Slashdot Mirror


Trekkie Dating, is it Good for the Gene Pool?

Eloketh writes "It seems that Tucker Carlson of MSNBC thinks that Internet Dating services are a somewhat disturbing trend. Specifically, when talking about Trekkies, he says 'Is this good for the gene pool?' He also goes on to question whether allowing Trekkies to meet and mate is 'in the national interest.'"

41 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. Fortunately... by RoffleTheWaffle · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... pairs of males can't procreate. No, the Star Trek universe does not afford a real work-around for this problem, and procreation and replication via androids just isn't feasible.

    1. Re:Fortunately... by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. I have a Star Trek mystery dinner party game. Requires 4 men and 4 women. Where are you going to get 4 female trekkies? Are there 4 female trekkies?

    2. Re:Fortunately... by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Informative
      Where are you going to get 4 female trekkies? Are there 4 female trekkies?

      You're kidding, right? Trek fandom has always been notable for attracting a significant number of women (especially compared to SF fandom in general or other realms of geekdom). Historically, women have been drawn to Trek by romantically appealing captains, by the ideals of gender equality the shows represented (Uhura may not have done much, but she was a bridge officer), and the community opportunities of fandom itself. The whole genre of "slash" fanfic was invented by female trekkies fantasizing about a Kirk/Spock relationship. Fanfic is also rife with uber-competent "Lt. Mary Sue" characters who win the heart of Kirk or Spock or another character, also obviously written by women. In the TNG era, the DSPSGs (drooling, slobbering, Patrick Stewart groupies) were rampant on CompuServe (and mostly female). To cite a mass-media example, there's the woman who made the news for wearing her Starfleet uniform for jury duty. Whoopi Goldberg finagled herself a part on TNG because she was a fan. I haven't been involved in Trek fandom for a while, so maybe the women have been abandoning it for other more interesting subjects (leaving only the men who refuse to ask for directions), but the notion that female trekkies are some kind of mythical creature is simply incorrect.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:Fortunately... by Syberghost · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's OK, because the women that DO come to Trek conventions are mostly, oh how to say this politely:

      Willing.

  2. requires IE6 for the 'free' video? by daemious · · Score: 3, Funny

    I really wanted to see Tucker Carlson making an ass out of himself too.

    1. Re:requires IE6 for the 'free' video? by magicchex · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then turn on Fox anytime he happens to be on.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
  3. Perhaps by grindcorefan · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..one should have a look at the Darwin Award statistics. How many Darwin Awards have been given to Trekkies, how many have been given to non-Trekkies? I'm afraid this will come out in favour of the Trekkies. However, that doesn't necessarily say anything. Trekkies are just as useless as non-Trekkies, perhaps just wee bit more able to survive.

    1. Re:Perhaps by bisscuitt · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's easy for you to say!? You weren't given a red uniform !!

      eek!

  4. people actually listen to tucker carlson? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I figured that after Jon Stewart emasculated him on Crossfire people would have written the bow tie wearing blowhard off for what he is -- a moron.

    1. Re:people actually listen to tucker carlson? by zoloto · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't recall that. Do you have a website / video for reference (today's not my day for google, search results don't turn up much)

      wait... here it is.
      click for links to movies/transcripts

      this is great!

    2. Re:people actually listen to tucker carlson? by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't understand why he isn't in favor of geeks getting together. More couples and new familes means more taxpayers to try to prop up broken Social Security systems and more young'ns to send into meaningless wars.

      But then maybe he doesn't want them for the intelligence reasons. It's far easier to control a populace made up of idiots.

    3. Re:people actually listen to tucker carlson? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think he realizes that once we establish our political dominance (by actually, y'know, voting...) that the outdated and broken social security systems (and many other social programs...) are going to get a major reform, along with stamping out what I like to call "legislated morality".

      The major problem I see facing that is that a) many geeks I know don't vote, for reasons I can't explain, and b) many of those same geeks are (like myself) decidedly childfree.

