Slashdot Mirror


GnuCash 1.9.0 Released

Grendel Drago writes "The GnuCash team have released GnuCash 1.9.0. After literally years of waiting, GnuCash is now a GTK2 application. The current version is unstable, and testers are needed."

221 comments

  1. heh, gtk2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    gnucash was by far my toughest install ever on linux.

  2. Finally by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 5, Funny
    FTFA:
    ...might crash unexpectedly at any point during runtime.

    Finally...software that is a perfect fit for my finances.

    1. Re:Finally by cryptochrome · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fortunately, it's free as in beer! So even if it blows your finances you'll always be able to afford it. If need be you can run it on cheap legacy hardware. Now all you have to worry about is electricity...

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    2. Re:Finally by vivek7006 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Seriously, How can they *release* it if it is known to be unstable. Had it been a beta release, it would have made sense.

    3. Re:Finally by david.gilbert · · Score: 5, Informative
      From TFA:

      The GnuCash development team proudly announces GnuCash 1.9.0 aka "We're gonna make it!", the first of several unstable 1.9.x releases of the GnuCash Open Source Accounting Software which will eventually lead to the stable version 2.0.0. This release is the very first of the gtk2-based GnuCash series, and is intended for developers and adventurous testers who want to help tracking down all those bugs that are still in there.

    4. Re:Finally by Horas · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well - dataloss is very dangerous. So bann all this "unstable software" and use software which calls home and saves all your vital private finance information by sending them to the author over the internet.

    5. Re:Finally by sp0rk173 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is a beta release. Odd numbered releases, like the linux kernel, are unstable in GnuCash. The poster just didn't mention that. 2.0 will be the stable release. This is nothing more than a preview/stress test of new features and the new interface.

      Clearly, you're a moron.

    6. Re:Finally by neokushan · · Score: 2, Funny

      You were doing well at explaining that until you said "you're a moron", which is the part where I, and likely many others, lost all respect for you.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    7. Re:Finally by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Uhm, see, in Linux, and probably other things too, there are different releases. Some are called stable, because they are stable, some are called testing, because they are testing. Some are called unstable because...because...

      --
      I don't get it.
    8. Re:Finally by rsidd · · Score: 1

      I think "moron" was shorthand for "someone who asks inane questions without reading the fine article". When you run into a sufficient number of said species, you start using a more compact way of referring to them.

    9. Re:Finally by gears5665 · · Score: 0

      because your respect meant so much to him before he posted...;)

    10. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unstable, under debian and derived distros (I do not recall any other uses of the stable/testing/unstable classification in linux world BTW) means that between one package upgrade and the other big changes to the software could occur, especially in the configuration files. Of course a testing package has usually less bugs than an unstable one. Really unstable packages are in experimental.

    11. Re:Finally by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Seriously, How can they *release* it if it is known to be unstable. Had it been a beta release, it would have made sense.

      You do realize you just called it a beta *release*, right? At some point, even if it's alpha software, you have to release it to people for testing.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    12. Re:Finally by aevans · · Score: 1

      You have heard of a something called 'open source' haven't you? You release your software even when it's unstable, that way other people can help you test and fix it.

  3. Just what I needed by cryptochrome · · Score: 4, Funny

    A buggy, unstable money management program... BRILLIANT!

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Just what I needed by linguae · · Score: 1

      It's in BETA. As in use at your own risk, capiche?

    2. Re:Just what I needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked out for Microsoft Money, didn't it?

    3. Re:Just what I needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what I need - a finance program that doesn't drain my finances!

    4. Re:Just what I needed by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      Considering it's an open source application, why don't you help with it, test it and submit defects instead of just complaining about how a beta might be unstable?

    5. Re:Just what I needed by barkingcorndog · · Score: 0, Troll

      You misspelled 'Brillant'.

      --
      "I know together we'll make the possible totally impossible" - Homme
    6. Re:Just what I needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the correct spelling for that word is capisce. Still, not a bad guess. Much better than people who use
      "walla" for "voila".

    7. Re:Just what I needed by Nutria · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the word was French, (I think) that would be the correct word. Since it's Italian, it's capice.

      My Dad loved to use that word when he was yelling at me. It took me years to verify that he meant "understand".

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    8. Re:Just what I needed by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      " unstable money management program... BRILLIANT!" I assume you ment this as a joke. Of course the authors of the program don't want it to be unstable. One very good way to make sure it is stable is to widely test it. You would be really stupid to test it using your real data.

      So here is YOUR chance to save the world from buggey unstable money managment. Download it, and send it well written reports of any bugs you find.

    9. Re:Just what I needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me get this straight, you have a tool that does exactly what you want, and don't want to deal with new development software. So why did you bother reading the article? It's said and said, but if you don't care, don't bother with it! Theres no need to attempt to deride other people's enjoyment because all your problems are solved.

    10. Re:Just what I needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of Pete, you're arguing against yourself. Let me recap: The software is free and you have the ability to test it, fix it, and submit bugs or suggest improvements. If you're not interested in that, and want software that "just works", then other options are available to you.

      So, what exactly is the point of complaining about a free software that doesn't work for you?

      That's what the GP asked, and what you consider zealotry for some reason known only to you.

    11. Re:Just what I needed by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      Typical moronic response from you, too. Oh, and no, I don't feel like I need to hide behind an AC mask.

      "Software that works" works because it has a development and a QA team. Open source doesn't always have the luxury of both being totally dedicated teams. My point was that if you're going to take the time to complain about it, do something about it! Help the project, *or*, go spend money on Quicken, Moneydance, Microsoft Money, etc and use them. There's nothing remotely productive or constructive about the OP's comments.

      Oh, and FYI, I'm a developer on a piece of proprietary software, and I was a member of its QA staff for several years too. I happen to like aspects of both development models (open source and proprietary) and I am hardly a zealot of either.

    12. Re:Just what I needed by db32 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Microsoft Money?

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    13. Re:Just what I needed by Zarquil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Typical whinging NIMBY answer.

      "Let the *other guys* do all the work and just give me the final product."

      In fact, why don't we just send them all over to your place to enter your transactions and then balance them for you?

      Guess what? It's strictly optional. YOU don't have to lift a damned finger if you don't want. *I* am going to download it tonight and give it a go because I want to.

      I consult fixing other people's computers - solving their software problems. Guess what? I'm good at what I do. I'm good at it because I take the time poking around with programs that interest me. GNUcash holds my interest. Quicken - bless it's popularity - is a festering piece of crap I can't stand to use.

      Hey, that's still my choice. I don't have to use Quicken, I opt to use GNUcash. Now I get the chance to beta-test for them. I don't expect to find a lot, but if I do it'll help a bunch of other users out there. That's cool to me.

      You don't have to pitch in. But neither do you have to bitch about beta-testing in the Open Source fashion.

        Zarquil
          A tad surly, it seems.

    14. Re:Just what I needed by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      I don't think the parent was trying to troll, this is a classic TheDailyWTF reference. http://www.thedailywtf.com/

      --
      I don't get it.
    15. Re:Just what I needed by ebassi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since it's Italian, it's capice.

      It's capisce, third person (singular) of the verb capire (to understand) with the imperative form in a question (capisce, lei? == do you understand?).

      It's pronounced in english as ka-pee-sh, but in italian the final e is not muted, so it's pronounced like ka-pee-sh-e.

      --
      You can save space. Or you can save time. Don't ever count on saving both at once. -- First Law of Algorithmic Analisys
    16. Re:Just what I needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't love Pete, you insensitive clod!

    17. Re:Just what I needed by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

      Here's a thought... instead of wasting time on a slashdot article about software you don't plan on using... why don't you download, install and help with said software and actually contribute to OSS instead of whining. Time management is all about priorities.

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    18. Re:Just what I needed by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Yes, the US government has...enjoyed...great...uh...success(?) therewith.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    19. Re:Just what I needed by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1
      A buggy, unstable money management program... BRILLIANT!

      Hey, it worked for Quicken.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    20. Re:Just what I needed by Sgt_Jake · · Score: 1

      I think the Bush administration is installing it right now...

  4. Years of waiting... by gameboyhippo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who's been waiting? I liked the application the way it is. With something as important as finacial tracking, there's no way I'd want to test it. I don't need a pretty ui to tell me I'm broke.

    1. Re:Years of waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't need a pretty ui to tell me I'm broke.

      You're missing the point, with this buggy software you will either think you are rich or, due to bugs, will be something you can blame for being broke.

    2. Re:Years of waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two points:

      (1)No way you'd test it? Then don't test it. Others will. Bitching about it is stupid and a waste of time

      (2)If everyone thought like you, there would be no quality open source software.

      And as for who's been waiting for this, I have. I happen to like things on my desktop looking consistant. Seriously man, next time keep your goddamn mouth shut.

    3. Re:Years of waiting... by jayloden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ever try compiling it, particularly on Slackware? I liked GnuCash when i tried it last, but trying to install it can be a real pain in the ass if you dont have a package for it available. Converting it to GTK in this instance was more than a cosmetic change, it was probably to get away from Gnucash's heavy dependencies on legacy libs and make future code changes more portable.

