Slashdot Mirror


Turn an Optical Mouse into a Scanner

John H. Doe writes "This student was bored one day, so he decided to see what the world looked like from the bottom of his optical mouse. He jury rigged a few wires to his parallel port and wrote a program to take a look. And seeing as how one thing a mouse does is to detect motion, made it into a ghetto b&w handscanner. "

191 comments

  1. And this is what he saw through that mouse's eyes: by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing for you to see here. Please move along.

  2. I envy by Irashtar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I envy this hacker's skills, B+W? I'd only see red.

    1. Re:I envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so will this work with my old trackball? ;)

    2. Re:I envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This definitely wins the award for Most Random And Least Necessary Wikipedia Reference.

    3. Re:I envy by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Good point...since it's only a red light, would it only pick up red wavelengths?

      Would that further mean that optical mice don't work on a pure blue surface?

    4. Re:I envy by NewKimAll · · Score: 1

      Good point...since it's only a red light, would it only pick up red wavelengths?

      I should pick up anything that is NOT red and whatever dark colors it sees, other than light colors such as yellow or light-green, should show up as black. This is my current understanding of how it should work.
      --
      This sig would be invisible to your optical mouse scanner, if /. allowed colors.

  3. cool, but eh by PlayfullyC1ever · · Score: 1

    Pretty cool, wish it could of had better results, image is crap and doesnt even look like there is anywhere you can go to make a cheapscanner from a $15 optical mouse, but interesting hack, might try it myself over the summer.

    --
    Well, Slashdot is going down hill. PlayfullyClever
    1. Re:cool, but eh by Tx · · Score: 1

      doesnt even look like there is anywhere you can go to make a cheapscanner

      Dunno, improving the software to match up successive images better should be prefectly possible, it's hard to say exactly how good a result could be achieved, but I'd say a lot better than the posted image. You could also hack in multiple coloured LEDs, and thus possibly make a colour scanner. Probably never actually be useful though, hard to say.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re:cool, but eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty cool, wish it could of had better results

      I think you meant could have had.

    3. Re:cool, but eh by The+Notorious+ASP · · Score: 1

      Phht, call me when you can make an optical mouse out of my old flatbed scanner!

    4. Re:cool, but eh by coogan · · Score: 1

      Uses...none I guess. Crap image - sure is. However, these are the kind of things appreciated by geeks with no friends - You only find them by reading Slashdot where we are all social outcasts - who gives a shit about politics?

    5. Re:cool, but eh by spudgun · · Score: 1

      no use ?
      what about espionage ?
      custom wiring inside mouse , and then when he uses the mouse over a sensitive document....

      Muhuhuha !

      --
      Type unto others as you would have them type unto you.
    6. Re:cool, but eh by GrungyLotG · · Score: 1

      Because we all use sensitive documents as mousepads. ;)

    7. Re:cool, but eh by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I have a canon scanner which uses LIDE (LED Indirect Exposure) technology to do the scanner rather than the older style light bulb. You can't actually see the LEDs, it uses a lot of really small ones, but I think it has R, G, and B LEDs. I think he is just applying the same technology, only without as many lights, and with not as much precision.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:cool, but eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ. Have you ever considered proofreading your posts before you click the "Submit" button?

  4. Repost from hack-a-day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Are we just syndicating from Hack-a-day's RSS feed nowadays?

    1. Re:Repost from hack-a-day by Linker3000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, via the digg.com front page, it would appear.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  5. groovy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Groovy .. may come handy in places where scanners need special permissions.

    1. Re:groovy by Teun · · Score: 1
      places where scanners need special permissions

      Indeed my first thought, paranoid security drones might find this a terrorists wet dream.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    2. Re:groovy by operagost · · Score: 1

      Unlikely, as you would still need to load a device driver and that requires high privileges on a Windows box. Said security drone would not allow just anyone in the local Administrators group.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  6. ya..Verry impressive and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bu bu but does it run Linux?

    1. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by Musteval · · Score: 3, Funny

      The program is written in Visual Basic. So no.

      --
      Note to mods: I'm probably being sarcastic.
    2. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by Helios1182 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was a quick and dirty hack. He even said he doesn't like VB, but for a simple GUI it is easy. The source is available so you are welcome to port it to whatever language/plaatform you like.

    3. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " The program is written in Visual Basic. So no."

      As the author noted, he didn't write it for Linux because stopping to learn GTK or KDE would've turned an impulsive weekend project into a major undertaking.

      Which is something that is unfortunately missing from Linux...a simple RAD environment which makes GUI development completely trivial for quick-and-dirty tasks. Borland's Kylix is probably the closest thing out there...any other systems that are worth looking in to?

    4. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Which is something that is unfortunately missing from Linux...a simple RAD environment which makes GUI development completely trivial for quick-and-dirty tasks.

      Uuh... Tcl/tk? Python?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by DrSkwid · · Score: 4, Informative

      see :

      http://wxpython.org/

      it's even cross platform

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    6. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's not RAD, but very fast and powerful: Tcl/TK.

    7. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be brilliant if it wasn't Python.

    8. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting how fitting that is. The optical mouse ended up providing a basic visual of what it sees. Of course you'd go with visual basic!

    9. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Informative

      is this enough bindings ?

      for actual links see
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WxWidgets

              * [1] binding wxBasic for the BASIC programming language
              * [2] binding wxPerl for the Perl programming language
              * [3] binding wxPython for the Python programming language
              * [4] binding wxRuby for the Ruby programming language in September 2004 "early beta"
              * [5] binding wxSqueak for the Smalltalk programming language
              * wxLua for Lua; a Sourceforge.net project is also available here
              * wx4j for Java
              * wxJS for JavaScript
              * wxHaskell for Haskell
              * wxEiffel for the Eiffel programming language
              * wx.NET for C#/.NET
              * wxCL (formerly wxLisp) for Common Lisp

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    10. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      and c++, of course

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    11. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and not very good VB at that.

      Makes the classic C programmer mistake - Dim X, Y As Integer doesn't create 2 integers, it only creates 1. X gets created as the system default, usually a Variant.

      Your program usually works anyway, but gets interesting when you start passing data to API functions.

      Tony

    12. Re:ya..Verry impressive and all... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Or simply move to Gambas

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  7. Hey cool ! ... by bushboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... He even used it to create his web page.

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:Hey cool ! ... by d474 · · Score: 1

      You too huh? I thought something was wrong with my browser. The text got warped under his pictures... and too think this guy can make a scanner from a mouse but can't make a normal web page is sweet irony.

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    2. Re:Hey cool ! ... by amembleton · · Score: 2, Informative
      The text got warped under his pictures

      I thought that at first too, but soon realised that it was just some text at the bottom of one of his screen shots.

    3. Re:Hey cool ! ... by leshert · · Score: 1

      And "too think" that someone can criticize the web page of an amazing hack but can neither spell nor tell the difference between the bottom of a screenshot and magically "warped" text is not sweet irony. It's par for the Slashdot course.

    4. Re:Hey cool ! ... by d474 · · Score: 1

      And "to think" a slashdot reader would miss the sarcasm of my post...impossible!

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  8. If a mouse can do this... by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

    ...imagine if you get a Geforce to do password crack. Duh!

  9. Wow by Q-Hack! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is definatly the ultimate in low tech.

    Still, it is ingenuis.

    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is definatly the ultimate in low tech. Still, it is ingenuis.

      I think you meant definitely and ingenious.

    2. Re:Wow by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      You must be new to here, no?

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    3. Re:Wow by non0score · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah...this low tech thing also reminds me of someone trying to use a sound card as an oscilloscope (through the mic)...or how someone used the sensor on a logitech trackball device to track how a fly walks (the fly walks on a light ball colored in such a way that the sensor could still read it).

    4. Re:Wow by Premo_Maggot · · Score: 1

      Uh...he has one less digit than you..

      --
      Good karma sticks to me like velcro on a piece of plexiglass.
      Move along, citizen.
    5. Re:Wow by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Whatever it is that you are smoking, please give me some, because no matter how hard I try, I just can't find the uid of that Anonymous Coward!

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will learn, young paduan, that you should quote ACs when you respond to them.

    7. Re:Wow by ian_mackereth · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Low tech? You're using an 18x18 pixel video camera that takes over a thousand snapshots a second of the shadows of your desk, then uses a DSP to calculate the differences between those images and thus how far and in what direction the mouse has moved, and you call it LOW TECH?!!

      And all this in a chip that costs the manufacturer about a buck.

      Perspective!

    8. Re:Wow by baKanale · · Score: 1

      This is definatly the ultimate in low tech.

      But... what about wooden Bender?

    9. Re:Wow by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      The "parent" link you must use.

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
  10. Well by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Interesting
    At least this hack is a little funny. I have been wondering about a mouse with force-feedback and then I can't wait until I see the mouse wander over the edge of the table when infected by some strange virus...

    What resolution is it possible to get with the laser mice that you can get?

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:Well by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Like this one?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Well by kalleguld · · Score: 1

      I think he means iFeel mouse

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health
    3. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe there was a force feedback mouse... it was heavily advertised inside the instruction manuals for Sierra's Quest for Glory 4 (circa 1995). No idea who made it or how well it worked, but I do recall the presence of such a device.

  11. a spy scanner! by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just use any sensitive document as a mouse pad......

  12. more of the sam? go here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:more of the sam? go here: by Mooga · · Score: 1

      This is not the first time that Hackaday has beat /. to a story...

      --
      ~ Mooga
  13. Linux? by mtenhagen · · Score: 0

    The software is written in VB, how ugly can it get.

    So the question is not "Does it run linux?" but "Is there a linux version?".

    And I'am curious if this site can be slashdotted.

    --
    200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
  14. MX1000 = 800DPI by eddy · · Score: 1

    Logitech claims 800DPI for the MX1000.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  15. Nevermind. by eddy · · Score: 1

    Sorry, that's movement resolution (after whatever processing they do). Thinko on my part. I'm sure the sensor isn't all that. Still be interesting to "see" though.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Nevermind. by cnettel · · Score: 1

      One might be able to deconvolute (anti-anti-alias, so to say) the picture from the sensor, but I would imagine that to achieve a stable 800 DPI resolution, one would actually need a sensor with a comparable, or better, sensor... unless the 800 DPI figure is a VaporNumber (TM).

    2. Re:Nevermind. by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, that's what the sensor+optics is. The mouse is likely to report movement by one pixel reliably, unless it does some good sub-pixel image comparison (which isn't impossible...).

      Thing is you can get about any DPI you desire (up to the limit of light wave length) from such a rig by replacing the optics. You're still stuck with readout area of some 16x16 pixels though, so lower resolution = better, meaning less waving your hand to "wipe" whole area of the document.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:Nevermind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One might be able to deconvolute...

      I think you meant to say deconvolve.

  16. confused by digitalsushi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are we supposed to send him a gift scanner? Clothes? Food? Matches for starting fires? :D

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    1. Re:confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Matches for starting fires?
      That would probably be a bad idea.
  17. Scan-mouse by massivefoot · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was promtply purchased by DARPA on a hunch that it might be able to see through concrete...

  18. But the real question is... by EdipisReks · · Score: 5, Funny

    could he turn a flatbed scanner into an optical mouse?

    1. Re:But the real question is... by pesc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or turn a camera-equipped mobile phone into an optical mouse? Preferrably with bluetooth support using the built-in phone BT chip! It should only be some programming to get it to work, right? Finally a sensible use for cameraphones.

      --

      )9TSS
    2. Re:But the real question is... by ginotech · · Score: 1

      that would kill your battery. still a pretty neat idea though.

    3. Re:But the real question is... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "could he turn a flatbed scanner into an optical mouse? "

      No, but how about a huge trackpad? Though it's be painfully slow. "DO NOT MOVE FINGER UNTIL SCAN COMPLETES"

      Also, "DO NOT TOUCH COPY AREA DURING VIDI-COPY OPERATION"

    4. Re:But the real question is... by klokop · · Score: 1

      Sony has done that. http://tweakers.net/nieuws/40654

      --
      Passing silhouettes of strange illuminated mannequins
    5. Re:But the real question is... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Or turn a camera-equipped mobile phone into an optical mouse? ... Finally a sensible use for cameraphones. - I don't think the word 'sensible' means what you think it means.

    6. Re:But the real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any reason why you couldn't move the scanhead to track the trackpad pointer (rather than doing a full page scan for each refresh)? Then you could have semi-realtime update.

      Hmm... if I ever have a few hours to kill maybe I'll investigate more.

      Matt

    7. Re:But the real question is... by doxology · · Score: 1

      A more serious question is, is it easy to get a bluetooth-enabled cell phone with a camera to feed the image directly to a computer like a webcam?

      --
      sigfault. core dumped.
    8. Re:But the real question is... by emj · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, almost all cellphones grant access to the camera via the Java api, but bluetooth is abit morestateof the art it accsesible on most good phones these days (such as k750). The problem is that Micro java is really shutdown on most phones and requires user acknowledgement each time it want to acces he camera.

  19. Oh dear! by Skiron · · Score: 1

    Now the cats out the bag, I expect the next generation of MS worms and viruses won't need keyloggers - they will just WATCH you type in your passwords/CC numbers etc...

    1. Re:Oh dear! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did you point your mouse at your keyboard, dumbass?

  20. Re:OUTGOING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It means you're are stupid.

  21. Re:OUTGOING by Max+Threshold · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I think they are one-time-pad messages from terruhists.

    Or designed to look that way.

  22. It's useful enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...to make a cheap barcode scanner. Barcodes have checksums, and if every other pass works it's good enough.

    1. Re:It's useful enough... by ZorroXXX · · Score: 3, Interesting
      A bar code reader also stuck me as a useful modification. I wrote C code for interpreting the pulse from a bar code pen/wand as part of a project the last year of my engineering education, and replacing the pen with an optical mouse will more or less give an identical project, so this should by all means doable.

      Because of that I did learn a bit about the different types of bar codes. This was in 1995 so the following is just based on memory, I might have some minor errors in the following. The bar code type that is used to identify products is called EAN-13 (European Article Numbering, 13 digits). An EAN-13 bar code usually looks like the following (footnote 1):


      9 || 780201 || 708424 ||

      Both the black and "white" lines in the bar code are used. Lines are either thin or thick (as far as I remember thick lines are either exactly two times the width of the thin ones or slightly thicker (maybe it was 2.5 times?)). The bar code start with three thin lines (start sync) and the the black sync lines are usually printed slightly longer than the rest. In the middle there are some additional sync lines as well as at the end.

      Each digit is encoded as five bars (black and white) in a 2+3 mix of thick/thin. There are defined three groups of different 2+3 combinations, Number Group A, B and C, i.e. Number Group A contains 10 different 2+3 combinations, B contains 10 others and C yet 10 others, The six first digits are either number group A or B, the six last are always number group C. The 2+3 combinations in number group C is the same as those in A but backwards. This means that if the six first digits decoded from the pulses from the bar code reader all are number group A, then you know that you are reading the bar code backwards.

      The combination of A and B used on the six first digits determines the 13th digit, so only 12 of the digits are coded directly with bars.

      Footnote 1
      Originally I wrote an ascii art drawing here, but slashdot complained "Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters." so I had to remove it... :(

      --
      When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
  23. It's all biological... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I heard of building a better mousetrap... but hacking a mouse?! If you're going to experiment with biology, just hack a frog and leave the mouse out of this.

    1. Re:It's all biological... by neomunk · · Score: 0

      Ever had a teacher that says "there are no stupid questions except unasked ones"?

      Well, I had a teacher like that in HS (my best teacher ever, btw), who's mind I changed about that. See, we were discussing when some scientist (I think Tesla, but I'm not sure) accidently made a spark between some metal object and a freshly dead frog's brain, thus making the frog's legs jump.

      Of course, this being my computer science teacher (and physics, the class where this conversation was held), and added to the fact that we had been studying digital logic in hardware (TTLs etc, wiring up logic circuits for homework) for the past few months, I immediatly asked if it was possible to make a remote control frog.

      Heh, he looked at me for a few seconds and said "Mr. *CENSORED*, what I said before about stupid questons was wrong, that would have been a smart question to leave unasked."

      Just thought I'd share the flashback you inspired.

    2. Re:It's all biological... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't get it. how is that stupid? if brains use electrical signals to control muscles and electronics are based on electric signals, why wouldn't we be able to create a remote control frog once the brain is mapped out enough?

    3. Re:It's all biological... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently trying to give some smoke to my mouse to see if she will gonna explode!

    4. Re:It's all biological... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      It's probably the moral implications of the question being asked. If you can remote control a frog (or a cockroach), it won't be long before someone can remote control a human. I noticed that a lot of science instructors are incapable or unwilling to discuss how science can be used for both good and evil.

    5. Re:It's all biological... by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      You can have it both ways. Reverse the polarity of the power, and the sensor chip will croak.

  24. impressive by jpellino · · Score: 1

    if only because some of my students won't stop shining the mouse into the iSight...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  25. Server seems a bit slow by bogie · · Score: 1
    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Server seems a bit slow by fatphil · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's because he turned his old Zip drive into a web-server.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  26. Jury rig? by AkA+lexC · · Score: 1

    Isnt it Jerry rig? as in botched german (Jerry) equipment in WWII

    --
    -AlexC
    1. Re:Jury rig? by dbretton · · Score: 1

      This is definitely off-topic, interesting nonetheless.

      Take a look here: http://www.bartleby.com/61/70/J0087000.html

    2. Re:Jury rig? by TiredOfCrap · · Score: 1

      Not necassarily: The term "Jury Rig" has been used at sea for centuries to describe recreating a rig from various components, usually when the main rig was lost in a storm or battle.

    3. Re:Jury rig? by AkA+lexC · · Score: 1

      fair enough:)

      --
      -AlexC
    4. Re:Jury rig? by Inda · · Score: 1

      Jury Rig is also correct. I have heard the Yanks say it before. I never made the connection to WWII but I suspect this might be true. Jerry Rig and Jury Rig sound so similar that the British accent to American accent translation probably has something to do with it too.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    5. Re:Jury rig? by AkA+lexC · · Score: 1

      I can see a connection with jury rigging (as in fixing trials), and apparently the spare mast on a ship is called a 'jury-rig'. its a one size fits all so some alteration is needed to get it working as a replacement. i guess the jerry thing was a later corruption.. sorry guys.. i'll keep my mouth shut in future :#

      --
      -AlexC
    6. Re:Jury rig? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Isnt it Jerry rig? as in botched german (Jerry) equipment in WWII

      I've heard it called a lot of things, some of them more obviously rooted in bigotry than others. Jerry rigging (or is it Gerry rigging?), jury rigging, Afro-engineering (and that's the cleaned-up form), rednecking, American engineering (a term also used for percussive maintenance), improvisational engineering, ... the phenomenon is so common and discussed so frequently and so informally that I would not be at all surprised if Jury-rigging and Jerry-rigging, despite their obvious phonetic similarity, might have different etymologies. Additionally, all of these terms are so highly colloquial that I would not be even a little surprised if the etymologies given in dictionaries for any of them were in fact false etymologies rooted in folklore and the actual derivation something entirely unrelated. I wouldn't know how to even begin researching such a topic, however. The true etymologies of these terms may just be lost in the mists of time.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    7. Re:Jury rig? by gizmonic · · Score: 1

      I love this guy's site for things like this. Not much newer information, but a little more thorough.

      http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-jur1.htm

      --
      WWJD?
      JWRTFM!
    8. Re:Jury rig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer frigging, as in "Just frig it about until it works".

    9. Re:Jury rig? by AkA+lexC · · Score: 1

      wow.. awesome link.. thanks!

      --
      -AlexC
  27. B&W Handscanner? by soulsteal · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who the hell needs black and white scans of hands? THE GOVERNMENT, THAT'S WHO!

    Paranoid twin powers, ACTIVATE! Form of Tinfoil, shape of Hat!

    1. Re:B&W Handscanner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Paranoid twin powers, ACTIVATE! Form of Tinfoil, shape of Hat!"

      Wow which anime is that from? I gotta see it :)

      p.s. is it hentai?

    2. Re:B&W Handscanner? by Jupix · · Score: 1

      In most optical mice, the 'eye' is on the table side ;)

    3. Re:B&W Handscanner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was friggin hilarious. Funniest thing I've seen this year.

    4. Re:B&W Handscanner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids these days...

  28. The "sun-like mark" on the chip... by CMiYC · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... is from Agilent Technologies (which just spun off its semiconductor business). For 65-years Agilent was also known was "Hewlett-Packard." In late 1999, HP spun everything but computers and prnters off into Agilent. (This past Dec 1, Agilent's semiconductors became Avago.)

    Just thought I'd throw that out there.

  29. Further modifications=Barcode scanner? by Gizmoguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With a bi more tweaking to the code, the mouse could possibly be made into a linear, perhaps even 2D :-)) barcode scanner. Barcode scanners can be expensive. Optical mice don't come cheap, but cost significantly less than a barcode scanner, could this be the next generation of the CueCat, made at home? Also, your killing two birds with one stone, as it's multifunctional. Mind you, it still isn't as good as that MP3 playing toothbrush I got for Christmas :-))

    --
    -- There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, And those who don't.
    1. Re:Further modifications=Barcode scanner? by binarytoaster · · Score: 1

      With a bi more tweaking to the code, the mouse could possibly be made into a linear, perhaps even 2D...

      So what you're saying is right now it scans in 3D? Holy shit, and he called it "ghetto"...

  30. It would appear... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that his mousepad is white and has the number "4", followed by a "0", and another "4" on it

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  31. Re:OUTGOING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's is means you're are stupid.

  32. When I was a kid... by slideroll · · Score: 0

    I turned my old Epson dot matrix printer into a scanner by mounting a CDS cell on the print head and wiring it to my Atari 1200XL paddle port and using BASIC to run the print head across the paper and take a reading. It was like 30dpi resolution, but I got some great scans of the cover of Rush' "Permanent Waves". I had no friends.

    1. Re:When I was a kid... by mindtriggerz · · Score: 0

      That's cause you listen to Rush.

  33. Would be alot cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you hadn't stolen it from yesterday's hackaday.

  34. What about barcodes by Senzei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I first saw this I thought it would be useful to turn the mouse into a barcode reader. A quick look at prices shows them starting at around forty bucks. If this could be made to work roughly as well as the barcode readers it might be pretty useful.

    --
    Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
    1. Re:What about barcodes by blincoln · · Score: 1

      When I first saw this I thought it would be useful to turn the mouse into a barcode reader.

      I think you'd have to do a lot of image correction in software in order to get something stable enough for that. In his example app, there's way too much alignment error between samples.

      Also, one of the reasons regular barcode scanners are a bit more expensive is that they use a laser with a motorized mirror (or something along those lines) so that you can do the scanning from a distance and the beam scans the barcode area itself.

      The CueCat (which someone else mentioned) operates like what you're describing. It works, and it's cheap, but if you're scanning a lot of barcodes it's a LOT more of a hassle to swiped the scanner over the barcode physically each time instead of just pointing and shooting. There's also much more error in terms of reads. If the barcode isn't high-contrast enough (like black on grey instead of black on white, or some other odd colour combination), the CueCat won't read it at all. Finally, most true barcode reader-enabled software does the equivalent of hitting "enter," "next," or "lookup" once it's got the number. With a hack, you have to do that yourself. Again, it's a small difference, but if you're scanning hundreds of things at once, it adds up into a hassle.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  35. Cue Cat by bangzilla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I seem to recall that something similar was done with that unmitigating disaster known as cue cat :-) Y'know - I don't really care how crap the images are - the point of this execise is all about hacking because it's there. I think this is pretty cool. Would I every replicate this hack or have value for it? -- probably not. But it's cool just for coolness sake. And one never knows when a cool hack will be something you would use (if not today, maybe tomorrow...)

    --
    Rich people are eccentric. Poor people are strange. Me, I'd be happy with odd.
  36. scan-mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people are Sooo handy!

  37. Seeds? by adolfojp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if this could be a cheap way to gather random seeds...

    Off I go to tie my wireless mouse to my cat!

    1. Re:Seeds? by whovian · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this could be a cheap way to gather random seeds...

      I've seen this somewhere for generating SSH keys. Might have been on Windows.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    2. Re:Seeds? by kalleguld · · Score: 1

      It was used by the old PGP-programs when making a private key. It was the movements of the mouse, though, that made random data, not the image underneath it.

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health
    3. Re:Seeds? by jnik · · Score: 1

      I've seen this somewhere for generating SSH keys. Might have been on Windows.
      PuTTY's key generator uses mouse motion as the randomness in generating a key.

  38. Some one has to say..... by rts008 · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, mouse watches YOU!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  39. Posted on digg earlier... by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 0

    This was on digg first. Let's not leech off digg, shall we?

    --
    "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
  40. what ever happened to hand scanners by wcb4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Its a shame really. Hand scanners seemed to ahve peaked in popularity before their time. I understand that they were popular because they were a lot cheaper to build that flatbeds, and as flatbeds came down in price, the hand scanners died away. Seems perfectly reasonable since the handscanner was a pretty ppor match for a desktop computer anyway. The only problem with this was that as the price of flatbeds fell, so did the price of laptops, now a lot of folks have laptops, and hand scanners would be perfect to throw in the laptop bag.... If you are in a library or somehwhere and need a quick scan, the hand scanner would have been perfect. But I have not been able to find a single color hand scanner that will run with XP, which is what I run on my laptop. If I could find one, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. The last time I needed a scan of something when I was not at home, I ended up puling out my digital camera (which I had with me for another reason, and snapping a picture. This was not the ideal situation, but it worked for what I needed. How often do you have a good digital camera with you (not the crappy one in your cell phone)

    Does anyone know of a handscanner compatible with XP? I'd still like to have one.

    --
    I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
    1. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by nekonoko · · Score: 1

      Here's one I'm thinking about picking up myself: http://www.planon.com/docupen_rc800.php

    2. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by Laplace · · Score: 2, Informative
      Does anyone know of a handscanner compatible with XP? I'd still like to have one.

      Yes. My digital camera. (seriously, I've made digital copies of pages from books, contracts and artwork with my camera).

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    3. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Handscanners had LOTS of disadvantages compared to flatbeds. Poor resolution resulting from uneven movement speed (flatbed can go as slow as you desire. User moves the handscanner slightly faster and data gets lost.), small width - need for "stitching", poor absolute distance/shape quality (turn it a little, let it slide a bit etc), poor tollerance for uneven surfaces (try to scan a page in a thick book, the roll of the scanner falls off the book when the scanning element is still 5cm into the text) and quite a few other serious disadvantages. The guy advising you a camera is right. I have a Logitech handscanner and a cheap Canon camera, and the camera produces better images than the scanner. Not to mention it's vastly faster :) In great most cases camera suffices. Only if you need -huge- image in good resolution (I mean like 10000x10000px) the scanner makes sense, but you rarely do. And definitely not with a laptop, on a travel.
      One more handy thing. You won't scan a 2mx3m train schedule hanging on the wall, no matter if you use handscanner or a flatbed. Camera is just right for that.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by wcb4 · · Score: 1

      Have you been able to get a picture good enough to run it through OCR? I used to do that all the time with the hand scanner, which was perfectly sized for a column of type.

      --
      I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
    5. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by modecx · · Score: 1

      Totally, the camera thing is great, and if you need serious quality for a single or very few pages or items, he're the best way: Find a photographer with a 4"x5" camera, or pick up a similar medium format camera with a 50mm lens or so, it's fun anyway. Get your lighting the way it works for you, take the picture, get it developed, and take a negative or slide somewhere where they've got a drum scanner. It's easy, but it might cost ~$60-100 per frame to have it all done. Huge files though.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    6. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by modecx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Absolutely, works fine, even with my 3.0MP P&S camera, so it dosen't require anything fancy. 10pt and up seriff fonts are no problem, though if there was very small text, it might not get that. I need to test it some more. The single most important thing is good light for good contrast, even better if the light isn't aligned very close to the len's axis. Flash tends to wash it out.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    7. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I don't ever remember hand scanners ever being a more cost efficient solution. I bought my first flatbed scanner in '95 for just over $100. My assumption had always been that hand scanners died out because they were unweildy half-assed solutions.

    8. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Speed of light: air=299702547m/s; vacuum=299792458m/s
      Speed of sound: air=345 m/s; vacuum=???


      I'm not sure I understand your signature.

      If you are genuinely asking what the speed of sound in a vacuum is, you need a quick physics lesson. By definition, there can be no sound in a vacuum; sound needs a medium to travel in, since it is nothing more that propagating pressure waves. Light on the other hand can travel through a vacuum because of the particle-wave duality.

      If you are merely pointing out that there is no sound in a vacuum, perhaps in a veiled criticism of various sci-fi movies and television shows, then it's really not very clear.

      If you are just pointing out how clever you are to know the speeds of light in a vacuum and air, then the joke is lost on this highly geeky crowd.

      Care to comment?

      Oh, and so I'm not modded into oblivion: you're right. Cameras are way better than hand scanners. In fact, almost all of the high end digital photocopiers used in high-volume work scan pages using a digital camera type system. None of this business with the lightbar crawling from one side of the page to the other; these copiers just have a flashbulb and a CCD. This means they can copy pages far faster than other copiers. The only speed bottlenecks are a). the speed the papers can be fed through the document tray and b). the speed the captured digital image can be written to disk/memory.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    9. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by Wonko · · Score: 1

      I don't ever remember hand scanners ever being a more cost efficient solution. I bought my first flatbed scanner in '95 for just over $100. My assumption had always been that hand scanners died out because they were unweildy half-assed solutions.

      You don't remember, because 95 is too recent :). I bought my first flatbed 1-2 years after you for $60. IIRC, when I started high school (91-92?), flatbed scanners were $300 and hand scanners were $50-75 or so. Those numbers are only from memory, and are probably not terribly accurate. :)

    10. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by Somegeek · · Score: 1
      the sig of AeroIllini (726211) read:
      You can have it all; just not all at once.

      I'm not sure I understand your signature. If taken at face value, your quote indicates that you believe that it is possible to possess everything there is, everywhere. If you genuinely believe that, you need a looong physics lesson.

      If you are merely making a veiled criticism of greed and various similar themes as portrayed in movies and television shows, then it's really not very clear.

      If on the third hand you were just making a quirky, personalized comment to individualize yourself amidst the teeming masses, then what the hell are you picking on his sig for?

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    11. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      It's just a little mean question with a built-in fallacy, tickle your brain, "ouch, it won't work". Just like these 0=1 proofs, just physics-based. The first case I thought of it was at the time of the article about the Voyager probe crossing the border where solar wind slows down below the speed of sound... speed of sound in what?!

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    12. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      OK, cool. Thanks for clarifying that.

      Yeah, I really don't put much stock in the types of comparisons the general newsmedia uses when they talk about scientific subjects. The one that sticks out in my mind was when the shuttle Columbia exploded, and CNN was scrambling to get information in the bottom screen-scroller. They were in such a rush that all kinds of incorrect things were shown, like "shuttle was traveling at mock 25" and "shuttle was traveling 25 times the speed of light". It would have been funny if the situation wasn't so tragic.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    13. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by wcb4 · · Score: 1

      I remember having one of the logitech ones - 24 bit color 300dpi and it was motorized so you did not have to worry about moving the things at the right speed. I bought it for $125. I also had a flatbed at work that cost $500. (this was '87or so)

      That is the kind of scanner I would like to have right now, something that I can throw in the laptop case, scan a 4x6 image reasonably fast. Does not have to have the same quality as my flatbed. I could use my camera but I do not carry my camera everywhere I go, it is generally at home unless I carry it when we go out with the kids. I guess I could buy a seperate camera just to have for this purpose, and cheap 3-4 mp cameras can be had in the $100-$150 range now anyway, which puts it where the hand scanner used to be. Even one of the cheap ones would be good enough for what I am talking about, and I would always have a camera with me.... its a thought... What would really be good would be a decent 3mp camera phone. I do have my phone with me all the time.

      --
      I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
    14. Re:what ever happened to hand scanners by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      The idea of sonic boom in void explained here.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  41. extra security measure.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    besides barcode scanning possibilities, how about an additional login security measure....scan your thumb print plus password.

  42. I know ghetto gets thrown around a lot...... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    but I live in the ghetto you insensitive clod!!!!!

    1. Re:I know ghetto gets thrown around a lot...... by blincoln · · Score: 1

      but I live in the ghetto you insensitive clod!!!!!

      Liar. If you really did, you'd be capping his ass instead of posting a rebuttal. Although, come to think of it, that would make for a pretty awesome version of Slashdot. "Slashback: North-North Soldier writes to tell us that CNN has photos of the carnage that arose when i_want_you_to_throw threw down on John H. Doe earlier this week..."

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    2. Re:I know ghetto gets thrown around a lot...... by Neoncow · · Score: 1

      For your viewing pleasure. Okay, so the formatting is a bit messed up. Read the summary and subsequent comments.

  43. how about a python version... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ... and a hack that adds in teh pass thru inside the mouse?

  44. Plagiarism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is a direct rip from hack a day and should be removed. If the Slashdot crew can't come up with stories that are original, they need to go ahead and shut down.

  45. Good Idea but.. by earthstar · · Score: 1

    A very good idea... but its at nascent stage.....If some s/w companies are going to have a full fledged software to convert Optical mouse to scanner , it'll be great.Probably Google will do it.....Free Google Mousescan !

  46. ah yes, slashdot whiners by subtropolis · · Score: 1

    wish it could of had better results, image is crap... So, which is more pathetic? The hack or this response?

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  47. Optical Mouse Chips by Stigmata669 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You can use the chips for optical navigation too. I played around with one for an introductory robotics class, here.

    --
    Yawn.
  48. no, maybe you do by subtropolis · · Score: 1

    because you have nothing better to do than to read about this on /. and then whine about it.

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  49. Laser Mice by JK1150 · · Score: 1

    I know laser mice are supposed to detect a clearer image of the surface below, would be interesting to see this done with a laser mouse.

  50. Musical flatbed scanner by lampiaio · · Score: 0

    That kind of "undocumented feature" reminds me of this. I was stunned when I watched the video of the scanner in action; it's incredible how much "power" is hidden within most electrical devices!

    --
    My other account has mod points.
  51. Via USB? by epheterson · · Score: 1

    Could it be possible to write a driver to be able to use this application through a standard USB or PS/2 connection, without the need to rewire it?

    1. Re:Via USB? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Nah, I just looked it up. PS/2 and USB mouse signals basically send as (Enhlish-ified) 'The mouse moved {this} far in {this} direction, and has {these} buttons pressed'. Basically, the mouse is processing the image and sending the computer just the movement data. Thus, the reason for clipping traces and re-wiring the thing.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  52. Re: It has been done. by chrestomanci · · Score: 3, Interesting
  53. How hard, and what strategy to coordinate by krysolid · · Score: 1


    the little pieces of each "saccade" of the mouse ... after
    all that is what the human brain does ... it pieces all our
    shaky random movements together into a steady picture of the
    world ... any ideas?

    1. Re:How hard, and what strategy to coordinate by d474 · · Score: 1
      "the little pieces of each "saccade" of the mouse ... after all that is what the human brain does ... it pieces all our shaky random movements together into a steady picture of the world ... any ideas?"
      Feel free to start a "hack" replicating the visual system of human brain. It's very, VERY complex at a multitude of layers. Good luck! DARPA I'm sure would be very interested if you pulled it off.
      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  54. ScanJet Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, but someone turned a scanner into a soundcard... http://www.ganjatron.net/misc/scanjet/scanjet.html

  55. Re:Ghetto? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehe. You beat me to it.

  56. Idea: Cute! Hack: ~ by baadger · · Score: 1
    1. Notice optical mice have a iddy biddy CCD
    2. Grab a datasheet
    3. Wire it up
    4. Take 1 free I/O parallel port library under "no explicit licence" for non-commercial use.
    5. Write ~180 lines of Visual Basic
    6. Start selling optical mice scanners to Digg'ers? (after getting "explicit commercial licence" for I/O library.)
    7. Profit!


    Nice idea for a hack, but let's see you do something with like read a barcode or OCR a sentence :P
  57. This is what the original design was for: Capshare by steve_l · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is very funny from a historical note.

    Most optical mice have a chipset from agilent (look for the * logo on the bottom). It was originally designed for a portable scanner, HP Capshare, that had battery+scanner+IR link on it.

    The trick in the box is stiching software; you would scan back and forth, turning it on a page without lifting it, and the firmware would work out what the content was. Like optical mice, it doesnt work on shiny pages.

    The product crashed and burned, but at least the silicion could be turned into mouse silicon instead, and in the process actually increasing the selling price of a mouse. Who wants a no-good ball mouse, the junk you get bundled with a PC?

    I still have a capshare scanner; its actually quite useful for discreetly scanning bits of books at the local university.
    I have an inherited

  58. Not unless... by Sr.+Pato · · Score: 1

    ... you plan on using your keyboard as your mousepad...
    ... and your mouse as the utencil to press the keys with...
    ... and you press each key slowly enough for the letters to register and not be a big blur...
    ... and that the hackers feel like flipping through thousands of key-strokes to find any coherent meaning...

    .. and that... you get the idea.

    --
    Nobody's gay for Mole-Man. :-(
  59. Jerry rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, hell, boy! Y'all ain't frum 'round here now, is ya? Iffin ya wuz, yood kno t'was jury rig. I tell you whut...

  60. Reminds me of this C64 hack... by Lazarian · · Score: 1

    This is a pretty cool hack, even though its usefulness is debatable. Still, that's the spirit of hacking. It kinda reminded me of this guy who made a scanner for his C64 with a photocell and lego blocks...

    http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/tech/tech.html

    Even today, that's neat. He even turned a scanner into a digital camera.

  61. I do on Zip Files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geforces are great password crackers. 15 to 16 times faster than a PC on a plaintext attack.

    8hour max to 30 mins Max to do the crack.

    Partical cracks run great on Geforces.

    1. Re:I do on Zip Files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duck! Concorde flying overhead! WHOOOSH!

  62. Sounds like Thunderscan. by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Sounds like Thunderscan. by snow_man · · Score: 1

      first thing i thought of too.

      damn i'm old.

      --
      i am snow. fear me.
  63. Reversing the course of history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The HP CapShare camera was a handheld scanner. As HP (and later Agilent) realized that the same technology they were using for scanning strips of pages relied on the sense of direction, the product was repurposed (and redesigned etc) as a mouse. So, there is nothing new here.... presumably a quick patent search can prove this out.

    1. Re:Reversing the course of history by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Here you go.
      US Patent #4804949: Hand-held optical scanner and computer mouse.

      As you can see, the patent is quite old. It was filed in 1987, published in 1989.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  64. Shocking by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

    I am appalled at the use of the term ghetto. Go ahead. Blame the victim.

    --
    fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
  65. Hook up a different lens to your mouse... by Shanep · · Score: 1

    and you could have a black and white camera with 0.000324 mega pixels!

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  66. handheld XP by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    Docupen.

    doesn't need the computer until you want to dump.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  67. Re:This is what the original design was for: Capsh by boomgopher · · Score: 1

    ...at the local university I have an inherited

    Dude, you're the man - a whole university?

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  68. Same hack works with your monitor by ibirman · · Score: 1

    A similar hack actually works with your monitor to take a picture of whatever is in front of your computer. There is a demo at this site:

    http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Acres/3072/came ra2.html

  69. But... by lancelott · · Score: 1

    Does it run Linux?

    1. Re:But... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Something tells me that it'd be easier to do this on linux considering you can just cat /dev/input/mice stream to get the mouse data.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  70. It's 'de jure' (was:Jury rig?) by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

    The term "jury rig" comes from Latin, of course, "de jure" (pronounced about 'day jury') meaning "for the day".

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  71. ghetto b&w handscanner by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

    Of course it only understands ebonics

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  72. Poor images.. by LoneTech · · Score: 1

    At first I thought it was one of those typical Frontpage-generated sites that overlap images with text, but it turns out he used screenshots and didn't even match the images with the windows he wanted to show, so we're seeing random garbage around them. The pink/green effect on the gray areas is indicative that he's using 16-bit, so yes, this guy could use a new graphics card. Fairly neat hack, but combine it with for instance ALE's video mode for proper effect.

  73. Mindstorms anyone? by serutan · · Score: 1

    This is a million times cooler than the guy who claimed to have played sound from a scanned images of a phonograph record. I wonder how good an image you could get with a Mindstorms machine to move the mouse back and forth? [don't look at me, I have enough unfinished projects]

    1. Re:Mindstorms anyone? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I pretty much liked the record scanning hack, but what about combining them, reading your phonograph records with an optical mouse! :)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  74. Re:This is what the original design was for: Capsh by steve_l · · Score: 1

    > Dude, you're the man - a whole university?

    Only a little one, that issues degrees and doctorates by email. you may have got some of our adverts in your inbox.

    We specialise in a limited number of courses
    -nigerian banking
    -0EM software
    -Phishing; basic and advanced.

    The Phishing course is becoming more popular, as we actually offer a discount on the degree if you successfully collect the SSNs and banking details of a thousand new individuals. You may also be interested in a doctorate, though as PhDs require actual work, you'll need to spend time writing and monitoring the phishnets that I'm devising.

    -steve