Slashdot Mirror


Blogging For Paychecks

prostoalex writes "When you hear about blogging, you're most likely to hear about personal journals, self-expression and youngsters sharing their daily routines online. However, as Wall Street Journal notes, the word blogger can now frequently be seen in corporate job ads. Blogging jobs pay anywhere from $40,000 to $70,000 and frequently require writing copy for corporate Web sites and ability to promote on the Internet. A search for blogger and blogging on one of the job meta search engines yields several hundred open positions."

187 comments

  1. Meh. by Seumas · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So, I'm supposed to take a significant paycut _and_ throw away any sense of decenty I have?

    1. Re:Meh. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reading this article makes me think we are setting ourselves up for a whole 'nother dot com boom/bust.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    2. Re:Meh. by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Apparently you seem to think that most people who have time to write lengthy blogs have jobs or something.

    3. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      darn that frikkin "t" key for being so damn close to the "c" key.

    4. Re:Meh. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      And the only time such stupid corporate ideas come to fruation is when they have extra capitol to spend. In other words, the ecconomy MUST be doing well for these kinda jobs to be handed out at 70k a year.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Meh. by kfg · · Score: 1

      Apparently you seem to think that most people who have time to write lengthy blogs have jobs or something.


      Well, they would if it were their job, now wouldn't they?

      Too bad I'm alergic to work there aren't enough showers in the world to wash off, and I rather doubt these jobs come with artistic control and pay or play contracts.

      KFG

    6. Re:Meh. by BigGerman · · Score: 0

      No this is for people who would consider this a pay raise and are comfortable with little trolling for dollars kind of thing.

    7. Re:Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, we don't care what you have to say.
      hang on to that sense of decenty, too, it'll get you WAY more than 70k some day!

    8. Re:Meh. by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      I think the word you're looking for is, "integrity". My sig is just a coincidence.

  2. blogging=marketing? by RayDude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I see. So to corporate america, blogging equates to marketing.

    Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

    Raydude

    1. Re:blogging=marketing? by ndansmith · · Score: 1

      Yeah, let's call this what it is. It is clearly not blogging (as in Mark Cuban, Josh Marshall blogging), but rather a strange corporate tactic called "advertising."

    2. Re:blogging=marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Get with it man. It's called "blogvertising".

      How are you going to survive in the computerized e-future if you can't even wrap your head around a simple Xoncept like blogging?

    3. Re:blogging=marketing? by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm paid to blog. However, I do not earn very much from it. Probably because I'm NOT pimping for someone else. I merely news gather and post the news. Simple as that. Pay is a lot less for that sort of gig unfortunately.

    4. Re:blogging=marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thumbnail galleries" are not "news".

    5. Re:blogging=marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roland is that you??

    6. Re:blogging=marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mmmm. Such a nice word, too - blog. Blogs blogging blogger blogvertising.

      So easy to say with a blocked nose, too.

    7. Re:blogging=marketing? by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 1

      I see. So to corporate america, blogging equates to marketing.

      Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

      It definitely was an expected thing. Marketing has become increasingly import (and disgusting, imho) in our society. Wherever ads can creep in, they do. Cf school books with ads. I'm glad I'm done with school.

    8. Re:blogging=marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't have posted as an AC. Now you won't be able to take credit for that word when it comes into common use.

    9. Re:blogging=marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NM, I just googled for "blogvertising", and it came up with nearly 2000 entries. First time I've heard the word, though.

    10. Re:blogging=marketing? by SysSupport · · Score: 0

      Damn, beat me to it.

    11. Re:blogging=marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So to corporate america, [some random activity] equates to marketing.

      Is this a good thing or a bad thing?


      It's the normal thing.

  3. For all the whining teenagers by Saven+Marek · · Score: 4, Funny

    For all the whining teenagers... your time has finally come. yes, people want to pay you to get all angsty.

    1. Re:For all the whining teenagers by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're completely mistaken. Blogging software, while usually used for personal journals by teens, is actually just an evolution of static websites. A blog enables a writer to produce content quickly without having to worry about editing html.

      It's being used to make BOATLOADS of money by such folks as WeblogsInc and others.
      For more information about professional blogging, check out the guru himself: Darren Rowse. Darren makes a 6-figure income simply by providing quality, regular information on a number of websites he owns and operates.

      --
      World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
  4. The secret to getting these jobs by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A little thing to realize about want ads is that they are usually filled by the time you read them.

    So what is the job seeker supposed to do? Well, according to What Color is Your Parachute, the key is to use your connections to get in.

    If you are a blogger with a dedicated audience, you will already have people knocking on your door to get you to write for them. I know I do, and all I do is write a few words on this site here.

    If you want to blog for a company, see if you know anyone working there. They have a better idea about the hiring situation inside their company than any want-ad could ever let you know.

    1. Re:The secret to getting these jobs by DenDave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only that but I think you have to be a bit of a wordsmith too. Being able to quickly redact and react to the world of interest to your company. I am a proponent of companies blogging in the sense that it may mean a reduction in meaningless marketing. Consider it like a good salesman who is passionate about his product and can convey his enthousiasm and highlight the important aspects of the product. For example a good blog for RedHat could track the open source movement in corporate environments, this could help to spread the news and gain general acceptance for the product and the segment as a whole. Apple has a lot of succes with blogging, except it's free and they don't know the blogger.. sometimes they disagree with the blogger but it's attention grabbing marketing nonetheless.. ;)

      As with printed media, blogs suffer the fact that quantity does not equal quality and hence the selection of bloggers will now indeed be on a you-know-who-know basis, it's a question of trust I guess. In future these functions may formalize and we may see assesments geared for this kind of redactionary work. Perhaps journalist schools will embrace the medium, maybe they already have. For ommercial schools in the US this would be a good time to get started with a program.

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    2. Re:The secret to getting these jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading your comment hurt my eyes. Did you mean to omit words and punctuation marks? How about the spelling errors? In otherwords, am I missing sarcasm here?

      Help me out here, please.

    3. Re:The secret to getting these jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you are a blogger with a dedicated audience, you will already have people knocking on your door to get you to write for them. I know I do, and all I do is write a few words on this site here.

      Agreed. It's not that hard to make a lot of money just writing on sites like this for different companies. Why, for example, McDonalds recently commissioned me to subtly write about their delicious tasty Quarter Pounder which is served with a generous portion of mouth-watering, delectable fries and a refreshing drink, all for an affordable price. I can tell you that I'm loving it! And they love it too. Many companies will gladly pay for product placement. The secret to landing these gigs is to start off the day right with an Egg McMuffin and rich aromatic coffee brewed fresh, then contact the various companies to see if they would be interested. Take the HR person out to lunch -- McDonalds will get you served and on your way quickly -- then follow up a few days later.

    4. Re:The secret to getting these jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he's not a blogger...

    5. Re:The secret to getting these jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am certain you have no idea what the word redact means. It's not personal, but you just sounded like an idiot. I wanted to let you know so you could fix your diction and present yourself to the world in a more positive manner.

    6. Re:The secret to getting these jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely he fucking is.

    7. Re:The secret to getting these jobs by DenDave · · Score: 1
      Redact
      The answer is always but a link away..
      I wanted to let you know so you could fix your diction and present yourself to the world in a more positive manner.
      *yoda*
      when languages as many speak as do I, not so clear present yourself will you
      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
  5. I'm sure Roland would agree by dnixon112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder how much he gets payed by Slashdot?

    1. Re:I'm sure Roland would agree by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      No you got it wrong, he probably pays slashdot to run his stuff, not the other way around.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    2. Re:I'm sure Roland would agree by alecks · · Score: 1

      Roland?!??? Roland of Gilliad?

  6. You're Hired! Until.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make a mistake and screw up our pr by saying something wrong and we're unable to take it off the blog in time to prevent a media disaster.

  7. Hopefully they're literate by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At most of the places I've worked, the grammar of a significant percentage of the employees bordered on illiteracy. At least these bloggers are likely to be able to write coherently.

    1. Re:Hopefully they're literate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At most of the places I've worked, the grammar of a significant percentage of the employees bordered on illiteracy. At least these bloggers are likely to be able to write coherently.

      On most of the blogs I've looked at, the grammar of a significant percentage of the bloggers bordered on illiteracy. At least these bloggers are likely to be able to write coherently... ?

    2. Re:Hopefully they're literate by kfg · · Score: 1

      At least these bloggers are likely to be able to write coherently.

      Takes one to know one. Who's doing the hiring?

      KFG

    3. Re:Hopefully they're literate by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, I would assume that the corporate communications department would be involved in the blogger's work. Do most companies still have those?

    4. Re:Hopefully they're literate by kfg · · Score: 1

      corporate communications department

      And you find those to be great fonts of literacy?

      KFG

    5. Re:Hopefully they're literate by L202 · · Score: 1

      True. And based on a majority of the responses to this thread, no one here is in danger of being hired for their outstanding grammar and wordsmithery. ;)

  8. This is anything new? by hoka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just a marketing extension really, businesses have long since been hiring people to go "put out the good word" for them. It happened for a long time on the Internet without many people noticing, with company rep's using a sock puppet attack to gain support for some company. I've seen them all over tons of forums (usually given away by talking about _any_ company and having less than 5-10 posts, and all those posts being total garbage), onto IRC for certain channels of people counter-pointing some viewpoint, and even in Slashvertising. Seriously folks, nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:This is anything new? by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      It's the damn truth and some of the best advertising money can buy. Now quiet, we're getting paid here!

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  9. Well, look at Kottke by ral315 · · Score: 1

    Jason Kottke blogs for a living, taking voluntary "micropayments" which, so far, have been enough to support him.

    1. Re:Well, look at Kottke by lendude · · Score: 1
      "...taking voluntary "micropayments" which, so far, have been enough to support him."

      What, as opposed to involuntary ones? *scratches head*

      --
      "Get off the cross - we need the wood" - Tori Amos
    2. Re:Well, look at Kottke by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Yes, as opposed to involuntary (compulsory) ones. When you go to the newsstand and buy a magazine, that's an "involuntary" payment. If you want to read the content, you HAVE to pay for it. Voluntary means if you like it you can pay for it, but you don't have to if you don't want to. Like slashdot.

      --
      My other car is first.
    3. Re:Well, look at Kottke by danro · · Score: 1
      "...taking voluntary "micropayments" which, so far, have been enough to support him."

      What, as opposed to involuntary ones? *scratches head*
      Arrhh! Micro-robbery!
      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    4. Re:Well, look at Kottke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what his website says, however don't take that to mean that those micropayments are what pay the bills each month. People have other sources of money, through inheritances, spouses, wealthy families, etc. Any of those reasons can allow you to 'earn' a living.

    5. Re:Well, look at Kottke by lendude · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that explanation - makes sense now! Cheers

      --
      "Get off the cross - we need the wood" - Tori Amos
  10. Nothing new by Neil+Blender · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's now just another word for marketing gopher.

  11. The new dot-com nonsense by AEton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gullible hacks are all over this 'blogger' gibberish because somebody somewhere thinks it's a hot new word.

    It isn't - it's silly and it rolls off your tongue wrong, like "Pog" - but that hasn't stopped anyone.

    In fact, it's gotten so bad that I was reading Time magazine today and saw a totally serious sidebar on this hip new phenomenon, "Blogebrity". This is a nonsense Contagiousmedia hoax, and I'm surprised the editors let it slip through. (Or I wonder how much they got paid.) At any rate, Time's sloppy standards there exemplify the cultural phenomenon where anything that says 'blog' and sounds trendy is brilliant and worth supporting.

    Yikes.

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:The new dot-com nonsense by hinkomatik · · Score: 1

      It's an ALF pog, Bart! Remember ALF?!? Well, he's back. . . in pog form.

    2. Re:The new dot-com nonsense by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's clear you don't know what you are talking about as you failed to use any words ending in "sphere" (for example blogosphere, papersphere, buzzesphere, etc)

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  12. Why not? by Palal · · Score: 1

    They have corporate prostitutes (obviously they're not called that), why not corporate bloggers? And then we wonder why Enron goes bust!

    --
    -Palal
    1. Re:Why not? by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      They have corporate prostitutes. . .

      Personal Satisfaction Engineers find that term offensive, you insensitive clod.

      KFG

  13. I never thought that I would ever see the day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I never thought that I would ever see the day when being a loudmouth with NO credentials is worth $40,000 or more. Where do I sign up?

  14. Business is business by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Frequently updated and interesting content like /. can develop a community around it. From there, whether the site chooses to simply offer a service for the goodwill of their readers, or incorporate a more conventional way of monetizing website traffic, provides the business payoff.

    Smart business IMO, and we'll probably see more of it.

    __
    Laugh Daily funny free videos
  15. Rely on the corporate bussiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Rely on the corporate bussiness to take advantage of something new. Im just surprised the pr0n industry wasn't here before :)

    But then again, maby they where?

    (like I wouldn't know.. because I don't surf pr0n).
    *emptying cache* :)

    1. Re:Rely on the corporate bussiness by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      "Im just surprised the pr0n industry wasn't here before"

      They were there long before the web. It's called the Penthouse letters page, and it's long been a home to illiterate, implausible drivel, so I think it qualifies.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Rely on the corporate bussiness by PornMaster · · Score: 0

      Never been to http://fleshbot.com/?

    3. Re:Rely on the corporate bussiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blogging or marketing -- They are there:

      http://www.boobblog.com/index.php

  16. Re:I never thought that I would ever see the day.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I never thought that I would ever see the day when being a loudmouth with NO credentials is worth $40,000 or more.

    Welcome to 1997.

  17. Figures... by QQoicu2 · · Score: 1

    First, they took an individualistic form of expression and commercialized it (all the cool kids these days have Xangas... and have the nerve to call them blogs!). Now they turn it around and corporatize it. It's interesting to see how new forms of media evolve in positive ways, as well as get exploited.

    --
    "I hate quotations. Tell me what you know." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
    1. Re:Figures... by Kinky+Bass+Junk · · Score: 1

      Wow, just like "Indie" fashion; corporate blogs make about as much sense as paying for faded jeans. What's next? 'Taggers' (graffiti form for those not in the know) getting registered as artists? This sort of thing makes me wish Communism actually works.

      --
      Anonymous Coward
  18. Cash for ..ah..blogging by Kaorimoch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As long as they state on the blog who they are paid by, I'm fine with it. It is where they don't tell you that they get paid to do it that I get concerned about where blogging is taking itself.

    1. Re:Cash for ..ah..blogging by karnal · · Score: 1

      Awwww. People who aren't 100% "up front" to you are people you don't like?

      You've just described 99 percent of the world's population. People will do just about anything for a dollar, including not telling you upfront who is paying them....

      --
      Karnal
  19. What a great idea by The+Angry+Artist · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wonderful! Now, instead of professional journalists writing shoddy articles on shaky ground for widely circulated publications, we can have complete amateurs do it, too!

    --
    If you're reading this, stop it.
    1. Re:What a great idea by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, it will be 'instead' rather than 'too'. Then the 'professional journalists' can get on with something they are more suited to, like drawing welfare checks.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  20. Disclosure by Goonie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they disclose that they're being paid by $COMPANY$ to blog, fine. If they don't, that's unethical.Just like advertorial in newspapers or on TV, actually.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Disclosure by Viceice · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      OOO... I get it. It's just like those Slashvertisements we see around here all the time... Except in a newspaper!

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    2. Re:Disclosure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, it's unethical. So they will not be paid! No wait... They will have their account suspended! No wait... They will be fined! No wait... They will be shunned by their family, friends and neighbors! No wait... Um, are there any disadvantages to being unethical these days?

  21. When's Trolling Going to be a Paid Job? by tjstork · · Score: 4, Funny

    bloggers, webmasters, when are we trolls going to get some respect!

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:When's Trolling Going to be a Paid Job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bloggers, webmasters, when are we trolls going to get some respect!

      When they can turn the crap you post into fertilizer???

    2. Re:When's Trolling Going to be a Paid Job? by JumperCable · · Score: 0

      Sorry. That is seasonal work. You have to wait for election season.

  22. Excellent by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    Corporate America is willing to pay to steal the last shred of legitimacy from an already specious source of information.

    Not only can we count on unedited accounts from the mouths of non-specialists... we can count on those non-specialists being paid off by corporate interests to spout off opinions that those corporations will not have to take any responsibility for.

    This can apparently only be used for good.

    1. Re:Excellent by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 0

      Kinda like writing reviews for their products at various online retailers.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  23. This is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I am glad to see companies begin to drive magnetic web-readiness so they can reinvent ubiquitous niches and streamline impactful deliverables. The whole idea of deploying viral infomediaries is the first step in transforming intuitive infrastructures and recontextualizing impactful channels. Good for them!

  24. Spelling error in article by BJH · · Score: 3, Insightful


    %s/blogger/astroturfer/g

  25. Blogging is good for society by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While companies may think they are using blogging as a marketing tool, I think that the reality is somewhat more complicated. Corporate sponsored blogs tend to end up being a focal point for interaction related to specialized (corporate related) topics. And specialization is the crucial attribute that make blogs so interesting.

    For the first time in the history of the world, we now have a direct channel for hyper-specialization. Blogs + RSS amount to a revolution; The high availability personal-press.

    Each of us tend to seek out and interact on subject matters that we are interested in, believe in and/or know something about. In the past, that generally meant your choice of friends and organizations that you belonged to. But today, we can gather around micro-press engines that allow us to interact (as I am doing now).

    The end result is that like-minded people from all over the world end up exchanging ideas and critical thought with one another over subject matter that is important to them rather than what a media outlet wants to be important to them.

    This new explosion of specialization will have profound and unforseen results as it evolves, such as a completely new and transcendent awareness in society. The populations that make use of blogs are literally transforming themselves from network/newspaper zombies into their own people with their own refined views that match their own personalities. In a very real sense, the blog is an attractor that is pulling us towards a new form of collective awareness or sentience.

    So in summary, I think it is a good thing.

    --
    The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
    1. Re:Blogging is good for society by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      You're only considering one angle on the issue, though... I think you're missing one of the big implications of the GP's post.

      Corporate sponsored blogs tend to end up being a focal point for interaction related to specialized (corporate related) topics.

      What about astroturfing? We see it on Slashdot from time to time--somebody who's on a company's payroll but trying to look independent will submit links to articles or blog posts that are entirely self-serving. I run across blogs every day that seem to be solely corporate shills.

      This isn't a problem of blogging in particular, sure--but the point is that not all bloggers are honest about their motives and sponsorship.

      For the first time in the history of the world, we now have a direct channel for hyper-specialization.

      No offense, really, but the rest of this is kind of just a screed about how great blogs are, how they'll change the world, and usher in a new era of human consciousness, a distributed Monolith by which we shall advance to a hyperHuman state...

      I swear, anybody modding the parent "Interesting" or "Informative" is gonna hear from me.

    2. Re:Blogging is good for society by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 1

      The end result is that like-minded people from all over the world end up exchanging ideas and critical thought with one another over subject matter that is important to them rather than what a media outlet wants to be important to them.

      Groupthink, groupthink, groupthink. And no offense, but your whole post reads like those television ads for Dianetics. "Bloganetics will change your life forever!"

      --
      "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    3. Re:Blogging is good for society by scottme · · Score: 1

      An insightful comment to be sure.

      While corporates may attempt to jump on the blogging bandwagon as another marketing channel, unless their paid-for bloggers really do deliver the goods and establish themselves as worthwhile net contributors to the communities they seek to engage, they will surely fall by the wayside.

    4. Re:Blogging is good for society by scottme · · Score: 1

      not all bloggers are honest about their motives and sponsorship

      So, welcome to the world. There is no requirement that bloggers, or anyone else for that matter, should be honest. But in the long run, integrity tells, and those who value it find ways to filter out those who don't.

    5. Re:Blogging is good for society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about astroturfing? We see it on Slashdot from time to time--somebody who's on a company's payroll but trying to look independent will submit links to articles or blog posts that are entirely self-serving. I run across blogs every day that seem to be solely corporate shills.

      There is a theory that subtle astroturfing was what popularised Apple and Google.

    6. Re:Blogging is good for society by nysus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, it's quite obvious that communication is a fundamental activity that underpins all human activity. When you change the way people communicate, you change society in profound ways.

      The Gutenberg's printing press broke the Catholic Church, made modern science possible, and gave rise to modern Democracy. There's no question the Internet will have very profound long-term infulence over future structure of society. We're only 10 years into it.

      --

      ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    7. Re:Blogging is good for society by bit01 · · Score: 1

      There is no requirement that bloggers, or anyone else for that matter, should be honest.

      Nonsense. It's called fraud.

      ---

      Any large public or private organisation paying recurring, per-seat licensing for software is being economically stupid.

    8. Re:Blogging is good for society by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 1

      Well, it's quite obvious that communication is a fundamental activity that underpins all human activity. When you change the way people communicate, you change society in profound ways.

      The Gutenberg's printing press broke the Catholic Church, made modern science possible, and gave rise to modern Democracy. There's no question the Internet will have very profound long-term infulence over future structure of society. We're only 10 years into it.


      Finally, someone takes my bait and delivers the goods. Thank you, this was exactly my point. And yes, the socioeconomic ramifications of the high-availability personal press will be even more profound.

      --
      The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
    9. Re:Blogging is good for society by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      but in the meantime, Google gets cluttered up with the rest of their dishonest blathering.

      I liked the internet without blogs just fine.

    10. Re:Blogging is good for society by trezor · · Score: 1

      I liked the internet without blogs just fine.

      To be honest, internet has always been full of blogs, technically speaking. The only actual difference now is that entirely clueless people are now also able to "contribute" to the internet. Not that I don't get your point or disagree with it, though.

      Newsflash (specificly adressed to the media):
      Posting stuff on the internet is nothing new! It is what it was made for. Now please end this stupid mediahype immidiatly. You look like utter morons.

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    11. Re:Blogging is good for society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For the first time in the history of the world, we now have a direct channel for hyper-specialization. Blogs + RSS amount to a revolution; The high availability personal-press.

      Serious flashback! I feel like I'm reading Wired circa 1998.

    12. Re:Blogging is good for society by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Corporate shilling != fraud

      We're talking about bloggers not being completely upfront about their motivation in the context of veiled advertising, not people intentionally committing fraud. Apples != oranges.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    13. Re:Blogging is good for society by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Crikey! If I said that was the biggest load of hype, like, ever ... well, I wouldn't be guilty of hype at all. It's beyond hype. It's hyperhype.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Blogging is good for society by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 1
      Crikey! If I said that was the biggest load of hype, like, ever ... well, I wouldn't be guilty of hype at all. It's beyond hype. It's hyperhype.
      Yea, sorry for the sensationalism, but I am a little excited about the role that blogging is starting to take in society. If you think this thing through and imagines the social changes that widescale blogging will naturally produce, you too will probably get pretty excited.

      Of course there were precursers like usenet and even BBS's. But let me tell you something, my mom is into blogs and she can't even use Excell and never hit usenet or a BBS. The ubiquity and acceptance of blogs as a tool for specialized collaboration and finely tuned information distribution is the essence of the revolution.

      Watch as the U.S. and other parts of the world wake-up from their media-induced-zombie catatosys over the next few years as a direct result of personal choice in information sources.
      --
      The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
    15. Re:Blogging is good for society by bit01 · · Score: 1

      You and I both know the difference between honest dealing and corporate shilling is important, otherwise they wouldn't bother trying to do it, time and again.

      It's dishonest, any way you look at it. Marketing parasites try to spin doctor it but it's still fraudulent misrepresentation. i.e. fraud.

      The law hasn't caught up yet but hopefully it will.

      ---

      I'm not worried about the use of DRM. I'm worried about the abuse.

    16. Re:Blogging is good for society by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Watch as the U.S. and other parts of the world wake-up from their media-induced-zombie catatosys over the next few years as a direct result of personal choice in information sources.
      Call me a pessimist, but I'm not convinced. After all, nobody forces people to watch pap like "Big Brother".
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  26. Wake up by dmiller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wake up: the emperor has no clothes. Blogging has been owned by vested interests for a while.

    Look at all the technology companies who encourage their employees to blog and wax effusive about their products. (picking a couple of easy examples) Sun, Microsoft, Redhat and many more do this.

    Witness the co-opting of political blogs of all kinds during the last season of US and Australian elections. Notice the tight coupling between the language used by certain bloggers and spin crafted by political parties?

    Observe the abuse of blogs to gain or destroy Google ratings.

    If you think that what you are reading in a blog is somehow automatically more "real" than something you would read in an advert, press release or partisan hack's column, then you are deluding yourself. Blogs are another tool in the bag of PR and marketing people and they will continue to be used as such.

    1. Re:Wake up by AntiPasto · · Score: 1

      I think this is very insightful... TPM is a prime example! There are some political blog heros that pointed out the partisan nature of many... but I don't know where they went.

  27. TRUTH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's main stream media trying to get a piece of the action..I wouldn't touch their sites(CNN, DrudgeReport, ABC, CBS, NBC, etc.) even with blogs.

    Honesty and integrity means something to me.

    1. Re:TRUTH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I trust Fox News more than most blogs I've seen. Blogging is the least trust-worthy news source because the vast majority of them have no accountability. Dan Rather got his ass prematurely fired for jumping the gun on Bush's military record. I don't know of any blog that would fire somebody for publishing that. In fact, I bet Indymedia would give them a raise.

  28. Bobbing for Paychecks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was immediately excited when I saw the headline.
    Bobbing for paychecks, what an easy way to make money.
    Thanks Slashdot, for yet another disappointment.

    1. Re:Bobbing for Paychecks by kfg · · Score: 0

      Bobbing for paychecks, what an easy way to make money.

      You haven't seen The Magic Christian, have you?

      KFG

  29. at last by sch1sm · · Score: 1

    Wow, so they managed to create a job title lower webmaster?

    1. Re:at last by hinkomatik · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      huzzah, I say.

  30. just another bubble by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can remember when blogging was cool.

    Now it's just another fashion to coopt for marketting reasons. These people will make lots of money for a months until everyone realizes that anyone can write blogs -- that's the entire point. Then it'll be just another job requirement for employees.

    Wait, that's not true. Blogs were never cool.

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    1. Re:just another bubble by nysus · · Score: 1

      Blogs are a part of the communication infrastructure like the phone system. They aren't "cool" or "uncool". They will be used for good purposes, bad purposes, excellent purposes, and ridiculous purposes.

      But they are here to stay. The term "blog" may be a bit of a fad like "cyberspace". But it's basic form isn't going to go away any time soon. That's because they do one thing very well: help people communicate.

      --

      ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    2. Re:just another bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's because the basic form is a web page. The whole rest of the phenomenon is based on some software which makes it easier to write pretty web pages, and a new word which became a fad.

    3. Re:just another bubble by nysus · · Score: 1

      That's not correct. They are more than pretty web pages. They include other distribution and interactive technologies such as RSS feeds, trackbacks, comment systems, etc.

      --

      ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    4. Re:just another bubble by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      "But they are here to stay. The term "blog" may be a bit of a fad like "cyberspace". But it's basic form isn't going to go away any time soon. That's because they do one thing very well: help people communicate."

      You're correct of course. I was basically making fun of the depths companies will sink to to pander to investors. Investors will flee over transitory problems, so companies need a way to say "everything is fine" more frequently and more publically. The message hasn't changed, but they think finding a new way to present it will make it more credible.

      It's been possible since Internet access because widespread, but until someone automated it and called it a "blog" companies thought of it as a press release that was available online.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
  31. The Qualificiations... by dj245 · · Score: 1

    Must have method of transferring data into computerized format. Must be able to spout rumor and opinion, and mix with a believable amount of fact to present a digestable blog. Roland Piquepaille need not apply.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  32. Digital Promotion by Sundroid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you still think blogging is about teenagers keeping their journals, you're so 2003.

    Blogging has entered business in a big way, and people getting paid to blog is a natural progression. A good blogger must be able to crank out topical posts every day, often more than one entry a day. It ain't easy. I try to keep up my graphic blog (at: http://sunandfun.blogspot.com/) regularly and the best I can do is about one post every two days.

    The lady in the Wall Street Journal article blogs for a yogurt company. I'm sure blogging is a more effective way of pulling in business than, say, sending out sample dispensers in supermarkets, which is kind of messy, plus the company has to provide all the samples that always get eaten by people who never buy. Of course, her blog will be even more popular now that she's got a write-up in Wall Street Journal.

    1. Re:Digital Promotion by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it will. I mean, 4 visitors are better then NONE right?

      Seriously. Who here entertained even the most transient desire to go look up a blog on yogurt? Popcorn?

      It is the middle of the night, and I doubt that even bored slashdotters are *THAT* desperate.

      I believe it has its place in the corporate world; interesting jobs and people can make for OCCASIONAL interesting blogs. As a marketing tool for hiring new folks, I imagine that the MS blogs are great -- I've even seen some negative opinions of MS come out of their own blogs, which speaks *very* well of the system (were I job searching, and found only positive blogs, I would be rather skeptical).

      As a tool for selling microsoft products? Eh. Not so much. *POSSIBLY* it increases brand recognition among a few individuals with some purchasing clout. But the price of paying someone to update their blog two or three times a week, taking an hour or more to do so each time, is pretty damn significant (rare are interesting 'mind dump' blogs, which require maybe 1/2 hour to produce). Significant to adding the same amount of potential brand recognition with a bit more ad spending. 3 hours a week times how many blogs? And the most interesting blogs (as in most read) are from the higher paid engineers, so we aren't talking 40-70K a year for these peoples salaries. I'm guessing twice that.

      3 hours a week * 48 weeks * $75/hr = $10,800 per person blogging.

      I say 75 an hour by picking a salary of 100K (~50 an hour) and adding a half for overhead (soc sec, office, chairs, computers, etc) that MS has to pay above the base salary. Should probably double it.

      I will go on record as saying that it is a fad: bean counters at all but a few lucky companies will soon* notice that it does little or nothing that couldn't be done better by tossing the same cash to an ad agency. Or astroturfing ;~)

      *soon = 2 to 5 years, would be my prediction.

    2. Re:Digital Promotion by houghi · · Score: 1

      A good blogger must be able to crank out topical posts every day, often more than one entry a day.

      Hey, that is just the same as journalists do. No matter how much news there is or how importand it is. The output is counted in words, not content.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Digital Promotion by 3ryon · · Score: 1

      If you still think blogging is about teenagers keeping their journals, you're so 2003.

      Actually, when I created the first blog by keeping an daily online journal I was in my 20's. :) (Do a search for The Semi-Existence of Bryon). Too bad there was no money it in then. I remember how annoyed I was when The Spot was created. It was a fake journal of a bunch of sexy guys & girls living in a house together. It was nothing but fiction used to sell advertising. I didn't see any way to make money without compromising integrity...I guess that's still true today.

    4. Re:Digital Promotion by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      I wrote a blog entry about that a few weeks ago.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
  33. Oh, they are coming. Coming to take it away. by hinkomatik · · Score: 1


    http://www.reallysimplesyndication.com/2005/04/28# a487

    Ask a garbageman. Everything is a paycheck to someone.

  34. Dear ED, by JumperCable · · Score: 4, Funny

    MAKE up to $4000 PER MONTH!
    Work From Home
    Be Your Own Boss
    NO EXPERIENCE NECESSARY!!!!
    Training is Available
    Part-time/Full-time

    We've already helped thousands of people around the world.
    We'd love to show you how this is possible!
    What are you waiting for?

    NEED PROOF?
    Hear what people are saying about our BlogFromHome System:

    'In my first 30 days I earned over $2300. Today I earn over $15,000 thanks to following the BlogFromHome System!'
    - Julia Whitney, former leasing agent

    'My first month I made over $1500! Today, at the age of 22, I am earning over $18,000 per month thanks to the BlogFromHome System'.
    - Jason Fisher, student

    'Last year we earned $110,000 following the BlogFromHome System!'
    - Ladeo & Vito Dante, director modeling agency/mechanic

    'Last month we earned over $12,000 using the BlogFromHome System!'
    - Dan & Laura Delphia, progammer/professor

  35. The problems I have .... by shri · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some random thoughts... no disrespect meant to anyone..

    Most corporations have been hiring shills for centuries. Shilling has been done online for years ... bloggers, for unsophisticated marketers, are shills. Corporations should look at other ways of creating buzz if they cannot find a handful of users / customers who cannot say something good about them.

    The best bloggers are loyal employees. Use them to show that the company has a soul and a heart. No need to hire outsiders... look within.

    I've tried to hire some tech bloggers to help me develop content on a website or two... specially given that my skills are in putting together sites and not blogging or reporting or even writing coherent articles.

    To me commerical blogging (from a non corporate but money making perspective) is essentially fairly similar to running or working for a newspaper. It has to be a very controlled equation that manages egos, commercial reality, discipline, ethics and discipline.

    Egos: The most dedicated bloggers I've met (and I've met a fair few in person) walk around with their egos in their pants.. (and moan about not making enough money to pay their hosting bills). Sometimes it is this wonderful mix of poverty and passion that produces great blogs... usually it is passion.

    Commercial Realities: At some point, people stop caring about the bloggers mundane life and start caring more about the news and information in the blog. In a corporate environment, no one cares about how much salt you put on your fish and chips... deal with it and develop a focus on what the readers want .. not what you want them to read.

    Discipline: Can you produce a story or two a day that will keep readers coming back? Most blogs are abandoned, usually because the bloggers loose interest... If you can discipline yourself and produce a good story every day (hard to do in most areas) or week, you will see people return.. this will equate to $$s

    Commerical Realities: At some point we all need to accept that anything commercial needs a disiplined approach. Commercial entities do not understand that the best journalists often don't file a story a day... they are good because of the quality and not the quantity. If their PR department cannot find something new about the company every day ... I doubt a blogger will.

  36. No, you have it all wrong! by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    Those would be blah-gers.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  37. Boing's LiveJournal by Helios292 · · Score: 1

    At last, we can know what the Anime Hair Color of the 757 is.

  38. Almost the perfect job... by Slashcrunch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, if only they would add "jerking off" and "reading slashdot instead of actually working" to the job descriptions, imagine the flood of applications?

    Sorry, I just could not resist :)

  39. No, you'll just be "getting the facts out..." by UnapprovedThought · · Score: 0

    It will of course be framed according to the POV of the corporate reality distortion field.

    Only a very naïve person could really enter the field to get through the interview stage. Likely their local equivalent of Darth Vader will sense you coming from a distance. He may yet leave you alone and bide his time in the hopes of turning you over to the dark side.

    However, if you start to portray their products for what they really are, the Emperor might find out, so be ready to grasp your throat.

  40. Re:Tagger artists by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    If the taggers can get paid for what they call art, it will be art, and they will be artists.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  41. peanuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Blogging jobs pay anywhere from $40,000 to $70,000"

    Thats' what... around 10,000 euro's these days? ;-)

  42. Honesty and integrity? by Colourspace · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Go Anonymous Coward!

  43. but by manojar · · Score: 1

    which company will pay me for dissing them?

  44. i remember a few years ago by Atreide · · Score: 1

    Just around Y2000 everone talked about web developers and web sites.
    Where are they now the IT buble has gone ? Nowhere, my web dev friends have a hard time to work now.

    Surfing the trend is dangerous for your career...

    --
    The world belongs to those who get up early. - I'm far from being the king of Earth then :-(
  45. Now I get it by Odocoileus · · Score: 0

    The secret to moderating fairly, is to read everything as if the professor from futurama was speaking it.

    --
    ...
  46. Uh oh! by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Now spammers will infiltrate blogs. You THINK you are looking for something ("we have proof Senator Cottonpicker does bad stuff" or "how to raise children", perhaps "social security benefits") and wham! Penis enlargement advertisement (or something else just as useless). Have erectile disfunction? Tough! No advertisement here. I'm sorry to suggest this but I'm sure they are already thinking it.

  47. Zonk and blogging stories by The+Hobo · · Score: 0

    I was able to use autocomplete for the subject, big surprise there, another Zonk blogging story

    --
    There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. Nothing new? by nuggetman · · Score: 1

    So basically it's the same old copy writing jobs, except now they're throwing a buzzword in the ad?

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  52. Yawn. by HomerJayS · · Score: 1

    So now the vast majority of online users will be ignoring corporate shills disguised as bloggers as opposes to just ignoring clueless idiots disguised as bloggers.

  53. Now if they can just learn how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to write coherently, they'll have it made.

  54. ProBlogger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    loads of bloggers making big money from blogging these days.

    I follow ProBlogger every day - he's someone who earns well over $100,000 per year from his own personal blogs - and he's one of the small guys.

  55. Re:What's the ROI? by caseydk · · Score: 1


    I just read the business plan of a friend and it had every buzz word imaginable...

    blog, podcasting, voip, social networks, blogrolls, text messaging, rss, photo rating, and SEO options in addition to forums and a variety of other things

    and it was a stinkin' picture sharing site!

  56. Who cares about the topic of this article? by zaren · · Score: 1

    I'd never heard of simplyhired.com, so I checked them out (since I got laid off AGAIN last week). I've already found several (non-blogging) jobs I'm going to apply for that I haven't found on other job boards.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    1. Re:Who cares about the topic of this article? by spaceman375 · · Score: 1

      How much did they pay you to say that?

      --
      On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
    2. Re:Who cares about the topic of this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as much as they paid me to say this :)

      Search for blog* jobs on indeed - 656 jobs from the last 30 days

    3. Re:Who cares about the topic of this article? by 500Hats · · Score: 1

      actually, we haven't paid him anything yet; but if he's a little bit more effusive in praising us & included a few more links to our site we might think about it ;)

      - dave "we don't need to bribe no stinkin' slashdotters" mcclure
      http://www.simplyhired.com/

      --
      - Dave McClure mailto:dave@simplyhired.com
    4. Re:Who cares about the topic of this article? by zaren · · Score: 1

      It'd be nice if they did pay me, what with me being out of work and all. Just some honest praise for a useful site... not that I'd turn down an offer of a little compensation for linking to them from my cafepress stores ;)

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  57. No offence by trezor · · Score: 1

    But people too stupid to handle or lazy to learn the minimum HTML required to create a simple webpage really isn't the kind of people I take my advice from.

    Think of it as trashing the web like the easy to use IRC-clients have caused a similar "evolution" of IRC. It really doesn't bring much more useful content out there, just more.

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    1. Re:No offence by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Of course, communicating via the Internet should only be available to those who understand the underlying technical concepts and protocols. Of course, I am being sarcastic, and have several issues with your viewpoint.

      1. Saying that only people who write HTML can produce content on the Internet is arbitrary. There is no reason, whether technical or ethical, why someone who does not know HTML should not be able to produce content for other people via the web. Your point about advice is valid, as long as you are talking about advice on HTML. But on any other topic, your point falls apart. Why does knowing HTML make you more knowledgeable on every single subject which is discussed on the Internet? I think this is a case of arrogance.

      2. An analogy is only allowing people to drive who can build cars, or for a less extreme analogy, people who can drive manual cars. There is no reason why people with automatic cars should not be allowed on the roads, especially when the underlying technology is abstracted allowing people to drive safety and effectively without understanding the underlying transmission system.

      3. Speaking as someone who does know HTML, even I disagree with you. Writing pages via raw HTML is a terrible way to run an internet journal*. It is inefficient. The best way is probably to input the articles via a web form or other abstracted system, and to let the underlying scripts and programs generate the HTML page automatically, either once-off or dynamically when the page is accessed, drawing data from the content database. Writing the HTML directly for each page is what I'd expect from someone just getting to grips with making web pages, rather than from someone actually using them for a practical purpose. I know this is a bad example, but could you imagine how for instance Slashdot would be run if each commenter had to write a HTML page for their comment, rather than just typing in a form?

      * I don't like the word 'blog'.

    2. Re:No offence by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      Ahem*! Unless you want to be stuck with the invariably boring templates the blogsite has to offer, you *do* have to know HTML, and will prefer a site that understands most of it.

      The point is that once you get the page set up how you like it, you just dump text in on the fly. Really not much different from having a regular web-page with a very smart CGI script embedded, but with free hosting.

    3. Re:No offence by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous.

      Yes, there are spam blog. There are also kiddies writing about their favorite music. Neither of these are useful to us.

      But there's a whole different class. Just as journalists don't need to know (for any reason) how a printing press is built, bloggers don't need to build their own CMS.

      Blog platforms are providing a new avenue for journalism and high-quality content-delivery. Blogs that aim at specific markets (niches) and provide authoritative content for that market deserve to be respected as valuable websites.

      On Slashdot, when an economist drops their opinion we don't first ask "but are you running on your own custom-compiled *nix kernel?". That's not only elitist, it's ignorant to the fact that other people are highly trained in OTHER things. Like economics or, in the case of bloggers, writing.

      The reason blogs are getting big is that more and more writers are finding ways to deliver useful content online - in blogs.

      It's all about publishing content with the greatest liberty.

      --
      World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
    4. Re:No offence by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      That's not only elitist, it's ignorant to the fact that other people are highly trained in OTHER things. Like economics or, in the case of bloggers, writing.
      Don't you mean "... in the case of 99% of bloggers, writing total and utter shyte."?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  58. well duh! by Selcitset · · Score: 0

    where do you think newspapers came from? most started off as pamphlets by some guy trying to push political or commercial ideas. funny how this has never changed. the vast majority of news sources are and always have been shills, either for political and/or corporate interests, thats what they're for.

  59. several hundred positions...bulshit by iambarry · · Score: 1

    I followed the link. When you subtract out the blog software devel positions, the QA positions, the marketing positons that want hip ideas like blogging, etc., how many real blogging jobs are there? One or two maybe?

    Of those handful of blogging jobs listed, how many are real, and how many are work at home scams?

    $70K for blogging. No experience required. one is born every minute.

  60. Hmmmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Working as a blogger...the 21st Century's "HTML Editor"...oh to be a $50.00 an hour HTML editor...I weep silently...

  61. Same-Day WSJ op-ed piece from Instapundit by Hulkster · · Score: 1
    The blogging article was on the front of page B1. In the same issue, Glenn Reynold's from InstaPundit.Com had an op-ed piece published titled "We the (Media) People" that also talks about blogging and it's affect on mainstream media. Glenn has this link on his site which appears to work for folks without a WSJ subscription.

    I kinda doubt that Hulk's Blog is going to go Corporate ... ;-)

  62. But Microsoft is an Asshole about it by argoff · · Score: 2, Funny

    That may be the case with most blogs, but Microsoft doesn't just promote their crap, on slashdot they actually mod people down who dare to talk down about their doomed future and their crappy proprietary software.

    Even on anti Microsoft posts where I got +5 moderation, that was usually after 10 mod downs and 15 mod up's. Yeah, you really gotta be that good at making your point to nail them.

    Perhaps, shashdot should have a special rating for anti Microsoft posts that make them more difficult to mod down, and they should completely block access from known Microsoft ip addresses. :)

  63. Where have you been hiding? by nathan+s · · Score: 0

    This has been happening for years already. It's annoying as hell.

  64. Blogs Are a Four Year Craze by mrighi · · Score: 1
    At my blog, I wrote an article that explains why I think blogs are a four year craze. From the blog,
    "Over the past few years I've seen the popularity of web logs grow faster than the mold in my fridge. I really get a kick out of four year crazes. Don't get me wrong, I think that web logs are profoundly important and here to stay. But right now web logs are experiencing the hype of a four year craze. Hear me out. My first experience with the World Wide Web was circa 1993. On the weekends my father would take me into work and plop me down in front of a Silicon Graphics workstation while he accomplished work worthy of a weekend visit. I'm proud that my first web experience involved Mosaic, and when it went live a year later, Yahoo. I can't imagine what it would be like for a child's first experience with the web to involve Internet Explorer. That must be like learning how to drive on a Pinto. I digress...."
    Read the rest at http://www.michaelrighi.com/2005/05/02/four-year-c raze/
  65. My favorite blog... by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    Is this guy: http://devrock.blogspot.com/

    I don't know if he's making any money, but it's one of the few, rare, raw blogs I've read. I just wish he'd update it more often.

  66. Well now by pjammer · · Score: 1

    I fear most of those 'jobs' are going to be outsourced to India ... and the precious few who remain stateside will probably be powered by A.I. content-generators like AutoBlogger. ;)

  67. Wake up-Door Man. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Wake up: the emperor has no clothes. Blogging has been owned by vested interests for a while."

    Most blogs ARE "vested interest". The question generally is "who's interest"? The blogger pushing a particular viewpoint over all other alternatives, is just as biased as say being a corporate frontpiece.

    "If you think that what you are reading in a blog is somehow automatically more "real" than something you would read in an advert, press release or partisan hack's column, then you are deluding yourself. Blogs are another tool in the bag of PR and marketing people and they will continue to be used as such."

    Much like the flatearthers are pushing their own agenda.

  68. Tired of the word "blog"... by johnwyles · · Score: 1

    Can't some pipsqueak in P.R. do the job? Do they actually need someone who specializes in posting daily non-sense? If I recall correctly the blogging movement was started mostly by those who DIDN'T have jobs and were writing about their daily complaints and boring details of life.

    --
    [[ the only 15 letter word that is spelled without repeating a letter is uncopyrightable: it may soon be, however. ]]
  69. i remember a few years ago-Time machine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Web development hasn't gone away. It's GROWN UP. The amount of knowledge, and skill has gone up considerably. Especially in smaller companies were you wear many hats.

  70. Re:I never thought that I would ever see the day.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    George bush?

  71. Here come the ghosts by gilgamesh2001 · · Score: 1
    I blogged on this, incidentally, just a couple of days ago: Business Blogging: Here come the ghosts

    It's fine if the person is actually working with the company and doing more than blogging ... but if they're just blogging, then it's just a new term for advertising.

  72. What's the difference? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    Q: What's the difference between a paid blogger and a shill?

    A: A shill can go home in the evening and keep quiet.

    --
    That is all.
  73. Re:Tagger artists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in my area they have been paying these taggers to paint murals on all the railroad overpasses. It gives them some money for things they like to do.

  74. In the old days, Blogging for Cash was called by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Public Relations.

    But hey, call it whatever you want.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  75. blogging for $$$==SHILLING? by IceAgeComing · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I know "shill" is an inflammatory word to some, but that's what I equate with blogging for money. It is a natural consequence of tying salary to writing.

  76. My point vs your points by trezor · · Score: 1

    I realize this is proabbly is very much depending on your point of view, but still.

    1. HTML is easy. That was my point. As long as you don't want to make fancy stuff like CSS Zengarden, HTML is pretty darn easy.

    2. I would prefer a different analogy, but in the end it doesn't really matter, because an analogy is only just that, an analogy. Anyway, mine goes more like this: People should know the basics of how a car works to be allowed to use it. Like for instance knowing what the dials on the dashboard means. IMO the "Automatic versus manual" diversion is rather irellevant, as what kind of transmission you use doesn't really affect the car being a car.

    3. My point was that if you want to publish stuff on the net, knowing how the net works might be a good idea. I, myself, when I make a website always write my own db-backed system from scratch, and even make a nice front-end for adding content, but that's beside the point. Again, what I meant was that "1. HTML is darn easy". People incapable of learning it, are people I will assume are too stupid to be worthwhile my attention.

    Now that's me being arrogant, presumptious and probably a tad elitist, but given the amount of junk out there, I don't see the problem in doing some rough filtering. Now 'Blogs' have definitely increased the SNR of the net for the worse, and that's why I'd like them dead, buried, gone and away with.

    (4. This is definitely getting mod'ed offtopic.)

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  77. All blogging = self-promotion! by aquarian · · Score: 1

    I see. So to corporate america, blogging equates to marketing.

    How is this different from anyone else? "Self expression" -- give me a break. I can express myself without doing it to the whole world. There's definately an element of narcissism in blogging -- ie "look at me" -- which is self promotion.

    Is this a good thing or a bad thing?

    Neither. It just is. I wonder what took them so long to figure it out. The internet as a commercial space has been around for how many years now?

  78. Re:Wake up - does that include your post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're here on slashdot. But you're really posting for engadget.com, aren't you? Aren't you???

  79. My Favorite Blog Is Written By A Monkey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure these guys are paid on this site, but this dude writes some fascinating stuff about computer crime case files. He updates is pretty regularly too.

    http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/security/investigator

    The writing style is great.

  80. Danger of hidden agendas? by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1



    I'm wondering if most corporate bloggers are up-front about the corporation that pays them, or ideally the corporation that funds the corporation that pays them. A hypothetical example: Laura Didio == Yankee Group == Microsoft.

    The potential for abuse of this "buy-a-blogger" system is huge.

  81. Re:What's the ROI? by Dabido · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you might find that the purpose of corporate bloggers, is it's another avenue of propergander for the corporation to use to get it's message out there. Only by using blogs, it will probably be camophlaged in a way to make it look like it's a persons opinion or facts from an unbiased source, rather than part of the Corporate Internet Advertising machine.

    As such, a good blog with a good disguise might pull in big bucks for the Corp (by selling their products), provided they get enough people reading them. After all, some blogs have thousands of individuals visit them each week. (Some of my friends have hundreds each day, and they are all different IP addresses, so it is most likely they are individual people.)

    Will it go bust ... depends how much the craze hits. I think it probably won't be too bad, but I can certainly see an eventual decline in the nummber of Blogger jobs required. A lot will depend on the success of it.

    Just my two cents worth. :-)

    --
    Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)