Slashdot Mirror


3-Way Motherboard Shootout

Steve writes "Hexus.net has put three high-end i955X-based motherboards through their paces, to see which is the best LGA775 platform motherboard. Intel's own offering falls a little short, but Gigabyte and ABIT both make compelling boards, with ABIT taking the top-spot by a small margin."

122 comments

  1. ATI by gcnaddict · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ill stick with my dual dual-core opteron mobo, thank you :)

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  2. 3-ways are hot. by PSXer · · Score: 0, Insightful

    They are.

    1. Re:3-ways are hot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the words "3 way" .. didn't need to read the rest of the headline, let alone the article.

    2. Re:3-ways are hot. by Ceribia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "3-ways are hot" This is slashdot, thats not insightful it's redundant. Seriously, find one of us who didn't say it internally the moment we looked at the article.

      --
      It has yet to be proven that intelligence has any survival value. Arthur C. Clarke (1917 - )
    3. Re:3-ways are hot. by Pneuma+ROCKS · · Score: 0

      The term 3-way should not be tossed around just like that, you know?

      Lets have some respect and save it for special ocassions.

      --
      Favorite quote: "
    4. Re:3-ways are hot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just think of the heat generated by three computers running at the same time!

  3. Not ATI, AMD by gcnaddict · · Score: 0, Troll

    whoa... i wasnt thinking straight when I wrote the subject to my comment :| I meant AMD :P

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  4. No guns were found by prurientknave · · Score: 5, Funny

    The test ended rather abruptly when it was found the motherboards were not equipped with guns as ordered.


    Move along. Nothing to see here folks.

    1. Re:No guns were found by netkid91 · · Score: 1

      LOL, If I had mod points I'd mod this up to 5 as funny, but I don't :P

      --
      NO~, I read Slashdot because I think it's stupid.....
    2. Re:No guns were found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, if I said 'LOL' on Internet forums, I'd shoot myself in the face, but I don't :P
      How old are you anyway? 12?

    3. Re:No guns were found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, is XD now the preferred method?

      If so: here you go.

    4. Re:No guns were found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's possibly the funniest thing I've seen all day. I take my hat off to you. You are clearly the most humorous person ever to have graced mankind with his presence.
      Surely your humour will go down in the annals of time as the premier example of wit in this 21st century. I pray that I will never cease this interminate guffawing and the rest of my days will be brightened by this incredible mirth.
      Yes, indeed I LOL and, although I have no mirror to check, I can only assume an accurate 'emoticon' representation of the current appearance of my face would, in actual fact, be XD.
      This has been the greatest day of my life. I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

    5. Re:No guns were found by Fastball · · Score: 2, Funny

      The test ended rather abruptly when it was found the motherboards were not equipped with guns as ordered.

      However, a lascivious motherboard menage a trois ensued when an enterprising hacker introduced the "Hot Silicon" mod. Senator Clinton is investigating.

  5. oh god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    three way... mother.... shoot.... too easy.

    1. Re:oh god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Stick it up your asus.

  6. three way by DavidLeeRoth · · Score: 5, Funny

    it would have been even more embarrassing if the article was called "Threesome Motherboard shootout."

    1. Re:three way by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thanks for the idea, always looking for something new and exciting.

    2. Re:three way by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      Well, it might just be me, but I don't want to think about a "Threesome ... Shootout" but that's just me.

      --
      Sig
    3. Re:three way by fshalor · · Score: 1

      I was thinking "3-way"... as in 2-way or 4-way... and going nuts trying to envision a board with 3 processors... ;)

      arg...

      Good to see ABIT's still knocking them down. I've been away from building with Abit for a long time. Though my first board, a KT100, is still ticken quite well.

      I've been building asus or gigabyte for desktops and workstations and tyan for everything else.

      Still would like to see multiway boards someday. As in, mix and match processor boards. With dual core it's getting closer... but not close enough yet. ;)

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    4. Re:three way by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Odd, a friend of mine bought a Gigabyte board and had some serious issues with a bad production run.

      After a couple weeks and lots of trouble with his machine, he found his board was missing a capacitor next to the processor that later versions had. No mention of the problem on Gigabyte's web site, some guy on a forum found it by comparing an earlier run with a later run to find the missing capacitor. They were good to repair it, but they covered it up pretty good too..

      I'm not a huge fan of Gigabyte. Honestly, I've grown fond of Soltek... My last one really gave me no trouble at all, and I think I'd give them another chance, for a less expensive board they are really nice...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  7. What about quality? by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How is the quality of these boards? Will they still be working in two or three years? Or will they have leaking capacitors by that time?

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:What about quality? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is the quality of these boards? Will they still be working in two or three years? Or will they have leaking capacitors by that time?

      You want to know if they'll still be working in two or three years time? Ok, let me just take a short trip in my time machine so I can find out.

      Oh wait...

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:What about quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah it sounds like you got stuck with one of those defective boards like I did. I had a dual 866 that died young. Didn't know what happened until I found a report during a web search. You could see the leakage on mine. The joke was I paid for a good quality board and still got crap technology. Sad thing was it was one of the best machines I ever owned or built right up until it died.

    3. Re:What about quality? by hab136 · · Score: 2, Informative
      The leaking capacitors were an industry-wide problem.. it was basically a crapshoot whether or not your board had them.

      http://channels.lockergnome.com/news/archives/2005 0801_leaking_capacitors_muck_up_motherboards.phtml

    4. Re:What about quality? by KillShill · · Score: 1

      industry wide as in all taiwanese brand capacitors. they stole part of the formula from a japanese company but couldn't figure out how to make it work well. or so i've read.

      this problem has been pretty much worked out since apparently the reports of motherboards dying have mostly faded away in the past year or so.

      to save a few pennies, they doomed millions of motherboards. i just love when they make quality products.

      pass the damn costs onto the customers, don't scrimp and save and cut major corners!!

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    5. Re:What about quality? by Evro · · Score: 1

      My crystal ball says... "try again later!" :-(

      --
      rooooar
  8. I prefer the Gigabyte by StarHeart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if the Abit has a slight performance lead, I like all the features on the Gigabyte more. It is nice to see two pata connectors instead of just one like the other two boards. It also has more PCI slots than the Abit.

    --
    Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
  9. high end? by vbrtrmn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, no SLi on any of them, I'll stick with my ASUS for now.

    --
    it's a sig, wtf?
    1. Re:high end? by corrosive_nf · · Score: 0

      thats because nvida refuses to allow intel to have sli on its chipsets. They have the two physical slots and from all indications its merely a bios flash that would enable it but nvida refuses to allow it as that would cut into sli chipset sales.

    2. Re:high end? by KillShill · · Score: 2, Informative

      well thankfully SLi is a useless feature except for the most hardcore gfx enthusiasts.

      i consider myself a gfx groupie but i wouldn't touch SLi with a 256ft pole. too much expense for too little return. gfx technology is moving too fast for SLI to become viable to more than a very small set of people.

      you're also looking at extra cost in electricity in running 2 gfx cards. extra juice from the PSU is also required; meaning a more beefier unit which most people lack. it also takes up 2-4 slots total depending on the cards in question. it's a good option for the very few who have the money and willingness to go for it. otherwise, save up your money and in 6 months, you can buy a virtually similar performing card in a single slot solution.

      if someone can find another reason to buy a motherboard with an extra high speed PCI-e slot... that's another story though.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    3. Re:high end? by antime · · Score: 1

      SLI would be attractive if I could use several lower-end cards to achieve a decent performance without the heat and noise issues. Unfortunately it's only aimed at the very high-end at the moment.

    4. Re:high end? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for SLi to work with my bunch of old Tseng ET4000 myself.
      If I could have twice that 1024x768 goodness in 256 colours, it would be just great. I might even get a 487 to go with it!

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  10. Avoid Abit High Ends by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Informative

    I used to think brands really didn't matter. Until I bought the Abit Ka7-100. It was a highend board back around 2000 with 4 Dimm slots and 6 PCIs, 1 AGP. And an ISA slot which could be used when sacrificing the last PCI slot. It was fantastic at the time.

    Then the transistors fried. I paid for shipping etc and got a replacement. Then it fried again, replaced, then fried again. 4 years later Abit sends me a letter saying they lost a lawsuit for selling select board models with broken transistors including the Ka7-100. Basically they knew it, and told consumers nothing about it.

    1. Re:Avoid Abit High Ends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to ABIT, they only use "Premium Japanese Capacitors" on their newer boards, such as the AV8.

    2. Re:Avoid Abit High Ends by FullCircle · · Score: 1

      I agree. They look great on paper, but they aren't worth it.

      Way back I had the Abit dual Celeron board. Worked fine except for the horrible Ultra66 controller that was one of my biggest reasons for buying it.

      Bought a k7a something or other, that died shortly.

      Bought one of their first Nvidia chipset boards. Returned one DOA, one died within a day, tried one more DOA board and gave up.

      Had one of their Max legacy free P4 boards. That lasted a few months.

      No more Abit for me, thanks.

      --
      If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
  11. Faster, higher, stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, we get it. You guys can build big motherboards with gobs of features, including legacy stuff I'll never use.

    For once, I'd like to see somebody build a small motherboard with modern connectors, quiet (or no) fans, and no legacy crap that just takes up space. Right now, about the only way to get that is out of a Mac mini.

    I'm still using a 5-year-old computer that I've only upgraded once (bought a new 80 GB disk to replace the old 9 GB one). It's still fast enough for everything I do -- if/when I upgrade, I hope to get something smaller and quieter. I don't care about faster, because the slowest new computer available is faster than this sub-GHz Athlon.

    It's kind of sad that, over the past 10 years, the only thing that's really changed about motherboards is that they've gotten faster. They've gone to all the work to come up with new and faster and smaller busses (Firewire, USB2, S-ATA, etc.), but it doesn't make the boards any smaller if they're still including all the big old legacy ports, still, too!

    (Yay, floppy, IDE, and PCI slots! What, no ISA?)

    ISTM that all motherboard manufacturers today build pretty much the same product, which is aimed at ... everybody, which means "nobody in particular". This is a market ripe for picking. If somebody had the brains and balls, they could really make a killing. How about a Mac mini-like motherboard?

    1. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by uchihalush · · Score: 1

      but can it run linux? Oh wait...

    2. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by slazar · · Score: 1

      Sure it can run linux! Linux runs on much more than just x86

      http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/librar y/pa-madmac1/?ca=dgr-lnxw01MadMacP1

    3. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by The+Slashdotted · · Score: 1

      I was going to write about PCI express, and how cheap legacy connecters were, and then I realized you were a prime canidate for legacy connectors, and then ISA?? Top it of with Anon. Coward and it's a guaranteed troll. My hat to you sir.

    4. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by eLDeR_MMHS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's been stuff out there for several years now.

      A lot of the "small form factor" barebone cases by Shuttle, Biostar, Soltek, etc. might fit your spec.

      Most of those cases are still at least four times bigger than a Mac Mini to accomodate full-size AGP/PCI-Express/PCI cards and 3.5" and 5.25" bays but then they are probably four times smaller than a regular PC tower. Price-wise they are somewhat more expensive than a DIY PC.

      But yes, someone has thought of this.

      --
      -Victor Chow (Elder_MMHS)
    5. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by James+the+Warder · · Score: 1

      Why would motherboard maker remove stuff that people still use? There are smaller motherboards out there, but you're paying more for less. And these boards are made for smaller cases that are harder to cool. I just don't see a point to less features motherboards.

      Economy of scale means you're getting these things for 'free'. And someday when your SATA drive goes pop you may just need to grab an old IDE drive from the back closet.

    6. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you've somehow missed the chatter about the miniITX boards?

    7. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by KillShill · · Score: 2, Informative

      it's probably not a troll. just another user lacking insightful knowledge in the right context. it's not that legacy components are good but in his case he has no right to complain. a sub-ghz athlon, just upgraded his 9GB hd?

      seems like by the time he gets around to upgrading his computer, Terabit ethernet would be long forgotten.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    8. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 2

      There are plenty of board to meet that request, most very small, inexpensive, and with soldered in CPUs.

    9. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by cpuobsessed · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, I have two legacy boards both AMD and both Slot A. Still going and going strong. 1 is running XP Pro and the other SLOWER board is running Windows Server 2003.

    10. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've somehow missed the chatter about the miniITX boards?

      Yes, he does know about the miniITX. He is just whining like a stupid bitch...

    11. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by endoplasmicMessenger · · Score: 1
      Maybe you should take a look at one of these:

      VIA EPIA SP13000 Mini-ITX Motherboard.

      "To Summarise: The EPIA-SP 13000 is an important update to the VIA EPIA range improving the 3D graphics performance of the system. ... this is the best VIA EPIA system yet - highly capable as an office machine, or entertainment platform, even capable of the odd game or two. The compact size means it's suitable for a variety of systems, a compact cube case, or a custom solution. The extremely reliable system allows you to use the board as a permenantly switched on server / router / firewall / etc. The number of ports and expansion possibilities lets you customise the storage solution whether you want SATA RAID, or numerous IDE hard drives."

      And here's how someone built a MythTV on one.

      But if you're going to setup a MythTV on one, I would use the minimyth custom MythTV front end.

      --
      Evolution is a fact. Darwinism is a joke.
    12. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      If I wanted a mini-ITX board, I'd use a Socket 479 Pentium M or even a Socket 478 board. The EPIA chip is definitely not very powerful- my old 2.2-M Northwood benchmarks well above it and it gets its tail handed to it by modern CPUs. But for a HTPC or something, it would suffice. The whole SFF computer thing is pretty neat as I don't really *need* a huge full-tower setup with six 5.25" bays, three floppy bays, and 4-6 HDD bays when I would have one floppy, one or two HDDs, and one or two opticals.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    13. Re:Faster, higher, stronger? by Behrooz · · Score: 1

      ISTM that all motherboard manufacturers today build pretty much the same product, which is aimed at ... everybody, which means "nobody in particular". This is a market ripe for picking.

      In many cases, it costs more to design a separate 'barebones' mobo than it does to include the same components as a standard/midrange mobo. For an example from the last few years, even if only a few percent of the market wants an ISA slot, the additional sales more than cover the cost of the additional components on the entire product line, and it's more profitable than having two separate designs.

      Feature creep on steroids...

      --
      "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  12. 3-Way ? Mother ? Bored? by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 2, Funny


    Is there a hidden message in this post that I cannot see?

    1. Re:3-Way ? Mother ? Bored? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, let me decode:

      "Hey, Slashdot, look at my $2,000 cock!"

    2. Re:3-Way ? Mother ? Bored? by tigersha · · Score: 1

      And the real sad thing is, if he actually used the $2000 to buy things that actually impress the ladies me might have had a use for it!

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  13. how the HELL did this get modded up??? by killa62 · · Score: 1

    plz mod me up too, i think 4 ways are hotter. :P

    1. Re:how the HELL did this get modded up??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me guess... mom dad and your brother? sounds fun

    2. Re:how the HELL did this get modded up??? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Naw, 4-ways are less fun, because it invariably becomes 2 couples. Group sex is always more fun with an odd number of partners because by necessity, there's turnover.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  14. Rewritten to fit title by rietran · · Score: 2, Funny

    Steve writes "Hexus.net has set three high-end i955X-based motherboards against each other, to see which is the best LGA775 platform motherboard. Intel's own offering fell after taking a shot to the head, but Gigabyte and ABIT both survived for hours, with ABIT taking out Gigabyte by dropping his gun and strangling him to death. Police are still investigating the cause of the shootout and Hexus' motive in provoking it."

  15. pssst.... by KillShill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    these motherboards contain intel's DRM technology.

    pass it on.

    http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2449

    search for DRM in the above site for confirmation and some extra info.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    1. Re:pssst.... by Fastball · · Score: 4, Funny

      pass it on.

      I would but my motherboard prevents me from doing so.

  16. Why can't they link directly to this? by Mechcozmo · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://www.hexus.net/content/reviews/review_print. php?dXJsX3Jldmlld19JRD0xNjAw

    Printer friendly version for everyone so that this (click, load ads) doesn't (click, load ads) happen (click, load ads) to (click, load ads) you (click, load ads).

    1. Re:Why can't they link directly to this? by KillShill · · Score: 1

      my, grandma. what an obfuscated URL you have.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  17. The most important thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Only one thing matters. Warranty.
    As a Genuine Intel Dealer, I can expect a replacement board to be overnighted even before I send the faulty one back. That way there is minimum disruption to the customer.
    Try telling a customer their server is down for a few weeks while you wait for the board to be shipped back to Taiwan/China for testing before they'll issue a replacement.

    Had a few customers who got non-Intel boards and had no computer for up to three months while waiting for a replacement. Think about that. That's three months paying for broadband you can't use for some people. The inconvenience cost adds up pretty quickly. Kinda makes a 5% increase in motherboard performance seem pretty irrelevant.

    And Intel has a good history of actually fixing mistakes. FDIV bug -> replaced processors. VC820 SDRAM bug -> new board and free RDRAM RIMM.

    Oh well. I'll stop ranting but hopefully you get my point.

    1. Re:The most important thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had a few customers who got non-Intel boards and had no computer for up to three months while waiting for a replacement.

      What, you couldn't loan or rent them a spare board to use while they waited?

      Seems like poor customer service to me.

    2. Re:The most important thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well when the board is a two year old design, compatible boards are hard to come by (think about getting a board that takes a . We keep some spare as a matter of course. But all it takes is a power spike to knock out a few machines and our supply runs out. Wish we could keep a spare board for every customer but there just isn't enough margin in this industry to cover that.

    3. Re:The most important thing... by st3v · · Score: 1

      Well I had a problem with a Gigabyte GA-8KNXP motherboard recently, and had it RMA'd to Gigabyte headquarters in Southern California. I just drove over there and dropped off the board since they were pretty close. I even talked to the engineer that was in charge. They called me later saying they couldn't fix the problem with the board, but since they didn't have any more boards with an 875P chipset, I could pick any motherboard they currently sell. Guess what, I picked the GA-8I955X, and I'm running it now with a Pentium-D. It has HD Audio, Bluetooth, Firewire 800, and much more. I have to say, it is an awesome board.

      I think most Taiwanese companies have U.S. headquarters, and Gigabyte's service has been great.

    4. Re:The most important thing... by thebdj · · Score: 1

      As a Genuine Intel Dealer

      I kiss major ass?

      Seriously, would someone like to help me count the number of Intel pooch-screws? As I recall they have released a few products that weren't quite up to snuff...

      And I would have to agree with another poster, no real trouble with those "evil" Taiwanese board makers, cause they all have US headquarters. Check with Intel, I would personally be shocked if they don't make or get their boards from Taiwan.

      free RDRAM RIMM

      Lets avoid RDRAM, it sort of answers part of my question above...

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    5. Re:The most important thing... by Eivind · · Score: 2, Informative
      Only one thing matters. Warranty.

      Maybe to Americans. In a lot of other civilized countries the consumer protection laws are good enough that warranties are completely irrelvant.

      Let's take Norway as an example. You have trough law 2 years warranty, 5 years on capital goods that are meant to last significantly more than 2 years. Probably motherboards would fall under this category, but even if not, 2 years is decent for electronics.

      If something happens in this period, excluding normal wear and consumer misuse, you have the rigth to a cost-free repair or a new replacement, at *your* option. (that's rigth, you don't have to accept the repiar but are free to demand a replacement part.) Furthermore if you do choose to accept the repair, you've got the rigth to cost-free borrow a similar item for the duration of the repair, if the repair is estimated to, or in actuality takes more than 1 week.

      Warranties larger than this are not really needed.

      Btw, there are exceptions to the rule that the customer can choose if he accepts repair or want the item replaced, namely when the costs are unacceptable, as in a large multiple of the repair-costs.

      For example, if you buy a car, and after 5 months the clock stops working, you won't be able to demand the dealer replaces your "broken" car with a new one. In this case you'd have to accept the repair (with a borrowed-car for the duration if it takes more than a week, which it shouldn't in this case)

    6. Re:The most important thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but mr dimwit the issue is whether the replacement comes morning next business day, or after months of arguing about what caused the problem, endless shipping and writing.

      if someone nicks my stuff the police will look for him. and my insurers will pay new-for-old value. but guess what - I still lock my door.

    7. Re:The most important thing... by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Well, yeah. But first: it doesn't contribute constructively to a debate to go around assuming other people are dimwits.

      Secondly, which service you get is largely a function of which dealer you use, and not which brand motherboard you buy.

      Or are you suggesting that if I buy a BrandA motherboard from say mindfactory.de I'll get excellent service, while with BrandB bougth from the same dealer, I'd get crap service ?

      That doesn't fit my experiences. I agree you should be willing to pay a small premium for a dealer you know generally honours his responsibilities without making a lot of trouble. That is, however, orthogonal to which brand you buy.

      Secondly, if you read my post you'll notice there can be no "endless shipping and writing" with Norways consumer-protection laws.

      If repair is estimated to take, or actually take more than a week, you've got the rigth to an equal replacement-part. This means if dealer promised you a 5 day repair, 8 days ago, you can go there and demand an equal replacement part.

      Sure he can refuse this, in that case your best option is to a) buy a new motherboard somewhere else b) file a small-claims case on the dealer and c) make sure that neither you, nor anyone you know ever use that dealer again.

      Small claims take about 3 months, costs around $100 (which you'll get back from the dealer) and it's a total slam-dunk in a situation like this, most dealers will fold, even if they're complete assholes, the moment it's clear theyve got no choise.

      The *only* way you could actually lose would be for the dealer to go bankrupt *after* you deliver your motherboard and (voluntarily!) accept a repair, and before paying you or delivering the replacement.

      That's a real (if small) risk. But I don't see how you can avoid this risk by bying a different brand motherboard.

  18. 3-Way Motherboard Shootout... by MrLizardo · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...Leaves 2 hard drives dead and one CD-ROM drive wounded.

    --
    ^I'm with stupid.^
  19. Yes but does it run linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, these bleeding edge boards never come with decent linux support and require freaky windows drivers as well.

    I'll keep my 386 thanks.

  20. ECC Memory support is extremely important... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 3, Informative

    and that's why I got a D955XBK in my new dual-core P4 Extreme system. It's amazing how 99% of desktop computer users have NO IDEA if their memory flips a bit every now and then (let alone correcting it!). The Intel MOBO supports ECC memory.

    1. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by markass530 · · Score: 1

      What exactly does ECC Memory Do? (I am a computer nerd, so complete laymans term aren't neccesary), I would consider myself an enthusiast, I do a lot of video encoding/graphics work/etc, so what will ECC Do for me?

    2. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, so how do you tell if non-ECC memory "flips a bit?" Since you are such an expert on this and since we are all so ignorant, please inform us.

    3. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      For starters, there is no efficient way to tell with non-ecc memory if the data is corrupted or not. You have to use some redundant data source, or way to regenerate the data exactly and check it against it, which is extremely slow (and pointless, if you have a known good source, just use that, right?). Abstractly, ecc works similar to an MD5 hash sum, it is able to tell you that data is corrupt, though it is unlikely to be able to tell you exactly which part. If you're not doing calculations which require exacting accuracy it is completely worthless. Do you care if the result to some calculation is 1.999999999 * 10^8 instead of 2 * 10^8? Not likely...

    4. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      correction: actually there is a high occurence of the corrupted data being recovarable, but of course its not assured.

    5. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by leathered · · Score: 1

      Personally, I wouldn't take advice off someone who wastes their money on a dual-core P4 EE.

      The high latency of ECC memory together with a P4EE with is like driving a sports car with an anchor tied to the back. Except the P4EE isn't much of a sports car compared to AMD's dual core offerings.

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    6. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's hit three of your last points...

      Abstractly, ecc works similar to an MD5 hash sum, it is able to tell you that data is corrupt, though it is unlikely to be able to tell you exactly which part.

      Um, no. ECC will *correct* one-bit errors - you'll never know a cosmic ray or background radiation flipped a bit (or that a hardware failure occured). If two or more bits go bad, ECC memory will reliably inform you which memory is bad after your app/OS crashes. You want it to crash, since you don't want to use untrustworthy results.

      If you're not doing calculations which require exacting accuracy it is completely worthless. Do you care if the result to some calculation is 1.999999999 * 10^8 instead of 2 * 10^8? Not likely...

      Wrong again. First of all, any bit can flip, so it's just as likely that 2.0e+8 will turn into 2.0e+0 (or 2.0e+72). ECC is "completely worthless" if you can tolerate the possibility of random errors in *any* of your data. Granted, the possibility is low, however would you build a bridge based on numbers that *might* be wrong? Also, if you need high reliability (long uptimes) ECC is critical - otherwise your operating system has an increasing likelyhood over time of becoming corrupt, especially when many GB of RAM are involved.

      Frankly, I think it was a horrible idea to eliminate parity checking from memory, and ECC should really be standard equipment.

    7. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      So you think only the least significant bit can be corrupted? Think again.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
    8. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      So you're the guy who bought the P4EE chip, I was wondering who you were!

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    9. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel is about on par with ECS
      they are both the worst motherboard maker on earth

      Intel because it's expensive, less powerfull, and has less features than the others

      ECS because of it's low quality and because they make useless things such as a notebook without battery

    10. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by jandrese · · Score: 2, Informative

      Eh, unless your memory, power supply, or memory controller are marginal flipped bits are pretty damn rare. They do exist, I used to work for a place that had 50+ SGI Challenge XLs loaded to the gills with memory. We had to write special filters in the log watcher to filter out "Single bit parity error" messages, because there would be several of them per day. However, this was over thousands of memory sticks. On the one or two sticks you have in your PC, it's almost unheard of. You're far more likely to lose data due to an OS glitch. It's just extra money spent that probably won't correct a single bit in it's entire lifetime.

      Anecdotal evidence: I have an old PII-400 at home with ECC memory. Thus far it has yet to correct a single bit error, despite being on 24/7 since January of 1998.

      In other words, are you going to allow for a tiny amount of uncertainty (which may just be noise compared to the uncertainty you get from other parts of the system), for extra performance and cost savings? That's what you need to ask yourself. OTOH, parity checks are an easy way to spot a failing memory module, which can make debugging a hardware problem so much simpler.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    11. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now that's just not true. I know for a fact that Windows users are informed when their system "flips a bit now and then." The famed BSOD makes an appearance.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    12. Re:ECC Memory support is extremely important... by springbox · · Score: 1
      ECC

      Some systems require high reliability (e.g. servers), or are in high-radiation environments where this happens more often (e.g. satellites). Those systems deal with this problem by using special DRAM modules that include extra memory bits - ECC-capable memory controllers can then use error detection functions to detect when it happens, and possibly ECC functions to narrow down exactly which bit was in error and correct it. Error-correction functions in PCs can typically detect, and correct errors of a single bit per 64 bit word, and detect (but not correct) errors of two, or more bits per 64 bit word.

  21. That Hexus site... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 3, Funny

    That Hexus site is one of the most anoying I've ever seen. Every other word is highlighted with a sponsored link that's often not related at all to the subject at hand. It seems to me that the whole point of that site is to have mildly-useful content simply as click fodder.

  22. Still the old standards... by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Abit, gigabyte and intel? Sorry, theres a new highend standard, especially for overclockers. If you havn't heard of DFI, they have some kickass boards, loads of features, and rock solid. I guess they have a dozen s775 mobos, and im sure they'll have i955 chipset boards soon.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  23. How unsual... by msimm · · Score: 1

    I'll stick to performance reviews, its all a bit dice toss in reality and if you expected more from a publically held company you should reconsider.

    There are no saints here.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  24. OpenHardware anyone? by SolitaryMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like the time has come for OpenHardware and OpenMusic...

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
    1. Re:OpenHardware anyone? by rafa · · Score: 1

      Well, opencores is open hardware, and there is a lot of music licensed under the Creative Commons.

      --
      [Science] is one of the very few things that raises human life a little above farce and gives it the grace of tragedy.
  25. Abit gets a vote... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    For getting it's act together. I built up 10 P4 systems each with Abit AI7 motherboards. They all worked flawlessly... except for the bullshit Northbridge fan. I had to replace every one of them.

    Nice to see that Abit figured out a fix with the heatpipe system on the Northbridge chip and this board.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  26. What I got out of it... by ender- · · Score: 2, Informative

    So basically what I got out of that article is that the performance of all three boards using default settings were almost exactly the same, and that unless I'm using Microsoft Movie Maker, a 2.4Ghz Athlon64 kicks the crap out of the 3.6Ghz P4 Systems with this new chipset.

    Yup, I for one am glad that I went with an Athlon 64 over a P4.

  27. Generally Satisfied with ABIT Quality by dsci · · Score: 3, Informative

    While I don't have experience with these particular boards, I've have had very good luck with two ABIT models:

    KT7E and KX7-333R

    The KT7E has been running virtually non-stop for 4 or 5 years; the KX7 likewise about three years. Both have been used constantly for their service life running floating point, number crunching code.

    Both boards have withstood cpu fan failures and powersupply failures; replacement of the faulty components and they're up-n-runnin'.

    I'd recommend ABIT to anybody with the caveat that I did have some problems with the KX7 until a bios update was done. Since then..no problem.

    Though I have to admit, my newer systems are ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxes with Athlon 64 X2's. ;)

    --
    Computational Chemistry products and services.
    1. Re:Generally Satisfied with ABIT Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. I've been running a KT7 for a long time.
      1) All my fans are reduced speed so its pretty hot.
      2) I lan game so the system gets banged around. The large heatsink doesn't help here.
      3) The PSU has been dodgy for some time. It finally popped Friday (on inspection it was the caps).

      Through all that, my board has soldiered on. If I was speccing a new computer tomorrow, I would certainly shortlist the appropriate ABIT board.

    2. Re:Generally Satisfied with ABIT Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed!

      E.G. -> I had the Abit VP-6 Dual CPU/SMP Pentium III (with dual 1ghz Pentium III CPU's on it) & it performed for YEARS for me excellently for a system of its class...

      & now/currently, I own/use an Abit IC7-Max3 HyperThreaded Pentium 4 mobo (3.2ghz H/T CPU onboard):

      So far, so good on BOTH (a good pal of mine owns the earlier unit now)...

      However - I was sent notice of a "litigation" vs. Abit & this very issue iirc, recently via U.S. Postal snailmail!

      I then passed it onto the current owner of the first mobo by Abit I mention above (since he is a good buddy of mine) - BUT, he has not had this problem (after running that system for a year after I ran it for a GOOD 3 year stretch beforehand).

      I have not noted ANY problems (yet) with the newer Abit IC7-Max3 mobo to date either/so far, & this is after literally running it for a bit more than 1.5 years now as well/also.

      * :)

      I've been lucky it seems for the most part. This is a problem that has NOT hit me, & I regularly tend to stick by Abit mobos.

      APK

      P.S.=> It seems that it really IS a 'luck-of-the-draw' type of issue, but one that (as I am sure we can all agree upon) SHOULDN'T exist, period...

      I mean, lol, product obsolescence is enough of a fact in this field w/out the mobo makers having to try to 'cut costs' on crappy/substandard componentry anyhow, know what I mean?

      After all - 6 months to 1 year after you buy nearly ANY part nowadays??

      Even IF it is "state-of-the-then-art"/cutting edge, it gets outperformed by newer released components of the same kind, anyway... apk

  28. those were very likely capacitors by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not transistors.

    And honestly, many mobo companies had problems with this at that time. There was a company making knockoff capacitors that appears to be high quality components. Many good mobo makers got taken by this. It was covered on slashdot.

    I personally won't buy Abit again if I can avoid it, for different reasons. My high end from them is still working, but I had significant problems in the beginning and minor problem all along, and they just never even responded to my queries on their forums.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  29. Not using SLI, but have ASUS boards by dsci · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if someone can find another reason to buy a motherboard with an extra high speed PCI-e slot... that's another story though.

    I did.

    I'm running ASUS A8N-SLI's with Athon 64 X2's on board in a small cluster. I'm not using the SLI feature.

    I got these boards because:

    1. ASUS performance is solid with the dual core Athlon 64.
    2. Dual GbE on-board; no purchase of second NIC to use as headless cluster.

    I can tie one NIC into my existing LAN and keep the other for the dedicated cluster interconnect. I don't have a KVM, but I can ssh directly into any node if need be.

    3. *IF* I can full around and offload SOME number crunching to the GPU(s), maybe the SLI will come in handy in the future? It's a thought I'll keep in the back of my mind.

    --
    Computational Chemistry products and services.
  30. Their support blows. by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 2, Informative

    My KT7 stopped working the other day. As soon as you boot the alarm screams at you non-stop, even though nothing is wrong in the health section of the BIOS. And it locks up after about 30 seconds of being on, even when you are just sitting in the BIOS watching the seconds tick by.

    Their support of course says "check the CPU temp" and calls it a day. Despite me clearly telling them everything is fine in the PC health section of the BIOS, and that I had swapped out RAM, CPU and video card to make certain it was the motherboard. The fact that they can't even bother to read support requests, nevermind give useful support is ridiculous.

  31. Not really. by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First of all, its not like a cryptographic hash at all, its like a checksum, because it is a checksum.

    Second, do you care a pointer that used to point to one memory address suddenly and mysteriously points to another, leading to a segfault, or blue screen if its kernel memory?

    1. Re:Not really. by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      Do I care enough to use ecc memory, no, and by my estimation, such an occurence is extraordinarily rare, given that many machines without said memory exhibit large uptime numbers. Certainly nothing to warrant the extra cost or the performance hit (both bandwidth and latency) in day to day operations where you are not only unlikely to notice it, but it is equally unlikely to affect you. It has its place, but certainly not as a metric to compare desktop motherboard solutions. In such cases, it is asinine.

      I'm sure your correct about it being a 'checksum' and all but I feel you're engaging in a bit of pedantry as I didn't say that was 'how' it worked precisely because I didn't know exactly, but in an abstract sense an MD5 hash isn't all that different than a checksum, they both verify the integrity of a file, although the means are different.

    2. Re:Not really. by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 1

      Just because you don't care doesn't mean that anyone who does care is wrong. You pretended its a non-issue, when memory corruption actually causes very big problems, not trivial like you made it out to be. There's nothing wrong with wanting a board that supports ECC RAM. Also, there is no performance hit in bandwidth, only latency. And its so small as to be irrelivant.

    3. Re:Not really. by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      Agree to disagree.

      Though I can't resist making another comment. By most measures ECC is a non issue, otherwise market forces would have demanded it long ago.

      While you're correct that ECC itself doesn't cost any bandwidth you are only looking at the jump from registered to ecc memory, while most people are using unregistered modules, and in such cases there is a ~10% bandwidth hit in addition to a not insignificant latency hit.

        If you look at the G^nP you will see that I was simply pointing out that ecc isn't a make or break feature on desktop motherboards. It has its place in... mission critical boxes, servers, clusters, etc. Basically, anything where even a small error will adversely affect the results (i.e. large computations).

    4. Re:Not really. by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 1

      "Basically, anything where even a small error will adversely affect the results (i.e. large computations)."

      Everything is adversely affected by data corruption. You personally don't care about being adversely affected, which is fine. But stop acting like your personal opinion is correct and everyone else's is wrong. Talk about arrogance.

      "By most measures ECC is a non issue, otherwise market forces would have demanded it long ago."

      And so anyone who wants it is wrong, because most people (who don't have any clue) don't want it? I guess Linux is "wrong" then, since if it was useful then "market forces would have demanded it long ago"?

      "While you're correct that ECC itself doesn't cost any bandwidth you are only looking at the jump from registered to ecc memory, while most people are using unregistered modules, and in such cases there is a ~10% bandwidth hit in addition to a not insignificant latency hit."

      Um, no. Registered memory has no bandwidth hit, and the latency hit is one clock. Maybe you shouldn't be parading your opinion around as fact when you don't even know what you are talking about?

    5. Re:Not really. by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      http://www.2cpu.com/articles/44_2.html , http://www.lostcircuits.com/memory/reg_ddr/ , I'm sure you can find more sources if it so interests you as to the differences, and I believe the bandwidth hit is in fact a derivative of the data being held for 'a clock'.

    6. Re:Not really. by Some+Random+Username · · Score: 1

      No, the latency is from being held for a clock. Bandwidth is how much data it can move across the bus, which is still the same.

      And pointing to a moronic overclocker/tweaker website, and their retarded benchmarks of two completely different memory sticks, without even checking, much less telling us their settings, is absolutely the stupidest "evidence" you could provide. Think a little, it won't hurt.

  32. Errr... by HaydnH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article: "Having to replace a motherboard usually necessitates a long-winded process of reinstalling an OS, programs, and personal data."

    Since when has swapping a motherboard forced me to format my hard disks???

    --
    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a Linux user I have been relatively unaffected by moving to a new m/b, but I'm presuming they mean the whole reinstalling windows thing..

    2. Re:Errr... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Never did it with Win9x, huh?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Errr... by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      What reinstalling Windows thing?? Last time I changed a mobo on a win (2k) machine I just got "installing new hardware" when I rebooted - does XP force you to reinstall now???

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    4. Re:Errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      You don't have to reinstall anything, either in Windows XP or Linux (Ubuntu and Fedora). The hardware is found, and the proper drivers loaded.

      On Linux, you might have to change some configs however, to get all the features working.

    5. Re:Errr... by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      does XP force you to reinstall now??

      Yes it does - it will accuse you of trying to use your XP license on hardware it wasn't intended for and you'll have to reinstall and do the product activation mambo. Fun stuff.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    6. Re:Errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't. I upgrade PC's all the time.

    7. Re:Errr... by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      On Linux, you might have to change some configs however, to get all the features working.

      Or maybe recompile your kernel depending how specific it is with drivers for onboard sound yadda yadda...

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
  33. Abit motherboards and temperature monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Abit motherboards are infamous for reporting incorrect temperatures. I like their motherboard features but I will never buy another Abit board because the usefulness of their temperature monitoring software is greatly reduced when load temperatures are 15 degrees celcius than actual. Most motherboards give inaccurate temperature readings but Abit is the worst that I have seen.

    1. Re:Abit motherboards and temperature monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15 C higher or lower?

  34. Oh yea! by kirk26 · · Score: 0, Funny

    A motherboard 3-way! Who's on top?

    --
    Linux sucks. It is an underground OS that is completely unstandardized. Linux geeks, get the fuck over yourselves.
  35. Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot users -> article with ads -> easy money generator. I think you found the 3rd ??? step in the 1.2.3.4 Profit!!! joke.

  36. Skip ECC, get a good power supply by ffflala · · Score: 1

    AnandTech claims that most memory errors are due to bad power. So it it isn't critical, get a decent power supply and you can skip the ECC.

    The driving theory behind ECC memory is that it corrects errors that occur in memory. Perhaps a transistor is faulty and flipped for the wrong reason, or a faint electrical signal pulled a transistor into the incorrect position. While researching this review and others, we have noticed the largest factor for incorrect memory blocks is faulty power supplies.

    http://www.anandtech.com/casecooling/showdoc.aspx? i=1841&p=24

    1. Re:Skip ECC, get a good power supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AnandTech claims that most memory errors are due to bad power. So it it isn't critical, get a decent power supply and you can skip the ECC

      Did you bother to read the article you reference, which clearly shows that memory errors occur even with the best power supplies? Get a clue.

  37. Thank you, OP... by TheTranceFan · · Score: 1
    ...for actually
    • providing a useful summary
    • not overlinking
    • and not ending the post with an obvious slashdot-standard troll, like "Does this mean the end for Intel's waning mobo business?"

    A refreshing change.

  38. You've gotta be kidding. Aren't you? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
    FDIV bug

    You mean the one they initially didn't want to fix unless you could somehow prove that it might affect you? I'd be hard pressed to think of a worse example of this magical Intel warranty support you're so proud of.

    They may indeed be better now; if so, then you should have picked a case that didn't make people hate them.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?