Slashdot Mirror


Yak Launches Free Video and Voice Service

Jamie Garson writes to tell us Yahoo is reporting that Yak Communications has launched their new voice and video calling service, yakForFree. From the article: "In a crowded and competitive VoIP marketplace, yakForFree is distinguished by its free video capabilities and ease-of-use. By downloading the free Virtual VideoPhone, which takes less than a minute, users can make free calls over the Internet using a high-speed connection."

114 comments

  1. Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by geomon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember getting Teamspeak to contact my family and friends. We would set up a server and contact each other via IM to set up a session. Now Teamspeak charges for their service. I'm sure that was their intention all along, but it was sad to see it go subscription only.

    I wonder how long yakForFree will remain *free*? I suppose their free plan is a give away for getting people to sign up for the enhanced services. But I can envision a time in the near future when the free will giveway to *cheap*. I guess that if the price is right, that isn't a bad prospect either.

    I guess I'd better use it while the free offer is still good!

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by joelwest · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is free because it's free. There are aparently upgardes available to allow calling to PTSN (land line phones). It is however very cool.

    2. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I wonder how long yakForFree will remain *free*? I suppose their free plan is a give away for getting people to sign up for the enhanced services. But I can envision a time in the near future when the free will giveway to *cheap*."

      If they grab enough marketshare, they can sell advertising to splash during usage. I can't see any other way of them making money off this without charging for it. Also, by stating that it's a videophone, they can limit people complaining about ad display on their monitors, like people did when it was attempted with VOIP... though I'm sure it will be in their EULA.

      Possibly a tiered fee system, pay more for no ads.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by Kamidari · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless you are charging your friends and family to use your teamspeak server, it's still free (as in beer).

    4. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by squison · · Score: 1
      Teamspeak is still free. They only charge businesses, mostly those who charge customers to use their servers.

      If you're setting up your own server, then Teamspeak is free.

    5. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by geomon · · Score: 1

      Unless you are charging your friends and family to use your teamspeak server, it's still free (as in beer).

      Good to know.

      Thanks.

      --
      "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    6. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Teamspeak for small not for profit personel entities is still free.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by Stormy+Henderson · · Score: 1

      Geomon wrote: "I remember getting Teamspeak to contact my family and friends....Now Teamspeak charges for their service....it was sad to see it go subscription only."

      Teamspeak is not subscription only, and does not charge for their service. Unless you are a business or charge people to access your server.

      For your stated purpose, talking to your family and friends, it's as free as it ever was, for up to 100 people per machine. I use it every day.

    8. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's not clear to me why it wouldn't be free, or why we need a "provider" for this in the first place. You're already paying the ISP for bandwidth, do we really need a web page provider, ssh provider... another "provider" and another bill for every protocol over IP?

      Vonage, for instances, bills themselves as a VOIP provider, which I don't see as being quite the case. For pure VOIP calls, you don't need a provider. What Vonage really sells is a VOIP-to-POTS bridge... a transition technology until such time as every telephone and blackberry have IP addresses.

    9. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...maybe I'm missing something, but Teamspeak is still free for personal use. Me and some freinds still run our own server with it. Check your facts ;)

    10. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by xTantrum · · Score: 1
      blackberry have IP addresses
      ummmmm, blackberry!
      --
      $action = empty(PHP) ? backToC() : unset(PHP) ; "when the concrete cases are understood, the abstractions are readily
    11. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by jrockway · · Score: 1

      PSTN, you mean. Public Switched Telephone Network.

      Which is a very useful feature, I might add. I finally ditched my cell phone and spend maybe $2 a month using Skype to make all my phone calls. Less phone bill == more coffee!

      --
      My other car is first.
    12. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      I was about to write the same thing. I'll tell you the IP if you promise to not send me a bunch of crap! No I won't, and this wasn't posted from it!

      Later,
      -Slashdot Junky

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    13. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by ggravier · · Score: 1

      Teamspeak is still free for personal use. Server and client binaries are available for free, for Windows and Linux (and there is even a Mac OS beta on their site). You can set up a free Teamspeak server on any Windows or Linux server as long as you only have (I think) something like max 16 simultaneous connections... Which, for the "family" use you describe, is the case.

      Gilles.

    14. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      For pure VOIP calls, you don't need a provider.

      Not strictly true. If you hav a dynamic IP address (which many/most end users do), you need some sort of registration and look-up service, to match the current IP:port with a specific user. Whether this service is e.g. Vonage, or a dyndns service, you *do* need a provider of *something*.

    15. Re:Basically Teamspeak w/video (for me at least) by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Not strictly true. If you hav a dynamic IP address (which many/most end users do), you need some sort of registration and look-up service
      My Comcast IP address has only changed once in 4 years (I have a domain name pointing to it and run my own mail server at home, so I would notice!)

      Unfortunately, though, you still have a point... many people do need that.

      We already have a ubiquitous DNS service. Instead of hacking up numerous proprietary dynamic DNS services (Vonage, ICQ, etc...), I think it would be better to extend "real" DNS. For home users without their own domain names, it might be as easy as making amy3423.users.aol.com resolve to the current IP address of amy3423@aol.com, and disabling caching.

  2. Er... by Mwongozi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, this is a poorly disguised advert, right? Because neither "free video capabilities" nor "ease-of-use" are at all distinguishing features these days. iChat AV probably does both of these things better, actually, and there's a ton of similar apps available. Even for Windows. ;)

    Linking to the Yahoo news story is a bit odd, too. Here's "Yak's" actual site.

    1. Re:Er... by DeepRedux · · Score: 4, Informative

      Notice that the story is sent in by Jamie Garson, who has a yak.ca email address. The Yahoo story is a Business Wire press release. For a fee, Business Wire will distribute any press release and Yahoo will reprint it. There is no independent reporter involved here.

    2. Re:Er... by tpgp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So, this is a poorly disguised advert, right?

      Yes. It is.

      Because neither "free video capabilities" nor "ease-of-use" are at all distinguishing features these days.

      True they're not - however if you'd bothered to read the link you posted, you'd notice that in the FAQ:

      Q.) What are Open Standards and why does it matter?
      A.) An Open Standard is more than just a specification. The principles behind the standard, and the practice of offering and operating the standard, are what make the standard Open. yakForFree follows the standards proposed mostly by the IETF.

      If true, this is an advantage over most other chat clients (I am talking about video here)

      iChat AV probably does both of these things better, actually, and there's a ton of similar apps available. Even for Windows. ;)

      Hmmmmn.

      I presume the person who submitted this story was paid for promoting this product - I hope you were well paid for your adverisment too.
      --
      My pics.
    3. Re:Er... by Da_Biz · · Score: 2

      I have an idea: let the readers meta-moderate people with the ability to post new stories. As the months pass, why do I feel that I'm being had when I see an exhortation to "Meta-Moderate for Slashdot"? I just feel like I'm contributing free labor to a downward-trending initiative.

    4. Re:Er... by mbaciarello · · Score: 1
      Apparently this is a re-branded SIP client from CounterPath. I've used their voice-only free client, X-Lite, on my Mac.

      I find the interface ominous, and the audio quality pathetic (but it might be the VoIP service provider's fault.) However, it has one good quality: it works seamlessly in a NAT, even if you have several clients in your network.

      I must confess I didn't take the time to find out how it does this (server-based communications? UPnP binding random ports? or switching to different ones if the default is occupied?). In any case, that's a solution to the one problem that bugs me with iChat and many other similar products. Although they're starting to implement UPnP port forwarding, the presence of two or more clients in the NAT seems to break them, if anything because they (or the user themselves) can't change the ports they run on.

      This might be a good reason to give this thing a try, I guess -- granted, I don't know if it does perform as well as his older cousin, yet.

    5. Re:Er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look carefully, it doesn't double.

      Also, /. has no power. Slashdot did not cause the rise.

    6. Re:Er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Mac version?

    7. Re:Er... by sapgau · · Score: 1

      It sounds like a copy of Skype.

      Funny but I associate VOIP to be able to make calls over POTS (land line service). To do that you will have to pay, that interconnection is not going to be free anytime soon.

      I have switched and so far no problems (don't forget to register for 911, etc.). I got a local VOIP service (Digital Voice) and I think that helps in getting a better customer service (vs. Vonage for example).

      Check around your city, there might be a new VOIP company and they might have some amazing deals. I now save close to 60% on my regular phone service.

      0.02

    8. Re:Er... by Vryl · · Score: 1

      just piss off to kuro5hin... I mean...

  3. I for one... by fishybell · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new slashvertisement overlords.

    --
    ><));>
    1. Re:I for one... by interiot · · Score: 1
      Can I have some of the money? Please?

      Seriously, the more you sell your reader's eyeballs, the more those eyeballs will go someplace else.

    2. Re:I for one... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``I, for one, welcome our new slashvertisement overlords.''

      Well, and I DON'T!

      This is supposed to be _news_ for nerds, not advertisements for nerds. It's one thing that people try and submit advertisements as Slashdot stories, it's quite another that these advertisements actually get posted on the homepage (in favor of some real news stories, I might add).

      Seriously. Where's the news value in this? Here's yet another free-as-in-beer-but-not-freedom voice and video chat application, as if there aren't a dozen others already. There doesn't seem to be anything special about this one that makes it worth recommending over others (if so, I've certainly missed the recommendation). It's not even coming from an organization we all know that's now moving into the market, or something.

      If the overlords don't leave, I'll make sure I do.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    3. Re:I for one... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't think that slashdot posts all these advertisements on purpose. I think the editors are just incompetent.

      --
      My other car is first.
  4. It's run by idiots by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or, maybe I am. I decided "Hm - let's check it out."

    Fill out the form - done.

    Click the link to download - OK.

    They state "Mac/PC compatible"! That's good - I can do this on my Powerbook while I'm working on this code.

    Except - the only link takes you to a Windows executable. Um - I think they're missing something.

    That, and the site looks like it was designed by people who are REALLY HAPPY! WE'RE AWAKE, AND DAMN IT, WE'RE HAPPY TO SEE YOU. Wagh.

    Calm down. Take the lesson from Google: Simple. Easy. Not 20 different links and no clue which one to look for. So, too weird - forget it.

  5. I always wanted this ... by external400kdiskette · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had a discussion about this a while ago:

    Me: I want 10 year old netmeeting technology to go with my VOIP.
    My friend Masood Khan: Just Wait!
    Me: Wow that worked.
    Khan: It's an age-old diplomatic trick.

  6. Windows, Mac, and Linux???? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know of a good app that does voip, video, and whiteboard that runs on all 3 platforms?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Windows, Mac, and Linux???? by PoprocksCk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Video, no -- but check out BitWise [www.bitwisechat.com] which offers whiteboard and voip, and is for Windows, OS X, and Linux. I've tried it on my Linux box -- it's a very polished app and it works great.

    2. Re:Windows, Mac, and Linux???? by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      www.maratech.com

      All three platforms covered.

    3. Re:Windows, Mac, and Linux???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can speak for Mac... there is NO Native Mac SIP phone available for general SIP use. Gizmo is one such phone that works on the Mac, I think it even runs native, but they force you to use their SIP server only, which pretty much makes it useless to contact people running the Asterisk PBX software on their favorite UNIX box (sigh)...

      x-Lite, from X-ten is a piece of crap.. it does NOT run native on the Mac, in that it uses a portable GUI layer on top of the Mac OS, which it has to load in the entire GUI library to work, and the launch times exceed 5 mins on my g3 laptop. Once you set it up to "register" to your favorite SIP server, you have to Quit the program (mine takes 5 mins to quit). Then there is the sound quality - it totally SUCKS because there is a portable sound API that sits on top of Core audio (if it even uses it).

      sjPhone is yet another non-native SIP phone that can run on the Mac, but it also uses a portable GUI (more and more overhead - and sacrifice in performance), as well as a portable sound API (yet another layer to eat up your performance).

      Apple has not, nor do they plan to, offer a SIP and RTP stack in their API's like WinBlows does, and because of this, SIP phones for the Mac are going to lag far behind WinBlows.

      I've been working on a native SIP Phone for Mac to run under Cocoa, but (sigh) the SIP stacks out there are not designed to compile under X-Code, and I now realize the extreme difficulty of implementing a SIP Phone for the Mac.

      Eventually, I'll prevail, and eventually get something working on the Mac. but don't hold your breath...

  7. download? by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    so I clicked download, to see if there is a linux version. But I'm not giving them my email address even before I know if there is a linux version. What the hell they think?

    it's not free, the price is your privacy.

    PS: if anyone ,,sacrificed his privacy'' to check, please tell if there is a linux version.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:download? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I gave them my info as they're already my long distance carrier; all they had was a Windows .exe file, even though they claim to be Mac/Windows compatible. At least if they had an OS X .app file, it might be runnable under GnuStep PPC.

    2. Re:download? by AlgebraicSpore · · Score: 1

      I downloaded the exe and the install went perfectly using wine. The program has launched and I am about to go find a microphone so that I can test it out tonight.

    3. Re:download? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The email address isn't required. All that's required is a first name and a password.
      Despite the promised Mac version not existing, the people do have some clue:
      Q.) What are Open Standards and why does it matter?
      A.) An Open Standard is more than just a specification. The principles behind the standard, and the practice of offering and operating the standard, are what make the standard Open.
      Also (on the email address):
      The very first time you install yakForFree you must create a new user account. You will be asked to enter a security ID, an optional email address (this is where we can contact you for updates or where a new password will be sent if you forget it) and a yakForFree password.
    4. Re:download? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      But I'm not giving them my email address even before I know if there is a linux version.

      Then don't give them your e-mail address. You aren't under oath to give them a valid address.

      Have you been on the internet for more than a week? Arbitrary word@word.com e-mail addresses work find for 99.99% of web forms.

      It's completely idiotic that sites insist on having something in the e-mail field, but it's only invading your privacy if you willingly offer up your private info to them.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:download? by thempstead · · Score: 1

      The Email address field seems to be non-mandatory ... at least it let me through with out anything in it ....

      t

    6. Re:download? by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      Try mailinator.com if you're concerned about giving away your e-mail address.

    7. Re:download? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``At least if they had an OS X .app file, it might be runnable under GnuStep PPC.''

      Not unless you also write a binary translator, I'm afraid.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    8. Re:download? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please just use example.com/net/org for such purposes. Why should we send spam to irrelevant web site owners (word.com, in your example).

    9. Re:download? by jobcello · · Score: 1

      The email address field is not required. Only the fields marked w an asterisk are required. I checked the site, and only a windows client was available to me, but I'm not sure if that's just because it autodetected the operating system.

      You linked to mailinator. You can use http://www.mailinator.net/ to receive mail without "sacrificing your privacy". Seems like you didn't realize that though.

  8. Until by varmittang · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are blocked by router filters that kill the connections.

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  9. Free software VoIP by MrvFD · · Score: 2, Informative

    Luckily there's also one free software "skype-like" VoIP in development - http://www.openwengo.com/ (GPL). For video features, there's always GnomeMeeting, though it's more for businesses than for the average Joe because there's no centralized "address book" except for Seconix. And Gaim 2.0 should support Google Talk protocol, together with some webcam support for various protocols.

    1. Re:Free software VoIP by Goodgerster · · Score: 1

      Gaim 2.0 should support Google Talk protocol Gaim already does support Google Talk. It's called Jabber if you aren't a buzzword-integrated Google shareholder. Coming soon: support in Linux for the Apple Bonjour, Microsoft Remote Assistance and IIS 6.0 protocols.

    2. Re:Free software VoIP by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``Gaim already does support Google Talk. It's called Jabber if you aren't a buzzword-integrated Google shareholder.''

      Yes, just like it supports MSN and AIM and all the others: you can send text, but no voice or video. Remember? That's what we're talking about in this thread.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  10. Notice the submitter's email address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    @yak.ca ..... I remember a time, so long ago, when Slashdot wasn't an add for the latest VC-funded tech firm. Hell, getting a press release on Yahoo isn't really all that difficult, a local podcast group managed that.

    1. Re:Notice the submitter's email address by FathomIT · · Score: 1

      Please give us a list of /. altertatives that match the quality or lack there of...

    2. Re:Notice the submitter's email address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boingboing is pretty good, so is metafilter, i think a lot of people are really really over slashdot, theres a slashvertisment a few times a week (that i notice) YouTube was another one.

      http://trendwatcher.koan.net/node/685

  11. How is this different to MSN Messenger? by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    I mean, you can do both video and audio calls via MSN Messenger, and it's free... so how is this different?

    1. Re:How is this different to MSN Messenger? by badfish99 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's different because it's incompatible. It's Yet Another incompatible talK service.

      What the world needs is something that lets anyone talk to anyone else.

    2. Re:How is this different to MSN Messenger? by Leon_Trotsky · · Score: 1

      Exactly... and Yahoo, and Google talk, and skype. What EXACTLY is so revo-freaking-lutionary here? JAIMC - just another instant messaging client.

      --
      Ohhh! Pay Dirt! A pair of half-eaten choco-pants!
    3. Re:How is this different to MSN Messenger? by dotgain · · Score: 1

      What!?! You mean there's some people that _don't_ use MSN?!?!

  12. If you want better quality, use SightSpeed by amr42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want a free video phone that works great try SightSpeed. They have been consitantly ranked the best by PC Magazine and PC World.

  13. Slightly reworded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An employee of a company called Yak (jgarson@yak.ca) writes to tell us Yahoo is kindly storing a press release from same company. The press release has the usual glowing praise that offers no objectivity due to the obvious financial interests of the writer. The company has launched their new voice and video calling service, yakForFree, but has no marketing team, nor money, to promote it, and has decided to try to get it in front of people through fooling slashdot editors into believing the press release is a news report. From the press release: "In a crowded and competitive VoIP marketplace, yakForFree is just another soon-to-be burned-out shell of a car along the side of the dot com highway. What truly distinguishes it from other offerings is that it offers both video and voice services, which have only been available in most free chat clients for half a decade now. By downloading the free Virtual VideoPhone, which takes less than a minute, users are locked into a proprietary system which is likely to riddle their machine with spyware."

    1. Re:Slightly reworded by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      I can tell you from the screenshot of the program, that it is a SIP-only program. I don't recall the name of it, but I've worked with it and my companies SIP server.

      So, you see, yakForFree is really a SIP proxying service. You can register and make calls to any SIP-activated phone across the world. It uses an open standard. They targeted the geeks (a wise move). Geeks will start using it, and then so will their friends.

      Oh, and that "proprietary system" you talk wrongly about does not have spyware with it!

      Disclaimer: I don't work for Yak.

      P.S. If this was non-SIP, I would tend to agree with you.

  14. I told you this would happen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I jokingly noted in one of yesterday's Sony fiasco threads that employers would start banning music CDs from work computers. And here it starts:

    Sony CDs banned in the workplace

    "I've been chasing down several accounts of government agencies, companies, educational institutions and others banning the use of Sony CDs on their PCs, due to the security risks of having Sony's rootkit DRM infecting their PCs. One government ministry, Alberta Agriculture, has banned the use of music CDs altogether, since Sony is hardly the only music company crippling its CDs with sneaky, malicious software. Here are a couple examples:

    It has been brought to our attention that there is significant risk to the security and the operation of UC computers in using Sony BMG produced CDs. For this reason, the use of Sony BMG produced CDs in University of Canberra computers is prohibited.
    "


    EAT IT *AA's! Sony put a gun to your head and pulled the trigger.

  15. This is a mere press release! by lancejjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yahoo is reporting that Yak Communications has launched their new voice and video calling service, yakForFree. From the article: [...]

    This isn't an article written by a reporter. This is a corporate press release, evidently written by the owners of the product.

    Advertising? Yep. News? No.

  16. I've tested this program, Camfrog is far better by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seriously, This requires a high-speed conection for one-on-one? Camfrog only requires a 56 k modem and is so good that deaf people can "speak" over video near-flawlessly over 56k. Plus it's loaded with more features, offers actual chat rooms you can go to and see loads of other people (up to 100 cams if you pay a one-time $50 for the pro version of Camfrog Client) in the room, PLUS stream music, PLUS type. Oh, not to mention IRC-style options like giving others ops, half-ops, make users have voice (friend of the room,) and on top of that all it comes with IM built-in. Yak doesn't compare, YET.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  17. It does not. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    giving someone an email address in no way sacrifices yoyur privacy.

    Can the lok into your house? snoop through your wallet? read your mind? no. All they can do is send you an email, which you are free to delete.

    I don't like SPAM either, but SPAM in no way invades your privacy.

    Personally, I have an email just for this type of thing. If the service turnsout to not be spamming me, and I like the product, I will change my preferences to me second tier email address. My second tier email address has gotten exactly 1 piece of SPAM.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. Re:I live in a world by geomon · · Score: 1

    I guess you didn't read her blog.

    This woman hates men because of her divorce.

    If I got a divorce and had to deal with attorneys I think I would hate the other sex too. Not because I would hate women, just the divorce process.

    No one I have known who has been through a divorce has walked away from the experience without severe bitterness.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  19. Thanks for the summary by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Thank you for summarizing it. I was wondering if this was really free-as-in-freedom video chat come to earth. I guess it was too much to hope for. Oh well, back to dreaming.

    By the way, can anyone recommend some good apps to do voice and or video chat that _are_ free-as-in-freedom and work on *nix and can communicate without too much hassle with some app on doze? I know of GnomeMeeting. Are there any others? How far along is gaim-vv these days?

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  20. Rebundeled Technologie by CyMunz · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is clearly a free (and branded) version of eyeBeam from Xten (link) now known as CounterPath. Therefore my guess is that it's a service pretty similar to Free World Dialup (link) but with video (not sure if FWD support video).

  21. Yahoo! announces open source version... by sloths · · Score: 1

    gnuForFree.

    --
    really 867993
    Karma schkarma
    1. Re:Yahoo! announces open source version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be a long time waiting for that. Roll on bisonForFree!

      Oni

  22. Slashvert Pump-n-Dump by SSpade · · Score: 1

    Yak have been email pump-n-dump spamming for quite a while now.

    Remember, boys and girls! If it's slashverted, sell short!

  23. Gibson and VoIP on TWiT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So then how is Steve Gibson going to be received? How is he sizing up this competitor? Those of you who are TWiTheads will remember hearing Steve announce on TWiT this week that he is working on a VoIP client to do his podcasts with Leo Laporte, and he will be releasing it free (or so says the podcast).

  24. Can anyone help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm looking for some free VoIP software which does SIP, works on both Mac and Windows (don't want to learn two programs), does encryption (RTP/SRTP/??) and isn't owned by a company which is already tracking too much of my online activity (aka, Google or eBay). Does something like that exist?

    (This Yak thing sounded like it came close, except that the Mac version is vaporware, and I couldn't find anything about encryption.)

    1. Re:Can anyone help? by Eugenia+Loli · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, it's called Gizmo Project. www.gizmoproject.com

    2. Re:Can anyone help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, but can you point me to where it says it does encryption? I can't find anything about that on the site...

    3. Re:Can anyone help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, found something, but it still doesn't give any details. Doesn't give me much confidence in it...
      Urgh, even worse. Someone working for gizmo said We cannot release this information. when asked about details on the encryption.

  25. Low-bandwidth free VOIP services? by rfunches · · Score: 1

    And not something crappy like what AIM calls "voice chat." I'm talking something along the lines of TeamSpeak that uses low bandwidth, won't have issues with rather draconian firewalls, is free, and won't sound absolutely horrible in quality.

  26. This is NOT yak's VOIP by Valiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the way you are thinking. If you are thinking that you can download this and call your buddy on his cell, you would be incorrect. You want that service, you gatta pay to use their yakToAnyone service.

    This is an instant messenger-like application that does voice and video, a la [every other IM service here].

    --

    -Valiss
  27. Land phones by trollable · · Score: 1

    I don't see yet the use for this kind of software. You can call only people who have a computer and are sitting in front of it... Hmm. Personaly, I'm using voipbuster right now, this is free (or cheap, depends on the country 0.01/min), very good quality and you can reach any land phone (cell phone too but it is more expensive).

    1. Re:Land phones by DogDude · · Score: 0

      I agree 100%. While something like this could be useful if you're calling somebody in another country and cost is very prohibitive... but other than that... who in the hell makes phone calls from their computer? You've got to have speakers and a microphone, too, so it's not even feasable unless you're at home (where it's quiet, presumably). Going from a cellphone where all long distance is free (monthly fees, of course, but those are cheaper every day, seemingly), you can call from anywhere to something where you're tied to a computer with a chintzy computer microphone seems bass-ackwards. Plus all of the goddamn configuration shit that goes along with this stuff... Forget it. I'll gladly pay for my cellphone and not worry about it. Free voice calls these days are like saying free analog modems.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Land phones by xoip · · Score: 1

      Land phone to land phone...look at prepaid calling cards, dirt cheap when compared to regular phone rates, no monthly service fees...besides who really calls their mom on a video phone

  28. BroadVoice. VOIP software? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Broadvoice has somewhat unreliable service, but is free of per-minute charges to 35 countries. Cost: $25 per month. (Unlimited World Plus.)

    Does anyone know of direct-connect VOIP software that will traverse a NAT? Why have a middleman? Anyway, all conversations should be encrypted, and not trackable by third parties.

    1. Re:BroadVoice. VOIP software? by mikerozh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Use hamachi and run VoIP over it.

  29. Of course, just use a trash account. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    My SO wanted a free email account for trash emails. She tried trash@... It was taken. She tried bigtrash@... It was taken. Then she tried bigbigtrash@... Finally, success.

  30. Yuseless by Servo · · Score: 1

    As everybody above my comment has already stated.. this is just another Video/Audio chat client that joins the ranks of Yahoo, MSN, iChatAV, etc etc. They claim to be "free" VoIP but its not "real" VoIP. Its only connecting computer to computer for others who use the same damn service.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Yuseless by Khyber · · Score: 1

      but its not "real" VoIP

      Then what IS real VoIP? Voice Over Internet Protocol seems to mean to me that any "real" program that allows a two-way voice conversation would qualify as real VoIP, while everything else I'd consider Internet Telephony.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Yuseless by Servo · · Score: 1

      I consider POTS or PBX based phone service that runs over IP versus standard copper to your local Bell as "real" VoIP. Like Vonage, etc. Internet "phone calls" from computer to computer have been implemented by at least a dozen companies already. But they aren't integrated into the Bell system to call non-VoIP users.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  31. IDENTITY POLITICS IS A TOOL OF THE ELITE by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    In the 20th century, the American elite (the rich and the megacorporations and the business lobbies) created and nurtured Identity politics until it became the major aspect of the American Left. In essence the elite thus created a FauxLeft. The main mechanism to create the FauxLeft was the huge nonprofit foundations that were created from about 1920 to 1985 by the plutocrats and their main tool, the CIA and the FBI (back in the day, that is...). These nonprofits (such as the Ford Foundation, etc) funded activists and writers and academics with an eye to such activists and writers and academics who were oriented to Identity Politics, specifically race-oriented and gender oriented and culture oriented activists and writers and academics. By funding these identity-politics oriented activists and writers and academics, the big money was able to create a FauxLeft that paid much less attention the class war, much less attention to populist economics issues, such as universal healthcare and taxing the rich and controlling the monopolies. Instead the elite and their tools the nonprofits evolved a fauxleft that made the white middle class and white blue collar males in particular the scapegoat for inequality. By associating leftism with white hating identity politics, the elite (the true rightwing) was able to drive away most of white middle class and white lower middle class America from economics leftism,,,, Please pay no attention to the man behind the curtain; it is the redneck to blame for it all.... As an example of what I mean, Gloria Steinem was given her start by the FBI decades ago. They MADE her because they wanted to shift attention of the American Left away from economics issues, to identity politics. If you want to improve life for all your working class American citizens, abandon identity politics and become a REAL leftist--an economics oriented, race and gender blind Leftist.... Read and Learn about the manipulations of the elite here at http://www.leftwingmediamachine.blogspot.com/

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  32. So, what did the llama launch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cows launch cowpies, race horses launch piss streams.

  33. FWD.PULVER.COM Use REAL VOIP not hacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TeamSpeak - Proprietary and for idiot Slashdot nubs
    Yak - Proprietary and for idiot Slashdot nubs
    SIP, FWD, SIPPHONE - Not for slashdot nubs, but work just fine.

  34. Gimme just one line. by lukOh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hallo?

    All I just need is one any-interface, GPL, multiplatform piece of software that roughly:
    -supports RSA asymmetric encryption with gpg keys to avoid being listened by the kid next door
    -uses any decent combination of patent-free protocols to get just acceptable voice over broadband
    -I give it a kindly f'g IP ADDRESS and PORT , I AUTHENTICATE then TALK to whoever is at the other side.

    say: a multiplatform slightly improved netmeeting with single-port support to jump through isp portfilters/ proxies/ automatic firewalls with just one port forwarding

    Everything is out there: technology, code, codecs, IPv4, broadband connections.
    Any clue, ANYONE?

    I want not a community to join, no centralized servers to track me anytime I want to say hi to mum, no search capabilities, no calls to fixed or mobile phone numbers, not a PSTN phone replacement, no emergency number reachability, no fixed-location or registration of any sort, no other people's p2p calls killing my 256k upstream, -nothing as such-

    Or if that's so hard to grasp just a client-server linux voice bundle I can setup for my own use?

    I found hundreds of fancy clients, each with its own server network, community, subscription, "gimme your email or die", "It's free(for now, you s*r)", "I swear I have no spyware" disclaimer and "Best rated" claims all in in 25165824 colors.

    AllRight.
    `vi myTalk.c`
    [..] ..all was so freaking good using gopher..

  35. Re:I live in a world by essence · · Score: 1

    The woman who raised you wasn't the only influence in your life. TV (and other advertising that often degradates and commodifies women) and your peers probably had a great influence on your life too.

  36. Re:I live in a world by geomon · · Score: 1

    The woman who raised you wasn't the only influence in your life.

    No doubt. But there are several peer refereed journal articles that identify the parents as the most important influence on children's development.

    TV (and other advertising that often degradates and commodifies women) and your peers probably had a great influence on your life too.

    But the GPs point is that this is due entirely to our patriarchal society.

    I call bullshit. That explanation is too simplistic.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  37. Mod parent up. (Open peer-to-peer VPN software.) by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Interesting. Thanks. I didn't know about Hamachi.

    But what VOIP software would you suggest?

  38. It looks like a customized version of eyeBeam by LittleStone · · Score: 1

    From CounterPath (formerly known as Xten).
    http://www.xten.com/index.php?menu=eyeBeam

    I suppose it's SIP based.

    --
    A sig is redundant.
  39. Maybe it will actually work by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    I've had an absurd number of problems trying to get Netmeeting to work behind a NAT firewall (the type in all home DSL/Cable routers). No amount of port forwarding worked and putting a Microsoft box in the DMZ is extremely unsafe. So I've been keeping my eyes open for an alternative that doesn't have this problem. Maybe it will be different in that it will actually work for me.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  40. Re:Mod parent up. (Open peer-to-peer VPN software. by mikerozh · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure about VoIP software, but any software that can do direct IP to IP VoIP or video will work for you as there is absolutely no difference between regular IP network and hamachi network. It is like having several computers connected to the same LAN. GnomeMeeting is the first one of the possible options that comes to my mind.

  41. Re:Er... [pedant warning] by cs · · Score: 1

    Do you really mean "ominous"? "Onerous" I would understand, but maybe there are forebodings of imminent doom in the GUI...

    --
    Cameron Simpson, DoD#743 cs@cskk.id.au http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
  42. A free VOIP to POTS? by NewsWatcher · · Score: 1

    While we are discussing this, I thought I would throw in a partially off-topic request. Anyone have any idea about a good service that offers free VOIP to POTS transmission? I used to use a Korean one that was completely free, but it disappeared. Have never found another one that could match it. Any ideas.

    --
    If the pattern goes 9am, 10am, 11am, why isn't noon 12am?
  43. Re:Er... [pedant warning] by mbaciarello · · Score: 1

    I don't really know how that word ended up there... But looking at X-Lite's GUI, with those black & greenish colors and rounded shapes, it kinda makes me think of a lair from "Aliens." Eerie.

    BTW, if a "phone simulator" won't even let you paste in phone numbers copied from your Address Book, you can pretty much tell our world is doomed!

  44. TeamSpeex - TeamSpeak Mac client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TeamSpeak is still free, unless you use it for commercial purposes. It's definately free in your situation.

    And now I can finally(!) use TeamSpeak on my Mac as well, since an unofficial OS X client was released recently: http://www.savvy.nl/blog

    It's called TeamSpeex because it uses the Speex codec.
    I have tried it with friends and works just as good as the Windows client.

  45. So much negativity. by AIX-Hood · · Score: 1

    Jeez, so much negativity around these parts. The truth of the matter, is that this is a SIP (read "non-proprietary") format service that just licenses that the rather well working eyeBeam product that is indeed cross platform. Normally you'd have to pay for the client, but this way you're getting it for free if you're doing PC to PC calls.

  46. Re:I live in a world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *SLAP*

    Now get back in the fucking kitchen and make me some fucking pie.

  47. yakforfree (un)popularity graphs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot ended up being paid off by someone at Yak to promote their service as "news" when its a paid advertisement. You can see the lack of popularity of the yakforfree thing at trendwatcher, it rates really low YakForFree voip graph in search engines

  48. You mean "burned-out shell of a *french* car" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry...just had to snag that one

  49. Open Standards vs. Skype's Proprietary by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yak is a SIP client, which is the main newer VOIP standard, an Internet-style followon to the telco-protocol-style H.323 which is the previous main open VOIP standard, and they've included video with it, which the standards support but most clients don't implement. Skype uses a bunch of proprietary stuff, implemented fairly well. The Yak website doesn't appear to tell you how to rip the client apart, reverse engineer it, use it with other service providers, etc., but you should be able to. (Doesn't mean you can't find that out - it may be off in their member discussion boards somewhere.) The cool thing about SIP is that rather than servers being closed, the standard includes server-to-server communications, so you can use one server as a proxy to connect to another to implement stuff or connect providers together. That doesn't mean that Yak's clients or servers are designed to connect over to other SIP providers' systems (like Pulver's Free World Dialup, the well-known SIP community), but maybe htey can. They look like they plan to make money by selling outbound and inbound connections to old-technology telcos, but it'd be interesting to see if they get enough clue to interconnect with other SIP providers to cut down on settlements cost

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  50. What about usability? by glengineer · · Score: 1

    I'm sick and tired of the same old same old : the people I want to talk/video with are not computer saavy in the least, so any time something is even slightly wrong with either PC, like an audio driver gets out of whack or someone clicks "mute" on the mic input, or replugs the mic into the headphone jack, I have to spend 20 minutes listening to my wife saying "can you hear me now?" What I want is a VTC appliance that connects to either the PC monitor or the TV set, and directly to my broadband, not my PC. (Yes, I know about DLink's product, and i2eye's connection service, and it's free for now, but for how long?)

    --
    Evil Overlord Rule #86. I will make sure that my doomsday device is up to code and properly grounded.
  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion