Slashdot Mirror


Laptops Outsell Desktops

wintermute1974 writes "According to a new report by Current Analysis, laptops have overtaken sales of desktops for the first time in computing, ever. Figures are for the U.S. market, but presumably this is part of a world-wide trend." From the article: "Notebook prices fell 17 percent during the past year while desktop prices dipped only 4 percent. Some of the features common in most notebooks are longer-lasting batteries, CD burners and wireless capability."

66 of 414 comments (clear)

  1. Well .. by macaulay805 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, IMHO, this was bound to happen. With those good "desktop replacement" laptops, who wouldn't want to?

    1. Re:Well .. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 3, Interesting
      who wouldn't want to?
      Me ; )

      Laptops are still too slow compared to desktops, especially the hard drives. Laptop drives are not only slower, but you cannot get the same large sizes and the prices are far higher. Then there is the issue of graphics cards. Laptops generall have poorer graphics cards with lower memory. You can put together a far cheaper desktop with good components than you can get in a laptop. Most of the lower end laptops have crappy video with shared memory; they get too hot and have at most 3 hours of battery time. Oh and then there is the problem with the tiny screens. As a programmer, I cannot look at any screen smaller than 17" for a long time. Also, most of those lower end laptops only go to 1024x768 (I need at least 1152x864). These limitations may be OK for Joe User, but I don't think more tech savvy people or especially geeks could put up with them.

      I personally have had the "same" computer for about 4 years. I call it the "same" computer because I have changed different parts at different time to keep it current. You cannot do that with a laptop. My laptop is 2 years old and is not "bad" (1.7GHz P4, 512MB, 40GB), however I litterally have not used it for the past year. It just sits in my laptop bag on the floor of my office. After one year the battery died and cannot hold a charge so I can only use it pluged in. I don't feel like spending 100+ on a battery when I can spend that money on something else.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    2. Re:Well .. by FRiC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Probably depends on where you are, but even the lower end laptops I see nowadays have 15.4" widescreens with 1280x800 resolution.

      But I agree that the hard drive is the bottleneck. I have 1 GB of RAM but once it needs to load anything off the drive it gets really slow...

    3. Re:Well .. by permaculture · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My mate Dave says laptops are only good because "they go further when you heave them out the window."

      I remember a laptop that became a desktop after a mere 18 months, because the battery failed and *they had stopped making them*. It had to be plugged into the wall forever after that.

      My reason for avoiding laptops is the heat dissapation. If you set a laptop and a desktop next to each other and run the hard drives intensively, the desktop can run 24/7 forever, essentially. The laptop stops itself after a few minutes because the hard drive is getting too hot. You sometimes get the same effect on some of the 'all-in-one' PCs that have the LCD screen built on.

      My Mum bought a laptop. I told her she'd find the built in mouse pad less easy to use than a real mouse, and also it'd need to be plugged into the mains and network all the time. But she went ahead and got one anyway. A year later, and the laptop is tied down just as I had predicted. It has a USB hub too, with a scanner, printer, etc. It never gets taken 'off the grid' and used for mobile computing. No suprises there.

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    4. Re:Well .. by luchaugh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My company has started replacing laptops with desktops, as we've found (a) the laptops get destroyed far too frequently, and (b) the laptops were going home with users, but not for work purposes. Therefore, chain a desktop to their desk, and far fewer hardware repairs needed, plus no teenagers at home playing Doom or one-handed surfing on company hardware. I doubt this stat is accurate based on my experience, and the reasons stated by other posters.

    5. Re:Well .. by marafa · · Score: 4, Funny

      since u r not using it.. could you ship it to me? i will pay for delivery and use it to run linux which does not require a high end pc thanks in advance

      --
      _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
    6. Re:Well .. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, there are "senior" level developers out there who really think all these things?

      Most of the other replies have covered discrediting most things this guy said, but there is also the issue of upgrades. A typical laptop can take a range of processors and some come with miniPCI. If you buy a lower-end CPU for one, make sure the board in it can support higher speed chips and you are set.

      There are also 7200 rpm drives for laptops.

      Price? Yes, but if you are really a senior developer, you probably have some math skills. If you are able to set up shop anywhere when you get an idea or whatever, that is money made.

      I have not seen any laptop in any store for several years that could only support 1024x768, except for the tiny systems, but almost all of those have had 16:9 displays for a while.

    7. Re:Well .. by hhghghghh · · Score: 2, Funny

      1900x1200.. Great way to go blind (peering at a Dell Latitude D800 screen as I type this)

    8. Re:Well .. by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally have had the "same" computer for about 4 years.

      That's about normal. Take a typical power user. They have a good desk machine and the kids have to cast off. They also have a laptop. The desk top gets used at least 4 years and gets pawned off on the kids to extend it. A cola gets spilled on the keyboard and the keyboard gets replaced.

      Laptops... Either the battery dies after 12-18 months and it's considered obsolete. The laptop gets replaced instead getting a new battery. The coke gets spilled into the keyboard. The laptop gets replaced. The briefcase is left on the roof of the car while the presentation is loaded then forgotton. Know how many laptops are left in taxi cabs each year? These things don't happen to a desktop.

      When laptop and desktop sales are equal, I'm guessing desktops are still used 4:1 more than laptops. Laptops just get replaced more often due to them getting the hard knocks of mobile life.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    9. Re:Well .. by Garak · · Score: 2

      You kinda got that backwards, Desktops are becoming the niche. The average user wants something simple, one power cable and thats it. Thats exactly what laptops offer. When they do break its easy for them to just close the screen and carry to the nearest service depot.

      I, on the other hand, just buy used laptops off ebay. No need for a 1Ghz+ machine for just running firefox and ssh. When something breaks I got a junker that I can grab part from. My current machine has been through hell and back and still runs great, I think I'm on my 3rd battery, I keep lucking in and getting pretty desent batteries with the used machines. Hell I can even run some old games on this machine. My current laptop is a dell latitude PII 400 /w 256megs of ram, only got a 6.5gig HD, but thats where the lan comes in.

      I still have a powerful desktop machine that I use for gaming and lately mostly just a media player. The laptop is more pratical for day to day use. I'm use to the keyboard, more so than my desktop's keyboard.

      I can see desktops in their current modular/user upgradeable form becoming more expensive than laptops in a few years. Custom built desktops will become a niche for power users and gamers. While adverage users go for iMac like all in one systems and laptops, and business goes towards thin clients. Don't get me wrong, this isn't going to happen over night.

      --
      God, root, what is the difference?
    10. Re:Well .. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Laptops are still too slow compared to desktops, especially the hard drives.

      Not really. I have a Sager AMD - 64 laptop with a 17" screen. I'm usually the envy of the plane whenever I take it out. I edit videos (even has firewire built in), it has a 60 Gig high speed ide disk so I can easily edit a 20 gig - 1 hour avi file. It cooks right along and will even run on my shoulder, in the car, etc.. Has a DVD burner built in. It beats my desktop even with an accelerator card for the graphics and 320 Meg/sec SCSI disk with adaptec raid. And I can take it anyplace, even lock it in an industrial/commercial (standard Mosler or Diebold) grade safe if security is an issue. I do wish I could get much larger drives though. I need around a TB on that machine so I can hold more video data longer. I'm sure that is coming soon. I'm thinking in another 10 years desktops will be a thing of the past. Sort of like mainframes are today.

  2. This is in units sold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They overtook desktops in revenue in 2003.

    1. Re:This is in units sold by ZephyrXero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So they aren't counting the thousands of self built systems out there? Probably didn't count local sellers either... Once again statistics proven worthless.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:This is in units sold by Skippy_kangaroo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think you answer your own point - "the thousands of self built systems out there". It would have to be hundreds of thousands to make a dent in the statistics.

      The plural of anecdote is not data - no matter how many friends you have.

    3. Re:This is in units sold by fafalone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, when you come up with a better way of scientifically detecting patterns in large volumes of information, and using that to make predications which come true at a signficant level (and how do you determine whats significant without statistics without resorting to "seems like", "looks like", or other non-scientific nonsense?), you be sure to let everyone know. If you really think statistics in general are worthless, you are beyond ignorant as to their underlying workings. Oh, and where's your "proof" that these particular statistics are worthless? Do you have access to information that self-built systems significantly contribute to overall desktop use? How did you determine its significance, using "worthless" statistics? Or is your proof just some random thoughts of a non-expert who has absolutely no clue what they're talking about?
      I'd absolutely LOVE to see you PROVE that these statistics are worthless, and without statistics like significance tests, averages, etc... since those are so worthless. The only thing that pisses me off than bad statistical analyses is people like this troll who discount the entire field because of their ignorance.

    4. Re:This is in units sold by SacredNaCl · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have some 2004 numbers for the 4rd quarter.

      For instance ECS (awful boards) sold 1.26 million motherboards, 25,000 laptop boards. ASROCK/AsusTek 3.3 million boards, 200,000 notebooks. MSI 1.1 million boards. Gigabyte - 950,000 motherboards.

      The problem with just running with those is that companies like MSI also make boards for Emachines-Gateway/HP/many others. ECS used to do extensive work for IBM in the 90's (which explains some of those awful machines from then) -- Some major player must be using them, I can't imagine home sales of ECS boards are that high (though they are favored by bargain basement whitebox builders). Even Asus boards are showing up in HP's these days. So it's hard to seperate out the markets.

      If we could break these down by form factor it would be more enlightening. Most of the boards sold to OEMs are MATX. Most home builders aren't buying the MATX boards. I'm sure the motherboard companies have accurate numbers published somewhere, maybe in their financial statements of investment prospectus but I'm far too sleep deprived to go fishing.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  3. since 2003 by SuperQ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course, as reported on engadget.. first time ever.. since 2003
    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/03/technology/03TBR F1.html?ex=1118030400&en=cb60405e864fa27a&ei=5070

  4. So? by kc32 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My tower has a handle on it. And it weighs in at an incredibly portable 42 pounds.

    1. Re:So? by Reorax · · Score: 2, Funny

      And it has a battery life of one-half of ten minutes?

      --
      This sig is only here so people stop skipping the last lines of my posts.
    2. Re:So? by Skippy_kangaroo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Luxury! Sheer luxury!

      When I were a lad, we had portables that could barely play Adventure let alone this new fangled Zork thing.

      Kids these days don't know how good they have it.

  5. Funny by log2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Some of the features common in most notebooks are longer-lasting batteries, CD burners and wireless capability"

    No one who visits slashdot would know that! :) haha

    Sorry, I just found it funny.

    --
    Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    1. Re:Funny by null+etc. · · Score: 5, Funny
      Sorry, I just found it funny.

      At least it didn't end with a stupid question, like "Is this the end of desktops as we know it?"

    2. Re:Funny by Vengie · · Score: 2, Funny

      No 3G network connectivity. No GSM. Less Space than a LaCie BigDisk 1tb firewire drive. L4M3.

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
  6. They left out the killer feature by El+Cubano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of the features common in most notebooks are longer-lasting batteries, CD burners and wireless capability.

    Yeah. They left out the inability to easily upgrade components. In the last 10 years i have owned +/- 6 computers. One was a laptop that I purchased new. The others were all custom rigs that got upgraded expansion cards, peripherals, memory, etc. when needed. Thus they didn't show up as desktop sales. I am willing to bet that as building machines from components has gotten easier, lots more people have been doing it to get more bang for the buck.

    Thing is, with a laptop, upgrading the monitor is impossible and upgrading pretty much anything else is a royal pain and/or too expensive. Thus, laptop users can't take advantage of individual components on the same scale as desktop owners.

    1. Re:They left out the killer feature by llamaluvr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With all the external peripherals you can plug in with USB (2.0), this seems irrelevant in most cases. I used to stay away from computers with less then 3 free PCI slots, because I was always afraid I would fill them up and not have room for anything else, but now that I have a laptop, I haven't missed a beat in regards to adding the peripherals that I want.

      --
      Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    2. Re:They left out the killer feature by El+Cubano · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's called the right tool for the right job. Desktops allow you to customized and upgrade, laptops sacrifice that for portability. Get over yourself and go back to looking at porn on your super l33t custom rig with clear side panel and neon lighting.

      Sorry if I wasn't clear. What I meant to get across was this:

      • Case 1: Owner of desktop (custom or not) - wants new Athlon64 CPU. Orders CPU + mobo for $250 from NewEgg.
      • Case 2: Owner of laptop - wants new Athlon64 CPU. Drops ~$2500 on a new HP laptop.

      I am just trying to point out that the numbers are skewed since the first guy essentially got a "new" computer. I know that it is a bit different, but the old laptop will either get tossed or donated or relegated to something else. So in reality, it's like it is no longer there (in most cases).

  7. longer battery life? by dan2550 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    my current laptop is a toshiba satelite a75 series. circa end of 2004 batery life: 2 hours on "long life" mode. my very first laptop was a toshiba t-1000 circa 1980-something(late 80's) battery life: hours and hours... how is that a longer life?

    1. Re:longer battery life? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you factor battery life into your purchasing decision? There are many, many laptops these days around 4 hours. The really small Sonys are closer to 8, and unlike your 1980's model they have more than 64KB of RAM.

    2. Re:longer battery life? by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      my current laptop is a toshiba satelite a75 series. circa end of 2004 batery life: 2 hours on "long life" mode. my very first laptop was a toshiba t-1000 circa 1980-something(late 80's) battery life: hours and hours... how is that a longer life?

      You value battery life, but you bought a "mobile" Pentium 4 laptop instead of a Pentium M or Celeron M laptop at the end of 2004? It's not like the power-saving features of Centrino haven't been publicized and hyped since March 2003.

      Initially, Pentium M/Celeron M notebooks carried a notable price difference over Pentium 4/Celeron notebooks. But by the end of 2004, Pentium M technology had made its way all the way down to sub-$1000 notebooks (Celeron M). By that time, only "desktop replacements" (and older discontinued models) were using Pentium 4 CPUs. For the same price as that Toshiba Pentium 4-based notebook, I think you would have been much better off (with much longer battery life) with a Pentium M-based, or even Celeron M-based, notebook.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  8. heat output by DeusExMalex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    now if only they could make it so the damn things don't scorch whatever you sit them on. my lappy is so hot i can't leave it on my lap and i can feel the heat through the bottom of my desk. and the fans are loud enough that i can hear them from another room. give me a tower that i can play w/ any day.

    1. Re:heat output by wbren · · Score: 2, Informative

      Look for a notebook with a magnesium case. I've found they dissipate heat quite well, compared to notebooks with plastic cases.

      --
      -William Brendel
    2. Re:heat output by lukelele · · Score: 2, Funny
      That is, in fact, a very good method of birth control

      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/index.cfm?ObjectID=90026 31

  9. popularity vs. durability by Schlemphfer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Back in the day, laptops cost more than $1000 more than comparable desktops. Now, you can get a pretty decent laptop for $700. So it's not surprising that as the price difference between desktops and laptops has eroded, so too has the market share of desktops.

    The question that interests me is: are laptops becoming any more durable? One of my main reasons that I bought an eMac instead of an iBook is that the eMac is probably Apple's most durable computer. And I know that laptops tend to be much more prone to failure.

    It wasn't so long ago that if you bought a laptop, you could pretty much count on some kind of major failure within three years. I'm wondering if any good research has been done to show whether laptops are closing the gap with desktops in terms of reliability. If they are, I'm pretty sure my next computer will be a laptop.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:popularity vs. durability by CoolMoDee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I haven't had any durability problems with my 12" 900MHz iBook G3. I constatly throw the thing around (in my backpack into my car etc.) and have abused the hell out of it, and the only thing wrong with it is one of the little rubber feet fell off. I've had this laptop for about 2 years or so. My Sony laptop on the other hand...it was too big/fragile to treat to treat it like I do my iBook.

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    2. Re:popularity vs. durability by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI, Apple will replace those feet under warranty (if you still have it). One fell off my 12" iBook G4 and they mailed me a packet of 4 (in a fancy padded box, no less).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:popularity vs. durability by CoolMoDee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually - this 900MHz iBook was a free replacement for my 600MHz iBook. The rule is with apple, if you send in your product 3 times and it needs to go in a 4th time call up customer relations and request a replacement. That's what I did, ended up getting a 900MHz Combo Drive 40GB iBook when I sent them my 600MHz DVD-Rom 15GB iBook. Of course the 600MHz iBook that I sent in was originally a display model from CompUSA....so it had been massively abused before I even got it.

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
  10. College requirements by poity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would guess that a significant amount of this is due to the increasing number of colleges (and even some highschools) that require students to have laptops.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  11. Re:5 More Years Until PDA's Outsell Laptops by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    no, pdas are too small to be of any use, ive had plenty of them to know.

  12. Re:5 More Years Until PDA's Outsell Laptops by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Informative

    The pepper pad looks pretty neat, but I guess it's not quite small enough to be considered a PDA....

    --
    "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  13. Corporate Sales Impact by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Informative
    I've seen a couple of major corporations move to laptops in the past couple of years, which is probably having an impact on overall sales. The employees can telecommute more easily with laptops and those that have to travel frequently don't have to do without their systems. A few companies were experimenting with guest workstations for travelling employees but that usually turned out to be more hassle than it was worth.

    The standard loadout the last place I worked was a Dell 2.4 GhZ laptop with a gig of RAM and a CD burner. The only problem with the system was if you ran it at full speed with it in your lap, you'd end up cooking your weenie, even with the fans on full.

    It seems like not many companies are deploying wireless, though, so you still end up with travelling employees roaming the halls like undead zombies, looking for ethernet and power ports to plug in to.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  14. Re:Year of the laptop? by Razzak · · Score: 2, Informative

    in 2003, laptops outsold desktops in terms of revenue. these new figures are in terms of units.

  15. Re:What does this mean to desktop users? by peculiarmethod · · Score: 4, Funny

    you are forgetting, sir, that only with a laptop can you ensure your entire porn surfing collection and device are with you at all times. especially handy if you have a snoopy female type around.

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
  16. Re:What does this mean to desktop users? by shawb · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is for "electronics retailers" which I assume means Best Buy and Circuit City. I wouldn't worry* about being ripped off if you get your PC from them rather than rolling your own. But what I really think this means is that A)laptops are hard (impossible?) to assemble yourself from off the shelf/internet ordered components while it is easy (almost trivial to anyone familiar with computer hardware) to make a desktop.

    (* The reason not to worry about it is because you can allready assume that you are getting ripped off.)

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  17. Re:What does this mean to desktop users? by tmortn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So that your computer goes with you but when you need the space and larger screen etc you have it. With wireless you don't even have to mess around with hooking up a crap load of cables. Wireless mice and Keyboards already exist and it wouldn't take that much to create a wireless display system.

    I really wonder if wireless interface systems could get ubiquitous enough that you could more or less forgoe the full key board and mouse on the laptop entirely and just make a mobile processing memory unit say the size of a cell phone. Wirelesss interface stations would be all over the place and you could browse the systems in range and log onto yours.

    One idea I like about that is being able to test drive systems at a store before you buy it. Wonder if that new monitor has fast enough refresh ? Enough resolution ? Just attach it to the system on your hip and run a favorit movie/game etc... How about the sound quality of those speakers ? How about wondering if that new system will do what you want ? Access files on your current system while demoing a new unit with similar periphials you have at home. Have an automatic interface with your cars computer... no more dealer visits for codes or wondering what tripped the 'check engine' light.

    --
    I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  18. Re:This may lend credence to the by Clockwurk · · Score: 3, Informative

    All Apple notebooks are 32-bit G4s so plz stfu.

  19. Price or Wireless Revolution? by Mulletproof · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But this is not just a "desktop replacement" trend. Sure, you can emulate nearly every function on a laptop that you could get in a desktop, but that was true back when too. Sure, the price has gone down, but what's really changed?

    I don't think the wireless explosion is getting nearly enough credit here. Now your truly portable PC can take advantage of the most influential and pervasive phenomenon of the 21st century anywhere and everywhere. Coffee shops. Parks. The back yard. The laptops utility has been magnified 100 fold just by the wireless networking trend alone. It's so much more than a portable document holder now. You now have access to real time information anywhere, an unparalleled knowledge base at your fingertips on the go, keep in contact with people friends, family and partners instantly, etc etc etc. Wireless LAN? Standard equipment on nearly every machine now.

    I have no doubt the price drop has helped, but the utility and popularity of the laptop has absolutely exploded because of the wireless revolution that is still evolving at this very moment.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  20. Here's something to think about... by AtOMiCNebula · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The survey doesn't look like it takes DIY-computers into consideration. You can't build laptops like you can a desktop.

    Just a thought I had.

  21. Re:What does this mean to desktop users? by Tassach · · Score: 4, Funny

    You should never date a woman who objects to your porn collection. Hell, my wife's collection is almost as big as my own. Many an evening of incredible sex has started out with her sitting on my lap surfing porn together.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  22. Re:useable laptops? - thank Apple by dedazo · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hahahah, lo and behold the apple fanboy bullshit of the day.

    Apple has always been an innovator, but it has never lead the pack because it simply hasn't had those many laptop/notebook models. The advances in laptop technology have been pushed by the demand in PC laptops from Compaq, Dell, HP and more importantly, IBM. IBM has been probably the more innovating integrator of the lot. Apple is a distant catch-up, regardless of their good industrial design capabilities. The ability to have a hard drive the size of a pack of matches, wireless networking or power-saving processors does not come to us courtesy of your "friends at Apple", it comes from the Toshibas, VIAs and Intels of the world being pushed by PC makers with insane consumer-level demand. You honestly don't think Apple makes their own Firewire controllers, eh?

    Thanks for the laugh though.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  23. For two reasons by melted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1. Low-end desktops suck so bad, I wouldn't buy one if someone points a gun to my head. Just go to Circuit City or Best Buy and look at them. Do you want to buy this crap?

    2. I'm writing this lying on the couch. There's no going back to desktop once you go completely wireless. The only desktop I have is iMac G5, but that's only because I need a good display for digital photography, and iMac display is top-notch. If Apple puts decent panels into the next crop of their laptops, this iMac may go to ebay.

  24. Laptops: Complete, convenient, computing - Ahh! :) by iamcf13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will this mean higher prices for desktop users? I hope not. I for one HATE with a passion laptops. There great for surfing the web and chatting on aim but for real work I need a desktop. I'm personally much more productive on a larger screen, full sized keyboard, and a comfortable external mouse.

    I used to lug around A DESKTOP TOWER in order to do my work several years ago. Horrifically inconvenient but a necessary evil. :(
    Getting (and using) a laptop took some getting used to but now I wouldn't use a desktop unless I absolutely have to. My laptop allow me to work anywhere there is an electrical outlet, a chair and a desk. I heard that the laptop I have was one of the first ones to 'cram' desktop computing power in a laptop-sized package--kudos the the laptop manufactuer! (They are Japanese and they put out music and anime 'on the side'. I won't identify them lest I be branded a 'corporate shill' but I will say their laptops are built to last! My boss dropped his laptop several times with the last time borking the LCD display for good. Guess what? The HD was fine throughout all the unintentional abuse and is now working inside a laptop made by a large U.S. computer/business machine firm that shall remain nameless to avoid me being branded a 'corporate shill'. :)

    And to the smart asses who say you can hook all these up to a notebook, yeah but why?

    I did that at first then quit. I only hook up assorted data storage devices to my laptop via USB nowadays as these are external peripherals that matter the most to me.

    I like my laptop and am glad I was able to get one to use it.

    Laptops truly make computing complete and convenient - Ahhhh! :)

  25. In Australia by StArSkY · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Australia you can tax deduct 100% of the cost of a laptop in the first year. you can onlydeduct 33% of a desktop in the first year.

    As such there is a huge incentive to buy laptops rather than desktops.

    --
    lounge around on the blue couch
  26. Both by pintomp3 · · Score: 2

    I actually use both. I have a desktop for doing heavy lifting and storage. It has a huge monitor, gobs of HD, and pretty much everything else. I use the laptop is an accessory, not a replacement. So I only use sub 3lbs units. Great for browsing internet and email in bed or on the go. I'm on it more than my desktop. I'm probably in the minority in this style of use, basically using laptop as a big pda. I can see more ppl computing this way in the future though.

  27. Not surprised by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even if this is in fact the case, and not a result of bad stats, I'm not surprised. Why?

    College students. College goers everywhere are convinced they need a laptop for school for various reasons (I'll take notes with it..my desk is small..etc etc) when really what they need is a mini tower with an LCD monitor to accomplish the same or better end. Plenty of colleges require laptops (Which IMHO is so much more a status thing than anything productivity oriented) these days which is no doubt driving up the sales rates as well.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:Not surprised by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 2
      Plenty of colleges require laptops (Which IMHO is so much more a status thing than anything productivity oriented)


      My understanding is that schools that require laptops do so because it allows them to phase out public access computers in libraries and labs. If the students are packing their own laptops the schools only have to provide wifi or ethernet jacks, which would be a lot cheaper than buying and supporting rooms full of PCs.
    2. Re:Not surprised by chrisbro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you serious? I'm a current college student (MIS degree, so maybe I'm biased), but laptops are prevalent for a reason. Of course I take them to class for notes; I type much faster than I write, so I can get down nearly verbatim what the professor says. In classes where every little detail could be on the test, this is important. It's also nice to drag it out for breaks between classes when you can't go back home, but can't do much else, either...I have reports, papers, and programming projects that I get significant work done on while at campus. Which would you rather do, knock out something in the day when you'd be dicking around otherwise, or wait until you get home to your "mini tower" to do it? And with my entire campus blanketed in wireless, I don't have to deal with some shitty library Gateway to view RSS feeds, pass the time on AIM, or send out emails with my own client.

      "Status thing"? Please. Life got much easier when I got a laptop for school.

  28. Touchpads versus Touchpoints(eraser point) by lanner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I the only one who dreadfully hates touchpads and prefers touchpoints (eraser points, or whatever else you want to call them)?

    IBM still uses the touchpoints, but they are really expensive. I really liked Dell laptops, until they went el-cheapo a year or two ago and removed the old legacy ports and the touchpoints at the same time. A few laptops, especially those angled at the business market, still have touchpoints, but they are few, more expensive, and lack the features that I desire.

  29. Re:5 More Years Until PDA's Outsell Laptops by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Right now, perhaps. But in the future? It's all in the marketing. I use a Zaurus C3000 and am very happy with it as a laptop replacement when I'm traveling. I can watch movies, listen to music, connect peripherals, browse the web, connect to my office via vpnc (which means administer servers, check eamil, etc). Granted, none of that was out of the box, save the music and web, but it's currently possible at 640x480 resolution.

    If Nokia properly markets their new 770, or Archos with their AV series, it'll be all that's needed. Laptops were originally marketed as something you used when you were away from your desktop.

    Now we've got a whole new generation of PMP/PDAs that are capable of what laptops were just a couple of years ago, with all the above mentioned stuff AND office apps. Just attach a USB keyboard and you're good to go.

  30. Laptops are transitional products by Wolfier · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm still waiting for a PDA that when plugged into a docking station, will become a full-fledged PC.

    Someone MUST have done it right. Come on, it's 2005.

  31. Re:Laptops suck compared to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are the lonely ones stuck off by a power supply in the airport, they are too poor to hide their dislike for human companionship and too cheap to have a beast of a computer at home.

    Right, because the people at the airport without laptops are regular chatter-bugs with the total strangers who surround them, and not pretending to re-read the same month-old issue of Newsweek for the third time in a row while nursing a Long Island Iced Tea which cost them eight bucks at the airport bar.

    Sorry, but you are full of shit.

    The biggest problem with using a laptop in public is not loneliness. It's all the dumbass people who think your use of it is an invitation to talk about computer technology when you would much rather just be doing whatever it was you were using the laptop for in the first place.

    (Which is why phase-cancelling headphones are every bit as essential as a laptop when traveling. First of all, it reduces ambient noise slightly, but more importantly, nothing says "fuck off and leave me alone" quite like a good pair of headphones and an LCD screen to bury yourself in.)

  32. Re:What the laptop buyers forgot... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Informative

    "It's really no use these days as most people use the Internet for a lot of stuff. When power goes out, your connection goes with it unless you have a UPS."

    I'd rather not be in the middle of saving a file when the power dies.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  33. Let's take that rant .. by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

    Laptops are still too slow compared to desktops, especially the hard drives. Laptop drives are not only slower, but you cannot get the same large sizes and the prices are far higher. Then there is the issue of graphics cards. Laptops generall have poorer graphics cards with lower memory. You can put together a far cheaper desktop with good components than you can get in a laptop. Most of the lower end laptops have crappy video with shared memory; they get too hot and have at most 3 hours of battery time. Oh and then there is the problem with the tiny screens. As a programmer, I cannot look at any screen smaller than 17" for a long time. Also, most of those lower end laptops only go to 1024x768 (I need at least 1152x864). These limitations may be OK for Joe User, but I don't think more tech savvy people or especially geeks could put up with them.

    Too slow? My AMD 3000+ is not too slow, neither have any of my 1GHz+ machines been.

    Laptop disks are smaller yes, I got 80GB 5400rpm in this one. While it is nothing compared to the 500GB I have in my desktop, it is completely sufficient for 99% of the people out there. The average person does not even have something like 10GB apps, 20GB games, 20GB music, 20MB movies and 10GB to spare. With 512MB RAM most people won't need to swap and never really notice the difference. What most people do (chat, surf, music, movies, simple games) aren't IO bound. If you are a pack rat such as you and me, perhaps. The rest, no.

    Laptops have graphics cards that are just fine for everything but FPS games. Many people are non-gamers, even more are non-FPS gamers. Chat, surf, play mp3 and avis is enough for many people. Today, almost everyone needs to be on the net. Even in my own family I'm outnumbered two to one by my parents who certainly would do fine.

    Laptops are slightly more pricy, but including the cost of an LCD, not impressingly so. I did try to put together a cheap new desktop recently, making it a laptop would add maybe 50% to the cost, no more. For the flexibility of a laptop, that isn't much. It used to be several hundred percent.

    If your laptop gets too hot, it is malfunctioning or is a desktop in drag. Typical laptops don't get that hot, because there's more than enough power anyway. It has three hours of battery life versus none, what's your point?

    As for size and resolution, that is mainly decided by the laptop size as the screen can not get bigger than the machine. I've used a 12.1" 1024x768 and 15.4" 1280x800 screen, and it is whatever works for you. Seriously, people used to get work done in resolutions far less than that in the early days, it is mostly psychological. By the way, the 15.4" screen is only a inch narrower than my 19" CRT, and is excellent for watching 16:9 movies, better than a 17" CRT. Again, if you are a non-gamer.

    Nobody pretends a laptop is everything a desktop could be. But for the average user, I have no problem recommending a good laptop. If you a) need lots of HDD space, b) need lots of screen real estate, c) need fps gaming, laptops aren't for you (or at least not excellent for you). If you're in the huge "other" segment, go for it.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  34. Re:useable laptops? - thank Apple by skingers6894 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out these

    http://www.notesys.com/Copies/CNET%207Sep00%20IBM% 20Dell%20Wireless.htm

    Dell and IBM were duking it out for for honors of first Windows laptop with wireless a year after Apple had already offered it.

    I'm not sure whether Apple make their own firewire controllers but they DID invent the technology:

    http://news.com.com/2100-1040-271986.html?legacy=c net

    Finally it is clear to people who have been around for a while that Apple created the template from which almost all laptops are cut today. Check out this article that names the Powerbook 100 as the top gadget of all time.

    http://www.mobilemagazine.com/archives/2005/03/the _top_100_gad_1.html

    Admittedly blind fanboyism is not very informative but neither is denying credit where it is due.

  35. Re:Longer than a desktop, n'est-ce pas? by adpowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have the same computer. Soon after I got it, I took a flight from Seattle to Vegas. I was typing a document in the airport with the screen on lowest brightness. I continued typing for most of the way on the airplane and by the end I was only down to 69%. These PowerBooks last forever, and I think it is even better with Tiger (more efficient, less processing). Right now I'm on wireless internet and listening to iTunes. I've been at this for like 22 minutes and have only lost 10% battery life. Quite good if you ask me :)

  36. Annualized failure rates by steve_l · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to work with laptop developers, so know their problems.

    Laptops are not any less endurable than desktops, it is just they get thrown around a lot more. A workstation SCSI disk is very fragile, but you dont throw it the backs of cars, kick it under the seat of the airplane in front etc, etc. Furthermore, vendors dont like unrelaible laptops; the annualized failure rate (AFR) makes the difference between profit and loss on warrantied systems.

    What has happened is that the trend towards consumer-centric laptops has eliminated much of the exchangable-IDE drive design of the past. These all-in-ones are robust as they are mechanically simpler. The other big trend is that with two main ODMs in taiwan doing much of the work, a greater level of expertise has built up into doing quality designs.

    Now, for an annedote of amusement:

    When the first thin-and-flat laptops came out, the AFR went up. This was tracked down to people dropping their laptops while trying to lift them out of bags/briefcases one handed, and losing their grip. The older laptops were so fat and heavy they could be lifted two handed, but the new ones were thin and light enough to be one handed -only nobody had thought of this when it was designed

    If you look at today's laptops, they normally have grippy texture on the top and bottom, or some features on the batteries to provide a better handgrip. This is to eliminate the problem.

    That's an amusing story but it shows the problem: a robust laptop is not an intel chipset in a box. It is a system designed with ergonomics in mind too.

  37. Just Bought A Dell Inspiron 9300 by _Neurotic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been a PC builder/tweaker for 10 years. My latest system was a water-cooled P4 2.26 GHz overclocked to 2.85 GHz with a water-cooled, overclocked Radeon 9800 Pro. I even had heatsinks on the Radeon's memory and a waterblock on my northbridge. I've been running RAID-0 setups for years now and my mantra for cases was "Bigger = More Airflow = Better"

    I say this all as a backdrop to current situation. You see, I talk about this PC in the past tense because I am selling it. I have bought a Dell Inspiron 9300. The 2MB cache on my 1.86 GHz Pentium M makes this processor perform in the same league as a 3 GHz Pentium 4. It is actually faster than my overclocked system in many tasks. The GeForce Go 6800 outperforms my Radeon 9800 Pro (not surprising given the generation difference) and the 1 GB of dual channel DDR RAM allows for plenty of gaming overhead. The 1440x900 widescreen display has native resolution support in many newer games (like Half Life 2 and Riddick.) The 7200 RPM drive, while not comparable to a RAID-0 setup, is still quite zippy and the dual layer DVD burner works like a charm.

    So what's my point (other than tooting my horn?) My point is that desktop replacements have truly come of age. There isn't a game on the market now or in the next two years that I won't be able to play comfortably. Given that this little beast runs cooler and quieter than my desktop, there's nothing that I miss. Nothing.