  5. In other news... by bmo · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Editors Zonk and Scuttle Monkey: Are they good for Slashdot or are they better in a white wine sauce?"

    --
    BMO - It is hot here, like a cow on fire

  6. How else is a trekkie... by clickety6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... supposed to go where no man has gone before?

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  7. Finally we get a website by juventasone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unfortunately this site came a little late into my life, for myself, and some of my friends, we had to resort to finding our mates the hard way.. on IRC.

  8. The ratio's a bit out of whack there by greg1104 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I haven't seen that many men all trying to bang the same woman since the last time I watched...wait, I wasn't supposed to admit to owning that movie. Nevermind.

  9. Not sure I understand... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

    What does online dating have to do with "trekkies"? :-/

    At least in the country I live in, online dating services have people from 18 to ~60 with interests ranging from gardening to space science to hair styling...

    Online dating is very accepted and mainstream here. It's just one form of dating along with visiting clubs. Heck, it may even be seen as more hip than that nowadays, because it's more new and "in".

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  10. Bah! by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Funny

    He also goes on to question whether allowing Trekkies to meet and mate is 'in the national interest.

    Wow, what a coincidence! Here I was just wondering if allowing Tucker Carlson to mate was in the national interest.

    1. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe a good sized portion of the nation have already told him to go mate with himself.

    2. Re:Bah! by mph · · Score: 2, Funny
      He's actually one of the few people in the world arrogant enough to pull it off.
      I didn't even know you could pull it off. Make it red and sore, sure, but pull it off? Really?
  11. Re:Is this supposed to be funny? by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this supposed to be funny?

    Yes.

    I exaggerated the male to female ratio of Trekkies for comic effect. The idea was that people would see the absurdity of there being fewer than 4 female Star Trek fans in the entire world, causing laughter.

    Hope that helps explain the concept, Commander Data.

  12. War on Trekism by my+$anity++0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trekkies are a national security risk. Trekkies are everywhere. I might even be a Trekkie. See, Trekkies tend to believe that people must be tolerant, and progress in science, in order for any aliens to pay serious attention to them. You can see why this isn't in the national interest. The effects were minimized before they started breeding. Luckily, many Trekkies are male, leading to certain problems in mating, and a Trekkie and a `Normal' have a good chance of having a normal child. However, the number of female Trekkies is not decreasing. We must stop this infection of our society.

  13. Re:Is this supposed to be funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If there are less than 4 female trekkies world-wide, then I'm married to one of them. I'm so lucky. :)

    She also loves Stargate, Battlestar and Farscape, has a healthy interest in IT, and is the mother of all goddesses; a Librarian.

  14. Carlson is a Putz. by jcr · · Score: 2

    Every Trekkie who ever lived is worth million Tucker Carlsons.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  15. I married a Trekkie -- and lived by Roblimo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My wife is a low-level Trekkie; a fan of the series, especially the original, but not one who goes to conventions or wears Trek-based costumes.

    We met before the Internet was open to the public -- the old-fashioned way, in a coffee shop where we were sitting near each other.

    I wasn't aware of her Trekkie tendencies for several months. Finding out about them changed nothing. We (obviously) ended up married anyway.

    1. Re:I married a Trekkie -- and lived by nkh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Roblimo, thanks for allowing me to say this:

      <rant>
      I'm a geek, the kind that enjoys writing recursive functions in Lisp, but not one who goes to Linux conventions. I met my girlfriend on MSN (the new-fashioned way ;)

      She wasn't aware of my C++ tendencies for a few weeks, and when I told her, nothing changed and she doesn't mind me reading books about this Java thing. The truth is that she wants me to teach her a few things about programming now, and I want her to teach me a few things she knows so that we can enjoy more stuff together.

