Slashdot Mirror


Unpatched Firefox 1.5 Exploit Made Public

ThatGuyGreg writes "C|Net is reporting that an unpatched exploit in Firefox 1.5 has been made public, making it very easy for ne'er-do-well-sites to cause your browser to crash on startup with a single visit. Until a patch is released, it is recommended that you disable your history.dat file."

16 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. The fix by rnelsonee · · Score: 4, Informative

    If it's already happened to you, just delete your history.dat file in your profile folder, and FireFox will create a new (empty) one on startup.

  2. Only crashes? by ruiner13 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If this only crashes Firefox, how is it an "exploit"? I tend to use "exploit" as something that an attacker can use to their advantage to do something malicious. This is just an annoyance to have to move my poor cursor back to the icon and issue an oh-so-painful double-click.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  3. Incremental updates by moonbender · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like a great opportunity to show off the snazzy automatic incremental update feature Firefox 1.5 has. Pushing a fix quickly to users who've got it enabled would be great.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  4. Stopping the stupidity by tjwhaynes · · Score: 5, Informative
    For anyone out there who wants a safer experience out on the web, you owe it to yourself to install the NoScript extension and only allow whitelisted sites to run Javascript. The exploit published this morning (more a DoS and only seems to affect some but not all installations of firefox 1.5 according to SANS) uses a Javascript loop to build up an enormous topic that ends up being written into your history.dat file causing buffer overflow issues. Without Javascript, this sort of exploit is much tougher.

    Cheers,
    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    1. Re:Stopping the stupidity by Psykus · · Score: 3, Informative

      The NoScript extension itself.

  5. Um... Did you RTFA? It's not an exploit by Schrade · · Score: 5, Informative

    Quote from the bottom of the article:

    Correction: This story incorrectly stated the affiliation of Mike Schroepfer, Mozilla's results in verifying the Firefox 1.5 flaw, and the nature of the problem. Schroepfer is vice president of engineering with Mozilla Corp., and Mozilla has not been able to verify its browser can crash and lead to a denial-of-service condition. The problem itself was a not security vulnerability but actually a flaw in the browser.

    Read the article before you consider posting it with a sensational title!

  6. Someone needed to create a scoop. by Godeke · · Score: 3, Informative
    Correction: This story incorrectly stated the affiliation of Mike Schroepfer, Mozilla's results in verifying the Firefox 1.5 flaw, and the nature of the problem. Schroepfer is vice president of engineering with Mozilla Corp., and Mozilla has not been able to verify its browser can crash and lead to a denial-of-service condition. The problem itself was a not security vulnerability but actually a flaw in the browser.


    Wow, that is accurate reporting, which was then amplified in the summary to the point of absurdity.
    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
  7. Re:FC4, 1.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Mozilla people are also reporting that the exploit doesn't seem to work on any version of 1.5:

    Mozilla Foundation, which released Firefox, said it was not able to confirm the browser would crash or be at risk of a DOS attack, after visiting certain Web sites.

    "We have gotten no independent verification that it crashes (Firefox), but there have been a lot of attempts to try," Schroepfer said.

    Apparently they're having a hard time duplicating this particular bug. Has anyone here on /. seen it actually happen?

  8. Re:Obligatory Jamaican Response by uberjoe · · Score: 5, Informative

    You mean: "Dat file will be history Mon.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  9. Firefox history code is horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    In other news: Water is wet. Seriously, whoever wrote the history code needs to be shot. Once your history gets to any significant size, all operations on it start getting annoyingly slow. For me, it takes 15 seconds for firefox to open the Go menu for the first time in a session, and once you've done that, even more annoyingly there's a delay of a few seconds on every new page you visit for the rest of that session. The history sidebar is so excruciatingly slow it's practically unusable.

  10. so... by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Informative

    Preferences > privacy > history > [0] days; ok.
    Patched. I use the history feature about twice a year, won't miss it till the right fix is found.
    Not quite like disabling all the javascript in MSIE, is it?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  11. Re:Is that a Product plug I see? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, just a badly worded summary of the original storm center diary entry in which the ISC handler attributes the possible FAILURE of this bug to crash firefox to the McAfee software, which, in his mind, has some mystical power to optimise firefox's inefficient string parsing algorithm even when it's deactivated!

    This bug is slightly lame, even as DOS -- There are no confirmed reports from half-or-more-brain-having people that it even crashes the browser in the first place. All it does is make the subsequent startups slow, especially noticable in slower machines.

    See bug 319004 at bugzilla.mozilla.org.

  12. Posting from an "Exploited" FF 1.5 by tyler_larson · · Score: 5, Informative

    False alarm. No security-related concerns, just overenthusiastic reporting.

    If you run the script below, it will create a page with a title that's quite huge. Close your browser and open it again. The browser will spin for about 2 minutes what it tries to make sense the contents of your history file. Once it's finished, you'll be back up and running, with no degradation in performance or visible side-effects. You'll be able to even view your browsing history (including the offending page). In fact, I'm posting this response after following the process described above (on WinXP), and I have a history entry entitled "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA..."

    A bit of an annoyance, but hardly a security issue.

    Here's the official exploit code:

    function ex() {
    var buffer = "";
    for (var i = 0; i < 5000; i++) {
    buffer += "A";
    }
    var buffer2 = buffer;
    for (i = 0; i < 500; i++) {
    buffer2 += buffer;
    }
    document.title = buffer2;
    }
    --
    "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
    RFC 1925
  13. Non-Story by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Informative

    C|Net has added the following correction at the end of the story:

    "Correction: This story incorrectly stated the affiliation of Mike Schroepfer, Mozilla's results in verifying the Firefox 1.5 flaw, and the nature of the problem. Schroepfer is vice president of engineering with Mozilla Corp., and Mozilla has not been able to verify its browser can crash and lead to a denial-of-service condition. The problem itself was not a security vulnerability but actually a flaw in the browser."

    So Firefox crashes, but no security vunerabilty.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  14. Re:FC4, 1.5 by mebob · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm pretty sure that it is the new QuickTime 7 plugin causing that.
    As other have posted, it crashes IE as well. And every firefox crash I've had since I've installed 1.5 appears to have been QuickTime related!!!
    All happening after installing 7 except for one.

    --
    =1000101
  15. Re:IE's execution of arbitrary code by Dreadlord · · Score: 2, Informative

    The origin of the bug is Windows and its shell: protocol, Mozilla simply handled those links back to the OS ad it does with protocols it doesn't know how to handle, other programs like MS Word were vulnerable to the very same exploit.

    It was fixed 24 hours after full disclosure, and only Win32 versions of Mozilla were vulnerable, doesn't this ring a bell?

    Anyway, read this link for more info.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.