Slashdot Mirror


Nokia and Intel Group Up To Develop WiMax

WhichHost writes "Nokia and Intel's new alliance is aiming at creating and refining the power of "WiMax" as a new form of mobile-WiFi for devices such as laptops, cell-phones, etc. This is just the first step in making high-speed wireless networking available to the entire world. Covered at InformationWeek and Forbes as well." From the article: "Nokia and Intel Corp.'s development plans focus on mobile WiMax, which allows for roaming among base stations, as opposed to fixed WiMax, which is considered a replacement for DSL and cable lines."

91 comments

  1. Thanks Slashdot! by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thanks editors for posting another week old story to the front page. What ever happened to being at the forefront of the news game? I remember when this was the place to get information ahead of everyone else... Now we get links to 4 day old articles that I know I read about even before that.

    Are you too busy approving stuff in the submission queue that is really just duplicates of what we have already read?

    Get with it.

    1. Re:Thanks Slashdot! by garcia · · Score: 2, Funny

      Troll? No, it's not a troll. "Stuff that matters" is stuff that's from the last 24 hours. Stuff that's 4 days old doesn't matter anymore.

    2. Re:Thanks Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn, somebody is edgy today...

    3. Re:Thanks Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what? /. posts what it's USERS SUBMIT... this is not a site people scouring the internet for the hottest news. You want more up-to-date info? fucking submit it, dude. /. is what it's users make of it.

    4. Re:Thanks Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So /. sucks cuz we post old shit over and over?

    5. Re:Thanks Slashdot! by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What ever happened to being at the forefront of the news game?

      Stuff that matters... Where does it say "late breaking" and "up to the minute news?" In what world do you live in that /. was ever up to the minute?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
  2. wow by macaulay805 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It looks like we found a technology threesome. Intel, Apple, and Nokia ... lets call them Noinpple!

    1. Re:wow by Second_Infinity · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or just NIpple...!

  3. The Apple Nokia Intel Connection by isa-kuruption · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First, Apple and Nokia for new portable web browser
    Next, Apple and Intel deal to make processors for Apple computers.
    Now, Nokia and Intel to make hi-speed wifi.

    Will Apple be the first hardware vendor to have a portable device that uses the new hi-speed wifi w/ this browser?

    1. Re:The Apple Nokia Intel Connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares?

      The browser is insignificant. The vendor is insignificant. The only reason WiMax is cool is that it will allow broadbandish speeds from anywhere.

      Think VOIP cellphone service.
      Think bluetooth enabled phones with laptops that can get broadband from anywhere.

      I don't think people are ever going to want to use the internet (in its current form) on 160x160 screens. Specialized GPS using apps for finding directions, sure, but reading slashdot? No.

      Maybe email.

      Even better than phones are things like WiMax using GPS maps screens in cars. How would you like to have google maps on a screen in your car? What if it had real time traffic information like yahoo maps does. or overlays for restaraunts.

      WiMax is awesome, but portable devices like cell phones won't ever really take advantage. (unless the screens get bigger)

    2. Re:The Apple Nokia Intel Connection by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I think that this should have been moderated as "funny", like trying to find the Bacon number of an actor.

    3. Re:The Apple Nokia Intel Connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As with every other cool technology, Apple will be the first to ship computers with wimax. Think Powerbook.

      No Apple is not working with Nokia to develop an iPhone. Most likely they are trying to form standards for software and device interaction so that when Nokia and Apple release wimax devices they will "just work".

    4. Re:The Apple Nokia Intel Connection by DavidSJ · · Score: 1

      Actually, the iBook was the first computer to ship with WiFi, not the PowerBook.

  4. ... and Intel and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia and Apple and Intel and Nokia and Apple and Intel and...

  5. Explaining ... by kitzilla · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... Nokia's announcement yesterday that its new browser is being developed on Apple technology.

    The Dark Alliance gathers.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    1. Re:Explaining ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, any time more than two companies get together to create cool technology, it's a 'dark alliance'.

    2. Re:Explaining ... by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      You need the humor Force, my son.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    3. Re:Explaining ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Dark Alliance gathers.
      While the big, bumbling Jedi Order (Microsoft) is completely oblivious to what's happening around them. Pretty soon they'll be massacred. Long live Emperor Palpatine!
  6. Real Wilreless; How soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we reasonable expect now to have REAL wireless internet over long distance? EDGE/UMTS etc have theoratically broadband-like, but in reality suck ass due to latency & periodic bursts of speed.

