Slashdot Mirror


Death On Demand Drive Tech

Xanderoth writes "Engadget has an article on 'Dead on Demand' technology to destroy your disk drive should it be compromised by any number of ways. From the article: 'Configurable triggers such as removal or tampering of the drive, removal of device from a resting GPS point, cellular telephone call, or even a change in temperature will release a chemical mist into the drive (not the computer) destroying it layer by layer.' Of course the drives, due out next year, are expected to be priced between $2,500 to $9,000 each, plus a yearly fee."

60 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. "plus a yearly fee" ... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Uhm ... or they destroy the harddrive themselves?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:"plus a yearly fee" ... by Skater · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, the summary sounded pretty interesting, but the "...plus a yearly fee" tacked on the end added an ominous tone.

    2. Re:"plus a yearly fee" ... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Ominous" is a fitting word...

      "Nice hard drives you have there....it'd be a shame if something were to...happen...to them..."
      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    3. Re:"plus a yearly fee" ... by ottothecow · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Oh shit, nobody tell the boss but I think I just hit the wrong speed-dial"

      --
      Bottles.
    4. Re:"plus a yearly fee" ... by c_oflynn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Article submitter is a sensationlist moron. The yearly fee is for somethng completely different talked about in the article.

      "Other solutions exist to delete data or lock the computer if a user enters too many failed passwords or does not login at all over a specified length of time -- Beachhead Solutions will sell you their offering for $129 a year per computer."

    5. Re:"plus a yearly fee" ... by Acts+of+Attrition · · Score: 2
      The yearly fee covers them having to come and recover all your data when the drive frequently accidentally self-destructs.

      They also make money selling this recovery technique to your enemies.

  2. Aaaargh! What happen??? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny
    Here's how the post was supposed to look...sorry about that...

    From TFA:

    Configurable triggers such as removal or tampering of the drive, removal of device from a resting GPS point, cellular telephone call, or even a change in temperature will release a chemical mist into the drive (not the computer) destroying it layer by layer.
    Damnit! I had this exact same idea over a year ago!
    Actually, it wasn't exactly the same...*my* idea involved C4.

    ....which makes it EVEN BETTER , IMNSHO...

    If I had just marketed it, I'd be in Aruba by now....*sigh*

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  3. Clearly, I can see ... by Frit+Mock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... quite a lot of cyber-attack possibilities.

    What drive do you want to nuke today?

  4. Can't wait for the first Windows malware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that looks for these drives and triggers the self-destruct if it finds any.

  5. Notice: Your annual fee is past due by Message+Board · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Please make payment immediately to avoid automatic loss of data.

    Please note that this is for your protection - since if your drive is not protected against theft, we will activate the antitheft device to ensure that your data won't fall into the wrong hands.

  6. Technology in use for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I swear every Maxtor drive I've ever had has this feature...

    Any number of triggers activate self destruct mode...

    Defragging the hard drive
    Installing a new OS
    Turning the machine on

    1. Re:Technology in use for years... by runderwo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting that you mention that. I have had three consecutive failures of a 200GB Maxtor drive, and the drive that failed prior to this one was a Fujitsu 6.4GB drive that had been in service for many years. The symptom was that when power was applied, the drive would repeatedly spin up and spin down without ever coming online. Against popular wisdom, I obtained a second Fujitsu drive with the same model number on eBay, and swapped the drive PCB. Amazingly, I was able to recover all of the data without a single problem.

    2. Re:Technology in use for years... by Pusene · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have done this myself with several drives, and it has a 80% success rate. No weird sounds==error on PCB. For all those other kind of drives, throw them in the freezer for 10 minutes. This can get them going long enough to copy all the important stuff from them. When it heats up it will fail again, so be quick about it... The fun part is, you can charge customers A LOT of money for doing this to their dead drive.

      --
      Error #13: No coffee. Operator halted. Please place boot device at bottom.
  7. Why Bother? by eno2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just buy a Maxtor and all you have to do to destroy your data is... use it. ;P

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Why Bother? by djdanlib · · Score: 4, Funny

      Looks like you can't trust Seagate or IBM, either. I've had both of those die very quickly off the shelf as well. And don't forget about floppies, because drop them a half inch, take them into another room, or look at them crosseyed and poof! Then there's CDs that rot away all the time. Don't even mention DVDs. Oops.

      That's why I now use an automated system involving monks and papyrus scrolls for all my data.

      Those famous dead sea scrolls lasted how long?

    2. Re:Why Bother? by kesuki · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why I now use an automated system involving monks and papyrus scrolls for all my data.

      a 2000 year life span for the data if it's properly preserved? phaw, I have a dedicated array of Neanderthals drawing painting in caves. depending on geological stability I demand 35,000+ years of data storage life.

  8. Software Encryption (or Destruction) Instead? by Famatra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why destroy when you can simply have everything be encrypted? It's cheaper too, in fact there are some free / open source on the fly encryption programs that can do large partitions:

    Do any of the Linux distributions do encryption, of even full partition/harddrive encryption? That maybe ideal.

    1. Re:Software Encryption (or Destruction) Instead? by Stonehand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends on the threat level.

      If there's an encryption scheme, there's a key. And depending on who's looking for it, they may resort to coercive measures to get that key. Or, for that matter, attempting to get the key and the medium simultaneously -- e.g raiding your place and seizing anything that could provide the key, including you.

      The greater the physical destruction and the lower probability that the data would be recoverable, however, the less productive it becomes for someone to try, and the less likely that even if they DO try that the information will be compromised.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Software Encryption (or Destruction) Instead? by binarybum · · Score: 2

      A good point - Seagate is working on this on the hardware side:
      http://www.pcworld.com/resource/article/0,aid,1215 22,pg,1,RSS,RSS,00.asp

      Although it isn't nearly as cool as toxic mist spewing out all over the place as conjured by a phone call, it makes a lot more sense and would not bear an annual fee.
      Besides, a HD could be copied 100s of times over before you had a chance to make that phone call. In fact, there are relatively simple workarounds for all lines of defense on these destructive drives - they rely heavily on obscurity.

      --
      ôó
    3. Re:Software Encryption (or Destruction) Instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Linux supports this natively on most distributions - Loop-AES is the preferred system and has very little overhead. Just make sure you encrypt *everything* - i.e. all filesystems and the swap partition - to avoid having any leaks. The encrypted filesystem should also check the signature of the running kernel to make sure it was not tampered with (since obviously the kernel itself cannot be encrypted or the system won't boot).

      Loop-AES even goes so far as to scrub the RAM locations containing the key to avoid burn-in that could be traced later. In this configuration it meets many military grade security standards.

    4. Re:Software Encryption (or Destruction) Instead? by omnirealm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Software encryption is slow. Plus it requires a whole PKI infrastructure for large sytem deployments. That can be a nightmare for military operations.

      My cryptographic filesystem addresses this problem:

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/ecryptfs/

      It's got a pluggable PKI interface to facilitate integration into enterprise environments. But if all you need is plain old passphrase-based protection, it provides that too. It has Trusted Platform Module support, and it will soon have GnuPG support.

      It's currently in the "experimental" stage, and will be for the next couple of months (or over the next year, depending on how the Linux kernel community treats it :-), but it implements almost the entire UNIX filesystem semantics at this point and is pretty stable. Anyone who is interested in transparent cryptographic filesystems with strong key management and policy capabilities might want to keep an eye on this. And if you're in the mood for testing and/or contributing patches, please do. :-)

      Other crypto filesystems for Linux that I recommend include dm-crypt (it comes w/ the 2.6 kernel), EncFS, and CFS. Google around.

      That said, this self-destruct hard drive is a pretty good idea in some cases, for reasons stated elsewhere in this thread. It's hard to apply "rubber hose" cryptanalysis on the user when the media itself is irreparably damaged. The real trick is to get this technology ubiquitously deployed, so that the very fact that you are using it does not arouse suspicion. The next trick is to prevent "false positives." Try explaining to a CEO why his critical documents are toast because some $8-an-hour IT intern inadvertently caused his hard drive to disentegrate.

      Should the price tag drop by an order of magnitude and the false positive stats be low enough, I might consider getting one of these drives. Until then, I think that financial markets, military units, and other such high-risk/high-value will find these drives to be a worthy investment. I'm largely concerned with addressing the problem of some random crooks stealing my equipment, so good old fashioned crypto w/ a decent key protection scheme will do well enough for me.

      --
      An unjust law is no law at all. - St. Augustine
    5. Re:Software Encryption (or Destruction) Instead? by mattso · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, the NSA those guys are good.

      1. Had no clue about what weapons and forces Iraq really had.
      2. Still can't find Waldo.
      3. No clue where Bin Laden is.
      4. No idea in advance about 9/11.

      They might have acres of Vic-20's maybe. Sometimes I think they pay people to flood forums and what not talking about their amazing powers. Because the record clearly shows if they actually are good at doing anything it has nothing to do with what everyone claims they are amazing at.

    6. Re:Software Encryption (or Destruction) Instead? by swillden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the key is destroyed, all you have to do is look through 2^256 or however many combinations and see which of them decrypts the drive.

      LOL!!!

      You obviously have no idea just how large 2^256 is.

      An interesting analysis of exactly that is found in Bruce Schneier's _Applied Cryptography_. He looked at the problem from a thermodynamic point of view, asking the question: "Assuming a maximally-efficient computer that used a minimum quantity of energy per bit transition, how much power would it take to count from 0 to 2^256?".

      He assumed that the amount of energy required to toggle a single bit is the energy required to move a single electron from one orbit to another. Multiplying that extremely tiny amount of power by 2^256, an extremely enormous number, gives a result so large that, Schneier calculates, it would require the entire output of our sun for approximately two years. And we're talking about the entire output, not just the tiny fraction of it that lands on Earth. Break out your trusy Dyson Sphere

      And that is just to count through the values, to say nothing of the energy required to do a trial decryption with each, and analyze the "decrypted" data to see if the key guessed is the right one. It also ignores the time required to do all of this work.

      Of course, you could argue that reversible computing, a field in its infancy, might be able to cut the power consumption requirements significantly. But using real transistors, not theoretical devices that require the smallest possible unit of power, would increase them significantly.

      I agree with Schneier's conclusion: 256-bit keys won't be brute-forceable until computers are made of something other than matter and occupy something other than space.

      Nope. If a 256-bit key was used, and it's gone, your only hope is to attack the cipher, or weaknesses in the implementation of the encryption protocols, because you're not going to find that key with a brute force search.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  9. Great Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    This is a great idea! I'd pay for such a service, as I am sure will many others. Now if only they could offer end to end management of things like self-desructing offisite backups.

    I'd like to see them fire me then!

    "I'm fired. Oh really?" - presses speed dial 1 on cellphone.

    "There go the production servers hard drives. Lets discuss my retirement package quickly. Maybe we won't lose all the offsite backups."

  10. Yearly Fee... by Ismilar · · Score: 5, Funny

    "plus a yearly fee." ... which you WILL pay... or else you will get to see our drive-destroying technology in action!

    1. Re:Yearly Fee... by orkysoft · · Score: 2

      Actually, our yearly fee is another security feature. If you don't pay, we'll assume you've been captured by the black helicopters, and you'd want your disks destroyed.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  11. Hmmm... by Famatra · · Score: 4, Informative

    All I see there, on not4chan.org, are drawings. In some areas they are illegal I'm sure (along with 'regular' pornography too). However - at least in the United States - drawings are deemed legal since no person was harmed in the process.

    Pretty good principle, if an action or behaviour by a person harms no one (or only the person themself) then it should be allowed. I'd call it the harm principle I'd call it the harm principle or maybe negative liberty :).

    1. Re:Hmmm... by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 2, Informative

      not4chan.org == "drawn" kiddie porn, you sick fuck.

      --
      ymmv
  12. Re:Death On Demand Drive Tech? by sendai2ci · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These drives aren't aimed at destroying it's contents from a remote attack, they are for when the drive is about to be physically removed from it's environs (or a similar situation.)

    Practically no system is secure from an attack by someone who knows what they are doing when that person is in front of it. Does not matter if it's a Mac, Linux, OpenBSD, etc.

  13. Ah, the good ole days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of the early 90's when I first got access to a pirate BBS. I was so concerned that they would get busted and I'd get raided that I set up a script that would blow away my entire hard drive with one click.

    The stage is set.

    So, a month after I get access I'm hanging out on the BBS at about 11pm and there's a knock at my door. I look through the window and see a police officer. I run the script and answer the door with as much composure as I can muster.

    The police officer looks at me strangely like he was expecting me to react in some way. He then asked if I called. When I said no, he realized that he was at the wrong apartment.

  14. GPS is baaaad idea! by dindi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I imagine myself walking with a GPS Jammer around data centers like a little kid imagining how many drives I just blew away ....

    1. Re:GPS is baaaad idea! by dindi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not mentioning the technical questions:
      how will the hard drive see a GPS signal sitting in a HDD case, in a rack, in a room, in a building.

      My garmin starts to bitch if I am under a tree and hey I am almost on the equator with 10+ satellites showing full reception .....

      Actually it happened that with a clear view of the sky I just happened to be in the middle of the Atlantic ocean - well according to my gps.

      No radio tower/cellphone station or any well seen human cause interference ... I was in the jungle walking my dogs and my wife and recording custom routes for fun.

      My point is: if it happens to a trusted brand and quality but admittably a consumer device, it could happen by accident to any device.

  15. Wow. by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't a bad idea, but I imagine it's going to be a windfall for any child pornographers. How are you going to put them away if the hard drive's a bubbling mass of goop (or just...not readable. But they should use bubbling-goop chemicals just to make it more interesting).

    Of course, I can just see it going in the PGP direction: "He felt the need to buy a $9K hard drive to protect his stuff! He MUST have had something to hide! Guilty!"

    --
    Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
  16. How stupid is that? by lheal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For every N drives they sell, I would put at N the number of people who at some point say,

    "Ooops -- oh, crap."

    Is Murphy's Law just not taught any more?

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  17. Re:Can't wait... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

    Forget a virus or worm.

    Imagine the scene if you will.

    RING RING RING RING
    Click
    "Hello, this is john from [company] we are calling to confirm you have won the prize draw you entered..."
    (sound of mist being deployed in the background)

    Much more malicious, and also much greater chance of it occuring.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  18. Using obvious tricks for free. by nolife · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can not directly relate this to a HD so this is probably somewhat off topic..
    I created some user induced destructing car stereo amplifiers.
    I removed the painted on "Pos(+)" and "Neg(-)" markings from the power terminals and painted new labels on them that were backwards. I also used a black wire for the positive wire and a red for the negative. I used stencils from some old electronic hobby kits I had laying around and they matched perfectly. Jump ahead about 5 years and sure enough, those amplifiers were stolen as well. I can only hope that the person that attempted to hook them up the first time fried them in the process. Yes, I had some free time on my hands back then but I was so frustrated when my stereo was taken the first time that the relabeling the replacement equipment did not seem like a such a waste of time. The fact that there is a good chance this equipment will be ruined does make me feel a little bit better.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  19. Obligatory TSS comment by Pheonix5000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know, I heard Thermite was very effective in the trials. ;)

  20. Re:Why not just encrypt the drive? by Chazman · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Besides, the self destructive approach would never be acceptable in a military or top secret installation

    Not as a primary means of data protection, but they love it as a secondary means. They'd buy these drives *AND* run encrypted filesystems on them. Remember the spy plane that was forced to land in China? When the Chinese military stormed the plane, the comms op was hacking the crypto equipment to bits -- literally, with a large axe. Official recommended procedure, after going through the electronic sterilization steps. Execute all designed-in electronic destruction measures, then follow up with as many physical destruction measures as you have time for.

    --
    -----Chaz
  21. no fee for 'dead on demand' by yincrash · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think the author entangled his drive ideas.

    from TFA -
    "The drives will be available "early next year" for between $2,500 to $9,000 each."

    the yearly fee is only the for the other solutions that are already available like -
    "Other solutions exist to delete data or lock the computer if a user enters too many failed passwords or does not login at all over a specified length of time -- Beachhead Solutions will sell you their offering for $129 a year per computer."

    To summarize, the new drives aren't on a yearly fee, only the other offerings mentioned that are already on the market.

  22. The hundred ways to destroy a hard drive thread by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've wondered sometimes about the best way to quickly destroy a hard disk ... a thermite insert that stood between the cover plate and the platter
    Many of us think the same - nothing like powdered aluminium and iron with a bit of heat to turn a drive into molten metal - of course molten metal tends to do horrible things to everything around it.

    Explosives - an intensive enough shock wave through the platter is going to have the same effect as raising the metal above the curie temperature - all magnetic info will be gone, in addition to portions of the drive getting propelled through the wall.

    Heat - warm it up beyond the curie temperature, will probably also melt and burn any nearby plastic. As a bonus smoke will make it hard to get data from any drives not protected by this feature.

    Really big electromagnets - it's hard to be sure you've removed all trace of magnetic information with a magnet, so go one step furthur and use those electromagnets as an induction furnace - melt that drive!

    Hit it really hard - a shock wave through the material can change the phase and wipe out all that information, so something with a decent surface area moving around the speed of sound will probably do it.

    At this point some form of chemical attack seems to make a lot more sense, since it can be compact and probably won't cause the building to burn to the ground.

    1. Re:The hundred ways to destroy a hard drive thread by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      PLOW: Yep the old form of dragging the heads across the media. Simulating a Vinyl records with a stylus. Works every time!

  23. Re:Aaaargh! What happen??? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, C4 is no good at all ... too destructive and if you actually kill someone in your effort to destroy your hard disk a murder charge will probably it all seem pointless.

    No, I recommend a concealed thermite charge. Turn the drive into a hissing, glowing, molten mass in the bottom of the enclosure. Of course, it would be a good idea to line the case with asbestos or something similar.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  24. hackaday project by keyrat+rafa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For much less and zero maintenance fees you could just buy a big magnet and put it on top of your hard drive. Then have a missile style toggle switch with a red cover on your case to turn the magnet on. If really adventurous, you could tie the switch to a phone line. There would be no software involved and you'd probably save about $1.7k.

    It'd be much cooler too.

  25. Re:Has struck my mind before by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Thermite is how I would go about it as well. However, I believe it can be done safely - you just have to
    • 1) Use a minimal amount of thermite.
    • 2) Properly isolate the booby-trapped drive.

    1) would just require a bit of experimentation on old dead drives. I believe you can get away with using fairly little thermite (although some overkill doesn't hurt) - you don't have to melt the entire hard drive, casing and all, you just have to scorch the platters beyond recovery.
    2) should also be quite doable - since we're not talking excessive amounts of thermite here, I think a 5 1/4"-sized ceramic mount/casing for a regular 3 1/2" drive would work. It just has to be isolated enough to make sure the rest of the computer doesn't burst into flames and burn the house down.

    'course, using an external drive would make it even easier...

    Anyone up for a summer electronics/pyrotechnics project? :)
  26. Wasting money and valuable data. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Configurable triggers such as removal or tampering of the drive, removal of device from a resting GPS point, cellular telephone call, or even a change in temperature

    Change of temperature of the drive: Ok Smart one. You power down the system to do some maintenance poof there goes your drive. Or Your AC dies, Or you get a new cooler AC in. Or you do some unusual heavy processing. That is a wast.

    removal of the device from a resting GPS point: Doesn't GPS need line of site. I know when I am driving my cars GPS will not work if there are to many trees overhead. Opps a war just started, in canada. GWB first order turn off a civilian GPS so we can have a greater tactical advantage.

    Cell Telephone Call. I can see it someone one has the number and code in their host list and acidently hit the button. Poof. Also hacker with a war dialer.

    Removal or Tampering: The system needs to be fixed (because your second mirror self destructing drive died) Well lets take out the drive... Opps wrong one. Poof!

    This technology can lead to to much stupid mistakes. Issues such as high levels of encryption. Putting the system in a secure computer room with a heavy door and lock. and keep it locked. Good security and IT policies in place.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  27. Re:Aaaargh! What happen??? by stinerman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparently the new way to karma whore is to not use the preview button. ;-)

  28. might be handy by handy_vandal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not simply make sure nobody gets physical access to your HDD?

    Maybe I'm served with a subpoena requiring me to give the drive to the FBI or whoever. Or maybe it's my data, but the drive is sitting in a colocation slot -- Federal Marshalls swoop down on the ISP, seize the drive.

    Might be handy if the drive self-destructed ....

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  29. Make your own. by nrlightfoot · · Score: 2, Informative

    I suggest making your own with a layer of thermite on top of the drive. I wouldn't trust a chemical mist to destroy data to the point where it couldn't be read with a SQUID device, I want to see my hard drive melt! Plus if they charge $9000, you'd be hardpressed to build a computer expensive enough where it would cost more than if the whole thing was toasted.

    --
    what sig?
  30. Well sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    But since the child pornography problem is routinely overstated, this wouldn't be a problem.

    Yes, its overstated, because child pornography is the most common excuse used for violating our civil rights.

    "We can't allow [insert something the cops fear here] because it will only aid child pornographers. Thank heavens for 9/11 and terrorists; it allows the cops and politicians to work another cliche for a decade or two.

    1. Re:Well sure by plover · · Score: 3, Informative

      And here is an example of the court applying exactly that pressure.

      --
      John
  31. dialing wrong numbers..... by hansreiser · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you imagine, ring, ring, "Hello, is this Sheila? What an odd hissing noise. Sheila, are you there? I can hear faint noises.... Sheila, is there a man in your house? I hear him yelling. Pick up the phone! Oh dear, some man is crying, I can hear it.... Why doesn't anyone pick up the phone? I wonder if I dialed right."

  32. What I can't wait for... by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want this for my kids!

    If someone tries to kidnap them, they blow up! If I can't have them no one can!

    Disclaimer: Don't worry, I don't actually have kids.

  33. FreeBSD's geom disk encryption has something like by Calyth · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems that FreeBSD's geom disk (or partition) encryption allows you to destroy all the master keys should the need arise. It's not the same as having the HD die on you, but if the disks take the end of the earth to actually decrypt, it's as good as dead.

  34. Re:It probably did little by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jeez, you had to go and TELL him? He was feeling so good about his device :P

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  35. Re:This is so stupid by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You assume that some complex number crunching formula will solve the problem of harvesting said data. The DoD, nor do most other govt agencies believe that. They use industrial shreeders and then sometimes even melt said shreadded metal into slag.

    A thermite coupled over a drive might be the wiser thing, with an (internal uplinked) serial device that ignites the thermite using outlet power (which you can derive from power supply.

    Then, there's fire hazard....... and Thermite reactions are mighty hard to stop ;)

    --
  36. Re:Why not just encrypt the drive? by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I've been told, all military drives have platters made of glass sub strate. As such, they shatter when explosives inside the casing discharging. All it takes is a command and you get an instant maraca for a musical instrument.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  37. Re:Combo Attack by Igmuth · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ferric chloride is acidic.

  38. Why so complicated?? by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For a much simpler method simply have a program load your private data into RAM on start-up and remove it from the disk with an insane number of write/erases, then put it back if you shut down properly (maybe a hidden key sequence and password).

    When the cops come to raid you they will just hit the power and rip the machine off your desk (how many times have you seen cops carrying computers out of raids on the news?), and viola, not only have they destroyed the evidence (technically it was their incompetence and nothing to do with you), they have _also_ destroyed the data copying program (which also copied into RAM) so there's no evidence that there was any evidence in the first place.

    Remember just destroying something is useless if you're left with a charred remains, that's evidence in itself and can get you into allot of trouble.

    The great advantage of this method is its hardware independent - you could potentially install it on any system in minutes, its untraceable in almost every way (buying a physical piece of hardware might be tracable, especially if your credit card bill says 'data safe hard disk' on it) and with the insane explosion in memory you can easily fit most things on it.

    The only downside would be unreliability if you lost power or had a crash but this can be over come with additional systems and UPS.

    I just hope that in this day and age we're not breaking any laws by just talking about data destruction.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  39. Re:Why not just encrypt the drive? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Obviously you have no clue. The U-2 may have been a spy plane, but anyone can tell you that the EP-3 is just a maritime patrol aircraft [defenselink.mil]. Besides, it's over 40 years old. If it was a secret spy plane, I don't think you'd be able to google so much information on the subject.

    Don't you just love it when an AC without a clue says someonelse needs one?

    The EP-3 is the elextronic surveillence version of the P-3 (the US's land based MPA). It is used to intercept ellectonic transmissions (amongst other things) for analysis by the US. While it is overt (it's hard to hide an EP-3 flying over international waters), so is the U-2 (although the U-2 flies high so it's a lot harder to intercept). If you limit spying to covert operations, then it may not be spying but it still was (probably) on on intel mission (or else we would have sent a regular P-3) and not the much rarer EP-3.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  40. Dead without demand by j0ris · · Score: 2, Funny
    Ha! These guys got nothing on the good ol' IBM Deathstar.

    This baby did't need some silly demand to die. Plus, it featured the "click of death" (TM).

    Ah well, they just don't make 'm like they used to!