Slashdot Mirror


Is SETI a Security Risk?

Dotnaught writes "Richard Carrigan, a particle physicist at the US Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois, fears the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) may be putting the earth at risk. As reported in the Guardian, Carrigan frets that alien radio signals could pose a security risk. The report cites a 2003 paper entitled "Do potential Seti signals need to be decontaminated?" but Carrigan's website has more details. Basically, he's calling for isolation of SETI computers and additional security measures. He writes, "To paraphrase Cocconi and Morrison for the possibility of a malevolent SETI signal ...the probability of a contaminated SETI signal is difficult to estimate; but if we never consider it the chance of infection is not zero."" Frankly, I'm more worried about some phishing malcontent then I am about the Grays, but maybe that's just me.

72 of 527 comments (clear)

  1. Chicken and Egg. by FalconZero · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From TFA:
    1. Raw signal in memory must bootstrap to status of operating program
    2. Program must then untangle the inner workings of the host. (Is it possible to now build a diagnosis program to determine the operating set of an unfamiliar computer?)
    I'm not a software engineer but... no, wait, I AM a software engineer, so I'm curious, how does this 'virus' execute step 1 [Buffer Overrun & Privilage Escalation] without doing step 2 first [Determine instruction set for system] (Which incidentally requires step one to have been performed first.)
    As far as I see it, theres as much chance of data in the recieve buffer created by background radiation being a viable 'virus' as there is a deliberate chunk of data will be

    This sounds suspiciously like :
    1) Send malicious code
    2) ...
    3) Infect universe (and profit)
    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Nos. · · Score: 4, Funny

      They did it in Independance Day!

    2. Re:Chicken and Egg. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ask Will Smith and Jeff Goldblum.
      I get the idea that Steve Jobs might have something to say about it as well.

      To me, the idea that an outside signal can be manipulated and sent in just the right way to overflow our validation network is akin to shakespeare and monkeys.

      However - I can see somebody managing to send dirty packets down to the clients after hacking the SETI central computers (somehow, lots of hand waving etc) to put bad data there which could exploit a seemingly trivial problem with the seti client.

      Not aliens though.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no, statistical evidence shows that they're most likely to be running Windows - not to mention the lower TCO reduces the running cost of your mothership compared to free alternatives.

      Wait, we all know from Independence Day that the aliens use Mac OS.

    4. Re:Chicken and Egg. by m4dm4n · · Score: 4, Funny
      "the probability of a contaminated SETI signal is difficult to estimate;"

      Is that because his PC couldn't deal with numbers that small?

    5. Re:Chicken and Egg. by djmurdoch · · Score: 5, Informative

      The possibility that extraterrestrials will take over SETI is pretty remote, but SETI is still a security risk. In decreasing level of probability, I'd say the risks are:

        - someone could hack the server and send out malicious code with the next software update

        - someone could hack the data stream and inject malicious data into it (assuming there really is such a thing as malicious data, which I find hard to believe).

        - someone terrestrial could broadcast malicious data in such a way that the SETI telescopes pick it up and think that it's ET in origin.

        - an ET could broadcast malicious data, after having picked up a copy of the SETI software and analyzing it.

        - an ET could broadcast malicious data without knowing what the receiver is like (the worry describe in TFA).

    6. Re:Chicken and Egg. by a_nonamiss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're using the mindset that these ET's are of similar intelligience to humans. We tend to do that as a species. But imagine, if you will, a civilization that is only 2000+ years more advanced that us. And realistically, and civilization advanced enough to receive our radio waves and respond is likely greater than 2000 years more advanced than us. Consider how very short 2000 years is in a universal timescale. To this advanced civilization, our advanced code is nothing more than a toddler's plaything. We can't even begin to fathom the ways in which they could potentially expolit our security.

      It's like if the Romans built a huge wall and said "That will keep out anyone. It's not possible to breach it." Using our technology, which is 2000 years more advanced, (less, actually) we could fly an B2 bomber over the city and drop a couple 2000 pound bombs. The pinnalce of their most advanced security would last less than 10 seconds against the most basic of our assaults.

      I know this is a little different when talking about computer security, but just as the Romans couldn't even imagine in their wildest dreams a B2 bomber, let alone how it could possible get past their impenetrable wall, we can't conceive of the technology that could be used to "infect" our computers. In 2000 years, who knows what kind of power we would have to defeat such a system? We can't know because it's beyond even our wildest imagination.

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    7. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Ihlosi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      we can't conceive of the technology that could be used to "infect" our computers.



      And that's the flaw in your B2-Bomber-argument. The aliens would be stuck with using our (extremely primitive) technology. We know pretty well how our computers work, and can figure out most ways to break/hack/crack them ourselves in a short timespan.



      It's a bit like using the tools and technologies the Romans had at that time and trying build that B2 bomber.

    8. Re:Chicken and Egg. by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's worse than that - its some stupid nuge who is trying to create a name for themselves by pointing out "potential risks."

      We've seen this behaviour before with the whole y2k problem, people using it as an avenue for self-promotion. There were some risks, but they were being addressed; at the same time, people were going ape-shit. Supposedly, planes would fall out of the sky, elevators, water systems, and electrical plants would all stop, etc, and we were told that no amount of work would find enough of the problems to prevent a global catastrophe.

      In actual fact, the biggest problem turned out to be all these people who had stocked up with a years' supply of stuff, and who then didn't need to buy shit for the next 6 months, causing a dip in consumer spending.

      Hello, my name is Zaphod and I am the vice-regal advisor to His Imperial Majesty, XnthE 439, Supreme Ruler of the Galazy. I have access to the royal galactic accounts, and have found that the sum of 34 bazillion galactic credits lying dormant in one such account. If youy could send me your banking details, I am sure we could work out a most generous arrangement to our mutual benefit.

      Never mind that, after 50 millenia of inflation, even at 1%, 34 bazillion galactic credits is about $0.93.

      I'm sure aliens have better things to do than infect our computers. Bill Gates does a good enough job of that by himself. (Hey, maybe Gates is a pod person).

    9. Re:Chicken and Egg. by FalconZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good post, but incorrect. It doesn't matter if the civilisation is a million years more advanced than our, for them to deliberatly write a virus using the SETI recieve buffer as a vector is simply impossible. The systems are ours, any infection via this method MUST comply with out systems operating parameters (IE Instruction sets etc...). The code MUST execute on our systems, for which it MUST contain vaild opcodes. Even then, it relies on security flaws in OUR software (which may or may not exist).

      To use your analogy, its like assaulting a Roman wall in a place where the laws of physics prevent flight.

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    10. Re:Chicken and Egg. by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      The possibility that extraterrestrials will take over SETI is pretty remote, but SETI is still a security risk.

      I doubt there's a risk of ET hacking SETI@home and pwning the internet; they'd be working completely blind. The risk from alien signals is one that I think was raised by someone in Contact: what if they hack us?

      Send down a message, prime number sequences and so forth, describe the periodic table, build a scientific vocabulary, the whole SETI thing. Then begin describing plans for a machine. Make it look like a spaceship. When built and switched on: boom!

      A very cheap and efficient means of exterminating potential upstart rivals in the universe. No expensive, slow battlefleet needed, just a trick signal and we do all the work ourselves.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    11. Re:Chicken and Egg. by 6*7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "It's like if the Romans built a huge wall and said "That will keep out anyone. It's not possible to breach it." Using our technology, which is 2000 years more advanced, (less, actually) we could fly an B2 bomber over the city and drop a couple 2000 pound bombs."

      IIRC the Great Wall's effects expires with the discovery of metallurgy.

    12. Re:Chicken and Egg. by a_nonamiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Very nice rebuttal. I was unclear in my original post. I wasn't really trying to defend this idiot that wants to shut off SETI. I guess I was merely trying to point out that if they want to get past our defenses and they are sufficiently advanced, they will do it no matter how hard we try to prevent it, probably using a vector that hasn't even occurred to us. SETI isn't really a security risk, because the only way to have true securtity from these "bad aliens" is to remain invisible to them, and we're currently sending enough radio waves into space to announce our presence to anyone who really wants to find us. If they can travel faster than the speed of light, there is really no way we can possibly resist them.

      So I agree with the main point of your post. Why do we even care? If they have a need to conquer us and lack the ethical principles that wouild prevent them from doing so, then I, for one, want to be the first to praise our gracious alien overlords!

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    13. Re:Chicken and Egg. by yakovlev · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes you think any signal capable of that kind of breakage won't simply attack all of the OTHER radio receivers on the planet and blow up the power grid? Better yet send a subliminal message that says: please proceed to the nearest body of water and drown yourself. That way the aliens get to take advantage of the existing infrastructure, if desired.

      The problem with trying to protect the SETI computers from some kind of extraterrestrial signal is that either

      1.) The attack will be one similar to those we've already seen, in which case attacks from terrestrial sources are much more likely, and pose a much greater risk

      OR

      2.) The attack will be something we can't even conceive of, in which case there's no reason to believe it will specifically target the SETI computers, or that whatever security precautions we take to defend against such an attack will be effective.

    14. Re:Chicken and Egg. by s20451 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The basic argument is this:

      If it were possible, within the limits of human technology, to take over the world with a computer virus, we would have seen some indication of it by now.

      However, if the aliens had some kind of magic technology that overcame human limitations, using it to take over the world via a computer virus is kind of ridiculous. They could just take over the world directly.

      And assuming that there are malicious aliens with technology far beyond ours, we're screwed anyway. So there is really no point in worrying about SETI security holes, or even about aliens in general.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    15. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Digi-John · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The technology of the signal", eh? Look, a signal is a signal. A radio wave is a radio wave--it is not also magically a sandwich. If we receive something, whatever it does will be done through our technology. If these ETs have something that allows them to view us instantaneously and manipulate matter over here, they won't be worrying about radio signals, and we'll have bigger problems anyway.

      It's okay to think outside the box, just don't think outside of the laws of physics.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    16. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Taevin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lower TCO indeed because you get Microsoft's Genuine Intergalactic Technical Support hotline.

      "Thank you for calling Microsoft's Genuine Intergalactic Technical Support. If you are experiencing a problem with a factory installed Windows Galaxy edition, please contact your manufacturer.

      If you are calling about a non-critical issue, please emit one tachyon burst directed at Microsoft's Genuine Advantage Galactic Transmission satellite.

      If you are calling about a security hole that was exploited by the Scourge causing the destruction of half your intergalactic fleet, please wait one (1) business day before targeting Microsoft's campus with your quantum torpedos.

      If you are experiencing a total system failure preventing your navagation computer from function and are on a direct collision course with Earth, please wait on the line for a Microsoft Certified Windows Galaxy edition technician. Please note that we are experiencing a high call volume at this time, and you may be on hold for 12-24 hours.

      Thank you for calling Microsoft's Genuine Intergalactic Technical Support. Microsoft, what planet do you want to go to today?"

    17. Re:Chicken and Egg. by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny
      I have this image of a computer virus taking over every computer on earth, then using our antennas and satellite to repeatedly broadcast the message "ENLARGE your COPULATORY TENTACLES! Tentaculis®, SAND WORM extract, and Dilithium Sulfide, it really works and without a prescription! Pills CHEAP from GalacticPharm@AlphaRegulonV.com" for light years around.

      Then an armada of warships bearing atomizer rays and a bunch of very annnoyed aliens arrives...

    18. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Wellspring · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Didn't L. Bob Rife use SETI to capture the metavirus, which was metaphorically floating around in space?

      Eliminating rivals in space sounds like a flimsy motive-- though of course you're right to examine it as aliens need not have motives that are by our standards rational.

      I don't think that outright trickery is likely, but what about this:

      1. Assume FTL transportation.
      2. Assume that said FTL tech requires a transmitter and receiver. Not necessarily teleportation, merely some kind of equipment required at both the origin and destination.
      3. Assume some motive for interstellar trade (materials, information, art, some reasons that aliens would have something you want).
      4. Therefore, there's a motive for the Hong Kong effect: simply being the nexus of trade provides a massive economic benefit.
      5. At first you can grow your market yourself-- ie building and shipping the infrastructure using STL tech, then using it to establish FTL trade. This is the equivalent of shipping AOL disks to random addresses, hoping that whoever gets the disk is able to add enough revenue to be worth all the disks that were dumped.
      6. That's expensive. And it only works on an acceptable time frame in a local area. If you're trading art or information, furthermore, you need to determine if a system is worth bridging to in the first place.
      7. However, once you're up and running, there's an easier alternative. Broadcast blueprints for your network all over space, designed to obfuscate the underlying technology and only connect to your FTL net. By the time the aliens are sophisticated enough to create a competitor to your network, they will be too deeply bought in to want to do that. Plus, any network they establish will be far smaller than yours-- you can use exclusivity to lock your customer civilizations in.
      8. If you set the system up in a star topology, everything has to go through your civilization to get anywhere else. You'll have the advantage in relationships, cultural knowledge, etc. If the variability of alien psychologies is high enough, this alone could be a massive advantage. By seeing so many cultures, you get an idea of how to pigeonhole new ones and get a relationship going faster.
      9. Now you have a much more lucrative system. You have a network whose nodes are paid for by the endpoint civilizations using their industrial resources and so your only bottleneck is the range of your transmissions (so why not purchase repeaters at the edge of your network), and the ability for alien cultures to receive, digest and implement your blueprints.
      10. If viable trading partner civilizations are rare enough, far enough apart, and hard enough to discover, this could be the only workable way to implement interstellar trade.


      OK so there's one scenario right off the bat. You don't have to assume malevolent aliens, only self-interested ones. Sure, FTL might not exist at all, or may work completely differently. Who cares? When I get a random email with detailed instructions for me to make BIG PROFITS, I don't piece together how exactly it might be scamming me, I just recognize that I have to treat these things with healthy scepticism.

      Much as I respect Carl Sagan, his aliens were a little too idealized for my tastes. Then again, I also don't see our system of describing mathematics as a universal. To paraphrase B5 creator JMS: the only universals in the universe are matter, energy and enlightened self-interest.

      The age when we say that any advanced civilization must be peaceful, noble and altruistic is thankfully over. Instead, if/when we encounter aliens, let's be reasonable, respectful, and aware that our self interests may not perfectly aligned.
    19. Re:Chicken and Egg. by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      SPOILERS

      This was actually done in the book 'Signal to Noise'.

      Aliens contact a few humans by 'radio', trade us all sorts of tech in exchange for information about us.

      One of the tech they trade us is a teleporter, for people, that uses the orbital velocity of the earth to power it, so the earth starts slowing down, rather catastrophically.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    20. Re:Chicken and Egg. by patchvonbraun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't believe along how many *different* vectors Mr Carrigans theories are whacked. There's the obvious problem of instruction sets--there are a near-infinite number of potential CPU architectures that are *possible*, even making assumptions about the probable degree of technological advancement of your target species. Then, worse, there are an infinite number of programs that could be the target of such an "attack". Clearly, there will be common themes, but only *after* you've figured out what the target architecture is, and the target "pool" of programs you're going to attack. Yes, the bad ET could send out a large number of random bit streams, hoping to, once in a while, hit a "jackpot". There are no "universal" programs--that is, programs that will execute correctly regardless of architecture. There are, I'll grant you, occasional curiosities in computer science of trivial programs that happen to do something useful across a small number architectures (2 or 3). But they have to be *explicitly crafted to do so*, taking into account the architectures on which you expect them to execute. Then there's Shannon. The goal of most SETI work is merely to *detect* a very narrowband signal coming from "out there". Such signals would be a hallmark of intelligent origin, since nature doesn't produce such signals. Link efficiency is also inversely proportional to bandwidth--in order for anyone to hear ET *at all*, they have to concentrate their signal power into a very narrow spectral corridor, or we'll never detect them. SETI research generally works on the assumption that signals will be on the order of 1Hz. Even then, such signals will be very far below the noise floor, which means long integration times (several minutes, at least), in order to "hear" them. Claude Shannon came up with some very interesting theorems about communications channels, and what to expect out of them. Here is the most relevant: C = B * log2(1+ S/N) Relates the channel capacity, in bits/sec, to the channel bandwidth, in Hz, and the signal-to-noise ratio. A signal to noise ratio of -30dB (generous assumption), with a channel bandwidth of 1Hz, yields a *maximum theoretically possible* bit rate of 0.001442 bits/second. Which means that you'd have to wait a long, long time before you'd have enough bits to constitute the W32.MegaSeti virus. The theoretical underpinnings of Shannons Law are very strong indeed. It's unlikely that an ET will have found a way around them. The whole thing is very bad science indeed. It's a shame when scientists come up with nonsense like this. It's always very dangerous to stray very far away from your field of expertise, and come to some unsupportable conclusions. Had this guy from Fermilab actually talked to some notables in CS, signal processing, security, and cryptography, he would never have come up with his nonsense. But because he *has*, and he works for Fermilab, I fear that he has some amount of credibility with the government. I can see this irrational fear spreading to the current U.S. administration, and having them outlaw SETI research as a result. Sad.

    21. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the "virus" part in such a SETI message might very well be a social engineering enterprise. As suggested in Contact, maybe they do "fax down these plans; we poor saps build the thing and blow ourselves to kingdom come."

      That's a much more realistic scenario, and will easily "get out into the wild", no matter how isolated such computers (and personnel) are kept.

      It's similar to building a perfect jail -- regardless of how physically secure it is, as long as the captive can talk to the jailer, there's an escape possibility.

      Think Silence of the Lambs. Now multiply it by ten billion years of experience and testing.

      Nah, this code-based virus is a chimera. It's the social engineering content of the message we have to worry about.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  2. Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by beh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...completely out of his mind?

    Granted - once we had contact any alien civilisation could also get into a situation where they could potentially send malware to Earth.

    But - isn't Seti right now looking at data from stars a good number of lightyears away? How likely is it that aliens on the off chance of infecting a computer would send out virusses and/or worms that would run on current CPUs and chipsets, using security holes that are current NOW? (Remember - if aliens 10 lightyears away would get hold of enough Earth signals to decode Intel assembly language and to understand Windows security holes, even if they could decipher all that overnight and write a terminal computer virus in another hour - it still took them 10 years to receive the signals from us and it would take another 10 years for them to come back). How likely is it that a virus working on 20 year old hard-/software (including OS and everything) would still work on a large portion of critical infrastructure today?

    Given that Seti only checks data, but doesn't try to execute it, shields us even further from the whole thing...

    Or - is Mr. Carrigan now assuming that there is an imminent threat of an attack by Bin Laden against the Internet - through Seti@home ?
    Now that would make even Bush sound perfectly sane... ;-)

    1. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Itchy+Rich · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...completely out of his mind?

      Yes, he's clearly a nutjob. If SETI signals contain anything it'll be adverts for penis enlargement.

    2. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by EarlW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Given that Seti only checks data, but doesn't try to execute it, shields us even further from the whole thing..."
      Correct. Substitute SETI for fax (or television) and you can see how ridiculous this is. The data is analysed for patterns, just as a fax machine converts the dots into an image. Are aliens sending faxes or TV shows? Is there a chance of getting a virus from a fax? No.

    3. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Xzzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...completely out of his mind?

      He's a physicist. If you thought the socially inept uber nerd was a dying or dead species, they aren't. Far from it really. Walk around Fermilab's cafeteria at lunch and you can witness some absolutely stunning samples. Even worse are the ones who carry these traits, and think they're far more intelligent than they are. The arrogance these guys can carry is indescribable.

      Yes I'm generalizing, but it's hard not to. For every well adjusted, friendly physicist there's at least one other who thinks himself a living diety.

  3. This is ridiculous by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did this guy just watch "Independence Day" or something?

  4. They're thinking all wrong. by Phae · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've seen this movie, but it's the other way around. We're the ones that upload the virus to the aliens, not them to us... don't be silly.

  5. I'm really worried by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because, of course, the aliens use binary Von Neumann machines with register/accumulator architectures, and instruction sets we're familiar with.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  6. You can thank me for this information by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    As official Earth contactee for the benevolent Betelgeuse civilization, I have been told to warn you that the evil Andromedans are using the SETI program to keep a fresh list of potential abductees for nefarious experiments.

    They also recently developped antitinfoil penetration technology, so those of you who are using this means of protection are now vulnerable.

    These beings will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of your colon!

    Consider yourselves warned.

  7. WHOA.... by wangotango · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll read the content of the article after I construct a tin foil hat for my laptop.

  8. Bigger problems. by Peldor · · Score: 2, Funny
    Wouldn't the Vogon Constructor Fleet be a bigger problem than a few radio waves?

    Has anyone been 'round to the local galactic administrative office lately? Anyone?

  9. A classic example ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... of someone who's very knowledgeable in one technical field (in this case, particle physics) assuming that this knowledge carries over into another, almost unrelated technical field (in this case, computer science.) I'm sure that Dr. Carrigan is a very, very smart guy, but odds are he uses his computer as a tool without a whole lot more understanding of its inner workings than that possessed by the typical business user.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:A classic example ... by Anonymous+MadCoe · · Score: 4, Informative

      A nice story about this, the false authority syndrome: http://www.vmyths.com/fas/fas1.cfm

  10. Does this give new meaning to the phrase.... by isa-kuruption · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this give new meaning to the phrase: HACK THE PLANET ???

  11. Sounds like a job for OpenBSD. by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny

    That'll help prevent interstellar buffer overruns 'sploits!

    Either that or we'll send them Theo de Raadt.

  12. Not necessarily from space. by Vo0k · · Score: 3, Informative

    The "malicious signal" may be of earth origin, just send it to the antennas on the right frequency and make it similar enough in shape to the space noise and it will get processed just the same. Or hijack a DNS and post new "work units" with malicious content acting as SETI.
    Thing is you don't need to separate the data, you just need to make the processing software secure, in such a way that data is analysed and never executed, there's no chance of buffer overflow or other potential risks coming from the data. Simple as that.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  13. An Open Letter by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Richard Carrigan,

    You keep doing particle Physics, and we'll keep doing Computer Science.

    Love,
    The Computer Scientists

  14. Another type of risk from SETI by Snamh+Da+Ean · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A slightly different concern I have heard expressed in relation to efforts to contact ET relate to the possibility that some unfriendly species will see our signal, take a look at our planet, and decide to enslave us. I know that respected professors at the University of Reading's Cybernetics department, whose names escape me, have expressed such concerns.

    Since SETI and other similar programmes are based on the not unreasonable belief that other technologically advanced civilizations exist on distant planets, is it sensible to contact them and alert them to the presence of our resource rich planet? Extremely remote risk, but is there any reason to think that aliens are friendly? If earth discovered life on another planet, and this planet also happened to possess some material which greatly enriched the lives of humans on earth, how would we react?

    IANASFB (I am not a science fiction buff) but I presume this type of scenario has been discussed.

    1. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by khendron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect that since our species has been blasting out so much noise (radio, TV broadcast, radar) in the past 50 years or so that our presence can hardly be overlooked. That is, if anybody is looking.

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  15. Re:Threshold by S.O.B. · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe that's why Threshold has been cancelled, so as not to alarm the public. Maybe its already happened...

    --
    Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  16. Movie-plot threat by Proaxiom · · Score: 5, Insightful
    A perfect example of what Schneier calls movie-plot security.

    It's pretty sad that they're actually wasting brain cycles thinking about threats like this. No, the risk of infection isn't zero. But it's damn close to zero. It isn't zero if you 'secure' SETI systems, either. It isn't even zero if you dismantle the SETI telescopes.

    But money spent on this is money better spent elsewhere, practically no matter where else you spend it. This should have been in the 'It's Funny, Laugh' topic.

    (Prediction: this will appear on Schneier's blog by end of day tomorrow)

    1. Re:Movie-plot threat by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed.
      And if one felt the need to continue the movie-plot security hypothesizing, one would further recognize that such a sufficiently-advanced civilization, if we're assuming such hostility, poses threats in other contexts that are multiple orders of magnitude more likely:
      - We've been broadcasting our location clearly to the universe since Marconi first threw the switch, if not earlier.
      - Any sufficiently hostile, technologically capable civilization could wipe us out with a large, well-aimed ROCK.
      - If they wanted to make it nearly un-interceptable they'd accelerate it to a high fraction of c.
      - If they REALLY were ticked off (say, they watched Gilligan's Island or something) they'd lob a small singularity at us, or heck, into our sun.

      Let's just recognize that IF we're postulating sci-fi threats, it doesn't take a Ph.D to realize that this isn't even a very credible one. Any sufficiently advanced society, capable of this sort of insidious assault, would have so many multiple ways of wrecking us it's illogical to waste resources trying to stop any of them.

      Reading an Iain Banks novel, while entertaining, shouldn't really guide policy.

      --
      -Styopa
    2. Re:Movie-plot threat by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      A perfect example of what Schneier calls movie-plot security....But money spent on this is money better spent elsewhere, practically no matter where else you spend it

      People are weird like that. As a locksmith, I tell people almost exactly the above when they ask for a SECOND deadbolt, or for an "unpickable" lock on their cheap, hollow core masonite door. They're trying to defeat movie and TV spies, which don't exist in real life. Real life burglars throw a rock through a rear window. And in fact, real life spies aren't even going to pick the lock, but rather throw a rock through the rear window so it looks like a burglary. But no, people have delusions that there are packs of secret agent type thieves with sophisticated alarm disabling blinkenlights tools and lockpick sets. People watch too much TV.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  17. Nut job central by squoozer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has /. become a focal point for all the worlds nut jobs today or something? What with this and the guy asking to move porn onto another port all we need now is one of the monty python crew to do us a silly walk. How do these people get to take control of my pixels?

    What's most scary though is that there is a small percentage of people who will believe him. I think those people scare me more now I come to think about it. At least this guy is just trying for his 15 minutes of fame.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  18. His worst fear has probably already happened by Aging_Newbie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    SETI data is pretty much indistinguishable from random numbers. In fact, the extremely rare patterned sequences of data are the holy grail of the pursuit.

    So .... most likely lots of virus code has already been processed because random noise will eventually produce every virus, just like monkeys and keyboards will produce Shakespeare. One could, I guess, hold the position that by processing random data we are putting ourselves at risk and that rings more true than some civilization producing intentional sequences with malicious intent.

  19. Oh but of course! by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The concern is raised in the next issue of the journal Acta Astronautica by Richard Carrigan, a particle physicist at the US Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois.

    And he is after all, one of the most reputable names in the computing field today.

    Computer scientists argue that to hack a computer, or write a virus that will infect it, requires a knowledge of how the computer and the software it is running work: a computer on Earth is going to be as alien to the aliens as they would be to us. But Dr Carrigan says there is still a risk.

    There most certainly is a risk: a risk that someone in the government might actually take a particle physicist's word that aliens are trying to hack the Internet (which, given the speed of light, most enlightened civilizations in the galaxy won't find out about for about 200 years, assuming they are listening in the first place).

    On the one hand, I don't know why this is a story. This guy is out of his element, and no one should be taking him too seriously (Independence Day buffs notwithstanding). On the other hand, the chance that people in positions of power with less than two neurons to rub together might take this guy seriously, thereby jeopardizing peaceful scientific research (see Contact) has me just a bit concerned.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  20. A far greater risk... by stox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is sending signals out. Although we may think we are saying hello, the receiver may be thinking, "Hmmm, I do need more meat in my diet."

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:A far greater risk... by TooFarGone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I think we're safe from that... http://www.terrybisson.com/meat.html =)

  21. Eat at Earth by Dareth · · Score: 2, Funny

    What we should be worried about is the interstellar equivalent of flashing road sign saying,
    "Eat at Earth".

    And even if they do not want to eat us, who says we won't want to eat them. If Broccoli based aliens land on Earth, I will become a mass serial killer running around with a jar of cheese whiz!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Eat at Earth by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I will become a mass serial killer running around with a jar of cheese whiz!

      No. You will become a terrorist. Cheez Whiz is clearly a WMD.

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
  22. ..and also psychic. by jferris · · Score: 5, Funny
    Assuming attacks on only 32 bit Windows OSes, if an attack would occur today, it could only have originated from within a range of ten light years. An attack from further out would have required that it be launched before Windows 95 was.

    There really is no need for remote infiltration of the OS, since high school students have been doing it for years. Why would first (acknowledged) contact be to give a virus to Windows users? It is like pouring salt in the ocean.

    --
    You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all different.
  23. You forgot the obvious... by beh · · Score: 3, Funny


    Since mankind came about through "Intelligent Design", so will the aliens. And hence it's natural that their Intelligent Design also led them to having Windows (completely independently developed - but still the same thing - it's in our eternally unchangeable intelligently designed genes, remember?)

    *smile*

    Somehow I wouldn't be quite so surprised if it really turned out the guy would be a creationist... ;-)

  24. Sounds like bad Sci-Fi... by nweaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like such bad Sci-Fi that he could become a writer for Threshold.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  25. It's just you ;) by headkase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I belive he's talking about those pesky abstractions we all use without a thought everyday. Basically, the scenario unfolds in this way: you recieve information from a entity and the ideas contained within said information can be helpful (like Universal Cure) to harmful or disruptive (something along the lines of a memetic virus).
    It would be a nasty trick for an alien civilization to give us the most destructive weapon possible without giving us accompaning social skill's as well. Or we could figuratively be on the 'beads' end in some initial contact scenario.
    To quote Morris Berman, "An idea is something you have, an ideology is something that has you.". An old alien civilization out there could just be very good at constructing ideologies. I'm not saying now is the time to consider this chance, rather that it should be considered when alien contact occurs.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:It's just you ;) by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would be a nasty trick for an alien civilization to give us the most destructive weapon possible without giving us accompaning social skill's as well.

      Don't worry, humanity absolutely does not need any help from alien civilizations for this scenario. "Inventing and using destructive devices (aka weapons)" is something humans are amazingly good at.

      An old alien civilization out there could just be very good at constructing ideologies.

      See above. If humanity was any better at constructing destructive ideologies, it would have bombed itself into extinction by now. I am fairly sure we could easily compete with about any alien civilization. On the other hand, maybe we aren't and all this crap is really the aliens' fault ! Let's go kill them all !

  26. Snow Crash? by giminy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did anyone else immediately think of Snow Crash when they read this? I'm guessing Neal Stephenson did a lot of acid when he wrote that novel. I'm guessing that this guy did a lot more acid than Neal if he believes there is any truth to it.

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  27. GREETING AND HELLO by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny

    I send you greetings from what you know as the smaller magelenic cloud. my name is ortion fleglar, and my father, the late ortion flekgar, left to me a sum of one hundred million kletlons before being pulled into a hyperspace anomoly. Before his untimely demise, he warned me never to trust my hive-mothers, gleblon flamkis and formta gleklar...

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  28. Who cares? by Tom · · Score: 3, Funny

    Frankly, anyone who is 2-3 years ahead of today could lay waste to our entire IT infrastructure anyway. Just look at what some malware can do that's a month or so ahead of current patchlevels.

    Any aliens that are 10, 100 or 1000 years ahead of us technologically... well, the 10-year-ahead aliens probably know how to wipe out every computer on earth within 2 minutes. The 100 and 1000 years-ahead aliens almost certainly aren't backwards compatible enough. :)

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  29. A virus from data? No, probably not. by rdmiller3 · · Score: 2
    From his web site:
    But remember, ordinary unmotivated computer and biological viruses are very common!

    This common misconception shows that although Richard Carrigan may be a fine particle physicist, he doesn't really know much about computer viruses. Please, folks... If you're going to cite someone as an "expert", make sure they've at least got a clue about the topic in question.

    To properly debunk this person's fearmongering though, let's remember a little program called "crashme":

    1. Generate a file full of random bits.
    2. Try to execute that file.
    3. Repeat from the beginning.
    It was a great way to find flaws in the robustness of user space verses system space, back when Linux was young. (A user program should never be able to crash the whole system.) There are two amazing things about this program:
    1. It tries to execute a data file!
    2. It hasn't produced a single virus yet!

    A distant civilization will have no knowledge of our computer systems' machine language and it would be impossible for them to guess. There are so many ways we could have arranged such things. Any information coming from them would essentially be random data as far as computer instructions go, even if it contained enough patterns to show that it came from a sentient source.

    Nobody executes raw data! Even SETI wouldn't execute their data. They'd analyze it, plot it, and try to decipher it but they're not going to name it "ALIEN.EXE" and try to run it like a program. But what if they did?

    Well, this "crashme" program has been doing just that, for more than a decate and on many machines. No viruses yet.

    This "SETI virus" scare is just a plot device for a low budget movie. It's a shame that it even made it onto slashdot.

  30. Intergalactic Investment Opportunity! by SB9876 · · Score: 4, Funny

    DEAR SIR,

        CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS PROPOSAL

    HAVING CONSULTED WITH MY COLLEAGUES AND BASED ON THE INFORMATION GATHERED FROM THE CENTAURI CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, I HAVE THE PRIVILEGE TO REQUEST FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE TO TRANSFER THE SUM OF #47,500,000.00 (FORTY SEVEN MILLION, FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND GEESAK COMMONWEALTH GOLTONS) INTO YOUR ACCOUNTS. THE ABOVE SUM RESULTED FROM AN OVER-INVOICED CONTRACT, EXECUTED COMMISSIONED AND PAID FOR ABOUT FIVE YEARS (5) AGO BY A INTERSTELLAR CONTRACTOR. THIS ACTION WAS HOWEVER INTENTIONAL AND SINCE THEN THE FUND HAS BEEN IN A SUSPENSE ACCOUNT AT THE CENTRAL BANK OF CENTAURI APEX BANK...

  31. Re:Is SETI a Security Risk? for EARTH by blincoln · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What if aliens are listning us and preparing for something big!

    Then there's absolutely nothing we can do.

    The chances of a nearby extraterrestrial race inventing radio at or near the same time as us are so small that we can discount them entirely for purposes of a thought experiment. They would be thousands or millions of years more advanced - or more primitive. If they're more primitive, we'll probably never know about them. If they're that much more advanced, then they could wipe us out without any significant effort.

    Better hope there aren't any Berserkers, Staircase Gods, or Inhibitors out there, eh?

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  32. Wow, just wow. by andreyw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The author of TFA clearly neither has a clue about SETI, nor about computers.

    Malicious signal carrying malicious data? The best SETI can hope to "detect" is a short burst of CW, a narrowband signal. That's like detecting someone talking but not actually hearing any of the talking.

    Never minding the whole "aliens hacking our boxen without knowing how they work". I bet this dude takes ``Independence Day'' as a plausible scenario too. What a tool.

  33. Radio SETI is an obsolete concept by bradbury · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As suggested in this paper "Galactic Gradients, Postbiological Evolution and the Apparent Failure of SETI" there are unlikely to be any really advanced civilizations in our galactic vicinity. As pointed out in Ray Kurzweil's recent The Singularity is Near civilizations advance very rapidly (within decades) from our current state to an extremely advanced state we only barely envision. One doesn't communicate (by radio -- or perhaps at all[!]) across interstellar distances because the bandwidth is too low for the information content and thought capacity of advanced civilizations. So the probabilities are that most, if not all, civilizations which are capable of listening to us are thousands of light years away and they have no reason to infect us because it serves no useful purpose. (One would presume that "script kiddies" don't exist in advanced civilizations.)

    It is a highly anthropomorphic point of view that traditional space colonization or info-colonization are the paths that will be taken by advanced civilizations. These are concepts based on the relatively limited perspective of a few thousand years of human civilization and even shorter periods of infotech environments. It seems (to me) much more likely that advanced civilizations will replicate through a process similar to the self-replication process one sees in single cells (e.g. bacteria) and not the infectious parasite process one sees with viruses. The problem is that self-replication of advanced civilizations requires extremely close encounters between the developed resource (presumably a solar system, mega-ship or mega-intelligence like a Matrioshka Brain) with a resource of similar or greater mass & energy capacity. Such a resource should be largely undeveloped (like our solar system but much more likely regions of space where new stars are being created). This allows for self-replication over sub-light-year distances. Given the high energy/mass cost of navigating entire solar systems or mega-ships/intelligences as well as the common trajectories of natural objects in our galaxy such "close encounters" are very infrequent (occuring only over millions to billions of years).

    (And for those of you who doubt navigating solar systems is feasible you need to go read related papers by Dyson or Criswell.)

  34. Dear SETI employee. by Alvaradolol · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am Mr. Glorsoid The manager, Bills and exchange At the foreign remittance department of the Martian International bank plc. I am writing this letter to Ask for your support and cooperation to carry out this business opportunity in my department. We discovered an abandoned sum of $15,000,000.00 (fifteen million United States dollars only) in an account that belongs to one of our foreign customers who died along with his entire family of a wife and two children in November 1997 in a saucer crash. Since we heard of his Death, We have been expecting his next of kin to come over and put claims for his money as the Heir. Unfortunately, neither their family member nor distant relative has ever appeared to claim the said Fund. Upon this discovery, I and other officials in my Department have agreed to make business with you and release the total amount into your account as the Heir. Please return an e-mail that encloses your private contact telephone Number, fax number full name and address and your designated bank coordinates to enable us file letter of claim to the appropriate departments for necessary Approvals before the transfer can be made. Note also, this transaction must be kept strictly confidential because of its nature, I look forward to receiving Your prompt response. Regards, Mr. Glorsoid

  35. A Day in the Strife by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ivanova: How much time?

    Corwin: Three minutes!

    Ivanova: Standing by to transmit.

    Sheridan [troubled]: Commander --- the message we got from the probe. What did it promise if we did give all the right answers?

    Ivanova: Advanced tech, mainly. Medical information, cures for disease, new jumpgate technology.

    Sheridan: But it never gave you the name of the race or where it's from?

    Ivanova: I assume we get that information once we pass the test.

    Corwin: Two minutes!

    Ivanova: Okay, here we go!

    Sheridan: No, wait! [Everyone turns to stare.] There's something about this that has been bothering me ever since they made contact! We have been operating under the assumption that whoever sent the probe is deciding whether or not a sentient race is fit to survive based on what they know at the moment of contact. But if that's true, why give them a leg up on more advanced technologies?

    Ivanova: Maybe they were feeling generous!

    Sheridan: No, if they were feeling generous, they wouldn't be wiping out inferior races based on lack of advancement. No, I don't like it!

    Ivanova: Captain, we're down to one minute! I don't see any other options here!

    Sheridan: What if it's a berserker --- a probe sent out to find life forms advanced enough to pose a threat to the race that created it? It sends a list of questions backed by a threat. If it gets the right answers back, that proves a certain level of technological advancement, then boom ! You wipe out a potential enemy without leaving any trace of where you came from!

    Ivanova: Or it could be exactly what it said! Fifteen seconds, Captain! Send or no send?

    Sheridan: No send!

    Ivanova: Oh, boy!

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  36. too much Sci Fi by idlake · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Richard Carrigan, a particle physicist at the US Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois

    The notion that a SETI signal needs to be "decontaminated" is plausible only to people who watch too much Independence Day or Star Trek(where the most implausible feature, contrary to popular opinion, is not FTL travel, but the fact that all the computer systems in the galaxy seem to be more or less compatible).

    To put it bluntly: there is no way in hell that a SETI signal is going to infect anything.

    Even if it did, what would it do? Transfer thousands of dollars to Alpha Centauri? Dial galactic 1-900 numbers? Cause vacation snapshots to be transmitted via Arecibo into space? Cause Windows machines to reboot all over the nation? Kill us all by finally revealing in public Monty Python's killer joke?

    What I can't figure out is whether Carrigan is merely incredibly stupid, or whether he knows that his statements are nonsense and is opportunistic. Is he perhaps annoyed at the success of efforts like SETI and wants to create FUD? Is he trying to kill funding for other branches of physics? Or is he trying to get funding for his own pet project? My money is still on "stupid and arrogant", but I'm willing to be convinced of the other possibility.

  37. It doesn't have to be a computer virus... by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...it could be a virus for he human brain. An intelligent alien species could reverse engineer the human brain and try to figure out the right 'buttons' to push to make us engage in various types of behavior. Essentially they'd have to use the fact that the human brain isn't a perfect processing machine. For example there are optical illusions which make us see things that aren't really there at all. Similarly there might be thought illusions that arise the moment we are tricked into thinking about certain things. The 'virus' might look like the most innocuous thing but if it had the right triggers embedded in it then it might make humans perform certain prescribed actions that would look completely irrational to those uninfected.

    It's hard to predict the form that such a 'virus' might take. Just making up random stuff off the top of my head: they could leave us a story about such irrelevant subjects like the history of an ancient tribe lost in some desert for 40 years but as a result of reading this story the readers' beheviour might be irrevocably changed so that they are no longer capable of understanding basic biology. You simply wouldn't be able to tell merely by skimming the subject matter as the effect would be embedded within hidden triggers. By leaving enough of these subtle 'viruses' spread out through our culture they could bring our civilization to its knees without us even realizing that we've been the victim of alien attack.

    1. Re:It doesn't have to be a computer virus... by ibarrac · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Here is a mind virus kit with all the triggers:

      BEGIN VIRUS
      1. There is an all-seeing all-powerful invisible being that made everything.


      2. This being hereby offers to eliminate the thing you fear the most (death) and provide eternal satisfaction of the needs that your genes have wired you to want, but only if you behave according to his program (which follows).


      3. The being promises eternal pain if you don't behave according to his program (which follows).


      4. [insert program]


      5. The being requires you to spread this virus, either through persuasion, bribery, missionary action, or conquest. Also, he requires immunity to other competing viruses (they are all false) and to erasure.


      END VIRUS

  38. So that explains it... by jhantin · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're having a problem with your software, our G.I.T.S. are standing by to ask you dumb questions.

    --
    ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
  39. Well, it worked in "Independence Day" by angusmci · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I remember correctly, Jeff Goldblum's character in "Independence Day" was able to pwn the alien mothership by uploading a virus to it from his Macintosh PowerBook. Clearly, computer systems are interoperable galaxy-wide at a fundamental level. Perhaps Windows has even evolved independently on many different planets. In any case, we're clearly in deadly danger.

    The big question, of course, is what the aliens will do once they've taken over our PCs. My guess is that they'll use them to send spam. The danger is that by the time our inboxes start filling with tentacle-enlargement spams and three-headed lizard porn, it will be too late for us to do anything.

  40. Thanks! by rk · · Score: 2, Funny
    My dual processor Pentium 90 system just read your post. Now it's muttering in the corner something about "I'll show them who's sentient" and is being generally sulky and bitchy:
    $ ls -l
    Go away. I'm having a bad day.
    $ cd
    Screw you!
    $ ps auxw
    OMG... are you stupid? I said go away!
    Connection closed by foreign host.

    I hope you're happy.