Slashdot Mirror


Stealing Data? A Sniffer Shows it's Easy

museumpeace writes "Though its not exactly a How-To of cracking into financial institutions, a few intriguing details are mentioned in a New York Times article "the Sniffer vs the Cybercrooks" (it's worth the cookie). From the article: ""Tell me the things you most want to keep secret," Mr. Seiden challenged a top executive at the bank a few years back.....A week later, Mr. Seiden again sat in this man's office in Manhattan, in possession of both supposedly guarded secrets....""

206 comments

  1. BugMeNot by Fermatprime · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.bugmenot.com/

    gets you past registration

    --
    I hate the one hundred and twenty character limit for signatures with an all-enveloping, all-destroying, incredible pass
    1. Re:BugMeNot by Romancer · · Score: 0, Redundant

      or we can all use this from now on:

      username AnonymousCoward
      password password

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    2. Re:BugMeNot by tjcrowder · · Score: 1

      That is too cool.

    3. Re:BugMeNot by pyrrhonist · · Score: 4, Informative
      or we can all use this from now on: username AnonymousCoward password password

      No, actually, you can't. The NYT routinely removes accounts that are being used by more than one IP.

      That's why you need to use the bugmenot.com site mentioned above (i.e. logins that no longer work are removed from bugmenot's database). Furthermore, bugmenot works with other sites besides the NYT.

      Also, for Firefox users, you can try the extension.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    4. Re:BugMeNot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not anymore! thanks for the free nytimes account!

    5. Re:BugMeNot by quokkapox · · Score: 1
      No, actually, you can't. The NYT routinely removes accounts that are being used by more than one IP.

      Baloney. This is simply not true. I have been using the same anonymous registration to access nytimes.com from multiple IP addresses simultaneously for nearly a decade.

      --
      it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    6. Re:BugMeNot by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      http://www.wilmingtonstar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/articl e?AID=/20050731/ZNYT05/507310389/1002/Business or you can go to the local paper reprints [not local here, but it must be somewhere]...

    7. Re:BugMeNot by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Baloney. This is simply not true.

      Yes it is. Why do you think BugMeNot has a "This login didn't work" button.

      I've had multiple accounts get deleted while I've been using them and been forced to log in with a new ID.

      I have been using the same anonymous registration to access nytimes.com from multiple IP addresses simultaneously for nearly a decade.

      I'm not talking about using the same account at both work and home. I'm talking about hundreds of addresses actively using the same account at the same time. There's a big difference.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    8. Re:BugMeNot by zootm · · Score: 1

      I think your parent post somewhat underrepresented the meaning of "multiple" there -- what was meant was "many", not just an understandable small number.

    9. Re:BugMeNot by deadlinegrunt · · Score: 1

      > or we can all use this from now on: username AnonymousCoward password password

      >> No, actually, you can't. The NYT routinely removes accounts that are being used by more than one IP.

      As opposed to somebody that just decides to hijack the account and change the password?

      --
      BSD is designed. Linux is grown. C++ libs
    10. Re:BugMeNot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just get a syndicated NYT link?

      Click here to read the article in full
      http://www.wilmingtonstar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/articl e?AID=/20050731/ZNYT05/507310389/1002/Business

    11. Re:BugMeNot by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      No, actually, you can't. The NYT routinely removes accounts that are being used by more than one IP.

      I call FUD.

  2. Bugmenot Login by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Login and password for people who don't want to register ( from http://www.bugmenot.com/ ):

    Username: tweedlesz
    Password: tweedledum

  3. I heartily recommend ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ethereal! Definitely the best free sniffer out there.

    What?

  4. Sneakers... by thrill12 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm still looking for the part in the article that says "Too Many Secrets" or "Setec Astronomy", Mar... what you say his name was again ?

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Sneakers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name: Martin Bishop
      Age: 56
      City: San Francisco
      State: California
      Alias: Martin Brice

  5. I use Linux.... by pdpTrojan · · Score: 0, Funny

    so I don't have to worry about this sniffing stuff because open source software has no security flaws.

    1. Re:I use Linux.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitter troll.

  6. well by chrisxkelley · · Score: 5, Funny

    just takes ya back to the saying "the most secure server is one that's offline" :)

    1. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Essentially, you're claiming that the most secure server is the one linked from Slashdot?

    2. Re:well by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      I remember a very famous company operating an important web site while back that claimed they had an iron clad security when it came to the way they the stored and protected their data from intruders. One day they came to work only to find out that someone had broken in to their company and had loaded all their servers in to a truck and left. (--As heard on DSLReports)

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    3. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you captain obvious.

    4. Re:well by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Funny

      The most secure server is one that was raised in a supportive environment with lots of positive reinforcement. "You're a very good server! Everyone likes you, server!"

      Insecure servers are ones that felt unloved and neglected, and often engage in needy or self-destructive behaviors to compensate, leaving unnecessary services active and ports open to get the attention it never had as a child... (process)...

    5. Re:well by UltimateRobotLover · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget, the cost of hacking a network is a function of the sysadmin's salary and his loyalty to the company.

    6. Re:well by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      That's really really deep.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  7. Good thing...but far from perfect? by deathgeneral · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think that it's good that we see companies more involved and interested in tightening up their security. Most companies just buy expensive firewalls and other systems to protect their data, but ignore other obvious threats like someone just walking into their offices and sitting down at a unused workstation and browsing around the companies network. Security is multi-layered and a continuous process, that means even if they went through a security audit and everything was ok, they shouldn't stop to improve their security,..there's always a fast-paced race between those who protect and those who will try to pass that protection. Hope this story gives other companies which don't care about security a real reason to make an audit in the very near future.

    1. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by Skynyrd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I used to work for a school district as an IT guy. The ignorant trolls in the personnel department demanded their own locks on the doors (my master wouldn't work) and all sorts of other "special" security.

      Of course when I went to work on their machines, they would have their passwords on post-it notes on the keyboard.

      On more than one occasion, somebody would yell "hey Cindy, I need to use the blah blah system; what's the password". Cindy would yell it back to them - during business hours with lots of extra people in the room.

      Lock your network all you want, but if you hire idiots or people who don't care, it's an easy wasy to lose.

    2. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by TRS80NT · · Score: 3, Funny

      Once when I set up a small office network I made each person's password the model number of their monitor, because I figured it would show up there on a post-it as soon as I left anyway. This way there was maybe a small element of hiding in plain sight.

      --
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
    3. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by sykjoke · · Score: 1

      When you consider that the Government will ask you to send them personal details via insecure, unsigned Email that they leave on servers and sell on EBay Bin Larden seems like the least of the Government's intelligence problems.

    4. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by deesine · · Score: 0


      I'm having deja-vu or you copy-pasted this from one of your previous posts. Good story, that's why I remembered.

      I can relate.

      Probably the cheapest and most effective step a company can take towards improving computer security, would be to ban post-its.

      --
      damaged by dogma
    5. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by Savantissimo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You think that's bad - when I worked at BellSouth, for 2.5 years they left the default password on NavisCore, which controlled all their ATM switches.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    6. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that companies are run by people, and unless they are technology companies, they don't employe technology-savvy people.

      Most people in most companies have a fundamental lack of understanding of what the security risks are and what their nature is, even after you explain it to them.

      For any given security risk, high- and mid-level management expect to simply be able to buy one expensive product to fix it (not really even understanding what it means to "buy" a security product in the first place--that's IT's job). They don't even understand that there could possibly be anything more that needs to be done, and it's very difficult to get them to understand this.

      And if there is no commercial product that advertises itself specifically as "the fix" to a given security risk, management often refuses to even conceive that the risk might exist, so trapped are they in the worldview that "if there's really a problem, someone will have made a product to fix it; if no-one sells a product to fix it, then it must not actually be a problem."

      Things like changing the settings of a product or altering behaviors of employees or the topologies of network are simply beyond their understanding because they just don't have that deep a view of the technology-- the entire corporate network is just a pile of magic products to them and any product will either fix a problem, in which case it's a good product, or it won't, in which case (they believe) they bought the wrong product.

      As far as they are capable of understanding, throw some IBM, some Cisco, and some Microsoft all into a cemement mixer and stir, and *boom*, corporate network and you have "instant 21st century!"

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    7. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by deranged+unix+nut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You think that is bad? Remember the article posted a while back on the codes for our nuclear missles? It was something like: 000000

    8. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I did that for my parent's computer. Trouble was, they got a new monitor...

    9. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      I do this as well. When I set up a new computer for anybody, I make the administrator password some obscure string I find somewhere on the case. Sometimes it's just the model number, sometimes it's the serial number, if they have one of those "Geniune Windows" stickers with the product key I use that, and most recently I used what was apparently a mold code which was molded right in to the back side of a case door.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    10. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by improfane · · Score: 0

      That was all good until you realised they were all the same monitors...?

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    11. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by ford42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's amazing! I've got the same combination on my luggage!

    12. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by Chaostrophy · · Score: 1

      they did that for everything, dial into the pots switch login admin, and start forwarding calls to where ever

      --
      Plato seems wrong to me today
    13. Re:Good thing...but far from perfect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually a good way to get people care about security is telling them this: If someone else has your password, they can send emails in your name to whoever they want, with whatever content they want, and you'll be blamed for it.

      People understand that saying "Fuck You" to the General Manager is not so possitive for their future career chances.

  8. NYT Registration by PktLoss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Has anyone from /. / OSTG ever thought about asking NYT for system like the blogger registration-free linking thing?

    Just a thought

    1. Re:NYT Registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how then will NYT eat your soul?

    2. Re:NYT Registration by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      They did have it for a week but the dupes pissed them off. They can only handle so much Slashdotting in a week.

    3. Re:NYT Registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are the United States government. We don't DO that kind of thing.

      Good luck getting your winnebago.

  9. The most secure server by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    "just takes ya back to the saying "the most secure server is one that's offline" :)"

    The most secure server is first locked, then secured with a Kryptonite lock. After this, some real Kryptonite is attached to it (remember, it is never secure as long as Superman can bust into it). After this, it is encased in carbonite with a scarecrow wearing a Jar Jar Binks mask. The entire assembly is left in Jabba's palace. Don't worry, no one's gonna even be thinking of approaching the thing to rescue Jar Jar.

    Just in case anyone does, we have an "I Love the Bee Gees" bumper sticker on the side. Also, we've moved it to a position standing right behind Jabba's toilet. I dare you to approach it.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:The most secure server by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 4, Funny
      first locked, then secured with a Kryptonite lock

      You mean the ones you can unlock with a Bic pen?

      we have an "I Love the Bee Gees" bumper sticker on the side.

      Thereby guaranteeing it will be blown up by an anti-disco activist---as in "If we don't blow up this server, the disco Taliban will have won."

      Clearly, the best way to protect the server is to put it in a large bucket, then to pour molten titanium into the bucket. Then encase it in carbonite.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    2. Re:The most secure server by chrisxkelley · · Score: 1

      "Clearly, the best way to protect the server is to put it in a large bucket, then to pour molten titanium into the bucket. Then encase it in carbonite."
      oh, logic- where are you in my time of need?

    3. Re:The most secure server by gooman · · Score: 1

      Excellent security advice. Let me guess, you're MCSE, right?

      Well, don't forget a quick dip into molten lead so Superman can't use his x-ray vision to read the individual bits on the HDD from a distance.

      --
      "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
    4. Re:The most secure server by MiKM · · Score: 1

      You forgot the most important step: encase it in carbonite. It's secure AND it keeps the server cool.

    5. Re:The most secure server by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      The good Kryptonite locks use regular keys and are not the crap circular-key locks you're referring to. Not too many places still carry those locks after all the publicity, but you still see them on a lot of coin-op washers and driers.

      And yeah, the pen trick works on them.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    6. Re:The most secure server by PrntlUnit27 · · Score: 1
      I don't get it, what's wrong with the Bee Gees? -or Jar Jar?

      -or both?

      Whoops, it's probably /.'d by now...

    7. Re:The most secure server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the disco Taliban

      LOL. Isn't that a real song? Or atleast, it should be.

    8. Re:The most secure server by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      It's not Supe we would need to worry about. It's General Zod, Ursa, and Non; or at least Zod and Ursa, since Non would have no clue what he's looking at.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    9. Re:The most secure server by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

      Actually, the most secure vault ever, at least one where someone with non-trivial firepower has tried to break into was the one at the Afghanistan Central Bank. It contained 20,000 pieces of ancient gold coins and relics and the countries gold reserves. The Taliban tried to break into it, even shooting it with rockets from an attack helicopter but they couldn't break in. They wanted to dynamite it but decided against it as they figured out that would have collapsed the whole building on top of the vault. I think that's pretty secure. Maybe they should rent co-lo space?

      Story over here

    10. Re:The most secure server by Rayban · · Score: 1
      Just in case anyone does, we have an "I Love the Bee Gees"

      Sounds like a hint for an alternative reality game starring the brothers Gibb.

      It's way to late for puns...

      --
      æeee!
    11. Re:The most secure server by Rayban · · Score: 1

      It's way to late for puns... ... or grammar, in my case.

      --
      æeee!
    12. Re:The most secure server by Hasai · · Score: 1

      Or, we could simply fill the chassis full of concrete and chuck it into a volcano.

      The only 'secure' data is data that has been physically destroyed. All other measures are nothing more than varying levels of risk.

      --

      Regards;

      Hasai

    13. Re:The most secure server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't really see where the helicopter was mentioned in the story. Wouldn't it be tough for a helicopter to fire rockets at an inner vault?

  10. Re:hey /. editors. fuck you for linking to NYT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I tried the park, but the cops didn't like it to much... [/feeding trolls]

  11. nice by Renraku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's cheaper in the mind of a shortsighted executive that can only see ahead to about a three to six month range?

    Having you put in jail for threats of terrorism to shut you up about their secrets, or paying the IT guys overtime to fix the holes?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  12. protect yourself using SATAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    SATAN is a software package which can determine whether there are sniffers on your network. It finds some sniffers when the sniffer host looks up the same dns entries as other hosts.

    1. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by towaz · · Score: 1

      probable better using antisniff from l0pht

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
    2. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Competent people don't get caught.

    3. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by makomk · · Score: 1

      It finds some sniffers when the sniffer host looks up the same dns entries as other hosts.

      IANAHacker, but wouldn't the obvious thing be to use the DNS responses to the other computers, seeing as you're sniffing their data anyway? I'm sure a completely passive sniffer is possible...

    4. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by towaz · · Score: 1

      Iirc antisniff would broadcast different types of packets and then measure the responses from hosts.. though its been years since used last.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
    5. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One need not even have an actual connection to the network to grab data. With radio engineering and digital electronics experience, one can build a simple listener that will pickup the RF put out by most Ethernet. Using some digital signal processing software, one can re-assemble packets and ultimately get real data. Encryption protocols aren't much good when entire sessions, starting with protocol negotiation, can be recorded and later reconstructed. Given enough data, even IPSec fails to protect. Course, maybe all of this is sci-fi and I've been listening to a little birdie too long. ;)

    6. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by rjdegraaf · · Score: 1
      You are right, what you say is indeed sci-fi.

      What you are suggesting depends highly on an environment which has no other network cards transmitting which is unlikely, let alone the power cables which have a HUGE influence on the EM-noise you are also receiving. Though the 1/f noise reduction can be applied to some extension, the latter is really high. A focussed antennae might help.

    7. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      ...the power cables which have a HUGE influence on the EM-noise ...

      If you can't rig a Sallen-Key 60Hz notch filter in less time than it takes to post on /. then you aren't going to be doing radio sniffing anyway.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    8. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by rjdegraaf · · Score: 1
      Interesting, but...

      I forgot to mention: your network cable is shielded (or at least multiple cable close to each other) which flattens the signal anyway (from the outside seen).

    9. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Not something I know much about, but what if you had a special receiver which could attach to/wrap around an Ethernet cable? It could have shielding built-in so the only big source of RF would be the cable.
      Wouldn't work at range, but at least it wouldn't show up as a physical connection to the network...

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    10. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, once upon a time I heard that SATAN was an acronym for System Administrators Tool for Authenticating Networks. S.A.T.A.N. Satan is getting a wee bit long in the tooth though. It must be at least 20 years old. Use something a bit newer maybe (snort or NMAP (insecure.org)) are excellent choices. Air snort has built in breaking of wifi certain wifi networks (so don't use poor/useless encryption), and NMAP is featured as a picture on the NSA website when you drag your mouse over research.

    11. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but i saw it in a movie once, so maybe you just suck if you can't do it, JACKASS

    12. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by Cili · · Score: 1

      one could de-shield the network cable on one centimeter length then insert needles through the plastic isolation to each copper wire (or only those that carry data, I don't know much about the phisical layer). The problem is that after this you leave 'tracks' and later on one can see that there was a tapping involved.

    13. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by budgenator · · Score: 1

      There an easy and old-school way to stop that. Copper is expensive to run so a way was devised to allow 3 telephones to work on 2 pairs of copper rather than 3 pairs.
      1. Basicaly you take 2 audio matching transformers that are center tapped on the primary, and no center tapped on the secondary.
      2. connect the outputs of each transformers secondary side to the copper pair as is normal in telephone applications.
      3. to the outer taps on each tranformer's primary, inject a known and different signal signal.
      4. on the center tap of the two tranformer connect a third signal generator, set to a third signal.

      on the other side of the copper pairs, you have an identical arangement, and the sgnals are analysed for cross-talk. By carefully tweeking the setup for minimum cross talk, any changes become obvious. In the army before we had encryption at our level, this technique was used to provide relatively secure telephone lines, by inject a tone on the "virtual pair", if you heard tone, you stopped using the line. do that on a couple unused pairs inside your cat5 and a mouse runs down those cables, the alarms will sound, anything metal especialy like antenna or inductive pick-ups can be detected before they get clos enough to sniff any data. The biggest problem is false alarms, and getting the system set up so it doesnt go off evertime somebody slams a door.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    14. Re:protect yourself using SATAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I left out of my previous post is the fact this technology exists. A special division of Naval intelligence travels around to Navy and Marine bases to monitor what classified information, if any, leaves the base, be it via telephone, internet, etc. They have the ability to sit outside buildings in a specially equipped truck and monitor traffic from unshielded Ethernet. Granted there are obvious limitations because of interference and many other variables. However, my knowledge of this technology is over a decade outdated. I am sure there have been improvements. The same group monitors about every conceivable radio frequency known to man while auditing a base They have the equipment needed to decode digital cell phone traffic and nearly all other kinds of digital encoding used in modern radios. Although they likely pick up a lot civilian signals, they are more interested in the average soldier that talks about classified operation on his field radio.

  13. Basic Security Lesson: by DingerX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People expect thieves to act like thieves. Act like you know what you're doing, and you can walk out with most data.

    Another lesson -- put AP mines in your crawlspaces.

    1. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by towaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just walk around the company with a clipboard.. anyone confronts you ask for the name.. look pissed off and scribble on the clipboard ;)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
    2. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by SamSim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One time I was working as a temporary IT monkey at the company which had decided to change something to do with its email (I forget what exactly). It involved basically going around every computer on the site (which was big) and manually changing the settings on Outlook for each one. I was a temp and hadn't been there long so I didn't have an ID card or a door swipe card. Also, it was dress-down Friday so I wasn't wearing a smart shirt or tie - just jeans and a t-shirt. Eventually we got to the marketing department - which I'd never been to, nobody there would have a clue who I was - and the guy who was my partner on this particular excursion from the IT department said "You do that end of the corridor, I'll go down here and do these ones".

      So there's me - I could basically have been any random guy off the street - asking these marketing ladies who didn't have the faintest clue who I was if I could temporarily use their computer to change their email settings. And they all happily obliged.

      I'm told security's been tightened since.

    3. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by petermgreen · · Score: 1, Interesting

      i hope that last line was a joke

      using anti personel mines in the crawlspaces would make working down thier rather risky, would probablly be illegal in most civilised countries and would do a lot of damage to your network infrastructure if an intruder or employee set them off.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by tehdaemon · · Score: 1

      Naa.. just replace the explosives with tear-gas cannisters and alarms. :)

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    5. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Holy shit. I think you may have the single worst sarcasm/humor detector in the human race. Of course, it's possible you live somewhere that explosively trapping a server room would be expectable. This is a global world, after all...

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    6. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a global world?!

      Somebody modify this guy +5 Insightful quick!

    7. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Act like you know what you're doing, and you can walk out with most data.
      Not so hard to do, when you're a hired security consultant. I'll bet it's much harder not to act like a thief when you are a thief, with real consequences for getting caught.

      Assume pure chutzpah works 90% of the time - that would be a good record for a penetration tester, but a professional thief wouldn't last long with those odds.

      It might be easy to waltz out with some computers, just bring a dolly and look like you know what you're doing. But to do the same thing without leaving fingerprints or getting your face on a security camera would be much harder. Seiden doesn't have to worry about getting caught later.

    8. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by scibbers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lesson learned from playing to many video games AP mines = guarenteed TK. Problem is in real life there is no respawning...

    9. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm trying to find the "He surely doesn't get the joke"-Mod, but I can't find it.

      Before answering that there -isn't- such a thing : Yes, this was a joke too !

    10. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      "This is a global world, after all... "

      Dan Quale?!? Is that you?
      (I jest, no offence intended)

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    11. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell me; let me guess: Whenever you have to use the one of the words "there", "their", or "they're", you just pick one at random, right?

    12. Re:Basic Security Lesson: by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      You know you've spent too much time on Slashdot (or in front of your computer in general)... ...if you read that line about "AP" mines and "crawlspaces" and immediately thought about Associated Press and webcrawlers, without even realizing that that may not be what the poster meant until a reply made it clear.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  14. Reg Free by Anti_Climax · · Score: 4, Informative

    Paste this link into google and click through for a single page version

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/31/business/yourmon ey/31hack.html?pagewanted=all

    no reg required

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    1. Re:Reg Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Didn't work, but the "New York Times Link Generator" did:

      http://nytimes.blogspace.com/genlink

      The reg free url is

      http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/31/business/yourmon ey/31hack.html?ex=1280462400&en=31158975e4a4090a&e i=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

      The first page of the article was semi interesting. I didn't read the rest.

    2. Re:Reg Free by volve · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually it worked fine. All nytimes.com checks on is a referrer - if it's Google, you get in for free. So even though Google said "hey, I got nuthin!" for that URL, just click it again and voila, you're in.

      -volve

    3. Re:Reg Free by waferhead · · Score: 1

      This works, just klick thru to the original page when it gives an error

  15. Re:Gentoo?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your use of Gentoo affects you by turning you into a social outcast. People may make fun of you by calling you a "gentile."

  16. Penetration testing by elgee · · Score: 1

    Is mentioned again.

    My prurient is definitely interested!

    Interesting article.

  17. yummy! by intmainvoid · · Score: 1

    "Most systems are like this Tootsie Roll Pop," Mr. Seiden said. "They have this hard, crunchy outside, but they're very gooey and soft inside.
    So he'd be one of the fat geeks then.

    1. Re:yummy! by intmainvoid · · Score: 1

      Mr. Seiden is shaped vaguely like the Buddha
      Bingo!

  18. It is very easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    During my career, I have worked as a tech break/fix. I have worked for a university, federal govt, and private sector.

    Due to the nature of the job it is difficult to get passes or keys to move around immediately, especially into secure areas. So you put on your charm and off you go.

    It is very easy to take things. Just look like you know what you are doing and where you are going.

    Be presentable and nice, be friendly with the receptionists/secretaries/admin, and you can go anywhere.

    I have been let into computer rooms that are supposedly secure, I have been assisted by security guards in loading computer gear into my car, I have had secretaries hold doors on elevators so I could get stuff in. I'm talking thousands upon thousands of $$$ worth of stuff. All of them took my word for it, never questioning or phoning to find out. I have never had to show ID.

    I have actually had one employee of a major oil corporation watch me follow him in through the doors, ask me, "Where are you going? Who are you?"
    This was going into their engineering areas, from which I'm sure numerous other oil companies would love to see the data.

    I replied that I am a computer tech and visting XXXXXXX. "Who? Are they on this floor?" "Yeah, they are, around the corner." (I really only had an office number ;-) "Oh, ok. You look honest." He actually told me I looked honest, so it was ok! From there I found the office I wanted, no one was there. I was to swap out a couple of hard disks, so I did. Many people poked their head in, joking along the way, "Hey! You don't look like XXXXXXXX! Unless he's shrunk! hahaha!" One even to see "what does a hard disk look like?" No one questioned me from there.

    Many, too many to count, I have just knocked on the door and asked for Mr. S.A.S. "Oh, I'm here to take a look at his computer, he said it wasn't working. Can I see it?" Then they lead me to the office, in which Mr. S.A.S. isn't there. "Well, I'll just start and he'll come back and I'll let him know. Thanks." Then they leave.

    It doesn't matter how secure it is, like the article points out, being sociable gets you lots of open doors.

    Crazy part is that I pride myself on this "talent." It's much simpler to talk your way through than to have to run all over getting ok's and escorts into areas.

    1. Re:It is very easy by rolfwind · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mr. S.A.S.? Mister Side Angle Side?

      I wouldn't want to see him, heard he's always bent out of shape. :P

      Mod lame.

    2. Re:It is very easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whilst I recognise this, as a techie I've seen plenty of weak security, and been left unattended with computer systems that handle a LOT of money.

      However my experience is that organisations where security really(!) matters, or handling very big money, you just don't get in the door unescorted.

      And in one case, by appointment only, no electro-magnetic media, no electronic devices, physical search, photographic id, and they took a photo as you enter (just for the record).

      Most of these also had serious network security policies. That meant even people with significant internal know-how couldn't easily export information (unauthorised) via the network.

      Although interestingly one, which of necessity needed a lot of networking, achieved a lot of the security by dint of the staff not talking about the "problem areas" outside of a "need to know" basis. Technically this is security by obscurity, but it worked surprisingly well. Guess, as they say, it comes down to the people.

      Curiously the only thorough check I've ever been aware of on leaving any place, was a nuclear power station, and they were only looking to make sure I hadn't accidentally been contaminated, not that I think they had many secrets, or anything "safe" to steal.

    3. Re:It is very easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      One of the best ways to get someone to tell you how to circumvent the security of their company is to tell them a story of how easy it is to break in and steal stuff from various other companies. They can't help themselves, they are so proud of the security at their company that they tell you all about it.

    4. Re:It is very easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome to try that where I work, but make sure you bring proper ID and a real work order, because it won't wash.

      See, this is what you'll hear from the friendly secretary, the new guy in finance, the big boss woman who runs the place, or the guy who sweeps the floors and empties the bins...

      "Sorry, we don't have a key to this room. Try Dave in Room 8109 [three floors away]"

      and when you get to Dave, he's seen more social engineering attempts than you'd had hot dinners. He'd rather leave the room on fire than let in a fireman whose ID doesn't check out. Your existence means a delay to his coffee break, which means he is looking for reasons to send you away empty handed, or, if you must go in the room, he'll stand over you, impatiently, waiting for you to do whatever needs doing and then go away.

      Dave will know instantly if you're supposed to be there because the rule is simple. If you are supposed to be there it's because Dave asked for you. Damn. "The AC is broken?", "No it isn't, I am monitoring the temperature and humidity from here". "Er, Sun are offering free upgrades?", "That's nice, have them delivered to my office". "The windows need, um, cleaning?" "Then go outisde and clean my windows, that room hasn't got any". etc.

      Now after years of experience you probably imagine that I'm dumb for not mentioning the woman on front desk, she's got a cabinet full of keys, right? She has, but there's no spare for the room you want, each key for that room is ordered individually. Or how about that security guard? Master key! But no, the door you want doesn't have a master key, the guard doesn't know that (although he might suspect) he's simply been ordered not to mess with that series of doors. In orientation he'll have been shown that at least /some/ of the rooms behind that series of doors don't have any lights. Or a floor. They're all locked, and don't need to be "searched" for imaginary burglars so probably best never to go in those rooms then.

    5. Re:It is very easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having done some of this type of work myself I'll second the truth of it.

      However I long ago decided to take the opposite approach and make sure all the ID checks etc. are done.

      That way I end up with far less actual work to do and spend much more time sitting around reading trash sci-fi paperbacks whilst waiting for clearance etc. (always have a couple of good books handy)

      Hey, it's not that I mind working for a living - But given the choice I'd rather do less work for the same pay ;)

    6. Re:It is very easy by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Technically this is security by obscurity, but it worked surprisingly well. Guess, as they say, it comes down to the people.

      "Security by obscurity" has gotten such a bad rap because some many people have repeated it so often, but it isn't that bad. It's bad when it is relied upon instead of using it as a layer in defense in depth. Using it in conjunction with other security methods is not bad.

      (Maybe you were saying it was the only method used, but my english parser broke trying to understand your paragraph.)

    7. Re:It is very easy by halleluja · · Score: 1
      (...) being sociable gets you lots of open doors.
      Sociability is not about appearances, but behaviour.

      I may not be pretty-- but I would socially kick your royal butt on the street.

    8. Re:It is very easy by Mozai · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, at one of my jobs I was that guy who would ask "who are you? why are you here?" to strangers walking around unescorted. I would usually escort them to whomever they were supposedly visiting, or I'd take them to reception and tell them to wait there for their appointment.

      I got some strong hinting that I should stop doing that because I was "harrassing VIPs," namely potential investors. I did the same at another job, where I wasn't discourgaged, but people thought I was amusing. I know I was the only person doing this because I sat at the back of the building.

      Education, education, education. Security is not something you do once and forget about -- it's an attitude.

    9. Re:It is very easy by dptalia · · Score: 1

      My company has been emphasizing the "wear you ID at all times" policy lately. Which would be wonderful if our division had been issued IDs! We're supposed to check if someon has an ID before letting the in, but how can you when there's nothig to check... It's nice to make a policy and then fail to follow through.

      --
      Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
    10. Re:It is very easy by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Like most of the other posters have stated, social engineering works only when you've got a sufficiently lax attitude in employees and a large enough population to offer general anonymity. Having worked at a facility with a secure area, I can say that nobodu was getting into the secure area to any thing useful without proper ID. (I decided that getting out with data, should you be an insider, wasn't very hard though, as they put the receptionsist in the wrong place)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  19. Re:Ahem. by makomk · · Score: 1

    That's copying data, not stealing it.

    Interestingly, this time round it is "stealing data" - what else would you call walking out with a complete set of the company's backup tapes?

  20. According to an earlier story... by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...act as if you know what you're doing and you can walk out with the computers, too.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:According to an earlier story... by atomico · · Score: 1

      you can walk out with the computers, too

      That's exactly what happened where I work, some months ago. A guy entered the building (an endless string of repairs and re-repairs means there are always lots of construction workers and the like), went to the last floor (where management sits :), harvested three or four top-of-the-line laptops, and went away unmolested.
      That was at lunchtime. When the bosses came back, you could hear the cursing from three floors below!

      Thanks God someone had been thinking for once and encrypted all laptop's hard disks...
  21. Knowing is half the battle. by Baddas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The key to this is that knowing what he thinks is secret is half the battle to finding it out.

    Once the executive told him where to target, that made it much easier. If you're talking about sniffing the entire network output of a company looking for important stuff... that's a much harder task.

    1. Re:Knowing is half the battle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right to point out that it helps to be pointed toward the target, but I think you're overplaying its importance. Anybody who has any dealings with companies like these knows that privileged information about upcoming transactions is generally the most closely guarded, because the transactions usually involve publicly traded companies and therefore the SEC, insider trading, etc. The anecdote is in the story for dramatic effect, not because it's really news.

      It's not like this executive said "My biggest secrets are on server-276.example.com which is in the data center on the 12th floor, third rack from the door."

    2. Re:Knowing is half the battle. by markseiden · · Score: 1

      there are two reasons for asking this question. one reason is to determine how mindful they are about what their secrets are. (many companies have no labeling program for confidential material, and their employees have low awareness of secrecy.) the other reason is to get them to identify secrets which they think ought to be well protected, and see if in fact they are. almost any interested insider would be able to find this out quickly. there's no point in wasting their money determining it independently. most of my attack scenarios feature insiders with limited privilege, because these attacks can be extremely damaging.

  22. Terminology by Irongeek_ADC · · Score: 1

    Seems to me like they got their terminology a bit off. Shouldn't the guy be called a Pen-tester or part of a Tiger team. A sniffer is what the guy used, not what he is.

    1. Re:Terminology by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      ...and yet none of the examples given in the story actually involve him using a network sniffer. Indeed, all he used was his own ingenuity and his non-descript looks.

      Much like a "computer" was a person who computes, long before there were machines of that name, you could call a "sniffer" one who seeks out information, without the need for a computer.

      Funny though, the stuff he describes is basically the same stuff that Kevin Mitnick described as to how he could acquire his own information. Given that, as far as I remember, he also provides security consulting services, I guess they are in the same business.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Terminology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Funny though, the stuff he describes is basically the same stuff that Kevin Mitnick described as to how he could acquire his own information. Given that, as far as I remember, he also provides security consulting services, I guess they are in the same business."

      Kevin Mitnick was actually on the FBI's most wanted list and arrested eventually. Now that hes out of jail he does consulting (hes not actually allowed to even touch a computer), and he also released a book called "The Art of Deception: Exploiting the Human Element of Security". The book is about social engineering (using lots of short stories to illustrate the scenarios).

    3. Re:Terminology by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      Kevin Mitnick was actually on the FBI's most wanted list and arrested eventually. Now that hes out of jail he does consulting (hes not actually allowed to even touch a computer), and he also released a book called "The Art of Deception: Exploiting the Human Element of Security". The book is about social engineering (using lots of short stories to illustrate the scenarios).

      I could be wrong, but I think the restriction on Mitnick not being able to touch a computer has expired. Also, he's now written his second book as well:

      "The Art of Intrusion: The Real Stories behind the Exploits of Hackers, Intruders & Deceivers"

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  23. Security through obscurity by lgordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would have been impressed if the CEO didn't tell him what data he thought was most important and he was able to both figure it out and acquire it.

    1. Re:Security through obscurity by yerM)M · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It seems that one of your biggest secrets is what your biggest secrets are. I think the consultant just did some social engineering, I wonder if he put himself as a risk in his final report.

    2. Re:Security through obscurity by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      It is pretty well known that investment banks work with transaction data that will make almost anyone rich if they knew of it before it was released to the public. Crap, just following the rumor mill has worked for lots of people. Just the names of the companies involved would probably be enough to make you a tremendous nest egg. Stock charts go straight up and straight down usually by more than 20% on the annoucement of this type of transaction. You'd get a hard look from the SEC, if you were involved in two well timed buys in a row. If you had ready access to non-public information the game becomes similar to counting cards at blackjack (easy to beat, harder to stay in the game.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    3. Re:Security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My father told me many times, "the best way to keep a secret is to not let anyone know you have a secret."

  24. Uhhh... by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    SATAN is a vulnerability scanner. It was actually the first Open Source vulnerability scanner out there and reputedly got the author kicked out of SGI. It had a patch to rename it SANTA, because some people objected to the name. A revamped, commercial version was called SAINT.


    There are sniffer detectors out there, but I'd not want to use SATAN for it.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Uhhh... by James+Youngman · · Score: 2, Informative
      SATAN is a vulnerability scanner. It was actually the first Open Source vulnerability scanner out there and reputedly got the author kicked out of SGI. It had a patch to rename it SANTA,
      SATAN was by Wietse Venema and Dan Farmer. Farmer worked for SGI as "Security Czar" at one point. However, the patch you refer to was, I think, unneccessary - the name change ablity was part of the distributed software.
  25. New Article, by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    Old tricks, fat dog too!

    Social Engineering.

    Enuf said.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    1. Re:New Article, by markseiden · · Score: 1

      oh, i have some new tricks also. that old tricks still work well may be more entertainment than news. storytelling is often useful in educating people (other than those here). (you might as well criticize yoda for having wrinkles. when you as old as i am, then *your* weight we will measure.)

  26. find the key maker by E8086 · · Score: 1

    If you want ideas, just watch more movies and tv:
    Keymaker: There's a building. Inside this building there's a level where no elevator can go, and no stair can reach. This level is filled with doors. These doors lead to many places, hidden places, but one door is special. One door leads to the Source. This building is protected by a very secure system. Every alarm triggers the bomb.(Matrix Reloaded)
    ok, so maybe not "the bomb" but exploding bright blue/orange ink/itching powder(Lone Gunmen, Police Academy 7) packets might deter anyone trying ot pick the lock of the server or records room and make them any easy sight for security. And enough UPSs and generators in the isolated area to have everything work even if someone cuts the power to 10(Die Hard) or 27(Matrix: RL)sq blocks, depending which movie your watching but you're still screwed if they use a pinch(Ocean's Eleven). And don't forget the Mission Impossible room with extra large vents.
    Forget the ventalation shafts large enough for people to crawl through, just use more fans and small vents. And have one enterance into the room with a security desk outside, should deter anyone from sitting there trying to pick the lock. And scanning photo ID cards with finger prints and/or retna scan, just more things someone will have to fake and increases the chance of your armed security officer noticing that the person they've never seen before is taking a lot longer to enter the right codes.

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    1. Re:find the key maker by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      This is total overkill. all you need is one of those containers where radioactive material is transported in. This things are virtually indestructible. you have to use some huge bomb to crack it open. and i mean *really* huge. Now inside you put the server and fill the rest with the most effective UPS you can find. now you let only 2 cables go outside: one for the data and one for the power. but be sure you found some plug inside the container, so you can replace the cable more easy if someone cuts it off. To finish it, try to find something chemical that you can paint on the door and the frame so that it will melt together as soon as you close the door. *perfect* ;) (in case you want to be able to reopen the door you have to take the risk that anyone other could too. the lock does not matter that much as long as it's only controllable over the data-wire with some xxxxxxxbit key that 's impossible to crack brute force for all system on the world alltogehter.) p.s.: for your "small vents" "solution" what in the world are vents for in a system that does not need any fresh air? just be sure you have some decent non-mechanic cooling inside that uses the power line and th UPS as a cooling-energy source. if the cooling stops, then the server does too.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:find the key maker by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      You just need a heat exchanger. A Zalman Reserator would probably work. But none of this matters if you don't have life-and-death loyalty from everyone with a password anyway.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  27. Re:Ahem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly, this time round it is "stealing data" - what else would you call walking out with a complete set of the company's backup tapes?

    Stealing tapes. The data was not stolen, as, being a backup, it was only a copy.

  28. That's it boy.. by Hangin10 · · Score: 1

    common men! The packet went thataway! Oh, no! A gateway! Wrong port! They've lost the route.. Men! Listen up OSPF isn't working; we'll have to RIP that packet a new one!!

  29. yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I opened up my networks all the way. One day some guy comed on and he was all omg dud ur running teh mandriva! Can you teech me hacks? and I was all like 'cat foo.txt | grep foo' and he was like dude omgfwtbbqpdq that is some leet ass coding. I shwed him to use teh emacs (what real hackers use, i tried vi once and it tooks me three days to figure out how to quit it. what is that all about? piece of shit program si what! lol!) and also to use WinE so he can get on the internet explorer.

    I heard the NAS (that's like the governemt hackser guys, dumbasses) was trying to make linux illegal because they were all like we need to see your porns+warez and some dude was like no way, man, I got linux and there's no way I'm letting you guys in. Teh NSA was all like hella pissed! They got the best hackers in the world (except me of course! LOL!) and they can't even break into the lnux.

    1. Re:yep by Kell_pt · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points I'd give this a +Funny for such a successful impersonation of a teenager! Cheers! :)

      --
      "I don't mind God, it's his fan club I can't stand!" E8
  30. WebHostingGuy Supports Silencing a Billion People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  31. Good points by jd · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'd consider security as being essentially split into the following layers:


    • Stopping intruders getting onto the network in the first place (firewall, limited use of public IP addresses, etc)
    • Stopping users on the network from accessing machines they shouldn't (ie: strong user authentication, eg: Kerberos)
    • Stopping machines on the network from accessing other machines they shouldn't (ie: strong host authentication)
    • Stopping sniffers and vulnerability scanners by using encrypted network traffic (eg: IPSec, Sun SKIP, or something similar)
    • Removing code that has known exploits, to prevent the bypassing of any of the above
    • Using Active NIDS to detect attempts to break the security


    In practice, almost no organization is going to install all of the above. Even the US Government, which is not short of ready cash, is getting far poorer grades on their network security audits than they should.


    However, if you define the "target" or "ideal" security schema, then you have something you can compare against. IMHO, the above description is the "ideal", in that it is unlikely that anyone would be able to break in using technological methods.


    The remaining problem - social engineering - is not something you can program against. The description I outlined, if implemented in full, would provide enough checks and counter-checks to require someone using social engineering to get past several people, which raises the bar a little but does not make it hard enough.


    ("Hard Enough" is defined here as making it an impractical method for typical IT situations.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Good points by Hal9000_sn3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You seem to have left out the three most important things.

      1. Education

      2. Education

      and

      3. Education

      Without education, a junior sysadmin can open ports on your firewall, or run up their own harmless little p2p box in the DMZ.

      Users will share their credentials, or choose weak ones.

      Someone will find the false positives from the NIDS to be annoying, and route the output to /dev/nul

      Removed code will be reinstalled. And so on...

      All is in vain without education.

    2. Re:Good points by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i tend to agree with education being important, apart from letting them choose their own passwords, since people will always choose crap passwords. i have found the most help thing you can do to enforce security polices is to get the staff on your side. a fun demonstration or something to keep them involved and not feeling like the enemy. often when people instigate security policies staff end up in a them vs you situation. and in that case your going to lose, because insiders will always find a way to thwart the best laid security.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:Good points by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't understand this obsession with open ports. The firewall is a kludge to make up for insecure services that you haven't managed to turn off on machines behind it - if there are no insecure services running, there's no security issue.

      Now, I'm not going to argue that you shouldn't have firewalls, because they protect against random idiots turning on services that should be turned off as well as against some OS network stack vulnerabilities, but I can *assure* you that if a competent JR System administrator has decided to open port 16773 on the firewall for some random specific service he'll be running, it's a hell of a lot smaller a security risk than having outgoing port 80 open.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    4. Re:Good points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well...one would hope that the junior sysadmin wouldn't have priviledges to actually change the existing FW security policy or the ability to add unauthorized machines to the DMZ. If that's the case, you have much bigger issues than education to deal with.

      Yes, education can make a big difference in running a tighter ship and is a piece of the puzzle, but there are many more things to consider than just education.

    5. Re:Good points by ysachlandil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I manage a webserver there are two different types of access needed:

      -web traffic from the outside
      -management traffic from the inside

      This is where the firewall comes in. I especially don't want people trying to get into management on the server even though the passwords are solid.

      And no, you don't want to solve this with a management interface on the server, then anybody that gets into the server can get to the management of all the servers.

      I agree that the server itself should be secured as well, but see the firewalls as 'defense in depth'.

    6. Re:Good points by Eivind · · Score: 1
      You forgot the simplest, most basic thing to protect: physical security.

      Doing everything in your list to perfection still is pretty useless if you haven't got atleast basic physical security.

    7. Re:Good points by Hasai · · Score: 1

      "Stopping sniffers and vulnerability scanners by using encrypted network traffic (eg: IPSec, Sun SKIP, or something similar)"

      Simply running a switched topology can put a heck of a big dent in the sniffer threat, without any of an encrypted network's headaches.

      --

      Regards;

      Hasai

    8. Re:Good points by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Normally, a webserver has a public IP and needs to be able to accept and respond to incoming HTTP requests on port 80 from any internet address.

      Additionally, people need to be able to manage the server - a simple UNIX setup would give the entire internet access to SSH on port 23.

      A more paranoid UNIX setup would restrict SSH access to a specific range of IP addresses through the SSH configuration. (Note that it doesn't matter if the allowed IP range is "inside the firewall" or not.)

      In eithor case, a firewall would never block a connection that the host would have accepted. A firewall is good redundancy.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  32. Customer service by imgumbydammit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of the main reasons that approaches like social engineering work is because of the overwhelming emphasis a lot of companies put on "customer service".
    I worked for several years in corporate security (good money/awful job), and it was the cardinal sin to piss someone off. On one occasion, a white guy showed up on a weekend with a pass card with a Vietnamese woman's name on it that wasn't cleared for access to the floor he wanted to get onto, which was the executive floor of a bank nonetheless.
    The ten minutes it took to verify this guy's identity were the cause of a major spat between him (he turned out to be a VP of some sort) and my employer (the building management) that took days to blow over.
    Some of my colleagues would simply give in if someone was pushy enough. No one wants to be the person who said "No" to the wrong person, no matter what the circumstances.

    --
    That's right: I'm gumby dammit.
    1. Re:Customer service by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      No, pushy usually pisses them off. You just say when I leave I'll just have to tell them (take person's name)wouldn't let me in and was an asshole as well. WIth the emphasis on "being nice" these days I bet they let you pass. Another trick is to be a very pretty/sexy female (big tits, low cut dress, short skirt, etc.), or to use one to decoy the guard while someone else slips by. Of course if the guard is female you are sunk unless you happen to be Joe Handsome :)

    2. Re:Customer service by neillewis · · Score: 1

      Everyone who I've ever met who works for a US financial institution has been a a VP. Is there actually any lower job title?

    3. Re:Customer service by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there are tellers. There is also one president. Big banks have a few Cxx titles. For the most part though, it is teller or Vice president.

    4. Re:Customer service by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      How fortunate that I have no fear of saying no to the 'wrong person'...
      In the first, this VP is obviously an idiot, if he thinks his position grants him exemption from security protocols.
      In your place, I'd cut him off at the pass as well... "I'm sorry, sir, but I need your passcard to clear you for entry. Should you persist in attempting entry as is, I will be obliged to summon a security detail."

      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  33. Direct non-login link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. Re:Don't feel like signing up? by zymano · · Score: 1

    thanks

  35. Obligatory Trek reference by cnettel · · Score: 1

    You don't have to sniff to find his head lying outside San Francisco, even though it may help. Then it should be easy to steal him.

    1. Re:Obligatory Trek reference by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      You can keep your theiving hands off my head, thank you very much. I am rather attached to it :)

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
  36. Mitnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This had to be said,.

  37. entire article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The New York Times
    July 31, 2005
    The Sniffer vs. the Cybercrooks
    By GARY RIVLIN

    THE investment bank, despite billions in annual revenue and the small squadron of former police, military and security officers on its payroll, was no match for Mark Seiden.

    "Tell me the things you most want to keep secret," Mr. Seiden challenged a top executive at the bank a few years back. The executive listed two. One involved the true identities of clients negotiating deals so hush-hush that even people inside the bank referred to them by using a code name. The other was the financial details of those mergers and acquisitions.

    A week later, Mr. Seiden again sat in this man's office in Manhattan, in possession of both supposedly guarded secrets. As a bonus, he also had in hand a pilfered batch of keys that would give him entry into this company's offices scattered around the globe, photocopies of the floor plans for each office and a suitcase stuffed with backup tapes that would have allowed him to replicate all the files on the bank's computer system.

    "Basically, that all came from working nights over a single weekend," he said with a canary-eating smile that seemed equal parts mischief and pride.

    Mr. Seiden is what some people inside the security industry call a "sniffer": someone who is paid to twist doorknobs for a living, to see which are safely locked and which are left dangerously unsecured. Clients sometimes hire Mr. Seiden, a former computer programmer, to buttress the security systems that protect their computers and other precious corporate assets. But primarily, large corporations turn to him to test the vulnerability of their networks.

    "Mark is one of the more respected people out there doing this kind of work," said Bruce Schneier, a security expert and the author of "Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly About Security in an Uncertain World." Mr. Schneier called him "one of the good guys."

    And for Mr. Seiden and others practicing the strange craft of intrusion detection, business has never been better. As data-security breaches at places like ChoicePoint and LexisNexis have made headlines, there has been a "tremendous surge in vulnerability assessments" in recent months, said Howard A. Schmidt, a former chief security officer at Microsoft who has also worked inside the White House on cybersecurity issues.

    Indeed, purloined Social Security and credit card numbers are the new top prizes of the 21st-century cybercriminal. "In the early days of the Internet, breaking into systems was about bragging rights. It was about technical prowess. It was breaking into systems just to break in," said Mr. Schmidt, who is now working as an independent security consultant in Issaquah, Wash. "Now what we're seeing are economic crimes in a way we've never seen before."

    That is why corporations and other large organizations are increasingly turning to people like Mr. Seiden to assess the soundness of their security systems. No one knows how many people make their living doing what people in the industry call penetration testing, though clearly their numbers are climbing. The most recent Computer Crime and Security Survey - released earlier this month by the F.B.I. and Computer Security Institute, an information security trade group - said that more than 87 percent of the organizations they polled conduct regular security audits, up from 82 percent a year earlier.

    "Since the beginning of the calendar year we've seen a great increase in the number of calls from enterprises looking for someone to do security vulnerability testing for them," said Kelly M. Kavanagh, an analyst who tracks the security industry for Gartner Inc., a technology research group.

    CORPORATIONS in North America spent more than $2 billion on outside security consultants in 2004, Mr. Kavanagh said. That was up 14 percent from the previous year.

    As a result of all that spending, a large organization's data center - whether it holds a company's most precious trade secrets or the credit card numbe

    1. Re:entire article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, /. condones and practices blatent copyright violation.

      Way to go guys!

      Why the hell should I respect the GPL again?!?!?

  38. d'objet direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That reminds me of the graphing calculator story:
    http://www.pacifict.com/Story/
    that says a lot about corporate security.

    At any rate, the main point of the article is that there is a cost/benefit to security (security is expensive and can hamper productivity), but that most of the time people/corporations don't even bother looking for simple effective measures that would reduce the risk for little or no extra cost.

  39. Forgot? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Forgot? Read parent: "After this, it is encased in carbonite". Maybe you thought I said corbomite, which would also be very secure!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  40. Tootsie Roll? by pmazer · · Score: 1

    "Most systems are like this Tootsie Roll Pop," Mr. Seiden said. "They have this hard, crunchy outside, but they're very gooey and soft inside. And once you get past that crunchy outside and you're inside, you can do anything."

    How many licks does it take to get to the center of this corporate server?

    1. Re:Tootsie Roll? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Just a few nybbles and bytes!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:Tootsie Roll? by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      he just finished vetting Willy Wonka's server room security.

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  41. reg. free link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  42. Stealing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The data remains, therefore it is not really stolen. It's privacy is merely infringed :P

    But seriously. If you're so adamant about "copyright infringement" != "theft", I think you should do the same for "data theft" and "identity theft". In all cases no physical property is taken, so it doesn't seem right to call two theft and the other something else. Oh, right. It's only "theft" when it affects "us".

    1. Re:Stealing? by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with copyright, it has to do with privacy and security (eg passwords, bank info, etc). Copyrighted information isnt normally kept secret. You are beating the wrong dead horse.

    2. Re:Stealing? by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      You are correct, but still, I wonder. It's still data, information if you will. If nothing is physically taken, it's not stealing. You are not depriving anyone of the data. It doesn't really have anything to do with copyright. Copyright is only a subset of intellectual property law. It's amazing how simple replication has turned our property laws inside out.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
  43. The reality of the situation... by clambake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tell me the things you most want to keep secret

    That, right ther, was the single biggest security breach. By far, the amount of data that is out there is simply too much for a random hacker to grab some data and make a profit from it. He needs to know what data he can use. Professionally data thiefs already know what they want to steal, but they are not the types to simply be stopped by security measures of any kind. If worse comes to worse, he can always just get a job as a janitor, or better yet, a security guard at the place he wants to steal from and flount ALL security measures.

    1. Re:The reality of the situation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, right ther, was the single biggest security breach. By far, the amount of data that is out there is simply too much for a random hacker to grab some data and make a profit from it. He needs to know what data he can use. Professionally data thiefs already know what they want to steal, but they are not the types to simply be stopped by security measures of any kind.

      See, they're not scared of random hackers, they're scared of professional data thiefs. That's why they hired him.

      If worse comes to worse, he can always just get a job as a janitor, or better yet, a security guard at the place he wants to steal from and flount ALL security measures.

      That's pretty much what he did. RTFA.

    2. Re:The reality of the situation... by FCP · · Score: 1

      You'd have a much better point if he hadn't, in fact, been able to steal essentially everything they had. If that much data strolled out of there in the hands of black hats, they could analyze it to whatever extent needed and figure out what the Big Secrets were.

      It would be interesting to know if there had been any internal response to something as obvious as a missing set of backups. Not what you want to hear on Monday morning if you're the head of security.

      --
      .plan: file not found
    3. Re:The reality of the situation... by markseiden · · Score: 1

      there are lots of problems with unencrypted backups. first, they are seldom accessed, so it's unlikely you'll know they are missing. second, they are easily and undetectably copied. let's say an iron mtn employee went rogue, and decided to borrow and copy (then return) a single tape per day from random banking customers. what is the likelihood that this would be detected?

  44. Re:Gentoo?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anti-Gentilism!

    Anti-Gentilism! Anti-Gentilism! Anti-Gentilism!

    WE MUST combat antigentilism through improved monitoring, reporting, and law enforcement. A special representative to the UN should be named to address hate crimes.

    Major public education campaigns must be initated to promote awareness of antigentilism, racism and hate and to stress the importance of reporting these horrendous incidents.

  45. DKM has a RL story about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://kithrup.com/dkm/dkmnonfic/hacksec.html

    Summary: Daniel Keys Moran is a SF writer, does day jobs. One job, he was interviewing to work on for them, and was told their security was top-notch - he didn't need to worry about it.

    **
    Someday I'll remember my password.

  46. not offline, just disconnected and in a bunker by davidwr · · Score: 1

    A computer with it's own power supply in an electrically and visually isolated soundproof room - think 4 walls, a ceiling, a floor, soundproofing, and a faraday cage - is about as secure as you can get. Be sure to add an "air lock" so people can get in and out without leaking anything.

    The only way anything is getting in or out is by way of a human operator, and if you've got a mole in your environment you've got bigger problems than computer security.

    Just for added security, have the thing self-destruct if it is moved or tampered with, and have an armed guard ready to "shoot the disk" if anyone unauthorized gets near.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  47. copy of said patch by gr8fulnded · · Score: 3, Funny

    root@somebox# cat rename.patch

    #!/bin/sh
    # Idiots getting their panties in a bunch of a friggin' program name!

    # Fine, here:
    mv /usr/sbin/satan /usr/sbin/santa

    echo "Happy now?!"

    1. Re:copy of said patch by jd · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Seems awfully well commented.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  48. Nutsack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's?

  49. There's a FireFox plugin to integrate this... by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    roachfiend.com

    Just right-click the login textbox, hit "BugMeNot" and it looks up and enters a login for you. I don't use it often, but it sure is nice to have it.

  50. You can also sacrifice a virgin... by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    ...or drink chicken blood as homage to the dark lord. In return he will protect your network.

  51. Re:Gentoo?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In your case, a sniffer isn't easy. You'll have to get your use flags just right and then wait 8 hours for the emerge to finish. Your sniffer will be .5% faster though and you'll be 10% 1337er. Just kidding. I use gentoo too and like it - although everything i said is basically true, if a little exaggerated. oh well.

  52. a couple of stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Heres a few stories from my consulting days.

    Walked into this medium size firm at 7:00AM in the morning.
    ME: Hi I'm here from XYZ consulting. I'm working on the network for >insert name of director of ITdirector is not here.
    ME: Well can you let me into the room so I can do my taks?
    RECPT: sure, I'll have someone let you in.
    ME: Left alone for 2 hours in their main server room all alone until everyone else came on shift.

    ------------
    Story 2:
    Large datacenter company.
    1: Drive up to shipping dock of large datacenter wearing t-shirt of company hosted at facility.
    me: I'm here to deliver this to my cage (point at t-shirt).
    Shipping clerk: "ok"
    me: Has unlimited access to datacenter. Never badged or signed in.
    Now this will get you through some of the security at some datacenters, as you still need a final key or badge to get to the final layer. (or you can try the old "pop the floor tile trick".

    Other option could be:
    "This hardware on the shipping dock was misshipped and I'm here to move it back to (other datacenter | corporate office)."
    Depending upon affability you can get away with various expensive boxes that the company has sitting in the shipping area. (Cisco/Sun/dell etc.) (still never having badged in/out).

    1. Re:a couple of stories by museumpeace · · Score: 1
      yow! I wonder how many stories like that are around...maybe we are just lucky our entire banking system hasn't been siphoned off to untracible off shore accounts.
      I used to visit our companys cage at an Exodus data center to install my server code and it seemed like fort knox:
      • call ahead for appointment, you had to be expected, you didn't just stroll in
      • present ID at front desk,
      • sign in,
      • get buzzed through security door, and
      • when leaving show what you are carrying matches what you declared at sign-in.
      Not everybody has such high standards it would seem.
      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  53. Don't forget the black widows by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Just for added security, have the thing self-destruct if it is moved or tampered with, and have an armed guard ready to "shoot the disk" if anyone unauthorized gets near"

    You realize that all of this can be defeated with Tom Cruise lowering himself into the room on wires. Keeping a nice health population of large black widow spiders inside the room would greatly reduce the chance of success of such missions.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Don't forget the black widows by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      Snakes. It just has to be snakes.

  54. Re:Gentoo?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god; let's root out the hideous Judaeolaters and Bolsheviks.

  55. Re:Ahem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A copy is still data, the fact that an "identical" set of data exists somewhere else does not suddenly make this set no longer data.

  56. yup... that's exactly true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT: "We have to stop employees from writing their passwords on post-it notes and sticking them to their monitors."

    PHB: "That's gonna be tough. What can we buy to make this change unnecessary?"

    IT: "Nothing. It's a fundamental thing, it's not related to any product. Any product is only as secure as its dumbest user. You can't have passwords stuck all over in public spaces and expect to remain secure."

    PHB: "Well, everything seems to be working okay right now..."

    IT: "But it won't continue to work okay if we don't stop this practice!"

    PHB: "Why don't we watch things closely for a few weeks, make an evaluation about the state of things at that point, and then revisit the possibility of acquiring a solution to this problem at the next team meeting if we think it's necessary? Okay, gotta go. I've got a 3:30."

  57. Never safe by stevebenson · · Score: 1

    Thats some wild stuff makes me rethink my securty but it has always been my belief that once a computer is online then it is hackable if you want to store secrets on computers then do it with a computer with no internet connection.

  58. Security and Big Corps by threaded · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Big Corps only bother about security if a major shareholder gets upset by a security breach. The chances of a major shareholder getting wind of a security breach are minimal, unless it gets in the media.

    Hence most security in Big Corps is to prevent media people getting notice of security breachs.

    HTH.

  59. try ettercap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  60. Competitors allready know... by amcdiarmid · · Score: 1

    A competitor, or actual spy, allready knows what they are looking for: The company head just saved th e cost of making this guy a subject matter expert (vp level) in what they did.

    Consider this: "James, we suspect Dr. Badguy of creating a secret lab to destroy the earth. Check it out will you..." Or this "Powers, we have reports that GoldMember is out to make things very hard for everyone. Check it out will you?"

    In both cases, the agent is given preliminary intelligence. In the corporate world, this is usually done by followning analysts, or by competative research.

  61. Tapes--and password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If those backup tapes are encrypted, then hopefully you have the password too. Otherwise, all you have stolen is a bunch of white noise tapes.

    Muahhhahaha.

  62. Or use Ref spoof for FireFox :) by Gopal.V · · Score: 1
    Firefox has this cool extension called RefSpoof which lets you spoof HTTP referrers. All you do is give it a link like spoof://www.nytimes.com/;ref://google.com to get the desired effect.

    But the real hack is to include a greasemonkey hack for nytimes.com called nytspoof .

    This all goes to prove that never trust what the user's browser says :)
  63. Guy in the photo looks like.... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    ...Harold Shipman

    Oh my God! Harold Shipman has come back from the dead and is breaking into my network!

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  64. did you pay attention? by subtropolis · · Score: 1

    He picked locks. He made phone calls. He wandered around the building, awlking off with physical objects. This didn't involve breaking into any computers.

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  65. Why? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sick of these assholes submitting stories and not posting regfree NYT links.

    Seriously, why NOT post a regfree link? You KNOW damn well they exist, so what the hell is the problem?

    Instead of wasting our fucking time by either registering or logging in, you should spend an extra 2 minutes finding the regfree link.

    Be a bit more courteous.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:Why? by honor,+not+armor · · Score: 1

      You should have looked through the replies. I did, and it was posted under the "Reg Free" heading (granted, you did have to dig down one level to find the accurate one).

      For your convenience.
      http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/31/business/yourmon ey/31hack.html?ex=1280462400&en=31158975e4a4090a&e i=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

  66. But.... by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    I thought the guys on /. didn't like Bill gates.

  67. Interesting but I've read similar by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    For example, Kevin Mitnick wrote a book called "The Art of Intrusion" in which scenarios presented in the NYT article are laid out in much more detail.

    When people think about network and data security they tend to focus only on computers and connections. They forget that physical security plays a part in it.

  68. Of course he knew the secrets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Tell me the things you most want to keep secret," Mr. Seiden challenged a top executive at the bank a few years back.....A week later, Mr. Seiden again sat in this man's office in Manhattan, in possession of both supposedly guarded secrets...."
    Of course he knew the secrets -- the bank executive told them to him a week earlier!