Slashdot Mirror


Tagging Devices To Aid In Car Chases

kthejoker writes "ABC News is reporting that a company called StarChase has invented a device that will allow police teams to 'tag' cars involved in dangerous chases. The device is the size of a golf ball, can be launched via an air-powered shooter attached to police vehicles, and uses a "highly efficient" glue to stick to cars. From there, it transmits its GPS position to a central monitoring station."

79 of 394 comments (clear)

  1. Wicked Idea by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its like the spiderman toys we all used to throw at windows and doors.
    Am I the only one who could never get them to stick to friends backs?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Wicked Idea by doctormetal · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't see why they don't fashion some sort of electrical disruption device, like those trident things out of "2 Fast, 2 Furious" that the cops just shot into a car. Not only were they effective (unless the drive manages to somehow lean out of the window far enough to reach the back of the car and prize the 2 foot spear out of the bodywork while travelling at 100mph), but they look cool too.

      If the car is driving at a high speed and all electronics stop functioning, the car becomes uncontrollable and a crash will be unavoidable, which almost certainly means someone will die.
    2. Re:Wicked Idea by VagaStorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. Fiering a spear on a car doing 100 mph in trafic is rather dangerous.
      2. Why would you need a spear when you could just use a microwave gun http://www.abcnews.go.com/Technology/FutureTech/st ory?id=538452&page=1

      This leads me to belive this devise is realy most usefoull in cases where you whant to follow the car without stoping it.

    3. Re:Wicked Idea by hungrygrue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, have you ever driven a car? Do you have the slightest clue how your steering or brakes work? I would suggest that you find out. Why, exactly, would you ever begin to think that the car would suddenly become "uncontrollable", regardless of what speed it is traveling just due to a failure of electronics? If you suddenly have no ignition and therefore no spark, your engine will die. That's it. If your headlights were to be lost as well, that would rather suck if you were traveling at high speed on a country road with no street lights - but that has nothing to do with the vehicle becoming uncontrollable, that just means that the driver can't see where the hell he is going. You steering is not electrical or electronic at all, I don't care what you are driving. Once your engine stops, you will no longer have a power steering pump, which means that you won't be able to whip around a corner with one finger on the wheel, but you will still be able to steer and bring the car to a safe stop. The same goes for brakes, you won't have power assist so you will have to use some muscle and push that brake peddle down, but you will still be able to stop/slow the vehicle.

    4. Re:Wicked Idea by keraneuology · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is a device already deployed (though not widely) that is placed in the road and has what is essentially a wire sticking straight up. When the car drives over this gizmo the wire delivers a hefty spark to the car disabling it. I couldn't find a link/photo in 10 seconds of google so I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader. But it is already out there and works on newer cars. (Older cars without electronic fuel injection, power windows and LCD TVs (and yes, I'm trying to be mildly funny here) aren't are vulnerable to a simple spark and are harder to stop).

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    5. Re:Wicked Idea by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Modern brakes are designed to be used with a power assist.

      When your electrical system crashes, the alternator dies, which means the vaccuum pump won't be working, which means you'll lose hydralic pressure.

      Standing on the brake pedal without the power assist is like standing on a rock. Someone going 100 miles an hour while trying to evade the police is probably going to end up wrapped around the nearest immovable object if you kill their power steering/brakes at the wrong moment.

      Any situation where using one of those giant electric spears is safe, means that you could have used spike strips to blow out their tires.

      Running from the police is a lot harder these days. If you really want to get away from the cops, buy a motorcycle. Even the dinkiest motorcycles can out-accelerate and out-corner a Police Interceptor Crown-Vic.

      And a motorcycle makes a harder target for their little sticky GPS bundle of love.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Wicked Idea by Thagg · · Score: 2

      The "brakes" and "accelerator" in my car (a white 2004 Prius), are in fact, drive-by-wire. A computer meltdown could make things interesting. My car is nicknamed "Snowcrash" in anticipation of this possibility. Now, Toyota claims that the brakes have a kind of mechanical hydraulic reversion with a computer failure, and I trust that they have thought of, and prepared for, at least 99% of the failure modes.

      Even in conventional internal-combustion-only cars, the transmissions are becoming significantly more complex and electronics-driven.

      Thad Beier

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    7. Re:Wicked Idea by Dausha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Once your engine stops, you will no longer have a power steering pump, which means that you won't be able to whip around a corner with one finger on the wheel, but you will still be able to steer and bring the car to a safe stop. The same goes for brakes, you won't have power assist so you will have to use some muscle and push that brake peddle down, but you will still be able to stop/slow the vehicle."

      I beg to differ in one regard. You are seriously underestimating the effects of power assist. By way of example, I would suggest you go out to a large, empty parking lot, accelerate to about 35MPH or so, and turn off the car. Now, you will retain some power assist, but only until the brakes have been used. Simulate some turns. You will find that the brakes become essentially unresponsive before you stop, although you will retain some turning.

      About twenty years ago, when I was a teenager, I would screw around with my car by finding out what would happen if, for example, the engine died. I got pretty good after a while. There was a hill about a mile from my house that I could speed up on and then turn off the car (shifting into neutral)--and coast all the way to the garage. Of course, that meant I had to climb two hills, and conduct several turns. I had no brakes, but by the time I got to the garage I was only going about 5MPH, so I could get it to stop.

      Every once in a while I remind myself of the essential helplessness we have in modern US cars by doing what I suggest to you above. When I had a '69 VW Beetle, it was no worries--just an overpowered go-cart. Now nowdays.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    8. Re:Wicked Idea by Arvoshift · · Score: 3, Informative

      Okay, I think you have the wrong idea about how cars actually work. Vacuum assist is via manifold pressure - you have about 4 more "pumps" of the pedal before it all goes and if you leave the car in gear, you still have some manifold pressure. In an emergency braking situation, you should be down-shifting and braking at the same time, it eliminates the inertia of the drivetrain (if you really want to get into it, look into pascall's theory). Power Steering is a belt driven hydraulic pump, it will still work if you move your engine into a lower gear when it cuts out although it is far less effective. As for engine cut out, I had a holden genini in full race trim, if you have ever experienced points bounce, you'd know how uncontrollable a car can become when you miss with 12.5:1 compression. As for Automatic transmissions, most are electrically powered hydraulic, I know the EL falcons didn't like high tension power lines, they would downshift on the freeway and get confused from the RFI. I am a qualifed engine rebuilder, Mechanic and Panelbeater studying Mechanical Engineering. I know what I am talking about. That's not to say you don't, I just make it a policy to never assume that others have overlooked something so simple as this.

    9. Re:Wicked Idea by totallygeek · · Score: 2, Funny
      Someone going 100 miles an hour while trying to evade the police is probably going to end up wrapped around the nearest immovable object if you kill their power steering/brakes at the wrong moment.



      The problem? Sounds like a great crime deterrent to me.

    10. Re:Wicked Idea by LootenPlunder · · Score: 2, Funny

      spiderman has these, i think he calls them spidey tracers or something. batman has them too. this is just the next step in the slow transformation of law enforcement officers into super-heros. they can already see in the dark, stop bullets, crash through skylights, and see through walls. in about 10 years fat men with moustaches in skin-tight rubber suits will be known as police officers instead of fetishists.

    11. Re:Wicked Idea by alienw · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about you learn how cars actually work before you start spewing bullshit? There is no "vaccuum pump" in a car, the vaccuum is provided by the engine. Just in case you don't know, engines have available vaccuum only when you let go of the throttle. The brake booster stores vaccuum so your brakes don't cut out when you accelerate. Killing the engine will not immediately kill power brakes, there will be plenty of power to stop. Power steering will die, but it doesn't take much power to steer a moving car.

    12. Re:Wicked Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've also found that once you get 5 stars you can steal the warthog. That makes it far more difficult for the police to follow you. Alternatively, you can sneak into the military base and steal the tank; it really cant be called a high-speed chase after that. For some added fun, turn the chase camera on and watch yourself from a static position.

      Oh, sorry, I thought we were talking about GTA.

    13. Re:Wicked Idea by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Someone going 100 miles an hour while trying to evade the police is probably going to end up wrapped around the nearest immovable object

        regardless of what you do.

      It's all about the timing. If you can get them to stop moving when there's nobody else around, even if it results in them crashing, then I think it's perfectly acceptable to do so. Especially if it prevents them from getting into an area where there are more bystanders that they can kill when they eventually do wipe out.

      If you've ever watched any videos of car chases, or talked to people who have been involved in high-speed pursuits, a very high percentage of them seem to end in bad accidents. I don't know what the statistics are on bystander injuries, but a system that could lock the steering and render the car uncontrollable -- even if it was guaranteed to cause it to crash -- would still be useful, if it could be used to end the pursuit quickly and far away from uninvolved people.

      As far as I'm concerned, once you've decided to begin a high-speed chase, your life is forfeit. By driving 100 MPH down a street and doing any of the other sorts of things that people do when they're running from the cops, you endanger other people. When you show that much disregard for the lives of others, the police have a responsibility to do whatever it takes to stop you, regardless of whether you live through it or not.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    14. Re:Wicked Idea by slacktide · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Who modded this fool insightful?

      Vacuum assist brakes have NOTHING to do with your electrical system. In 95% of cars, they get vacuum from the engine manifold. What this means is that as long as the engine is turning, regardless of whether it is firing or not, you have vacuum. The other 5% (mostly on turbocharged cars) get vacuum off of a vacuum pump which is mechanically run off of the engine. Again, nothing to do with the electrical system.

      Now, have you actally ever DRIVEN a car with a broken vacuum assist? I have, and while you do need to apply more pressure, the car never approaches being out-of-control.

    15. Re:Wicked Idea by mysidia · · Score: 2, Interesting
      See the article EMP Protection, in particular:
      Another "myth" that seems to have grown up with information on EMP is that nearly all cars and trucks would be "knocked out" by EMP. This seems logical, but is one of those cases where "real world" experiments contradict theoretical answers and I'm afraid this is the case with cars and EMP. According to sources working at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, cars have proven to be resistant to EMP in actual tests using nuclear weapons as well as during more recent tests (with newer cars) with the US Military's EMP simulators.
      One reason for the ability of a car to resist EMP lies in the fact that its metal body is "insulated" by its rubber tires from the ground. This creates a Faraday cage of sorts. (Drawing on the analogy of EMP being similar to lightning, it is interesting to note that cases of lightning striking and damaging cars is almost non-existent; this apparently carries over to EMP effects on vehicles as well.)
  2. Does Parker own the patent? by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shouldn't Peter Parker own the patent to this device? If so, I wondow what the police will be paying in licensing fees.

    1. Re:Does Parker own the patent? by Mad_Rain · · Score: 2, Funny

      The device is the size of a golf ball, can be launched via an air-powered shooter

      Hhhmmm. The only person safe from this device: Tiger Woods!.

      ...well, and Chuck Norris, but that goes without saying.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
  3. Re:Ok... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Keeping up with a car in a highly visible chase scenario might be the most dangerous way to handle a criminal with a deadly weapon.
    Better to let them think he has outstarted the police and hopefully back off a little bit.
    High tensions and a rush hour road or pedestrian town centre don't generally mix.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  4. Liability by Ghoser777 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the police pursue a criminal in a high speed chase and someone else gets hurt as a result of it, the police have a good chance of being sued. The tagger would help tremendously in this department, as it encourages the person being pursued to ditch the car at some point instead of flying around the roads like a maniac.

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    1. Re:Liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Great, let's encourage them to ditch the tagged car, and steal/carjack another to continue their escape.

  5. useful in a practical sense too by joe+155 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it could well help avoid fatalities in road chases, the police can then hang back and not push too hard on the person they are chasing, this should help take some of the tension out and reduce the risk of the criminals trying something stupid and killing people, police helicopters can then be called in to keep track and the people in the car can be arrested when it stops (or if the tyres are blown out in a safe place)

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:useful in a practical sense too by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, but not every enforcement agency has access to a helicopter, not every helicopter is equipped with FLIR (making them less useful at night), and in any case helicopters are very expensive to maintain and operate, so I'd think this would be of interest from a financial perspective in addition to the tactical benefits.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  6. Why Only Police? by twiddlingbits · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Make these available to everyone. When you see someone being an idiot or asshole driver, not just the aggravating ones, but the really stupid ones you pull this out, and tag them. After about 3-4 "tags" the cops can pull them over and give them a "asshole" ticket. Even better would be if these tags had a memory in them that recorded the time and GPS coordinates of the event you tagged them for. Maybe even allow selection of event types such as speeding, reckless driving, drunk driving, blocking traffic, too slow, etc. But I guess this would be handing over the cops job to the citizens and you know we are not law enforcement trained so we wouldn't know a violation, and a lot of innocent people would be getting "harrassed"for something the didn't do ;)

    1. Re:Why Only Police? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lets run through your scenario.
      Your driving down the motorway/freeway minding your own business, driving carefully at around the speedlimit and some speed freak comes tearing past and undertakes you.

      You take out your Tag rifle and aim it at the car in front.

      Lean out of the window and take aim, but whilst you are doing this you swerve and take out 3 cyclists also minding their own business.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Why Only Police? by VIPERsssss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That would never work. You'd have too many people tagging that "asshole because he's richer than me" porche driver and the "holier-than-thou" prius driver and the "gas guzzling enviro-hater" SUV driver just because they don't like a particular $STEREOTYPE. I'd probably be safe in my $500 sable, though.

      --
      We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.
    3. Re:Why Only Police? by chigun · · Score: 3, Funny

      More interesting would be the meta-moderation of such a system.

      --
      swanker than you
    4. Re:Why Only Police? by 70Bang · · Score: 3, Funny



      if originality == 0
      {
      Gallagher brought this up years ago as a way to save money with the cops. They'd only have to watch traffic driving around and if someone had|has enough of a quota of "a%%holle" markers, pull them over & write a ticket under the premise "if they're driving [1] that many people mad, there's something wrong with them.
      }

      [1] paronomasia intended.

    5. Re:Why Only Police? by falsified · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haven't you ever shot a weapon from your moving car before?
      I swear, people these days...

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    6. Re:Why Only Police? by LootenPlunder · · Score: 2, Funny

      tire irons are good for so much more than changing tires. sigh... makes me nostalgic.

  7. This article is a year old! by sotweed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Surely there should be some real experience to report by now, rather than just a press release from the manufacturer...

  8. Why unglue when smashing will work? by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Regardless of whether fleeing drivers realize they have been tagged, it's unlikely that individuals could unglue the dart.


    Delicate electronics don't tend to survive being hit with a hammer. You don't have to get it off the car, all you have to do is disable it. I'd be curious to see how smash proof this thing is.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Why unglue when smashing will work? by Troed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm much more interested in if the police help owners of erroneously tagged cars remove the "super glued" device again, without leaving any marks whatsoever on the paint job.

    2. Re:Why unglue when smashing will work? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the criminals have to stop to smash it from their rear bumper then surely its job is done.

      I see win-win with this device in most scenarios.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Why unglue when smashing will work? by Tx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the criminals have to stop to smash it from their rear bumper then surely its job is done.

      I see win-win with this device in most scenarios.


      The device would be pointless if the police are right behind them anyway. OTOH if the cops are far enough behind to make a GPS tracking device useful, the perps will be able to take 30 seconds to stop and take a bullet/boot/brick to the thing. I'd say the GP poster makes a fair point.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    4. Re:Why unglue when smashing will work? by Saven+Marek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also if it hits paint which is the most likely area of a car for something to hit its going to come off easily no matter what. The only thing holding the thing on no matter what strength glue it is, is the bond between paint and metal. And thats not strong. It's like when your sister glues your hand to the car because she caught you with the cat and you think the superglue is going to bond you to the outside of the car but you find the paint comes off in the shape of your hand. You're free even if the glue has held onto the paint.

    5. Re:Why unglue when smashing will work? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yea,

      1. Get out of vehicle
      2. Fetch hammer from trunk
      3. "PUT YOUR HANDS ABOVE YOUR HEAD WHERE I CAN SEE 'EM"

      The point of the technology is to stop high speed pursuits from becoming more dangerous- by ensuring that the suspect cannot get away, police vehicles can back off a few hundred meters and wait for the driver to stop of his own accord/come to his senses/run out of fuel. The moment he stops, the police wil be on him in seconds and he'll be arrested.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    6. Re:Why unglue when smashing will work? by Blapto · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hello seann.

    7. Re:Why unglue when smashing will work? by Daengbo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like a personal anecdote to me. Hmmmm. A cat, you say?

    8. Re:Why unglue when smashing will work? by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's like when your sister glues your hand to the car because she caught you with the cat

      finally a metaphor i can relate to

      where'd you grow up, idaho?

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
  9. This fills a need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Car chases careening through L.A. mowing down pedestrians like wheat aren't just the stuff of action movies. They're actually a significant danger.

    And for as long as people have been saying, "Chasing people down residential streets at 80 miles an hour is dangerous, for Pete's sake!" the standard reply has been, "Well, we can't just let them go."

    Now, maybe they can let them go, and the Bigger-Dick Theory of Car Chases can finally be put to bed. Stick them with a tracking dart, surprise them when they're sleeping. Just like Batman. Except with less bats.

  10. Re:Ok... by ScottyLad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > "Why can't they just keep up with the car to begin with?"

    As mentioned above, high speed pursuits are extremely dangerous,and usually the police will want to back off if they are in a built-up area and they can track the perpetrator via other methods without aggravating them further.

    >"but chance are the cost makes it very impractical."

    As opposed to, say, smashing a patrol car or two, before slamming in to some unfortunate motorist who just happens to be crossing an intersection, America's Greatest Police Chases stylee?

    "Besides, why should the police get all the fun toys?"

    Because they're funded by the taxpayer to use all available resources in the fight against crime - so they have a budget for technoloy like this if it's going to prove cost effective (for example in reducing pursuit collisions).

    --
    Philosopher (n) - a wise person who is calm and rational; someone who lives a life of reason with equanimity
  11. what if car is stolen ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this will help tracking car but not the person in the car. if police stop chasing person because they think they can track using gps signal, person can leave the car ( if car is stolen ).

  12. Car chases? by IncorrigiblePunster · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am going to have to disagree with this plan. Yes, it might make running away from the police futile. Yes, car chases will be over more quickly. But I cannot and will not deal with the loss of "World's Wildest Police Chases" because some guy who had a spiderman sticky toy when he was 9 invents a spiderman sticky toy that ends police chases. It's not right.

  13. vehicle tracking by DarkClown · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recently did work at a company that sort of competes with onstar - the field is referred to within the industry as 'telematics' apparently. Anyway, it was kind of interesting, drivers could put their cars into a theft recovery mode' where in addition to reporting gps it would also kick the cell phone on in a stealth mode where operators could hear what was going on in the car and coordinate with law enforcement. One time when I was there one of these was going on and the operator was on the phone and could hear the siren as the police approached, and was able to tell them 'no, it sounds like you're getting further away from them' when the cop car took a wrong turn or something. Pretty neat.
    Apparently the legal department of the place spent the majority of their time fighting off law enforcement from getting info from the service to track suspected drug dealers or whatever for agency requests.

  14. I'm pesimistic by DongleFondle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems to me that anyone willing to engade in a long hi-speed pursuit is just the sort of person that this will NOT be effective with. I understand wanting to avoid long pursuits. In fact, in my city, as a matter of policy, police officers will not engade in a pursuit with motorcycle in the downtown area. The combination of speed and the crowdedness of the streets are simply not worth the risk.

    Also, think about the nature of the pursuits they are wanting to avoid. We've all seen it on cops. Driver takes off going way in excess of 100 mph on city and neighborhood roads. If the cops are lucky, they can radio ahead to other police officers and setup road blocks or put down tire strips. But the suspect always either nails the cops with his car and keeps going, or blows his tires out and keeps going along right on his rims shooting sparks every which way. Sometimes, the cops will perform that move where they catch up to the fleeing car and ram it on a rear fender which sends the driver spinning out of control. Sometimes this works. Sometimes they spin out and hit people and just keep on going. Sometimes they even get the suspect trapped between two cruisers and run at the driver, pistols drawn. And sometimes the drivers just smash their way right out of this almost killing the police officers in the process.

    Yeah, I understand the need to want to curtail all of this dangerous activity. But what the last thing you always see from your airial police-cam? The driver gets out and starts running. My guess, if the person fleeing is desperate enough to get involved in a high speed pursuit, then they are also probably going to run after they ditch their car. If the cop is hanging back, I seriously doubt they are going to catch them.

    1. Re:I'm pesimistic by bear_phillips · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you are over estimating the intelligence of criminals. I like to watch COPS too. It drives me nuts when the cop stops a guy for a routine traffic stop then I see: Cop: "Can I have permission to look in your truck: Guy: "Uh, Uh, yah sure" Cop: "Looky here, a pound of drugs" Guy: "Uh, I don't know how it got there. Its my friends, uh I its not mine"

      --
      http://www.windmeadow.com/
  15. Re:'high-speed pursuits' my backside by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can you lay a spike strip from behind a car?

  16. Mod parent funny by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2

    Cause too many people are taking him too seriously :D

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  17. Re:Ok... by canuck57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The best is still a chopper with night vision, so when the perp leaves the car they can be followed. After all, the value is in getting the criminal.

  18. Not So Easy by Old+Spider · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's not a bad idea at all. A hand-held launcher has one huge flaw: while you are chasing a suspect's car you are also likely speeding through the streets with the other vehicle, attempting to avoid obstacles and pedestrians, talking to other officers, trying to keep up with where you are so you know what to tell the other officers, and bouncing around inside your car. Now try tagging someone with one of these trackers at the same time. Not only would you be unlikely to make the shot, but you'll also be putting your life and quite possibly other people's lives in further danger.

    With this device another officer at dispatch could remotely aim and fire the vehicle-mounted device. However, using pre-installed GPS devices are far less costly to the police force and probably a bit more reliable, but this tracking ball is a great back-up in case someone didn't comply and someone else stole that particular vehicle.

    Then again... there are such things as helicopters. ;)

    1. Re:Not So Easy by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would presume that this would be fired by an assitant officer in the passenger seat?

    2. Re:Not So Easy by Old+Spider · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article doesn't say anything about that. However, I would advise against having a partner in the vehicle. You see, the reason the police in the US stopped using partners like that is because having two people in a hightened state (the adrenalin rush) causes them to experience a sort of tunnel vision. They become less inclined to keep sharp on the situation and instead fall prey to group hysteria. The obvious solution was to keep other officers out of a squad car so that officer can concetrate and keep things 'icy'. If you've ever watch the television show 'COPS', notice how the officers are reacting after a big chase. They're hyper and need time to calm down. Imagine how much more difficult it would be in a patrol car when two people are like that. Driving the vehicle as safely as possible under those circumstances would be greatly reduced.

      That's not saying police officers aren't trained to handle that kind of excitement. They certainly are, but removing an extra source of distraction keeps officers in a vehicle from losing control over themselves and ultimately the situation.

  19. Not a silver bullet by spiritraveller · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The idea that this will end high-speed car chases is seriously far-fetched.

    If a policeman relies on this device and stops chasing the guy, the common criminal will simply ditch the car and get away.

    The reason cops chase people is so the bad guy doesn't get away. Maybe it will help in situations where the police can't help but lose sight of a car in a chase, but how often does that happen outside of the movies?

    1. Re:Not a silver bullet by massivefoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think people are taking an over simplified view of this. Just because police cars have dropped back does not mean the suspect is no longer being persued. In the UK it seems to be standard practise to call in a helicopter to follow the car. This device would simply make it easier for the police helicopter to distinguish the car from others around it, and would also allow for the possibility that officers lose sight of the car before a helicopter arrives.

      Yes, the criminal will most likely ditch the car eventually, at which point he will still be visible to the helicopter pilot, who will be able to direct police cars back towards the suspect.

  20. Re:Ok... by c0007031 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I also think that if this weapon starts to be used a lot, the fugitives will also escape into dense cities, undergroung parkings, etc because they know GPS devices cease to function there. Anyone has an idea of how the data of the device is transmited back to the police... maybe that is another thing to work around...

  21. Re:Ok... by Orangejesus · · Score: 2, Informative

    in a lot of cities there are ordinances that the cops can't chase motorists under various conditions, like over 20mph over the speed limit. It's pretty common actually, the idea being that in high speed chases even more people get injured.

  22. Costs? by tod_miller · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are joking right?

    This is basically cheap ass battery and GPS unit that is so over produced today they are cheaper than peanuts. By Peanuts I mean slightly premium quality ones, that may costs 30$ a unit.

    And glue, well, that isn't exactly expensive, add on some air based cannon, not very expensive at all.

    Of course, the whole process of development is expensive, so you should be glad when such development that your taxes goes into comes out with something that can reduce get aways, dangerous chases and crime.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  23. The logical answer to that: GPS jammer by gd23ka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay... that just makes the case once more for the GPS jammer, a device that emulates GPS signals and fools every GPS receiver in its vicinity into thinking it is located near the south pole. Of course the car is still trackable by triangulating the location beacon. Of course a GPS jammer like that would be a dangerous thing to have and I'm thinking of here is what if someone happens to put that on a plane. I fly myself so that's a scary thought.

  24. It's not like when we were kids! by Blue+Mandelbrot · · Score: 2, Funny

    When we were kids we used to throw snowballs at passing cars. The kids of tomorrow will be throwing sticky GPS tracking devices at cars.

  25. Not every city has a helicopter... by m0ng0l · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I kept seeing a recurring theme throughout the posts on this device (and I haven't read the article yet), in that police should chase the criminals with helicopters. Great idea, but a lot of cities and towns don't have, or can't afford, or don't have the facilities for a helicopter.

    There are also many ways in which a helicopter can be either avoided, or at least forced to drop far enough back to give you a better chance to lose it. Going near a major airport comes to mind. A city with many tall buildings (downtown New York or LA comes to mind) would make the helicopter less effective.

    The way I could see police using this device, is tag the car, then "let" them get away/out of sight. Using the GPS, keep a group of patrol cars in a "box" around the suspect, and eventually, he/she will stop somewhere. At that point, move in. Best case, everybody wins. The cops get the criminal, the vehicle is minimally damaged, and few if any civilians get hurt. Worst case, the cops get the car back in good shape, and again, few if any civilians get hurt. Truthfully, I believe the cops would much prefer fewer chances of civilian injuries versus getting the criminal in custody, and not just because of the lawsuits.

    Likely, most chases start when the criminal does something to attract the attention of the police, who then do what they are supposed to do: try to catch them. The problem with backing off, is that once the chase is on, they get fixated on stopping them. It seems a (very loosely) similar situation would be when one is working on a project or program, and is cruising along, try to stop... One big difference, which I'm sure someone would point out if I don't, is writing code isn't going to hurt anyone.

    Stop and think for a moment, too, what would happen if the police *never* chased. Why bother doing anything even remotely near the speed limit? Streets are too corwded, hit the sidewalk at 60mph... Traffic signals would be less than "suggestions"....

    At least if people think there's the possiblity of a cop, or several cops, chasing, and likely stopping them, they're more likely to simply pull over. With the obvious exception of criminals....

    --
    Do you see the FNORDS? I refuse to post anonymously, as I am fireproof!
  26. Won't the police need spider-sense by MECC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Won't the cops need spidey senses to use it?

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  27. Tag people by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If everyone has a tag, then you can just track people directly. Even when they are on foot.

    Wouldnt we be so much safer if the government knew where everyone was , at all times?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  28. Dumb criminals by Quizo69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's see now. How about this for a hypothetical situation:

    Criminal/drug dealer type buys expensive car with his ill gotten money. Said person then proceeds to install a GPS TRACKER in his expensive car so if it gets stolen, the company can track it and return it to him and he can take the person who stole it to court???

    I guess this is why criminals continue to get caught - because by the sounds of it, most of them are stupid enough to voluntarily put TRACKING TECHNOLOGY in their own cars. Makes it easy for police to build a social network map of the criminal's associates and market now, doesn't it?

    In reality, SMART criminals would work like this:

    Buy aforementioned expensive car. No need to install expensive tracking device in case it gets stolen, because the thief would soon find themselves trying to play Harry Houdini with concrete slippers encased around their ankles....

    Nice and quiet, no need to involve law enforcement, and everyone ends up happy (well, except for fishfood boy).

    Only in America.... land of the stupid criminal mastermind!

  29. Spear Not Such A Wicked Idea by Somegeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The potential for someone getting hurt with an electrical disruption device (especially a 2 foot spear!) is much higher. This is passive so it doesn't involve any risk to those in the fleeing vehicle. If someone is driving at 100mph it might actually be more dangerous to just shut their vehicle off and have them lose control at that speed. Plus, it wouldn't have any affect on pre-computer vehicles, (ok so not a lot of those speeding around....)

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  30. what happens if the criminal panics..... by techmedic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What happens if the criminal panics?? More specifically, what will happen if the criminal thats being chased looks out his window and sees the cop aiming what looks like to be a gun at the car? Granted it would be pretty unrealistic to expect the officer to pull right up, point the thing out the side window and shoot while driving along side, but even so, one of three things could happen. The criminal can shoot back (very doubtful but who knows in a car chase). Or the guy can panic, loose control of the car, sending it into who knows where, or he can go at even faster speeds trying to lose the cop. Or he could just stop and the chase would be over ;) Its pretty obvious that these darts have to be shot discretely.

  31. Shoot back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The cops start shooting at you with anything at all for whatever reason their little pea brain has, that gives you the right to shoot back.

    If you are ever involved in a high speed car chase, common sense should tell you you can't outrun a cop car which has a souped up engine, souped up radiator, bigger gas tank, and when they are interconnected out there with radios and a central dispatch. You can learn alot from the discovery channel.

    This is what you do.

    First, you jam them across the radio band with a white noise generator connected to a transmitter you have wired to your beefed up car electronics system. If you're not driving with one of these, you're a sitting duck for any police action against you. They will pull you over, they will search you, they will plant evidence on you, and you will suddenly find yourself doing 10 to life. Pigs have more access to 'drug evidence' they can plant on you than you could ever imagine. In the end, it comes down to your word against theirs, who do you think a jury will believe. I thought so. The only person who will protect you is you yourself. This is life or death.

    Second, you site your automatic weapons on the son of a ****** that is chasing you from the rear seat while someone else drives. Slow down, let them catch up to you, and then aiming straight for the driver you let him have it with the full clip. If that don't kill the SOB it sure as heck will convince him to back the f off. If you can't get the driver, the tires and the radiator are secondary targets.
    Remember to lead your target.

    If you don't have someone else in the car or a weapon, you have to follow Boella's (sp?) Dicta, which says you should always, always, turn and face your enemy at all times. In this case, the bogie is already on yoru tail. Speed up real fast, get him going real fast with lots of inertia, and then slow down, closing the gap, so Piggie thinks he's being supercop and has you now. Then slam on the brakes real hard so he smashes into your rear end. You will be expecting it, he won't.

    Now most amatuers at this point would speed up and try to run for it again. No, that gives him time to speed up and go back into supercop mode. You do what any motherbear would do protecting her cubs. You turn and fight. That's right, swing your car around, and start ramming the SOB. Forward, backwards, forward, backwards, slam in to him, aiming for the weak points in his combat vehicle.. the driver side door first, the radiator second. Once you've beaten him black and blue, then you can leave. Get a good distance a way, ditch the car out of site, and get yourself a fresh vehicle.

    You will want to return and pick up the original car later, as it may trace back to you with prints, etc. So its good to stash it down some logging road in the back woods.

    Or, you can continue to live in your fairy land, that the police are there to serve and protect, and not a police state out of control, only interested in protecting power and fear and slander upon you. And that a defense lawyer, which should be the most honorable profession on earth, meant to be the last stand against the overwhelming power of the state... hasn't been undermined or sold out yet or has no clue how to really defend anybody in court, irregardless of how expensive they are.

    The only one who will protect your rights are you. You have to fight like a pyscho Indian, and yes, its to the death. Why this is? Because for the last 20 years nobody has stood up for civil rights, and everything that was fought for in World War 2 against fascism and police power has been eroded away and is now gone.

    Oh yeah, and when you stash your beat up car, assuming the "paintball golf ball gps unit" is still attached. Stop by an airport, find a plane that is about to take off, and stash it on somebody's carry on. Or if you can't find that, watch for one of those ninja bikes, and when he stops for gas, tag him with it, he should give them a run for the moeny. Or barring all t

    1. Re:Shoot back by ndansmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You should submit this article to eHow. I am sure many people would find it quite helpful.

    2. Re:Shoot back by jeko · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, to be 18 again. Good times.

      --
      He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  32. Saw this on a TV show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They use one of these in episode 8 of Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex to track and follow some criminals who are getting away through crowded down-town traffic. Nice to see some things from Sci-fi coming into reality.

  33. RF Jamming by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So you just have a jammer in the car before you commit a crime. Problem solved.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  34. It wouldn't take that long by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Some of you suggesting the perp could just stop and pull the sticky thing off should realize that when they stop, they'll have about 30 maybe 40 seconds, tops. That's a Chinese Fire Drill. Dispatch will know right where they are in real time and will be able to put units along their route. It won't stop the chase, the cops will just be able to drive at a more sane speed. Certainly it will give them a chance to ditch the car and flee on foot but I don't think they're likely to kill many people on foot.

    Tag 'em and bag 'em may not sound glamorous but I for one welcome our new sticky dart, GPS tracking overlords. It'll be safer for everyone.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  35. Sometimes they shoot people by QuincyDurant · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..and I'm not sure they pay to dig the bullet out. I wouldn't worry about your cockamamie paint job.

  36. Because surely... by bradleyland · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because surely, standing on the side of the road wailing on your car with a hammer is an effective means of avoiding pursuit.

  37. Will not work by failedlogic · · Score: 2, Funny

    As we've all grown up in the virtual crime world of Grand Theft Auto, as soon as our car gets 'tagged' by law enforcement, you just have to go and steal a new car!

  38. Re:Why try to hit the car with anything at all. by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are times when stalling the car would cause more damage than good. On a crowded street, it could very easily cause an accident, and get people killed.

    Quite aside from that... what about manual transmissions? And what happens when somebody figures out how to do it? No. Way too dangerous an idea. Far and above, the safest thing to do in a "high speed" chase is tag the car and break off the chase. Let them think they've gotten away, so they can slow down to a more sane speed, and then pick them up when they stop for gas, food, or some other kind of rest.

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  39. A smarter system by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...would be a 20mm cannon. That way when the cop misses the fugitive car and hits a pedestrian, the pedestrian won't be around to file the lawsuit.

    rj

  40. Re:I don't know... by laffer1 · · Score: 2

    c) Figure you're being tracked, pull in to a 7/11 and steal another car if you can't get the tracking device off or don't have time too. They just encouraged carjacking.

  41. Canadian RCMP do not chase motorcycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative


    If you really want to get away from the cops, buy a motorcycle.


    RCMP in Canada will not chase speeding motorcyles; the chase with an untrained driver is likely to end up in death, and they're not going to be able to keep up. A speeding ticket isn't worth a death sentence for the driver of the motorcycle.

    Makes me wonder what they do in the US.

    For what it's worth; it is a myth that police cars are fast. The interceptors are only fast on freeways, where you are unlikely to gain the speed differential needed to escape. They're very heavy. If you are in a sports car with performance tires, and know something about driving, you can outrun a police car very easily on a secondary road. The only question is if they can radio ahead to have someone block the road. Most areas do not have enough police coverage to do this.