Slashdot Mirror


Community, OSL and Sun Jump to Drupal's Rescue

Robert Douglass writes "Drupal asked for help and received a major dose of it. Sun Microsystems has stepped up and donated a Sun Fire V20z server which will be the backbone of Drupal's new server architecture at the Open Source Lab. Furthermore, over $10,000 in donations were collected in a matter of a couple days (thanks to all the people who responded to the previous /. post!), plus thousands more in pledges from groups like Apress and CivicSpaceLabs... looks like the community loves Drupal!"

175 comments

  1. I've got pictures!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pictures of the Sun equipment. Coral Cahed to boot.

    Damn I'm a nice guy!

    1. Re:I've got pictures!!! by axle_512 · · Score: 1

      Way to go Sun. Looking at the pictures, it seems that it has dual opterons. Awesome.

      Here is more info on the v20z server:
      http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/v20z/index.jsp/

    2. Re:I've got pictures!!! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Sun Fire...why I connect it with often happening result of linking to sites from /. ? :>

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:I've got pictures!!! by ManeeshBrash · · Score: 1

      Anyone else see the irony of having the drupal equipment pics hosted on a plone site?

  2. New /. Feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Remind me what Drupal is again given there isn't an obvious link to a "What is Drupal?" page.

    Maybe Slashcode should adopt a system that automatically links to topics that the story poster does not define.

    1. Re:New /. Feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Remind me what Drupal is again given there isn't an obvious link to a "What is Drupal?" page.

      Go to Google.com, type in "Drupal". Welcome to the Internets. :-/

    2. Re:New /. Feature? by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good idea! I'll just go to the first page that Google returns and... "The page cannot be displayed"... oh damn.

    3. Re:New /. Feature? by Zweideutig · · Score: 3, Informative

      Drupal is a content management system, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drupal if you want a description.

      --
      Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
    4. Re:New /. Feature? by Zweideutig · · Score: 1

      A good description of Drupal is in wikipedia

      --
      Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
    5. Re:New /. Feature? by garcia · · Score: 1

      Maybe Slashcode should adopt a system that automatically links to topics that the story poster does not define.

      A simple search for druapl in your little Firefox/Google Toolbar box would have brought you the information you needed.

    6. Re:New /. Feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's google? Do you have a link?

    7. Re:New /. Feature? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      A simple parenthetical phrase (like this) in the article, or maybe a link to the drupal site, could also have brought the information not only to me, but to the thousands of other people who have no clue what drupal is.

    8. Re:New /. Feature? by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Funny

      Drupal http://www.drupal.org/ is a content management system http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_management_sy stem and runs on a computer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer. It is written in PHP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHP which you can read more about here http://www.php.nt/.

      Slashdot has now become "News for wannabe nerds".

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:New /. Feature? by AddressException · · Score: 2, Funny

      www.php.nt eh?

      Your sar-chasm has just opened wide and swallowed you whole!

    10. Re:New /. Feature? by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it only runs for a few hours before you have to reboot. May want to stick with the php.net version until they fix that bug.

    11. Re:New /. Feature? by Matt+Clare · · Score: 1

      Well, there is a story on Google every other day, maybe if you read on of those stories you'll figure out what Drupal is.

      --
      .\.\att Clare
    12. Re:New /. Feature? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      That is the other sign of the decline of Slashdot. Making fun of spelling errors. Yea I made a typo My bad.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:New /. Feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why Drupal and other such systems aren't linked to on the wikipedia page. Usually, wikipedia articles have external and internal links to examples.

      Maybe somebody not so lazy should go do it...

    14. Re:New /. Feature? by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Remind me what Drupal is again"

      We don't put links to "What's Drupal" websites for the same reason we don't put links to "What's AppleMac" or "What's this grey box with a keyboard sitting on my desk" pages -- you're expected to know shit like that before you start commenting on slashdot

    15. Re:New /. Feature? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Yet another PHP web content management application that only works on a foundation of MySQL brokenness. Great, like we need more of those...

      Anyone have a list of CMS *not* written using PHP and capable of running on an ACID SQL database?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    16. Re:New /. Feature? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually it does work with Postgresql. Still in PHP but the code actually looks pretty well thought out. The only problem with it really is that the quick start guide is written just for MySQL. The truth is that MySQL is more than good enough for a CMS. You do not really need ACID for a CMS.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    17. Re:New /. Feature? by UnrefinedLayman · · Score: 1

      Why even include a synopsis of the article? Why doesn't slashdot just publish the title and link to the article? Clicking the link and reading the article yourself will bring you all the information you need.

      It surprises me when slashdot folk, who often lament their positions of technical support, criticize others for asking for more information. Would you rather have someone asking you for help tell you the thingy button's broken, or they receive a 403 Forbidden error when they visit http://www.yahoo.com?

      Really, how cogent is a story posted on slashdot when basic information that a four year old would request is omitted from its synopsis? It's not. It lacks class and sophistication, like much of slashdot, and is a mark of the increasingly sickening marketing-driven place slashdot's become.

    18. Re:New /. Feature? by dinojemr · · Score: 1

      Just google it to find out.

    19. Re:New /. Feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your insight into our business processes is valuable and I'd like to talk to you about some contract work. Are you available?

      It'd be great if we could get you on board, you seem already to understand what software we need for projects you don't know exist whose goals you've never heard and whose implementation process hasn't been planned.

    20. Re:New /. Feature? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      If you are only running a CMS then MySQL database will work. It is very clear that it works since it is being used all over creation. I never said that YOU didn't need one. Just that CMS do not need one. I also pointed out that Drupal can use Postgres.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    21. Re:New /. Feature? by dtungsten · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has now become "News for wannabe nerds".

      Oh, wannabe nerds, not wannabe women?

      So Drupal isn't that cross-dresser? This wasn't an article about him needing some new clothes?

    22. Re:New /. Feature? by AddressException · · Score: 1
      That is the other sign of the decline of Slashdot. Making fun of spelling errors. Yea I made a typo My bad.

      --
      It is good to laugh at yourself. Why let everyone else have all the fun?


      Read your own sig, and lighten up!
      News at 11....
    23. Re:New /. Feature? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually I was joking :) notice I said. "my bad"

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    24. Re:New /. Feature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Drupal isn't that cross-dresser? This wasn't an article about him needing some new clothes?

      EXACTLY what I was thinking. Drupal sounds way too much like Rupaul and is in desperate need of a name change!

  3. Advertisement! by Nova1313 · · Score: 1

    not only is it good they got support but it's good advertisement too. I was looking for a site system like that but was unsatified with those I had found even the commercial ones.

    --
    There exists some positive integer N that you are the Nth person to read this signature.
    1. Re:Advertisement! by Zemplar · · Score: 1

      Also consider Mambo as another CMS in the same league.

    2. Re:Advertisement! by aliens · · Score: 1

      I would but since I'm looking to run a large site with a lot of users I think I'll hold off since this is the headline story on mamboportal.com

      "Userdatabase cleared - Mambo unable to handle it"

      Seems to crap out at 100,000 users or so.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    3. Re:Advertisement! by Zemplar · · Score: 1

      With that type of load, I'd reconsider also. Perhaps something like Plone would be more suitable for your purposes?

    4. Re:Advertisement! by aliens · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Plone....

      While you're probably right, I've met people who have ended up in the loney bin after using/learning it ::)

      Not quite sure which path I am going to go down currently.

      Thanks for the suggestion.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    5. Re:Advertisement! by Zemplar · · Score: 1

      Sure Plone won't be as easy as Mambo or Drupal, but that is, in part, due to the expanded capabilities and features.

      What the hell? You read Slashdot! I'm sure you can handle it.

    6. Re:Advertisement! by aliens · · Score: 1

      LOL, yes that is true! Look at my UID!

      It's really more of a I have only so many hours to actually customize a CMS, on top of I am the only web developer on top of many other responsibilities.

      Don't ask why they only have one guy doing a site that will easily exceed 100,000 registered users. It's a large corp with managers. And we've all learned about managers from Dilbert.

      I am reading through the Plone docs again this week, but I really wish I had something that ran on Ruby On Rails. Such a great framework!

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    7. Re:Advertisement! by Zemplar · · Score: 1

      "It's really more of a I have only so many hours to actually customize a CMS, on top of I am the only web developer on top of many other responsibilities."

      Exactly why I use Mambo. But then again, I don't expect anywhere near the traffic you do. It might be time to tell the management that if they expect 100k+ visitors, time to add more help and financial support.

    8. Re:Advertisement! by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      make sure you test Plone's performance first.

      I don't know if it scales up, but it sure as hell doesn't scale _down_
      It's by far the slowest out of the box CMS I have ever played with.
      Also the split between Zope administration and Plone administration raises the learning curve quite a bit.

      I really liked the design of Plone, but unfortunately the performance was so bad that it wasn't worth putting in the significan effort required to understand the system.

      Something that comes close to Plone's design, but is much faster, well documented, and rather less complicated is ezPublish.
      I don't know how well it would handle 100,000 users though, as my CMS needs are for mostly public sites with a handful of editors as the only registered users.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    9. Re:Advertisement! by aliens · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link I hadn't looked at ezPublish really yet.

      Plone's design is kick arse, especially with the ease of use concerning external editors. I think we have the hardware power to handle running a plone site, but you're right everything I've read says it can be dog slow.

      I am hoping with a decent proxy I could fix this using Squid or something of that nature.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
  4. Opinions on Drupal by Dakrin1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does anyone have any opinions on Drupal? How does it compare to other Content Management Systems like LCMS, Rainbow, DotNetNuke, and PHPNuke.

    1. Re:Opinions on Drupal by Dakrin1 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I know people will probably say "It's better than DotNetNuke cause it will run on non-windows based servers" but mainly I'm just curious about the functionality, stability, and security of drupal itself and I could care less what I run it on. (yes, my windows servers are just as stable and secure as my linux servers).

      I just want a pure comparison between CMS's, not the underlying architecture.

    2. Re:Opinions on Drupal by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, considering that it is being backed so heavily by the community and is used on larger sites (i.e. mozilla.org) I would say that it has its place among the others...

      I haven't tried all of the above but I did examine PHPNuke for a short time because of Gallery's ability to easily integrate with it. I gave up on PHPNuke and went w/Drupal instead because of word-of-mouth even though Gallery v1 doesn't support Drupal integration.

      I came up with my own way to integrate my existing Gallery v1 setup into Drupal because their "blocks" allow you to run custom PHP code (or any code via external calls) in them.

      I have been quite pleased with Drupal and am looking forward to the new directions all the donations by the community, Sun, and OSL will bring.

    3. Re:Opinions on Drupal by eric_brissette · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out http://www.opensourcecms.com/ I really dig Mambo.. they take the firefox approach and make a solid CMS infrastructure with the basic features most people need and the community creates components/modules to extend that functionality... some free, some not.

    4. Re:Opinions on Drupal by SolusSD · · Score: 3, Informative

      I threw together a personal Drupal site in a matter of minutes: www.uwcreations.com straight forward/easy to use, but very powerful. I also use mambo.. but while it seems more flexible, it can be a nightmare compared to drupal.

    5. Re:Opinions on Drupal by drewzhrodague · · Score: 3, Informative

      Drupal seems to be a far better CMS than PHPNuke was, I had created a whole bunch of websites using PHPNuke.

      PHPNuke was great at the beginning, until kiddies started using the thing to send SPAM, post SPAM, and generally piss me off. Manual process to deal with that kind of crap.

      Drupal seems to have a couple of modules that let you deal with SPAM, though I haven't investigated it enough yet.

      I like how modular the code is, and I haven't needed to edit the Drupal code to make it do what I want, like I had to with PHPNuke.

      We're working on changing WiFiMaps.com over to Drupal, and I've alrealdy converted Recruiter-Rater over, using a nuke2drupal conversion script -- quite painless!

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    6. Re:Opinions on Drupal by Dakrin1 · · Score: 0

      oh, ya, i've used that, its awesome! I really like its simple and clean interface, and how easy it is to set things up pretty painlessly. I was hoping to look at some alternatives though, thats why i'm curious about drupal.

    7. Re:Opinions on Drupal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plone. Don't forget Plone.

      http://plone.org/

      Plone is simple. Plone is built on Zope. It's all Python (which I love). And there are so many Products - my favourite right now is CSSManager:
      http://opensource.arche.de/products/cssmanager

      You can do absolutely anything with Plone - I absolutely love it!

    8. Re:Opinions on Drupal by dnadig · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So, I've run/am running sites on mambo, drupal, Postnuke, Xoops, and Wordpress.

      WP is superior for simple blogging

      Mambo is superior for running a "newsy" kind of site

      Postnuke is superior for running a "fanboy" kind of site with lots of galleries, downloads, and discussion boards

      I find Drupal interesting - if only because of the wierd taxonomy/node system. I think it's best used for non-traditional creative group writing, but it falls short of the others in their respective categories for numerous reasons. I've also found it SO tightly written that its very difficult to make significant modifications.

      All just my opinions of course.

    9. Re:Opinions on Drupal by garcia · · Score: 3, Informative

      See here for how I used a Bash script to integrate a random Gallery v1 image into Drupal.

      Slashdot won't let me post it anonymously, sorry.

    10. Re:Opinions on Drupal by afinn · · Score: 3, Informative
      Drupal is an excellent piece of software. Compared to other CMSs it is fast, modular, has a clean codebase and a gentle learning curve. I recently started using it after messing around with various other CMS systems over the last couple of years.

      To be honest its the first one that has really impressed me. I looked at slashcode, scoop, zope, plone, postnuke, mambo.

      When I started using drupal I got the same feeling as when I started using Mac OS X. To continue the OS analogy postnuke and phpnuke are more like windows whereas zope and plone are kinda linux of the CMS world.

    11. Re:Opinions on Drupal by bertboerland · · Score: 1

      mozilla.org isnt run on drupal (YET!), spreadfirefox.org is.

      --
      -- for undocumented cisco commands, take a peek @ dotu
    12. Re:Opinions on Drupal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, astroturf

    13. Re:Opinions on Drupal by blazerw11 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Drupal is very easy to customize. We turned it into a really cool location based community now complete with Google Maps. A place where you can share cool (or interesting, or weird) locations related to almost any interest.

      Then, you can take them with you on your handheld.

      --
      A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
    14. Re:Opinions on Drupal by gnalre · · Score: 1

      Me too!. I've set a community web site with mambo and it was really easy. The best thing about mambo is that once setup everything can be done from the web browser. I was put off from Drupal when I read that modules required to be compiled . (Is that right?)

      I have heard however that Drupal is faster due to its page cacheing mechanism. I've also tried XOOP but I did not like the themes upload mechanism. Again with mambo its pretty easy. With XOOP you have to manually copy files.

      The only thing I do not like about mambo is its user access granularity, but I think they are working on that for release 5.0

      I may still download Drupal and give it a go.

      --
      Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
    15. Re:Opinions on Drupal by ari_j · · Score: 1

      My problem with Drupal is that every CMS lets me throw together a personal site in a matter of minutes, but none of them let me, in a matter of hours or even days, make things truly 'personal' with a format other than the "static pages, forums, calendars, and blogs" philosophy that most CMSes seem to share and a style that is uniquely my own.

    16. Re:Opinions on Drupal by metaclous · · Score: 1

      Modules need to be compiled? Uh, no. Maybe you're thinking of C? You do need to check a box to turn the module on, and in some cases modify your database if the module creates new tables. But I like that, because I know exactly what the module's going to do. A module installer is in the works.

    17. Re:Opinions on Drupal by wandazulu · · Score: 1

      I was checking out your site ... very cool! I'm curious how much you had to customize and what you did in fact customize. We're looking for software that has a lot of the features you have on your site, and was thinking of Drupal, and if it wasn't too much, maybe that will instill the confidence I have to go forward with it (and no, our site has absolutely nothing to do with maps :) ).

    18. Re:Opinions on Drupal by yelvington · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've built several sites on a Drupal foundation, including one significant community newspaper site that provides free blogs and photo galleries to thousands of community members. I'm very impressed with Drupal. Here are the major strengths and weaknesses as I see them.

      Strengths:

      * Stability.
      * Scalability. Configurable page caching is in the core feature set. Session data is in the database, so if you need to serve to the whole planet, you can deploy an array of web servers.
      * Extensibility. There's a very well-documented module API and a number of community-supported extensions that use it. A module called Flexinode lets you easily define new structured content types.
      * Integration. The authentication system can interoperate with a number of external sources, ranging from LDAP to LiveJournal. There are plug-ins for ecommerce payment systems, Amazon, etc.
      * Presentational flexibility. There are several optional templating engines; one (PHPTemplate) supports full PHP functionality, so you can not only customize the look and feel, but also easily integrate all sorts of information from non-Drupal sources without cursing. Content and presentation are reasonably well separated. Modules tend to assume that HTML is the target output format, but even that could be changed with some PHPTemplate magic.
      * RSS support. Just about everything can have its own feed, and file attachments automatically become enclosures. Result: Instant podcasting.

      Weaknesses:
      * Forums. The message board module is basic and does not, for example, let you promote a comment to base note status, or even move a comment from one thread to another.
      * Photo gallery support. The standard stuff is weak, no competition for Gallery. There is no support for integrating Gallery 1. There is a Gallery2 integration module, but G2 is unfortunately a flaky, poorly documented moving target.

    19. Re:Opinions on Drupal by Octorian · · Score: 1

      You can do absolutely anything with Plone - except have decent performance ;-)

      Yeah, it's slow, sluggish, etc... Sure, you can improve speed by doing a whole hunk of distributed stuff with Zope's ZEO, front-end caching, 3 gazillion tweaks and such, but at the end of the day, it is still slow as crap. (Unless you run it on a bunch of really fast servers and cache the hell out of it.)

      I'm running a Zope/Plone site myself, and I'm desperate to migrate to something else. I've looked at Mambo and Drupal before, but they seem to generally only offer my a 90% solution and are always missing those little minor things (like intermediate index pages that aren't "auto-generated blog format" or "news article listings") that Plone has.

    20. Re:Opinions on Drupal by rho · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's very easy to set up and use. It's very MySQL specific--if you want to use PostgreSQL, you'll spend some time removing MySQL-specific DB calls both from the core and from contributed modules. In order to work around the fundamental brokenness of older MySQL installations, Drupal does things itself that normally you would rely on the database to do for you. Foreign keys, for example. Sometimes the contributors do stupid things. One of the basic modules, search, requires a particularly up-to-date version of PHP (and/or upgraded versions of the preg library) in order to run without errors. This was a bad decision that should never have been allowed. I simply commented out that part of the search module and carried on.

      In operation, it's fast. It has a lot of modules, and writing new ones is pretty easy. Although it does not look like an OO system, the way it's been constructed it acts like one. Object-orientation built out of function calls, will wonders never cease. The contributed modules are of varying quality. It's non-trivial to wade into them looking to fix things unless you're conversant with Drupal-specific functions. The workflow of how modules work is sane. They have by default a "verification" phase for submitting forms.

      It tends towards the "two- or three-column Web layout that everybody uses", with a main body and one or two sidebars. I hate, hate, hate this look, but everybody expects it. Pah! Savages.

      I've found that unsophisticated users can use the Web forms to create content well enough. Even very unsophisticated users can manage the content on their site. In order to allow this, however, you'll spend a lot of time in the admin pages making tweaks and changing settings.

      Multiple theme options. It doesn't lend itself well to "this page looks like this, but this page is completely different", but it can be done.

      As a CMS, it's not the most sophisticated, but it meets 90% of what even sophisticated users need. You can even use it to manage documents and suchlike, if not perfectly. The image-handling functions are painfully Web-application-like. It's not iPhoto.

      I run several Drupal-backed sites, and to admin them is pretty simple. Often I find myself frustrated with Drupal for some simple thing that it won't let me do without writing a new module, but in calmer times I remember where I'd be if I had built the site from scratch--still writing code, not getting paid to admin a functioning site. That said, using the default admin sidebar, you'll spend half your life drilling down through stupid link-trees to get to frequently used commands. You will save yourself much trouble by creating a custom menu, or a custom page accessible only to the administrative users with common links and tasks.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    21. Re:Opinions on Drupal by BridgeBum · · Score: 1

      Check out http://cherrypy.org/ as a lighter weight python framework. It's not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison, but it's not as slow as Zope/Plone.

      --
      My UID is the product of 2 primes.
    22. Re:Opinions on Drupal by mislam · · Score: 1

      I run drupal on my web site. And I can tell you this is one of the greatest content management system out there. You can choose to do very very little with it, or you can choose to do an awful lot of stuff. It mostly depends on your need. The system is also very modular and you can write pluggable modules to serve specific purposes for your site only.

    23. Re:Opinions on Drupal by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      On the other side... I found that for doing a general site with various content management needs Drupal is quite superior. For your average user Mambo is far more complicated than Drupal in terms of maintenance and support. People understand drupal and getting waht typical users want done is far easier. So from the end user perspective the Drupal administration is much easier. Additional plugin/module installation also works well and without a hitch.

      On the technical side they make it quite easy to create a custom look and feel for your site. If you want to change some aspect of Drupal it really isn't that hard. Drupal's module documentation is on par with Mambos. I like Mambo for some features, Drupal for others. But when it came to explaining it to non technical people Drupal was far easier.

      I dunno, it depends on our uses certainly, but Drupal is very clean and understandable. To users, system administrators, and to developers. I think that is why Drupal is so popular. I certainly like it and think it does well.

      Jeremy

    24. Re:Opinions on Drupal by AugstWest · · Score: 1

      I've got a bunch of sites based on Drupal, and have been using it for quite a while, I've upgraded through 3 versions so far.

      The upgrades haven't always gone smoothly, but it's always been worth the hassle.

      I've got sites at http://www.libertylost.org/ and sites like http://genome.eutechtics.com/ -- the eutechtics sites are about 25 different "news" sites that I've been toying with to see what will generate traffic. It's really nice to be able to run a huge slew of sites off of one codebase, using virtualhosts. It makes maintaining a large number of websites a lot easier.

      The modules are pretty diverse, and if there's something you need that doesn't already exist, it's very quick and easy to build your own stuff and integrate it.

      All in all, it's the best CMS I've used so far, and I've gone through a lot of them

    25. Re:Opinions on Drupal by gnalre · · Score: 1
      Modules need to be compiled? Uh, no. Maybe you're thinking of C? You do need to check a box to turn the module on, and in some cases modify your database if the module creates new tables.


      Yep you are quite right, it is just a copy exercise however any operation after installation which involves logging on to the server is a not a tick in the box scenario


      But I like that, because I know exactly what the module's going to do.


      You must be Gentoo user

      A module installer is in the works.


      Fortunately Mambo already has one of those and an uninstaller.

      Seriously though there a lot of good open source CMS's out there mambo met my needs when I tried it so I am sticking with it. I am sure Drupal is good too.
      --
      Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
    26. Re:Opinions on Drupal by mbrod · · Score: 1

      The URL listed as my homepage runs it. I have really liked it. I didn't have to do a lot of home work to install it and all the little customizations I have done to it have worked well.

      Can't actually say I have had any problems with it at all so haven't tried any of the others you have listed.

    27. Re:Opinions on Drupal by 3.2.3 · · Score: 1

      You can do absolutely anything with Plone - except have decent performance

      Then you don't know what you're doing.

      Sure, you can improve speed by doing a whole hunk of stuff

      As in, sure, you can know what you're doing.

      Please mark parent as flamebait.

  5. Solaris by Zweideutig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is Drupal going to be running Solaris, or are they going to install Linux (SPARC) instead?

    --
    Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
    1. Re:Solaris by Ewan · · Score: 1

      A Sun Fire V20z is an opteron server, so that's just normal x86 linux

      Ewan

    2. Re:Solaris by tu_holmes · · Score: 2, Informative

      It doesn't really matter, but I can say it won't be Sparc linux...

      The V20z is an AMD Opteron server.

      It will either run Solaris x86 or Linux (the non-sparc version).

    3. Re:Solaris by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 1

      Having just had one of these *incredibly noisy* things to test, I can quite happily confirm they run Solaris... I'm not sure where you're getting your info from but it sure as hell isn't Sun..

      --
      I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
    4. Re:Solaris by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 1

      ack.. i just realised that you meant x86 Linux rather than.. oh... god the shame of failing to understand a short post on /. on a Friday afternoon. Apologies to parent, I just totally misread what you wrote :$

      --
      I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
    5. Re:Solaris by mrm677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have experience with a cluster of Sunfire V20z's running 64-bit Linux. It is not stable and we see kernel panics all the time. Fortunately this is a compute-cluster and we can deal with the crashes.

      A Sun rep said we are one of their few customers he knows of that is using 64-bit Linux because of the known stability problems in the kernel. The hardware tests out fine and the reps say that 32-bit Linux and 64-bit Solaris are both rock solid.

      I wonder if this is Sun-specific, or if 64-bit Linux on any Opteron is flaky?

    6. Re:Solaris by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Even a 15K is going to be running whatever you want it to once you take ownership of it. What it comes preloaded with really isn't all that relevant.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:Solaris by beezly · · Score: 1

      I am also running a large compute cluster of v20z's and v40z's and have no such problems.

      We had a couple of machines panic to begin with, but these were manufacturing problems rather than software and they have been replaced.

      64bit Linux runs perfectly well on v20z's and v40z's. I suspect the "known stability problems in the kernel" that your Sun rep are talking about are most likely Sun FUD or the Sun rep's lack of knowledge about Linux x86_64 support.

    8. Re:Solaris by Zemplar · · Score: 1

      I don't know what OS will run on the Sun Fire V20, but Gentoo is supposed to run on the new Dell servers, partly because of familiarity.

    9. Re:Solaris by Zemplar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with Breezly. 64-bit Linux can be stable, given the right distribution. I ran testing on several major Linux distros in 32-bit and 64-bit and Solaris before finalizing my choice on my dual Opteron W2100z.

      Summary of results: All 32-bit Linux good, some 64-bit Linux okay, 64-bit Solaris superb. In the end, I found the Solaris kernel better at SMP and more responsive with 32-bit Linux pretty good. 64-bit Linux on the distros I tried simply were not polished at the time (1st quarter 2005. Solaris 10 was the no-brainer final choice...though a Debian apt-get on Solaris 10 would ROCK!

    10. Re:Solaris by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      My big question is not if it will run Linux or Solaris but will it run Postgres or MySQL?
      From what I read they are going to use the Sun to run the database server.
      I would try Solaris myself just so I could learn it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    11. Re:Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the blastwave guys have an apt-get-like tool in pkg-get. I've never used it though, so ymmv.

    12. Re:Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gentoo will run on anything that has had a C compiler ported to it. That's the whole point. If you come to Gentoo from an RPM-based distribution, you'll probably appreciate it for the vast range of software {basically the whole of open source is in the Gentoo package repository}. If you come to Gentoo from Debian, however, you'll probably end up wondering what's so special about it.

    13. Re:Solaris by Zemplar · · Score: 1

      What was meant was that before the site was /.'ed, I read that the Drupal server was likley to run Gentoo.

    14. Re:Solaris by Zemplar · · Score: 1

      I've used it, and it is decent but simply does not compare to FreeBSD ports or Debian apt-get. Admittedly this is largely due to resources (human and otherwise). If only Debian could jump-ship from the Linux kernel and adopt the [Open]Solaris kernel/OS, this would be a great distro!

    15. Re:Solaris by joib · · Score: 1

      We have an Opteron compute cluster, based on HP 1U 2 cpu nodes. Runs just fine with 64-bit Linux. We use the rocks cluster distribution, which is based on RHEL 3 (the newest rocks relase is based on centos 4 which in turn is based on rhel 4, due to trademark issues).

    16. Re:Solaris by justins · · Score: 1
      I wonder if this is Sun-specific, or if 64-bit Linux on any Opteron is flaky?

      It's probably distribution-specific. You haven't said what distro you're using, and I hate to say it regardless, but you're probably best off using a RHEL clone like CentOS or Scientific Linux.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  6. Drupal still on the old server by Robert+Douglass · · Score: 2, Informative

    As you can tell from the way the drupal.org site is (not) responding, it is still being run from the old server.

    1. Re:Drupal still on the old server by bertboerland · · Score: 1

      some snaps i made for the new infrastructure (proposed, i am not in control there)

      --
      -- for undocumented cisco commands, take a peek @ dotu
    2. Re:Drupal still on the old server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice drawings. What did you use to make them?

  7. Re:Drupal by v3rgEz · · Score: 0

    Interesting?! Modded interesting!??? Funny, maybe, troll, probably, but here's what drupal is: an online, open source, content management system. You can run newspapers from it (I do), blogs (most people), or getfirefox promotional webpages. But this comment is not "interesting," it's "nonsensical" (which I also happen to find "funny").

  8. Server overkill? by afinn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So the old server was a Pentium Xeon 3Ghz with 1 GB of RAM. This server wasn't even dedicated to drupal - I believe it was shared with approximately 20 other sites.


    Now sun have donated a server with dual Opteron and 4G RAM. This alone would probably have been enough to host the drupal site wiht a serious improvement in performance. But they've also purchased 3 Dell 1850s with dual Xeons and 2G RAM.


    Given what was serving the site before, do they really need all this horsepower? With the unexpected server donation from Sun, could the money raised have been better spent on something other than more servers?

    1. Re:Server overkill? by faloi · · Score: 1

      But now they can dedicate the other boxes to the gaming servers that all IT people run in the background! Err... Yeah, it does seem odd that they went all out, but at least they shouldn't need any server upgrades for a while.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Server overkill? by garcia · · Score: 3, Informative

      With the unexpected server donation from Sun, could the money raised have been better spent on something other than more servers?

      If you had read the linked information from the blurb you would have found out that the Drupal team decided that putting all the money towards server/backend stuff is what the community would want.

      The community thought that they money they were donating was for a server to host Drupal at the OSL. When the donations went *way* over what Drupal originally needed the staff still felt that it should remain w/the server side.

      They also mentioned that they might have used some of that money to start up the Drupal Foundation but decided that additional money, already promised to them by various sources, would go to that instead (i.e. Summer of Code by Google).

    3. Re:Server overkill? by hattig · · Score: 1

      I think it was rather rude to decide to buy the Dell servers after Sun had donated one (that looks like a $5000 value server too). Spend the $10k on two more Sun servers to show your appreciation guys!

    4. Re:Server overkill? by Dakrin1 · · Score: 1

      well, they didn't before, but now that we posted a story about it on slashdot, they sure do.

    5. Re:Server overkill? by blinkylights · · Score: 1

      The servers had to be able to withstand the Slashdotting that would ensue once the article about the servers was posted to Slashdot.

      Duh. :)

    6. Re:Server overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they bought the servers long before the Sun was donated.

    7. Re:Server overkill? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Now sun have donated a server with dual Opteron and 4G RAM.

      I wonder how the anti-Sun slashbots will spin this one? Is big, bad, evil Sun out to squash open source now? Perhaps they are going to put a timebomb in the server so that it will fail miserably and take an entire open source project down with it...

      All joking aside, I wish that people would recognize the good things Sun has done for open source rather than nitpicking over small details that are really insignificant.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    8. Re:Server overkill? by Ganniterix · · Score: 0

      I don't agree. I think they made the wise desicion to get the best return for their investment. The money was donated by the community and they had an obbligation to the community to spend it in the best possible way!! Why buy 2 servers when you can get 3?

    9. Re:Server overkill? by metaclous · · Score: 1

      The server has not been moved yet. The original server is still serving drupal.org.

    10. Re:Server overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not an SGI, but still, good luck getting support for that SUN machine in two years...

    11. Re:Server overkill? by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      The server has not been moved yet. The original server is still serving drupal.org.
      or "not serving it" from my perspective
    12. Re:Server overkill? by BridgeBum · · Score: 1

      Isn't Sun Fire an x86 platform? How much support do you think it will need in 2 years?

      --
      My UID is the product of 2 primes.
    13. Re:Server overkill? by bradleycarpenter · · Score: 1

      Because 2 more v20s provide a much better return than 3 Dell 1850's. I would take a few v20s any day over more Dell systems. Why buy 3 dell servers when a competitor can do the job with only 2 servers? That is like saying they should have just bought a bunch of Dell poweredge $250 servers. They could have got 40 servers that way. Why didn't they just do that? Just because you can get more systems cheaper doesn't mean you are getting the same quality/performance that you could have gotten elsewhere.

    14. Re:Server overkill? by bradleycarpenter · · Score: 1

      Suns standard Warranty is 3 years. So they will get great support in 3 years. I doubt they will need it though. Suns systems are very reliable.

    15. Re:Server overkill? by cel4145 · · Score: 1

      Actually, drupal.org didn't make the decision. OSL did since they'll be hosting and supporting the hardware locally.

    16. Re:Server overkill? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      It's not an SGI, but still, good luck getting support for that SUN machine in two years...

      Bullshit... Sun will still support that server for 5 years after the EOL (end of life), or whenever they stop manufacturing it.

      You just proved my point by giving the typical slashbot anti-Sun response. Why don't you go find some other fanboi hangout to troll at.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    17. Re:Server overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is big, bad, evil Sun out to squash open source now?
      No, but they are out to make a profit. Trying to paint this as some kind of genuine charitable act is ridiculous; they're doing it for the publicity and the mindshare, and nothing more.
    18. Re:Server overkill? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      When the donations went *way* over what Drupal originally needed the staff still felt that it should remain w/the server side.

      Silly bunnies, they should have just celebrated and given free ipods to everyone with the money.

    19. Re:Server overkill? by Ganniterix · · Score: 0

      While Opterons overall can perform better than Xeons (because that is what your real issues is here) ... I dont think that 2x2 opteron servers can outperform 3x2 xeon servers. And I have no idea what a dell poweredge consists of cause i dont feel like searching ... but if their tasks could be split up into 40 individual tasks and each assigned to an individual pc ... they would probably still get a better performance!

  9. The name confused me 100% by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    "Drupal?" Well, that name caught me off guard! On reading the introduction, I thought Drupal is some famous [Indian] "computer" person. How wrong I was. But again, http://www.sourceforge.net/ does not list Drupal among the top 10 most active Content Management Systems! I used "CMS" as the search string.

    So, is the statement: "Drupal is the leading open-source (written in PHP) content management system and is used to power tens of thousands of websites, blogs, community sites, etc." really accurate?

    1. Re:The name confused me 100% by f-bomb · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's because drupal has their own development infrastructure and does not use sourceforge's services. Just because a project isn't hosted on sourceforge doesn't mean its not relevant. I switched to drupal from Post-Nuke about 6 months ago and will never go back.

      --
      Everyone should believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer.....
    2. Re:The name confused me 100% by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      So, is the statement: "Drupal is the leading open-source (written in PHP) content management system and is used to power tens of thousands of websites, blogs, community sites, etc." really accurate?

      I'd say so; I looked into open-source CMS solutions for work a while back, and Drupal was one name that kept cropping up. I was taken a bit aback by your comment about sourceforge, and repeated your search - I couldn't see Drupal in the top 20! Same on freshmeat, though I guess they'd overlap. I suppose Drupal may not be active on sourceforge's terms, ie. regularly updated through sourceforge. It certainly is an active project, though.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    3. Re:The name confused me 100% by sdsichero · · Score: 1

      ... and I thought it was a famous drag queen when I first heard the name!

      Our university is thinking about using this...

  10. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Drupal's new Sun Fire V20z has suffered a meltdown due to a /.ing.

  11. Now is the time to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... fix the vulnerabilities in Drupal. http://www.kdedevelopers.org/ was running Drupal and was hacked into.

    1. Re:Now is the time to... by geiseri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It was fixed earlier this week with the help of the drupal team. The biggest problem with drupal is that it requires so little babysitting to keep running it can get easy to ignore it when you are busy. Note that I am a KDE developer and not a web monkey, so I have bigger fish to fry than dorking with a server. The install that was present there was over 1 year old, and was missing a security patch that was issued the day before (the xmlrpc bug).

      Knowing this the drupal guys are working on a more automated way to push out updates so busy people like me who just want something to "just work" can do so safely.

      That said, I am pleased to note that the ISP has provided us with the names of the people who cracked the site. The kiddy who got in was nice enough to leave all of the logs unmodified, and left a few other tracks so it was pretty easy to confirm the source. Personally I think the liberal use some 10 penny nails on their joy department would be more amusing if only I had the time to get to Moscow. ;)

  12. Drupal by certel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Good for Drupal. Glad to see that people still care about others projects.

  13. Drupal Info by Dakrin1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oh, and I was curious what drupal was too, the slashdot link doesn't give much more info than that it's a CMS, and drupal.org is down (looks like they haven't installed the new hardware in time for slashdot).

    Here's the wikipedia with link:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drupal [wikipedia.org]

    Drupal is a content management framework, content management system and blogging engine which was originally written by Dries Buytaert and is the software used to power Debian Planet [1], Terminus1525 [2], Spread Firefox [3] and Kernel Trap [4], among others. Drupal is written in PHP using strict coding standards.

    Drupal is the English spelling for the Dutch word 'druppel' which means 'drop'.

    Though it started as a small bulletin board system, Drupal has become much more than just a news portal, thanks to its flexible architecture. Drupal has a basic layer, or core, which supports pluggable modules that enable additional behaviors. The modules available for Drupal provide a wide assortment of features, including e-commerce systems, workflow, photo galleries, mailing list management, and CVS integration. Drupal's taxonomy/classification module is especially interesting, in that it allows any content to be classified with a flexible tagging system.

    Some of the more special roles that Drupal has filled include company intranets, online classrooms, art communities and project management. Many feel that Drupal's focus on user communities is what makes it stand out from its competition.

    1. Re:Drupal Info by Dakrin1 · · Score: 0

      oh, and I really hope the main site doesnt' really look like this (google's cache): http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:OEEftNB5m34J: www.drupal.org/+&hl=en

      It looks like crap.

    2. Re:Drupal Info by Siscokid422 · · Score: 1

      Do you, or anyone else, know which modules are used for the workflow and project management systems mentioned above?

    3. Re:Drupal Info by Dark+Warrior · · Score: 1

      Once you get in there, look for the workflow and project modules, under "Projects," then "Modules."

    4. Re:Drupal Info by Dakrin1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... sorry about that comment, its my browser that was the trouble and wasn't displaying it correctly.

  14. Re:Some may find it distasteful... by muszek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    CMSs are used by some people to make wonderful stuff used by millions... stuff that they wouldn't be able to do by themselves.

    Example: several years ago I made a free info site that gets 5k unique visitors a day. Many people benefit greatly from what I've posted there (a lot of text, some useful web tools, etc.).

    Back when I was making it, I had absolutely no php (or anything similar) skills and simply wouldn't have done that website. I made it because there were some CMSs. And many people benefited my work (and indirectly the work of people that made my CMS).

    Now... I don't see how is a driver for some device for not so popular OS far more useful than millions of people being able to use CMS-based websites. Both things are important, let's just not be "my stuff is the only important thing"-like nazis.

  15. Re:Some may find it distasteful... by -noefordeg- · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OMG!

    The money they recieved were from donations. Not a penny was from someone who didn't want Drupal to have that money.

    "Donations like this should be going to people doing things worth being done"

    This is the stupidest thing I've read in a long time... Donations are given to people/projects which the donators think are doing something worthwhile, hence the donation!
    I can't think of a singel thing to better prove if something is of value than other people giving money to support the continued development.

    *shakes head*

    It is so simple really.
    You don't think Drupal is good? -Don't donate!
    If someone else think it's good and they donate, don't bitch and whine about it. Clearly they feel that Drupal is WORTH IT!!

  16. not in place yet? by myspys · · Score: 1

    either the new horsepower hasn't been put in place yet, or they need more money to buy better machines ;) (or optimise the software, duh)

    1. Re:not in place yet? by Black+Perl · · Score: 4, Funny

      either the new horsepower hasn't been put in place yet, or they need more money to buy better machines ;) (or optimise the software, duh)

      or maybe it got a sudden bump of popularity somehow... can't quite think of what it might be...

      --
      bp
  17. Re:Drupal by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

    > > Drupal is great because you can find everything there and for very low prices

    > ... But this comment is not "interesting," it's "nonsensical" (which I also happen to find "funny").

    Dude! It makes ferpect [sic] sense! Providing you pronounce "Drupal" as "Frugal"!

    ...though I love the idea that Google may need community help with funding. You know, what with being so cash-starved and all. ;-)

    --
    This is where the serious fun begins.
  18. Paying people doesn't always work.. by Gopal.V · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Let me tell this - paying people to work on open source often has bad results .. No I'm not talking about employing someone to work on OSS , just about invoicing OSS work.

    It so easily drops into a how much does it pay ? from it's cool, that's why I do it !. Speaking as someone who got paid a couple of thousand bucks to work on OSS, I just didn't feel like I was working for that rush anymore. The change was very shocking to me at first, then I realized WHY open source is popular - because it lets people work on what they like (want is ambigous because people might want a bounty job).

    On the other hand, more hardware .. better net connections for guys working on it etc do seem to make a bigger difference that paying the same to n different people of the project.

    But yeah, SUN's just showing off !. Sort of like a PR stunt - but it's good for drupal , so we don't mind.

    1. Re:Paying people doesn't always work.. by hayalci · · Score: 1
      But yeah, SUN's just showing off !. Sort of like a PR stunt - but it's good for drupal , so we don't mind.
      I think SUN does this often, and not only for public relations, they may be doing it for the sake of doing it.

      Last year they sent a sunfire server to our department as a gift.
      --
      hayalci
    2. Re:Paying people doesn't always work.. by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      It so easily drops into a how much does it pay ? from it's cool, that's why I do it !. Speaking as someone who got paid a couple of thousand bucks to work on OSS, I just didn't feel like I was working for that rush anymore. The change was very shocking to me at first, then I realized WHY open source is popular - because it lets people work on what they like (want is ambigous because people might want a bounty job).

      You are completely right, but this is not necessarily a bad thing. Most of the fun in programming is in the first half of the work. Devising an architecture, thinking of smart ways to solve difficult problems and implementing all kinds of cool features are the things that can make programming a lot of fun. But unfortunately, the second half of the work is not as enjoyable. Thorough testing, hunting down bugs and polishing your creation can be tedious or even downright annoying work. There are many promising Open Source projects that are halfway done. They have good features and great technology, but still buggy and unreliable, because the developers preferred to start another cool project instead of properly finishing the first one.

      This is one of the problems of Open Source development and this problem can be alleviated by companies paying for the work. If sheer enjoyment is not enough motivation to properly finish a project, possibly some cash might do the trick.

    3. Re:Paying people doesn't always work.. by justins · · Score: 1
      But yeah, SUN's just showing off !. Sort of like a PR stunt - but it's good for drupal , so we don't mind.

      Ha. Sun could invent a cure for death, give it for free to slashdot readers, and they'd still be bad. Am I right guys?!?!?
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  19. Perhaps, perhaps not. by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who is to say that Drupal, if they get a foundation together, might not use some of their newly found horsepower to support/host other projects that are getting off the ground, or need their help?

    Personally, i'd love to see them use their new stuff for the betterment of their project and a few others. Also, it'd be great to see them take the excess money and invest it in such a way that it can continually pay for their operating costs ... or summer internships for a few kids ... or something useful like that.

    Here's to hoping.

  20. You'd think that with that many servers... by jamesshuang · · Score: 1

    Go figure... Dual Opterons, 10k in donations, and a whole crapload of servers STILL don't stand up to a slashdotting... :-p

    1. Re:You'd think that with that many servers... by f-bomb · · Score: 1

      they're still on the old box genius. The new boxen have been ordered and the new Sun box that was donated by a drupal user at Sun is already there.

      Jesus, you'd think some people would take the time to actually READ a little bit.....

      --
      Everyone should believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer.....
  21. I still think... by Tmack · · Score: 1
    They should have gone with/asked for the v40z... As I mentioned before

    dual opterons are nice, but quad (with dual core = 8CPUs) with up to 32Gb makes for a (more) nice database server.

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  22. Ourmedia.org too by Silkejr · · Score: 1

    It's also used by the Ourmedia site so that they can get all that creative commons stuff dynamically published out to the site.

  23. Tim Bray by zocle · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Its worth noting this entry from Tim Bray:
    http://tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/07/14/Drup al-Server
    It seems that he deserves some credit for starting the ball rolling.
    A nice comment in the article:
    What we have here is an ecosystem. Drupal has a problem, the community notices, Slashdot broadcasts, we help them out, a nice piece of infrastructure is strengthened, the tide rises and all our boats float a little higher.
  24. Re:Some may find it distasteful... by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

    Well, to counter you, the people donating to Drupal obviously aren't that bright to begin with, since they're using a CMS. Can you trust these peoples' judgement?

    Sorry, I've missed something here. Use of CMS == Not that bright? Wow. I never realised that. I've made a CMS system for my employer's customers - they range from academia to high-street retail. And here was me thinking they were bright! Thanks for tipping me off; next time I meet with a client I'll know - secretly, since they use a CMS, they're stoopid.

    /sarcasm

    --
    This is where the serious fun begins.
  25. fixing is half the thing, implementing the other by bertboerland · · Score: 1

    drupal had a patch out very very fast. but you still need to upgrade to take "advantage" of it (as spreadfirefox.org and others didnt!)

    --
    -- for undocumented cisco commands, take a peek @ dotu
  26. Re:Some may find it distasteful... by VitrosChemistryAnaly · · Score: 1

    " Well, to counter you, the people donating to Drupal obviously aren't that bright to begin with, since they're using a CMS. Can you trust these peoples' judgement?

    You can't really say that these people were completely aware of what they were doing by donating money to something so stupid.

    It's like donating money to a group of people that are making free hats with holes in them, sure, they're free, but you can't be that bright to be giving the people making them money and access to a factory so they can make even more holey hats.
    "

    It's like posting as an AC while pretending you have something worthwhile to say.

    Geez, someone's always going to have a problem with donating to any cause. Get over it.

    I know someone probably has a problem with my "Kill a friendly Kitten" fund donations. Fuck 'em.

    --
    "It's a tarp!" -- Dyslexic Admiral Ackbar
  27. And it still gets /.ed. by crovira · · Score: 0

    "
    Warning: mysql_connect(): Too many connections in /home/www/drupal.org/includes/database.mysql.inc on line 37
    Too many connections"

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  28. Re:Some may find it distasteful... by gnalre · · Score: 1

    Drupal and other free CMS suites are often used to generate local community and charity sites. Of course we could just make them pay for a commercial package, but somehow I think the money saved by using drupal, etc maybe used more wisely

    --
    Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
  29. Who invited Theo? by kmmatthews · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    n/t

    --
    feh. stuff.
  30. Re:Some may find it distasteful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, this the Slashdot where BSD fans whine anonymously about a quite impressive and important generosity made in the FOSS scene. IIRC the proposal of PKH to work on the FreeBSD kernel after he receibed $X in donations (not sure what he worked on or for how much) was also posted here.

  31. Re: consider Mambo. Which Mambo? by obiwan2u · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Which Mambo? The open source version or the corporate version by Miro?

    --
    Ben in DC
    "It's the mark of an educated mind to be moved by statistics" Oscar Wilde
  32. Drupal doesn't use Sourceforge! by alienmole · · Score: 1

    Measuring open source projects based on their ranking on Sourceforge only makes sense if those projects host their development files and release files through Sourceforge! Drupal doesn't.

    1. Re:Drupal doesn't use Sourceforge! by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      Measuring open source projects based on their ranking on Sourceforge only makes sense if those projects host their development files and release files through Sourceforge! Drupal doesn't.

      You have no idea (alright, perhaps you do) how stupid I feel right now! It's been a while since I looked at Drupal; is that an excuse?!

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
  33. Re:fixing is half the thing, implementing the othe by hacker · · Score: 1

    Or disable the use of xmlrpc, which we had to do in several cases, because the modules we use are not ported over to 4.6.2 yet, and we'd lose quite a bit of the database schema by upgrading, which would eat some data we require.

    In our case, an upgrade isn't possible without a dump, clean reinstall and mostly-manual reload of the data by hand. No thanks, not yet anyway. When we migrate to a new server in a few months or years, we'll consider an upgrade, but right now, losing data is unacceptable.

    YMMV of course, if you use a "basic" Drupal instance.

  34. Maybe, just maybe... by sardaukar_siet · · Score: 1

    ...it's for some serious HL2 lan-partying!

  35. Let's see how /. Sun-haters can bash Sun for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What? No sinister theories as to why Sun's done this? What has /. come to when a gift from Sun is not looked upon as evil?!?!?!? Has the magnetic polarity of earth reversed? Dogs and cats, sleeping together, it's pandemonium!!!

  36. Drupal Customizations by blazerw11 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's really not too hard, but there is a learning curve to understanding the "Drupal" way. We did make some changes to core Drupal code, but that was more us not yet grasping the best way to make changes.

    What is the best way? Customizing Drupal through the use of modules. We wrote a few new modules for locations and maps and hacked a few others for groups and users.

    We spent about 3 months customizing Drupal. However, the task was made more complex because we had to integrate it with our existing JSP site and existing database.

    Read the Customizing and Developing links to learn all you need to know.

    --
    A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
  37. Drupal vs. Wiki by uberchicken · · Score: 0

    When would you use Drupal in favour of a Wiki? I'm trying to decide which would suit our intranet better.

    1. Re:Drupal vs. Wiki by yelvington · · Score: 1

      A wiki is an ideal tool if you want to have multiple users writing and revising the same document(s). It's focused on rewriting and revising. Typically a wiki journals all transactions, so if someone makes a mistaked (or defaces the system), you can roll back. If you have a need to build a knowledge base, documentation, et cetera, it may be an ideal tool. But your users need to be cooperative with one another and working toward a common goal, and willing to compromise. (This is why the LA Times' recent "wikitorial" experiment was a dumb idea from the start.)

      Drupal is a CMS that can provide workflow for editorial processes, so an author's work can be reviewed before it "goes live," and some documents can be made editable by groups of users, but it's a very different model froma Wiki. Drupal also provides an excellent shared blogging platform. If your intranet goal is internal communications and possibly discussion, Drupal is an excellent choice. If your intranet goal is to develop a knowledge base, pick something like MediaWiki.

    2. Re:Drupal vs. Wiki by uberchicken · · Score: 0

      Thank you, excellent comparison.

  38. NASA World Wind by fourtyfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How come when a project like this asks for donations they get tens of thousandths of dollars and hardware to boot, but when a project like NASA World Wind, that uses probably 100x the resources with at least 5x the user base asks for donations, we can barely make up a measly 300$ a month for the one community server. http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/

    1. Re:NASA World Wind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because it didn't get on Slashdot's frontpage?

    2. Re:NASA World Wind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm yes it was, twice

  39. But what about Debian?? by happymedium · · Score: 1
  40. SpreadFirefox.com cracked while using Drupal. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    I was just reading that SpreadFirefox.com was cracked. Apparently they were using Drupal.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  41. Drupal Expresses Gratitude by oringo · · Score: 1

    Yah, thanks for /. drupal in the first place, and /. again soon after the new server is up.

  42. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever posted this story is a total cocksucker. You think it makes you cool that you know the name of some obscure project and should therefore force everyone else to go look it up, rather than explaining. The only world where this makes you look cool is whichever parent's basement you live in.

  43. drupal host uses plone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://osuosl.org/ the host of drupal uses plone. http://plone.org/

  44. Use Sourceforge even if you think you DON'T need by halr9000 · · Score: 1
    Just because a project isn't hosted on sourceforge doesn't mean its not relevant.

    As an aside I want to say that to combat this common perception that people have, I simply create a sf.net project and redirect everything back to my "standalone" resources on my project website. I recommend that all project managers do this or something similar. I have a listing at Freshmeat and several other sites as well.

    I happen to host my downloads on SF, but even if I did not, I'd want the SF listing because it can help increase traffic, and it provides a consistent interface to those interested in other SF-hosted projects.

    Sourceforge !=CVS & mailing-lists.

  45. Re: consider Mambo. Which Mambo? by delfstrom · · Score: 1

    > Which Mambo? The open source version or
    > the corporate version by Miro?

    Number 5.

  46. Does Drupal have wiki functionality? by postrational · · Score: 1

    Just a quick questions to those who know Drupal. Does it have a wiki-extension? Can it be configures in such a way, that all users (resitered and anonymous) could edit all wiki pages (like on Wikipedia)?

    Will appreciate the answer, the only Drupal wiki module I found was designed to allow wiki-formatting in "forums", "pages" and "stories".

    postrational

    1. Re:Does Drupal have wiki functionality? by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      There's a Drupal module for wiki functionality here: http://drupal.org/project/wiki

  47. Sun generous to obscure CMS projects ? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is Sun coughing up four-figure servers to Drupal, a CMS with less installed user base than Slashcode, when there's a lot of Sun hardware listed as donation requests on OpenBSD donation request page??
    Just curious.
  48. One month with Drupal... by rjung2k · · Score: 1

    I started using Drupal about a month ago to totally revamp my site. It's still under construction, but the bulk of the work has been adding my existing content more than anything else. I wrote a few PHP modules to add some functions I wanted that didn't already exist, and tweaked some of the existing modules to my taste, but there was nothing there a decent coder would find troublesome.

    It's a bit confusing to learn at first, especially wrapping my head around how the taxonomy system works. But aside from that, it's been totally effortless, and I'd recommend it for folks who want a CMS that's more than just a WordPress-style blogging tool.

  49. Still never heard of it... by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

    I could understand if he asked "What is Linux?" or "What is PHP?" but this Drupal thing is new to me. Heck, my last project involved evaluating and deploying a content management system, and yet I've never heard of Drupal.

    I have, luckily, heard of Google, though.