Slashdot Mirror


I Dream of Silence From My Web Browser?

BRAINBUZ asks: "I'm finding more and more web-pages are blasting sound at me. Everyone who chooses to blast sound at me seems to manage to make their sound files much louder than what I was trying to listen to. I am finding this to be even more annoying than popups -- at least with pop-ups I could click the X and be done with it, pages with sound don't give an option to turn it off without closing the browser, or muting all sound. When I can, I avoid sites with sound, but just today I was checking my balance on one of my credit cards only to have some awful noise nearly blow out my speakers from one of their ads, for themselves. Opera has a feature to turn off sound in web pages, which doesn't work on most noisy pages. Haven't been able to find a similar option in Firefox or IE. The next killer feature, what I really want from my browser, is the ability to shut every web site up. I get security warnings from my browsers all of the time, why can't I get a warning about every media file (whether it be audio, video, flash, ActiveX or Java based) on the page that wants to play and the option to play or not play them?"

87 comments

  1. FlashMute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    FlashMute - cross-browser Flash muting.

    1. Re:FlashMute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it can mute sound from non-Flash sources aswell, like embedded .wav, .midi and stuff played through QuickTime.

    2. Re:FlashMute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's an idea... Why don't you TURN YOUR FCKNG VOLUME DOWN?

      ~:-P
      lamenessfilterencountered,slashdotcensorshipsucks

  2. I cannot count the number of times I've been... by Wisgary · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...in this situation. Here I am reading the news/video game article/PC article when all of a sudden a car insurance ad BLASTS at me with a screeching car sound. You can substitute screeching car sound with any conceivable annoying sound in existance. My solution? Adblock the hell out of them.

    1. Re:I cannot count the number of times I've been... by ssimontis · · Score: 1

      Host files are even better than adblock. With a well-written host file, you don't have any ads at all. I use the hostfile at someonewhocares.org/hosts, and haven't been bothered by ads in a long time.

      --
      Scott Simontis
  3. disconnect your speakers by mkcmkc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I run with my speakers (including that stupid internal one) disconnected all the time, unless there's something I want to hear. That solves about 99% of the problem. Don't install Flash plugins--that's an additional help.

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    1. Re:disconnect your speakers by bob+whoops · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is something I want to hear most of the time. My music.

    2. Re:disconnect your speakers by ResidntGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not YOUR music, it's the RIAA's music! You're DAMN lucky they allow you to listen, even if you paid for it! Count your blessings!

      --
      ResidntGeek
    3. Re:disconnect your speakers by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > It's not YOUR music, it's the RIAA's music!

      Ack, no, you've got to be kidding! I don't listen to that thrice-becursed noise. Yeesh.

      I listen to *real* music. You know, music that contains not just sound but actual *music*, i.e., counterpoint. Most of the really good stuff was written before 1750, so the RIAA has no claim on it, since it's older than they or their various member organizations and labels.

      (Okay, okay, so sometimes a modern performer will see fit to record some of the good stuff, and in that case the recording of the performance might be within the RIAA's domain. The music itself, however, is not.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  4. Most of these are flash... by Matt+Perry · · Score: 3, Informative
    Most of these sounds come from Flash objects. You can block Flash with FlashBlock. It puts a play button where the Flash object is. As an alternative, I would recommend using NoScript. It allows you to block JavaScript, Flash, Java, and other plugins and then whitelist sites that you go to all of the time. You can enable Flash, Java, and plugins by clicking to play like with FlashBlock. If you are just visiting for a moment then you can temporarily enable for that site just for your browser session. I've found that this fixes all of the sound issues that you are talking about.

    only to have some awful noise nearly blow out my speakers from one of their ads, for themselves.
    Then install AdBlock and the AdBlock Filterset.G Updater. Ads that play sounds are yet another reason in a long list why I block ads myself. Some people don't agree with blocking ads. Well, make up your own mind on what to do. Personally I take the approach that several bad advertisers ruin it for everyone so I block them all.
    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Most of these are flash... by dschuetz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most of these sounds come from Flash objects. You can block Flash with FlashBlock. It puts a play button where the Flash object is.

      Of course, then, you either get no flash, or when you explicitly play the flash, you still get blasted away.

      I asked about this ages (I think maybe even two years ago) for Mozilla. There's even a bug filed for it [and, OMB, it was filed almost exactly six years ago ]. It's got 53 votes, maybe it needs more: Bug 24418 - Allow user to turn on and off rendering of video/audio (disable sound).

      What'd really be nice is a volume control in an easily-accessed space on the browser, so you could, if you want, leave the browser sounds enabled, but at a mix level you're comfortable with.

    2. Re:Most of these are flash... by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      and, OMB

      Geez, even *with* preview, I substituted Office of Management and Budget for Oh, My God. My mind's still at the con, I guess.

    3. Re:Most of these are flash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just figured it was short for "oh my Bob".

    4. Re:Most of these are flash... by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

      In Linux, because the Flash 7 plugin uses the outdated OSS for sound support while the rest of my system uses ALSA, and since I always have my own music running, Flash things in Firefox can't access the sound. In fact, I have more trouble with NOT getting sound out of Flash when I want it.

      Besides, I have FlashBlock on top of that.

  5. No problem! by The+NPS · · Score: 1
    Updated Hosts file ...
    Firefox: Adblock (filterset.G), NoScript (set to block flash as well)

    No sound from any webpages yet!

  6. Sound levels by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Many sites play sounds at whatever volume level they found the file recorded at, which can vary from file to file, and Windows normalizes nothing. Also Firefox will play sounds not in the currently active window (or maybe it's just another tab in the same window, I'm not for certain), so I've had to hunt it down. To make things even worse, Midi and waveform generating files get different volume settings and it's not always clear which one you're dealing with.

  7. Use Firefox with noscript extension by thomasdn · · Score: 1

    Use Firefox with https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?id=722&application=firefoxnoscript extension.
    Noscript will block alle javascript, flash, and media files.
    You can then choose which ones to enable.

    Try it.

  8. 2 soundcards maybe??? by baton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the reason you dont want sounds is because your say listening to music via another app you could get a 2nd sound output device (say a cheap usb 'soundcard') make that primary ound output and not plug anything into it. Then set your sound app to use the other soundcard that has speakers on it.

    You shouldn't have to goto these lengths to do it, but it would work.

    1. Re:2 soundcards maybe??? by noblethrasher · · Score: 1

      Now that's the kind of out-of-the-box thinking I like to see. We get more of that and a little bit of Bruce Willis and we might just be able to save this rock. All kidding aside, that's a remarkable idea.

    2. Re:2 soundcards maybe??? by Poeir · · Score: 1

      If you're going to do this, why not just use /dev/null as the primary output device? Save the expense of using an extra sound card.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    3. Re:2 soundcards maybe??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because not everybody uses Linux/BSD/Whatever UNIX you prefer.

    4. Re:2 soundcards maybe??? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because then you couldn't scare the shit out of someone plugging speakers into the wrong soundcard by looping a loudass WAV of "AWOOOOGAH!! DO NOT TOUCH ME THERE HUMAN!!!!" through it.

    5. Re:2 soundcards maybe??? by harryman100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Chances are it's possible you're using the onboard sound from your motherboard anyway. What I did a while ago is buy myself a nice SoundBlaster, mostly because I wanted surround sound and my previous card didn't do it, My default sound device is my onboard card, and all "approved" apps have their ouput set to use the SoundBlaster which is hooked up to a nice surround sound set of speakers, the onboard sound is plugged into the shitty speakers built into my monitor (which are usually muted).

      This provides a nice way of having two different levels for different kinds of input, muting unwanted (unexpected) sounds, however, if you're using linux, it can take a bit of fiddling to set up in ALSA. YMMV

      --
      .sigs are for losers
    6. Re:2 soundcards maybe??? by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      One of the funniest comments I've seen in a while... keep the flave, man.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  9. What are they thinking? by DanZ23 · · Score: 1

    I've gone to both streaming and flash web sites lately, and I can't figure out what the webmaster is thinking.

    It guarantees I will not return willingly.

    1. Re:What are they thinking? by black+mariah · · Score: 0

      He's thinking that he's not making a website for douchebag luddites that can't deal with these newfangled gadgets.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  10. Your bank? by strikethree · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You say you were checking your balance. I would assume that this is your bank. Have you considered writing/calling them and letting them exactly how annoying a full-blast sound is? I am sure they would not tolerate such loud sounds inside of their bank, so I really do not think they would approve of such loud sounds coming from their website. The website was likely designed by an external company with little oversight by the bank.

    Of course, this only fixes one sight. Have you thought of writing a plug-in for Mozilla/Firefox similar to the wonderful flash-block plugin?

    strike

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    1. Re:Your bank? by ClamIAm · · Score: 4, Funny
      I would assume that this is your bank.

      Only one way to find out. Get the name of the president of the bank, stand directly outside of his office with a megaphone, and shout "Mr. Phillips! WOULD YOU LIKE A BIGGER PENIS?"

    2. Re:Your bank? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      An alternative to simply writing to your bank; you could use one of those Birthday cards which plays an annoying and repetitive tune when opened, and simply compose a clear and concise letter within letting the bank know how annoying sound can be when trying to work or relax. You'd also have the added advantage that the advisor dealing with your complaint would be able to fully appreciate just how frustrating unexpected and unwanted noise can be.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    3. Re:Your bank? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I have a great one: not only does it play sound, but it's got flashing LEDs too! My roommate's parents sent it to her from Paris.

      She was going to throw it away but I grabbed it because it has about two dozen white LEDs decorating the Eiffel tower on the front.

    4. Re:Your bank? by brainbuz · · Score: 1

      I was tempted to close the account and tell them the reason was getting blasted when trying to check my balance. But the credit card's been open over 7 years, since I don't carry balances on it, closing the account would lower my credit scores. The idiocy of Credit Scoring is worth another RANT or more but not in this reply.

      --
      minds, get scrambled like eggs, abused and erased. Hard Hearted Alice is who you want to see.
  11. A Mac solution - Audio Hijack by TTop · · Score: 1

    Ok, this is a little bit of work, but on the Mac, I can use Audio Hijack (Pro) for this purpose -- hijack the browser, then hit the Mute button in Audio Hijack. I also find this useful when the browser's volume balance is out-of-whack with iTunes -- I can hijack the output volume and lower it. All in all, I've found Audio Hijack Pro very useful, for more than just these purposes.

  12. Every now and then... by Gadren · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I think that Flash is one of the worst things to happen to the Web. Maybe it's just frustration, but do we really need to slowly fading buttons on a corporate website?

    1. Re:Every now and then... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      It's not just the web.

      Some of the colleges in my region use a product called LearnKey that relies heavily on Flash both for instruction and examination, and it's horribly broken. I don't think it's so much a flaw with Flash itself as that the person who wrote the software was completely clueless, but I've yet to see a session with the software where at least two or three of its Flash portions didn't crap out or lock up. Especially on multi-part questions in the quizzes... "Hey, it wouldn't go to the next part of question X when I took the quiz. Can I do it over?"

      Web masters and programmers alike: It's better for something to work well and be less flashy, than to be flashy and work like a piece of crap. Also, as this article shows, it's better to forego the "shiny" bits (whether audio or video) if it's going to annoy your viewers or customers.

  13. Oh, and by the way... by Gadren · · Score: 1

    ...in Soviet Russia, Flash mutes YOU!

    1. Re:Oh, and by the way... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Which flash? The Tungusaka event, or Chernobyl?

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  14. Big problem on MySpace by dave1g · · Score: 1

    Many of the myspace.com profiles have 1 of these 3 ways of emitting sound

    1. flash
    2. streamed wmv
    3. bgsound src=

    I can block flash, but has anyone figured out the others, especially if I could specifically target it at webpages form myspace.

    greasemonkey script?

    I use flashblock and ad block already, I will check out this no script thing. Anything else?

    1. Re:Big problem on MySpace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FlashMute, as mentioned in the first reply. Mutes more than flash.

    2. Re:Big problem on MySpace by dave1g · · Score: 1

      OK I am dumb, I just updated my hosts file with this

      127.0.0.1 www.videocodezone.com
      127.0.0.1 videocodezone.com

      I believe that is where most of the wmv music videos come form on myspace.

      Looking for hightech answers and it turns out the old school hosts file does the trick, no more annoying sounds.

  15. Sound Control Options on IE and Firefox by Mortlath · · Score: 1
    I browsed through the menus of both Internet Explorer and Firefox and found a setting, similar to the one in Opera, in Internet Explorer.

    Go to Tools->Options->Advanced->Multimedia

    I was unable to find any such options on Firefox, but maybe I missed it somehow. I looked for an extension on the Mozilla site as well, but I didn't have any luck.

    Like Opera, however, the sound setting in Internet Explorer doesn't stop Flash Ads.

    1. Re:Sound Control Options on IE and Firefox by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I also looked for a setting in Firefox that would disable HTML sound sources and couldn't find anything. Amazing/strange. I checked about:config, too.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  16. slashdot blocked by dave1g · · Score: 1

    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24418

    if anyone wants to copy paste it. I'm voting for it.

    Anyone know why the slahsdot referer is blocked?

    1. Re:slashdot blocked by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      oh, yeah, I forgot about that. Try this one (not sure if it'll work, but it's worth a shot): Bug 24418, via TinyUrl.

      (interestingly, it worked in the preview).

    2. Re:slashdot blocked by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I think it's just a farily zealous way to prevent a Slashdotting.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  17. noscript by kevstar31 · · Score: 1

    noscript blocks javavascpipt, flash and java on a site by site basis witch should prevent sound from playing. noscript.net

  18. Could always go low tech by coaxial · · Score: 1

    I got so tired of unexpected sounds, I leave on mute. When I want to hear sounds, I unmute. Not very elegant, I grant you, but it works.

    1. Re:Could always go low tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As mentioned earlier in this post, FlashMute lets you block sound from your browser, not only sound coming from Flash, but also embedded .wav, .midi and stuff played through QuickTime. Sound from Flash can even be volume adjusted separately (won't touch your precious music).

    2. Re:Could always go low tech by coaxial · · Score: 1

      FlashMute doesn't work for macs, nor linux. So it's not really an option for many people.

    3. Re:Could always go low tech by radioactivecow · · Score: 0

      He's talking about muting the whole computer, not using FlashMute.

  19. Use 2 sound cards by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    Kind of esoteric, and not extremely practical, but you can have one sound card (or even your voice modem's audio channel) as Windows' default sound playback device with no speakers attached, then play your desired program through the second card. This will only work with apps where you can specify where to send the output, but it's an option. I'm running on-board sound plus a mult-channel rackmount sound interface, and it'll do this.

  20. email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One can always complain to the sites and the parent company of whatever is being advertised. If you take the time write up a polite but firm complaint, just copy and paste it and send it off to the contact addy. Something along these lines, obviously write your own. "Dear sir/madam: Your advertisement x at site y contains an intrusive flash animation and sound package that is quite startling and annoying. In a business situation, the last thing you would want to do is to annoy any potential customers. It "gets your attention" but in a most negative way, and accidently hitting it at work where it blares out it becomes disruptive and is very unprofessional sounding. Many research studies have proven it, a tasteful non animated and quiet ad is much preferred by most internet consumers, witness the success of Googles non audio and quiet text-ad based system."

    DON'T send it to the webmaster at site y, they are the doofusses who make money off of faking out the company that they need some advanced macromedia crapware ad. Those guys will blow you off, do some looking and go directly to the company, find some relevant VPs to CC the complaint to, and not the marketing VPs either, they are in on it and are usually mesmerised by their own leet skills, useless talking to them. You send it to some operations manager at a company and the media relations people. Point out that consumers are switching in droves to ad blocking software precisely because ads have become so annoying that it is hard to even remain on a web page at some sites.

    In short, right after SPAM, Flash is the most hideous part of the web, and it's spyware to boot. Macromedia doesn't get near the dissin' they deserve as e-vile. It's perfectly fine if you are going to a Flash site on purpose that uses Flash for some artsy fartsy content, but that is a tiny fraction of how Flash is used.

    1. Re:email by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Flash is the most hideous part of the web, and it's spyware to boot

      Go on, back this up. I'd love to hear about it.

  21. don't be OSS compatible by marimbaman · · Score: 1

    Neglecting to modprobe snd-pcm-oss seems to kill browser sound quite effectively on my ALSA-based system.

  22. Re:simple by Jippy+T+Flounder · · Score: 0, Troll

    and stop using the fucking internet. dildos.

    --
    ---- I was woken up this morning by a face full of fur. Damn cat thought my head made a good pillow.
  23. Why waste the ram? by andy753421 · · Score: 1

    If you're never going to use sound, why even have it installed in the browser? When I upgraded for firefox 1.5 I intentionally did not install mozplugger so now stuff can't play sound no matter what. Similarly I don't like my PC speaker, so I didn't compile support for it in the kernel. Settings may change and get reset, but if it's not supported it sure isn't going to be doing much :) Unfortunately I don't know much about the Windows builds other than I think they come with all that stuff enabled by default, and I'm not sure how to get rid of it..

    1. Re:Why waste the ram? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > If you're never going to use sound, why even have it installed in the browser?

      Indeed, I was until this thread blissfully unaware that there *was* sound-playing capability in modern browsers. I have unpleasant memories of Netscape 3.x playing extremely annoying MIDI files (a significantly sped-up version of the I Love You song from Barney & Friends springs immediately to mind...), but I had assumed that such garbage had been thrown out with the other major atrocities of that era, such as Javascript functions that allow the website to change your system wallpaper and browser start page. It is completely beyond me why anyone would want their web browser to be able to pull such schenanighans.

      > When I upgraded for firefox 1.5 I intentionally did not install mozplugger so now stuff
      > can't play sound no matter what.

      I guess I didn't know about mozplugger. Is that an extension to let web pages play sound? If so, why would anyone install it? More to the point, why would someone then complain that web pages are playing sound?

      > Unfortunately I don't know much about the Windows builds other than I think they
      > come with all that stuff enabled by default, and I'm not sure how to get rid of it..

      perl -e 'open G,"grep \"win\" /etc/fstab |"; @_=split /\s+/,<G>; `dd if=/dev/zero of=$_[0];`'

      HTH.HAND.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    2. Re:Why waste the ram? by andy753421 · · Score: 1

      Yes, mozplugger is an extension that allows you to use mplayer with firefox to play movies and sounds. I installed it because I thought I would like it better than download videos and then opening them, I was wrong.

      dd if=/dev/zero of=`sed -n "s/\(.*\)\s.*win.*/\1/ip"`

  24. Re:simple by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your internet dildos intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  25. Well as a gamer by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    I find that an awfull lot of game sites nowadays come with flash trailers with sound. This is perfectly acceptable up to a point. They are trying to sell me a full 3D surround sound feast for the eye and ear and well doing that in pure HTML is apparently to difficult.

    So completly blocking flash or just disable all sound is not worth it to me.

    So gee, what other option do I have to disable sound from ads. Hmmm. Though one.

    Oh wait maybe I can block ads? Nah, I am not skilled enough for this and I am sure nobody else has bothered to code something like this.

    What the fuck is this question about?Ads annoy me, what can I do about it? BLOCK THE FUCKING FUCKERS! Find the server for the offending ad and block it in whatever adblocker you have installed.

    But blocking ads hurts sites who depend on them for their revenue. THOUGH SHIT! Nobody started out blocking ads. When the first few banners appeared people were more or less willing to accept them.

    However ad companies faced a problem, sites with millions of visitors generated only a handfull of click throughs. Could it be that they had the wrong ads, that people just ain't all the intrested in what is being sold? That people period do not read ads? Remember that before with TV/radio and magazine ads there was no real way to measure how many people were affected by ads. With click throughs the total failure of ads to attract is very apparent.

    Ad companies could of course have told their employers that consumers just ain't intrested in their products OR they can make the ads even more annoying and in your face because surely that is the way to get people intrested.

    So static images became animated, animated images came to surround all the text, the text was chopped up to maximize the amount of ads displayed, content became hidden by ad pages that had to be viewed and now sound to make sure your attention is diverted.

    Ads are totally out of control on the net as companies desperatly seek a way to get as many eyeballs to their product as possible. If your not intrested well then of course the only way to change that is by making the ad even more intrusive since nobody in the business can make money by simply accepting that you are not going to buy product X.

    The only recourse you have is to block them. So do so. Yes some idiots will claim it is stealing, these are probably the same people that dutyfully examine each ad in the news paper and sit upright in their chair during the commericial break while us thieves are taking a toilet break or stocking up on snacks.

    Ads are not in themselves offensive to me. But I grew up in holland where amazing as it may sound to americans we had NO ADS on sundays on tv. Now the ad blocks are 5 minutes and growing and frankly I have had enough. If you give the ad industry a finger they will rip of your arm and rape your ass with it. AND charge you for it.

    Block them, it your only hope for sanity. Of course the ad industry response will be to make ads even more annoying for the poor people who don't block them but well, who gives a fuck.

    All those who do not block ads, thank you for paying for my ad free internet. I appreciate it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  26. Disable the sound? Better solution... by baadger · · Score: 1

    If it's ads that contain these annoying sounds, just block the ads. Hit them where it hurts. I recommend Proxomitron because it runs as a proxy and hence covers all all your browsers simultaneously (but you can ad rules for individual browsers with header matching).

    Alternatively, if you just use Firefox, you can try the Adblock extension but, personally, Proxo is alot more powerful. If you're comfortable with regex, willing to learn a few $commands()'s, it's the way to go.

    Unfortunately it's Windows only, and no longer in development (sadly the author died and never released the source), but it's still widely used and has a quite a little community about it. If you need it, I'm sure someone else can point you to a Linux solution.

    Here is a taster of what Engadget can look like after a few rules in Proxo.

    P.S.
    On the morality of blocking ads: nobody complains when you goto fetch a drink and take a jimmy riddle during the commercial break, now do they?

    1. Re:Disable the sound? Better solution... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      For those not using Windows, Privoxy is also capable of blocking ads based on both location and other characteristics (eg. size). I also successfully used it to block Opera's ads and replace them with a grey bar the same colour as the rest of the window, back when it was ad-supported.

  27. How about Vista? by David+Horn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, I know it's a wait and I know it's Windows, but apparently you'll be able to control the volume of individual programs.

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    1. Re:How about Vista? by belroth · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I know it's a wait and I know it's Windows, but apparently you'll be able to control the volume of individual programs.
      Yeah, and it comes with Duke Nukem Forever and a cure for cancer, oh and I hear there's a winning lottery ticket in every box too.
      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  28. Wrong place by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    You are posting this to the wrong place. This is a great idea and would make a fantastic addition to firefox other options. But you should really suggest this to the firefox team.

    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product =Firefox&format=guided

    You can enter the feature in bugzilla as a "Wishlist" item. You never know they too might think this is a great idea.

    N.

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  29. Can't say I'd noticed by DrSkwid · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is a phenomena that I wasn't even aware of :0

    But it does raise an interesting question :

    How do you peons end up on /. ?

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  30. Re:simple by Jippy+T+Flounder · · Score: 1

    dear sir

    all you need to do to subscribe to the wonderful world of internet dildos is send a regular mail containing all your banking details to the following address:

    C/O Flobby Nobkins
    668 Griznibbit Rd.
    Shack Sector 2
    Nigeria

    and you can have as many internet dildos inserted as you can handle! perhaps more!

    you friend in good faith,
    mr. roger (aka shaft)

    --
    ---- I was woken up this morning by a face full of fur. Damn cat thought my head made a good pillow.
  31. Just use Linux by fatrat · · Score: 2, Funny


    Just put linux on a cutting edge laptop - volia, no sound :)

    1. Re:Just use Linux by MullerMn · · Score: 1

      I would like to congratulate you on your innovative new misspelling of 'voila'.

  32. Disable sound file support from the browser by lilmouse · · Score: 1

    This seems pretty straightforward to me...

    If it's flash (as many claim), then you have your answer: no flash.

    If it's not flash (doesn't *have* to be), then just disable the ability of the browser to play it automatically:

    Tools->Options->Downloads->File Types box. Remove anything that makes sound :-) Granted, you'll break other things (I'm thinking movies - make those play by something with seperate volume control), but you won't get sound!

    HTH and that I'm not missing anything :)

    --LWM

  33. older linux kernel w/ oss drivers by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    Simple - use an older linux kernel with oss drivers and play whatever you want on xmms, maybe have a "silent" track that just repeats (but don't violate Cage's copyright on silence either now....) xmms will lock /dev/dsp, and nothing else will be able to play sound. Oh, and other things trying to play sound tend to lock up...

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:older linux kernel w/ oss drivers by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > (but don't violate Cage's copyright on silence either now....)

      Cage doesn't have a copyright on silence. You can't copyright a mere idea such as silence. What Cage copyrighted is a particular _expression_ of silence. So unless you are copying some elements of his expression (e.g., including factors like making your tracks the same length as his movements, or having somebody actually sit at a piano and not play), you are in no danger whatsoever of violating his copyright just by having a silent track.

      > Oh, and other things trying to play sound tend to lock up...

      Huh. I've never had this problem. I have seen xmms crash, but I'm pretty sure it was due to a broken plugin, because it consistently happened about halfway through every track (which is when this particular plugin does its thing) without fail, and disabling the plugin stopped it from happening. The plugin in question was the "Scrobbler" thingy from last.fm, and I'm guessing it was either compiled for a different version of xmms (or possibly of some library it uses e.g. for sending data) or else was just buggy.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  34. perhaps CSS ? user level stylesheets by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1


    Is there an audio equivalent to the CSS "display:none" property that can zap specific page elements?

  35. In Firefox, all sound is produced by plug-ins by kbolino · · Score: 1

    Firefox has no native sound-producing capabilities. All of the sound is produced by media or applets that invoke a plug-in (Windows Media, Quicktime, Flash, Java applets, etc.). This would be impossible to write into the Firefox code. The only reasonable way to adjust this is to use Downloads: View & Edit Actions and modify all audio types to save to disk. Someone mentioned something about a flash muter, which would then also take care of Flash animations. It is rather uncommon for Java applets to play sound as the applet API can only play 8-bit mono files of a specific format (AU, I believe).

  36. Security and Annoyances by camperslo · · Score: 1

    Along with many annoying things showing up as Flash content, having the plugin enabled gives us one more place for potential security problems.

    Known or not, vulnerabilities relating to images and Flash existed for a very long time. Considering that offsite content greatly increased the potential exposure of even a selective surfer, perhaps it's worth reconsidering very aggressive blocking/filtering and disabling non-essential plugins.

    I haven't looked closely enough at the control offered by Firefox plugins. Is it possible to enable Flash and Javascript on a site by site basis while still blocking it for imbedded offsite-content?

  37. Zap Plugins Bookmarklet by JJC · · Score: 1

    It's cure rather than prevention but when I'm faced with these things (and animating ads that pull the eye away from whatever I'm trying to read) I use this nifty Zap Plugins bookmarklet which I keep within easy reach on my browser's toolbar. Apparently it works on IE, Firefox and Opera.

  38. You already have a plugin installed by neves · · Score: 1

    It's called volume control!

  39. Firefox Extension.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a Firefox Extension out there called media player connectivity. It detects many types of media. Real media, windows media, quicktime, playlists, mp3s, flash, wave/midi/au/aif, nullsoft video, shockwave, and authorware.

    It gives you a link to open the media in the program that normally plays the media instead of hearing it embedded in the web page. There are a few other things you can configure with it, too. Not important as much as what you are trying to achieve here.

  40. State law copyright in sound recordings by tepples · · Score: 1

    Most of the really good stuff was written before 1750, so the RIAA has no claim on it

    You mean NMPA/Harry Fox/ASCAP/BMI has no claim on the underlying musical works. RIAA members, on the other hand, have state law copyright in sound recordings of those musical works, which isn't limited by any "limited Times" clause (because it isn't granted by the federal government) and which Congress has agreed to let continue until 2067.

  41. RESOLVED DUPLICATE by tepples · · Score: 1

    You are posting this to the wrong place. This is a great idea and would make a fantastic addition to firefox other options. But you should really suggest this to the firefox team.

    I thought the point was that we discuss it here before we discuss it on Bugzilla because we don't want to waste developers' time with dupes.

  42. Naviscope is what I use... by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1
    Naviscope is what I use to solve problems like this. It's a Windows only freebie that is, unfortunately, no longer supported or in development but I've been using it for over five years without any problems save one (more on that later). I'm afraid you'll have to search for it. Version 8.70 was the last.

    Naviscope is a web proxy that I have successfully used with IE, FF, and Opera, has programmable prefetch (can be set to delay on page load), DNS caching, and time sync and more. It has a default block setting and you then set altered settings for any sites for which you want different settings (it comes with a few already set so you have working examples, e.g. WindowsUpdate). You can block: ads (this doesn't work as well as in the past), backgrounds, blinking text, pop-ups while page is loading or entirely, system information (UserAgent), last page visited (Referrer), cookies, javascript, and those damned sounds. Now true, FF without or with extensions can do a lot of this now, but you can also cover your other browsers with the same settings and just forget about it.

    One feature that I didn't list above that has proved invaluable as a web developer here is that you can monitor both incoming and outgoing traffic, i.e. header traffic and do pings and traceroute on them, in a decent graphical window. You can flip that on and off with a toggle. Very handy!

    The one glitch I've seen in all these years is that if you increase the number of simultaneous connections above the normal OS default for the network connection, it will crash. I haven't found this that much of a problem.

    It's installed on all my systems here and works on all versions of Windows, 95 to 2003, from personal experience here. For FF and Opera, set the normal port 80 traffic to point to 127.0.0.1 port 81. No idea about Vista but I doubt it given the changes to the TCP/IP stack.

    Just a thought.

    --
    "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
  43. From the headline by phorm · · Score: 1

    Everyone who chooses to blast sound at me seems to manage to make their sound files much louder than what I was trying to listen to

    In other words, he listens to music at a reasonable volume, and then disruptive flash ads pop up with blaringly-loud noises/voices/etc. So unplugging the speakers is not a reasonable answer.

    Personally, unplugging speakers would never be an answer. All OS's tend to have a "mute" option on audio out... so why would you reach around for speaker wires. Moreover, a better solution would be to disable/block the source of the annoyance, mainly the ads or perhaps flash in general. The flashblock plugins are useful... I remember there was one that showed a placeholder until you actually chose to click and therefore load the flash. Saves on bandwidth, saves on annoyance.

    1. Re:From the headline by mkcmkc · · Score: 1
      All OS's tend to have a "mute" option on audio out... so why would you reach around for speaker wires.
      Because I've been using (and programming) computers long enough to know that software sucks. If you absolutely need something to work, no matter what, don't do it with software. If you absolutely don't want to hear sound from your speakers--unplug them.

      As for the part about wanting to listen to music, I'd suggest that killing off plugins will still solve most of the problem. And for mp3's, a standalone mp3 player is nice.

      --
      "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  44. firefox in vmware sound off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the free vmware player with browser (which has firefox as the browser) from

    http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/vm/browserapp.html

    and turn off sound on the virtual machine.

  45. how pathetic by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

    Not the idea. It definitely works.

    It's pathetic that you would even think of it.

    It's more pathetic that I understand what you're saying.

  46. Similar Problem by Dream1979 · · Score: 1

    When I am running AIM (aol instant messanger) It sometimes runs noisy, annoying ads. I was wondering if there is anyway or removing the ads without having to get a mod that requires an earlier version of the program.