Slashdot Mirror


Google Jumps into Radio Advertising

Luke PiWalker writes "Just days after Microsoft announced its online advertising entry, Google has announced their entry into the radio industry. Google announced today that it has signed a deal to purchase dMarc Broadcasting Inc. for a cool $102 million. The deal will allow Google to enhance its presence in the advertising industry over to the radio industry. What's even more interesting is that Google says it plans to integrate its highly successful AdSense program with those from dMarc. The Google and dMarc deal is expected to close at the end of the first quarter, 2006."

19 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Well by Hopieopdepaus · · Score: 5, Informative

    People who didn't read this yesterday (http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/17/18132 01) happily thank you for the reminder.

  2. WHAT DO WE DO by i8puppies · · Score: 4, Funny

    Crap crap, Google isnt on the front page anymore!
    QUICKLY! REPOST BEFORE ANYONE NOTICES!

  3. Google will soon get bloated by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A lot of googles success to date has been because it was a small(ish) lithe
    fleet footed company that managed to wrongfoot the large sluggish opposition
    corporations such as MS that find it almost impossible to make snap decisions.
    However recently google seems to be putting lots of fingers in lots of pies
    and getting rather fat. I'm wondering how long before this golden child of
    the dot come revolution turns into yet the type of fat bloated corporation
    that its founders we so successful in outdoing....

  4. Find the 10 similarities by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who knew "Opposites Attract" was written about Google & Microsoft? There we go, read and compare:

    Baby seems we never ever agree
    You like the movies
    And I like T.V.
    I take things serious
    And you take 'em light
    I go to bed early
    And I party all night
    Our friends are sayin'
    We ain't gonna last
    Cuz I move slowly
    And baby I'm fast
    I like it quiet
    And I love to shout
    But when we get together
    It just all work out

    I take-2 steps forward
    I take-2 steps back
    We come together
    Cuz opposites attract
    And you know-it ain't fiction
    Just a natural fact
    We come together
    Cuz opposites attract

  5. Don't bother ScuttleMonkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just take one of those Trauma Pills and it will all be beter tomorrow.

  6. Re:Adsense Everywhere now? by tpgp · · Score: 3, Funny

    C'mon!

    Bad enough to have a dupe article - we don't need dupe comments too

    --
    My pics.
  7. other avenues by DarkClown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So now I'm wondering what this rumored google cube is going to be be like - if the os will be dynamically branded, and I'm also curiouser and curiouser about tv ad opportunities they're sure to persue. Y'know, they could save tivo's butt - what if there was a google ad that popped up when you were pausing or fast forwarding or whatever - tivo should have tons of the kind of data that google is basing their contextual ads on. I gues what bugs me about the radio thing is that it doesn't seem to lend itself to the contextual advertising they are good at, it would have to be more 'just ads' as opposed to contextual.
    Or maybe they're after the ad sales force they get with this purchase more than a means to get in the medium itself.

  8. Look at the link! by putko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Look at the link on the submitter:

    http://www.playfullyclever.com/

    And then you'll see articles like this one:

    "The Problem With Slashdot
    Everyone seems to be bitching about Slashdot these days. Whether it's dupes, digg farming, **Beatles-Beatles spam, or even yours truly, everyone has something to whine about. The problem is that none of these things are really the problem (oops, that's a thinker, don't hurt yourself slashbots)...."

    So it seems this guy is working in the spirit of http://anti-slash.org/ -- but even sneakier -- the guy gets a dupe posted, where it links to his "how to fix Slashdot" webpage.

    What a PLAYFULLY CLEVER bastard!

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:Look at the link! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent redundant. Taco has already addressed this:

      Mod Grandparent Up. Taco posted a story on story selection. No one has actually gotten around to doing anything about it yet. This is the second virtual dupe by ScuttleMonkey in under 48 hours.

      Please stay on-topic. :)
      With dupes this blantant, the dupe is the topic. Anyone who mods "dupe" posts as offtopic, clearly doesn't understand how this site functions.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Look at the link! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think I'm alone in saying: "I don't give a flying crap about your Dupes/Links/Beatles/Scuttle drama." When the discussion that gets modded to the top has absolutely nothing to do with the topic, I find *that* more of a reason to avoid /. than any number of dupes.

      So you care more about the symptoms than the disease? People are posting these comments for a reason.

      Realise: The Dupe Is The Topic.

      I just want to read the good posts by the informed readers who haven't seen the story yet, and just one or two links to the original discussions if it is a dupe.

      The previous story was posted yesterday. If people want to comment about it, then they can do that in that story's page. Not this one's. This story page is for comments about the dupe, otherwise we'll all just be repeating everything that was said in the other story.

      I for one, will be more interested in fresher comments concerning the dupe than stale repeats of what I read yesterday.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:Look at the link! by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And then, as if by magic, the link disappeared, with nary a word from the editors.

      Editors, it's your site. You can do whatever you like with the submissions, and I can certainly understand you removing that link now that it's been brought to your attention.

      However, at the time of my writing this, the only comment rated at +5 is the one I'm replying to, commenting on the link. Surely it's only polite to update the article summary to add something about having removed the link? Otherwise putko starts to look a bit silly...

  9. What's all the hubbubb? by Jonathan.Sidego · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One post letting everyone know this is a duplicate is enough.

    What's the big deal with duplicates anyhow? If someone didn't see it yesterday, they'll see it now, and if someone _did_ see it yesterday; they don't have to RTFA, ya know?

    1. Re:What's all the hubbubb? by bhiestand · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What's the big deal with duplicates anyhow? If someone didn't see it yesterday, they'll see it now, and if someone _did_ see it yesterday; they don't have to RTFA, ya know?

      Good point. Why does the Los Angeles Times put all that effort into writing a NEW newspaper every day? They should just change the date. If somebody has already read the articles, they can just skip them. If they missed them, then they can go ahead and read it! It's like a second chance. Forever!
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  10. Not *Truely* A Dupe by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Informative

    To be fair, yesterday's story linked to press reports on Google's purchase. Today's links are to Google's own press release on the story.

    Nonetheless, a simple "following up on yesterday's story", would do a lot to increase confidence in the editors. However, doing that would require ScuttleMonkey to actually read the front page.

    Sorry if that sounds a little snide but I am seriously trying to hold back the flames of fury here. I wish 'Taco would hurry up with the next Slashback.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  11. Re:Dupe... by njvic · · Score: 2, Informative

    For ScuttleMonkey, it's at least 2 dupes in as many days. His other was the 50 millisecond judging one yesterday

    What's amazing is that this Google posting is still on the front page!!

  12. Not it at all. by lheal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In business, there are two conflicting necessities: stay with what you know, and diversify. You have to stay with what you know or the competition (in areas you don't understand) will eat you alive. You have to diversify, or grow stagnant and then die when your niche has a downturn.

    Google is diversifying, while staying in the ad business. It's not like they bought a shoe company or something. The cliche they'll use is probably "synergy".

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  13. Community by Jonathan.Sidego · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe we can get the Slash guys to incorporate a feature that would let the registered userbase label a submission a duplicate.
    Once a certain number of users have done that, the two articles in question will be merged, one will be removed or something.

    Something must be done, cuz I'm tired of all this complaining everytime it happens, but nothing gets done.

    Doing something like this will keep Slashdot relevant, in an age where 2.0 rules the Net.

    Let's do something! Yesterday!

  14. Re:Well [its a dupe, so what] by tpgp · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Meh, Its not that big a deal that its a dupe methinks.... there's been a lot more time for people to analyse this news.

    For instance, this article in the register makes this interesting point:
    Digital radio is simply an MPEG stream, and contextualizing digital streams, and injecting advertisements into them is Google's core competency - and not some untethered spacewalk into the unknown. And while creative agencies are certainly looking at the growth of paid web search with some trepidation, Google has shown no inclination to get very "creative" itself. It's as much a recognition that the phenomenal growth in paid web classified advertising can't, as Google has itself long predicted, be sustained.
    Two points there:

    1) Google's foray into traditional radio could simply be to facilitate its digital radio.

    2) Google's growth cannot be sustained in a single market.

    Neither of these were discussed too much in yesterday's comments.
    --
    My pics.
  15. Adsense by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While this is certainly news, I'm surprised that the integration of Adsense comes as a shock to anyone. Since I highly doubt we'll see "Go to Google for more information. Type Aitch Tee Tee Pee colon slash slash double you double you double you dot gee oh oh gee el ee dot see oh em.", the only other 'content' to deliver by radio is ads supplied by customers for their product, which would require some kind of integration with their existing system (Adsense). My crystal ball doesn't tell me if this will be a successful experiment, but I highly doubt Google will use it to advertise Google.

    And "Pee colon slash" sounds pretty awful, anyways. ;)

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.