Slashdot Mirror


Robot Receptionist with an Attitude

techno-vampire writes "Carnegie Mellon University is experimenting with a robot receptionist with a personality. The article on NPR tells about the receptionist, named Tank. Tank lives in a computer, with a Frankenstein-like face showing on the monitor. He responds to typed-in questions, including personal ones, with a rather curious personality courtesy of the Drama Department. Among other things, he doesn't seem to like his boss, Dr. Reid Simmons, very much. If asked, Tank will tell you he's also worked at NASA, and failed as a satellite robot. A job at the CIA was also a bust. Dr. Simmons explains that they're trying to make it easier for people to interact with robots, and upgrades are planned."

117 comments

  1. In the near future... by Red+Samurai · · Score: 4, Funny

    We'll all have robots pissing in our coffee...

    1. Re:In the near future... by dpiven · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last place I worked, the coffee already looked and tasted like used machine oil, so I don't think too many people would notice the difference.

    2. Re:In the near future... by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      The coffee tastes like machine oil? Like... maybe someone just put a drop in, say, for the flavor?

      For the love of everything you hold dear, GET OUT OF THERE! Retreat to a same distance and open fire on the building until it is SLAG. Don't let ANYTHING get out. We'll have to pray they haven't turned the furnace into a Langstrom field generator already...

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
  2. Great! by jacobcaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our receptionist is already surly and a bit gruff, we can replace her with "Tank" and dramatically increase our gruffness-to-customer ratio! We'll also be able to irritate our customers 24x7 instead of the normal 8x5 we currently get out of our receptionist!

    1. Re:Great! by Phariom · · Score: 0

      Which makes me wonder how long it will take them to replace the little punks who work at McDonald's with one. Remember the Café 80's in Back to the Future 2?

      "You must have the special!"

    2. Re:Great! by MattPat · · Score: 1

      Imagine the appointment reminder cards it would send... or how it would react if someone had to cancel their appointment...

    3. Re:Great! by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      Can you remember the robot Marvin from Hitchikers Guide To The Galaxy ???


      Marvin: You can blame the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation for making androids with GPP...
      Arthur: Um... what's GPP?
      Marvin: Genuine People Personalities. I'm a personality prototype. You can tell, can't you...?


      Oh, this invasion of personality enabled robots makes me feel so depressed ;(

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    4. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget receptionists. Call me when they need help debugging the robot hooker...

  3. Don't plug it into any other computers... by Beolach · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... or else they'll commit suicide.

    --
    Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
  4. Humanity: Obsolete by Yirimyah · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe they'll invent a psychotic computer. --Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes

    1. Re:Humanity: Obsolete by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know if Parry would be happy working there.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  5. "easier for people to interact with robots" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aha, so "lies all the time" == "more humanlike" ?

    1. Re:"easier for people to interact with robots" by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1
      Tank: Who are you?

      Microsoft Bob Mark II: I'm Microsoft InsuranceSalesBob. Have you ever thought about what would happen to your family if you were in an accident and couldn't earn a living?

      Tank: No. I don't have a family. I don't even have a (censored). (pointing downward)

      MISBII: (grabs Tank's hand and shakes it. Tank's hand falls off.) See? It could happen to anybody!

      Tank: You %$&^ hat.

  6. now with... by PoPRawkZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now with genuine people personality! I'm so depressed.

    --
    peace,
    -Grokent
    1. Re:now with... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I'm so depressed.

      So is Tank.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:now with... by GoodOmens · · Score: 1

      This is just screaming Marvin the paranoid android.
      Marvin: Here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they ask me to take you to the bridge. Call that job satisfaction, 'cause I don't.

  7. Not that different from previous roboceptionist by Agelmar · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is really not that new. Before the current roboceptionist, we had Valerie. I really can't tell the difference between the two - when they first installed Tank, I thought it was a Halloween joke. (He looks somewhat like Frankenstein on the monitor). There is a different face and a different voice, but it seems the same. If you ask "Will it rain tomorrow" he will either not understand your question, or give you the current weather. Trying to find out tomorrow's weather is still rather difficult. Yes, it is an interesting experiment, and yes, it can give directions (rather clearly) to various locations on campus, but it's not at the point where secretaries need to worry about losing their jobs (yet).

    1. Re:Not that different from previous roboceptionist by Iriel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I went to school at The Art Instititute of Pittsburgh (just a short bus ride away) and had done a few internship projects at CMU. I'd seen Valerie, and while I understand that this is about the advancement of robotics, AI and such, there was another fundamental flaw with it. (Please keep in mind, I'm not knocking it, this is just one gripe):

      The animations from the head could have used a serious visit from someone skilled in 3D animation. If we're talking about creating an experience like that of dealing with an actual receptionist, the visuals of the roboceptionist need to look a little more advanced than pre-Lawnmowerman. I reiterate: the idea and execution had many aspects that were very interesting about how it worked, but when trying to create a robot that functions like a person (in limited scope), it would be nice to see equal attention paid to the 'human' side of it as the robotic instead of looking like something from an 80's sci-fi movie.

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
    2. Re:Not that different from previous roboceptionist by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1, Insightful


      Actually I think this may be deliberate to avoid Mori's Uncanny Valley. Since we have not yet advanced to the point where you can make the animation and response indistiguishable from a human, most AI researchers seem to have gone back to almost cartoonish interfaces, which people react to much better than an almost, but not quite right, photo realistic representation.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    3. Re:Not that different from previous roboceptionist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent has a great point! Please mod it up!

    4. Re:Not that different from previous roboceptionist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me and everyone I knew at CMU loathed Valerie. It's one thing for an AI agent to not understand a natural language question. It's another thing to give you attitude about it. From the description, Tank sounds equally surly and unlikeable. The drama department has proved that it can create AIs that inspire emotional responses. Now let's see if they can inspire anything other than negative emotional responses.

    5. Re:Not that different from previous roboceptionist by Kuxman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I checked Tank out before leaving for winter break, and there didn't seem to be anything different between Valerie. However, they must have fixed one bug in it... When I visited for my admissions interview, I got there a couple hours early, so I was wondering around and found Val. I typed, "hello, my name is ____" (long polish name), and Val started to respond by saying "Hello, ..." then came a screeching "beep"! Val crashed trying to say my last name. Next the X session that it was running on came crashing down like a rock with error messages everywhere. Guess she didn't like us Polacks. However, Tank isn't a racist. Maybe he understands what it's like to be a minority because of his hideous face. Tank must take some serious discrimination for that. Poor guy...

      --
      http://www.asti-usa.com
    6. Re:Not that different from previous roboceptionist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that; I learned something new!

    7. Re:Not that different from previous roboceptionist by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Guess they are using Festival as text to speech converter - it used to be rather crashy. Here is something to play with: http://www.aerospacesoftware.com/text-to-speech-ho wto.html

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  8. Starship Titanic, anyone? by Hosiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Flash to the adventure game of a few year's back, "Starship Titanic"? Based on Douglas Adams' work and the game had voices from members of the Monty Python troop portraying various robots and creatures. I never solved all the way through it without the cheat book, but the game environment finds one talking to the bots just to see what outrageous thing they'll say next. Just don't put this kind of thing in any kind of mission-critical function...

    1. Re:Starship Titanic, anyone? by seldrick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just don't put this kind of thing in any kind of mission-critical function... No kidding. This great "productivity saver" is going to cost a fortune before it saves a dime. Everyone in the office will be neglecting their work to queue up to play with the secretary. I've worked at offices like that, but she was a flirty, hot 19 -year old instead of a box with a Frankenstein face. At least Tank won't need maternity leave.

    2. Re:Starship Titanic, anyone? by BushCheney08 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've worked at offices like that, but she was a flirty, hot 19 -year old instead of a box with a Frankenstein face.

      I think most of us have worked at places with both types of girls working the reception desk. : p

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    3. Re:Starship Titanic, anyone? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Notice that Tank is replacing the cutsie Valerie-bot, a spunky Barbara Streisand fan?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Starship Titanic, anyone? by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anything would be an improvement over a Barbra Streisand fan.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  9. ok, but... by User+956 · · Score: 1

    Carnegie Mellon University is experimenting with a robot receptionist with a personality. The article on NPR tells about the receptionist, named Tank. Tank lives in a computer, with a Frankenstein-like face showing on the monitor.

    the real question is, can it find Sarah Connor?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:ok, but... by ActionJesus · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is slashdot. Fark is that way ---->

    2. Re:ok, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the real question is, can it find Sarah Connor?

      No, the real question is, does it run Linux?

    3. Re:ok, but... by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      curioser and curioser... I don't think that's any Windows desktop on the other monitor on the right hand side of the area...

      I've just emailed him to find out... his email is on his own website

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    4. Re:ok, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but it can give you her phone number, email address and class schedule.

  10. Hmm.... by killeena · · Score: 2, Funny

    Combine this robot and the female android, and it could even be programmed to be the CEOs mistress!

    --
    Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices. -Theodor Adorno
    1. Re:Hmm.... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I dunno about a mistress named Tank. And a keyboard, how quaint. But maybe if you combined it with a cluster of The Neediest Dolls In The World, you might have something.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  11. does it fart too ? by opablo · · Score: 1, Funny

    does it fart too ?

  12. WHY THE HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every time there's a slashdot article on robots, we can't get 50 posts into it without someone talking about fucking a female robot!?!?

    1. Re:WHY THE HELL by Elvis+Parsley · · Score: 1

      That's a question which answers itself, really.

    2. Re:WHY THE HELL by Skye16 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd do it. Think of the stories you could tell later in life!

      Everyone bones a fat girl at least once. Why? Most of it is because they're having a bit of a dry run and they're getting desperate, but a lot of it is for the stories they tell their buddies afterwards. "My hand slid between her rolls, and I was all 'fuckin' 'ell, give me that back!, but she didn't, and it just kept going in further and further until I was elbow deep, standing on her stomach and yanking, hoping against hope that I wouldn't have to gnaw my arm off at the shoulder-bicep region before her flab consumed my very soul", followed up with "So, she starts going crazy, screaming '01111001 01100101 01110011 00101100 00100000 01111001 01100101 01110011 00101100 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 00100000 01101101 01100101 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110010 01100100 01100101 01110010 00101100 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 00100000 01101101 01100101 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110010 01100100 01100101 01110010 00100001 00100000 01110011 01110100 01101001 01100011 01101011 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110101 01110011 01100010 00100000 01110000 01101111 01110010 01110100 00100001', but at this point, her sata cable had fallen off her cd drive and was just flapping around everywhere and really freaked me the fuck out, so I stopped, gathered my things, and ran for it.".

      I never said they'd be good stories, exactly. But still worth noting!

    3. Re:WHY THE HELL by killeena · · Score: 1

      Hey man, didn't say it was me, it was the CEO. Besides, you know you'd hit it. ;-)

      --
      Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices. -Theodor Adorno
    4. Re:WHY THE HELL by aconkling · · Score: 1

      According to this binary translator, that binary says:
      "yes, yes, fuck me harder, fuck me harder! stick it in my usb port!"

      Pretty funny.

    5. Re:WHY THE HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, We almost made it.. I counted 40 post.

      By the way why are looking at this web page and not answering the phone?

      and oh yeah, There is no way in HELL this robot would be as much fun at the next Christmas Party... Or is it now the end of year/ Holiday party????

  13. Wakamaru by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/n ews/2005/12/26/wrobot26.xml

    Wakamaru is a bit friendlier than tank and acts as a security guard.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Wakamaru by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      Funny line from that article: "Some young boys found him [Wakamaru] a bit scary, even though Japan never had Daleks." =)

      Wonder how fast household robots will spread outside of Japan..? After they have developed to a level where they are easily recognized, by all, to be usefull, and not be just novelty items? *And cheaper too..*

      --
      Store with salt
  14. Re:GNAA by utamaru · · Score: 1

    You must be new here.

  15. Have you seen this robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did happen to Valerie? Has the FBRI been alerted? Perhaps her picture could be put on oil cans or something, 'cause it'd be a shame if she was found in some dumpster.

    1. Re:Have you seen this robot? by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

      What did happen to Valerie?

      Perhaps she's in chroot() jail.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Have you seen this robot? by iotaborg · · Score: 1

      Actually, Valrie is dead. Her hard drive crashed, and no backups were found (can you believe that! here, at CMU! not backing up a simple thing). I believe they are trying to do the desparate hard disk recovery protocols; maybe Valerie will be back one day.

  16. Do we really need one? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, great idea. Create a robot to deal with customer service, one of the real jobs that shouldn't be replaced by robots. Replace the menial jobs that don't matter with robots, i.e. McJobs.

    1. Re:Do we really need one? by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Create a robot to deal with customer service, one of the real jobs that shouldn't be replaced by robots

      You mean it could get worse? Already when I am forced to deal with SBC, the person on the other end

      1) Can't understand half of what I tell them
      2) The half they do understand they completely fail to put in context
      3) I have a hard time understanding them
      4) They assume whatever I'm doing is wrong
      5) 9 times out of 10, whatever they tell me to do is wrong

      Personally? Yeah, I'm more than willing to give the robots a chance.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:Do we really need one? by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think the idea is to make an economically viable receptionist. Otherwise they'd have suck with Valerie. It's research.

      The idea of a social robot is interesting for several reasons. First is that our behavior and thinking is a lot more determined by those around us than we think. Also, to be successful, you have to make the robot operate "intelligently" in as many real situations as possible, as opposed to a constrained problem like chess or block world. Placing it in a public place like this and gathering data on its interactions also gives an interesting opportunit for incremental improvement. You'd expect the robot to succeed in a few cases, fail miserably in the vast number of cases, and in a very small number cases fail after showing some initial promise. This last category represents a kind of technological frontier that can be explored.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Do we really need one? by vertinox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, great idea. Create a robot to deal with customer service, one of the real jobs that shouldn't be replaced by robots. Replace the menial jobs that don't matter with robots, i.e. McJobs.

      Actually you couldn't be more wrong. Most customer service skills are outsourced to foreign countries as it is. Replacing those jobs wouldn't affect our market that much. (trust me... my old call center with an unnamed major ISP layed everyone off right after I quit and outsourced to India... I do still tech support over the phone, but if I got replaced with a robot it wouldn't bother me that much since most of the people that are in CS or TS phone support hate their jobs anyways and spend most of the day browsing monster.com at work)

      Secondly, a Robot would put up with shit that human would not. Screaming... Cursing... All that stuff that customers do without retorting or walking off the job. Hell it would have an "American accent" and have better english skills than you or I.

      However the trick is to fool the customer into believing the person is an uber happy person willing to give them their proverbial first born which means the thing will have to pass a turing test... ...which means not any time soon.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    4. Re:Do we really need one? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Otherwise they'd have suck with Valerie. It's research.

      I did not have sex with that robot! ...it was research...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Do we really need one? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I'm more than willing to give the robots a chance.

      Yeah, I agree. Except, can't they make them fucking neutral? I don't want a robot to gossip with me, or share both ridiculous and flat-out untrue complaints.

      But as to your list of SBC issues, it sounds like a slight amount of artificial intelligence would vastly outdo the crap job that humans are doing there.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    6. Re:Do we really need one? by milimetric · · Score: 1

      your idea is even more brilliant. Get rid of the only hope some people have of staying afloat and not killing themselves. Get rid of McJobs. Yeah, sure, just cause you don't need them, it means nobody needs them, right? How about start with giving everyone proper education and mandating a certain level of nutrition from mcdonalds and other places that live off the poor. Then when those people can get good jobs, then take the rug away, not while they're standing on it.

    7. Re:Do we really need one? by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 1

      Replace the menial jobs that don't matter with robots

      Hmm, this begs question of what will happen the lower %30 of the bell curve. Oh wait, those are employed by government....the lower %30-%60 then?

      Are they doomed to a life predicted by Star Trek, where their only purpose is wandering around the hallways, and getting killed by aliens on away mission? (Yes, the officers in Star Trek never get killed, its always that enlisted shmuck that's along for the ride).

      What do we do when robots have taken the place of everything, and only businessmen and engineers have jobs?

      Well, since I'm an asshat I know what I'd do...put an ad in the news[sic]paper! "Bow down to Zorg! Zorg will pay you $25/week to cook and clean all day long, and maybe Zorg let you sleep if you always bow down to Zorg!"

      And even with this abusive add, there will be at least a 40 broke-ass tools enqueued outside. Then I can delightfully test their tolerance for verbal abuse as they drink the tea and eat the scone they really came for. Once I find a suitible unit, or resource, or whatever these things are called, I can announce to the still-lengthy queue outside that the position has been filled, and gleefully watch the sea of faces fall, the chins pucker, and then watch them shuffle to the government-subsidized dormatories full of decay and disease, care of an institution desperate to reduce the surplus population.

      Oh yes, I'm looking forward to it actually. It won't last long before anarchy or communism take the reins, but in the meantime I can be delightfully fetid :D

    8. Re:Do we really need one? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      I didn't mention McDonalds. I mentioned McJobs.

      I really don't believe customer service can ever really be replaced by intelligent machines. I say this based on my feelings that a machine won't become as intelligent as a human anytime soon. I think a well trained human can do a better customer service job than a machine would be able to do.

      Since you mentioned McDonalds, let me use that as an example. Maybe if they can use machines to make the food for customers, so more people can handle orders. Maybe at a grocery store, more employees can be at the checkout lines to handle ringing things up, instead of being in back dealing with the stock or whatever. I think I'm getting too off topic, and it's been too many days since I made my original post to try commenting on what I think I originally intended to say.

  17. Robot with Attitudes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zordon: "Alpha 5, Rita Repulsa has escaped."
    Alpha 5: "Aie, aie, aie, aie, aie."
    Zordon: "Find me five robots with attitude."

