Slashdot Mirror


The Video iPod is on its Way

An iPod Speculator writes "Is Apple developing a Video iPod? Recent contracts and software releases suggest that a video enabled iPod is forthcoming. If so, what kind of features will it have? I offer some insight into why video is the next step for the iPod and how it might come about in this article."

131 comments

  1. umm... by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Just unfounded speculation from some guy who's dumb enough to post a link to his own website on slashdot when he knows (and says, right on the webpage he's linking to) that he's not going to be able to afford the bandwidth to keep the page online. I think I'd prefer some unfounded speculation by someone smarter.

    We could already find this exact same speculation in comments on earlier slashdot stories, too. News? Hardly.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    1. Re:umm... by TheViffer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mark this poster as a troll if you wish, but he makes a valid response.

      This article is written by a person "currently pursuing a Bachelor's Degree in Computer Science" and thinks red hair is cool. In his spare time he dreams about the next iProduct to be released.

      So what is his article going to be next week? When Apple comes out with dual core Power Mac so that he can replace his Dual 2.7 Power Mac?

      Don't take it the wrong way I am sure Jay means well, but Jay needs more reliable sources then thinksecret and macrumors. A few years out in the real world would not hurt either.

      But I give him credit, he got it past the slashdot editors.

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    2. Re:umm... by rf600r · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Any chance of modding down the actual story itself? That would be nice.

    3. Re:umm... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has editors?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:umm... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      Any chance of modding down the actual story itself?

      You bet. It's called: kuro5hin

      Stories like this would never get posted there specifically because the stories are voted upon with considerable vigor. On the other hand, you wouldn't have the fun of thrashing the author for as long (stories vanish when they are voted down.)

      Slashdot's story selection process is a mystery, at best. You like mysteries, don't you?

      :-)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  2. No Way by north.coaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I tend to agree with some of the previous /. posts on this topic. Video makes no sense on a portable iPod device. The iPod is a natual extension to what people already do. Video is not a natural extension.

    1. Re:No Way by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      What bothers me about this (if it's true), is to see Apple trying to compete in the feature matrix wars. Putting another check in a feature matrix is not what Apple does best. Trying to compete on that level will only get them into trouble. I'd much rather see them continue to bring us well designed products that fill an existing need.

    2. Re:No Way by OmniVector · · Score: 5, Insightful

      playing video back on a 2" screen is even more than silly, it's downright stupid. it's hard to watch, and impractical based on the usage conditions of an iPod. people simply don't want to watch video on such a small screen nor do they even have the opportunity (kinda hard to watch a show while jogging or driving to work), plus people don't want to watch the same show over. they DO want to hear the same song over and over.

      based on these implications, it's never going to play video on that little screen. however, look at what we now have:
      video out port on the ipod
      video support in itunes
      music video purchasing

      the writing's on the wall. apple will enable a video PLAYBACK on a tv with the new video out port for music videos. this should naturally support any video compatible with whatever it is that itunes 4.8 supports (it doesn't seem to support every codec, only a subset.. gee, maybe because it only supports what the new ipod will support? i think so).

      --
      - tristan
    3. Re:No Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a particularly new idea - my old portable CD/MP3 player also runs VCDs, for example, and my camera plays MPEGs. But it's never caught on in the past, and I'd be surprised if Apple could make it work.

    4. Re:No Way by Malfourmed · · Score: 1
      playing video back on a 2" screen is even more than silly, it's downright stupid

      I happen to agree, yet every PDA/smartphone these days includes video playback capability. Vodafone are creating original video content for phones. Are they just ticking the feature box or is there a genuine market for movies on a two inch screen?
    5. Re:No Way by svanstrom · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This isn't a particularly new idea - my old portable CD/MP3 player also runs VCDs, for example, and my camera plays MPEGs. But it's never caught on in the past, and I'd be surprised if Apple could make it work.


      I wanted to buy one of those VCD-playing CD/MP3-players, but I couldn't find one in a local store which seemed to be good enough qualitywise; not to mention that VCDs never been popular here... And at the time my computer wasn't powerful enough for it to be an option to reencode DVDs; and even if it had been it still would have been more trouble (and costly and timeconsuming) than it'd be worth, compared with simply bringing the DVD to where I was going, or even renting a VHS-version of the same movie.

      Then we started seeing more and more portable DVD-players, which were great... you could see the movie on a small screen... But by then I had a DVD-playing powerbook with 15" screen; which I could connect directly to any tv/screen/projector available to me.

      Nowadays I carry an iPod with me most of the time, and the powerbook's been replaced (for portable uses outside my home) by an iPaq; I find even CD-players to be too big to carry with me...

      An iPod Video OTOH... it could be slightly bigger/heavier than my existing iPod without it bothering me much (as it'll replace my existing iPod), I could store several non-reencoded DVDs on it (or a lot of reencoded stuff)... connecting it directly to tvs would be great, but since it's already got a small screen it'd be perfect for watching news etc on the bus.

      Yes, that's right, there are people which wouldn't mind the small screensize...
      --
      perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
    6. Re:No Way by sockit2me9000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I posted this last week but it got lost in the modding shuffle. I'm really interested to see if anyone else agrees with this so I'm going to repost it here:
      Apple is building a remote. It will really be a thin client/palm-style device. But it will be marketed as a remote for your entire life. Look, apple's already said that they view thier media in a modular way. That's because they are a weird amalgamation of a software and hardware. This model really affects thier design in a fundamental way. They view both as feeding the other. Unlike Microsoft. Or Sony. Both of those companies don't have the (ability) (balls) (forsight) to realize that you really do benefit from doing both. That's because the new tech market is turning towards usability as it's prime selling point. Witness the iPod. But you know this.
      Now, think about the home media center. What is the primary user interface element? The remote. For all intents and purposes, the equipment has acheived a level of abstraction in our heads. What do the butttons on a TV do? Who cares? The remote can do it. My AV receiver doesn't even have all the bottons on the face. Only on the remote. And this abstraction yeilds some interesting results. One, that you handle your remote more times in the average day than a book or your keyes. We don't even realize how much time we spend with these damn things. They are integral. And they almost uniformly suck. How many remotes do you use? How much fumbling? Your universal remote does most things. But what about when you need to schedule and rank your DVR? The remote falls apart. The fuction is mapped to some button that is not intuitive. It's a giant mess. Sort like the MP3 market ummm.... four years ago.
      While the remote is bad at it's primary function, it falls apart completely when it comes to digital media. Enter microsoft with their assinine "Media Center PC" Why God, why? Why do you need a whole new computer in your living room? You already have a computer somewhere in your house. But Microsoft is a software company. They need to sell the software. They're trying to break out of this with the Xbox. And they will haves success. But it's a lackluster implimentation of the central problem: the remoteis the media center, see. How are people going to interact with the Xbox? With the controller and a TV monitor. This is crummy, in my mind, because if thier view of media is to add another box to the den that just happens to deal with my digital media as a second fuction, I call bullshit. Let each componant do what it is primarily good at. The Xbox controller , even if it includes that rollerball thing, still is a poor way to interact with media. It'll be good for gamers, sure. But that will color the rest of it functionality. It already has, really. See, there's no big, legible display to speak of on the damn thing. So you abstract the abstract. The Xbox took over your media and the controller takes over your Xbox, which makes you look at the tv screen as the navigation aid. I'm not sure if I can exactly explain why.... but this feels icky to me. So, this is where Apple steps in. The Airport express is an important clue. The idea is make a centeral computer and stream over the air the media to a router near the media center. But make the router "magic" Using, I don't know, Rendevou...err... Bonjour. Which just got released for the PC, yes? Pieces are starting to fall into place. So, what's misssing is a remote that doesn't suck for your media that can interact wirelessly with your media. Something like a big lcd touchscreen. And only like an LCD screen. Nothing else. It's the display and the input. Simple. Elegant. Getting cheap. This is a thin client, really. But it won't be marketed as such. No, it'll be the iPod for the rest of your life. It'll be your remote. It'll be your newspaper. It'll be your media manipulator (edit movies, work on garage band tracks, retouch photos). It will be your morning newspaper. It will be the thing you pick up when you put your iPod down. Think about it. All the technology is there. But

    7. Re:No Way by svanstrom · · Score: 1
      playing video back on a 2" screen is even more than silly, it's downright stupid.
      For you maybe, but I don't think so.
      it's hard to watch, and impractical based on the usage conditions of an iPod.
      For your usage maybe, but not mine (I spend a lot of time on buses and boats...).
      people simply don't want to watch video on such a small screen
      I do...
      nor do they even have the opportunity
      I have...
      people don't want to watch the same show over.
      Even the minis can hold more than one show...
      they DO want to hear the same song over and over.
      Yes, and that's how I'd use the iPod Video when walking to the bus, but on the bus/boat/train I wouldn't mind watching podcasted news, a movie or the latest episode of whatever I'm into at the moment.
      --
      perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
    8. Re:No Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of Christ, why did you bother posting? Your entire comment can be boiled down to "nuh-uh." Why the hell did you waste our time?

    9. Re:No Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ticking the box. Video in phones is as important right now as cameras in phones. Everybody sells it, practically nobody actually uses it. It's a gimmick, nothing more.

    10. Re:No Way by nine-times · · Score: 1
      I'll say the same thing I said about adding a color screen to the iPod (before the iPod photo came out). If this feature greatly decreases battery life or greatly increases size or price, Apple shouldn't do it and probably won't. However, if Apple's engineers find a way to add in this feature without any major downside, then they should and probably will.

      I think it's likely that as Apple will continue to add new features into the iPod until it becomes an all encompassing portable device (PIM, music/video, camera, games, maybe a phone, wifi/bluetooth, web browser, e-mail, whatever). Especially now that the PSP is out and positioned to be a competing product.

      However, I'd look for Apple to only integrate these new products as they are able to do it without:

      • increasing the price above $500
      • increasing the size dramatically
      • dropping battery life below 8 hours
      • screwing up the interface

      Yes, that last one is bold for a reason, in that it's the thing that many people would forget about. Apple won't add a feature until they figure out how to work it into the current interface sensibly, and that's the problem with adding in a phone or anything that requires text input. I wouldn't put it past them to figure something out, given enough time, but text input is doubtful for the foreseeable future. Adding video support into the interface, however, wouldn't be hard. I suspect the major problem would be battery life.
    11. Re:No Way by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      Not to flamebait, but it would help for getting answers if you formatted your text with some whitespace in order to make it readable...

      You might want to read some insightful essays by a usability guru on this very subject, addresing the forces that affect the problem and an existing solution.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    12. Re:No Way by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Cameras in phones are actually somewhat useful. I got a camera phone because I wanted one capable of data, and it was the cheapest. I didn't actually want the camera, but I do find myself using it because it's there.

    13. Re:No Way by antimatt · · Score: 1

      Agree. It's like this: playing a movie file on a HDD-based system requires reading from the HD almost constantly for the entire length of the film. Playing a music file does not; with a sufficient amount of flash storage, the system can read the music data from the HD, send it to flash, power down the HD and play the file from flash.

      Playing movie files will not work with iPod hardware until we get nuclear batteries, 100% lossless compression (see also perpetual motion) or unless you never unplug it from AC power. Or unless you don't mind watching 15 minutes of your favorite movie, then having to recharge, then watching the next 15 minutes, then having to recharge, then ...

    14. Re:No Way by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Archos claims 3.5 hours video playback battery life. There is no reason that the ipod couldn't do the same.

      --
      Q.
    15. Re:No Way by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      You're equating lossless compression to perpetual motion?

      Ever heard of a zip file?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    16. Re:No Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the point is that you did not buy the phone for the camera, and you will not buy your next phone based on its camera.

    17. Re:No Way by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, my next phone may well have a camera, as I DO find myself using the camera. I'm just going to make sure that CHEAP data cables are available for my next phone, because I'm not paying a lot for a data cable or for picture transfer...

    18. Re:No Way by antimatt · · Score: 1

      "It is mathematically impossible to create a program compressing without loss *all* files by at least one bit."

      My point was that eventually there's a point where compression can't do any more. We'll probably never see a compression algorithm that shrinks a full-length movie to 4MB while maintaining its original quality, for example.

    19. Re:No Way by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Well if Apple decide to use their own proprietory movie format, it's no better than PSP using UMD.

    20. Re:No Way by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      So by "lossless compression" you actually meant not lossless compression, but theoretically impossible compression. Fine.

      But so what? Processors and transfer technologies are getting faster all the time, and hard drives keep getting bigger.

      You sound like someone 20 years ago claiming that we'd never have digital pictures that are as high quality as real photographs, because you'd never be able to fit a significant quantity on a 800 KB floppy disk and they'd take forever to send over your 300 baud modem.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    21. Re:No Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You go out of your way to get the camera, an item of no use at all, but you don't get Bluetooth? You're an idiot.

    22. Re:No Way by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Which "proprietory format"? MP4?

    23. Re:No Way by antimatt · · Score: 1

      We don't disagree. Seriously.

      My original point was that movie files will not play effectively on existing iPod hardware, because the battery won't be able to handle the combination of current file formats and storage methods. I certainly do not think that all innovation has stopped and that we will never have a handheld media player capable of playing feature-length movies--but the iPod as we know it is not that device.

    24. Re:No Way by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Mod SockIt2Me up.

      Absolutely right on target. The Media Center has to be the remote to make interacting with all this stuff easy--not work.

      I've seen a lot of normal consumer electronics in homes not work for the simple issue of connectors and "in and out" modes. A media center PC that has computer interface means a geek with an expensive TV on his computer.

      The conduit is the next generation Airport eXpress eXtreme II (or something equally hideously named).

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    25. Re:No Way by imnojezus · · Score: 1

      playing video back on a 2" screen is even more than silly, it's downright stupid.

      I agree with you 100%...but who said it'd have a 2" screen? Knowing Apple, it would more than likely be completly aesthetically revamped.
      And even if it did have a 2" screen, I'd probably *still* want one.

    26. Re:No Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is already an excellent remote for the MacMini... It's called the salling clicker. Check it out at VersionTracker.com. Basically, your mac pushes a control-menu via bluetooth to supported mobile phone handsets and bluetooth-equipped PDAs. I currently control my iTunes on my MacMini with an old SonyEricsson t68i handset. On the handset's tiny display (120x80) I get a list of playlists, and I can select songs within the playlist from my phone. Once I select a song from tyhe handset, the Mini plays it. This works the same for iPhoto, VLC, etc... Apparently, on some PDAs, it can also preview iPhotos before kicking them up on the big screen.

      It really is nice having a remote with a display. Suffice to say that I think some sort of newton-sized (but really thin) panel would be a geat iProdukt for Apple to consider. Ideally, such a device would only cost a couple of hundred dollars... Something in the range of decent home-automation remote controls with a 5" - 7" touch-screen.

    27. Re:No Way by bynary · · Score: 1

      My original point was that DVDs will not play effectively on existing VCR hardware, because the heads won't be able to handle the proprietary disc format. I certainly do not think that all innovation has stopped and that we will never have a personal home video player capable of playing DVDs--but the VCR as we know it is not that device.

      Thank you Captain Obvious. X is not Y. Great! Thank you for clearing up that mystery.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
  3. I can't imagine this happening for real by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Y'know, Apple's learned the form factor lesson from the Newton. The Newton was brilliant, but its form factor embodied a middle of the road compromise that pleased nobody. It was too big for a PIM, to small for a do your serious work on. The clamshell variant (the eMate), however, was the forerunners of the iBooks, which simply scaled it up to the minimum size and specs needed to be a fully functional computer.

    A video playback device in the current iPod form factor is a complete joke -- at best a novelty. However, an iBook sized playback device is plausible, however. If Apple goes that way, look for an innovative approach for how the device functions as part of the users' systems. This is where Apple succeeds and other fail: itunes store -- itunes/Mac -- iPod.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by rokzy · · Score: 1

      um... don't Apple already have "an iBook sized playback device"... the iBook?

      I can't see Apple making a crippled version of the iBook that can just about play video but nothing more.

    2. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Winterblink · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's interesting. I scoffed a bit at the iPod photo, thinking to myself as you do that the form factor does not match the content it's designed to handle. And really it isn't -- who wants to look at photos on a tiny screen like that? Until you factor in the ability to hook it up to a TV or a projector, which suddenly allows it to be a hand-held slideshow presenter.

      I imagine the same thing is in mind for the iPodVideo. The form factor makes it nearly useless to play video from itself, but when you consider the ability to play it in on any video source? Suddenly the thought of ripping dvds with iTunes and having the iPod carry around my videos to play wherever I want sounds pretty neat.

      That's not to say I'd buy one, thought. Admittedly I don't have a use for the iPod photo and thus I haven't even considered spending that wad of cash on it. Given the meager sales Apple has been seeing for it, I'm not alone. I imagine the price point for the iPod Video would be far higher than the Photo one, and the market for it will be even smaller. They should really be careful with this one. Just my 2 cents.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    3. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Golias · · Score: 1

      who wants to look at photos on a tiny screen like that? Until you factor in the ability to hook it up to a TV or a projector, which suddenly allows it to be a hand-held slideshow presenter.

      I imagine the same thing is in mind for the iPodVideo.


      The problem is, a typical DVD these days is 7.5 GB of data, and only slightly better-looking than a standard-def TV signal.

      More and more people are beginning to own huge 720p or 1080i TV sets, and believe me, once you do, the relatively low resolution of DVD's becomes pretty much the minimum you are willing to put up with when watching a movie you paid to see.

      Anybody wanting to sell video in a format which is compressed even more than DVD is going to have a tough sell. Lossy video formats are barely even watchable on a 20-inch SDTV. Zoom them to fill a wide-screen HDTV, and they will look like ass compared to what people are used to.

      Right now, DVD movies have become so cheap, they actually cost less than the CD sountrack of the same film. (Which the record industry should find damning.) Quality older titles flood the shelves of Best Buy and deepdiscountdvd.com for less than $10 each.

      Music downloads can compete against CDs, because the record companies are gouging people. 99 cents a song seems reasonable when albums cost as high as $18 a pop sometimes.

      How in the hell are you going to sell a video download service when NetFlix and Blockbuster already have such fantastically cheap and convenient rental services, and DVD sales cost mere pocket change?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Winterblink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Enter H.264 (or whatever), the newest codec added to the Quicktime arsenal. Have you seen video encoded with this? There are test files available for download at the quicktime site that have been encoded with full high definition. Check it out here, it's pretty spiffy and the filesize is shockingly low.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    5. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you've never heard of H.264. DVD content can be compressed down to as little as 512 Kbps, and HD content down to a megabit.

      This is the authoritative series of articles on H.264 right now. There are lots of examples of encoded content. The most amazing one is the clip from "The West Wing" at half a megabit: no visible artifacts whatsoever. There's HD content on there too.

    6. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Golias · · Score: 1

      From the link you posted: H.264 delivers the same quality as MPEG-2 at a third to half the data rate

      So, to rip a DVD at the same resolution and frame rate, you go down from 7.5 GB to about 3 GB. Impressive, but still a huge file.

      And if you want to retain the quality of a full-HD signal, you are easilly looking at four times that size.

      Also, full-frame 1080i playback of H.264 files via Quicktime requires a dual-G5 tower. Do you really think the iPod will match that kind of processing power anytime soon?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Also, full-frame 1080i playback of H.264 files via Quicktime requires a dual-G5 tower. Do you really think the iPod will match that kind of processing power anytime soon?

      Well I know I haven't seen the specs for the purported iPod Video. :) I'm only theorizing of course, which is all any of us can do.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    8. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. What a great series. You have to scroll down past the "Serenity" stills and the cheerleading, but there's some very good stuff down toward the bottom. The clips from Saving Private Ryan look amazing at even 768 kbps.

      When Apple says that H.264 works as well as MPEG-2 at half the bit rate, they're being very conservative. SPR is an 8-mbps movie. It looks really good at 768 kbps, amazing at 2 mbps.

    9. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Why would you be trying to playback 1080i video on a 2" screen? Downres it to about 320x240 then put it on the device. You wouldn't be able to tell a difference.

      --
      Q.
    10. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by hey! · · Score: 1

      Too much moolah to fit into the "affordable luxury" category which iPaq pioneered.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    11. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yes, I had the same idea -- portable video storage. But it hardly seems like a compelling problem. Sure, you can rip your DVDs to bring them over to your friend's house, but why not just bring the original discs? You can bring your home movies along, but why not just master a DVD?

      I don't see this as a compelling problem, or a compelling product, unless there is some kind of decent display attached (who knows -- video goggles?). If Apple sees a potential to sell what amounts to portable hard disk for your video collection, they must think they've put their finger on something bigger systems concept of which the storage is just one enabling part (all the better to bind them to your on-line video store).

      I could see something along the lines of the current generation portable DVD players, only equipped with firewire, a hard disk, and advanced codec. Or maybe with the ability to put DVD quality video onto a tiny 2.5" optical disk. I can imagine this being a moderate success if priced between an iPod and an iBook, but nothing like the iPod. You aren't going to be able to spend your life wired up to a video box the way people spend theirs wired to their iPod.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Golias · · Score: 1

      The thread was about using the iPod for playback on bigger screens. For that, you would want something considerably better than 320x240

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    13. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Quikah · · Score: 1

      OK, so then you downres it to 640x480/720x480, DVD res. Unless you can somehow jury rig a DVI or component port to an ipod you won't be able to see HD res anyway.

      --
      Q.
    14. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Golias · · Score: 1

      Unless you can somehow jury rig a DVI or component port to an ipod you won't be able to see HD res anyway.

      Which kind of gets back to my point. Five years ago, something like an iPod that served up 640x480 video would have rocked people's worlds.

      People's expectations are a lot higher now, and if you were going to make a hand-held video player for the sake of selling movies and playing back on modern TV sets, you would be laughed at if it could not handle HDTV.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    15. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Either you stream out the data to a device that can actually handle H.264, or you add a CELL chip to the video iPod.

      I think we are going to get a Remote that controls a media stream over a next gen Airport Extreme with some wireless receiver you add to your home electronics.

      A video iPod could control or sample the library of media through iTunes, and tell the computer to transmit or decompress the video.

      There are a lot of different ways you could, ahem, play this.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    16. Re:I can't imagine this happening for real by iamacat · · Score: 1

      They'll just have a hardware decoder chip to watch 5 HD movies that you decided to take on your 60GB iPod. Remember that you can get an $20 DVD dedicated DVD player while a general-purpose computer capable of playing DVDs fullscreen costs at least 20 times more. A big hint on how future computers will keep up with Moore's law if you ask me.

  4. Here it comes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awaiting the arrival of As Seen on TV and his liberal use of "we" in 5... 4...

  5. No. by rokzy · · Score: 1

    didn't As Seen On TV already spell out how Apple understands that portable video is retarded (which it is).

    1. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, gee, I guess if some phony astroturfer "spelled it out", then all futher discussion should be banned.

      FWIW, it's inevitible there will be a video ipod, just a there will be video cellphones and video wristwatches and video condoms. The only question is when/what price/what size/etc.

    2. Re:No. by thatnerdguy · · Score: 1

      Didn't they also say that solid state mp3 players are stupid?

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    3. Re:No. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting
      He did. Which makes a recent trademark filing by Apple curious:
      IPOD: Education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities; provision of electronic publications (not downloadable); providing on-line electronic publications; publication of electronic books and journals on-line; providing publications from a global computer network or the Internet which may be browsed; computer assisted education services; computer assisted teaching services; computer assisted training services; computer based educational services; education services relating to computer software; editing of audio-tapes; editing of tine-films; editing of video-tapes; editing of written text; film editing (photographic); videotape editing; digital imaging services; digital music provided from web sites on the Internet; digital music provided from the Internet; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid
      I'm not sure I can see the aspiring editor building a cutlist on his iPodAV on the subway, but maybe...
      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of video condoms, I'll bet you're waiting for sufficiently advanced miniaturization, huh?

    5. Re:No. by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      In the case of video condoms, I'll bet you're waiting for sufficiently advanced miniaturization, huh?

      Hey, Mine is HD-ready.

      It's just that the aspect ratio really sucks. ;-)

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  6. iPod Video by BabyPanther · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I disagree with all of those that think the video iPod is not a natural extension. Here are just a few reasons:

    * Plug a couple into the car to let a couple kids that can't agree on a movie watch whatever they want.

    * Use it to demo videos to clients. (Send an entire iPod to a client as a promotional gift with the new commercial that you created for them. Admittedly this is 0.0005% of the market!)

    * Take a movie over to a friends house -- just plug your iPod into the RCA jacks and play the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy.

    * Last, but certainly not least for Slashdot geeks, take porn with you everywhere!

    iPod Photo is a half a step away from iPodVideo. Natural extension -- like putting on comfy slippers after having worn around sandals all day.

    It could also be a *huge* market. Not that competitors have ever swayed Apple, but xBox, Sony Playstation Portal (or whatever it's called), and now cell phones will have video capabilities of different sorts. Apple has a strong track record with music and can bring that expertise to video.

    1. Re:iPod Video by rokzy · · Score: 1

      >Sony Playstation Portal (or whatever it's called), and now cell phones will have video capabilities of different sorts

      my phone has the abilty to play video because it also has the ability to RECORD video. so should the ipod video be a camera too?

      the PSP has video but it also has a screen that's already bigger than the largest ipod. plus it remains to be seen if anyone will seriously use the PSP video beyond initial novelty value.

    2. Re:iPod Video by BabyPanther · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would expect an iPod Video to be different from a normal iPod. Maybe even completely different. Afterall, Apple does do a ton of marketing research and they may completely revise our understanding of how an iPod Video would work. You mentioned a couple of the obvious features:

      * Larger video screen.

      * Ability to capture video: however, the counter point is -- does the iPod capture audio? Not without additional third party add-ons.

      There could be many more features -- firewire connectivity for faster transfer of files and ability to use the iPod Video as a storage container for digital camcorders, and a screen that is NOT viewable from wide angles so that the person sitting next to you on the commuter train can't see what you are watching.

    3. Re:iPod Video by chromaphobic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem is, the only way much of that would be even feasible is if Apple launched the iTunes Movie Store, or whatever it might be called.

      Otherwise how do you get those movies for the kids or that copy of the LOTR trilogy onto the damn thing? Legally and easily, at least. If it's on DVD there's no way to legally copy the movie onto an iPod, short of using a video capture card (as with transferring VHS tapes) to record the output from a DVD player. Which would be prohibitively time consuming for most, in addition to the fact that few people (at the base consumer level) even have video capture devices.

      Sure, there's other ways to copy a DVD, but nothing legal. Will Apple be able to get the MPAA to sign on the dotted line when they know it will lead to people circumventing the copy protection to copy their DVD's? Will Apple be able to get people to buy it if they're locked into either buying from the Apple video store or breaking the law to copy their DVD's?

      Yes, there's a huge potential market there. But DRM is seriously impeding taking advantage of that market. Unlike music, whose media is mostly (for now) unencumbered with DRM of any kind.

    4. Re:iPod Video by salzbrot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      * Plug a couple into the car to let a couple kids that can't agree on a movie watch whatever they want.

      Just what we need. A couple more kids that think they have to get anything they want right here, right now and never learn to compromise.

      I mean kids cannot agree on which movie to watch in the car?!? In my times we read a book. Sheesh...


    5. Re:iPod Video by carmaggedon · · Score: 1

      tiny-screen video playback may seem like a goofy novelty today, but i think it's more a question of 'when' rather than 'if' for ipod. i forget its name, but a video cellphone (for which your service would sell you the content) was pushed pretty heavily on tv for a while. we will eventually hit the point where the extra hardware to play video clips makes a trivial dent in prices. i think TFA hit it on the head when it suggested that a tiny video player would be about music vids and clips, not films, and i think at that angle it would find a ready market.

    6. Re:iPod Video by BabyPanther · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I mean kids cannot agree on which movie to watch in the car?!? In my times we read a book. Sheesh...

      Did you read the same book at the same time? ;) Ok, maybe you read it out loud. I agree that it is a shame, but movies do help past the time on long road trips. And, you could load only educational shows on the video iPod. Content is still your choice.

    7. Re:iPod Video by biglig2 · · Score: 1
      The thing is if you use your video ipod to store films on for playing on TV, then you have to store them (and download them from itms) in HDTV resolution. And then fudge them down to the 2" screen in hardware.

      I reckon that:

      • the itunes changes are for using a mac mini as a media centre
      • the video ipod will come out when they can make one the same size as an ipod that clamshells open with a flexible LCD screen inside that bends round the hinges, so you get a 4"-5" screen. And even then, I'm not sure that would sell
      • Jobs knows the biggest threat to ipod is from Nokia. The mobile phone is busy obsoleting the PDA, but it has already turned it's baleful eye to the iPod. The moto deal to put itms on a mobile is not going too well - Apple seems to be too used to controlling the whole shebang of hardware and OS and a fair chunk of the apps. Will they make an iPhone? They could build something spectacular, but could they get it cheap enough?

        Hey, shoulda fleshed those points out, posted it somewhere, and gotten slashdotted out of existance. :-)
      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    8. Re:iPod Video by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      The thing is if you use your video ipod to store films on for playing on TV, then you have to store them (and download them from itms) in HDTV resolution. And then fudge them down to the 2" screen in hardware.


      That's where the oh-so-scalable H.264 MPEG codec comes in... scales from HDTV all the way down to... well super tiny screens.

      But has anyone considered that the video iPod would most likely be a massive launch. And we all know that Apple likes to keep massive launches secret (save for rumor sites). So if it was in the near future, I doubt we'd be seeing video in iTunes until the day of release.

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    9. Re:iPod Video by Golias · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, there's other ways to copy a DVD, but nothing legal.

      Oh really? So it's illegal to make a backup archive of your own DVD on a hard drive you own?

      Both Apple and Microsoft are enabling copyright violations by having the ability to open VIDEO_TS folders with their included DVD players?

      Everybody who rips DVD's they own to their laptop hard drive so they can get more battery life when watching their movies during a long flight is breaking the law?

      Good luck trying to make that case.

      Don't take this too personally, but I think there should be a "-1, Factually Incorrect" mod option.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    10. Re:iPod Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really? So it's illegal to make a backup archive of your own DVD on a hard drive you own?

      Yes, if you remove the encryption. DVDs are protected by an access-control mechanism. Circumventing that mechanism is against the law in every country that signed the WIPO treaty.

      Both Apple and Microsoft are enabling copyright violations by having the ability to open VIDEO_TS folders with their included DVD players?

      I don't know about Microsoft -- they have a DVD player? how cute --but Apple includes this feature for previewing VIDEO_TS folders mastered out of iDVD and DVD Studio Pro before burning them to disc.

      Everybody who rips DVD's they own to their laptop hard drive so they can get more battery life when watching their movies during a long flight is breaking the law?

      If they remove the encryption, yes.

      Good luck trying to make that case.

      It's not a case; it doesn't have to be made. It's just a fact.

      Don't take this too personally, but I think there should be a "-1, Factually Incorrect" mod option.

      Me too, man. Me too.

    11. Re:iPod Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's all this about removing encryption? Just grab a direct image, like thousands of Mac users do every day, and watch it with the DVD player. Easy. Legal. No step three. It just works. Think different.

    12. Re:iPod Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if you remove the encryption.

      Then don't. The access-control mechanism of the DVD player can treat a rip with no encryption removed just like any other DVD.

      Problem solved.

    13. Re:iPod Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever tried it? It doesn't work. You can't play back an encrypted VIDEO_TS folder. It's the DVD drive itself that does the decrypting.

      Busted.

    14. Re:iPod Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So burn it to a disk, encryption and all. Or mount it as an image.

      For something which you insist is "illegal" it sure goes on a lot. Do you have any cases in which somebody's been convicted of this "crime" which you can point to? Or are you just joining in with the usual DMCA FUD which seems to be the drug of choice among slashbots?

      Fair use is fair use, regardless of what the movie industry would like you to think.

    15. Re:iPod Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVDs are protected by an access-control mechanism. Circumventing that mechanism is against the law in every country that signed the WIPO treaty.

      Kindly cite this law. If it is illegal, then VersionTracker is in violation of the DMCA and can be shut down, because they distribute programs like "Mac the Ripper", which do exactly that.

    16. Re:iPod Video by chromaphobic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh really? So it's illegal to make a backup archive of your own DVD on a hard drive you own?

      No, that's covered under fair use. But, the DMCA does make it illegal to circumvent the copy protection: "No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title." So, without decrypting the files, can you do anything with that backup? Can you copy those files back onto a DVD-R and burn them, without modification, and have a watchable DVD? I've never tried it, but my suspicion would be no.

      Both Apple and Microsoft are enabling copyright violations by having the ability to open VIDEO_TS folders with their included DVD players?

      No, because the files themsleves remain encrypted. You can get at the files, but, without decrypting them, can you do anything with them?

      Everybody who rips DVD's they own to their laptop hard drive so they can get more battery life when watching their movies during a long flight is breaking the law?

      If they've used any method of decrypting the data on the DVD to facilitate the copying or viewing, yes.

      Good luck trying to make that case.

      I have no interest in trying to make that case, I think it's a fucked up law. The MPAA, however, just might. The portion of the DMCA that prohibits creating or distributing software to circumvent copy protection has already been tried and held up, in the DeCSS case. They haven't, to my knowledge, sued any individuals for decrytpting DVD's, but they do have the DMCA behind them if they ever actually wanted to.

      Don't take this too personally, but I think there should be a "-1, Factually Incorrect" mod option.

      Trust me, I don't take anything on Slashdot personally. :-) But, in this case, I think my facts are correct. If I'm wrong I'm sure someone will correct me, and I'll have no problem admitting so if that's the case.

      The full text of the DMCA is available from the EFF if you really want to actually read through it all.

    17. Re:iPod Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well they do a pretty good job at convincing the world otherwise, ie no legal software products that can do what you say goes on all the time.

      no software at bestbuy besides that shitty DVDXcopy. no integrated solutions

      just crappy hacks because no company can get away with it,they will be sued.

      DeCSS cases are still going on jackass

    18. Re:iPod Video by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2, Informative

      Golias, it would take too long to explain how wrong you are.

      As things stand right now. Apple could not make a device to grab video from a, current purchased DVD and store it to play back unless it copied the DRM with it and added some other restrictions that would have to be negotiated with each and every DVD vendor who could have rights infringed.

      So, it will have to be video downloaded from iTunes or future DVDs that have a new license and DRM scheme. The device would not copy older DVDs because--there isn't enough ink to cover the legal briefs that would take.

      Apple's amazing achievement with the iTunes music store was not the technology (although the payment system is pretty elegant), its overcoming all the legal hurdles.

      TiVo's "ToGo" device has had a lot of troubles and they already have a "fair use" storage on a hard drive. DeCrypting from a DVD is not considered fair use because it circumnavigates a copy protection device--which was a cool legal way to get around fair use by the content providers.

      Apple has to deal with a thousand, greedy stupid clones of Donald Trump. Imagine the egos and palms to be greased and fears to be overcome. Shudder. That has got to be the second toughest job in the world (the first would be staying married to Donald Trump for the duration of the "marriage").

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    19. Re:iPod Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, fair use is fair use. But removing the encryption from DVDs is not fair use.

      And your "burn it to disc" comment was stupid because this conversation started out talking about people making copies of DVDs to store on their laptops.

  7. text as the site indicates it cant handle the /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have recently posted a link to this article on Slashdot.org and if the traffic from the link becomes too high for my web server, I will have to take my site down (or face penalty from Comcast, which equals $$$ that I don't have). So if anyone is willing to mirror this for me, send me a message and I will email you the article to mirror.
    The Video iPod is on its Way

    by Jason Taylor

    05.14.2005

    When the iPod was introduced by Apple in 2001, it revolutionized the way that people listened to music. They no longer had to carry multiple CDs around with them or worry about running out of space in their flash-based MP3 player. The iPod allowed users to store 1200 songs on one device, which is more songs than most people own, and allowed them to access their music through an innovative "click-wheel" interface. Since its introduction, the iPod has become the number one selling hard drive MP3 player in the world, grabbing 90% of the hard drive based MP3 player market. As time went on, the capacity of the iPod increased to 10 GB (2500 songs), then 15 GB (3000 songs), 20, 30, 40, and now 60 GB (15,000 songs). Excited about what Apple had done for music, people awaited the next big innovation from Apple: video.

    In the past year, there have been many requests, rumors, and pundit analyses of an iPod that could play videos and an iTunes like service to support it, but Apple has remained firm on their stance that selling videos to play on the iPod is a bad idea. They believe that the screen is too small, the battery life is too short, and the downloads are too large to provide a positive video experience on the iPod. It would make no sense to sell movies to view on an iPod or even a new video playing device for that matter, because the user experience would be sub-par (even devices with larger screens, such as portable DVD players offer a poor movie experience). Yet many recent actions by Apple are suggesting something different. They suggest not only that Apple is open to releasing a video iPod, but that they are actually developing one.

    A Small Update to iTunes

    The most recent video-related hint came on May 9, 2005 when Apple released iTunes 4.8. The update boasted few new features, most of which fell under the category of "music store related features" and not much else. Once installed, users began noticing that one of the new features of iTunes was that it could now play and manage videos. They also noticed that the iTunes Music Store was now offering videos and PDFs for download as album extras. What is Apple doing with these new features? Why include videos in the music store and in iTunes if users have no way to play or view them except through their computer? These new iTunes Music Store features could simply be extras designed to keep people coming to iTunes instead of using another online music service such as Napster or Yahoo Music, but Apple has never been very worried about other stores in the past because the iPod doesn't work with them anyway*. So if that isn't the case, is Apple just creating a more robust music experience for its users, or is it preparing its music infrastructure for a new product, a video iPod, perhaps?

    Enter the Video iPod

    Though Apple's recent additions to iTunes and the music store could be unrelated to new iPod models, I believe that Apple is preparing for a robust update to its best selling product. Critics and pundits have been predicting the future of the iPod since its release and lately have been saying that that future would involve video capabilities. Apple has remained firm in their resolve not to release a video capable iPod because of the mediocre viewing and purchasing experience that such a product would have. But what it didn't play movies? What about short videos? Just imagine: you go to the iTunes Music Store and download the latest album from your favorite artist, complete with behind the scenes video interviews and a few music videos, as well as a PDF file full of pictures and extra info about the album (if you reall

  8. But... by rokzy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...will it have a stopwatch !?

  9. Re:No Way... But if they DO make this... by slot32 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...we'll all suddenly proclaim it the best thing EVAR and praise Apple and say "Jobs R0x!"...

    Comon... We *will* do this... Just like "solid state mp3 players iz t3h sux" until Shuffle came out (even Jobs said this - more or less) and then "solid state MP3 with no screen r0x0r$!"

  10. I think it could work - Psp test case by acomj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While on the plane with my game boy advance, I've ben asked multiple times "can you watch movies with it". Granted the clamshell game boy looks like a small portable dvd player. I thought the screen was too small, but people seem to think it would be a good idea.

    We will see how well PSP does well with movies, from there anything can happen.

    1. Re:I think it could work - Psp test case by Quarters · · Score: 1
      I've ben asked multiple times "can you watch movies with it".

      To which you answer, Yes. Yes it can.

    2. Re:I think it could work - Psp test case by mrch0mp3rs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm an early adopter of the iPod, and I can't imagine how I got through the first 29 years of my life without one. I've supplanted my everday use of my 15GB 3G iPod with my Shuffle, which provides the soundtrack to 50% of my PSP usage (games). The other 50% of my PSP usage is for movies, and I've been using my PSP to watch a host of MP4s in the past several weeks with round-trip travels from East Coast to West Coast. When I get tired of playing Lumines, I've been watching Ali G, Lewis Black, Chapelle Show -- you'd be amazed how much you can fit on a 512MB Memory Stick when you compress video down to 15fps. The quality still remains remarkably nice on the PSP. I use PSP Video 9 (http://www.pspvideo9.com/) to encode my video files and it's awesome.

      --
      --- -a- "I'd love to change the world, but it'd be easier if the universe exposed its API."
  11. pr0n by birdwax2k · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now I can watch my pr0n on my way to work on the city bus!

  12. Maybe limited support... by hadleyhope · · Score: 3, Insightful
    • iTunes (4.8) can now play song videos.
    • iPhoto (5.0) can now play imported video from digital still cameras.

    So would it make sense for colour screen iPods to support the same?

  13. Forget video support... by irchs · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Give us support for more Audio formats. Namely Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, MPC and the like. Official support for this in iTunes and on the iPod is definately possible with the new generation of chips making their way into the new iPod's. For example, the iPod shuffle (please slap me if I am wrong) features the next processor up from the one used in the Rio Karma, which supports a plethora of audio formats which includes Ogg Vorbis and FLAC.

    A question I always had tho, is Ogg support out the question due to Licensing Issues?! I always guessed not due to the fact that the Rio Karma has done it :D I understand that Ogg support was not possible before due to the sheer lack of horsepower to process the Vorbis streams, but now?! Please Apple, its the only thing holding me back from buying an iPod :)

    Surely it wouldn't take them that long to code Vorbis support?! :)

    Anyway, back to work.

    Jan

    --
    Jan
    1. Re:Forget video support... by nuggetman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Surely it wouldn't take them that long to code Vorbis support?! :)

      However... is the amount of iPods that would sell because of this feature (or not sell because of lack of this feature) to the vocal minority who clamors for it in every iPod thread here on /. worthwhile to finance development of an offical Vorbis plugin for iTunes/QuickTime plus a firmware upgrade for the iPods?

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    2. Re:Forget video support... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give us support for more Audio formats.

      The iPod supports AIFF, WAV, Apple Lossless, MP3 and AAC.

      Namely Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, MPC and the like.

      Nobody's ever heard of any of those.

      A question I always had tho, is Ogg support out the question due to Licensing Issues?!

      It's out of the question because nobody's ever heard of it.

    3. Re:Forget video support... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      Surely it wouldn't take them that long to code Vorbis support?! :)

      Vorbis container support may be possible, but Ogg is probably not going to happen any time soon.

      The big problem with Ogg is that the default decoder is very heavily reliant on floating point calculations of the kind that pretty much requires a floating point processor to calculate in a timely manner. The majority of music playback devices (like the iPod) are designed for integer calculations.

      There was work being done a few years ago by the Vorbis developers on an integer Ogg decoder (the name of which escapes me at the moment, although I believe it started with a "T"), but at the time it was up in the air as to whether it would be openly licensed or not, and I haven't seen or heard anything about its development in nearly two years.

      Apple isn't going to sit down and write its own Ogg Vorbis integer decoder just to satisfy thre people in /., nor should they. And I wouldn't expect them to jam an FPU into the iPod either, as this would unnecessarily raise the price of the iPod with no benefit for the vast majority of owners.

      Yaz.

    4. Re:Forget video support... by irchs · · Score: 1

      Ogg Integer only decoder was called Tremor. It is available under the BSD license from here: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/

      I think the iRiver H300 series also supports Ogg.

      So no need to bung an expensive new CPU in the iPod, and no need to spend money building an Integer only decoder :)

      Thanks

      Jan

      --
      Jan
    5. Re:Forget video support... by ben_rh · · Score: 1

      is the amount of iPods that would sell because of this feature ... worthwhile to finance development of an offical Vorbis plugin for iTunes/QuickTime plus a firmware upgrade for the iPods?

      Personally, I believe it is worth it.

      I've done a fair bit of programming with libvorbisfile and it has one of the best APIs of any library I've seen. Now I haven't looked much at Tremor (the integer / fixed-point implementation of libvorbis), but I assume its API is also quite nice.

      If the iTunes codec model is worth its weight in .c files, then implementing Vorbis support should be easily doable in a solid day's work. Of course, there's testing and firmware integration and all those associated things as well... but I fail to see how this could be a huge undertaking.

      Of course, it's not on the same level, but I've hacked support for a new format into a media player in an afternoon, and I'm certainly no guru.

  14. OMFG by yotto · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I didn't read the article because I won't want to give this guy yet more free hits for his advertisers, but I suspect the article boils down to: OMFG IPODZ R TEH BESTEST I 3 VIDEOZ!!~!

    My only hope here is that it drives the price of a 40 gig ipod to under $100 so I'll be able to even think about the possibility of some day buying one.

    1. Re:OMFG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW: I don't have advertisers on my site. None. I hate them. It makes me no money whatsoever. So why don't you take a look at the article before you pass judgement on it. - The Author

    2. Re:OMFG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may have been wrong about your motives, but considering the fact that he did not read your article, he summed it up really well.

  15. Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Apple developing a Video iPod?

    No.

    Next question.

  16. Re:No Way... But if they DO make this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's all this "we" stuff you are talking about?

    I preferred HD-based players (especially the iPod) before the Shuffle came out, and I still do.

    Other people are fine with the Shuffle.

    Don't mistake multiple people posting different things for a collective mind disagreeing with itself.

  17. Pix - Video by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

    People are showing pictures from iPod on TV, so why not video?

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  18. Groundwork by bats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fact the iTMS is suddenly selling music videos is clearly not ground breaking. It is, at most, a curiousity. Some folks will download some videos simple to see how it works. (I probably will.) For Apple, however, its a public beta of their video distribution channels. Its important that they test out their distribution chain end to end. This is a lot easier with 3 minute music videos rather than all 12 hours of LOTR. The iPod isn't going away any time soon, but clearly in several years, the cell will absorb these functionalities. (Cell phone outfits are already planning (announced?) cell phones with hard drives.)

    What's more likely is a home entertainment device, probably tagged with the iPod moniker -- iPod TV if you will. Imagine a small (probably white) box that you sit next to your TV. Plug in a couple cables and {poof!} you can see all the media on your mac. It'll probably have ethernet as well as Airport Extreme. It'll be zero-conf and automagically find your mac via Bonjour/Rendzvous/whatever. A lot of this functionality is available on your TiVo today, at least music and photos. iPod TV will likely provide similiar functionality plus video. On the mac side, iTunes will expand to encompass video as well, managing video playlists and libraries, all exported to the iPodTV. iTMS being able to deliver video content over the internet is the last piece to this puzzle. Jobs has got to annouce something at WWDC.

    Oh, and BTW, bluetooth on the iPod is stupid for syncing. There's just not enough bandwidth. Airport and Bonjour could do the job though. That's not entirely crazy.

    1. Re:Groundwork by nine-times · · Score: 1

      The only thing I could see bluetooth being used for on the iPod is playlist syncing-- not music syncing. Right now, smart playlists don't really update until you connect to a computer. So I could see bluetooth being used as a way of updating playcounts (and other such metadata) as well as playlists, but I'm not sure it'd be worth all the price and trouble.

    2. Re:Groundwork by beeshman · · Score: 1

      I agree. A small whitish box, say 6.5"x6.5", about 2.5" tall. It could fit right into your entertainment center, hook up to your TV, fit into the home network via ethernet, Bluetooth, or Airport. Don't know about the name iPodTV, though. How about Mac mini?

    3. Re:Groundwork by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      I would say Bluetooth DOES have its uses... HP just released some very nice bluetooth headphones for their iPaqs... wireless headphones could be very nice.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    4. Re:Groundwork by bats · · Score: 1

      No! No! No!

      Connecting a desktop computer to a TV is the realm of linux weenies who argue about gold-tipped cables. Real People, the kind that buy macs because they 'just work', don't want to use a keyboard anywhere close to the TV! This device needs to be a dedicated box that does one thing and does it well. It bridges the gap between media center in the living room and media depot on your mac. A resonably equipped mac mini (airport, memory, applecare) is about $700 or $800. This device needs to be $200 and brain dead easy to use. (That means it'll be brain dead easy to use, but cost $400.)

  19. The Truth is Out There by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I learned some things from his article.

    *The iMac had no way to write data. I was under the impression it had a hard drive and USB and network ports (and later firewire)...but this article has told me the truth.

    * Apple crippled the 12" powerbook by giving it a severely undeprowered CPU. I had thought the 12" had a 15% slower CPU since it had less surface area for cooling. But apparently the real reason was to severely cripple the G4.

    * The iPod Photo cannot actually take photos. Apple gives us a misleading product name, once again!

    Luckily, we now know the truth about apple's evil ways of crippling their products thanks to this article...

    1. Re:The Truth is Out There by amichalo · · Score: 2, Funny

      * The iPod Photo cannot actually take photos. Apple gives us a misleading product name, once again!

      In addition, the "iPod" does not actually turn you into a "Pod" and the if you have a deck of 52 "iPod Shuffles", you cannot actually shuffle them (though the end caps may pop off if you attempt a "bridge")

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  20. Agreed, how the hell does this crap get through? by Biotech9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is probably the worst thing I've ever seen passed as news on /.
    I've seen plenty of people complaining about Advertisements for people's new sites or products being posted as news stories, and I winced at that review of the Battery Sticker that gave mobile phones longer battery life, but this is an all time low.

    This article is so ridiculously retarded and bereft of any insight, it is not even an educated guess, or any kind of intelligent prediction. Someone using 3 appleinsider links as his sources and also stupid enough to postulate erroneously on the capabilities of the current iPod photo chip's power even though those data are available on the net with a little digging, does not deserve to have his drivel served up to /. readers as news.

    Having said that, this quote made me laugh,

    Their strategy is to release a bare minimum and upgrade if they absolutely have to. This is a major, major flaw of Apple and you can find examples of it over and over in their history (iMac with no way to write data, 12" Powerbook severely underpowered at 867 MHz, iPod photo that cannot actually take photos)


    what an idiot.

  21. Archos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are already such devices on the market that play video.

  22. the iMac is a PVR for today by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lots of people are speculating about the "iPod Video", even though Jobs and others have pointed out that while music is a "background" to daily taskes, watching a video is an action that few want to commit 2+ hrs to on a 2" screen.

    But, I propose that the latest itteration of the iMac G5 is the perfect "iPod Video". Here's why:
    - G5 processor can decode H.264
    - Upgraded graphics cards in the iMac line can now handily manage HD video
    - Beefy 1GB Eithernet can get content (from the iMovie Video Store?) in a flash (too bad Cable/DSL lines can't fill that but it's atleast faster than a USB2 iPod connection)
    - BTO options for internal 400 GB at 7200 rpm means no HD lag or filled drives
    - External Firewire drives and the Dual layer DVD burners in the iMac G5 allow for archiving large video libraries
    - 17" and 20" flat screen options also have VESA mounts for dramatic display opportunities
    - standard bluetooth means wireless keyboards and pointers from the sofa
    - add an Eye TV 1080i tuner and you have a great PVR

    Even if Apple introduced an "iPod Video", I am not in the market. But with an iMovie Video Store, an iMac G5, cable/ADSL modem, and a stack of dual layer media, I am in the market to dispose of my Blockbuster membership card.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:the iMac is a PVR for today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      - G5 processor can decode H.264

      Any processor can decode H.264. Examples can be found on the definitive H.264 site.

      Beefy 1GB Eithernet can get content (from the iMovie Video Store?) in a flash

      Ah, yes, you need a gigabit ethernet connection to go with your fancy new gigabit cable modem. Oh, wait.

      17" and 20" flat screen options also have VESA mounts for dramatic display opportunities

      If you think a 20" screen could ever be considered "dramatic" in any room bigger than an airplane bathroom, you're out of your mind.

  23. Video Shuffle by harkskirr · · Score: 2, Funny

    hmm.. I'll wait until the Video iPod Shuffle comes out.

  24. I hope they use UMD by displague · · Score: 1

    It would further acceptance of the format, increase competition among players (reducing prices), and would probably add credibility to the longevity of iPod (not to mention UMD).

    --
    Marques Johansson
    1. Re:I hope they use UMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is UMD?

    2. Re:I hope they use UMD by displague · · Score: 1

      Straight from the source:

      What is UMD? UMD (Universal Media Disc) is a new, proprietary, high-capacity optical medium enabling game software, full-motion video and other forms of digital entertainment content such as movies and music, to be stored. The newly developed UMD is the next-generation compact storage media and at only 60mm in diameter, can store up to 1.8GB of digital data, making it perfect for a portable entertainment player like the PSP system. UMD stores a broad range of digital entertainment content including games, music, movies, and more.
      --
      Marques Johansson
  25. Re:No Way... But if they DO make this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Jobs said was that itty-bitty flash players that had something like 32 MB of RAM in them sucked. And they did. That's why the iPod Shuffle has a gigabyte of RAM. Nobody ever said flash absolutely sucks. If they had, they would have been stupid. What they said was that players that are too small and too hard to use sucked.

  26. Who approves these things? by wtmcgee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not only is the article total speculation, the title is worded in a manner that makes it sound like a video iPod is coming, and the proof is below. The link goes to some kid's blog site with his wish list and some links to mac rumor sites.

    I have no problem with some speculation of what's coming next, but this isn't 'news', so let's not label it as such.

    --
    *** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
  27. As Seen on TV and speculation by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If As Seen on TV is to be believed there were two key points he made.
    1) the continous run life of an ipod disk is measured in hours. mp3 and tiny photo loads are quick and played from cache. Movie playing would be real time streaming from disk and would kill it.

    2) watch the airport express.

    3) video is immersive and people dont do it on the GO (aside from cars which again are sedentary)

    The key I think is 2. As Cringley observed, the mac mini does not need an optical audio jack because it's on the airport express. And the mac mini does not need the HDTV horse power since that too can be offloaded to a custom $20 chip. Thus the mac mini is the internet download appliance and storage center. the processing power will be be custom and hence the need for a standard.

    But I think there is an even more important reason to offload the decoding to hardware. DRM. forget what you feel about DRM and just ask what would be the best way to do it.

    You dont want to do it on a custom reconfigurable computer. Because as we have seen repeatedly this means that you can intercept the digital decode step and rip a perfect copy with no DRM.

    Microsoft is trying to use paladium and now Janus to move the decode step out to a remote piece of trusted hardware closer to the delivery point, and most importantly away from the compute program.

    an airport express like device would serve.

    The trouble in implementing a real airport express would be the badnwidth needed. Can wireless support real time video streams. It certainly cant if the video stream is uncompressed. thus if it is to work it has to be sent compressed. so once again we are led back to the decoding at the airport express not at the computer.

    so I suspect all the clues about some modular video device are really about a new airport express module and not a video ipod

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:As Seen on TV and speculation by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      He's right (if he doesn't already know from first hand knowledge), I said this a few months back myself on another forum, using the AE to do video is where things need to go. It's already part way there. You put your AE behind your stereo system to run music to. What else is usually with your stereo system? Your TV.

      As for the bandwidth issue, according to Apple full hi def is 7-8 Mbps. Even 802.11b is 11 Mbps, and with the AE already using 802.11g, it shouldn't be a problem at all.

      If anything, my money is definately on an AE for video. Perhaps even combined with that remote the poster one or two threads up was talking about (that would certainly mix in the new touch screen patent)

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:As Seen on TV and speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full high def is 7 to 8 Mbs per second compressed. uncompressed it is higher I believe.

    3. Re:As Seen on TV and speculation by womby · · Score: 1

      Full high def is 7 to 8 Mbs per second compressed. uncompressed it is higher I believe.

      1.5 Gbs (1920x1080x32x24) assuming the video is 32bit colour, and at 24fps.

      --
      **** lying is wrong even for sleeping dogs
  28. hmm... by amichalo · · Score: 1

    As I mentioned:
    - G5 processor can decode H.264 - didn't say other processors could not, only that the G5 can.
    - 1 GB Either is much faster than cable and adsl today - but 1 GB either would be great for playing a movie off your own home file server if you have a network.
    - "dramatic display" refers to the VESA mount - not the 17"/20" screens.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  29. Editors? by ravenspear · · Score: 1

    But I give him credit, he got it past the slashdot editors.

    That takes about as much effort as getting something past a fat, drunken old man lazily reclining in a bean bag chair whilst watching a porno and listening to Yani.

  30. Just Because it Says iPod... by chia_monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Simmer down folks. Just because it may have the word "iPod" in the name doesn't mean it's going to have a tiny 1.5" screen. Hell, the iPod Shuffle doesn't even have a screen, yet it still says "iPod". What better way to capitalize on an amazingly successful brand name...use the term "iPod". Use the marketing muscle, the brand awareness, and put out a small video device that all Mac-heads, all trendy people, all geeks, and all consumers will want because "it's an iPod that plays video".

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  31. You are so Money and the mods don't even know it by amichalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am fully on board with your insighful comments.

    I don't care what component in my AV arsenal is delivering the media - my wife cares even less.

    If Apple intros a remote that can logically control the devices and allow a PowerMac or iMac in the office to deliver H.264 HD to a flatscreen in the Den while being controled via an Apple Bluetooth remote or what-have-you, then Apple will have a major leg up in the "digital hub" realm.

    And why not? the pieces are all coming together. G5's with H.264 in QuickTime 7, Dual-layer DVD for archiving, VESA mounts on iMacs....

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  32. Apple will NEVER... oh, whoa, they did... by argent · · Score: 1
    Any time you put together a sentence with "Apple will never..." or "Apple knows that ... is retarded" or any other construct that attempts to predict that Apple WON'T do something... you're setting yourself up.

    Saying "Apple will never..." is a stretching excersize for fitting your foot in your mouth. For example:
    But no, I suspect you're right that [the $500 iMac] is a hoax. Not because of logistics, but because Steve Jobs irrational antipathy to "ugly monitors on nice Macs" is too well known... he'd much rather force Apple users to put up with lousy monitors in pretty shells than lose face by backing down on something like this. -- Me, December 30, 2004
    This was just before MWSF05 where, a year after Steve Jobs had "explained" why flash MP3 players were retarded, Apple introduced both the Mac mini and the iPod Shuffle. No, friend, I don't believe that there's anything Jobs or any other Apple spokesman could say that they wouldn't take back once they figure out a way to make it cool.
  33. iPod AV? Airport Express HD? by CeZa · · Score: 1

    I'd imagine they will call it either iPod AV, and the new airport express will be called Airport Express HD...

    It would fit with iChat AV and iMovie HD....

  34. WAY! by alternapop · · Score: 1

    have you people never flown in coach class on a plane? hold your 2" ipod up and compare the size of the screen to the relative size of the closest airplane video screen. chances are the sizes are comparable if you're sitting more then 2 rows away from the plane screen.... and yet you don't complain about the size of that?

  35. That could be it! by beetle496 · · Score: 1

    Very interesting, perhaps even insightful! The remote you describe fits the news of the tablet patent from last week. Another thing I've pointed out on a few threads is how well most of the OS X GUI works out of the box for high color (24 bit) but relatively low resolution displays (like a TV). Two more pieces of the puzzle fall into place!

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!
  36. A question for LCD pros/geeks by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Those tiny screens you put on eyeglasses are ready for public consumption? Those ones I saw military usage etc.

    Yes, you understood what I predict ;)

    BTW, why does iTunes have fullscreen video playback and "contains unpublished work from Dolby labs" ?

  37. BFD: Archos Got There First by rutabagaman · · Score: 1

    Archos beat Apple to the bunch with their excellent Gmini400 video player with its 2.1" color screen. It plays DivX/XviD encoded AVI files which can be ripped off DVDs. Its 20G HD has space for about 25-30 full-length movies. Plus, it has composite video out in case you want to plug it in a TV or projector.

    AND it has a compact flash card slot for saving/viewing digital camera images. Like the iPod Photo, but more useful.

    AND it can record audio via the built-in mic

    AND it's an MP3 Jukebox of course, which displays the album art while you listen.

    AND it can play(relatively lame) Mophun games.

    AND it actually fits nicely in your shirt pocket.

    AND it retails for less than the iPod Photo.

    Oh well, I guess if they charged a few hundred dollars more for it and stuck an Apple sticker on the case it might get them noticed.

    --
    (insert witty/esoteric/dumb quote here)
  38. What this really means by Delilah+Jones · · Score: 1


    Video iPod + Boring Class = Happy Student Sitting in the Back of the Room

    --
    http://augustwestproducts.i8.com