Slashdot Mirror


Experimental Transistor Breaks 600 Gigahertz

neutron_p writes "The goal of a terahertz transistor for high-speed computing and communications applications could now be within reach. A new type of transistor structure, invented by scientists at the University of Illinois, has broken the 600 gigahertz speed barrier. A new type of transistor - built from indium phosphide and indium gallium arsenide - is designed with a compositionally graded collector, base and emitter to reduce transit time and improve current density. With their pseudomorphic heterojunction bipolar transistor, the researchers have demonstrated a speed of 604 gigahertz - the fastest transistor operation to date."

87 of 381 comments (clear)

  1. Transistor Breaks 600 Gigahertz by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    And is forced to pay for their replacement as well as 100 hours community service.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Transistor Breaks 600 Gigahertz by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Funny

      Terahertz transistors, indium phosphides, indium gallium arsenide, compositionally graded collectors, bases and emitters, reduced transit time and improved current density... And a pseudomorphic heterojunction bipolar transistor with speeds of 604 gigahertz.....

      At times like this I like to leave a slashdot page open on articles and walk away from my computer.

      Anybody walking past my computer looks at the screen and thinks 'JESUS! How clever is that guy?'

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    2. Re:Transistor Breaks 600 Gigahertz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anybody walking past my computer looks at the screen and thinks 'JESUS! How clever is that guy?'

      Or: "Fuck! When does this moron do some work?'

    3. Re:Transistor Breaks 600 Gigahertz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Almost there...

      640GHz should be fast enough for anyone...

  2. But... by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    can it be overclocked?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:But... by Reignking · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, you're right. And while you're at it, since it has indium phosphide, that means it is made with Indians, right?

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    2. Re:But... by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Informative
      True, but most arsenic compounds are highly toxic, too.

      This is one just one of many reasons why silicon chip manufacturing is such an environmental nightmare....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:But... by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Arsenide does mean arsenic. I work in a place where we use GaAs chips a lot. Burning them out doesn't result in any kind of vapor (generally, you get metal alloying with the semiconductor). However, mechanical abuse can cause them to turn into powder (GaAs is very fragile), so we take some care.

      Of course, to put in into perspective, most LED's are Gallium Arsenide as well. LED's are packaged, and high frequency (>10 GHz) chips are ussually not.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    4. Re:But... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sort of like with gold jewelry. It's too expensive for many people, so they mix in other metals to reduce the price.

      I suppose this is a joke, but pure gold is rather soft. mixing it with other materials makes it hard enough to survive normal use.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    5. Re:But... by fleck_99_99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of your more run-of-the-mill silicon chips are doped with arsenic as well. Phosphorus and arsenic are probably the most common N-type dopants used in semiconductor manufacture.

      --
      seven two six five
      seven four six one seven
      two six four two e
  3. huh by moonbender · · Score: 5, Funny

    their pseudomorphic heterojunction bipolar transistor

    *blank stare*

    What now? It's pronounced nu-cu-lar!

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    1. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      pseudomorphic heterojunction bipolar transistor

      [sarcasm]
      Thank GOD they got this one right! If they would have invented a pseudomorphic homojunction bipolar transistor, the right-wing would have gotten pissed.*
      [/sarcasm]

      *If you're offended by the above, bugger off.

    2. Re:huh by stungod · · Score: 2, Funny

      The first thing I though of was the Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator. I get the feeling that both are equally destructive to life on Earth.

    3. Re:huh by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Informative

      That name is quite descriptive, for the right public. People at academia use to describe on the names everything that is different from the usual.

      That make some very bad titles, but is very usefull to gather articles fast and to generate unique names.

    4. Re:huh by kirun · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...that can morph into strange things...

      This is how Transformers work, right?

      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
  4. Bipolar? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the article:

    With their pseudomorphic heterojunction bipolar transistor, the researchers have demonstrated a speed of 604 gigahertz - the fastest transistor operation to date.


    Sure...it's fast now, but just wait until it goes into its depressive phase...
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Bipolar? by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Sure...it's fast now, but just wait until it goes into its depressive phase... "

      you mean when it's asked to run windows? ;)

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  5. Terahertz transistor within reach? by isd_glory · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, because after the first 600 GHz, the next 400 GHz are a piece of cake.

    1. Re:Terahertz transistor within reach? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Funny

      The difference is that it's has an accent over the 's'. When you are speaking to someone, that's where you let a blob of spit fly out and strike the person you're talking to. Glad to help.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:Terahertz transistor within reach? by overshoot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      At least in software engineering, speed improvements less than, say, 5x, aren't really that impressive. Does the same hold true in electrical engineering?

      No, because unlike software engineering electrical engineering has to do with physics. For instance, the engineering required to crank up PCI-Express from 2.5 Gb/s to 10 Gb/s basically requires a complete reengineering of the whole physical layer circuitry.

      It doesn't have to do with the semiconductors so much as the physics of the wires, which really screw up signals at that rate thanks to frequency-dependent loss mechanisms.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  6. Longhorn by faqmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just in time for Longhorn!

    --
    Are you...Are you some kind of genius?
    No, ma'am, I'm just a regular Slashdot reader.
    1. Re:Longhorn by maotx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Followed by Debian's next stable release followed by Duke Nukem Forever.
      In other news, Satan is asking for more engineer's souls to design a device to fight back the record low temperatures.

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    2. Re:Longhorn by FreeLinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Spare me. Please.

      I call this the race to Google. It is a test for how long it takes for a desktop machine to actually become useable. This is usually a better measure than the ambiguous "boots in x seconds", that we often see. Here is how to perform the test.

      Take any modern linux distro you like and install it as a dual boot with Windows XP. Now time how long it takes from pressing <enter> in grub (or Lilo if you are so inclined) and when you can see the main Google page. Try this with both Linux and Windows XP using Firefox as the browser on both.

      The results? So far I have tested SuSE, Fedora, Mandrake, Slackware, Ubuntu and yes even Gentoo and in ALL cases, Windows XP was able to access Google faster than Linux on the same machine.

    3. Re:Longhorn by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 2, Funny

      The real test is whether XP can handle all the complicated operations involved in loading Google's homepage.

    4. Re:Longhorn by drigz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course. A lot of Microsoft engineers spent a long time making XP boot as fast as possible. They'll probably do the same thing with Longhorn.

      What remains is that when I minise a window on my parents' 700MHz XP box, it takes noticeable time to render the desktop, and these kind of delays will be much worse in Longhorn (probably).

    5. Re:Longhorn by Skraut · · Score: 2, Funny

      If Google is your benchmark, I can get to Google in half the time on my linux box. Just load it in Lynx

      --
      Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    6. Re:Longhorn by loose_cannon_gamer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I seem to recall from performance theory that the only true benchmark is how well a machine can perform your workload (where 'your' means the user / buyer / operator / etc.).

      If your workload is to see how quickly you can load google's website, well, I just don't know what to tell you. Maybe take a screen shot, print it out, and paste it on the monitor? Voilà, execution of your workload in 0 seconds! Every time! Repeatable!

      Sorry, I just don't see why this 'benchmark' is relevant. Funny, yes. Relevant, hmmmm.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, us are belong to all your base.
  7. OMG! by Zsinj · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I find these at CompUSA?

  8. Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by nebaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If we assumed that all transistors on a chip (say a P4) were this type of transistor, and could run at 600 GHz, I know there is time required for a signal to cross all of these transistors, etc., and that some chips have a billion transistors on them, how fast could the current chips run with these transistors?

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Assuming you mean the speed that will be marketed to the public, thats impossible to tell without knowing Intel, AMD, or IBM trade secrets.
      That speed is dependent on the "critical path"s of the chip's logic systems & subsystems, the switching speed of a single transistor is merely a factor in that equation.

    2. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by RayDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suspect the power requirements for this bi-polar transistor would make it impossible to build something on the scale of a P4.

      Bipolar eats power.

      I think these transistors, if found to be manufacturable, will probably be used in communications not digital logic.

      Raydude

    3. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by CSMastermind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Eventually, they will be able to run much much faster. But at the time the current chips aren't made to use this kind of transistor. They'll definitly bump up speed in the long run but I'm wondering if it still won't follow Moore's law.

    4. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by mlyle · · Score: 5, Informative

      It all depends on the wiring delay and how many transistors deep a pipeline stage is.

      fMax of a pipeline stage is 1/(switching times+wiring delays) under worst case thermal conditions. The wiring delays will stay about the same unless they're also improved by the new process, which is unlikely.

      A 600GHz transistor, with really deep pipelines like the P4, and very good interconnect technology might allow 20-50GHz operation; but there are many other things to contend with (like thermals/dissipation) that can limit speed. Thermals, in turn, depend on the amount of capacitance being switched, which isn't specified here.

    5. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even being an EE I could not answere that as Intel probably keeps that a closely guarded secret. That said, the main delay time in an Intel and AMD chip today is not the transistors, but the propogation time due to RC (resistance capacitance) in the signal path over long distances (relative to the chip size). Given that, they _may_ be able to double the Ghz, but that is all until they solve those problems. If they had a room temerature super conductor they could put in there, it would be easier to say.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    6. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by bbrack · · Score: 2, Informative

      It has to do with how many gate stages the processor had in each pipeline stage - if the worst case stage has 14 gate delays, then the processor would theoretically be able to run at about 600/14GHz.

      HOWEVER, there is no way the chip would actually get that close - this 604GHz oscillator is probably a single ring on a chip containing many oscillators. The average speed could easily be more in the 400-500GHz range.

      Also, these transistors are BJTs, which are useless in very large xtor count chips due to their much higher current density, so it's unlikely you'll see a computer made out of them ever (processors have been almost exclusively CMOS for over 20 years)

    7. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by mothz · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think these transistors, if found to be manufacturable, will probably be used in communications not digital logic.

      Indeed. The transistors used for digital circuits (i.e., computers) are mostly MOSFETs. The chief benefit of MOS transistors is that no current goes into the gate, so power is only used when switching from one state to the other (i.e. from a 1 to a 0).

      Bipolar transistors have a base current (albeit small), so they draw power even when responding to a constant signal. However, they're faster and can output a lot more current than MOSFETs, so they do have plenty of other applications.

    8. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Jiga = giga... Back in the old days before processors and memory had the "giga" term that we've come to know and love, some people pronounced the "g" softly, like "j" as in "george", and these words were featured in movies like Back to the Future.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    9. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by mlyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One other point: transistors on exotic processes like these are most suited for wireless and communications applications at this point; problems with power density, logic density, yields, and manufacturability have thus far kept them isolated to radio and interconnect modulation systems to date, rather than bulk logic. These problems are not necessarily insurmountable, but prevent its use in fast microprocessors for the foreseeable future.

    10. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by ChrisMaple · · Score: 4, Informative
      So, if you build the world's fastest transistor, then how do you know how fast it is going since it is obviously well beyond the range of your test equipment?

      By heterodyning with (multiplying by) a lower frequency. Look up formula for sin(at) x sin(bt).

      Note also that harmonics of a given frequency can be created by passing it through a nonlinearity.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    11. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Radiate the signal out (not hard at 600 GHz), bounce it off a machined diffraction grating, and use a variable position power detector to measure it. The diffraction angle tells you the wavelength, and hence the frequency.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    12. Re:Not being an EE geek...let me ask a question by melch+moo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think these transistors, if found to be manufacturable, will probably be used in communications not digital logic. No probably about it. Communications applications are by far and away the heaviest driving factor in (read: give the most money to) THz and ultra-high speed data processing. Demand for high-speed internet is rising as more people are subscribing and applications such as HDTV and VOIP are using more bandwidth. Of course, in order to keep up with these demands, routers need to be able to handle more and more information. Of course, even if it is infeasible and improbable for us to see this technology in our processors (as mentioned in many other posts), communication isn't the only use for THz architecture. THz emitters and detectors could be used for a lot of detection and exploration purposes, e.g. molecular compositions, plasma observation, and molecular astronomy.

  9. English please? by mboos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's pack as many big words together as possible!

    compositionally graded collector, base and emitter
    pseudomorphic heterojunction bipolar transistor

    --
    --Mike Boos
  10. Power usage? by rsrsharma · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's the power usage on this thing? For one transistor it doesn't matter too much, but remember that todays chips have billions of transitors in them- Intel's Prescott core is rediculously power comsumpive right now. Even worse, over 100 watts of the power is lost to heat! So, what's the power and thermal design power of these things?

    1. Re:Power usage? by jridley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even worse, over 100 watts of the power is lost to heat!

      For all practical purposes, ALL the power is "lost" to heat. Information has SOME thermodynamic value, but it's pretty damn small.

      If you have a computer that draws 500 watts of power, you have a 499.99999(etc) watt heater.

    2. Re:Power usage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Replace every room heater in the world with a (networked) computer of the same wattage, get a supercomputer running with no additional energy consumption on top of normal heating needs. The nodes of the supercomputer that are active will mostly follow the nightside of the Earth and winter hemisphere, but who cares, as long as there are enough nodes at any given time, it doesn't matter whether they are located in Alaska or Chile. *This* is the future of computing.

    3. Re:Power usage? by WaterBreath · · Score: 3, Informative

      No microprocessor any time soon is likely to be constructed using bipolar junction transistors (BJTs) such as this one, pseudomorphic or otherwise. Microprocessors are generally constructed using metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), in a power-conserving organizational standard known as complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS).

    4. Re:Power usage? by CarlinWithers · · Score: 2, Informative
      All the heat that processors these days are producing have effects other than just wasting energy.

      I work at the local computer repair shop while going to school, and right now we check every incoming system for bristling capacitors. About 25% of the time they have bad capacitors. Why? Heat from the CPU is causing them to overheat, expand, and become useless.

      If you haven't looked at your own motherboard recently, make a point to. Capacitors should have entirely flat tops. Anything else means they are on the way to destruction.

    5. Re:Power usage? by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was under the impression that information had 0 thermodynamic value. Where'd you hear otherwise? (I'm curious to know, not flaming or doubting).

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  11. Just like Illinois by lheal · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'll be clearly the best engineering team, but will lose in the finals to the more talented squad from MIT.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  12. Another Fast Transistor by ncg · · Score: 5, Informative

    More and more we here about these new HBT circuits that are faster than all get out.
    The truth is that nothing will replace CMOS anytime soon. The infrastructure is already there, and it is being optimized over and over again and has a huge work force to man it.

    I once heard someone ask Intel is they ever plan to switch to HBT for speed. Their response is, and will probably be for a while, that why would they switch technologies after investing $50 billion a year in their CMOS foundries etc.

    These advancements may never make it to the point that the average consumer will take notice of them.
    And it may be that these academic inventions will never find any market relevance.

  13. Pseudomorphic heterojunction bipolar transistor? by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, that was Final Jeopardy's question last night! Where was this post when I needed it?

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  14. Availability of materials by tetranitrate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Silicon is widely available for current transistors. Are indium phosphide and indium gallium arsenide just as available, or are they the doping materials.

    Will material prices be the main determining cost of chips made from these products?

    I didn't RTFA -- it was slashdotted.

  15. Zero gain bandwidth by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK, I cannot RTFM right now as it is /.ed, but:

    This sounds an awful lot like they are giving the zero-gain bandwidth of the transistor - the frequency at which the transistor does NOT amplfy a signal anymore.

    So, at 599GHz the transistor will amplify a little. At 600 GHz the transistor takes as much power to drive the input as it is able to switch at the output. At 601 GHz the transistor takes more power to control than it can switch.

    Given a 600 GHz zero-gain bandwidth transistor you ARE NOT going to make a 600 GHz clockspeed processor.

    1. Re:Zero gain bandwidth by TenDimensions · · Score: 3, Funny

      Isn't that how warp speed works?

  16. Re:Is this a UIUC comeback? by jpu8086 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I found out who you were, I'd come bitch slap you.

    First of all, this transistor was developed in the ECE dept, not CS.

    As for CS, we're not droping in rankings. On the other hand, we shall be climbing very soon. We have the highest percentage (and number) of young faculty of any CS program in the world. I give us 2-4 years before you see the results of the rampant hiring over the past 2-3 years (15+ new faculty members), who are all pushing to get tenure over the next half-decade.

    Finally, Mosaic, the original httpd and NCSA telnet were all "intented" at NCSA, not at CS department. However, they did hire tons of CS grad students on those project. Nonetheless, these 2-3 inventions are not the only things that make us prestigous, except maybe in the eyes of mainstream media and the lay man.

    --
    now supporting:
    cmdrTaco for president '04
    michael for oval office intern summer '05
  17. I remember when... by brontus3927 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In 20 years, will you you be able to say: I remember what I was doing when I first read on slashdot about the first transistor to break teh 600GHz barrier?

    But seriously, a previous poster had a point, what's the relationship between the speed of a transitor and the speed of a proccessor? Because 600GHz is a HUGE jump over 3.4GHz. If there's a 1:1 ratio, then a proccsoor of with 600GHz transistors would have 176 tiems the proccessing power over the current breed. A Beowolf cluster in a single chip!

    1. Re:I remember when... by pclminion · · Score: 3, Informative
      But seriously, a previous poster had a point, what's the relationship between the speed of a transitor and the speed of a proccessor? Because 600GHz is a HUGE jump over 3.4GHz.

      The transistors in a 3.4 GHz chip are capable of switching faster than 3.4 GHz. The chip as a whole runs at that particular speed because heat dissipation becomes problematic at higher speeds. The individual components are there, but we haven't figured out how to put them all together yet to achieve higher speeds. A processor is MUCH more complicated than a single transistor... Don't expect to see 600 GHz chips made out of 600 GHz transistors. Once we get to 10 THz transistors, you might start thinking about 600 Ghz chips...

  18. CMOS logic isn't the only product by NoseBag · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IMO you are correct that Intel/Microchip/AMD aren't going to change their processes without a damned good reason. But PC parts and logic circuits aren't the only thing transistors go into.

    How about the RF modulators/demodulators in all cell-phones, the RF amps in same, the special-purpose chips, regulators, detectors, buffers, amplifiers, etc that mfgrs still crank out by the butt-load, etc?

    Personally, I'd really get off on an op-amp designed around these puppies! Imagine the gain-bandwidth product (eff-sub-Tee)!

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
    1. Re:CMOS logic isn't the only product by ncg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree with you on the usefulness outside of processors, digital logic, etc... But even companies like Freescale (ex- Motorola) and ADTRAN, all doing communications, use a derivitive of CMOS. Why? Because of infrastrucutre and economics. What you can do in HBT, CCD, etc you can get similar functionality and even speed (heard of strained silicon?) from CMOS.

      But yes, there will be more indium phosphide op-amps, as there are currently on the market, aimed towards the high speed communications market.

  19. Re:Article text please! by BabyPanther · · Score: 3, Informative

    Another article covering it here [www.newscientist.org].

  20. 600 GHz Barrier by solitarian · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was unaware of this barrier.

  21. 600Ghz for short periods... by demopolis · · Score: 2, Funny

    They clocked it in a good mood, immediately after that it was seen moving along at only 20Ghz, then 200, then 600 again......

  22. And then... by jkitchel · · Score: 2, Funny


    And then MIT will loose to the high school kids from Phoenix.

  23. Re:People need to get their terms straight. by mangu · · Score: 2, Informative
    Speed = Distance / Time


    I thought that was velocity. AFAIK, "speed" can also be used to mean "rapidity", that is how fast something happens. OTOH, "velocity" can only be used to mean how fast something moves, which is the definition you mention.

  24. bipolar transistor by werewolf1031 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, just what I need, a manic-depressive CPU.

  25. It looks like .. by macaulay805 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It looks like Longhorn's requirements will be fullfilled!!!

  26. Scope This by Nexboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just looked on Agilent's website and they don't seem to have any 600,000 MHz oscilloscopes for sale. I wonder how they tested this thing? A string of divider flipflops, perhaps?

    1. Re:Scope This by elgatozorbas · · Score: 4, Informative
      Good question, I asked myself the same one. They did NOT use a string of divider flipflops, as they only just developed the transistor itself, and to do the division the flipflops should be made of a superior technology.

      I know special methods exist to predict the f_s from low-frequency measurements. Maybe they measure the amplification at a some 'low' frequencies (GHz range) and extrapolate the gain-bandwidth pruduct from this?

    2. Re:Scope This by ShakuniMama · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're right, I just looked at the Appl. Phys. Lett. paper. They measured it to 50 GHz and curve-fitted it to get 604 GHz, assuming a 20 dB/decade drop-off. 50 GHz can be measured with a HP network analyser.

  27. How do you measure 604 gigahertz? by MOBE2001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the researchers have demonstrated a speed of 604 gigahertz - the fastest transistor operation to date.

    How does one measure 604 gigahertz? Just asking.

    1. Re:How do you measure 604 gigahertz? by ValuJet · · Score: 3, Funny
      How does one measure 604 gigahertz? Just asking.

      I'm not entirely sure on the specifics, but rumor has it you need 1.21 gigawatts.

    2. Re:How do you measure 604 gigahertz? by John+Miles · · Score: 4, Informative

      Spectrum analyzers could "see" up to 325 GHz directly in the early Eighties. So I'd guess that newer and better waveguide mixers are available now. A Tek 2782 or 2784 analyzer could theoretically display a harmonically-downmixed signal 1.2 THz, although I have no idea how you were supposed to acquire the signal in the first place.

      You may not be able to see a single one-picosecond pulse in the time domain, but if you fire off a bunch of them in succession, you can build a picture of the waveform with repetitive sampling techniques. Technology was available in the 1960s to perform repetitive sampling in the 20-picosecond regime, so someone like Tek or Agilent or Picosecond Pulse Labs may have a sampling gate that can do the job.

      I would recommend surfing around at PPL's site if you're seriously interested in this stuff. There may also be some photonic tech involved in the measurement; I haven't RTFA yet.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    3. Re:How do you measure 604 gigahertz? by nickyandthefuture · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, if you look at the paper, they only measured up to 50 GHz and extrapolated a linear (in dB) decay of the gain, and found a zero crossing at 604 GHz. So they didn't measure anything at all at 600 GHz; they only found device behavior that indicated that there would be a response up to that frequency.

    4. Re:How do you measure 604 gigahertz? by Biff+Stu · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is done all the time in sub-mm astronomy.

      The way to do it is heterodyne detection. In order to do this you need a mixer and a local oscillator. You can purchases special Schottky diode mixers that are engineered for this application.

      Your local oscillator can be an off the shelf line-tunable Far-IR laser. These lasers are based on rotational transitions in small molecules in the gas phase. These lasers are pumped with a CO2 laser. If the conditions are right, the dynamics of vibrational to rotational energy transfer give you a population inversion. These lasers make nice local oscillators because they have been used for years for sub-mm wave astronomy and the frequencies of their lines are known to a large number of significant figures.

      Once you have a local oscillator and a mixer, you can measure the beat frequency with an off-the-shelf spectrum analyzer.

  28. Re:What's the ROE for it, though? by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Assuming it's all about network communications and storage. I'm guessing you've never done any graphical apps with your machine. Those eat CPU's for lunch. I can peg even the fastest consumer machines available now with some of the stuff I work with. Just depends on what you do.

  29. the consumer benefits from competition by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Interesting



    why would they switch technologies after investing $50 billion a year in their CMOS foundries etc.

    Hopefully, competition.

  30. 7% increase in 2 1/2 years -- WOW! by DumbSwede · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I hadn't seen any headlines about semiconductor speed advances in awhile, so I was prepared to be impressed by this news, however having read the article and done a little Googling, it would seem to not be so impressive.

    CPUs have stalled out at about 4ghz overall clocking, cutting edge transistors seem to be hitting a wall at about 500-600ghz.

    Now granted faster gate transitions make for faster CPUs, but multiple gate operations are necessary for each state change, add signaling and propagation delay and who knows what you can really clock the CPU at (I am not an Electrical Engineer).

    Here is a page link claiming a record 562ghz transistor switching in Oct. 2002 article

    here is another claimed record of 509ghz, Nov, 2003 article
    Obviously at odds with the 2002 anoucment. Undoubtedly it should narrow its claim for a specific transistor type.

    Here is a U of I annoucment calming a record 382 ghz Jan. 30, 2003 article
    But expects 700ghz by early 2004 (I'm guessing they didn't make it).

    Lets assume 562ghz in 2002, so we - drum roll please --- 7.5% increase in speed in 2 ½ years!

    This is not going to keep Moore's Law humming along.

    Even stranger, here are claims of TerraHertz transistors at Intel in 2002 article

    Ironically, while googling for transistor or gate speed will show hundreds of hits, you can't actually find the switching speed for individual gates in a P4 or AMD chip. This stuff seems to be super secret stuff, and only the overall CPU clock it published. I wouldn't be surprised if the individual gates and transistors are transitioning at several dozens of ghz if not a couple of hundred or more. While Moore's Law death claims may have been premature 10 and 20 years ago, they may not be now.

    I hope I'm wrong, I want my Holodeck Playstation 5 in 2015.

  31. More Interesting than the Speed of the Transistor by Foolomon · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is how fast you can fry an egg on it when it's running.

  32. Yikes. by BigZaphod · · Score: 2, Funny

    "pseudomorphic heterojunction bipolar transistor"

    Sounds like it needs to see a doctor!

  33. In other news... by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Funny

    SpyMac reports Apple intends to ship a Power Mac G6 with a 600 GHz processor by Macworld San Francisco '06, thus bringing the company back into harmony with Satan.

    Oh, and just to piss off right-wing Windows users, Steve has decided to celebrate 29 years of Apple with a retro pricing scheme of $666 for "Hellspawn," as the new system has been code-named.

    An Apple representative did not deny the story, saying that "company policy is not to comment on unannounced products." Clearly, it must be true.

    p

  34. Second answer by ChrisMaple · · Score: 4, Informative

    Filters of known frequency response can be made by knowing only their geometry. Pass the signal through several filters of different frequency responses (one at a time) and feed the output of the filter into a resistive material. Measure the temperature of the resistive material. The peak frequency of the filter which warms the resistive material the most is the (approximate) frequency being generated.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  35. Pet peeve by JoeBuck · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nice round numbers do not form a "barrier". The speed of sound was a barrier because aerodynamics is fundamentally different for an aircraft travelling faster than the speed of sound. Likewise, new mask-making techniques (phase correction, optical proximity correction) had to be invented to fabricate chips with feature sizes smaller than a wavelength of the light used to manufacture them, so a wavelength was a barrier.

    But there's no "barrier" at 600 GHz or any other nice round number. It's just a number, and I wish tech writers and marketeers would quit using the "barrier" word in cases like this.

  36. Re:Star Trek Script? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Informative

    Reply to you and the poster immediately above:

    This actually makes perfect sense to me. One of the specializations I took at school was electronic devices, which details the flow of electrons in semiconductors. I'll try to explain it. It's a tough job without pictures.

    Indium Phosphide and Indium Gallium Arsenide are the materials used to construct the device. Generic transistors use Silicon, and you've no doubt heard of Gallium Arsenide. These are just made from a different material.

    The collector, base, and emitter are the three parts of a bipolar junction transistor. Colloquially, that's a "transistor". If you're talking about a MOSFET, you'd say "MOSFET". I'm not sure if you'd capitalize it when speaking. ;) By compositionally graded, they mean that the junctions between the n and p regions have a specific type of gradation. In other words, they aren't uniform. I can't explain this without pictures.

    Transit time is how long it takes for one electron to take the trip across the transistor. Current density is current over area. It is defined in many way, but it all stems from the true form of Ohm's law. (Not the V=IR that everyone is familiar with, but J = oE )

    The pseudomorphic heterojunction BJT is just a specific description of the junction type. Like the other junction, there's now way I can describe this to you without a picture.

    If you know what this guy is talking about, he is making perfect sense. Look up some books online and get ready to brush up your multivariate calculus.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  37. Kids Cartoon Villains team up by Benjamin+Shniper · · Score: 3, Funny

    Our hero, Milton Feng, has discoverred a plot by the evil Terahertz gang to break the Universe's barier.

    Pseudomorphic, the evil gang leader, has invented a new device to break through the barrier. "I will cause the failure of all the communication devices and computers." He cries. His sidekick, Heterojunction, says "I will collect the indium the we need to finish our ultimate machine!"
    Pseudo's girlfriend, Bipolar Transistor, has a bag full of arsenide and is on the lookout to kill anyone foolish enough to interfere.

    Milton stealthily invades the enemy base, where he overhears that the Terahertz gang will strike the bandgap in selected areas. After he finds this out, he speeds his electron flow to warn the others.

    But what he doesn't know is that while his group of heroes is made of dissimilar and equally spunky men, the Pseudomorphic has his gang thoroughly doped.

    Can our hero improve the compositional grading of the transistor components enough?

    Or will the PseudoMoprh defeat them with his awesome signal charging time?

    Find out on the next episode of "Moore's Law"!

    -Ben

  38. Re:What are the environmental impacts? by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bad for the planet? The planet doesn't care. We're just a thin scum on the surface.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  39. Indium... by krypticide · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised no one has noted that indium is rare enough that this transistor wouldn't be practical. Most of the indium is used in the transparent electrode (indium tin oxide) for LCD screens, etc. and it's in very short supply. Certainly not like silicon.

  40. Re:is this useful? by bobdole369 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not the distance light can travel in that time period that matters. Typically its also not a "signal" every 1.6 picoseconds, its a change in polarity or electromotive force (i.e. Volts). You would utilize such a device more efficiently in class C operation, where the transistor is biased above ground, and only conducts for 180 degrees.

    Think of it like a hose that you squeeze and let go of 600 billion times a second. The electrons don't have to necessarily change direction, just magnitude (and following ohms law, current) 600 billion times a second.

    --
    Lousy facepalm.