints for Erols.

      AOL didn't use the RBL to filter mail.

      Sam Al of BulkISP didn't call Kelly a bitch, he called another MAPS staffer who was not involved with the RBL, a bitch.

      Sanford Wallace stopped spamming in late '97, long before he started discussions with Jim Nitchals about "going straight" in '98.

      Those are errors that even the laziest intern can disprove in a few minutes. I'm sure they're not the only ones, but I'm not going to do your research for you.

    2. Re:Be specific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "If you really care about getting this bit of Internet history right"

      Hmmm. As the author of the book, isn't that YOUR responsibility? Not only is it part of the work that you were paid for, but it's your ethical obligation to do everything you possibly can to "get it right".

      Trying to shove responsibility for that off on a third party speaks volumes about you...and what it says isn't good.

  32. SamSpade deserves its credibility by Spamroll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Steve,

    There is no doubt you, your site and your work deserve lot of credibility in "the business." What I am trying to do with Spamroll is not upend anyone's credibility, but instead try to enhance it by letting the general population know that you actually exist.

    Whether or not Brian's book appeals to the technical set, it will get good shelf space. That means an everyday email user may get curious and pick it up. And that means they will realize a fight IS going on, and quit complaining to their sys admin or ISP everytime they get spammed. They become more aware, and learn to deal with the problem in the interim, as well as avoid the "user errors" that exacerbate the problem in the first place.

    That makes yours and your colleague's job easier, and that should be a good thing, eh?

    Also, note in the introduction that Spamroll is classified as "new", hence there is no reason to believe you would or should have heard of it. If you have some suggestions on how I can spread the word in a more effective (or more credible, which ever you prefer) manner, please let me know. I have provided a link to your sites tools section (long ago), but would be overjoyed to get your additional input.

    Regards,

    Michael

    1. Re:SamSpade deserves its credibility by SSpade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's nothing wrong with yet another blog about spam issues at all. At a brief look yours looks as good as most, better than some.

      Reviewing a book that is simply not an accurate history of events and not commenting on that leaves the impression that you're not aware of the reality of what actually happened during the period the book attempts to document, and that you didn't notice from some of the obvious writing techniques used in the book that it's, at best, a fictionalised account. (Not that there's anything intrinsically wrong with a fictional account based in a real universe and mentioning some real character either, as long as it's not mistaken for an accurate description of history.)

      None of which is a particularly big deal, but if you post a glowing review of a badly written book to the front page of slashdot, expect to get called on it.

  33. I'll only buy it by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

    if it includes a DVDROM full of the latest spamming software and a bunch of emailing addresses to get me started in the biz.

  34. Interesting tidbit about Sanford Wallace.... by gm0e · · Score: 4, Funny

    This guy started a dance club in rural New Hampshire after he "oficially" got out of the spam business. The funny thing is that every month or so he mass emails all of the University of New Hampshire students advertising his scummy club by pretending to be a girl talking about the place. At one point I sent him a snide reply "Why don't you just go back to spamming professionally?" I can't find his response but it was something to the effect that he has more fun doing it unprofessionally.

  35. Question by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    IANAL, so...now that we have all this wonderfully detailed information about spammers, how do we use it to have them locked up for 20 years or so with their very own girlfriend named Spike? ;-)

  36. And I just got an email selling stocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coincidence? I think not!!!

  37. What about.... by Quixote · · Score: 1
    Is there any mention of the following luminaries:
    Alan Ralsky
    6747 Minnow Pond Dr.
    W. Bloomfield, MI 48322

    Laura Betterly
    717 Weathersfield Dr.
    Dunedin, FL 34698-7437
    (just keepin' the memory alive... ;-) )
    1. Re:What about.... by Pathwalker · · Score: 1

      Is this Ralsky's house?

      I know from the Tiger-2004fe dataset that the street address should be along that section of road.
      From the pictures that are out there, it looks like it might be it.

      It's hard to tell for sure. It might be the one to the north, which was still under construction as of 2002-04-10.

      Looks like a pretty nice area, although since the wooded area behind it appears to be floodplain/swampland, I'll bet there are a lot of annoying bugs during the summer.

  38. Cruel and Unusual by Samrobb · · Score: 1

    For three days the world had watched while chirpsithtra executioners smothered four men slowly to death. In some nations it had even been televised. "Don't you see, we don't *do* things like that. We've got laws against cruel and unusual punishment."

    "How do you deal with cruel and unusual crimes?"

    I shrugged.

    "Cruel and unusual crimes require cruel and unusual punishment. You humans lack a sense of proportion, Rick Schumann."

    --
    "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
  39. That book would only be interesting if... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    it included the spammers' home addresses.

  40. If spamroll.com is anti-spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...then why is it promoting so many spammers?

    On the home page of spamroll.com, we find links to:

    • tigerdirect: spammers
    • espcoalition.org, a consortium of major spammers which reads like a who's who of spam: Digital Impact, Blue Hornet, Cheetah, Doubleclick, Exact Target, Responsys, ValueClick, Vertical Response, Yesmail and dozens of others.
    • the DMA, best know for their adamant pro-spam lobbying activities and partially responsible for the (YOU)-CAN-SPAM bill
    • clickz.com: spammers
    • jdoqocy.com: spammers
    • anrdoezrs.net: spammers
    and so on.

    The ironic part is that other links on the same page, like the one to NANAE, make it easy to figure out in minutes that these are spammers and that there is no way a supposedly anti-spam site should be promoting any of them.

    So...whose side are you on?

    1. Re:If spamroll.com is anti-spam... by Spamroll · · Score: 1

      First, I don't really understand most of the straw-man logic you present, but that isn't surprising considering the way you posted.

      No, Spamroll is not run by spammers...it is run by me. Some of the links you reference were put there not to "promote" spamming organizations, but to instead make people realize that there are some organizations out there that try to get their members to comply with the laws (as well as the unwritten rules and regs which cover the net). Several of the ESPC members are public companies, and they service many more public companies to boot. If they were sending out UNSOLICITED email, law enforcement (as well as their shareholders) would be screaming bloody murder.

      While I don't agree with all the premises behind CAN-SPAM, the DMA and ClickZ are quick to continually pound on the need for their constituents to comply with the law. That is a good thing, and should be noted (which is why I do). Several of my posts emphasize the point. In addition, none of the member organizations are are out there putting up fake websites attempting to steal peoples identities, which I think is a bigger (and faster growing) issue anyway.

      If you purchase products over the net, and/or stick your email address in a webform, looking for something for nothing, don't expect to recieve nothing. If you read the fine print, there is a lot of opt-in language that abounds. That doesn't make it spam, it makes it solicited.

      Meanwhile, as your last point about a link to NANAE is makes no sense whatsoever, I'll just point you in the right direction. My background is located under about the author at www.thoughtmarket.com. If you would like to send me your background, contact information, and whathave you, I would be happy to discuss the issue in further detail. By the way, I have a half dozen other sites up or in development, and none of them contain any links to each other. I believe they should all stand on their own (i.e. I don't like gaming search engine rankings either).

      As for the "so on", well please elaborate. Just because someone puts something together that cuts to the root of some issues, instead of repeatedly posting "KILL ALL SPAMMERS," doesn't make it a pro-spam site run by spammers. Take the tin-foil hat off, after you get your head out of your ass, that is. If you are so adamantly opposed to someone covering some minimal operating costs by using some very well labeled ads to do so, please feel free to make a monthly contribution, and I will take them out.

  41. Minor adjustment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that you are close, but that this is more likely.

    Terraserver.microsoft.com flagged the address as being across in the open lot across the street from my mark. But Terraserver has a bad habit of getting the wrong side of the street.

    The house photos are taken from the street, and from that point of view, the garage is on the right-hand side of the house (hires0005). Also, the pictures show a house that has a flat front facade. Finally, the roof on the neighboring house to the right is a grey color.

    The aerial photo of house that you picked do not match those details - the stub to the garage is on the left from the point of view of the street. That house is L-shaped, and there is a neighboring house with a very light color roof.

    I spent about 20 minutes studying the aerial view of the house I flagged looking for a similar mismatch, and could not find one. The driveway is right. The road to the south does lead directly into that driveway (hires0001). Given the rest of the neighborhood, it sure makes sense that the bulk of the people coming up the road in hires0001 would turn left - that is the way in and out of the subdivision and the melted snow shows most people going left. The last picture (hires0010) shows thick trees beyond the neighbor's house, and the aerial also shows them.

    The other thing going for this is that his house is a big one, and the one that I flagged happens to be one of the largest in the area if not the largest.

  42. Steve Atkins and Spam Kings by BMcWilliams · · Score: 1
    An anonymous coward wrote: "[I]t's your ethical obligation to do everything you possibly can to `get it right.' Trying to shove responsibility for that off on a third party speaks volumes about you ..."

    A third party? As Steve Atkins (the creator of this thread) said, he is mentioned in the book. He's an email consultant and a long-time contributor to the Nanae anti-spam newsgroup. So you can see why I'd want to interview him for Spam Kings.

    But when I tried in 2004 to get him to provide information about a couple of incidents in spam history (in order to "get it right"), he declined. He even threated to sue my publisher if his company (Word to the Wise) was mentioned in the book.

    In brief, Atkins declined to share his view of events. And now he's publicly complaining that my rendition departs from his (secret) interpretation. That speaks volumes about him.

    1. Re:Steve Atkins and Spam Kings by SSpade · · Score: 1

      But when I tried in 2004 to get him to provide information about a couple of incidents in spam history (in order to "get it right"), he declined.

      A half-truth. I chatted with Mr McWilliams online, but declined to go into detail on some issues he wanted to discuss. The main reason for that is that some of the information is confidential, and it's very difficult to discuss the non-confidential parts of an incident with a journalist without risking mentioning confidential issues.

      He even threated to sue my publisher if his company (Word to the Wise) was mentioned in the book.

      An outright lie. I did call O'Reilly and talked to one of their editors. I told them that I had been told that there was some untrue and libelous material in the draft at that point and that I or my company may have been mentioned in the draft. I asked for a copy of the manuscript to review. I never received that draft, nor a return call from O'Reilly. Mr McWilliams did follow up with me, was very polite and professional and told me of the mentions of myself, my company and my wife in the book.

      In brief, Atkins declined to share his view of events. And now he's publicly complaining that my rendition departs from his (secret) interpretation.

      I declined to share some private information primarily due to confidentiality concerns, but also secondarily because I was pretty sure, from the questions asked and the response to others, that it was not a book I wanted to be involved in. Tabloid journalism and hatchet jobs are seldom pretty to anyone involved.