Slashdot Mirror


Copyright Law Protection for Employees?

Copyright Fringement asks: "I've been constantly asked by my employer to install software (Office, XP, etc) on unauthorized computers, as well as duplicate copyrighted material (video, CD's) en masse. I know that there are watchdog agencies that look out for this kind of stuff, and it's setting my employer (or me) up for serious fines and Other Bad Things(tm), but is there a way to protect myself from said Bad Things (tm)? I've explained till I'm blue in the face, but the bosses always: get a glazed look; or give some nonsense explanation. I like my job, but I'm not taking the fall for these guys. What's a self respecting Slashdot reader to do?"

138 comments

  1. What I'd suggest... by dave-tx · · Score: 1
    I don't know if this would absolutely protect you, but ask your manager to tell you, in writing, that the computers are authorized for the software install.

    --

    >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

    1. Re:What I'd suggest... by Reorax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the same way a hitman can present written copies of his orders.

      Oh, wait.

      --
      This sig is only here so people stop skipping the last lines of my posts.
    2. Re:What I'd suggest... by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      Or just install it and move on down the road. This happens everywhere. The bigger the corp normally there are more violations. The only place I have ever worked (besides for myself) that had licenses for every piece of software was Arthur Andersen. Pretty funny huh?

    3. Re:What I'd suggest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Holy bad analogy, Batman!

    4. Re:What I'd suggest... by toddbu · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's possible that even this is not enough. I once had to drive a truck down the road that was missing a tire and got pulled over and written a ticket. I went to court and fought the ticket on the grounds that my boss had told me to drive the vehicle rather than provide a new tire. I still lost the case. As the magistrate told me, "Your boss can't order you to do anything illegal". So if you get a letter from your boss saying that everything is ok, the actual act of asking him for the letter shows your suspicion, and if you get busted you could be asked why you didn't dig further.

      Personally, I'd just tell the boss that I wouldn't install the software. I've had times that I've needed to tell me boss that I wouldn't participate in illegal activity. They don't like it, but it's the right thing to do.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    5. Re:What I'd suggest... by jasonmicron · · Score: 1

      Yea but that kind of knocks you down a few pegs on the ol' corporate ladder. It kind of cuts into the whole "ass-kissing" thing. :p

    6. Re:What I'd suggest... by Mattcelt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps the best course of action is to call the BSA yourself and offer information in return for immunity. Get a lawyer to figure out the language, b/c you want to make sure:
      a) they will not sue you personally
      b) they will not press criminal charges against you
      c) they will do everything in their power, including have their legal team represent you at their cost, to protect you if anybody else sues you, fires you, files criminal charges, etc.

      I have no idea if it will work, but it's worth a shot asking - the BSA has an 'anonymous' hotline you can call and get at least a preliminary understanding of how they work.

      If the BSA isn't willing to help you, they can't very well hold you accountable, I wouldn't think.

      Just a thought.

    7. Re:What I'd suggest... by Deanasc · · Score: 1

      That sounds like one hell of a balancing act. Was it a stearing tire or a driving tire? Or both if a front wheel drive vehicle.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    8. Re:What I'd suggest... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Some trucks have more than 4 tires. Ever hear of an "Eighteen-wheeler"?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    9. Re:What I'd suggest... by ogre57 · · Score: 1

      An addition to this written and signed statement, have your boss agree to indemnify you against any and all legal action that may result from such activity, expressly including that he/she will personally pay any resulting fines and serve any resulting prison time. Might get the point across.

      And, if your boss is dumb enough to actually sign such a thing, and if you want the job, show the signed statement to his/her boss.

    10. Re:What I'd suggest... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

      An anonymous hotline doesn't help if you are turning over evidence in exchange for amnesty...

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    11. Re:What I'd suggest... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work. A signed statement from your boss saying that he takes all the blame isn't an authorized contract for the copyright holder. In other words, it is the copyright holder's wishes that you have to abide by, not your boss's.

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    12. Re:What I'd suggest... by cdwiegand · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed, mod parent up! Even with an official letter from the CEO on letterhead, it won't protect you in most places/situtations. YOUR EMPLOYER CANNOT FIRE YOU FOR NOT DOING ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES. IF YOU COMMIT A CRIME, *YOU* COMMITTED A CRIME. If they try to force you, talk to a lawyer. Most have a free or very low cost initial consultation - it helps them to ferret out the idiots who are just suing 'cause they're stupid from the people who actually have a case. And if you employer penalizes you for not doing an illegal activity, in most places that is illegal as well (although not all).

      I am not a lawyer, this is NOT legal advise.
      #include

      --
      . Define sqrt(x) as something really evil like (x / rand()), and bury it deep. Watch your coworkers go nuts.
    13. Re:What I'd suggest... by toddbu · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was a tire on a trailer that I was towing. We put too much weight in the back of the trailer and it started to fishtail while we were driving on the highway. The back end snapped around and popped the tire completely off the rim. As I was headed back to the shop, a cop spotted the missing tire and wrote me up. The law that he used was a Michigan law against studded snow tires. It prohibits direct metal contact with the road.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    14. Re:What I'd suggest... by Ommadawn · · Score: 1

      Similar issue: the company truck had expired plates - not just months, but *years* expired. as in, 2002 tags on one, 2001 on the other, in 2004. I told him (the boss) several times that the plates were expired.. yeah,yeah,yeah.. guess who was driving when the truck got pulled over? me. Whose responsibility? Mine.

      He said he'd pay the ticket, but he didn't, with the result i'm still dealing with it a year later, and this is just an "expired tags" ticket.

      --
      Restrictions are prohibited. Be well, get better.
    15. Re:What I'd suggest... by ogre57 · · Score: 1

      Didn't mean to imply it would work from a legal standpoint. Intent is to try to shock some reality into the (theoretical) mind of the PHB. Granted this is normally a futile undertaking. But if the fool actually signed such a thing .. "Hey, boss's boss, take a look at ..". Alternative, noted by many others, is to rat out to someone like the BSA thugs; am trying for a "nicer" solution.

    16. Re:What I'd suggest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some trucks have more than 4 tires. Ever hear of an "Eighteen-wheeler"?

      Yes, but how many tires do they have? :o)

    17. Re:What I'd suggest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who's job it is to support ms license sales to businesses for a large reseller, there are a couple of things I would suggest.

      First, the owner of the PCs is responsible for their licensing. Thus you (personally) will not be liable for any fines relating to this. Though this says nothing about who gets blamed (and thus canned) internally.

      Second, the majority of BSA audits are initiated by disgruntled employees, and involve nothing more than an anonymous call, email or web form. This risk is only heightened by poor management practices, such as you describe.

      Finally, if you're serious about trying to convince your manager, your explanations need to induce fear of the consequences. The fine leveraged by the BSA for violations is $1000 per application. While this may initially look like merely double the price for office pro(~$450, without maintenance options), and so may be worth the risk, this is false. An office pro install consists of no less than 8 applications, making each unlicensed PC result in no less than $8000 in fines. And if they want to keep using ms office, they'll need to buy the licenses anyway.

      So, while an average small business of 50 employees would cost $23000 to license office pro, using the unlicensed software anyway will make them liable for fines of $400000 or more, plus the $23000 it would have cost initially.

      I bet openoffice.org will start to look better and better...

