Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.5 Beta 1 Announced

christchurch writes "The KDE Project has announced the immediate availability of KDE 3.5 Beta 1, dubbed "Kanzler". This will be the last major release in the KDE 3 series. Qt 3.3.5 was released too late to adapt to it and it shows some fundamental compilation problems. We had a preview of KDE 3.5 two months ago."

140 comments

  1. 3.6? by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

    Maybe they'll release a KDE 3.6 that is just a port to Qt 3.3.5 ?

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
    1. Re:3.6? by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does anyone think we can port KDE to Windows? It will be really cool if instead of explorer we boot up into KDE. Just an interesting possibility. I know something like this has been done before but its not as good as having complete KDE or Gnome!

    2. Re:3.6? by Psiren · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does anyone think we can port KDE to Windows?

      I seem to remember reading somewhere that Qt4 would make this a distinct possibility, or at least make it easier to contemplate doing it. I don't know if there would be any interest in doing such a thing, but time will tell.

    3. Re:3.6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDE runs on top of X, which is available on Windows using Cygwin. However, X on Cygwin is slow as hell, so getting a version of KDE to run on top of X on Cygwin would be utterly useless thanks to the lousy performance.

    4. Re:3.6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      yes, that's the plan for 4.0, thanks to Qt now being GPL on windows too. i don't know how many people will be working on this, though. probably few.

    5. Re:3.6? by m50d · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a target for 4.0, since Qt wasn't free on windows before V4. However, there's already a working cygwin version and partial pure native port at http://kde-cygwin.sf.net/

      --
      I am trolling
    6. Re:3.6? by Rich · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, since the release of Qt 4, Qt has been GPL on win32 as well as unix and Mac. Plans to change the way KDE is split up were discussed at akademy that should make a win32 version easier, as will the move away from autoconf/automake to a new build system. Some parts of KDE such as kjs can already be built on win32, but there are many other parts that would need quite substantial work to port. That said, there is already a cygwin port of KDE that can be used right now.

    7. Re:3.6? by paulatz · · Score: 1

      Does anyone think we can port KDE to Windows? It is possibile, and with Qt library already existing for windows it could be shorter than I fear. On the other hand I would surely prefer windows to be ported to POSIX.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    8. Re:3.6? by Bralkein · · Score: 1

      I don't know, does anybody know if they meant that Qt 3.3.5 was out too early to make it work with just the beta version, or will the 3.5 full release also not support it? Isn't beta just a feature freeze, so then maybe they can get bugfixes in still for the problems making it impossible to build it with 3.3.5? Does anybody have any additional information?

      As far as I know, the only other releases in the KDE 3 series will be 3.5.x bugfix releases, and then KDE 4 comes out, which will be on Qt 4. Either they fix it before 3.5 is released, they fix it on a 3.5.x release, or not at all. That's how I see it.

    9. Re:3.6? by Klivian · · Score: 1

      I guess it's meant the beta version. KDE versions are always tagged a week or more before the release are announced, making the time of the Qt 3.3.5 release too close.

      I think most modules in SVN 3.5 branch already have got the fixes, like kdebase http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-commits&m=112699238328 835&w=2

    10. Re:3.6? by mk_is_here · · Score: 1

      someone already did that, isn't it?
      http://kde-cygwin.sourceforge.net/

    11. Re:3.6? by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid you don't really know what you're talking about
      I use KDE 3.2 with cygwin over the network and, although it's a bit slower, it's perfectly usable.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
  2. Already running it! by Mishura · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its pretty cool. Hasn't crashed yet. If you are running Kubuntu, you can go to this site: http://kubuntu.org/kde-35beta1.php and get the hookup.

    1. Re:Already running it! by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      How are some of the more advanced guifications/eye candy? Last time I tried turning them on, KDE slowed to a crawl, and my system's not too shabby. If KDE could get the same performance as Enlightenment, that would be great, otherwise, I hope more development goes into Enlightenment. As it stands, I prefer Gnome, so make of that what you will.

    2. Re:Already running it! by Mishura · · Score: 2, Informative
      Lets see, everytime I try to use Transparency or drop shadows (in KDE 3.4.2) it wouldn't work. It wouldn't crash, just give me an error message.

      Haven't tried it yet with 3.5.. no point really. My system gets bogged down if I'm running amaroK and something else thats big. I do like the new mouseover effects on the taskbar (hover mouse over clock when you upgrade. Thats cool.) As far as speed goes.. feels just as fast as 3.4. I've only had it installed for about 4 hours, so.. I'll find out the little quirks later.

      Big selling point: Konqueror ad-blocking. Now I can use that instead of Firefox, which is slow. Plus Konqueror handles media types better than the mplayerplug-in hack that Firefox uses (launch in Kaffeine).

    3. Re:Already running it! by rsidd · · Score: 1
      Lets see, everytime I try to use Transparency or drop shadows (in KDE 3.4.2) it wouldn't work. It wouldn't crash, just give me an error message.

      What did the error message say? You do need to enable the composite, damage, fixes extensions on xorg. With those, it gives me a warning that it may not be stable, but it works.

    4. Re:Already running it! by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      apparently kcompmgr is getting done up in kde 3.5, so it should be (more) stable, hopefully.

  3. Old news again! by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can whoever it is that reads osnews.com stop posting copies to Slashdot 4 days later?

    --
    #include <sig.h>
    1. Re:Old news again! by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      Either:
      1. Those submitting stories to slashdot are VERY serious about accuracy and spelling.
      2. The stories from osnews.com get circulated through several dozens of blogs until they finally reach the one the slashdot submitters are reading.

      If it's number two, we just need to convince these guys to read osnews.com. If it's number one... well, I didn't get what I didn't pay for.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    2. Re:Old news again! by m50d · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not OSNews, it's KDE Dot, the summary is identical. This happened with the Qt 4 release too, even though I'd submitted a better version. I think the way to get stories approved is to bribe the /. editors.

      --
      I am trolling
  4. KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    kde cannot print for a damn, it lacks wysiwyg printing, documents in konqueror and kmail and koffice do not appear the same on the screen when compared to print output.

    do not tell me it works fine because i know that it does not work.

    1. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      it was one of the Google Summer of Code projects
      http://developer.kde.org/summerofcode/pagedmedia.h tml

      it is in trunk, will be in 4.0

    2. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by chill · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have not had a problem with printing from KWord using CUPS as the printing service and the standard KDE interface to it. The print preview looks just like the output, as does what is on the screen in KWord.

      I haven't tried it in Konqueror or KMail, but if you're having a problem it is probably something to do with KHTML's interpretation. That is a known issue and being actively worked on. It was part of Google's "Summer of Code".

        -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Since when is a browser supposed to exactly match the printed output?

    4. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by ardor · · Score: 1

      You do know what WYSIWYG means, right?

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    5. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by bsartist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      HTML isn't WYSIWYG. Browsers can and do render pages differently for display vs. printing. If a separate style sheet is supplied for printing, the difference can be drastic.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    6. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that is the purpose of "Print Preview" in Windows.

      --
      ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    7. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by bsartist · · Score: 1

      "Print Preview" isn't part of what most folks consider WYSIWYG. The commonly-used definition of WYSIWYG is a situation where the normal rendering of a document onscreen - that is, the one you see when you're interacting with the document - closely matches that of the printed output. There's no real need for a separate "print preview" function, because there's no significant difference between what that function would display, and what's already being displayed.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    8. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that was not what my SoC project was about. The problem the parent is probably experiencing is his printer driver choosing different fonts than those on screen.

    9. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I understand what is being complained about. It has nothing to with cups or the low level printing driver. If the problem was cups' fault, pdf output would not look like ass but it does. It is the fundamental font writer and embedding subsystem that is deficient. Hence, the printing transport system (cups or lpr) does not matter here, it is the rendering and font embedding code in Qt and KDE.

      The problem has been known about for a long time, and it is a damn shame that no developers have even bother trying to fix it in the some seven or so years that KDE has been around.

      I just wish it would start working correctly sometime soon, please!

      Out of everything in the world, can any open source program other than perhaps scribus print wysiwyg? Can any program handle postscript correctly?

    10. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by Synic · · Score: 1

      well what if the screen width is wider than the printed page? then what? you end up with images that either resize, get cropped, or text is pushed around onto other pages. you can end up with two pages printing for a single page in browser with an orphan on the 2nd page.

    11. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what does it matter if the fonts do not match? i might like seeing something in my output other than some derivative of nimbus.

    12. Re:KDE NEEDS WYSIWYG PRINTING by bsartist · · Score: 1

      well what if the screen width is wider than the printed page? then what?

      In a WYSIWYG app, you get the same layout, scaled to fit. So you either have vertical scrolling to view the whole page, or unused space to the left and/or right of the document display area.

      you end up with images that either resize, get cropped, or text is pushed around onto other pages. you can end up with two pages printing for a single page in browser

      Like I said before: HTML isn't WYSIWYG.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  5. But... by PowerPunk · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is it Merkel or Schröder?

    1. Re:But... by KhanReaper · · Score: 1

      Oh, who needs merKel or KSchroeder when you could have KStoiber?

      --
      Even the Politburo concurs with Process of Elimination http://process-of-elimination.net
    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Nice to know the umlauts weren't broken with the CSS switch.

  6. Two Words by mpapet · · Score: 1, Informative

    Print Selection

    One of many basic features that remains unfulfilled.

    One example of the fundamental difference between OSS and commercial offerings.

    Now, if you can work just fine without such a simple feature, then KDE is great. I use it and have been for quite a while now. But KDE is low on the WAF. (Wife Acceptance Factor)

    I know, more than two words. Don't get your knickers in a bunch.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:Two Words by Knome_fan · · Score: 1

      One word: Idiot!
      Why?
      Not because you might not be right about some feature missing, but for taking out one missing feature and bashing a whole desktop and in fact OSS in general based on it.

      That's just stupid trolling.

    2. Re:Two Words by user317 · · Score: 1, Informative

      huh? kde works with cups lpr lpd and rlpr. setting up yor printer is outside the scope of kde and should be done by your distro/admin, but once printing is working its fairly trivial to select that printer that you use. my office uses lpr, and my laptop running gentoo automatically finds all the printers on the network. i can select the one that i want to print using, you guessed it File->Print. A dialog box pops up where you can select the printer that you want to use under Name:. so wtf r u talking about?

      --
      me fail english? thats unpossible
    3. Re:Two Words by binford2k · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. He's talking about making a selection (such as a text selection of a paragraph or two) and then printing only that selection. Not selecting a printer to print to. Unix has done that for 30 years.

    4. Re:Two Words by bsartist · · Score: 2, Informative

      A dialog box pops up where you can select the printer that you want to use under Name:. so wtf r u talking about?

      Perhaps if you spent more time reading standard English and less time using "cute" messaging baby-talk, you'd understand. The OP didn't say he has a problem selecting a printer. He said he has a problem printing the current selection. That is, the currently selected text.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    5. Re:Two Words by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Text selection, not printer selection.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    6. Re:Two Words by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny
      But KDE is low on the WAF. (Wife Acceptance Factor)

      KDE's WAF an KidAF scores are pretty high in my household. Maybe you need to upgrade your W?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:Two Words by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      I believe the bug report in bugs.kde.org actually have patch you can apply to achieve that. Otherwise expect it for KDE 4. Until then you can use the rich text copy-paste to move the selection including mark-up to another document and print that.

    8. Re:Two Words by Gleng · · Score: 1

      My wife uses KDE. I use either Gnome or WindowMaker. Why can't we argue about normal things like other couples?

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    9. Re:Two Words by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      I hear W2.0 has some pretty good features but don't forget the service packs which will fix some security holes that existed out of the box or would that be In the box?

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    10. Re:Two Words by cvd6262 · · Score: 1

      When I first got into Linux (when KDE2 was new), my wife made me config her login to use Gnome. Why? Because she liked "the cute mushroom and ladybug icons."

      --

      I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    11. Re:Two Words by bluGill · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of icon themes in KDE that you can choose from if eye candy is your only issue. Though if eye candy is your only issue, then Gnome is just as good as KDE, though in different ways.

      IF you want to get into a Gnome/KDE flamewar you need something more than icon themes to argue about.

  7. It is Schröder... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

    ... or else they would have called it Kanzlerin.

    1. Re:It is Schröder... by High+Hat · · Score: 1

      Nope, that would've been more like (K/F)rankenstein ...

  8. Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by Einherjer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Konqueror (I suppose with the Apple patches in, thanks guys) now succeeds at rendering the ACID2 Webstandard-Tests (yes, we know that it's not an official standard. Firefox still can't do this.

    And best of all, its got AdBlock-like functionality integrated, that works like a charm. Even with the Filter G Set for Mozilla Adblock.

    That's one less user for Firefox, I'm sticking to Konqueror now as it is faster and not as memory-greedy.

    Check it out!

    1. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by Microlith · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's nice.

      Get back to me when Konqueror runs on Windows.

    2. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by m50d · · Score: 1

      A lot of the patches had to be rewritten and others could only be merged after apple opened up its VCS (which it only did after the row provoked by those patches), it wasn't just a question of dropping in the Apple patches. It was quite a flamewar if you remember.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by zecg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use KDE and would gladly browse using Konqueror, if only Scrapbook (http://amb.vis.ne.jp/mozilla/scrapbook/) wasn't da shit.

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    4. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by Einherjer · · Score: 2, Informative
    5. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by Einherjer · · Score: 1

      oui, but they opened up and that's what matters, after all they were not obliged to do so.
      (the long-old discussion of "choose the right license if you can't cope with it".)

      I say kudos to the KHTML/Konqueror Team for making this world-class engine,
      and also to the Apple WebCore Team for improving it even further.

    6. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by Danuvius · · Score: 1
      Konqueror (I suppose with the Apple patches in, thanks guys) now succeeds at rendering the ACID2 Webstandard-Tests (yes, we know that it's not an official standard.
      Do you not think that Konqueror developers have the talent and the ingenuity to make their own browser render CSS properly... without the help of (by comparison) newbie developers who quickly littered their fork full of OS-specific code?

      Have you missed the whole big thing about Apple's changes not being clean enough to merge back into Konqueror?
      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    7. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by Einherjer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure I understand your point here.

      Are you an Apple developer so you know that they are "newbie developers" ? Do you know that they littered their source? Have you even looked at WebCore?
      I did, and it is one of the tightest integration of an HTML engine I've ever seen.
      I presume you miss the goal of what was to accomplish:

      1. the KHTML want to make a full-fledged HTML engine
      2. the Apple guys want to make an Apple Webbrowser(!)

      there are fundamentally different concepts of the two being compatible in the process of engineering. that the KHTML guys wanted to know what they did is understandable, as per required by the license, but, once more, the Apple guys were never obliged to make the
      source "generic" as the KHTML engine would need it (one could wish).
      it was only after this reputation clash, that they opened up all of their WebCore to show their good will.

      so no bad rep. to apple for this. also no bad rep. to khtml for this. why?
      because in the end, what matters is, that both of the projects improved.

    8. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by Spoing · · Score: 1

      Scrapbook is what I wanted when bookmarks first came out. Very slick.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    9. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by digidave · · Score: 1

      I would love to switch to Konqueror, but there are serious issues with trying to configure it as both a good browser and a file manager. For instance:

      1. As a file manager I can set the Home button to take me to my home directory. But I can't set the browser's Home button to Google at the same time. Either I get a file manager's Home or a browser's Home.

      2. I love Konqueror's tabbed file manager interface. When I have one instance open and I open another directory, I get a new tab instead of a new window. Perfect. Unfortunately, if I have a Konqueror browser open, the new file manager tab will appear in my browser. Sure, I can detatch it after the fact, but that's not the way it should work. I know I can select to always open external links in a new window, but I like the tabs when using the file manager.

      3. The window won't remember separate position and size attributes for the browser and file manager unless I mess around with KDE's window preferences, which doesn't work very well since it resizes dialogs and other things in the same app.

      There are a couple more points I can nitpick, but I won't right now. Konqueror is just too good a file manager for me to give it up so I can use the browser properly. In fact, Konqueror is the best file manager I've ever used (tabs! yes!). Great software, but a poor separation between file manager and web browser. I've been on the lookout for a 3rd party lightweight KHTML browser. It'd be great to have a Firefox clone with extension support that ran KHTML.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    10. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      I use Opera. Now it's free. Doesn't pass Acid2, but damn close. It's quick in loading itself and rendering pages. Crossplatform. Has mouse gestures and a mail client. For four megs.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    11. Re:Konqueror succeeds at ACID2 and gets Adblock! by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Everything you want to do can be achieved by hand editing the user profiles, and then putting a 'load profile' button in your main toolbar.

      Define separate homes for browsing and file managing.

      I believe you can specify target windows for file manager tabs. You'd need to edit your default file manager profile

      Any of the KDE window settings can be defined in the view profile, and it will be specific to the profile.

      The only problem is you can't get multiple bars for the user profiles on your toolbar, just a 'load profile' button

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  9. uninspiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seriously KDE has never been as uninspiring. It used to be a Kool desKtop but now it just sucKs. Kan't they just maKe the whole experience easier on everyday people? What bugs me about them is that they Kopy windows and do a bad job at it.

    1. Re:uninspiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sucK it trebek

  10. both? by william_w_bush · · Score: 1

    They're forming a coalition together, but unfortunately it's incompatible with the gpl.

    So it looks like you're all stuck with communism again, so have fun with that!

    --
    The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
  11. Doh! by uberjoe · · Score: 4, Funny
    Qt 3.3.5 was released too late to adapt to it and it shows some fundamental compilation problems

    Oh Krap!

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  12. Website information by Shotgun · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why should I care?

    Really, in the best writing classes that I've ever taken, the instructed always made the point that a writer should always be first concerned with why would the reader care about the subject matter.

    I looked all over KDE's website. About all I could find was "Here's a new beta. Try it and tell us what you think." But, nowhere did it give me any reason to want to try it. I use KDE on a production basis, but there's no reason for me to go poking around and messing with stuff that ain't broken unless there is some benefit to realize.

    Hey, guys and gals. I know ya'll've been working on something. What have you fixed/upgraded/added?

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    1. Re:Website information by mkro · · Score: 5, Informative

      KDE 3.5 feature plan. Green is finished, yellow is in progress, red not started.
      Anyone tried the MSN and Yahoo webcam support in Kopete yet?

      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    2. Re:Website information by urborg · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Website information by sillysnipes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IMHO I have to agree.

      Take the recent Gnome release. A few screenshots, a bit of bragging about what they felt was cool and a simple overview that showed they had added some interesting stuff. Got me interested enough to go look at Ubuntu.

      Now look at the KDE. All we have is a feature plan which isn't even directly linked to anywhere on the page. Now add that a lot of people aren't interested in how replacing the klistbox with a klistview will improve usability. The end result is that the average user won't get the information that tells them why 3.5 is going to rock their world, and compel them to upgrade.

      Sure its a beta, but even then, it would be nice to know what is planned/implemented thats in plain English.

    4. Re:Website information by manyoso · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't care. Nothing at all to see. Move along. Nothing to see here.

    5. Re:Website information by Klivian · · Score: 2, Informative

      The end result is that the average user won't get the information that tells them why

      It's a beta and it really tells it all. If you are not interested in helping finding bugs to make the 3.5 release better, this release is not for you. That's essentially what betas are for, not the average user.

    6. Re:Website information by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Versus... "Hey, boss... chat me up in 'Trillian' on 'ICQ' while I fire up 'Firefox'"?

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    7. Re:Website information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt the same. Where's the changelog, and why should should I have to go hunting for it?
      If they're proud of their accomplishments, you'd sure never know.

    8. Re:Website information by pherthyl · · Score: 1

      Better than generic names.
      "Yeah boss, just open up explorer and navigate to.. No, not MSN explorer, not internet explorer, just windows explorer!"

    9. Re:Website information by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

      I'm not a Linux user and simply browsed the todo list. One thing that caught my attention was the topic of adding a basic non-scientific mode to KCalc. Why? Maybe somebody absolutely want 1+2*3 to equal 9.

    10. Re:Website information by Mornelithe · · Score: 1

      There have been similar previews for KDE 3.5 as well. These were even featured on Slashdot.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    11. Re:Website information by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't say "Open up Explorer." You'd say something like "Open My Computer."

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    12. Re:Website information by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Uh, you would just tell them to start Messenger while you opened Internet Explorer. Sorry, those are the most used in enterprises. Next.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    13. Re:Website information by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      What is Messenger? I've never even heard of it.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  13. Alternative native Window Mangers for Windows by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why not? Someone ported Afterstep to Windows. It was a native port, too, not using Cygwin. It should be possible for someone to examine how the replacement of the Windows GUI was achieved, and the X calls shouldn't pose a problem as KDE uses Qt, and Qt will run under Windows. Anything KDE doesn't do through Qt should be solvable by looking to see how the Afterstep port solved the problem.


    What I'd LOVE to see is someone porting the full KDE system to run natively on Windows, then write a layer that'll handle Windows GUI calls and DirectX through KDE. A screenshot of that would freak out so many people...

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Alternative native Window Mangers for Windows by jd · · Score: 1

      The forest with nobody in it would.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Alternative native Window Mangers for Windows by m50d · · Score: 1
      What I'd LOVE to see is someone porting the full KDE system to run natively on Windows, then write a layer that'll handle Windows GUI calls and DirectX through KDE. A screenshot of that would freak out so many people...

      Considering how horrible-looking and slow gtk-qt-engine is, I don't think such a layer would be very useful.

      --
      I am trolling
  14. Re:KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least KDE is trying to copy an OS launched in 2001. Gnome is trying to clone MacOS 8, launched in 1997. Pfft!

  15. Better yet... by jd · · Score: 1
    Snapshots exist for Qt 4, so why not do a port for that? The KDE team'll need to do the port sometime anyway and it doesn't matter if Qt 4's API isn't stable yet provided the difference between the API now and when it stabilizes is less than the difference between the Qt they're using now and the final Qt 4, as they'll still save effort in the long-run. It'd also give them a feel for any tuning needed for Qt 4.


    Of course, this is pretty obvious stuff - the bleeding-edge branch of any rapid project is almost invariably going to stay as far ahead of the curve as possible, so that the software is moderately stable by the time the code hits beta-testing and beta-testers can concentrate on QC, not feature-fixing.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Better yet... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative
      Snapshots exist for Qt 4, so why not do a port for that?

      Erm, that's what KDE 4 is.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Better yet... by Bralkein · · Score: 2, Informative

      KDE 4 has been underway for a little while now, and all of the software is being ported over to Qt 4. If you read this little article, then maybe it will help you see what they're doing.

  16. Wha? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kanzler? I thought Microsoft's beta naming conventions were goofy, but after Mandriva and now Kanzler, I think a torch has been passed.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Wha? by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Informative
      Kanzler? I thought Microsoft's beta naming conventions were goofy, but after Mandriva and now Kanzler, I think a torch has been passed.

      Like many of their other release names, it's German. And probably a reference to the current election mess in Germany (Kanzler = chancellor).

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
  17. Re: Huh? by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Scenario 1. Print a portion of a newsgroup digest from Kmail.
    Let's say the digest contains two U.S. Letter sized pages of text of which I want to print a single insightful portion.
    -File>Print....... Guess what? I can't print a selection because there's no option in either Kmail's File menu or KDE's print dialog box.

    Scenario 2. Print a portion of code from KDE's text editor.
    The file is open in the text editor and the editor does a beautiful job of rendering the code. Now, I want to print just one section.
    -File>Print..... Surprise, no print selection option under File menu or Print dialog boxes.

    Scenario 3. Print a selection from Mozilla browser.
    With the browser open on some URL with text, highlight some text on a page.
    -File>Print>Option Selection is available as an option.

    Details my friend, details.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  18. Meh by stud9920 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Windows NT has been past that since what ? 1995 ?

  19. kiolucene vs beagle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the power of kde framework!!
    hey guys Kde have a full featured search well integrated to kde and all apps
    http://kioclucene.objectis.net/

    beagle ? hahahahahha

    1. Re:kiolucene vs beagle by Knome_fan · · Score: 3, Informative

      kiolucene doesn't search the content of files, so comparing it to beagle is a very stupid attempt a trolling at best.

      However, there also is kio_beagle, wich let's you use beagle from within konqueror.
      http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=2 8437

      And while we are at it, there is of course kat, which is roughly the kde equivalent to beagle right now. Kat will see a major redisign in the next version according to the developers and will work together with kiolucene.

    2. Re:kiolucene vs beagle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >kiolucene doesn't search the content of files

      That is 100% _wrong_. Kio-clucene searches the content of file, of course. What would be the point of using a (c)lucene library, if not for full text indexing...

    3. Re:kiolucene vs beagle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What *are* you talking about? What did you think it indexes with lucene, the file names?

  20. KDE still has a long way to go! by hvatum · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    KDE gets in my way in all the same ways Windows does. This is a Bad
    Thing. This has nothing to do with what theme or wm I'm using in KDE,
    KDE just seems to be overly grandious about providing a freaking
    desktop environment. The KDE menu is also organized very bizarrely
    (for someone coming from straight-out AfterStep).

    I've been using computers since I was 8, and I started on a VAX where
    my father was the sysadmin. I, of all people, should not be
    overwhelmed by KDE. Simplify it, folks! KDE is so baroque, it
    wouldn't surprise me if it pisses off Windows users, and you've seen
    what kind of interfacial abuse they subject themselves to.

    There is very little I can't change in gnome in more than five
    mouse clicks.

    However, one thing that tweaks me about both DEs, still, is that they
    go out and clone xterm. Uuh, why? And why make it as ugly and only
    slightly more useful than Windows Telnet? I realise that DE's are
    supposed to be most helpful for newbies, but *jeeze*, I have to wonder
    if anybody stopped for a moment and thought that maybe unleashing
    something as garish and stubborn as Windows Telnet on the Linux
    community isn't the right thing to do.

    It's too bad that this new release of KDE won't address any of these
    problems.

    --
    Netbooks, they come with Linux or a $3 copy of Windows. Either way, Microsoft loses.
    1. Re:KDE still has a long way to go! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      However, one thing that tweaks me about both DEs, still, is that they go out and clone xterm. Uuh, why?

      <feed object="troll">For starters, because xterm doesn't have tabs. Second, because most people don't want to edit .Xdefaults to change their console font. Those two alone are enough for me.</feed>

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:KDE still has a long way to go! by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that xterm's scrollback support is fundamentally broken.

      Konsole and Gnome-Terminal are the only terminal apps that scroll back properly. I don't use KDE as my WM/DE anymore (I use Ion now), but I still use Konsole as my only terminal app when I'm in X.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    3. Re:KDE still has a long way to go! by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Care to elaborate?
      What about xterms scrollback support is broken?

      Scrolls back just fine for me...

    4. Re:KDE still has a long way to go! by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      xterm won't let you scroll back when something is running in the terminal. It's rather important when I'm, say, compiling something, and I need to scroll back and look at some of the messages.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    5. Re:KDE still has a long way to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does xterm*scrollTtyOutput: False in .Xdefaults fix this?

    6. Re:KDE still has a long way to go! by dutchd00d · · Score: 1

      "Fundamentally broken"?

      Ctrl-middleclick in the xterm window. You'll get a menu called "VT Options". Unselect "Scroll to Bottom on Tty Output".

    7. Re:KDE still has a long way to go! by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      well, and here's the third way to do it:

      xterm -si

    8. Re:KDE still has a long way to go! by vdboor · · Score: 1
      Let's not forget that xterm's scrollback support is fundamentally broken.

      Not only that.. try running "
      time ls -lR
      " in a xterm twice.. now run it on Konsole twice.. A semi-transparent konsole just beats a blank xterm in drawing speed..!
      --
      The best way to accelerate a windows server is by 9.81 m/s2 ;-)
  21. good linux desktop by illuminix · · Score: 1

    It still seems like nothing is there yet. At home, I run the big 3.. OSX, Windows, and Linux. It may be for a lack of looking, but I still haven't found a desktop manager for linux that really screamed "COOL". So I've settled for fluxbox which is light and functional.

    Currently I have to run all three to get everything I want. I love the OSX desktop. As a unix administrator who works from home quite a bit, I rely on linux. It's the swiss army knife of my environment.. (firewall, file server, terminal desktop, etc). And windows, as much as I resent it, I need it around to play my games. And as such, I grudgingly give it the best hardware.

    If there were an OS that was based on linux with a desktop like OSX Tiger that (easily) ran windows games / software, I would cash out my 401k and fill my house with boxes running it.

    So, to tie it back in with the topic.. KDE just doesn't do anything for me at all.

    --
    http://cubemonkey.net/quotes -- fortune-mod quote generator
    1. Re:good linux desktop by Silkejr · · Score: 1

      The only person who can really judge for you what's cool is you. To that end, and considering that 100% of KDE is pretty easily customizable, why don't you try bothering to make it cool instead of bitching about its default characteristics?

    2. Re:good linux desktop by illuminix · · Score: 1

      How do you know I haven't? I've installed it, and tweaked around with it. It doesn't do it for me. Too much "cutsie and the letter K".

      Thanks for the advice though.

      --
      http://cubemonkey.net/quotes -- fortune-mod quote generator
    3. Re:good linux desktop by Tab+is+on+Slashdot · · Score: 0
      It may be for a lack of looking, but I still haven't found a desktop manager for linux that really screamed "COOL".
      E17 is what you're looking for.
    4. Re:good linux desktop by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What might be good is a Windows-alike that doesn't do the XP-bloat thing.

      For some folks, at least. As for me, while I still use a lot of KDE apps (including Konqueror for my file manager), I switched to WindowMaker for my desktop about a month ago and immediately noticed a performance boost. (2.8 GHZ Pentium with 1GB RAM that's less than a year old, so it's not exactly ancient hardware I'm using here.) Starting a wterm takes about a fifth as long as it does to fire up Konsole, for instance, and switching desktops is also much faster. Running WM on my new laptop has proven a bit tricky with the touchpad (wayyy too sensitive and there doesn't seem to be any easy means of adjusting it), so I blew a big 20 bucks on a mini-mouse and now it's golden.

      I find that I'm heaps more productive since I made the change.

      On the eye-candy end of things, WM themes are so easy to make that my mom could probably do it. ;)

      The only thing I miss from KDE is the Kalendar popup taskbar applet, and I have yet to find a WM equivalent.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    5. Re:good linux desktop by illuminix · · Score: 1

      I remember hearing something about E17, but I never actually looked into it. After looking at the screenies, it looks pretty slick. I'll give it a shot tonight. Thanks!

      --
      http://cubemonkey.net/quotes -- fortune-mod quote generator
    6. Re:good linux desktop by schleyfox · · Score: 1

      As someone who is using it now, I will reccommend it highly. Screenshots do not do it justice. The effects that are everywhere and the polish really make everything happy. I used to be a fluxbox user because I am into the minimalism, but I now use E17 all the time because it is just as fast. E17 has also been quite stable for me, more stable than kde in any case. It is a bit of an adventure to get it installed (I use gentoo so its not bad) but it is highly worth the effort. If you are used to fluxbox like stuff, then you will appreciate it, it is not a windows clone type thing at all.

    7. Re:good linux desktop by cozziewozzie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to do this for the longest time. I ran Afterstep with a kde session running in the background. Then, at work, I ran WindowMaker using the same setup.

      Eventually, I found that KWin can be configured to work almost exactly like AfterStep (which was my ideal WM for a long time), and that it isn't in fact any slower.

      Now I'm simply running a full KDE desktop. It looks a lot like AfterStep, and nothing like a regular KDE default, but i find it works just as well as AS/WM and it saves me some trouble.

      Similarly, I learned to love Konsole, although I used to be an aterm diehard.

      With time, KDE caught up with my special requirements, while getting more stable, featureful and faster.

    8. Re:good linux desktop by Budenny · · Score: 1

      Two good things about WM. It runs well on slow hardware. I've seen acceptable speed on 64MB/200Mhz MMX. And if you are in a kind of kiosk environment with computer-wary people, its an interface they are fine with. I've showed it to a bunch of retired ladies who started out saying, we don't know about computers. After five minutes, which was basically double click on the icons to start your apps, go between desktops using the arrows on this icon, the reaction I got was something like, of course I can use this. Probably not good for the home user who wants lots of multimedia and stuff, but if you just want access to one or two apps in a simple administrative work environment, its great. Really worth considering if you are settng up a poor charity with some kind of database lookup app and WP/Spreadsheet.

  22. AARRRGGGHH!! KDE has print selection!!!111oneone by Knome_fan · · Score: 1

    How about:
    File>Print>Option>text settings and choose print selected text only?

  23. Re:Getting Ready by mpapet · · Score: 1

    If you can step away from the emotional response you had, you might acknowledge the following:

    1. I didn't bash a whole desktop. As my original post states, I use it. It's good for me, but as the Print Selection feature example points out, there are some feature gaps. I tend to think they're pretty boring gaps to fill which is why someone hasn't taken the time to do it. But the gaps narrow their potential user base.

    2. As OSS matures, people far more detail oriented than me are evaluating it for adoption on a large scale. So, if KDE is looking for commercial acceptance, then the DE need to be ready for this kind of objective and potentially unflatering review.

    3. Look at it as growing pains. Maybe KDE wants commercial acceptance. If they do, they may need to pause and fill in the gaps. That's the way I see it anyway.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  24. Quite beaten, but... by Mustafu · · Score: 0

    KDE 3.5 Beta? Sweet! I for one welcome our new desktop Koverlords.

  25. Re:Getting Ready by Knome_fan · · Score: 1

    If you had actually cared to investigate, you'd be aware of the fact that KDE actually has the feature you are "missing".

    1. Two words: You did!

    2. And I quote: "One example of the fundamental difference between OSS and commercial offerings."

  26. Re:AARRRGGGHH!! KDE has print selection!!!111oneon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Even as a huge KDE fan, I must say that I don't see that option when viewing this page from Konqueror. It *is* there when printing text from kate, but it is on a tab that's only there for text. Furthermore, I would expect it to be near the page selection options on the Copies tab, and not on another tab.

    OTOH, I don't think this is important enough to bash KDE on, but that may just be me hardly ever needing such a thing.

  27. Re:Eterm RuleZ j00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using KDE solidly since v3... Konsole is awesome for one reason, tabbed consoles. That's sweet! But over-all, I prefer Eterm. It's light and fast. I installed quite a few fonts that are awesome, with my custom color console text scripts/DIRCOLORS, fonts, random Eterm backgrounds, small size, quick. I love it. It's still lacking tabs *sigh*. But konsole always seemed big and clunky to me.

    Now, one thing I'd like to see in the KDE eye candy department, is smaller widgets. Like in Gnome, they have themes with skinny scrollbars. It seems like every KDE theme has big fat buttons and scrollbars. And some of the browser plugins have a tendancy to crash/not work in Konqueror vs Firefox (last time I tried it).... Hmm, that's about the extent of things I can think of to bitch about in KDE. So overall. It's pretty damn sweet. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this proj...

  28. Kitchensync? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Any hope of being able to sync to a WinCE PDA?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  29. Live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any live CDs available for a quick look?

  30. Re:Getting Ready by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't bash a whole desktop.

    No, you bashed the entire open-source movement. You said:

    One of many basic features that remains unfulfilled.

    One example of the fundamental difference between OSS and commercial offerings.

    What exactly did you mean by that, if not that OSS was fundamentally incapable of offering basic features?

  31. Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like every version bump of KDE always comes out before the problems with the previous version ever gets fixed. I have followed KDE for a long time and have never considered the desktop as a reliable, stable program. Instead of continuously creating new bells and whistles with new problems, why don't the KDE folks try and create a reliable, stable program first? Or does that just make too much good sense?

    1. Re:Crap by KayosIII · · Score: 1

      Can't say I share your experience... KDE has been solid for me since about 3.1 - care to elaborate on what does not work for you ??? anyways My belief is that 3.5 is mostly a bugfix release anyways

  32. Don't ask by Peaker · · Score: 1

    Don't ask what your KDE can do for you.

    Ask what YOU can do for your KDE.

  33. KDE? Huh? by asackett · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm just as lame as a one-legged duck, but would someone please explain why I ought to ditch GnuStep in favor of KDE? Dammit, I have work to do, and none of it involves learning how to futz around with my UI!

    --

    Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.

  34. but... by kioopi · · Score: 1

    does it run on OSX.

  35. X11 deps by msh104 · · Score: 1

    it's also nice to notice that "removing X11 dependancy" from kdebase and kdelibs is on the todo list. this will make it even easier to port kde to windows. (or native mac)

  36. Konsole and KDE desktop switching by shani · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Starting a wterm takes about a fifth as long as it does to fire up Konsole, for instance, and switching desktops is also much faster.

    I am running on a 1.7 GHz laptop right now, and it takes less than one second to start up Konsole:
    $ time konsole -e "/bin/echo"

    real 0m0.603s
    user 0m0.409s
    sys 0m0.033s
    Did you actually time the startup of the shell? Even if you did, do you really notice the 0.5 seconds of difference? For myself, KDE's "bloat" actually increases my efficiency, because I can create a new tab in Konsole rather than opening a new shell.

    As for the desktop switching... the desktops switch faster than I can click - I tried to use the hotkeys to outrun the system (Ctrl-F1, Ctrl-F2, ...), but it is faster than I am.

    KDE is not inherently slow.
    1. Re:Konsole and KDE desktop switching by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
      Did you actually time the startup of the shell?

      No. Why should I? I don't need to use the eyedropper extension to tell that the Slashdot logo is white on green, either.

      Even if you did, do you really notice the 0.5 seconds of difference?

      Yes. wterm or xterm is virtually instantaneous, and I can tell that Konsole takes a LOT longer than 0.5 sec to start up. (Don't get me wrong, I like the tabs okay. But I don't need a stopwatch to tell me which one's faster.)

      As for the desktop switching... the desktops switch faster than I can click.

      In WindowMaker, I usually just use the scrollwheel. WHEEEEEE...! ;)

      I've had the opportunity to compare the performance of KDE, Gnome, and WindowMaker at length on 5 different machines (would be 6 except for my remaining token Win2K box), and on every one of them, WindowMaker runs rings around KDE, and is somewhat faster than Gnome. If I had to choose between KDE and Gnome, I'd go with KDE even though Gnome is quicker. Speed is important, but it's not the only consideration.

      But this isn't a pissing contest; you can use what you like. And I can use whatever I like. Which, come to think of it, is one of the reasons why I switched to *nix.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  37. Re:KDE by pedicabo · · Score: 0

    Gnome? Gnome? who's talking about gnome?

  38. Either one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... as long as the full title doesn't start with Reichs...