Slashdot Mirror


Supermarket VOIP

chuckT writes "Tesco, the UK's largest supermarket chain, has announced plans to sell a VOIP handset and connection through their stores. Given that one out of every eight pounds, spent on shopping in the UK goes to Tesco, and the UK has one of the highest broadband takeup rates around, is this the end for the classic telecoms providers like BT?"

139 comments

  1. The end for BT? If only... (nb) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The end for BT? If only...

    1. Re:The end for BT? If only... (nb) by Farfromlosin · · Score: 3

      Doubtful. Most people don't realize (at least here in the US) that the phone companies own the interconnects, and thus, the backbone of the internet. If you put the telco's out of business with the internet, guess where the internet goes?
      Kind of like the theory that if you want to get rid of heart disease, remove everyone's heart. That is the only quick, easy, and sure fire way to do it. Once all the hearts have been removed, there will be no more heart disease, or cancer, or crime, or overpopulation......

      --
      ...because what good is power unless you can abuse it?
  2. Imperial March by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    one out of every eight pounds,

    Isn't the UK on the metric system? It sounds like Tesco should cut down on the amount of packaging it uses.

    I once worked for a mobile cellular company; it had a product called Freedom Link that allowed business to setup an infrastructure that would relay on sight traffic for one mobile device to another. That was squashed a few years ago forcing you to go through their lines and pay the minutes that way. If you knew how simple these devices were, you wouldn't be paying any cell phone bills ever again. If everyone built the wireless router to have frequency hoping characteristics and CDMA tagging then the current cellular structure would fall apart. Everyone could setup a mini mobile switching station and calls would be nearly free for everyone. The only thing that would have to change is a master area frequency delegation computer would have to be setup to control all the frequency hopping but I believe that a really smart device could be built to be self-aware of the spectrum usage.

    Can you imagine in 15 years that cellular as we know it could change to something similar that VOIP did to long distance. It is just a matter of time when some young engineering student topples a big portion of the cellular stranglehold.

    1. Re:Imperial March by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the UK on the metric system? Er, yeah. But the article isn't saying that 1/8 of all weight is spent on Tesco. Pounds are the British unit of currency.

    2. Re:Imperial March by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The brits also have this wonderful thing called sarcasm. You shold look into it sometime

    3. Re:Imperial March by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Showing off your intimidating wit in the bowels of AC /.?

    4. Re:Imperial March by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the sarchasm. The huge gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.

  3. Ahh those marketing geniuses! by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    The BT service offers free calls to UK landlines at evenings and weekends, at a cost of £4.99 a month

    This is totally kick-ass! Where else can you pay £4.99 to make free calls?
    NOWHERE! That's where!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Ahh those marketing geniuses! by gowen · · Score: 1

      That's a total bargain compared to the standing charge that BT will charge you, just for the right to make their distinctly-non-free calls.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Ahh those marketing geniuses! by Kagenin · · Score: 1

      Here in the US we enjoy free local calling. Most places in Europe, UK included, don't enjoy such a luxury.

      It must be nice having a view of the world that's limited to your own back yard.

      --
      "All warfare is based on deception."
      Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
    3. Re:Ahh those marketing geniuses! by timbo_red · · Score: 1

      Which you will still need to pay in order to retain the line you need for your broadband connection.

    4. Re:Ahh those marketing geniuses! by hattig · · Score: 1

      BT used to be (I don't know about now) limited by the regulator to not be competitive, as it is a monopoly.

      That's why BT never offered free local calls.

      Of course, all the cable companies offer them, and competing phone companies too.

      However people just want one number, and more and more frequently they want it to be the mobile number. It's nice and easy, it isn't tied to your location, and the phones do lots of useful & neat things too. The number's the same if I move house, go on holiday, etc. The housemate has her own mobile phone and thus there's no argument over the phone bill. It's all good.

      I hate the line rental fees that all the companies have though. They have no basis in reality. £11 a month just to have the line - that's £132 a year, which is a big pile of DVDs, and that's before services that bring normal mobile features (caller display, voicemail, etc) to it. Insane.

      Tesco is getting too big for anybody's good though. Unless you're like me and scavenge the reduced price section after work regularly for a cheap dinner. heh.

    5. Re:Ahh those marketing geniuses! by cmdrbuzz · · Score: 1

      With BT Privacy Caller Display is now free, and 1571 gives you a (very basic) voicemail for free.

    6. Re:Ahh those marketing geniuses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Here in the US we enjoy free local calling. Most places in Europe, UK included, don't enjoy such a luxury.

      You are wrong here.

      But you do get "free" local calls after you pay $24.99 for your landline. And that's just in a big city. To 'baby Bells' you can pay much much more... A the CHEAPEST landline down South for a friend of mine started at about $50/month; I told that friend to suggest Baby Bells perform an anatomically impossible act on themselves, and get a cell-phone instead.

      They screw us over with the cell service in US too. A co-worker of mine is so proud to get 3000 FREE minutes a month... D'oh, dumbass, why wouldn't Cingular give you that after you already pay $80/month for the ability to make roaming calls for $0.49/min...

      Plus have you ever tried watching TV lately? 3 mins of show, 5 mins of ads, another 3 mins of show, then again 5 mins of ads. They even add 2 mins of ads at the end of the show, right before the damned credits!!! Even the bloody PBS is starting to have ads now!!!!!

      The telecom companies are screwing us over, I tell ya!

    7. Re: Ahh those marketing geniuses! by ncurtain · · Score: 0

      Which you will still need to pay in order to retain the line you need for your broadband connection.

      You can now have another company running the once BT line if you wish. You can get a confusing assortment of packages to go with it, too. For example a company might offer you broadband and VOIP along with your line rental and so and so many hours free phone calls at hours of the day that suit your needs best.

      I'm using HomeCall a subdivision of the Caudwell Group that offers such stuff. I only just found out they also own Phones4U so I won't be using them much longer and have not taken them up on their "amazing offers" as they cheated me on my first mobile phone.

      But they are still better than BT who couldn't get me online after trying 5 disks unless I used their (peak rate) help desk. Which I concluded was a mandatory clause in all their dealings.

    8. Re:Ahh those marketing geniuses! by jazman · · Score: 1

      I heard BT once tried to get into the property market, but had a job finding people who were willing to take out a mortgage on a property, then pay rent on that same property, then pay an additional charge for each room they used.

  4. HI can I have two cans of soup and 100 minutes.. by frinkacheese · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course, Tesco are likely just re-selling somebody else's network like most other VoIP players seem to do. So far they do Insurance, Tellys, Voice and banking services.. They will be operating small brothels next..

  5. The end is near! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is this the end for the classic telecoms providers like BT

    I'm sure there are many disgruntled BT customers that hope so.

  6. I hope not by whirlibulf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    VOIP has many problems, e.g. unlike regular telephones on regular telephone lines, they do not work during power cuts. They can also cause problems when being used for emergency calls, as the location of the person cannot be traced easily (if at all.) Until the problems are sorted out, I don't think people will be jumping onto VOIP phones.

    1. Re:I hope not by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're hoping for a level of corporate ethic that just does not exist. Who's going to tell average beer-drinkin' Joe (or cheerful Jonathan in the UK) that the cheap "inturrnet" phone doesn't support emergency calling or calling during power cuts. I'm pretty sure it's not going to be plastered over the VOIP phone boxes, and I'm also reasonably sure that average Joe/Jonathan does not read Slashdot (or a newspaper for that matter). And at last count, there are more Joes in the world than Slashdotters = $$.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    2. Re:I hope not by certel · · Score: 1

      For the average user, I don't think they really think about those factors. The majority of people will see the free long distance and make a decision on that. I think it should be noted on the box of the VOIP phones that there are still some real issues with the network.

    3. Re:I hope not by ZekeSMZ · · Score: 1

      The other thing to think about here is that most people now have redundancy when it comes to phones.

      We just made the jump to voip at my house. Previously, we would not have considered it - but now that my wife and I both have cell phones - the ability to make emergency calls is not really a problem. (Unless the cell phones aren't charged of course). In the event of a big disaster, it's likely that all phone service will be down so we'd be hosed anyway.

      I think the two things driving the voip revolution are price and annoyance with the incumbent phone carriers.

      I'll take a small quality hit to pay less money for service - and to not have to deal with the phone company.

    4. Re:I hope not by podperson · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. The emergency services issue has been solved. (OK, it requires the end-user to pay a little attention.) In any event, it's not really worse for VoIP than, say, cell phones.

      2. Power cuts are an issue, sure. Of course, a UPS for the VoIP box, router, and cable modem (which would probably keep going for a LONG time) would solve this issue. Most folks I know use cordless phones which -- guess what -- don't work during power cuts either (the handsets are battery-powered, but the base stations aren't).

    5. Re:I hope not by RalphSleigh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the UK Broadband is mostly DSL, so you need a regular phoneline anyway, and I assume BT keep it connected for emergencys even if you dont pay them for a phone service through it. Might help during a power cut.

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    6. Re:I hope not by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Why would you go to all the trouble of finding a landline in an emergency *anyway*? Most people would just ring from a mobile. After that, it's all down to triangulation.

    7. Re:I hope not by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a pension fund and the funniest piece of research was a chart breaking the population down between the two proposed bundle carriers (voice video internet) 30% hated the phone company and would switch to the cable company under any circumstances, 15% would go to the cable company for the bundle if it were cheaper, 10% couldn't decide, 15% would go to the phone company if it were cheaper, and 30% hated the cable company and would switch to the phone company under any circumstances.

      More interestingly was the relativly small number of people who would switch if there were a 1-3 hour battery attached to the phone (allowing use in a power outage.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    8. Re:I hope not by uncqual · · Score: 1
      And at last count, there are more Joes in the world than Slashdotters

      And given the level of whining by /.ers about getting dates, this condition seems doomed to only get worse as evolution continues its inexorable march.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    9. Re:I hope not by williamhb · · Score: 1
      VOIP has many problems, e.g. unlike regular telephones on regular telephone lines, they do not work during power cuts.
      Since a large part of the UK has a portable (not mobile) phone as their only home phone - like me, rather a lot of the UK's regular phones don't work during power cuts either. Ok, you can answer (using handsfree on the base), but dialling is a problem.
    10. Re:I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A few months back, I think it was in November, Verizon had a major outage in Long Beach, California. I think 10 other cities were affected as well. Something about a major piece of equipment failing... Well anyways no one who had Verizon land lines could make any phone calls to anyone, not even to 911. I live in Long Beach and have Speakeasy naked DSL and VOIP service... I was able to call anyone and everyone even if they had Verizon. Strange situation, but it shows that while VOIP can have problems with emergency situations, so can POTS lines.

    11. Re:I hope not by u16084 · · Score: 1

      I have Voip through TWC, the "modem" has a 3 hour battery backup.

      --
      -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
    12. Re:I hope not by Synn · · Score: 1

      The emergency calling issue has pretty much been solved already.

      And for power cuts, most people have cell phones these days and Vonage can detect outages and re-route your calls to any other number(like your cell phone).

  7. Wireless by bombadillo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless there is a wireless grid the users of voip will still be dependent on the cables coming into their house. Those cables for the most part are owned by the telco/cable companies. It's not really an end to the Telco's it is more of a transition of services offered.

    1. Re:Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AIM/Yahoo/MSN/Jabber exists, yet people prefer those over sending physical letters through the mail. It's frankly easier and less expensive than the previous solution. It's because we've gotten used to using the phone for EVERY THING and EVERY WHERE, people just can fathom using VoIP from their home/office, yet they go about chatting on some sort of messaging protocol laughing at the days they had to write the return address on some envelop.

  8. Phone number replacement needed by dada21 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a big fan of VoIP (I've moved many friends and family to various companies). I can't wait until there are more programs available to let me use my PDA-bluetooth-tether-cell combo (150kbps download nearly everywhere) to talk without the cell network. I believe T-Mobile will actually help transition their users to VoIP as they build a faster network (and make their money that way).

    The big problem I have with VoIP is it still seems to rely on people wanting to contact POTS numbers. When will we see a replacement for the old phone number?

    The e-mail address isn't a bad idea, but I honestly don't want to share that with some people. A new number isn't memorable. Names are too generic and duplicated (there are 3 Adam Dada's that I've found in the past 3 years).

    What is the solution for the "Follow Me" signature that we can use as our VoIP contact? Is the future settings up 3 or 4 addresses so we can give friends, family and tele-marketters different numbers?

    1. Re:Phone number replacement needed by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1

      Numbers will never go away, simply because it just won't be the same, as many Slashdotter known, to ask a cute girl for her e-mail address in a bar.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    2. Re:Phone number replacement needed by dada21 · · Score: 1

      as many Slashdotter known, to ask a cute girl for her e-mail address in a bar.

      And as a few recent slashdotters (who I sent my dating guide for geeks to in the past few weeks) know, the e-mail address is a loser's venture :)

      I'm not single anymore, but I would find it funny to ask for a phone number and get a VoIP IP-address instead.

    3. Re:Phone number replacement needed by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      The e-mail address isn't a bad idea, but I honestly don't want to share that with some people. A new number isn't memorable. Names are too generic and duplicated (there are 3 Adam Dada's that I've found in the past 3 years).

      Google is offering VOIP service with their google talk service. Unsurprisingly it uses the same scheme as the rest of DNS. You can talk to bob@gtalk.com or set up your own domain and people can send you talk requests to bob@mydomain.co.uk or whatever. Set up as many as you like. They are easier to remember than numbers and it does not matter since you can just save them to your phone and computer. This is pretty much a non-issue.

    4. Re:Phone number replacement needed by dada21 · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much a non-issue.

      It seems like a non-issue, but I find that domain names are more bothersome than ever.

      My old e-mail address, say A.Dada@GoingSomewhere.com, was easy 5 years ago. Then it became "Is that .com or .net?" As I traveled more, it became "Wait, .com or .co.uk?" and then it is "A.dada or adada? or is that a-dada?"

      I switched to gmail specifically for spam filtering, but I found that I never have to repeat my e-mail address anymore (and saved me thousands of dollars a year in what I paid my employees to run all our servers).

      For me, giving out the e-mail address is easy, but for whover took over my old domain names, I bet they'll be in the "repeat that again. once more" boat.

    5. Re:Phone number replacement needed by Wingchild · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if people could reach my VOIP line by calling my domain name - just forward it along like another protocol, say. We'd have to spend a few years with this as an optional way of doing business, though; land-line phones don't have a lot of options for calling URLs.

    6. Re:Phone number replacement needed by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought of this years ago -- why not just start up a new domain flag like the MX and call it the VO or something. DNS can support it easily.

      In the long run, we can figure out a way to make a phone number address a domain name, I'm sure. We just need another DNS layer for reverse lookups, I guess.

    7. Re:Phone number replacement needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For someone who doesn't want to share you email addy, putting it on a slashdot post seems a good way to keep it a secret :)

    8. Re:Phone number replacement needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The domain name is too big a unit -- user@domain, like email and Jabber, is the right size. That way you don't have to have a full domain per-device or per-person (way too clunky, too many names needed, and lots of namespace collisions).

      Maybe there could be an optional default user for a domain -- you'd just dial "example.com" and it would automatically forward to "wingchild@example.com". For a company, it could go to the main switchboard (or the local switchboard, with some geo-magic). For a personal domain, it would go to whatever "number" the domain owner sets -- your home, your mobile, your voicemail, whatever. But I don't think I'd want the default advertised via DNS; I'd want it handled transparently on the receiving side of the call. That way nobody can mine the DNS database and make junk calls to all the default "numbers".

      I actually like the user@domain scheme, and we can take another page from the Jabber handbook and designate particular devices ("resources") as user@domain/mobile, user@domain/home, user@domain/voicemail, etc.

      The user@domain scheme fits our current method of assigning and reassigning phone numbers, too. For people who care a lot, they can get their own domain and keep their "number" when they switch providers. For most folks, it's enough to have user@provider's-domain, and change their "number" when they change providers. Cell phones already do something similar: 1234567890@mobile.mycingular.com, or 1234567890@vtext.com, for example (it turns emails into text messages, but there's no reason it couldn't handle voip streams as calls...). We could even grandfather the old numbers in, for people who didn't want to change, with a single super-domain containing all the existing numbers: xxxxxxxxxx@oldnumbers.com or whatever domain the baby bells agree on.

      I really think this could work nicely...

    9. Re:Phone number replacement needed by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      "When will we see a replacement for the old phone number?"

      I'd like a gateway myself, for legacy support.

      What most people don't think of though is the advantage of having a new phone system that uses voip. Right now, all voice transmissions are at the rate of 8kbps, which is rather shitty for voice quality. FM is at 64kbps and a cd can be ripped to 320kbps.

      Imagine how much easier it would be to discern someone's voice on the phone if they were at FM quality?

      --
      I don't get it.
  9. kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by fantomas · · Score: 1

    well picked up, oh don't ya love those marketing geniuses :-) ... but this kind of makes sense in the UK, where we have to pay for all calls (does the USA still have free local calls?). UK consumers will get the "pay 4.99 and have free calls" because at the moment they pay BT a standing line charge and then pay for each call (time based charging) on top....

    1. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

      UK consumers will get the "pay 4.99 and have free calls" because at the moment they pay BT a standing line charge and then pay for each call (time based charging) on top....

      This is exactly the kind of thing that makes people angry, move to other continents and start a Revolution against the reigning Empire.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by Chi+Hsuan+Men · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm from the US and my phone service provider used to SBC. I switched to vonage over the Summer, but I can't imagine the billing has changed all that much. When I subscribed to SBC, local calls were free, however, it depends on your definition of "local".

      For example, I live in Madison. Orange, which is 24.15 miles away (as the wolf runs) is a "local" call. On the other hand, Branford, which is 10.73 miles away, is not a local call and I am charged on a per minute basis.

      That never made any sense to me whatsoever.

      --
      Respect It.
    3. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2, Informative

      The USA has free local calls, and most providers throw in free domestic long distance as well now. For $99 a month you can get the whole package, broadband, telephone service with all the bells and whistles (caller ID, 3 way, voice mail, free LD, etc.) and television service. All the major cable companies and telcos offer it.

      Here, like most of Europe, however, its all changing to cell phones. I dont know anybody who still owns a landline. All cell phones in the US include free domestic LD. Many people have cell phones from other cities (personally I have a Houston number but live in Austin. Got the number when I lived in Houston and didnt want to change.)

    4. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by space_dude_27 · · Score: 1

      The best thing about this is that you'll need to have broadband. If you want broadband over BT lines (most likely) then you're still going to have to have a BT phone line coming into your house in order to get it - so you'll still pay BT at least 11 pounds per month in order to make your free calls. Hmmmm....

    5. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by sgt101 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The funniest thing I heard for a while was the discussion about the "British Day" that Gordon Brown mooted recently. My friend proposed that we should celebrate it on the 4th July... Why? Well, that's the day that the US celebrates independence and complete separation from the British state and nation, and so should we, so should we...

      --
      --------------------------------------------- "In the end, we're all just water and old stars."
    6. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by XorNand · · Score: 1

      It's because the two locations are in different "rate centers". It's similar to school districts. You could live across the street from one high school, but your kids have to attend a different one a few miles away because you happend to be the border of the district. And as much as I love to hate SBC, they really can't be faulted for this. Rate centers are determined by the state.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    7. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      In France the standard packet is ADSL2+ w/ TV, often WiFi, IP phone which is free for France and often other regions (my operator lists Germany, Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Spain, US/Canada (inc, cell phones), Ireland, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, UK and Singapour). The usual price is 30 €s / month.

      However the catch is that calls to other local VOIP operators isn't free. And you can't tell the numbers apart. :)

      Of course if you watch the TV or make a call, you eat into the available bandwidth (less so w/ the phone of course).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    8. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by c_forq · · Score: 1

      I had an odd thing like this in my area, then the local telco's got together and made it pretty standard in my county that your local calling is your exchange/s (for example the biggest city was 772-776) and all adjacent exchanges. If there you aren't touching or in the exchange your calling then it isn't local. I don't think this would work as well in more urban cities, but it is great for medium-populated counties.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    9. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by drix · · Score: 1

      does the USA still have free local calls?

      Haha... we have free long-distance calls nowadays. I would much rather live in Europe for a lot of reasons, but I will say this: telecom be cheeeaaaap in this country.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    10. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      My father used to claim that if the Crown and Parliament in the 1770s had given in to American demands for representation in Parliament, then the Brits would have started a civil war sometime later to separate from the America's in order to prevent their complete domination by their colonies.

    11. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Here in the US, we had a low-key celebration of Ben Franklin's 300th birthday. In a couple of the history shows that I heard on the radio, they mentioned that in the 1750s or so, Franklin had extrapolated various data on population and the economy, and estimated that within a century the North American colonies would have more people and a larger economy than the UK. He predicted that the effective capitol of the Empire would then be in the Colonies, probably New York, rather than London.

      But he changed his mind in the early 1770s. In 1771, he took a trip across the Pond and toured England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland. In Ireland, he hired a driver to take him out into the countryside, against the advice of the people in Dublin. When he got back home, he started telling people what he'd seen: The Irish were living in a state of poverty hardly distinguishable from slavery, ignorant and uneducated, with no possessions and not enough food, while all the produce of the Island went to benefit their English rulers.

      He observed that Parliament was starting to impose laws and edicts on the Colonies much like what had been done to Ireland, and the end result would be the same: The people in the Colonies would be reduced to the same sorry state as the people in Ireland.

      He had a good reputation by then, and a lot of people listened to him.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    12. Re:kinda crap but makes sense in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Franklin isn't alive today so he could take Bush around this country to see the same things - people in deep debt working for a pittance salary.

  10. Wireless-#1 "/." Book. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's not really an end to the Telco's it is more of a transition of services offered."

    True, but it's amusing to see slashdot grasp for anything titled "How to escape from telco's", even if it's an illusion.

  11. Problems with the VoIP sellers by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They lock down the hardware so that the market has lots of used VoIP hardware that is 100% useless. I can find gobs of Vonnage SIP phones on ebay for dirt but are locked to Vonnage.

    I just wish these companies would be required to be friendlier and unlock the hardware after the "contract" is up.

    Cellphone companies do thew same crap. I had to threaten to sue AT&T wireless because they locked my personal phone to their service. I purchased an unlocked phone myself used their service and their scumbag service rep locked my phone. these companies really need to learn what customer service is and that the customer's property needs to be released to them at the end of thwe contract.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Problems with the VoIP sellers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realise that you can get your phone unlocked by somebody other than AT&T right?

    2. Re:Problems with the VoIP sellers by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and pay for it. It cost me nothing to have a letter sent (i have legal insurance), the office manager called me and worked out getting my phone flashed BACK to what it was supposed to be... Unlocked and unbranded and apologized for company policy to hijack customers property. I did it out of making a point. Most everyone should do this and stand up to the companies demanding that they act responsibly.

      If more people did this, these companies would think twice before gleefully screwing people. VoIP is a prime example. After 2 years that cisco phone that is vonnage branded is paid for and the property of the person that bought it. Yet vonnage refuses to unlock them.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Problems with the VoIP sellers by dada21 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      just wish these companies would be required to be friendlier and unlock the hardware after the "contract" is up.

      You want to pass a law to do this? Make it criminal because you don't want to read the contract and deny making the free market decision to walk away from a bad contract?

      You sign one bad contract -- stupid you. You sign more than one -- you're the problem, not the other company. I don't sign any stock contracts anymore for anything, even my cell phone company accepted my changes to their contract -- I just had to deal with customer retention department to get the modifications accepted.

      Cellphone companies do thew same crap. I had to threaten to sue AT&T wireless because they locked my personal phone to their service. I purchased an unlocked phone myself used their service and their scumbag service rep locked my phone. these companies really need to learn what customer service is and that the customer's property needs to be released to them at the end of thwe contract.

      Lovely. You signed the contract. Don't buy the phone at a $100-$200 discount if you don't like the contract.

      I can't believe you'd want the law to protect your plain irresponsibility in singing things before reading them.

    4. Re:Problems with the VoIP sellers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough :)

    5. Re:Problems with the VoIP sellers by rco3 · · Score: 1

      I read his post as saying that he bought an unlocked phone, separately, on his own, WITHOUT AT&T, and that the AT&T rep locked his phone to their service. Is that not what you read? Was that somehow his fault as well? Are you saying that AT&T's contract said they would lock his phone to their service? Can you post a copy of his contract for us all to read?

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    6. Re:Problems with the VoIP sellers by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Wow really? I did not know that AT&T owned the cellphone I bought from a different company for Full price like I said in my origional post. They must own the cellphone manufacturers companies as well to give me that mysterious discount you speak of that was never mentioned to me at all.

      It is obvious you read about 3 lines and started foaming at the mouth and chose to not read everything in my post.

      Almost everything you said is 100% wrong and not applicable to my situation nor anyone elses. I HAVE looked at the contracts for various VoIP providers and none of them state "we will keep your equipment locked to our service forever. We will never unlock your property that you rightfully bought with your own money in order to strong arm you into staying with our company or to punish you for daring to leave our company for a competitor after your contract/agreement is fulfilled.

      So, they do not state that they will never give you control of your property back. it is typically an internal decision to be very rude and pull borderline illegal tactics on their customers.

      Yes, Illegal. after fulfillment of the contract they have no legal right to continue to hold the customers physical property hostage. And unfortunately it takes people like me that will gladly use the courts to force these companies to comply with the law and common decency. Just because you prefer shady and illegal business tactics does not make them right.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  12. Huh? by BMonger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given that one out of every eight pounds, spent on shopping in the UK goes to Tesco

    People in the UK exchange their fat for goods and services based on how much they weigh? Weird.

    warning: kidding

    1. Re:Huh? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      People in the UK exchange their fat for goods and services based on how much they weigh? Weird.

      That's nothing, in the States they can even make money and star in their own television shows!

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:Huh? by kadathseeker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude! Us Americans could be effing RICH! We have more fat and weight-gaining products than the rest of the world combined - surely we'll make more than enough to pay off our natl. debt.

      P.S. Americans think the world revolves around us because it does! The fat of America actually creates its own gravitational field stronger than the Earth's, which means it rotates around us. This is also why we have so many anorexic people here, they weren't heavy enough to remain where they were because our gravity is stronger. Watch out, McDonald's stock is up...

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    3. Re:Huh? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Informative
      People in the UK exchange their fat for goods and services based on how much they weigh? Weird.

      Some bore will probably mod me 'off-topic' for this but the British pound gets its name from the time before the Bank of England started issuing fidicuary (sp?) money and when a pound note was representative of a pound of gold held by the BoE.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      when a pound note was representative of a pound of gold held by the BoE.

      A pound of silver, or roughly 240 silver pennies.

    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      People in the UK exchange their fat for goods and services based on how much they weigh? Weird.
      Bro if you're gonna speak chav ya gotta go da whole hog. "Us people in this manor swap ours fat for shit and favours", you gettin it?
    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Aw, I'm pretty sure that should be:

      Bro if you is gonna speak chav ya gotta go da whole hog. "Us people in dis manor swap ours fat for shit and favours", you gettin it?

  13. BT? by pisces22 · · Score: 1

    BellTory?

    1. Re:BT? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      British Telecomm., I believe.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  14. Dear GOD! by Caspian · · Score: 2

    Tesco receives one out of every eight pounds spent on "shopping" (how is "shopping" defined? Is it all commerce, all commerce minus Internet commerce, all commerce by individuals as opposd to corporate entities and associations...?) 12.5% of the entire British shopping budget? One quid for every eight spent in the ENTIRE FLIPPING COUNTRY?

    Where is the outrage about this? Can you imagine the American equivalent? I can't imagine that even Wal*Mart, powerful as it is, gets one out of every eight bucks spent in the US... If they did, there would (I presume) be a lot more public outcry.

    Then again, I strongly suspect that Microsoft makes at least 12.5% of the total profit earned by the entire computer industry (hardware + software + services), and they are still relatively un-protested (beyond grumbles about "the damned computer locked up again") in the US.

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    1. Re:Dear GOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't imagine that even Wal*Mart, powerful as it is, gets one out of every eight bucks spent in the US...

      According to Wikipedia WalMart is at 8.9 percent U.S. retail market share, or about 1 out of every 11 dollars spent in U.S. retail stores. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wal-Mart

    2. Re:Dear GOD! by silasthehobbit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Trust me, there are a small but growing number of people in the UK who are horrified at the amount of money Tesco makes.

      http://www.tescopoly.org/

      "Remember, every little hurts" is a piss-take of the Tesco slogan "Every Little Helps" which grates me every time I hear it.

      Tesco are also bad for the environment, as trucks delivering to Tesco in a year, which in 2002 stood at 1,150,000 deliveries, clock up a total mileage of 140 million miles (224 million km).

      --
      silas
      hobbit

    3. Re:Dear GOD! by camusflage · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can you imagine the American equivalent?

      According to Wikipedia, Wal-Mart accounts for 14% of US grocery sales, 20% of toy sales, and increased overall efficiency in the US economy by .75%.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    4. Re:Dear GOD! by se7en11 · · Score: 0
      ENTIRE FLIPPING COUNTRY?

      Please stop saying "flipping". I'm about to flip out....like a ninja

    5. Re:Dear GOD! by handelaar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's one eighth of all retail spending.

      If you really want to get het up about them consider this: online, they take one pound in every four.

    6. Re:Dear GOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I live in a rural state, in a city of 60,000... 120,000 including all the small towns that have dried up to the point where everyone drives here to shop.

      We have *TWO* walmart superstores. The local paper reported a few months ago that they do 40% of the retail commerce for our area.

      Having seen them cause the rapid disappearance of mom-n-pop retail, hell will freeze over before I'll shop at a walmart.

    7. Re:Dear GOD! by gstovall · · Score: 1

      In this rural county (about 20,000 people in the county) We have one sizable town, with a population of 13,000.

      In this town, there is a Walmart and 4 other grocery stores. Walmart does well over 50% of the grocery business in this county.

      I'm all for local businesses, and patronize them when feasible (I MUCH prefer the local hardware stores over Home Depot), but when it comes to food, which is such a large chunk of our monthly budget, we HAVE to use comparison ad shopping at Walmart. Walmart honors all other competitors ads, which means we can shop a single store and get the best prices on anything anyone has on sale. We save $50/week using comparison ads, and that pays for the clothing budget (yeah, I know $50/week clothing budget for a family of 6 is ridiculously small).

      Anyway, I'm concerned about the viability of local businesses, but afraid the home budget trumps that concern sometimes.

    8. Re:Dear GOD! by tech49er · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reason for this is that Tesco's are an amazingly sharp fast-moving company. There's nothing they wont sell if they think they have a market for it. Aswell as groceries: credit-cards, personal finance (loans etc), Filling-stations. In the US maybe this would come into antitrust hassles but (in Ireland at least) it appears to be a win for the consumer. They've got the cheapest petrol (Gasoline) going, decent prices on groceries. I've never been so brave as to check out their personal loans though. They also do some clever cross-marketing stuff like spend 50 euro on groceries get 5 euro off your petrol and such.

      They seem like clever guys - and now they're selling cut-price phones with their groceries!

      --
      "... always going forward 'cause we cant find reverse! "
    9. Re:Dear GOD! by gowen · · Score: 1
      Tesco are also bad for the environment, as trucks delivering to Tesco in a year, which in 2002 stood at 1,150,000 deliveries, clock up a total mileage of 140 million miles (224 million km).
      WTF? Even if we shopped in a more diverse range of stores, the produce would still need to be delivered to those stores. You're an idiot.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  15. uh... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    None of the problems seen as particular to VOIP (in the sense of Vonage at home etc) actually are and, besides, in the corporate environment, it has been a done deal for years. I haven't seen a large office that wasn't using IP phones in some years.

    POTS doesn't run on magic fairy dust, it requires electricity, but it is assumed to be well backed-up, although it still suffers problems of cut lines etc. In "real" emergencies like earthquakes and storms, POTS goes out ALL THE TIME. How about the growing tide of wireless-only people? 911 problems are the same, towers go out, etc. With VOIP, you're running over POTS or cable. If YOU have a backup power system, much as is required on the provider end, there's little if any systemic difference in reliability--and really, most people no longer use telephones that run only on the power of the phone line itself, so while your telephone line may be just dandy, it doesn't do much good when the phone itself is dead.

    1. Re:uh... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      The place I work at (large multinational) is using the http://www.doro.com.au/ doro congress 100 phones as desk phones which dont appear to be VOIP (although they might be)

    2. Re:uh... by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      "POTS goes out ALL THE TIME"

      Huh?

      Someone did the math on this, most US based phone services have an uptime of about 99.999% which equated to about 6 seconds of down time *a year.* Vonage has an average uptime somewhere around 99.4%, which in this event, is quite a large difference.

      --
      I don't get it.
  16. VoIP isn't all it's cracked up to be by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Value for money is fantastic, but have you actually compared with POTS? I called a friend using Skype, then my internet connection died. So I picked up the phone and called back.

    The lag in conversation was considerably smaller. The audio quality was a lot better. There were no dropouts. The audio never went crackly. It's a much better service, and the amount that people spend on ordinary landline calls these days is so small that the cost of broadband and equipment needed isn't worth the investment.

    1. Re:VoIP isn't all it's cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Skype every weekday to talk to Australia (from here in the UK), and have done for nearly a year. While the quality isn't perfect, it's completely acceptable, and the lag is small and doesn't cause any problems. Skyping people in the UK, the sound quality is very high, much better than using the regular phone, and there's no perceptible lag.

    2. Re:VoIP isn't all it's cracked up to be by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Last time I used a POTS phone, I'm pretty sure my friends voice didn't go all crackly/warbly when his computer bogged down playing FF11.

      That's my main issue with Skype... CPU Usage. It's fine on my uber computer, but my friend isn't so blessed and it's quite annoying. We never had a real problem with teamspeak, though... Gotta keep trying to get him to switch back.

      I'm sure the same thing can happen on VOIP phones with high bandwidth usage, but it's been a while since I've managed to max out my line.

      Note: I haven't used an actual POTS phone in my home for over a year now, so maybe the phone company actually managed to mess that up, too. I dunno.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:VoIP isn't all it's cracked up to be by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      When I first tried Skype, the quality was almost unnervingly good - my gf and I were both using fairly high quality Sennheiser headsets, and had a fairly low ping between her house and mine (same head end, different UBRs). It sounded more like studio talkback than telephony.

    4. Re:VoIP isn't all it's cracked up to be by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      That's my main issue with Skype... CPU Usage. It's fine on my uber computer, but my friend isn't so blessed and it's quite annoying. We never had a real problem with teamspeak, though... Gotta keep trying to get him to switch back.

      This is why you shouldn't use stuff like Skype. They offer no Quailty of Service, as any decent provider would offer. But then again, I really don't care for Skype all that much either. It's phenomenally stupid to have to rely on a computer/usb combo at all for VoIP, much less other users for power and bandwidth.

    5. Re:VoIP isn't all it's cracked up to be by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I use Skype every weekday to talk to Australia

      Have you tried using POTS to Australia though? If it's anything like the difference in calling Israel you'd be surprised at the quality difference. And the price difference... Skype wins here.

  17. The end for BT? I doubt it. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative
    is this the end for the classic telecoms providers like BT?

    I doubt it.

    For a start, Tesco's on-line systems to date have sucked. I subscribed to Tesco Downloads to get a legal music download I wanted, and the UI was so bad that having let me sign up with a particular e-mail address, I then couldn't log in using it because it was a character too long for the field on the web form! I tried to contact them, but... there were no contact details, anywhere, and mails to webmaster at both the Tesco Downloads and the main Tesco site went unanswered. This doesn't exactly make me want to try relying on their VOIP system.

    In addition to Tesco's apparent incompetence, BT (or the cable companies, depending on who you're with) still make a significant amount of money from those broadband subscribers. I hardly use my landline any more, but I still have to cough up several quid a month for BT line rental so that my broadband ISP and I can communicate. The actual cost of my calls on BT represents around 0.1% of the money I pay them, since they've been offering calls-for-almost-nothing for months anyway.

    In other words, BT are now effectively an infrastructure company and not a services company, and their own phone service is almost free. Why do I need VOIP again?

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:The end for BT? I doubt it. by oh_bugger · · Score: 1
      I agree, BT don't need to worry about this kind of thing.

      For a lot of people in the UK, whether they use their landline, or a VoIP phone they are still paying money to BT one way or another. Either by traditional phone bills, or through their ISP who use the BT network. Not to mention you pay BT a chunk of money each month even if you don't make any calls at all. And with NTL getting stronger, it seems like BT's monopoly is under threat enough for it to avoid being broken up like AT&T in the US. Products that use the BT network wont scare BT as they could just provide a similar one. The threat will come from cable companies, who can tempt people away from BT completly

      --
      Go home and shave your giant head of smell with your bad self
    2. Re:The end for BT? I doubt it. by chuckT · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree (I submitted the story with a throwaway idiot question at the end. Sorry.) BT will move far more to become an infrastructure company, moving into the background, whether from choice or necessity.

      What is more interesting for me is that I have tended not to bother much with VOIP because most of my non-tech family and friends find it too much to cope with. But, over the last month, both my father and father in law got broadband connections, and they are both in their sixties. Mass broadband takeup coupled with VOIP handsets/software being easily and simply available on the high street could radically change the way people make calls on a very large scale, which could be intersting

      Oh, and Tesco dominance is scary - but I shop there every week. Someone made comments above about disliking Walmart, but not being able to stretch the household budget too far, and I feel the same way about Tesco. It was also intersting to see the comments about their DIY tills and music downloads being crappy: their online/home delivery frequently sucked in the past too, but is now very slick. If they really are taking 1 in 4 pounds spent online, I would guess they have it licked.

      Moral: Tesco get started early, and keep at it until it works.

      Now, if only I had spare cash to buy shares...

      Chuck

      --
      - These are small, *those* are _far away_
  18. Commoditization by Morrigu · · Score: 1

    If a grocery store starts selling VoIP hardware, that surely means that it's a commodity. Commoditization means that consumers will choose services based on prices first and features later (think bargain-basement $399 PCs from Dell or Wal-Mart). Commoditization means that there are products that are "good enough", and the winning suppliers will win on best value and lowest price.

    It's time enough for the telcos and other lumbering pseudo-government regulatory-era dinosaurs to shape up and actually compete for consumers or die.

    --
    "We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - Major Mike Shearer, UK
  19. UPS works great by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I've got a $25 UPS which keeps my microwave modem, router and VoIP running. I then have a cordless base station that has battery backup. All in all i can keep calling and surfing for about 45 minutes when the power dies.

    I suspect most of the energy probably goes on keeping the microwave link up, but it's still a pretty decent solution for me.

  20. Re:HI can I have two cans of soup and 100 minutes. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Next? I've been f**ked six times in the last month! Their swanky new DIY tills don't seem to understand what special offers are, nor to be able to count change accurately...

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  21. Premature by Halvard · · Score: 1

    And who do you suppose would terminate those calls for the next forever if BT ceased to exist tomorrow?

  22. VoiP by GmAz · · Score: 1

    I would totally sign up for a VoiP phone service. The downside is that in California, none of the providers offer local phone numbers in the Valley. They are all in the bay area. Oh well, guess I will stick to my cell phone for the time being.

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
  23. We're the Meatmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you suck.

    - Tesco Vee

    1. Re:We're the Meatmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man... what a great album. Cricifux.. lansing michigan.. wow the memories are flooding

  24. Re:HI can I have two cans of soup and 100 minutes. by hattig · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh, yeah, my Tesco has:

    Buy 3 CDs for £12!!!!
    (all the CDs cost under £4 on their own)

    I've had to put up with the DIY tills for a year or two now. They finally work most of the time now. Haven't had issues with special offers though.

  25. VOIP! by lpangelrob · · Score: 1
    "Kristin, you look burnt... or dead." —Cheerleader

    Actually, how is VoIP doing since people are dropping landlines for cell service? And since 911 is still only fully supported on POTS? Is it business environment only? Is a company like Vonage overrated / unnecessary?

    1. Re:VOIP! by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really, to be honest, could care less about 911 calling on VoIP. If 911 is all important, then it should be a governement provided and supported service. 911 should be active on any landline, regardless of whether you have service on the line or now. Simply plug in a phone and you can dial 911. Done. If this were the case, VoIP adapters could have a extra port for connection to a landline jack and route 911 calls to it.

    2. Re:VOIP! by sagenumen · · Score: 1

      I agree. I always thought it was odd that there is no law requiring the Bells to make sure all lines can call 911 no matter what. Isn't this the case with cell service i.e. you can call 911 from any cell phone, even if you just find it on the street and it's been deactivated?

    3. Re:VOIP! by ishepherd · · Score: 1

      GSM phones can call 911 even if the 'keylock' is on. On a UK phone, the same goes for the UK emergency number 999. Nice and easy to dial by accident / in your pocket etc.

      Of course, don't ask me how I know that, heh.

      --
      fud, notfud, yes, no, maybe
  26. probably not... by kvnflynn · · Score: 1

    Telecomms provide most of the interconnection lines used by Internet users... They may have to decide who and where they will start making their money, which may move from subscribers to the Service providers (i.e. ISPs, VoIP-to-POTS providers, Wireless MAN-to-Wireless MAN connectivity). basically anyone who needs to travel long distances will need to traverse their networks and you can believe that if they are losing end-user subscribers they will begin to collect closer to the network core.

  27. Tesco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesco is great and everything but, do they sell both Micro&soft and Linux side by side like Walmart does?

    1. Re:Tesco by ncurtain · · Score: 0

      I have never seen a linux box on sale there. http://www.tesco.com/electrical/search.aspx?Ntt=co mputers&VSI=9&Ntx=mode%2Bmatchall&Nty=1&N=0&No=60& Ntk=primary&Ns=P_SORT_Price

      BT was once the state telephone monopoly and part of the Royal Mail. What it did was once very good indeed. When it was sold off the asset strippers that bought it made inroads into its services that it has never recovered from.

      Their internet service was once the most deplorable I have ever come across. Not having a BT line anymore, nor having come close enough to touch them with a 10 foot pole since, I can't say what it is like at the moment.

      Having said that, I find it hard to believe a British supermarket provides an outstanding internet service.

  28. Re:Moot point by vertinox · · Score: 1

    VOIP has many problems, e.g. unlike regular telephones on regular telephone lines, they do not work during power cuts.

    Neither does anything else in the house.

    Except candles and books... Oh and a cell phone.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  29. I don't think so... by McFadden · · Score: 1
    is this the end for the classic telecoms

    The end of BT? Errr... who owns the majority of the cables Tesco is using. (hint. take the letters T and B and rearrange them)

  30. Not the end for BT by vtechpilot · · Score: 1
    is this the end for the classic telecoms providers like BT?


    No Its not. Even tough Tesco offers broadband, They are just reselling BTs service. Most of the UK is covered by BT DSL service, and there aren't many other options. Cable internet is almost non-existent. There are some alternatives but few have any noteable penetration. Point being, BT isn't going anywhere.
    --
    Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
    1. Re:Not the end for BT by Jaknet · · Score: 1

      I am interested that what I consider one of the biggest problems with all these Voip we have in the UK has not been mentioned... or I missed it

      That is no matter which Voip you sign up for you are limited in that if you want to call someone from it then they have to be on either a landline, mobile or the same Voip as yourself. I do not know of any Voip that is able to call a different service as in Skype to msn for one example. So will this voip be the same.

      If I wrong on this please..please let me know as I am sick of having to have different services all running to speak to different people

    2. Re:Not the end for BT by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Even tough Tesco offers broadband, They are just reselling BTs service. Most of the UK is covered by BT DSL service, and there aren't many other options. Cable internet is almost non-existent. There are some alternatives but few have any noteable penetration. Point being, BT isn't going anywhere.

      I'd just like to add: yes, Americans, BT is a monopoly. A fricking huge one. It used to be the state-owned one and only telecoms service, but was privatised a while back. Unfortunately all the competitors that sprang up were... well, pretty crap, really... and pretty much everyone who switched away has gone back (except in Hull, for some reason).

      There's a government regulator continually leaning on BT to make sure they play nice; they stalled for quite a while about broadband, delaying its progress in the UK for bloody ages (google 'local loop unbundling' for the whole gory story), but now there's a fair amount of competition in the broadband internet market and eight-megabit connections are starting to become affordable.

      Possibly things might be better if BT had actually been broken up at privatisation, but who's to say? The mobile phone market is a world of cut-throat free market competition between many providers - who generally charge a bloody fortune for calls to anyone else's network...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Not the end for BT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hull always had it's own phone company, don't know why tho.

  31. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Not a U.S. story - no digg.

    Oops, sorry - wrong website.

  32. Actually, I'm dropping CELL in favor of VOIP! by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    >Actually, how is VoIP doing since people are dropping landlines for cell service?

    I dropped landline in favor of Cell a while back. I just didn't like the principle of paying twice for the same service. Especially getting taxed twice for it (two 911 fees, etc.)

    But the fact is, a cell phone for my wife and I on the Verizon Family Plan costs us right at $80/month. With the price of gasoline what it is now, plus we just had a baby, I'm looking to cut corners everywhere I can.

    So now I'm ditching our cell phones for Vonage, which we have had for a couple of months now. Quality is not quite as good as POTS yet (but is easily as good as my cells have every been), but it's good enough. And it's only $27/month for unlimited calls anywhere in the US. I couldn't get a local phone number, but all of our friends are in Atlanta anyway, so I got a 404 number which was a bonus as now they can call us for free.

    I've gotten really used to the convenience of having a phone always available, and maybe I'll miss it, but for two things:

    First, it really hasn't been all that long that I've had a cell phone. Only 5 or 6 years. I didn't suffer terribly for the lack of one before that.

    Secondly, I have recently found out that in the US, all cell phones must be able to dial 911 whether you have cell service or not. I checked this with a couple of "dead" Cingular phones we have laying around, and it works fine. I have also recently found out that you can get your phone reprogrammed (wish I could figure out how to do it myself) so that it will automatically dial into the American Roaming Network and allow you to place credit card calls, even if you do not have cell service. Sure, it costs $3/minute, but I will only use it in emergencies.

    So I'm dropping cellular in favor of a landlocked VOIP phone.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  33. Superstore Mobile service in Canada by BlindSpot · · Score: 1

    In Canada, Superstore/Loblaws/Extra Foods (same company, different store names) has recently started selling pay-as-you-go mobile service. They already offer banking and insurance services and have done so for several years.

    Given this trend, I would not be at all surprised if they started selling VOIP service, amongst other things, in the near future.

  34. Fine by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to say Tesco are pure pure evil, but they are bloody useful, I had an old supermarket near me it was overpriced, crap quality and only open at traditional business hours, it shut down and was replaced by a tesco - cheap, everything you could imagine under one small roof, always open, always full of people, but I guess thats how the market works, if your business is old and bloated *cough* BT you're going to loose out, personally i find all telecoms companies here are overpriced and have crap service, my old mobile company cost me prices comparable with a satelite call! and 3G drops connections so much its like trying to talk through old-time radio. I think its going to be sad but necessary to take these big telecoms companies round the back and put a bullet in them, sad because there will be potentially so many redundancies but necessary because the world is moving on people now expect to be able to communicate anywhere with anyone for next to nothing. Companies like BT should know better I mean how long did it take for un-metered dial-up to appear? Why have we been using the same old system of analogue phones sampled at local exchanges when we could have pioneered and switched to an entirely digital phone system years ago thus saving allot of hassle and making high-speed net access built in? BT is big on research and they have failed to significantly change the way they do business, therefore they are going to go out of business.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  35. Walmart gets all my money by gstovall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Walmart gets pretty much ALL my money spent at retail. And with a family of 6, we spend a lot.

    Not saying I'm happy about it, but can't make the paycheck stretch as far anyplace else.

    But Newegg gets my computer equipment expenditures...

  36. About the UPS thing by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

    Two points about UPSs:

    • I have a 300 VA UPS on my DSL modem, VOIP adapter, and telephone (I have a cordless phone). If I notice I'm having an outage, I unplug the phone and plug it in only when I want to make an outgoing call. The whole assembly lasts about 2-4 hours like this, which seems quite short, but since I have a cellphone too, it's not such a big problem.
    • Alot of people would be concerend that a power outage would cut their phone service, but I bet alot of people have a cordless phone system (like me), and they'd be phoneless in an outage, regardless of their service, VOIP or POTS.
    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  37. Re:HI can I have two cans of soup and 100 minutes. by belroth · · Score: 1
    A friend bought a microwave oven from Tesco before Christmas, when he got home he checked the bill and found he'd been charged for two. He went back to the shop and complained so they refunded the total amount and told him it was policy.
    So as far as he's concerned Tesco gave him a free microwave oven.

    Of course I hope that I'd notice an extra 70 pounds or so on my bill but he was in a hurry...

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  38. Tesco by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

    This being Tesco, every time you make a call, you'll be asked "Do you have a clubcard?"

  39. If you can beat Skype, join em by sideswipe76 · · Score: 1

    This is thinly veiled Skype. They even have a similar pricing model.

  40. Duopoly by tepples · · Score: 1

    They offer no Quailty of Service, as any decent provider would offer.

    But what if the ISPs run by both the local telco and the local cable company block quality of service, and no competing DSL ISPs find your location viable because of the prohibitive rates that the local telco charges for use of its last mile?

  41. The answer by Free+Bird · · Score: 1
    Given that one out of every eight pounds, spent on shopping in the UK goes to Tesco, and the UK has one of the highest broadband takeup rates around, is this the end for the classic telecoms providers like BT?

    No.
  42. one out of every eight pounds by baKanale · · Score: 1

    one out of every eight pounds

    You mean 3.53 out of every 14.12 dollars?

  43. Re:HI can I have two cans of soup and 100 minutes. by Tintagel · · Score: 1

    Yes, there are (small) signs by the tills saying that if they charge you the wrong price for anything, they refund your payment and you keep the item. Your friend expected to buy a microwave for 70 pounds, but walked out of the store having paid 140 pounds for it. Full refund.

    Small quibble with their self-service tills though. If you select to pay by credit/debit card, then swipe a Tesco credit card (the one that doubles as a ClubCard), the till treats it as a ClubCard only (i.e. just takes your ID, not payment) and dumps you back at the select-payment-method screen. No display of "Thanks for the ClubCard, now please pay" or anything. So you think your payment failed, and are averse to swiping again, until the assistant promise promise promises you that no payment is taken unless you get a receipt.

  44. Re:HI can I have two cans of soup and 100 minutes. by Blapto · · Score: 1
    And, of course, be promoting incest!

    Mum = mom, but spelt, well, correctly.

  45. Total crap makes sense in time. by ncurtain · · Score: 0


    I often wonder at the remarkable leaps that historians put on record. How for example, would a repeat failure of one crop kill a largely agrarian population when other crops are not also affected?

    Did it affect fish, wheat, oats, mutton, beef, turnips, parsnips, carrots etc etc?

    Why would the American colonists react to the price of tea when they could get alternatives locally for free? In fact I dare say that if they were interested enough in the product, they could grow camelias (or whatever they used in those days) locally.

    I dare say one day there will be historians analysing the Microsoft vs Linux wars or DRM controversy, with perfectly obvious explanations that wouldn't be comprehensible to any of us if we were around to argue the toss.

    1. Re:Total crap makes sense in time. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Presumably you're referring to the Irish Potato Famine, which was mid-1800s. But the situation existed in the 1770s, when Franklin was doing his tour.

      The problem wasn't really a crop failure. Ireland produced plenty of crops, a good surplus in fact. It was all owned by the mostly-English aristocracy, and most of it was sold over in England. The Irish were generally not permitted to own land (and neither were 3/4 of the English population, for that matter). They were merely laborers on the farms. The wages were so low that most of the Irish couldn't afford a nutritious diet.

      Most of the workers were permitted to live on the farms, in tiny houses, the classical one-room thatch huts with a dirt floor. They were permitted tiny gardens for their own use. Since the commercial food wasn't affordable, they had to supplement their diet with whatever they coud grow in the gardens. Potatoes were introduced around 1600, and quickly turned into the highest-yield crop, so that was mostly what was grown in the garden plots. The workers were surrounded by, and worked in fields with lots of other crops, but they couldn't afford to buy those, so they ate mostly potatoes.

      A 90%-potato diet is not very nutritious, and is lacking in a lot of nutrients. There were widespread health problems due to these deficiencies. But the owners didn't much care. They viewed the Irish as sub-human, uncivilized beasts, and paid them the minimum that would keep them alive enough to tend the fields. Nothing was wasted on education, which was mostly the job of the parish church (and paid for by the parishioners, not the government). And people suitable only for field labor weren't worth educating anyway.

      Franklin managed to pick up on most of this in a few days of travel through the Irish countryside. And he presented it to people back in the Colonies as their likely future.

      This system was stable in Ireland for several centuries, actually, until the potato fungus appeared in the 1840s. This pulled the rug out from under the whole setup, and people started dying in large numbers.

      But historians have pointed out that during the famine, Ireland was still a major supplier of food to England. The crops were doing quite well, except for potatoes. The rulers never saw any reason to change what was for them a very profitable system. And, after all, they were ordained by God to rule over those uncivilized, uneducated brutes in Ireland who didn't have the intelligence to lift themselves by their own bootstraps.

      Google finds 1/3 million hits for "Irish Potato Famine". There's lots of reading on the history, from all points of view. Some of them go into the social and economic situation. Ireland's history is not very pleasant reading. But that's what people are like.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  46. Tesco VOIP provided by Freshtel (Firefly) by grizzlyb3ar · · Score: 1

    Taken from http://www.theage.com.au/news/Business/UK-Tesco-to -take-stake-in-Freshtel/2005/12/29/1135732686987.h tml "Freshtel will provide the network, infrastructure and billing information for the retailer. It will earn per user licence fees and margins on all calls to a landline or mobile. Tesco will also pay maintenance fees and Freshtel will earn additional royalties on all hardware purchased by Tesco from Freshtel's manufacturing partners."

  47. It isn't necessary to go VOIP personally anyway by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Just choose another carrier.

    http://www.uswitch.com/

    Same old phone, line and number but all your calls go via another carrier who do all the hard work for you.

    e.g. Justdial.
    http://www.just-dial.com/

    Free evening and weekend calls but no extra flat rate charge and only 2p/min for daytime calls and you don't have to buy any special hardware or install software on a PC or anything.

    --
    Deleted
  48. out of context. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    The comment was preceded by "during EARTHQUAKES AND STORMS." If you lose connection for ten seconds on an average tuesday due to some network issue, your chances of being inconvenienced are pretty slim. If the telephone lines are snapped in an ice storm, that's probably a tad more inconvenient.