    4. Re:Years of waiting... by jsled · · Score: 4, Informative

      The gtk1 libraries are soon simply not going to be distributed by distros, and with them software that depends on them. I too was fine with the UI, but we (GnuCash) would rather keep being distributed.

    5. Re:Years of waiting... by Skater · · Score: 1

      Check out my page on the matter. I for one welcome our new GnuCash GTK2 overlords.

      I did find a less-than-stellar operating situation a couple weeks back when I ran out of disk space in /home and didn't realize it: it gave me NO warning whatsoever when it wasn't able to finish writing the file.

    6. Re:Years of waiting... by Arker · · Score: 1

      Well, unless someone keeps a GTK1 fork alive, I personally won't be using or distributing it. Not that that's any big loss - not like I've been contributing code to the project, after all. But it's a datapoint, and I know I'm not the only one. GTK2s forced windowsisms are definately NOT universally appreciated, or tolerated.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    7. Re:Years of waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that you can actually test a program without actually trusting your financial tracking on it. You can even test it with false values just to check if you can get it to crash. If developers are willing to give some of their free time to make you a free software, why couldn't you give some of your time to test it, to make it even better?

    8. Re:Years of waiting... by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 1

      The gtk1 libraries are soon simply not going to be distributed by distros

      I hope so. And then xmms will be rewritted.

    9. Re:Years of waiting... by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      I don't need a pretty ui to tell me I'm broke
      Amen to that!
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    10. Re:Years of waiting... by m50d · · Score: 1

      GTK1 breaks under composite, so for that reason alone it should move on.
      <flamebait>How long is it taking applications to move to qt4, and what does that tell you about their respective ease of development? But then you don't have to move to a braindead file selection box when you do that.</flamebait>

      --
      I am trolling
    11. Re:Years of waiting... by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      unfortunately, the GTK 1 theme I really like, IceGradient, has not been ported to gtk2.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  5. FINALLY! by VValdo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been waiting for this FOREVER. Another alternative for Linux is Moneydance, a java app that apparently spoofs Windows quicken online banking on Macs (or Linux)..

    It would be nice for someone to do a mini-review or comparison of the different FOSS or FOSS-friendly financial packages, because frankly, I'm ready to leave Intuit.

    Oh, and speaking of which--y'all know that you can file your taxes for free, right? Or at least 70% of Americans can. Down from 100% last year, but still something.

    W

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:FINALLY! by MBCook · · Score: 5, Informative
      Ask, and you shall recieve:
      1. The Grumpy Editor's guide to personal finance managers (Part I)
      2. The Grumpy Editor's Guide to Personal Finance Managers, Part 2

      Courtasy of the always great LWN. They are from September of last year.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:FINALLY! by publius_jr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Is that you Georgie? Taking advantage of the opportunity to boost voluntary tax compliance amongst your fellow citizens: "File taxes, it's FREEEEE!" Helluva job, Shrub. Helluva job.

    3. Re:FINALLY! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Another alternative for Linux is Moneydance, a java app that apparently spoofs Windows quicken online banking on Macs (or Linux).

      What do you mean by "Spoofs?" I know the author put considerable effort into making it familiar for quicken users, but everything you see is pure Java code written by the author himself. I spoke with him on several occasions, and even managed to finagle a special version with plugin support out of him. Unfortunately, I never completed the project I wanted it for. (Creating a WAP interface to add transactions to Moneydance from my phone.) Sadly, I wasn't able to get ahold of a WAP enabled phone at the time, and lost interest by the time I did. :-(

      P.S. GMail users: You MUST try out the new IM in the GMail interface. It has this cool spinning smiley feature. :-)

    4. Re:FINALLY! by VValdo · · Score: 2, Informative

      By spoofs, I mean--

      It's my understanding that Moneydance can appear to banks as if it were Windows Quicken, when really it's Moneydance running on a Mac, or whatever.

      If I'm wrong about this, someone correct me, because this is an important feature that I'd kinda need for my bank...

      W

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    5. Re:FINALLY! by forevermore · · Score: 1

      I gave up. I switched to moneydance last week, and other than having to get used to the new UI, it's great. The ability to auto-download my credit card and bank info is totally worth the $30.

      --
      Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    6. Re:FINALLY! by Noksagt · · Score: 4, Informative
      It would be nice for someone to do a mini-review or comparison of the different FOSS or FOSS-friendly financial packages, because frankly, I'm ready to leave Intuit.
      I maintain the FW Finance FAQ: Free and Open Source Finance Applications, which (1)offers this, (2)links to other (usually more detailed) comparisons, and (3)offers ongoing discussion on the topic.
    7. Re:FINALLY! by Noksagt · · Score: 1
      The ability to auto-download my credit card and bank info is totally worth the $30.
      But Gnucash also has OFX support to do this! I even have a cron job set to download both the info from my financial institutions and my stock quotes each day--whether I open GnuCash or not.
    8. Re:FINALLY! by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      The company I work for does online backups for Intuit, please don't leave, they'll be losing one of the smartest customers they probably have.

      --
      I don't get it.
    9. Re:FINALLY! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0

      Ah, you mean that it's compatible with Quicken. Yes, I do believe you're correct. :-)

    10. Re:FINALLY! by VValdo · · Score: 1

      Ah, you mean that it's compatible with Quicken.

      Not to get in a terminology debate here, but "compatible with quicken" to me would suggest that files could be exchanged between Moneydance and Quicken, which I actually think is the case..

      What I'm talking about is a compatibility with the banks, who think they have a connection with Windows Quicken when it is actually Moneydance identifying itself as such and acting identically. This is much the same way Firefox can identify itself to a server as Internet Explorer for Windows for Web sites that block non-IE for windows browsers.

      Maybe "comparable to Quicken" would work better, similar to how generic drugs sometimes advertise "compare with the active ingredient in Bayer" meaning "this does the same thing".

      W

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    11. Re:FINALLY! by unDees · · Score: 1

      Okay, but at least the version of GnuCash I was using (can't cough up the number here, sorry) tortured me with a "wizard" upon import, requiring me to assign a category to each transaction (even ones it should have been able to guess from my previous activity, like the rent). And it had zero ability to recognize and deal with duplicate transactions. Don't get me wrong -- I love GnuCash standalone. But I haven't found a way to make it work with my bank that's any easier than just treating it as an offline check register.

      Any tips on setting up the whole crontab / OFX thing? (Sans specific bank info, of course!)

      --
      "I call a baby goat a 'goatse.'" -- my non-Internet-savvy 6-year-old stepdaughter
    12. Re:FINALLY! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      That works for me too. I just didn't know what you meant by "spoofs" is all. :-)

    13. Re:FINALLY! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Keep waiting, the site has been Slashdotted.

    14. Re:FINALLY! by HalWasRight · · Score: 1

      I gave up on gnucash years ago. Scheme for scripting? Yeah right. I looked at Moneydance, but I wanted full source. Finally just wrote my own -- it does exactly what I want.

      --
      "This mission is too important to allow you to jeopardize it." -- HAL
    15. Re:FINALLY! by joschm0 · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone stick with Quicken if there's an open source alternative? I got tired of the calls and emails from Quicken asking me to upgrade every year or two to get features I've never used. Besides, I would rather have something that runs on Linux. Running Quicken on Linux with wine just wasn't good enough.

      Now, the only reason for me to ever run Windows is to use TurboTax or TaxCut.

      --
      01/20/09
    16. Re:FINALLY! by JourneymanMereel · · Score: 1

      So the IRS site seems a little light on details, but does a married couple filing jointly have to have a combined income of less than $50,000? I'm guessing that's the way it is, but I really don't know for sure.

      --
      Life has many choices. Eternity has two. What's yours?
    17. Re:FINALLY! by JourneymanMereel · · Score: 1

      I should also point out that any military members can efile both federal and state returns from free using a link from militaryonesouce.com. This is true for reservists as well as active duty and irregardless of your AGI.

      --
      Life has many choices. Eternity has two. What's yours?
    18. Re:FINALLY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ask, and you shall recieve

      May I receive $1,000,000,000 US dollars?

  6. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will this do my taxes?

    1. Re:So... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      No, but somewhere down the road, I would suspect that one of the tax companies are going to get smart and offer their tax stuff on OSS using gnucash. That would allow them to pick up a number of customers that Turbotax does not support.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  7. Ask Bill by msbsod · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once it works for him, it certainly works for all of us.

    1. Re:Ask Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well he fires it up and finds a bug straight away....

      "Damn thing won't let me put in enough zeros!"

  8. I Am Really Interested In Looking This Over by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since it is slashdotted, here are some excerpts from the site:

    The GnuCash development team proudly announces GnuCash 1.9.0 aka "We're gonna make it!", the first of several unstable 1.9.x releases of the GnuCash Open Source Accounting Software which will eventually lead to the stable version 2.0.0. This release is the very first of the gtk2-based GnuCash series, and is intended for developers and adventurous testers who want to help tracking down all those bugs that are still in there.

    What's New in GnuCash 1.9.0?
    o Welcome to GnuCash 1.9.0 aka "We're gonna make it!" the first of several unstable releases of the GnuCash Open Source Accounting Software which will eventually lead to the stable version 2.0.0. This release is the very first of the gtk2-based GnuCash series and is intended for developers and adventurous testers who want to help tracking down bugs.
    o WARNING WARNING WARNING - Make sure you make backups of any files used in testing versions of GnuCash in the 1.9.x series. Although the developers go to great lengths to ensure that no data will be lost we cannot guarentee that your data will not be affected if for some reason GnuCash crashes in testing these releases.
    o PLEASE TEST TEST AND TEST SOME MORE any and all features important to you. Then post any bugs you find to bugzilla http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Gn uCash
    o If you have the urge to help beyond testing please get involved in the discussions on the GnuCash mailing lists which you will find at http://www.gnucash.org./ We especially need people to help with updating the documentation as all texts refer currently to the 1.8.x series. Please see http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Development on how to get involved.
    o PS I'm not going to list the many features changed or updated in this release because obviously there is so much that has changed.
    Caveats

    Caveats for testers:

    * Any 1.9.x version might crash unexpectedly at any point during runtime. If you test some serious work in a 1.9.x release, make sure you hit "Save" after ever non-trivial workstep.
    * Keep in mind that features which are not used in everyday work might crash unexpectedly at all times. This includes but is not limited to: graphical reports, scheduled transaction editor, price editor, financial calculator, OFX/QIF/HBCI import.
    * Especially all the new features might crash instantly on testing. This applies in particular to any of the budget-related features. We may always decide to disable such new features for the initial 2.0.0 release, and re-enable them in a later release.
    * The documentation is completely outdated. All help texts usually only refer to the 1.8.x series; please expect all descriptions in the help texts to be totally wrong when applied to the upcoming 1.9.x series. Everyone is invited to help improve the documentation; see http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Development on how to get involved.

    How can you help?

    * Testing: Test it and help us discover all bugs that might show up in there. Please enter each and every bug into bugzilla at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Gn uCash
    * Translating: The new release comes with plenty of new translation strings. If you consider contributing a translation, we invite you to test this release already, but please keep in mind that we are not yet in our string freeze phase. Please check http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Translation_Status for updates on this, as we recommend to wait for the string

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
    1. Re:I Am Really Interested In Looking This Over by he-sk · · Score: 3, Informative

      > PS I'm not going to list the many features changed or updated in this release because obviously there is so much that has changed

      Like what? I was eagerly awaiting this release, mainly because GTK1 sucks on OS X (no umlauts in my experience). So far, the only changes I noticed (besides the GTK2 switch) is budgeting and closing of a financial year, both of which I haven't tried so far. Plus a dubious UI change by presenting account windows as tabs and not as real windows, meaning you can only see one account at a time. It still has the old UI bugs, my favorite being that the reports don't resize with the window and that reports are lost when you switch files. This after years of work.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    2. Re:I Am Really Interested In Looking This Over by pintpusher · · Score: 2, Informative

      Edit->Preferences->Register options check the box for "Register Opens in new window"

      simple.

      or Window->new window with page

      even simpler.

      This is a huge, extremely complicated project being developed by a literal handful of volunteers. Give them some credit

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
    3. Re:I Am Really Interested In Looking This Over by he-sk · · Score: 1

      Thanks, this helps a lot.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    4. Re:I Am Really Interested In Looking This Over by he-sk · · Score: 1

      Well, I should have tried this out before answering.

      The entire menu showing in register windows? Plus the name of the account as a tab, even though you can't add new tabs? Windows that take 3 seconds to open and you can watch the construction of the contents which resizes the window multiple times? What is this, 1995? Moronic.

      Gnucash had a somewhat confusing UI before, now the "changes" just make it worse.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    5. Re:I Am Really Interested In Looking This Over by jsled · · Score: 1

      The "entire menu" thing is pretty common, these days. In fact, GTK2 has first order support for [un]merging menus for just that reason. There's actions that are "global" and some that are contextual, and we present them together.

      You can add new tabs by opening accounts registers, reports or budgets. I don't know how else you'd like to add new tabs.

      Showing the window before it's been populated isn't great, but it's a consequence of some changes that occurred in the last couple of weeks regarding making the application initialization less silly. If you think this is really intollerable, file a bug.

    6. Re:I Am Really Interested In Looking This Over by he-sk · · Score: 1

      > You can add new tabs by opening accounts registers, reports or budgets. I don't know how else you'd like to add new tabs.

      How can opening a new account register add a new tab to an already open account register window, if I have it configured to open a new window each time?

      One can argue about the menu thing, some people might like it to start tasks from a register window. Personally, I find it cluttering and distracting.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
  9. GnuCrash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I the only one who read GnuCrash?

    1. Re:GnuCrash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

  10. Sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this what Enron used?

  11. GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by Pentrant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been using GNUCash on Linux for awhile, and have wanted to also use it on Windows, as I've found it to be better than Quicken and the like. I looked for a Windows port, but the only thing I found were some messages saying something to the effect of "Wait until it's on GTK2."

    With this news, it looks like a port might finally be reachable. This may be the next great OSS app that I can show off to friends and family, and I'll be able to use it on my Windows laptop. Here's to the GNUCash team for all their hard work!

    1. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely that Gnucash will be ported to Windows.

      1) Lack of manpower in the current GNUCash development team. Honestly kudos to them to get it this far.

      2) As this is a Gnome2 app, all of the hooks into the GUI are now Gnome2. Unless someone is doing a Gnome2 port to Windows, along with the multitude of dependant libraries than GNUCash uses, I don't see this happening.

    2. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gnome2? Do you mean GTK2? there is a difference. Is there something I'm missing that links GNUcash to gnome other than they both use the same GTK2 toolkit?

    3. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      beforenow it did requir gnome, you could use cygwin to load it but that is ugly

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    4. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by Mr.+Frilly · · Score: 1

      Well, GnuCash is a GTK app, not a GNOME app.

      But all of GTK2 and most of GNOME has already been ported to windows anyway. You can get prebuilt binaries for most of the libraries at: ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/platform/2.12/2.12.0 /win32/dependencies/

      I'm not sure how many extraneous libraries GnuCash 1.9 relies on... but if all the libraries already have windows ports, it's really easy. As an example, the last GTK2 app I ported to windows took about 30 minutes of time.

      And the native MacOSX GTK2 port seems to be coming along as well.

    5. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I've been using GNUCash on Linux for awhile, and have wanted to also use it on Windows, as I've found it to be better than Quicken"

      Although more suited to business, you may want to check out sql-ledger. It's multi-platform capable, free as in beer, and in every way an equal to Quickbooks:

      http://www.sql-ledger.org/

    6. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by wik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >I'm not sure how many extraneous libraries GnuCash 1.9 relies on...

      If it's anything like the 1.8 version, it relies on at piles of esoteric packages. Why this program has significant portions written in scheme (of all things!), I will never understand.

      I use the program, but it requires extraordinary care and maintenance. There was an issue with debian package dependencies sometime last year which completely broke gnucash for weeks. It's simply poor software design. Now I run it within a vmware player image which never gets updated, so I can be sure that it'll start tomorrow.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    7. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: the GNOME 2.12 components are still experimental on Win32. I think gtk+ 2.8 which GNOME 2.12 depends on is not stable yet.

      gtk+ 2.4 and gtk+ 2.6 is considered stable on win32 though.

      http://www.gimp.org/win32/

    8. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by jsled · · Score: 3, Interesting

      wik, the GnuCash developers agree. We've been focusing very intentionally and narrowly on getting the gtk/gnome2 port out the door w/o many other changes to minimize risk, but once this release is out, I think you'll see some large simplifciations of the codebase.

    9. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by jsled · · Score: 1

      GnuCash has always had a "light" affiliation with gnome ... so, yes, it's primarily GTK, but it is GNOME-specific dependencies as well. Using gconf, for instance ... and goffice for graphing.

    10. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by symbolic · · Score: 1

      kudos : )

    11. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by ookaze · · Score: 1

      Gnome2? Do you mean GTK2? there is a difference. Is there something I'm missing that links GNUcash to gnome other than they both use the same GTK2 toolkit?

      What you are missing is that Gnucash 1.9.x. uses more than the gtk2 toolkit. It explicitly access gnome functions and uses Gnome components like GConf. And don't forget either that some components like gtkhtml are actually part of Gnome 2 now.

    12. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by fnc · · Score: 1

      About Scheme: I think it was to be used as a scripting language. At least that was the objective of this particular implementation of Scheme (GUILE). I dont know GnuCash to say if this is a good idea.

    13. Re:GNUCash Ported Elsewhere? by wik · · Score: 1

      From an average user's standpoint, it's a horrible choice for GNUCash IMHO. Scheme is certainly not (and was never intended to be) a scripting language.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
  12. Special Computer by Blue+Mandelbrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe Bill can finally have his taxes processed on a 'normal' computer now that GnuCash 1.9.0 is out?

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/01/141823 3

  13. Re:Where I come from it's called a failure... by sp0rk173 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Where I come from, you're called a motard.

  14. KMyMoney by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative
    I gave up waiting and switched to KMyMoney about a year ago. It did everything that my relatively simple personal finances require, plus supports nifty stuff like using KIO slaves to load and save its data files (so I can use sftp:// from work to view my checking account on my home machine).

    Now, I have nothing bad to say about GnuCash. It's a good program and served me well when I used it. I only mention KMyMoney as an alternative worth considering.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:KMyMoney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to drag along all the KDE cruft just to run a money management app.

    2. Re:KMyMoney by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't want to drag along all the KDE cruft just to run a money management app.

      Good point. A well-written money management app would implement its own widget toolkit, graphing engine, database backend, network stack, C library, and floating point handler. After all, why leverage the work of thousands of others when you can re-write it all, poorly, yourself?

      Don't be a jackass. No reasonable size application is written from scratch anymore. The KMyMoney folks decided to use the KDE framework, just like the GnuCash group used all the "Gnome cruft" instead. If you want something totally minimal, perhaps I could introduce you to vi, bc, and grep. Wait - scratch that - bc depends on ncurses and readline. It may not be "pure" enough for someone of your discriminating tastes.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:KMyMoney by istartedi · · Score: 1

      I gave up waiting and switched to KMyMoney

      I hope it didn't actually K your money.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    4. Re:KMyMoney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very well said.

    5. Re:KMyMoney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      way F-en funny

    6. Re:KMyMoney by k.a.f. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point. A well-written money management app would implement its own widget toolkit, graphing engine, database backend, network stack, C library, and floating point handler. After all, why leverage the work of thousands of others when you can re-write it all, poorly, yourself?

      You have something of a point -- but when the developers themselves explicitly use words like "nightmare" and "even with apt-get, some packages may still need to be installed manually", re-use has definitely been taken too far.

    7. Re:KMyMoney by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      when the developers themselves explicitly use words like "nightmare" [...], re-use has definitely been taken too far.

      True. I think GnuCash made some technology bets that were pretty reasonable at the time, but just didn't pan out as hoped. For example, I think they picked Scheme as an extension language because people who use it almost universally love it. Unfortunately, it never really picked up the momentum that everyone had hoped, so now there's a pretty small pool of potential developers (how many people do accounting and functional languages?) compared to Python et al.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  15. With a web browser by FS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why I would want a web browser that is able to browse the Internet inside an application that holds all my financial information? Sounds Microsoft Money-ish to me. I'd prefer to keep applications separate so there is less possibility that a malicious website could pull financial information off my computer.

    1. Re:With a web browser by alan.briolat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would agree. They copied the wrong "feature" there. Who in their right mind browses the net like that?

      Of course in MS Money it was worse, considering the browser is IE-based, and therefore shares the security holes... Might as well just mass-mail your financial details...

      --
      I swear we should be allowed to give mod points to sigs... "-1, Offtopic"
    2. Re:With a web browser by jsled · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, we use gtkhtml for rendering the reports, which emit html. While we used to have it setup to do "arbitrary" browsing, I'm pretty sure that's not working in 2.0. It [abritrary browsing from w/in GnuCash] is certainly not a direction the current devs are interested in going.

    3. Re:With a web browser by FS · · Score: 1

      There is a screenshot showing that GnuCash can browse Slashdot. Or at least there was before the site was Slashdotted. It seemed to me that it was being boasted as a feature, otherwise why advertise it?

      My point wasn't that it shouldn't be okay to render HTML within your app, but that it shouldn't be possible to browse the Internet. HTML is fine for generating reports, and I would be glad that for something standards based.

      Looks like the site is back enough to bring the link: http://gnucash.org/images/gnome-1.6/help-slashdot. gif

    4. Re:With a web browser by jsled · · Score: 1

      Yeah. That screen shot is from 1.6, which was released in 2001. The website will be revised once the port-related bugs are in-hand.

  16. Re:Not a M$ Windos fan but..... by brxndxn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought Quicken Deluxe 2006. And, I started entering in a bunch of data. I found a flaw where if you enter data quickly by tabbing through the boxes, it will eliminate the categories you need for reporting taxes..

    I spent about 2 hours talking to an Indian guy over chat who barely spoke English who could not help me. He switched me over to a hispanic girl who spoke even less English at me for another 3 hours. Seriously.. both spoke horrible English. About three-fourths of my effort went to trying to communicate with them. Also, they knew shit about Quicken. It was easy to tell I knew more about it than them - just they were there as 'support' for idiots only or something.

    Then, I called in the next day and spoke with person after person for another three hours. Each time, I had to duplicate the problem on my end, reinstall Quicken, duplicate the problem again.. and show them how to duplicate it. They duplicated it and still could not tell me how to fix it. They said they will send it to the development team. That was a month ago.. Hopefully they can fix this before tax season.

    Whereas, in open source, if there was a problem like this, I could probby get one of the developers to issue a minor quickfix in a matter of days..

    Hopefully there's a way to convert all my current data (about 50 hours of entry worth) into GnuCash's format. I'm definitely willing to give it a try..

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
  17. Woohoo! by TheDarkener · · Score: 3, Informative

    GNUCash is a *fantastic* finance tool. I use it every day to keep track of my tech consulting businesse's bank accounts, expenses, liabilities, and so on. It's absolutely great. It's so nice having tools like this that not only gives you equal (or greater) power than it's commercial alternatives, but is free (as in beer) so small and new businesses don't have to pay an arm and a leg to simply track their small business finances!

    Horray!! Thank you, GNUCash team!!

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Astroturfing a free program. Yeesh.

    2. Re:Woohoo! by robertl234 · · Score: 1

      GNUCash is most definitely not the equal of its commercial equals, which in your case would be QuickBooks or PeachTree. GNUCash is decent if all you want is to keep track of your transactions but it's noticeably deficient in its online, printing, and report generating features.

    3. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wrote its online, printing and report generating features, you insensitive clod!

  18. Re:Where I come from it's called a failure... by hobbesx · · Score: 1

    Where I come from it's called a failure

    Holy *Crap*. It's a development version, jackass. The whole point is for other developers to try it out and report the problems. Writing accounting related software sucks, and they're improving the situation (or at the least, trying). Cut 'em some slack!

    --
    This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
    Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  19. Time is money by karlto · · Score: 1

    Hopefully there's a way to convert all my current data (about 50 hours of entry worth) into GnuCash's format. I'm definitely willing to give it a try..

    Don't ring support again - another 10 phone calls and you could re-key it...
    I think it is some kind of rule that any support hotline may not be manned by people that are native english speakers.

  20. Screenshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty please?

  21. Switched to Monedance last March... by Stalin · · Score: 1

    ...and haven't missed GnuCash one bit. As a personal finance manager, GnuCash sucks. Moneydance is easy to use and comes with a decent default account to get a new user started. Moneydance is well worth the minimal price tag if you need to keep track of your personal finances. If I needed to manage a small business I might re-consider GnuCash, but I'm not sure. I might look at other alternatives based on my prior experience with GnuCash.

    http://www.moneydance.com/ if you are interested.

    1. Re:Switched to Monedance last March... by amazon10x · · Score: 1

      The idea is it's supposed to be F/OSS. MoneyDance doesn't exactly fit the bill...

    2. Re:Switched to Monedance last March... by Stalin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I get the "idea." But, being F/OSS doesn't make it instantly the most awesome product available. No, Moneydance isn't that either; it is better than GnuCash, though. At least, it is better than the last version of GnuCash I used. I like free just as much as everyone else, but I like quality better.

    3. Re:Switched to Monedance last March... by timelady · · Score: 1

      Agreed, tried Kmymoney2 and Gnucash, and am buying a Moneydance licence. Its just the best option for home finances atm. As soon as there is a F/OSS to match, I will switch my support. More to the point, I also have no objection to donating to F/OSS where I can, in lieu of licences.

      --
      Nothing - well thats something.
  22. The Kot by msbsod · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here is a little example from the Gnucash source code:
    char *
    libgncmod_tax_us_LTX_gnc_module_path(void) {
    #ifdef LOCALE_SPECIFIC_TAX
    const char *thislocale = setlocale(LC_ALL, NULL);
    if (strncmp(thislocale, "de_DE", 5) == 0)
    return g_strdup("gnucash/tax/de_DE");
    else
    #endif
    return g_strdup("gnucash/tax/us");
    }
    In plain English, this means if you know only your little backyard, then there is just US. Otherwise your world may include Germany, and the rest is, of course, US. Now, some people may find this funny. Others might cry. I am just confused. How can they write such code? It should read if Germany ... else if US ... else if ... else UNKNOWN, STOP! (or use perhaps a switch/case/default statement).

    The last time I put numbers like the shown 5 into code was almost three decades ago in a Basic program. I have seen much better GNU software and hope someone removes the word GNU from this project's name.

    No offense, but I thought financial planning software should comply with higher standards.
    1. Re:The Kot by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 3, Informative
      You're not fairly depicting the situation. Let's take a look at the source in question. Sadly the SVN server seems to be crushed at the moment, but this is representative. The filename is "gncmod-tax-us.c". The header reads "module definition/initialization for us tax info" Conclusion: this isn't a module intended for general consumption, but is US specific.

      So, what's German tax information doing in there? Let's look a little further into the file where this exact same technique is repeated in another function... This is a very simple hack that loads the (new, special) German tax definition file in a German locale, or (default) loads the previous US tax file. */

      A clear answer: this is a hack not really intended for general consumption. I'm guessing someone is experimenting with integrating the German data, but it isn't quite ready yet. LOCALE_SPECIFIC_TAX may be a "this is under development and will hopefully eventually work, but not now" setting. Little unused hackery and experiments live in most mainstream code, commented or #ifdefed out. It's fairly common in proprietary software because the end user has little to no chance of learning that they're there.

      It looks like this little hack is present, if no enabled, in the trunk of their repository. That's not good and it should probably be removed (or marked more clearly so it doesn't accidentally ship). But it's hardly a Major Problem.

    2. Re:The Kot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the heck does a hack do in software like Gnucash? How many other hacks are there? The whole attitude of writing unstable software without guidelines for years is just wrong. Looks like a perfect example to me.

    3. Re:The Kot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In plain English, this means if you know only your little backyard, then there is just US. Otherwise your world may include Germany, and the rest is, of course, US. Now, some people may find this funny. Others might cry. I am just confused. How can they write such code? It should read if Germany ... else if US ... else if ... else UNKNOWN, STOP! (or use perhaps a switch/case/default statement).

      Or perhaps it should not have explicit comparisons for the various locale values at all and instead use a configuration file for the mapping. And perhaps nowhere in the code should any hard coding based on locale be done, instead using a configuration file that contains parameters (and perhaps a simple, limited rule language if really needed) for any locale-specific business logic that is required. That way, new locales with different parameters and/or rules could be added by updating the configuration file without changing the code.

    4. Re:The Kot by cortana · · Score: 1

      No offence, but maybe you should look up the definition of strncmp(3) before mouthing off in public.

    5. Re:The Kot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      strncmp, compare up to N characters.

      What would you have done?

      #define LENGTH_OF_de_DE 5
      #define GOOD_RETURN_VALUE_OF_STRNCMP 0
      #define KEYWORD_FOR_GERMAN "de_DE"

      if (strncmp(thislocale, KEYWORD_FOR_GERMAN, LENGTH_OF_de_DE) == GOOD_RETURN_VALUE_OF_STRNCMP)

      Go back to Basic.

    6. Re:The Kot by m50d · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. Why is there logic that says, in hardcoded form, "If we are in Germany, use german tax definitions, otherwise use US ones"? Sure, it might be all they can support right now, but the correct thing to do is "Use definitions for the current locale, if they exist, otherwise use US ones".

      --
      I am trolling
    7. Re:The Kot by jsight · · Score: 1

      Do you know of any financial applications with no "hacks"?

    8. Re:The Kot by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      And I suppose the source code for your favourite closed, proprietary accounting package is pure and clean?

      The thought that your work might potentially be seen by millions of pairs of eyes worldwide has a definite effect on the way you program. If I'm writing a piece of disposable code, which need be neither portable nor pretty, then I might use all manner of nasty tricks with for loops [the construct for (initialisation; test_condition; recycle) { is highly suitable for creative application, especially with the aid of the , operator] and hard-coding in constants. OTOH if I'm writing something that I think other people might conceivably see, then I'll use a while loop {with the initialisation outside and the recycle term inside the loop} and the proper use statements to import the proper constants -- and comment the code.

      I can't speak for anyone else, but I have noticed that people do tend to behave differently depending on whether or not they think they are being observed. And a piece of closed-source software need not be portable {"we'll tell you what you can and can't run it on" *slap* *slap*} nor pretty {"it's not for the likes of you to look at" *slap* *slap*}.

      Ugly hacks in Open Source projects have a habit of getting cleaned up in a later version, because some programmer will eventually find a prettier way of doing the same thing. Of course, if the only person who actually understands what the hell it was meant to do is the original author, then by definition it's not ugly -- it's elegant!

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    9. Re:The Kot by he-sk · · Score: 1

      And you've never heard of strlen, right?

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    10. Re:The Kot by cortana · · Score: 1

      Why bother comparing the entire string when you know that the locale is determined by the first five characters?

  23. I know *exactly* what you mean. by fluxrad · · Score: 2, Funny

    It was about three years ago in February that I decided to switch to BitchBetterHaveMyMoney, and I've never looked back. The application is rock solid. And it keeps track of not some of my money, but all of my money.

    Truth be told, their motto is proof: "Through rain, sleet, snow, or dark of night: BitchBetterHaveMyMoney."

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
    1. Re:I know *exactly* what you mean. by the+plant+doctor · · Score: 1

      X3 Switched several years ago after not wanting to deal with all the dependancies of GNUCash, esp. on Slackware when it didn't support GTK1.

      KDE Cruft? That's alot easier to install kdelibs and then Kmymoney2 than all the junk with all the hoops you had to jump through for GNUCash.

      For me Kmymoney2 has been a MUCH better application. If you don't want KDE libs, etc. there's always qhacc

  24. Financial programs by jd · · Score: 1
    They look ok, the GUI is fine, etc. I don't see any way of conversing with my bank, though, or any e-commerce system (billing systems, store accounts, etc) or commercial database (currency exchange, etc). Those would be great. Mondo support would be cool, if only someone used their cards, as it would be convenient to be able to download cash. (For those who don't remember them, Mondo released a "smartcard" called the Mondex, which stored cash on a smartcard. Unlike debit cards, it didn't connect to a bank, transfers were direct to and from the card itself, which - if I recall correctly - had its own RSA hardware, CPU and a bunch of other hardware. They were useless purely because they were never in wide enough use to be a practical method of paying for anything.) There aren't any meaningful micropayment systems left, so support for them wouldn't help. Paypal support would be good, but I guess that still really comes under banks.


    I'm not saying GnuCash is bad - it's very good at what it does, it's just not doing enough for what I'd want.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Financial programs by Noksagt · · Score: 3, Informative
      I don't see any way of conversing with my bank, though
      Gnucash supports QIF and OFX import.
      or commercial database (currency exchange, etc).
      It also has various places to download current price data like this--I get my stock prices this way.
      I'm not saying GnuCash is bad - it's very good at what it does, it's just not doing enough for what I'd want.
      It does more than you give it credit for.
    2. Re:Financial programs by gregeth · · Score: 1

      This is I think the greatest problem with financial software. None of them seem to really follow any kind of standard for the database store. Try using several programs at once and you'll see what I mean.

      I'm surprised there hasn't been a push for something akin to the OpenDocument standard for financial programs. Then we wouldn't have to worry about creating all these importers, etc to bring in a quicken file as (hopefully) everyone, including the banks, would follow the standard.

    3. Re:Financial programs by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it would put accountants -- and the assistants they employ to copy and paste figures out of one Windows application into another Windows application, under the misapprehension that this somehow constitutes doing something clever with computers -- out of business. Accountants, since as a matter of definition no money ever moves anywhere without their noticing, have got their hooks very deep into the system; and consequently can exert a lot of power.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    4. Re:Financial programs by matman · · Score: 1

      GNUCash uses XML and can now and will in the future also store data in an SQL database. While this doesn't meet the definition of a "standard format", it does give access to the structured financial data by a standard means.

    5. Re:Financial programs by jmahler · · Score: 1

      :huh:

      I work for a local, independent accounting firm of about 75 CPAs and I can tell you that you're full of it (no offense intended, of course). There is a lot more to it than the handing off to assistants to copy and paste -

      Our auditors, for example (about half of our staff) are trained in interrogation techniques to obtain the best picture of whatever company we're doing the audit of, and know how to mine data from sometimes literally thousands of pages of documents more efficiently than any accounting program I have ever seen.

      The tax side CPA's are required to attend several long tax-law and industry-specific classes every year to maintain their certification, and work harder and put more thought into their work than any industry I've ever worked in. Right now, as we enter "tax season", I feel horribly for them - some of these guys will sleep at their desks in their cubicles and work straight through several weeks as we approach April 15th - like coders, in some ways... except accountants get better looking girls (should see the intern women here - holy cow).

      If I went around to every accountant here and at any of the firms we partner with and asked them if they'd like a Money / Quicken / Quickbooks application that was standardized on the database end AND easy to use for the enduser, 99.9999% would think it to be an incredible idea. It's not the accountants that don't want this, believe me. They'd love to not have to sort through god knows how many different programs and file formats, and our company would LOVE to not have to buy several different versions of software that essentially does exactly the same thing every frickin' year. (Quickbooks Pro / Premiere 2001-2006, Quicken 2000-2006, Peachtree, money, etc)

  25. the end of dependence nightmares by jeebee · · Score: 1

    Those who never tried building some of the previous GnuCash releases from scratch probably won't appreciate how monumental this is, but this version builds and runs on a stable Debian system without any updated libraries installed.

    Previous versions were terribly difficult to build due to dependences on specific versions of rarely-used libraries. As a result, GnuCash was always late getting packaged for Linux distributions, and the delays likewise probably greatly reduced its adoption by users. The situation probably didn't help the development community's growth much, either.

    I've used GnuCash for years, though, and I'll be happily beta testing this version (while keeping a copy of my finances in 1.8 at the same time). Great work, and thanks, guys!

  26. Re:Where I come from it's called a failure... by symbolic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Come on... they've just done a major conversion, and now it's testing time. OF COURSE it's going to crash. Why not channel your criticism into more constructive uses of your time and help with the testing?

  27. Cash's not gnuCash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's what they would have to pay me to use it. Call me when Google's new payment service starts to accept it.

    1. Re:Cash's not gnuCash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer Cash Utilization Network Transer (CUNT). I hope there is a release of OpenCUNT soon. I'm tired of spending my money on a proprietary CUNT.

  28. Not happy with any of them by chriguhose · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been into Personal Finance Manager appliction for a while. Just for fun, because now that i actually make money i would like to manage my accounts in a proper way. Unfortunatly i've found that not to be easy at all.

    Tried with:
    GnuCash
    Quicken
    and now with MS Money

    None of them really do what i want.

    GnuCash had double entry accounting which i think is just much to manage for my personal finances. Support to import transaction was incomplete back then (only QIF format worked, and QIF is a PoS). Now it seems that they improved on that but still the double entry system makes me nervous.
    Quicken is a buggy, ad invested piece of software. Whenever you click on a "function" you're send to some third party website. Their move to not allow import of QIF for certain types of accounts gave me the rest and i quit.
    Money is not as ad invested, but buggy as well. But right know i still kinda like it, except that some general functionalities are missing that i really would like to see in the future.

    What's missing in all of these PFM's is that they don't take stupid work away from me, they should help me, not give me more work than necessary.
    Example: My Payee information that i download in the transactions of the banks looks like encrypted bullocks to me. There has to be a way to name these things in user friendly way.
    The automatic categorization of transaction lacks functionality as well. It should be possible to define rules. Like: i went to Safeway at noon on a weekday -> Lunch Category, otherwise Groceries
    Furthermore i like to have the whole thing setup as a service on my computer, it wouldn't take too much... The service would then automatically log into my bank accounts everyday and download latest transactions. Maybe even sent me an e-mail or text message that i should maybe not use credit card XYZ anymore, because i'm about to bounce the credit limit.
    There is more and i just wish i could see any sort of progress in their yearly releases, but i've given up on that.

    1. Re:Not happy with any of them by robertl234 · · Score: 1

      Quicken 2006 automatically renames the Payee for you based on a set of rules that you provide. Alternatively, if you enter the transaction manually, Quicken can learn those rules automatically.

    2. Re:Not happy with any of them by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

      GnuCash had double entry accounting which i think is just much to manage for my personal finances.

      That's what you think now. Then your demands change, perhaps you want to maintain a small business. Double entry accounting (which GnuCash can also do in the background) is the right way to handle things.

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    3. Re:Not happy with any of them by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      It should be possible to define rules. Like: i went to Safeway at noon on a weekday -> Lunch Category, otherwise Groceries

      So instead of taking 2 seconds to change the category, it would be easier to enter the date/time of the transaction, verify it choose the right category, and correct it if necessary?

      What if you go to safeway on a sunday and buy bread and deli meat. Is it pro-rated to the Lunch category if you take a sandwhich to work?

      Maybe you should hire an accoutant to follow you around all day and keep track of all your expenses and put them in the right category.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:Not happy with any of them by pintpusher · · Score: 1

      Now it seems that they improved on that but still the double entry system makes me nervous.

      The accepted standard accounting practice of double-entry bookkeeping makes you nervous? Better go back to balancing your checkbook on the back of a napkin.

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
  29. cool! by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 0

    Cool! Considering Quicken was the program people wanted on Linux, Gnucash always seemed like a one-man-band and was desperate for developers.

    An interview with the lead developer

    http://slashdot.org/interviews/01/07/05/1456248.sh tml

    Its a good read.

    1. Re:cool! by jsled · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Rob hasn't been a lead developer or even working on the project for a few years now.

  30. I don't get it, people! by TheDarkener · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is wrong with all (most) of you?? All I see are flames here, toward GNUCash, how blah blah, it's unstable, blah blah, use KMyMoney, blah blah, the code is lame... I've been using it for 2 years straight and haven't had a problem ONCE. No database corruption, no corruption of any kind. THERE is your proof that GNUCash won't fuck up your finances.

    I've learned so much about finances with GNUCash it's amazing - much more, I'm sure, than using some other program. The layout is very LOGICAL - maybe not the easiest, or prettiest (1.9 will probably fix the prettiness though) but crap... aren't we all about the functionality? Using "accounts" instead of "categories" is really cool IMHO - it allows so much more flexibility with what you're doing and doesn't corner you into doing things one certain way - it just teaches you how things are done.

    Give me the name of another financial program that's able to track BUSINESS finances (not just personal), other than GNUCash. Now sit down, shut up and eat your beans!

    GO NINERS! =p

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:I don't get it, people! by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      SQL Ledger.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    2. Re:I don't get it, people! by dbcad7 · · Score: 1
      I admit I haven't tried GnuCash, but I recently installed sql-ledger. I suppose it "could" be used to managed personal finances, but it would require more accounting knowledge than I currently have.

      However, I am not "dissen" sql-ledger. It appears to be a good small buisness accounting program. The reason I looked at it, was the multi-lingual capabilites. which I played with a bit. If I ever get to the point where I can act on some business ideas I have for a startup, I would probably run it with sql-ledger.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    3. Re:I don't get it, people! by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Yes, SQL Ledger is certainly overkill for personal finance - small to medium sized business is its target market. However, GNU Cash is good for both personal and small business accounting.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    4. Re:I don't get it, people! by Yosho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No database corruption, no corruption of any kind. THERE is your proof that GNUCash won't fuck up your finances.

      Dude. "Anecdote" is not a synonym of "proof." I highly doubt you use the program in exactly the same way as everybody else here.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    5. Re:I don't get it, people! by m50d · · Score: 1
      What is wrong with all (most) of you?? All I see are flames here, toward GNUCash, how blah blah, it's unstable, blah blah, use KMyMoney, blah blah, the code is lame... I've been using it for 2 years straight and haven't had a problem ONCE. No database corruption, no corruption of any kind. THERE is your proof that GNUCash won't fuck up your finances.

      So you have one persons experience, and therefore conclude no-one at all can ever have problems with GNUCash. Maybe, just maybe, people are criticising GNUCash for fucking up their finances is it did actually fuck up their finances?

      --
      I am trolling
  31. Buggy financial software? by sgeye · · Score: 0

    Doesn't sound that different than Quickbooks, Quicken, CCH, Lacert, etc. Quickbooks 2005 ocassionally breaks every other version of QB when you install it, Intuit says it has been a known issue for over a year and there is no fix... perfect solution for accountants who need every version of Quickbooks because their clients don't upgrade. Quicken 05 makes you uninstall every prior version, but you can get around it by "pushing" the application down. CCH... don't even get me started on their software. Lacert I don't know about, but we just bought a firm that uses so give me a couple of weeks and I am sure I will know something. A real Linux financial suite is the only reason we can't make the switch.

    1. Re:Buggy financial software? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      A 'real Linux financial suite'? Try SQL Ledger.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    2. Re:Buggy financial software? by sgeye · · Score: 1

      Doesn't quite replace CCH Tax and CCH Engagement. Open source doesn't work for this because there is too much work involved in updating the forms.

    3. Re:Buggy financial software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried running the CCH applications on CxOffice?

      Every year I try some annoying things on Wine/CxOffice and frequently, there is something new that actually works on it - one MS head-ache less...

  32. "Release" by Barnoid · · Score: 1

    FTFA:
            * Any 1.9.x version might crash unexpectedly at any point during runtime. [...]
            * Keep in mind that features which are not used in everyday work might crash unexpectedly at all times. This includes but is not limited to [...]
            * Especially all the new features might crash instantly on testing. [...]
            * The documentation is completely outdated. [...]

    after years of waiting, couldn't the developers have spent a couple more months to make it a bit more stable?

    1. Re:"Release" by db32 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I havn't tried the 1.9.X yet, but I would guess that those statements are largely CYA. You are dealing with financial software here, you don't want people to jump right in on the latest version and have it chew up important stuff. I imagine it probably is quite a bit more stable than they make it sound, but it certainly does warrant a great deal of caution when using it to deal with finances. If you are using it for personal finances its one thing, but if you are using it for professional/business stuff and it blows up...that can cause a world of hurt.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    2. Re:"Release" by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      This is an UNSTABLE branch. Did you complain about the 2.5 series Linux kernel being buggy too?

    3. Re:"Release" by bertvv · · Score: 1
      after years of waiting, couldn't the developers have spent a couple more months to make it a bit more stable?


      "Release early, release often".

      The GnuCash development team is short on coders and need help with debugging from their users.

      And as you can read in another reply to your post: 1.9.0 is a development version. Nobody forces you to upgrade. Why don't you wait a couple of months while they make it a bit more stable? ;-)
  33. another great GTK holdover by august+sun · · Score: 1

    so should I hold my breath that XMMS will follow suit?

    1. Re:another great GTK holdover by Blackknight · · Score: 1

      It's called Beep Media Player.

      http://beep-media-player.org/site/BMPx_Homepage

    2. Re:another great GTK holdover by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

      try XMMS 2 or beep-media-player.

  34. If cross platform is important. by Goner · · Score: 1
    In the meantime jGnash has reached a level where I can have a .jar of it on my usb stick and balance my checkbook on any machine under any OS. Darn useful. It still isn't quite as nice as Quicken, but it is completely transparent in the way that it does work.

    Whatever computer you run it on stores enough info in your home directory so it automatically opens your account file from the stick too of course. Good news is that it can import GNUCash files.

    Projects like gaim have taken gtk2 based apps and ported them to here and everywhere, but that's only due to rampant popularity (and some Google support). Even then, I would need to actually store 3 binaries on the usb stick, and at that point I am wasting more space and time trying to find the right icon to click on.

    I would say that overall GnuCash still has the most features, so if you're an aspiring accountant then... go for it.

  35. Re:Where I come from it's called a failure... by db32 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have been using GNUcash 1.8.X for some time and it has never crashed. I think the point is that 1.9.X is unstable because it has been converted to GTK2, not that the whole GNUcash application is unstable. The waiting part refers to the fact that everyone has been waiting for the GTK2 conversion to happen, since previously the project has stuck with GTK1. I would suggest doing some research and using the program before making such innane comments.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  36. Win32 version of GnuCash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there some Win32 binaries of GnuCash I can download?

    1. Re:Win32 version of GnuCash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  37. Re:Not a M$ Windos fan but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gnucash has qif import

  38. Re:Not a M$ Windos fan but..... by Noksagt · · Score: 1
    Hopefully there's a way to convert all my current data (about 50 hours of entry worth) into GnuCash's format. I'm definitely willing to give it a try.
    Gnucash does have QIF import. Moving between any financial application often leads to "strange things," but my migration went O.K. (You also used to be able to pay someone to migrate your data to Gnucash for you, though I never used that service...)
  39. Re:Not a M$ Windos fan but..... by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Which is why I always trudge down to H&R Block, and sit in front of a Real Person (TM) who not only does the data entry, but can also call over a manager (who might actually be a CPA) if he/she gets in trouble. Also, I get some limited liability coverage (although you are still responsable for having all your forms). Followed by... in all the years I've sent it in through Block, I've never been audited or had the IRS send back a correction (like they did once when I did it myself).

    If you want to risk spending days of your time doing taxes yourself, and wonder whether or not the software carried the decimal properly, then by all means buy software, set it up, and do it yourself. If you value your time, have a Real Person (TM), either a retail outfit like Block, or (probably more expensive) a CPA do it.

    Of course if your taxes are trivial this advice doesn't apply. When I've been able to use the EZ form, I've done it myself no problem; but this year I've got a move across state lines and a number of other issues. No way would I even think about it. The time saved and piece of mind is well worth it. Plus they usually have free coffee.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  40. But once you quit your job as a programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because RMS says that you're engaging in anti-social behavior, you won't NEED a money management program.

  41. Re:Not a M$ Windos fan but..... by brxndxn · · Score: 1

    My mother, a financial advisor, is a lot more aggressive in our reporting of taxes. It's amazing how much you can save if you know what you're doing over companies like H&R Block. The reason you never got audited with H&R Block is because these 'bulk tax' companies are very conservative with their reporting. The IRS typically doesn't audit people that pay a little over their share.

    So ya.. for a normal business, call H&R Block. If you're a financial advisor and have a son willing to do data entry for college money, then do it yourself.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
  42. Web Version by alohatiger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quickbooks Pro has a web based version that's pretty nice. Pros: great tech support. Cons: $25/month and only works in internet explorer.

    I would pay a monthly fee for a standards compliant web based version of Quicken.

    --
    Bigtime Consulting - "We're the best because we cost the most"
  43. Re:Not a M$ Windos fan but..... by MrBoring · · Score: 2, Informative

    FWIW, I've made several comments and suggestions to the GnuCash user list and I always get a helpful response. No one treats me like an idiot, has an axe to grind or the like. Most of the time, someone named Derek is the one responding who I believe is an MIT graduate and writes very clear English. In general, I dislike the quality of most OSS software, but I like the way GnuCash is run, especially considering how few people actually contribute to it.

    I can certainly relate to your experience with Quicken, although mine is with an AT&T VPN dialer. When it refused to work after an upgrade, I had to re-explain my problem over and over again, and their perspective, even after spending hours on the phone with me, was that *I* was the one doing something wrong. I've gotten better tech support by calling Microsoft, if you can believe it.

    Best wishes anyway.
    ~Boring

  44. When Reporting Bugs... by eDavidLu · · Score: 1

    Please attach your data file, including all bank account and credit card information. Thanks.

  45. NOOOOoooo, etc. by cortana · · Score: 1

    Why, for god's sake, is every application following Apple's lemming-leap off the cliff of moronised single-window-only application design!?

    1. Re:NOOOOoooo, etc. by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      Firefox and Opera, baby. (And IE7, too). Tabs are the new blue.

  46. Sounds like MS Money! by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had to switch from MS Money to Quicken after I found a bug that incorrectly calculated values. I spent almost an hour trying to get through to someone at MS. When I finally did, I walked the tech through recreateing the bug on his machine. He was able to easily recreate the problem to verify that it was in fact a bug. The next time I heard from them was about three months later when they left a message on my machine saying that they found this old trouble ticket, and since I wasn't home, they were going to close it out. Not fix it mind you. Just close out the ticket.

    1. Re:Sounds like MS Money! by pintpusher · · Score: 1

      And this is relevant how?

      I assure you had you found a computation error in gnucash and contacted the devs it would have been fixed, probably within hours.

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
  47. Re:Where I come from it's called a failure... by ClamIAm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Uh-huh. And I suppose when you hear "Microsoft releases buggy beta version of Vista", or "prototype car doesn't pass crash testing" you complain about that too.

  48. I use GnuCash by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    I use GnuCash and I like it, it is really a great tool. Kudos to developers for 1.9.0!

  49. A few gripes. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Funny thing--due to a small change in a header location in a recent release of a package, it won't build on Ubuntu out of the box; if fixed and compiled, it then crashes on startup. This isn't Mandrake 7.2, or Slackware Version Ancient--this is a fully updated version of one of the three most popular desktop distributions out there. I'm a bit disappointed.

    So it's a bit less monumental for us Ubuntu users, alas...

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  50. Re:Where I come from it's called a failure... by syousef · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh yes, testing something that is buggy after years of development is a great use of my time. Even better than watching paint dry!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  51. I waited for THIS? by icepick72 · · Score: 1
    After literally years of waiting, GnuCash is now a GTK2 application. The current version is unstable

    Hell, not even Microsoft can do it that bad. This sucks.

  52. Moneydance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used GNU Cash for quite a while, but it got really old. It was impossible to compile from source without some sort of libtool voodoo magic, in my experience. It also crashed quite a bit. It certainly had a novelty appeal, but that can't prop up the spaghetti library dependencies and multiple development languages forever.

    I eventually plucked down the $30 for Moneydance and have used it for the last couple years. The very best thing about Mneydance is that it is a Java application, meaning that anyone with a Java runtime can use it. It works on Mac and Solaris and Windows, for example. I actually consider it one of the showcase Java apps, where it really is cross-platform and works.

  53. Mac binaries? by mh101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if they or someone else will release Mac binaries finally?

    Yes, I know you can install GnuCash using Fink, as that's what I do currently. But it would be so much more convenient to be able to download a standalone GnuCash.app like you can with Gimp, Frozen Bubble, OpenOffice, AbiWord, and others.

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  54. Donating to the Gnucash project by jroysdon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been using Gnucash for close to two years now. It was the final step to me ditching my Windows install, since I was using Quicken before.

    Gnucash isn't perfect, but it's got everything I need to keep track of things. I do all my entry manually, although I have imported a few times just testing (I prefer my own formatting and such and don't care which gas station, etc., just that it was a gas station).

    I figure if I'd been upgrading Quicken versions, I'd have spent at least $50. Plus, I would like be able to link to a Windows port on my Free GPL Programs page which I list all the apps I use that others should check out on Windows.

    I decided to donate to the cause. Hopefully others who use Gnucash will consider tipping the developers. I'm sure even $5, especially if it's dozens of folks, will help motivate them.

    I wish I had the time to bug-test v1.9, but I don't, so I'll tip a little more ;-)'

  55. Re:Not a M$ Windos fan but..... by RedBear · · Score: 1

    Hopefully there's a way to convert all my current data (about 50 hours of entry worth) into GnuCash's format. I'm definitely willing to give it a try..

    I wouldn't be in a hurry if I were you. I'm sure GnuCash can import your QIF file from Quicken, but you don't want to use this version of GnuCash since it's an unstable development version. Also, you don't explicitly mention what operating system you're using, but just in case do you realize GnuCash only runs on Linux? As far as I know, anyway. And I get a funny feeling you aren't using Linux and probably aren't ready to switch just to use GnuCash.

    Several people have mentioned Moneydance so far in this discussion and I'm taking a close look at it myself. I would be much more interested in seeing how well a person like you and your finances get along with Moneydance. Personally I hate all platform-specific software no matter what platform it's on (especially for important things like finances). For that main reason I have never really given GnuCash much attention and Moneydance is looking good to me since it supports Mac OS X along with Windows and Linux. And it can import your Quicken QIF data, of course. On top of that it also seems to support a lot of the online features that make people stick with Quicken. So you really might want to check it out. And if you find a bug, get on the phone with them and see how they respond. That would be interesting to hear about as well.

    This may sound like a plug but I don't work for them and haven't even used the software (yet). It just looks to me like a much better option especially if you are running Windows or Mac OS X. If I had a household with mixed Win/Mac/Linux computers (I do) I can't imagine using anything that isn't cross-platform for something this important. Quicken may run on Mac and Windows but have you ever tried migrating Quicken data from one platform to the other? It's a joke. Hopefully Moneydance can handle such situatiosn better.

  56. Free, my arse! by PinkyDead · · Score: 4, Informative

    There was a /. article about two weeks ago about Novell listing apps to be ported or something like that and at the top was Quicken/Quickbooks, which I use and am well pissed off that I can't get it to work on Linux.

    One reply suggested that GnuCash was a viable alternative to quicken. My problem with GnuCash (or really with Quickbooks) was that I couldn't export the accounts from Quickbooks into GnuCash. Well anyway, at the time of the Novell article, we had just hit our year end, so we had P&L and Balance sheets for everything.

    So, perfect time to try GnuCash, just resetting everything off the Balance Sheet. Anyway, through this process I discovered that Quickbooks had 'lost' some of my previous VAT payments. Added them all up - £400 for me (don't worry I triple checked - no messing with the tax man). So GnuCash wasn't free for me - they actually paid me to use it. Cheers, GnuCash!

    I miss the simple 'VAT Report' from QuickBooks - it's quite tricky in GnuCash. But if it was costing me £400 - I can handle the minor inconvenience.

    I'm really looking forward to the 1.9.0 - hopefully, some more of the inconveniences will disappear and maybe the interface will be a little less GTK1.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    1. Re:Free, my arse! by msoftsucks · · Score: 1

      I think you're actually better off trying something else other than Quickbooks. The latest version (Quickbooks 2006) is nothing more than a steaming pile of dog crap. I was forced to implement this for a client, and this product is so buggy and sloooow that it makes GnuCash look like a prince. In this version, they have implemented a new database (I think based on SQL Anywhere) and they really haven't done any quality control on this product.

      --
      Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
      Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.
  57. None-free GnuCash contenders by wysiwia · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the GnuCash developers know that even Linux users wish for none-free cash application, see

    OSDL: Desktop Linux Client Survey
    Novell: Cool-Solutions website
    LinuxQuestions.org: "What programs would you like to see ported to Linux"

    and would like to know what they consider to do against.

    O. Wyss

    --
    See http://wyoguide.sf.net/papers/Cross-platform.html
  58. Quicken 2004 on Crossover by Oxide · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using Quicken 2004 on linux through crossover for a while now. I'm very satisfied with it. It is stable enough for me to do everything I need to do. I see little to no reason at all to use GUNCash until it is stable enough.

  59. Ever heard of a static compile? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Would solve all your problems with the libraries. Yes it would be
    big but you could always have the gtk2 version as an optional
    download.

    1. Re:Ever heard of a static compile? by jsled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, there's both maintainability and feature reasons to move to gtk2 (and, generally, modern libraries), as well. It does require non-trivial changes; "optional" gtk1 and gtk2 front-ends would be a massive undertaking that no one has helped do.

      While the overall dependecy profile of gnucash is large, it's really not that large; but it certainly sits very high up on the desktop application stack, so there's a lot of depth below it. In any case, the dependencies are there for two reasons: it's a comparatively featureful app as well as ... over-engineered. I'd rather reduce some of the dependencies through simplificiation of the code base.

      In any case, static linking binaries is generally silly.

  60. Hunt bugs! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Why don't you wait a couple of months while they make it a bit more stable? ;-)

    Or better yet, try it out and bitch loudly but articulately and helpfully on bugzilla about everything you don't like.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  61. Suitable for Europe? by KevinColyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am searching for a replacement package for our small charity in Brussels. My main concern is that the authorities here have quite clear guidelines for reporting our finances - they dictate account codes for example. To do quaterly VAT returns we need to know some precise details for some precise forms.

    My question is are the FLOSS accounting packages up to this. Can the/have they been customised for the accounting systems here in Europe?

    Any ideas/help please!

    1. Re:Suitable for Europe? by jsled · · Score: 1

      GnuCash is pretty flexible; so long as the accounting requirements are based in basic accounting principles -- which you would hope they are [! :)] -- you should be able to model and account for it in GnuCash. We have a setup for templated account trees, which can then be created as a unit [i.e., "I want a data-file with 'Checkbook', 'Loan' and 'Renter Expenses' accounts"] ... we already have a contribution of the German SKR03-04 account tree, which sounds very similar to your situation. We'd love a contribution of the account tree if you can provide it! :)

    2. Re:Suitable for Europe? by bertvv · · Score: 1

      I guess you're referring to the new laws concerning "VZWs/ASBLs" in Belgium here? I'm sure that GnuCash can be a solution! I'm a long time GnuCash user for my personal finances and live in Flanders.

      I want to help you setting up GnuCash for your purposes, if you like. Can you point me to guidelines that you have to follow? An overview of account codes, how you have to report to the taxman, etc. I'll pass that on to the GnuCash team so others can benefit from it, too...

      If you want to contact me in private, my e-mail address is my slashdot username, followed by @advalvas.be (I speak Dutch and English; my French is rather bad, I'm afraid).

      By the way, if you're looking for Windows accounting software, you may also want to take a look at jGnash, GFP or EekBoek. The latter is Dutch software, and is suitable for European style bookkeeping... That's all I know about these tools, though.

    3. Re:Suitable for Europe? by KevinColyer · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

      This is very helpful. I am currently in the UK but will be back in a week or so. Had trouble replying personally to your post via email but will perservere when back in Brussels.

  62. "currently unstable" by ninja_assault_kitten · · Score: 1

    Just like everything that uses GTK.

  63. Re:Not a M$ Windos fan but..... by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 0

    Which is why I use TurboTax Deluxe for $20. It takes less time the H&R Block, I'm in control and it found deductions that the buld tax preparers miss.

    --

    Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
  64. Re:Where I come from it's called a failure... by psgalbraith · · Score: 1

    You forgot to close your italics tag. Where I come from, that's called a failure.

    Perhaps they mean unstable like Debian means unstable: development release that changes often.

  65. Re:Where I come from it's called a failure... by syousef · · Score: 1

    You forgot to close your italics tag. Where I come from, that's called a failure.

    Where I come from that's called the sign of a troll.

    You need to understand the difference between a failure and a mistake. I don't feel like educating you so go look it up.

    Perhaps they mean unstable like Debian means unstable: development release that changes often.

    Perhaps they mean unstable as in changes frequently, full of new and varying bugs, and not fit for an end user. This is something someone's suppose to trust their finances to for pity sake. People suggest this sort of SHIT to their friends and relatives as an alternative to a mainstream product, and then wonder why their friends and relatives think they're even more of a basement dwelling geek than before. But of course said geek then blames the end user for not knowing about the latest 0 day patch that fixes the problem or some esoteric command line option that has to be used.

    Gee I wonder why Linux hasn't taken off on the desktop.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  66. Re:Where I come from it's called a failure... by psgalbraith · · Score: 1

    You're the troll in this case.

    It would indeed be a mistake to suggest an unstable release to end user as a polished product. But you'd be the one making the mistake rather than the developers who wrote it and labelled it as unstable. Suggest it to your friends when it reaches 2.0.

  67. Amen, and kudos. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Indeed! I hope to get some good bug reports filed; even though I don't speak guile (which a great deal of GnuCash is written in), I can definitely file good, repeatable bug reports and do my part to help out the project in that sense. Only a tiny fraction of users actually file bugs, and only some of them file good bugs. And only a very, very small fraction of those actually become developers. Well, at least I've moved from filing bad bugs to filing good bugs.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Amen, and kudos. by jsled · · Score: 1

      Only a small fraction of GnuCash is written in guile (scheme). Probably less than 20%.

      TIA for some good bugs filed. :)

  68. Re:Where I come from it's called a failure... by syousef · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not going to suggest this to my friends. EVER. I'm not going to suggest Linux to my friends either. These are not tools for end users unless they have a lot of time to spend fiddling. Fiddling's perfectly fine if you're interested in computers. But products like these aren't ever going to catch on in their current state. The whole mindset needs to change.

    As for being a troll, look up the definition some time. A troll is not simply someone who has a point of view you don't like.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer