Slashdot Mirror


SAGE 2004-2005 Salary Survey Announced

Nalez writes "The ever-popular SAGE Salary Survey is ready to go and available to all computer administrators. Everyone who participates will get a copy of the results. The survey takes 17-20 minutes to complete. SAGE members can access the 2003 results and you can read all about previous SAGE surveys."

120 comments

  1. Are These Things Useful? by DanielMarkham · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read these every year but I wonder how useful they are. I've never heard of anybody going to their boss with survey results to ask for a raise, and I can't imagine getting your pay cut because others are making more. Perhaps the benefit is in planning for new hires? Telling people you pay better than market rates?
    As a consultant, I don't use these to set my rates, and the information is usually historical rather than predictive -- what I'd like to know is what's going to be paying more next year, not last year. But I'm sure there are other uses. Makes for great gossip if nothing else.

    Speak Up About Poor Software Quality!

    1. Re:Are These Things Useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I read these every year but I wonder how useful they are.
      Like most things on the Internet, they're useless from a scientific point of view but add much to our lives as entertainment. You read them every year, right? Isn't that your answer?
    2. Re:Are These Things Useful? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      I always find the results to be way higher than what anyone I know in the industry makes, senior positions or not. You get results showing things like the average entry level Perl coder makes $50K.. are they heck! Perhaps I just know a lot of people who work at sweatshops.

    3. Re:Are These Things Useful? by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's hard to go to your boss with a request for a raise when there have been company-implemented pay-raise-freezes for several straight years. :)

    4. Re:Are These Things Useful? by bytemap · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When I was a director of engineering, I noted they had the opposite effect. I knew I had to pay more to keep the REALLY GOOD people I had (this was leading up to 2001, granted), but the board of directors kept telling me that their salary surveys said we were already paying too much. Salary surveys don't tell the whole story. Talent counts for a LOT. And my staff was worth more than "standard."

    5. Re:Are These Things Useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it is just all the people who put in bogus numbers wanting to get a copy of the results. I hope they eliminate all data entered during the period of influence of the dreaded Slashdot Effect(tm).

    6. Re:Are These Things Useful? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are so neive. Have you not been paying attention for the last 6 years or so?

      I can't imagine getting your pay cut because others are making more.

      No, but what they will do is lay someone off (ie, fire them) and then either outsource the job, or hire two two people at a lower rate when they need another employee (ie, there's more work than you're able to do).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    7. Re:Are These Things Useful? by KoReE · · Score: 1

      I honestly think it's just interesting to know. Whether it does anything....I would say probably not. Companies that pay crappy wages will still continue to pay crappy wages. They may change, but it won't be a survey that makes it happen.

      --
      Instant Karma's gonna get you...
    8. Re:Are These Things Useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound unlike any director of engineering I've ever dealt with! Can I send you my CV? :)

    9. Re:Are These Things Useful? by kentmartin · · Score: 1

      I find scenarios like this terribly annoying.

      Wage slave: Can I have a raise.
      Management flunky: Of course not, there is a company wage freeze on.
      Wage slave: Ah, well, not your fault, that's OK then.

      By implementing it as policy, they are pretending there is nothing they can do about it. Effectively they don't need to be fair because they have given you advance warning that they are going to be unfair to everyone.

    10. Re:Are These Things Useful? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Annual layoffs and cutting 50% of your workforce keeps employees in line, too. When half the offices are empty, you're happy enough to have a place to be at 9:00am, much less give a damn about any raise.

    11. Re:Are These Things Useful? by Raiford · · Score: 1

      These things are always hard to interpret and it's difficult to see significance in any trends. What does seem evident is that many corporations value talent in a different way now than they did 10 years ago. Talent for many companies now is thought of as a more common commodity with less unique value. Talent can be replaced now as easily as replacing a resource such as the office fax machine. This seems to be the sentiment and the reality is that with the more diverse work force you may always be able to find someone willing to work for less than what they are really worth. Cultural factors do depress salaries and allow companies to focus more on the bottom line. ----

      --
      "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
  2. I don't have a salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..you insensitive clod!

    Working for yourself running your own business is a different world. The first person to get a pay cut when theres no profits is me.

    1. Re:I don't have a salary by lheal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Salaries are for women and feebs.

      Real men bill the client directly, with an arrow stuck into their door, shot from a bow they've made by hand with a string they've strung themselves from tanned bear entrails.

      If payment is tardy, the second arrow should be lit on fire before the bill is sent.

      After that, you may have to get nasty.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  3. Meh, these questions are easy by antifoidulus · · Score: 0

    the answer always is 'not enough#....on a side note, fucking german kezboards!!!

    1. Re:Meh, these questions are easy by ISaidItOmega · · Score: 1
      fucking german kezboards!!!

      I have tears in my eyes from laughing so hard. Antifoidulus you are my father.

  4. Surveys are Meaningless by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2

    It doesn't matter if we punch in $20,000 or $50,000 or $100,000. The only important thing anyone needs to know out of the result... you are buying less for your dollar in 2005 than in 2004. Most U.S salaries including non-ITs are absolutely unportional to the economy.

    Average joe need to spend almost 70-80% of the their paycheck to maintain the same standard of living. Of course that is unless you got rich in the .com boom or spoiled the real estate market at your investment expense. In that case, none of this applies to you. Happy 4th.

    1. Re:Surveys are Meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that is a hint that Average Joe is living beyond his means, in other words enjoying a quality of life he cannot afford. One needs only to look at national saving/borrowing rates as well as goverment borrowing to see something isn't right.

      Everyone didn't get rich during the dot com boom but now we are sure that everyone will get rich on real estate. Ofcourse the good times just might go on forever this time. They propably won't but maybe. So stop worring about your salary and inflation and buy a house or two. If the shit hits the fan, the goverment will bail us out, right?

    2. Re:Surveys are Meaningless by Avalerion · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're an idiot.

    3. Re:Surveys are Meaningless by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1

      The government will not bail you out. Details can be found in the new bankruptcy law. Fun stuff!

  5. Wait to they see this! by Anonymous+Crowbar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I imagine the survey will look a lot different next year if things keep going the way they are. The article below talks about a company out in California looking for a programmer at $15/hour.

    http://news.com.com/2061-10788_3-5770608.html?
    ta g=ubind.bld

    June 30, 2005 3:26 PM PDT
    Coding for $15 an hour?
    Could a computer coding job paying just $15 per hour signal something's wrong with the tech world?

    That relatively measly amount is what's promised in an ad for a "ASP.NET Programmer" on the America's Job Bank site. The job, which calls for "at least 1 year's experience either in school, at work, or a combination of the two," is being offered by employment services company AppleOne, according to the ad.

    1. Re:Wait to they see this! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Could a computer coding job paying just $15 per hour signal something's wrong with the tech world?

      There's nothing wrong with the tech world: once, programmers did this obscure, complicated thing called "coding". Nobody else could do it, it was new and cutting edge, and therefore they were paid very well and were very respected.

      Now, the industry has matured, computers are ubiquitous, programming languages, IDEs, operating systems, libraries... are numerous, well developed, documented, and the programmer of yesteryear has become a line pisser, paid like any other moderatly skilled worker. I should know, I was one of them (note the past tense :-).

      There's nothing wrong with that. All industries go through the same cycle.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Wait to they see this! by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      That's only for 1 year of school. I'm sure there's much better offers for somebody with a BS in CS. There are, right?

    3. Re:Wait to they see this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just graduated from college two months ago with an AS in CIS (networking) and I got a job with a company with about 150 employees. I'm their second of two network admins and I only get paid $14.00 per hour, to top that off, right now the senior admin is gone for a month because of health reasons and I'm running the entire network by myself.

      Personally I think I was lucky to get a job as good as this, the whole outlook of the industry is really horrible for people fresh out of college.

    4. Re:Wait to they see this! by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      This sounds like the qualification for an intern/co-op type of position. $15/hr is about right.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    5. Re:Wait to they see this! by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      As someone earning loosely in the range of $20.50 an hour (I'm not paid hourly, or expected to work specific hours, which makes the calculation tricky :) ), I just thought I'd ask... ...so how much do you think programmers should be earning. I don't normally go for anecdotal evidence, but I'm not 100% convinced by a lot of numbers I see mentioned, so I'm looking for known salaries of programmers, and what qualifications they had to earn that salary?

    6. Re:Wait to they see this! by AutopsyReport · · Score: 2, Interesting
      the whole outlook of the industry is really horrible for people fresh out of college.

      Normally I would agree with a statement like this, but my personal experiences have led me to believe differently, at least for now.

      I'm 21, haven't finished my BSc (going into my 4th year), my programming skills are on average, but I'm great with people and building solid customer rapport. I do some contracting/consulting on the side of school. I'm far from the technical side of programming, and sometime it amazes me I'm still doing this. My first job was $30hr CDN. Now I'm pulling $40hr USD (roughly $50hr CDN) working for companies in the US.

      So when people get on here or elsewhere and moan about low wages and poor job prospects, I often think they should be evaluating what skills they don't have, such as good relationship building, and working from there.

      The money is out there. You don't have to be a programming genius to find it, and I'm living proof of this. All it takes is an average mind to earn yourself an above-average wage.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    7. Re:Wait to they see this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you are forgetting is: not everyone is good with people. Everyone has different skills. Some guys are really good at sitting down, thinking through a problem, designing things, you know, what used to be called "engineering". They can talk with other techs, but not with the customer generally. They may not all be basket cases, but they just aren't sales/marketing/business types.

      However now it seems that you people skills are more important than everything else. So most of the people moaning are probably just frustrated that the only apparent road to success is one they can't travel.

      And you might say, well, maybe they should learn people skills. But it isn't that easy, social skills are innate in some ways, the result of a lifetime of experience in others. The typical quiet computer geek thinking about the world generally gets to the level he is at because of his withdrawal from the world. Yes, there are exceptions to this, some very smart people have also been outgoing (see: Feynman), but for the most part, they just can't do it (or at least, they can't do it well).

      Can a linebacker compete in figure skating at the pro level? Should a linebacker even waste his time trying, or should he just focus on what he is good at? Maybe this is a lame point (analogies tend to make for bad arguments), but whatever. The problem is that the message to the tech nerd of today is that technical knowledge isn't that important, and that the way to succeed is through customer rapport and the like. The tech nerd of today feels himself being thrown away by the world and is frustrated about it. But what can one do? The best the tech nerd can do today is to try to become something he is not, but that may not be possible.

    8. Re:Wait to they see this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AS in CIS? I think you're lucky your tagline isn't :"Would you like fries with that?".

    9. Re:Wait to they see this! by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Yes, I fully expect to make at least 20% more than that after I get my degree.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    10. Re:Wait to they see this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are slightly misfiring here. You don't need to be some sort of mind control expert who can charm the birds from the trees and twang knicker elastic at 50 yards with a well-placed quip. What you need to be is a professional. This is within everyone's grasp; keep your word, turn up on time, pay the necessary attention to your personal appearance, try to get on with your colleagues, manage your time effectively, do your job within the terms of the people paying you (important note for recent graduates who won't listen anyway: not on your own terms). Its not so much who you know as who you are respected by. Around Slashdot theres the idea that raw technical prowess gets your respect but this isn't really true unless you want the nicest thing ever said about you between potential employers to be "He's very skilled technically but...."

      On a less positive note though, I disagree with your argument which portrays the stereotype geek. There is some truth in the charicature, but heres the thing: the world is a very competitive place. Right now there are people who are technically strong and very good with people. I'm sorry, they do exist and in increasing numbers. The tech sector is getting more competitive for jobs, and this is the inevitable effect of competition: it gets harder, you have to do more and be more. You have to brace yourself for this and raise your game. To quote you "not everyone is good with people". I'm old enough to remember the argument in various industries of "not everyone is good with computers...these guys have 30 years of experience in X/Y/Z, how can you expect them to be good with computers?". Well, those people either bit the bullet and got skilled with computers or lost their jobs eventually. Its a hard life isn't it.

    11. Re:Wait to they see this! by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

      You were thinking that an ASP.NET programmer with 1 year of experience was worth more than that?

      Most "programmers" with 1 year of experience are barely break even, asset/liability wise.

      You are entitled to nothing, least of all a job paying twice the average wage, for a skill with which you are barely a novice.

    12. Re:Wait to they see this! by wik · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the company's view in this. If you became a regular full-time employee (instead of a contractor, perhaps only working when needed), the company would have to pay health benefits, vacation time, retirement, legally mandated benefits, etc. Right now, you are probably a source of extraordinarily cheap, quality labor!

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
  6. 2003? by Gothmolly · · Score: 0

    Great, I can find out what salaries were two years ago. That should help me a lot in my current job search.

    Hello? How about a real-time DB that you could query by postal code?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:2003? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Develop it, and make a fortune charging folks for access to your information!

      Oh wait... no one in IT would pay. They'd yell "information wants to be free"!

      Nevermind.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:2003? by waffleman · · Score: 1
      Develop it, and make a fortune charging folks for access to your information!

      Oh wait... no one in IT would pay. They'd yell "information wants to be free"!

      Nevermind.

      I realize you're being humorous, but to be serious for a moment, you're both right and wrong. Develop for the wrong market and getting money from people is more traumatic than pulling bones from living animals. (yeah, I'm a programmer) It's just plain hell. However, develop for the right market and people gladly spend money on your product or service.

      For example, a service for unemployed people will likely be a hard sell because people don't want spend money while they don't have income. It's all about emotional state, and the unemployed are insecure. They will still buy things, but not something that is targeted at them because they don't have income. In any case, it's not clear what the emotional value of this service would be for said market.

      Now, if you could target the friends and relatives of the unemployed, then you've got a market you can sell to. In this case you are selling help/aid/home-charity. Clear emotional value, and the problem can now move to the next step, which is marketing. How do you get message out to friends and relatives that if unemployed Joe only knew how much he could be making, then his life would be so much better?

      This isn't a creative problem, it's market research. Talk to people that have unemployed relatives, and see if you can get them to think that giving your information would make things better. Find out what, if any, messages work. Then find out how they would want to give the information to start determining pricing and packaging.

      But note, you haven't developed anything yet. If you didn't find an effective message, at least you haven't burned away too much time and living expenses. The last two steps are, 1) build a prototype, and 2) build a business plan. Now you're on your way to making a fortune charging folks for access to your information! It's not quick, easy, or without loads of risk, but realistically "information wants to be free" doesn't have to enter into the struggle.

      Whatever.

    3. Re:2003? by Gothmolly · · Score: 0

      So what is the point of your post, other than to waste DB space?

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    4. Re:2003? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      To piss you off. See, I am part of the global conspiracy you talk about in your other posts. I am out to hound you, to keep you from telling the masses about our nefarious plan. No one else but you can see this message. Part of the Carnivore plan that is "defunct".

      Or I could just be a loser with too much time on my hands.

      The truth is out there.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  7. Depressing by dbarclay10 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I the only one who finds filling this out depressing?

    Especially when you fill out the bad bits about the current job. And see that you checked most of the boxes. And then realise that is says "please specify no more than three."

    *sigh*

    --

    Barclay family motto:
    Aut agere aut mori.
    (Either action or death.)
    1. Re:Depressing by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who finds filling this out depressing?

      You sound like your current job doesn't satisfy you. Which lead to the question: why don't you consider finding another one? Are they hard to come by in your field?

      Personally, I have realized that the most important thing in a job is liking it. Because, apart from sleeping at night, working is the second most important activity in a 24h day. Therefore, if you don't like your job, you become miserable.

      For me, that meant changing field entirely and taking a big pay cut. I don't regret it though, I have no credits, and I've come to realize money isn't what makes one happy in life.

      All in all, I'm glad I left that stupid computer industry: less stress, stable working hours, and a job I like. That's important to me. Maybe you need a big change too?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Depressing by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 1

      Here here; I went back to school to be a psychologist!

      School is a lot of fun, I'm excited about what I'm learning and becoming, and I'll only have to live through 5 more years of financial instability before I'm money. And satisfied. And making my own hours. Doing something that I know helps people.

      Otherwise, I'd have a lifetime of financial instability to look forward to, along with long hours under a string of asshole bosses at shitty companies that produce no real wealth, scrimping and saving all the while for fear of the next certain round of layoffs.

      Yeah, fuck being a programmer.

    3. Re:Depressing by gotih · · Score: 1

      miserable jobs exist (partly) because people are willing to take them. if it's that bad, threaten to leave if changes don't happen. if you don't get what you want, go somewhere else (maybe even DO something else). start something with some friends or former co-workers. good jobs do exist, espically if you make them. the alternative is to have a simmering hatred of 1/3 of your day for the rest of your life. ya know, it's your call.

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    4. Re:Depressing by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's my exact situation.

      I didn't check any of the good things, and all, "Good, now I can check the bad things!" and got a huge limp one when I saw Icould only pick three. There were at least 4 which -needed- to be checked...

      Maybe it's time to check out another job.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:Depressing by drsquare · · Score: 1

      But what about us who have low-paying, shit jobs? I can't take a pay cut for a more enjoyable job, because my job's already the bottom of the barrel, and all the enjoyable jobs don't exist.

    6. Re:Depressing by drsquare · · Score: 1

      At most places of employment, if you threaten to leave, they say 'OK, close the door on your way out.' It just makes things a bit easier for the next round of layoffs.

      There's nowhere else to go. All the jobs are taken, that's why millions are unemployed. If you want a job you're at the end of a queue millions of people long.

      the alternative is to have a simmering hatred of 1/3 of your day for the rest of your life.

      I wouldn't call it a simmering hatred. I've pretty much come to terms with how shit it is, now I just endure it apathetically. The place can burn as far as I'm concerned.

  8. Canadian Salary Data? by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have decent Canadian Salary Data? I'm particularly interested in figure for the Ottawa area...

    1. Re:Canadian Salary Data? by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

      I hear you can get c++ for something like $3.50 USD an hour.. But youll have to accept your treefidy, and like it.

    2. Re:Canadian Salary Data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good question :(

    3. Re:Canadian Salary Data? by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1, Informative
      The Canadian Job Futures should give you a good start on average salaries, expected education and/or experiences, and future outlooks for a variety of jobs.

      It's an excellent site to gauge a careers' prospects.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    4. Re:Canadian Salary Data? by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      Excellent. Thanks for the link!

  9. San Francisco Bay Area Quesiton... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most of the PC Technician contracts I been getting in the San Francisco Bay Area are usually between $16 to $20 per hour. However, I been getting offers for work outside the SF Bay Area (mostly in Southern California) for $50 to $60 per hour for the same kind of work. Can anyone explain the difference?

    1. Re:San Francisco Bay Area Quesiton... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

      I been getting in the San Francisco Bay Area are usually between $16 to $20 per hour. However, I been getting offers for work outside the SF Bay Area (mostly in Southern California) for $50 to $60 per hour for the same kind of work. Can anyone explain the difference?

      The hour is longer in socal. You can tell because all the job offers indicate "willing to be working long hours". Probably to prepare workers for life on another planet that spins more slowly on its axis or something...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:San Francisco Bay Area Quesiton... by eh2o · · Score: 1

      The SF bay area has a lot of tech wealth -- i.e., smart money. In Socal its all old money and big media.

      There is also the (possible correlated) fact that the bay area is saturated with over-qualified techies, but they are somewhat rare in socal.

      I live in the bay area but almost all of my income comes from non-local sources. Local work just isn't worth it (unless its google, maybe).

    3. Re:San Francisco Bay Area Quesiton... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      This is an easy one to answer.

      Both jobs listed require on-site service calls,
      and neither includes travel time as billable.
      The SF area position includes mostly clients that
      can be readily accessed via BART and other public
      transportation. The LA position cannot make use
      of public transportation, because there isn't
      any such thing.

      A billable 8 hour day in SF works out to perhaps
      a 10 to 12 hour day, whereas a billable 8 hour day
      in LA isn't even possible for that same 12 hours.
      Subtract the cost of the personal automobile, gas,
      insurance, and maintenence, and the fewer billable
      hours per day, and the pay differential for LA
      will barely cover the cost of the tranquilizer
      prescription needed to deal with LA traffic.

      In other words, the difference in per hour salary
      is entirely consumed by the different working
      conditions between SF and LA.

    4. Re:San Francisco Bay Area Quesiton... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I found this article on the New York Times about how Silicon Valley/SF Bay Area is changing.

  10. For convenience, by HungWeiLo · · Score: 4, Funny

    For convenience, will they automatically convert the salaries to rupees?

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    1. Re:For convenience, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whoosh*

  11. Take my advice, 10 RUN, 20 GOTO 10 by infonography · · Score: 1

    Because the SF Bay Area is filled with people who can do it. I bailed out a long time ago, I was doing SA work there in 2001, and the wages were shrinking fast for new contracts. There is an entrenched group of Senior people who own houses and have local investments (kids in school and the like). They won't move out of the area because their life is there. Since they are fighting to protect their houses and mortgages they will work for dirt cheap. 16 year UNIX and Programmers will work for $36k/yr. Thats just sick.

    Take my advice, RUN! I went very far away and I am back to my salery level of 100k+ in a distant city. You don't find that in SF/Bay anymore.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  12. Let's make this international by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...and find out how much the average pay really is... I'm guessing somewhere in the neighborhood of $15 a day.

    Then everyone in the states making $15/hour could start to feel real fortunate when they fire up their microwave on another bowl of ramen.

    1. Re:Let's make this international by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all relative. I work for a multinational company, and I can tell you one thing. I make 32K in the states. My job in Tokyo pays 41K(USD). My job in Bangalore pays 19K(USD). And you know what? All of us do ok, because our buying power is determined by the local economy. So if I make like $32k and I'm happy, and they guy over in India makes $19k and we both have roughly the same spending power, who is to say that I make more than him? Maybe in absolute dollars, but certainly not in quality of life or buying power. By any measure of financial success, we are equals regardless of the fact that I make 75% more than the him.

      You have to take that into consideration.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    2. Re:Let's make this international by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 1

      Well, it's nice to know that everyone's making equally crappy wages, I guess.

    3. Re:Let's make this international by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not in IT. For what I do, I make really good money(4.5% above market rate). My job is incredibly easy, albeit a little stressful.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    4. Re:Let's make this international by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Programming is incredibly easy when you're good at it. I RULE!

    5. Re:Let's make this international by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not really. If you can each live on 80% of your salaries and you invest the other 20% each year, the Tokyo guy would retire a multimillionaire while the India guy won't have nearly so much. Mr. Tokyo could cruise around the world in a yacht or something while Mr. India could never afford to travel the world.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    6. Re:Let's make this international by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant. (1) You are off on a tangent given the GP's point regarding comparing local wages against the local economy. (2) A tangent about luxuries is a red herring. Can both individuals live comfortably, afford their children's local education, etc.

    7. Re:Let's make this international by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I eat ramen by choice... actually is my favorite food... you insensitive clod!

    8. Re:Let's make this international by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . So if I make like $32k and I'm happy, and they guy over in India makes $19k and we both have roughly the same spending power, who is to say that I make more than him? Maybe in absolute dollars, but certainly not in quality of life or buying power. By any measure of financial success, we are equals regardless of the fact that I make 75% more than the him.

      The guy making $19k in India has far more spending power than you have making $32k in the states. Far, far more. You are not close to being equals.

    9. Re:Let's make this international by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Well, the Indian would save 80% of his salary at a slightly higher interest rate, while the Tokyo guy would be able to save 20% (cost of living differences).

      Do the rest of the maths yourself :).

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    10. Re:Let's make this international by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Um... you are very wrong. The poster said "By any measure of financial success." Whether someone can afford a yacht or not is difinitely a measure of financial success. To say two salaries are equal once you factor in the cost of living assumes both people spend 100% of their salaries in the local economy. Only an idiot would do that. Unless you are comparing 2 idiots, more money really is more money.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    11. Re:Let's make this international by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Um, what???? The speculation assumed both people lived on 80% of their salary. Are you trying to say that in India someone can live on 20% of his salary? And why on earth would India be able to make higher returns than Tokyo? It's a global financials market, dude.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    12. Re:Let's make this international by dodobh · · Score: 1

      India has a higher risk, so the interest rates are higher (we are about 2% over the US currently).

      And yes, you can live on as little as 100 USD.mth, and quite comfortably on 200 USD/mth. Average sysadmin salaries are between 2400 USD to 6000 USD per annum. If you are really good, 12000 USD pa (at current rates). So a 19K salary would be about twice what a _really_ good guy gets (The senior admins at MNCs w/ over 10 years of experience make about 17000 USD pa).

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    13. Re:Let's make this international by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      To say two salaries are equal once you factor in the cost of living assumes both people spend 100% of their salaries in the local economy. Only an idiot would do that.

      Every year billions of people pretty much only spend their income in their local economy. While most are poor some are very comfortable. Again, the world travel and yacht arguments are red herring.

      Unless you are comparing 2 idiots, more money really is more money.

      And the money vs money comparison is naive and simplistic, the real economic comparison is "wants" satisfied.

    14. Re:Let's make this international by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's odd that someone thinks 32k is a crap wage. Who are you, Bill Gates? I make 17k and I'm grateful for that (used to be 14k). I think some of you computer types are spoiled by the Dot Com era.

    15. Re:Let's make this international by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Economic comparison is not about "wants." It is about power. Living in India gives you lower expenses, sure. But your real measure of power is how much money is in the bank at the end of the month after all your expenses are paid. That has nothing to do with where you live. I think you are confusing contentedness with financial success. The man with more money in the bank has the power to do more things after his expenses are met.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    16. Re:Let's make this international by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Well, you should be putting your money in the US stock market and not in India govt. bonds if you want real returns. And whether you live in India or the US, you can buy either type of investment.

      It is interesting that Indian expenses are so much lower. But to really compare how relatively wealthy you are, you need to measure how much money you have left over in the bank every month compared to the guy in the other country.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    17. Re:Let's make this international by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      Economic comparison is not about "wants." It is about power ...

      Economics is based upon "wants". Power is based upon "force".

      ... I think you are confusing contentedness with financial success.

      Not at all. I am saying that wanting a yacht and wanting to travel the world in style are arbitrary non-universal wants. To define a person's financial well being in terms of those is naive and simplistic. This tangent about luxuries is a red herring.

    18. Re:Let's make this international by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 1

      You make an average eight and a half bucks an hour (if they're not raping you on overtime, which they probably are) and you're happy about it?

      You ought to be pissed off. Pizza delivery boys make more money than you.

      $32k is a crappy wage. Knock off 20% for taxes, now you're down to $25600, which is only about $2130 a month.

      Figure $1000 for a home mortgage payment, $400 for a car payment, plus an extra $300 a month for property taxes and home insurance, plus an extra $200 for auto insurance, plus about $300 for utilities (gas, electric, water, trash.) That's $2200. Look at that, not breaking even. Forget about buying food or keeping yourself entertained. Oh well, at least you'll have more time to work overtime and not get paid for it. Yummy.

      $32 would be a great wage if you were living at home with your parents, which it sounds like you are. But for a real live grown-up with real expenses, it's a pile of piss.

    19. Re:Let's make this international by drsquare · · Score: 1

      In that case, how the hell do you think anyone survives on $32k or less, bearing in mind that is above the median wage? According to you, there'd be hundreds of millions living on the streets, all with high-paying full-time jobs.

      If you're that stuck for cash, perhaps you shouldn't be spending so much on luxuries like cars and mortgages. How long do those car payments last? At $400 per month it shouldn't take you a year to pay it off. If you're spending $300 per month on utilities you're doing something wrong.

      Also take into account the low cost of living in the US, and the low taxes, and you're doing pretty well.

    20. Re:Let's make this international by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 1

      Yep, it is above the median wage, and it's still shit. That's why most people with these "high-paying" jobs are not land-owners in this wonderful 'property society' of ours. Most people rent shitty apartments, drive shitty cars, and still live paycheck to paycheck. Most people in this country have no medical coverage. None.

      This country is in a process known as proletarianization, along with a good part of the rest of the western world. We, the masses, are being relegated back to serfdom.

      What sort of warped reality do you live in where you can call cars and mortgages luxuries? Owning a home and a means of transportation are luxuries? No wonder you're happy making $17k. You're an idiot.

    21. Re:Let's make this international by dodobh · · Score: 1

      I believe the currently accepted measure of comparing incomes is purchasing power parity (PPP).

      If you have a 1000 USD left over in the states, and 200 USD in India, the Indian can scrape through for two months, the guy in the states for one. That difference is the PPP.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    22. Re:Let's make this international by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I don't have a car, I get by fine. This 'car is necessary' crap is an entirely American thing. Some of us are able to walk or ride a bike, or live in countries with decent public transport. Americans can barely get to the end of their drive without a twelve-tonne SUV to get them there. And of course they complain about how much work they have to do to afford it.

      In the current climate, buying a house when you can't afford it is a wrong move. Having your own house is a luxury. It's only a recent development to get out from the family home as soon as possible to set up your own household. Those Indians doing the computer programming jobs probably all live in large family households. If you want your own house (because of course it's the fashionable thing to do, and fashion counts for all), then you're going to have to pay for it, but don't complain when you have to pay for it.

    23. Re:Let's make this international by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 1

      Hey, yeah, that all sounds great.

      Like, if I didn't want to live indoors, why I bet I could get by on only $5k a year. That would be just peaches and fucking creamy too. Hell, I can give up eating and be a goddamn wiseman professionally for just pennies a day.

  13. I did my part by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    I did my part to bring the averages down and broaden the standard deviations, by including my mid-sized city, midwestern, academic compensation in the dataset. The compensation results in these surveys are so alien to the job market in which I work that I don't know whether to laugh at them or just cry.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  14. Job != life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some of us, what we do to pay the bills doesn't define who we are. Yes, it's a large part of your time and energy, but if you are happy when you get home and have time and money to do what you want without worrying about how to pay for it, that can be just as satisfying. It depends on the person, though: my wife is very emotionally drained and bitter about her work and will be leaving her job soon. I just don't place such a high value on the nature of the work I'm doing in order to survive. I found being unemployed to be the most miserable experience ever, and would gladly work a stressful/grunt job to avoid that.

  15. Let me get this straight... by merc · · Score: 1

    You're free to hand over your salary data but in order to see the results from 2 years ago you have to be a member?

    No thanks.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by merc · · Score: 1

      Responding to my own post here; I didn't RTFA close enough apparantly. From what I can see participants do get a copy of the results :Z

      --
      It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  16. Result of Linux: 16 years UNIX experience, $36k/yr by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 4, Interesting

    16 year UNIX and Programmers will work for $36k/yr. Thats just sick.

    Why is everyone so surprised? Isn't this one of the expected outcomes of PC-based FOSS software like FreeBSD and Linux? I'm not saying this was a goal, just an anticipated side effect, the downside outweighed by the upside. When a particular field of knowledge and experience becomes commoditized the price that the knowledge and experience commands drops.

    In the early to mid 90s many people honestly believed that Unix was on the way out, that it was destined to become a niche. Few people invested much time in learning Unix, we used it in school and when the staff polled the CS majors about how the program could be improved a very popular request was classes on Windows programming. Thankfully the staff said that the university teaches concepts not the flavor-of-the-day OS, go learn to program Windows outside of class.

    So those people with Unix experience were rare and able to command high salaries. Now enter FreeBSD and Linux. Many CS student I knew didn't really care about the GPL or the politics, all they cared about was that they could do their Unix based homework assignments on their PC at home and not have to wait for machines in the lab or dial-in through a damn modem. A handful got into FreeBSD and Linux. Between the former and later groups Unix knowledge and experiece became widely available. If my company needs a website I don't have to go out and buy an expensive Sun box and hire expensive people with Sun experience. I can go out and get decent PC hardware and use FreeBSD or Linux and hire a far less expensive person to setup and maintain them. Sure the Sun hardware is more robust but for many businesses it doesn't really matter.

    I saw similar things at school. The university stopped buying Suns and purchased PCs and installed Linux. The vast majority of students and profs only needed a general purpose Unix desktop. The handful that had some very specialized need could get a Sun.

    This is all the rational expected outcome of FOSS software like FreeBSD and Linux. FOSS not only frees the users but it also frees the corporations, they are no longer "held hostage" by what Unix admins and programmers once jokingly labeled themselves: the "high priests".

  17. Considering the lack of experience demanded. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's about right.

    That's 28 grand a year, before taxes. In Canada, that'd be enough to live comfortably (where the poverty line is about 16 grand before taxes). Unless you live in one of the expensive areas of the US, I suspect that'd be enough too. Hotel managers in Hawaii make about that, for example.

    Making that much money means you get more money per year than about 60-70% of the population. There is a large gap between rich and poor in the US.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Considering the lack of experience demanded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making that much money means you get more money per year than about 60-70% of the population. There is a large gap between rich and poor in the US.

      Median salary in the US for a family is in the 40's, so you wouldn't be making more than most of the population at that wage

    2. Re:Considering the lack of experience demanded. by Vitamin+P · · Score: 0

      hmmm in the us you usually consider 2K hours/year when figuring salaries... 15.00 * 2,000 sound to me to be like roughly 30K/year before taxes. In California that will get you shack and maybe 1 meal/per day while in a midwestern state you can almost raise a family of 3 on that. That is what the problem is with the way we figure out salaries. It is not what the market would bear alone... it is also what does it cost to just to live. In California; I am told $15/hr is "minimum wage". Shit I WISH I made $15/hr that is only around 30,000 /year which if I was single in this part of the world would allow you to actually not live from paycheck to paycheck.

    3. Re:Considering the lack of experience demanded. by G00F · · Score: 1

      In cali the average income is 60,000, and someone making that much money doesn't come close to qualifing for a loan for the average home in cali.

      On a side note, I think $10 an hr is min wage for scrapping by, any less than that is poverty for a single person. You would bearly be able to pay bills in most cities (asuming 500 for rent and utilities)

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    4. Re:Considering the lack of experience demanded. by ignorant_coward · · Score: 1


      In the US, I'd say anything less than 30K/year household income is poverty. Try raising a family of four in a single-wide mobile home, because that's what 30K/year will buy you these days.

      Housing is the real killer, IMO. Where I live, housing is going up 10%/year, which is modest relative to the insanity of the west coast. The cost of housing basically doubles every decade, and that _sucks_ for the middle class.

      Food really hasn't gone up much, because I've managed to switch to store brands when the brand names jack up their prices. Doing that buys a few years inflation. Things like cable TV and cell phones are optional, and there's no reason to buy any clothing at retail price.

      But housing...anyone buying a house is going to be fucked. Proof of the problem: the popularity of interest-only mortgages (bbbaaaarrrrrffffff!).

  18. Thirteen Canadian Dollars by kai.chan · · Score: 1

    I'm coding for $13/hr -- Canadian dollars. And I am the only Firmware/Software Engineer in the company with a lot of pressure to produce. I am thinking of moving to the United States for better opportunities. Maybe someone on Slashdot can help me.

    1. Re:Thirteen Canadian Dollars by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      If you're the only firmware/software engineer, then you should consider asking for a raise, because hiring someone else, with that pay rate, that knows what you already know, is not an easy task.

  19. to prepare workers for life on another planet by infonography · · Score: 1

    Didn't they do a few movies about that happening to dead people? I think the movies where called Phantasm

    oh yes and don't forget

    BOY! /Creapy voice.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  20. These Surveys Used To Sell IT Training by uncleroot · · Score: 5, Informative

    As someone formally employed in the IT certification training industry, I can tell you that the results of these surveys are often used by unscrupulous salespeople to sell expensive courses and training "kits" (over-priced boxes of cheaply bound, poor quality books and a CD or two) to gullible persons looking to get into IT. Let's say experienced Cisco admins are making $65k/year according to the survey. This information is pitched to prospective students to imply that they will make $65k if they just buy the $5000 CCNA course and pass the exam. Of course a CCNA and no job experience is unlikely to get you a job at all much less a high paying one. I'll name names: Intense School, Wave Technologies, TechSkills, and by far the worst, New Horizons.

    1. Re:These Surveys Used To Sell IT Training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Add another one called Quilogy to that list of unscrupulous tech mills. I had the dubious honor of working with them on both their consulting and training sides. What a joke. Not once did I hear anyone ask what is good for the students or clients, but rather how much can we bill them for? How many students can we get from XYZ Company into the one week $2000 Microsoft .Net intro course?

    2. Re:These Surveys Used To Sell IT Training by erlenic · · Score: 1

      What's really sad is the US Air Force paid two of those companies to each teach me the same class (CCNA.) I was rather disgusted with the whole process, considering I told my supervisors to send someone who wasn't already capable of passing the test.

    3. Re:These Surveys Used To Sell IT Training by TreyHarris · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not sure whether you meant that the people who do the surveys market IT training or that third parties do so, but let me make one thing clear: SAGE is a nonprofit membership organization, and we do not have salespeople market to participants of the Salary Survey (for that matter, we don't even have any salespeople).

      The Salary Survey is a service provided by SAGE to the public as part of our mission to "advance the status of computer system administration as a profession."

      Trey Harris
      Interim Director, SAGE

    4. Re:These Surveys Used To Sell IT Training by dancallaghan · · Score: 1

      As someone formally employed in the IT certification training industry

      I hope you meant formerly. ;-)

  21. MOD THIS UP: informal surveys are useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who works in the HR profession categorizing jobs, I know that many companies spend millions a year working with formal HR groups to do job leveling and compensation surveys. People in the industry *know* these informal online surveys are chock full of errors, and are representative of what the people who decided to participate decided to enter as data, not what the real market is paying. This is utterly useless, and you shouldn't base your career on the data therein.

  22. Depresing. by Forge · · Score: 1

    Nothing as Depresing as finding out that not only is my salary lower than the average fore any kind of computer geak job.

    It's not even in the same ballpark.

    I'm gona have to move.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    1. Re:Depresing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm gona have to move."

      No, stand still. I'm making a move to Uranus.

  23. Disagree by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    From interviewing people and getting jobs myself, it seems that most engineering or science graduates (especially math/physics grads, or those who have never worked in their lives), assume that who you know is much more important than what you know. The misconception from the "ivory tower" is that socializing is far more important than intelligence or solving problems. In the real world, it's maybe about even with perhaps a bit more importance assigned to socializing.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
  24. You're hired. by btarval · · Score: 1
    "Real men bill the client directly, with an arrow stuck into their door, shot from a bow they've made by hand with a string they've strung themselves from tanned bear entrails."

    We have a need for an Accounts Payable person. You're hired.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
    1. Re:You're hired. by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      surely you meant: Receivable?

    2. Re:You're hired. by btarval · · Score: 1

      Nope. ;) And please quit calling me Surely!

      --
      The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
  25. Pure utter nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got over 20 years of experience with UNIX, and over 10 with Linux. My rates are between $75-85 per hour right now. And I don't have trouble finding work. Agents tell me my rates are typical for the people they are looking for.

    If someone is only making $36K per year, then I question their experience and qualifications. Personally, I see a lot of people who haven't kept their skills up in this range.

    The effects of Linux and FOSS has been to open up a lot of opportunities for me; not close them. And to keep my rates up at a fairly decent level.

    To further counter your argument, I saw UNIX dying in the mid 90's. Companies where moving towards Windows, and the UNIX opportunites were shrinking. If it wasn't for Linux and FOSS, I'd probably be doing Windows work - and I'm a hardcore UNIX/Linux bigot. Unabashedly so.

    So your argument is pure nonsense. Keep your skills up, and if you're a "can do" person, you'll have plenty of opporunities if you can at least do a semi-decent job.

  26. Re:For convenience, Or, Hey Cousin Lo by HungWeiWeiHai · · Score: 1

    I guess the "inhumane" HR expects candidates to go "WHOOPIE" when they hear "Rhupee"/"Rupee"...LOL/DOH

  27. Surveys are Meaningless-Discounts are great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Average joe need to spend almost 70-80% of the their paycheck to maintain the same standard of living. Of course that is unless you got rich in the .com boom or spoiled the real estate market at your investment expense. In that case, none of this applies to you. Happy 4th."

    Simple. Download everything you can. Three-finger discount the rest. File for unemployment repeatedly. Section 8, welfare, food stamps, SSI, government cheese. Charity from the local church. Move in with mom and dad even though you're an adult.

  28. You don't know how good you have it by rve · · Score: 1

    That's roughly what I make (with about 4 years of experience) depending on the exchange rate of the dollar to the euro.

    I can't believe the standard of living in the US. Wages are incredibly high, and prices are incredibly low.

    For the price of a two bedroom appartment in a poor neighbourhood here, you could buy a family home with a nice big yard and a car in the US. Food and clothes cost about twice as much here, and gasoline about the equivalent of 5 or 6 dollars per gallon, depending on the exchange rate.

  29. Your experience is consistent with my point by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    On the contrary, your example is consistent with my point. As a matter of fact you seem to be unknowingly agreeing with me. No one is arguing that there are no high end Unix positions, merely that there are far fewer. Perhaps you are merely qualified enough that you can effectively compete for the scarcer opportunities. What has changed is that when talent was scarce those with mediocre skills could still find high paying jobs. Now that talent is not scarce they have to settle for lesser paying jobs. Being part of the "high priest" class no longer means job security. Most of what the Unix admin did when I was in school, late 80s early 90s, is now part of the skillset of some of the incoming freshman.

    1. Re:Your experience is consistent with my point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not at all. If there were "far fewer" high end UNIX positions, as you claim, I should be having trouble finding work, and my income should be going down. What I see is completely different.

      FOSS has expanded opportunities and the business, not lessened them. Without FOSS, the UNIX biz would be dead by now.

    2. Re:Your experience is consistent with my point by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      No, not at all. If there were "far fewer" high end UNIX positions, as you claim, I should be having trouble finding work, and my income should be going down. What I see is completely different.

      No, you would only have trouble finding work if you are part of the mediocre crowd, are you mediocre? Also there is plain luck, good contacts, etc.

      I did "misspeak". I don't know why I wrote Unix jobs are fewer, well I do - I was tired and just got home at 2am and left out the word "relative", my point has nothing to do with absolute jobs but increased competition for the jobs. The absolute number of jobs has probably increased since FreeBSD and Linux came onto the scene and "saved" Unix but the number of people with sufficient Unix knowledge has grown faster. The supply of Unix expertise has driven down its cost. Now for niche jobs where they still use traditional Unix hardware and vendors (Sun, Sgi, etc) or operate larger sites it may be that not much has changed, but in the lower end of the Unix market companies are no longer forced into buying the upscale hardware and people, or forced into using Windows.

  30. Re: America's Job Bank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America's Job Bank is run by the Dept of Labor, that's where they post the jobs the companies want to bring foreign labor for, to see if some american is willing to do it first.