Slashdot Mirror


Japanese 'Minerva' Robot Lost in Space

space_weasel writes "A little Japanese robot that was supposed to land on the surface of an asteroid has accidentally been flung into space by its mothership. New Scientist Space reports that the accident occurred as the data link with the spacecraft was being switched from an station in Japan to one in Australia. Mission controllers still plan to punch a hole in the asteroid and collect samples, which will be returned to Earth."

201 comments

  1. High Anxiety by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dammit, they can't even handoff mission control without losing the probe, and they still think it's OK to go around punching holes in ancient celestial objects? What if they miss?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If they miss, then at least they won't get sued by some idiot astrologer for affecting her "readings."

      (Note: using "her" instead of "him" to appear sensitive to political correctness, not because most astrologers are women. If you even thought that, you're sexist!$#@!!1)

    2. Re:High Anxiety by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they miss the asteroid, and hit the astrologer, they might still get sued... from beyond the grave (bwahahahaha).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:High Anxiety by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      As of the last report, mission control is unconcerned about the chances for the primary mission. The lost probe (Codenamed "Major Tom") was "supposed to do that" and does not hamper the mission in the least. The mothership (Codename "HAL") still has another unit aboard (Codename "Dave") that should be able to complete the mission without incident. According to the recent communication from "Dave", the mothership will no longer eject things into space^W^W^W^W^W^W^W is in perfect condition to complete the mission.

      * tongue still firmly in cheek

    4. Re:High Anxiety by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      they might still get sued...

      Yeah, killing a scientist is really a bad thing.

      For those who have no idea what I'm talking about I would refer you to this link about the new definition of science from the folks who are trying to bring us Intelligent Design.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:High Anxiety by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

      Intelligent Design is the theory that aliens designed life on Earth, right? And the bible is just the old man page, written by a clueless man operator?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Astrologer... Astronomer... what's in a word?

    7. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You joke, but I know something many of you probably haven't heard of.

      The 2nd law of thermodynamics against Evolution. A chaotic soup of particles doesn't just magically tend towards order. For scientists to have any credibility, they would have to prove that there is some sort of huge source of energy external to the Earth. Consider this: according to my calculations, there would need to be at LEAST a few million terawatts of power hitting the Earth's surface, averaged over a year, for any of what we see now to have happened.

      What say you now? *Crickets chirping.*

    8. Re:High Anxiety by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I say you're an Anonymous offtopic Coward cricket. Your "calculations" obviously ignore the vast disorder created elsewhere by ordered organic systems. Or do you think your toilet leads nowhere? Of course, the "external energy source" driving Earth's biochemistry is... the Sun. Sure, you're probably "joking", but there are plenty of anonymous gibberers who'd post exactly your drivel. I now leave you to commune with the crickets.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:High Anxiety by databyss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The laws of thermodynamics have very little influence here since they all deal with a closed system.

      You'll find that the laws of physics and the laws of thermodynamics call for pockets or order within the larger system as a whole.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    10. Re:High Anxiety by ThankfulJosh · · Score: 1

      This was a pretty dang complex mission to begin with, but it seems the Japanese just aren't very good at space probes. Isn't this the 3rd or 4th failure they've had in the last several years?

      Kind of makes you appreciate NASA a little more.

    11. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical of the creationists to overlook such obvious things as the Sun when it suits there religious views.

      Go read a book. No! Not THAT book, it's full of BS :)

    12. Re:High Anxiety by cheesygrapes · · Score: 4, Funny

      But my bible says the sun goes around the Earth! It can't be that important!

    13. Re:High Anxiety by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Competition makes people try harder. It also makes "the best" look better.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:High Anxiety by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      Harebrained Design might actually be plausible. The Designer was obviously unwilling to refactor our code--I mean, look at how our spines break down within the projected operating lifetime of a human even when used well within operational parameters. Isn't it about time we deprecated all our quadrupedal functions?

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    15. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      note to self... strike doc ruby from the new years eve party list.

    16. Re:High Anxiety by hyperquantization · · Score: 1

      I think the point here is that the Universe is the whole closed system...where'd it get it's energy from?!?

      another idea: do we even know how a lack of any kind of order, i.e. total entropy, manifests itself? I fear that theorizing about anything to do with total entropy would be already defeating the purpose.

      just something to chew on...and for those wonderful /. mods: no, I am NOT trolling

    17. Re:High Anxiety by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The design objective of the Intelligent Designer was to produce a global species that would welcome the arrival of the Designer with absolute unquestioning worship, along with extremely high degrees of physical comforts - for the Designer. Mission Accomplished, and human suffering ignored.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    18. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What bible do you have? The Druid bible?

    19. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh great, another case of life imitating art...according to "my calculations" little Minerva is now going to return in twenty years with as a giant evil Robot Minerva and lay waste to the earth. We better start building Voltron.

    20. Re:High Anxiety by pedroloco · · Score: 1

      Consider this: according to my calculations, there would need to be at LEAST a few million terawatts of power hitting the Earth's surface, averaged over a year, for any of what we see now to have happened.

      Would you care to show your calculations? Please define your variables and state your assumptions in such a way as to allow review of your work by others.

    21. Re:High Anxiety by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Whoa - riding the line between mockery of Creationists and the possibility that they're worshipping actual aliens has robbed me of my sense of humor. One to beam up!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    22. Re:High Anxiety by schon · · Score: 1

      I think the point here is that the Universe is the whole closed system...where'd it get it's energy from?!?

      Gee, I have no idea.

    23. Re:High Anxiety by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll do it:

      average solar radiative power incident at the Earth's surface is 1370W/m^2
      radius of the Earth r is 6400km
      Assuming the Earth presents essentially a flat disc to the Sun, that gives a total area of pi.r^2=1.3E8m
      That gives a total incident power of 1.8E11W
      1TW = 1E12W, therefore we have approximately one fifth of a terawatt hitting the Earth's surface. That's a shitload of power, but nowhere near the quoted value.

      Even using half the surface area of the Earth rather than the area of the disc it presents only doubles the estimate.

      None of that allows for the niggling suspicion that that figure of 1370W may be at Earth's orbital distance, rather than actually incident upon the surface; it's been a long time since I did any Physics though, and I can't be arsed to work it out or look it up.

    24. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm posting as an AC cause I'm not sure of my logic, and my ego doesn't want deflating right now, but this is the way I see it.

      According to the first few Google Sources, the Earth is receiving from the Sun constant power to the tune of 1.4 kW / m^2. Now, again, according to google consensus, the surface area of the Earth is 150,000,000 km^2.

      Giving praise and thanks to both God and the GNU 'units' program, I plug these numbers in, like so....
      (1.4 kW / m^2) * (150000000 km^2 * .5) the .5 cause only half the surface is gettting bombed at any given time....

      I asked for terawatts, thus asking how much power the Earth is getting at any given time, in terawatts.

      It said 105000 terawatts.

      Now I dunno if I should be calculating for a 2d cross section instead of half the surface area or not, I'm no scientist or mathemagician, but any way you slice it, that's a large number. Cut it in half, and it's still big. And keep in mind, this isn't the power available per year, this is the ALWAYS available power, as fast as the system can soak it up.

      Just my 2 cents.

    25. Re:High Anxiety by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      "For scientists to have any credibility, they would have to prove that there is some sort of huge source of energy external to the Earth."

      Yeah, that certainly tears the Big Bang theory with its immense explosion that was big and powerful enough to create the universe to shreds.

      "A chaotic soup of particles doesn't just magically tend towards order."

      What about the strong nuclear force that holds the particles together as atoms - or the electromagnetic force that brings them together in the first place? You're right - particles don't form atoms on their own - these two forces help them out.

    26. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A signal from the missing probe was received: "All your bases are belong to us"

    27. Re:High Anxiety by hyperquantization · · Score: 1

      umm...maybe because that still doesn't answer the question?

    28. Re:High Anxiety by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1
      I think the point here is that the Universe is the whole closed system...where'd it get it's energy from?!?

      Maybe it's plugged into a powered USB port?

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    29. Re:High Anxiety by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      You underestimate the universal driving urge to find lunch and have sex. Even particles have urges, man.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    30. Re:High Anxiety by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I mean, come on. The appendix has been deprecated for millenia and we still haven't gotten a design update.

    31. Re:High Anxiety by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      "umm...maybe because that still doesn't answer the question?"

      Maybe it does - the energy came from the Big Bang.

    32. Re:High Anxiety by hyperquantization · · Score: 1

      and you're right, given that the energy to make such an enormous explosion spontaneous is already present...and we all know that there couldn't possibly be any kind of eternal force, or dare I say _deity_, at work before said explosion *sarcasm*, so it just had to have happened!

      but really, all seriousness aside, where did all that come from? who's immagination is vibrant enough to give an answer?

    33. Re:High Anxiety by AtomicDevice · · Score: 2, Informative

      To quote MC Hawking, "the second law is quite specific as to where it applies, only in a closed system must the entropy count rise, the earth is not a closed system, it's powered by the sun"

      --
      Ze Atomic Device! It iz Ztolen!
    34. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're off by a factor of a million.
      1km^2 = 1,000,000m^2

      Your results also disagree with this.

      Hope that helps.

    35. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... that massive external power source he said would have been needed? He was talking about the Sun man. It was a joke.

    36. Re:High Anxiety by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      What better way to earn "Flamebait" mods than to ignore the Sun?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    37. Re:High Anxiety by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      "but really, all seriousness aside, where did all that come from? who's immagination is vibrant enough to give an answer?"

      We may never know. I know it sounds silly, but it's entirely possible that the particle from Big Bang was created by aliens in another dimension.

      And I don't see what any eternal force or deity has to do with what we were talking about. You said that Big Bang didn't answer the question of where the Universe got its energy from, I said it got it from the explosion that created it.

      Where would this said deity have come from, anyway? Are you suggesting that it's possible for a deity to just appear, yet impossible for a particle to just appear? Let's not forget that both the idea of a god and the idea of Big Bang were created by a human mind. Whether the universe was really created by God, or by Big Bang, or if God created Big Bang we may never know. Don't just blow off others' ideas of the creation of the universe - no one knows for sure, and it's just as likely that you're wrong as it is that they are.

    38. Re:High Anxiety by hyperquantization · · Score: 1

      yes, I admit, I am a bit hasty about cosmology.
      but my reasoing is that if our universe follows a chain of action-reaction, and we are in no capability to rise above ourselves, who is to judge whether the "seeding-event", or whatever you might call it, must follow the rules of what it originated? as far as we know, talking about eternity future/past is referring to a dimensional frame beyond our own. we could could even be talking about the lack of dimensional restrictions alltogether. (and yes, I know that I'm using fuzzy-science/philosophy, but it's all my punitive level of education will allow for now)
      and by the way, let's not make judgements about the concequences of there being such a deity; that deity could very well want itself to be known by it's creation. the existence of God is not necessarily just the result of human imagination. and yes, I would be a hypocryte if I blew off the Big Bang, as absolute judgements require absolute knowledge.

    39. Re:High Anxiety by ThankfulJosh · · Score: 1

      It also separates the wheat from the chaff.

    40. Re:High Anxiety by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation +3
          80% Funny
          20% Flamebait
          Total Score: 5

      Now that's an extreme moderation. Those extra "Flamebait" TrollMods just cleared the way for extra "Funny" mods. Thanks, ChrisTrolliban!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    41. Re:High Anxiety by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I had a physics lecturer at College who pushed the AC's argument while teaching thermodynamics to us. I gave him the same answer and he agreed with me.

      This guy was not at all stupid. One of the best teachers in that place. Funny how some otherwise intelligent people have the need to talk rubbish from time to time.

    42. Re:High Anxiety by jamiethehutt · · Score: 1

      they would have to prove that there is some sort of huge source of energy external to the Earth.

      Something matching that description rises every morning, or at least where I live....

    43. Re:High Anxiety by databyss · · Score: 1

      "let's not make judgements about the concequences of there being such a deity; that deity could very well want itself to be known by it's creation. the existence of God is not necessarily just the result of human imagination."

      Of course, after humans created the idea of god, they could decide that this made up god would want us to know about it to further our believe in what we made up.

      Just another possibility.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    44. Re:High Anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shouldn't this be labeled flamebait? I mean it's not that funny and especially not "5" funny!

    45. Re:High Anxiety by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward asks whether a joke at Intelligent Designer's expense should be "labeled" flamebait, after neither getting the joke, nor understanding moderation. Why don't you ask the Designer? Or look it up in your bible?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    46. Re:High Anxiety by hyperquantization · · Score: 1

      of course, but I don't think you're getting the point, so let me also restate myself...
      it would be much easier to tell a true interpretation than fabricate a background as extensive as the Christian Bible's; these recollections correlate too efficiently with the facts of history to be mere "imaginary" stories. maybe reading and studying what they "made up" could help you to see what I mean.

    47. Re:High Anxiety by aug24 · · Score: 1
      Six replies so far, and only one of them has seen the light!

      God help the poor, overly-literal nerds, as evolution clearly hasn't.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    48. Re:High Anxiety by databyss · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm lucky then, I've done my homework. I grew up Catholic and went to Catholic school and have read the bible.

      Many of the stories in the bible are derivatives of stories that have been told ages before the bible and are echoed in religions that predate christianity. Christianity even found it useful to borrow holidays from earlier religions.

      They didn't really make anything up as much as borrow things from different places and put them together in another context.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    49. Re:High Anxiety by hyperquantization · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course there a plenty of stories that predate Christ, and thus Christianity, they come from the Jewish Torah. The rest of the Bible is strictly consistent of historical documents.
      Concerning holidays, the church used symbols and dates from many pagan religions in order to confront and compete directly with them, making it harder for people to choose both.

      Out of curiosity, do you know which of those stories had been recorded before the original biblical scrolls?

  2. Re:fp by ThosLives · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps, but someone failed it when it came to the hazard analysis on that spacecraft...

    --
    "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  3. Talk about lag... by borawjm · · Score: 1

    and I get stressed when my ping hops over 50ms while playing online action games. I couldn't imaging a 16minute lag.

    1. Re:Talk about lag... by borawjm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Likewise...

    2. Re:Talk about lag... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1, Funny

      If I were them, I would go searching for another provider.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    3. Re:Talk about lag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      says the slashdot reader

    4. Re:Talk about lag... by Squalish · · Score: 1

      But einstein's been our provider for so long...

      What are you suggesting, we hook up with String Theory for their "Now with FTL" plan?

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
  4. Undisclosed sources ... by didit · · Score: 2, Funny

    wonder if it might still be able to land on a few chairs thrown from Redmond some days ago.

  5. Warning, Will Robinson by dada21 · · Score: 3, Funny

    How do you say "Blame Dr. Smith" in Japanese?

    1. Re:Warning, Will Robinson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      sorewa zenbu dokuta sumisu no seda! (frantically)<br>
      it'a all dr Smith 's falut!
    2. Re:Warning, Will Robinson by dada21 · · Score: 1

      He said it both ways :)

    3. Re:Warning, Will Robinson by macshit · · Score: 1

      "... no sei da!" ?

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  6. Flung off into space? by batknight23 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Must have been a bug-eyed anime probe that made a high pitched squealing sound as it was "flung off into space" by the mothership...

    1. Re:Flung off into space? by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      Am i the only one who thought of the Fruit Fucker 2000 when I heard this news?
      Poor little guy....All he wanted was to "sample" the asteroid a bit...

    2. Re:Flung off into space? by VAXcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Naw, it was just a regular probe by the name of Joel..it did a good job cleaning up the place, but his bosses didn't like him, so they shot him into space...

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    3. Re:Flung off into space? by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      word is Joel will be replaced by Mike.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    4. Re:Flung off into space? by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      Yah, and he won't be very funny...

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    5. Re:Flung off into space? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      High pitched squealing preceeded by:
      "Are we there yet?" "No." "Are we there yet?" "No." "Are we there yet?" "No." "Are we there yet?" "No." "Are we there yet?" "No." "Are we there yet?"

      "THAT'S IT!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  7. What I really dread... by OakDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is, after roaming the galaxy for 200 years collecting information, it will come back to Earth to destroy us.

    1. Re:What I really dread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even if it traveled at the speed of light, 200 years would not take it very far through the milky way. The Sun is 28,000 light-years distant from the center, and the diameter of the disk is c.100,000 light-years; its average thickness is 10,000 light-years, increasing to 30,000 light-years at the nucleus. Your pathetic chemical propulsion craft would have barely stepped out the door in the galactic neighborhood in 200 years.

    2. Re: What I really dread... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      > even if it traveled at the speed of light, 200 years would not take it very far through the milky way. The Sun is 28,000 light-years distant from the center, and the diameter of the disk is c.100,000 light-years; its average thickness is 10,000 light-years, increasing to 30,000 light-years at the nucleus. Your pathetic chemical propulsion craft would have barely stepped out the door in the galactic neighborhood in 200 years.

      And they say Slashdotters are anal-retentive.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re: What I really dread... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

      > ...is, after roaming the galaxy for 200 years collecting information, it will come back to Earth to destroy us.

      The good news is, this one doesn't seem capable of finding anything.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:What I really dread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they didn't give any large swords or the ability to create flashing and scrolling backgrounds to the robot

    5. Re:What I really dread... by Steve+Newall · · Score: 1

      Whenever life gets you down, Mrs. Brown,
      And things seem hard or tough,
      And people are stupid, obnoxious or daft,

      And you feel that you've had quite eno-o-o-o-o-ough,

      Just remember that you're standing on a planet that's evolving
      And reolving at nine thousand miles an hour.
      It's orbiting at nineteen miles a second, so it's reckoned,
      The sun that is the source of all our power.
      Now the sun, and you and me, and all the stars that we can see,
      Are moving at a million miles a day,
      In the outer spiral arm, at fourteen thousand miles an hour,
      Of a galaxy we call the Milky Way.

      Our galaxy itself contains a hundred million stars;
      It's a hundred thousand light-years side to side;
      It bulges in the middle sixteen thousand light-years thick,
      But out by us it's just three thousand light-years wide.
      We're thirty thousand light-years from Galactic Central Point,
      We go 'round every two hundred million years;
      And our galaxy itself is one of millions of billions
      In this amazing and expanding universe.

      Our universe itself keeps on expanding and expanding,
      In all of the directions it can whiz;
      As fast as it can go, that's the speed of light, you know,
      Twelve million miles a minute and that's the fastest speed there is.
      So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure,
      How amazingly unlikely is your birth;
      And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere out in space,
      'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth!

      The Galaxy Song, from: Monty Python's The Meaning of Life

    6. Re:What I really dread... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Well of course as it travelled through space it also found out how to break the light barrier, so its travel was probably actually 120,200 years, but flying back at greater then the speed of light the trip was -120,000 years. Duh.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    7. Re:What I really dread... by brianlj · · Score: 1
      "And reolving at nine thousand miles an hour."

      Ain't the web cool. Googling for reolving python gives 337 pages.

    8. Re:What I really dread... by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      Yes, so when human spacefarers wearing spandex outfits, accompanied by a hot bald woman with an LED in her throat make their way to the center of the massive alien ship threatening to wipe us out, at it's center will be this!

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    9. Re:What I really dread... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      even if it traveled at the speed of light, 200 years would not take it very far through the milky way.

      Time is relative when you talk about going the speed of light. It would not seem like long at all for the craft itself.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    10. Re:What I really dread... by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      D'you think if we give it its red ball it will go away and not destroy us all?

    11. Re: What I really dread... by khallow · · Score: 1
      And they say Slashdotters are anal-retentive.

      You have a citation for that?

    12. Re:What I really dread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      200 years? Phew! Not my problem.

    13. Re: What I really dread... by noims · · Score: 1

      And they say Slashdotters are anal-retentive.

      Shows what they know. We're not anal-retentive, we're pedantic. There's a difference!

      Noims
      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world. This is just a tribute.
  8. what the robots were thinking.. by tont0r · · Score: 5, Funny

    robot 1 : target acquired, beginning landing sequence...
    robot 2 : roger that, beginning land... OH LOOK A STAR!
    [all robots turn towards the star]
    robot 3 : OOHHHHHHHHHHH PRETTY!!!!

    1. Re:what the robots were thinking.. by Nykon · · Score: 4, Funny

      this is why I was firmly against implementing the io.add libraries into the APIs of robot code :)

      * add = attention deficit disorder

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    2. Re:what the robots were thinking.. by Jardine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pay attention Gir!

  9. huh by Lindz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    'Still, he admits that mission controllers do not fully understand how to deal with the spacecraft's motion after the periodic thruster firings' Then why are they mission controllers????

    1. Re:huh by bani · · Score: 1

      RTFA? It's all explained in there.

  10. Whoops! by Skye16 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how, exactly, the software being used had the capability to allow this to happen. Even if the problem were procedural, I would think that, on transfer of control, you would lock down all non-essential functions - like "flinging" payloads into space - until control has been successfully handed off.

    Of course, this is all pointless conjecture on my part - it may have been a hardware malfunction, for all I know. It would be interesting to analyze things like these. Having only a few years real-world experience, I doubt my programming skills would be worth a damn, but I would be thrilled just to have the opportunity to read the code they use before hand. Generally I don't volunteer my time to OSS-like programs, but this is one situation where I could easily see myself helping. Or trying to help, more like it.

    Then again, by releasing it beforehand open source, someone else may very well be able to analyze the code and "steal" control of the probe/satellite/whatever-is-using-the-software, possibly using it for nefarious gain, or possibly just being a bunch of dicks. So this probably wouldn't pan out. Still, a nerd can dream.

    1. Re:Whoops! by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Even if the problem were procedural, I would think that, on transfer of control, you would lock down all non-essential functions - like "flinging" payloads into space - until control has been successfully handed off.

      As I understand the story (which could easily be wrong), they had to issue the release command blindly, because the need to make the adjustment came up precisely when Murphy's Law predicts. Having the flexibility to do so at least allowed them to make the gamble that they wound up losing.

    2. Re:Whoops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who on earth would have access to a high power space antenna, have funding and time to run said space antenna, and decide to use it to go prank someone in outer space? A disgruntled grad student?

    3. Re:Whoops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem was - if I understood the story correctly - that the main probe performed some automatic position adjustment during the antenna switch. Since it was too close, it accelerated away, and when the command to release the robot arrived, it was moving away faster than the escape velocity of the asteroid, so that the robot will not arrive on the asteroid anytime soon.

    4. Re:Whoops! by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of another country. North Korea and Japan don't have the best of relations (or China and Japan, to a lesser extent). I'm not sure they would actually attempt to do this officially, but "accidentally" leaving a loophole in their own systems to allow "hackers" to do it could do the job just as well, leaving the country in question (pick one of the three) a plausible excuse. While it certainly wouldn't help their relations which each other, it may also provide the degree of deniability of wrongdoing necessary to "get off scot free", as it were. I'm not saying this would happen as a matter of course, but nationalistic pride often has a way of interfering with logic, common sense, and decency. And, frankly, there aren't too many space programs who will be keen to chance throwing away a multi-million dollar probe/satellite launch just to get some free software analysis by a bunch of hobbyists. Again, it'd be nice, but the more I think about it, the less likely I think it would be. Sadly. :(

    5. Re:Whoops! by king-manic · · Score: 1

      North Korea and Japan don't have the best of relations (or China and Japan, to a lesser extent).

      Actually most of asia don't like Japan that much. somethign about raping and pillaging that doesn't make friends.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    6. Re:Whoops! by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I donno about that, Europeans seem to like Sweden and Norway nowadays. Then again, that was quite some time ago. And it raping and pillaging definitely seemed to be pretty trendy at the time. So maybe that's why they've been forgiven, just like everyone who once liked New Kids on the Block or Pogo balls.

    7. Re:Whoops! by king-manic · · Score: 1

      I donno about that, Europeans seem to like Sweden and Norway nowadays. Then again, that was quite some time ago. And it raping and pillaging definitely seemed to be pretty trendy at the time. So maybe that's why they've been forgiven, just like everyone who once liked New Kids on the Block or Pogo balls.

      It's been about a thousand years, so I think they've let bygones be bygones. It'll be at least 1 or 2 generations mroe before they give up this grudge.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    8. Re:Whoops! by macshit · · Score: 1

      It's been about a thousand years, so I think they've let bygones be bygones. It'll be at least 1 or 2 generations mroe before they give up this grudge.

      Well, before the population gives up the grudge. Actually it's already happening -- all the young Koreans I know admire Japan, and say that anti-Japanese feeling is an "old people thing" (a lot of those in Korea it seems :-).

      What's a bit more scary is that authoritarian governments like (the P.R. of) China and North Korea will keep it alive artificially as long as they can, because it's a useful tool to distract attention from the government's failings.

      [Of course democraticly elected governments are hardly very pure either -- the Japanese government could help a lot by pandering a bit less to the right-wing loonie fringe -- but they simply don't have the control authoritarian governments do.]

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  11. I have a bad feeling about this by s20451 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Star Trek has taught us nothing else, it is that probes lost in space are a bad thing. And the fact that it's Japanese means that it's definitely going to come back and go apeshit.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re: I have a bad feeling about this by Black+Parrot · · Score: 0

      > And the fact that it's Japanese means that it's definitely going to come back and go apeshit.

      No, King Kong went apeshit. Godzilla went mutantradioactivereptilianthingyshit.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by davygrvy · · Score: 1

      I just knew someone here was going to mention NOMAD.. I just knew it.

      --
      -=[ place .sig here ]=-
  12. Oh, dear. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    When working with the USA, spacecraft get lost due to forgetting to switch between metric and common units.

    When working with Australia, spacecraft get lost due to forgetting that their maps of the universe are up-side-down.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Oh, dear. by rmstar · · Score: 1

      My condolences to all the hard working japanese scientists and engineers who have seen their dream shattered today. This must have hurt badly.

    2. Re: Oh, dear. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

      > My condolences to all the hard working japanese scientists and engineers who have seen their dream shattered today. This must have hurt badly.

      Well, if we're lucky it will hit some random alien in the ass, and we'll get a bit of payback for all the unauthorized probing.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Oh, dear. by jda487 · · Score: 5, Funny
      When working with the USA, spacecraft get lost due to forgetting to switch between imperial and common (SI) units.
      Fixed
    4. Re: Oh, dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UPIA?

  13. Cybernature is Cruel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "A little Japanese robot... flung into space by its mothership...

    Exonature is as cruel as mothernature herself. Obviously, the mothership began to ovulate, and, sensing a potential mate nearby, cruelly cast off her young to fend for itself.

  14. Gorf by fm2503 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Game over space cadet"

    1. Re:Gorf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "ah, ah, ah, ah."

  15. That's why we need AI in space by MOBE2001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    During this 40-minute antenna change, information about the spacecraft's vertical motion was unavailable to ground controllers.

    For a country which prides itself as being at the forefront of robotics technology, this is rather surprising. The latency inherent in space communication over great distances is the primary reason for using intelligent robots in space. If the probe was sufficiently intelligent, it would perform its tasks without supervision from ground control. I hope they (including NASA and the ESA) put a lot more effort into automating their space probes in the future.

    1. Re:That's why we need AI in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't happen. Automation scares them, after all, if they put an automatic probe in space and it uses the incorrect units for a calculation and screws up, who do they fire?

    2. Re:That's why we need AI in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sounds good, but apparently doesn't work in practice. See DART. People who who work with space stuff are by necessity very VERY conservative since stuff costs so much (of course, things cost so much because everything is endlessly tested and evaluated which costs a small fortune for each piece of electronics on the vehicle, but that's a different story). But regardless, the managers who have to sign off to take the financial responsibility for a vehicle are going to be highly suspicious of an autonomous vehicle given the limited success we've had it in it so far.

      Of course, I understand the russians have been doing it for years (Progress Cargo Spacecraft).

      Disclaimer: IWARE (i *was* a rocket engineer)

  16. Why is nobody... by john83 · · Score: 0

    Thinking of the poor little robot's feelings? It's just been flung into deep space by its mother. Most of us would resent being kicked out of the basement. Now it's definately going to come back and bite us on the ass.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  17. The real reason the minerva robot was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reavers.

  18. Had to see it coming... by Gruneun · · Score: 5, Funny

    The probe was named Minerva, after the Roman goddess of wisdom and skill. The mothership is named Hayabusa, after the world's fastest flying bird.

    Unfortunately, the mission controller was named Bob, after the Roman god of lazy eyes and uncoordinated pitching.

  19. I hope I'm the first to say by chadamir · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Danger Will Robbinson! DANGER!

  20. The last transmissions received... by MS-06FZ · · Score: 0

    "Haro, genki. Haro, genki-nai."

    It is a sad day indeed...

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  21. Read a bit earlier -- this was already a kludge by ianscot · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "But this "dress rehearsal" was cut short because mission controllers could not accurately guide the spacecraft using its fuel thrusters - a contingency solution devised following the failure of two of the craft's three stabilising reaction wheels."

    This was a series of truly bad rolls of the dice. Two of their three stablizers failed, they had bad altimeter data because "the slope of the asteroid's surface had apparently caused the altimeter to misjudge... estimates of the craft's altitude," and then they got below 100 meters while the antenna switchover was happening. They sent the separate command without realizing the thrusters to maintain minimum altitude had just fired, because of that break in communications. So the article says, though it's not a sterling example of great science writing, I'll give you that.

    The "mission officials are saying "Our readiness was not so complete," to their credit, but it's not like they're complete incompetents. More like they're pushing the technology: the altimeter hadn't ever been used before, for the obvious example.

    Sort of fits the cheaper/faster model of robotic exploration. You have your hits and your misses. This isn't a Cassini Cadillac of a probe.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Read a bit earlier -- this was already a kludge by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if Minerva might have troubles of its own. Japan has been putting quite a bit of effort into developing space exploration over the last couple of years, but don't have the benefit of screwing up as many times as the US and Russia have. You learn a lot from failing abysmally. They're on a good start though. A few commercial rockets blowing up here and there, then that probe that died after almost reaching Mars a couple years late due to a navigation problem. Give them time and a few billion more dollars, they'll make it eventually. With Hayabusa, they've still got 2 chances to make a powered landing, and if nothing else, they've gotten detailed pictures of the asteroid.

      I imagine it's frustrating for them that, despite the effort they're putting into developing novel missions like Hayabusa that involve a great deal of finesse and scientific potential, the Chinese are getting more positive attention by building on existing Russian technology to create a high profile manned program.

  22. Re:And we wonder why? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
    Somehow this doesn't surprise me. . .

    Hmm. Japanese space robot goes bananas, attacks other Japanese space robot, hurls it off into deep space... I've seen that before somewhere.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  23. Well! by Chewbacon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That wasn't very motherly.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  24. As seen on 'Mork & Mindy' by ThePatrioticFuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mork : "Fly, be free!" [SPLAT]

  25. Re:dang! by eln · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe Steve Ballmer was on the ship. It would certainly explain why the ship suddenly threw the probe into space.

  26. hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Mission controllers still plan to punch a hole in the asteroid and collect samples, which will be returned to Earth."

    Robot or not, eventually "samples" will get to earth...

  27. From the press release.. by Odonian · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mission controllers John and Maureen Robinson briefly left the control room to attend to an unforseen family crisis involving their children, Judy, William and Penny. Mission scientist Dr. Zachary Smith was left in charge of the lander. When chief mission controller Major Don West came into the control room an hour later to relieve Dr. Smith, the probe was found to have drifted off the asteroid after faulty commands were sent from one of the mission computers. Investigators later found a giant magnet stuck to the computer. Dr. Smith's only comment on the mission was that the robot was a "clattering craft of clinking computerized clumps"!

  28. Children, children! by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Funny
    Mission controllers still plan to punch a hole in the asteroid
    Now, now, don't go around punching things just because you lost your robot. We'll just make another one, okay? Here, have a lollipop.
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  29. There's still a chance... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    to recover that probe.

    This looks like a job for Gekiganger III!

    1. Re:There's still a chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have called D.I.C.E., which is International (or is it Intergalactic?) Rescue on steroids! However, you have to live in Sarbylion galaxy...

  30. It was hardware and circumstance by ianscot · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Of course, this is all pointless conjecture on my part - it may have been a hardware malfunction, for all I know.

    You'd sure know more if you went to the (somewhat unclear) article, which would obviate the need for lots of your conjecture.

    The main probe has been going on one of its three "stablizing wheels," the other two having failed. There's a sidebar link in the article to an earlier one about those failures. Mission controllers have been burning extra fuel keeping the thing at the right distance from the asteroid, facing the asteroid, and with its solar panels facing the sun; they already had that against them. Then the altimeter data they were getting was bad, they were closer than they thought, because some combination of the laser altimeter (previously untested) and the slope of the asteroid's surface confused the data.

    They realized they were within 100 meters and had to send the detach command while the antenna switch was happening. The blackout prevented them from realizing a "keep above minimum altitude" engine thrust had just gone off.

    This is much more of a reflection of this model of probe: it's cheaper, it's faster to develop, and there are going to be failures like the Beagle and this.

    (Personally I do think there'd be a big gain if, before and after missions like this, the code got reviewed. I doubt very much that hackers in Idaho would have foreseen the failed stabilizers, the workaround, the potential for misjudging the altimeter data, and the combination of the blackout and the necessity for the release command. But in terms of intellectual freedom, it'd be a nice statement, and the Post Mortems would sure feature a lot of people asking Feynman-esque questions about icewater and O-rings.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:It was hardware and circumstance by tylernt · · Score: 2, Funny

      "hackers in Idaho"

      Hey, I *am* a hacker in Idaho, you insensitive clod!

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
  31. At just 10cm by carguy84 · · Score: 1

    At just 10cm, why didn't they send up more then one of these robots? The bots could have even colonized once they got there...

    1. Re:At just 10cm by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      Sir, with all due respect, you are under the illusion that because they are small and Japanese electronics, they are also cheap.

    2. Re:At just 10cm by thousandinone · · Score: 0

      Whats more expensive in terms of return on investment? Paying for two and actually getting results, or launching one into space and getting nothing?

    3. Re:At just 10cm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, like your mother

  32. Re:dang! by MS-06FZ · · Score: 0

    Mojo Jojo ... work(s) for bananas

    D'ohhhhh! That is a misconception!

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  33. Now they've done it by chrisnewbie · · Score: 0

    Now it will be lost for 300 years and come with a name like "vger" and try to contact it's maker

    oh yeah i tell you i saw it foretell

  34. Ouch! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Funny
    accidentally been flung into space by its mothership.

    I told you not to pinch your mother there!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  35. Re:Had to see it coming...Bob who? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Unfortunately, the mission controller was named Bob

    Isn't Bob an especially annoying of in-house developed Microsoft software. Maybe the final version of the source code to Bob was on the robot and this was the only way to get rid of it forever!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  36. Oh noes! by Caspian · · Score: 0

    They lost Minerva??? But she's so ... so ... minky!

    (preparing to get modded (-1, Furry)...)

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  37. Sucks to be a robot I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially in space.

  38. We all know what happened by Riktov · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone set up them the bomb.

    1. Re:We all know what happened by Sabathius · · Score: 0

      Reply from Minerva:

      "What you say?!"

    2. Re:We all know what happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chown -R us ./base

  39. It's a shame really by Skiron · · Score: 1

    Personally I find this a bit sad; it would have been great to see the little thing in action, hopping all over another world investigating things. I mean, these projects take years to design and get there - it's not like they can send another one tomorrow.

  40. Common problem? by Bombula · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It seems like motors, solar panels and stabilizers are always the thing that fail on spacecraft. Seriously, it's the sort plot device Star Trek episodes are criticized for - "Captain, the left stabilizer is failing - I can't balance the phase inducers!"

    Is there some reason why we can't make these things tougher or more redundant?

    --
    A-Bomb
  41. Flying Bag of Money by Puhase · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a politician instead of a scientist, the first thing that came to mind when I read this story were the faces of the people who made the budget for that robot. They just heard that their spacecraft flung a $20million bag of money into the great unknown. I imagine that feels just about the same as getting kicked square in the nuts.

    --
    I am and always will be a stereotype, because who in their right mind prefers mono?
    1. Re:Flying Bag of Money by vertinox · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a politician instead of a scientist, the first thing that came to mind when I read this story were the faces of the people who made the budget for that robot. They just heard that their spacecraft flung a $20million bag of money into the great unknown. I imagine that feels just about the same as getting kicked square in the nuts.

      Moreso than not, because this is the first step in inventing a robot that flings politicians into deep space.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:Flying Bag of Money by Angelox · · Score: 0

      I guess my dad's life long policy for a solution to politicians, which is; "Put them all on a barge, tow it out to sea, and sink it!" - Can finally be handed down to me. My improved version of this policy would state;"Give them all a free tour of the astroids with the Japanese Nasa."

    3. Re:Flying Bag of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just heard that their spacecraft flung a $20million bag of money into the great unknown. I imagine that feels just about the same as getting kicked square in the nuts.


      So space is another place where shooting off your load can cost you...
    4. Re:Flying Bag of Money by waveclaw · · Score: 1

      Moreso than not, because this is the first step in inventing a robot that flings politicians into deep space.

      So, how far along are they on this politician deep space launching robot? And, speaking of this does anyone have anything to which I could to get elected? Or cheap long-duration spacesuits?

      Heck, I hear that there's an as yet untouched asteroid at which you could even target the robot.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
  42. Homing system? Phone home? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    As I am sure it may have been posted before, didn't Minerva have some type of visual lock-on/homing mechanism that will automatically find the largest rock nearby and move towards it? I guess it is not that sophisticated, or it just missed its trajectory due to the 40-minute atennae switch.

    My other theory is that Minerva (feeling lonely, isolated and missing her father) just went on to Jupiter to say hi to her Dad.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  43. One Word..... by Mr.+BS · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ffffuuuukkkkooooovvvvvv!!!!!!

    1. Re:One Word..... by chivo243 · · Score: 1

      one point too.... I get it all the time, and I loved the Wreck! was too funny for someone who has seen way too many reruns of all of the ST's

      --
      Sig Hansen?
    2. Re:One Word..... by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

      I wonder if Pirk was doing some "Maunal Targeting"..... Maybe he broke his little Joy Stick!!!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  44. Someone just pushed the wrong button by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    They went for the little sheild circle thing and accidently hit the button for hyperspace. The little triangle ship reapeared brieftly but was shot out of the sky by a small saucer shaped imagine with little dots.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  45. Cross circuit to A... by PhineusJWhoopee · · Score: 0

    ...and prepare to jettison the warp core. On a more serious note, ultimately it comes down to the tradeoff between weight, space, and payload. Making redundant or more robust (usually means more massive) systems generally means less payload mass (instruments) would be available - assuming they did the smart thing and maximized the total spacecraft weight to begin with. In addition, there may be other constraints with the geometric volume of the launch vehicle, that preclude some solutions. ed

  46. wait, we are receiving a transmission by digitallysick · · Score: 1

    " we are receiving a transmisson from our lost space robot" (everyone at mission control goes silent) ARE YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. heh by tnk1 · · Score: 1

    AIBO!! Go fetch!!

  49. This is a job for Aibo! by keraneuology · · Score: 2, Funny

    Go fetch, boy! Go fetch the little robot!

    --
    If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
  50. The Stereotypical anime shot.... by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    Would be of the robot zinging into the part unknown followed by a star like shine of where it is heading followed by a sound.....

    Maybe even a text message from robot reading "Yanna Kanjiiiiiiiiiiiii!!!"

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  51. Re:The sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you must be new here, organized physical sport has no place on /.

  52. Overwhelming horror by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    All pride is become evaporation due to the poor work quality of these shameful space workers. We must now do what is right and true, and move on with our heavy-set heads but awful hearts made of pewtrid filth.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  53. Re:fp by Agarax · · Score: 1

    Japanese 'Minerva' Robot Lost in Space

    Danger, Will Yamamoto!

    --
    Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
  54. Confirmation by WgT2 · · Score: 1

    They should have used TCP!

  55. Why no duplicates? by Ruvim · · Score: 1

    I saw a comparative size of the Minerva, and it makes me wonder: with it being so small, couldn't they just fly 2 or 3 of them on board? You are already firing a rocket anyways!

  56. Some pictures by biraneto2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here you can see Minerva (and it's cover) saying "so long and thanks for all the batteries" (In japanese, of course). Also there are pictures of Hayabusa taken from Minerva (first 2)

  57. Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new Japanese robotic overlords.

  58. The ultimate nerd achivement? by Pichu0102 · · Score: 2

    So, will people start trying to remotely install Linux on it?

  59. Not to go off on a rant... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...but one might realize that from an American's PoV (the poster was almost certainly American) imperial units ARE "common"?

    I'm sorry, but just because we don't subscribe to your particular social engineering doesn't make us bad. I work for a German firm and *constantly* get bugged by the question "why don't you just switch to metric - it's so much simpler!"

    First of all, I point out that US firms and people HAVE switched to metric in many of the sciences and international transport, where it IS simpler.
    Further, the "metric" system is NOT universally "simpler". The imperial system with its base-12 feet and fractions is in many ways superior (HERESY!) in the practicalities of everyday application. For example:
    - If I have an inch standard, I can go fairly easily down to an accurate 1/32 or even 1/64 of an inch. Without a ruler with accurately scribed gradations, can you measure me 0.396875 cm?
    - a base 12 foot is wonderful for general use. 12 is a number that can be divided by 2, 3, 4, and their multiples very easily, and still end up in integer units again without equipment. The decimal metric system gets icky when you try to divide anything by anything except 5 and 2.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Not to go off on a rant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      12 is a number that can be divided by 2, 3, 4, and their multiples very easily,

      ...which is why the optimal solution is to redesign the human race more intelligently, with 6 fingers on each hand, preferably 2 symmetric thumbs per hand. Then rewrite metric in base 12 and everything is perfect.

      There, world peace in two easy steps, and it isn't even encumbered by patents!
    2. Re:Not to go off on a rant... by afaik_ianal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I have an inch standard, I can go fairly easily down to an accurate 1/32 or even 1/64 of an inch. Without a ruler with accurately scribed gradations, can you measure me 0.396875 cm?

      Please tell me you're not being serious there. Do you honestly believe that centimetres can't be halved recursively too? Or, a more realistic solution, a metric person can pull an ordinary plastic ruler out of their desk drawer, and mark off 4mm (all metric rulers are marked with mm, some even half or quarter mm, except perhaps children's rulers).

      If you really need a measurement more accurate than a millimetre (about a 25th of an inch), you should probably be using a more accurate tool.

      So you're example was meant to point out that 10/64ths of an inch is harder to do in metric than imperial. Surely most people find it considerably easier to manipulate base-10 numbers (even the Americans do that with their money), then round to mm than manipulate fractions with differing denominators (albeit normally powers of 2), then work out how many 16ths, 32nds, and 64ths they need. And if you want to use a calculator, you end up with decimal anyway, or a denominator determined by the calculation (which may not even be a power of 2).

      "I want 8 lengths of 1 and 3/16th inches, plus 3 lengths of 2 and 13/64th inches, then divide the whole lot by 3".

    3. Re:Not to go off on a rant... by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      > - If I have an inch standard, I can go fairly easily down to an accurate 1/32 or even 1/64 of an inch. Without a ruler with accurately scribed gradations, can you measure me 0.396875 cm?

      By the same token, I can fairly easily go down to an accurate 1/2 or even 1/4 of a cm. Without a ruler with accurately-scribed gradations, can you measure me 0.19685039 inches?

    4. Re:Not to go off on a rant... by drsquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Other than inches in feet, what else in the imperial system uses 12? There are 16 ounces in an inch, three feet in a yard, 8 furlongs in a mile, 14 pounds in a stone, 8 stone in a hundredweight. I'm not seeing many 12s there.

      12 is a number that can be divided by 2, 3, 4, and their multiples very easily, and still end up in integer units again without equipment. The decimal metric system gets icky when you try to divide anything by anything except 5 and 2.

      You can't divide 12 by 5 and get a whole number either. You can divice by four just as easily in metric as you can in imperial. For example, 8 cm divided by 4 = 2 cm. Whereas 6 inches divided by four goes into decimal places. Luckily most measuring units have decimal places so it's a non issue.

      Maybe you live in some world where you often need to work out what a third or a quarter of a foot is without using any measuring instruments that show anything smaller than an inch. Maybe you need a new ruler.

  60. Anyone else think of Major Tom reading this..... by WareW01f · · Score: 1

    The German version, not the crappy english one:

    Völlig losgelöst
    von der Erde
    schwebt das Raumschiff
    völlig schwerelos

  61. No witty comment needed by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    This is funny all by itself. ;-) It's also why I believe every vessel sent into space should have its own little ion drive as a backup. (If the robot was supposed to land on the asteroid without the mothership, then I would count it as a vessel.) I don't know what technical problems it would cause or how much it would cost, but I doubt the mothership could've propelled the little robot with so much force that it couldn't recover with a few days/weeks using of continuous acceleration. Unless of course, it smashed into another asteroid before it had a chance to slow down or turn around.

  62. Where's a .... by Funkyness1 · · Score: 1

    Ryo-ohki when you need one? Who wouldn't want a cute little pet that turns into a space ship when flung into the air?

    (Bonus points if you can guess the reference)

  63. The real question... by Trails · · Score: 0

    is how many tentacles the demon-alien that rides the probe back to Earth will have? I postulate 23!

    1. Re:The real question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      23? Is that enough for the Japanese girls school dormitory that it'll land in?

      Exactly how many does it need for each girl?

      I'll have to see if i can research that answer on Google... Hmmmm 14 million hits on comics and stories containing those keywords. Best to start reading them all now...

    2. Re:The real question... by Trails · · Score: 0

      Probably not enough, I just have a "thing" for prime numbers, though I suppose I could've picked a higher one...

  64. Lost In Space? by Sodki · · Score: 1

    "Danger, Will Robinson!"

  65. Gunshot of insight... BLAMBLAMP'TANGZOINGwaBOW! by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

    Gravity will eventually pull the robot somewhere, it's just a question of where. if it lands on another asteroid, they might be able to just make the best of the situation...

    --
    "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
  66. The Dish 2 by A3gis · · Score: 1

    Yay! Time for a sequel to The Dish: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0205873/

  67. Typical naive Slashdot question by ringm000 · · Score: 1
    Well, if the gravity of the asteriod is so weak, why having a separate probe for landing, or at least why trying to get it to the asteriod surface with such a complicated example of acrobatics and markmanship? Couldn't they land their main spacecraft? With all the fuel they have it would be easier to correct the errors, and getting off the surface would hardly be a problem.

    I've heard asteroid landing was successfully tried once, with the craft which wasn't even designed for landing!

  68. testing by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    This is just a test.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  69. What kinda idiot by Kanasta · · Score: 1

    schedules a critical task like launching a robot during a data link switch?? Couldn't wait a minute so the change was complete?

  70. For once I'm glad my operating system is made... by macraig · · Score: 1

    ... in the quaint little town of Redmond, Washington instead of anywhere in Japan! Did the guys at JPL *ever* screw up that bad? Ever?

  71. Where? by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Where does you bible say that? Mine is silent on orbits. Other than a few times where the sun stands still in the sky or moves backwords, but those give no clue how the orbits work - or even if there is an orbit.

  72. Poor Mazinger Z by ShadowXOmega · · Score: 1

    Yea, poor Mazinger Z, he would be crying by now.... uh...no... is only oil from the refrigeration system... (FMI (For Moderators Information): Minerva was a robot that appeared in the Mazinger Z series...alongside with Mazinger, until the robot overheated and disabled itself....droping tears(oil) from her(uh?) eyes... )