Slashdot Mirror


Paris Accelerates Move to Open Source

* * Beatles-Beatles writes to tell us that the city of Paris is moving to open-source software a little faster than originally intended. As a part of the strategy to 'reduce its dependence on suppliers' they anticipate replacing both server and desktop applications with free and open-source software. From the article: "Earlier this year, volunteers among the city's 46,000 staff were invited to download and install open-source software to their desktops, including the Firefox browser and the Open Office.org productivity suite. Now, the city is planning to migrate all the users of one city department or all of those in one of the city's 20 districts, not just the volunteers, to test a larger migration. The city has 17,000 workstations, up from 12,000 in 2001"

225 comments

  1. Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Paris went open source since her famous video went to the internet.

    Oh, wait...

    1. Re:Nothing new... by g2devi · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Paris went open source since her famous video went to the internet.

      I think you're confusing the licensing. Paris may be exposed, but you can't modify her.

      Basically, she's under a "shared" source license.

    2. Re:Nothing new... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Paris went open source since her famous video went to the internet.

      Nah, everyone knows that proprietary systems get 'rooted' more often than open source.

    3. Re:Nothing new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he confused "open source" for open *sores*.

    4. Re:Nothing new... by Hosiah · · Score: 2, Funny
      Paris may be exposed, but you can't modify her.

      But her plastic surgeon modifies her all the time...

  2. Good for her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That should keep her Sidekick from getting hacked again.

    1. Re:Good for her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About damn time. I'm fed up of wearing this.

  3. hmm by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Paris Accelerates Move to Open Source"

    by distributing 100 dollar laptops with Red Hat Linux to every rioting teen

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:hmm by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      no no no... the correct, politically sensitive term is "youth" not "teen". And they weren't rioting. As someone being interview in the Washington Post said they're expressing themselves. They're just saying "We're here! We exist!".

  4. Hui! by flamesrock · · Score: 1

    There is a french version of open office?

    1. Re:Hui! by corwin2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course, openoffice is translated in dozens of languages among them French (and the translation is of very good level).

    2. Re:Hui! by dana340 · · Score: 1

      Ummm, missing the scarcasm.

      --
      "10001110101 - periodic table with a centerpiece of mind" -Clutch
    3. Re:Hui! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course! It's called L'OpenOffice. It's open sauce after all, and who better than the french to get in on it? Everything comes with either butter or cream sauce.

    4. Re:Hui! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I think the orignial is German. All defaults are German anyways.

    5. Re:Hui! by corwin2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ah... you mean that the typical anglo-slashdotter posting anti-French comments everytime a news more or less remotely relates to something happening in France is expressing sarcasm ? I thought it was just good old racism and that this kind of comments should be replied to a factual level, but that's just me, you can keep rateing these comments as sarcasm/humor...

    6. Re:Hui! by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      No, you still missed the joke and

      "I thought it was just good old racism"

      since when are the French a "race"?

      Seriously, if you plan to play the victim at least try to figure out what you're the victim of.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    7. Re:Hui! by yiantsbro · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...since when are the French a 'race'?" since no other group will claim them--they must stand alone. Oh shit, guess that was more French bashing.

    8. Re:Hui! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since "race" is a social construct. Try to prove or disprove that french is a "race", just for fun...

  5. [grin] by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never mind TFA, this is just payback time for the 'freedom fries' jibes... None of your nasty closed-source software - we will 'ave the free(dom) software instead!

    Oh, and I spit in your general direction!

    Simon :-)

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:[grin] by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hmmm- learn your WWII history-
      Here are some book to get you started. I am not a big francophile, but nor am I a France hater. But the Poles played a big part in liberating Paris.
      http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/listmania/fullvie w/3DRV4RIE2IBVW/104-1606606-3940704?_encoding=UTF8

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    2. Re:[grin] by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course, the whole "french fries" fiasco was even funnier considering that french fries aren't even named after France - it's the way they're prepared that gave them their name, and the word just happens to be the same in (contemporary?) English.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    3. Re:[grin] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close, but the verb french (cut into strips) still refers to the French. At one time, to french a vegtable ment to cut it like the French did.

    4. Re:[grin] by PhotoBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Funnier still is that the UK and US governments deliberately mis-quoted Chirac, they claimed Chirac had promised to block any vote for war in the UN. What Chirac actually said was that he would not vote for war unless the weapons inspectors were allowed to complete their inspection and confirmed the presences of WMDs. Which is quite reasonable if you ask me...

      But that didn't stop Bush & Co from demonising the French and starting a nationwide backlash against them just to prevent their reasonable criticism from being heard. I don't have any great love for the French but we should at least criticise them for something they did actually do.

    5. Re:[grin] by bertramwooster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just a small correction: you mean I fart in your general direction .

      And also...

      Wi nøt trei a høliday in Sweden this yer?

      See the løveli lakes

      The wonderful telephøne system

      And mani interesting furry animals

    6. Re:[grin] by boule75 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thank you to point out that dishonnest misquoting.

      But you ought to point out that the bias in the translation was setted up from second one: The Associated Press _in French_ misquoted Chirac and was translated that way. Tony Blair then used a somewhat-more-distorted-again quote in the Commons in his great discourse to justify this war before this temple of Democracy.

      In the US it became something like "we must attack Saddam because he must be a real ennemy for the Frogs to defend him". Hum... Indeed, I am too pretentious of a frog, sorry: France was just bashed to provide a convenient red-herring and to distract the crowds from the already too many lies, distortions and so on that were already used at that time.

      To be honest, I was working in the axis of Paris main military airport at that time (Villacoublay), and it is certainly true that French diplomacy used many planes to convince many countries not to support the war at that time. Maybe does this explains why the US and the UK warmongers were so angry. The point is and will remain, to quote and translate Chirac correctly, that this region (the Persian Gulf) was not needing another war at that time.

      --
      I am not Remy Mouton, unfortunately: http://remy.mouton.free.fr/art/
    7. Re:[grin] by speculatrix · · Score: 4, Informative
      the fact that when troops arrived in Iraq they found proof that the Iraqi gov't owed huge sums of money to the French and Russian gov'ts may have played just a tiny part in their refusal to go to war?

      now, of course, the debt is cancelled :-)

    8. Re:[grin] by lakiolen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The proper term is "Frenched Fries (notice the ed)". Refering to the way that the potatoes are cut, specifically cut into long thin strips. So the potatoes were frenched then fried, hence, frenched fries. Then throughout the years, english speakers (British, American, Australian, etc.) being as lazy as they are, dropped a syllable and they became french fries.

      --


      What are you expecting to find here?
    9. Re:[grin] by Spoing · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Of course, the whole "french fries" fiasco was even funnier considering that french fries aren't even named after France - it's the way they're prepared that gave them their name, and the word just happens to be the same in (contemporary?) English.

      The Belgians -- and quite a few French -- consider that Belgium is the source of the friet.

      (I was asked years ago to make sure people knew this...and I keep my word.)

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    10. Re:[grin] by Flambergius · · Score: 1

      now, of course, the debt is cancelled :-)

      Is it? I'm asking because I'm too lazy to check. That's not how this usually works. If the debt is legitimate then the it is not the "regime" or even the "gov't" that owes the money, but the nation. Successor states usually have to pick up the tap.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers - Pablo Picasso
    11. Re:[grin] by Dom2 · · Score: 1
      No, no, no. You're all wrong. They're chips.

      -Dom

    12. Re:[grin] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't even have the letter 'ø' in Swedish! It's Norwegian and Danish.

    13. Re:[grin] by ThJ · · Score: 1

      We call them Pommes Frittes in Norway, a french name... So, french fries aren't actually french? I need to read about this on the old Wiki...

    14. Re:[grin] by speculatrix · · Score: 1
      http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/12/15/sprj.ir q.france.debt/

      can't find any up-to-date news, sorry, but I only spent 10 seconds with my friend google.

    15. Re:[grin] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pommes Frittes in Norway, a french name

      That's odd. Pommes Frites is the German name. Of course there is the "pomme frite" a French name for a Belgium food apparently. I guess you just have to find who stole the word 'pommes' from whom.

    16. Re:[grin] by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Have you actually read the article ?

      It says France will indeed forgive its debt to the Iraqi *new* government, so the parent is right, the debt is still outstanding, or was.

      It seems to be a relatively nice gesture.

    17. Re:[grin] by ThJ · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming the -s suffixes are pluralizations. Someone once told me that Pomme d'terre (Earth apple) is French for "potato". I've always strongly associated deep-frying ("fritere" in Norwegian) with French cooking. German and Norwegian share a great number of words, idioms and grammatical constructs. A linguist once said that the easiest language for a Norwegian to learn is Low German. It's apparently not the same as regular German, but having the name, I'm guessing it's in the same ballpark. German is easy enough. A Norwegian can allegedly speak the language fluidly after only 6 months in Germany. It kinda spoils the fun of linguistic nationalism each time you stumble across what seemed an ultra-Norwegian word and it turns out to be borrowed from German.

    18. Re:[grin] by Xaositecte · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's really not very hard to demonize the french, considering most of us Americans hated them -before- their UN antics

    19. Re:[grin] by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      What the French, German and Russian governments did was simply obey the will of those who elected them. The invasion of Iraq faced massive disapproval from the peoples around the World. I call your attention to the fact that the History's biggest demonstrations ever, just happened recently, with the populations all around the globe rallying against Bush's intention of invading Iraq.

      Particularly in Europe, disapproval of the war was rampant, and the governments from UK, Spain, Portugal, Holland, Italy, and others, just showed they think Democracy is good for wiping their asses, since they decided to support Bush's evil plans.

      Now it's very fashionable to bigot French, and the neocons and their media propaganda machine keep pulling "facts" like this from their asses to desecrate France.

      Although the Aznar cocksucker (former Spanish prime-minister) licked Bush's ass at the time, the Spanish people were recordists in opposition, since 90% of the population opposed to war. So, why don't you bigot Spanish instead?

      And Barroso (Former Portuguese prime-minister, current Chairman of European Commission) also kissed the Texan ass, but 70% of the Portuguese people were against the invasion. So, why not bigoting Portuguese? Or English? Or Italians?

  6. Yeah France! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now that's a new combination...

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  7. Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good Job France -- seems that the French/Freedom fry equality is true - they really do stand for freedom.

    1. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by garcia · · Score: 1

      Good Job France -- seems that the French/Freedom fry equality is true - they really do stand for freedom.

      Oh good grief! This is a software decision for a single city's desktops. You are really going to try to Karma Whore with likening it to real war where people are getting killed?

      Blah.

    2. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by Total_Wimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are really going to try to Karma Whore with likening it to real war where people are getting killed?

      They wouldn't be if we had stopped to listened to the French. Hey, here's a bright idea, why don't we actually have a dialogue with our allies instead of pouring their wine down our gutters when they dare to disagree? It's just possible they may have a good point of two.

      TW

    3. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listening to someones does not mean agreeing with them. This is a common misconception of partisans everywhere.

      As for France and freedom... I'd like to see how free Muslims in the US believe they are compared to Muslims in france. I would assume that most muslims would not consider the freedom to riot and burn things as important as the freedom to express oneself religious throughout their daily life, whether they're in school or not.

    4. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by Total_Wimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Listening to someones does not mean agreeing with them. This is a common misconception of partisans everywhere.

      I would have been quite happy with honest disagreement rather than demonizing the dissenter.

      I know I'm way off topic here, but many of the biggest problems of this administration can be linked directly with building a climate where only yes-men are listened to. If you allow honest dissent then you get to see a much clearer picture of how things look, you gain advanced notice when things aren't going so well and you gain valuable insight into the flaws of your plan. If you don't listen to honest dissent then you voluntarily put blinders on, people become afraid to tell you about problems and you gain the false impression that your plan is perfect, even though it would be much better if you just tweaked a few things.

      Even if you believe that the Iraq war was a good idea, which I do not, certainly you can see how doing a few things differently might have helped. Some people told Bush to take more troops. Some people gave Bush advice that more resources were necessary to rebuild Iraq when the war was done. Some people told Bush that we would face guerilla fighters after the war who would refuse to surrender. If Bush had listened to this dissent then he may have still prosecuted the war, but he would have done a better job of it. Less people would be dead, Iraq would be more stable and we'd be that much closer to bringing everyone home. Pouring out wine and renaming fries helped ensure that these dissenting views were marginalized and ignored. Frankly, it helped ensure in my mind that our president does not have the capacity to lead wisely.

      TW

    5. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are really going to try to Karma Whore


      Ironic that you're acusing this "Anonymous Coward" guy of karma whoring.


      The poor guy - it seems no matter how often he posts insightful stuff his karma never gets as high as yours.

    6. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by Zphbeeblbrox · · Score: 0, Troll

      1. Listened to france

      2. Realized they didn't have any good points

      3. ???

      4. Profited!!!!

      --
      If you see spelling or grammatical errors don't blame me. I tried to preview but IE here at work borked the CSS
    7. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by fbjon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you misspelled '4. Defense industry profited!!!' there.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    8. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by kesuki · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are really going to try to Karma Whore

      yeah Damn that Anonymous Coward, such a blatent karma whore there is hardly a single discussion where he hasn't got at least 5 or 6 +5 modded comments.

    9. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by bufalo_1973 · · Score: 1

      People burning cars (and everything else) in France were saying "stop building mosques and start giving us jobs" even before they began burning anything. And if you think "express oneself religious throughout their daily life, whether they're in school or not" is a good thing... I disagree. It's the best way to turn a group against other ("look at those &%@$#* arabs") spetialy if they are in school.

    10. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pouring out wine and renaming fries helped ensure that these dissenting views were marginalized and ignored

      Exactly! This whole French-bashing bullshit was engineered for only one purpose: distract the masses from the mess in Iraq. And I thought I was the only one to see the obvious! Open your eyes people! Don't be dumber than the average.

    11. Re:Freedom Fries were appropriately named. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do find it difficult to see why anybody would expect to be able to "express oneself religious" in school. It's school, as in "an environment tailored to teaching and learning a curriculum provided by a secular state". Anything not directly related to that task is presumably extraneous to the plot, disruptive to class and all the rest of it. And one can't have it both ways; one minute it's "Students of certain ethnicities or descent are discriminated against by teachers! Woe is us!", and the next it's "Students aren't permitted to proudly display arbitrary markers of their unique self-identity! Woe is us!"

      I firmly prefer teaching and learning in an environment where the subject matter of the class receives attention; tribal or religious "identity" can get in the way of that. Traditional paraphernalia (crosses, scarves... labels) is designed to force perceived division. Learning to keep your personal philosophy in perspective is probably the best preparation you can have for living in a multi-cultural environment.

  8. Actually they had to switch because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    the rioters burned all the Windows licenses.

    1. Re:Actually they had to switch because by BokLM · · Score: 1

      It's funny how many people outside France heard about thoses riots and think it was something very important. But actually, beeing in France, you wouldn't notice anything if you didn't listen to the news or to the people talking about it after they heard it on the news. I would say that 99% of the people living in France didn't see it from their own eyes and only heard about it on tv.

  9. Microsoft HQ is not happy... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1, Funny

    France surrenders!

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    1. Re:Microsoft HQ is not happy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, France opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq as part of a broader policy of appeasing Arab nations. Given their high Muslim immigrant population, one might be able to understand why they would pursue such a policy. But look where that has gotten them...

    2. Re:Microsoft HQ is not happy... by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      And look how much better we are for it! Romania's receiving massive amounts of US investment, while its chances of getting into the EU haven't diminished much at all because of the support it gives to the Americans. It's pragmatism, not dogma.

      -- a Romanian

    3. Re:Microsoft HQ is not happy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. France should have followed the U.S. policy and killed all these colored mofos to make the world a better place.

    4. Re:Microsoft HQ is not happy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh* Another baseless blanket statement from someone who's too blinded by the fact that his guy lost in back-to-back elections to see the facts. If you think that U.S. policy in the Middle East is motivated by racism, then how do you explain our peaceful relations with modern Arab nations that aren't hell-bent on wiping Israel off of the map?

      If France is such a model for the rest of the world, then what is the reason for the recent riots? Why were they unable to put down the riots quickly? Why are their taxes and unemployment outrageously high for an industrialized nation? Why are they politically and militarily impotent?

  10. Employees don't see cost savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Employees don't see cost savings, so they need to see feature benefits. Hard to tell if there are enough new or better features to justify the the move.

    1. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's not just cost savings that are important; It's also important to ask: "Who's getting paid?" If you're paying local citizens for support, instead of a company overseas, that's a big deal.

    2. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If they were using Office XP and switched to OO.o 2 I know well from personal experience that the employees will see the benefits, especially in Word vs. Writer. Writer can export a document as a pdf without needing a 3rd-party macro or a program you use as a printer, plus it's FAR more stable. Writer's UI is better organized as well, IMO.

      FF vs. IE? You gotta kidding me. More stable, more features, blocks pop-ups by default, etc.

      One problem, though and I've mentioned this before; there's no open souce alternative to Acrobat Pro. Not even plans for one that I know of. That really sucks; we need Adobe-free computers, what with their exorbitant costs, product activation, and so on.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    3. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by NineNine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One problem, though and I've mentioned this before; there's no open souce alternative to Acrobat Pro. Not even plans for one that I know of. That really sucks; we need Adobe-free computers, what with their exorbitant costs, product activation, and so on.

      Why not do what we did: make your office PDF free? I hate PDF's with every fiber of my being. The files are enormous, the readers are bloated (and at 56+ Meg just to open a fucking file, I'd call "bloated" generous), and they're a pain in the ass to alter.

      Could somebody please tell me why people use PDF's in the first place?

      I feel like if at this stage, enough people said "NO" to PDF's, then it would just die on the vine. Right now, if any of our vendors send a PDF, I bounce it back with a message that we don't use PDF's, and it has yet to be a problem.

    4. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      They let their staff download and use OS software for more than a year and now the project is accelerating. It's not the definitive answer we'd like to see, but the evidence is that the employees liked what they got. Put another way, if there had been a big backlash then it would be difficult to see them pushing so boldly forward.

      TW

    5. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by snugge · · Score: 0

      "the readers are bloated" this one is both small and fast and has always worked for da snugge! http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php

    6. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by swv3752 · · Score: 4, Informative

      PDF let anyone see something as it is meant to be printed. On other platforms that do not use Adobe's Acrobat Reader, the pdf viewers are pretty lean.

      For the niche that PDF fills, nothing else works as well. Postscript (which PDF is just a variant) is even larger, and other options such as DVI are not well supported.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    7. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      Could somebody please tell me why people use PDF's in the first place?

      If I send a Word document, then your version of Word may helpfully re-format it, if you can read it at all. Also, you can alter the contents.

      I can generate a PDF. Now the formatting is the same on both computers, AND you cannot alter it (easily).

      And I use WordPerfect, which has "Print to PDF" built in.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    8. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1

      To partially counteract the bloat, try Adobe Reader Speed-Up. I've just started using it a couple of weeks ago, but it's pretty nice.

      Disclaimer: it did refuse to open one PDF (specifically this[PDF warning--duh]) complaining about missing plugins, but I put exactly zero effort into fixing this (and you can allegedly get it to work on something like this with minimal effort).

      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    9. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by cp.tar · · Score: 1
      there's no open souce alternative to Acrobat Pro.

      I hear that Scribus can do most things Acrobat Pro can, including fillable PDF forms. And is available on both Windows and Linux (not sure about Mac, but probably that, too).

      Didn't have time to test it, though, so...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    10. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      It's not open source, but Mac OS X comes with Preview.app which is similar to acrobat and IMHO better.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    11. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by JulesLt · · Score: 1

      I think the format is good, but Acrobat Reader definitely sucks - it doesn't play well with browsers and it takes half an hour to load..

      However, there are some things where it's good to be able to send a 'read-only' file - they may be a 'pain in the ass to alter' but this is an advantage in some situations. I'm aware it's possible to hack a PDF, but it serves the purpose far better than Word, or sending everything as a Fax - example - sending a legal document to a customer that needs to be signed and returned in the post.

      And lastly, while Adobe's software is closed, the spec is open. Because of that there are a wide variety of open source tools for printing them.
      MacOS uses it as the native screen format (which means you can read most PDF without having to fire up Acrobat - definitely a blessing).
      Like any software you just need to understand what the purpose is - it's a method for making final versions of documents portable between machines.

      --
      'Capitalists of the world, unite! Oh ... you have' (League Against Tedium)
    12. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree. In a way, I hate pdfs. But I write online pen & paper Rpg products (mostly for nothing) and they almost always have to be pusblished as pdfs to be accepted anywhere. At least I'm kind enough to not password-protect them like a lot of jerks so the only things you can do with them is view and print.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    13. Re:Employees don't see cost savings by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Man, it's too bad I wasted all my mod points yesterday - this really deserves a + for informative since it's about a subject where alternatives of any sort are little-known.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
  11. Changing one monopoly for the other by doktorstop · · Score: 1

    I bet they will need support... and therefore, they will buy OO (oops, StarOffice) from Sun rather than instructing their employees to download it from the net. Therefore, they will just exchange one company for the other.
    Good for Sun, good for OpenOffice... bad for Paris Hilton =)

    --
    http://www.automatiq.se
    1. Re:Changing one monopoly for the other by marsperson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are probably right in the sense that they will find it necessary to have some consultant firm help them out, but using open source software probably protects them from being so dependent on one firm.

    2. Re:Changing one monopoly for the other by rastakid · · Score: 1

      I bet they will need support... and therefore, they will buy OO (oops, StarOffice) from Sun rather than instructing their employees to download it from the net. Therefore, they will just exchange one company for the other. Good for Sun, good for OpenOffice... bad for Paris Hilton =)

      And I bet they have an entire IT staff more than willing to support OpenOffice. Third party support may be necessary for smaller businesses, the French government has enough geeks on their payroll. Good luck France!

    3. Re:Changing one monopoly for the other by BokLM · · Score: 1

      Not only Sun can support OOo, there's many other companies that can do it (it's Open Source). And even if they ask Sun, at least they won't be stuck with a proprietary format.

  12. Translation.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are planning on pissing off a lot of people and want to lessen the surface area exposed to retaliation.

  13. Itchy and Scratchy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "As a part of the strategy to 'reduce its dependence on suppliers' they anticipate replacing both server and desktop applications with free and open-source software."

    So basically they moved from the whims of closed-source suppliers, to the itches of open-source suppliers.

    1. Re:Itchy and Scratchy. by mw13068 · · Score: 1

      The whole idea of "open-source" is that you don't *need* to rely on any supplier, you can allocate some of your resources, and take care of your own software needs/wants.

      But you probably knew this already.

    2. Re:Itchy and Scratchy. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      So basically they moved from the whims of closed-source suppliers, to the itches of open-source suppliers.

      Are you dim or something? Are you paid by MS to spread this FUD? How many suppliers are their for Windows? Answer: 1. How many suppliers are there for Linux. Answer: hundreds. How many suppliers are there for MS Office? Answer: 1 How many suppliers are there for Open Office? Answer: hundreds. With closed source software you are limited to a single supplier. With open source you can buy service and support from anyone, since anyone can view and modify the code. This means with open source if someone stops selling a particular word processor version and moves to only selling a new, incompatible version you don't have to upgrade, since the old one is still available. This means if you need a new feature or a customization you can take bids from all sorts of developers (including those that speak the same language as you so) or even task a person within your organization to make the desired change. It frees you from being locked into one vendor, especially compared to vendors that only implement closed formats and protocols as a way to make it hard to move to other solutions.

  14. Good news! by dmccarty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some of the French youth are extremely happy about getting their hands on Firefox.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  15. Poor kiddies by Dekortage · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article: The city is also responsible for IT matters in its primary and middle schools. There, it has installed Open Office on 2,150 computers, and plans to bring the total to 3,500 by the end of March, it said. French high schools are run directly by central government.

    B-b-b-but those poor kids won't learn how to use Microsoft Windows! How will they ever succeed in the real world?!

    (This is sarcasm, folks, regarding a commonly-cited reason for American school systems to standardize on Microsoft Windows.)

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:Poor kiddies by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      Why troll? Announcing something as sarcasm doesn't make it NOT sarcastic.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    2. Re:Poor kiddies by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      Because a lot of mods just won't get it and mod him as a troll. I meta-mod every day and I see that happening often. Just last night I had a case of someone being modded off-topic for a joke the mod apparently just didn't get.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    3. Re:Poor kiddies by middlemen · · Score: 0

      Hey, but the script kiddies will not succeed it there ain't any Microsoft Windows to r00tk1t!

    4. Re:Poor kiddies by HairyCanary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How does installing OpenOffice have anything to do with learning how to use Microsoft Windows? I was ASSuming they were just migrating from Microsoft OFFICE to OpenOffice, not from Windows to Linux, and Office to OpenOffice.

    5. Re:Poor kiddies by Gobelet · · Score: 1

      I guess they install OpenOffice and Firefox on those "small children" computers, because they don't have to learn Excel or stuff... Some of the courses in high school require a perfect mastering of Excel. And only Excel mastering will get you a job, nobody cares if you can use OOo.

      But they usually install Firefox all over the place. And if it's not we usually install it over, and screw everything on their badly locked up computers. Shitty Netware network.

      Greets from the French Riviera!

    6. Re:Poor kiddies by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Why troll? Announcing something as sarcasm doesn't make it NOT sarcastic.

      Being sarcastic doesn't make it a troll, either.

    7. Re:Poor kiddies by Dekortage · · Score: 1

      Nice emphasis on "ASS" there. Very subtle. Same for the repitition of "Office to OpenOffice."

      But at least you're right that I should have said "Microsoft software" instead of the more specific "Microsoft Windows". When schools standardize on Windows (instead of Linux or Mac OS X), they also standardize on MS Office, and the justification is generally "because that's what they'll use in the real world." Like they have any idea what they'll use in after graduation. Or what OS's and word processing software will look like in ten years when the kids finally graduate from college.

      Then again, more than once I've heard a school administrator refer to Office as Windows, or in fact just say "I'm sending you this document in Microsoft format" -- not even understanding that there is an actual difference between Windows, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Same thing happens (to a lesser extent) with Photoshop and Acrobat -- "How do I save this in Adobe format?"

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    8. Re:Poor kiddies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when I started my first IT job being a little confused as to what the tech guys meant when they talked about a computer having "Adobe" on it...

    9. Re:Poor kiddies by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

      B-b-b-but those poor kids won't learn how to use Microsoft Windows! How will they ever succeed in the real world?!

      Sarcasm aside, the American education system does have a tendency to emphasize tools and rot memorization rather than generalized knowledge and exploration. You don't learn how to use computers, you learn how to use Word. You don't learn how to interpret history texts, you just regurgitate them. And so on... Maybe if we gave students the capacity to use their brains, we wouldn't need weak arguments based on specific tools for the job. We'd teach them how to do the job, and let them pick and adapt to the tools they use in the future.

      Of course, it's not always easy to create a society of sheep when you encourage them to put actual thought into things for themselves...

      </soapbox>

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
  16. Cheap shot by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I hope they hurry the hell up and do the conversion BEFORE the city gets burned down around them. :)

    Ok, Ok, some of us just can't resist a bit of taunting the French. Actually I do hope it can be pulled off for a change, getting tired of reading about conversion projects started and then scrapped as things either get complicated or Microsoft's wallet opens to local politicians.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  17. liberté, eqalité, fraternité by matt+me · · Score: 0, Troll

    Liberty, equality, brotherhood. The tagline for the French republic. So they have to use free software , or they'd be breaking their ideals. Like "God bless America and the separation of church and state". I'm suprised the French don't use more free software, given their hate for America and the anglofication of their language, of which computers are a big cause. I used a French version of windows ocne. Only the very front was translated, any error messages, anything practically not visible at first view was still in English.

    And thank the French language for having separate words gratuit and libre, to distringuish the meanings of free. No excuse for the open source buzzword coerupting ouyr message there.,

    1. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by lixee · · Score: 1

      I believe the move falls more into the "nothing personal, just business" stack. Windows' TCO sucks! Plain simple. Except from that, you made excellent points there.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    2. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by lwagner · · Score: 1

      Well, just as one has America to blame for Microsoft, one also has America to thank for bringing us Free Software. I think it is purely a cost issue -- nobody likes to pay the Microsoft Tax, and, since American states like Massachusetts are stepping up and saying "No", I think it emboldens other governments to do the same.

    3. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      "given their hate for America"? o.O Wow. Talk about trolling.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by xutopia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How is that modded to insightful?

      France does not hate America and doesn't really care about the anglicization of the French language. Only a few really vocal conservatives care about anglicization and they go "shopping" and "park" their cars next to the "building".

      Also your comment about a French version of Windows being poorly translated is false. It is very easy to have a completely French computer if all you install is French versions of the software you want. Mix and match your software and you could see Korean and Elbonian on your computer.

      Please stop with that fallacy about France hating America. The only thing France hates about America is now at record lows in approval ratings. Seems you have more in common with the French than you might expect.

    5. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by jsuarezcasana · · Score: 2, Informative

      "And thank the French language for having separate words gratuit and libre, to distringuish the meanings of free. No excuse for the open source buzzword coerupting ouyr message there.,"

      gratuit = gratuito (esp) = without cost
      libre = libre (esp) = free

      those languages (fr and esp) are more subtle, english is way to easy
      cheers

      --
      [JL] IH8U
    6. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by Enzo90910 · · Score: 1

      Not to worry, french people being currently reached by "your message" perfectly understand the two senses of the english word. I suspect this is true for most non-american countries.

      --
      I don't have much to add.
    7. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by Alarash · · Score: 3, Informative
      Liberty, equality, brotherhood. The tagline for the French republic. So they have to use free software , or they'd be breaking their ideals. Like "God bless America and the separation of church and state". I'm suprised the French don't use more free software, given their hate for America and the anglofication of their language, of which computers are a big cause.

      "Given their hate for America" ? Duh? France doesn't "hate" America any more than any country in the world, and probably like America more than most countries in the world. As for the "anglofication" of the language, well the Elders try to prevent it, but most of the youth use a lot of english words (like "cool", "joystick", "chat"), and a lot of english words are also commonly used ("parking", "joystick", "week-end", etc...). Many efforts are made to keep the french language and culture alive though. And I think it's great because the french culture is good (a lot of renowned book authors or poets for instance). Not "the best culture in the world", because no such thing exists, but definitively a great one.

      I used a French version of windows ocne. Only the very front was translated, any error messages, anything practically not visible at first view was still in English.

      I use a French Windows everyday, and basically everything is translated, except maybe the Blue Screen Of Death. I think what you saw could be third-parties software error messages not translated. Microsoft actually did a great job (aaar! don't mod me down!) translating their OS's to French (I don't know for other languages).

      And thank the French language for having separate words gratuit and libre, to distringuish the meanings of free. No excuse for the open source buzzword coerupting ouyr message there.

      Just for the people who don't know: gratuit means free (as in beer), libre means free (as in open source and freedom). So Firefox is gratuit and libre.

    8. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm suprised the French don't use more free software, given their hate for America

      Yeah, France hates America, that's why they were crucial in securing your freedom from England. Yeah, France hates America, that's why they gave you that huge statue parked outside NYC.

      I guess when France questions your foreign policies, it's easier to write them off as having an irrational hatred for America, but in actual fact, it's just because your foreign policies stink.

    9. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used a foreign Language version of Windows? The core is still in English.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    10. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by HawkingMattress · · Score: 1
      To be fair, all the people i know here really hate the infiltration of American culture... Which doesn't means that they hate American citizens, it's totally different. Mostly what they don't like is that the US culture is everywhere since the 80's, and i mean everywhere. It's infiltrating our lives, our habits. We're slowly becoming Americans and it seems we can't do anything about it.

      Let me give you an example:
      Do you know that since maybe 8 years we have halloween day here too ? It didn't exist before that, it has never been in our culture. All we knew about halloween was from the US movies. But suddently one day in october we've seen all the halloween merchandising invade the supermarkets, shops in town decorating their windows with spooky themes, disco clubs having halloween nights and children coming at our home asking for candy. That's it, some bright bastards had managed to make a huge campaign to sell their merchandising for a nonexisting celebration in france, and had managed to involve schools, and whatnot to create a tradition.
      You might say that we could just refuse to celebrate it if we don't like it, but the children had been intoxicated with the stuff with all the "halloween special" shows they had seen on tv during the preceding month, and their teachers who realized that children love to make spooky masks. So the children genuinely wanted to celebrate Halloween, even if they didn't had the slightest idea of the cultural background behind it, like their parents.
      So now they come for candy, try to say the same phrase that children say is the US to have their candy and we try to react like the american characters we've seen in the movies because we don't know what we're really supposed to do. It's just surreal...
      It's not that we don't like american culture, I mean american movies are quite watched around here, but we don't like to have a different culture , any culture, pushed down our throat like that.

    11. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Speaking as a Brit, I can only say the following:

      If we let you share Bonfire Night, can we join in on Bastille Day?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I used the English version of Windows NT for some years, and I would sometimes get an error message saying 'Datei kann nicht gefunden werden' ('File can not be found' in German), so I consider it highly likely that not all of the error messages in the French version are in French...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by roard · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a French, that sounds like a nice compromise ;-)

    14. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by HawkingMattress · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but no i'm trying to convince the germans to swap bastille day with the beer festival. It's longer, much more alcoolized and you get to pee while standing at the bar. But once it's here you guys sure can come. We never refuse an invasion of alcoolized streakers in our beer festival.

    15. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by fbjon · · Score: 1

      That's just great, do you want Microsoft to translate the variable names?!

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    16. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster child for Free Software, Linux, originated in Finland. The German government was funding Free Software development years ago. Why are we thanking America for Free Software? Why are you giving Massachusetts credit for something done years ago by European countries? If any emboldening is going on, it's in the opposite direction.

    17. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      "english is way to easy" Not too easy?

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    18. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by jsuarezcasana · · Score: 1

      ;) nice, busted, anyway, "English been too easy" is like an unbased statistic, it's just my opinion pulled out of my ass.

      --
      [JL] IH8U
    19. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by Spoing · · Score: 1
      France does not hate America

      Ah, but you can see how USA - Americans would think so. After all, being scared $#!7less about the actions of the current US government looks alot like hate.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    20. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      It's quite simple actually. You give them candy. That's it. That is Halloween. I have no idea where you got the idea that there was culture behind it. We bastardized someone else's culture to produce Halloween. It's just an excuse to sell shit and eat junk food. The problem is you have corporations and retailers that saw how their American brethren were making piles of money on superficial holidays and they decided they wanted a piece of the action ;)

    21. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      I hope you're at least talking about NT 4.0, but even then you're talking about software released nearly a decade ago.

    22. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by xutopia · · Score: 1

      You can blame many people for the English tradition (yes English tradition, not American) but Americans are only part of the reason why Halloween appeared in France.

      According to this link: http://french.about.com/library/bl-halloweeninfran ce.htm France Télécom has about as much to do with the tradition spanning to France as American television did. The first I saw of Halloween was in Saint-Pierre and Miquelon in 1990. I hear from friends in Bretagne that in Rennes locals are resisting the tradition.

      The first I heard about Halloween in mainland France was when Orange (France Telecom partnership with the English operator) decided to put thousands of pumpkins around the trocadero to sell their new phone. http://www.humanite.fr/journal/1999-10-30/1999-10- 30-298586 I was in Canada at the time but could tell that France was going through some deep changes from the looks of it.

      I'm not sure Halloween should be something to "blame" on the USA on and actually come to think of it France should concentrate on American cultural memes which disfavor some of France's finest achievements. I'd be more scared of the commercial beers, process cheese and fast food crap that does inroads on the French market. All of these things replace to some extent the fine wines, liquors and ciders, outsanding cheeses and excellent restaurants that are unequaled world wide (IMHO).

      If anything France should adapt with Halloween and use it to market their nougats, papillotes, guenots and other local candies. I believe 99% of what French people ingest is of better quality than what crap we eat here in North America. Chocolate bars in France don't have wax in them, MSG is illegal in restaurants, etc...

      France still has a lot of fronts to defend their qualities on. Not having Halloween isn't imho a quality.

    23. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by welshie · · Score: 1

      how about the term "inclusive" ? It's so rarely used by marketing people producing English language adverts, and can be such a useful word.

      "Buy a car, get a free road tax and tank of fuel"
      "okay, I'll have the free road tax and tank of fuel, and leave the car"

      as opposed to

      "Buy a car, get inclusive road tax and tank of fuel".
      no confusion possible.

    24. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by BokLM · · Score: 1

      Thank Amireca for bringing Free Software ? Yes, there's some people in America writting free software, but there's also people from all around the world.

    25. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by xutopia · · Score: 1

      I use a French Canadian version at work. Some applications installed in English still have Ok-Annuler buttons instead of the Ok-Cancel ones.

    26. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster child for Free Software is the FSF and Richard Stallman. If it was not for him, there would be no Linux. Sorry, history is history.

    27. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux wasn't even originally under the GPL. Sorry, history is history.

      Oh, and a person and organisation can't be a poster child for software. Look it up. A poster child is a shining example of something. Is RMS a shining example of Free Software? Is the FSF? No and no.

    28. Re:liberté, eqalité, fraternité by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      What the parent means is that occasionally dialogs pop up with English in them, typically errors and warnings, sometimes only button labels. It's more unsettling than one would think if one truly speaks no English.

  18. Ok then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    je donne vers le haut !

  19. Product support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So who do they actually turn to when they need software support with open-source apps??

  20. Could be a big flow on effect by intmainvoid · · Score: 1

    This could have a much bigger impact than just 17,000 users. Just about the only time I have to dig out IE is to access some crazy government site that I HAVE to use, but can't get to work with anything but IE. It might not be ideal, but if it becomes the case that Parisians can't pay their taxes or something unless they use Firefox, well that's got to be good for Firefox. After all, after being forced to try it, they might like it!

    1. Re:Could be a big flow on effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, forcing users to use Firefox is good, but forcing users to use IE is bad?

    2. Re:Could be a big flow on effect by intmainvoid · · Score: 1

      As I said, it could be "good for Firefox". Whether that's good or bad is up to you.

  21. Not really by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    With MS, there is only one place to get real support; MS.

    With nearly all (or perhaps all) OSS products, you can get support in a number of places. Other companies are offering OO support. Of course, Sun does good support, so I would not be surprised to see them win the contract. But OO is not a monopoly.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  22. Submitter is a link spammer, does /. care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm recycling a comment from another AC in another Scuttlemonkey/**Beatles-Beatles post. This guy's getting worse than Roland Picklepail:

    Am I the only person who has noticed the numerous stories that get posted by *--Beatles-Beatles? Am I also the only person who has noticed that the link used in is name is a constantly changing URL (depending on the story) with pointers to various scammy sites? Is it not obvious what he's doing? He's using the awesome PageRank of slashdot do promote his sites based on searches that have the word Beatles in them.

    It's a small price to pay for free advertising. Find a story, summarize it in 5 minutes, post to slashdot, and get a pagerank boost that advertisers would pay hundreds (or maybe thousands) for. (Text links on high-ranking sites is big business - just ask oreilly).

    Slashdot should at least put a ref=nofollow in the links to submitters (or better yet, only link the submitter's name to his/her user page).


    In closing, a quick bit of WHOIS shows that all the sites linked by **B-B are registered to Carl Fogle. Carl, cut this crap out.

    1. Re:Submitter is a link spammer, does /. care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In closing, a quick bit of WHOIS shows that all the sites linked by **B-B are registered to Carl Fogle. Carl, cut this crap out.

      But Carl has porn to buy and monkeys to spank! You wouldn't want to deprive him of the revenue to fund his activities now would you?

    2. Re:Submitter is a link spammer, does /. care? by tehshen · · Score: 1

      Or instead of picking out every submitter who does this, why doesn't Slashcode slap a ref="nofollow" on the link? Same link, no spam.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    3. Re:Submitter is a link spammer, does /. care? by ElderKorean · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter really, as no-one ever reads the articles anyway.

      The Slashdot effect is just a coincidence.

    4. Re:Submitter is a link spammer, does /. care? by hikerhat · · Score: 1

      It would have worked better if he picked a different name than Beatles. It doesn't matter how many slashdot stories he gets posted. He'll never climb above the thousands of Beatles (the band) links.

    5. Re:Submitter is a link spammer, does /. care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      His name is all over the Intarwebs. Maybe give him a call. Let him know how you feel about the whole thing.
      carl fogle developer 5url.com 4120 manhattan ave nyc, ny 11224 Tel: 718 996 7672 Fax: 718 996 7672

    6. Re:Submitter is a link spammer, does /. care? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Right now, the Submitter's name doesn't have to be that of a real Slashdot account. In fact, it often isn't. If I wanted, I could probably write a book review as honestpuck and submit it, and only he'd be the wiser, at least at first.

      There's not much preventing that kind of abuse.

  23. Not really cracked by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Informative

    IIRC, It was the Windows boxes that were broken into, and then accessed the sidekick. The sidekick was suppose to be open to the network, os it did what it was designed to do.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Not really cracked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      IIRC, It was the Windows boxes that were broken into, and then accessed the sidekick.

      Didn't she just choose the name of her dog as password?

  24. One thing the article doesn't cover.... by 8127972 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ....is what has their experience been during this migration? What are the things they've tripped over? This sort of info would be handy to combat the FUD that the PHB's have stuck in their heads.

    Also, is this the largest migration to an open source environment that anybody has heard of? That piece of info would be nice to know.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:One thing the article doesn't cover.... by corwin2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is by far not the biggest migration to openSource in France, actually, the only reason why you see it in Slashdot is because it mentions "paris", it doens't even make the subtitles of French opensource portals. The whole French administration is slowly turning to opensource, currently for instance the Gendarmerie (police) is updating all their 40.000 PCs to OOo + Firefox/Thunderbird, the Tax administration announced last week that they are currently deploying Oo on their 80.000 Pcs and have already registered an immediate 29Million benefit because of it (2006 licence fees), the Police Nationale (the other Police administration besides Gendarmerie) has been using Oo for 2 years already etc. An official from Gendarmerie explained that leaving MSoffice for OpenOffice had an immediate benefit beside the very cost of the licences, they were able to disolve a whole department with several people paid only to make sure that the thousands of Gendarmerie buildings in France (metropolitan and abroad) were using legally licenced MSoffice suites ! Cops were paid to make sure that the licences were all paid instead of working on the street to arrest thieves...

  25. After switching to open source.... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    The unemployment soared to 30%. Pundents blame the lack of supply chain jobs.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    1. Re:After switching to open source.... by bit01 · · Score: 1

      The unemployment soared to 30%. Pundents blame the lack of supply chain jobs.

      Yep, all the money not spent on the M$ tax simply evaporated. The broken window fallacy.

      ---

      Marketing talk is not just cheap, it has negative value. Free speech can be compromised just as much by too much noise as too little signal.

  26. If Paris is moving toward open source.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    We should definitely change the name to "Freedom Source".

  27. The reason by mcgroarty · · Score: 5, Funny
    The reason France is so excited by open source:

    Wait for it...

    Wait...

    It runs faster.

    1. Re:The reason by suitepotato · · Score: 1

      It runs faster.

      I hope this is a joke because I have a 2GHz P-IV w/256MB RAM and with as much stripped down as possible, it still won't burn a DVD-/+R at 8X on-the-fly without fouling up. Fedora Core 3, K3B, everything quintuple checked.

      Ever look at the average Linux desktop load and see what is set to run every so often in the background? Ever have Linux grind to a frigging halt in both KDE and Gnome, six different kernel revisions, various software running at each time, and when you go to top you find it is the same mysterious thing that on a Google shows as a common Linux daemon set to update itself and its database every so often?

      Happens to me constantly on every box I have ever installed Linux on, every mainstream version. Faster my (...)...

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    2. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope this is a joke because I have a 2GHz P-IV w/256MB RAM and with as much stripped down as possible, it still won't burn a DVD-/+R at 8X on-the-fly without fouling up.

      Umm, did you ever read about WW1 or WW2? I mean.....really. Oh wait, I get it. You are returning sarcasm for sarcasm, tit for tat. Touche

    3. Re:The reason by Jackmn · · Score: 1

      So install Slackware and a lightweight WM. There is no need for Gnome or KDE.

      Enlightenment, Blackbox, WindowMaker, Ratpoison, etc all work fine.

      You do not have your machine as 'stripped down as possible'.

    4. Re:The reason by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      I hope this is a joke

      You hope? Then you go on bashing the performace of Linux (better said: KDE and GNOME. As for the burning: I never managed myself, I blame it on K3B and I was to lazy to learn the command line tools)... Anyways: of course it's a joke!

      According to the running joke (excuse my pun) the French always surrender. You know, they "run away" from danger. "running faster is better".

      I can't believe that I'm even trying to explain this because I'm a European (though not French) and I absolutely hate that joke...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    5. Re:The reason by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      Have you tried one of the BSD's?

      --
      home
    6. Re:The reason by mcgroarty · · Score: 1

      "Oh! When did you add the red and the blue stripe to your flag, messieurs?"

    7. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but i demanded my money back when it didn't include any daemon girls.

    8. Re:The reason by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Standing joke* that french surrender.

      i.e. "For sale: French rifles, great condition, only dropped once."

      I like the double play on "runs" faster in the sense that the french run away faster and the software runs faster.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  28. Not so great in Finland by Oldsmobile · · Score: 2, Informative

    In Finland, my home city had a widely publicised project to start using open source software. In the end, the project was scrapped, with the only thing achieved being that MS lowered it's licensing fees somewhat.

    Only a few weeks ago the City anounced it would purchase a new MS software for all of its computers.

    This was probably due to proficious wining and dining on the part of MS.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    1. Re:Not so great in Finland by OpenServe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This was probably due to proficious wining and dining on the part of MS.

      More likely it was due to the fact that OpenOffice.org, while young and promising, still sucks terribly for real-world daily usage. Your home city probably thought it could simply get a "free lunch" by using it, rather than recognizing that it is still a needy, infantile project. OpenOffice.org is at the stage where early adopters *MUST* become co-developers for it to succeed. (both on a grand scale and for the success of their own deployments)

      Let this be a lesson to any of you advocates and political types out there. OpenOffice.org is Free Software, but it's not free quite yet, in the sense of "install and forget about." For the sake of effective advocacy, don't confuse people and don't stretch the facts! It's not yet the highly-polished, feature-rich, hastle-free software that Office is. If you're going to promote OpenOffice.org, make sure that people know that they will have to invest fairly heavily in making it work properly, including contributions to its development community. (read: paying developers to fix the many show-stopper problems you'll encounter with it)

    2. Re:Not so great in Finland by bit01 · · Score: 1

      More likely it was due to the fact that OpenOffice.org, while young and promising, still sucks terribly for real-world daily usage.

      Marketing nonsense. For 95%+ of people OO.o works just fine for real-world, daily usage.

      ---

      The majority of modern marketing is nothing more than an arms race to get mind share. Everybody loses except the parasitic marketing "industry".

  29. Mod Parent Up! by howlingmoki · · Score: 1

    *I* managed to see the humor, sarcastic as it was.

  30. France is evil by SebNukem · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah! Another post related to France. I can't wait for the flow of rioting cheese eating surrender monkey hate posts to follow. Boycott France, United we stand and God bless america.

    The French Scapegoat http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/10/19/193648/40

    (Score 5: Offtopic.)

  31. at first I didn't see ... by Surt · · Score: 1, Troll

    ... how to properly insult the stupid french over this. But then I saw that, really, this represents the french surrendering to our open source power.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:at first I didn't see ... by BokLM · · Score: 1

      I guess it was a joke ... making fun of people who think America has all the powers.

  32. Now when you support open source... by pmike_bauer · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you support malaria, riots, and car-torching.

    --
    I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    1. Re:Now when you support open source... by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

      ...you support malaria, riots, and car-torching.

      Finally, a cause worth supporting!

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
  33. surrendering France... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when you make this reference to France as a nation that surrenders, you are referring to Viet Nam, right? Where France gave up and the U.S. had to show 'em how it's done?

  34. Not only that by HawkingMattress · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My sister in law is student in "teacher's school" (no idea how you call that in english) in france.
    She'll be a teacher in primary school next year. They have computer courses to be able to teach children how to use a word processor, web browser or graphic editor. What's interesting is that they learn everything on free software, are given a cd full of OSS (for Windows), and encouraged to distribute it around them.
    They're told not to use commercial software with children, simply because their parents are not necessary wealthy enough to pay for the stuff at home so it would create ineqalities among the children. Very good idea if you ask me. Now if they could make a program to build very cheap computers and give one to each child it would be even better. But that's a start.

    1. Re:Not only that by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      Now if they could make a program to build very cheap computers and give one to each child it would be even better You've heard about the $100 laptop i guess...

    2. Re:Not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now if they could make a program to build very cheap computers and give one to each child it would be even better. But that's a start."

      FYI - http://laptop.media.mit.edu/

      BTW: Anybody else who has posted have to type "CROTCH" to verify they are human??? Gotta be a conspiracy in there somewhere.....

  35. Open-source . . . by bluffcityjk · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  36. IMPORTANT by plj · · Score: 1

    The right to burn a car is your fundamental right to exercise your Liberty in the Sixth Republic of France. Note, however, that when burning a car, you need to carefully check, whether the the design of the car is Free; that is, it is licensed as GNU GPL. If it is, you're obliged to use a version of Molotov's coctail that's formula is licensed under a GPL compatible license to ignite the car, as the coctail is then linked to the car by the fire and is as such, becomes a derivative work of it.

    Those using a non-Free or a non-GPL-compatible version of Molotov's coctail when burning a car shall be subject to a fine of up to 10,000 F and the material costs of the burned car.

    *ducks*

    --
    “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
  37. Why use PDF? This is why by tehshen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not do what we did: make your office PDF free?

    Because PDFs work, and if it ain't broke, don't fix it? Anything that's edited in-office is .rtf, anything sent outside the office gets converted to .pdf before sending. Your method makes you a troll, apparently.

    The files are enormous

    It depends how you make them. I can LaTeX up a file and the resulting pdf will be (typically) 30->100kB in size. Others are just comprised of scanned pictures, and the largest I've seen is 2.5MB. If you think that's enormous, get some more storage (it's really cheap nowadays) and then look at the .doc format.

    the readers are bloated (and at 56+ Meg just to open a fucking file, I'd call "bloated" generous)

    Evince is using 40.4MB to read a typical PDF with standard text/pictures for me, and that's hardly putting strain on the total memory. While Firefox is using over 100MB.

    and they're a pain in the ass to alter

    Some people might consider that a strong point. Try printing it out and writing on it if you need to edit it so badly.

    Could somebody please tell me why people use PDF's in the first place?

    Because they're what you see is what you get, anywhere? Compare that with almost all word processor formats where the layout is dependent on fonts, printers, the program, all sorts of things. Not to mention that it's well-supported.

    Stop complaining about the file format just because you've been using them badly. PDFs were never intended to be a word-processor format, so stop treating them as one.

    --
    Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
  38. riots by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

    Now we know the true cause of the riots. They were obviously financed and sponsored by Microsoft in retaliation.

    1. Re:riots by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      hehehe, good one, definetely 5-funny in my book.

  39. One thing your post doesn't cover.... by NineNine · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This sort of info would be handy to combat the FUD that the PHB's have stuck in their heads.

    So, you're assuming that anybody who doesn't want to go OSS "FUD" stuck in their head? I use very little OSS in my business, and I can assure you that "FUD" has nothing to do with it. If anything, I'd like to see an end to the FUD that OSS zealots constantly are trying to stir up. I can't even begin to count the hours that I've wasted because of OSS zealot FUD. Personally, I wouldn't have wasted hours and hours playing with the OSS that I did, just trying to get BASIC functionality, if not for the zealots screaming about how Linux and other popular OSS apps are "easy to use". Please, take your own FUD and shove it up your ass.

  40. Nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Those using a non-Free or a non-GPL-compatible version of Molotov's coctail when burning a car shall be subject to a fine of up to 10,000 F and the material costs of the burned car.

    It a) used to be FF, and b) it's now.

    1. Re:Nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It a) used to be FF, and b) it's now.

      c) /. still doesn't recognise the € sign if it's not written as &euro;, and d) I'm to stupid to preview.

    2. Re:Nonsense. by plj · · Score: 1

      Well, as you can see I referred to the fictional Sixth Republic of France, so I didn't want to use the €. But I didn't know that it was FF instead of just F.

      Btw, /. naturally does not recognise the € sign, as its charset is iso-8859-1, aka latin-1. The € sign is not part of that charset; AFAIK only iso-8859-15, aka latin-9 (and closely resembling latin-1), and various Unicode charsets, such as UTF-8, have the € sign included.

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
  41. Solution to the riots ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is Linux!

  42. Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 Informative

  43. France's use of Open Source by David+Off · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No I do not think it is the largest. For example by the end of 2005 the 70,000 workstations used by the French Gendarmerie will use Open Office. This is the biggest French migration. The Gendamerie hope to save 2 million euros per year. 10,000 computers bought since 2004 will have OO preinstalled. The Gendarmerie say this saves 75 euros per PC for an MS Office license.

    The Gendarmerie say it is not just a simple question of money. Managing Microsofts complicated license structure was becoming a nightmare for the Gendarmerie - reason alone for the migration.

    The Gendarmerie is also redevloping in Java a number of standard VB macros written for word to automate form filling. The idea is to leave open a possible future migration to Linux. XML will be used as a storage format along with PDF and open document formats. Stephane Kimmerlin for MS France says it is not a victory for OO, the Gendarmerie only used a fraction of MS Office's features so didn't really need the power offered by MS Office.

    In France the interior ministry will move 50,000 workstations to Open Office, the finance ministry is moving 8,000 PCs to OO, the public works ministry is looking to move 60,000 PCs to OO and Customs have migrated 16,000 PCs to OO and its use is mandatory since January 2005.

    Hope that proves useful.

    David

    ps I've consulted for the French Education ministry for their Antares project - a Java based system for managing recruitment which used JBoss and also Weblogic.

  44. France, sinking into anarchy by Abuzar · · Score: 2, Funny

    First, they start with beheading a stupid queen.

    Then, a bunch of punk ass kids get away with acting out violent Grand Theft Auto scenes.

    If that weren't enough, they made the gov't admit systemic racism to boot.

    Now they're all going open source? What the $!@# is goin' on? I guess you can really have your cake and eat it too!

    I'd pack up, move to Paris and join all that debauchery if I weren't scared piss of the US gearin' up for Operation Liberate France! Them nuke-totin' anarchists will not be allowed to get away with all this terrorism.

  45. WWII In France by queenb**ch · · Score: 1

    My issue with the French stems largely from WWII as well. To my mind, their reaction to the Nazis cost them all rights to any future griping. Any group of people who is sufficiently mentally defective to vote to allow the Nazis into your country so that they don't bomb your musems, is too mentally defective to be allowed a voice in any future decisions.

    Sure, Mr. Hitler, come on in. Round up our Jews, our staunch Catholics, our Gypsies, and kill our people. Just, please, oh please don't bomb our musems.

    What a bunch of logic that was!

    2 cents,

    Queen B

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
    1. Re:WWII In France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You obviously don't know anything about history.
      No one voted for the nazis, but when the nazis succeeded invading France, a part of the military decided to sign a treaty giving some autonomy to half the country (south) rather than having it all as occupied France. Some other refused the decision and went on fighting with the British (the USA only came at the end of the war, not doing much before being attacked by the Japanese).

    2. Re:WWII In France by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Why would it have been appropriate to interfere in European affairs back then when the international community thinks it's inappropriate for us to interfere with just about anything today? If a war broke out between France and Germany today, would the US be expected to go in and put a stop to it tomorrow?

    3. Re:WWII In France by Fancia · · Score: 1

      That was *60 years* ago. If you want to go back enough, you'll find quite a number of bad things in any country's history.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    4. Re:WWII In France by queenb**ch · · Score: 1

      The French government voted to accept the Nazi's terms, which earned them the epithet "Vichy Government". The Vichy Government also operated their own camps, in addition to actively assisting the Nazis in rounding up and shipping people to camps in Poland. French President of the Council, Philippe Pétain who was in fact voted into office in 1940. He was a war hero from WWI who turned on his own people and handed them blissfuly over to the Nazis. Ask a Frenchman what he thinks of the Vichy goverment now. Yet, they voted for this goober at the time, which is my point.

      Actually, if you'll check, you'll find that one of the major official reasons given by the French government at the time of their surrender to the Nazis was that specifically they did not want to have their musems bombed. They were also quite aware of what the Nazis were doing to the people in the countries that they "occupied" and they were surrenduring their own people to a bunch of genocidal maniacs. The French had been smuggling out reports of Nazi atrocities for quite some time in an attempt to get the US involved in the war before it spread as far as it did. Instead of telling me that I "don't know anything about history", I would suggest that you do some serious reading.

      No, we didn't participate in WWII much until we were actually attacked. We pretty much had a belly full of useless European posturing during WWI, which ended in 1926. Since we were attacked in Pearl Harbor in 1941, most the men currently in our military at the time either had themselves seen action in WWI or their fathers had. We got drawn in to a European conflict then and came out rather the worse for wear. When WWII rolled around, it looked like another Euro-trash party to us and so we decided to sit it out. Mustard gas, anyone? Thanks, I'll pass.

      2 more cents,

      Queen B

      --
      HDGary secures my bank :/
    5. Re:WWII In France by BokLM · · Score: 1

      Any group of people who is sufficiently mentally defective to vote to allow the Nazis into your country so that they don't bomb your musems, is too mentally defective to be allowed a voice in any future decisions.

      So what about all the people who voted for Bush ? And this one was not 60 years ago ...

    6. Re:WWII In France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, what have you been smoking? Faux News?

      France declared war on Germany in 09/1939 after the invasion of Poland, and sent troops to Poland. 200,000 french soldiers died in WWII.

      The US on the other hand, sat idle for over 2 years and did not declare war on Germany until Pearl Harbor in 12/1941.

      Overall, 562,000 french people died in WWII (13 death/1000 population). The number is 417,000 (3.2/1000) for the US.

      Remind us again, who appeased the Nazis?

  46. How is this political? by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

    Just because France is doing this and (if you listen to the likes of Bill O'Reilly) they're sworn enemies of America?

    Honestly, if London, Berlin, Dublin, Madrid or any other European city had opted for OSS, would it have been viewed as a political news item?

    This bollocks is, well, a load of bollocks.

    1. Re:How is this political? by bufalo_1973 · · Score: 1

      Madrid still hasn't, but Extremadura, Andalucia, Valencia, Catalonia and Balearic Islands have (in bigger or lesser degree) opted for OSS. I think Hannover (or was it Munich?) has opted too for OSS. So is not "what if they had" because they had already opted.

    2. Re:How is this political? by waferhead · · Score: 1

      It's OK, a decent percentage of US citizens stayed awake long enough in American History...
      To always remember France is the USAs oldest, and historically strongest ally.

      This "we hate France" garbage is all media hyped BS. No one really gives a tinkers damn.

      Back on-topic, France has an advantage--- Mandriva rocks. I hope they get the contract.

  47. Considering MS allowed SONY to take over ur pc by ScrewTivo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    it is no wonder. I predict much more of this. Willing or unwilling I consider MS to blame. A simple dumb click by a dumb user should not allow a rootkit that cannot be removed get installed PERIOD! How is it that WinXP has option "Hidden files and folders - Show hidden files and folders" yet these files are still hidden. I PAID YOU FOR THIS, YOU WORK FOR ME! GOOD GRIEF CHARLIE BROWN.

    Oh yea, and Registry entries are hidden Also! Where is the option to display hidden registry entries? It must exist, yet I cannot find the option to turn it off.SONY found it! I do not think I will be interested your new fangled SOL file system now. You can't get the old one working right. If MS cannot fix this problem they should get out of the operating system business. If u think Linux is to niche just opt for solaris. Game over Bill. I almost wish this problem hit me then I would have cause to go after these thugs.

    I sure hope the CIA has at least infected China's version of the CIA and the Iranian's and the Russian's CIA.

    In reality some dumb ass 16 year old has already done it and the CIA is clueless.

  48. Misreading by Joe+Random · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one who originally read the title as "Particle Accelerators Move to Open Source" and was preparing a "Beowolf cluster of strangelets" reply before realizing the truth?

  49. Not so great in F/OSS-land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah stop blaiming the world and improve F/OSS instead.

    I'm not cross and I'm not attacking the parent, it will take a lot of work to do all the things mentioned below in one single distribution which is one of the reasons it hasn't been done already. It wont only take coding skills it will also take management skills and dealmaking.

    I love F/OSS but there's never going to be any progress in the desktop market if we can't realize that for the end-user MS Windows is actually a generation or two in front of Linux and other F/OSS OSes.

    I said for the end-user, not for the administrators and IT staff, but for the average, common, end-user who used years to wrap their heads around a GUI, doubleclicking, and getting comfortable enough to actually use the tools they need in their job.

    If all the F/OSS programmers are so darned smart why don't they realize how "dumb" the end-user is? That it is shallow simplicity which is what it will take to really challenge MS and Apple? The worst part is that there are so many areas for improvement and simplifying the experience for the end-user beyond the best that MS or Apple manage to provide but it always seem to boil down to catfighting about implementation which completely removes any kind of aim and then it all just peters out into /dev/null.

    Think I'm trolling? I'm not. Tell me how many car manufacturers demand that the customers must be mechanics to drive their cars? Until the day that the "community" wakes up to this problem F/OSS OSes will never win a significant share in the desktop market.

    1 automagic, default secure, choice-free, autoupdated, autoconfigured OS with an easy to use firewall like Firestarter, an easy to use Antiviral program (even if it doesn't do anything but provide an additional layer of email-cheking; you'll not have to explain anything about *nix & viruses), an easy to use, instinctual, and selfcongruent FULLY INTERNATIONALIZED wysiwyg word editor that doesn't eat system resources, 1 -one- default intuitive (= learn 2-3 rules and you know it all) GUI configured to be exactly the same as MS (do NOT tempt yourself with adding choice, it will only add confusion). Copy & paste and click & drag for ABSOLUTELY EVERY program on the OS. Professional support, interactive education material, and complete up to date, clear, concise, easy to understand information. Include Flash, Shockwave, real full Java and other stuff like that which 99% of all Windows desktop users are used to and do it OUT OF THE BOX. 0 -zero- compiling of ANYTHING unless the user wants to: that means precompiled binaries without dependencies following autopackage or klik style as the norm. Remove the incentive to use a server OS as a desktop OS or vice versa. Hide root and make any absolutely neccesary use of sudo transparent to the end-user. Sand-box everything possible by default. Get support for hardware at any cost so that it will never be a question for the end-user. Make everything the dektop requests of updates of programs and drivers extremely transparent for any IT staff, provide tons of hooks for the IT staff to monitor the the health of the desktop system, NIDS, HIPS and so on.

    The only change the end-users should notice is how much easier stuff is and how much they DON'T have to do and DON'T have to learn unless they absolutely want to. The question the developers should ask themselves is "how can we make it unneccesary for the end-user to know this or do that unless they want to?"

    The above simply does not exist as of now in any Linux desktop distro (if anyone actually thinks otherwise they're deluding themselves terribly), and to make it worse there are about 20 runner-ups that are somewhat close (but not anywhere near as close as they like to think) which simply just fragments a miniscule market and hinders its growth.

    Ease of use != Perl dogma translated to the OS! Wake up or shut up.

  50. -1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA makes no mention of Iraq, Chirac, or demonizing.

  51. The very best thing about the Iraq Invasion Scam.. by Qbertino · · Score: 1, Redundant

    was the whole bit about "This fine british paper" that Powell presented. A paper from, suposedly british intelligence origin, describing all the Über-Threats from Iraq and the dangers coming from them. When it hit the news that the entire paper was copy and pasted from an american students essay posted on the internet, related to Desert Storm in 1991 - copied with exact same typos and all - I was laughing my head off for half an hour. I still crack up today just writing about this.
    Absolutely hilarious with cheap and phony shams polititians use to try to get away with things. ... The sad part is that they usually do.

    "Fine british paper." An instant classic. Absolutely.

    ...

    As a matter of fact I've been laughing to tears again the last 5 minutes at the end of this post.
    Monthy Python really pales compared to the bizarness of this incident.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  52. Absolute bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck cares about what Chirac said? Or what Bush said? Chirac is renowned for his "cloud-speak", few politicians can best him when it comes to saying nothing while speaking a lot (do a poll about it in France and you'll see). And Bush is renowned for trying to say more than he's actually able to ;)

    No, what was said and not exactly subtly implied in the UN is what mattered.

    You obviously didn't listen to Dominique de Villepin in the open sessions of the UN security council or you wouldn't be so incredibly ignorant as to say what you do. The practical effect of what Villepin actually said in those sessions was that France would use it's veto and it's as simple as that. France tried to convey an impression in the UN that they did so on behalf of other countries without veto powers, an odd situation were it seemed like they weren't truly comfortable with vetoing on their own behalf... And please realize that the UN weapons inspectors were already on overtime, for years! Blix himself testified to the open sessions that they were being continually obstructed and derailed by the Baathist regime to the degree that they couldn't be sure that they actually performed a function. I know because I listened to him in those sessions, all of them. Blix were right of course, plenty of Iraqi surveillance equipment was found embedded in the quarters provided to the inspectors, something Blix and his fellow inspectors had been totally convinced of from their inspection experiences.

    Saddam responded too little too late (except for a massive attempt at obfuscation) and France, Germany, China, and Russia didn't manage to protect their economic interests even with France vetoing. Why is that so? It's because the matter at hand wasn't whether France or other nations approved but whether Saddam would actually comply or not. That was the crux of the matter and he never complied in any significant way, quite contrary, and as such he didn't even try to help those who had an interest in avoiding the war in the UN, leaving them with egg on their face (believe me they realized, just like the US GOP realized themselves when much of the intelligence (both US and international including French and German agencies) proved wrong). There is a reason they've all moved on from this matter you know (all but parts of the uninformed populace of course).

    Neither could you have followed BBC World News coverage or any direct news media coverage of the same public UN security council meetings (note plural, all were shown live and unedited on BBC World News).

    Freedom fries was and is stupid but by god so too is the crowd that doesn't have anything more insightful to do politically than regurgitate bush-bashing. A bunch of clueless hypocrites who by the consequence of what they're saying actually supported the continuation of Saddams tyranny no matter what they themselves claim. Compare the numbers from for example Amnesty International on Iraqi deaths in an average year of Baathist rule to even the most critical assesments of Iraqi deaths in the first year of US occupation and you'll find something to ponder.

    Doubt me, it's good to be critical, and find the transcripts of the open security council sessions starting with resolution 1441 and onwards and read them. I think you will be surprised. But at any rate please stop forming your opinions from soundbytes in either one or the other direction because that isn't knowledge or understandng, it's simply shallow tripe.

    1. Re:Absolute bullshit by boule75 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Is there anything by /. below -1 ? Because this one deserves it.

      It is the same pack of sheer lies and half truth that was aired by anonymous US officials cowards for years now.
      "Saddam was not compying": the inspectors told repeatedly the contrary, maybe he was not complying enough, but he was. Where they bugged?
      "The Frogs would use their veto": right, but only because the previous resolutions were stating "no war while the inspections work", and they were at that time and a war was completely unecessary. And the Russians and the Chinese would have done the same. As well as most countries in the security council, so this would ot have been a veto, you see? As well as all people of the "grand coalition", especially Brits and Italians, who were overwhelmingly opposed to the war. Basically, Chirac, for once, had boll*qs for the others.
      "The UN inspectors were overtime": er... no, indeed, Saddam _had_ complied in 1991 but had forgotten to advertise it at that time. Anyway, it is hard to prove one has destroyed something when one actually did, and even more to prove it to someone that will not believe you, however hard one tries.
      "all western intelligence agencies were agreeing Saddam had WMD": er... no again. Have you heard them by the way? All had doubts, certainly, but what more?

      And so on and so on. In the end, the facts matter and one can already guess who was right: the warmongers ot the others.

      Bye coward.

      --
      I am not Remy Mouton, unfortunately: http://remy.mouton.free.fr/art/
  53. Nuke-totin' anarchists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuke-totin' anarchists...

    Would that be the frappé force frappe? Don't worry, they're only into making souffle (not to be mistaken for a mushroom cloud) :)

    Hints for those who don't get the puns:
    frappé = mad
    force de frappe = military might
    force frappe = nickname for the french nuclear forces
    souffle = breath/"breeze" and also the name for a specific kind of dishes filled with air

    1. Re:Nuke-totin' anarchists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about learning French ?

      It's called "force de frappe" which means nothing more and nothing less than "strike force".

      Force = force
      de = of
      frappe = strike

      "Soufflé" and "souffle" are completely different things, the first being the cake filled with air, the second being breath/breeze.

  54. Gratis is a valid English word, let's use it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is that too demanding and confusing for Slashdot readers? Gratuit, gratuito, or gratis, the word exists in one form or another in almost all european languages.

  55. Those Darn French by NoMorePoints.com · · Score: 1

    They are just doing it because it's free.....! NoMorePoints.com soon to be NoMoreFreeLoaders.com

  56. No clue why they're moving to open source by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

    I mean, look at it this way....

    With a fire wall like that, they sure as hell won't need security.... "I try to root your box!" "Hon hon hon! yahr beurx eeeez on fahr!!!!!!"

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  57. Ah but you forget Chirac's Gaullism! by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Chirac's opposition to the war is not really the French issue with we right wingers. Chirac using France and Europe as a counterpoint to American power is. In other words, Chirac sees France as the leader of an opposition to the United States simply for the sake of opposing it.

    Chirac made numerous trips around the world decrying everything about American culture and as a consequence, the American people, and he's attempted to rally the world to his vision of France as the leader of a block standing against the American "threat". If he wants to view the USA as a threat, that's fine by him, but you can't honestly say France is a friend to the United States for painting us that way.

    Thus, we on the right believe that to say the USA has alienated our "French ally" has missed the point. France is not our ally. She's a "friendly" rival because she wants to be, and I just don't see a reason why the United States needs to kiss up to France if France is going to be so petulant.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Ah but you forget Chirac's Gaullism! by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      That's interesting because before Chirac became president he used to tour the US on a regular basis and to make it quite clear that he loved the country.

    2. Re:Ah but you forget Chirac's Gaullism! by BokLM · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should know that every country is supposed to be free to have its own opinions, they don't have to follow what America decide if they don't agree with something. Bush is not the master of the world, or at least not yet. If Chirac did not support War, it's because he thought it was not a good thing, not because he sees the USA as a threat.

      Are you one of thoses people who think the USA has control over the earth and sees anything outside USA as a threat ?

    3. Re:Ah but you forget Chirac's Gaullism! by tjstork · · Score: 1

      No, I'm one of those people that simply don't trust world leaders when they say the USA is an enemy. It has nothing to do with America's "master of the world", and it has everything to do with Chirac and others of his ilk blaming America for their own domestic problems.

      --
      This is my sig.
    4. Re:Ah but you forget Chirac's Gaullism! by BokLM · · Score: 1

      You probably watch too much FoxNews, Chirac never said that.

    5. Re:Ah but you forget Chirac's Gaullism! by tjstork · · Score: 1
      --
      This is my sig.
    6. Re:Ah but you forget Chirac's Gaullism! by BokLM · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I can't see where in that text he says the USA or anyone else is an enemy.

  58. troll? by jesterpilot · · Score: 1

    Even the French understand irony.

    --
    Trust me, I work for the government.
    1. Re:troll? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Thank you, that was the worst moderation I've gotten in quite a while.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  59. Germano-Belgo-Norwegian Pommes Frittes? by ThJ · · Score: 1

    Why can't Slashdot have an Edit button? Reposting as Plain Old Text:

    I'm assuming the -s suffixes are pluralizations. Someone once told me that Pomme d'terre (Earth apple) is French for "potato". I've always strongly associated deep-frying ("fritere" in Norwegian) with French cooking.

    German and Norwegian share a great number of words, idioms and grammatical constructs. A linguist once said that the easiest language for a Norwegian to learn is Low German. It's apparently not the same as regular German, but having the name, I'm guessing it's in the same ballpark. German is easy enough. A Norwegian can allegedly speak the language fluidly after only 6 months in Germany.

    It kinda spoils the fun of linguistic nationalism each time you stumble across what seemed an ultra-Norwegian word and it turns out to be borrowed from German.

  60. Re:The very best thing about the Iraq Invasion Sca by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1
    I found nothing about the phony push for war particularly hilarious. Not the initial marketing slogan "Shock'n Awe" nor the US military's recent light-hearted "Shake'n Bake" slogan for baking people alive in Fallujah. Or anything that has taken place in Iraq between these cheerful American sloganisms.

    But talking about the manufactured evidence that supposedly incriminated Iraq in the eyes of the hypocritical invaders (Chinese military occupation and genocide in Tibet seems to be perfectly acceptable for both Blair & Bush!), it's the story of the one mentally unstable Iraqi refugee, a pathological liar nicknamed Curveball, that explains how crazy unverified rumours were processed into "undeniable facts" by the wannabe aggressor regimes.

    In the run-up to the war and long into the invasion the "wholly-embedded" US media was scarily jingoistic so it is a minor relief that the "patriotic" war-journalism has finally given way to some soul- and fact-searching.

    How U.S. Fell Under the Spell of 'Curveball' The Iraqi informant's German handlers say they had told U.S. officials that his information was 'not proven,' and were shocked when President Bush and Colin L. Powell used it in key prewar speeches. (LA Times, November 20, 2005)

    It is a long and detailed chronicle of an empire hell-bent on starting a war, and how media-massaged 88% popularity ratings make it easy for the most hapless of Führers to manipulate the state machinery and the populace of "the greatest democracy".

    I wonder how many americans are still boycotting produce from the democratic and anti-war Old Europe but have no trouble buying Chinese imports and thereby aiding and abetting the oppressive and expansionist dictatorship there? Actually almost the whole planet was against the war but the fact that some sycophantic governments took decision to participate in the "grand coalition of the billing" against the popular opinion camouflaged that fact from the american public for a while. Meanwhile the Chinese state propaganda machine is still having a field day reporting about the American military quaqmire while the Communist Party is busy creating alliances with anti-Bush developing countries around the globe.

    The most unfortunate long-term result of that American uni-lateralism may not be the civil war and splitting of Iraq into smaller ethno-religious states but the split between the USA and Europe which will benefit the Sino-Russian neo-imperial block. With moral-free business ties reigning supreme so far above the so-called "western values of freedom and democracy" that it isn't even funny, the politically bullied or already occupied neighbours of those authoritarian powers will be the biggest losers in this sad saga started by a handful of neo-cons backed by the american religious far-right.

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  61. Re:The very best thing about the Iraq Invasion Sca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans only got the second hand reaction to that. You should have been in Britain when one of the newspapers uncovered the story... funfunfunfun. I think Tony Blair aged about 10 years in 1 day and journalists looked like they were doing impressions of that infamous scene from When Harry Met Sally.

    Prime Minister's Questions was also worth watching... incidentally, that's something I've always wondered about: why doesn't the U.S. have something similar. Forcing the guy on charge of the country to appear in front of elected representatives and answer any question thrown at him for 45 minutes a week is a great bit of democracy -- it also ensures that you never end up with morons in charge (you still get crooks and bullshitters... but stupid people... no).

  62. I already imagine by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    a Beowulf cluster of misreadings. And all of them leading to a reply.

  63. Union contracts requiring Open Source? by Safe+Sex+Goddess · · Score: 1
    I'm a member of the Cal State University Employees Union which includes technical and professional employees. Yes, that's programmers, system adminsitrators, analysts, DBA's, and the like.

    Our contract is up for renegotiation this year and I'm wondering if there are any other union contracts that direct their employers to make a move to Open Source as a cost saving measure to save jobs during budget cuts.

    Also, can anyone recommend the most accurate reports that detail cost savings per workstation by moving to an Open Source OS or OpenOffice?

    --
    Abstinence is a government conspiracy. www.SafeSexZone.co
  64. Re:Courageous to stand up to Bush? by daem0n1x · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Forgot the LA riots, dude?

  65. [META]Mods on parent post. by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    Look at the parent comment moderation. Yesterday it was +4 with already the reasonable flamebait score. Today modded down all by overrated. Nothing wrong in getting modded overrated, but it's quite a strange distribution, all favorable and "responsibly negative" ratings first, all cowardly unfavorable later. So what, you say? Imagine a beowulf cluster of a microsoft astroturfers' fake slashdot accounts.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol