Slashdot Mirror


1Gbps Broadband Service for Hong Kong

Limax Maximus writes "Hong Kong is planning to launch a 1Gbps broadband home service. Although the idea of using shared infrastructure is nothing new for TV/phone/data this appears to be the first to do this over IP at such high speed. The cost is high - 215 USD a month. Per megabit, however, this is a very cheap service. This kind of solution only really works in town blocks where cat5 cabling is a realistic option."

17 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. Faster, but for what? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While per megabyte/second it seems very cheap, you have to consider what your internet usage actually is. If you're only using the internet for an hour or two a day (and who among us doesn't?), then this faster speed internet is a lot more expensive than normal slower service. You're paying more, but not using more. That's not a better value, that's getting ripped off.

    Even if you had this faster pipe, what would you do with it? Download more porn? Upload more MP3s?

    I see the benefit for a fatter pipe for businesses who need to serve up large amounts of data, but for the average user, faster does very little. It's nothing like the jump from dialup to broadband. We are as fast as we need to be. Page downloads are already instantaneous, how can you seriously improve over instantaneous.

  2. Re:shouldnt it be by SithGod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually you can run 1 Gb/s over Cat5e cabling. Cat6 is just better suited for it

    --
    Don't you hate pants?
  3. Re:Can neighbors share/resell. by grolschie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well it will be as soon as someone installs a WiFi AP without changing the default settings. ;-)

  4. Re:Firewall of China? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hong-kong has been kept in a sort of Capitalist sand-box in many ways , so it does not suffer the same restrictions as the rest of china. iirc

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  5. Why is this so cheap? by neomage86 · · Score: 4, Informative

    1 gbps is more bandwidth than an OC-48, which run for about 700,000 US dollars/month. I understand that consumers will only use a tiny fraction of their allocated bandwidth, and they don't demand the level of stability that an enterprise line needs. Still, you've got to figure that the ISP need to dedicate at least 50mbps of bandwidth to each customer (approx a DS3), and that would still be about $15,000 a month.

    1. Re:Why is this so cheap? by xstein · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not so.

      Read the fine print. Overseas bandwidth is capped at 20mbits. (sorry for chinese language) It's only local traffic that will run at 1Gps, and that costs them nothing as they own all the fibre.

  6. This already exists in Sweden. by pomac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In sweden www.bredband2.se offers 1 Gbit connections for 118,60 USD. This is without limits.

    For more information and so forth (in swedish) see www.labs2.se

  7. Re:Firewall of China? by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, our net access is not regulated or monitored by China. China has to maintain some distance from us until 2047, and any action that reeks of Beijing's hand would be met with massive resistance in HK.

    Hong Kongers love their market economy and freedoms, often citing it as an example of why HK is a better place to live and work than other rivals in the region like Singapore and Shanghai.

  8. A communist sandbox? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Hong-kong has been kept in a sort of Capitalist sand-box in many ways "

    Is that the opposite of a Communist Sandbox? Remember the old joke: "What do you get if you bring communism to the Sahara Desert? Well, at first, nothing. Then, after 10 years, you get a shortage of sand."

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  9. Re:Ok, since people insist America isn't "behind" by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "The whole reason we're "Behind" is because we have to update old technology, whereas most of the Aisan countries weren't as technologically advanced as we were until recently. Then they could go on making new technology, whereas we have to spend money to replace older stuff."

    I don't "get it". How does "not having anything in the first place" make it cheaper and easier? I'd guess that there would be no difference either way, and it might be a little easier to upgrade in the US if you have cable conduits all over the cities and wiring in the house for it.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  10. Re:Conquer Taiwan by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Why doesn't China entice Taiwanese with special offers? Because the Taiwanese block spam from China too."

    Which leaves those Taiwanese to shake their heads in envy as they look across the Straights of Formosa to China, where they see the men standing on the shore taunting them by waving their prodigious giant penises and making 1/2 km jumps with their super HGH-herb-enhanced powers. They say to themselves "See? If we could get Chinese spam, we'd be just like that!"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  11. Re:Firewall of China? by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is trying to narrow that gap, surely.

    However, by law it can't meddle all that much with Hong Kong's affairs, at least not without violating their agreement with the British and pissing off Hong Kong's 7 million people (and many in China who view Hong Kong as a democratic beacon of hope).

    After a massive protest in HK, China decided to lay off enforcing Article 23, which dealt with subversion. It also lead, indirectly, to the Chief Executive (our leader) getting sacked. The debate now is when (not if) Hong Kong will be able to elect its own leaders.

    There's a large voice of dissent in Washington against China, especially with their yuan policy. I suppose that may be the reason the US sees things over here in a very negative light.

  12. Re:Ok, since people insist America isn't "behind" by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ofcourse ,You need to stop complaining now as the people of Peru are far worse off than you and they shouldnt complain as the people of Papua new guinea are worse off than them and.... so the beat goes on

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  13. P2P by MarkByers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With peer-to-peer, the more popular a download is, the faster it can be downloaded. The limit is the speed of the internet connections of those trading file pieces. There is no central bottleneck. With a few high speed connections uploading, everyone's downloads will be faster.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
  14. Re:what for ...? by JamesTRexx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh come on... This is /., we all know that stack of Playboys under your bed is just an offline backup in case your internet connection fails.

    --
    home
  15. Re:Ok, since people insist America isn't "behind" by Regul8or · · Score: 4, Informative

    The only parts of America that are behind are the areas with monopolistic corporations that have no motivation to offer a more powerful service. In East Wenatchee, WA, the Douglas County Public Utilities District has laid fiber to the demarc( yes, to each and single house) and is offering 100 mbps symmetrical fiber internet service for $39.95/month. http://www.localtelonline.com/dbf.htm The PUD can get away with trampling all over inferior competing providers without getting sued by Charter and Verizon because the city isn't large enough to fight over.

  16. Re:Thanks to piracy by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In HK if we want pirated DVDs or software, we can buy it for about 50c/disk. Less hassle than downloading mostly. Though I suppose BitTorrent will pick up when people want to see the new episodes of Survivor or whatever. (Even though the overseas bandwidth is capped, local P2P will go much faster once there's a local seed or two.)

    But the commercial motivation is probably video on demand, and video phones.