    18. Re:What I'd suggest... by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      most places, if you are driving a company vehicle they are responsible for things like tags.. you could at least sue your boss.

    19. Re:What I'd suggest... by Raghead · · Score: 1

      Actually, this isn't completely correct. While it's true your employer cannot cover you if you do something illegal, they can certainly fire you for it. Most states are "at will" employment states, and an employer can fire you any time for any reason not specifically prohibited by law. Plus, they can even fire you for reasons that are prohibited, if they're cunning enough to not SAY they are firing you for a prohibited reason.

    20. Re:What I'd suggest... by Marcion · · Score: 1

      It is a very difficult situation, you may need to consider another job. Get into a union if you can.

      How about suggesting that there are free and legal alternatives and install that instead? Or just install it and say that "I couldn't install Word but this is much better and is the latest big thing"

      Use OpenOffice 2.0 instead of Word, Gimp instead of Photoshop and so on. All well known programs have two or three alternatives - one of which will provide a windows binary (look for win32).

      Best thing is to cultivate a reputation as a Free Software ( www.gnu.com/philosophy ) fanatic and people won't dare ask you for Windows software.

      Good luck.

    21. Re:What I'd suggest... by Marcion · · Score: 1

      Sorry the link is
      http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/

      When is /. going to get a post correction feature?

      Also good is the FSF/UNESCO Free Software Directory http://directory.fsf.org/ Which allows you to search for free and legal alternatives under different categories. Good for finding out the names of things.

    22. Re:What I'd suggest... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I nearly found this out first hand in my company vehicle. I was pulled over for a random breath test (we don't have field sobriety tests in Australia, just breath tests afaik). I passed that with flying colors, but then I was asked to park the car around the corner, because it didn't appear to have current registration.

      The police officer made a call and found that it was registered, it just didn't have the current sticker on it. I think I could have been fined for this but they just asked that I take care of it as soon as possible and then sent me on my way. It turned out that the current registration sticker was on a desk in the office somewhere, and just hadn't been given to me yet.

      Work pays for all the expenses associated with the car (registration, petrol, insurance, servicing, etc), and part from the petrol, pays for them directly (i never see the bills) but I drive the car as a personal vehicle, so i'm not sure exactly where I would have stood from a legal point of view.

    23. Re:What I'd suggest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I once had to drive a truck down the road that was missing a tire

      The road was missing a tire? Where I live, that's a _good_ thing. Tires in the road slow down traffic and can lead to accidents. You should be happy that the road was missing a tire.

    24. Re:What I'd suggest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Difference is that as the driver of the truck, you are legally obligated to ensure that the vehicle is safe.

      A person installing software can take instructions and on a good faith basis install said software.

  2. No protection for employees by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is no protection just because you are an employee following orders. Technically, you and all of your supervisors all the way up to the president of the company, and the company itself, are individually and collectively guilty of copyright infringement, even if you don't know it is going on. If you *do* know then you are not only guilty, but willfully in violation. In either case, all of you can be sued individually.

    Speculating here, in practice the copyright holder would probably attempt to sue anyone with the ability to pay (which may still include you, although for a smaller amount than the company might be sued for). And in front of a jury you might get off using the victim defense (i.e. if you could convince the jury that you were afraid of losing your job, etc.). You'd probably still be found guilty but you might escape a fine (at least in a civil suit). At the very least you should document each time you are told to install an illegal copy f something (who, when, what, where, and your protest to your supervisor at the time). Sounds like that could be a full time chore in your case.

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:No protection for employees by sudog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the employee doesn't know it's going on, the person responsible is the one in charge handing him the software and saying "Install this, it's authorised, bought and paid for."

      No employee should expect to shoulder the burden of verifying that every single thing they do conforms to every possible law and is in fact legal when their bosses give orders and make false or misleading claims. It's an impossible expectation.

    2. Re:No protection for employees by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with you but copyright law doesn't. You can still be found guilty and the minimum fine is $200 per occurrence last I heard. However, I would also agree that a jury would probably feel the same as you in most circumstances and acquit (but this would be from a human standpoint, not from a point of law).

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    3. Re:No protection for employees by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      Doesn't a corporation (or LLC) provide protection against this kind of stuff?

      In other words, if anyone gets sued it would be the corporate entity not an individual. The corporation takes any legal heat. I thought that was the whole point of having a corporation.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    4. Re:No protection for employees by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In a civil case, it would make no sense to sue the employee as opposed to spending all efforts going after the company's big bucks. I don't think the individual has much to worry about. Besides, most people don't know exactly how many licenses the company has purchased since it isn't their responsibility to keep track; it's the company's.

    5. Re:No protection for employees by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      That protects shareholders, not employees.

    6. Re:No protection for employees by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      it provides that protection to the stockholders and investors, not the employees

    7. Re:No protection for employees by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

      In general, being incorporated, or working for a corporation, limits your risk in that a corporation's bad choices cannot risk your personal property, etc. But this doesn't protect you from the consequences of your own illegal actions, whether or not you were directed to perform the action by the corporation.

      If that were possible, everyone would form a corporation and then commit all of the illegal actions they wanted. Once caught, they'd fall back on the corporation guilty, individual innocent defense.

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    8. Re:No protection for employees by pthisis · · Score: 1

      However, I would also agree that a jury would probably feel the same as you in most circumstances and acquit (but this would be from a human standpoint, not from a point of law).

      No, it's a point of law. Jury nullification is legal and well-established through court rulings and precedence. It's not codified, but neither are a lot of other court precedents.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    9. Re:No protection for employees by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      There is no protection just because you are an employee following orders.

      In either case, all of you can be sued individually.

      No, you can't be sued individually for performing your duties as an employee. This can be true even if you weren't directly following orders. The doctrine is called respondeat superior, which stands for "let the master answer".

      Of course this doctrine doesn't protect you from any criminal case which could be brought against you, and since you're infringing copyright for the benefit of a for-profit corporation it would probably be considered a criminal matter.

      To answer the person's question, the only real way to protect yourself 100% is to refuse to commit the copyright infringement, and if you witness them commit it anyway, then to go to the police. This is a bit of a ridiculous reaction to the situation, if you ask me, but that's what the law tells you to do.

    10. Re:No protection for employees by jbplou · · Score: 1

      Most likely the copy right holder would just sue the company because they are the ones getting value from the software. They may press charges though on all involved in the scam, the installer who knows the about the problem and still does it is definately going to be a target.

  3. Get it in writing... by Rolan · · Score: 1

    ...would be a good start. At least then you can show that you told your boss why it shouldn't be done and that he told you to do it anyway.

    --
    - AMW
    1. Re:Get it in writing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah unfortunately most of the stuff you would have to get in writing... but then theres the catch that you wrote up why something was illegal and you do it anyway... if i were you i would lie and say that theres newer software protection and your key will not work... then come up with a budget to get them up to par and legaly, and get them to sign that.... so then if you did get in trouble it would show the measures you have been taking to get things cleaned up...

    2. Re:Get it in writing... by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      ... or not.

      With a paper trail, it's pretty certain that you were the one doing the installs. Without it, they will have to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that you were the person who did the install in every instance which they claim is a violation. That's not an easy get. It'll be much easier for them to prove malfeasance on the part of the corporation than to prove it on the part of a single person.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    3. Re:Get it in writing... by Rolan · · Score: 1

      In a corproate environment, unless you make an effort to hide who installed the software, it's typically pretty easy to figure it out. When it comes down to it, you're company's going to blame you anyway and claim ignorance. If you have it in writing, they can't get away with that.

      --
      - AMW
  4. Give them the invoice by redog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Buy the software and give them the bill.

    1. Re:Give them the invoice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hopefully with the company's money and not yours...

  5. Report them! by alta · · Score: 2, Informative

    Go to http://www.nopiracy.com/

    And fill out the form.

    Yeah, right... Maybe if there was a bounty. Is there a bounty? Hmmmm

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:Report them! by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or just print out that page and anonymously leave copies in common areas. After all, if you like your job, you don't want the company shut down or even disrupted.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    2. Re:Report them! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I think leaving anonymous copies would be a bit obvious since only the person installing the software would have a concern. Most users don't care whether the software is licensed or not as long as it works.

      Would you work for a company that's asking you to do something illegal? That's not a job I would keep. I left one company because the boss insisted that I work seven days/80+ hours a week even though the company has a six days/60 hours a week policy, and HR was looking the other way. You got to know your limitations and when to fold them.

    3. Re:Report them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Type 0: This one doesn't even know the alphabet. A typical post is like this one:
      wow u r fat
      123 4 5 678

      Some has speculated that a Type 0 has to be about a 14-year-old. Personally, I think this indvidual never graduated from nursery school and/or doesn't know how to use more than seven letters.

    4. Re:Report them! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you count how many letters are being used, it's seven. The letter w is used twice. I'll make sure I make distinction the next time I update it. Thanks and have a nice day!

  6. If you're interested in money.... by Prien715 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Talk to one of these so-called watchdog groups and offer testimony in exchange for diplomatic immunity and a tidy sum (because you risk losing your job).

    Machiavellian? Maybe. Remember the alternative: participating in blatant ethics violations that you know are wrong but decide to do anyway.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:If you're interested in money.... by Inominate · · Score: 1

      in exchange for diplomatic immmunity?
      Is he working for the UN or something?

    2. Re:If you're interested in money.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably, the UN are theives of the highest order.

    3. Re:If you're interested in money.... by jon787 · · Score: 1

      Does the whistle blower protection stuff cover this?

      Personally my job does not include keeping track of licensing, that is my boss's job. My boss gets the requests, signs off on them, and gives me the work orders. Unless I am given evidence otherwise I just assume my boss actually checked the licenses. I have had to return a few that request some software which is only free for personal use though.

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    4. Re:If you're interested in money.... by wolf31o2 · · Score: 1

      Basically, you need to look at it like this. Can you risk the possibility of having the BSA or some other watchdog group coming after you personally? If not, then you should take a strong stand. Your first course of action is to scare the shit out of your boss, not by making threats, but by getting documented evidence of just what happens to companies that willfully break copyright law. Find the absolute worst examples you can come up with to show to them. Perhaps if they realize that they can be sued personally, and in some cases even spend time in jail, they might see things in a different light.

    5. Re:If you're interested in money.... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

      Whistleblower protection is for an employee's protection from the company's retribution. The copyright holder isn't required to protect you from penalties for your participation in copyright infringement, although they may voluntarily do so if you are the one who reports the infringement (but again, they wouldn't be required to do so).

      The truth is, while everyone is responsible by law to know if a copyright is being infringed, in reality (as you point out) it's not practical and a jury would probably side with you when it came to setting a fine. If you *do* know, however, and the copyright holder can prove it, then look out cause all bets are off (as they say :).

      Keep in mind there's a difference in copyright infringement and being penalized for it (if you copy it without permission then it is infringement - the infringing part is the act of copying, not whether you know it is copyrighted or not).

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    6. Re:If you're interested in money.... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Why is this rated funny? It's probably the best last-resort solution. If they absolutely won't listen to you, they'll still listen to the BSA.

      And the BSA doesn't necessarily have to raid your workplace; they just have to give your boss a nice, friendly call.

    7. Re:If you're interested in money.... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      Whistleblower protection is for an employee's protection from the company's retribution
      There's no whistleblower protection at goals and expectations setting time. When your boss gives you next year's goals, and you've got 20, and next year's expectations, and you've been asked to do things far outside your realm of control... there's no whistleblower protection. Next year, at performance review time, you'll get reamed six ways to Sunday, a 0% raise, and maybe even demoted. When you finally quit from being burned out there's no whistleblower protection for the state of mind you're left in.

      Best to just do what the company asks and cover your butt as quietly as possible.
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    8. Re:If you're interested in money.... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      In theory sure there is. The goals and expectations end up being provably out of line with what other people were getting (i.e. they took revenge) and the company gets nailed by the department of labor so hard it isn't funny (like being shut down). On the other hand the department of labor enfocement hasn't happened it any meaingful sense since Carter was president.

    9. Re:If you're interested in money.... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      There's no whistleblower protection at goals and expectations setting time.

      And in order to sue a company for firing you you're going to have to take a big risk that you won't spend a bunch of money on a lawsuit and still lose. If you're going to go the route of refusing to commit copyright infringement, and you can't live off unemployment compensation for a few months while trying to get another job, then you better start looking for another employer.

      Really, if you're not working under a contract, and you can't live off unemployment compensation for a few months, then you should be looking for another employer anyway (and/or lowering your expenses and saving up money in case something does happen). It's really easy for an at-will employee to get fired, and it's really hard for one to win a wrongful termination lawsuit.

    10. Re:If you're interested in money.... by systemofadown · · Score: 0

      wtf diplomatic immunity are u talking just IMMUNITY?

      --
      Science is but a perversion of itself unless it has as its ultimate goal the betterment of humanity. -Nikola Telsa
  7. Refuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get it in writing that they are asking you to do it ... then refuse ... and sue them when they fire you.

    1. Re:Refuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I knew a reply like this was going to come up. And I kind of knew that I was going to see it modded up. But... this is just a ridiculous way to look at things. Small companies do things like this all the time. I worked for a small consulting firm, that was an awesome place to work for, paid well, and they treated us great. But... their software licensing practices were shady at best. I didn't feel entirely comfortable about installing software I knew we didnt have a license for, but in the end I liked my job, played dumb and installed whatever. The place had kind of a cowboy culture to it and even if I went against the boss and he caved, I would have been branded "not one of them" and my future there would have been hurt.

      THINK about what you are saying. Youre telling this guy to piss off his boss to the point where he may be fired or considered not a team player and passed over for opportunities, and then sue them. Ok so the guy gets fired, with what money is he going to sue them? His gravy train that was paying his mortgage and feeding his kids with a little left over is gone, and hes going to spend his reserve cash on suing his ex-employer? Did you think about what would happen if he wins? He might win his job back. Yeaaah, thats really going to work out swell. After all the hassle, he might win a few months worth of wages after losing sleep over a legal battle for months.

      I've heard the retort "well if the company does things like this, this isnt a company you want to work for." It just does not hold water. The company might be awesome in all other respects, but they don't feel that software piracy is something to be concerned about. You must put yourself in his position. When the choice is to walk out on a job and cut yourself off from your source of income, or to just install the damn software, I am betting you will just install the damn software.

      In a .com world, where you might have been able to walk out the door on Friday and be walking into another company on Monday, I might agree with you. But this is a small issue in the grand scheme of things where you may be facing the reality of prolonged unemployment.

    2. Re:Refuse by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      Every company does some things wrong. You just have to decide if that company does so much wrong that you can't live with it.

    3. Re:Refuse by pthisis · · Score: 1

      THINK about what you are saying. Youre telling this guy to piss off his boss to the point where he may be fired or considered not a team player and passed over for opportunities, and then sue them. Ok so the guy gets fired, with what money is he going to sue them?

      I agree, suing them is unrealistic. It's potentially worth documenting anyway, if they're going to fire you you can point out that it's illegal and essentially settle with them--but at that point relations are going to be SOUR, so it's probably only a stopgap to keep you working while you job hunt.

      I've heard the retort "well if the company does things like this, this isnt a company you want to work for." It just does not hold water. The company might be awesome in all other respects, but they don't feel that software piracy is something to be concerned about.

      This is BS. It's one thing if a company has some policies you don't want, asks you to work more weekends than you'd like, etc. I could maybe see overlooking them installing illegal copies of software for you to use--I'd have a problem with that, but I haven't been in that situation to know if I'd actually walk or not.

      But it's an entirely different thing if they order you to commit illegal actions. It's not worth it, especially since you know it's illegal--you're accepting personal liability beyond the payment you're getting from the job.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    4. Re:Refuse by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      It's potentially worth documenting anyway, if they're going to fire you you can point out that it's illegal and essentially settle with them--but at that point relations are going to be SOUR, so it's probably only a stopgap to keep you working while you job hunt.

      More importantly though, it's something to use in your defense if the company tries to say they fired you for cause and you don't deserve unemployment compensation. Suing a company for wrongful termination is really hard. Unless I had a really good case and could convince a lawyer to take it on a contingency basis I probably wouldn't do it. But getting them to pay up to 50% of your salary in unemployment compensation while you look for a new job is much more realistic.

  8. That sucks by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    My advice...

    1) Talk to your corporate counsel. If they're not idiots (which isn't a given), they'll realize you're doing them a favor.

    2) Don't sweat it. This is between you and your conscience. You may theoretically be liable for these violations, but nobody will be coming after you personally, especially if you have a paper trail covering your ass and super-especially if you've gone to your lawyers.

    But, yeah, stuff liek this sucks, especially in a small company.

    1. Re:That sucks by Wolfger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      2) Don't sweat it. This is between you and your conscience. You may theoretically be liable for these violations, but nobody will be coming after you personally, especially if you have a paper trail covering your ass and super-especially if you've gone to your lawyers.
      s/especially/if and only if/
      If you don't cover your butt, you can pretty much expect that your company has documented that you installed the pirated software, and they will do their best to make you the fall guy for it all. Do not trust your company to be altruistic, nice, or even honest. Failure to do as the boss asks can damage your job, but doing what he wants could ruin your life. Document the heck out of your objections. Ask your boss to put the order in writing (or "send me a quick e-mail clarifying what you want").
    2. Re:That sucks by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

      [...]your company has documented that you installed the pirated software, and they will do their best to make you the fall guy for it all

      Wouldn't work for the company. No amount of documentation of your activities would get them off the hook. They would be guilty if they knew or didn't know, and if they instructed you or didn't instruct you to infringe. The company's best defense would be to show that they had procedures in place to periodically audit their computers, and they found and removed the illegal software as soon as they could have reasonably been expected to do so. Anything less and they will end up paying big bucks. On the other hand, if *you* document the infringement, later you might be able to convince the jury that you were a victim (along with the copyright holder). Then, you might get away with it with no penalty (but no guarantees).

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    3. Re:That sucks by Otter · · Score: 1

      We can disagree about the probability of the guy's getting screwed, but I think we agree that he'd be wise to take precautions against it.

    4. Re:That sucks by snooo53 · · Score: 1

      I agree with the above posters sentiments.

      Not knowing the size of your company I'd consider a couple other things:

      1. How much is the software being used on said computers? If the software or the computers are seldom being used, I'd say don't worry about it. If on the other hand, these an intergral part of what you produce you should really have a license.

      2. Is there a free or cheaper alternative that does the same work just as well? If the app in question is Photoshop, could they be using Gimp instead? And maybe keep one license for Photatoshop on the server so someone could use it.

      As far as CYA goes, I don't think you really can, as many others have suggested. One suggestion might be to talk to the person in charge of finances and see how big an impact it would have, and weigh that against the risks of prosecution. Either way I think the best way to CYA is start looking for another job.

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  9. Fake a letter email from MS telling them to stop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fake a letter email from MS telling them to stop! I'm sure you can make the email look like it came from MS's progrom that sniffs out cheats... PUT THE FEAR of litigation in them!

  10. Documentation by bitty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Get them to give you those orders in writing . Then explain to them why you won't do it in writing . Take both documents to their corporate lawyers and keep a copy at home for safe keeping. Now you not only have a paper trail of the situation to protect yourself should the company get audited, you have ammo against them should they try to fire you for not following orders.

    What they're asking you to do is violate copyright, and it's just plain wrong. Should you comply, you're opening yourself up to a world of hurt. If the company gets nailed you will be hung out to dry. You would be the one doing the copying and unauthorized installs, not management. The managers can claim they didn't know you were doing it and are shocked -- shocked! that you would to such a thing.

    1. Re:Documentation by seanellis · · Score: 1

      This is easily the best suggestion so far. Mod parent up!

      It will require a lot of courage to go through with it, though. Point out the fact, however, that you are protecting the company as a whole against potential liability, and you're not just doing it to be petty-minded.

    2. Re:Documentation by mutterc · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've pushed and pushed before to try to get orders in writing (or even email) (not because they were illegal, but because they were a Bad Idea).

      I've never been successful. I do passive-aggressive resistance instead ("sure, I'll put that on my to-do list") - the bosses are too busy to keep badgering me about every little thing.

    3. Re:Documentation by bitty · · Score: 1

      The phrase, "I'll be happy to address this as soon as I get it in writing," stated in a pleasant manner leaves no room for doubt that you absolutely have to have it in writing before you'll even consider it without being confrontational. This type of thing is not where you can allow yourself to be spineless.

    4. Re:Documentation by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >I've pushed and pushed before to try to get orders in writing (or even email) (not because they were illegal, but because they were a Bad Idea).

      Say that your boss wants you to make a hundred widgets and you think that bad things will happen, say because they don't fit your hundred gromets.

      Write an email to him;

      "As we discussed this afternoon I will create the hundred 3" widgets, starting on Friday and I expect to finish on Monday. I understand that you need them because of an emergency request by a customer.

      Please be aware that, as I have explained before, these sized widgets will not fit our existing 8 mm gromets."

      Now you've gotten what you wanted. If the order was wrong or misunderstood, he should tell you as soon as possible. If the bad thing becomes reality, then you've warned him and he should have taken you seriously. If the bad thing never happens, well then you've learned something and your boss sees you as an annoying in-box filler.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:Documentation by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      And when they fire you for demanding it in writing sue them for wrongful dismissal.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:Documentation by jizmonkey · · Score: 1
      And when they fire you for demanding it in writing sue them for wrongful dismissal.

      The submitter almost certainly lives in America, given his spelling and the demographics of Slashdot. Either you didn't catch that, or you don't know much about American employment law.

      --
      With great power comes great fan noise.
  11. You're breaking the law by mcgroarty · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What would you do if your employer asked you to break into a competitor's office and copy their contract files? How about if he asked you to go buy him some drugs and hire him a prostitute?

    Just beacuse it's a crime with a lesser chance of getting caught doesn't change the nature of the act. (Not that the spy and hooker job wouldn't be hella awesome...) You refuse to do it, or you break the law. You don't isolate yourself from responsibility for your commission of a criminal act.

    1. Re:You're breaking the law by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about if he asked you to go buy him some drugs and hire him a prostitute?

      Make sure I get some too ? It's the one lesson we all learned in kindergarden: if you're going to get hookers and blow, make sure you bring enough for everybody.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    2. Re:You're breaking the law by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just beacuse it's a crime with a lesser chance of getting caught doesn't change the nature of the act. (Not that the spy and hooker job wouldn't be hella awesome...) You refuse to do it, or you break the law. You don't isolate yourself from responsibility for your commission of a criminal act.

      Now if /. would just learn the difference between civil law and criminal law we'd be good to go. I guess apples to oranges comparisons are more interesting though.

    3. Re:You're breaking the law by jbplou · · Score: 1

      Now if /. would just learn the difference between civil law and criminal law we'd be good to go. I guess apples to oranges comparisons are more interesting though.

      Copy Right infringement is criminal law that is why you can go to jail for it. Just because the RIAA are making many civil cases doesn't mean that stealing is not a crime.

  12. It is time to look for another gig by Safety+Cap · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The company's values are not the same as yours. You have only two choices:
    1. Change your values to match theirs, or
    2. Find a place that shares the same values.
    They will not change, and you cannot change them.

    This is not a bad thing, per se. It just means you and they have different values. Would you work at a lab where they routinely sprayed oven cleaner in Rabbits' eyes (even if you weren't the sprayer)? What about at a place that dumped chemicals into streams (even if you weren't the dumper)? How about a place that forced some employees to work in very unsafe conditions (even if you didn't work in unsafe conditions)?

    We all have a choice. You can either stay or go; being the "whistleblower" means that you will be leaving almost immediately as you take your parting shot on the way out.

    --
    Yeah, right.
  13. Go for the reward by nixman99 · · Score: 1

    Report them. You might get up to $50K reward. Let us know how much you really get.
    http://www.siia.net/piracy/report.asp

  14. not surprising by teksno · · Score: 2, Interesting

    after this ask /., its not surprising we get stories like this: http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/24/051 7229&tid=185&tid=98&tid=218

    how is the general public supposed to find copyright infringment wrong when companies are doing it, and your boss is telling you to do it...

  15. Not that this helps much... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a self respecting Slashdot reader to do?

    But why is anyone with self respect reading /. ?

  16. Wrong question by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    We really need an end to Ask Slashdots that request legal advice. Leaving aside the legal and ethical problems of providing legal advice from non-lawyers, the potential for harm to the questioner from misinformed Slashdotters is mind-boggling!

    Fortunately small in this case. My very inexpert opinion is that an employee who does something illegal at his bosses request has no more legal coverage than if he acted at his own initiative. But the chances of your being prosecuted or sued are very small -- in past situations like yours, the IP police have gone after the company, not the individual employees. Of course there's no guarantee that they'll always do this.

    The question you should be asking is "What do I do?" There's no simple answer there. You say you like your job, but you're also concerned about the legal risks you're running. You have to weigh one against the other. And this is something you just have to do for yourself. You're the one at risk of unemployment and/or legal peril. Only you can decide how important all the factors are.

    It's certainly not fair that your bosses have put you in this position. But that's the kind of shit that we all have to deal with.

    If you're determined to put an end to this situation, there are various outs -- all of which put your job at risk.

    • Simply refuse to make any more pirate installations.
    • Narc on your company to the IP police.
    • Find somebody in the company bureaucracy who sees things your way. The legal department would probably not be happy to know that managers are putting the company at risk this way. The HR department might also be helpful.
    Legally, your bosses can't retaliate against you for doing any of the above. Doesn't mean they won't, or that they won't get away with it.
  17. Give us a call! by bluephone · · Score: 1

    Hi, my name's Bob S. Arrow. You can call me BSA for short. I can help you out of your situation! Just give me a call at home, my number is 1-888-667-4722 (It's pure coincidence that my phone number spells NO-PIRACY) and give me your name, place of employment, their phone number, address, and what software they're asking you to copy and I'll help you out in not time! Pay no attention to the swarm of lawyerbots and accountants swooping through your office windows...

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    1. Re:Give us a call! by k4_pacific · · Score: 1
      1-888-667-4722 (It's pure coincidence that my phone number spells NO-PIRACY)

      Where are you getting the Y?

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    2. Re:Give us a call! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Y is superfluous, but they tack it on because no one would know what "No Pirac" would mean.

  18. call the bsa by capoccia · · Score: 1

    call the bsa anonymously.

    1. Re:call the bsa by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you call the BSA anonymously, they will not know who you are. So when they sue your employer, you'll get sued too.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  19. Yup, been there by Komarosu · · Score: 1

    I was in pritty much the same situation, but this time it was local goverment, and not only that but they'd been caught with it before. New IT manager, new mistakes. He ordered everyone around to "bend the rules, and we'll fix it later". but they never got round to it.

    Problem was he started getting shirty about my personal blog when i made a joke about one of the councillors in the area. So much so i ended up resigning. A quick talk with the BSA and now i hear that idiot is also out of a job.

    While i've technically done a "Good Thing"(tm) i still feel a bit evil as my actions generally cause another person to loose his job.

    While being a snitch is the best way to fuck someone over, make sure you have the heart to commit fully to your actions.

    --

    "What do you mean you have no ice? Do you expect me to drink this coffee hot?" - Random Customer, Clerks
    1. Re:Yup, been there by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is one of the best truisms I ever heard: if you never piss anyone off, you're probably not doing anything worthwhile.

      I'm a nice guy. My natural inclination is to be everybody's friend. If you never have to deal with people whose views may disagree with yours, then that's great.

      But sometimes, you have money involved. Sometimes, your relationship with someone puts one of you in a senior position within some organisation. Sometimes, you simply have a strong difference of opinion with someone, or your ethics mean you disapprove of their behaviour. In these cases, it's impossible to be everyone's friend all the time.

      I've come to the conclusion that when this happens, the only two things that count are having principles you believe in, and sticking to them. To me, and amongst other things, that means you back people up when they deserve your help, you deal with people with honesty and integrity, you negotiate firmly but fairly, and if someone is doing something wrong, the consequences are their responsibility, and theirs alone.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  20. Report them to the BSA by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

    Report them to the BSA.

    They'll come in, do an audit, fine the beezubus out of them, and give you a cut.

    Then take that money as a severance package and get a job with some folks who aren't complete kneebiters.

    I dislike the BSA as much as the next /.'er, but if you're a business, and you can't afford the software license, then use something else. Don't copy it. It's not like there aren't GPL'ed software for most needs.

    --
    -EvilMagnus
  21. Let Microsoft be the bad guy. by Deanasc · · Score: 1

    Tell them you got a phone call from Microsoft asking you why there are two copies of the program using the same account number. You know, kind of like what this guy did.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    1. Re:Let Microsoft be the bad guy. by hacker · · Score: 1

      You realize the professor made completely falsified threats, right? The thief kept the laptop and I'm sure the professor lost a lot of credibility.

    2. Re:Let Microsoft be the bad guy. by Deanasc · · Score: 1

      My sarcasim is sometimes too subtle. This appears to be one of those instances.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  22. You'll be fine...just CYA by j-turkey · · Score: 1

    There's alot of paranoia going around, huh? Yeah, if you knowingly break the law under company orders, you're still breaking the law, but criminal charges for something like this are generally unlikely. In cases like this, businesses are usually held responsible...and the business will look for an employee scapegoat. At this point, I should probably get the IANAL out of the way...so IANAL.

    Here's what I'd do, send a written meno to your boss and his/her boss. Make sure that they get it, and make sure that you save a copy for yourself. In the memo, make it clear that you are unsure of the legality of what you are doing, but you will move forward on their orders under the assumption that the manager who assigned you to do the work obtained the proper licenses (list their name). Also note your objection to this in the case that the proper licenses are not in place. This will take care of the CYA part. Now, the burden is on them.

    Don't call the BSA if you still want to work there. Those guys are dicks, and they'll surely audit your company, and you will be the guy doing all the work. It will make your life very difficult. You will have to prove that you purchased every license for every piece of BSA software on every machine in your company. It's a sucky process, and in the end, the BSA typically waive any charges if your company buys all of their missing licenses and promises not to screw up again. To complicate matters, your company will have a pretty good idea that you called the BSA on them (since you've already raised a small stink).

    On the other hand, if you're really pissed that they put you in that position in the first place...don't install the software and find another job. I still wouldn't call the BSA on them, because I've got a thing about not burning bridges (and again, they'll probably put two and two together to have an idea that it was you who blew the whistle). I'm sure that they'll eventually get theirs without your intervention.

    --

    -Turkey

  23. Nonsense - he screwed himself by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While i've technically done a "Good Thing"(tm) i still feel a bit evil as my actions generally cause another person to loose his job.

    No, his actions caused him to lose his job. Had he behaved ethically and responsibly, he would still have his job. He asked for it, he got it (Toyota).

  24. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reach around behind you, get a firm grip on the stick lodged up your ass, and pull.

  25. Your best defense by aminorex · · Score: 1

    Your best defense is to anonymously report them to the BSA and the FBI, and to demand from each of those organizations a confirmation code that you can use to identify yourself as the informer in court, should you ever be faced with criminal prosecution or a similarly damaging civil judgement. There's no reason to sacrifice your job because your employer is breaking the law.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  26. Re:Fake a letter email from MS telling them to sto by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    Parent's modded Funny, but it's more like Insightful. The point is: scare them.

    Tell the Powers That Be that you're afraid that some disgruntled employee might turn them in. You like your job, so that's not gonna be you, and make sure they can see that. But it's a very real danger and you're trying to look out for the company. That's the message to bring them.

    With that said (and especially if they still brush you off), you might want to consider just how much you like that job. If the company's asking you to do something unlawful for which you'd have take some of the blame, that's not exactly a company that cares about its people, y'know? I used to be "the PC guy" for a regional retailer that populated its entire corporate office with a single license each for Lotus 123 and WordPerfect. I'd include software in the purchase req. for a new PC, and one of the VPs would say "We already have that." (I finally persuaded them to start buying more licenses... to get more manuals.) Stupid stupid rat creatures. That was a warning sign, and I'm glad I got out when I did (before they imploded from executive incompetence).

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  27. Union by srobert · · Score: 1

    The last time I was in a similar situation, it wasn't as much about the legality of my action but the safety of employees and customers that drove me to tell an officer of my company that I would not be able to follow his instructions. That was a union job and I had seniority. I knew that the union would back me up. Pissed them off but they weren't able to fire me.
    My advice: organize.

  28. For get your job - it is dead anyway by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Forget about your job. The company is dead, and therefore your job is dead. They just don't know it yet.

    There are whistle blower laws in place to protect you, but you better be working with the police if you want to apply them. (This may be a civil matter where they don't apply)

    Update your resume tonight. The only reason you wouldn't take a new job (even for less money) is if you were collecting evidence, even then you should ask them what you should do.

    Contact every piracy organization you can find, and ask their advice. Insist of getting everything in writing.

    Get a lawyer. 1 hour with the right lawyer can easily be worth the cost. (You only need 15 minutes of their time, the rest is time for them to research the laws that apply)

    I'd tell you to sell your stock, but that would be considered trading on insider information, so I'm not sure if you are safe to do so.

    Most important, consider your current company bankrupt - they will be soon anyway.

    1. Re:For get your job - it is dead anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you have to be a corporate officier or legal counsel or other special position to count as an "insider" ?

  29. No Contracts to Break the Law by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 1

    I don't know if it's this way in all states, but I've been told that it is impossible to make a legal contract to commit an illegal act. So, you maintain personal responsibility for breaking the law and cannot hide behind loyalty to your company or contractual obligation because you cannot be compelled into action by any prior agreement.

  30. Get legal counsel by GlL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone that has posted has an opinion, Some of them make more sense than others, but none of us are lawyers. The best thing for you to do is to get advice from an attorney. NOW! Before a disgruntled employee other than you calls the BSA or other agency.

    --
    I'm a happy pessimist. I expect and prepare for the worst, when it doesn't happen I am pleasantly surprised.
    1. Re:Get legal counsel by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good advice. If you are routinely required to do something you know is illegal, your first stop should be at an attorney's office.

      By the way, I'm not an attorney but I am married to one and I get a layman's explanation on lots of interesting legal subjects (my wife requires me to say that I have NOT asked her for and she has NOT given me advice to pass on the Slashdot on any subject, past or present).

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
  31. resign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, find another position. In a similar position I wound up paying a 10,000 dollar fine and spending jail time plus 2 years on probation .. eventually my record was cleared but the years of struggle were not worth it.

  32. Tell them about the BSA by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    I would tell your boss that it just takes one disgruntled employee to make an anonymous call to the BSA. If they tip them off that there is illegal software, they can show up for an audit. Tell him that they could be fined $10,000 for each violation and all it would take would be an anonymous phonecall.

    I like to mention the disgruntled employee thing, because it puts things into terms they can understand.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:Tell them about the BSA by wowbagger · · Score: 1
      I like to mention the disgruntled employee thing, because it puts things into terms they can understand.


      Terms they can mis-understand, you mean. Putting it like this will almost guarantee that your boss will take this as a threat by you to do exactly what you describe.

      Making your boss think you are threatening him is NEVER a good thing.

      This guy's boss is clearly incapable of understanding ANYTHING more complicated than a nipple - and people like that judge everybody else by their own set of morals. His boss has no problem screwing other people - do you think his boss wil NOT think "Hey, this guy's trying to screw me 'cause that's what I'd do?"

      Again, as many others have already said:
      • Get the requests in writing, signed by your boss, on company letterhead. DO NOT accept an email, or a simple scribble on a random piece of paper is NOT good enough to stand in court.
      • Respond to the requests in writing on company letterhead, detailing your concerns.
      • Send copies of both your boss's letter and your response to your company's legal counsel, along with a cover letter summarizing your concerns about the legality of the actions.

  33. Insightful AC posting, film at 11 by metamatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You need to bear in mind that copying more than 10 copies of a piece of software, worth more than $2,500 total, is a felony if it is done (a) deliberately and (b) with intent to violate copyrights.

    The courts would have no trouble at all proving that you deliberately made the copies, knew you were violating copyright, and hence did it deliberately.

    They would also have no problem proving that it was done for commercial gain, since it was clearly saving the company money. Hence, you would personally be liable for not just a huge fine, but also a term of up to 5 years in federal prison.

    As someone else has already pointed out, your boss ordering you to do something illegal does not remove your liability under law. Doesn't matter if you have your orders in writing, you are still expected to obey the law or face the consequences.

    Even if you don't report the company, sooner or later someone at Microsoft will notice that a company with N employees only has 1 licensed copy of Windows, and they'll ask questions. They've gone after public schools and charities, damn right they'll go after a profit-making company without hesitation.

    So, the real question you should be asking yourself is: do you love your job so much that you are willing to risk an ass-pounding in prison to keep it for a while? Personally, I wouldn't take that risk.

    That's the selfish argument. Now the altruistic argument.

    By shielding the company from the true costs of proprietary software, you are aiding Microsoft. If your bosses had the choice of paying for Office or using OpenOffice, they might make a smart decision based on the actual merits of the products. Right now, you are assisting Microsoft in maintaining their monopoly.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  34. What's a self respecting Slashdot reader to do? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    Probably start visiting another site, as we don't take kindly to no rootin tootin "self respectin'" folks around here =P

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:What's a self respecting Slashdot reader to do? by Marcion · · Score: 1

      >Just install ubuntu, firefox, thunderbird on the >machines, and place a windows Longhorn [top secret] >wallpaper on the desktop, and tell you boss you got >the latest windows W4r3z on the computer, Laugh but I've seen it work. Go for Fedora in this case because their update system looks a bit like Windows update, although any distro will do. The XP background is called bliss.bmp and you may find a lookalike on the google. Add some desktop shortcuts with Windows like names and then leave it with them. Don't forget a few stupid card games - that is actually key to acceptance. Once they have written a letter and checked their email, then they are passed the fear stage already. Then tell them that they are using the latest big thing and that is far better, then show them that it has twenty games pre-installed. Leave them playing tux racer or pingus.

  35. Is it worth your job? by Carik · · Score: 1

    Before you can figure out what to do, you should decide whether it's worth your job. If you report them, and they find out, they'll certainly start looking for an excuse to fire you. If you simply refuse, they'll probably HAVE an excuse to fire you.

    Personally, I would report them, and hope like hell that they never found out it was me. I'd also start looking for a new job.

    Before going that route, though, there are a few things you could try.

    - Put it in writing. Filing a formal protest with your supervisor is a good first step. If you can give them dollar amounts for the fines for each piece of software, they might respect it.

    - Offer alternatives. Look around for the best price on each piece of software, look for free/cheap alternatives, find ways to get licenses that let you do what you need to but won't cost as much. This will (hopefully) show the boss that you're not just saying "This can't be done," but trying to work to find a better alternative.

    - If your supervisor has a boss, you could try discussing it with them. My experience has been that, in most companies, there's someone somewhere along the chain of command who understands that legal trouble is a Bad Thing, and can order their underlings to obey the law, or at least be less obvious in breaking it.

    - If all else fails, I suggest leaving the company. If they're willing to break one set of laws, they're liable to be willing to break others. Once you know they're unreliable, you should start looking for ways to get out. Yes, I've done this. Yes, being unemployed sucks. The fact is, you can usually find SOME other job, and it's better than getting caught up in the wreck when the copyright holders catch up to your current company. And once you're gone? Report the suckers.

  36. BSA Press "hit" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congrats go out to the BSA for submitting a fake "question" to Slashdot in order to get "free" coverage. I find it suspect that just days after a posting on slashdot about Microsoft's Genuine Advantage being cracked, this "question" gets posted to Slashdot. Yeah BSA, I heard your advert on the radio this morning too, but ignored it.... Faking a "question" is much more effective against slashdotters.

    1. Re:BSA Press "hit" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. This is more insiduous BSA propaganda, which in itself is a form of dishonesty.

      Any nerd worth his salt would know how to approach this and come up with the suggestions offered in this thread already.

      The BSA, RIAA and other compnies regularly troll slashdot to get their point of view accross.

  37. We're missing the obvious answer by dheltzel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Come on guys! This is /.

    Explain that they will need to pay for the software before you install it, but if they want you to install Linux and OpenOffice, then you'll be happy to comply and it won't cost them anything for the software.

  38. bust his ass by john_is_war · · Score: 1

    and e-mail M$ about this... and watch yourself climb the ladder

    --
    Live life to the fullest. It's not that life is short, but that you are dead for so long.
  39. Forget the BSA ... by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

    If the company is publicly traded, you only need two words: Sarbanes-Oxley .

    --
    I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  40. You're fine by kajoob · · Score: 1

    You're in the clear for two reasons:

    1.) You don't have nearly as much money as your employer, so a software company isn't going to sue you. They're going to sue the employer. Seriously, you go for the deep pockets - not the guy installing software.

    2.) The legal doctrine of "Respondeat Superior" covers you. It pretty much means that the "Employer answers for the crimes of the Employee". If a software company is going to sue for infringment, it's as if the lawsuit passes through you and onto your employer BUT only if what you did was within the scope of your employment. If you were installing the infringing software on your own free will, then you're in trouble. However, if you installed the software at the direction of your superior, then they're the one that is in hot water - not you.

    So in sum - you are not in trouble and have no duty to disclose under the law, although whistleblower statutes would protect you if you did. I think the best thing for you to do is realize that it's friday and that pretty soon you should be drinking mass quantities of beer. Cheers!

    ***This is NOT legal advice and I am not you're attorney. If you have serious legal questions, you should seek counsel in your jurisdiction - the laws may be different***

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    1. Re:You're fine by jbplou · · Score: 1

      Just because your supervisor told you to do something does not make you free from guilt in a court of law, especially since someone can probably come up with atleast one email showing that he installed the software and knew it was an illegal copy. It would be that same as a manufacturing company thats needs steel instruting some of there employees to go steal the steel from the docks. When they get caught do you think saying my boss told me to is going to get them off the hook. All involved can be found guilty here, he must act quickly to CYA.

  41. Due diligence by spooky_nerd · · Score: 1

    I don't know how much this would really help you if the BSA did a raid, but there is the concept of due diligence. You need to be able to show that you made an effort to follow copyright instructions and get your boss to do the same.

  42. Are you sure? Civil vs Crim by redelm · · Score: 1
    What do you know? Do you know that they haven't struck some kind of deal with the software vendors? Since I doubt the amount rises to the level of criminal copyright infringement, your burden in upholding the law is less.

    I would send a nicely worded email to your boss (&whoever else relevant) stating you will be glad to install the software, but the company needs to make sure it has correct licences. You also need a series of activation keys because otherwise "false" alarm bells may be ringing at MS. And print & keep emails offsite.

  43. dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dead? You're joking. I don't remember the numbers, but I know that a very significant fraction of small businesses use at least some pirated software*. This guy's employers are no deader than the rest of them unless he deliberately decides to cause trouble, and even then it's a case of inspections and fines rather than dismantling the company.
    Copyright laws *cannot* be strictly and universally enforced right now, because it'd put too much of the workforce in prison - what sane democratic country would do that?

    *Not to mention an even larger fraction of home computer users...

  44. What's a self respecting Slashdot reader to do? by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    self respecting?

    Just install ubuntu, firefox, thunderbird on the machines, and place a windows Longhorn [top secret] wallpaper on the desktop, and tell you boss you got the latest windows W4r3z on the computer, and within 3 months everyone woudl haev seamlessly gone from typing

    >>john@drinkbeer.com[tab]I am bored at work[tab]Hi JJ, I need some beer, fuck work, my boss is a twat.

    and clicking send to typing

    >>john@drinkbeer.com[tab]I am bored at work[tab]Hi JJ, I need some beer, fuck work, my boss is a twat.

    and clicking send.

    Seriously, ubuntu, firefox and thunderbird. He won't know will he, I mean, come on. You can setup their passwords etc. Go on, try it.

    Don't for get the 'w1nd0wz l0ngh0r|\|' wallpaper for added authenticity. You might get a payrise. But, tell him you can't tell anyone, else SCO might ask for a license!

    Oh hahaha! that should go in the joke thread. *wipes tear*

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  45. piracy by itzdandy · · Score: 1

    im all for piracy, no really!? BUT only in certain circumstances and i think the law should allow for this:

    Pirating windows is wrong UNLESS you are installing it in a virtual machine on an OS that has a valid license. so you've paid your license fee and are just extracting more usefullness from that license.

    you are using a pruduct for personal education. NOT that schools can pirate software! for instance, if you are typing up a report, or a letter, or a memo, or whatever in a piece of software that is not licensed, that is wrong, BUT if you are teaching someone to use a piece of software or teaching yourself then it is ok.

    liesure outside of software's market. pirating games is wrong. pirating 3d studio max to make 3d images and sell or give away is wrong. pirating 3d studio max to experiment with 3d modeling for personal use is ok BECAUSE 3d studio max is a professional product with a market in pruduction to distribution of 3d content, where you would only be producing and not distributing. the moment you sell or give away one of your works you would need to license the product.

    and on that line of thought, many companies should allow full, and unrestricted copies to their software be used for free BUT have a visual, un-removable watermark on any output. so your word doc would look good BUT it would have small microsoft "unlicensed copy" text spread on it in random formation.

    1. Re:piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. Don't post such blatantly uninformed garbage. You obviously don't know what you're talking about, and you can't spell either.

  46. Have your employer indemnify you. by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're installing that much software and worry about it, tell your boss that you're uncomfortable taking possibly illegal actions and want them to indemnify you against any actions or liability that may come about by you following your boss's instructions.

    But, really, the smart thing to do is to spend the $500 to ask a lawyer this question. They'll know what protection your state gives innocent employees of criminal organization, and what can and can't be indemnified against.

    And a good lawyer will also be able to tell you how your state's employment laws can keep you from losing your job if you refuse to perform illegal acts.

    1. Re:Have your employer indemnify you. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      It's called being a whistleblower. You cannot be fired for it. You CAN be fired for some made up reason, though. If the place you work at is owned by a large enough corporation, they usually have anonymous tip lines you can call to report things like this.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Have your employer indemnify you. by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      It's called being a whistleblower. You cannot be fired for it.

      Sure you can. If the employer was dumping toxic sludge in the gutter and you called your governor, you'd be a whistleblower. If you notice that they seem to be committing copyright violations and blab about it, you might very well be lying.

      Especially if the goverment can't prove a thing, the copyright holder setttles or doesn't care, and YOU can't find the cash to mount a good enough defense.

      Not to metion the fact that, since the questioner had already installed the software, my not-a-lawyer-but-I-read-a-lot mind thinks "hey, he sounds like an accomplice, not an innocent whistleblower."

  47. Are you sure? by cgenman · · Score: 1

    This seems like it would fall under activities on behalf of a company. If you order 30k computers for your company and you have no way to pay, the company goes bankrupt, not you. If you include a popular song in a product your company puts out without permission, your company is liable, not you. If you raid your company's pension funds, sell off their assets, give yourself a big fat bonus, and quit as the company enters bankruptcy, the company is liable not you.

    I fail to see how the legal burdern of having unlicensed software on company computers would fall on the shoulders of individuals any more than the legal burden of not poisioning the rivers would.

    Of course, this person should document everything, because they will be the fall guy if the fit hits the shan, including (recorded, with permission) conversations with superiors farther up the toem pole. He probably also qualifies for whistleblower status, and if necessary he should consider a pre-emptive strike. It won't make employee relations any easier, but it will legally prevent them from holding him accountable for their decisions.

  48. What to do. by Kaenneth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Remember when the narrator 'retires' from his office job in "Fight Club"...

    1. Re:What to do. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      You mean where he went batshit insane?

  49. You have to refuse from the very first time. by jonadab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Once you've been talked into doing something once, precedent makes it *much* harder to say no thereafter. I had a former employer that asked me to falsify records, though it wasn't stated that way. It was, "You check to make sure that this thing is thus-and-such, and then you record it", but the first time I wrote down an accurate but unacceptable value, it became, "You CAN'T put THAT down!" I shrugged and said, "That's what it was." They had somebody else take the book and change it, a compromise I was willing to live with at the time. Anyway, my point is that because I refused the first time, it thereafter was easy to refuse subsequently, and before very long an understanding developed that I couldn't be asked to do that.

    That is the position you want to take. It may not totally protect you if everyone in the whole company goes down in flames, but it CAN reasonably be expected to keep a target from being painted on your particular chest. (Well, a legal target anyway. Some bosses hold grudges, which could be a different kind of target, but if you think you have that kind of boss you probably should be looking for another job already anyway.) But if you did the thing the first time, you may have to take that position on your *next* job.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  50. Dont try the 'nazi excuse' by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    " but i was ordered to kill those people "

    It wont fly..

    Your only real choices are to get a statement that the license is legal, or quit your job..

    If you *knowingly* install it, you are as liable as the shop is. Having the statement above would let you off the hook. But dont hold your breath on getting it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  51. Shut up and do your job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You won't get caught.

  52. Re: Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Free Music and Witty Commentary"

    No such domain: www.pityfive.com

  53. Your boss may fire you ... by hadaso · · Score: 1

    Of course your boss cannot fire you for not doing illegal activity. Your boss can certainly fire you for another reason if you are not doingthe illegal activity...

    The guy driving the broken truck and getting the ticket probably have done the right thing. The ticket was probably much cheaper than the risk of losing a job...

    It is really the fault of the law that doesn't make the employer accountable. In this case both the driver and the one giving the instruction should have been fined, and the boss should have been fined more!

    This week in Israel we had a crash between a truck driven by an overworked driver and a train. (The driver was said to have worked 40 hours...) Both drivers were killed, Several passengers were killed. hundreds of passengers were wounded, some severely. The owners of the company emloying the truck driver had sabbotged the "blackboxes" recording working hours of drivers and other data on their trucks so they could overwork the drivers without superviosion. The operators of the train did not have good enough arrangements at the railroad crossing that was known to be dangerous. I realy hope some management ends behind bars. Otherwise nothing would change...