Slashdot Mirror


LCD TopGun Hands On Review

Xbox Evolution writes "Lik Sang has done a hands on review of a lightgun that is compatible with Plasma, LCD, TFT & DLP. The review of the LCD TopGun which works with the PS2, Xbox and PC gives a good overview of the features and functionality."

98 comments

  1. Now bring back Duck Hunt! by BigZaphod · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes! Those old shooting games were the *best*! We need some new modern ones spiffed up with high-rez 3D laughing dogs and surround-sound quacks! I can't wait...

    1. Re:Now bring back Duck Hunt! by Zephiria · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not Quail hunt ?

      Bonus points if you hit the lawyer :)

    2. Re:Now bring back Duck Hunt! by demonbug · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking of duckhunt... did you see the Daily Show's re-enactment of Dick Cheney's "accident"?

    3. Re:Now bring back Duck Hunt! by SunPin · · Score: 1

      You might shoot your friend when he declines to get involved with your corruption.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    4. Re:Now bring back Duck Hunt! by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

      Forget high-resolution dogs, I'll buy the game in a heartbeat if they just let us shoot the son of a bitch.

    5. Re:Now bring back Duck Hunt! by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

      Too true!!

    6. Re:Now bring back Duck Hunt! by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Dick Hunt?

      Cheney's got a gun...

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  2. CRT by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Funny

    Still no support for CRT. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    1. Re:CRT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, it works with CRT and anything else including your Memory Stick picture frame.

  3. Re:Another hands on review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't click. I've seen this URL before.
    Probably not safe for work.

  4. Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the heck. This is just a big advertisement. They even have a "Buy now" button to the gun they are reviewing.

  5. its back to the 80's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    there really are no new ideas in this world, just the same ones, over and over and over again

  6. High def clay shooting by od05 · · Score: 1

    This operates by the same idea that the Power Glove does, remember the big T you had to set up? You've got to calibrate it, and it was never accurate. Old light guns made the targets white and the gun would sense that reflectivity, you'd hold the gun right next to the screen and never miss.

    1. Re:High def clay shooting by garrett714 · · Score: 1

      Old light guns made the targets white and the gun would sense that reflectivity, you'd hold the gun right next to the screen and never miss.

      This brings me back to the days of the old NES and Duck Hunt. How did they make it accurate at a distance though? You could be standing back pretty far from the TV and still make pretty accurate shots, on an old 8-bit CPU. Can anyone explain the technology or provide a link?

    2. Re:High def clay shooting by calibanDNS · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wikipedia has the answer.

    3. Re:High def clay shooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:High def clay shooting by rubberbando · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Old light guns made the targets white and the gun would sense that reflectivity, you'd hold the gun right next to the screen and never miss.


      It was even more effective if you were using a black & white tv that had manual brightness and contrast controls. If you adjusted things just right, you could aim at one target and due to a bug, you would hit all of the targets with one shot. I loved playing Gumshoe doing this as normally the game was near impossible. If you shot Stevenson to make him jump, all of the baddies on the screen would explode and it wouldn't use up any bullets either. It really helped fighting Zulie (the final boss).

      --
      DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    5. Re:High def clay shooting by garrett714 · · Score: 1
    6. Re:High def clay shooting by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      I just used a magnifying glass.

    7. Re:High def clay shooting by cgenman · · Score: 1

      It was even more effective if you were using a black & white tv that had manual brightness and contrast controls. If you adjusted things just right, you could aim at one target and due to a bug, you would hit all of the targets with one shot.

      You could also just shoot at a white piece of paper. My favorite trick was to take out the little plastic lens, turn the room lights up, and invite some friends over for a massive display of my skillz.

  7. Jack Thompson... by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    Jack Thompson is going to have a field day with this one. I'm very much against what he's doing but that doesn't stop the guy from spinning this out of control.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  8. Correct me if I'm wrong but... by The+RoboNerd · · Score: 1

    Don't light guns use intensity and not position to determine if you've hit the target or not? Why would they need to be "compatible" with a display device if all they depend on is intensity? Please someone educate me!

    1. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      They detected the bright pulse of light caused by the electron beam hitting a parituclar phosphor. This swept across a CRT pixel by pixel, line by line. This only works with a CRT and needs specific support from the graphics hardware (to find out the X/Y position of the electron beam at the time of the light pulse)

      This doesn't work with LCDs, Plasma TVs, DLP/LCD projectors / OLED displays etc. as all pixels are illuminated simultaneously, not sequentially.

  9. training video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hunters can use this to practice telling the difference between a human head and a semi-domesticated quail.

    Bring back Duck Hunt, Vice-Presidential Edition.

  10. A Little Too Real by Smarty2120 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Getting a light gun to finally work with all the different screen types is great. Unfortunately, the gun looks very close to a real Glock. There is a very good reason to make toy guns a bright obnoxous color, even if it kills the "I'm holding a real gun" buzz a bit. How long until some some little kid gets killed in a rough neighborhood by a cop who thought this thing was real?

    1. Re:A Little Too Real by jon.wolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it looks nothing at all like a Glock. It seems to me to be modeled after the Beretta 92F/FS.

    2. Re:A Little Too Real by nancypants · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's obviously not a Glock, it's a Beretta, but what about the orange cap I thought all toy guns were supposed to have?

    3. Re:A Little Too Real by OverkillTASF · · Score: 1

      Depends on how long before a negligent parents gives one to the kid and ignores him/her for the next 15 years of his/her life.

    4. Re:A Little Too Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cord hanging from the bottom of the "firearm" might be a give-away. For some reason that reminds me of a futurama episode.

    5. Re:A Little Too Real by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Funny

      None if the parents teach the kid not to be a dumbass.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    6. Re:A Little Too Real by westlake · · Score: 1
      How long until some some kid gets killed...by a cop who thought this thing was real?

      It's a question worth asking.

      My father, still a hunter, didn't own or play with replica guns or gun toys at any age. That was the one line between reality and fantasy his father would never cross.

    7. Re:A Little Too Real by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Clearly you have no parenting experience what so ever.

      Kids are excitable, everything is new, and they live very much 'in the moment'.

      This includes early teens. I think of all the stupid stuff I did, scares the hell out of me thinking what my kids will try.

      Ever have a for year old stick a bead up their nose just to see what would happen? I have. They new better when they thought about it, and we certianly never taught them to put things in their nose, yet it happened.

      I know you may have been joking, but raising a child is a very complex thing to do. For example: I am trying to raise my kids to think about what they do, and be good. Unfortunatly I do not raise the 1000 other kids that share their school.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:A Little Too Real by mollymoo · · Score: 1
      My father, still a hunter, didn't own or play with replica guns or gun toys at any age. That was the one line between reality and fantasy his father would never cross.

      That explains the dresses then.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    9. Re:A Little Too Real by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Certainly telling your 4 year old not to stick a bead up their nose is not necessarily something you would tell your kid, but one would think that a lesson you always teach your kid (and more often than once) is never to point a toy gun at anyone, and especialy never at a cop. Sure raising a kid is complex as hell. Teaching them basics like not pointing guns at people should be common place though.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    10. Re:A Little Too Real by dingDaShan · · Score: 1

      Simply changing the color of the gun would not help because it can be painted over in black. The best way would be to alter the shape AND add color to make the gun unrecognizable as a real gun.

    11. Re:A Little Too Real by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      You sir are an idiot if you think the color of a gun makes the slightest bit of difference.

      Officers are trained in threat assessment and common sense tells you to take no chances. i.e. a six year old in the playground with what looks like an uzi is going to get treated very differently than a masked man leaving the bank in a hurry with what looks like a pink polka dot shotgun.

      Ask any officer if the color of the weapon makes the slightest difference? Now ask them just how far they would let the kid go before they'd drop her. Most cops would probably let the kid do anything until the weapon dis-charged, even then they would want to see intent to harm before they'd open fire. The guy in the mask better have dropped the gun before he turns.

    12. Re:A Little Too Real by goarilla · · Score: 1

      isn't that a beretta and not a glock?
      i don't know for sure but i do think it is

    13. Re:A Little Too Real by bobbyhc · · Score: 0

      the gun's realistic look shouldn't stop you from buying it for a kid, the fact that you never took the time to teach your kid not to pull anything that even looks like a gun out when dealing with cops should keep you from buying it.

    14. Re:A Little Too Real by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1
      Sure, and he can also carve a block of soap into the shape of a gun.


      Sorry, there is only so much you can do to stop people from being dumb-asses. If somebody goes out of their way to paint the gun black, then it really isn't your fault.

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    15. Re:A Little Too Real by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Any child that would consider that a good idea is clearly not old enough to be using something like this '(Mental years) .
      Why on earth should we all suffer because of some peoples poor parenting / stupid children .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    16. Re:A Little Too Real by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1

      My guess is that the gun pictured is not being sold in the US market. Some other countries are not as paranoid as the US is when it comes to toy guns (probably due to the fact that they have much lower gun-crime rates...or less lawyers).

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    17. Re:A Little Too Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids have had "life like" toy guns since before slashdot was even born. Why would it being assosiated with a videogame make it any different?

      And to answer your question. Only in America would a cop shoot a kid because he had something that looked like a gun pointed at him. Scratch that.

    18. Re:A Little Too Real by TheRealSync · · Score: 1
      How long until some some little kid gets killed in a rough neighborhood by a cop who thought this thing was real?
      I don't live in the USA, you insensitive clod!
      --
      -- A good compromise leaves everyone mad. --Calvin and Hobbes
    19. Re:A Little Too Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it doesn't look like a Glock at all.
      It's a replica of a Beretta 92.

      And why would you run around with a videogame controller with a cord hanging from it when you can get an airsoft gun or any other replica?

    20. Re:A Little Too Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or parts of africa or asia, where kids (child soldiers) use real guns to shoot real people. IIRC some UN (nigerian) peacekeepers have been killed for forgetting that.

  11. See [[Light gun]] by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't light guns use intensity and not position to determine if you've hit the target or not? Why would they need to be "compatible" with a display device if all they depend on is intensity?

    Traditional light guns for CRTs since the Super Scope use submicrosecond timing of blue and green phosphor flicker, which when correlated with the timing of the horizontal and vertical blanking of the composite or luminance video signal gives position. Even older light guns that rely on intensity, such as the Zapper, might get confused by LCD's slower response and lack of flicker. This Wikipedia article should help you understand.

  12. shoulda been in the 80s by slumpy · · Score: 1

    Monitor to the danger zone!!!!

    --
    http://www.commaecho.com
  13. Re:Remember, Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad you needed pancreatic cancer to find out.

  14. Great review but I'm still not buying one by serutan · · Score: 1

    Thanks to the guys at Lik Sang for taking the time to do this review. It was very thorough and well written, with nice screenshots and good information about the gun. So much for the review.

    Having said that, I think it's a waste to use a gun-type pointing device with any kind of display screen, unless the game is about shooting through a window from the middle of a room. To physically get into the spirit of a gunfight takes more than a pistol grip and a trigger. You really have to be in a larger play environment where threats can come from all over, such as VR goggles provide. I don't see how moving your arm side to side a few degrees to pick targets off a screen is any more exciting than using a mouse or a joystick.

    1. Re:Great review but I'm still not buying one by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Good point. Ya know what I wanna know, where can I buy a display built into a pair of sunglasses? The technology exists. There's a market for it. Why has no-one taken a punt and mass produced em yet? You have to make technology acceptable to the masses to reduce the costs and get it into the market. But everyone who makes wearable computers appears to think having equipment attached to your head in new and uncomfortable ways is a sane way to introduce people to them. Consider, for example, the EyeTap. Brilliant technology. Cheap to manufacture. Absolutely no commercial interest. Why? Well, take a look at the picture on that page. If you saw someone wearing that on the street what would you do? You'd back away slowly. Instead, imagine the person had on of those things on each eye and a standard sun glasses filter over the top. Sure, it wouldn't look as avant garde but that's a good thing. You can walk about wearing a pair of enhanced sunglasses without drawing attention to yourself, which means you can actually program your wearable computer to do something useful with your augmented vision.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Great review but I'm still not buying one by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      There are two major problems with current VR technology. The first is head-tracking latency, and the second is focus. Even the best head-tracking systems take an unacceptable amount of time to relay the motion to the computer, render the scene from the new position, and display the resulting images on the LCDs in the glasses. Most people have difficulty adjusting to this, and many experience very unpleasant side effects. Furthermore, even with a full VR setup, you still have the problem that what you're seeing doesn't match reality. You have to remember not to e.g. walk around the virtual environment, or you'll risk running into something, or falling, or.... The liability for this is probably a major issue. As for the glasses themselves, they don't provide all the normal clues for three-dimensional perception. In a decent system, you'll have one flat screen for each eye, with a fixed focal plane set at a comfortable distance. Clever software can use that to give you an apparent 3-D image. However, normally your eyes would make use of things like focal distance, depth-of-field, peripheral vision, your sense of balance, etc. When using VR equiptment, these senses tend to atophy and become disconnected to the point where recovering from the effects of the VR glasses themselves can be quite a challenge for a frequent user. Of course, many of these problem would be less significant for "augmented reality" displays with purely two-dimensional overlays, but they still need to be considered. Failure to overcome these problems, and not fashion, is the primary reason for the conspicuous lack of omnipresent VR technology today.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    3. Re:Great review but I'm still not buying one by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      When it comes to VR games I have to agree with you. There is certainly some issues there. But when it comes to augmented reality the kind of things researchers have acheived with custom built equipment is truely useful. It's so useful that commercial head mounted display systems are available for engineers and military specialists. These systems are of the "unfashionable" variety. So yeah, when it comes to consumer augmented reality the problem is not technology, it's a willingness to gamble on the creation of a new market. Everyone is waiting for someone else to do it, even the people who have the most expertise to make it happen. As for virtual reality though, yeah, you're probably right.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Great review but I'm still not buying one by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what he said. And while we are at it, I don't want to play flight simulators unless I can actually be in a cockpit at 15000 feet. And no driving simulators till my seat jumps every time I hit a bump. And no more AI opponents; every character in every game should be played by another player or paid actor.

      We should just ignote the fact that there are technical and monitary limitations to everything. Sure, I could sit down and, with off the shelf technology, design an arcade shooter with 360-degree visibility. Of course, it'd cost $50,000 for one box. It'd burn out $1000 worth of bulbs every month. It'd be suseptable to teenagers touching the screens or spilling their sodas.

      To top it all off, it'd cost $5 for a few minutes of play.

      We use 17" and 19" screens for a reason. The same reason we use keyboards vice voice recognition.

      But, I guess in your world everyone drinks unicorn giggles, uses their voice to provide input, and gets output via a nural link.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    5. Re:Great review but I'm still not buying one by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      to summarize, "me too" is a lot easier than "this is new".

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:Great review but I'm still not buying one by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should have read his entire post. All he said was that he didn't see how this was more fun than a FPS, not that shooting games are dumb because you're not actually shooting things.

  15. Sad experience by LordMyren · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd just built a projector out of a LCD monitor. It was rigged up out of lego's, cardboard boxes, duct tape and hot glue, in the nice dark basement. We had a seven foot tall screen of playstation 2 going and had been playing GTA3, GT3 and Armored Core all week.

    My friend went out and bought a light gun thinking how awsome it would be. "Does not work with monitors, lcd's or projectors."

    Of course, it was actually all three.

    1. Re:Sad experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What technique did you use for making the projector?
      any links

      I actually own a DLP project, yet i'd still like to mess with building one as i've lots of surplus crap.

      Thanks in advance

    2. Re:Sad experience by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      With all that hardware hacking, there is nothing stopping you using a 12gauge to take out the targets....

  16. Augmented gaming is better by ben_1432 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not sure if anyone else is doing it, but an Australian uni group is working on an augmented gaming thing that looks significantly cooler.

    Why settle for a gun in your lounge when you can have a game incorporated into your surroundings?

    1. Re:Augmented gaming is better by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      if you want to run around hiding and shooting 'aliens' in the real world, you could just pop lsd... You'd certainly look just as stupid as having all that robo-gear.
      Some guys at RMIT (Melbourne Australia) came up with a real/virtual Doom around campus - they wore a headset similar to the one on your link, and used GPS/laptop backpack combo. Problem was they needed 'minders' cos they would run away from the flaming skulls into traffic.. cant be bothered finding the link.

    2. Re:Augmented gaming is better by ben_1432 · · Score: 1

      Heh .. I can see the need for minders. Imagine it *combined* with a gun-control-thing :D

      It's only clunky backpack & goggles till Sony drops a billion into making it a wristwatch and Oakleys.

    3. Re:Augmented gaming is better by jbrader · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm gonna guess that you've never tried LSD.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    4. Re:Augmented gaming is better by ben_1432 · · Score: 1

      It's no crime not to have taken LSD. Don't put that peer pressure crap on me and imply I'm missing out on something I need ;)

    5. Re:Augmented gaming is better by jbrader · · Score: 1

      The first one is free but next time you have to pay.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    6. Re:Augmented gaming is better by chris+macura · · Score: 1

      You won't get rich, LSD is a non-additictive hallucinogen:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSD#Addiction_potenti al

    7. Re:Augmented gaming is better by jbrader · · Score: 1

      Haha, believe me pal Im familiar with the effects of LSD. Its not addictive but the profit margins are enormous.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
  17. Shame under UK law to be introduced soon .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Those under 18 will not be allowed to purchase this as it comes under the definition of "imitation firearm".

    In fact it looks fairly realistic, if you removed the fake laser unit under the main "pistol" it could even be classified as a "realistic imitation firearm" and thus banned from sale in the UK.

    1. Re:Shame under UK law to be introduced soon .... by StonedRat · · Score: 1

      They'll likely just make it bright green or something equally ugly and childish looking.

      --
      "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
    2. Re:Shame under UK law to be introduced soon .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the one I've just ordered makes it through customs then!

  18. Molded from a real Beretta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Note the gun is molded from a real Beretta. Even has the model and "PATENDED" on the side. Cut the cord and from a few feet away you can't tell if it is real or not. Definitely not good for kids...

    1. Re:Molded from a real Beretta by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be copyright infringement?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:Molded from a real Beretta by damsa · · Score: 1

      No because it's a thing that can be patented, you can't claim copyright on things that are meant for patent protection. Otherwise you can extend patents to copyright levels.

    3. Re:Molded from a real Beretta by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Would that be a design patent? Since what's copied is the design, not the functionality.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  19. Erealgames G1 is better (supports projectors) by Zhen-Jock · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.erealgames.com/ I find this gun heaps more promising although there isn't any PC support yet. Works with PS2 and X-Box's though.

    1. Re:Erealgames G1 is better (supports projectors) by arodland · · Score: 1

      Ooh, and best of all, the website says it's compatible with "Time Criss"

  20. wolf 3d by Joe123456 · · Score: 0

    There was a Version of Wolf 3d in VR A long time ago and it cost a lot I think it was $4 a game and it was time based.

  21. Finally! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Lik Sang has done a hands on review of a lightgun that is compatible with Plasma, LCD, TFT & DLP to meet the massive demand for lightguns.

    ("but shoots very real holes in conventional CRTs" would also be an acceptable answer.)

  22. Chaney should hunt with this by Coldeagle · · Score: 1

    Well folks, I don't know about you but I think that VP Dick Chaney should practice with this instead of a real gun. A lot less "Accidents" would happpen.

    1. Re:Chaney should hunt with this by Churla · · Score: 1
      Well he did shoot a LAWYER...

      In some places that is considered a public service.

      --
      I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    2. Re:Chaney should hunt with this by Coldeagle · · Score: 1

      Very true...maybe we should have Georgy go hunting with SCO's leagal team?

  23. Better solution? by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

    I used to love playing the rail games. Maddog etc. When I got my flat screens the fun went away :-( I took a look at the various tech involved and asked /. for comments, silly editors :-(

    I took a look at the tech involved in this and by far and the best tech is the laser dot on the screen which is captured by a seperate camera. In the military the small arms trainers work this way.

    I started off with a laser pointer and used a usb webcam. It worked well on anything other than CRT, crt can on occasion reflect the laser inside the tube causing the whole screen to go red, try it. I eventually ended up with a couple of co2 airsoft guns and red/green lasers mounted in the barrel.

    Worked well. No cables from the guns and highly accurate. Accuracy limited by webcam pixels. Auto configuring, before a game the camera was set up. The screen flashed bright white five times and we were off. Where the pointer his was were you were counted.

  24. Any distributors other than Lik-Sang? by Kuj0317 · · Score: 1

    Every time i go to Lik-Sang, i wish that they had a redistributor located in the US. Soo much cool stuff, very reasonable prices, restrictively high shipping costs. I am not saying Lik is padding their shipping (as it does have to ship from Hong Kong) but when the shipping is 50 percent of the cost, it really becomes hard to justify.

    At 35 dollars each, these guns will sell like crazy. At 45 each they would sell well too.
    Unfortunately, being in the US means that shipping from Lik is always what turns me off. In fact, if the guns were 45 each with 10 dollars shipping, i would have been more likely to buy it.

    Unfortunately that is not the case.

    I priced out 2 guns. at 35 each, thats 70 bux. however, after shipping, the total was 100, which means that shipping alone is 30 dollars. I just cant justify that, which sucks cuz i have a projector and have been itching to play house of the dead and Time Chrisis (and Duck hunt via emulator).

    Oh well.

    1. Re:Any distributors other than Lik-Sang? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In fact, if the guns were 45 each with 10 dollars shipping, i would have been more likely to buy it.

      Ok, so we just need to find light guns that cost 55 dollars or less and you'll buy them.

      I priced out 2 guns. at 35 each, thats 70 bux. however, after shipping, the total was 100, which means that shipping alone is 30 dollars. I just cant justify that

      What the hell, this makes 50 dollars each? Yeah, maybe Lik Sang should just include the shipping fees into the price for people like you who have problems with counting numbers. Other than that, I don't see a problem.

  25. What do you do with toy guns? Were you ever a kid? by Augusto · · Score: 1

    > ... one would think that a lesson you always teach your kid (and more often than once) is never to point a toy gun at anyone,

    That's the whole point of a "toy gun", to pretend you're shooting at each other while making "bang" sounds. That's one of the main points, and that's why toy guns are painted with those horrid colors, to prevent any confusion.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  26. They're suprisingly objective. by pelrun · · Score: 1

    Actually Lik-Sang are really very good with their reviews. Yes, they're selling the items they review. But I've never known them to pump up a review just to drive sales (and in some cases the reviews have caused them to decide not to stock a sub-par product, like the original batch of GP2Xes.) If they think it's crap, they say so.

  27. Quail Hunt with Dick Cheney by Computeradam · · Score: 1

    3d Sound, Laughing Dogs and Dick Cheney hunting quail, but needs to avoid shooting friends while hunting.

  28. Bought these for my LCD based mame cabinet by Banishedwun · · Score: 1
    When I first built my mame cabinet I opted for a thin-footprint design using a 17" LCD monitor. http://www20.brinkster.com/mymame

    I didn't know at the time that light guns didn't work with LCDs, I'd just honestly never thought of it. Now a few years later, I saw the Topgun guns designed to work with any screen and immediately ordered two. They arrived last friday.

    Given the two hours I've been able to play with them, here's what I can tell you so far:

    * For use with a PC, the install cd will install the drivers, but did not install any configuration software or instructions on how to get them to work with Mame.
    * You *CAN* have two guns plugged in at the same time.
    * I have been unable to get past the configuration screen. I can get the laser to come on, shoot in the five locations that configure them, but upon shooting the fifth shot the laser does not turn off.

    In looking, I did see that the manufacturer has a new set of drivers and software out, hopefully I'll get around to installing and testing this weekend. As for the design, the gun ROCKS! Good weight, feel, design. If you have kids, spray paint it orange. Personally, I like the realistic look.

    1. Re:Bought these for my LCD based mame cabinet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am having a similar problem. Although, sometimes any number of the shots won't work, but about 80-90 percent of the time, the last shot won't fire. When it does work, the calibration is all out of whack. The cursor bounces between two locations (usually separated by an even amount in both the x and the y). I have no idea if one of the LEDs is broken or if the gun is or what. If anyone has any idea how to fix this problem (or whether it is fixable), please post! As far as your problem goes, though, aren't there supposed to be six shots? (One to the: upper left LED, center of the screen, upper left of the screen, upper right of the screen, lower right of the screen, lower left of the screen)

    2. Re:Bought these for my LCD based mame cabinet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just received my LCD TopGun. I had a little trouble setting it all up, but I am able to calibrate it with no problem. Mine came with a CD hand labeled TopGun 3.0.

      I just can't get it to work with MAME v0.89. I tried with and without Gun2Mouse running and could not get MAME to recognize it.

  29. Re:What do you do with toy guns? Were you ever a k by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    Indeed, which is why I said teach the lesson more than once. Because kids don't really pay all that much attention. But you grind it through their skulls that they never ever point it at a cop and they'll at least get one part of it down. I know I did.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  30. Have you thought... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    About banning toy guns altogether? In my home, they are banned. In the case some uninformed relative gives Lucas (going 7yo) a toy gun for his birthday, he plays with it inside the house for a couple of days with it and then it magically vanishes. That simple. Not that _I_ should be highly concerned -- his real interest is dinosaurs. :-)

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  31. Top Gun from Lik-Sang does't work with TimCrisis by ShooterFrank · · Score: 1

    Paid over $30 for shipping for the gun. Turns out DOESN'T WORK with Time Criss II and III. Sucks!

  32. LCD/Plasma/Projector Light gun from eRealgames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got my light gun from www.erealgames.com today. Works great with TimeCrisis II and III. I love it - it's wireless. It doesn't look real, I guess they can't sell a realistic one in US.