Slashdot Mirror


Unlocking the GeForce 6800

Timmus writes "Firingsquad is running a story on how to unlock all 16 pipelines in nVidia's GeForce 6800. By default the card only ships with 12 pixel pipelines enabled, but with a tool and a few mouse clicks, the card can be unlocked to run with all 16 pipes. Performance improvements are seen everywhere, so it's a pretty nice free upgrade. These cards are currently selling for $200 online, so a 16-pipe GeForce 6800 delivers great bang for the buck."

46 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Nice Work! by coop0030 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm surprised, this actually showed a significant increase in performance in their charts. This is one of the best mods I have ever seen on a Video Card.

    I wonder if this would actually hurt, or help Nvidia's sales, or have no effect?

    I currently have an ATI card, and am very happy with ATI, but would be willing to switch to Nvidia since the price/performance on this card is so high now.

    1. Re:Nice Work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      price/performance high = price too high for the performance.

    2. Re:Nice Work! by Adrilla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure NVidia will be happy to jack up the prices of the 6800's once this mod becomes widely known.

      or when they start shipping it with the mod unlocked themselves.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    3. Re:Nice Work! by phasm42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They do note that that some games had weird graphical glitches that came and went after turning the additional pipelines on, so the increase in performance may come at the cost of quality, depending on the card you got.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    4. Re:Nice Work! by darc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is unlikely. In the article itself, they note that graphical artifacts appear when you turn on this mod. This is likely because they didn't QA that section of the chip, and it's probably defective-ish. Now, that doesn't mean you'll definitely get a buggy chip, but NVidia won't unlock this because the part isn't tested, and assumed broken.

      In fact, it may be reject parts from the Ultra series that makes it 6800 standard. From what it looks like, they deactivate the broken pipelines and then sell it as a lower model, much like CPUs do with clockrates.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
    5. Re:Nice Work! by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, these types of mods are old hat. Go look for the Radeon 9500 to 9700 mods, etc. Unlocking pipelines is as old news as overclocking, and it results in a whole bunch of 'l337 g4m0r' kids with dead video cards.

      What the hell is this "confirm im not a script" crap, anyways?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:Nice Work! by NetNifty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably won't - IIRC you can do pretty much the same thing on some models of the NVIDIA 5900 to make it a 5950 by flashing it, and I don't think they increased the price to compensate.

    7. Re:Nice Work! by Mac+Degger · · Score: 5, Informative

      This kind of thing has been going on for a very long time. ATI does it too. What happens isn't that the card isn't tested, it's that it /is/.

      After the card is made, they run a series of tests on it. If all parts work perfectly, you have the "6855,5 UltraDuper"; if all parts work, but instability occurs at higher clockspeeds, they call it a "6849 Ultra"; if certain parts (ie a few pixel/vertex shader units) don't work, they lock these off and call the card a plain "6800"; if more than a certain number don't work, they just trash the card.

      Thing is, it's nothing new; ATI has been doing it (and softmods [software based] and hardware based modshve been available) since at least the 8xxx series. So whilst this is news, this isn't as hot as the blurb or /. would have you believe...it was actually innevitable. Shit, soon /. will have a press release out on how to mod your x800/6800 into a fireGL/quadro :) Whooppie...what news...

      BTW, the same kind of thing goes on with cpu's, where it's called 'binning'.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    8. Re:Nice Work! by Cipster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep. Just did this with a 6200 card. My 3D Mark scores went way up but I am sometimes getting artifacts. They are not enough to make me switch back but they are definitely noticeable at times.

    9. Re:Nice Work! by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They may also mark down fully functional parts to lower model numbers to meet demand for "low end" parts.

    10. Re:Nice Work! by Decker-Mage · · Score: 2, Interesting
      He's probably seeing the same thing I am: "To confirm you are not a script, please type the text shown in this image: wtfwrxy". Stupid really, since there are two problems. (1) It ain't section 508 compliant (biggie to me as I'm also disabled, and these are really visually challenging to moi!). (2) I'm logged in as me and last time I looked, I ain't a script, although some might have a different opinion.

      If they are really having problems with scripted spam from logged in users, block the fraggin' accounts! Or better yet, after you prove you ain't a script, remember it in the stupid cookie! How many times do you have to prove you are you?

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    11. Re:Nice Work! by Kazymyr · · Score: 4, Informative

      This sort of thing has indeed been going on for a long time, and was invented by "granddaddy" Intel. The oldest example of a chip manufacturer turning off some capabilities on their chips and selling them as a lower end product that I'm aware of happened in the 486 era. Intel released the 486DX as a high end, expensive product with integrated FPU for the first time. Then they released the 486SX as a low end budget priced chip. The 486SX did not have a FPU, but what Intel didn't tell (though it became known rather quickly) was that the SX chips were identical to the DX except that the FPU was turned off in the fab. Thus the same assembly line produced both DX and SX chips.

      And Intel even went the next step. They later marketed an "upgrade" for the 486SX which "added" a FPU to those systems. That was the 487DX, which was supposed to be installed in a separate socket on the motherboard and work in tandem with the existing 486SX. Again what Intel didn't say was that the 487DX was in fact a 486DX, and when it was installed on the motherboard it would simply turn off the SX altogether and take over. You could remove the SX chip and throw it away and it wouldn't make a difference. The 487DX was priced below the 486DX, but you ended up paying more for the 486SX+487DX than for a regular 486DX. And to prevent people from buying 487DX chips and use them instead of 486DX, they made the socket pinouts incompatible.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  2. I hate to trolll but.... by packeteer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thsi is kinda old news. People have been doing this for about a year now ever since the card came out. Either way its a good guide to getting some extra bang for your buck although everyone needs to remember that if the card worked 100% fine with 16 pipelines they would have sold it that way.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    1. Re:I hate to trolll but.... by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      although everyone needs to remember that if the card worked 100% fine with 16 pipelines they would have sold it that way.

      Not necessarily. If they need to fill a price point, chip companies will sell the higher grade stuff at a lower price point and intentionally cripple it.

      Intel and AMD have been doing it for years, and they are hardly the only ones.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  3. I turned by Jozer99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I turned my 6800 into a Radeon 9700 Pro with my 1337 sk1lz!

  4. Disabled Hardware?? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the first place, why would you deliberately lock down 4 of the pipelines to begin with? Wouldn't it make more sense to just go ahead and have all 16 pipelines pumping out the frames in the first place, to give a TRUE impression of what the card can actually do, instead of crippling the card?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Disabled Hardware?? by Siergen · · Score: 4, Informative

      MBAs learned long ago that in many businesses you can make more money selling both high-end and low-end products in the same market than you would by selling just high-end. Disabling 4 of the pipelines allows them to do this with one main production line and one product development effort.

    2. Re:Disabled Hardware?? by edwdig · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Two reasons to turn off some of the pipelines:

      a) They were defective, and this allows you to salvage the part.

      b) People with too much money will gladly pay significantly more money for a slightly higher end version of the same card.

    3. Re:Disabled Hardware?? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I *DID* read the article. Still, the question makes sense to ask. And for the hell of it, let's add another question, you coward.

      Why would the PCI-E version only ship with 12 pipelines, hrm? Especially when it's got double the bandwidth and two-way writing?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Disabled Hardware?? by mikael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For profit reasons, a graphics chip maker wants to cover all possible market segments. For the cheap end of the market, they provide a card with basic functionality ie. four pipelines. For the expensive end of the market, they provide a card with as many pipelines as possible (16, 32, 64). To fill in the space between, they have graphics card with different capabilities - card makers can't really nobble screen resolution or colour depth any more, so they are left with 3D performance. And so they provide cards that have things like overlays, hardware accelerated line drawing and multiple pipelines disabled.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:Disabled Hardware?? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Informative
      Sounds kinda like the thing PC manufacturers used to do with the "Turbo" button. If you turned the turbo off it would actually slow the CPU down.

      That was there for a very specific reason: the lame-assed DRM in the original Lotus 1-2-3 used a CPU delay loop to time hacks on the floppy drive that they used to prevent normal copies from working. The DRM scheme failed with CPUs that ran faster than the original 4.77MHz 8086.

      Therefore, to load Lotus 1-2-3, you had to turn off the turbo button to slow your machine down to the original speed of a 4.77MHz PC. It was also useful to run a handful of early games that used CPU speed to time the action.

      What was really stupid is that the DRM scheme drove millions of otherwise law-abiding people to use questionable cracked copies. The original DRM'd 1-2-3 floppies were so precious, and floppy disks were so unreliable and subject to wear, very few people would risk using their original disks for day-to-day use. Most everyone I knew, even in large corporations, used cracked disks instead. The original disks stayed safely on the bookshelf in those thick cardboard ring binder + carton combos that software always used to come in.

  5. I'll wait a while.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    till they unlock 64 pipelines.

  6. no, by Run4yourlives · · Score: 5, Informative

    because you want to charge an extra $50 for those cards.

    It's cheaper to do things this way than it is to actually alter your production lines.

  7. No one has mentioned this yet, but... by JMan1865 · · Score: 5, Informative

    AGP only, it seems. No love for us PCI-E types.

    --
    I think the people above me are having sex - or they're sleeping restlessly and agreeing with each other a lot.
  8. 6800? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pff. I'll save my money for the Radeon 6502.

  9. is there a centralized list of these hacks? by schweini · · Score: 5, Interesting

    does anybody know whether there's a website where a comprehensive list of these 'free update' hacks is maintained?
    there seem to be an awful lot of them (Sony Clie 710->740, Siemens A55->C55, 720kb-->1,44MB Floppies, etc.) but usually they pop up in rather dubious threads on some weird forum, and having them in one nice place would certainly be nice.

    1. Re:is there a centralized list of these hacks? by cyberwiz01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The overclockers.com forums has a sub-forum specifically for video cards and their mods.
      http://www.ocforums.com/
      check out the video card section here:
      http://www.ocforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7

  10. Reminiscent of Cannon 300D Hack by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This sounds rather like the incident which occurred with the Canon EOS 300D Digital Rebel where the entry level model had very similar features to the higher end "professional" model costing hundreds of dollars more. However, it was discovered by some enterprising users that a relatively simple hack, flashing the BIOS with a modified version, could "unlock" the hardware and enable most of the features that were found on the more expensive model. This type of hardware homogeneity protected by software locking is advantageous for the manufacturer because it reduces manufacturing costs, since only one version of the hardware need be produced, but it is also vulnerable to those users who are sophisticated enough to circumvent the software locks. Is it possible that NVIDIA was holding back these pipes as a stop-gap measure so that they could release a new "Ultra" version of an existing card on short notice to counter a new competitor release more quickly? Perhaps, but these two incidents, the camera hack and now the video card hack, may induce corporations to rethink their software locking strategies. In the meantime it appears that savvy consumers can reap the benefits of these companies' mistakes.

    1. Re:Reminiscent of Cannon 300D Hack by dotgain · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Uh huh, software does the same too. Case in point, Microsoft Exchange. Available in Standard and Enterprise editions (maybe others too). Standard Edition, limited to one store, and that's limited to 32G. Enterprise Edition, no such limitations. It's not like they'd rewritten the software at all. Just open a header file, change a couple of constants, and recompile.

      Probably exactly the same for XP Pro vs Home, SQLServer vs MSDE etc.

    2. Re:Reminiscent of Cannon 300D Hack by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      No they are not manipulating the market, but rather taking advantage of known properties thereof.
      This has been going on for some time, since before modern pc's I'd bet, in other markets as well. And it's a fact most people learn about same time as they get old enough to vote or drink, so no one is being deliberately fooled.
      It's simular to how you can find two brands of the same product in a store with as much as a 2:1 price difference and yet they are the EXACT same thing.
      For example I once worked at a factory that packaged charcoal briquettes(sp?). There are exactly four types of them defined by two binary properties. All hardwood or mixed, with or without lighting fluids added. That's it, the packaging is just packaging and who's name on the outside has no bearing on the contents. When we had enough of brand x all we did was switch the bags we were filling, it all came from the same bin with absolutely nothing done between bag switches.
      Yet go look in a store at the costs of the various brands. The same amount of the same thing can cost from $5 to $20 depending on who's name is on the bag.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  11. Re:cheapskate's advice by Vertdang · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'd say $200 is pretty decent.

    I used to be the kind of guy that would spend $400 on a new videocard that you can get for $200 within 6 months. That's since changed

    Last night, my mother in law bought me a new videocard (CRAZY!) because she missed my birthday a month ago... it's an ATI X700Pro 256meg that ran $179.00 after instant $20 rebate.
    I installed it last night and it was VASTLY superior to the card I got 1&1/2 to 2 years ago for nearly $500. I turned everything up on Farcry, WoW, and BFVietnam. It's smooth as glass on my AMD3000 machine.

    I wont be shelling out that much money again anytime soon.

    --
    Statesmen serve to better the country and help the people.
    Politicians serve to better themselves and help friends.
  12. Be warned though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This does not work on all GeForce 6800's. If you research this hack, as stated by another poster this has been a known hack for some time now, you will find information on why this is possible and why Nvidia "locks" some of the pipes. I seem to remember something about problems inherent in there manufacturing processes.

    You can unlock all pixel piplines as will as additional vertex shaders. I bought a 6800 last year and tried this. I was able to unlock everything, but it resulted in artifacts and other issues that made games un playable.

  13. Locking down makes sense... Business Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Discluding the cards that might not be up to snuff to be sold to work consistently with 16 pipes on, it still makes sense to sell a "lower-end" card, if your aim is to make money, and not to help people that you don't know, and honestly are not that nice people anyways.

    By selling a "low-end" and a "high-end" card, you can take the most money from everyone- Milk the guys that can afford it for all their worth, but still sell to the poor sods that still need to play Half-Life 2 at some overly-impressive benchmark.

    This made sense before when the low and high end cards were different hardware, and it still makes sense now when the cost of manufacturing 2 different boards is higher than just making one and 'neutering it' to get two.

    And I'm pretty sure it'll hurt sales. Not by any noticable amount, though since, come on, only an uber-nerd would really learn how to and then actually do this.

    -Aylw

  14. alas by atari2600 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Again, a lot of newbies posting on slashdot. VGA card modding is nothing new (ATI released moddable cards 9500-9700pro and other stuff) a while back. Just go google for them. Also, 200$ for a graphics card is not overkill - you get what you pay for.

  15. this is a fault tolerence technique by acidrain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They manufacture the part with identical pixel pipelines, and if one of them is flawed they can just disble it. This is a common technique in silicon manufacturing. E.g. the celeron is a pentium with the flawed half it's cache disabled.

    Flaws happen, and at say 20% rate per chip that is a lot of your profits. If you your design is redundant and can survive with parts disabled you can recover a lot of that 20%.

    As another example the Cell processor has one SPU disabled in the PS3.

    The flaws may not be visible in all games, or occur frequently. Thats why lots of people report the card working fine. The maker has better testing.

    Of course it is possible that they also crippled a few that were just fine...

    --
    -- http://thegirlorthecar.com funny dating game for guys
  16. Good Deal? You bet... by Some_Llama · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is actually one of the best found "upgrades" for video cards in recent past.

    In order to enable the extra pipelines all you have to do is modify the Registry (in Windows) and if all of the pipelines are functional then it "just works". The great side to this is that if there are any problems witht he pipelines then you can just revert back to the original settings.

    Previous mods like changing the Radeon 9800 pro into a 9800 XT required flashing the card with a different firmware to unlock the disabled features, or worse (like the old geforce4 to quatro mod) required soldering contact points on the card.

    The first few batches of this card were pretty hit and miss ( and usually 75% miss) but as Nvidia refined their chipset manufacturing process more of these cards are actually using high quality chips that have fully functioning pipelines that have just been disabled to sell at the lower price point, so your chances of getting this "free upgrade" are pretty good (esp with certain models).

    There is even a free tool http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=163
    that gives a GUI interface that shows all of the pipelines, their status, and allows you to change them on the fly (you can change the settings back and forth but a reboot is required to take effect).

  17. Test results... by biode0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone else find their test results to be kind of odd? No ATi cards in the 3dmark05 benches. The lower end cards (9800 and 5900) achived results that are the complete opposite of every other test I've seen in Doom 3 and HL2. The test system was also fairly out of date, meaning the top end cards were probably somewhat limited. I'm not calling them liars, this stuff just seems kind of... iffy. (terribly sorry for the double post, I had problems logging in, not cowardace)

  18. Re:DMCA by zr-rifle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmmm, lets say more or less a year, if nVIDIA sued tomorrow? This mod has been around for this amount of time now, and I'm suprised this has made it to the main page as "news".

    More or less the same happened back in the Quadro/MX days. Using a soft-mod similiar to the one discussed in the article, you could transform your cheapo-but-great Geforce 2 MX into a much more costly Quadro card for graphic professionals.

    The difference between now and then is that this mod isn't guaranteed to work for each and every 6800 card out there. So unless you get to test the hack before buying don't think you can get away with a 6800 Ultra at a lower price. If you buy it, take it home and the mod doesn't work because the extra pipelines are defective, you're stuck with a really pricey card (check the V9999 from ASUS) that will perfom worse per dollar than a 6800GT (or probably even a 6600GT).

    Also, please read the DMCA again: this kind of mod is perfectly legal, unless you plan to put up a shop that sells them. If it weren't so, even overclocking would be illegal.

    --
    Hack your mind out of its sandbox.
  19. Did this by Linthos · · Score: 4, Informative

    I did this with my AGP GeForce 6800, and the extra piplines didn't work for me. They were damaged. Also you can unlock an extra vertex processor on it, which did work fine for me. I have read that it's about a 50-50 chance that the pipelines will work, as that is one of the reasons they are not sold as ultras. A reason they do work on some cards is that something else was wrong with the card that is also limited on the 6800 model, such as using less memory at slower speeds.

  20. Re:I was all excited... by toddthefrog · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can't SLI vanilla 6800's, only the 6600GT, 6800GT, and the 6800 Ultra.

    You should have dipped into your wallet less (for the 6600GT) or more (for the 6800GT).

  21. right on by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I also did a softmod on the vanilla 9500. It worked great, and I sold the system to a friend. The 9500 and 9500 PRO were actually different boards, however the 9700 and the 9500 were the same.

    As I remember it, the mod was first tried when someone in europe (thinking Germany) spotted the one difference between a 9500 and a 9700, one solder point. They changed the solder point and their 9500 was a 9700.

    Someone made a driver that ignored the signal the card sent to identify it's model, just assuming the model to be a 9700. A lot of the cards worked too, it sure kept the 9500 vanilla above the cost of the 9500 pro for a while.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  22. Re:Same thing with a new BMW 3-Series by fwitness · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yep, all the Beamer-owners I know are cost cautious. They love to save a buck. Hell, most of 'em take the "BMW" logo off, I mean who cares about the a silly brand name? I bought this for the *performance* man.

    --
    -- I have fans? Wow.
  23. Apple by ylon · · Score: 2, Funny

    How can this be accomplished on Mac OS X on a Power Mac?

  24. Warranty... by CreateWindowEx · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...messing with a $200 video card is one thing, but voiding the warranty on your brand new $30,000 car is another, especially a very high-tech new model. Also, I believe it's not just the intake, but also the intake manifold, MAF sensors, throttle body, and airbox.

    It will be interesting to see what the various tuners do with the E90 325--presumably the big guys like Dinan who enjoy a close relationship with BMW might get some pressure not to release a cheap 255 hp upgrade. The VANOS systems are supposed to be very hard to modify--it may turn out to be non-trivial to make the change without inside information.

  25. Willy-waving by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

    You have to take all overclocking claims with a bit of salt, because for some people it's like the size of their penis depends on it. They'll be... very creative and selective in what they tell you, and that's putting it very mildly.

    I've briefly been into the overclocker willy-waving scene myself, so you can take that as an admission. Guilty as charged, guv'nor.

    Anyway, I've played with it long enough to know that there very rarely is a hard point where the card works 100% flawlessly, and 1 MHz higher it just locks up. There's more of a gradient grey zone where the card sorta works enough to finish one particular benchmark, but glitches, is unstable, or eventually overheats. And where it might work at that frequency in one game or benchmark, but lock up hard in 20 others.

    The big overclocking brag-fests you read are usually from this grey area, not from the 100% stable zone.

    Yes, you see some screenshots of a mondo 3DMark number there or of some utility showing the card running at 4 gazillion megaherz, but what you don't see is that it runs stable only for the 10 minutes needed to finish the benchmark. After that it overheats and starts artefacting, or outright locking up.

    Be even more suspicious of brag-fests where they only ran half of 3DMark, and hand-waved the other tests as "bah, they didn't make much of a difference on the score anyway." (Ever notice how the biggest overclocking claims fall in that category?) Usually it means it crashed or locked up in those tests.

    So I wouldn't take those as a baseline or as "_all_ 6800 cards make it that high with no problems, and it's just the mean MBAs at Nvidia marking them down." Fully expect that any card you buy might not be quite stable that high.

    Which brings me to another point. To paraphrase another saying "overclocking gives you something for 'free', if your time is worth nothing." Because in the end the price you'll pay is a lot of time tweaking and testing that overclock... for each new game you buy, time replaying 30 minutes worth of something _again_ because the card locked up just before the save point, etc. It can end up a passtime in and by itself.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  26. Re:I'm not sure by bongo69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Either you have incredibly slow reactions, your retarded or you like playing games in slow motion. I have an FX5200 and while I can crank it upto the full settings the game is unplayable (on both Debian Sarge and WinXP ). The Doom 3 setup auto-configures the settings to the lowest possible resolution on my machine with slightly better frame rates on my Windows XP partition than the Debian one. Medium is playable, but I occasionally notice lag.