    Nokia knows how to make some kickass wireless devices & prolly this allaince will herald real wireless broadband.

    And, BTW, Insight Cable Broadband sucks ass. (Die bastards, DIE!) I just can't wait for some real competetion in the broadband arena.

  7. wouldn't it be cool by toQDuj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now, I must point out that I haven't kept up-to-date with this techniligy, but wouldn't it be cool if all this wireless tech would automatically create a network with its surrounding similar wimax devices?
    Does it do this already? sort of like, forming ad hoc networks, pathways through other people's wireless equipment to the nearest internet link?
    Or is this just a dream..

    B.

    --
    Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    1. Re:wouldn't it be cool by planckscale · · Score: 1
      I think you'd have to be in some pretty serious traffic in order to be able to connect adhoc and to WAP's on the fly like that. Say car1 w/ a WAP is in close proximity long enough to receive your broadcast for an IP. It returns the IP address to you and by the time your IP stack is repaired, it moves behind a big rig. So then you're broadcasting again, and get a WAP on the side of the road. By the time you broadcast, get an IP address, and then connect, you've passed the WAP and no longer receive a signal. So then Car2 with a WAP of a different flavor (802.11A) comes in range but going the opposite way on the other side of the road...

      Seems to me like you'd need an array of wireless cards - 2 PCMCIA cards A&G, and 4 USB cards hanging on dongles connected to the roof, and some powerful multihoming software with a multiprocessor PC that could easily switch and aquire multiple IP addresses and autoswitching signal strength detectors.

      I'm pretty much brainstorming but it sounds pretty difficult with existing technology to maintain a strong signal on the road.

      --
      Namaste
    2. Re:wouldn't it be cool by puhuri · · Score: 1

      Sure, it would be nice to have ad hoc networking, but there are several problems; most visible to user are:

      • battery life, as you wireless device must also relay other people traffic
      • latency, as each wireless hop contributes a delay (WiMAX is better than WiFi, but still)
      • network stability, as radio environment changes (MIMO may help for that)
      • security issues, both for user and provider,

      Anyway, I saw recently one slide from Nokia that they estimated that after 4G (that starts around 2010) there won't be a network anymore 2020 as we know it now...

  8. Did You Say INTEL??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to mention Apple == 3... 2... 1...

    Gotta keep Apple on the tips of everybody's tongues, you know. It's all about the S P I N !

    How will this affect the greatest company in the world? Did Steve in his magnificence know about this? How is Apple so good while everyone else is so evil? Did you know they invented the GUI? Did you know they're the greatest? How great are they? Supergreat!

    1. Re:Did You Say INTEL??? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Not at all. I have it on good authority that Apple is insanely great.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  9. Uh... help me out here by mcc · · Score: 1
    Isn't this
    1. 802.16
    2. Old news?
    Is the "news" here that Nokia has joined with Intel in promoting WiMax?
    1. Re:Uh... help me out here by Nos. · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, 802.16 is WiMax, and yeah, there isn't much in the way of actual news here, which is why I never posted it at openwimax.org. Intel is fighting hard to promote there WiMax chip and get hardware manufacturers to include it in they're devices. The only thing interesting here is that a cell company (Nokia) is working with Intel. Typcially the cell phone companies are pushing 3G and 4G which are for the most part, competeing with WiMax. Interesting since WiMax promises an alternative to cell phones... mobile, wireless VoIP.

    2. Re:Uh... help me out here by captain_craptacular · · Score: 1

      Typcially the cell phone companies are pushing 3G and 4G which are for the most part, competeing with WiMax. Interesting since WiMax promises an alternative to cell phones... mobile, wireless VoIP.

      People will still need a handset. Hence the involvement by Nokia. I don't see why Nokia really cares what protocol their phones are using as long as their still selling phones. Nokia, like Apple, is a hardware company.

      By the way, nice shameless plug for your site ;)

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    3. Re:Uh... help me out here by Cat_Byte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before they start talking about making wireless available to the "entire world" they should think about getting cell phone service out where my parents live. Every time I hear talk like broadband is available everywhere it makes me think these have to be people who live very sheltered lives inside the city limits.

      Seriously though. Even cell phone service maps are nothing but a bunch of disconnected circles like the chicken pox in between interstates and cities. I would love it if they could actually do this but they are FAR from covering the "entire world".

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    4. Re:Uh... help me out here by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Why? That's like saying we should have waited until we could land an aircraft on top of Mt. Everest before we flew into space. There's no reason to expand a technology that looks like it will soon be outdated unless it is economically viable. If its not currently viable to cover your parent's area, does that mean they should stop development of new wireless communcation protocols?

    5. Re:Uh... help me out here by Przepla · · Score: 2, Informative
      Seriously though. Even cell phone service maps are nothing but a bunch of disconnected circles like the chicken pox in between interstates and cities.
      In the US. In Europe there is hardly a place when there is no mobile service, and there are plenty of places where one can not have broadband. So this WiMax would solve it.
      --
      When in doubt, go to the library. - Ron Weasley in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
    6. Re:Uh... help me out here by hunterx11 · · Score: 1
      Intel is fighting hard to promote there WiMax chip and get hardware manufacturers to include it in they're devices.

      Seriously, man. I try not to be a grammar Nazi, but there's only so much I can take before I get nauseous^H^H^Hated.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    7. Re:Uh... help me out here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old English is easier said than drunk.

    8. Re:Uh... help me out here by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Nokia has no fear of exploring new grounds...

      It started as a paper manufacturer, the original long distance communication media, moved to telegraph cabling and finnaly to electronics and telecommunications!

      The Nokia history is really amazing, check it out at http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,8764,1127,00.html

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    9. Re:Uh... help me out here by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      That's like saying we should have waited until we could land an aircraft on top of Mt. Everest before we flew into space.


      How is it saying they shouldn't advertise falsely that it would cover the entire planet when they don't even cover some areas in 2005 with regular cell service is like waiting for an aircraft carrier on Mt Everest? I think you misunderstand the whole point of my post and are too eager to flame.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  10. Old Stories by orangeguru · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... one network to bind them ... ... and with WiMax to find them ...

  11. If we all just wait six months by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Funny

    SBC will be offering WiMax for $19.99 a month which you can use on your $300 laptop.

    Or you can pay thousands of dollars - for the same thing - now.

    The market cares nothing for your desires, and tech is just another commodity. So long as Japanese girls buy it, it will be made available.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:If we all just wait six months by KillShill · · Score: 1

      thank heaven, for japanese girls.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  12. Security by bodester17 · · Score: 1

    With these expansive wireless networks, what secutiry features are going to be enabled? You will be essentially on a large LAN, what is to stop some person driving by your house from looking at your files. Also, what does this mean for file-sharing? LAN file-sharing programs like sharescan will allow users to anonymously transfer files. Watch out RIAA!!

    1. Re:Security by JesseL · · Score: 1

      The same things that protect my files from prying eyes on the networks I'm connected to right now. Firewalls, encryption, passwords, os/filesystem permissions, etc.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    2. Re:Security by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Security has been part of 802.16 from the beginning. Mostly this is because it's designed to be operated by ISPs, and they don't want non-customers to "borrow" free bandwidth off their access points.

  13. Roaming between base stations... by FWMiller · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the holy grail. IF this happens, it could represent the biggest challenge yet to the existing mobile phone network. The mobile phone network does this really well and currently the only thing out there that does.

    The problem is, this is really hard given the basic architecture of the Internet protocol suite. Lots of things just rely on your IP address not changing in the middle of a TCP session or a VoIP call or whatever. If you move between base stations with current WiFi, you have to change your IP address.

    The cell phone network solves this by essentially rerouting things on the fly at layer 2. This is really hard to do in the Internet. My guess that some kind of Layer 2 technology will be adopted to allow groups of WiMax base stations (all under the control of a single provider in all likelihood) to move an IP address from one base station to another quickly. Beyond that it takes sharing agreements and all that and that will be really tuff!!

    --
    Frank W. Miller
    1. Re:Roaming between base stations... by BrookHarty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The 2 big datavendors Sierra Wireless and Novatel have some nice data products that you can use VoIP on the go.

      Novatel has the Ovation, a product from a San Diego company, will have support most high speed including Wifi/WiMAX. Very interesting product, but Novatel doesnt support quad band GPRS, little problem.
      http://www.novatelwireless.com/products/ovation/in dex.html

      Sierra Wireless has a great PC card coming out, support quad band, 850 and 900, so better coverage in the USA. Including the new HSPDA upgrade from UMTS. Cingular (and ATT Wireless) limited launched UMTS, but they are upgrading and expanding UMTS to HSPDA now.
      http://www.sierrawireless.com/ProductsOrdering/ac8 x0.asp

      I'm prob going to pick a Sierra Wireless PC card, after using UMTS on my limited channel phone (tethered), its amazing. WiMAX will be nice when it finally gets here, but UMTS is already launched, and vendors already software upgraded their UMTS to HSPDA.

      I just wish i could get a single HSPDA/UMTS/EDGE/GPRS/WiFi G card.

    2. Re:Roaming between base stations... by Nos. · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, roaming is a definite consideration, that being said, even if its not solved that quickly its not as bad as it is with WiFi. Remember, WiMax can have ranges of up to 31 miles (without line of sight) which would handle most day to day type uses. That being said, even if a brief interruption were to occur say every 25 miles, cacheing any broadcast type streaming could certainly compensate for the routing change, though live applications (like VoIP) could suffer some.

    3. Re:Roaming between base stations... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Of course in reality mobile WiMax will have a cell radius of 1-2 miles, making handoffs much more frequent.

    4. Re:Roaming between base stations... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Make the whole thing peer-to-peer with the base stations in range of each other. Then it doesn't matter if packets go to the wrong base station, they can just get passed along, and over time the routing tables will be updated. It might mean we need to replace BGP with something more dynamic though.

      --
      I am trolling
    5. Re:Roaming between base stations... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      The difference is that an IP address is (relatively) anonymous. Cellular is more like tracking with a MAC address. You have your own unique ID number that follows you everywhere. If we could ensure that all ethernet connections have their own unique ID, then we could theoretically have Internet roaming, but the same technology that allows you to roam, would allow anyone to locate/identify you. That's why every stupid web site on the planet uses user+password identification. If we had roaming then any web site could read your UID and use that as a login credential.

      The whole concept is very different from today's Internet.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:Roaming between base stations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VoIP article using WiMAX, totally on topic.

    7. Re:Roaming between base stations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Technology to allow changing WiFi Access points while keeping your IP number have been around for several years. Such systems have been installed in large building where PC's roam among several AP's while keeping there IP number.

    8. Re:Roaming between base stations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's an answer for you:
      http://mosquitonet.stanford.edu/mip/
      http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mobileip-charter .html
      http://www.eeng.dcu.ie/~jnoonan/mobileip/mipwork.h tm

      overview: Your IP address is rooted with one provider who, when you're within his network sends traffic directly to you. When you're in a foreign n/w he forwards your traffic to an 'foreign agent' in the other n/w that sends it on to you. A mobile-ip daemon on your host takes care of all the automatic registration/deregistration.
      The difficulty: As you said, agreements between operators :-(

    9. Re:Roaming between base stations... by tech49er · · Score: 1

      Here's an answer for you:
      http://mosquitonet.stanford.edu/mip/
      http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mobileip-charter .html
      http://www.eeng.dcu.ie/~jnoonan/mobileip/mipwork.h tm

      overview: Your IP address is rooted with one provider who, when you're within his network sends traffic directly to you. When you're in a foreign n/w he forwards your traffic to an 'foreign agent' in the other n/w that sends it on to you. A mobile-ip daemon on your host takes care of all the automatic registration/deregistration.
      The difficulty: As you said, agreements between operators :-(

      --
      "... always going forward 'cause we cant find reverse! "
  14. Security may not be that great, but ... by WillAffleck · · Score: 1

    You will be essentially on a large LAN, what is to stop some person driving by your house from looking at your files.

    We already did that. After we finished reading them, the cops pulled us over for ROFL at what you had entered in them.

    Security by Obscurity - the latest choice

    --
    Will in Seattle
  15. Cringely Predicts... by parvenu74 · · Score: 3, Funny

    that Intel will merge with Nokia.

    You read it here first!

  16. is intel the new "cheap" IBM!? by netdur · · Score: 1

    how do you compare game console market to pc one?

    will Nokia release WiMax's driver for linux?

    when will Evolution/Nokia start support sync calendar/to-do/email with Nokia phone via bluetooth/infrared/cable?

    will Nokia support VOIP on new phones?

    I did add skype to Nokia 3650 - I use bluetooth to call or recieve calls

    --
    "Steve Jobs invented the world" -- Bill W. GATES
  17. I want high speed, not more press releases! by slapout · · Score: 1

    I wish companies would stop inventing and reinventing techologies and just spend the money to get broadband access to people outside of major cities.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:I want high speed, not more press releases! by CrackersnSoup · · Score: 1

      Your ignorant of business. Why should they spend the money to bring you broadband (cable/dsl isnt cheap) if your not willing to shell out the development money? I run a pc shop and have been apart of 2 wireless ISP's (and working on my own now). WiMAX will be one of the BEST ways to bring that broadband to you just as wiFi is now (for the rural people). Companies are about making a buck. You want broadband? Put your money where your mouth is and DO IT YOURSELF. Its not hard at all just costly, just call up your local telco and ask for a T1(1.5mbit, $750+/mo) or DS3(45mbit 7k/mo. Blamo you have broadband. If your in a place where you can get the sub $500/mo T1's you almost certianly have broadband. Odd how that works, cheap internet pipes = broadband in the area! Want a company like me to bring you a cheap net pipe? Bring me 30 contract signed pre-paid for 6 month customers and ill bring cheap net to the moon (but they must live there first). Crackers`n`Soup

  18. Re:The Freak must pay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...You guys have the right to bear arms but you did nothing to correct this hideous miscarriage of justice..."

    Uh, so you want someone else to commit murder because you like the freak? Yeah, why not, it's not your ass that could end up in jail with Bubba.

  19. the commercial theme song by musikit · · Score: 1

    Apple corporation what's your function?
    hooking up Intel and Nokia with WiMax.

  20. Monopolies ?? by Brigadier · · Score: 1



    My question is who will impliment this. WIll this mean that internet (dsl) monopolies will now move to cell phone carriers ? If this is the wave of the future it woudl be really nice to have this be a joint venture and allow any carrier to use it.

    1. Re:Monopolies ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See this from yesterday: Sprint, Intel Team on Mobile WiMax

      http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,120771,0 0.asp

      Add Apple and Nokia to a partnership, then you have a Sprint WiMax/PCS network for Nokia phones running iTunes and the Apple browser, Apple gets the WiMax ISP they need for movie downloads as well as a carrier for their iTunes phone, and Sprint also becomes a single provider for voice, media content, and the web ANYWHERE.

      Cringely was partially right: Apple is going for broke, but they are not going to get bought out by Intel. Apple is probably partnering instead with Nokia, Intel and Sprint in WiMax to bring all of the pieces they need together for a unified "lifestyle" digital hub.

      Brian G.

  21. What Jessica really needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jessica went and fastened herself down as best as she could. Now
    obviously she could never do all of her straps, but like Lynndie
    cared?????????? Jessica was on a box frame. Very old fashioned, a simple
    square frame. But Lynndie liked its simplicity for this reason. She had made
    very minor changes to it. After fastening the final strap locking the whore
    Jessica in place, Lynndie was glad to show off.

    This is, (looking directly at Jessica),so simple. I do NOT say it
    will bring out the best in you slut, I am saying though that it is the best
    for all around spanking and whipping. When you first looked it did look
    like a square. But when you looked closer you saw the hinges. Small hinges
    that would allow me to bend you nearly any way I want to.

    Walking over, Lynndie fastened the last cuff, making sure Jessica was
    firmly tightened down. Lynndie just walked around, slowly circling her slave,
    enjoying the moment. Going back to her table, Lynndie picked up a riding
    crop, and strode back to Jessica. Lynndie smiled then struck Jessica across the
    face with the crop leaving a bright red welt across her cheek. As tears
    roll down the slut's face, Lynndie begins to whip her boobs with the riding
    crop. Smashing her nipples with the crop brings a delightful scream from
    her slave's throat exciting Lynndie even more and causing her to redouble her
    tit whipping. After a few minutes, Jessica's boobs are a bright red, bruises
    forming, and a little bit of blood trickles from one boob. They are
    completely marked by her Mistresses lashings. Lynndie stops to admire her
    work, then leans over and licks up the small amount of blood.

    Putting the crop down for a moment, Lynndie leans into Jessica and
    licks the tears off her face. Digging her fingers into Jessica's boos, Lynndie
    steps back pulling the slaves boobs out as far as they will go. Jessica just
    whimpers. Lynndie leans forward again and bites down hard on one nipple, her
    right hand going between her slave's legs to rub her mound. Lynndie slides two
    fingers into her slave's moist pussy and begins finger fucking her.
    Kneeling down, she begins to suck on Jessica's clit, her fingers pumping in
    and out of the slut's pussy. Jessica begins moaning louder and louder, her
    juices wetting her Mistresses face and hand, then she lets out a scream as
    she comes. Then she lets out a shriek as she feels her Mistress bite down
    hard on her outer labia.

    Lynndie stands and rubs her wet face against the whore's lips. Kissing
    her softly on the lips Lynndie whispers to her. You are doing splendidly, I am
    very proud of you. Jessica's eyes brim with tears of happiness as she gazes
    back into her loving Mistresses eyes. Lynndie picks up the crop and begins
    rubbing it between Jessica's legs. Soon Jessica is cumming again, her juices
    soaking the riding crop in her Mistresses hand. Lynndie raises the crop to her
    face and licks some of the slave juice, then presses it to Jessica's face
    and watches her lick it totally clean of her juices.

    Lynndie steps back and goes behind Jessica. Raising her arm she begins
    raining hard blows on Jessica's back. Striking her across her shoulder
    blades, and down to her ass and back up. Lynndie keeps up her beating until
    Jessica starts to go a bit limp, but Lynndie does not stop. Her slut is still
    screaming so nicely. Lynndie feels herself getting wet as nice large bruises
    form on Jessica's back. Some of her blows were harder than she realized as
    some of the welts are bleeding slightly. Her arm finally grows tired, so
    Lynndie steps to Jessica's front, pulling one of her nipples out as far as it
    will go, she kisses Jessica, then heads back to her table to sit for
    awhile. Sitting down, catching her breath she admires her handiwork. Jessica
    is standing again, her face has a bright red welt across it, and below her
    neck it is a mass of welts and bruises. Lynndie just loves the way Jessica
    looks at her waiting, she knows there will be more punishment shortly.

  22. Great News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the current state of affairs with accessiblity to wireless driver specs for Open Source today. Are we going to have more of the same with this? Intel has been pretty selfish so far in releasing any info on what they got in wifi. Is this just going to be more WinWifi stuff?

  23. Food, not bits. by Winterblink · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is just the first step in making high-speed wireless networking available to the entire world.

    Great, I'm sure the starving people of Africa will appreciate being able to get access to their corporate email everywhere, all the time, on their Treos.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  24. Don't feed the Africans by Urusai · · Score: 1

    It only encourages them to survive.

  25. WiMax != WiFi by thpr · · Score: 1
    Not your fault, given the summary; however, calling WiMax "high speed wifi" is not correct.

    Wi-Fi is a trademark owned by the Wi-Fi Alliance, and is based on various parts of 802.11. It is a wireless local area network standard.

    WiMax is a trademark owned by the WiMax forum, and is 802.16d (Fixed WiMax) and 802.16e (Mobile WiMax) [.16e is not yet ratified by IEEE]. These are wireless metro or wide area network standards (depending on where you feel that difference lies)

    The two network technologies will likely co-exist in the future. See this article for how their interaction might work out (in the first few paragraphs) [the article refers to fixed WiMax].

  26. PaLease by Rac3r5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    dude.. if u saw it b4 everyone else.. and if its not posted on slashDot.. submit it to slashDot and quit ur whining..

    stuff on this site is community submitted...

  27. It's called mobile IP by ae · · Score: 1

    That's why mobile IP was created:

    Mobile IP provides an efficient, scalable mechanism for node mobility within the Internet. Using Mobile IP, nodes may change their point-of-attachment to the Internet without changing their IP address. This allows them to maintain transport and higher-layer connections while moving. Node mobility is realized without the need to propagate host-specific routes throughout the Internet routing fabric.
    --
    Blog Ho
  28. But... by convoy83 · · Score: 1

    will Nokia Phones run OS X?

  29. Mobile IP! by porttikivi · · Score: 1

    Mobile IP works great. But only if you have a public IP address, and some people might argue you should also have Mobile IP support at servers. Which both mean in practice, that you and the servers need IPv6 and Teredo tunnelling in the real life non-IPv6 Internet of today.

    All this you can have today on Windows XP SP2. The only thing missing are clients supporting IPv6, but there are some...

    I believe that currently this looks like the only real reason to have IPv6, but reason enough.

    --
    Anssi Porttikivi / app@iki.fi
  30. Yep by Rytsarsky · · Score: 0

    I blogged about this.

    --
    God became man to enable men to become sons of God. -C.S. Lewis
  31. Nokia and Intel?? WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's like Firestone and ArmorAll making a racecar that runs on a gas-alternative.. talk about unlikely players for WiMax....

  32. Just the first step... by mikehunt · · Score: 1

    "This is just the first step in making high-speed wireless networking available to the entire world."

    Deja-vu...no...that was 3G!

    How many 'first steps' do we need?

  33. WiMax, yawn by Erich · · Score: 1

    Wake me up when they've solved the multipath and doppler problems at the high datarate.

    --

    -- Erich

    Slashdot reader since 1997

  34. Nope by bananahead · · Score: 1
    I hate to rain on the Intel/Nokia love fest, but this just isn't gonna fly for the following reasons:

    1. 802.16x is not as advertised. It is not 50+Mb at 70 miles, it is either/or. The further out you get, the more the bandwidth drops, and it drops fast. This means more towers to cover a geographical area with acceptable service, which destroys the business model.

    2. 802.16 is a TDMA technology, which simply means time slices. Each connection (user) requires a time slice from the tower. As the density of the area covered by a tower grows, to give you acceptable performance (see #1 above) they need more towers, which destroys the business model.

    In short, while the technology might be coaxed to give adequate performance to a decent number of people, the business model sucks, which will prevent it from really gaining a foothold. Nobody really wants to pay for mobil internet, as much as they seem to want it. There will be a few early adopters, but not enough to make the business even support itself.

    --
    A most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is if they foul up there's no law against wacking them around a bit.
    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I thought 802.16 is FDMA? (Which is basically like CDMA with a FFT infront).

      Multipath can be solved via Fingers and diversity gain, as they are in 3G.

      Doppler is going to be an issue, because FDMA is more suited for standing still.

      On the IP layer, it can all be tunneled over MPLS using RSVP with Fast Reroute.

  35. Nokia's just not putting all it's eggs in telcos. by WareW01f · · Score: 2, Insightful

    However, the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) has yet to ratify the mobile WiMax standard, known as 802.16e.

    Right. So the question is this, who really defines a standard a body like IEEE, or the first set of vendors to hit the market with a workable product. Sad, but painfully true. I say bully for them. Even if they come out with their own proprietary setup, if they release it soon, it'll only force the others to follow. That and it's not like I *really* used to choice in the telcom space anyway.(modem types, locked cell phones, etc)

    Telcoms need to find a niche and move there fast. "3G" is going to hit too little too late. My city is one of the brave that's planning on lighting up public WiFi which will blow the doors off any of the offerings that are coming Real Soon Now(TM) from our beloved telcos. Nokia's not stupid. I can see them offering a VOIP cellphone when the time is right. (And T-Mobile may be thinking about biting from what I here) That, and when it happens, it's going to be the areas with crappy cell coverage thumbing thier noses at what will by then be some 3 remaining cell companies.

    I'd start snatching up any dark fiber out there if I had the spare change to do so. I wouldn't be shocked at all if in a near future, cell phone companies have to roll to the old POTS model of not charging for local minutes and make their cash on long distance routing. I only own a cell now (ditched the POTS a while back) I have no qualms about VIOPing home from a free WiFi access point for local calls.

  36. How consumer-friendly is WiMax? by Entropius · · Score: 1

    One of the great things about 802.11 is that there are no restrictions on its use. I can, using cheap hardware available anywhere, set up a wireless network anywhere for pretty much any purpose I want, subject to the limitations of the technology.

    I can play Starcraft with someone in another car next to me. I can let guests use my internet connection when they visit. I can check my email from my parking lot.

    Wifi has, IMO, been such a great success because it goes back to the P2P nature of the Internet. Rather than being a captive customer to (say) a cell phone company that owns all the cards, it's a technology for me to use for free for whatever I want.

    Will WiMax be the same? Can I go to Circuit City, shell out $whatever for WiMax equipment, and check my email from a mile away from my apartment?

    1. Re:How consumer-friendly is WiMax? by geekee · · Score: 1

      "Wifi has, IMO, been such a great success because it goes back to the P2P nature of the Internet. Rather than being a captive customer to (say) a cell phone company that owns all the cards, it's a technology for me to use for free for whatever I want.

      Will WiMax be the same? Can I go to Circuit City, shell out $whatever for WiMax equipment, and check my email from a mile away from my apartment?"

      No. You pay for either a fixed or mobile WiMAX service from a telcom provider. For the fixed service, you put an antennae on your roof or window, and get rid of your cable/DSL/dialup service. For mobile, you get cell phone like connectivity for roaming devices such as laptops, pdas, cell phones, etc.

      Having end users broadcasting arbitrarily for miles isn't an efficient use of the spectrum, nor is it a good solution for roaming since your still limited to a couple of miles from home.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
  37. This will coincide with cell market saturation by xtal · · Score: 1

    Right now, whoever releases a device that does this will not sell any more phones to the cellular providers. The reason it's the holy grail for you, is the reason it's the black plague to cellular companies. I don't like the business practices of cell companies, and I absolutely HATE I am stuck in the dark ages here in North America.

    Once the market for cell phones levels off, companies like Nokia will have all those engineers, and all those production setups.. and not much to produce anymore. That's when someone will say F it all and break ranks going after the potentially HUGE consumer market.

    Perhaps this is the beginning.

    --
    ..don't panic
  38. We need Full Duplex for VOIP by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

    Wireless 802.something could be used for hot spot phones if it incorporated many of the features that cell tower/phones use. One that would have helped our Cisco VOIP deployment is full duplex wireless.

    Just another pipe dram of mine... I hope my grandkids will have it. :-(

    --
    Your Average Joe
  39. WiMAX for broadband by bent_san · · Score: 1

    There seems to be some confusion as to what WiMAX will do, even the industry is confused. WiFi uses a public bandwidth, it shouldn't be used by Telco's because they're will be huge regulatory issues involved. However using WiFi in McDonald's...etc is okay because McDonalds owns the property, and hence can use that bandwidth (but only in that property). WiMAX will used regulated bandwidth (like 3G,GSM etcc..). I'm sure WiMAX uses FDMA, although it could be viewed as TDMA because it doesn't use a different spectrum for upload/download, like 3G. Multipath and Doppler issues can be resolved via vendor specific technologies like rake receives, diversity gain...etc, like it is used in 3G. However doppler will be more of an issue with WiMAX than 3G becuase 3G uses CDMA, which is better for roaming. Whereas FDMA is better for standing still. WiMAX's opportunity is in last mile access to homes, I can forsee people installing WiMAX antenna's for their homes, and using it for Voice, Data, TV (Triple-Play). Instead of having a leased line for the phone, cable for TV and Internet. Wireless is cheaper than rolling out cables, this is particularly pertinent to places like India and China where the bulk of the population do not have telephone lines (hence cannot use DSL).

  40. Agreed by shmlco · · Score: 1

    This used to be the place where the OTHER sites got their leads. Now it seems all /. can do is rehash and repeat (several times) week-old news reported elsewhere...

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  41. WWW.COCONNECT.COM far better than WIMAX by borninabarn · · Score: 1

    check out www.coconnect out of St. Gorge Utah, it is the future for right now for high speed wireless,
    1. no additional equipment needed other than your existing wireless card (wimax uses a huge antennae!!??) 2. up to 54 mpbs 39.95 a month and free dial up wireless to anybody 3. free roaming all over the city even while you drive walk or whatever (wimax is a point to point fixed wireless??) 4. iptv 5. voip 6. uses nodes on top of buildings to communicate with each other creating a mesh network over the city...

    wimax may be good for long distances, but not for making a city fully high speed broadband wirelsss, especially so everyone can access it for a reasonable price...

  42. Motorola Canopy by yodha · · Score: 1

    Competition for Motorola Canopy.