      The fact is that everyone's a nerd for something, most people are just "nerds about life and society", but some people are jealous and don't like Trekkies or computer geeks because they love what they do and asking if it's a good thing for the gene pool is insulting. Who cares who you're dating as long as you're enjoying yourself? (thanks for reading this off-topic rant)
      </rant>

  16. Is anyone else scared? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'Is this good for the gene pool?'

    I don't know about other people but statement like that really scare me. We as humans should really stop trying to control our evolution and let nature take its course.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  17. It's only somewhat dangerous by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trekkie dating is OK, although somewhat dangerous. Particularly if bystanders don't move quickly when the Klingon gets excited.

  18. Thing is... selection is becoming much easier. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And it's not necessarily good for the human race as a whole.

    Take okcupid for example. Answer 500 muliple choice questions and the statistical grouping algorithm it uses matches you up with well lots of people who answered in a similar manner. You end up talking to people who think in a very similar way, often with similar interests. In fact it can be damned near telepathy at times. OK, that's great and getting on with someone is very easy but... As well as the influence of the nurture stuff there are underlying genetic mechanisms to the way people think and act but guess what, we're sorting these similar "good" and "bad" genes to be close to one another.

    The result is potentially increased incidence of genetic diseases. Ultimately I think things like this will weed out the bad genes naturally as they express themselves in children but there's the suffering and potentally increased healthcare costs.

    --
    Deleted
  19. Methods of Matching by SeanDuggan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Take okcupid for example. Answer 500 muliple choice questions and the statistical grouping algorithm it uses matches you up with well lots of people who answered in a similar manner. You end up talking to people who think in a very similar way, often with similar interests. In fact it can be damned near telepathy at times. OK, that's great and getting on with someone is very easy but... As well as the influence of the nurture stuff there are underlying genetic mechanisms to the way people think and act but guess what, we're sorting these similar "good" and "bad" genes to be close to one another.
    Well, first of all, you're assuming that these services match for similarity, that someone who put in the exact same answers as you will score the highest. While the early dating programs did exactly that, I highly suspect that the more modern ones work on a black box based on data from existing relationships. Odds are, the people who set it up don't even know whether it's a case of "like to like" or "opposites attract"; they just plug in all the data in and get back what appears to be the statistical patterns. The more people who sign up for your service, the more data that you have.

    The result is potentially increased incidence of genetic diseases. Ultimately I think things like this will weed out the bad genes naturally as they express themselves in children but there's the suffering and potentally increased healthcare costs.
    There's an additional fallacy you've got here, assuming that genetics are that influential. Unless the system is specifically matching to get blue-eyed, blond-haired, fair-skinned people together (eAryan?), I suspect a lot of the factors are personality-based, which is more of an environmental thing. I'll assuming that you're not arguing that a fondness for long walks on the beach correlate to a recessive gene coding for receding hairlines and color blindness.

    That said, there is some interesting data regarding the rise of autism in Silicon Valley which is suggested to be the result of a generation or two of geeks breeding with geeks due to the environmental concentration thereof. While this is more of a case of them living in a target-rich environment rather than specifically matching for it over personality matrices, there is some fit there in that today's society allows you to pretty much pick your mate rather than having to select from the small pool of your local area.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  20. People listen to and read trolls, sad to say by ianscot · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Tucker Carlson and the entire breed of televised "pundits" are little more than trolls. Think John Dvorak. People read them for the same reason this story caught our eye; because their job is to provoke reactions and get "eyeballs" on their show, or reading their column... And here we are, reacting.

    The most interesting aspect of this species of critter is their seemingly complete lack of self-reflection. They've got images -- the bow tie -- but they're entirely externally facing, and seem not to be subject to introspection. It's like the trade requires a sort of obtuseness in that area, to the point where stuff like Jon Stewart reaming him probably got filed away as "People who didn't follow the script" by Carlson.

    Small example of this lack of reflection: Carlson himself has an extremely high "nerd radar" presence for me. He doesn't seem that far from Trekkie country himself. Does he?

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  21. Eugenics Wars by pete-classic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, when it comes to Eugenics Wars it's better late than never.

    KHAAAAAAAAAN!

    -Peter

  22. There are other things that shouldn't procreate... by scolby · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...like men who wear bow ties.

  23. As opposed to letting Tucker Carlson reproduce? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny
    And is the fact that HE'S going to have children supposed to make me feel GOOD??

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  24. Why not? by reachums · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why wouldn't you want to marry a Trekkie? I'm a Trekkie, my friends are Trekkeis, my husband's a Trekkie, my Father is a Trekkie. all of us managed to find love, some have even reproduced. I've yet to have someone come to my home while I had Star Trek on (NG or DS9) and said anything negative about it. infact, normaly it's something to the effect of "Oh, I remember this episode!!"

    Trekkies just aren't really all that rare anymore.

    --
    "Just call me Girly Blank"
  25. Re:Drasticly Needed Action by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey! Damaged genes are the basis for evolution! That's our gene pool you're dissing. Not that I want to wade in that pool, but what crawls out might be interesting.

  26. Of course it isn't by danpsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just think if the US populace had more intelligent/nerdy people get together and procreate, why, there might be more intelligent people out there. And then who would be left to watch Tucker Carlson?

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  27. Online Dating by danpsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As people tend nowadays to leave their house less and less thanks to the news media and their condemned perspective on the world in general. And since there are now less social venues as parks and drive-ins turn into parking lots and shopping malls, online dating has exploded. Now people like Tucker Carlson are going to say that's bad too? What is a person who doesn't want to pick up a mate at a bar supposed to do if they aren't in a friend circle with a bunch of single females? You know, real life isn't like Friends or Seinfeld for everyone. Sometimes people have to venture outside of their social group for a mate. Everyday the choices of activities outside the house get slimmer, and the social ones even more so. It's getting to the point where everyone is a potential online dating candidate because nobody is meeting anyone new anymore.

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  28. It's all relative by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Allowing Trekies to breed can't possibly be any worse for the gene pool than, say, allowing rednecks to breed...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  29. Better start a national program by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tucker Carlson is right, of course - trekkies mating is not something we can have. Why, if intelligent people had children, then the children might be intelligent, too - and who would still vote for the republicans in 50 years then? Just think about it - George IV. might not even become president anymore!

    So we definitely need a program to keep this from happening. I wonder what we should call it; since it's a program for trekkies, how about "4T"? Or better yet... T-4! Yes, that's perfect!

    Thanks, Tucker. Just what would we do without people like you?

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  30. Obligatory Futurama Quote by Braxton_the_Covenant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Takei: ....You see, the show was banned after the Star Trek wars.

    Zapp: You mean after the vast migration of Star Wars fans?

    Nichols: No, that was the Star Wars trek. [Some mechanical hands come out of her jar, pick up a video tape and put it in the VCR.] By the 23rd century, Star Trek fandom had evolved from a loose association of nerds with skin problems into a full-blown religion.

    [On the screen, a service is held at the Church of Trek.]

    Priest: [on TV] And Scotty beamed them to the Klingon ship where they would be no Tribble at all.

    Congregation: [chanting; on TV] All power to the engines.

    Nichols: As country after country fell under its influence, world leaders became threatened by the movements power. [In Berlin a sign is unveiled saying "Welcome To Nazi Planet Episode Land. Formerly Germany".] And so the Trekkies were executed in the manner most befitting virgins.

    [On the rim of a volcano two men throw Trekkies into the flames.]

    Man: [on TV] He's dead, Jim! [They throw another in.] He's dead, Jim! [Another.] He's dead, Jim!

    Nichols: Finally, the sacred texts were banned.

    [The episodes are put inside a torpedo casing.]

    Takei: The last copies of the 79 episodes and six movies were dumped on the forbidden world, Omega 3, along with that blooper reel where the door doesn't close all the way.

    [As he speaks, a ship that looks like an Eagle from Space: 1999 fires the torpedo. It hits the planet like Spock's coffin in Star Trek: The Wrath Of Khan. The video ends.]

    Nimoy: Thus, Star Trek was forever scoured from human memory.

    Bender: Another classic science-fiction show cancelled before its time.