Slashdot Mirror


Dell Offering "Open" PC

Sans writes "Dell began offering a new desktop Dimension E510n PC this week with no operating system installed. The machine is designed for people who want to run open-source software such as Linux instead of Windows. The PC comes with a blank hard drive and a copy of the FreeDOS operating system, which can be installed by customers."

54 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. Waste of time and source of FUD for Microsoft by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the kind of thing that leads to misleading statistics...News headline: "Dell offers PCs without Windows but demand remains close to zero." Microsoft spokesman "It's obvious to us that most PC buyers want Windows running on their machines yadda yadda yadda..."

    Who would buy this machine? A inexperienced home user? They wouldn't be interested in a computer that wouldn't even start up out of the box. Business? Business would buy the equivalent Windows machine for $70 less and replace Windows with Linux (assuming that was the intended use for the FreeDOS machine). Geeks? They'd recycle an old machine or build their own.

    If Dell was serious about providing another OS on their hardware, they'd partner with a Linux company (Red Hat, Novell, Mandriva, Linspire, etc.) and let the Linux company provide the software support.

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:Waste of time and source of FUD for Microsoft by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 4, Informative
      They do... From TFA:

      Despite its affinity for selling Windows-based computers, Dell is also a staunch supporter of Linux. The company has invested almost US$100 million in open-source developer Red Hat and sells PCs and servers based on its operating system, such as its Dell PowerEdge SC430 with a dual-core Pentium.

      On the desktop, Dell has been installing Linux on its Precision workstations for a couple years. Dell spokesman Liem Nguyen said the company will continue to do so.
      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:Waste of time and source of FUD for Microsoft by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I agree for the most part this isn't much of a savings and the average home user probably won't bit on this, but there was one point in the article that is a truth and that is companies who use Dell will often have their own software licensing and baseline which means they wind up removing the OS that comes with the box. But a couple posts down someone mentions the cost savings between a naked OS and one with Windows and the savings are really not much. Additionally I wouldn't be surprised if Dell already caters to companies who make large purchases from that to give them "open" boxes... All-in-all this doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me.

      --
      News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    3. Re:Waste of time and source of FUD for Microsoft by LnxAddct · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, actually the law firm I work at has. Excellent support from both Dell and Red Hat.
      Regards,
      Steve

    4. Re:Waste of time and source of FUD for Microsoft by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft spokesman "It's obvious to us that most PC buyers want Windows running on their machines yadda yadda yadda..."

      Well - Let's be honest. Most buyers do want Windows on a PC they buy.

    5. Re:Waste of time and source of FUD for Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's be really honest: Most buyers don't know they don't want Windows on a PC they buy.

    6. Re:Waste of time and source of FUD for Microsoft by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ahem. Most *home* buyers.

      Most corporate buyers don't want an OS or applications. They've already engaged in volume licensing deals with their OS vendor and their applications vendors. They're just going to strip off the software that's on there and install their own customized load.

    7. Re:Waste of time and source of FUD for Microsoft by drakaan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Two things:

      One, why do I get no results searching "All of Dell.com" for "e510n", but plenty when I search for "e510"

      Two, why is the e510n selling for $849, when a 3.0GHz e510 with the same hardware sells for $779?

      Truly puzzling...

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    8. Re:Waste of time and source of FUD for Microsoft by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure it would. Maybe this is some half assed deal with microsoft that allows dell to get an even greater discount on OEM licensing. I can see it now,

      BILL: hey dell, you want a bigger discount on you OS purchases?

      Dell: sure but were is the stings?

      Bill: well just offer a home brand pc running linux, offer no support for the linux and limited support for the hardware, and price it hight then the same version running our windows. Hell, if you make the user install the linux, we'll knock aniother $5 off.

      Dell: Well... OK but we want an even biger discount if you going to brag that no one want to buy them because linux is involved.

      Bill: Ok, how about another $5 off and a minimum 30% decrease before that.

      Dell: ok but we need the discounts to remain active durring the vista price defuckle.

      Bill: sure thing. lets start tomarow, just pick a computer thats not likley to run linux easily, jump the proce up and its a go. I'll start our "nobody wants linus" PR campain about a week after they're availible. Well get that firm that does our TCO analisis to make some numbers up about why they want windows. BTH you still get that discount on our improved DRM if you want it.

    9. Re:Waste of time and source of FUD for Microsoft by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well - Let's be honest. Most buyers do want Windows on a PC they buy.

      Most buyers want something that runs their (Windows) applications. Windows as such? Most people don't recognize much more than the boot screen and start menu. Not that it really makes any difference for the end result.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  2. news? by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Dell has been selling machines with FreeDOS for some time. We've bought several (including the machine I'm typing this on) for work. Let me know when they start to ship with AMD chips. That will be news.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:news? by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The news is that the machines are now available "at the consumer level". However, it will flop. The typical home user is not going to buy a computer that they can't take home, set up, turn on, and have it work.

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    2. Re:news? by TheViffer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Apparently the original poster failed to mention that 99% of the time the machines that do not come with Windows are generally priced equal to or more then the comparable system with Windows. In addition to that, they generally never come with all the "free" offers Dell gives out with there PC's.

      Right now Dell will see there 380n Precision workstation (no windows) for $1058. But I can go buy the 380 Precision workstation (with windows) for $1058 .. so where is the deal?

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    3. Re:news? by F_Scentura · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let alone the *horrible* support that comes with the Dell consumer line.

    4. Re:news? by Surt · · Score: 5, Funny

      What I think you're seeing is the definitive proof that windows is worthless.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:news? by illcare · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree. One problem I have with Dell is, they usually do not apply their promotions (double memory, free LCD monitor) to their "n" series (systems with alternative OS). So during promotions, a Linux or a FreeDOS system ends up more expensive than a Windows system.

      We are an all Linux shop here. But when we buy a system from Dell, we get a Windows system, wipe the harddrive and install Linux.

      Cheers!

    6. Re:news? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course another interpretation is that the costs of the hardware and support dwarf the Windows license fee about which everyone loves to complain ... and I strongly suspect that support for an OS-less PC could be pretty expensive.

      Customer: "Um hello, yes I bought your Open PC and installed my favorite Linux distro and it doesn't work."

      Dell: "Let me forward you to our Linux expert."

      Linux Expert: "Hello, which distribution did you load?"

      Customer: "Well, it was Redhat."

      Dell: "Let me forward you to our Redhat Linux expert."

      Redhat Linux Expert: "Hello, which version of Redhat did you install?"

      Customer: "It was version 8.0"

      Redhat Linux Expert: "Let me forward you to our Redhat version 8.0 expert"

      Redhat 8.0 Linux Expert: "Hello, which configuration did you install?"

      Customer: "It was the Professional edition."

      Redhat 8.0 Linux Expert: "Let me forward you to our Redhat 8.0 Professional Edition expert."

      Redhat 8.0 Professional Edition Linux Expert: "Hello, can I help you"

      Customer: "My Open PC doesn't work"

      Redhat 8.0 Professional Edition Linux Expert: "And you installed Redhat 8.0 Professional Edition?"

      Customer: "Yes, but of course I rebuilt the kernel to improve disk performance by 0.05%"

      Redhat 8.0 Professional Edition Linux Expert: "I'm sorry, we can only help you if you installed a Linux distribution from our list of supported distros."

      Customer: "So how do you handle defective hardware?"

      Redhat 8.0 Professional Edition Linux Expert: "Perhaps you should install Windows to verify that the machine works before putting in your distro. Or you could use one of our supported distros."

      Customer: "You call that Open? I need an RMA so I can send this piece of crap back."

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
  3. How is this news? by gagravarr · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've bought 3 desktop PCs from dell in the last year that came without an OS, and with a FreeDOS cd in the box. So, how does this announcement qualify as news?

    --
    This post will enter the public domain 70 years after my death, unless Disney buys another extension.
  4. Perhaps I should look IN to these. by LaminatorX · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dell calls them "Open." Microsoft calls them "Naked."

    [Quagmeyer]Aall Riiiight[/Quagmeyer}

    1. Re:Perhaps I should look IN to these. by NeuroManson · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard they ship with a 40 Giggigity hard drive (OH!)

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  5. Re:SHENANIGANS! by itomato · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www1.us.dell.com/content/products/features. aspx/featured_desktop2?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs

    $679
    After $50 Off Instantly!
    Only an 80GB HD, but there's the bonus of a 17" LCD..

  6. Re:SHENANIGANS! by ScootyPuffJr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have you considered that it probably does cost $30 to Dell? I remember hearing that dell pays $15 per license for plain XP, so this isn't an unreasonable price.

    Microsoft offer tremendous volume discounts to OEMs to ensure they ship their computers with Windows.

  7. good start by rayde · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this is a good start, too bad they're including FreeDOS disks and not free Ubuntu disks though. But I'd guess that the people who would buy this sort of machine already have access to some distributions.

    1. Re:good start by zoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dell doens't want to have to offer support for machines running Ubuntu Linux. FreeDOS is easier to support. If the end user wants to put Ubuntu, FeeeBSD, etc, on the machine they can do so without Dell having to support it.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
  8. Bill was right by should_be_linear · · Score: 5, Funny

    he envisioned back in '80s that PC with DOS will be good enough even in 2005.

    --
    839*929
  9. Ahh, how amusing... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...quite apart from being "old news", that is.

    The number of times I've seen people post on here adamant that they don't want to pay the Microsoft Tax on a new PC, only to see the response so far to this, makes me smile. Complaining that the difference in cost is too small, or that Dell hasn't chosen their favourite Linux distro to put on there, doesn't have an AMD processor, blah blah blah.

    It's a PC without a preinstalled forcibly-paid-for copy of Windows. So Dell gets Windows for cheap, you don't see a huge price difference, but all those people who wanted an MS-free PC can now buy one. You can't possibly be upset by that, can you???

    1. Re:Ahh, how amusing... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a PC without a preinstalled forcibly-paid-for copy of Windows. So Dell gets Windows for cheap, you don't see a huge price difference, but all those people who wanted an MS-free PC can now buy one. You can't possibly be upset by that, can you???

      First, you can buy this same machine, from the same vendor, with a better hard drive, and with Windows for significantly less money. That does not sound like they have removed the cost of Windows. More likely they are still paying a flat fee to MS and have added an additional fee to cover whatever "penalty" MS is charging them. Second, this comes included with FreeDOS. Why do you suppose that is? No one really uses it. It is not popular, well supported, or in demand. Why would Dell ship any OS with this, and when shipping with an OS, why such an obscure one?

      Clues to answering these questions may be hidden in their choices. I surmise that they ship an OS because for some reason paying someone to press copies of FreeDOS and package it is cheaper for them than not including any OS. Is that perhaps because they have a contract with MS that penalizes for or forbids them to ship boxes without OS's? If I were a large PC seller and was going to ship an alternate OS, I'd pick one of the popular Linux distributions. Pretty much any of them, on the surface, seems to be a better choice. What does FreeDOS have? Well it is DOS based, like Windows. Could Dell have a contract that forbids them from shipping Linux specifically, or one that is worded in such a way that only FreeDOS and Windows meet the specifications of OS's they are allowed to include without incurring a penalty. Either of the above contracts would be blatantly illegal and a violation of anti-trust statutes. Of course it would also be a protected trade secret and the only people who could do anything about it would be Dell and MS. I know if I was running Dell I would not bet the future of my successful company on the hope that the American legal system would properly deal with MS. It has already shown that it is willing to ignore MS's tactics.

      Or maybe Dell just does not want to piss off any given faction of Linux users by favoring another. I wouldn't bet on it though. My opinion is MS is behaving in a criminal manner and this is just more indication of it.

  10. Not necessarily "Open source" PC... by sarguin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Open Source PC?? What if I already own a copy of Windows, simply _replace_ my current PC with a new one and use this copy of Windows. I don't want to pay a new copy of Windows each time I _replace_ my PC...

    I can already buy a PC from my local "PC clone" vendor without Windows on it (Windows price removed) , so why is Dell, HP, IBM... can't do it?

    1. Re:Not necessarily "Open source" PC... by wedding · · Score: 3, Informative

      Part of it would depend on how you acquired your seat of Windows. Remember that most copies are OEM, and would be tied to the hardware they shipped on. In that case, you _would_ have to buy that seat of XP if you wanted to run it on the new box.

      Office etc are all the same when buying OEM. We just had a burglary a few months back, and had to repurchase Office (covered, so not a big thing,) because the CDs I had were OEM tied to the hardware that was no longer in my possession.

    2. Re:Not necessarily "Open source" PC... by diogenesx · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you bought a brand name computer, you're out of luck if you want to install the copy of xp on another machine. The OEM licensing says that copy of XP is only valid for that individual pc. I tried using a copy of XP that came with a Dell on an HP computer. I had to call micrsoft for validation. They asked why I needed xp re-activated and I said I was moving it to my new PC. I was told that I could only use that copy on the Dell and that I must purchase a new copy for the new computer. I told the rep I'd install Linux instead, and I did ; ).

      The moral of the story: If you want to use an OEM copy of XP on another computer. lie.

  11. Shifting Power: HP & Dell vs. Microsoft by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the past, PC makers that offered non-MS variants were allegedly punished by MS with higher prices, delayed access to info on future MS OSes, etc. That both Dell and HP are offering machines with Linux suggests that the power has shifted, that MS needs HP and Dell more than those big PC makers need MS.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  12. Re:If it's so open by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly AMD can't support the load of having customers therefore we regret to inform you that we will not offer AMD products ... um...

    Self-fulfilling prophecy if you ask me.

    If you want real choice just find your local vendors and get them to order what you want. You support local business, you get what you want and often you don't pay more [or much more] than the monopoly controlled "wonder box" you get from Dell [et al.]

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  13. Dell Machines w/Red Hat Pre-Loaded by everphilski · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www1.us.dell.com/content/products/compare.a spx/precn_n?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd

    Took less than 5 minutes of looking. Hit *customize* and make it your dream machine.

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:Dell Machines w/Red Hat Pre-Loaded by bedroll · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Of course, the problem is that you can still get a cheaper machine with Windows on it. People typically go to Dell because they sell machines cheaply. The numbers will get skewed because few people are even interested in one of these "workstations" versus a "desktop".

      When you think about it, we all know that the typical Linux installation is far less resource intensive than Windows, so why don't they sell it on their lesser hardware? I really think it's just pandering to a particular crowd that said, "hey, I want this." Now they say, "look, we have it and you're not buying." Well, of course not, I don't want to pay $1k for a workstation, I wanted a $500 desktop with Linux on it.

      I also want to see the price drop if I get a machine without Windows. Microsoft thinks Windows XP is worth $100. Why is it that if I buy an OS free machine the price changes $0?

    2. Re:Dell Machines w/Red Hat Pre-Loaded by everphilski · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read later on in this thread. Actual cost of a license in volume is about $30. And that price is reflected in the cheap machines. (post is by Trip Master Monkey).

      -everphilski-

    3. Re:Dell Machines w/Red Hat Pre-Loaded by RetroGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why is it that if I buy an OS free machine the price changes $0?

      This is how Microsoft got so much market share. They had agreements with the HW manufacturs that based Windows 3.x licence costs on boxes going out the door.

      If you sold a computer, you paid MS for a Windows licence, even if the hard drive was unformatted. So there was no incentive (and quite a bit of financial detriment) to offer alternate OS's.

      I believe that this was ruled illegal, but by then it was too late.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    4. Re:Dell Machines w/Red Hat Pre-Loaded by bedroll · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Those aren't the cheap machines. The Dimension 2400 is the cheap machine. Without any discount you can buy a 2400 for $399.

      As for the license difference, I'll point out how he's off the mark in a reply to him.

    5. Re:Dell Machines w/Red Hat Pre-Loaded by ajs318 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When you think about it, we all know that the typical Linux installation is far less resource intensive than Windows, so why don't they sell it on their lesser hardware?
      I'm not sure that's true anymore. Sure, Linux will run on a '486SX with 16 megs of RAM. And handle all the usual stuff like apache and sendmail. But Windows 98SE will run on that same machine and give you a GUI, and even run Microsoft Office 2000. Slowly, slowly, I'll grant you; but there's a perception about that shiny flashy graphics are somehow always easier to deal with than simple text-mode commands. And while I believe that is false, I also know that offering lower-spec hardware with Linux is not going to do anything to challenge that perception; in fact, it will only serve to reinforce it. Most people are clueless and just want a machine with big numbers, under the impression that it must be better {car analogy: they only care about engine cc's, not how far it will go on a litre of fuel}. You're essentially making out that a lower spec machine is only good enough for running Linux, not good enough for Windows.

      What eats resources is the X11 windowing system. {Though object-oriented, interpreted languages -- such as the JavaScript embedded into web browsers -- probably don't help much either.} It used to be that KDE was horribly bloated, but GNOME is no longer a lightweight alternative. Of course there are less resource-intensive desktops {my favourite, which I will be using in my own distro, is WindowMaker} but most people are expecting a Windows XP clone. Hence, KDE or a heavily-customised GNOME.

      I'm sure that you could create a display server optimised for applications running locally on a desktop machine with a single monitor {most people's configuration} and it probably would be less resource-intensive. But would it really be worth it? Who is the intended market? The people that are running older hardware generally know what they are doing. There are still a few '486 and first-generation Pentium boxes in every co-lo; and they churn out web pages and e-mails that are viewed on machines with ten times the RAM and twenty times the processor speed.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    6. Re:Dell Machines w/Red Hat Pre-Loaded by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Federal Trade Commission got Microsoft to agree that the "per processor" licensing agreement was in restraint of trade. No penalties for prior infractions, and by changing to the completely different but functionally identical "cliff pricing" managed to continue the illegal practice.

    7. Re:Dell Machines w/Red Hat Pre-Loaded by bedroll · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'm not sure that's true anymore. Sure, Linux will run on a '486SX with 16 megs of RAM. And handle all the usual stuff like apache and sendmail. But Windows 98SE will run on that same machine and give you a GUI, and even run Microsoft Office 2000. Slowly, slowly, I'll grant you; but there's a perception about that shiny flashy graphics are somehow always easier to deal with than simple text-mode commands.

      No. Don't compare Linux of today with Windows of yesterday. Compare today's with today's and yesterday's with yesterday's. If you compare Win XP with nearly any X setup you'll find the X is more efficient.

      What eats resources is the X11 windowing system. {Though object-oriented, interpreted languages -- such as the JavaScript embedded into web browsers -- probably don't help much either.} It used to be that KDE was horribly bloated, but GNOME is no longer a lightweight alternative. Of course there are less resource-intensive desktops {my favourite, which I will be using in my own distro, is WindowMaker} but most people are expecting a Windows XP clone. Hence, KDE or a heavily-customised GNOME.

      I have a Pentium II 266 Compaq laptop that came with Windows 95 installed originally. When it was given to me it didn't work right and had been deemed useless. I brought it back to life with VectorLinux. It runs X (albeit a little slowly) and I normally use XFCE. When my wife uses it she likes IceWM, it has a Windows 95 feel to it. I know people who use full KDE on Pentium 3 600 machines with 256MB of memory, it keeps its pace with Windows easily. Besides, I wasn't even talking about old hardware. I was talking about lower end machines right for sale (new) today. The Dimension 2400 is a 2.4GHz Celeron with 256MB of memory. That will run KDE handily. That's better specs than my old P4 1.7 with 256MB memory, on it you could see a noticeable difference between KDE and Windows.

      [I know I'm taking this out of order, but I think my reply is better organized this way]
      And while I believe that is false, I also know that offering lower-spec hardware with Linux is not going to do anything to challenge that perception; in fact, it will only serve to reinforce it. Most people are clueless and just want a machine with big numbers, under the impression that it must be better {car analogy: they only care about engine cc's, not how far it will go on a litre of fuel}. You're essentially making out that a lower spec machine is only good enough for running Linux, not good enough for Windows.

      That's not what I'm saying. I'm not saying, "only offer Linux on the cheap." I'm saying: "Offer your all of your models as OS-independent, especially those that most people will be shopping for. Ohh yeah, and give the value of that Windows license back, definitively." I have no problem with Linux being looked at as more of a premium offering, but why on earth can't a whitebox pc be considered a commodity? I think it's because they don't want to be offering it; they're still charging for Windows on it; and they want to use it as an incentive for force people who want this to buy more expensive hardware. If I'm spending that much money on a PC then I am not spending it at Dell.

  14. Re:SHENANIGANS! by hands0n · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a Dell Premier login so I can configure machines for our company, and send the e-quote to our purchasing rep. Dell lists a bunch of "standard configurations" on the first page. If I choose an Optiplex GX 520 MT and configure it, for example, it costs more than if I go under Systems and choose the Optiplex GX 520 MT there. Some comparisons ... moving from the 40GB SATA hard drive to an 80GB SATA II hard drive costs $16.15, and changing to an optical mouse costs $11.90 on the standard configuration GX 520. If I do the same by going under Systems, the hard drive upgrade costs $11.25 and the mouse upgrade costs $10.50. Shenanigans is right!

  15. would have been better by wesman83 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if they put in a Nvidia card for the linux users.

  16. Re:SHENANIGANS! by anubis__ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its not just the price of XP Media Center you're taking into consideration there. There are a slew of vendors who pay to have their software and adware preinstalled on a new PC coming from a manufacturer such as Dell - all that crapware figures into the overall equation. If there's no OS, then there's no crapware included.

    I received a Dell XPS last month and it came with no less than 7 media players for playing music (and the only one I wanted, iTunes, wasn't one of them). (I use the term adware above to refer to Real Advertiser which is included with virtually any PC with Windows as an OS from a manufacturer; I think the actual purpose of said program is to play video or music, albeit at really shitty quality, but I've never made it past the advertisements to find out.)

    --

    "After three days without programming, life becomes meaningless." - Tao of Programming
  17. Pirates! by Kylere · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now Dell is promoting piracy! Hasn't Microsoft told us that selling machines without Windows just means that people install pirated copies of their OS? :-)

  18. Nothing more than a PR stunt. by FellowConspirator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can you tell? Well, for starters, you can buy the same system with a hard disk twice the size with a 17" LCD monitor and Windows Media Center Edition for the same price.

    More importantly, the 510n comes with an ATI card that will be difficult to get to work properly with X.org (dunno if Xi Graphics is still in business), whereas the 510 uses an Intel chipset that, while not great, will probably work better.

    And why not simply install a popular Linux distribution on it from the get go? They could "brand" it simply by adding a package with Dell-logo wallpapers, themes, and icon sets.

    Dell's just grubbing for some positive press.

    1. Re:Nothing more than a PR stunt. by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with your first point but not your second.

      I recently built a brand new system for less than the price of this new Dell ($775). It has a new nForce4 Ultra motherboard, an Athlon 64 3200+ Venice, 1GB CAS2 RAM, 250GB SATA2 hard drive, and an ATI Radeon x800 Pro VIVO 256MB. Yeah, what I put together isn't the cutting edge, but it sure makes this Dell system look like a sad sack. Sure, I already had a monitor, case, keyboard, and mouse. Who doesn't?

      As far as ATI support in Linux, I find that ATI's drivers have been pretty solid for at least the last two years. My Radeon 9500 and my x800 both work perfectly in Linux with X.org, even with 64-bit drivers.

  19. I *would* have bought this... by fak3r · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would have bought this earlier this year, as it stands I bought a Dimension 3.2G box for less than 500$. I DID NOT want to buy a machine with XP already installed on it, but get this; it was 80$ CHEAPER to buy the same machine with Windows than a 'naked' machine with a freeDOS option! I guess it's supply and demand, but it still irks the hell outta me that I paid the MS 'tax' and continued the 'look at home many ppl buy machines with XP installed!' FUD. Can these "Open" machines compete in price with Dell's (constantly) adverstised special? If not, I can't see too many ppl paying more for a machine with no OS vs a cheaper machine with XP (That I immediately installed over - no, I didn't look into the 'rebate' - sounds like it's a hassle anyway).

  20. RTFM by ross_winn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just love that the use an ATI video card, an audigy sound card, and a Serial ATA drive. If you can pack more difficult components for linux into a single box I would be very surprised. Most distributions seem to have the USB issue under control, but the rest is laughable. The price is also out of this world.

    --
    Ross Winn "not just another ugly face..."
  21. Difference between Dell PC and a trampoline by cerberusss · · Score: 5, Funny
    What's the difference between a Dell PC and a trampoline?

    With a trampoline, you take off your shoes first.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  22. Re:Real news will be when Apple ... by rworne · · Score: 5, Informative

    They do - in a way.

    Yellow Dog Linux is an Apple "Value Added Reseller". From their website:

    A Unique Apple Reseller

    Terra Soft, an Apple Authorized OEM VAR (Value Added Reseller) is granted a unique license to install Yellow Dog Linux on Apple computers and maintain full Apple hardware warranty for home, commercial, education, and government customers.

    If that isn't approval by Apple, I don't know what is.

    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  23. Decent Dells for $249 by jfoust2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the past year or two, a number of "hot deals" sites have featured Dell's low-end servers without pre-installed OS at nice prices in the $249-$349 range.

    I recall model numbers 400SC and SC420 among others, decent Intel motherboards that you'd otherwise find in Dell's mid- to top workstations, P4 1.8 to 2.8 Ghz, various combos of RAM and HD, some bundles with flat panels, free shipping, etc. I remember one deal for the 400SC with buy-one-get-one-free 10K 70 gig SCSI drives; another deal for dual CPU low-end servers.

    These make very nice desktops for the average business or home user - certainly they're a step above what Dell normally sells in the big ads in the consumer marketplace for roughly the same cash.

    As with many hot-deals, you'll find plenty of these units - parted out and not - on eBay. The shipping is crazy, but the overall price is often still low.

    --
    Curator of the Jefferson Computer Museum http://www.threedee.com/jcm
  24. Re:Real news will be when Apple ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Not to mention that way back in the 68k era it was possible to get a choice of MacOS or AU/X (Apple UNIX) on Apple hardware, and that Apple financed mkLinux - the port of Linux to run on top of Mach for running on Apple PowerPC hardware.

    Seems like the grandparent is suffering from Mac-envy.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  25. Re:SHENANIGANS! by bedroll · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I see how you got to that conclusion. Unfortunately, I'm not really convinced, even if it's proven that XP licensing costs $30. I still believe that you are looking at nothing more than a packaging scheme that is done just to get $30 more from the mainstream customers.

    Very few customers are going to specifically look for the Open Source desktops (as a whole). Dell knows this. If you look, they started the packaging off differently for their Open Source systems than they did for their Windows ones. They actually start off being more expensive. So, since they also didn't start off with equal hardware, you changed the configurations until they matched in spec. Surprise, price difference!

    Well, you're not dealing so much with "this proves the licensing cost," as you are with "this proves that I can stretch my dollar further at McDonald's by getting a value meal." It's all about packaging. Manufacturers just as fast food companies want to reward customers for fitting a mold and making it easier for their workers to make generic things.

    Go to your local dealership and spec out a base model car with all the premium model options added, you'll find that, aside from getting wry looks from the salesman, you'll be paying a lot more. Does that prove that the NAV system that comes as an option has more licensing fees than the one in the Luxury package? No. The price difference is specifically related to the manufacturers desire not to have to custom build vehicles if they can avoid it. It's also to try to convince people that getting a little more for another chunk of money is a value. Lastly, it's to try and squeeze money from the rube who doesn't know any better.

    I tend to think that Dell is really focusing on that last point. They know that only a certain number of people will compare the two systems. How many paying customers are going to notice or care that there's a $30 difference? Especially when the base model Windows machine is cheaper.

  26. Small business side by Nf1nk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another bonus is that when you by from the small business side the prices are somewhat lower

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared