Slashdot Mirror


ITunes Australia Goes Live

daria42 writes "ITunes Australia has finally gone live, after more than a year of waiting. Apple is holding a press conference in Sydney this morning to officially launch the service to the media, but the store has already opened. Like the Japanese ITunes store, it looks like Sony-BMG is not participating."

54 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Frist P5ot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what the sad thing is? This idiot editor ScuttleMonkey picked from an obviously massive number of iTunes Australia submissions the one that doesn't write iTunes correctly.

    GG SCUTTLEMONKEY! Want a free Ipod?

  2. Mod up dumbasses by FullCircle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Modding down the only people who TRY to RTFA?

    The URL is WRONG

    --
    If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. - James Madison
  3. Global store? by bugbeak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure there are numerous world branches of just about every major record label out there. What's stopping Apple from running a global iTunes Music Store?

    1. Re:Global store? by akac · · Score: 3, Informative

      Simple - each record company is a single company but they operate separate divisions in each region and each division/branch deals with the copyrights in their own country.

    2. Re:Global store? by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm sure there are numerous world branches of just about every major record label out there. What's stopping Apple from running a global iTunes Music Store?

      The record companies. The songs are licensed for sale in one country only. Apple would love to be able to offer their entire catalog to anybody anywhere, but the record companies won't allow that. They have to negotiate completely separate licensing agreements for each country.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:Global store? by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just tried it. The US store pops up a one-button dialog box:

      "Your account is only valid for purchases in the Australian Music Store. Clicking OK will take you to this store. [OK]"

    4. Re:Global store? by JWW · · Score: 2, Funny

      The record companies. The songs are licensed for sale in one country only. Apple would love to be able to offer their entire catalog to anybody anywhere, but the record companies won't allow that. They have to negotiate completely separate licensing agreements for each country.

      What, are the record companies stupid or something? ... oh, wait, nevermind.

    5. Re:Global store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're going to say something as stupid as "outdated business practices," you might as well go the full distance and put the blame where it really belongs: national sovereignty.

      See, different countries have different laws regarding taxation, contracts, royalties and licenses. If you buy a copy of the latest Limozeen album in Taiwan, the retailer has to handle the local taxes differently and the record company has to pay royalties differently than if you bought it in Topeka.

      Why? Because the people of Taiwan have decided that they want different laws than those the people of Kansas have.

      So really, the problem is sovereignty. If we could just conquer the world and force everybody to use the same laws, Apple would be able to have one big iTunes store.

      (Fucking idiot.)

    6. Re:Global store? by pookemon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because we are "downunder" you have to invert the soundwaves so that they'll play correctly on our equipment.

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    7. Re:Global store? by SJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which is where in Indies should really be pushing...

      "Here Apple, have our entire catalogue for world wide distribution."

      That has to make everyone happy.

    8. Re:Global store? by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Says the record companies. When is a distribution company going to put the record companies in their place and do what what everybody wants?

      Um, yeah, well see, the record companies own the copyrights to the music people want to listen to, so distribution companies can't do anything.

      Unless, of course, a distribution company becomes a powerful monopoly, and the balance of power shifts because the record labels wouldn't be able to sell their music if that company refused to sell it. That's exactly what they're afraid of happening with Apple, which is why they're so reluctant to cooperate - they don't WANT Apple to become too successful, because that would mean Apple would become more powerful than they are.

      If it were anybody else, this wouldn't be hysterically funny, but think about it:

      Record companies are terrified of Apple becoming a monopoly.

      That just cracks me up.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    9. Re:Global store? by shark72 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The record companies."

      Partially correct. In most cases rights must also be secured from whomever owns the publishing rights -- that is, the copyright on the words and the lyrics. Words and music are owned by the songwriter and composer, unless they transfer the rights to somebody else. Record companies typically only own the copyright on that recording of the words and music. Sometimes the local country's artists' rights management societies get involved as well.

      This is important to understand for folks who kneel at the shrine of "record companies bad, artists good." It's not just the greedy, stupid record companies that are getting in the way of progress -- sometimes it's the greedy, stupid songwriters and composers!

      I'm sure you were aware of that, but the way your post was written, it gave the impression that the record companies are the only obstacle.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    10. Re:Global store? by jaseparlo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as most 'pop' music goes, the songwriters and composers are in the employ of, or at least part of the machine with, the record companies, and still little or nothing to do with the perceived 'artist'.

      --
      All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
  4. Super by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's great, but I just hope it doesn't scratch easily.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    1. Re:Super by bach37 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you could just sue.

  5. I tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I tried it, but the songs were upside down.

  6. The correct URL is... by Osrin · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:The correct URL is... by TheShadowHawk · · Score: 3, Informative

      No.. the correct URL for getting music is: http://www.allofmp3.com/. :)

      --
      Friends don't let Friends use Internet Explorer.
  7. Mysterious future. by Xenex · · Score: 3, Interesting
    From: xenex@opinionstick.com
    Subject: [DP] ITunes Australia Goes Live
    Date: 25 October 2005 12:32:57 PM
    To: daddypants@slashdot .org

    The link is dead.

    http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/iTunes_M usic_Store_comes_to_Australia/0,2000061733,3921879 8,00.htm seems to work though.

    The article comes up here just fine. Also, another interesting article: Apple: Our biggest competitor is P2P.
  8. iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by mattnuzum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a friend in India who says that he would use iTunes store if it were available, but because it isn't he simply uses peer-to-peer.

    As the iTunes store becomes available across the world it will help legitimize the online music industry. I think there are a lot of people in the world who don't have the option to go and buy the music they want to listen to. If they could, they would.

    Of course there are a lot of people who will jump at the opportunity to get something for free if they can, but no one is stopping these now, so it's not really the point. But if you give everyone the opportunity to pay for the music, many will. I think this is a good thing.

    Speaking of online music sales, I'm really looking forward to another price war. Come on guys, we need a legit iTunes competitor to drive down the prices!

    1. Re:iTunes store is helping legitimize online music by pintomp3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      itunes prices aren't based on competition, but what the riaa charges. apple doesn't make much on the store, thier money comes from ipod sales. unless the riaa is going to take a smaller cut from a competitor, the competitor isn't going to be able to charge much less than itunes. i believe riaa gets 71/99 per track. not much room to undercut there.

  9. MacRumors coverage & personal retraction by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 4, Informative
    Well, the ZDNet story is down (-1 Redundant), but MacRumors.com has one up.

    Ahead of schedule, iTunes now provides an Australia link in the iTunes Music Store.

    Songs are being offered for $1.69 and videos for $3.39 (AUS). Rumors for iTunes Australia have been long whispered. Cited reasons for the long delay have included resistance from music labels.

    According to the most recent reports, Sony BMG has not signed on to the iTunes Australia launch.

    Official launch is expected on October 25th at a media conference in Sydney.

    [Image of Australia Option in iTMS]


    Looks like it's not variable pricing as I thought it might have been. Thus, I hereby retract my "Crikey!"
  10. No Sony-BMG = No Good by 246o1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This lack of participation is a Very Bad Thing for anyone who likes to buy digital music easily online. As a consumer in Japan, I have been much-thwarted in my attempts to buy songs I hear on the radio or wherever. Though iTunes is very convenient, I haven't spent any money on iTunes Japan because it's so crippled. Obviously, I don't think this is good for either Apple or Sony-BMG, and hopefully they work something out eventually.

    --
    Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
  11. Re:No Fair Use by TeraCo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fair use is irrelevant here, as Apple have permission from the record companies to publish it in the relevant format.

    --
    Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
  12. In other news, Madonna . . . by weighn · · Score: 4, Funny
    . . . has begun buying all her tracks from iTunes in an effort to stop others from downloading them.

    A spokeswoman from Warner, Maverick's parent company, declined to comment.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  13. Apple, how about NZ? by mdew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how about Itunes service that includes NZ too?

    --
    http://www.fanboy.co.nz/adblock/
    1. Re:Apple, how about NZ? by Audent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not sure if I should post a story I wrote but what the hey, it's /.

      http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/news/8515A04BC 338B24BCC2570A5000C063D

      with "hints" on how to circumvent the Aussie only rule. I'm sure you've already cottoned on to that.

      Apple NZ head said he doesn't know if/when Apple will even launch in NZ.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind
  14. Re:True fans don't rip off their artists. by weighn · · Score: 4, Funny
    True fans don't rip off their artists.

    That's right, Jim. We leave that up to Sony.
    Badda-ching!! I got more, I got more...

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  15. Re:No Fair Use by ozTravman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But what is the user allowed to do with it once they buy it? How many devices can it be stored on?

  16. Now iPod usage is legal! by ross.w · · Score: 2, Informative

    Until now, an iPod was an expensive paperweight unless you were prepared to infringe copyright, which meant that it was a copyright infringement tool, which meant that it had the same legal status as a X-Box or PS-2 mod chip.

    Didn't stop them selling them though.

    You have to remember that in Australia there are no fair use rights. You do not have the right to make copies of content for personal use or even backups. People do, and they are unlikely to be prosecuted, but it is illegal.

    Attempts to get this law changed have met with howls of protest from the likes of ARIA, and it probably won't happen until Digital Restrictions Mandating becomes universal so you won't be able to do it anyway.

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    1. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by mattjb0010 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Until now, an iPod was an expensive paperweight unless you were prepared to infringe copyright, which meant that it was a copyright infringement tool, which meant that it had the same legal status as a X-Box or PS-2 mod chip.

      Actually mod chips are legal as they allow legal use of games/DVDs purchased overseas (and to restrict trade like that is in violation of the Trade Practices Act). Recent High Court decision here. But you're right on the iPod copyright infringement.

      You do not have the right to make copies of content for personal use or even backups.

      There are limited rights to make backup copies in some cases.

    2. Re:Now iPod usage is legal! by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Until now, an iPod was an expensive paperweight unless you were prepared to infringe copyright ...

      Or unless you listened to MP3s of bands that published them online? Or if you bought music from AllOfMP3.com? (If that is legal in Australia)

  17. It's a shame there's no Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cause we won't be able to download the lastest Australian Idol releases...wait did I say shame?

  18. Important positions being taken here by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So Sony won't allow Apple to sell their tunes library, (about a quarter of the big five's recorded music), in Japan and now Australia/New Zeland. interesting. And ABC (Disney) is the only TV network willing to sell their TV Shows, Pixar only willing to debut a few (very cool) shorts.

    This is very important everyone. the content providers are VERY SCARED. First they were scared the medium wouldn't be popular enough to thwart file sharing, now they are scared it is SO POPULAR it will thwart their very role in distribution!

    I for one welcome the medium - The quality of "Lost" is totally acceptable for the price and download time, actual movies should only be provided in a hgher quality though.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  19. Suicidal pricing by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The pricing is just ridiculous. $1.69 per track for lossy recordings that, in Australia at least, you cannot necessarily legally burn to a CD or otherwise duplicate is simply outrageous.

    The record companies (I don't think this is Apple's fault) need to realise that they are competing with FREE on the Internet, not with each other. They also need to realise that when they have ZERO manufacturing costs they are going to need to reduce their prices accordingly.

    This is a perfect example of what a sheltered and monopoly/oligopoly dominated market Australia is. Other examples are air travel (two airlines), print media (one and a half newspaper conglomerates, most major cities have no media competition) and telecommunications (one major telco). The record company execs have obvious sat down and decided that they think Australia is sheltered enough that they can continue to screw us, iTunes or no iTunes.

    Send them a message: do not use this service. Buy a physical CD instead - it'll work out about the same price if you shop somewhere decent anyway (10-12 tracks = $17-$21 on iTunes, which is crazy). Alternatively, if you have a UK or US bank account, use the services in those countries to encourage Apple to put more pressure on the record companies in Australia.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Suicidal pricing by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are deeply, deeply missing the point.

      The only way to legally burn a CD from your digital music in Australia is the iTunes store. Because when you buy a song from iTunes, you get a license from the label via Apple to do certain things with the music. Fair use isn't necessary if you have a license from the owner.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    2. Re:Suicidal pricing by Thrudheim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Send them a message: do not use this service. Buy a physical CD instead - it'll work out about the same price if you shop somewhere decent anyway (10-12 tracks = $17-$21 on iTunes, which is crazy)."

      No! The record labels would absolutely love for people to buy physical CDs. They want to keep that tired, old model going as long as possible. If you want to send a message, boycott them altogether.

    3. Re:Suicidal pricing by skingers6894 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Send them a message: do not use this service. Buy a physical CD instead"

      Actually that is EXACTLY the message they want...

      IF you want to send them a message go and buy DRM-free 192K VBR MP3s from emusic.com for 33 Aussie cents each.

    4. Re:Suicidal pricing by GaryPatterson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The price is steep compared to the US, but the message should not be to stay with physical media. We're seeing more and more "copy-controlled" discs these days, and they just don't rip so easily.

      Also, despite parallel imports being around for ten years or so, I still see new release discs at $25-$35, much higher than the iTMS album price of $16.99. I think the music industry would absolutely *love* it if only physical media were sold and the Internet distribution model failed.

      I'm going to give iTMS a good go and buy music from there. I'm no audiophile, and I think the sound quality is very good (except for some music with higher-pitched harmonics, but that's not so common).

      I'll also investigate other options like emusic, which I'd never heard of before this topic came up. I absolutely won't buy anything in WMA format though (not so hot on the iBook), so my options are not huge.

  20. New Zealanders Feel Left Out... by Traegorn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    New Zealanders who feel left out are apparently lying to Apple and getting songs anyway...

  21. Re:Suicidal pricing -Check the TOS by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Informative
    Before jumping to conclusions, check out the Australian store Terms of Sale:http://www.apple.com/au/support/itunes/legal/ policies.html>iTMS AUS TOS.
    CONTENT USAGE RULES
    Your use of the music downloaded from iTunes Music Store (the "Products") is conditional upon your prior acceptance of the terms of this Agreement.

    You shall be authorized to use the Product only for personal, non-commercial use, and not for redistribution, transfer, assignment or sublicence, to the extent permitted by law. For details of your rights and restrictions on your right to use the Products, see:
    www.copyright.org.au; or
    www.ipaustralia.gov.au/ip/copyright.shtml; or
    www.copyright.asn.au.

    You shall be authorised to use the Product on five Apple authorised computers.

    You shall be entitled to burn and export Products solely for personal, non-commercial use.

    Any burning or exporting capabilities are solely an accommodation to you and shall not constitute a grant or waiver (or other limitation or implication) of any rights of the copyright owners of any content, sound recording, underlying musical composition or artwork embodied in any Product.

    You agree that you will not attempt to, or encourage or assist any other person to, circumvent or modify any software required for use of the Service or any of the Usage Rules, or interfere with, remove or alter any rights management information on the Products.

    The delivery of a Product does not transfer to you any commercial or promotional use rights in the Product.
    So basically, you have the same usage rules as the other music stores. Please don't spread FUD.

    I agree with most of the rest of your post but if you really want to send them a message, stop buying music all together and send in letters declaring your boycott. Buying CD's is not going to send them any sort of message other than you like their current business practices in general.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  22. Re:True fans don't rip off their artists. by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Funny

    As recording artist "Tool" noted

    I love "Tool." He's hot.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  23. Re:True fans don't rip off their artists. by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the dude from Tool also wrote
    "i sold my sole to make a record"
    "then you brought one"

    Yes true fans don't ripe off the band.
    Which is why true fans support CDBaby, iTunes, and the little independant Record store so the next gen of Artists can be free of the crude we know today.

    Some Day down the track we will have the market driven by the culture not a culture driven by marketing like we have now.

    That day will come, the record compaines will disappear. The fans don't need them anymore, the artists don't need them anymore.

    The only ones left are the techinical support people but i'm sure they will learn how to break free soon enough.

    --
    "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
  24. Re:No Fair Use by Petrushka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to this person's research into the Terms and Conditions, it's ambiguous whether buying a track from iTunes Oz grants you any CD burning privileges or not:

    You shall be entitled to burn and export Products solely for personal, non-commercial use.

    Any burning or exporting capabilities are solely an accommodation to you and shall not constitute a grant or waiver (or other limitation or implication) of any rights of the copyright owners of any content, sound recording, underlying musical composition or artwork embodied in any Product.

    So you're allowed to burn and export products; but you don't get any copyright waiver, and there's no such thing as fair use in Oz, so you're not allowed to burn or export. So ... are you allowed to burn CDs or not???

  25. Re:Mistakes a plenty... by NineNine · · Score: 3, Funny

    cAlm dOwn, fAnboy. aPple dOesn't rEad sLashdot. nO bRownie pOints fOr pRosletyzing hEre.

  26. interview CD Baby behind-the-scenes iTunes AU by linuxbaby · · Score: 4, Informative
    My company is one of the main providers of music to iTunes worldwide.

    Knowing that iTunes Australia was launching, I did an interview with AppleTalk Australia that tells a little bit more behind-the-scenes stuff, in case you're interested.

    I'm glad this is finally up-and-running. Australia has a great independent music scene (as I spoke more about in previous Slashdot comment).

  27. No "Just For You" feature, but a workaround by michaeldot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Aussie store currently doesn't have the Just For You feature, but if you go to the home page and switch to the US store using the popup menu at the bottom, it appears.

    (You have to switch back if you want to buy a song later.)

  28. It's slow and NO paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't bother with ITMS.au, it's slower than molasses. In fact it's so slow it makes dial up look positively snappy. I think they have employees that read the incoming HTTP requests out, and someone writes it down, walks over to the library catalogue of songs they have... works out the search results, writes it down, hands it back to the data entry employee (there is just one, who is really busy) who then types up the results in HTML and sends it back out the 300 baud modem to me. It is faster to find and download a song over p2p than it is to see if ITMS even has the song.

    And no PayPal, despite there being a PayPal.com.au site. *sigh*

  29. Re:No Fair Use by mmj638 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is true that there isn't a 'fair use policy' in Australia equivalent to the US. However, this has nothing to do with lack of Australian TiVO models. We have plenty of personal video recorders, both for free-to-air and pay (cable) TV. Most of those are more permissive than the TiVO - we have no broadcast flag issue here, and we can freely copy files from PVRs to computers via USB. As for why TiVO doesn't seem to be available here, you'd have to ask them about it. They probably have their own reasons for not producing an Australian model.

  30. Get an overseas bank account by GrahamCox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have been downloading from iTunes to Australia for well over a year, because I have a UK bank account as well as an Australian one. The choice from the UK store is probably better than the Australian offering at the moment anyway. Apple doesn't care where your IP address is from, they only check that your credit card is registered in the territory that the music store is located in. This seems to work around the regional disaster that is the record industry quite neatly. In fact, I'd say it makes a mockery of the whole regional distribution model, and really it's about time that the record industry realised that it needs to wake up and smell the coffee as far as globalisation is concerned. As for any tracks I still can't get legally? Well, there's always Acquisition...

  31. TiVo Down Under by violet16 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are a few different reasons behind the absence of TiVo in Australia. One is that if they can't make a profit in the UK, they're unlikely to here. Another is that the Australian courts have deemed raw TV guide data to be IP (Telstra vs Desktop Marketing), so you can't produce one without the networks' permission. There's no way in hell they'll give that to a PVR manufacturer, and without TV guide data, PVRs aren't so useful.

    The same issue makes it a little harder to set up something like MythTV; you need to use slightly dodgy open/volunteer TV guide data or (technically) break the law with a Perl script that scrapes it from the networks' web sites.

  32. Re:No Fair Use by YoungOzLawyer · · Score: 4, Informative
    How on earth is this moderated informative?

    Australia has no "Fair Use Policy" laws

    Howabout Div 3 of Part III of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)? - scroll down to the appropriate point on this page http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/0/244/to p.htm and have a read as to what is permitted as "fair dealing" under Australian law.

    so far there has been no test case

    This is just wrong. There have been cases about fair dealing and so forth since the Act was encated. Try this link http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinocgi.cgi/au?m ethod=boolean&rank=on&query=ca1968133%20s40 if you're really interested.

    This is the reason TiVO has not been introduced to Australia.

    I would suggest that there are several reasons TiVO has not been introduced, such as:

    - only 5 free to air channels
    - no free cable, encrypted pay TV
    - no electronic program guide
    - TV stations who persist on not running to time
    - different video standard (PAL not NTSC)

    It's certainly not the law - which hasn't prevented VCRs from flourishing (albeit they reisde in a somewhat grey area) - but more likely a question of economics.

    It is illegal to record any TV show that is not being broadcast live to air

    In fact its UNLAWFUL (but not illegal) to record a TV show at all (except in the case of fair dealing, and other exceptions I wont go into now) whether broadcast or not.

    But the distiction between unlawful and illegal is an important one. Unlawful means that the TV station or distributor or somebody has to come sue you for infringing upon their copyright. No jail time. Illegal means that somethings is a crime - the copyright holder just has to notify the cops, they can pick you up and you might face jail time (although now is not the time to go into criminal sentencing procedure).

    It is also illegal to rip cds to MP3

    Again, it's unlawful, but not illegal.

    Apple have finally taken the chance, which is good to see.

    I would suggest that this is not, in fact, a chance or risk for Apple. Australians are high per-capita purchasers of music. It is guaranteed profit which will also drive the iPod market with a legal source of downloads. Apple has only "waited" so long because the record labels in Australia have been absolute asses to deal with. Sony BMG is still not on board.

    Hopefully none of the recording labels will launch a lawsuit

    This is the bit that gets me most... it is the labels WHO ARE COOPERATING WITH APPLE TO ALLOW APPLE TO SELL THEIR MUSIC. The labels would be, in effect, SUING THEMSELVES. This will not happen.

  33. Re:No Fair Use by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Informative

    So ... are you allowed to burn CDs or not???

    The answer is although it's technically illegal, in practice nobody has ever been prosecuted in Australia for making personal copies. The reason is simple: if you're not standing on a street corner handing them out, who's going to know?

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.