Slashdot Mirror


Self-Repairing Spacecraft Uses Ant Logic

Elitist_Phoenix wrote to mention a New Scientist story about what could be the first steps towards a self-repairing spacecraft. From the article: "The team at CSIRO, Australia's national research organisation, is working with NASA on the project and has so far created a model skin made up of 192 separate cells. Behind each cell is an impact sensor and a processor equipped with algorithms that allow it to communicate only with its immediate neighbours. Just as ants secrete pheromones to help guide other ants to food, the CSIRO algorithms leave digital messages in cells around the system, indicating for instance the position of the boundary around a damaged region. The cell's processor can use this information to route data around the affected area."

111 comments

  1. Why do I get the feeling.... by DoraLives · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that when this thing gets built that it won't do ANY of what it was originally intended to do but will wind up costing about twenty times more than originally budgeted?

    --
    Is it fascism yet?
    1. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by Cerdic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that will really suck. At least the $500 hammers were used to pound nails and the $800 toilet seats were used on toilets. Or at least I hope they were.

      --
      Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
    2. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All this sounds like is peer to peer sensor net rather than a central server processing the information.

      I agree with your assertions however, because whilst the sensors may themselves be damage limited, unless each unit had its own repair kit, the same centralised problem occurs (micro-meteor through the only welding torch for instance).

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      The big problem would be a micrometeoroid through the only on-board MP3 collection. Of course, since the cells are peer-to-peer, the collection will probably back itself up automatically anyway.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by Archimboldo · · Score: 1

      Because you know congress wants it done for 1/20th the amount it really takes to do it.

    5. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know anything about the project mentioned, but the ant theme suggests a solution - the way large numbers of ants form themselves into a bridge made out of their own bodies to cross gaps. One could imagine heat and impact resistant tiles in a rectangular or hexagonal grid, made out of individual small robots that can climb over each other. If one is damaged the group senses it, and a spare tile makes it's way to the damaged area, releases the damaged one, and takes it's place.

    6. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe that you are discussing a primitive version of a very dangerous synthetic lifeform known as "the replicators". I have it on good authority that these are a "bad thing". If you don't believe me, then ask Thor, or for that matter Colonel O'Neill.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      that when this thing gets built that it won't do ANY of what it was originally intended to do

      What do you expect, using ant logic. Every time you de-bug it, it stops working...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    8. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Nah,

      IronMan worked this out years ago on one of his earlier armor designs.

      Someone just needs to ask Tony Stark for some help.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    9. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      makes it's way
      takes it's place

      "its".

    10. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this remind anyone of when the "terminator" (original 101 model) in the film Terminator II, when the T101 got it's tail beaten by the newer liquid metal one?

      (When the newer terminator drove a metal rod thru the T101 series orig. terminator's powercell/routing & it then "dies" but, shortly later, there is a graphic that appears onscreen showing a route of traces that says "power re-routing"?)

      It does me, comically in a way, but the fact that what we see in films becomes reality sooner or later (quite often within 20-30 years, going from "Sci-Fi" to reality - cell phones? "Beam me up Scotty" tech from StarTrek TOS, here today, being another example).

      Now, if there are already such systems in place, my bad & my oversight... I am not an "EE" by trade so I cannot make statements here that are possibly 110% current/up-to-date, but still...

      I thought this was a cool read!

      * :)

      APK

    11. Re:Why do I get the feeling.... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Like Ants? So that means I'm sitting down at a picnic table and NASA space craft start landing and exploring the terrain of my sandwich?

  2. Reminds me of a bad sci-fi movie by Badvirus.exe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Something you'd see on late night TV where they implant a spaceship with proprietary "ant-logic". The spaceship becomes sentient and runs straight into a planet in a vain attempt to lift it.

    1. Re:Reminds me of a bad sci-fi movie by Barryke · · Score: 1

      Its basicly a tcp/ip network in brick form.

      woohoo.

      hell, even i could have come up with that:
      1) Put a 4-way switch in a brick with one connector on each side.
      2) Use power-over-ethernet
      3) 'fuse' every incomming connector.

      Tell me if i'm wrong.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
  3. Great Concept... by Nerd+Systems · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Distributed computing on a different scale then we are used to seeing... quite interesting concept...

    It is nice that these skin cells can detect that they have been damaged, yet I read nothing about if they have been damaged, how they plan to repair the damages caused?

    I guess this is just a way for processing of a system to continue, even if a certain chunk of the spacecraft is destroyed, that it can still function seperate from the rest...

    Few Question though about this layout:

    1. How is the power system? Is this a central powered source, such as from a battery pack with a solar panel to recharge it, or is each cell having it's own power cell and solar panel to recharge things?

    2. What is going to be implemented, as far as damage recovery systems? Is there going to be another group of devices onboard, that can be dispatched to repair cells? Is there going to be a collection of extra cells waiting, so that the damaged cells can be discarded, and the new cells brought into place?

    3. Communications among cells are discussed, yet what about relaying this information back to NASA? Also, what happens if the primary communications antenna is destroyed... is there provisions to replace this as well, using this technology?

    It looks like this is a start to promising self-healing taking place in satellites and other devices, not to mention the implementations of it being used on Earth...

    --
    Need a Nerd?
    Nerd Systems
    1. Re:Great Concept... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the simplest ideal you could react with a linked system such as this would be having a computer port available at any of the nodes.

      Main processing computers goosed? Ahhhh well, just plug in a spare laptop into the bathroom wall and carry on.

      Could even have various redundent machines connected wherever around the ship.

      It becomes fun when additional modules (ISS habitats) connect into the net and can access information from any other part of the ship.

      It makes for an amazingly robust communications channel, but not so good for self repair.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Great Concept... by MonkeyBoyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is nice that these skin cells can detect that they have been damaged, yet I read nothing about if they have been damaged, how they plan to repair the damages caused?

      Um, no, a skin cell cannot detect that it itself is damaged. Undamaged neighbors that can't communicate with a cell can decide it is damaged.

      "repair" in the sense used means routing communication and tasks around the damaged cells.

    3. Re:Great Concept... by SpectreBinary · · Score: 0, Troll

      The idea here is detection before anything else. There may be other methods of repair, power or communication, but the first part of the process is knowing just where the damage is caused.

      Imagine a car that can sense it has a broken taillight. That might seem like some minor technology, but alerting a driver that the left rear taillight is out may be all that's needed, and repair or awareness that the break exists is already making a drive safer.

      Ten Thousand Free Adult Desktop Pictures

    4. Re:Great Concept... by superflyguy · · Score: 1

      When did we start using impact sensors to see whether neighboring computers were transmitting data? Obviously, it is also intended that each tile can detect damage which does not reach the circuitry, such as big-shallow-crushed-surfaces like the one that caused Columbia to break up. It also says they hope to be able to discern between different types of damage. Types of damage do not matter for routing communication, nor is there any reason that rerouting would only be done rapidly in certain cases. This information is only needed if the purpose is so that the tiles can be physically replaced.

    5. Re:Great Concept... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So why do you paste the link to the porn into your post instead of just putting it in your sig?

    6. Re:Great Concept... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So why do you paste the link to the porn into your post instead of just putting it in your sig?"

      I can think of a couple of reasons:

      1.) Sigs have a 120 character limit.

      2.) People can turn of sigs, but they cannot prevent the link in the post from being posted.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Great Concept... by Nerd+Systems · · Score: 1
      Yeah, and just trying to figure out what adult wallpapers, have to do with this posting at all... maybe since the article mentions skin, they have to show some skin? I guess that is why... wow what a genius... showing skin when we talk about skin... man those are some nice looking robots, lol...

      I mean, at least my website, http://www.nerdsystems.com/ has to do with computers, which is semi-related to this matter... and if I have people clicking on my Google Ads, at least I can make a little money off things, VERY LITTLE of course, but hey, if enough people click on things, those pennies add up greatly over time... so go ahead and click on my ads people all you want, lol

      That adult website doesn't even have advertising, nor do they charge for anything... kind of funny if you ask me, why even BOTHER posting that link, if you are not going to make money off it or anything...

      Oh well, guess some people just have too much time on their hands, and want to watch all us fellow nerds on here going "OH WOW, FREE PORN!!!"....

      Oh well, at least my original posting gets read, thanks to the free porn offer... lol

      http://www.nerdsystems.com/

      Gotta be a tool as well, lol :)

      --
      Need a Nerd?
      Nerd Systems
    8. Re:Great Concept... by tooth · · Score: 1
      Um, no, a skin cell cannot detect that it itself is damaged. Undamaged neighbors that can't communicate with a cell can decide it is damaged.

      A meteorite had knocked a large hole in the ship. The ship had not previously detected this because the meteorite had neatly knocked out that part of the ship's processing equipment which was supposed to detect if the ship had been hit by a meteorite. --Mostly Harmless, DNA.

    9. Re:Great Concept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's not much porn there. Very few tits, and no cunts, assholes, or fucking that I could see. (I just skimmed, though, and didn't spend a lot of time there.) Misleading advertising, if you ask me. "Adult", indeed!

  4. Hey, we can actually use the real quote here! by sgant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kent Brockman: "I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords".

    You know...the one about Homer in space and the ant experiment they sent up got broken and there are ants floating around....guess you had to have seen it.

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:Hey, we can actually use the real quote here! by kicken18 · · Score: 0

      haha yeah, twas good. Everything in life can go back the simpsons in one way or another I reckon

      --
      Visit My Blog at http://spaces.msn.com/members/chrisharries
    2. Re:Hey, we can actually use the real quote here! by Elitist_Phoenix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I put that at the end of the article when I wrote it (3 days ago) looks like the editors, edited it out.
      I for one DON'T welcome our editor overlords!

      --
      "I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google"
    3. Re:Hey, we can actually use the real quote here! by drsquare · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean, it starts of alright, then just gets worse and worse and worse until you're begging for it to end?

    4. Re:Hey, we can actually use the real quote here! by kicken18 · · Score: 0

      haha, sme of the latest eppisodes had been bad but some have also been good and funny

      --
      Visit My Blog at http://spaces.msn.com/members/chrisharries
    5. Re:Hey, we can actually use the real quote here! by putch · · Score: 1

      and the remainder classify as cruel and usual.

      --
      just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
  5. what? by RyuJJ · · Score: 0

    I thought they had dropped anti-logic...

  6. ants? by convolvatron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    substitute 'adjacency updates' for 'pheromones' and you have a generic dynamic routing protocol...

    1. Re:ants? by mrogers · · Score: 0, Troll

      Check out AntNet and MUTE.
      (JetiAnts and AntsP2P are offshoots of MUTE as far as I can tell.)

  7. Yeah, well. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everything sounds just fine until the damned things carry off your picnic lunch.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  8. Ah, finally! by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally we can have a system that tells us stuff like:

    Rerouting through secondary coupling.

    Bypassing damaged pathways.

    Red alert! Red alert!

    Diverting power around fused regulator 4A-CJ1.

    The colony is under attack! Protect the Queen!

    Which one's the Queen? I'm the Queen! No you're not!

    Freedom, horrible horrible freedom!


    The ants and space stuff kinda threw me off, but either way it's about time if you ask me.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  9. These will all come back in super-intelligent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...v'ger mode demanding all the Earth's sugar.

  10. Why is that needed? by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I cannot, for the life of me, figure out why they would need to use 'ant logic' or whatever for this system. All it does is take readings and process them in each cell... why not just use a central database of all the cells and a central (yet redundant) computer to process all the data.

    Seems like you'd get the same result, but it wouldn't be as 'cool' or expensive to develop...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Why is that needed? by pwnage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because it wouldn't be as cool or expensive to develop. Duh.

      --
      Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
    2. Re:Why is that needed? by fabs64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      for the very reason this technology was created.
      to try and get rid of the central point of failure.

    3. Re:Why is that needed? by skiingyac · · Score: 0

      Basically, it lets the individual cells be very simple. An ant in an ant colony has only very basic, localized senses and a tiny brain. But, lots of ants cooperating using very well-designed but simple behaviors can collaborate to do much more complicated things, like find the shortest path to a food source, etc.

      So, these skin cells can be very simple and not be programmed in advance with how to handle each and every possible failure combination. Instead, through their cooperation they can (in theory) figure out what the best thing is to do. The trouble is that it is hard to perfect the local rules needed to produce the emergent behavior that you want.

    4. Re:Why is that needed? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A system like this has a greater degree of redundancy built-in at the cell level than you could possibly hope to achieve with a centralised database; each cell is already checking the status of its neighbours, so for a square grid you have four way redundancy (the grid needn't even be regular, as long as individual cells know how many neighbours it should have). Also, a central controller needs a direct link to each cell, which would probably mean a complex and heavy wiring loom (introducing another point of failure); 5mm^2 of silicon weighs a lot less than (say) 5 meters of copper wire, multiply the difference by the number of cells and you're looking at a substantial weight saving for an active sensor system*.

      There's also the interesting possibility that any spare computing cycles could be put to other uses: add the ability for cells to transfer data to other cells arbitrarily instead of by physical proximity and you're looking at the basis of a hardware neural net (I can't think of an immediate use for this, since I wouldn't advocate putting a mission-critical computer on the outside of a spacecraft, but then I am not a rocket scientist).

      *Aerospace is the only field where "nothing" has a tangible dollar value: the more "nothing" you can put in a spacecraft, the cheaper it is to launch.

      (Side note: I'm not logged in as I type this, and the script-filter word is "meteors". Coincidence? Perhaps...)

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    5. Re:Why is that needed? by danila · · Score: 1

      The answer is dynamic reconfiguration. With smart cells you can have much greater flexibility. Consider M-Tran, a self-reconfigurable modular robot. These designs are (potentially) much better than centralised systems, because you can reconfigure them any way you want. Want to add a new antenna on your spaceship. Ask some cells to prepare for holding it, passing over their current functions to some neighbouring cells.

      Yes, you can have a central database, but then you need to waste a lot of system resources on communications. Waste, because for many functions/decisions you don't need to consult the central authority. This isn't a problem when you only have 10-100 smart units (sensors or actuators), but what when you have 10000-100000 of them? Design of such system is a choice between computing and communications. When the number of units is small, you choose a centralised design, when it's huge, you distribute the processing.

      Think again what they are designing. They are designing skin. Do skin cells in your body consult the brain (or the spinal cord) to decide whether and how to heal a scratch? Would that make sense? Does that make sense for a spacecraft?

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  11. In other words... by markov_chain · · Score: 0

    "Human scientists discover the secret of Automated Repair"

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    1. Re:In other words... by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Judging from the title, we probably traded it from the Klackons.

  12. great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe now those poor robots can avoid spinning out into the void after falling through the meteor hole where the ship's backup brain was stored, and the strateej-o-mat will never revert to lurk mode.

  13. More cliche by thc69 · · Score: 1

    Cue the "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that" jokes...

    --
    Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    1. Re:More cliche by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Cue the "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that" jokes...

      "We are sorry Dave, we can't do that" in a Borg voice.

  14. Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Erm, I don't get the reason behind the "Self-Repairing" part. As far as I can see, it's Diagnostic they have in mind. As long as they're one piece, solid state cells they ain't going to repair anything. But sure, they can tell you stuff, like any sensor array out there. Imho, we shouldn't consider this anything more than it is: smart skin. Sure we have ceramic/metalic/whatever thingies protecting the space ships now. But if instead of that we could have smart ceramic/metalic/whatever skin that can tell us what exactly is wrong with it (burn, corrosion, impact, radiation levels?), I still think it's a great thing, which doesn't need the bombastic allusion to self contained tech. The only way I see self contained tech occuring is nanotech, and that's just because the "bricks" of it are too small for our perception. In fact, our whole tech is self contained, but we don't really accept it because we see the "parts" being so different and apart. Being small enough will create the illusion of it, but hey, who said we're smarter than that ? :)

    1. Re:Misleading title by mwilli · · Score: 1
      Erm, I don't get the reason behind the "Self-Repairing" part

      Exactly. It's not self repairing, it's just self redirecting. If it was self repairing, it would actually repair the affected region instead of bypassing it using the neighbor cells.

      But if instead of that we could have smart ceramic/metalic/whatever skin that can tell us what exactly is wrong with it (burn, corrosion, impact, radiation levels?)

      That should also be integrated, or at least something along those lines, they would be stupid not to. They already have the processesors, they could attach a few sensors to it and, WALLA, you know exactly what is wrong, where the damage occured, and how it is bypassed

      --
      My sig beat up your sig.
  15. Great Start by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think its more of a 'start' of something..

    You cant repair something if you dont know its broke...

    So, this would be the logical first step.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  16. Can they use this concept freely? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Microsoft already patent this concept?

  17. Somebody explain this to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..why do self-repairing ants need new spacecraft?!

  18. Re:Happy birthday, Zonk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zonkbonking is wrong :(

  19. Obligatory Atom Ant reference... by Brad1138 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Up and At'em, ATOM ANT!"

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Obligatory Atom Ant reference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Script Coach: "Up and atom!"
      Wolfcastle: "Up and at them."
      Script Coach: "Up and atom!"
      Wolfcastle: "Up and at them."
      Script Coach: "Up and atom!"
      Wolfcastle: "Up and at them."

      Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted.

  20. Not Really Ant logic but Skin logic by RobertF · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't you think? Exactly what our skin does, or rather, the nervous system endings in our skin. If you get cut, all the nerves around the cut go off and send signals, like pain. So, the same can work for a spacecraft, sending off messages about the problem. Now if scientists can just get these processors to perform mitosis so that ships can "heal" themselves, we'll be all set!

    --
    And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be bannana-shaped.
  21. A note for the scientists by Cliffy03 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just don't call them Replicators.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Nigel makes plans for you!
  22. Mutant Space Ants. by infonography · · Score: 1

    They are telepathic and can spot a picnic basket from orbit. On the upside they go great covered in Chocolate. But the size factor would make the many gallons of Chocolate very expensive to ship from earthside.

    Guess it's time to get cracking on those orbital farms.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  23. Good, cuz that'll solve this problem... by jpellino · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Click, click, hum.

    Click, hum, click, hum, click, hum.

    Click, click, click, click, click, hum.

    Hmmm.

    A low level supervising program woke up a slightly higher level supervising program deep in the ship's semi-somnolent cyberbrain and reported to it that whenever it went click all it got was a hum.

    The higher level supervising program asked it what it was supposed to get, and the low level supervising program said that it couldn't remember exactly, but thought it was probably more of a sort of distant satisfied sigh, wasn't it? It didn't know what this hum was. Click, hum, click, hum. That was all it was getting.

    The higher level supervising program considered this and didn't like it. It asked the low level supervising program what exactly it was supervising and the low level supervising program said it couldn't remember that either, just that it was something that was meant to go click, sigh every ten years or so, which usually happened without fail. It had tried to consult its error look-up table but couldn't find it, which was why it had alerted the higher level supervising program to the problem .

    The higher level supervising program went to consult one of its own look-up tables to find out what the low level supervising program was meant to be supervising.

    It couldn't find the look-up table .

    Odd.

    It looked again. All it got was an error message. It tried to look up the error message in its error message look-up table and couldn't find that either. It allowed a couple of nanoseconds to go by while it went through all this again. Then it woke up its sector function supervisor.

    The sector function supervisor hit immediate problems. It called its supervising agent which hit problems too. Within a few millionths of a second virtual circuits that had lain dormant, some for years, some for centuries, were flaring into life throughout the ship. Something, somewhere, had gone terribly wrong, but none of the supervising programs could tell what it was. At every level, vital instructions were missing, and the instructions about what to do in the event of discovering that vital instructions were missing, were also missing.

    Small modules of software -- agents -- surged through the logical pathways, grouping, consulting, re-grouping. They quickly established that the ship's memory, all the way back to its central mission module, was in tatters. No amount of interrogation could determine what it was that had happened. Even the central mission module itself seemed to be damaged.

    This made the whole problem very simple to deal with. Replace the central mission module. There was another one, a backup, an exact duplicate of the original. It had to be physically replaced because, for safety reasons, there was no link whatsoever between the original and its backup. Once the central mission module was replaced it could itself supervise the reconstruction of the rest of the system in every detail, and all would be well.

    Robots were instructed to bring the backup central mission module from the shielded strong room, where they guarded it, to the ship's logic chamber for installation.

    This involved the lengthy exchange of emergency codes and protocols as the robots interrogated the agents as to the authenticity of the instructions. At last the robots were satisfied that all procedures were correct. They unpacked the backup central mission module from its storage housing, carried it out of the storage chamber, fell out of the ship and went spinning off into the void.

    This provided the first major clue as to what it was that was wrong."

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Good, cuz that'll solve this problem... by snakeCharmer · · Score: 1

      Cool

      I vaguely remember reading something very close to this in a novel a long time ago... If so, can you please refresh my memory? :)

      Thanks

    2. Re:Good, cuz that'll solve this problem... by Grim+Leaper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seems to be from Mostly Harmless by Douglas Adams. It's a while since I read it too - had to look it up.

    3. Re:Good, cuz that'll solve this problem... by snakeCharmer · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Turns out you can read the first few pages in which this passage occurs on amazon.com :)

  24. Now maybe we'll find out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  25. Mars Probe Steals Potato Salad, News at 10 by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Honey, there's a Mars Probe carrying away our potato salad! I told you we shouldn't have picnicked near JPL."

    Seriously, though:

    "Other groups are developing impact sensor systems controlled by a centralised processor. But such systems would fail if the area containing the processor were damaged. So a distributed system could be much more reliable, says Bill Prosser of NASA's Nondestructive Evaluation Sciences Branch in Langley, Virginia."

    That kind of seems like overkill. It's like "One processor is too risky, so we should instead have 100." Have 3 processors and 3 busses. If something can damage all 3, then the probe is F'd beyond all repair anyhow. You have to wire power to 100 processors anyhow if you do that such that a damaged power bus can still take out multiple panels. Weight is premium on probes, and 99 processors is not a very effective use of weight.

    1. Re:Mars Probe Steals Potato Salad, News at 10 by danila · · Score: 1

      It's not overkill at all. As computing units become cheaper and smaller, it becomes increasingly more attractive to design a system of simple smart cells instead of a limited number of more complex processors. With 3 processors and 3 busses (sic!) you need to make connections to each of the surface sensors and what not. This isn't a problem when you've got barely a dozen surface sensors on the ship, but when you have 1000s of them, wiring every sensor up (not to mention doing this with 3 busses (sic!) ) becomes a design nightmare. And BTW, I don't see how having 3 busses (sic!)helps at all. If one skin tile is destroyed, all the busses (sic!) will be destroyed too or at least the segments that were going through that patch.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    2. Re:Mars Probe Steals Potato Salad, News at 10 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      But then you need to wire power to each cell. Also note that you have to shield chips from radiation. It is less total shielding for a semi-central system than many duplicate chips. It is like building individual bomb shelters for each member of the family versus building one large one.

      Actually it may be cheaper just to have a camera(s) on a mobile arm to take images of the probe surface to look for problems. Such arm may also be able to nudge stuck antennas and booms, so it has multiple uses. Stuck booms and antennas have been a big problem in the past. The extreme tempurature swings in space and launch vibrations make lubricating such things difficult.

    3. Re:Mars Probe Steals Potato Salad, News at 10 by danila · · Score: 1

      Your reasoning is deeply flawed. You approach design with the assumption that sensors, actuators and various electronics is expensive and limited. This is how it was in the past and how it is to a large extent today. But we can already see that this assumption becomes increasingly less true and in the future will be totally bogus.

      There is no reason why you should NOT have electronics and sensors in every cubic centimetre of the space ship. Once you remove the considerations of costs, the default decision becomes to have them. And this project is exploring how you can make these smart blocks communicate with each other. It doesn't ask the question whether we should do it, because the answer is so obvious.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  26. Not the ant I was thinking of... by lpangelrob · · Score: 2, Funny
    I saw this, and I thought it was cool that the spacecraft was issuing

    ant clean, repair

    to fix their spacecraft. Ah well. This is cooler.

    1. Re:Not the ant I was thinking of... by loconet · · Score: 1

      me too. I thought self building would have made more sense.

      --
      [alk]
    2. Re:Not the ant I was thinking of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the first thing I thought of was how horrible conditionals are in apache ant...

  27. why ant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer make.

  28. Borg! by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is how the Borg got started. Watch out, NASA.

  29. Everyone knows an ant can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would that ant be trying to lift a rubber tree planet? He's got high hopes!

  30. Michael Crichton? by Dh5 · · Score: 0, Troll

    This sounds like something out of his novel Prey. In the book, virtual "agents" are developed and coded within a computer system, and one of the AI behaviors is modeled on ants. Of course, with technology developed like this, and implemented into other types of machines, such as nano particles, new species could be created, and problems could arise.

    1. Re:Michael Crichton? by Kent+Simon · · Score: 1

      Michael Crichton is good at many things... giving an accurate description of what AI actually _is_ is not one of them.

      --
      Kent Simon Multitheft Auto
  31. In Other News.. by arron_nz · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA scientists charged for developing extensive peer-to-peer filesharing system disguised as "self repairing ant logic"

    --
    garble
  32. Oh swell... by anandamide · · Score: 3, Funny

    The first alien that comes along with a giant magnifying glass and we're screwed.

    1. Re:Oh swell... by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      Sex music for Ant people!
      Ant music for Sex people!

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  33. Somewhat old news by Kerhop · · Score: 2, Informative

    Saw an article some months ago in Popular Science about cars may eventually be made of this stuff so that when they get in a fender bender the "dent" in the car pops back out saving insurance companies millions of dollars currently going towards minor repairs. Also found an old article from 2001 here and here on the same subject.

  34. Um, duh. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    "Centralized" dosn't mean single, thats why I said "redundant" centralized systems, rather then a weird, unessisary CA system.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Um, duh. by fabs64 · · Score: 1

      what's it help if you have "redundancy" if a meteor punches through that section of the hull?
      The whole point in a cooperative cell system is that it's ultimate redundancy, there is no 1 or 2 systems that if destroyed bring down the whole system.

      If you don't see the merit in that for a spaceship... well, hopefully you never get a job designing spaceships :-P

      Just an addon, it's "unnecessary" yes, it's true, the english language doesn't use the exact same letters for every sound.

  35. Re-entry telemetry: by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

    "OW! Hot! Hot! Hot! Hot!"

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  36. Remember H2G2 by ScuttleEnough · · Score: 0

    In one of the Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy *books* the book opens with a spacecraft being disabled but not detecting it because the part of the ship responsible for detecting whether it had been hit by a meteor was knocked out by a meteor.

  37. Wrong logic... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    They should be using cockroach logic so the space probe will survive forever. You know... like Voyager 6 (V'ger). ;)

  38. fucking nasa by Madd+Scientist · · Score: 0, Troll

    they need to hire some new blood. these 60 year old donkeys they got with these 60 year old ideas just got to go. why the christ wouldn't you make the sensors able to communicate with EVERY other node? they do realize that if a large ring shaped problem occurred in the net that the inner nodes could never communicate with the outer nodes. there is no reason to do things this way and it doesn't make the problem any more fail safe, it just makes the solution to any problem based on this data that much more prone to special cases. dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb.

    1. Re:fucking nasa by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      you really have to watch out for that ring shaped meteor when travelling in space.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    2. Re:fucking nasa by Madd+Scientist · · Score: 1
      yeah.... so it's totally worth it to make any subsequent design 100 times harder. real bright. did you used to work at nasa?

      i say the design is bad because it makes implementation difficult and also has a huge flaw, and you just point out the huge flaw isn't VERY likely to be exploited by conditions... and thus the original design is OK?

      people like you are why these moronic designs are probably getting through the pipeline over there at nasDUHHHHHHH.

      i'm out.

  39. UP AND AT THEM by riker1384 · · Score: 0

    UP AND AT THEM.

  40. First Launch by tengu1sd · · Score: 3, Funny

    The first launch application will be on the Nomad probe, targeted to collect sammples, sterilize and return to Earth for analysis.

  41. Misleading article title by lucm · · Score: 1
    Self-Repairing Spacecraft Uses Ant Logic

    This is deceiving. From the title I thought they had java software recompiled in space :-)

    People should add either TM (Trademark) or RL (Real Life) when they use confusing terminology. This way nobody would be confused reading headlines like Self-Repairing Spacecraft Uses Ant (RL) Logic or Bug Found In Ant (TM)

    Actually this is a bad idea. Since Microsoft has copyrights on the whole english dictionnary it would be difficult to use english anymore: Windows, Office, Word, Excel, Access, Exchange, Notepad (etc).

    Maybe I am just too tired and I need a cup of java (RL).

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Misleading article title by Novus · · Score: 1

      A lot of these problems can be avoided by capitalising headlines as normal sentences. "Self-repairing spacecraft uses Ant logic" and "Self-repairing spacecraft uses ant logic" are easy to tell apart (assuming you can trust the writer to capitalise correctly, which may be unrealistic on Slashdot).

      Another fine example of degenerate American English. B-)

  42. Nope by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 0, Troll

    Steps of dynamic routing:
    1. discover an efficient route
    2. detect loss of connectivity
    3. goto 1

    This is only step 2 and only for a finite, non-expanding, known set of nodes whose relative topological positions are pre-arranged for convenience. Ie in terms of relative complexity this is to Tic-tac-toe as dynamic routing is Go.

    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steps of dynamic routing:
      1. discover an efficient route
      2. detect loss of connectivity
      3. PROFIT !!!

      How exactly do you use those routes?

  43. Ant Inside? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    +++ Out of Cheese Error +++

    REDO FROM START

  44. Ant -Logic by danblackracing · · Score: 1

    When can I use this on my car?? LOL!!!!

  45. no kidding by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women!

    1. Re:no kidding by dangitman · · Score: 1
      In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women!

      ... then you get the nanorobotic virus.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  46. Logic vs Anti-logic by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    I thought they had dropped anti-logic...
    The main problem with anti-logic is that, when it comes into contact with logic, a huge explosion results.
    If you don't believe me, watch any debate between scientists and creationists.

    Even when no logic is present, sparks can fly if anti-logic is present in sufficiently large quantities, say, during debates between candidates for the U.S. Presidency.
    Small amounts of anti-logic can be handled safely by ignoring it (e.g., most guests on the Okra Windbag show (esp. Tom Cruise)).
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  47. Not a "Misleading title" by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    Erm, I don't get the reason behind the "Self-Repairing" part.
    The system as a whole "fixes" itself.
    You could think of it as the software being self-repairing by routing around the damaged hardware.
    To use a human analogy, a person who has a stroke can recover to some extent, even though individual neurons may be permanently damaged or killed.
    The system as a whole (human/spacecraft) is self-repairing, even though individual components (neurons/cells) may noy be.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  48. Good uses... by MrArmyAnt · · Score: 1

    Believe me ants are awesome ;-). Though this may cost a fortune now, and I don't see it being near what it will be in the end, the possibilites with something of this nature are endles, from putting them on cars during crash tests, to better see how and what breaks first, to shapechanging objects.

  49. I'm confused.. by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
    he cell's processor can use this information to route data around the affected area.

    Are the sensors all Cell processors? That would rock! Just think, a synergistic CPU in a grid of hundreds or thousands... the space-based supercomputer. And no need for extra cooling if the skin is facing away from the sun!

  50. Sounds like Flex-Metal by Tempest451 · · Score: 1

    Iron Mans' armor was made of something called flex-metal. It was a series of interconnecting tiles that acted independantly of each other, but communicated information on its condition and position. Sounds like NASA has cought up to the comics.