Slashdot Mirror


Internet Growth in 2005 Sets Record

miller60 writes "Netcraft's Web Server Survey reports that a large gain in web sites in October makes 2005 the strongest year ever for Internet growth. The web has added 17.5 million sites so far this year, eclipsing the previous annual best of 16 million during the dot-com boom in 2000. And that's with two months left in the year. Is this growth for real? Web hosts targeting the small business market (like Yahoo Small Business and Go Daddy) report that business is booming, suggesting that web-wary local businesses are finally going online. But some of the the growth is likely due to domain name business models, with speculators buying large numbers of domain and placing advertising on them."

108 comments

  1. what real value from this info? by yagu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If this is true, it means there is a site for approximately one site per every 350 people on the planet! Hmmmm, don't know if that's impressive or not. However, some criteria that would make it more clear to me what they're counting as web sites:

    • they claim these are responses from "sites" -- what is the question/query? Is it a spider?
    • does a blog represent a single site? If so, would that mean a couple of Google machines hosting 10,000 blogs would represent 10,000 sites?
    • are load balanced sites (e.g., corporations, et. al.) represented as one site? Or are they represented by the number of machines balancing the load? (If this is true, then you can figure Google's contribution to the site count to be well over 100,000 by now.)

    As in the blog universe I suspect a large number of these sites are not much in substance. Aside from my curiosity about the realness of this number I wonder what really can be gleaned from it. It is interesting to see the profile and trends of the technology serving the sites (most notably Apache vs. IIS/.NET).

    1. Re:what real value from this info? by jzeejunk · · Score: 2, Informative

      does a blog represent a single site? If so, would that mean a couple of Google machines hosting 10,000 blogs would represent 10,000 sites?

      TFA says "Hostnames". I don't think a blog can be called a hostname.

      --
      sarchasm
    2. Re:what real value from this info? by gunpowda · · Score: 4, Informative
      However, some criteria that would make it more clear to me what they're counting as web sites

      An older survey of theirs seems to contain the answer:

      The Netcraft Web Server Survey is a survey of Web Server software usage on Internet connected computers. We collect and collate as many hostnames providing an http service as we can find, and systematically poll each one with an HTTP request for the server name.

      So yeah, they're probably being quite lax about actual content.

    3. Re:what real value from this info? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      Does it count support.mydomain.com and www.mydomain.com as two sites? Does it count mail.mydomain.com as a website if it's just a webmail portal? What about two sites such as www.school.edu and www.school.edu/~philosophy? As the post asks, how about landing/ad pages for domain speculation? Does it distinguish between domain.com and www.mydomain.com? What if www.domain.com is a pointer to www.mydomain.com? Does it record a difference between using host headers, a meta redirect, or server side redirect?

      My guess is that the numbers are entirely estimated from a small sample that is not representative of the actual number. The margin of error is probably very high.

    4. Re:what real value from this info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me reiterate what the other AC said (without the flame):

      Virtual hosts.

      For instance, what is apparently Rosie O'Donnell's blog has its own hostname: http://onceadored.blogspot.com/

    5. Re:what real value from this info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think for every successful website, there are about a dozen misspellings that are ad pages.
      So, really, the growth is probably not so great...

    6. Re:what real value from this info? by joranbelar · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If this is true, it means there is a site for approximately one site per every 350 people on the planet!

      Correction, it means we have added one site per 350 people this year. In total, we have about 12 websites for every person on the planet.

    7. Re:what real value from this info? by 1ooser · · Score: 1

      Cheap Drugs / Porn / Replica Watch SPAM websites change their domains every couple of days.

      --
      Paint yourself into a corner, burn the bridges!, and you will feel the liberty of a man who has nothing to lose!
    8. Re:what real value from this info? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      I think all of these factors will average out somewhat. If there are 10,000 blogs on Google's servers should they not each be considered an individual site. Even if they are light on content, they are still each unique and offer individual content.

      I'm sure a site for every 350 people is NOT an accurate evaluation. Many people have multiple blogs or multiple sites. Personally, I run several sites of my own and the company I work for currently has four unique sites. Each site is individual and fulfills a purpose, which in my mind makes it good to represent them in a survey of this kind.

      One interesting thing I've seen in my local area is there are more and more local businesses with websites. Increased broadband penetration, rising advertising costs in conventional mediums and lower hosting/development costs make a website an economically viable implementation for many businesses that previously weren't interested.

    9. Re:what real value from this info? by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 0

      In total, we have about 12 websites for every person on the planet.

      74,409,971 / 12 = we have approximately 6,200,830 people on this planet :-) You probably meant to say we have about 12 websites for every 1000 people on the planet.

    10. Re:what real value from this info? by jzeejunk · · Score: 1

      apparently the mod didn't know this either, so i'm not alone ;)

      --
      sarchasm
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Netcraft confirms by thedogcow · · Score: 1

    Netcraft confirms that Netcraft confirms that "Internet Growth in 2005 Sets Record"

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
  4. Interesting... by Pudusplat · · Score: 0

    I'm glad to see the porn industry thriving. Although, even with a fair amount of time allotted to "browsing" per day, I simply don't see how I can be expected to visit all sixteen million sites.

    --
    "If you put butter and salt on it, it tastes like salty butter." -Terry Pratchet, on Popcorn.
    1. Re:Interesting... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see the porn industry thriving. Although, even with a fair amount of time allotted to "browsing" per day, I simply don't see how I can be expected to visit all sixteen million sites.

      Pornography?!?!.........On the Internet?..........You've got to be kidding!

    2. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much KY, so little time. :)

  5. What's the real growth? by QuantumPion · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'm sure 99.9% of those are pr0n, sp4m, and (crap) blogs.

    1. Re:What's the real growth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean (cr4p) bl0gs?

    2. Re:What's the real growth? by varmittang · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had trouble trying to get a domain to shorten my url down so I can ust it for mail. I would natually use dtg.com, but hey, some big ISP took it, and their name is not even close to these letters. They are holding onto it for no reason other than to not let other people use it. Same with a bunch of domains that my friend wanted to use for his business. All of them taken and being held for money, spam, or nothing at all.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    3. Re:What's the real growth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the heck did this get modded flamebait? It's a legitimate observation...

  6. Time to drag out this old chestnut: by This+Old+Chestnut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "You can shovel more shit on the pile, but in the end you still just have a pile of shit."

    - Martin Luther, circa 1542

  7. I'll be the first to say whoopty-do by theantipop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of the 17.5 million new sites, 17.3 million are blogs about the sad life of a suburban middle-class teenager.

    1. Re:I'll be the first to say whoopty-do by whyde · · Score: 1

      Don't downplay the unique angst felt by every adolescent. It just shows you can't possibly relate to what they're going through. Each and every one of them is the first and only person ever to have felt that way.

    2. Re:I'll be the first to say whoopty-do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A million angsty teenagers may have something to do with it, but don't overlook the spammer factor. A random browse through blogspot or similar will show a bunch of blogs with mechanically-generated content purely intended to boost page ranking by linking heavily to some other site.

  8. And the graphs show MS is missing out by 00_NOP · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure they are still gaining customers - in a market expanding this quickly you have be really bad not to do that.
    But apache is winning big style - I wonder how many of those apache boxes are being hosted on Linux or BSD?

  9. Internet? Article should read... by max99ted · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...strongest year for Interweb growth.

    --

    Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

  10. Internet Bubble 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who do you think are the ones benefiting this new internet bubble?

    My bets goes to Apple, since they are the ones making best shovels this time.

    1. Re:Internet Bubble 2.0 by jzeejunk · · Score: 1

      apple's not about this internet bubble. mp3/music bubble ... may be. the biggest gains will be to google (http://slashdot.org/search.pl?tid=217). And probably by the end of this bubble microsoft might end up being the biggest loser.

      --
      sarchasm
  11. But what happened to .info? by titaniam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I download the zone files about once per month for my surf engine, and noticed that this month the .info zone file shrank by ~30%... Is this past month the anniversary (1-5 year) of the .info TLD setup (ie bulk pre-registrations expiring)? What happened to info for the number of domains to go from 3.7M to 2.7M in one month?

    1. Re:But what happened to .info? by droptone · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is the cause, but Domainsite.com (last year) had free registrations for .info domains (as many as you wanted). And I know the ones I registered have recently expired (I wanted to switch to GoDaddy anyway).

      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    2. Re:But what happened to .info? by miller60 · · Score: 2, Informative

      About a year ago the .info central registry, Afilias, began offering the domains free to registrars - who could then charge for them or give them away. A unit of eNom registered more than a million .info names "on behalf of" their existing .com and .net customers. Soon after Dotster followed suit with about 350,000 more. The one-year free registration period on these .info names is now expiring, and a bunch are being deleted as a result.

    3. Re:But what happened to .info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dotster gave me a free .info domain for each of my 15 .com domains, this past year.

  12. Growth? by Wingie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's cancer! Kill it with radiation!!! Let's hope it ain't testicular.

  13. Not so impressive by Uukrul · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The web has added 17.5 million sites so far this year
    Viagra: Results 1 - 10 of about 12,800,000 for viagra . (0.07 seconds)

    So 17.5 million - 12.8 viagra webs = 5.3 million

    Texas Hold'em up: 3,720,000
    5.3 million - 3.7 Texas hold'em up = 1.6 million.

    So may be there are a lot of new webs, but if there are spam who cares?
    --
    My city: Barcelona.
    1. Re:Not so impressive by mypalmike · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Viagra: Results 1 - 10 of about 12,800,000 for viagra . (0.07 seconds)

      Great, now you've posted the word "viagra" on slashdot. Now google will come up with 12,800,001 hits for viagra. Thanks a lot.

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    2. Re: Not so impressive by bartyboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      My God man! Why aren't you charging people for this brilliant research?

      Look what else Google tells us:

      - 149 people got bitten by a vampire
      - 20,900 people smell good
      - There are 4,730,000 websites dedicated to pickes

      You had better patent this research method before someone else beats you to it. But behold - I think 279 people have already done this!

    3. Re:Not so impressive by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      some people I know have stopped using Google because all they get are static web sites with keywords and ads

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    4. Re:Not so impressive by theantipop · · Score: 1

      Funny stuff, but remember Google brings up page results. This survey counts entire sites (ie, multiple pages per site).

    5. Re: Not so impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While 149 people got bitten by vampires (sic), 556 were both bitten and can speak english.

    6. Re:Not so impressive by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you forgot to figure in the crossover - how many of those 1.6 million sites are for poker players with erectile dysfunction?

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    7. Re:Not so impressive by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

      If they switch to a different search engine, which they also don't know how to use, how will this help them?

      --
      Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
    8. Re: Not so impressive by dapyx · · Score: 1
      It may be that 20,900 people smell good, but:

      - 152,000 people stink.

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    9. Re: Not so impressive by HeliumHigh · · Score: 1

      Wow, those mormons must like vampires! They had a mormon forum as the first result!

      I keeed.. I am one, so I can bash :)

    10. Re:Not so impressive by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      Syntax between google and yahoo are close.
      I dunno about stuff like Site: and such.

      This shit is the new spam.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  14. Well... by CKnight · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I did start 2 blogs...that's 2 more blogs than I did back in 2000 so there may be some merit.

  15. Cost by op12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The price of domains has gotten so low, that it's not all that surprising that this is the case. I think godaddy's got domains at just $2 now. I think it was something like $8 just 2 years ago.

    1. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Godaddy still has to pay Verisign $6.00/year for .com's. Anything below that is a loss-leader to sell other services. There are no free lunches.

  16. What's a site? by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If each blog is a "site", then that could explain a bit, considering that huge internet trend probably booming this year.

    If not, and it's e.g. a domain name, I personally find this a bit surprising. I thought the growth rate would decline a bit, and even recalling seeing such predictions just a few years ago.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  17. OH NO!!! by M00NIE · · Score: 3, Funny

    I better get out there and register LeftHandedElvisImpersonator.com before someone else does!!!!!!!

    --
    "As far as I'm concerned, I prefer silent vice to ostentatious virtue." ~A. Einstein
    1. Re:OH NO!!! by eaddict · · Score: 1

      No rush, there are a heck of a lot of variations out there available still.

      lefthandedelvisimpersonator.com Available
      lefthandedelvisimpersonator.net Available
      lefthandedelvisimpersonator.org Available
      lefthandedelvisimpersonator.biz Available
      lefthandedelvisimpersonator.info Available
      lefthandedelvisimpersonator.us Available

      Just think of all the money you will be raking in!

      --
      "If you are on fire you can just stop, drop, and roll. If you fall into Lava you are just dead." - my 5yr old daughter
    2. Re:OH NO!!! by M00NIE · · Score: 1

      Whew, I can relax and know that I can get my domain before anyone steals my glorious scheme to get filthy rich hocking plastic replicas of left handed elvis impersonators. Everyone who sells junk on the internet gets rich right?

      --
      "As far as I'm concerned, I prefer silent vice to ostentatious virtue." ~A. Einstein
  18. No duh? by Pudusplat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It only makes sense that the amount of sites right now is growing exponetially. Every year more people are connected to the web, more people spend more time on the web, and more money is derived from and therefore pumped into the web.

    Most human driven growth, in almost any field (print, television, power generation, population sizes) tneds to be exponential, driven by the population increase and the parallel growth of technology and information management.

    --
    "If you put butter and salt on it, it tastes like salty butter." -Terry Pratchet, on Popcorn.
    1. Re:No duh? by ScrewTivo · · Score: 1

      With insight so clean then you would have no trouble understanding my new web site.
      http://savern.com/

      Some people just don't get it.

  19. Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    17.4 million of them are on Cogent, so we can't get to them.

  20. % of temp domains for spammers by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'd wager that a goodly number of the "active domains" are the random letter/word domains created by spammers to evade filters and blacklists. Because the cost of adding another domain is nearly $0, the statistic doesn't reflect as much new content creation as it might seem. Add to that the addition of new TLDs (and peopel buying their domain in multiple TLDs) and the practice of search sites slurping expiring domains to get traffic, and I wonder how much new content lies behind the increase number of "active domains".

    It would be interesting to analyze the number of domains per unique content set.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  21. In other news... by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1, Funny

    The pornography industry has posted record gains for the 10th straight year in a row.

    One analyst commented "The price of stocks are swelling rapidly. It's a wonder the engorged industry hasn't peaked. I've been waiting for things to deflate, but they just keep rising, straight as an arrow."

    --
    "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
  22. much like the 2000 boom by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0

    But some of the the growth is likely due to domain name business models, with speculators buying large numbers of domain and placing advertising on them."

    --
    Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

    http://financialpetition.org/
  23. Internet Sites Grew in both Quantity and Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's great that we're seeing continued internet growth, but one thing that the article failed to mention was that the quality of the internet sites was also on the rise in 2005.

    For example, behold the recently created website for the Flock browser.

    Brace yourselves and be prepared to witness true innovation.

    http://www.flock.com/

  24. Daddy Beater by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Go Daddy spends its profits from your fees backing American torture.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Daddy Beater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great! A company that's bucking the outsourcing trend, and keeping those torture jobs with Americans where they belong.

  25. Doman names? by elgee · · Score: 1

    Is there a count of actual domain names somewhere?

  26. Who I blame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xanga and Pre-teen crisis.

  27. spiders.txt? by nugas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to know--how many spiders.txt files do you have to ignore to come up with numbers like this?

    1. Re:spiders.txt? by trentblase · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean robots.txt?

    2. Re:spiders.txt? by nugas · · Score: 1
      You mean robots.txt?

      That's the one.

      How many?

    3. Re:spiders.txt? by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Probably none. It's permitted to access robots.txt, and once you do you can figure there's a website there. No further investigation required.

    4. Re:spiders.txt? by nugas · · Score: 1
      It's permitted to access robots.txt, and once you do you can figure there's a website there.

      Can't you tell there's a web server there just by trying to open a TCP connection on port 80? If so, there's no need to download any files.

      In any case, I was figuring that Netcraft would use spiders to populate their Big List of Hostnames. One way to find out if there exists a hostname "xyz.acme.org" is to go to www.acme.org and spider that site for hostnames. That's where I was figuring someone might have ignored the rules in a robots.txt or two.

      I'm willing to be disabused of this assumption with an explanation of how they come up with the hostnames list.

  28. Slashdot Effect... by Rhoon · · Score: 1

    Of the 17.5 million new sites, 17.3 million are blogs about the sad life of a suburban middle-class teenager.

    Don't you mean Dupes?

    --
    "If all the world's a stage, I want to operate the trap door." - Paul Beatty
  29. Speculating Spelling mistakes ... by b3x · · Score: 2, Funny

    The sites that prey on spelling mistakes and the like are just annoying ...

    Learn from my mistake, Dick's Sporting Goods is not dicks.com

    1. Re:Speculating Spelling mistakes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I hate that.

      Here's another one that really caught me off guard.

      I was looking for the website for The Weather Association of Tennessee

      Naturally, I tried www.twat.com

      Boy was I surprised at what I found.

    2. Re:Speculating Spelling mistakes ... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yeah! Those bastards! ... wanna buy WindowsCista.com?

  30. The debate is over.. by modi123 · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The UN/EU can have the stink'n internet if they want. Clearly from this article indicates the strangle hold the US has over the internet is stifling innovation, commerce, and the participation of a larger community. If one country controlling the DNS servers can do this poorly, then having a whole BUNCH of nations controlling it would increase the grandeur of the 'net. What would be fun if this broke down the increase in sites per country, sites still existing per country, and sites lost by country. Yup that would show'm. Darn US and their broken system. Free it up and it might work right, people might sign on more, and businesses might join the online community.

    Sorry to bleed over topics...

    1. Re:The debate is over.. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I was thinking much the same thing. The EU is using scary talk to make people think that system is having some major problems, but the truth is the system works pretty well (in spite of Verisign.) Given the fact that any extended issues with DNS would cause an economic dislocation of Biblical proportions, the EU is taking a hell of a chance. Notice though, that in their documents they point out that there should be no changes in actual infrastructure, equipment or personnel ... they just want the authority to fuck with it if they want to. As I mentioned in another post, I just don't see the benefit to the U.S. This whole thing is about trust, so they are saying. They don't trust us to run the Domain Name System to their satisfaction. Okay, fine, I can accept that. But conversely, what guarantees do we have they they will run their part of system to our satisfaction? That's a rhetorical question by the way.

      Bad as ICANN is, ceding control of a functioning global networking system to that world-class debate society called "The United Nations" would be a mistake. And for giving control of the servers to the individual nations that happen to be host to them ... forget it. That's just asking for trouble: the Internet works when it works the same for everybody.

      And anyone who is truly honest (and wants to Internet to continue to be the greatest thing to come along since the invention of the wheel) should think twice about advocating this. You may not like the United States right now for other reasons (George Bush, War in Iraq, etc.) but remember the kinds of people that populate the U.N., and then think again.

      When you get right down to it this is political posturing having nothing to do with a reliable network. When have you ever known a politician (of any race, creed, color or nationality) who truly understood the concept of "if it ain't BROKE, don't FIX it" when there's money and/or power to be acquired. The Internet could go dark tomorrow, and as long as these fools were "in charge" they'd be happy little campers. I'd be more impressed if they weren't trying to grab control, and were asking for more root servers to be dotted around the world, in preparation for a worst-case scenario (terrorism, nuclear war, whatever.) But this attitude smacks of "let's stick it to the U.S", rather than "let's build a better world."

      It's unfortunate that America chose to ignore its Founding Fathers, who wanted a free and independent nation, by becoming such an integral part of the "global economy". We wouldn't really care whether they screw up their part of the Internet or not. But too much U.S. business depends upon overseas communications nowadays.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  31. Re:Internet? Article should read... by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

    A few assumptions:
    - As web hosts increase, so does the number of emails to/from those hosts.
    - As P2P, gaming, instant messaging increase, so would the number of hosts about those activities. A good example is bittorrent. As more people use BT, more sites about BT are created.

    Based on those 2 assumptions, WWW is a good indicator of the Internet as a whole.

    That said, these studies are always a bunch of BS and don't really reflect anything useful.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  32. Not nearly as impressive by manifoldronin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait until the UN takes over!!

    --
    Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    1. Re:Not nearly as impressive by in-tech · · Score: 0

      why do you want UN to take over? you wait while we fly over ...

    2. Re:Not nearly as impressive by manifoldronin · · Score: 1

      See my sig...

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
  33. i guess by in-tech · · Score: 0

    i guess we will have more than one site each one day. pushing ...

  34. and this couldn't be predicted...? by super_ogg · · Score: 0

    Of course it sets a new record.

    More people == More need for computers
    Cheaper computers (along with internet) == More people with computers.

    Probably a whole bunch of other equalities you can put in here. Fill in the blanks. The internet will grow.
    ogg

    --
    Black cat, searing pain, flames...? I must be in Heaven! - Homer Simpson
  35. Re:Internet? Article should read... by max99ted · · Score: 1

    You are right of course... I was just nitpicking on the article text. Although I might argue that WWW isn't necessarily a 'good' indicator.... especially (as others have pointed out) if the 'growth' is attributed mostly to blogs, and viagra ;)

    --

    Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

  36. Netcraft joke is lame? by RandoX · · Score: 1

    I'm just glad that I haven't heard about Natalie Portman and hot grits for a while...

  37. The local business idea makes sense by iabervon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the main factor is likely to be that people are coming to expect that the little restaurant down the street will have their hours and phone number up on the web, and getting someone to put up a site with this info and enough matching design elements that people will know they're in the right place is becoming easy enough that people are doing it.

    I've certainly noticed an increase in my ability to find purely informational web sites owned by and about small brick-and-morter businesses, and it makes sense, as more people start to prefer the web over the phone, that this would give an advantage in terms of customers tending to show up when the business is open and feeling confident when leaving the house that the business will be open.

  38. How much is spam? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
    Yeah, the amount of email sent probably increased by quite a bit too - but, like email, how much is spam?

    By spam, I mean those pages set up just to catch Google searches, that have nothing to do with your search but just happen to have your exact search terms in their URL, for example.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  39. Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Part of this "growth" is from outsourcing (ie jetblue pays retired old folks a 40k+ to answer calls). Another part is from other contries (asia,india,russia) deciding they can do a much better job of democracy and capitalism than we can (According to friedmen's The World is flat) they might be right being as that so far american business wines and moans about the 'cost' of workers and paying them enought to make rent/morgage/bills/food and btw drive to work an 5 am to open at 6 and leave at 1600 . Where as some asian companies (studio ghibli for instance) likes having a smaller core of decently paid workers that are content -and they consquencly use the internet bigtime to colaberate with partners, manufacturing firms etc.

  40. What kinds of sites thou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well with the rate the spammer/scammer/moronic address staker ads companies,

    I AM NOT SURPRISE AT ALL.

    Nearly all the even-moderately popular sites have their pseudo-address-name ad sites.

  41. Woh! Woh! Woh! Hold up here . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . Inter-what?

  42. The internet really is growing... by secureboot · · Score: 1

    The internet really is growing at an exponential rate! All those bad conference papers were true...

  43. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! (Score:2, Funny)
    by cloudkj (685320) on Thursday October 06, @03:00PM (#13733097)

    Al Gore must be proud!


    Remember, Gore did not invent the internet.

    He just "took the initiative in creating the the internet."
  44. Only problem with that by scronline · · Score: 2, Informative

    Netcraft is inaccurate as all get out. When things fall off the list, they don't come back no matter what you do. When things get on the list, the don't necessarily fall off the list. Basically it's an unpredictable service that only caters to the largest of hosting companies and ignores all of the rest with extreme prejudice.

    With that in mind, I place such small stock in ANYTHING that netcraft says. How can I do otherwise when sites that have been hosted by me for years never show up on netcraft, and sites that died 6 years ago are still showing up as hosted by me.

  45. williamshatnerrules.com by SpaceAdmiral · · Score: 2, Funny

    It may be because of jerks like me: Domain names are so cheap that sometimes I register things like williamshatnerrules.com for no reason except that the domain is funny. One day I might put some content at all the domains I have.

    Did I mention that I own williamshatnerrules.com? 'Cause I own williamshatnerrules.com!

    1. Re:williamshatnerrules.com by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Engaged!

  46. blogs by Madcapjack · · Score: 1

    I remember a few years ago reports that the number of websites were declining (around the time of the dotcom crash). Can this new record upsurge in webpages be the result of the new popularity of blogging?

  47. Re:In other news...Mod funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh come on mods, I thought the previous was funny! You got a hard on for using that troll mod? It must be penis envy... Don't be a dick!

  48. OMFG by wumpus188 · · Score: 1

    damn bloggers !!!1!1

  49. 3 months left! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would they know? What if it shrinks radically in the last quarter?

  50. Sites or pages? by millennial · · Score: 1

    Are we talking about web SITES or web PAGES? A web site is a collection of pages, after all. It's hard for me to swallow that that many SITES were created in the past ten months. Pages, sure. I create a page when I add something to my blog. I don't add a site, though.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  51. Rubbish sites? by mister_llah · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many of these sites have more than porn or warez on them...? Or how many of these hostnames are set up for nasty purposes?

    ===

    There'd be something worth knowing... so I could shudder in fear every night for the rest of my life.

    (or shudder with the anticipation of warez...? )

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  52. Yes, it's true by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

    ...and 75% of those web sites are "worthless" blogs full of people's crap about their mundane lives.

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  53. and another chestnut... by weighn · · Score: 1

    Wake me up when September ends

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  54. yahoo, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case they're counting the domain names only:
    Might this growth have anything to do with Yahoo offering domain names for $2 (or more recently for $3)?

    just my $0.02

  55. Scrape sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A significant part of the growth must surely be due to the scrape sites: websites created purely to gain Ad Sense revenues which are created on single topics and then scrape content from other sites. They're seriously compromising Google's search results because the only way to distinguish their content from original stuff is for it to be reviewed by a human. Google is going to have to employ lots of human site reviewers so these sites can be downgraded in the results.

  56. on a unrelated note by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

    The "Earth" has already added nearly 100,000,000 "people" in 2005.

    --
    1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
  57. Pull or push? by nikolaypavlov · · Score: 1

    I am not sure whether the increase in domain names reflects real activity on the Internet. For example, I recently received a spam email from some guys claiming to be the official registrar for the .ws domain names. They had this cool video that presented a very compelling argument why I should reserve the nikolaypavlov.ws domain. The argument went like this: "Nikolay, think how you would feel if someone else owned your name! Take it before it is gone!" I did not pay them a cent, because I hate spam, but I did call my buddy who runs a hosting business and how I am the happy owner of http://www.nikolaypavlov.com/ And, now that I own it, it just sits there and gathers dust...

  58. Big numbers, small brains by billcopc · · Score: 1

    This unfortunately counts all the spam domains with ultra-long names like cletus.spears.happysearchspam.wizzleteats.net that all point to the same stupid server. It's not uncommon for true garbage servers to have hundreds if not thousands of domains pointed to the same machine, with funky scripting that adapts the content to the domain name AND the search terms (from the http Referer).

    Of those 17.5 million sites, how many actually have valid content on them ? Probably less than half a million, and I'm just pulling that number out of my nether region.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  59. Invest now! by klack · · Score: 1

    I tell you, the Internet is where the money will come from. You'll be rich. Invest my friends!