  18. Bender-like? by Seltsam · · Score: 1

    Does it drink beer?

  19. Obligatory Futurama reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill all humans!

  20. Still no cure for cancer... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
    This line of work in Comp Sci is just like a soap opera. The characters change and the fads change, but after years and years of study they have yet to make a machine convincingly human like.

    Largely because it's really hard to fit years of human experience into a few GB of disk space.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:Still no cure for cancer... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but not too long ago, they were trying to fit a lifetime of human experience into a few MB of disk space. Soon we'll be trying to fit months of human experience into TB of disk space! We're making progress! :)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  21. Speech synth still lacking by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Interesting
    If you RTFA, there's a link "Listen" with audio of the NPR piece. I'm surprised that they're using a speech synth that sounds like it's at least ten years behind the times, as? well? as? sounding? like? every? word? is? a? kvestion?? The Lernout & Hauspie TruVoice engine that MS gives away with SAPI4/Agent is arguably better, and that's 1998 tech from a dead company. (L&H, not MS.)

    A good speech synth would add a lot to Tank's personality. (On the other hand, I have 1980s tech card that would sound awful but very robo-retro.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  22. I already did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in 1983. His name was/is Artificial Insanity. He has several personality disorders (the most glaring being bipolar), doesn't pay attention well, but does answer questions in context.

    A friend had a later version loaded on his computer, and his friend got so annoyed with Art he broke the keyboard!

    He was first created on, believe it or not, a Timex/Sinclair computer with no disks and a 16k (not meg, KILO) memory. He usually passes the Turing test quite well.

    Its purpose was to demonstrate that apparent sentience isn't necessarily real. You can simulate anything on a computer, but a simulation isn't reality. I fear my grandchildren may live in a world with a PETA-like organization for "machine rights."

    Frank Herbert had teh right idea with Dune, "sentient" machines in charge of humans actually controlled by other humans, resulting in a jihad against thinking machines and outlawing them.

    Art was later ported to the Apple II, then to DOS. It hasn't been upgraded, but is available for download at mcgrew.info.

    One of these days I may get around to porting it to javascript.

    (mrc="bewitch")

    1. Re:I already did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The download site for art.zip is down...is it dead or slashdotted?

    2. Re:I already did by PastAustin · · Score: 1

      Yeah... The file is down. =(

      Got a copy or a link to a copy?

      --
      Firefox 2.0 - Spell Rightly.
  23. replicants by infoape · · Score: 1

    It's only a matter of time before we'll need to pull out the the Voigt-Kampff machine to tell them apart from us soylent-green folks.

  24. You want some more by Jammet · · Score: 1

    You want some more

    You want some more

    (This is the most advanced thing I've seen as a bar mixer so far in the 5th Element, and when I saw this news I just had to chuckle thinking about this clumsy stupid little robot serving drinks at the airport in the movie).

    --
    Leopard cub
  25. Always the first question to greet you by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Thanks to David Spade)

    'And you are...?'
     

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  26. Here's a robot that's perfect for this software by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    This guy already has the right attitude. I would be happy to buy one for the White House, in fact.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Here's a robot that's perfect for this software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sure, like the White House needs more smokescreen-launching robots!

  27. telling us fleshies apart from robots by hostingreviews · · Score: 1

    My 9th grade english teacher asked us to come up with a short question that would allow us to keep robots out of a building yet let humans through. I came up with something about lies, but that wouldn't work and was too vague. It will be more and more difficult to seperate the clankies from the fleshies and in say, 50 years, you won't I'd imagine.

    1. Re:telling us fleshies apart from robots by wickedsun · · Score: 1

      Naa, all you have to do is get one of those Soul-Detectors.

    2. Re:telling us fleshies apart from robots by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which would you prefer: 1) A flower for your sweetheart, 2) A puppy, or 3) A Large properly formatted data file?

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    3. Re:telling us fleshies apart from robots by butterwise · · Score: 0

      Naa, all you have to do is get one of those Soul-Detectors. Naaaah - that wouldn't be fair to Bush and Cheney...

      --
      If a baby duck is a "duckling," why would anyone want to eat "dumplings?"
    4. Re:telling us fleshies apart from robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that all depends on whether or not you consider them human.

    5. Re:telling us fleshies apart from robots by cooley · · Score: 1

      3? Oh Nooooooo! I guess I'm a robot after all!

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    6. Re:telling us fleshies apart from robots by Mathus · · Score: 1

      What is in the data file?

    7. Re:telling us fleshies apart from robots by butterwise · · Score: 0

      Actually I was questioning whether they possess a soul.

      --
      If a baby duck is a "duckling," why would anyone want to eat "dumplings?"
  28. Does he get paid :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with a brain the size of a planet...

  29. The opposite! Please replace CS desks urgently by Morgaine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >> Create a robot to deal with customer service, one of the real jobs that shouldn't be replaced by robots.

    Your experience of Customer Service departments clearly does not match my own. The following memory will live with me forever:

    Me: Here, I'll demonstrate your service fault to you. Please telnet to your site on port 80 first.

    Verisign Customer Service: What is telnet?

    This kind of CS problem is actually not very surprising. The front desk Customer Service staff for any large business have to be the cheapest of the cheap because manpower doesn't scale and is a collosal business expense. It follows that the people are often rather poorly skilled, perhaps given only a few days training in which they learn by rote rather than acquire real understanding.

    So bring on the expert system AIs for Customer Service quickly please!! This is the ideal application.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  30. Ehm, why? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Okay I can understand the use of an AI that can understand a question like, 'what will the weather be like tomorrow'. This is a complex question especially if you factor in that if I ask it YOU might know that tomorrow I am going to england/london.

    But who the fuck cares about a computer with a history? I want small talk from my PC? If I want meaningless drivel I talk to the my co-workers thank you very much. I really can't see this as being usefull. A good receptionist gives you the information you want, he/she does NOT show you the photographs of the kids.

    I don't get this whole "making computers easier to communicate with" deal either. By the time this tech will be usable all the old people who have a VCR with a blinking timer will be death and kids who grew up with PC's will have taken over. Spend you time on a better google, not on creating another Bob or Clippy or that damn stupid Dog in that made me hate XP with a passion first time I saw it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Ehm, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admit it, you hated XP before you saw it.

    2. Re:Ehm, why? by vertinox · · Score: 2, Funny

      But who the fuck cares about a computer with a history?

      Hello Dave, would you like to see home made videos of my previous owner and his 70 year old wife? Let me show you all his browser history of old love sites he would browse. What are you doing Dave?! Why are you trying to format my hard drive!

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  31. another fine innovation brought to you.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...by the marketing division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation

    it should greet you with "I think you ought to know I'm feeling very depressed,"

  32. Not really all that impressive... by Improv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just like Valerie (the previous persona they gave to the dalek-like roboceptionist), there's nothing particularly impressive that goes into it - mix the eliza software with a few queries that can produce canned answers and the (admittedly useful) ability to look up weather around the world and find where people's offices are, and you have this thing. The public face is nothing impressive -- anyone who has seen what the Final Fantasy movies will find the graphics on this thing ridiculously primitive -- Valerie's face looked like it was generated on the fly in the age of PentiumII/200, and Tank's face is the same but less attractive. I suppose that's not the point though -- the project is intended to study human/avatar interaction, and a number of people do seem to enjoy playing with the system.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  33. Marvin! by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    After reading the article, all I can think of is Marvin the Paranoid Android, specifically the incarnation from the BBC TV series seen here in the US on PBS from time to time.

  34. Re:The opposite! Please replace CS desks urgently by maxume · · Score: 1

    There is an article in the Jan 05 issue of Fast Company about Fujitsu's customer service business in Europe. No free link available yet.

    Instead of getting paid by call volume, they got companies to pay them based on the size of the customer pool they are supporting. Instead of crappy, quick turn-around based phone service, they work with callers to actually understand and solve the problem, and then they work with the company to eliminate the issue that caused the problem.

    Apparently they are doing pretty well, and their employee turnover, if memory serves, was 8%, compared to 40% for the industry. So maybe things are going to get better.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  35. Oh, terrific! by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1

    Oh, Terrific!

    Having been the boss at places before, it is already hard enough because the staff has a natural tendency to hate their supervisors. Now even the computers can hate me, too.

    --
    { - Generic Guy - }
    1. Re:Oh, terrific! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      natural tendency to hate their supervisors

      Hate their supervisors, or hate you as a supervisor? What makes a great manager is someone who doesn't micromanage or control. I get the funny feeling, you do exactly that - and people hate that. People don't "hate" you personally, they hate the act of what you do. The human race aspires around great leadership, there's never been a period of anarchy where there isn't someone who trying to control everything, the problem lies in that they piss off too many people and we start the whole cycle again (killed, fired, quit, replaced, dissappeared, etc etc...). Nothing aginst you personally, but when you said you were a boss and that you think your workers hated you, I know I wouldn't want you as my boss from you saying that.

    2. Re:Oh, terrific! by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I knew when I posted that that it would be food for the trolls, to come out from under their bridges. It was just supposed to be a setup for a Funny, but I guess I was too late to posting.

      The fact is, most people grouse about their boss at sometime or other. I'd be more worried about a boss who tries too hard to be buddy-buddies with their hires.

      My wife runs her own firm, and even though all her employees like her and enjoy working with her, there have been fly-on the-wall times where they bitch about a policy or some goings on at the office. You get all kinds of feedback -- whether you want it or not -- when your own mother is the main receptionist. Of course, being a mother, I'm sure she has very protectionist feelings about her daughter and her workplace. My wife understands that people will bitch behind your back some of the time, it is just natural. Usually it is compliance regulations, liabilities, or somesuch, which people often find intrusive into the way they perform their jobs or the way bonuses/health insurance/taxes need to be handled.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    3. Re:Oh, terrific! by Experiential · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier to replace a Boss with this program? Receptionists are expected to Think and Interact Productively.

  36. Your wrong the Japanese robot would really want by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  37. Get it right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OP wrote:"...with a Frankenstein-like face..."
      Nope, Tank's face doesn't look anything like a mad scientist's. Oh! You mean "Frankenstein's MONSTER". Geez. Can we at least get _that_ right?

  38. In robot Russia by zrk · · Score: 1

    Coffee maker pisses on you!

  39. Attitude is everything by blastard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the point here is that the computer does not have the Stepford Wife annoyingly pleasant attitude that the usual computer assistants have.

    Back in the early '80s my fellow students and I wrote computer based quizzing software for our classes. We played around with different responses to wrong answers. Contrary to what educational software companies were putting out, our programs would occasionally razz you for a wrong answer. Care to guess which ones the students used more often?

    There is only so much a person can take of a caring and supportive computer before it gets really annoying.

    BTW, I also wrote a rudimentary hash algorithm to weed out obscene names, without having to code those very names into the program. And yes, it could be defeated by inserting 1 or 0 in place of L or I and O.

  40. Sexually confused robot????!!!!!!?????!!!!!??? by technoextreme · · Score: 1

    Dam.. What is it about Japan and their habit about being vague about gender. I mean come on.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Sexually confused robot????!!!!!!?????!!!!!??? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      Since robots do not reproduce, no need for a gender. I guess they make them with qualities of both sexes to appeal to the greatest consumer audience.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  41. Re:The opposite! Please replace CS desks urgently by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So bring on the expert system AIs for Customer Service quickly please!!

    He said expert systems. He didn't say replace customer service with text-to-speech ELIZAs. Give that guy a rough idea of how HTTP is supposed to work in training (which can be as simple as "client says GET webpage.html, server either says 200 OK and prints the page, or says 404 Not Found and prints an error page"), and when the customer says "telnet to your server", he can easily pull up a description of what Telnet is, an AI-influenced description of what he would need it for (by tracking the conversation): e.g., he'd need to know what port 80 means, but probably not what local echo means. Once he's connected, the system shows what the web page is supposed to return. If the customer says it's something different, the expert system has a link to the appropriate RFC, which he can check and either refute the customer or file a real problem report.

    Most front-line customer service workers would never encounter telnet in their life. So we can't make knowing it a job requirement - but they have to know telnet if they're ever asked. So we give them an AI that they can use to learn stuff on the spot. It's a lot more helpful than making up stories or transferring calls all the time.

  42. obligatory Bender reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the robot say "Bite my shiny metal a**!"?

  43. I always get warm and fuzzy, thinking about AI. by neomajic · · Score: 0

    Helping me read my email, get weather reports, stocks quotes, mapping the human genome, curing cancer, etc, etc. Then I remember such memorable quotes from the TERMINATOR such as: Kyle Reese: Listen. And understand. That terminator is out there. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead. Kyle Reese: You still don't get it, do you? He'll find her. That's what he does. That's all he does! You can't stop him. He'll wade through you, reach down her throat, and pull her fucking heart out. [At a gun store] The Terminator: The .45 Long Slide, with laser sighting. Pawn Shop Clerk: These are brand new; we just got them in. That's a good gun. Just touch the trigger, the beam comes on and you put the red dot where you want the bullet to go. You can't miss. Anything else? The Terminator: Phased-plasma rifle in the forty watt range. Pawn Shop Clerk: Hey, just what you see, pal. [the Terminator is loading a rifle in the shop] Pawn Shop Clerk: You can't do that. The Terminator: Wrong. So who's with me? We need to go take out these companies like iRobot - before their Roombas take over the world. And while we're at it, lets get USR - U.S. Robotics, before they actually start making robots. Cyberdyne Technology needs to go too before they offer us SkyNet. Who's got the C4?

  44. Online persona by wayward · · Score: 1

    Some friends and I briefly talked about trying to create an online persona with a "soap opera" factor. We'd planned to have a blog with machine-generated entries that included stuff like hookups with various guys. In other words, she'd have more of a sex life than most geeks out there. We also wanted to have her occasionally post to message boards to see how well she could engage the users there. But some professors in my department were concerned about the ethics, so it's temporarily on hold.

  45. Move along.. by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

    This is an old project. I've heard before about the virtual personas in computers NASA invents throughout the years.

    Thing is they approach AI upside-down. I.e. instead of creating a system that's good on pattern recognition and logical operations, they instead cobble up together lots of simulation technologies, like speech recognition, vast dictionary and a ton of if..else code.

    I.e. they build AI based on the output of its interface (behaviour, speech, vision) and not based on how intelligence trully works.

    Back in the old DOS days, the Sound Blaster sound card shipped with a similar gadget, I think it was called Dr. Sound Blaster or something like that. You ask it questions, and it speaks out pseudo-intelligent replies, based purely on few programming tricks of resynthesizing your question.

    I wonder what's the progress since those times.

    Oh, and you can't build fast neural network in a linear CPU design. You need massively paralel processing, so I suppose as our chips become increasingly parallel and cores multiply in the thousands (well maybe in 20 years?), we'll see smarter AI simulation as time passes.

    1. Re:Move along.. by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      You don't need a fast Neural network :) Your neural network is only on the order of a few hertz. A linear simulation running 1billion neurons at 1 Gigahertz can simulate a 1 billion neural network running at 1 hertz in real time.

    2. Re:Move along.. by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      Actually no it can't. The number of operations required to simulate a node in a neural network and the GHz of your Pentium have no correlation whatsoever.

      As a start, the CPU can't perform one op per hertz every time, sometime is has to wait for cache, and waiting for data from RAM can take hundreds of idle cycles.

      And even besides that, the code for simulating one node in the network is actually not one basic CPU command, it's a tiny program on its own.

    3. Re:Move along.. by Procyon101 · · Score: 1

      I know. That's why I said "simulation running 1 billion neurons at 1 Gigahertz", not "machine operating at 1 Ghz." Assuming that a single Neuron can be simulated in 1 billionth of a second (AKA, 1 Ghz) then a billion neurons can be simulated in 1 second at 1Hz. This doesn't account for the ram required to store the neural output of a billion Neurons, or the actual processor hardware required.

      If a single neuron can be simulated using a more reasonable average of 400 cycles, (if we assume mathmatically modeled neurons, rather than actual neural simulation) then a 4 Ghz processor can do 10 Million Neurons per second. In order to build a 1 Ghz realtime network using these assumptions, you would either need a cluster of 100 4Ghz machines (doable) or a single 400Ghz machine (not doable currently). Again, this does not take into account other latency, which probably is another factor of 2 difference.

      For realistic human brain simulations, we have to magnify this factor by 100, because the brain has about 100 Billion Neurons, and another 100, because neurons actually operate at between 50-200 hz normally. That gives us, compensating for latency, about 2 million 4 Ghz machines in our cluster to simulate the human brain, or a single machine running (assuming no communication latency because we are linear) at 4 PHz (Petahertz). Assuming Moores law holds, I should have a 1HP (one humanpower... the equivelent in brain processing to a horsepower... and yes, I just made that up) machine on my desk in about the year 2035.

      These are just rough, back of the napkin (or rather, slashdot textbox) calculations done for my own amusement though.

  46. A classic question by mangu · · Score: 2, Informative
    a short question that would allow us to keep robots out of a building yet let humans through


    That's the Turing test. It's best done by asking something out of context. For instance, when talking about music ask: "did the car where you learned to drive have an automatic transmission?". A robot would need to have a very large set of information about human experiences to be able to answer a random question like this. One effort to develop such a system is the Cyc project.

  47. Virtual Person Depression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess now we are going to need a Psychiatrist for our roboreceptionist. I wonder how Sigmund Freud would think about tank being suspicious of his creator. I think Tank is secretly attracted to his creator.

  48. No wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder hes pissed off hes a male receptionist!

  49. upgrades needed by fr3nch_com · · Score: 1

    ... if he keeps failing at jobs like that! I wonder if it was his attitude or 'just being lazy' that got him fired from nasa?

    --
    PHP Developer Virginia this sig sold out!