Slashdot Mirror


Is the iPod Generation Going Deaf?

prozac79 writes "Ars Technica and Wired News are both running interesting articles on how personal music players are a major contributor [ArsTechnica] to early hearing loss [Wired]. According the ArsTechnica article, an increasing number of people are now living in "noisy" environments that is only made worse by blocking it out with even louder music. The article also suggests that listening to music for one hour a day is considered safe. So now you have a choice... go deaf early or go insane listening to your coworkers chatter."

106 of 632 comments (clear)

  1. What about Bose Headphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a pair of Bose Quietcomfort headphones, and I wonder if the noise cancelling is actually damaging my hearing. What do you think?

    1. Re:What about Bose Headphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What did you say?

    2. Re:What about Bose Headphones? by fireklar · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but it may be damaging your thinking.

    3. Re:What about Bose Headphones? by afidel · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll make the typical audiophile quip: If you like the sound of Bose you have nothing to worry about, you're already deaf =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:What about Bose Headphones? by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll make the typical audiophile quip: If you like the sound of Bose you have nothing to worry about, you're already deaf =)

      This shouldn't be marked as funny. For people like truck drivers, machine operators, or generally anyone who's around whole bunches of loud noise the first thing to go sub-base to base followed by the high range. And these people, no insult intended, when picking out speakers that sound the best to them pick out things with a strong mid range. These are the people who can't tell the difference between a Bose Wave Radio and a decent Cambridge SoundWorks set, or don't mind if their 5.1 DVD player doesn't filter out that horizontal refresh noise, or worse yet have bad ground loops. The statement "no highs no lows... must be bose" isn't always true except for those things people tend to buy... those ultra low profile solutions that cost an arm and a leg are where this statement tends to ring true.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:What about Bose Headphones? by /ASCII · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Since the headphones actually reduce the amount of sound, the are not damaging your hearing.

      On the other hand, since noise cancelling only works on low to mid frequency noise, and hearing loss is caused by high frequency sound, they aren't helping either.

      On the third hand, if you are using noise cancelling to allow you to listen to music at a lower volume in a noisy environment, then they might actually help out a bit.

      --
      Try out fish, the friendly interactive shell.
    6. Re:What about Bose Headphones? by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're absolutely right that noise-reducing headphones most likely help rather than hurt. However, your statement about hearing loss being caused by high-frequency sound is incorrect. Loud low-frequency sound is much worse than loud high-frequency sound, because the loud sound has to travel along the entire length of the cochlea to reach its intended destination, and it causes damage along the way. The reason you lose high-frequency hearing first is that the high-frequency region of the cochlea is closest to where the sound comes in, so that every loud sound that hits your ears passes by that region and causes damage.

      Preventing significant hearing loss is easy - don't blast music, and give your ears a rest once in a while. It's kind of like not staring into the sun all day, but for your ears.

      --
      On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
    7. Re:What about Bose Headphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are on the way to deafness.
      You have no chance to hear make your time.
      Ha Ha Ha.

    8. Re:What about Bose Headphones? by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong.

      The cochlea is a waveguide - incoming sounds launch a wave along the basilar membrane. This wave is dispersive, meaning that at a given location, low frequency energy travels more quickly than high frequency energy. For energy at a given frequency, the wave slows down as it travels until it reaches a "characteristic place". At the same time, the amplitude of vibration increases. The characteristic place is defined as the location where the amplitude of vibration peaks; for a given location, the frequency that causes the largest vibration is called the "best frequency" for that place. At the best frequency, the cochlea is locally resonant, and energy is shunted through the basilar membrane. As a result, the energy at a given frequency does not propagate significantly beyond the characteristic place (this is equivalent to saying that the wave speed decreases to zero near the characteristic place).

      The cochlea is tonotopically organized, so that more basal locations (near where the stapes inserts) have high best frequencies, and the best frequency decreases systematically with position as you move apically. As a consequence, high-frequency sound energy that enters the cochlea is shunted through the basilar membrane at a basal location, and does not propagate further into the cochlea. Low frequency energy, in contrast, propagates as a wave along the basilar membrane to the apical region of the cochlea. In other words, high-frequency sounds only vibrate the most basal part of the cochlea, whereas low-frequency sounds vibrate the entire cochlea.

      For more information on the cochlear traveling wave, read the classic papers by Georg von Bekesy, who won the Nobel prize for discovering it. You might also want to look at some of the early computational models by Zwislocki and/or de Boer. For a more introductory description, I recommend chapter 5 of Geisler's "From Sound To Synapse", or Patuzzi's chapter in the book "The Cochlea".

      --
      On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
  2. Go deaf. by Mister+Impressive · · Score: 3, Funny

    Win win situation. Listen to music until you're deaf, and then never be able to here your chatty coworkers again!

    --
    Let the commencement BEGINULATE!
  3. 1985 by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is the Walkman Generation Going Deaf?

    US News and World Report and Newsweek are both running interesting articles on how personal tape players are a major contributor [US News] to early hearing loss [Newsweek]. According the US News article, an increasing number of people are now living in "noisy" environments that is only made worse by blocking it out with even louder music. The article also suggests that listening to music for one hour a day is considered safe. So now you have a choice... go deaf early or go insane listening to your coworkers chatter."

    Nothing new hear, we've been getting this since at least 1980. There are likely stories about how the photograph, motion picture "talkie", transister radio and lord knows whatelse cause problems.

    1. Re:1985 by Nutria · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing new hear, we've been getting this since at least 1980.

      I am hard of hearing, and I lay the blame squarely on myself for, in the late 70s/early 80s, slapping on headphones and cranking up the volume.

      My parents warned me, but of course I didn't pay attention...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:1985 by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats why it goes to 11 dude :-)

    3. Re:1985 by cowbutt · · Score: 4, Informative
      i've gone to so many live shows (blisteringly loud metal) that i can't even listen to music loud anymore - it's my own fault, but now i wear earplugs for shows simply because it actually hurts to listen to loud music.

      The turning point for me was seeing At the Gates and a couple of other bands at a small pub in 1997 (and, I admit it, seeing a photo of Alx Hellid of Entombed wearing plugs on-stage). Before then, the longest periods of tinnitus I'd experienced were 2.5 days after seeing bands (e.g. Anthrax) in larger venues in the late 80s. After this gig, though, I experienced tinnitus for 4 days. By the end, I was promising myself that if it went, I'd wear plugs at gigs in future. The tinnitus did pass, and I've kept that promise (with the exception of "treating myself" for favourite songs or short sets!)

      Similarly, once I started jamming in a band earlier this year, I got fed up with the tinnitus and general fatigue induced by the drummer's brass, and quickly picked up a pair of Elacin ER-20 plugs. I can thoroughly recommend these for use by musicians and concert-goers as the attenuation (-20dB, or 75% of the energy) is fairly flat across the audio spectrum. If you've previously tried foam plugs, or cotton wool, and didn't get on with either, try these and a reckon you'll be pleasantly surprised.

      One note though; I saw Cradle of Filth and Mendeed recently, and despite wearing my ER-20s throughout both sets, I still had some minor post-gig tinnitus afterwards that was gone by morning!

    4. Re:1985 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to have tinnitus after loud shows. It would last a day, two days, sometimes 3-4 days. It always went away. Then one time it didn't. After one show it became permanent. I hear ringing constantly now, 24/7, no matter what I'm doing.

      I protect my hearing carefully now, but the tinnitus and hearing damage will never go away. There is no cure, and there likely won't be in my lifetime. There is some promising research on nerve cell regeneration, but I doubt it'll result in an effective therapy for a long time.

      Bottom line: Wear those earplugs. Once it's gone, it's gone.

    5. Re:1985 by EtherealStrife · · Score: 5, Informative
      Ditto. I can second the suggestion. I'm in my 20's and I already have permanent -- and uncorrectable -- hearing damage. You can't imagine how frustrating it is walking around 24/7 with a constant background static buzzing away...until you have it yourself. And when I'm surrounded by complete silence (soundproof rooms/studios) the sound is emphasized, and becomes deafening. And since it's sensory damage, white noise doesn't do squat.

      They may look lame or uncool, but the alternative to wearing earplugs is much much worse.

    6. Re:1985 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Similarly, once I started jamming in a band earlier this year, I got fed up with the tinnitus and general fatigue induced by the drummer's brass, and quickly picked up a pair of Elacin ER-20 plugs"

      Beyond just passive plugs, have you thought about picking up honest to god in ear monitors?

      They take a little getting use to, but they work pretty well. The last band I was working with was a grammy nominated r&b group and with a dozen people on stage with brass and other instrumentation, it was as loud as any death metal band I'd ever worked with. Anywho, I started taking a pair of Shure in-ears with me and having the monitor guy give me a nice custom mix to my remote and this meant not only did I have near isolation, but I only needed to hear enough to keep my parts in line.

      A good pair of in-ears will isolate everything enough that you can listen at a much lower volume than you would have normally (this is especially true if you get the earpieces custom molded to further isolate). I prefer the Shure's, but there are a few others that are professional range and work for these applications.

      Anywho, posting this anonymously because slashdot don't like anyone that has made money through RIAA means and it would taint my future posts as a geek :-) If you have any questions about these, ask and I'll try to respond back though.

  4. Hello, Mcfly! by Glendale2x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Uhm... yes? If I can hear the music clearly from your earbuds across the room, your "coolness factor" (apparently consisting of making sure everyone can hear your really loud rap music) will not prevent hearing damage. I say let 'em. Common sense will prevail for the rest of us.

    --
    this is my sig
    1. Re:Hello, Mcfly! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 5, Funny

      I say let 'em. Common sense will prevail for the rest of us.

      Problem: if stupid people go deaf the rest of us will have to listen to them shouting their inane conversations at each other.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Hello, Mcfly! by Mateito · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, listen to rap music will make you DeF.

    3. Re:Hello, Mcfly! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I have no desire to be "that guy/girl"

      I think you might have more serious things to worry about than your iPod volume...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Hello, Mcfly! by typical · · Score: 2, Funny

      While I am fine with anyone who wants to be a transvestite taking that route, I have to say that this is the first time that I've seen someone called out for having problems for *not wanting* to be one.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  5. Is it just music players? by miaDWZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find, when walking down the street - that I've got my iPod's volume up to the highest level. It's not because I really like the song, and want to hear it really loudly, but rather, I can't hear it if I turn it down at all. Simply because of the passing traffic is so noisy.

    Had I kept the iPod down to a lower level, say at 0.75 or 0.5 - then I simply wouldn't be able to hear it - so, perhaps the problem is not the music players, but rather, an increase in noise from other locations? For example, traffic?

    Is the world itself getting noisier?

    1. Re:Is it just music players? by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It also doesn't help that iPods come with earbud-style headphones. If they came with larger ones that covered your ears, then you wouldn't have to turn the volume up so loud to hear it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Is it just music players? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I was a teenager, I worked in a wood processing plant during the summer. It was really loud and everyone wore hearing protection. I started using a walkman and played it really loud to cover the noise. I was quickly warned that anecdotal evidence (experience of people working at that particular plant) suggested that that was a very bad idea. I switched to ear plugs.

      As for the world being noisier, I think it is. Get a pair of Bose noise reduction headphones and try them in your office. Once the drone of your computer, any other office machines and the HVAC goes away, it gets pretty quiet. The difference between wearing the headphones turned off (no noise reduction) and turned on (with noise reduction) is amazing. Plus, if you have an ipod, I can't imagine the sound being worse for you than having earbuds jammed in your ear. In addition, the noise reduction allows you to listen at a lower volume. The downside is they cost $300 but I say worth every cent.

    3. Re:Is it just music players? by earnest+murderer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Had I kept the iPod down to a lower level, say at 0.75 or 0.5 - then I simply wouldn't be able to hear it - so, perhaps the problem is not the music players, but rather, an increase in noise from other locations? For example, traffic?

      Headphones with active noise canceling will help with that. Where I used to keep the volume at 75% or more, I now rarely bump it above 30%.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    4. Re:Is it just music players? by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like quiet, so sometimes I use noise cancelling headphones. Good ones can be expensive but worth it to keep my sanity - plus I have a reason not to hear the phone :)

      Anyway, on the few times I use it to play music versus regular pairs of headphone, I notice that I don't have to set the volume up nearly as much.

      Even when a TV is blaring in the next room.

      Note: I don't know if those things fit an iPod or portable music player in general as I don't have one..... but mine uses a battery in of itself, so I see no problem.

    5. Re:Is it just music players? by rm999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just bought these headphones: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 065BP9/

      They offer really good sound isolation (I sat next to the engines in a loud airplane last month and when I wore them I heard almost nothing).

      They are a good alternative to sound cancellation - if you don't let sound in, you don't need to cancel it with iffy technology. Plus it costs less than 10% of the money and gives superb sound quality (not audiophile, but the best you can expect for less than a 100 imo).

    6. Re:Is it just music players? by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 2, Informative

      in-ear-canal phones like the shure and etymonics do just as good a job in reducing outside noise as the active cancelling ones, plus have much better quality drivers to boot (and don't require batteries). My Shure e2c's are better that any headphone I've ever tried, and the volume on my jukebox seldom goes above 20%, compared to a around 70-80% with normal earbuds. And they only cost about US$70. The next up in the range are supposed heaps better still, but at a cost (one, day, she will be mine, oh yes)

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    7. Re:Is it just music players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't think that drowning out the sound of passing traffic when walking down the street has the potential to damage more than just your hearing?

      I personally would rather be able to hear the sound of an oncoming car, hear that there is a bicycle/jogger/dog/low-flying aeroplane/impending mugger so I am aware of their presence and react accordingly.

      I've seen people step in front of a bicycle (in this case changing their position on a pathway, not stepping across a road), despite the fact the cyclist rang their bell, because they could not hear the cyclist approaching due to a music player. A rather ugly incident for both individuals concerned.

      It might be deemed quite appropriate to block out all sound and immerse yourself in music so as to be almost unaware of your surrounding environment, but that environment will remain aware of you.

      Whenever using my iPod I want it at a level where I can hear what's going on around me.

      Rockin' Az - not logged in.

    8. Re:Is it just music players? by Marvin_OScribbley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      whats 300 bucks now if you lose your hearing tomorrow? 300 bucks is peanuts

      If you don't have 300 bucks, I would said 300 bucks is a lot!

      --
      I'm not a journalist, but I play one on slashdot
    9. Re:Is it just music players? by Avumede · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had the same problem. Try using canalphones. It lets you block out the outside noise, so you can maintain a low volume.

    10. Re:Is it just music players? by labnet · · Score: 5, Informative

      I do sound engineering, and you need to be 6-12dB above ambient noise to hear something clearly. Thus if you are in traffic of 95dB and you headphones cut out say 5dB, you will still need around 100dB. This could be damaging. See the tables below.

      Environmental Noise
      Weakest sound heard 0dB
      Normal conversation (3-5') 60-70dB
      City Traffic (inside car) 85dB
      Train whistle at 500' 90dB
      Subway train at 200' 95dB
      Level at which sustained exposure may result in hearing loss 90 - 95dB
      Power mower 107dB
      Power saw 110dB
      Pain begins 125dB
      Pneumatic riveter at 4' 125dB
      Jet engine at 100' 140dB
      Death of hearing tissue 180dB
      Loudest sound possible 194dB

      OSHA Daily Permissible Noise Level Exposure
      Hours per day Sound level
      8h 90dB
      6h 92dB
      4h 95dB
      3h 97dB
      2h 100dB
      1.5h 102dB
      1h 105dB .5h 110dB .25h 115dB

      Perceptions of Increases in Decibel Level
      Imperceptible Change 1dB
        Barely Perceptible Change 3dB
      Clearly Noticeable Change 5dB
      About Twice as Loud 10dB
      About Four Times as Loud 20dB

      Sound Levels of Music
      Normal piano practice 60 -70dB
      Fortissimo Singer, 3' 70dB
      Chamber music, small auditorium 75 - 85dB
      Piano Fortissimo 84 - 103dB
      Violin 82 - 92dB
      Cello 85 -111dB
      Oboe 95-112dB
      Flute 92 -103dB
      Piccolo 90 -106dB
      Clarinet 85 - 114dB
      French horn 90 - 106dB
      Trombone 85 - 114dB
      Tympani & bass drum 106dB
      Walkman on 5/10 94dB
      Symphonic music peak 120 - 137dB
      Amplifier rock, 4-6' 120dB
      Rock music peak 150dB

      --
      46137
  6. Walkmen by esaloch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Was this not a problem when the walkman was introduced or is our environment a lot noisier now? I'm just curious as it seems this would affect every generation since the walkman was introduced not just the "ipod generation". Then again, I admit I didn't rtfa.

  7. Not a binary solution set by Nutria · · Score: 4, Insightful

    go deaf early or go insane listening to your coworkers chatter.

    Or wear ear plugs.

    It'll be difficult for some people to stop wearing headsets. You get used to the "company", and become a bit nervous when there's silence.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:Not a binary solution set by Mateito · · Score: 5, Funny

      I find that I can better hear the voices in my head with the iPod turned off.

  8. Eh, what? What's that you say? Speak up!! by pieterh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Deafness is a useful adaption to the modern working environment. A touch of deafness blocks out the computer fans, the traffic noise, the endless airplanes flying overhead, the neighbour's kids, and the wife. The only problem is that it takes more and more volume to produce that "oh, yeah!"effect when listening to music. But that's someone else's problem.

    Personally, I went partly deaf at the age of 16 from spending too much time on a firing range. But most of my peers went similarly deaf not from the iPod, but from the Sony Walkman.

    This story is about 25 years too late. I guess each generation reinvents the "we went deaf because..." story.

  9. Misbranded by gunpowda · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This could happen regardless of whether you use a portable music device or not. Anyone who goes out to clubs will be exposed to loud music anyway, and in that kind of setting you can't control the volume.

    I believe EU iPods have a volume limit anyway, but this is easily removed.

  10. etymotic in ear headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They block outside noise by 23db, so you don't have to turn the music up to drown out the noise. I sometimes leave them in even without listening to music. They are nearly as good as a pair of headphone style hearing protectors.

    http://www.etymotic.com/

    1. Re:etymotic in ear headphones by cbirkett · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was going to suggest exactly the same thing. My er6is are a godsend in noisy environments. When I stick them in my ears, I can't even hear a person talking beside me. An added bonus is that because there's no background noise, you don't need to turn up the volume as much. Of course, there are cons, like the inability to hear warnings, phones, and such, but you have to take that into account when you decide to use them. I keep the phone where I can see it ringing, keep an eye on the receptionist when I'm waiting for an appointment, etc. They're basically like earplugs that can play music.

      Etymotic also makes sound attenuators for use when you actually want to be able to hear what's going on. They reduce sound by approximately 20dB in a fairly linear way, which is great for obnoxiously loud concerts, clubs, etc. They're pretty cheap, too.

      --
      "My fellow Americans, these are not the droids the nation is looking for."
    2. Re:etymotic in ear headphones by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 3, Informative
      I got a 30GB 4G iPod ("The iPod Formerly Known As Photo") recently. A friend who works at Apple also recommended the ER6is, and I ended up getting a set of those too.
      The safety concerns are real. I probably wouldn't use them biking or around outside in a city, because you really can't hear what's going on around you. But on commercial airline flights, they are amazing. It can actually be startling to remove the earphones mid-flight and hear how loud the engines are. What's really weird is that you can indeed listen to your music at a volume that would be completely drowned out by the ambient noise without the isolating earphones.
      As mentioned in the parent and grandparent posts, Because of the noise isolation, you don't have to turn up the volume a lot. I've heard a few people complaining about the bass response, but I attribute this to two effects. First, many people are used to listening to music in a way that would be appropriate for those ridiculous cars with the monster sound systems whose bass you can hear from a distance of several km. But even more important, I think the people who complain about the ER6i bass haven't properly inserted the 'phones into their ears. I believe this is a common problem. I've seen it mentioned in a few reviews of the ER6is, and Etymotic Research is even including a slip of yellow paper in the ER6i packaging now with the following message:
      IMPORTANT

      For Best results:

      Be sure to obtain a good seal.
      Without it, you will not have an optimal bass response.

      In some cases, slightly moistening the white eartips will help improve the seal in your ear canals.
      So if you're researching ER6i earphones (and possibly other noise isolating earphones) online, and you read reviews saying they have "no bass" or something similar, keep this in mind.
      Etymotic even makes optional smaller and larger eartips to allow for the correct placement and seal in ears that the standard eartips don't fit just right.
      I do recognize that bass may be in the ear of the beholder, so YMMV. It's best if you can find somebody you trust and ask that person's opinion. I was fortunate to have the ER6i earphones recommended to me by somebody whose opinion I've come to trust, and I've been more than satisfied with them.
      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
  11. Ironic by gpw213 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I followed the link to the Wired News article, and the ad on the side of the page was for the iPod nano.

    --
    However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. -- Winston Churchill
  12. Every generation has it's own disease. by Talondel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Didn't I read this same story about Walkman's 20 years ago? And didn't they decide the effects were negligable? Oh yeah I did. Abstract from a study in 1987: Krahenbuhl D, Arnold W, Fried R, Chuden H. Investigations on 50 high school students showed that this group had been using the "Walkman" only 1.5 h. per day during the last 14 months. A comparison of the audiometric results obtained with these 50 "Walkman" users, with those of 20 age-related non-"Walkman" users, showed no statistically significant differences. The investigation further revealed that to avoid hearing loss, an upper threshold level of 93 dB (A) should not be exceeded for a daily "Walkman" user time of two hours. PMID: 3613781 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

  13. Probably not by jpardey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even if they are active, they will just cancel out the external sounds. I am not sure how to work it out, but I would expect the energy to transfer to heat or somethin'. I would think that noise cancelling headphones would reduce hearing loss, as you don't need as much sound.

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
    1. Re:Probably not by Transcendent · · Score: 2, Informative

      The energy used is simply the energy required to create the "cancelling" noise, which is electrical and mechanical energy (~=heat).

      The "cancelling" noise is basically a phase inverted replica of the incoming noise. It's like total destructive interference on the sound... as much as possible anyway.

  14. Personally, I've noticed the opposite. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't have an ipod, but I do listen to music through headphones. I'm a bit hard of hearing and for the past year or so when I listen to music I play it at the absolute lowest volume that I can hear it. Maybe it's just in my mind but I've noticed an improvement in my hearing. Not to mention it's less of a distraction to my development (and/or slashdot postings).

    Consequently, this behavior makes me realize that I need a quieter PC case. I've got a home made hack job case too many fans. I think it's time to upgrade to a professionally built case that would be quieter but I'm still having a hard time justifying dumping $150-$300 on a case.

    After that I've still got fish tanks that make a significant amount of noise. Not much I can do about that other than keep the water levels full or get rid of them alltogether.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Personally, I've noticed the opposite. by david.given · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Consequently, this behavior makes me realize that I need a quieter PC case.

      A while back I tried to figure out how to do this on the cheap; I eventually ended up with the computer box in the attic, with long wires connecting up the keyboard and monitor. USB was ideal for I/O, but I didn't have a USB CD drive so instead I used a slightly over-spec IDE cable --- which eventually turned out to be unreliable if I had DMA turned on, which was less than ideal. If I were doing it today, I'd use Firewire.

      It was an incredible bodge job, and did involve having to cut a hole in the ceiling, but pressing the switch on the wall and hearing the slight bong as the monitor powered up --- and nothing else --- was wonderful. You won't realise how wonderful a truly silent computer is until you get one.

  15. The 80s called ... by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ... they want their discussion back :)

    Seriously: I was born 1969 and clearly are part of the walkman generation, using one (OK, cheap copycats) from the mid 80s till the early 90s. Then I exposed my ears to techno parties :-P Whenever they check my hearing at the doctor or hospital they are surprised how good I hear considered my age.

    So let me say:

    Bah.

    1. Re:The 80s called ... by leifsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      It really depends on your situation. Mine for example with a slight hearing disability on my right ear after a nasty accident as a kid left a wooshing sound, I really should avoid too high volumes not to make it worse. As always, use your senses so you dont end up with a constant ringing bell in your ear. I have friends with ringing ears and it's a pain for them especially at nights.

  16. ipod == gateway device by Boss+Sauce · · Score: 2, Funny
    Careful folks, these iPods are just a hint of things to come. iPod listeners are sure to move onto harder stuff-- their fiendish desires will lead them to actual *concerts* where large speakers will jackhammer their tender little eardrums to oblivion.

    iPods don't make people deaf; really really loud sounds make people deaf.

  17. Car stereos + loud exhausts by JonTurner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's not just mp3 players, it's car stereos (especially the 1000+ watt "boom cars") and loud exhausts. Some of the cars on the streets in my town can produce sound pressures that are actually painful -- from a distance of ten feet, in another car, with the windows up!!

    Even base stereo systems these days are 60+ watts. That's enough to cause substantial hearing loss in a matter of weeks if listened to repeatedly, for an hour or more per day.

    I can't even imagine how profound the boomcar boyz hearing loss must be. Not that I care... karma and all that.

    Ever attended a rock concert? It's a near certainty that you did permanent damage toyour high frequency hearing.

    Bring lawn tools into the equation (leaf blowers, lawn mowers, chainsaws, etc.) and that == more hearing loss.

    However, it's not just the under-thirty crowd. Many of our fathers served time in the military, when hearing protection meant sticking your finger in your ear before the guy next to you threw a grenade or fired a 30.06. Hearing loss didn't mean shit when your biggest concern was not being shot on a beach landing. The difference is the genX'ers are *choosing* to damage their hearing.

    1. Re:Car stereos + loud exhausts by Two99Point80 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can't even imagine how profound the boomcar boyz hearing loss must be. Not that I care... karma and all that.

      I used to feel the same way, until I started noticing the infants strapped into their car seats right in front of the subs. A case could be made for that being some degree of child abuse... and I don't think it's just the risk of hearing loss. What does long-term exposure to such loud sound do to a child's - or an adult's - endocrine system, and what are the social consequnces of that?

    2. Re:Car stereos + loud exhausts by barzok · · Score: 3, Informative

      The wattage doesn't matter. It's the decibels and proximity to the ear. Those iPod earbuds aren't anywhere near 6 watts, let alone 60 watts, yet they'll do plenty of damage.

  18. Re:Chatter is good for you by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you are so anti-social that you feel that your coworkers' chatting is driving you insane

    I don't know about you, but I find a twenty minute "chat" about the latest goings-on of Survivor or the some other reality show to be about all it takes to drive me nuts. Especially when the "chat" involves someone who hasn't done a 5 minute task I asked them to do three days ago but has found time to have numerous other "chats" in addition to lunch breaks, coffee breaks, etc.

  19. Pardon? by Dunwich · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aye? what was that? SPEAK UP!

  20. inadvertent danger by ctime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a similar comparison to the thoery that cell phones might give you some kind of brain cancer. It's still highly disputed and nobody can be too certain, there is logic to it but it's hard to prove either way when dealing with sublties of the human body (obviously this isn't always the case)

    The real dangers lie with people inadvertantly exposing themselves to danger because they are effectively disabling an important sensory organ.

    Take hiking/running in the desert with a music player on full blast, how the world are you going to hear a rattle snake or other really pissed-off animal or reptile. conversely how can anyone tell if a car has just ramped on the sidewalk behind you while jogging in manhattan?

    You've essentially reduced yourself to someone who is deaf. Although...when compared to listening to my coworkers....gimme the friggin thing on full blast.

  21. Noise cancelling headphones do work by panurge · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm deliberately starting a new top level thread because the previous poster on this is getting negative moderation on some of the replies, and there is then no point in responding to them.

    Noise cancelling headphones if correctly implemented are rather more complex than just inserting an inverted signal. For the record, I am deaf (artillery and large engines, as if you care) and because of the strange hole in my hearing response I use a digital hearing aid. The configuration screen for programming this runs to a number of pages, and I can have it set to include or exclude things like refrigerator and fan noise. In fact, I have one program that does optimised noise cancelling to get the best speech response, and another that does no noise cancelling which is useful for music and for checking that things like HDDs are making the right noises.
    Noise cancelling technology is already used in professional telephone headsets, and I am surprised that it is missing from iPods and the like. It would be easy enough to have a button which switched between cancelling and not cancelling external noise sources and which, like my hearing aid, has a setting which allows through a sudden loud noise when in N/C mode, as a safety factor in traffic. This would mean the ability to listen at lower volume levels in noisy conditions.

    I have a local inductive loopset (one of the few good things to come out of Nokia in my view) which allows me to use the cell phone and to inject another sound source. With the hearing aid switched to inductive pickup only, and to block external sound, I can make a phone call in noisy conditions without difficulty.

    Conclusion: the technology exists to fix these problems and enable people to listen at lower volumes, manufacturers just can't be bothered.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Noise cancelling headphones do work by blackomegax · · Score: 3, Funny

      one problem. once you inject all that noise cancelation, any audiophile with 20/10 hearing is going to snort in disgust at how bad it sounds vs "unfiltered, 500 dollar amped" stuff.

  22. Solution by Biotech9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Noise cancelling or isolating headphones.

    Etymotic, Shure and Koss all make noise isolating headphones, which are generally cheaper and have higher quality sound than noise cancelling gimmicks like the Bose headsets.

    Basically, you put in a set of these ear-canal plugs, you hear nothing but the music, and therefore can listen to your music at far lower levels in noisy environments than you would be able to with normal open or closed can style headphones.

    The isolation from the Etymotic ER-4p/s for example, is 44 decibels, which is phenomenal. I own a pair of Er-4ps myself, and have used them a lot while travelling, and have to say that spending 300 euro on a set of headphones does not look like a waste of cash once you get up to 30,000 feet in a packed Airbus.

    The isolation is so complete that it's shocking to hear the noise levels that everyone else is being exposed to once you pull the headphones out after a period of use.

    Not to mention the fantastic sound quality.

    1. Re:Solution by hhghghghh · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was gonna mod you up, but I'm gonna have to join in the rave, right here. I've got a pair of Koss The Plug headphones that I really like -- it takes some getting used to stuffing all that foam in your ear, but it isolates outside sound great. Not 44dB, but still impressive. Apparently sony also have an affordable, and better-sounding, isolated headphone, which is surely on my list of stuff to get. I've tried Sony's active noise cancelling headphones, and the effect is amazing; you'd be standing next to a subway wagon speeding past hearing almost nothing. Kinda scary, even. Neatest thing is a switch to turn noise cancelling on or off so you can hear the effect (or perhaps switching noise cancelling "off" just turns on a noise generator ;-).

      I'd say, go for some sony plugs - they're really not bad, and you can spend as much or as little as you like. (I also like Sennheiser, for non-isolated/noise-cancelling headphones for everyday use, the low end stuff is great value for money, especially compared to low end crap from Philips).

    2. Re:Solution by rsborg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Noise cancelling or isolating headphones.

      Etymotic, Shure and Koss all make noise isolating headphones, which are generally cheaper and have higher quality sound than noise cancelling gimmicks like the Bose headsets.

      Not sure if this is the case with noise-isolators, but I have a pair of the early (gimmicky) Sony ND-5's (noicse canceling)... but they're impossible to use with the noise-cancelling on in a car... the anti-noise circuit is too slow, resulting in a choppy sound... happens sometimes in planes too, but only if I'm near the wing.

      One other thing: Noise cancellers abosolutely rule for eavesdropping in the office. Without the whine of the workstations, people who are wispering or talking softly in cubes near your you sound loud and clear if you turn your music down >:)

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    3. Re:Solution by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Informative

      First of all, I'd like to say IANAA, IAAST (I am not an audiophile, I am a sound technician).

      No. They fail to isolate the low frequencies.

      Those go straight through something like a pair of earphones.

      However, active noise cancelling headphones (which in-ear 'phones are not ever, despite the GP's claim) can help out in cancelling the lows.

      Ear covering headphones (cans) have another problem in that the speakers themselves are not suspended, which causes problems with the high end getting absorbed by things that aren't your ears (causing strange nonlinearies).

      The big problem that in-ear headphones solve is in sound reproduction. Within the human range of hearing, most in-ear headphones claim to be able to reproduce any frequency without any nonlinearies (I haven't actually tried it myself, however I can point you to studies that test frequency response that confirm that they're much better than anything else). This is possible simply because the tiny, tiny elements don't have to produce much vibration to do their job, so the inertia of the speaker element becomes negligible, and because there's nothing else to get in the way of absorbing the sound besides your ear.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  23. Partial deaf people and I have advantages... by antdude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was born with hearing impediment so I have to wear a bone conduction hearing aid since I cannot hear well. Let's just say you would have to yell at me just to talk to me. I can hear music from loud concerts, loud movie theaters, loud churches, etc.

    Anyways, I can always turn off my hearing aid if things get too loud. :) I could have a surgery to regain hearing but I think I will use my partial deafness as an advantage. Turn it off, and poof. Less audio to hear for me.

    Although wearing hearing aid can be annoying (e.g., changing batteries, fall off if I shake my head, hurt a lot if wearing too much, my head gets itchy, etc.).

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Partial deaf people and I have advantages... by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't kid around. If you can get an operation to restore your hearing even just partially, do it. Naturally you'll lose hearing as tinnitus sets in with age, but if you don't take advantage of what you can today you'll regret it. Life is full of all kinds of sounds, not just loud ones, and if others can't communicate emotions softly to you and you can't hear birds chirping and leaves rustling, you're missing a lot.

  24. Wait a minute . . . by tgzuke · · Score: 2, Funny
    Shouldn't the headline read:

    IS THE IPOD GENERATION GOING DEAF?

    (by the way, the lameness filter can't take a joke.)

  25. Dumb And Dummer by cannuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Temporary or permanent hearing loss can happen if: a) sound above 85 decibels - the louder, the more damage (got meter?). b) 85 decibels one hour or more in duration - the longer the more damage. c) and if the maximum output is forced into the 4000 Hz range - that does the maximum damage (like the Hollywood idiots boost sound during trailers - dumb and dummer). d) smoking cigarettes causes permament hearing loss. e) drinking alcohol cause temporary hearing loss. f) worse case scenario - guy who smokes and drinks and has been running sound boards at concerts for several years (dumb and dummer) - likely 50% hearing loss. g) notion is that if someone beside you can hear what's playing on your earphones/buds - you are having a hearing loss happening.

  26. Headphones are the leading cause of hearing loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only way to reduce this to limit the exposure time your ears endure. Hearing loss is a fact of life for anyone who wear's headphones for an extended period at high decibel levels, whether it's an iPod, Walkman or whatever. Check the link.

    http://www.hearnet.com/at_risk/risk_aboutloss.shtm l

    From someone in the music industry, I cannot recommend noise cancelling phones or buds enough for someone who loves music and values their hearing. They are worth every penny and more. For the frequent concert goer or clubber, see an audiologist and get professional earplugs made. You won't sacrifice any sound quality and you'll preserve your hearing for future concerts and the rest of your life. It's one of the best investments you'll ever make.

  27. Hearing aid companies -- stock tips anyone? by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can someone suggest some good hearing aid companies to invest in? Should be quite a growth industry in the future.

    All those boomers that didn't listen to their parents telling them to turn the music down... they're getting up to retirement age now.

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    1. Re:Hearing aid companies -- stock tips anyone? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Don't forget about:
      • people in cars with the loud, thumping stereos
      • import tuners with the whining exhausts
      • the motorcylcists on Harley's without mufflers
      • sport bike street racers with the extra loud exhausts
      • Gamers with 500W 6.1 surround sound systems
      • Data center workers.
      • Computer geeks with the 8 PCs running 24/7 with 4 fans and 4 HDs per box
      • Live music lovers who go to show at 150dB
      • Club-goers dancing to music at 130dB

      You better believe it is a growth industry. I am looking for some good companies to invest in.
      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  28. Earplugs + Headphones by Bob9113 · · Score: 2, Informative

    People will look at you funny, but earplugs with headphones is the right answer. You can eliminate all the background noise, and play the music at a level that (after passing through the earplugs) is safe. Foam earplugs are available at drugstores - 20 - 30 pairs for about 6 dollars. To really do it right, get a nice pair of circumaural headphones like Sennheisers.

  29. Feedback by meburke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been thinking about this for years, in a minor way off and on, and I'm still waiting for someone to invent a good feedback system for hearing level. If the music can be heard clearly at 80-85db, thenit is probably safe, right? However, all the studies I've seen measure db in the environment, not the energy approaching the ear. And if you're wearing earphones, how do you prevent hearing loss when you don't know what you are delivering to your ear?

    Reactive noise-cancelling earphones would seem to be a good idea, especially if they can reduce the ambient noise to 50 or 60db and alow music to be heard at less than 85db. In fact, without music, I would be relieved sometimes to have noise-cancelling headphones to simply provide some near-silence. It would be a worthy project for competent technicians to come up with an inexpensive (less than $20) noise-cancelling headphone with signal contrast (outside noise less than 50db to inside noise less than 85db), easy equalization, and galvanic skin response sensors to indicate when the music was causing discomfort. (GSR might not be sufficient. Many recent studies showed that the type of music listened to can produce a variety of emotional and chemical responses ranging from peaceful, healthy, joyful to irritated, angry and unhealthy. Here's a a different question: If you knew loud rap and metallic rock were as bad for your system over the long run as cigarettes, would you quit listening to it?) An article written in layman's terms with good references can be found here: http://www.headwize.com/articles/hearing_art.htm.

    Although the general consensus is that much hearing loss is irrepairable, I have heard rumors of people recovering some hearing ability by listening to specific music. (I think I first saw this in a book called "Superlearning 2000", and have heard subjective reports since then, but I haven't noticed any scientific papers.) Also, if high-frequency loss is a problem to you, I've heard good things about Echophone.

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  30. Re:Have a Heart by twoshortplanks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The main worry is the noise on the bus PLUS the extra level of noise you have to insert if you want to hear it clearly.

    You shouldn't have to crank up the sound level if you get yourself some proper headphones. I use shure e2c headphones that are buds that completely close off the ear - following a design that was originally intented for use as a 'monitor' for live performances so that artists could hear what they were playing and block out 90% the external sound from the rest of the band. The key thing is that I use the same volume level if I'm on a bus or in a quiet room. I wouldn't wear them (in both ears at least) if I'm crossing the street however - I'd be worried that since I was so deaf I'd be run over.

    (additionaly note for audiophiles: Yes, I know the e2cs don't have the best sound in the world, but they're truely exellent for listening to audiobooks or the cricket and what everyone agrees with is that they're good at blocking external sound.)

    --
    -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
  31. The solution is simple (but expensive) by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a proud owner of a Rio Karma, I wanted to get the most out of that player's superior sound quality (take that, iPod!), so I picked up a pair of Etymotic ER-6 earplugs. They provide about 35 dB of sound isolation, and the sound quality is utterly amazing. I've never had to pump the volume on my Karma past 20% while using them - and when I'm listening to music with them, I can't hear the phone ring three feet away (another huge benefit).

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  32. You can always sniff out a snobby XYZ-phile by Ogemaniac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    by their inevitable disdain of mid-high quality but mainstream XYZ products.

    Whether we are talking about speakers, wine, chocolate, cars, or golf clubs, there is nothing the aficionado hates more than anything in his or her realm of expertise that is pretty good and reasonably priced, as it undermines the value of their hard-earned knowledge.

    1. Re:You can always sniff out a snobby XYZ-phile by Flakeloaf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This has nothing to do with BOSE being mainstream and hating it therefore becoming chic and everything to do with the fact that consumer-level BOSE equipment really is crap.

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    2. Re:You can always sniff out a snobby XYZ-phile by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice try, but this doesn't apply to Bose. Their good reputation stems entirely from marketing. In fact, their products are mediocre at best, certainly not 'pretty good'.
      Bose tends to market their products using technobabble that impresses the mainstream consumer, but is absolutely ludicrous to anyone with a modicum of knowledge of acoustics. Their 'surround with 2/3 speakers' claims are a good example: it doesn't bloody work!
      Try comparing Bose products to equipment that costs the same, but is produced without the technobabble influence. Mainstream stuff will do, nothing exotic is necessary. The Bose stuff won't sound better.

      I did this once with a set of Bose 301 speakers versus a set of Magnat Concept 2 speakers (about $100/pair cheaper than the Bose set). The Magnats had a much more linear frequency response, the Bose really emphasized the midrange frequencies too much. The Bose's direct/reflecting system made them sound unfocused: close your eyes and you've no idea where the sound comes from. With a good system, you should be able to point out where the instruments are - can't do this with the Bose, piece of cake with the Magnats.
      Also the Magnats were far less fatiguing to listen to (side effect of the flat frequency response).

    3. Re:You can always sniff out a snobby XYZ-phile by asbjxrn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bose tends to market their products using technobabble that impresses the mainstream consumer, but is absolutely ludicrous to anyone with a modicum of knowledge of acoustics.

      As opposed to "audoiphile" marketers using sciencebabble that impresses the audiophile consumer, but is absolutely ludicrous to anyone with a modicum of knowledge of physics.

    4. Re:You can always sniff out a snobby XYZ-phile by mrjb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With a good system, you should be able to point out where the instruments are - can't do this with the Bose, piece of cake with the Magnats.

      From a soundperson perspective I find this discussion 'A is better than B' a bit pointless. In a discussion "Bose vs Magnat", "Better" is relative.

      First of all recording technique makes a huge difference in this. In signals recorded with crossed microphones (x/y), locating the instrument is a piece of cake, though it might lack in 'spatial' feeling. When recorded with 2 parallel mics (A/B), things might sound very spatial but locating the panorama of the instrument in the stereo image is much harder. For this reason, most pop recordings are recorded in X/Y (mono compatible for radio play, good panning, does not sound very spatial) while most classical/jazz is recorded A/B (spatial sound but poor localization of instruments. Phase problems may occur, possible mono incompatibility).

      Something similar happens in playing back the sound. Bose designed their speakers to have an as large as possible 'sweet spot', resulting in a more consistent spatial sound across the room, however this is at the cost of localization of the instruments.

      The magnats have a relatively narrow 'sweet spot' compared to the bose speakers. As a result, localization of the instruments in a stereo image is more accurate, but the 'sweet spot' is much smaller.

      All other things left out of consideration, if accuracy in stereo image is your thing, you'll prefer the Magnats. If you prefer consistent sound all over the room, you'll prefer Bose.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  33. Obvious? by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Researchers at Boston Children's Hospital determined that listening to a portable music player with headphones at 60 percent of its potential volume for one hour a day is relatively safe.

    60%! I would have thought it was bloody obvious that going over 60% of an iPod's volume was a danger area. I just tried mine at around that volume with the normal headphones and found it uncomfortably loud. Apart from anything else, I could tell which song was playing from the other side of the room, so anyone listening that loud on public transport deserves to go deaf.
    I had always assumed that the only reason it went so loud was for powering external speakers etc.

  34. I'm OK by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The plural of anecdote is not data.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  35. Tinnitus by lheal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have tinnitus, "ringing in the ears". I hear a constant sound, like a high-pitched squeal, all the time. It's worse when the ambient noise is low, but I barely notice it when there's noise around. In a very quiet place the sound I perceive can be very intense.

    It comes from damage to degeneration of the nerves in the inner ear, or so I've been told.

    Any constant, low-level sound tends to "mask" the ringing, so I can ignore it. Riding in a car with the windows down or in an airplane I don't notice the sound at all.

    Noise cancelling headphones are an ironic sort of hell for me. The sound is a lot better, but in the breaks between songs I hear the tinnitus sound, like a freight train braking for a herd of violin-screeching crickets in my head.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  36. 95 dB is your threshold by Dark+Coder · · Score: 4, Informative

    You do not want to exceed 95 dB, ever: EVER!

    Take it from a deaf person whose hearing loss is averaged as 64 dB at 20Hz down to 95 @ 8 KHz. That is the surveyed threshold for a lifelong usage of a hearing aid without losing ones remaining hearing (thus rendering such hearing useless).

    Hearings is not recoverable as the many tiny cilia hair nerves gets shortened at greater than 95 dB due to excessive POUNDING of the noise whipping these reed-like cilia back and forth (tearing or cutting off blood flows) as amplified by your middle ear bones and outer ear's ear drum.

    Protect your ears, take it from a deaf person. It is career threatening in your mid-life. No need to get another cow during your mid-life crisis.

    Cholear implant (CI) is a proven technology, but a bothersome hinderance to those late-deafened teens and adult as they did not grow up accustomed to these CI outfits. (Doable, but takes longer to get accustomed to these CI). CI is not a perfect replacement as you would get 32 channels (more later) spread across the sound spectrum but with GAPS in between. Computer/signal processors back-fills in these inter-channel gaps (not pleasant to a true classic music afficiandos).

    Keep it down... It might save your life.

    Don't get hit by a bus because you're IPODing. (interesting tidbits: 422 deaf people were killed by bus.)

  37. Doesn't the EU have maximum volume regs? by rklrkl · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe (though trying to find it on www.eu.int looks tricky !) that the EU has statutory maximum volume limits on audio devices where headphones can be attached (but I could be wrong on this). Mind you, I just bought a new MP3 player that is "comfortable" volume in the 15-25 range, but it can go to ear-bleeding "40", which I suspect is way above the EU limits. Strange, though, because I have another player that the same site sells and that's got a much lower maximum volume.

  38. Isolating Canalphones by Hackeron · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.shurestore.com/earphones/eseries_e5c.ht ml - Its all in the name of good health, right?

    But seriously, I had mine for about 6 months now and I have to say the isolation is incredible. Baby screaming at the DVLA? no problem. Construction and train noises are also easily blocked out. The London Underground is a good test because its *very* loud - you cant hold a conversation screaming at the top of your lungs there. Here the isolation isnt enough, but all you hear is a faint windy sort of noise, which is fine.

  39. European ipods by BlightThePower · · Score: 2, Informative

    are locked to a maximum "safe" volume. You can unlock them if you want but I've never felt the need myself. I suppose its American-libertarian to let you deafen yourself when you damn well want to be deafened or something.

    --
    Plays violent online games as: Nerfherder76
  40. I've given this thought recently... by Kaldaien · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have mild hearing damage in my left ear, unrelated to headphones. In my case, it has to do with years of practicing the violin without an earplug in my left ear (which is most vulnerable to damage in violinists).

    Nevertheless, I think the iPod generation is in luck, because they are also one of the first generations where genetic therapy is not purely science fiction. In the past couple of years, researchers discovered that the production of a protein (Rb1) was responsible for the behaviour shared by the inner ear hair cells of all mammals, or more to the point... the reason the hair cells do not divide and hearing does not regenerate. Recently scientists discovered the gene that was responsible for producing this protein in mice. Given 5 to 10 years, I am optimistic the naive iPod generation, senior citizens and even I will be eligible for gene therapy to reverse the effects of hearing loss.

    It is important to protect your hearing, but damage is inevitable no matter how careful you are. Luckily, for musicians and the ignorant iPod generation, there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon :)

  41. Re:Heh, the irony by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Informative

    Both of these responses are exactly the things that XYZ-philes always say.

    That doesn't make them untrue. This isn't painting-the-edges-of-a-CD audiophile nonsense, it's verifiable through simple means.

    That 'niche at the upper end of the mainstream' is occupied by companies like Denon, Onkyo and Marantz, not Bose.

    Have you ever tried comparing a Bose system with anything else? You know, actually do listening tests?

  42. Riffle fire... by all204 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've spent 6 years as an infantry soldier and I can say that I do have hearing damage from it. The little yellow foamies that are given to us like candy do nothing for percussive sounds. (Riffle and machine gun fire, explosives like grenades, firing mortars, etc...) It even comes with a warning on the packages. The only thing that really works would be a combination of the foamies and the full sized earmuffs. Now, you cannot wear earmuffs with a helmet. So we wear the foamies when we can.

  43. You're doing it backwards... by Two99Point80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem there is that the "good" sound gets attenuated just as much as the "bad" sound. Instead of drowning out background noise by brute force, try using headphone-style noise reducers over on- or in-ear headphones. Better signal-to-noise ratio that way, so the sound oughta be cleaner.

  44. Article is wrong by technoextreme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read the same thing in the newspaper and it said listening to your muisc at sixty percent volume is safe for one hour not what the person wrote.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  45. s/world/people/ by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I find, when walking down the street - that I've got my iPod's volume up to the highest level. It's not because I really like the song, and want to hear it really loudly, but rather, I can't hear it if I turn it down at all. Simply because of the passing traffic is so noisy.

    And you know what is really sad? If, after some years (or decades, if you're lucky) you find that your hearing has suffered irreversible, non-repairable damage, that a big (if not the biggest) part of it was inflicted upon yourself, by yourself. Say what?

    You turn the volume up to 'overpower' the background noise, right? In order for that to work, the volume will have to be at least equally strong as the background noise. It helps that you use earphones (which greatly reduce the background noise), but from the sound that enters your ears, most was produced by yourself. And so will any hearing damage that results from it.

    To avoid long-term hearing damage, there's only 1 way: reduce that background level. And you don't have to be kind to the ones causing it - it's your health and well-being (and that of many others) they are damaging. Maybe not as bad, but no different from someone pouring a container with poison into a local park.

    Is the world itself getting noisier?

    I'd argue not (see subject). It's more that people are making lots of noise wherever they go. The noisiest places are often the same as those with large concentrations of people (big cities, pop concerts). And mostly there's little you can do about it. You want peace and quiet? Then put some distance between yourself and your fellow human beings.
  46. The head phone are crap. by boyce111 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hate ipod people. There is nothing worse than being on the London Underground, full stop, Unless you are stood 2 meters away from a person and able to hear their music.
    I've also had the joy of being able to over hear their music over my own.
    9 time out of 10 you when you look up to find who it is, they'll have the little white ear buds half hanging out.
    If you love music so much, why use the crap cheap earphone that comes with the thing?
    Go buy a decent pair, ones that other people don't have to listen to.

    Last year when I went to Japan it had become socially unacceptable to listen to music which was audible to other people.
    This came about as a result of the offending people being smacked in the face. I'm all for this remedy.

    Be a have-a-go hero and smack an ipod user in the face. You'll be able to hear them coming and they have no social awareness so they won't notice you at all.

    Your headphones are crap and I hate you!

  47. It happened to me by prudek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is very real threat. Headphone induced hearing loss happened to me. And I did not even have flash player or walkman.

    When I was 35 I noticed that I often do not understand what people say, especially in noisy environments, while all other people around me understood each other. Medical exam revealed 30% hearing loss. Doctor questioned me about my history and we soon pinpointed it: between 15 and 25 I often listened to music via headphones at top volume for 2 or more hours at a time.

    Now doctors recommend that I should wear hearing aid. I wish it did not happen. But such hearin loss cannot be cured at all. It can only get worse.

    Doctors told me that if I do not start to wear hearing aid now, my hearing will worsen because the brain will pay less attention to a sense that is degraded, and that a sense of hearing, if not used, will fail as a result. And they pitched expensive hearing aid products.

    I got suspicious and asked a friend who happens to be an ORL specialist. He said that these claims are false, aimed at selling the hearing aid products... and that my unassisted hearing would get somewhat worse if I started to wear hearing aid, but I would hear more thanks to the hearing aid. So I decided not to buy the aid. And I found that I can enjoy quiet music just like loud music. And subjectively my hearing improved somewhat.

  48. Noise Cancellation? Pink Noise is Better by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I don't understand why the noise cancellation headphones are so popular. They just reduce the background, making the cellphone shouters more clearly audible.

    I use gray noise - equalized pink noise (See the Wiki). It covers up everything with an even background that you forget you're even hearing. Turns a busy office into an acoustic oasis. Even better is to pop in some plugs on top of that.

  49. Rural Chinese by CrazyMik · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I read once that Rural Chinese have higher rates of hearing damage than people in cities. Why?

    Well, if I remember correctly, it was because they are exposed to very little noise, and then very loud firecrackers. It seems the constant and loud background of cities conditions the ears somehow.

    So this sounds like a complex problem...

  50. Re:Heh, the irony by zerocool^ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you ever tried comparing a Bose system with anything else? You know, actually do listening tests?

    I have. I worked in the Audio department for about a year at Best Buy.

    For starters, bose dictated sale prices to best buy - best buy couldn't just choose to put them on sale; they had to put them on sale when Bose corporate said to, which is why the circulars always said "All Speakers Onsale*" *except bose.

    And the no highs, no lows, must be Bose does hold true. I am by no means an audiophile, but even my damn-near deaf due to rock concerts ears can tell they suck. I mean, the 201's and 301's aren't terrible speakers, but they are a bit muddy and much more expensive than, say, a pair of JBL bookshelfs that sound better.

    The crux of the matter is the Lifestyles systems, though. The bass tube with the little cubes? Ugh. You're not going to get good bass out of a 6.5" woofer, especially if it's the unpowered one. If you do a sound sweep from like 50 hz to 50 khz, you're going to hear huge dropoff points all over the place. They just sound bad. Which would be acceptable for consumer electronics, if they were cheap, but they're upwards of $1000! The one with the dual cubes and the powered sub was $1300 when I worked there, and I bet it hasn't gotten cheaper. Give me $1300, and I'll get you some relatively inexpensive Sony tower speakers for front and rear, and a JBL center channel and 10" sub, and give you $400 back, and it'll sound vastly better (just going off of the brands that were there when I worked there). I know that sony and JBL aren't excellent names in home theater, but jesus, they're a far cry better than Bose.

    It's not an audiophile thing. It's a listen to it and say ugh thing.

    ~Will

    --
    sig?
  51. I have two, both recommended by panurge · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Actually I have two: A Siemens, and a slightly simpler Widex as backup. They are both excellent and I would strongly recommend them. The Siemens is more sophisticated, has wider bandwidth and more power, and longer battery life, but is physically larger. The Widex is smaller, the audio is not quite so good, but is better for active environments.

    Oh, and I don't need any sympathy. The truth is, I am not a lot more deaf than many people of my age. I'm just willing to admit it and get it fixed. My mother wouldn't admit it till she was 82, and it caused her a lot of problems. I get a lot less inconvenience from the hearing aid than the glasses I use for driving. Looking at other people fiddling about with Bluetooth headsets, iPod earpieces and so on, I basically plug in in the morning, put my phone in my top pocket with its loopset, and then the most complicated thing I do all day is switch to noise cancelling mode if the phone rings in the office. If manufacturers were really interested in a clever product, they would make devices with the same functionality as in the ear hearing aids which similarly communicated with phones, iPods and the like. Hands free, cable free, but I do get looked at as if I'm mad as I walk round making a phone call with no visible phone, no bluetooth headset...it's only a downside if you don't like people giving you extra room on the sidewalk.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  52. Actual causes of hearing loss; you==misinformed by sczimme · · Score: 2, Insightful


    hearing loss is caused by high frequency sound

    Hearing loss is caused by a number of factors; yes, loud sound can do it, but high_volume != high_frequency. Where did you unearth this particular piece of mis-information??

    According to the the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association there are at least seven causes of hearing loss in adults. PS, "high frequency sound" is not on the list.

    Neither is "marriage", but that's a topic for another time... :-)

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  53. Re:Heh, the irony by Vr6dub · · Score: 2, Informative

    As for you complaints about the Lifestyles system, you're obviously not the target audience. Take for example my Mother. She thinks they're cute and really likes that she can hide the speakers amongst all her nic-nacs. To be honest, I don't blame her. I'm not to familiar with all the available "micro" systems but Bose is the one of the few manufacturers that I've seen in brick and mortar stores. On a side note, I have a pair of my Dad's old 901's and they still kick ass after all these years (almost 20!!). Pair them with a sub and I have been perfectly happy. Although, IAMNAAudiophile.

  54. Earplugs by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm a DJ and in addition to my shows, I frequently go out to clubs to hear other DJs. I had similar experiences with ringing ears for days after a loud show. I tried foam earplugs, but they made everything sound terrible. I finally broke down and got custom "musician's" earplugs. Mine are Westone ES49. I've never been happier! These things keep the sound quality almost the same, just reduce the volume (mine have 15db filters in them).

  55. Re:Eh, what? What's that you say? Speak up!! by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

    This story is about 25 years too late.

    Too late? It's a record! 25 years between dupes? They'll never top that! ;-)

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  56. Geez.... by fitten · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most /. readers already had to worry about making themselves go blind... now they have to worry about going deaf as well????

  57. Re:Actual causes of hearing loss; you==misinforme by Phisbut · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hearing loss is caused by a number of factors; yes, loud sound can do it, but high_volume != high_frequency. Where did you unearth this particular piece of mis-information??

    Take a course in biology and you'll learn that high-frequency noises are indeed related to loss of hearing.

    The cochlea (inner ear) uses tiny "hair cells" to "catch" sounds (vibrations) and transform them into a signal that the auditory nerve can get to the brain. Different lengths of hair cells catch different wavelength of sound. Higher frequency noises (shorter wavelength) are caught by the shorter hair cells.
    Those cells being shorter (thus smaller), they are somehow more fragile than their longer counterparts, so they are the first ones to die with age / hearing of loud noises.
    Loss of hearing happens usually with the higher-frequency noises first, because of the reason stated above. This is the reason why old people have a hard time understanding what women say (higher-pitched voice) while being able to hear men much better (lower-pitched voice, higher chance that hair-cells for that frequency are still alive).

    High-frequency noises will always be the firsts to go when going partially deaf. They all go eventually though. Higher wave amplitude (volume) will make that happen sooner. Canceling out low and mid frequency noises will keep some hair cells from being hurt, but if the high-frequency sounds still go through, short hair cells still get hurt.

    Linky
    Linky
    Linky

    --
    After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
    - The Tao of Programming
  58. I can personally attest to this. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have worked several jobs wehre there was EXTREME loud noise at the jobsite(within 10 feet of unmuffled generators and a carousel pipe organ that could be heard 2 miles away). I always wore earplugs, the simple wax or foam ones from the drugstore. I was the only guy on the job that did. Whenever i had to listen to something, i would remove the right earphone, I always kept the left one in. Additionally, when out walking around, i only use the right headphone of my walkman. I can notice a diffrence in the hearin on the right and left sides of my own head from the minor damage over the years. The hearing in my left ear is much more acute overall, and can hear frequencies that the right one cant.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  59. Re:Noise Cancellation? Pink Noise is Better by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Simple noise cancellation works by taking the inverse of the 'noise' signal. This can be done with simple analogue circuits, there's no need to analyze the noise in any way. This doesn't care about any details about the signal, so persistent noises are cancelled just as well as sudden ones.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  60. Re:All your sub-base belong to me by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Funny

    However I do like base fishing

    All your bass are belong to us.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.