Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo DS Wireless in Freefall

Nicholas Roussos writes "Wired reports about four skydivers who decided to give the Nintendo DS wireless capabilities a try while they were freefalling. 'The four sky divers proved that an ad hoc network set up using the wireless functions of a Nintendo DS works perfectly at distances of nearly 400 feet while falling 120 miles an hour,' states the article."

202 comments

  1. Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    were part of an experiment this month to discover the outer limits of the wireless capabilities of the DS
    Wow, amazing, so you mean that all that wind doesn't mess the signal up? But seriously, I think that if you got a few people with a couple of two-seater ultralights it might be slightly cooler. Well ok maybe not.

    I'll tell you what would be cool, ultralights with automatic paintball guns, heat seeking nerf missiles, and a HUD. Then have a dogfight, and when Mr. Farmer comes out of his house yelling at you for scaring the bejesus out of his livestock you make a second pass, *thunk* *thunk* *thunk* *thunk*

    Wait, what was this article about again?
    1. Re:Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn it! I wish I didn't use up my mod points earlier today. That's was way too funny! To all four of the moderators on /. who actually have a sense of humor, mod parent up!

    2. Re:Boring... by s20451 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll tell you what would be cool, ultralights with automatic paintball guns, heat seeking nerf missiles, and a HUD. Then have a dogfight

      I'd like to see the dude who tries to do an Immelman in an ultralight. Or his next of kin.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    3. Re:Boring... by RM6f9 · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are such things as aerobatics-capable ultralights....
      (to avoid the temptation of flying with a paintball gun)
      Air-to-air paintball would all too often become inadvertent air-to-ground, and how much do we want to wager that Joe Farmer owns a 12 ga. double barrel that is most emphatically *not* firing paintballs?

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    4. Re:Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would just like to point out that the DS does *NOT* use ad hoc mode at all, but instead, uses infrastructure mode. The first DS into teh game acts as a wireless access point that the other units connect to.

    5. Re:Boring... by magefile · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's what the Mojave is for!

    6. Re:Boring... by RM6f9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gives "painted desert tortoise" a bit of a different spin, hey? Thanks for the chuckle.

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    7. Re:Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG! Thats why it hasnt been tunnelled, cause it does use ad hoc mode. They wouldnt build the feature into it and never use it.

    8. Re:Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok so a while back I was making a cargo run past Alderaan and my Wookie picks up a wifi invitation on his PSP. Just then I spot a couple of TIE fighters on my tail. It turns out the Wookie was playing Lumines with some Imperial goon, anyway we make the jump into hyperspace and the TIE fighters are on our ass the whole way. Only when they were shooting at us with their blasters did my friend lose any signal.

      Next week I'm heading to the forest moon of Endor to try it out on some speeder bikes. I'll post a link to the videos. Should be fun.

    9. Re:Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it uses infrastructure mode. The reason it isnt tunneled is because it doesnt use TCP/IP at layer 3 and up of the OSI model.

    10. Re:Boring... by Zeos386sx-16 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You gotta watch out for that lead based paint!

    11. Re:Boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and frikkin' lasers...

  2. Einstein would be pleased by SiliconEntity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In this year of the Einstein centenary, these skydivers have managed to rediscover the Principle of Relativity - that it matters not how fast you are moving, the laws of physics are the same. Indeed, if radio waves failed to propagate for skydivers the entire structure of physics would have to be re-created from scratch.

    1. Re:Einstein would be pleased by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn, there goes that "I'm sorry officer, but the kids in the back seat were driving me nuts with that video game thingy, so I just put it to the floor," excuse for that speeding ticket.

      KFG

    2. Re:Einstein would be pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's not what Einstein's General Relativity was about.

    3. Re:Einstein would be pleased by LadyLucky · · Score: 1

      Not so. Could just be a doppler shift that causes it issues.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    4. Re:Einstein would be pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No relative motion = no doppler phenomena.

    5. Re:Einstein would be pleased by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "In this year of the Einstein centenary, these skydivers have managed to rediscover the Principle of Relativity -"

      I have a question: If the skydivers were travelling near the speed of light, would this still have worked? (note: Ignore the detail that they'd punch a Wile E. Coyote-esque hole into the planet.)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Einstein would be pleased by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have a question: If the skydivers were travelling near the speed of light, would this still have worked? (note: Ignore the detail that they'd punch a Wile E. Coyote-esque hole into the planet.)


      Yes. Thats the whole point of relativity. Its just as valid to say that they're still and that the earth is moving near C towards them, in which case why wouldn't it work?

      --
      Why?
    7. Re:Einstein would be pleased by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "... in which case why wouldn't it work?"

      Well, let's say you were moving at 5mph below c. Relatively speaking, wouldn't that mean that the radio signal would only be moving 5mph towards the other guy? If not, wouldn't that imply that the speed of light isn't the limit that RF can travel?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Einstein would be pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, unfortunately.

      Light works in a funny manner.

    9. Re:Einstein would be pleased by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      "Well, let's say you were moving at 5mph below c. Relatively speaking, wouldn't that mean that the radio signal would only be moving 5mph towards the other guy? If not, wouldn't that imply that the speed of light isn't the limit that RF can travel?"

      This is where relativity comes in. The RF signals are traveling at C relative to the transmitter. If the transmitters are moving at C - 5 MPH, then the radio waves are moving at 2C-5 MPH.

      Get it?

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    10. Re:Einstein would be pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much doppler shift do you need to mess up WIFI?

    11. Re:Einstein would be pleased by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 1

      at C - 5 MPH, then the radio waves are moving at 2C-5 MPH.
      Not true, no matter can move faster than light, nor can light. To the people moving @ C-8km/h, the light being emitted (RF) would be @ C To Farmer Joe on the ground, the light would be C as well. It is all relative to who is observing it.

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    12. Re:Einstein would be pleased by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is where relativity comes in. The RF signals are traveling at C relative to the transmitter. If the transmitters are moving at C - 5 MPH, then the radio waves are moving at 2C-5 MPH.


      Wrong, actually.

      Under Galilean Relativity, you would be correct. this isn't usually what people mean when they talk about relativity. The problem facing physics at the end of the 20th century was that we had two really great systems for describing reality - Newtonian mechanics with constant unchanging distances and a universal clock, and Maxwells equations that described electromagnetism. The problem was with light - Light always moves at C relative to you - regardless of your frame of reference. This totally fubars Galilean relativity, because of exactly this situation.

      From the POV of the guys in the Air, obviously the radio signals are traveling away at C. However, according to Maxwell, this is also true for the guys on the ground. Einstein resolved this paradox by doing away with a universal clock, and for that matter universal distance and mass.

      --
      Why?
    13. Re:Einstein would be pleased by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      This is what is supposed to happen. As an observer approaches the speed of light, time becomes distorted for the observer to allow the light to travel at the same relative velocity to him. To other people who are motionless (for argument's sake) they would see the light act the way you describe-as if it were catching up to him at a rate of 5MPH.

    14. Re:Einstein would be pleased by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      There are a lot of people answering you, and only a few know what the hell they are taking about. Two simple things to remember;

      Electromagnetic radiation in a vacum travels at 1.8026175 × 10^12 furlongs per fortnight, always.

      Time is not the same for everyone, and bends to make the above possible.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  3. excitement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    nintendo ds, cause falling 120miles/h towards the ground isent exciteing enough.

    1. Re:excitement! by Adrilla · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just don't forget to pause, so you can pull the chute.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    2. Re:excitement! by niteice · · Score: 2, Funny

      i need a mod "+5 shit, he's right..."

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    3. Re:excitement! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      flamebait? Seems funny and clever to me. But I have no mod points. Ah well.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  4. Please turn off your electronic equipment... by FuryG3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now when they kick you and your friends off the plane for using wifi while in flight, you'll be all good.

  5. Why should it not work? by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, there is no/little relative velocity, and radio waves are fast (plus there is no ether :D).

    As to the whole thing... I really dont know. Its cool, but it sounds like a real potential for darwin awards ("damn, ill get you. Just a nother round..." *splash*)

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Why should it not work? by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      Google: cypress AAD

      Forgetting to open is very unlikely to kill you these days.

      "Remember -- when the people look like ants, pull. When the ants look like people, pray"

      "Pull high -- it's lower than you think."

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    2. Re:Why should it not work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Exactly, they may be moving at 120MPH in relation to the Earth, but not in relation to each other.

    3. Re:Why should it not work? by lightspawn · · Score: 1

      Its cool, but it sounds like a real potential for darwin awards ("damn, ill get you. Just another round..." *splash*)

      A *splash* may or may not result in a Darwin award. I think the word you were looking for was *splat*.

    4. Re:Why should it not work? by Newander · · Score: 2, Funny

      At those speeds, it really makes very little difference.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    5. Re:Why should it not work? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Assuming natural reproduction, it in fact requires a splash of sorts in order to be ineligible for a Darwin Award.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. The Video by bscience · · Score: 5, Informative
    There is a torrent serving up the video of the PSP and Nintendo DS tests here:

    http://stashbox.fromtheshadows.tv/

    or the actual torrent:

    http://torrents.fromtheshadows.tv/fts_box1.0.avi.t orrent

    1. Re:The Video by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else notice the street sign they stole in the beginning of the movie? That's kind of dumb of them to include that in the video...

  7. Good to read..... by wpiman · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is good to read about some real world applications with todays technology. Usually these articles are so theoretical....

    1. Re:Good to read..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Most people don't realize how long you fall while skydiving. It can get kind of dull after the first few seconds. If my friends and I could play games on the way down it would probably break up the monotony.

  8. This is really cool... by Smiffa2001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...though I'd really hate to try it. I get sucked into "the zone" when gaming and computing so tend to ignore most outside stimuli (feel free to correct spelling, etc.). Hope that my parachute would be automatically opening, otherwise...

    1. Re:This is really cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well if it does open automatically and you're not paying attention, I would image that while YOU might slow down, the Gameboy wouldn't (well unless it has a little parachute of its own, or you have a really good grip).

    2. Re:This is really cool... by XPisthenewNT · · Score: 1

      The sky divers in the article fashioned handstraps for the DS so they wouldn't drop them ;)

  9. So? by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Wow. Line-of-sight is line-of-site!
    2) If all 4 of them are falling in the same direction at the same speed, than their velocity is irrelevant; their relative velocity is zero.
    3) What networked games can you actually finish within the 60 seconds before you hit the ground?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halo 2.

    2. Re:So? by Fjornir · · Score: 1

      I've seen catch played with a tennis ball and an orange ribbon to increase visibility...

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Indeed
      2) But, a dropped packet could kill someone
      3) Ping? Sorry, sorry, I mean pong, that's it

    4. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      psht, orange ribbon and a tennis ball...why, back in my day, it was a cannonball with a shackle on it, and we were falling uphill five miles in the snow!!

    5. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      4. ??????

    6. Re:So? by Tibe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Good god you must have a boring life.

    7. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5. PROFIT!!!

    8. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idk, but...

      5. Profit!

    9. Re:So? by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      Damn, how many frags do you play to?!

    10. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warioware ... 12 times.

    11. Re:So? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "3) What networked games can you actually finish within the 60 seconds before you hit the ground?"

      Pilot Wings!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:So? by oGMo · · Score: 1
      What networked games can you actually finish within the 60 seconds before you hit the ground?

      The entire library of networked DS games. And you'd still have time for 59 seconds of pictochat.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    13. Re:So? by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      "So there I was playing the skydiving level while I was skydiving..."

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    14. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ping? Sorry, sorry, I mean pong, that's it

      Asumming you don't suck at videogames, a game of pong usually lasts a while. And it's more fun than most of today's crap, too.

    15. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One. Then I realise that I have already played doom, and that it's not fun anymore.

    16. Re:So? by uncqual · · Score: 1

      3) What networked games can you actually finish within the 60 seconds before you hit the ground?

      It's been 20 years since I made a couple hundred jumps, but as I recall (and assuming air density hasn't changed much in 20 years), one has about 72 seconds until they hit the deck (assuming exit altitude is 12.5K). Of course, in that last 12 seconds, the ants start looking a lot more like people and there would be a certain urgency to finishing your very last game - would hate to have the tombstone read "he lost his last game". :)

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    17. Re:So? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      What networked games can you actually finish within the 60 seconds before you hit the ground?


      Paratrooper multiplayer

  10. An EM Signal at 120MPH? by ColdZero · · Score: 5, Funny

    At speeds like that, how could the speed of light even hope to keep up?

  11. SPLAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dude, I fragged you!
    No, dude. I fragged you first!
    No Way! I fragged you first.

    SPLAT!

  12. What about different speeds? by Kainaw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If they are all travelling at the same speed - so what? What if one was still and the other was travelling at 400mph? Could they still communicate? I know, they would be too far apart if the moving one went in a straight line. But, what if it went back and forth? The issue is the simple doppler effect. At what point is it unable to handle wireless communications?

    I only ask because I feel that we will eventually have wireless transmitters in all cars to monitor traffic and assist in directing traffic away from congested areas. At what speed do cars lose effective communication with stationary antennas? Cell phones seem to work just fine at 100mph+

    --
    The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    1. Re:What about different speeds? by tool462 · · Score: 1
      The doppler shift varies relative to the speed of light. So the short answer is that you'd have to be moving VERY fast before the frequency would be shifted enough so that the two devices could no longer communicate. The real issue behind wireless communication at speed is that you will quickly travel outside of the functional range of the device. Cell phones have solved this problem by having many cell towers and a means of handing off transmission between them.

      Reference link on the Doppler Shift for light.

    2. Re:What about different speeds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      easiest way to oscilate someone is put them on a fairground ride i seem to remember one similar to a centrifuge.

    3. Re:What about different speeds? by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cell phones seem to work just fine at 100mph+

      As radio communications with Apollo seemed to work just fine at relative speeds of about 25,000 mph. As others have noted EMR is really, really fast and doppler shift is relative to that speed.

      In any case they have invented these things called "variable resistors" that can be used to make a simple circuit popularly refered to as a "tuner." They gone even further and created circuits that automatically seek and lock onto a signal, popularly known as "scanners." The radio in your car can probably serve as an example of one of these (FM signals can drift far more than you're ever going to see from a doppler shift on your wireless equipment).

      Note that the radio in your car works just fine no matter how fast you go, but please, don't tell the officer about this post, K?

      KFG

    4. Re:What about different speeds? by Grond · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So I looked up the relativistic Doppler effect and plugged in some numbers.

      For a relative velocity of 400mph you get an observed frequency of 2.39999856GHz.

      Now, looking at the 802.11b spec available at the 802 working group site I see that it operates in the 2.4 - 2.4835GHz range.

      So the Doppler effect at 400mph introduces a difference in frequency equal to .0017% of the total frequency range. Unfortunately, I don't know what the tolerances for 802.11b are, but I have difficulty believing that .0017% would cause much trouble.

      Now, backfiguring for a more common 5% tolerance, we get something like 500,000m/s or 1.1 million mph. So, yes, 802.11b probably won't work between passing spaceships. Aside from that, we're probably safe.

    5. Re:What about different speeds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, so I should pull the 802.11b out my TARDIS?

    6. Re:What about different speeds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, you already did.

    7. Re:What about different speeds? by anethema · · Score: 1

      They are all moving at the same speed..so the relative velocity of the skydivers is 0. How much dopper effect shift does that produce? :D

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    8. Re:What about different speeds? by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      Of course, for 802.11b to work between passing spaceships, they'd need to be within 100m of each other.

      I'm not sure that at those speeds (remember, we're talking _relative_ speeds here) I want two space ships to be within 100m of each other.

      Of course, they could be using those Pringles cans for extending their range ....

    9. Re:What about different speeds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that the maximum distance between units is something like one hundred meters, at a speed of 500.000 m/s, it would be 0.4 ms maximum.

      Probably not enough time for a game, anyway... It should even be very difficult to connect.

    10. Re:What about different speeds? by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ... as one approaches the 'c', the RF will encounter extreme relativity and each transceiver will form its own VERY parabolic shockwave.

      Thus each daring sky-diver will no longer overlap each other's receiver. One would have to alternatively take turn drag-braking into each other's RF parabolic range to conduct a simplex conversation.

      Why bother going back to C.B. radio? Use a tachyon transceiver instead.

    11. Re:What about different speeds? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The Apollo ground stations had phase-lock loop receivers that could compensate for doppler. Doppler measurements were used as part of the range and range-rate system that was used to determine the spacecraft's position and velocity.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    12. Re:What about different speeds? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd like to go back and rewrite that one, because it didn't come out quite right, because it was a hastily done rewrite.

      The original was longer, better, more accurate and a bit less "snippy," but got eaten by the computer Gods before posting.

      KFG

  13. Not a big shock. by darkonc · · Score: 1
    Things should work fine as long as the relative speed differences don't get too high (of course, you'd then have a distance problem pretty fast).
    My reall worry would be paying too much attention to the game, and not enough to your altitude...
    Ha! I've got a bead on you you .....
    splat!
    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  14. Cool. by JackAxe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I won't personally be trying this with my DS anytime soon. If I wanted to pee, besides in my pants while playing my DS, I'll just do it in the bathroom.

  15. Good thing they didn't use the PSP... by solowCX · · Score: 5, Funny

    They might have hit the ground before they booted up the game and loaded the level. ;)

    1. Re:Good thing they didn't use the PSP... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, I'd be more concerned about having enough battery power to play the PSP wirelessly during a 60 second freefall.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    2. Re:Good thing they didn't use the PSP... by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      ... stuck pixels ... stuck pullcords ... one's more impactful than the other. I'm not sure which.

    3. Re:Good thing they didn't use the PSP... by radish · · Score: 1

      At least they don't have to worry about dropping the stylus and decapitaing a spectator ;)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Good thing they didn't use the PSP... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      But they missed out on a potential game of PSP disc-launch tag.

      "Hah hah, I got you!"

      "And I get to keep this game right?"

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    5. Re:Good thing they didn't use the PSP... by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      Actually, freefall is a good environment in which to use the stylus. You can let go of it and it'll hover at a constant position relative to you since you're both in freefall.

    6. Re:Good thing they didn't use the PSP... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Too bad that's not true, since they're not in a vacuum, and have different ratios of mass to surface area...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. excellent.. research at its finiest by peculiarmethod · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is wonderful news for any dirt poor terrorist state or organization who wishes to drop cheap DS enabled bombs from a crop duster. All that hard research done for free!

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    1. Re:excellent.. research at its finiest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      parent is not off topic. There was concern that playstations would be used to power a ballistic missile weapons system.

  17. Re:worthless by Adrilla · · Score: 3, Funny

    You don't want those UMD's to come accidentally shooting out at that height.

    --

    "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  18. And I thought..... by wpiman · · Score: 1

    it was raining PSPs and Nintendos the other night. These guys should do a better job of holding onto them.

  19. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
    There are a number of activities they could have done during freefall that would have been of some interest and/or difficulty:
    • Eat soup
    • Paintball
    • Frisbee
    This article was just barely worth the effort to post a negative comment.
  20. Gotta Get that High Score by StarWreck · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jimmy! PULL THE STRING!!
    *waves hand* Just a second man
    For the love of god! Deploy your parachute!
    I just gotta get the high score, I'm almost there. *SPLAT*

    --
    ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    1. Re:Gotta Get that High Score by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Jimmy! PULL THE STRING!!

      I-I-I jjjust flewww i-i-in fro-fro-from South P-P-Pa-Pa-Park
      Aaaaannd, bo-bo-boy are muh-muh-my arms t-t-t-tired.




      Gr-Gr-Great c-c-crowd.
      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Gotta Get that High Score by ndogg · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more like this:

      Mike: "Jimmy! Pull your rip cord!"

      Jimmy: "WHAT?" (staring at the screen)

      Mike: "For the love of god..." (starts writing on the screen)

      Jimmy: "Oh, that, right."

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  21. Uhhh... by Sheepdot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reminds me of a bash.org IRC quote:

    Zanthis(ALE): AFK, tornado

    Has a whole other meaning in this context.

  22. Now, I can sleep by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The four sky divers proved that an ad hoc network set up using the wireless functions of a Nintendo DS works perfectly at distances of nearly 400 feet while falling 120 miles an hour"

    I'm glad they proved it, it was really keeping me up at night.

  23. One Lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hopefully this encourages people to toss their X-boxen out the window.

    Wonder if they were going to simulate tetris...falling out of the sky and all.

    Does this somehow change the definition of "dropped packets?"

    If someone skydove with airsnort to packet-sniff, does that count as a flying pig?

    That's what I call hardware acceleration!

    1. Re:One Lines by jbarket · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since when does Carrot Top try out new material on Slashdot?

      --

      -----
      jonathan barket
    2. Re:One Lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I'm a bit confused...are those supposed to be funny?

    3. Re:One Lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forget, you're a modern gamer. Most jokes you'd understand usually start with "So I just got my car back from being pimped and..."

    4. Re:One Lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey, that's a double pun, godamnit! You didn't think of it!"
      -George Carlin

  24. Reminds me of another recent story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was afraid I was going to read that one of them had his legs chopped off in a freak mid-air accident...

  25. stylus by muel · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Nintendo DS is already a hassle to control with two hands while on the ground - how the heck did these guys keep their styluses steady mid-descent?

    1. Re:stylus by uncqual · · Score: 1

      Particularly if they were jumping through the clouds (no, I didn't RTFA) - my experience is that the pointy ends of raindrops are painful :)

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  26. try 16 with PSP by hedley · · Score: 1


    Of course, a suitable title supporting 16 is needed.
    8 obviously could be done today.

    Hedley

  27. OH CRAP, I DROPPED IT!! by AvantLegion · · Score: 2, Funny
    Oh how cute, we put a mini-parachute on it too! Whew!

  28. Experiment by Aenox · · Score: 0

    I also tried this and found it hard to decide which was most entertaining; falling at hundreds of miles an hour or playing my instructor at mario.

    Due to his diving experience he could concentrate on the game better and repeatedly thrashed me.

    I had the last laugh however when he forgot to pull his chute.

  29. Isn't it ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that WIRED is reporting on WIRELESS networks?

    1. Re:Isn't it ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

  30. Yeah... by l00sr · · Score: 5, Funny

    I get pretty bored skydiving too.

    1. Re:Yeah... by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      I get pretty bored skydiving too.

      Heh, ADD at it's finest. It's no surprise most comments are about ... wow, a spider

  31. This story is a commercial break, an advert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Generally speaking, advertising is the paid promotion of goods, services, companies and ideas by an identified sponsor (Nintendo). Marketers see advertising as part of an overall promotional strategy. Other components of the promotional mix include publicity, public relations, personal selling, and sales promotion.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advert

    telling it how it is,
    this is nothing more than a publicity stunt, that always gives me a bad feeling about a product, i mean if your product is honestly good you wont need to resort to tacky promotions disguised as "news"

    1. Re:This story is a commercial break, an advert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You moron. If you actully watched the clip you'd discover that it is a bunch of guy's doing it for the hell of it, for free. They also had a segment about the PSP, so their an equal opportunity underground show.

      React, then read/view the material... that's the Slashdot way!

  32. New testing scenarios... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Gotta love Nintendo. I supposed they will now *require* video game companies to test their new multiplayer games by having testers jump out of airplanes. God knows testing this stuff on the ground can be a major pain in the butt.

    Unfortunately, video game companies don't pay testers enough to go splat if the parachute doesn't open. I'm sure EA will find a way around that problem.

  33. Physics/Math test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) If Bob is in the baggage car of a train traveling north at 90MPH and Margaret is standing still 10 cars north of Bob, each car being approximately 40 feet long, home much time would pass before Bob crashes into Margaret? Show your work.

    2) If I put two chickens in a bag and give you the bag, how many chickens do you have?

    3) If radio waves from a Nintendo DS travel at roughly 186,000 miles per second, how fast would two parallel trains moving in the same direction have to travel before the conductor in each train could no longer receive signals from the other conductor's Nintendo DS?

    4) If you were in a car travelling at the speed of light and you flashed your high-beams, would anything happen? Assume you're on the New Jersey Turnpike.

    1. Re:Physics/Math test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 - Sorry, I'm a humanities major.

      2 - Mmmmmm......... Breasts.........

      3 - Who cares? I'm still thinking about breasts. Mmmmmmmmm..........

      4 - You'd be a Phillydelphian getting yelled at to get the fuck out the way.

    2. Re:Physics/Math test by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      In a world where "in Soviet Russia" and "one step, followed by a blank step, followed by profit" is funny, that was actually funny. Thanks for that.

    3. Re:Physics/Math test by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Just imagine if he also included 5) ??? 6) Profit!

    4. Re:Physics/Math test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome. It was the chickens, wasn't it?

    5. Re:Physics/Math test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) If I put two chickens in a bag and give you the bag, how many chickens do you have?

      None -- you only gave me the bag, they're still your chickens.

    6. Re:Physics/Math test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) It depends where she's standing still.
      2) It depends how sharp the chickens' talons are.
      3) It depends what medium is between the trains.
      4) It depends whether anyone is able to observe your car.

      In other words, it's all relative.

    7. Re:Physics/Math test by earthbound+kid · · Score: 2, Funny
      2) If I put two chickens in a bag and give you the bag, how many chickens do you have?

      None -- you only gave me the bag, they're still your chickens.


      See, I knew the *AA people read Slashdot!!
    8. Re:Physics/Math test by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      You only gave me the bag, but since you didn't take the chickens out, I still have (am in posession of) two (of your) chickens.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  34. What it forgets to mention... by Kaisum · · Score: 1

    "The crew was so caught up in their activity and forgot to pull their ripcords, their wives will be suing Nintendo for not posting a 'warning do not get caught up playing DS whilst plummeting to the earth' sticker on the side of the module"

  35. Yet another testament by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to how Wired really doesn't understand science and technology. No wonder I cancelled my subscription.

  36. Do they keep working after sudden decelleration? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Four skydivers perished when they all failed to open their shutes. Videotape suggests they were all too busy playing Super Mario to notice how close they were to the ground.

    All four Nintendo DS games survived the impact and were still wirelessly networked when the recovery team arrived. Final game results were not available at press time.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  37. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How's it going to deploy the parachute? It has no arms!!!!

    MAYDAY MAYDAY!!!!!

  38. Galileo would be pleased.. by rufusdufus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The skydivers experience is consistent with Galilean relativity, Einstein's special relativity wouldnt have much of an effect in this situation.

    1. Re:Galileo would be pleased.. by Jerf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not the theories of Relativity, the Principle. There is a difference. Einstein's theories of Relativity solved an increasingly important conflict between physicists beliefs that the Principle of Relativity was true (an intuitive belief) and their inability to put solid math around the way the Universe works.

      The first chapter of this work should help. Basically, the principle of relativity is that physics is the same for all inertial reference frames; Einstien put that together with the fact that light appears to travel the same speed for all observers. Galilean relativity doesn't work with that; it has other contradictions inherent in it (it can't answer the Zeno paradox, again, see the linked work), but it takes longer to notice. There are other relativity theories that haven't panned out, either.

      Pardon the pedantry, it's intended to be educational.

    2. Re:Galileo would be pleased.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be picky, but this is general relativity. It is an accelerating reference frame rather than an inertial one. Well, I guess that is being picky, huh?

  39. Don't drop the stylus! by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

    And I thought I had it bad when I drop one in the living room.

    Thank you everybody, enjoy the veal.

    --
    Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
  40. Re:The Video - anyone have a non-torrent link? by Black+Acid · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have a link to download the file without BitTorrent? (My school blocks BitTorrent.)

  41. FUD'd Math ..? by charon_1 · · Score: 0

    Wait... if you are travelling 120 mi/hr, that equals 176 ft/sec. The articles says "distances of nearly 400 feet while falling 120 miles an hour". If you are going 120 mi/hr about 2 seconds (400/176) before you hit the ground... I dont think you would be alive to test out the networking capabilites.
    Can somebody explain this?

    1. Re:FUD'd Math ..? by Lohrno · · Score: 1

      Probably they mean 400 feet between skydivers. Not from the ground. 400 feet or less is the limit you can travel without a traditional pilot's license as I recall, so that would be pretty short.

    2. Re:FUD'd Math ..? by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      They forgot the word lateral - vertical distance fallen was far more than 400', a lateral spread of approximately 400 feet was apparently between the jumpers.
      (A vertical spread of 400' between jumpers was also possible, but not as much fun due to opening requirements)

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    3. Re:FUD'd Math ..? by charon_1 · · Score: 0

      Oh. ok. Thanks for the clarification.
      Well no shit it would work. Relative to each other the are moving at 0 mi/hr. Why wouldn't the laws of physics apply.....?
      Stupid article.

  42. I dont know who is more retarded... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wired for writing it or slashdot for posting it.

    ugh.

  43. Not... really by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That's only the first part of Einstein's postulates. The other one states that there is a fundamental constant that is absolute for every frame: C, the speed of light. The radio waves that these skydivers were using for their wi-fi connection are EM waves, propagating at speed C.

    It is not surprising that their wireless worked in the least, as to be able to detect any relativistic effect, their frame, determined by gamma=(1-v^2/c^2)^(-1/2) would have to be close to or greater than 1. That would be darn close to the speed of light.

    1. Re:Not... really by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      Their wireless would continue to work exactly like it does at 120mph. Outside stationary sniffers, OTOH, would see the frequency shift.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  44. I swear to god by august+sun · · Score: 1

    next person to make a joke about not openning the chute or dropping the stylus is gonna get stabbed in the throat

    1. Re:I swear to god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the Stylus ?

    2. Re:I swear to god by s7726 · · Score: 0

      I wish i could mod your ass up, that's hella funny.

    3. Re:I swear to god by robotoverflow · · Score: 1

      ...with a stylus falling from the sky?

      --
      % mkdir :
      % ls -dF :
      :/
  45. I hope no one else tries this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It might give new meaning to the phrase 'network crash'.

  46. Yeah, Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, yeah - I hope it's me. Gonna post lots 'n' lots to do the "123...".

  47. SPLAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanted to write the word *SPLAT* in a comment so that it could get modded up to funny.

  48. Philosophical question... by Pinkoir · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you really have a network when all nodes got just got dropped?

    Hur hur hur...

    -Pinkoir

  49. troll of the year?? by pjr.cc · · Score: 1

    Personally i think this whole article should have been marked up as a troll... someone has almost certainly decided to see how many sites are willing to publish something that does nothing and proves nothing we didnt know before my own birth...

    I find it highly amusing to read peoples comments though.. some of the funniest comments yet!

    Now for the next experiment, lets see if the nintendo DS works across the vacuum of space!! *GASP*!! that'll make it on ripleys believe it or not!

  50. Solexo-diving... by Dark+Coder · · Score: 3, Funny

    If four skydivers were in space (exo-solar-diving) free-falling from Jupiter toward the Sun with an intent to drop into Earth after a few braking maneuvers (what a rush! Oh wait, you'd barely feel the solar wind, uh?).

    So, once again if four sport-extremists were sol-exo-diving, would that 20 K-mile/per second put a dent in your line-of-sight RF communication channel?

    Yes...barely I leave you to do the math.

    (plus, then, no one can hear you scream in space)

  51. We're all missing the important question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah yeah...but can you successfully port Linux to it at that altitude?

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Last Words by 955301 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Skydiver 1: Is it working?

    Skydiver 2: What?

    Skydiver 3: He said, IS IT WORKING?

    Skydiver 4: Mine is up!

    Skydiver 1: Okay, so is mine now.

    Skydiver 2: What?

    Skydiver 3: HE SAID, HIS IS WORKING NOW!

    Skydiver 2: OKAY THANKS!

    Skydiver 4: Start the game already.

    Skydiver 2: What?

    Skydiver 1: Okay Cool, I can see everybody!

    Skydiver 3: .... I feel like I forgot something... my charger .... or ....

    WHUMP!!

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  54. Here comes the science by sunami · · Score: 4, Informative

    I hate to break it to you guys, but so long as the people are moving at the same velocity, there isn't any kind of problem. If all of them had been moving at .999 speed of light (in our point of view), there still wouldn't be a difference, because they are all in the same frame of reference, and they would all measure the speed of light from their point of view to be 3.0x10^8 ms^-1. No doppler effect of the radio waves would be created, and no greater time lag would ensue. It's as if they aren't moving, because according to each other, they aren't!

    1. Re:Here comes the science by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      That's actually the point of Einstein's special relativity: "Overturning the old absolutist views of Aristotle, it held that motion, or at least uniform motion in a straight line, only had meaning relative to something else, and that there was no absolute reference frame by which all things could be measured."

      It also relates to Galilean relativity: "Another way of formulating the observation that there is no phenomenon in dynamics that will allow an observer to establish a zero point of uniform velocity, is to state that the laws of motion are equally valid in all inertial reference frames."

      So I hate to break it to you, but what seems so obvious to you now is only obvious thanks to these amazing-in-their-time discoveries.

    2. Re:Here comes the science by jridley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If all of them had been moving at .999 speed of light (in our point of view), there still wouldn't be a difference

      Well, there might have been; some lower frequencies of external source could have been shifted up into a wavelength that would have interfered with their wireless, or sunlight from behind them may have shifted downwards.

      Also, light from in front of them may have shifted into gamma rays or higher and killed them before they managed to get to level 2.

    3. Re:Here comes the science by xENoLocO · · Score: 1

      Umm... radio waves don't travel at the speed of light.

      --
      "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
    4. Re:Here comes the science by skeptic1 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Umm... radio waves don't travel at the speed of light.

      Umm...yes they do. Radio waves are part of the electromagnetic spectrum. ALL electromagnetic radiation travels at the speed of light.
    5. Re:Here comes the science by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I hate to break it to you guys, but so long as the people are moving at the same velocity, there isn't any kind of problem. If all of them had been moving at .999 speed of light (in our point of view), there still wouldn't be a difference

      Actually, I imagine it would become a pretty significant problem at the point when the wind resistance caused them all to burst into flames.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Here comes the science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in a vacuum

    7. Re:Here comes the science by DrLex · · Score: 1

      In a non-vacuum the 'speed of light' may be lower than the known c = 299.792.458 m/s, but it's still the 'speed of light' in that medium, being c/n with n = index of refraction of the medium.

  55. hooray for journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:
    "It brings up a cool theoretical," he said. "A guy's flying first-class to Hong Kong, and I'm flying coach. We have no idea who each other (is), but we fire up the devices, log into a multiplayer game and fire away. That was never possible before."

    Amazing.
    Last time I flew to Malaysia, I played a trivia game with other random people on the plane through the entertainment system that was available to all classes...

  56. Obligatory Futurama reference by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course [it can't]! That's why scientists increased the speed of light in 2208.

  57. Poses interesting ideas.. by DarkMorph · · Score: 1

    For example let's say the skydivers are playing some sort of deathmatch game on the DS; I don't if such games for DS exist but let's hypothesise. Then, if a player dies he has to drop his DS. He's out. Just uh, don't drop it by accident, or else I guess that constitutes a suicide.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - Wouldn't have it any other way. And fuck beta.
    1. Re:Poses interesting ideas.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't if such games for DS exist

      It's packaged with the system

  58. Mixed bag by rinkjustice · · Score: 2, Funny

    The good news was the four skydivers proved that an ad hoc wireless network using the Nintendo DS works perfectly at distances of 400 feet while falling 120 miles an hour...

    The bad news is neither the Nintendo DS or the four skydivers bounce very well.

    Meh. Batting .500 ain't bad.

  59. Terminal velocity by mattr · · Score: 1

    of the stylus = ?

  60. OK, I bit, I RTFA, but only some... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    ... I really wanted to "follow the money". I mean, why would you buy a jump and then fart around with games - I'd want to enjoy the ride.

    So, from the article: "The stunt was coordinated by Los Angeles filmmaker John Hering, who was shooting material for his series of internet-only videos"

    Ok, if you are into skydiving, AND, someone else (I assume) PAYS for it, the only catch is to do as directed (and, oh, yeah, you will be in a MOVIE! Yippie).

    Anyhow, do you think the "models, locations, and products release" will include a kick-back from Nintendo?

    As has been said before, nothing surprising that it worked. Sounds like a big ad to me. Check the sponsers of the film site when it is out...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  61. The delights of our civilisation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA: "Climbing mountains like Mount Everest is 10 hours of tough climbing, with hours of nothing to do once the sun goes down," Mueller told gaming blog Kotaku. "We thought the DS would be perfect because we can play games wirelessly against each other, as well as draw pictures and send messages."

    Err.

    Hi. We went to climb everest. However, we thought it would be boring, so we brought computer games.

    What the fuck are they there for if they're not having fun CLIMBING EVEREST!?

    Maybe they should just stay at home and play games instead. It would save them all the hard work.

  62. Whee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brings a whole new meaning to the mile high club.

  63. Don't collide with Otters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's why the guy got his legs chopped off...

  64. Incase you weren't being sarcastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumb enough to buy a handheld game system that won't break pending a slight breeze. You know, assuming it wasn't broken when it came out of the package. And even if it isn't broken at the moment, a broken system isn't much worse than the battery dying twenty minutes before a game of tetris loads.
    PSP = wow factor
    DS = long term value
    suck it.

  65. TRICK QUESTION!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows cars don't move on the New Jersey Turnpike!

  66. well... by jadenite · · Score: 1

    Thank god, now I know that my two player game of mario bros. won't get screwed up as I plummet to my death

  67. Re:worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great! Just what I need! The same damn generic racing games i've been playing since the early 90's!

  68. PSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh, I'd rather do a HALO Jump with a set of PSPs, onto a casino..Hell, screw the skydiving and the casino*

    *Apologies to Matt Groening.

    But all that aside, they should have saved the money from this wasted jump and bought themselves PSPs.

  69. pilotwings by tardigrades · · Score: 0

    now if only they remade that on ds. Of course it would use parachutes and not gliders. And when your ready... touch the screen and your chute unpacks.

    --
    really bored? My blog
  70. Well. by drwiii · · Score: 1

    That's one way to beat the minigames where you have to blow into the mic.

  71. /slaps forehead by bobdole369 · · Score: 1

    Well effing DUH! The elementary laws of electromagnetism, electronics, and the principles of radio are not even taxed! Wanna test this another way? Get on a high speed train and make a cell phone call, or just drive on the freeway really fast and do the same. IT IS JUST ORDINARY RADIO!!!!!!!

    Now that that is out, did they really think it might not work?

    --
    Lousy facepalm.
  72. No voice games by santouras · · Score: 1

    I hope they weren't playing yoshi's touch and go or any of the voice mini-games in warioware. How would you do that one where you can't make a noise otherwise the little critters fly off the tightrope!

    --
    my utility belt tells me its to the bar batman
  73. Re:The Video - anyone have a non-torrent link? by karmatic · · Score: 1

    You try changing your client port? Depending on the setup, it might make a difference.

  74. Maeans of propulsion by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    They could have kept themselves up a little longer though by using UMD discs as fuel, twisting the case to eject them and thus slowing their fall ever so slightly.

    Someday I imagine fleets of vehicles powered by a vast array of twistible PSP's.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  75. Well... by ultramk · · Score: 1

    On the bright side, at least they didn't crash.

    m-

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  76. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    l a m e! I mean : WOW! They skydive while playing a video game. SO? Is this supposed to be "extraordinaire"???
    I'm sure they enjoyed their game up there! Yeahhh.... it's easy to look at a screen and play when your falling... COME ON!

  77. Re:The Video - anyone have a non-torrent link? by Black+Acid · · Score: 1

    Yeah - no difference. My school doesn't actually block BT; they detect it and shape it to 1.2 KB/s.

  78. Calling justice on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One or more years ago when an article about extreme programming popped on the /. frontpage I wrote a funny reply about me programming while skydiving and ending up in a vats of hot grits where natalie portman was waiting me... naked. My post was modded -2... some random nerds with l33t parachute powers instead are plainly astroturfing Nintendo and they get the frontpage...

    I mean, as Anonymous Coward I have the 90% of posts here, I AM Slashdot!!! Come on guys, which kind of justice is this? No one even interviewed me also...

  79. Searching for nodes in free-fall? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

    I guess you'd have to call it war-diving.

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  80. What next... by dlelash · · Score: 1

    Wardiving?

  81. Gravity Games by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    Is this what the new Gravity games will hold? Extreme Geek Diving? Who can beat the first level of Doom III before going splat?

    Are these Uber-Geeks?

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  82. I beg to differ by kpwoodr · · Score: 1

    > There are such things as aerobatics-capable ultralights....

    This all depends on the speed at which the wind is blowing. Ever seen someone try to land an ultra light in a 15 kt crosswind? They can be quite aerobatic.

    --
    This sig has been removed pending an investigation.
  83. So what? by danimrich · · Score: 1

    Where is the interesting technical or scientific news in that story? Didn't they know that electromagnetic waves travel at light speed and that there is no such thing as an "ether"?

    --
    where's all that Karma?
  84. Yea, the real problem is when they hit.. by Inhibit · · Score: 1

    1.001 times the speed of light. Then the radio signal'd get funky.

    Of course, I think they'd have bigger problems at that point. Like stopping. :)

    --
    You're reading Slashdot. Of course you like Linux and pc hardware
  85. Relatively speaking... by Otto · · Score: 1

    Well, let's say you were moving at 5mph below c. Relatively speaking, wouldn't that mean that the radio signal would only be moving 5mph towards the other guy? If not, wouldn't that imply that the speed of light isn't the limit that RF can travel?

    Nope. It'd be moving at c with respect to you and the other guy. Where it gets really odd is that if you and the other guy happened to pass a guy who was standing still, then he'd see the RF travelling at c too. Now, he'd see some doppler effect (red-shifting/blue-shifting of the light as it moved away/towards him), but that would only change the frequency of the light, not its speed relative to him.

    That's the trick. Light (any form of EM radiation) always moves along at speed c, for any observer, in any reference frame. In order for this to be true, people moving at speeds closer to c are experiencing time pass at a much slower rate. They don't notice it, obviously. But moving faster means that your personal time slows down.

    This also explains why everything seems longer when you're sitting in rush hour traffic and not moving. ;)

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  86. Galileo proved right by stud9920 · · Score: 0

    Breaking news ! Apparently, that LSD-induced bullshit Gallileo uttered about laws of physics being invariant in linear uniformly moving reference frames was not so delirious ! Extra ! Extra !

  87. 400ft is damn good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...compared to my experience of wifi.

  88. Read the title again by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

    When I first read the title of this article, I thought they were referring to sales figures or their market share. I figured the PSP would do at least a little better, but that line seems harsh.

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds