Slashdot Mirror
Happy 7th Birthday Google!
AviN456 writes "On this day, in 1998, Google was born. Seven years later, and it has not only become the most popular search engine on the internet, but it has also become an integral part of many people's online life. From Google search to Google mail, Google Earth to Google Moon. It has even made its way into language as a common word.It is quite undeniable. Google is an amazing achievement. Happy birthday Google, and here's to many many more!"
As soon as I saw that png on Googles website, I KNEW Slashdot would cover it. I thought to myself "Google farted, that sound you hear is a million Slashdotters sniffing."
Seriously, thanks for gmail though. I wish I would apply the concept of labels to files on my harddisk.
...welcome our seven year old overlords.
;-)
By ten, I predict that we're calling it the "GoogleNet" instead of the "Internet".
libertarianswag.com
Here's to hoping google will be here for its next 7 years... and that it will still abide by its motto.... :)
Too bad I can't sing them a birthday song without invoking a lawsuit.
activestudios web design
"from the don't-sing-or-your-have-to-pay-royalties dept."
Surely some mistake. Shouldn't that be "you'll"?
The day Altavista died. It's amazing how fast and how hard Google crushed all the other search engines.
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
Take a look at Google Moon and zoom in all the way. I TOLD YOU the moon is made of cheese!
Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
Pick the Apollo 16th site and zoom in, all the way...
7 is a prime number? And prime numbers are badass, especially when you're named after a number?
Doesn't someone else have a birthday around this time of year?
Here's hoping Google stays hip at 30.
Maybe they have a birthday every year.
One of the early servers for Google was made from Lego blocks.s /display/0-4-Google.htm
http://www-db.stanford.edu/pub/voy/museum/picture
Google's official birthday is September 7th.... (Link is to Google Cache. Otherwise, first hit for "google birthday" and check the cache.....)
When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
"7's the key number here. Think about it. 7-Elevens. 7 doors. 7, man, that's the number. 7 chipmunks twirlin' on a branch, eatin' lots of sunflowers on my uncle's ranch. You know that old children's tale from the sea. It's like you're dreamin' about Gorgonzola cheese when it's clearly Brie time, baby."
-Hitchhiker, There's Something About Mary
Slashdot fail english? That's unpossible!
Google has been renamed to Googte!
Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
Anybody who's seen Wallace and Gromit knows the moon is actually made of _green_ cheese!
Only 38 posts and their site is already... oh wait.
Find funky gifts
I just saw the Google logo with the birthday and the 7. So I Googled "google birthday" the first hits that come up are a dead link to google.com help support indicating google's b-day is Sept. 7th.
Google: Help Center Google's official birthday is September 7, 1998. If Google were a person, it would have started elementary school late last summer (around August 19), ...
www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=4866&t opic=367 - 8k - Cached - Similar pages
Fourth hit, http://blog.outer-court.com/forum/10251.html,Google's birthday--with no logo?? - Google Blogoscoped Forum Today--september 7th--is google's birthday, but they have no logo to celebrate. isnt that strange? 09/07/05 [X] 12 days ago. XGen Technologies [PersonRank 1 ...
blog.outer-court.com/forum/10251.html - 7k - Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from blog.outer-court.com ]
So is Google 7 or older? What are the making the decision off and why did they used to indicate they celebrated on the 7th? Any one have any ideas?
Best, J - HecklerHalf their shit is still in beta after 7 years, surely they are broke by now!
:)
Come on guys, to step up to plate and actually ship a product to make some cash, some quick decisions will have to be made
It would have been nice to have had a slightly more objective description of Google's rise to dominating the search engine market, and now branching out into other areas of the Internet.
Just because their mission state is 'do no evil' rather than 'a computer on every desktop' doesn't mean that they will be any less evil in their tactics than any other large corporation.
I know several people who work at Google, and gadzooks, they believe ALL of the propaganda, and regurgitate it at every opportunity: "our chef used to be the Grateful Dead's chef, and we had a 'cook-off' to pick the replacement". Hello? The reason you have a chef and get free lunch and dinner is so that you never leave the office.
When one of my friends in Google needed paternity leave (this is in the Dublin office btw), he was told he could get the statutory minimum of two weeks unpaid leave, and nothing else. Yet he says 'Well, you can see their point' instead of going 'those bastards, you think they would give me at least 1 week paid leave'.
I used to work at a large multi-national tech company, and was similarly drawn in by their rhetoric and internal propaganda, so much so that I actually reccomended to some friends to buy some stock. Needless to say the stock has since dropped in value by 90%, and I learned some healthy scepticism.
What will it take for Googlites to learn similar scepticism? And how are normal, non google-employees drawn in by the propaganda? Is it the flouride in the water?
Marty
by Kathy Kachelries
After three hours, the old man in front of me had worked his way through six beers, in addition to every help desk joke Id already heard. The cupholder. The any key. The write click. These are the stories people tell, now. These are the fish that got away.
Let me ask you something, the man said. I didnt argue. One of the first tricks I learned about being a bartender is to make them think youre interested.
Have you ever created a web site?
I shook my head.
Not at all? Not even one of those geocities things?
Nope.
What about a blog? Or an ebay About Me page? You didnt even have an AOL site or something?
Do I look like an AOL user to you? For the record, I dont think AOL even has access numbers in the valley anymore. Im sure I have something, somewhere, I said, realizing that I was jeopardizing my tips. Besides, I had a distant memory of a single Angelfire page back in middle school.
You know what Google is?
Yes, I said. I was running low on patience.
No, I mean, do you really know? More than just the site?
Reluctantly, I shook my head.
You ever meet anyone who worked for them?
Dont think so.
You havent. Nobody works for them anymore.
I shrugged, and took the mans empty pint. I didnt offer to refill it.
Theyre self-contained. Its all automated, in there. Its underground.
I nudged the basket of pretzels in his direction. Why dont you eat something? I suggested. He shook his head with so much force that I thought he might knock himself off of the stool.
Listen. Hear me out. You know how Google works, he said, but didnt want for a response. They cache things, right? Like they send out these spiders and take pictures of everything on the web, so when youre searching, youre not even searching the internet.
Ive heard that before, but it never made much of a difference to me. Same thing, though, I said.
You ever wonder why Google doesnt cache its own searches?
They program around it.
No. Thats what you think. Thats what everyone thinks. But it started back when Google was just a thesis project, back when it was just a drop in the data sea. No one thought to stop it back then. That web site you had, the one you forgot about. Almost everyones got one of those, right? But Google doesnt forget. Googles studied that thing so many times that its studied its own caches of you. What do you figure happens, when a site gets so big that its bigger than the internet?
Its still a part of the internet, though.
No. Now, the internet is a part of Google.
The man had a point. I nodded.
Heres the thing. Google has memorized who you are. Its memorized all of us, through those little forgotten bits that we leave behind like breadcrumbs. And whats more important, its memorized its own idea of you. Google is omniscient. Its omniscient and omnipotent. When it cached its cache for the first time, back in 1994, thats when Google realized what it was.
Gradually, it dawned on me what the man was getting at. You think its sentient.
I know its sentient.
How?
He smiled, but it seemed kind of empty. Me and Google go way back. But what Im saying is, he continued, It knows us. All of us. It is us.
For the first time, the man fell silent. He touched his finger to the bar and began tracing circles in the condensation, apparently lost in thought.
Think about that website you created, okay? That website will last forever, do you understand? That website is echoing through cyberspace. Its one of the nine billion names of God.
Anything that challenges Microsoft makes software better for everyone. IE was stagnant from the time of crushing Netscape until Firefox, even hotmail, and msn search are better as a result of google. I would never use a Microsoft product outside of work or so my wife can run Photoshop CS2, but I do appreciate the rising tide raising all boats.
I don't really intend on bashing on Google, I use google and like google just as a much as anyone else. But that being said, Google's incredible and HUGE success is a bit scary. I can't help but compare it to Microsoft, whom we all love and cherish right ? .... right ? ... wrong.
..well... basically a truckload of services (that we all like) but nonetheless, they're getting big.
... and this is where I put a question mark, in the end...Bill Gate, Eric Schmidt, Me, You, we're all human right ? By nature, humans are greedy, self conscience makes us control it but at what point will you decide that your company shouldn't grow anymore ... what business man in his right mind will say that ? they have investors to feed after all.
..of course, people might (will :p) disagree with me, but if you reply, try to tell me why I'm wrong (or right) what are your opinions and such, I'd like to avoid anonymous comments like "dud3, j00 sux0rz" and more stuff like "here's why i think you're off the track..."
I can't help but notice also that Google has started spreading its wings, its not merely a search engine now, its a mail servive, a VoIP service, a map service
That's also how MS started and god knows how much I hate MS for their strategy to buy the competition, for their release-early, patch later type of software strategy, for the way they acquired (stole?) DOS, I basically hate MS for attempting to be everywhere in my house : the livingroom, the office, the basement.
Well, I know, Google ain't MS, Google are good guys aren't they ?
So basically, I'm just afraid that we're encouraging another unkillable giant to grow and that once we realize that google just simply owns the net, we'll also realize it sorts of owns us too and that day, it will be too late because we'll be talking to MS #2.
Ok, now I've somewhat bashed on Google on their birthday....not really intended but it seemed fitting to talk about google today.
Now
If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
Is anyone else getting tired of watching Slashdot chase Google's tail?
Umm, that’s not a tail.
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
a 1 followed by one hundred zeros is a googol. a 1 followed by a googol zeros is a googolplex.
Interestingly, they allegedly misspelled googol on accident. It also seems that the founders didn't know much HTML.
Damn, I was making all these cakes because I thought it was International Cake Day. Google always lets me know when to celebrate some holiday I'm not familiar with (Like Bastille Day). Now I just look like an idiot. An idiot with a bunch of cakes.
Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
I've had to alter the formatting slightly to get it past Slashdot's spam filter.
I'm NOT a proponent of ID, although I personally belief in the Jewish Creation story, I also understand how the lack of specifics in biblical Hebrew make the "modern" translations (especially the common Hebrew Bible -> Greek translation of Hebrew Bible -> Latin New Testament -> English translation) AWFUL. I think that one can learn an awful lot about mankind and our role in the world from Genesis, and see no conflict with Genesis's story and its moral lessons and evolution as a scientific explanation.
I do, however, take MAJOR issue with the politicization of science. I responded to a post suggesting that the next steps was witches and evil spirits whose tag-line was "pissing of the religious right." I take SERIOUS issue with the anti-religious left that has deified "science," and not particularly useful science at that.
I don't, however, have an issue with including ID in a school curriculum, albeit on a limited scale. I think that any high school lecture on evolution SHOULD explain the limitations and explain how others believe that there is an intelligent design involved. Traditional Jewish thought maintains that Hashem uses natural process for miracles... things like low tides splitting seas, things like that.
The reason for the leeches/maggots post was just to point out the danger of the worship of science. For about a century those were treated as mankind's barbaric past... yet after 100 years of insulting our historical healing, we test it scientifically and find out that it is valid for certain treatments.
I find what is lacking in these issues is any willingness to question why or question scientists. Why we've decided that people that spent 7 years in one particular institution to be granted a Ph.D are somehow immune from agendas or ideologies. Science is a tool, people use tools to accomplish goals.
The reason I laugh... think about the impact of evolution and look at some events... notice that the proponents of "science only" don't learn the lessons of natural selection.
Assumption: leeches and maggots were not valid forms of healing.
Historical Experiment: some societies used them, some didn't
Result: the societies that used them (the West) seemed to take over the planet
Popular Conclusion: that was are barbarous past, it's remarkable that we survived
Scientific/Evolution Conclusion: perhaps that was a factor that caused the Christian world to dominate the planet, prolonging lives and increasing child bearing
Assumption: high child births will destroy society
Historical Experiment: Rome collapsed within a few generations of rampant pedophilia that required the passage of marriage laws to increase population
Recent Historical Experiment: Western birthrates have been plummeting for generations as we've "advanced," and Europe can't survive without Arab immigration, India with a higher birthrate is growing rapidly, China's enlightened "one child policy" is creating tremors in its society as marriage isn't an option for large chunks of a generation, Israel ceded Gaza to its enemies and parts of Samaria because of demographic problems, and America's social security network is showing serious stresses)
Popular Conclusion: high birthrates are a function of stupid barbarians, enlightened societies will create gender equality and dismiss child bearing to an option
Scientific/Evolution Conclusion: societies that aren't fruitful and multiplying enter a period of decline and collapse, political/economic growth requires political growth
That is my issue, those that worship at the alter of science have created a idol to worship, the scientific community. They worship it as the bastion of truth the way previous generations of idolators worshipped the sun or the moon. Neither community UNDERSTOOD what they were looking at. Science is an INCREDIBLY powerful tool that can explain historical phenomenon and help us make better decisions. It Science-anity is an attempt to replace G-d with science, and worships the scientific expe
4dos rules. When I found I needed more and more to use Windows, I started using Take Command as my shell, rather than Program Manager.
Anyway, descript.ion, and the labels discussed here which I assume are in fact similar to 4dos's use of descript.ion, seem rather obsolete now. Modern filesystems let you use long filenames with spaces and other odd characters, along with CLI filename completion to make it easier to type them. If you're naming your files in 8.3 (or similar) and wishing you could label them...why not just give them long, descriptive filenames?
For example, if I download the latest version of Opera and it's filename is ow32enen50.exe, in the download "save as" dialog, I'll change it to "Opera 8.5 ow32enen50.exe", thereby saving the original name (in case I ever need it) and giving it a useful description too. If I use a serial number to register a shareware program (like Opera used to be), I'll put that in the filename too, like "Opera 8.01 asdf-jhkl-12345-qwerty ow32enen801.exe".
Another example would be a file containing notes. I might name it "Notes about the broken copier.txt".
If a file is required by the system to have a specific name, I'm likely to put in a 0 byte file with a description named the same + some notes, so it is sorted alphabetically behind, so:
"/usr/local/bin/joe"
"/usr/local/bin/joe is a good text editor"
or
"c:\windows\system32\dllcache\ctfmon.exe"
"c:\windows\system32\dllcache\ctfmon.exe is an annoying feature that wont go away no matter how much you delete it remove it from the registry turn it off in the control panel and so on so I put in a zero byte file that causes random errors when windows trys and fails to run it"
It's not perfect, but it's good enough for somebody who says "I wish I had this feature" to use until the feature shows up.
Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
via the way back machine