Slashdot Mirror


DDR Coming To West Virginia Schools

Next Generation is reporting that Konami is bringing Dance Dance Revolution to 765 state public schools in West Virginia. The move is intended to counteract the growing youth obesity problem facing the United States. From the article: "'Bringing the health benefits and enjoyment that DDR provides to school children is a great way to combat childhood obesity that is caused by the sedentary lifestyle of today's kids,' said Konami's Clara Gilbert, director of business partnerships. 'DDR has been a proven success in schools and this program with the State of West Virginia demonstrates the positive effects that can come from making DDR a part of one's daily routine. This first-of-its-kind partnership will help us continue to demonstrate the benefits of DDR to consumers around the country.'" On one hand, that's awesome. On the other, if I was still in middle school, I think DDRing in front of middle school girls would be a sure way to cause permanent psychic scarring. Update: 01/25 21:34 GMT by Z : HTML is hard. Fixed link.

184 comments

  1. Link by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    The story if you want it.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Link by fishybell · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, come on, you ruined it. Now I actually have to (feign) RTFA before posting...

      --
      ><));>
    2. Re:Link by grazzy · · Score: 1

      No need to worry, this video sums it up:
      http://www.frozenhippo.com/tragic-guy,75.html

    3. Re:Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here comes a new generation of children with sever knee problems.

  2. Will the obese play? by fishybell · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What's stopping the "cool" kids (who are already active) from preventing the obese kids (mostly uncool due to aforementioned obesity) from playing?

    I say instead give a standalone DDR like machine to every obese kid. That way they can sweat to the oldies (or techno or whatever) in the comfort of their own home.

    --
    ><));>
    1. Re:Will the obese play? by csbrooks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I play DDR sometimes at the local Peter Piper Pizza. I've seen some overweight kids going to town there. They were pretty good, too.

      I don't think it'll be a problem. Yeah, you move your body, but it's all about reacting quickly to stuff on the screen. I mean, basically, it's a videogame.

    2. Re:Will the obese play? by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

      Obese people are not so cool to play with this games, they prefer a hotdog and some books than this.

    3. Re:Will the obese play? by mendaliv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a college student weighing in at over 300lbs., and I also play DDR. I own my own pad and play on occasion, though not nearly as much as I used to.

      Honestly, if you gave each kid his own cheapo pad and SM... or even a PS2 and a pad, he won't play it. Before I started playing, I thought that DDR was some stupid game that losers with no life play (like I was one to talk).

      It took some peer pressure to start, and I sucked badly. It takes some time to get the coordination before it's more a matter of speed. Obese kids are going to get bored or frustrated by that point, especially in high school. I can't imagine the ridicule that'd be directed at the "dancing bear" in gym class.

      So what I'm getting at here is that these kids need a supportive environment to start playing in, much more than anything. DDR is most certainly not fun if you're new to it and uncoordinated.

    4. Re:Will the obese play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Worse.

      The obese people I know who play DDR counteract it entirely by letting their diet go to shit.

      "I played a song of DDR, so I can have two quarterpounders, a large fries, a large shake, and a large cola instead of a granola bar!"

      Yeah, um, no.

      Fat people are fat because they choose to be fat. Making them play DDR isn't going to change that. What needs to happen is that society as a whole needs to decide to make it be completely socially unacceptable to be fat and force fat people to actually decide to take action and lose weight. As long as society allows people to be fat, people will be lazy and remain fat.

    5. Re:Will the obese play? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      What's stopping the "cool" kids (who are already active) from preventing the obese kids (mostly uncool due to aforementioned obesity) from playing?

      In other words, will the obese be ASHAMED of playing? i.e. if you have to go DDR, it's because YOU'RE FAT! (Insert nelson quote here)

      I think that what we'd need is to get more physical education classes and give those kids a healthy balanced diet.

      Hey yeah, why not having a "nutriology 101" course at the first semester? :) That'd dispel all those best-seller theorists getting rich with people's fatness, and go straight to the basics.

    6. Re:Will the obese play? by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      [...] at the local Peter Piper Pizza. I've seen some overweight kids going to town there.

      If weight is the issue, I think you've identified the problem.

    7. Re:Will the obese play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they "choose to be fat". So what? Why should society as a whole make it socially unacceptable? Just 'cause you don't like fatties? I personally don't like militant Republicans, but does that mean society should make them unacceptable too unless they convert to left-leaning Democrats like me? Grow up.

    8. Re:Will the obese play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I think that what we'd need is to get more physical education classes and give those kids a healthy balanced diet."

      Bzzzzzt. Sure, giving them another hour a week to have their phobia of being made fun of pounded further into their heads. Gym class to a fat kid is basically state sanctioned public humiliation. That'll definitely encourage them to stay away from the nice juicy cheeseburgers and quarts of ice cream that give them comfort when they're feeling down.

      C'mon, fat people know that eating that shit will make them more fat. But it's a choice between immediate gratification and comfort, and some small possibility that some day they may be slightly less fat. It's pretty easy to see how that choice will turn out.

      More information on how to eat well ("nutriology") is a lot more likely to do some good IMHO.

    9. Re:Will the obese play? by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      It's definitely much less humiliating than being the last guy running around the track, because everyone's partaking in a pretty humiliating activity. This is coming from a multitude of experience. In fact, after four years of sitting on my fat ass, I'm taking a college PE class, and it's pretty damaging to the ego, even in an environment were people are pretty supportive.

      That said, I don't know if it's a great idea. In gym class you should be getting people exposed to team sports and outside on the field running around. It's once they get home or out of school that DDR becomes a better option.

      On the nutrition point, much better to get kids active than give them advice that'll go in one ear and out the other. Being active is separate from your weight, and both are pretty key to your being healthy. You can be obese and still have decent stamina and some muscle. I'm about as heavy now as I was in high school, but I'm in much, much worse shape, because I just plain haven't been active. Better to keep the kids moving around and give them the resources for nutritional advice if they're into it, or maybe devote a semester's elective to it alongside gym class.

    10. Re:Will the obese play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because society as a whole has to pay for it.

      They have to pay for those stupid DDR machines because the twinkie-stuffers won't walk for a half-hour a day. We have to pay higher health insurance premiums to cover Mr. Supersize-triple-hamburger's insulen depandancy created by eating nothing but McDonalds for 10 years.

      Fat people hurt society, and society shouldn't allow them to continue doing so. It's not hard to lose weight. Here's one word that can help anyone lose as much weight as they want: walking. That's all it takes. It's not hard.

    11. Re:Will the obese play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fat people are fat because they choose to be fat."

      That's generally true, but it's largely because we live in a culture of fat-or-thin. People are obsessed with all sorts of activities, whether it is a food-attention-deficit-disorder or reading too much Cosmo and actually taking it seriously. I say food ADD, becuase there are so many affordable and deliciously fattening foods out there, that people can go through a grocery store and just load their carts with junk, from Pop Tarts to Tropicana Twisters to Toaster Streudels to flourescent Gogurt to 50 types of candy bars to ice cream to butter pop corn to 'You can't eat just one' chips to Chips Ahoy to whatever. I'd say that two-thirds (at least) of my local grocery store is junk food. And, for you Cosmo people, just get a life, a real one.

    12. Re:Will the obese play? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      That said, I don't know if it's a great idea. In gym class you should be getting people exposed to team sports and outside on the field running around. It's once they get home or out of school that DDR becomes a better option.

      Step one: Introduce students to DDR, using peer pressure to get them to play it
      Step two: Watch as some of them get to like it, buy a dance pad, install StepMania and move quite a lot because they really want to AA that B4U remix on 9C (once there is a DDR clique you'll see people trying to improve their skill for bragging rights)
      Step three: There is no step three, you have successfully interested lazy students in moving instead of sitting on their butts (sports > DDR, but DDR > nothing). Rinse and repeat if effects are satisfactory


      I encountered StepMania, a DDR clone for Win/Linux/Mac, on a real-life event from an internet community (essentially a LAN party without the LAN) and I've come to like it quite a lot (and you don't even need to listen to the hyperactive j-pop in the DDR as there are lots of different simfiles online). If I wouldn't happen to live on the first floor I'd own a dance pad by now, drastically increasing the amount of movement I get...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    13. Re:Will the obese play? by phlinn · · Score: 1

      It's not our fault you chose to force everyone to pay for everyone elses healthcare. When medicare, etc were implemented, I'm willing to bet (I have not researched, it just seems plausible) that opponents claimed it would lead to restrictions on liberty, and proponents dismissed those claims and said they had no intention of restricting liberty, irrespective of the fact the forcing A to pay for B's healthcare explicity reduces A's freedom.

      Now, of course, people like you use the cost of implementing the programs in a fair non-restrictive manner as an excuse to enact further laws which explicity restrict other's freedom.

      If you were only referring to private insurance, than your premise is incorrect. You pay higher premiums for being a high risk individual, not because others are high risk.

      None of this changes the fact that the school system shouldn't be using DDR as a health measure. If nothing else, forcing kids to play will take all joy out of the process.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    14. Re:Will the obese play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, of course, people like you use the cost of implementing the programs in a fair non-restrictive manner as an excuse to enact further laws which explicity restrict other's freedom.

      Yes, heaven forbid we try and save lard-ass lives. Face it, lardasses waste societies money. We're better off with them in the economy doing something productive than pulling the economy down by wasting money.

      I'd love to see a law that says that restraunts can't serve people over 200lbs - you'd see a reduction in the number of fast-food fatties immediately. But society as a whole has to do something to solve the fat problem. It'd be one thing if lardasses only hurt themselves, but they don't. They also hurt everyone else.

      You're right, DDR in schools won't solve a damned thing. The problem goes beyond schools. If you're not willing to take care of yourself and force society to do it for you, then society should be able to take care of people proactively instead of waiting for them to need a quadruple bypass. We have seatbelt and helmet laws, we should have anti-fatass laws too.

    15. Re:Will the obese play? by phlinn · · Score: 1

      Let's make a deal: You don't have to pay for my health care, I don't have to pay for anyone elses health care. I get to do whatever the hell I want that doesn't harm anyone else. NOTHING gives you the right to use force to prevent someone from making their own choices, even if in your opinion the cost of their choices is higher than the benefit, as long as they aren't imposing that cost on you.

      Lardasses, as you put it, are only hurting themselves. It's not their fault you've chosen to cover their medical costs, that's your own damn decision. Just because people like you chose to intrude on society in one way DOES NOT MAKE IT RIGHT FOR YOU TO INTRUDE IN A DIFFERENT WAY! I would argue that the first way is wrong too, for reasons beyond the scope of this discussion.

      We're better off with them in the economy doing something productive than pulling the economy down by wasting money.

      This is stupid on the face of it. You have no justification for assuming that fat people are a net drain on the econmy.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
  3. for christ sake by ryanelm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    whatever happened to exercising without a $500 machine, it might make America's youth less of technology addicts (current company excluded, of course).

    1. Re:for christ sake by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      Do you ever listen to music while exercising? DDR is just that, taken to a whole new level. This is coming from a former couch potato who now competes in Heavy level DDR tournaments. I have enough stamina to play for hours at a stretch, sweat streaming down my body. The best part? I completely lose track of time when playing. It removes the work from exercise, and makes it fun. What's so wrong with that?

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    2. Re:for christ sake by lpangelrob · · Score: 1
      whatever happened to exercising without a $500 machine, it might make America's youth less of technology addicts (current company excluded, of course).

      I'll bite. I hated it.

      The reasons are varied. I had no stamina, so of course I would tend to get picked last. Running was (and still is) a disaster whenever I try; I don't think I ever ran a mile under 10:30. Of course, early in my education, times were directly linked to grades -- they wisened up about 6th grade, or 12 years ago for me. Physical education to most geeks, present company included, was pretty much a place for the jocks to show off and get away with making fun of you because you can't catch, can't hit a ball, can't jump, or look stupid putting 100% effort into activities that have no educational value, when they can do "just enough" and be quite good.

      DDR levels the playing field a bit because everyone looks stupid doing it, and suddenly hand-eye coordination — a skill that playing years of Super Mario Bros. happens to actually refine — becomes necessary. I'd be willing to bet that most geeks can last on a song in standard difficulty.

      Okay, rant over.

    3. Re:for christ sake by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      Plus, it is generally one size fits all. And, most of the time that means running. Which I was never very good at either, though not quite 10:30 bad. But, I had no problem with water sports. So, I got graded on how fast I can run, while heading to 1.5 hour swim practices every afternoon in high school.

      Actually, I have a little trouble with DDR now due to two things:

      1) Being out of shape and over weight.
      2) Too many years in water sports developing the wrong muscles for high impact actvity.

      Or, as I like to say... Land sports BAD. :)

    4. Re:for christ sake by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1

      Xbox = $150
      Game and pad bundle = $65 (or cheaper, if you shop around or don't get the brand new version)

      Even if you buy extra games and pads...I just don't see how that adds up to $500. Or even close to it.

      The arcade machine is well over the $500 mark, and I don't see most schools bothering to invest in the metal pads that would be much better for heavier usage.

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    5. Re:for christ sake by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Actually, the pads range in price, the best ones being near arcade quality and costing over $1,000... the games range anywhere from $29.99 to $50+ depending on where you live. I don't know why you'd want to bother with the Xbox ones anyways, they suck compared to the DDRMAX series. (ULTRAMIX 1: Light/standard/Heavy/Training/Challenge VS DDRMAX/MAX2/EXTREME: beginners/light/standard/heavy/Oni Nonstop Challenge/Endless/Training Mode and a larger variety of songs)

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    6. Re:for christ sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whatever happened to exercising without a $500 machine

      I did the broomstick with gallons of water tied to the end thing in highschool too.

    7. Re:for christ sake by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      Physical ability should be linked to PE grades. Do you think that those evil Nazi jocks should get an A in Algebra II just because they tried their best to solve a quadratic equation despite failing miserably? Just as they had a (presumably) natural aptitude to athletics that allowed them to do well in PE, we had a natural aptitude to various academic subjects (math, science, or whatever) that allowed us to do well in those classes. So why should only one group reap the rewards of its genetics? I hope it's not that "no educational value" thing, because it's precisely that sort of thinking that has led us into our current obesity epidemic.

      I'm saying this, BTW, despite the fact that if they gave fair grades for PE today, it almost certainly would've wrecked my GPA in high school.

      Rob

    8. Re:for christ sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define physical ability.

      Is it being able to run a mile in 8 minutes but collapsing if you try to run for longer than 20 minutes? Or not being able to do better than an 11 minute mile but being able to run a marathon? A woman who can bench 90, or one who can do a piked front flip from a standing position?

      Gym classes as they were when I took them tended to be 6 rotating units per year: "track and field" (running a fast mile and sprinting, if we got lucky and they had equipment high jump); gymnastics; field hockey (almost universally loathed, and ice hockey has nothing on women with clubs for danger); basketball; baseball; and random fun stuff for a week between each unit (dodgeball mostly; I was good at that). You were graded on how well you did at those specific sports, in defiance of overall fitness or ability at anything else. Under this grading scheme, you could be an Olympic gold medalist in judo but still fail gym class. Worse, you were graded relative to your peers, but being better than your peers at one or more things didn't actually make you fit.

      I'd like to see a standard fitness test (strength, balance, flexibility, cardiovascular, possibly coordination) administered at the beginning of every year, and the end of year grade made dependant on fitness level, with the +/- used to indicate progress. Start fit, end fit, get an A. Start average, end fit, get an A+. Start fit slump to average, get a B-. Gym class should be about overall fitness, not one's ability to perform a specific sport well, and should be measured according to an individual person's potential rather than against their peers (if you're a paraplegic, you shouldn't be penalized for not being able to do a leg press, but should be penalized if you can't touch your toes). Aptitude for an individual sport would grant admission to things like participation in extra-curricular sports and varsity teams, but wouldn't necessarily mean you would pass gym class.

      If that had been the way I was scored, I might even have stuck with it.

    9. Re:for christ sake by mushroom+blue · · Score: 1

      uh, no. you can purchase metal dance mats (rated for 250lbs) for $150 each. including shipping, you can get two of these for less than $400. whole lot less than $1,000.

      personally, I built my own using schematics I found on the web (had to change some things to make it support 500lbs on each side - me and fat friends). for about $160 total. two cheapie playstation gamepads (hacked into an abomination of wires), an EMS USB2 adapter, sheet metal, some plexiglass, foam, and some printouts of the arrows. work fantastically well. and if I don't want to play with my HTPC (stepmania is awesome), I can just plug it into a PS2.

    10. Re:for christ sake by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Cobalt Flux pads are generally considered to be the best, and they cost $300 each (not including shipping)

    11. Re:for christ sake by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      I am using two Intec hard foam pads.. and for non-metal pads, they are pretty damned good (like all hard foam (NOT DENSE FOAM) pads). Been able to survive Burning Heat! (3 Option Mix) and TSUGARU heavy easily. ^_^

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    12. Re:for christ sake by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Right. I'm sure they're cheaper than $1000.

  4. "Pyschic scarring"? by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Funny

    On the other, if I was still in middle school, I think DDRing in front of middle school girls would be a sure way to cause permanent psychic scarring.

    They would visciously abuse you with the power of their MINDS. I've always suspected females were capable of this.

    Seriously, though, I think you're looking for the word "mental" there.

    --
    Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
    1. Re:"Pyschic scarring"? by Powder_Keg_Monkey · · Score: 1

      I think girls would probably go for the guys that can dance over the guys that are too "cool" to try.

    2. Re:"Pyschic scarring"? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1
      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    3. Re:"Pyschic scarring"? by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      The problem, of course, being that DDR really has little to do with dancing.

      Rob (Of course, I suppose middle-schoolers don't know how to dance anyway)

    4. Re:"Pyschic scarring"? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      However, a guy who's not too cool to hop around to candy-sweet j-pop like the SMILE.DK stuff might also not be too cool for other stuff the girls find interesting... Also, there's the "is not a lazy bum who doesn't want to move at all" appeal.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  5. It is a surprising amount of fun... by Powder_Keg_Monkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My brother bought two pads and DDR Extreme something something over Christmas, and we tried it out over the holidays. It is surprisingly addictive, and gets you sweating in no time. I hate going to the gym and shoving weights around, or spending a half hour pedalling to nowhere. For me, there is no reward in that. But with DDR, I don't notice at all that I have been jumping around for half an hour, and the game aspect in my particular version pushes me to get to the next level in complexity.

    1. Re:It is a surprising amount of fun... by fishybell · · Score: 1
      Alright...now venturing into widely the offtopic AC realm to comment on your sig.

      What about Bill Clinton?

      --
      ><));>
    2. Re:It is a surprising amount of fun... by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      "I hate going to the gym and shoving weights around, or spending a half hour pedalling to nowhere."

      So instead you play Simon with your feet?

    3. Re:It is a surprising amount of fun... by Powder_Keg_Monkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I should change that. I am referring to practicing lawyers in private practice, as opposed to politicians who undoubted first consult their penis before making a decision. There are some pretty long hours: hence, no time for sex.

    4. Re:It is a surprising amount of fun... by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      Exactly! At speeds sometimes exceeding 300-bpm using muscles that support your entire body, driven by addictive music. Seriously, some of the harder songs I've played require 5 or 6 steps per second to pass them. You really have to have major stamina to play this game for more than a few minutes, and that's the whole point.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    5. Re:It is a surprising amount of fun... by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it's a good workout. Just like weight lifting and riding a stationary bike are good workouts. I was just making the point that DDR can be just as ho-hum as the other two. It just depends on your perspective. Personally, I think DDR is ok, but I'd rather get aerobic exercise riding a stationary bike. Then again, I can read on a stationary bike. I hear that some people can't due to motion sickness reasons.

    6. Re:It is a surprising amount of fun... by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      Wait... motion sickness on a stationary bike?

      I probably couldn't read on a stationary bike, as after playing an intense set of DDR for any period of time covers my entire body in a layer of sweat. Try turning a few pages with hands constantly dripping... not very pretty. ;)

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    7. Re:It is a surprising amount of fun... by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      Q: "Wait... motion sickness on a stationary bike?"
      A: I don't understand it too well as I don't get motion sickness as far as I've ever noticed. From what I understand, it's because your head is moving back and forth a bit while you are pedaling. Apparently some people who are susceptible to motion sickness cannot handle that while reading.

      Q: "Try turning a few pages with hands constantly dripping... not very pretty. ;)"
      A: "Wristbands" (They're also good for keeping sweat off your hands while lifting.)

    8. Re:It is a surprising amount of fun... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I hate going to the gym and shoving weights around, or spending a half hour pedalling to nowhere. For me, there is no reward in that.

      But spending half an hour jumping to nowhere is ok?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:It is a surprising amount of fun... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Jumping to nowhere while listening to music designed to make you want to move. Also, there's the challenge of improving your ratings or passing a level above what you usually dance.
      In the end it's a game with immediate, fine-grained feedback. It's just as addictive as Tetris, DooM, Civilization or <insert classic here> - if you like it, of course.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    10. Re:It is a surprising amount of fun... by Powder_Keg_Monkey · · Score: 1

      It's okay precisely because I didn't notice that half an hour had past. That is the difference between getting exercise in a fun way as opposed to getting exercise in a boring way. I don't have anything against going to the gym; like everyone else I overpay and underuse my gym membership, but at least I have one. I just don't like going to the gym because it is really boring. Classes are more interesting, but they are usually mostly women, which scares me off because it is creepy to be the only guy in a gym class. So if I could find something to keep me working out and interested at the same time, that would be the best solution. I agree that it is much more desirable to have kids go out and play co-operative sports at recess or something similar, but my brother (who is in high school) tells me that kids these days are just sitting around during their recess breaks anyway. If DDR gets them off their butts, and a few kids lose a few pounds, well, that's a good thing. As an aside, we've had a similar conversation before regarding controlling a game with an exercise bike. http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/01/13/ 1217202> Given a choice between the two, I'd probably pick DDR, if only for slightly better music and the sake of my knees.

  6. The original article by bignickel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the original article. I wonder if Massachusetts will take up the case, but insist that Stepmania [stepmania.com] be used instead...

    1. Re:The original article by kevin.fowler · · Score: 1

      the flexibility and downloadability of stepmania is awesome. I usually pull out the dance pads for parties... and my friends are much more likely to do a Daft Punk song than that godawful Blow My Whistle song.

      --
      Bury me in mashed potatoes.
    2. Re:The original article by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just try to find a commercial game that lets you rape your keyboard to Rob Hubbard or Press Play On Tape.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  7. Great.... by MBraynard · · Score: 4, Funny
    I suppose this will lead to DDR being a sport in WV like Soccer and wrestling - not quiet on the level of Football, track and basketball, but up there.

    Will you be able to 'letter' in DDR? Will there be state championships?

    Or will this be more like just a machine in the middle of cafeteria that no one will touch for fear of peers' redicule. I would have tried it back in the day because I had pretty much maxxed out the peer redicule I could get.

    OR will it be like racketball played against a gyms collapsed bleechers for two weeks during the required PE class?

    Of course, if the machine is not on free play and/or not well maintained.... I actually expect both. I'd be surprised if K didn't expect kids to dump their change into the machines like they do with the soda/snack machines next to them.

    1. Re:Great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >Soccer and wrestling - not quiet on the level of Football, track and basketball.

      Ah Yes. Will it simply be as popular as those two small insignificant sports, soccer. Which is played nearly everywhere. Or Wrestling which has been around since the first olympics.

      Not quite as popular as Football, an American invented sport that has just been inveted in the last 100 years and is a derivative of a hugely popular world wide sport.

      Nice analogy.

    2. Re:Great.... by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      I played lots of sports in high school gym class that were not available as varsity teams, such as dodge ball and archery.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    3. Re:Great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      soccer not really up there? bud... soccer is the world's most popular sport. why don't you get rid of your american-centrist view of the world.

    4. Re:Great.... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      I suppose this will lead to DDR being a sport in WV like Soccer and wrestling...


      More in the, um, realm of figure skating, synchronized swimming, and that gymnastics thing with all the twirly flags on sticks.

    5. Re:Great.... by CoderBob · · Score: 1
      Considering that the place in question is in the States, and that over here soccer and wrestling are not followed as avidly as Football, Basketball, or Baseball, I don't see what your point is. I'm not even sure of the last time I saw a soccer match on a TV station that wasn't dedicated to sports- but I see football games on public channels all the time.

      I'm not sure track should be there, but from the standpoint of teens and school sports, wrestling and soccer (if you even have a HS soccer team), Football is pretty farking big.

    6. Re:Great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because WV is in America? He's wondering if it will be as popular as football or basketball is in a typical American high school not as popular as they are on a worldwide level.

      In my high school soccer was actually more popular than track but I agree with his distinction in general. In high school there are sports that tons of people try out for, that nonplayers like to watch in droves, and that are to many people almost a status symbol to play for. Then there are other sports that have a small niche following and pretty much only parents go to watch those games.

      In most American high schools basketball and football fall into the former category and soccer and wrestling in the latter. In American culture that just happens to be our preference. It is in no way a snub to other countries. It's just what's popular the US. So when wondering how popular something will be in a US state of course you compare it to the popularity of other things in the US.

    7. Re:Great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soccer is the world's most popular sport. But here's a secret. In the US, it isn't as popular. American schools have soccer teams, but they don't get the attention or the funding that football and basketball does. How is it American-centrist to recognize that in West Virginia (an American State), soccer is not as big as football?

    8. Re:Great.... by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, somewhere in there possibly.

    9. Re:Great.... by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure track should be there

      I listed track (track and field) because is it the sport that is most common to all American HS - more so than Football - and is typically where football players (and Cross country guys like me) were required to spend their off-season.

    10. Re:Great.... by Supurcell · · Score: 1

      I never had archery in gym class. I'd expect that to be pretty popular in the post-LotR movie era. Of course most schools are too worried about having a zero-tolerance weapon policy to ever have something like this. And if there ever was an unfortunate mishap, I've no doubt video games would be to blame, given the large number of Hunters in World of Warcraft.

    11. Re:Great.... by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      Our football team all seemed to pick up lacrosse in the off-season, but that may be a regional thing.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    12. Re:Great.... by CoderBob · · Score: 1

      Ahhh. Our football guys were required to be somewhere off-season, but could choose baseball or track. It was always assumed if you ran CC, you were a distance runner in track.

    13. Re:Great.... by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      I don't think the sport is played in WV HS. It wasn't played in SC HS. I don't even know what the game looks like or involves- likely a regional thing.

    14. Re:Great.... by engagebot · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone in a country other than america get so upset in a discussion just because america is not like ?

      news flash: football and track are the two most popular american highschool sports here, and it just so happens that american schools are what we're talking about. period.

      Hate to break it to you, but over here almost nobody cares about soccer. If you think that just because soccer is popular internationally that americans will give up football, then don't get it. Apparently you've never watched american college football. It's followed on a militant religious scale here.

      --
      Han shot first.
    15. Re:Great.... by jackbird · · Score: 1
      If your school gives you a day off for the first day of deer season (definitely a regional thing), it can safely be assumed that archery will be regarded as a perfectly acceptable sport, regardless of the presence of zero-tolerance weapons policies.

      Heck, my HS had a shooting club and zero-tolerance. A cased long gun wasn't considered a weapon.

    16. Re:Great.... by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      You mean, kinda like this?

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    17. Re:Great.... by Kyosuke77 · · Score: 1

      And it's not a weapon provided you aren't allowed to carry the ammo to school along with it (i.e. it's stored somewhere else and taken out only when it's going to be used for the proper purposes).

      --
      GET THEM INSIDE THE VAULT!
  8. Psychologically scarring by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

    On the other, if I was still in middle school, I think DDRing in front of middle school girls would be a sure way to cause permanent [psychologically] scarring.Scarring for whom? Perhaps both?

    All kidding aside, I don't think it matters what middle-school-aged boys do in front of girls. They'll be embarrassed in any case. This is just a good way to burn a little energy and be entertained at the same time.

    --
    Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    1. Re:Psychologically scarring by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Unless you go to a school like I do where DDR is increasing in popularity... much of the middle school plays it.... I was in a conversation with a large group of 10 or so DDR players and potential players talking about my adventures into the realm.
      DDR can be embarassing if you let it get embarassing. Concentrate on AAAing that Light/Standard/Heavy song and you will not have to worry about looking like crap during the gameplay, and actually doing badly, from experience.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    2. Re:Psychologically scarring by Drakin030 · · Score: 1

      HAH im sorry, if i was a girl and I saw some kid having a siezure on a dance pad I think I would call 911.

    3. Re:Psychologically scarring by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

      Hahahah yeah right. Try to make them see it that way.

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
  9. Back in the day.... by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There was this game we used to play what was it called?

    Oh, right, kickball.

    How much did it cost to play this?

    The cost of a ball or nothing if you had a butcher shop willing to give you an pig's stomach.

    Thank god West Virginia has been blessed with DDR. Were it not for this half a grand machine, they might go down in history as morbidly obese like their forefathers.

    What? Their forefathers weren't morbidly obese? You mean, it may be possible to have fun and excersize without some company cashing in off of you? Blasphemy!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Back in the day.... by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think their forefathers avoided morbid obesity more through working really, really hard all the livelong day, mining coal and farming rock and like that. Kickball was probably how they caught up on their sleep.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    2. Re:Back in the day.... by eldavojohn · · Score: 1
      I think their forefathers avoided morbid obesity more through working really, really hard all the livelong day, mining coal and farming rock and like that.
      Child labor it is then! We'll solve both obesity and a lack of a sugar fed workforce in one fell swoop.

      Just mix those gradeschoolers in with the convicts on the chain gang ...
      --
      My work here is dung.
    3. Re:Back in the day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes kickball...

      The athletic kids take the pitcher position, and man the bases with a few scattered in the outfield. The rest stand around in the the outfield doing nothing.

      And on the other team, the athletic kids do all the kicking, maybe giving the non-athletic kids and the girls a single chance to kick the ball and get out.

      How does that do anything for obesity? Standing in the outfield is not exercise. Kicking a ball once a day is not exercise, not even if you try to run to first afterwards. In fact, even for the athletic kids doing the actual playing, I wouldn't really call kickball excercise.

    4. Re:Back in the day.... by Supurcell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Kickball only works until about middle school. After that the kids are so strong that most of them are kicking homeruns(I wasn't one of them). Kickball, baseball, and softball are not very engaging sports, especialy when they are only played for about 40 minutes. Half the kids are sitting on the bench waiting to kick, and the other half are in the outfield waiting for the ball to come to them. With class sizes the way they were when I was in high school, there was even more waiting. Not much excercise going on there.

      Ultimate Frisby is probably the best option for an all-inclusive sport. With a few frisbies you can break the class up into smaller groups, so that more kids can actually play the game. It requires the good hand-eye coordination that we nerds have built up through years of computer use and masturbating. It is also a lot of fun to play( that is coming from me, some one who generally doesn't like sports).

    5. Re:Back in the day.... by engagebot · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Ultimate Frisbee is easily the most popular rec sport here at LSU.

      --
      Han shot first.
    6. Re:Back in the day.... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      The point here is to get kids to do aerobic exercise. Sitting on a bench waiting for your turn at the plate just doesn't get your heart pumping.

    7. Re:Back in the day.... by Kryis · · Score: 1

      I had to get up in the morning at ten o'clock at night, half an hour before I went to bed, eat a lump of cold poison, work twenty-nine hours a day down mill, and pay mill owner for permission to come to work, and when we got home, our Dad would kill us, and dance about on our graves singing "Hallelujah." But you try and tell the young people today that... and they won't believe ya.

    8. Re:Back in the day.... by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

      My regular workout includes DDR. It's fun and, on heavy mode at least, it is a rather good cardiovascular workout. It's also low-impact, and I don't have to go outside in the snow in order to play it. Just to make it more interesting, I often throw in pushups or crunchers between songs.

      --
      Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
  10. Too Lazy by CastrTroy · · Score: 1, Informative

    If the kids are too lazy to play real sports (soccer, football, baseball, general active play rather than watching tv) then what makes these people think that the kids won't be too lazy to play DDR? Also, you can be really thin, but if you're eating junk food all the time, then you're still going to be unhealthy. They are fighting the problem in the wrong way. They should be getting kids to do more real activities, rather than relying on expensive equipment to make them healthy.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Too Lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is not real about DDR?

    2. Re:Too Lazy by jclast · · Score: 1

      I agree with your sentiment wholeheartedly, but I know that if I had an overweight child that either wanted to lose weight or had been told by a doctor that they should, I would try everything to help them.

      If that means exercising together, great. If it means buying a DDR game and a dance pad, that's great, too.

      I'd rather have a healthy child that got that way with a video game than an unhappy and unhealthy child.

      --
      e2 | LJ
    3. Re:Too Lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because DDR is more fun than baseball or (11-a-side) soccer, less likely to get you injured than football, doesn't require big teams of people (specifically people willing to play with you, which is a problem for some kids, and also the people have to be of your approximate skill level making them more difficult to find).

      I'd say that DDR as a sport is right up there on the fun scale, probably only basketball and 5-a-side soccer beat it. And for convenience it beats everything short of jogging or push-ups. It is absolutely the most fun sport you can play on your own.

    4. Re:Too Lazy by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      News Flash, but DDR is a real sport, even if not recognized as one. Anything that regularly runs tournaments, and has participants playing so long and hard that they're glistening with sweat is more than a mere videogame. Most people who play also cite how addictive it is. I was too lazy to play "Real Sports" myself, yet I'm one of the better players in the DDR community, and that really takes years of practice.

      Any activity is better than sitting on your ass, so why not encourage it?

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    5. Re:Too Lazy by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      If the kids are too lazy to play real sports (soccer, football, baseball, general active play rather than watching tv) then what makes these people think that the kids won't be too lazy to play DDR?

      There are lots of reasons a person might not want or be able to play the team sports you listed, but still enjoy DDR. Most real sports require opponents and teammates, and they aren't always available. You can force this issue in a school, by making people play together, but that's not terrible fun if the people don't get along. In addition, sports require that all the players be at similar skill levels, or else it doesn't work as well. In general, the overweight, uncoordinated, not social kid is not going to find team sports all that much fun.

      As you alluded to, there are other sports and activities that don't require many other people (jogging, biking, hiking, throwing a ball against a wall), and really all this activity is, is another option. Notice that most of the activities I just listed are pretty boring to lots of people. Someone might find DDR more fun, or simply more accessible than the other options. If someone becomes more active because of this, then I consider it a good thing.

      I guess what I am really trying to say is that some people are inactive because thay are lazy, and some people are inactive because they simply don't enjoy any of the active options available to them. It's not necessarily obvious who is who.

      As far as whether this will work, despite what I said, I'm skeptical. I just don't think one game alone is going to have enough appeal to have much of an effect.

      Now for a related rant...

      My honest opinion on the subject of fitness in kids is that we've screwed them over by over scheduling their lives. It doesn't help that they are swimming in junk food, and plenty of non active activities (TV and video games), but I don't think this is the real problem. The real problem is no one just picks up a ball and plays in the street anymore. Instead we are driving our kids from one activity to the next. And we are overloading them with homework, too. So, the only exercise kids get is through organized sports. As I mentioned above, this doesn't work well for many kids who aren't athletic to begin with. So, we end up with a society were the athletic are pushed to be more athletic, and the rest become sloths on the sidelines.

    6. Re:Too Lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A big reason that kids dont like sports is that jocks are gigantic egocentric bullying assholes that have the support of the school, and they know it. It often has little to do with the activity itself, but the people they are forced into dealing with.

    7. Re:Too Lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have extra pounds. I don't like sports. I don't like sports where people can keep the [puck, ball, whatever] to themselves or their friends. I won't do a thing to burn some fat.

      I DO like DDR, and I DO play it sometimes. Of course I have to go to arcades and that's why I don't play more than that, but, if I had acess to one machine, freely, you can be sure that I would be there often.

      Of course, that would mean that I would lose weight and that I would reduce all the associated health risk, but I would not be playing because of those goal. In that way, by being fun, I end up having fun exercising.

      Why then buy this for kids? Because then most kids will do some exercise. The goal is to get them to exercise. And because some, like me, love this game, then, some, will exercise.
      Does this machine + maintenance cost more than the salary of the guy who used to supervise kids when they played kickball (+ inflation) or not, I don't know.

      All that I know is, DDR is fun, and thus people play. Also playing DDR is a good cardiovascular exercise, and cardiovascular exercise are good for your health.
      Thus:
      DDR is good for your health.
      Kids, they like to play DDR.
      Health of kids gets better.

    8. Re:Too Lazy by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Soccer, football, baseball... I love how you listed all team sports... I'd have been hard pressed to find more than four people to play with growing up. That's some really simple soccer and football (I should know we did try both). Even at school it was hard to do unless forced. Even then little was ever done...

      & dear god a girl would ever have to play a sport in PE... They may break a nail or stub a toe...

      As it stands I see DDR being a better option since it requires fewer people and a girl may not think of it to negatively...

      I have to say though, while I was never one for sports, I was a fairly active kid and still considered by most to be 'obese'. It tends to make me feel this will have no real effect, no matter what really happens.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    9. Re:Too Lazy by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, buy I never had a problem playing any of those sports with just two people, sometimes just by myself. When I was bored, I would often kick a soccer ball against a fence, or practice kicking or throwing a football, or throwing a baseball, or hitting baseballs by pitching them to myself. All these activities can be enjoyed alone or with one other person. The other person just does the running after the ball for you. Or the other person can act as the defender. There is no reason why you need 22 people to play soccer.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:Too Lazy by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Soccer is probably teh worst example. It's the sport I had the least exposure to as a kid (probably one of the few reasons I don't mind it nearly as much as others). Football, personally, was my dad's sport and I hated it... That's probably why I cna't imagine 'playing' it by myself, though we did try a couple times to do 4 person 'games' of it in my neighborhood. We found they were pretty uninteresting, especially when I can drag both the opposing players down the 'field'. I also can't hit a baseball to save my life, pitching to myself is a complete waste of time. I've never been sure why, but I 'played' baseball in a league for three or four years as a kid and I had a horrible batting record where I was lucky to hit one ball an entire season. It's the only sport I've ever played where I couldn't hit the object to save my life, go figure...

      While you may not need 22 people to play soccer (I don't think I've ever played an official game or ever had 22 people any time I've played it), it's meant to be played as a team sport. I personally wouldn't try with less than 6 people (2 goalies, 4 'field' players, half on each team). Less than that just wouldn't interest me.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    11. Re:Too Lazy by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      It's not really laziness, it's boredom. Like it or not, DDR is a very valid way to get lots and lots of people exercising that otherwise wouldn't.

      And the equipment for two people to play simultaneously can be a PS1/PS2 ($20-$60 used, probably), a copy of one of the DDR games ($20), two dance pads (about $20 each on the cheap end). I daresay this is less than I spent on any of my team sports in terms of cleats, sneakers, uniforms, a baseball bat, a tennis racquet, sign-ups for a league... even weights, a bike, etc, etc.

    12. Re:Too Lazy by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      You don't have to join a league to play a sport. I don't know where people get this idea.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    13. Re:Too Lazy by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      S'true, but in a lot of neighborhoods it's tough to find people to get together and play without some sort of league. Plunking down money makes them actually show up.

      Anyway, the main point was supposed to be that a working copy of DDR that can be used by two people simultaneously is about on par with what most people pay to play organized sports or work out. You're not shelling out extreme amounts of money for technogear any more than with a lot of other physical activities, and you don't see too many people bitching at hockey players, catchers, golfers, tennis players, football players, gym members, etc, etc, for spending too much money on their gear.

    14. Re:Too Lazy by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Or you skip the Playstation and the game and just buy the pads and two PSX/USB adapters (but first check which ones are good for dancing pads) or just two USB pads and install Stepmania on your PC. The total price is somewhere between 40 and 70 bucks and you don't need to buy another game to play different songs.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  11. DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by dada21 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The proper role of education is RRR - Reading, wRiting and aRithmetic. The idea that a school (a public one no less) should be enforcing diet or exercise or moral structure or anything other than a basic education is crazy.

    How about we stop funding these nutjobs who want to be parents to our children, no educators?

  12. On the other hand, standing in front :) by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    On the other hand standing in front of a bunch of teenage girls doing DDR could lead to an awfull lot of handwork :)

    DDR as a way to fight lardasses. Hmmm, okay. Wouldn't a live action doom be faster? Double shotgun in the blubber butt should cure them.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:On the other hand, standing in front :) by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Personally, I think it's going to be alot more fun for the lardasses to watch the teenage girls play DDR than the other way around. I suspect this will be just another reason to sit around. Not a reason to get up and move.

      Of course, I would prefer to watch women play RRR, but that's just me. :)

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    2. Re:On the other hand, standing in front :) by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a live action doom be faster? Double shotgun in the blubber butt should cure them.

      The damage caused by a plasic slug in the face is severe. Even a bean bag in the face, at the velocities caused by crowd-control guns, is too dangerous for P.E. class.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:On the other hand, standing in front :) by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a live action doom be faster? Double shotgun in the blubber butt should cure them.

      I've often thought that a combined action game/exercise machine would be a great (although expensive) product. Use a treadmill or bike as a controller - pedal or run to make the character move. Sounds like a more fun way to burn calories to me. (I should do a google search to see if anyone's done this).

    4. Re:On the other hand, standing in front :) by FLEB · · Score: 1

      I've seen this in the arcades... something with a flying bike. It cost a buck a play, though, so I don't think I actually ever went for it.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    5. Re:On the other hand, standing in front :) by sasami · · Score: 1

      something with a flying bike

      Prop-Cycle! Loved that game, and you could definitely work up a sweat playing it. The flywheel had hefty resistance to it, nicely matched to the gameplay. But yes, $1 a play was a bit rich when I was that age; like other racing games, beginners die more (and so pay more) than experts.

      Come to think of it, most places charge $1/play for DDR too.

      --
      Dum de dum.

      --
      Freedom is not the license to do what we like, it is the power to do what we ought.
  13. DDR != aerobics by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

    Bringing the health benefits and enjoyment that DDR provides

    Health Benefits!? Seriously! Has society dropped that low. Whatever happened to PE class and casual sporting. Doctors should be to blame too for not telling their patients to lose weight miraculously solving many health problems without a pill.

    Less coddling more ass kicking!

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:DDR != aerobics by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      Yes, health benefits. Can you maintain 90% of your max heart rate for a sustaned 4 hours or more? Without that pesky stitch in your side? Can you do this in a competitive environment? I can, thanks to DDR.

      The lower levels may be coddling, but you don't start out on the hardest step-patterns. Once you get there, and it's addictive enough to encourage advancement, it's seriously good exercise.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    2. Re:DDR != aerobics by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      Health Benefits!? Seriously! Has society dropped that low. Whatever happened to PE class and casual sporting.

      Spoken like somebody who has never really played DDR before judging.


      I participate actively in P.E in school, but I also play DDR at home... a lot of DDR, not just light mode, but standard, and heavy/standard/heavy on doubles mode (with 2 pads).


      DDR involves you using your body. Play it a lot, you will notice changes. Just because you don't see how it is arobic doesn't mean it isn't, it just means you need to update your definition. I have strengthened my legs considerably, and can move them faster too thanks to DDR.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  14. Get rid of "high fructose corn syrup" by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    When I was in high school, we used to drink coke/pepsi/pop/soda whatever a lot and we never gained a lot of weight. I really believe that the switch to high fructose corn syrup is a big cause of obesity IMNSO (non-scientific opinion). Obese kids back then were few and far between unlike kids today. I don't really see what kids are doing today that was different in high school in the 80s. So diet may have changed but this country needs to make a stand on what they feed their kids.

    Perhaps, we should tell the corn lobby to screw itself and go back to sugar. Sugar is used in Canada, is obesity a problem there?

    sri

    1. Re:Get rid of "high fructose corn syrup" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sugar is used in Canada, is obesity a problem there?

      According to a quick Google search: Yep.

      Personally, I'd blame videogames more than sugar. More and more kids spend their play time sitting in front of these machines than they do outside playing physical games. That's the entire reason they're getting DDR machines, the concept is to somehow combine videogames and physical activity.

      Given that all the fat people I know who got DDR based on that theory are STILL fat (if not fatter) I doubt this will actually work. You can lead a fat horse to water, but you can't get them to stop eating Twinkies and sitting on their duff... (In fact, I know one fat bastard who's probably up to a good 400 pounds and "plays DDR" - his diet got WORSE because he thought he was "doing something healthy". I wondering if he realizes you have to use the pad, not the controller...)

      If you really want to lose weight, WALK DAILY! It's easy, FREE, and actually works!

    2. Re:Get rid of "high fructose corn syrup" by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

      umm.. unfortunately it is... obesity is a big problem in Canada. There are too many ppl here who would rather stay at home and watch TV rather than go outside. And the fact that its freakin cold all the time doesn't help too much either.

    3. Re:Get rid of "high fructose corn syrup" by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Then I guess it has everything to do with exercise or lack thereof. Pity. Not being active makes us poor competition when we get out into the workplace. Sports and competition is a critical part of an education I feel.

      sri

  15. The "cool" kids wont touch it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The kids good at DDR won't touch a console version with the crappy pad they will be supplying.

    Now if it was Stepmania with a couple of Cobalt Flux pads, then you may have a problem.

  16. Is our children learning yet? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

    No, if schools are wasting time focusing on stuff other than learning

    1. Re:Is our children learning yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is our children learning yet?"

      It would seem that you skipped subject-verb agreement day in English class. Let me fix that for you.

      "Are our children learning yet?"

  17. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by szembek · · Score: 1

    Yeah, we should just cut out all physical activity during the day in preperation for that desk job their bound for after college.....

    --
    nothing
  18. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by CaptainPinko · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well this is health education and I think if it can make a difference in people's lives its worth it. Frankly, I'm using it to get back into shape and am beginning to see results and lose weight.

    Also, if we take the 3Rs strictly that precludes the teaching of algebra (algebra being beyond the scope of arithmetic), computer science,and trade class, art class, geography or any other science, literary criticism... and just about anything else worth knowing.

    Frankly the only nutjob here is you.

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  19. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by dada21 · · Score: 1

    Art class and history can be fun electives -- electives that are chosen by the student and paid for by the student. I don't see the need for a state funded 8-3pm education. Grammar/spelling/reading, mathematics (up to pre-algebra) and writing/typing are all I want to see the public system doing. Basic bare education, and let the parents fund the rest.

    I don't want to fund kids jumping up and down, that is the parent's job to make sure their child is healthy, not my job.

  20. Jail the parents! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Look. I'm a father of two and soon to be three. I watch what they eat. I criticize and take an active role in their appearance, health and nutrition. I do this because somewhere in my past, my parents were like this and back in THEIR day, your children were viewed as an extension of yourself... and god forbid I ever embarass my parents by being fat or not being properly cared for.

    Perhaps fear of humiliation is not the best motivation, but it certainly worked for my parents and it works for me. I'm proud of my kids and the results of my efforts. I'm proud of my ability to apply my mind to overcome the current environment (where virtually all food is bad for you thanks to competition and efforts to increase shelf-life). I feel shame for all the parents of obese children and pity for the children -- it's not their fault!

    I've ranted on this before and I guess I am again. If a parent was "neglecting" a child in some way that causes bodily harm, usually, the kids are taken away and/or the parents are criminally prosecuted. Why, then, isn't childhood obesity not considered bodily harm?

    1. Re:Jail the parents! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and god forbid I ever embarass my parents by being fat or not being properly cared for.


      What well rounded individuals you must be raising with your parental skills.

      Yes, its always best to instill fear, criticism, shame and guilt on a child. Those actions have never scarred a child emotionaly, lead them to grow up into angry, socially inept adults, or the need for them seek therapy and anti-depressants because their parents were ashamed of them.

      Way to go!

      The wrong way to act as a parent is to be proud of a child, support them, take an active role in their health & nutrition so they don't lead to quality of life and health problems in later life.

      No you're quite right, every parent should be ashamed of an Obese, Deaf, Blind, C Grade, Liberal, Gay, Lesbian or otherwise "Imperfect" child.

    2. Re:Jail the parents! by erroneus · · Score: 1

      It's pointless to respond to the anonymous criticism, but let's add some pointers to responding:

      1. Limit your assumptions to that which has been stated... then they won't be assumptions beyond your own interpretation.
      2. Don't be anonymous if you want to be taken seriously.

      Now on to what you've said:

      In addition to other mental weaknesses, I think it's very wrong to take pills to compensate for emotional imbalances. I think fear is an important and critical component for getting along in the world. It is the basis for respect. And yes! Shame and guilt are also important. It's how we learn to be careful and consciencious people. When we do something wrong, we should feel bad about it. Those feeling don't necesarily come naturally -- they must be taught.

      Pain is a fact of life. Teach a child to handle it well and he won't need to go to a therapist or a doctor for every little problem. Equip a child to be strong and self-reliant and not some pansy-ass who blames the world for his problems... like so many anonymous cowards we hear from on a regular basis.

      OBESITY IN CHILDREN is 99.999% a problem of nutritional negligence. It is really very rare when it's a real biological anomoly. These days every kid is diagnosed with ADD... those same kids eat trash on a daily basis. My kids don't have such problems and is it coincidence that they don't eat garbage so often?

    3. Re:Jail the parents! by nickyj · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points use (expired yesterday). I agree with both of your posts.

      --
      Causing Chaos Everywhere,
      Nik J.
      The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
  21. Maybe, maybe not by eXonyte · · Score: 1

    While I'm all for the promotion of my favorite video game genre, I don't think this is the way to go about it. A lot of people (myself included) will not be able to enjoy the game because they are being told to play it. If they had picked it up on their own it would be fun in addition to a good workout.

    Also, why are they paying $740 bucks for this? I could get the same thing for less than $500 per setup, thereby saving over $200,000 in the process. They're more than welcome to forward that extra $200k my way and I'll hook 'em up.

    Ah well. I prefer Pump it Up anyway...

    1. Re:Maybe, maybe not by avageek · · Score: 1
      Also, why are they paying $740 bucks for this? I could get the same thing for less than $500 per setup, thereby saving over $200,000 in the process. They're more than welcome to forward that extra $200k my way and I'll hook 'em up.

      From the picture in the article it appears that they're using the red octane metal pad which usually costs about ~$200 each. Makes sense, when we're talking about middle and high schoolers it's best to get something that can hold up to a bit of a beating.

    2. Re:Maybe, maybe not by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      In that case, they should pick up Cobalt Flux pads instead. I'm not a shill; I've played on my two Flux pads for almost a year on the hardest songs in the game, and my pads still work great. Without modifications, the Red Octanes can not say the same. Also, Cobalt Flux makes pads especially for fitness clubs which are even more robust, though they also cost over $1000 each.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
  22. Wow, it's not dead yet?! by uradu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fifteen years after its demise, the East German communist state is infiltrating a US school system--talk about sneaky and resilient.

    1. Re:Wow, it's not dead yet?! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Fifteen years after its demise"? Where have you been? The US school system has been the East German communist state for *years* now.

      Chris Mattern

    2. Re:Wow, it's not dead yet?! by uradu · · Score: 1

      LOL, touché!

    3. Re:Wow, it's not dead yet?! by gerddie · · Score: 1

      Firstly, East Germany came to your computer as DDR-RAM, now we are in the US school system ... All Your Base Belong To Us!

      Seriously, the East German School system was one of the better ones. Actually, Finnland, which scores amongst the best in the PISA-Tests took a good look at East Gerrmany and learnt a lot.

      ... and besides, it is a common misconception that East Germany was communist - we called it socialist, and even that one might argue.

    4. Re:Wow, it's not dead yet?! by uradu · · Score: 1

      > and besides, it is a common misconception that East Germany was communist
      > - we called it socialist, and even that one might argue.

      Well, I spent the first 14 years of my life in one of its "sister" Warsaw Pact states, so I have an excellent idea of what they were all about. The education was good, indeed, but extremely hard-driving and unforgiving, almost completely ignoring the different developmental paces of individuals. And yes, I was a "pioneer" with red scarf and all because we had to, and no, it didn't mean diddly to me nor to most others I knew.

      And even though deep down very few people were actually devout communists, many could still get you in trouble for saying the wrong thing if there was a gain to be had. So yes, overall the system was still very much communist, even if you personally didn't fall asleep at night reading Marx.

  23. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by szembek · · Score: 1

    I suspect somebody was always picked last for kickball and still holds a little grudge toward phys ed in public schools.

    --
    nothing
  24. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by egburr · · Score: 1
    The proper role of education is to teach people how to think (not what, but how) and how to learn. It should also teach useful skills. Reading, writing, and arithmetic are only some of those skills. Basic health, including diet and exercise, are others.

    Morality is a hard one. The problem lies in figuring out what should be common to everyone and what should be left to the individual's family and culture.

    Most teachers don't want to be parents to their students; they want to be teachers. However, way too many parents either don't have the time or inclination to be parents, so often the teachers end up filling that role as best they are able. The government sees what is happening and tries to take on some of that itself instead of leaving it up to the already-overworked teachers. I'm not saying this is right, only that it is what is happening. If more parents would take responsibility for their children, this wouldn't be an issue.

    If parents weren't so quick to anger when someone else disciplines their children for doing something wrong, this wouldn't be an issue.

    For example, just yesterday while we were at a restaurant, my two year old son was punched by a 6-8 year old just because he was in the way while walking toward the game room. He's got a nice bruise on his cheek now. My wife didn't do anything but pick him up, because she didn't want to cause a commotion. She wouldn't point the kid out to me either. If I'd seen it, I'd've grabbed the other kid and made him take me to his parents to let them know what he'd done, and hope they'd agree that was wrong.

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  25. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by dada21 · · Score: 1

    Actually the football coach begged me to join Freshman year (I was hard to tackle when we played smear-the-queer at recess) but I hated football. I also held records for some stats for almost a decade after I graduated (pull ups, climbing speed, and track). I'm no jock, but I'm very athletic.

  26. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, fuck you.

  27. great idea by AK__64 · · Score: 1

    They also need to find a way to allow students to get DDR credit as a way to avoid the useless and largely unnecessary PE classes. Usually only athletic students really participate, to everyone else it's just a junk class to be avoided and ignored as much as possible...

  28. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by dada21 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Basic health, including diet and exercise, are others.

    So you want the same government that promoted the Food Pyramid death trap to teach your kids how to eat and exercise? Sorry, but I'm a pro-fat pro-protein anti-sugar anti-starch kind of guy, and I know that the teachers are teaching kids that bread is good, butter is bad. It is the other way around, friend, and you're going to poison your kids with that garbage.

    The problem lies in figuring out what should be common to everyone and what should be left to the individual's family and culture.

    There is no common morality as I see it. The only rule I can think that needs to be taught to kids is "don't hurt anyone else, don't hurt their property." The side comment of this is "if two adults share cooperate voluntarily with each other, no one should stop them from transacting any barter or trade." That's it. The parents teach that, the schools teach education. I'm against public funding of education entirely, but stretching it to cover morals or health is ridiculous.

    However, way too many parents either don't have the time or inclination to be parents, so often the teachers end up filling that role as best they are able.

    In 1980, the household tax burden was under 30% of total income to government at every level.
    In 2005, the household tax burden is over 50% of total income to goverment at every level.

    You want to know WHY parents don't have time? They're too busy paying off the bad decisions the voters made 20 years ago. End the public education system, dump the property taxes that pay for it, and you'll be able to return mom (or dad) back home to take care of the children. Don't tell me to pay for your bad voting decisions.

    The government sees what is happening and tries to take on some of that itself instead of leaving it up to the already-overworked teachers.

    Overworked? When teachers have to teach homosexuality, AIDs, exercise, diet, government-written history, and economics to children, of course they are overworked. These are subjects that should come from family-paid higher education or the home, not from teachers. We can cut education to 3 hours per day, refund 70% of the money people pay in taxes for education, and fix the problem in 1 year or less.

    If I'd seen it, I'd've grabbed the other kid and made him take me to his parents to let them know what he'd done, and hope they'd agree that was wrong.

    I'd have grabbed the kid and called my lawyer. I also wouldn't let my 2 year old be wandering around without me. I wouldn't let my 6 year old or 10 year old do so either. It is the parents' job to monitor their child completely until that child is a major, at which point that adult (no matter the age) is responsible for themselves. If an 8 year old is wandering around alone, he's an adult in my eyes.

  29. Not efficient by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

    Only one person can be on a dancepad at a time. How many will be in each school?

    1. Re:Not efficient by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      Only one person can be on a dancepad at a time. How many will be in each school?

      Depends...


      On a regular DDR arcade game, 2 people can play (except for the Solo version). On home versions, mostly 2 players as the maximum except for the DDR ULTRAMIX series (DDRMAX series pwns) which can have up to 4 players playing at once.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    2. Re:Not efficient by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      Yes, more than one can play the game at the same time but each need their own pad (I don't know, maybe they have a double pad for the arcade but the principle is the same).

    3. Re:Not efficient by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      The only other option, odds are it is really craopy, but if doing DDR in a class, do "ghosting" for those not playing the DDR game itself, so they stil can mimic the moves and try getting the exersise the main player(s) are getting (if not using the bar).

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  30. Screw DDR, get those kids a real game... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Screw DDR, get those kids a real game... by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      Screw DDR, get those kids a real game...

      Hmmm....

      game1 (gm) n. An activity providing entertainment or amusement; a pastime: party games; word games. A competitive activity or sport in which players contend with each other according to a set of rules: the game of basketball; the game of gin rummy. A single instance of such an activity: We lost the first game. games An organized athletic program or contest: track-and-field games; took part in the winter games. A period of competition or challenge: It was too late in the game to change the schedule of the project. The total number of points required to win a game: One hundred points is game in bridge. The score accumulated at any given time in a game: The game is now 14 to 12. The equipment needed for playing certain games: packed the children's games in the car. A particular style or manner of playing a game: improved my tennis game with practice. Informal. An active interest or pursuit, especially one involving competitive engagement or adherence to rules: "the way the system operates, the access game, the turf game, the image game" (Hedrick Smith). A business or occupation; a line: the insurance game. An illegal activity; a racket. Informal. Evasive, trifling, or manipulative behavior: wanted a straight answer, not more of their tiresome games. A calculated strategy or approach; a scheme: I saw through their game from the very beginning. Mathematics. A model of a competitive situation that identifies interested parties and stipulates rules governing all aspects of the competition, used in game theory to determine the optimal course of action for an interested party. Wild animals, birds, or fish hunted for food or sport. The flesh of these animals, eaten as food. An object of attack, ridicule, or pursuit: The press considered the candidate's indiscretions to be game. Mockery; sport: The older children teased and made game of the newcomer.
      Nowhere does this disqualify DDR from being a real game. ^_^
      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    2. Re:Screw DDR, get those kids a real game... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Dance games are not TR00 H4RDC0R3 0LD-SK00L games. ;)

    3. Re:Screw DDR, get those kids a real game... by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, old school games... I seee, and agreeeeee maaan. ^_^

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  31. Low-fat foods make you FAT by NuShrike · · Score: 1

    If you've seen Frontline's Diet Wars a lot of it could be due to the "Low Fat" craze. Low fat foods are not low calorie foods. In fact, they're only a few cals different from the full-fat foods. The food makers make up with something else when they remove one ingredient. Low-fat could mean high sugar/carbs instead for instance. Full-fat salad dressing is healthier than low-fat, because veggie fats are good for you, etc.

    Dieting is actually all about restricting caloric intake instead which hasn't been the focus. If the Earth 2 biodome results were any indication, restricted caloric intake extends your life too.

    Seen that can of soda? From 100 to 160 calories right there.. Then you have a big 1000 cal lunch and dinner (Carl's Jr?), and you're already beyond the normal 2000 calories males should be intaking a day.

    This is why Atkins and South Beach seem to work because they're all about low-calorie meals (meat is slow-burning, low-cal, and high fat), and at least South Beach seems to be about eating healthier too.

    Get rid of the soda machines, make the kids walk to school (with 5 pounds on each foot preferably :), would be just as effective. Then you DDR for the Olympics. :)

    Disclaimer: I'm a former DDR addict also, but I've lost more inches through just pilates and a no soda diet. Still 160lbs.

    1. Re:Low-fat foods make you FAT by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      Well, that depends... You are correct it is about calories. The way I look at it is this way though.

      1 tablespoon of fat (oil, butter, mayo, etc..) 100Cal
      1 oz dry pasta 100Cal
      1 slice of bread 100Cal
      1.5-2.5oz of meat (depending on animal) 100cal (40-70cal/oz)
      5-10 oz vegetables (depending on fiber content) 100Cal.

      The way I see it all diets that work control calories the differences are about making it easier to eat less calories. Atkins works because it easier to eat 800 calories of pasta, than a 12oz steak. Of course vegetables are a better way to go, since it would take a couple pounds of most vegetables to equal the steak or pasta. Even giving 200 calories for 2 tbls of full fat dressing.

      And soda is a problem just because it is really easy to drink 500 calories without really noticing. That is only about 3 12 Oz cans. 1 at lunch, 1 atmid-afternoon, and 1 at dinner. Then, you have to only eat about 1500 calories in solid food which I think tends to be very unstatisfying, so if you are not paying attention you actually eat say 1800Cal of food and 500Cal of soda and start gaining a pound every 10 days. (assuming you don't exercise the extra 300/day calories away).

  32. The real news. by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

    I think the REAL news here is that Konami still gives a shit about DDR anymore.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
  33. This isnt rocket surgery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to lose weight then eat less, eat healthier and exersize more. Thats it. Thats all there is to it.

    Its not complicated or difficult, its just easy to be lazy and buy mcdonalds and feel full instead of buying a salad and being hungry. If you change your lifestyle (because temporary diets are a joke) you will feel hungry, you will feel tired, you will feel different and upset. You have to deal with it.

    Stress and Malnutrition are the ONLY ways to lose weight. If you consume only 1700 calories a day, you will eventually be down (or up) to 170 pounds.

    Its simple math.

  34. My Highschool Has been doing this for a while .... by neomage86 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I graduated from HS 3 years ago, and they had DDR and some kind of bike hooked up to a playstation for my Junior and Senior years (the HS is in a western suburb of Chicago).

    The thing is, that almost no one ever used them ...
    The kids who really wanted to get into shape used the weight room, treadmills, and other 'traditional' excercise machines and the kids who didn't want to get into shape weren't going to be fooled by such an obvious ploy.

    We were required to wear pulse monitors and our grade depended on our average bpm (I think something around 170+ was an A ...). They were easily 'hackable,' so the lazy kids just had them display the last person who got an A's statistics when the teacher came around to collect scores.

    No amount of technology is ever going to get people into shape who don't want to be. Working out, almost by definition, involves hard work. People who want to get in shape will manage to regardless of how few tools are available, and people who want to avoid it will always be able to do so (in fact, I think these high tech toys are easier to cheat with).

  35. Why is it... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    I have an image of an entire generation dancing like the DDR Asian kid in the "You Got Served" episode of South Park?

    The horror... The... Horror...

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  36. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You want to know WHY parents don't have time? They're too busy paying off the bad decisions the voters made 20 years ago. End the public education system, dump the property taxes that pay for it, and you'll be able to return mom (or dad) back home to take care of the children. Don't tell me to pay for your bad voting decisions.
    Bull-fucking-shit wages take taxes into account, drop taxes, wages will drop as well.
  37. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by keyne9 · · Score: 1

    Like it or not, schools are effectivley daycares for children. Unless, of course, you plan on sitting with your children in each class. There's something to be said about home schooling here, but in its absence, yes, schools do provide "parenting" (in addition to education) for kids while mommy and daddy are working/etc.

  38. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by dada21 · · Score: 1

    And I believe wages are lower because both parents work. Once women entered the workforce en masse, they increased the supply of available workers, lowering the demand, and therefore lowering wages, too.

    The mess starts with government, it ends with government, and it has government in the middle too.

  39. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about you teach your kids a reasonable diet and acknowledge that too much meat and butter is as bad as too much bread and sugar?

  40. Not if you know how to do it by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    It doesn't take that long to be halfway decent at DDR. If you practice at home for a month or two then you could probably get to a standard where people will gather round and watch in awe.

  41. Well, about time! by pla · · Score: 2, Funny

    DDR Coming To West Virginia Schools

    You mean those poor buggers still had machines running with PC133? Ouch!

  42. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evil goverment allows women to work? Move to middle east!

  43. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by egburr · · Score: 1
    I also wouldn't let my 2 year old be wandering around without me. I wouldn't let my 6 year old or 10 year old do so either. It is the parents' job to monitor their child completely until that child is a major,

    My wife was with him. I was at our table with my other son. She had no reason to expect some kid to just lash out and punch him as he was walking by.

    As for some of your other points...

    Another reason parents don't have time is because they both have to work to pay for all the things they think they need, including cable TV and a new car every few years. Housing prices don't help things either; a house has got to be one of the only things in existence that gets more expensive with every sale.

    You say you see no common morality, then go on to start a short list of what should be common. I agree with all the items in your list, but if given some time could probably think of a few more to add. Others may disagree. So, again, what should be common? :)

    As for diet, maybe teaching how to watch what you eat, how to impose self-discipline instead of eating it all just because it's there, and other general concepts like that. As for our understanding of what's good for you and what's bad for you, that does seem to change a lot over time. You would prefer that every person must experiment for him/herself and see what happens 20 years down the road when it's too late to do anything about it?

    And about teachers being overworked... They have to teach all day, usually with a one hour break and 15-20 minutes of lunch before returning to supervise the students. Only after the students go home do they get time to grade homework and prepare the next days lesson plans. Yeah, absolute basics probably would require only 3-4 hours a day in the classroom. All the extra stuff grew over time as people wanted other things taught. Remember, our government is run by people who want to appear that they are pleasing the majority of people or at least the loudest mob.

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  44. This a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do any of the /. DDR players realize how insane this sounds?

    WV is one of the most ass-backwards states in the Union. The only way to get kids to play that game in WV would be to replace the K-pop and J-pop with some David Allan Coe.

    1. Re:This a joke? by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      So your saying that DDR in schools is only problematic in ass-backwards states and a good idea in places where it is more likely to succeed (more and more states, since DDR is inceasing in popularity here. ^_^) BTW, k-pop and j-pop are NOT the only kinds of music in DDR... 500+ songs spanning nearly (or over) 20 games in more than 5 genres IIRC.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  45. Exercise and obesity by Budenny · · Score: 3, Informative

    Exercise will certainly do some good. However, the problem has come from the two great uncontrolled dietary experiments the US has undertaken in the last 50+ years.

    The first was the large scale introduction of vegetable oil, often hydrogenated, into the diet, to replace animal fats. There is not, and never was, any scientific basis for exposing mass populations to dietary elements which their evolutionary history could not have prepared them for.

    The second was the large scale move to a high carbohydrate diet. it was called low-fat. Low-fat sounds reasonable and uncontroversial. High carbohydrate, which is what it was, has neve been shown to improve the health of any population, and would have been very controversial if labelled as what it was.

    The results of the experiments are now coming in. The evidence is that the results are increases in heart disease and diabetes and obesity. The way to solve the problem would be partially exercise, but a more important step would be going back to the diet traditionally eaten around 1900, before the great increase in heart disease. This would be a diet fairly high in animal fats, generally eaten incidentally to eating meat and poultry or dairy products, and one with (complex rather than refined) carbohydrates accounting for a much smaller percentage of calories than today. We would eat grass fed meat, fish and eggs, with fresh vegetables and butter on them, and relatively coarse, though not whole grain, bread. Olive oil would be used in cooking and salad. There would be a total lack of polyunstaturated and hydrogentated vegetable oil, and little or no refined sugar.

    Exercise is fine, but exercise while eating faddish garbage is not going to solve the problem.

    1. Re:Exercise and obesity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      source?

      (I'm asking now because I do not believe you, but because I want to know more about this...)

    2. Re:Exercise and obesity by Ezel · · Score: 1

      Eeh?
      Isn't Olive-oil a sort of vegetable oil?

      I've heard that Olive-oil is actually a bit worse (not much at all though) than rapeseed-oil (Rapsolja in swedish).

      --
      Prosp long and liver.
    3. Re:Exercise and obesity by Budenny · · Score: 1

      Yes, Olive oil is a vegetable oil. However, unlike say hydrogenated corn oil, we have a history of human populations eating it, cooking with it, going back thousands of years. We've also a lot of population statistics to suggest that those populations have neither high rates of diabetes nor heart disease. Finally, we have studies of the ingredients and their effect which are similarly supportive. We have just about none of this for the massive shift to either polyunsaturated vegetable oils, like safflower and corn and soy, or to hydrogenated variants. In fact, all the experiments performed on shifting fat consumption onto polyunsaturated led to poor health outcomes. The results of the shift to a combination of vegetable oils and refined carbohydrate diets are coming in now.

      Rapeseed oil is an entirely new ingredient in the human diet. I don't think there is any large scale population evidence to suggest it is safe or beneficial.

      It is an extraordinary thing, how ready we are to shift away from unprocessed to heavily processed foods on grounds of health, where there is no evidence whatever of benefit. Cow's milk for instance, is being substituted by soy milk, one of the most manufactured foods there is, with no evidence of any benefit, and much to the contrary. Sometimes myths are created - one important one is that the Japanese diet contains large quantities of soy. It doesn't. It contains small quantities of soy, very carefully and cautiously prepared, including by long fermentation. There is a reason for this.

      Get Nourishing Traditions by Fallon. And remember what Elizabeth David said. It should be engraved on the hearts of all dieticians.

      "The only accompaniment any vegetable needs, is a little good butter".

  46. You seem to think West Virginia is made of money by Pluvius · · Score: 1

    Well, it was when Robert Byrd was Senate Majority (and Appropriations) Leader, but not any more. You've inadvertantly pointed out the primary problem with this program, though; it'll cost a lot of money to maintain unless you only provide very few machines, which in turn will cause crowding concerns. The state may be willing to spend that money, however, considering how massive (haha, I made a funny) the obesity problem is here.

    Rob

  47. Just watch out for shin splints by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

    Like anything that pounds on your feet, watch out for shin splints. Always wear good supportive shoes when playing for extended periods of time. Don't use soft mats and bare feet.

    That is one bit of information that doesn't get passed around enough.

    Of course kids are less susceptable than us older folk, just be careful because shin splints take forever to heal (if ever). I actually built a hard DDR pad that would allow me to use shoes because I got shin splints after playing DDR for 6-8 hours a day for three days straight (it's years later and they still flair up).

    --
    The ratio of people to cake is too big
  48. Dear Governor Manchin, by Dachannien · · Score: 1
  49. Who needs consoles? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not just teach them real dancing?

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    1. Re:Who needs consoles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Ballroom dance is not only great exercise, but it teaches excellent (and lasting) social skills as well!

      Someday, you're probably going to want to avoid looking stupid at prom or at someone's wedding, so kids arguably need to learn these skills anyway.

      DDR may be fun, but it's not exactly as useful in greater society.

  50. Psychic? by aitikin · · Score: 1

    Maybe you meant Psychological scarring? It'd be impressive if DDR will teach you how to mess with someone's mind!

    --
    "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
  51. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

    But despite that you seem to hold some grudge against those of us smart enough to get past algebra.

  52. Stupid waste of money. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What an idiotic waste of money.

    Want to keep their weight down? Have students sweep and clean school grounds every morning like they do in much of Asia. This will have other benefits beyond just getting exercise, in the very least you'll save money and keep the school clean. Put them through a more rigorous exercise program than the useless nonsense that passes for gym class. Obviously the existing system has its problems if they continue having obesity problems, and a bunch of video games wont change this.

    How about teaching them dancing for real? It's a hell of a lot more effective than bouncing around like a fool on a giant pad and it will actually be useful outside of that game.

    Where the hell do they find the people who run these schools?

  53. Free or rich kids only? by jmhewitt · · Score: 1

    I was just curious will these machines be free (or incentive based)so that everyone can play or will they require cash so that only the kids whose parents can afford to give them money for the machines can play? It'd be nice if we had one more way to point out the poor kids at school...

  54. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    Oh good, create a permanent upper class. As if it isn't bad enough already. Put your idea in place and only wealthy kids will learn music, foreign languages, advanced math, and only wealthy kids will go to college.

    By the way, parents are funding the "rest" it's called taxes.

  55. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by CronoCloud · · Score: 1
    Goddess save me from Libertarian Randite entrepreneurs who can't admit they're really plutocrats in love with their own wallets.

    I'm against public funding of education entirely,


    And where did you go to school at? You've got yours so who cares about anyone else as long as there's more money in your wallet?

    In 1980, the household tax burden was under 30% of total income to government at every level.
    In 2005, the household tax burden is over 50% of total income to goverment at every level.


    You know why? Because the share of taxes paid by business went down, thanks to selfish Me First Libertarians and Country Club Republicans

    These are subjects that should come from family-paid higher education or the home, not from teachers.

    So every family is supposed to have their own teacher? Wouldn't it be smarter for a bunch of families and say people interested in having an educated society to pool together their resources and have a bunch of teachers in one place, say a school? We could call the pooled resources...taxes.

  56. Dance Dance Revolution May Help Treat ADHD by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (Some relevant info from a slashdot story I submitted a few months ago, which didn't make the cut)

    Besides the obvious exercise benefits, it seems that the Dance Dance Revolution video game may also help out children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A recent study in which sixth-graders with ADHD played DDR Disney Mix for an hour each week suggests that playing the game improved their focus and attention, although further studies are planned to get a better understanding of how it could help kids out.

  57. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a female workforce boosts productivity and increases the market, creating more supply as well as demand. But then, when didn't females participate in the economy? Except for the middle and upper classes, females have been working in the Western world forever, because the lower class has never been able to subsist off of a single income. Wages in the U.S. are dropping because more jobs are being moved to cheaper markets, leaving unskilled low-paying work. When you go to your anarchocapitalist meetings, do any of the educated people there make fun of you for being ignorant and nonsensical?

  58. The good and the bad by symbolic · · Score: 1


    First, the good...

    The intent is to address the growing problem of youth obesity.

    Now, the bad...

    The games, which will run on Microsoft Xboxes...

    Nothing like shoving more taxpayer money into Microsoft's coffers.

  59. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by glitch0 · · Score: 1

    nowadays the point of school is more to keep kids who aren't old enough to work occupied all day more than really learning.

    --
    -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
  60. WTF education system! by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

    Although its pretty cool that they're resorting to video games in an effort to teach the young'ens, I think the best thing to do is have mandatory gym classes all the way up to highschool, and actually fail kids who don't pass the gym class. I don't know about in the States, but here in Canada the only possible way to fail a kid is if the parents and the teachers agree to "hold them back". WTF!! I know kids in grade 12 that can't even fucking read because of this. Seriously, schools need to crack down and fail kids who are failing, and pass kids who are passing.

    --
    disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
  61. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by Otonotachibana · · Score: 1

    Schools should take a pro-active role in physical exercise (and other areas like sex education) because parents sometimes do a really poor job raising children. Children should not have to suffer due to lack of exposure to certain health issues.

  62. DDR rules!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting for DDR on Xbox 360.

  63. Re:DDR? 2/3 wrong letters by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

    Why do two of the "3 Rs" not start with R? Somebody screwed the pooch on that.