When I find an attacker getting into my company's network I start pulling my hair out and run around screaming "Aww! Aww! The crackers are taking over my network! Aww! Aww!"
I know you meant this as a joke but if crackers are getting into your network; as a Sys Admin you're responsible for not safeguarding your network. It is no wonder you got laid off.
exactly like when we were young, and you made digitally exact copies of the music you liked and shared it with thousands of people
Digitally exact copies? huh
What is a digitally exact copy?
IIRC TCP transfer protocol allows for lost bits and a request to send them again.
My problem is that digital "reproduction" can't be reproduced correctly using the protocols we have not. So I get an "exact" copy... we don't really get an exact copy. According to when we receive the digital copy do we timestamp each and every bit we get?
We are talking derriviate work here. I can play the notes a c b d e f on any instrument and it will sound 100% different when played on a piano as opposed to something else that contains the same notes only separated by a time factor that is maybe 2 times what the author intended.
Can any one tell me where a successful copyright case has been decided where the spacing between notes is relevant?
The music industry has been grappling with issues of piracy over the last few years, in particular since broadband became popular.
This whole idea of music in the digital age is fscked up no matter what.
A computer can sample music and then CONVERT into a series of 1's and 0's which could be COMPLETELY different from the original recording. The way the law reads (IANAL but I stayed in a holiday inn last night) that there has to be a significant change from the original to be considered a copyright infringment. Can some one wiser than me tell me where in copyright law it says I can't take something that is recorded in analog and I convert it to digital where that is infringing on the original authors copyright?
After all the dictionary is copyrighted but people are still free to take those words and compile a copyrightable version/story that they then can protect/apply copyright onto.
I don't know if this is legal but I hereby copyright "0" so any third party that uses the actual symbol or a digital representation of a zero is hereby in violation of my copyright.
IIRC one way to copyright material would be to publish that same material.
Slashdot is one way to publish something so henceforth anyone using a representation of the number "0" is violation of my copyright. My liscensing fee will be for the betterment of all.
All I require is that I be paid.00000000001 euro for each and every 0 that is contained in a digital recording.
Please remit said fees to myaccount which can be accessed (after paying the appropiate copyright fees to myaccount2 which will reimburse your account.0000000000001 euros for each and every 1 that you use.
Signed a man with a wife that will spend $10 euro's a week more than I can bring home.
40% of americans are hispanic. i think a lot of those people probably speak spanish. not to mention all the other groups that live here...
And who the fsck are you in saying that which "40 percent of that population; Which I dispute but am not going to try and argue." Unfortunately corporations are only looking at the bottom line... if I can hire 10 people that will work for x amount of hours. (it doesn't matter if they can speak english then I can just hire a translator or spend a bunch having all our companys documents translated to then I will be a profitable company.) hmmm there is a problem with that. Having to convert documents to another language costs $ and you eventualy end up spend more money on conversion of documents than you do if you had originally hired an English/German/Swahilli insert language of the day.
But you say I am saving 30 cents an hour on hiring people but you are spending more on what you're saving on what it "actually" costs to train and retain workers. Sure you can hire 10 illegal immigrants to do the work and save $ but the savings are eaten up by having a translator on staff/the time or effort having all your documentation available in other languages.
I have worked in a place that couldn't/wouldn't fire someone unless there was a translator around.
When there wasn't that person wasn't fired not even notified that there was a problem. Therefore they didn't know there was a problem and couldn't improve or explain that there was a valid reason that work performance wasn't acceptable.
And another thing people somewhat forget our Emergency Broadcast System is supposed to be available to a vast majority of people.
If we have a "real" emergency what are the people that only have analog to do?
Same thing with AM radio what is on AM radio today besides moldy oldies and talk shows? Lets just drop
AM because no one listens to it anyway. IMHO it is because it is a niche market and the advertisers are not ready to give up on it.
Maybe it fell of because IT WAS HELD ON WITH TAPE!
Or maybe you would be more lenient if it was attached to what it was trying to protect with a design that cost $35M and took 5 years to develop.
Sometimes the simpliest ideas are also the best.
To Paraphrase from an urban legend.
NASA spent 60M dollars designing a pen that would write in zero G... the russians used a pencil.
As a senior I am sure you have the answers to all of life's questions.
This happens to everyone...
I wish I knew what I knew at 18 today. I would be the richest/baddest mofo that ever lived.
The first lesson to learn at 18 is you know jack sh$$ and use that for the rest of your life.
Wisdom comes at a great expense and you will find out when you get old enough to know what wisdom is.
Now get off my lawn.
Got that? A BOOK. a fictional story. I can see people wanting to get a copy early, but court injunctions to stop them from reading them sound a little excessive.
I think that a court telling me what I can and cannot read is unconstitutional in the U.S.
If I legally purchased the book it is my property to do with what I want to do. If I want to read it I can. If I want to scan it into a computer I can. If I want to spread it to the rest of the world I can wait a minute I can't.
Shit then Never Mind this is Rosanna Danna signing off.
How about tax breaks for folks _without_ cars?
Or how bout tax breaks for people that can afford their own tzx breaks.
This is BS... I smoke and contribute more in taxes than someone that doesn't. My gas prices rise exactly the same as someone that doesn't partake in the "sin" taxes.
Hell I am on a fixed income.... my income is fixed on the amount of hours I am forced to work. I want a tax break.
I am forced to live under a budget why isn't everyone else also forced to live under a budget.
If I ran my life like the government I would probably be in jail for not paying my bills each month.
I'd rather have one city a month bombed, just like london, than deal with the TSA and the homeland security bullshit.
UNLESS It was your family that was part of the damage.
I do agree I would rather see 100/1000 people die than anyone from my group of extended friends/family but that has never happened to me. You might be singing another tune if you had a person you cared about on the list of dead/missing.
If I had mod points today.... why wasn't this posted yesterday. (
Debt collection agencies may not have the "teeth" to actually do you harm by themselves but they will/can report this to a credit agency which will either harm you or cause you to spend more time/money than the debt was worth in trying to fix it.
I for one do not welcome our new Corporate Overlords.
...a college professor take a CIS test before hiring him?...
Those that can do those that can't teach. Wish I could attribute this quote to someone...
But it is so true sometimes. If all your life you have only worked with facts/figures/statistics you sometimes find that what the facts/figures/statistics say is 99.99% certain then someone comes in and says how are you? You freak you haven't seen another human being in how long?
There is more to being a decent worker that knows his stuff you actually have to communicate the fact to other people, and if your people skills are fscked up no matter how much you belittle others for not knowing as much as you do you're NOT going to be sucessful.
It is just that the others are so imcompetent that it is always their fault.
Ever worked for someone like that? Would you do it again?
What I want to know is What exactly was he arrested for? What are the charges. Even if the charges are legit then I think the state is going to have a fairly hard time showing proof.
Unless the culprit sang like a canary there is no way that the state has or had proof.
hmmm in the us you usually consider 2K hours/year when figuring salaries... 15.00 * 2,000 sound to me to be like roughly 30K/year before taxes.
In California that will get you shack and maybe 1 meal/per day while in a midwestern state you can almost raise a family of 3 on that. That is what the problem is with the way we figure out salaries.
It is not what the market would bear alone... it is also what does it cost to just to live. In California; I am told $15/hr is "minimum wage".
Shit I WISH I made $15/hr that is only around 30,000/year which if I was single in this part of the world would allow you to actually not live from paycheck to paycheck.
That depends on what you want to use the telescope for when you are not looking at this event. A dorm room of the appropiate sex is one possible alternate idea.
You are looking at only 1 subset of what a(n) union does.
A(n) union in pure form is just a collection of people that say this is what we want to perform what you want. Nothing too wrong there is there? But the "union" wants to classify employees based PURELY on when you joined the company. (Bad Example follows) A job is posted that you would like to have. You have all of the listed qualifications but some one with more seniority wants to try something different; guess what you lose out on this because being Unionized you're just a number, because if you weren't "just" a number you wouldn't have to be unionized, you could just let the "free" market value your skills.
I have worked Union shops before and they don't care if you are the next Jesus Christ and can perform miracles you are just #6549687651684 on the seniority list and we have to let Joe Schmo (the janitor with 30 years being a janitor) have the next network administrator because he wants the job and he is next on the seniority list.
A person only has to do the "minimum" to stay employed in a(n) union.... anyone that wants to advance in their carreer by showing that they can get the job done using less resources than the company is using now is SOL as they will be lost in the there has been 10 drones/slaves that have a lower number on our list that want said job; we would like to thank you for your interest.... but it will be a cold day in hell when you get this job.
Rather, it languishes in tribal warfare made all the worse by the relatively recent influx of Islam which has torn the northern countries of Chad and Sudan to shreds.
Then being 100% serious they are doomed!
Islam will not allow what most of the modern world considers essential to having a prosperous economy. If you can't allow 50-60% (your women) of your population to produce what you need then you are forced to take it from somewhere else therefore making us infidels a lucrative target we have the cash and the balls to let most anyone work to produce what we want to spend our money on.
Islamists (yes this is flamebait) only care about themselves and history has shown that they are at an economic disadvantage when they restrict their population from enhancing their economic status.
If they would wake up and smell the camel dung they might see that restricting about half of your population might seem like a good idea it is not without risks.
For all the people, before there is a holy war, let me set some things straight. If a person arranges to meet someone underage, send them to jail. If a person chats with someone underage and tries to solicit sex, send them to jail. I am all for sending people to jail who harm others.
There has been a person that has been convicted of trying to have sex with a 14 year old.... only problem was he/she was not 14 years old the person was an undercover officer of the sex crimes division.
How can one prove intent beyond a reasonable doube?
Sure I advertised that I wanted to have sex with someone the legal age but when confronted with the fact that the personal I was corresponding with was most likely legal age and probably encouraged me to meet him/her only to arrest them under the pretense that they portrayed themselves as under the legal limit for consentual sex but still arrest the person that allegedly tried?
I am a novice when it comes to sexual acts.... just ask my wife.
But to arrest a person for thinking he was going to have sex with an underage person even when accosted with the fact that the person he/she was presented with was in fact legal age and nothing happened is ludricous.
Protect the children my ass the children run this world and don't need any protection...
But you miss the big picture this guy has already been convicted this is an appeal case.
A jury/judge has already determined that you did in fact break the law. So you analogy about getting away with it is flawed. You and your lawyer failed to convince a single person that was in power to decide that you didn't do the crime you were charged with.
This tells me that the guy is guilty as hell. If you can't convince even 1 person out of 12 that there is reasonable doubt then give it up. People seem to forget to convict you have to convince 12 people (in a jury trial) but to acquit you only have to convince 1 person that you are not guilty.
There is more to this story than meets the eye.
You are absolutely correct. I live in the midwest and the National Weather Service puts out so many Tornado Warnings that people are getting accustomed to ignoring them. i.e. Radar has shown that the clouds are doing funky stuff so we have to issue a warning. I don't care for this untill a person has seen a Tornado on the ground then don't sound the sirens. I live close to Lincoln Nebraska and we had a regional baseball game here. The NWS issued a warning for Lancaster County (which is probably 1000 sq miles and they had 8,000 people gathered in one place. But the sun was shining at the ballpark (only later when thunderstorms appeared in area did they postpone game.) But according to NWS guidelines the 8,000 people should have ran for shelter because there was a radar indicated tornado 25-30 miles away.
There was no visual siteing of tornado just a radar indication that there "could" be a tornado.
I thought that "could be" only deserved a watch.
Yea a webcam that is focused on a picture of the last supper is going to change any ones mind.
Problem with poker is if you believe you have the best hand you should play it that way.
Bluffing online is only for bots and foolish people If you think you have the cards you bet and let the other suckers compensate you for your "skill" at making sure that you have a lock. You aren't going to rich using this strategy you will make money.
Poker isn't about betting/folding as it is about money management. It is simple if you have the better hand you win. No AI needed for that play he odds and if the odds shift then fold.
A bot can outlast you just playing the odds w/o relying on the fact that you could be bluffing.
So what you get bluffed out of a pot being a bot you don't care you will make it up in the A-Holes betting 2-9's into your JJ or whatever.
you are so full of yourself!
your generation is not anything different from any previous generation. You are rebelling against the status quo... something EVERY generation has done for thousands of years. Just becaus you decide to deface your body is no different from us long haired geeks that rebelled against the status quo 30-40 years ago with the exception we can always grow up and cut our hair while you losers with tats can't unless you want to spend the $ to remove your I luv . Rebelling against athority is a part of growing up but PLEASE don't do something that you have to carry the rest of your life. I would imagine that there are doctors claiming to fix "disturbed teenager's" mistakes are laughing all the way to the bank with your money.
Contrary to popular belief a tatoo only serves to let others know that you fell into the "out" crowd and now have to wear that sign for the rest of your life.... hell why don't you douse yourself with gasoline and ignite it the results are the same (scarred for a HELL of a long time.)
I have to butt in here and start a flamewar.
What does converting a song you ripped from the original format to MP3 have to do with this?
You have spent the energy/storage requirements to make a deriviative work of the orginal.
Yes technically it is by ear the same as the orginal but is it really?
I rip a song from a CD (which I legally own or have fair use rights to) and convert it to something that's entirely different.
If I wave my wallet near some type of scanner, which card will be selected?
Easier answer the one that the owners of your cards can make the most money off of.
You have 2 cards one that charges 2% and one that is "free" which one do you think will conclude the transaction? My money is on the one that will make the corporation the most money.
When I find an attacker getting into my company's network I start pulling my hair out and run around screaming "Aww! Aww! The crackers are taking over my network! Aww! Aww!"
I know you meant this as a joke but if crackers are getting into your network; as a Sys Admin you're responsible for not safeguarding your network.
It is no wonder you got laid off.
exactly like when we were young, and you made digitally exact copies of the music you liked and shared it with thousands of people Digitally exact copies? huh What is a digitally exact copy? IIRC TCP transfer protocol allows for lost bits and a request to send them again. My problem is that digital "reproduction" can't be reproduced correctly using the protocols we have not. So I get an "exact" copy... we don't really get an exact copy. According to when we receive the digital copy do we timestamp each and every bit we get? We are talking derriviate work here. I can play the notes a c b d e f on any instrument and it will sound 100% different when played on a piano as opposed to something else that contains the same notes only separated by a time factor that is maybe 2 times what the author intended. Can any one tell me where a successful copyright case has been decided where the spacing between notes is relevant?
The music industry has been grappling with issues of piracy over the last few years, in particular since broadband became popular. This whole idea of music in the digital age is fscked up no matter what. A computer can sample music and then CONVERT into a series of 1's and 0's which could be COMPLETELY different from the original recording. The way the law reads (IANAL but I stayed in a holiday inn last night) that there has to be a significant change from the original to be considered a copyright infringment. Can some one wiser than me tell me where in copyright law it says I can't take something that is recorded in analog and I convert it to digital where that is infringing on the original authors copyright? After all the dictionary is copyrighted but people are still free to take those words and compile a copyrightable version/story that they then can protect/apply copyright onto. I don't know if this is legal but I hereby copyright "0" so any third party that uses the actual symbol or a digital representation of a zero is hereby in violation of my copyright. IIRC one way to copyright material would be to publish that same material. Slashdot is one way to publish something so henceforth anyone using a representation of the number "0" is violation of my copyright. My liscensing fee will be for the betterment of all. All I require is that I be paid .00000000001 euro for each and every 0 that is contained in a digital recording.
Please remit said fees to myaccount which can be accessed (after paying the appropiate copyright fees to myaccount2 which will reimburse your account .0000000000001 euros for each and every 1 that you use.
Signed a man with a wife that will spend $10 euro's a week more than I can bring home.
40% of americans are hispanic. i think a lot of those people probably speak spanish. not to mention all the other groups that live here. ..
And who the fsck are you in saying that which "40 percent of that population; Which I dispute but am not going to try and argue." Unfortunately corporations are only looking at the bottom line... if I can hire 10 people that will work for x amount of hours. (it doesn't matter if they can speak english then I can just hire a translator or spend a bunch having all our companys documents translated to then I will be a profitable company.) hmmm there is a problem with that. Having to convert documents to another language costs $ and you eventualy end up spend more money on conversion of documents than you do if you had originally hired an English/German/Swahilli insert language of the day.
But you say I am saving 30 cents an hour on hiring people but you are spending more on what you're saving on what it "actually" costs to train and retain workers. Sure you can hire 10 illegal immigrants to do the work and save $ but the savings are eaten up by having a translator on staff/the time or effort having all your documentation available in other languages.
I have worked in a place that couldn't/wouldn't fire someone unless there was a translator around.
When there wasn't that person wasn't fired not even notified that there was a problem. Therefore they didn't know there was a problem and couldn't improve or explain that there was a valid reason that work performance wasn't acceptable.
And another thing people somewhat forget our Emergency Broadcast System is supposed to be available to a vast majority of people. If we have a "real" emergency what are the people that only have analog to do? Same thing with AM radio what is on AM radio today besides moldy oldies and talk shows? Lets just drop AM because no one listens to it anyway. IMHO it is because it is a niche market and the advertisers are not ready to give up on it.
Maybe it fell of because IT WAS HELD ON WITH TAPE! Or maybe you would be more lenient if it was attached to what it was trying to protect with a design that cost $35M and took 5 years to develop. Sometimes the simpliest ideas are also the best. To Paraphrase from an urban legend. NASA spent 60M dollars designing a pen that would write in zero G ... the russians used a pencil.
As a senior I am sure you have the answers to all of life's questions. This happens to everyone... I wish I knew what I knew at 18 today. I would be the richest/baddest mofo that ever lived. The first lesson to learn at 18 is you know jack sh$$ and use that for the rest of your life. Wisdom comes at a great expense and you will find out when you get old enough to know what wisdom is. Now get off my lawn.
Got that? A BOOK. a fictional story. I can see people wanting to get a copy early, but court injunctions to stop them from reading them sound a little excessive. I think that a court telling me what I can and cannot read is unconstitutional in the U.S. If I legally purchased the book it is my property to do with what I want to do. If I want to read it I can. If I want to scan it into a computer I can. If I want to spread it to the rest of the world I can wait a minute I can't. Shit then Never Mind this is Rosanna Danna signing off.
How about tax breaks for folks _without_ cars? Or how bout tax breaks for people that can afford their own tzx breaks. This is BS... I smoke and contribute more in taxes than someone that doesn't. My gas prices rise exactly the same as someone that doesn't partake in the "sin" taxes. Hell I am on a fixed income.... my income is fixed on the amount of hours I am forced to work. I want a tax break. I am forced to live under a budget why isn't everyone else also forced to live under a budget. If I ran my life like the government I would probably be in jail for not paying my bills each month.
I'd rather have one city a month bombed, just like london, than deal with the TSA and the homeland security bullshit. UNLESS It was your family that was part of the damage. I do agree I would rather see 100/1000 people die than anyone from my group of extended friends/family but that has never happened to me. You might be singing another tune if you had a person you cared about on the list of dead/missing.
If I had mod points today.... why wasn't this posted yesterday. ( Debt collection agencies may not have the "teeth" to actually do you harm by themselves but they will/can report this to a credit agency which will either harm you or cause you to spend more time/money than the debt was worth in trying to fix it. I for one do not welcome our new Corporate Overlords.
...a college professor take a CIS test before hiring him? ...
Those that can do those that can't teach. Wish I could attribute this quote to someone...
But it is so true sometimes. If all your life you have only worked with facts/figures/statistics you sometimes find that what the facts/figures/statistics say is 99.99% certain then someone comes in and says how are you? You freak you haven't seen another human being in how long?
There is more to being a decent worker that knows his stuff you actually have to communicate the fact to other people, and if your people skills are fscked up no matter how much you belittle others for not knowing as much as you do you're NOT going to be sucessful.
It is just that the others are so imcompetent that it is always their fault.
Ever worked for someone like that? Would you do it again?
What I want to know is What exactly was he arrested for? What are the charges. Even if the charges are legit then I think the state is going to have a fairly hard time showing proof. Unless the culprit sang like a canary there is no way that the state has or had proof.
hmmm in the us you usually consider 2K hours/year when figuring salaries... 15.00 * 2,000 sound to me to be like roughly 30K/year before taxes. In California that will get you shack and maybe 1 meal/per day while in a midwestern state you can almost raise a family of 3 on that. That is what the problem is with the way we figure out salaries. It is not what the market would bear alone... it is also what does it cost to just to live. In California; I am told $15/hr is "minimum wage". Shit I WISH I made $15/hr that is only around 30,000 /year which if I was single in this part of the world would allow you to actually not live from paycheck to paycheck.
That depends on what you want to use the telescope for when you are not looking at this event. A dorm room of the appropiate sex is one possible alternate idea.
You are looking at only 1 subset of what a(n) union does. A(n) union in pure form is just a collection of people that say this is what we want to perform what you want. Nothing too wrong there is there? But the "union" wants to classify employees based PURELY on when you joined the company. (Bad Example follows) A job is posted that you would like to have. You have all of the listed qualifications but some one with more seniority wants to try something different; guess what you lose out on this because being Unionized you're just a number, because if you weren't "just" a number you wouldn't have to be unionized, you could just let the "free" market value your skills. I have worked Union shops before and they don't care if you are the next Jesus Christ and can perform miracles you are just #6549687651684 on the seniority list and we have to let Joe Schmo (the janitor with 30 years being a janitor) have the next network administrator because he wants the job and he is next on the seniority list. A person only has to do the "minimum" to stay employed in a(n) union .... anyone that wants to advance in their carreer by showing that they can get the job done using less resources than the company is using now is SOL as they will be lost in the there has been 10 drones/slaves that have a lower number on our list that want said job; we would like to thank you for your interest.... but it will be a cold day in hell when you get this job.
Rather, it languishes in tribal warfare made all the worse by the relatively recent influx of Islam which has torn the northern countries of Chad and Sudan to shreds. Then being 100% serious they are doomed! Islam will not allow what most of the modern world considers essential to having a prosperous economy. If you can't allow 50-60% (your women) of your population to produce what you need then you are forced to take it from somewhere else therefore making us infidels a lucrative target we have the cash and the balls to let most anyone work to produce what we want to spend our money on. Islamists (yes this is flamebait) only care about themselves and history has shown that they are at an economic disadvantage when they restrict their population from enhancing their economic status. If they would wake up and smell the camel dung they might see that restricting about half of your population might seem like a good idea it is not without risks.
maybe 1.2 people but how many of then can afford starbucks?
For all the people, before there is a holy war, let me set some things straight. If a person arranges to meet someone underage, send them to jail. If a person chats with someone underage and tries to solicit sex, send them to jail. I am all for sending people to jail who harm others. There has been a person that has been convicted of trying to have sex with a 14 year old.... only problem was he/she was not 14 years old the person was an undercover officer of the sex crimes division. How can one prove intent beyond a reasonable doube? Sure I advertised that I wanted to have sex with someone the legal age but when confronted with the fact that the personal I was corresponding with was most likely legal age and probably encouraged me to meet him/her only to arrest them under the pretense that they portrayed themselves as under the legal limit for consentual sex but still arrest the person that allegedly tried? I am a novice when it comes to sexual acts.... just ask my wife. But to arrest a person for thinking he was going to have sex with an underage person even when accosted with the fact that the person he/she was presented with was in fact legal age and nothing happened is ludricous. Protect the children my ass the children run this world and don't need any protection...
But you miss the big picture this guy has already been convicted this is an appeal case. A jury/judge has already determined that you did in fact break the law. So you analogy about getting away with it is flawed. You and your lawyer failed to convince a single person that was in power to decide that you didn't do the crime you were charged with. This tells me that the guy is guilty as hell. If you can't convince even 1 person out of 12 that there is reasonable doubt then give it up. People seem to forget to convict you have to convince 12 people (in a jury trial) but to acquit you only have to convince 1 person that you are not guilty. There is more to this story than meets the eye.
You are absolutely correct. I live in the midwest and the National Weather Service puts out so many Tornado Warnings that people are getting accustomed to ignoring them. i.e. Radar has shown that the clouds are doing funky stuff so we have to issue a warning. I don't care for this untill a person has seen a Tornado on the ground then don't sound the sirens. I live close to Lincoln Nebraska and we had a regional baseball game here. The NWS issued a warning for Lancaster County (which is probably 1000 sq miles and they had 8,000 people gathered in one place. But the sun was shining at the ballpark (only later when thunderstorms appeared in area did they postpone game.) But according to NWS guidelines the 8,000 people should have ran for shelter because there was a radar indicated tornado 25-30 miles away. There was no visual siteing of tornado just a radar indication that there "could" be a tornado. I thought that "could be" only deserved a watch.
Yea a webcam that is focused on a picture of the last supper is going to change any ones mind. Problem with poker is if you believe you have the best hand you should play it that way. Bluffing online is only for bots and foolish people If you think you have the cards you bet and let the other suckers compensate you for your "skill" at making sure that you have a lock. You aren't going to rich using this strategy you will make money. Poker isn't about betting/folding as it is about money management. It is simple if you have the better hand you win. No AI needed for that play he odds and if the odds shift then fold. A bot can outlast you just playing the odds w/o relying on the fact that you could be bluffing. So what you get bluffed out of a pot being a bot you don't care you will make it up in the A-Holes betting 2-9's into your JJ or whatever.
you are so full of yourself! your generation is not anything different from any previous generation. You are rebelling against the status quo... something EVERY generation has done for thousands of years. Just becaus you decide to deface your body is no different from us long haired geeks that rebelled against the status quo 30-40 years ago with the exception we can always grow up and cut our hair while you losers with tats can't unless you want to spend the $ to remove your I luv . Rebelling against athority is a part of growing up but PLEASE don't do something that you have to carry the rest of your life. I would imagine that there are doctors claiming to fix "disturbed teenager's" mistakes are laughing all the way to the bank with your money. Contrary to popular belief a tatoo only serves to let others know that you fell into the "out" crowd and now have to wear that sign for the rest of your life.... hell why don't you douse yourself with gasoline and ignite it the results are the same (scarred for a HELL of a long time.)
I have to butt in here and start a flamewar. What does converting a song you ripped from the original format to MP3 have to do with this? You have spent the energy/storage requirements to make a deriviative work of the orginal. Yes technically it is by ear the same as the orginal but is it really? I rip a song from a CD (which I legally own or have fair use rights to) and convert it to something that's entirely different.
If I wave my wallet near some type of scanner, which card will be selected? Easier answer the one that the owners of your cards can make the most money off of. You have 2 cards one that charges 2% and one that is "free" which one do you think will conclude the transaction? My money is on the one that will make the corporation the most money.