Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo Considers Offering Prizes to Search Users

Bemmu writes "According to the San Francisco Chronicle: 'Yahoo Inc. is considering offering free music downloads, discounts on DVD rentals and frequent-flier miles to users who make the Web site their primary search engine.'" More from the article: "Offering rewards to search engine users isn't new. During the dot-com boom in the late 1990s, a number of companies including AllAdvantage.com and MyPoints.com gave cash, prizes and loyalty points to users, although many of the companies eventually went out of business or were sold at fire sale prices. That's not to say the model never works. One exception is iWon.com, a Web portal that offers cash prizes for using the site. After some success during the boom, iWon is now owned by Ask Jeeves and its parent company IAC/InterActiveCorp. " Update: 02/12 21:07 GMT by Z : Headline changed for accuracy.

100 comments

  1. Another Spin to Grab Attention by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The headline reads:
    Yahoo Offering Prizes to Search Users
    Yet the first line of the story is:
    According to the San Francisco Chronicle: 'Yahoo Inc. is considering offering free music downloads, discounts on DVD rentals and frequent-flier miles to users who make the Web site their primary search engine.
    And, in fact, when I search on Yahoo I am not offered any chance to win anything.

    Why do the editors of Slashdot feel the need to spin stories so that the headlines read like it's actually news? Someone mentioned this to the press and suddenly it's headlines that they're doing it. Please don't fall victim to the ways of other news providers, that's why I read Slashdot because it's not using shock reporting to get my attention.

    Yahoo wants this. You're a tool if you print it like this.

    "Stay tuned for a very special local Fox affiliate news report about how just going to school can be harmful for your children. They may already be dead! Find out how at nine."
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The headline reads:

              Yahoo Offering Prizes to Search Users


      The sad thing is-- the way I read it, Yahoo is encouraging people to go through their customer's stuff by rewarding them with prizes.

    2. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      While you may be correct remember that Slashdot is little more than CmdrTaco's blog with a big community. It's a news source for many, but it's expected to have more bias and mistakes than more professional and respected sources.

      Granted, many other news sources aren't much better. But let's keep these debates to Taco's posts on gathering feedback.

    3. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by baadger · · Score: 1

      And at what point does a 'personal website/blog' become a 'personal project', then just a 'project' and then an actual thing?

      That can never happen, right?

      I was going to moderate you funny, but an inkling tells me you're actually serious.

    4. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember that Apple Computer is nothing more than Steve Jobs' garage project, albeit with a lot of users...

    5. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by darkmonkeh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they offer money, I'll use their search engine. It's really the only way they'll get me anywhere near it.

    6. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by brokencomputer · · Score: 1

      By the time I downloaded the RSS feed, they had already fixed the title (I download in 15 minute intervals).

    7. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Please don't fall victim to the ways of other news providers, that's why I read Slashdot because it's not using shock reporting to get my attention."

      Hahaha. Good one.

    8. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by smilingman · · Score: 0

      Never mind that the title is actually "Yahoo Considers Offering Prizes to Search Users"

      Why do the editors of Slashdot feel the need to spin stories so that the headlines read like it's actually news? Someone mentioned this to the press and suddenly it's headlines that they're doing it. Please don't fall victim to the ways of other news providers, that's why I read Slashdot because it's not using shock reporting to get my attention.

      More importantly, why do the posters of Slashdot feel the need to grab attention and karma by complaining about imaginary problems?

    9. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by kaptron · · Score: 1

      Update: 02/12 21:07 GMT by Z : Headline changed for accuracy.

      Slashdotters are equally guilty of complaining about imaginary problems as they are quick to point out each other's mistakes. Such is the circle of life.

    10. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do posters on Slashdot constantly feel the need to grab attention by blatantly ignoring obvious messages at the bottom of each post, like "Title has been changed for accuracy"?

    11. Re:Another Spin to Grab Attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I received a survey from Yahoo! about such a program about two weeks ago, and was recently invited to join such a program. So they were not to far from the truth when they originally posted the original topic.

  2. Blingo! by Xshare · · Score: 1, Insightful

    http://www.blingo.com/ Lots of my friends and people who I've heard from have won from Blingo. No spyware, not too many adds. Just a google search with a win every so often. Seems to work for them.

    1. Re:Blingo! by eobanb · · Score: 1

      How have you not yet realised that sites like this simply can't exist without being scams?

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Blingo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that his friends have won prizes from that website?

    3. Re:Blingo! by docdude316 · · Score: 1

      I know people probably aren't going to believe this, or they're going to say that I'm working for the company or something, but I have won something from Blingo. It was only a free movie ticket, but it is proof that it's not a scam.

    4. Re:Blingo! by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Ponzi schemes, affiliate links, 'sign up for this trial / give us personal info and get a free iPod shuffle', etc. have been around forever. There's a price for everything. Not to be harsh, but get a little common sense.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    5. Re:Blingo! by masterren · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've won a movie ticket from Blingo already. They're able to give stuff away because they add their own text advertisements (about 4 of them) to the top of your search results. From http://www.blingo.com/about:
      How can Blingo afford to give away prizes?

      Just like other popular search engines, we earn money from the sponsored links you see when you do a search. (These links are always clearly identified and separated from search results.) Prizes are simply our way of encouraging people to use Blingo to search the Web.

    6. Re:Blingo! by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2, Informative

      "You must live in the United States" to win a prize, according to their website.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    7. Re:Blingo! by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've been using Blingo since last November. Have already won 3 $10 iTunes Gift Certificates (though one of them I won through my referral).

      http://www.krunk4ever.com/blog/?p=5

      There are some caveats. Only your 1st 10 searches per day qualify for a win. For someone like me, that makes those 10 searches within the hour it strucks past midnight, it doesn't really give me any advantage to continue using Blingo after my initial 10 searches. Also, as more people join, the # of prizes and the frequency of the prizes given out doesn't increase, so the chances of winning decreases everytime someone new joins (unless they join under you).

      They do have a toolbar for IE and a search bar engine for Firefox:
      http://www.blingo.com/howto

      That said, they don't exactly have the same results as Googles, even though it's powered by Google. Often times the results are the same, but sometimes when I can't find stuff through Blingo, I can still use Google to find it. I wonder if that's a thing with Google, where search engines using them get 2 week old results, while searches on Google get the newest ones.

    8. Re:Blingo! by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 1

      And this gets marked Flamebait, but the original, no reading done, obviously flamebait comment doesn't.

      Yay Slashdot mods.

      *burns karma for going offtopic*

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
    9. Re:Blingo! by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed, and they're certainly quite quiet about it if you don't read their Terms of Service. A friend of mine tried to get me to sign up after he was using it for a while, and I told him a few minutes later that we're both ineligible as we're Canadians. They'll certainly let you sign up and think you can win though...

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    10. Re:Blingo! by rjrjr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why was this moderated down? Blingo is a legit site, and they're proof that this prizes-for-eyes models work on some scale. They're not a spam factory, they're not a ponzi scheme, they're not cheats in any way at all. You search, you get results, and occasionally you just might get a movie ticket, or an iPod.

      Full disclosure: they're friends of mine, but I have no business interest with them. Just immense respect.

    11. Re:Blingo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not being sneaky about how the site applies to US residents only. It's not buried in the terms of service. It's right there in bold on the signup page (http://www.blingo.com/signup) and in the FAQ (http://www.blingo.com/about) and in the blog (http://www.blingo.com/blog/archives/2005/07/when_ is_blingo.html).

    12. Re:Blingo! by eitnom1977 · · Score: 1

      I have won a few times on this site. It kicks butt

    13. Re:Blingo! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Ah, cool, they've changed it then. That bold notice wasn't there previously (a few months ago I believe was when I was referred).

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  3. Those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who don't learn from history are bound to repeat it (to paraphrase). Another time honored marketing ploy to seduce/coerce personal information from customers. Dupe!

    1. Re:Those by imipak · · Score: 1
      Another time honored marketing ploy to seduce/coerce personal information from customers. Dupe!
      Do you mean "duplicate story", or "the customers were duped"?
  4. A9 amazon discount by bstadil · · Score: 0
    Try A9 the amazon search engine. You get a Pi/2 percent (1.57%)discount after a day or twos useage

    It is a wonderful search engine. It is based on Google for normal search but you can add extra panels and having it use diffferent vehichles.

    Doing a Wikipedia search concurrently with a general search is in my oppinion the best of both worlds.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:A9 amazon discount by imipak · · Score: 1
      >It is based on Google for normal search but you can
      >add extra panels and having it use diffferent vehichles.
      >

      Gosh, pluggable search-engine modules, what an innovative idea. Someone should tell Apple or the Firefox people about this, perhaps they could implement it on the client. Then your choice of search engines would be entirely up to the user, rather than being selected from a range pre-picked from selected partners of the search site...

    2. Re:A9 amazon discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Can you sue them because Pi/2% of a price is uncalculable and is rounded somehow in their calculation?

  5. Full List of Prizes by MikeSty · · Score: 1, Informative

    Searching for online rewards

    Yahoo is considering free offers, discounts and rewards to users of its search engine. Here are some of the possible incentives listed in a recent survey of Yahoo's customers:

    Five free music downloads per month

    Donations to charity (of users' choice)

    Unlimited Yahoo mail storage (instead of 1 GB)

    Discounted personals (one free month and $19.95 per month thereafter, instead of $24.95)

    Frequent-flier miles (250 per month)

    Source: Chronicle research

    1. Re:Full List of Prizes by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Funny how half of those (music, mail, personals) are cobranded services that Yahoo offers, eh?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Full List of Prizes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more free stuff will com

  6. no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And support Yahoo turning over people to the authorities? No thanks!

    1. Re:no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Name me a search engine corporation that respects human rights.

    2. Re:no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alta vista hasnt had any bad press lately

    3. Re:no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It hasn't had any press lately.

  7. Free trip to Guantanamo Bay by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

    After you search for any keywords on the DHS watchlist.

    1. Re:Free trip to Guantanamo Bay by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Guantanamo Bay?

      I'm holding out for one of those extraordinary renditions^Wvacations to the Middle East

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Free trip to Guantanamo Bay by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      Actually, their latest addition to the prize bonanza is a trip to China for 10 years in a "re-education" camp... Lovely accomodations with 5000 of your closest friends, all the rice you can eat, and to finance the whole thing you make cheap leather wallets and kids toys.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    3. Re:Free trip to Guantanamo Bay by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      which words would those be then ?

  8. iWon worked well for a brief period by bigtrike · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I found iWon to actually be useful and relevant for a brief period of time during the boom. Like just about every other portal and search which died off, they seemed to give in to greed and sell top placements, making it worthless.

    I would attribute the brief success of iWon to it functioning well, rather than the gimmicks.

    1. Re:iWon worked well for a brief period by SkidWilly · · Score: 1

      Yes, the gimmicks were definitely their downfall.

      I never used it myself, but my Dad had actually signed up with them, I guess thinking that he was surely the next big-money winner. I had no idea what iWon was all about, until I ran AdAware on his machine, and turned up some 400+ tracking cookies--from iWon alone. All in all there were 678 objects (the number still stands out in my head!), who knows how many of the extras were precipitated from 'registering' with iWon's advertisers.

      I hope Yahoo! has different plans...

      --
      Oops, my bad, I've been moderating sigs.
    2. Re:iWon worked well for a brief period by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Companies like Google and DoubleClick track you around their large advertising networks using fewer than 400 cookies. Doesn't make them any better, by the metric of "cookies == spyware" that you appear to have bought into. In fact, people seem to be tolerant of advertising as long as it keeps cool new products free.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:iWon worked well for a brief period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that cookies != spyware. In fact, I should have mentioned it in my post (in my own naivete, I couldn't discern their origin), but there were four processes running. That, to me was a major flag, and I pointed it out to my Dad, and finally got him to believe that this is why his connection had slowed, I think.

      Don't get me wrong, my Dad is very intelligent, and has forgotten way more about computing than I could ever hope to know. I'm just a hobbyist--doing linux for the 'fun' of it, but he's been in the trenches, and--if you can believe it--was elated when Visual Basic came out. Silly man. I'm not doing him justice right now because I can't remember the languages/machines he's worked with (they were very obscure to me). Now he's lost in the internet. I'm very flattered when he asks about this and that, but most times I'm just winging it myself. Hopefully, a tiny bit better than the rest of the 'bots'.

      That's my humble rhetoric, and I can only add concurrance to your post by saying that a major part of marketing is making things seem too good to be true. The bright-n-shiny-n-flashy ads do get attention. There's some very smart people figuring out what the general public wants to buy, or see...oooh, look! Emoticons!

      A lot of people with the option to do so, block ads. I don't. They're just noise in the periphery, and I don't care, or click. I do use Gmail, cookies be damned, and I don't care about the text ads. I do think that Google's content-specific advertising is quite innovative however. I think there's some grey area between advertisements (was that gentle enough?), and shove it down your face advertising....

    4. Re:iWon worked well for a brief period by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
      and old ones (links to WOXY, my fave internet radio station).

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  9. Frequent-users miles by biocute · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This got me thinking -- Maybe instead of offering prizes (which one needs to win), why not offer frequent-searcher credits?

    So if you searched while logged in (then Yahoo! doesn't even need forever-cookie to track a user's activity), you will accumulate some credits and when you have reached certain threshold, you can exchange for things that you actually want.

    1. Re:Frequent-users miles by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      So if you searched while logged in (then Yahoo! doesn't even need forever-cookie to track a user's activity), you will accumulate some credits and when you have reached certain threshold, you can exchange for things that you actually want.

      How long would it take to write a little bot to search for random stuff at a high rate giving a specific user all the credit? How long to create 10,000 accounts, all vectored through AOL since they're kind enough to obfuscate your IP address, and spread that searching out over all the accounts equally?

    2. Re:Frequent-users miles by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      During school, my friend tried one of those programs that gave you money for surfing with their program as it served up new ads, every minute or so, on the top 20% of the screen. And he was trying to sign up everyone up left and right as it was a pyramid program.

      Anyway, to trick the program he was surfing, he wrote a simple WinAPI program that moved the mouse every few seconds, perhaps later versions actually clicked on links, don't know.

      I think the most he ever got in a check was like $27 one month, but I'd hate to see how his electric bill increased with a desktop on 24/7.

      Some people aren't too bright (or value their time too highly....)

    3. Re:Frequent-users miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So if you searched while logged in (then Yahoo! doesn't even need forever-cookie to track a user's activity), ...


      Funny how people are all over Google recording search history while you're logged in (which you can edit and delete), and everyone seems to gloss over the fact that Yahoo has personally-identifiable search history which you can't modify, but it's fine, because they don't show it to you, but they'll hand it over to the cops if they ask.
  10. "considering"! by Quixote · · Score: 1, Redundant

    There's a difference between offering (as the headline implies) and considering offering as the article states. For all we know this could be the handiwork of some marketing droid who just ran a poll for a Powerpoint presentation.

  11. Chinese dinners by kitzilla · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yahoo is also offering Chinese dinners as a prize. Dunno why.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  12. market strategy by DoubleRing · · Score: 1

    This would be an excellent market strategy if you made little profit in the first place. However, for an already successful company like google, this would only cut into their revenue. I see this only as a desperate attempt by yahoo to save their market share.

    --
    Before you die, you see DoubleRing...
  13. Free stoning from rabid mob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...after you search for 'mohammed cartoon bomb'.

  14. iWon == spyware distributer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  15. This is one of the oldest marketing tricks around by ravee · · Score: 1

    I remember the last time I bought a certain brand of coffee, my decision to pick up the particular brand was influenced by the free ceramic mug that came with it. There was a equally better coffee brand sitting besides this one but I chose the one with the free gift.

    This is one of the oldest tricks in the marketing field. The companies doing business are clever in taking advantage of this human weakness. That is exactly what is happening in the internet arena too. And yahoo is leading the way in pulling potential search users in using their search engine by luring them with freebies.

    --
    Linux Help
    for all things on Linux
  16. Speaking of cookies by DoubleRing · · Score: 1

    If the search activity was stored on the user's computer, wouldn't it be relatively easy to alter it? There sure is a lot of incenive.

    --
    Before you die, you see DoubleRing...
    1. Re:Speaking of cookies by biocute · · Score: 1

      Search activities will certainly be stored on Yahoo!, but your comment got me thinking even further:

      These credits are awarded based on keywords. For example, searching "Google Rocks" might give you $0.00001, searching "Google Sucks" might give you $0.001.

      And this opens up marketing (not advertising) opportunities, where companies will bid for keywords to reward users who searched for them. It's almost like Google Adsense except this one rewards users who searched for them.

  17. I may just be tired today by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

    but that headline seems to imply that prizes are being offered to people willing to search Yahoo users. How thorough of a search do I have to perform, and do they have a suggested list of users? Will a basic pat-down and frisk be enough, or do I have to get a flashlight and gloves? Inquiring minds want to know.

    --
    the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    1. Re:I may just be tired today by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      Will a basic pat-down and frisk be enough, or do I have to get a flashlight and gloves?

      Seems to be that would depend on who the searchee was.... (and hot they were).
      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
  18. go'head by voudras · · Score: 2, Funny

    frisk me - i've got a prize for ya

  19. equally != better by qzulla · · Score: 1
    There was a equally better coffee brand sitting

    There is equal. There is better. There is no equally better.

    qz

    1. Re:equally != better by ravee · · Score: 1

      Yeah I mixed up there I guess. Was in a hurry to post my comment that I forgot to check the wordings. Thanks for pointing it out.

      --
      Linux Help
      for all things on Linux
    2. Re:equally != better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's equally correct or wrong either way so don't worry

    3. Re:equally != better by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      Unless of course you're comparing the two to a THIRD. Then they can be equally better if the third sucks. :)

      --
      This space available.
  20. MyPoints? by zaren · · Score: 1

    Mypoints.com *still* offers awards to folks that read their advertising emails. If I would just get off my butt more often and slog through what they send me, I could already have my fourth $10 restaurant gift certificate.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    1. Re:MyPoints? by ahecht · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's slowed way down. In my first year at mypoints, I earned enough for a $100 Sharper Image gift certificate. It took me two years (just clicking emails) to earn my most recent $20 gift certificate. Almost anything worth points these days requires a credit card.

    2. Re:MyPoints? by FS · · Score: 1

      I still do this as well. I occasionally do purchase through them, so am a decent customer and still receive approximately 60 emails a month from them. I filter them and save them for the weekend so I can click through them all at one time. I've returned $200 in Circuit City gift certificates over the years and am close to getting another $50. I've slowed down because I started using fatwallet.com because of the direct return, but if MyPoints has a ProFlowers deal or the like and I was going to buy flowers for my wife anyway, I'll go through them so I get some return.

  21. Not worth it by qzulla · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yahoo's survey said that users who sign up for the rewards program would be required to do most of their searching with the company. The program may require users to register, so the company can track usage, or use a Yahoo rewards toolbar.

    Not worth it. Let them track someone else. Then the next time the subpoena wagon rolls through town they can hang them, not me.

    qz

    1. Re:Not worth it by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      It's a feature rich contest though.

      Yahoo will automatically forward the price to your next of kin if you happen to be a Chinese dissident that they turn in.

      Screw Yahoo. Better to pull out of a market than get people killed for speaking up.

  22. Firefox extensions.. by damneinstien · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If the search prize giving algorithm isn't too draconian, we might as well use an extension to search google and yahoo at the same time and use google's search while getting money from yahoo.

    1. Re:Firefox extensions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto A9. Although there's a privacy issue since Amazon has your real contact info.

    2. Re:Firefox extensions.. by sankyuu · · Score: 1

      Hmm... might actually be one of the things they're trying to do: increase chances of assimilation. Instead of sticking to Google, you might once in a while check Yahoo to see if you won. They're hoping you might even find some good hits/useful search options.

    3. Re:Firefox extensions.. by PresidentEnder · · Score: 1

      This is probably exactly what I'd do. I might even make up bogus searches and randomly click whatever comes up in hopes that I might get some free stuff. However, in doing so, I will be exposed to advertising, which is what makes a search engine profitable.

      --
      I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
  23. FREE Air Miles? by immorak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow, if I use Yahoo! I might get free Air Miles? What happened to what i was looking for.. A good e-mail account or search results?

    1. Re:FREE Air Miles? by damsa · · Score: 1

      You can use those free air miles to fly out of China. Sounds pretty good to me.

  24. Can they really be that clueless? by YGingras · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I search for some keywords, I'm not after free music (unless the keywords are "free" and "music" of course), I'm after relevant search results. Unless Yahoo can feed me those (and they can't at the moment) no amount of free music will make them a usable search engine.

  25. Re:first by fantasticalmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Negative points are given, not only to change the karma of registered users, but to filter the comments. Some readers will only read comments of +3 or higher for example, and by marking 'first' posts as first posts, people who don't want to see them, don't have to. With regards to the yahoo thing, I can't really see them attracting many users if they do go through with this. I only ever used Yahoo! search when I was logged into my mail account and it was easier than changing to google. If I was on any other webpage, I used google. Since swapping to Gmail, I no longer use Yahoo! and the possibility of getting rewarded really doesn't tempt me to search with them. (Especially since personalised google came along).

  26. Posted at C|Net by code65536 · · Score: 1
    This was posted at C|Net three days ago.
    http://news.com.com/2061-10811_3-6037090.html

    The C|Net article includes a screenshot showing what incentives Yahoo! is considering offering, as well as this text:

    Yahoo! is considering launching a program to reward people who make Yahoo! their primary search engine. Yahoo! Mail users will be given early access to this program. You will receive a monthly reward if you make Yahoo! your primary search engine. This means that most of the searching you do each month must be on Yahoo! Search. To ensure users receive credit for all searches conducted on Yahoo!, you may need to log in or use a search box specifically designed for this program (e.g., a Yahoo! rewards toolbar).


    Some of these things could be interesting: e.g., like the airline miles. Some of them are a bit lame because they are things that Google already offers for free: e.g., like POP3/SMTP for mail. I just wonder exactly what they mean by "most" and the technical impossibility of ensuring "most" (which would be relative to rival engines) instead of "at least n number of searches".

    (more of my thoughts on this are posted here)
  27. I can see it working. by WoTG · · Score: 1

    I've never tried Blingo until I saw the GP post. After having tried it, I'm impressed by the business concept. All that they do is show some Google AdSense advertisements above and below the regular Google search results -- Google has a program specifically for co-branded searches. To you, the end user, you still get Google "quality" results, although, the sponsored links are somewhat more prominent that on Google.com. Plus, you get an (admittedly small) chance of winning a prize.

    I would not be surprised if they earn a couple dollars per thousand searches -- it would be in the ballpark of my experience with AdSense. At that rate, it's quite easy to finance a couple of movie tickets an hour plus a bigger prize like an iPod or PS2 every day.

  28. Re:first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes it more clear to me now. Thank you, content police, for now I understand exactly what that threshold thing that I always have to change when I want to read the funny parts is for. (actually this is a joke; it really does make sense and even sounds like a good idea. BTW, please mod me down, and the parent up, as his comment was insightful, and mine is, once again, mostly ignorant rambling)
      (In the interest of not completely wasting the time of whoever bothers to read this)
    ...And as far as the yahoo thing goes, I've never really used yahoo before, but from what I hear about it, it's not entirely bad, maybe not as comprehensive as google, but surely not the evil empire. I agree that when I use a search engine, I do want to spend as little time doing it as possible, but for the people who don't mind spending a few extra minutes weeding through unnecessary adcrap, or (god forbid) the folks who are actually interested in being marketed at, the offer of ten bucks off a dinner for two might be a good thing. Plenty of people like dinner for two, and many of those people like ten bucks off. Ten bucks off would be nice, especially if I wasn't really making much of a sacrifice for it (how big is the difference, really, for people who don't live at their computers; ie: the average user?)

  29. This got me thinking... by scooter.higher · · Score: 1

    If Yahoo is successful, maybe Google will consider this...

    Since Verizon is trying to get Google to pay for use of their network (I don't agree with this happening, but for the sake of the argument keep reading), maybe they could consider becoming partners and Google could offer a free month of DSL through Verizon as one of the incentives...which could possibly bring more Google users to Verizon as customers...

    If this happens, I better get credit for the idea.

    --
    Ramen
  30. Happy Days? by xpeeblix · · Score: 1

    Did Yahoo! just jump the shark?

  31. They're getting on the Blingo bandwagon, no? by mstra · · Score: 2
    I've had pretty good luck with the Blingo service (intentionally not posting my "affiliate" link, although it's in my .sig). They piggyback on Google's search results, and you basically have a chance to "win" randomly through each search of the day.

    Mostly, I've just found it to be a good way to pick up a couple free iTunes gift certificates :)

    I think that the model of accumulating "points" just ends up being more of a pain than it's worth.

    --
    Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
  32. nothing new by deesto · · Score: 0

    Users of certain sites have been falling for such ploys for years. I remember five years ago, an ex-coworker of mine used to keep a certain search page as his home page, and he would visit the page at least ten times dirung the workday, and each time he'd sit there and refresh the page about fifty times, in hopes of being granted one of these prizes. In a typical workweek, that would have given him 2500 chances per week. He did this everyday for the two years during which I worked with him: about 260000 times. And, surprise: he never won a thing. But he gave that site plenty of hits in the process.

    Sadly enough, I guarantee that, despite some opinions, some people will fall for this.

  33. Confidence inspiring by SnuffySmith · · Score: 1
    I was prompted, just two days ago, to fill out a survey from Yahoo! about their services. Part of it asked about whether I used Yahoo search as my primary search engine, and if not why.

    I explained that I used Google b/c I trust Google, and I don't trust Yahoo. But now that they may bribe me to use their service, I may change my mind. Nothing inspires trust like a kickback.

    1. Re:Confidence inspiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at what's become of the latest version of Google Groups if you still trust Google.

      If you have ever posted to Usenet, you have a user profile over there. Real name or not, the posting address has been auto-profiled. Furthermore, even if posts were removed from one or more of the newsgroups, the groups themselves still show up in the list.

      Whether or not this is a bug, or intentional design, that's the way Groups 2 Beta works today.

      Now think about that one for a moment--especially if someone once posted to, or had their account broken into and someone else posted to, or had posts forged to... well, any adult-oriented or support-oriented alt.* newsgroup for starters. Removing the posts should have protected their privacy enough (provided those posts weren't quoted, of course), but now that the user profiles were added, that doesn't protect their privacy anymore now.

      Just because Google Web search is their cash cow and they want to protect their search data, that doesn't mean that privacy issues don't exist in other areas of Google that they are probably well aware of, and do they actually really care?

      Frankly, I don't trust Google anymore.

  34. This sounds desperate by Animats · · Score: 1

    When you have to pay people to use your free product, you have a serious marketing problem.

  35. Google rewards with results by karlto · · Score: 1

    If I am using a search engine, I am not interested in finding what I am looking for! If I want to waste my time trying to win prizes, I will buy a scratchy ticket.

  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. Verizon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, as interesting as that would be, I still can't see it being a viable option, being that I have Verizon for my cell phone and the service I get is spotty, at best. Add to that the fact that Verizon charges you extra to use the mobile Web from your phone, and it also eats into your minutes? I'm sorry, but I can't see this working as anything more than another marketing gimmick.
     
    Now, if they were to offer free pr0n or more towers... either or...

    BTW, this is Dawg, I'm just too lazy right now to log in and post

  38. Oh great! by aukxsona · · Score: 1

    Another offer to get crap I'll never use and end up giving away just to be free of having to maintain it!

    Consumerism....the evil that enslaves you.

    --
    Not a geek just looking for one.
  39. Chinese Journalists by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 1
    Maybe it could offer Chinese journalists Get Out of Jail Free cards.

    P.

  40. Yeah...free vacation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign up for Yahoo "total search monitoring" now and you may win a free trip to a slave labor camp, err, "resort", of your government's choice!

    Just ask Li Zhi and Shi Tao, who thought they were anonymous when they made pro-democracy forum posts! Both are now rotting away in prison, uh we mean enjoying their free vacations at the expense of the Chinese government - since Yahoo turned their information over to the Chinese authorities.

    Tao won a ten year trip, and Zhi got eight glorious years of FREE (re)EDUCATION!

    http://blog.studentsforafreetibet.org/?p=152