Slashdot Mirror


17 Year Old Creates Flickr Competitor

An anonymous reader writes "Michael Arrington over at TechCrunch has an article up on a new Flickr competitor called Zooomr. The interesting thing about all of this that it was developed in only three months by a 17 year old and to top it all off, the site is currently localized in 16 languages."

224 comments

  1. So? by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I was 17 I was...umm......creating a hotmail account. So there!

    --
    [ ]
    1. Re:So? by autOmato · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I was 17 I was...umm......creating a hotmail account. So there!

      When I was 17, it was a very good year. It was a very good year for small town girls and soft summer nights. We'd hide from the lights. On the village green. When I was 17.

    2. Re:So? by FrostyWheaton · · Score: 2, Funny
      When I was seventeen, I drank some very good beer
      I drank some very good beer I purchased with a fake ID
      My name was Brian McGee
      I stayed up listening to Queen
      When I was seventeen

      --
      Comments should be like skirts. Short enough to keep your attention, but long enough to cover the subject
  2. Competition is nice, but . . . by Nomihn0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Competition is nice, but innovation is far more impressive.

    1. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by eobanb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I feel like Zooomr's use of OpenID alone is reason to celebrate. I mean so far OpenID has been used by, uhm, LiveJournal...and that's just about it. It's a really underrated technology.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by Atrus5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, OpenID is very weak for an authentication system; it has no authentication or integrity checking. I'll tolerate it for blog comments, because it is better than trusting anything, but there's no way on earth I want to use it where money or real privleges are involved.

    3. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately, OpenID is very weak for an authentication system; it has no authentication or integrity checking.

      What are you talking about? It's an authentication system! Of course it has authentication and "integrity checking."

      Do you actually understand what its limits are?

      (Hint: do you trust your bank's authorization scheme on their website? Your bank could authenticate you with third party sites using OpenID just as securely as they authenticate you with their own).

    4. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I believe you are on the wrong site, you must have lost your way, the site you are looking for is here. Go make those kind of comments there. This is slashdot.

    5. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about trust?

      This is not a trust system. Trust requires identity first.

      -- Quoted from openid.net

      So, the trust layer is still up to him, or livejournal, or your bank, or one of those patches to mediawiki... OpenID is more like a drivers license. Just because someone shows you a drivers license, you don't trust them with your house keys, do you?

    6. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by dubl-u · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just because someone shows you a drivers license, you don't trust them with your house keys, do you?

      What? The TSA guy at the airport told me that it was proof that I wasn't a terrorist. Why else would I need it to get on a plane?

    7. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 2, Informative

      Believe me, I've read that, and I understand that it's not a trust system. Unlike the gp poster, I understand the difference between authentication and authorization. gp claimed that "OpenID has no authentication or integrity checking," which is clearly false.

      People like gp read something like "This is not a trust system" and take that to mean "this is a weak system, that you should not trust." They don't expend the mental energy to actually understand what that means, and instead go parroting around that "OpenID is very weak for an authentication system."

      It's people like that who make it necessary to write press releases that dress up real technical content with fluff like "OpenID uses state-of-the-art SHA1 encryption technology to provide a bulletproof way to keep your identity safe."

      Just because someone shows you a drivers license, you don't trust them with your house keys, do you?

      Of course not. Who's proposing anything like that? But here's what it does mean. If I go to a doctor's office and show them my driver's license, they can establish an account for me there. They will associate my confidential medical records with that account. Later, I can access those records by presenting them my driver's license. The benefit is that I don't have to carry around *different* ID's for everything I do -- my driver's license authenticates me to everyone who stores information about me.

      That is what OpenID can provide. And it's just as secure as any web authentication system out there (the security depends on the security of your "home" website, but if you are using it for sensitive things, you'll choose a home site whose security you trust).

    8. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by mikecito · · Score: 1
      You're completely right. My brother and I developed a free version of classmates.com in about a month. The innovative part that we included is that it's completely free, supported by Google Ads of course. You can find it at highschoolforever.com and it's actually pretty well done. There are blogs, forums, pictures, everything.


      The only reason I bring this up is to show how simple some of those websites out there really are. And yet people pay $30/year for classmates when there are services like ours that are free.


      The difference - classmates.com made their site first. They came up with the idea. They will always have more traffic than us. We have a couple classes that are really using the site well, like this one:
       
        Class of 1986 of Minico High School
       
      And their class list:
       
        Class list

      It's easy to duplicate, and I'll be the first to admit that. It's harder when it comes to inventing the idea yourself.

    9. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by Atrus5 · · Score: 1

      The spec I'm reading uses three servers, none of which are authenticated. It also uses plain old HTTP, which is wide open to tampering.

      So, the system is vulnerable to at least DNS poisioning (or simply a domain expiring) and man-in-the-middle attacks in several places:

      • Consumer fetches the identity page
      • Consumer contacts the server
      • User-agent contacts the server
      Note that this is an obvious vehicle for phishing. The user is expecting to be redirected to a different page that they trust and are expected to enter some sort of credentials. Just use JavaScript to open a window with no location bar and something that looks like the page they're expecting; customization is easy since you can be pretty sure you know what identity server they're using.

      The protocol has an "associate" mode that provides some semblance of authentication, but it seems to be temporary (OpenID::Server in CPAN defaults to 14 days). There's also this bit in the protocol that blows it away: "if you use an assoc_handle the server doesn't know about, it'll pick its own and you'll have to use dumb mode as well."

      My bank, on the other hand, uses SSL or TLS with an X.509 certificate signed by another company whose sole purpose is to verify identities. If I don't trust that, I can at least check the certificate fingerprint every time I connect (like SSH), so I verify that I'm connecting to the same server. As for authenticating myself, I present information that only I should know (this part is weakest). There is authentication, encryption, and integrity.

      I'm not asking for a full-blown PKI; simply verifying that each machine is the same would probably be sufficient. Encryption isn't necessary because the information transferred (your OpenID server and the answer it gives) is not confidential.

    10. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      (Hint: do you trust your bank's authorization scheme on their website?...

      Riddle me this. Could you create a page that looks just like this? http://www.wachovia.com/ that is a typosquatted site. Via my querty keyboard typo generator, here are some suggestions: wacgovia wavhovia wschovia wachpvia qachovia wachovis wachocia wachivia wachobia eachovia wachovoa wacjovia wachovua waxhovia Just go and register some of the good ones, and pay the $7.95 fee to your non-local sleezy registrar, and make every login merely redirect them to the login page at Wachovia, but feel free to collect the username/password.

      Now, if I (or you, or someone you love) typed any of those combinations by accident, how do you trust a non SSL page to ever be your bank, and not a typosquatter, or someone that DNS poisoned, or whatever? Remember, SSL certs require the name of the server to match the cert, and they are able to be validated by the user. No, its not perfect, but a little better than a plaintext http login eh?

      When I ssh to an unknown machine, it asks me, "Do you wanna talk to them? You have never talked to them before" And if the cert has changed on the machine, it asks me "DO YOU WANT TO TALK TO THESE PEOPLE AT ALL???? SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG HERE!"

      http/https does none of these things.

      I can't wait until I can do brick and mortar banking with a username/password like the computer logins. I can't wait until I can purchase things without a credit card, but rather just give them a username/password. Its good enough right?

    11. Re:Competition is nice, but . . . by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I would have said "cooperation" there. Seriously.

      Why can't I have an account on some other service and still tag photos that are hosted on Flickr? It's not like I have to go and get a Hotmail account just to chat with people who happen to use Hotmail.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  3. Awesome, but not so unique by Kickboy12 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Although it is nice to see someone so young get the attention they deserve, this isn't unique. I can personally vouche there are thousands of people between the ages of 15-18 that have the potential to create things like this. In terms of the technology behind this type of website, I've been working with it for almost 2 years. The problem with people in this age group getting noticed, or getting the attention they deserve, is quite simply a financial issue.

    Not to gloat, but I've created some pretty usefull projects and technologies in my time comperable to this one, just as simple side projects. However, most of them don't make it past a few months of development for one simple reason: I can't financially support it. As I just noticed when I tried to load the Zoomr website, the ammount of money needed to buy a server that can support such a community is overwhelming, especially for someone in the age group of 15-18 who's primary concern to buying lunch every day.

    I would love to see more projects of this calibur come from this same younger generation, and I would love to be part of such projects. But getting ones foot off the ground is the first, and hardest step towards this success.

    Kristopher Tate, the 17-year-old who make Zoomr, will undoubtedly become noticed by companies looking for such ambitious programmers. But he got lucky; the rest of us aren't so fortunate.

    1. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed, many people have made similar technological things. I count myself among them. By 18, I was working at a small local phone company, running their website. A ton of money was probably made from the orders that went through the site. But, it wasn't especially glamorous. It was like any other "E-commerce" site at the time, really. And, the company wasn't about to advertise the fact that their tech staff was extremely inexperienced.

      So, I won't bow down to this kid from a technological standpoint.

      But, shit. He did his own thing, and he managed to get the word out about it. My hat is off to him as a self promoter. Nobody ever heard of me, so he pretty much has me beat from that angle... Even if his website is dead.

      Lots of guys like me and the parent poster have a reasonable amount of skill with technology, and did so at a rather young age. We all had neat ideas. He made his idea. That deserves respect. My real time strategy game, for example, still only exists as notes on scrap paper, and the start of a header file for a prototype...

    2. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it is nice to see someone so young get the attention they deserve, this isn't unique. I can personally vouche there are thousands of people between the ages of 15-18 that have the potential to create things like this.

      So, you personally know thousands of 15-18 years old and can vouch for them? Man, you must be very popular.

    3. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by Kickboy12 · · Score: 1

      Takes time, energy, and a great memory.

      None of which I seem to have...

    4. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by woolio · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Kristopher Tate, the 17-year-old who make Zoomr, will undoubtedly become noticed by companies looking for such ambitious programmers. But he got lucky; the rest of us aren't so fortunate.

      I'm not sure this kid getting notice is a good thing for him...

      I'm not sure how fortunate he will be. If Ebay can get sued for the "Buy It Now" feature, how long will it be until Flickr [or another compnay] sues the 17yr-old for patent infringement? [Or maybe they will wait until he turns 18]

      That is, when his thing takes off and starts to compete, I can see Flickr sueing him into smitherenes. [I didn't read the article:] And since he probably hasn't taken the necessary steps to hide behind his own cooperation, this kid will be paying for more than just college loans...

    5. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. He is just a kiddie porn king.

    6. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More likely: he sells to Google, which lost the buying-war for Flickr to Yahoo and is probably looking for a Flickr-competitor to work with Picasa, Hello, and Blogger. This thing has "acquire me" written all over it.

    7. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not the software google wanted to buy, but the name and the userbase. I mean really, it's a website that lets you post pictures and make comments about them. A blog with pictures.

      The company that makes one of the most advanced search engines in the world could surely duplicate such software, and get it done quickly.

      Brand recognition though, you can't whip that out whenever you want.

    8. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by cryptoz · · Score: 1

      Did you just say that Google doesn't have brand recognition?

    9. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by somersault · · Score: 1

      when it comes to advertising and search, yes.. not so much when it comes to having a site like deviantART or flickr.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by humina · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah google would be stupid to acquire this site. Look what you would get: young, talented programmer with a drive to create good software. If I were google I wouldn't touch that with a 10 foot pole.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    11. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      ...it's a website that lets you post pictures and make comments about them.

      Don't we already have one of those?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    12. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I agree - this is an achievement more from a business/marketing point of view, than a technical one. I don't know if someone can comment on some particularly innovative technical features of what he's done, but the general idea of writing a software product at 17 isn't in itself anything special - surely there are plenty of people beat this by many years? (Personally I feel that the tactic of writing "x years old" after your name to make it look more significant ought to end when you hit 16!)

      The problem is that most people don't have the desire, funds, or possibly marketing ability to turn what they write into something commerically successful. I'm sure that most people fall into the situation that as soon as they have money to spend, they have less of a desire to make extra money when they're working a full week and would rather release as open source - plus, most people spend several more years in education after 16, so they're never in a situation where they both have money to invest, and are 17.

      Not to mention that many job contracts will prohibit commercial projects such as this.

    13. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I'm sure Google has programmers who could write something like this in a week, which would cost them pennies. But then again, with all that capital burning a hole in their pocket, who knows?

    14. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by Omaze · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I work(ed) around many wealthy families at my previous employer. In the 40s the trend for parents to bluster about their kids was the military. In the 50s and 60s the trend was the football team. In the 70s, 80s, and early 90s it was all about which colleges they could get into and the size of the family SUV. In the last part of the 90s and into the 00s it seems that the parents are one-upping each other with what sort of business ventures their children can get into. The people I worked with had children as young as 15 who were: movie producers (with offers from major studios), MMORPG game writers (with offers from game producers), day traders (to the tune of tens of thousands in profit), and database consultants (with small company contracts). The bottom line was, though, none of those kids could have even come close to doing what they did without the several thousand dollars' investment from their parents and the parents' willingness to stand back and give the kids room to pursue the ideas rather than hounding them to get some part time job at the local restaraunt.

      I don't mean to take away from the fellow who's created Zoomr. More power to him and my hat's off to him. Let's stop short of automatically giving him an adult measure of respect, though. He wouldn't have been able to do what he did if he'd been spending his 5 evenings/week after school bagging groceries. Let's not start flogging ourselves remorsefully over wasted youth. The bottom line is opportunity--which most of us never really have.

      --
      The government itself is not stealing your liberties. Their new programs are enabling criminals who will.
    15. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by Vapon · · Score: 1

      It sounds a lot like he is already talking to Google, you can use a gmail account to login to his site, and google maps is imbedded into his site. I don't think you are able to just access gmails user account database without some sort of agreement.

    16. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      I mean really, it's a website that lets you post pictures and make comments about them. A blog with pictures. The company that makes one of the most advanced search engines in the world could surely duplicate such software, and get it done quickly.

      There's no particular reason to believe that. The kinds of software are very different, as are the skills needed to make them.

      Flickr is pretty far from being merely "a blog with pictures". In two years, it has vaulted from a crazy idea to one of the top 50 web sites. If you need an oversimplistic description, "a community about pictures" is closer, but that still isn't enough to explain their massive growth.

      Google's main superpowers are simplicity and scale. Some of their newer apps are starting to show some nice UI improvements, but they are still worlds apart from Flickr. Their closest thing to this is Orkut which, frankly, sucks and has sucked for a long time.

      I think the difference is that Google's approach is to put passionate, high-powered engineers in charge and let them do what they want, whereas Flickr had a similarly passionate and high-powered team that was cross-functional.

      Google can't yet do Flickr for the same reason that you missed why Flickr succeeded: the things that made the difference for Flickr are things that engineers don't normally notice or value.

    17. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're right. It's probably better for him if he doesn't get noticed. Then he won't fall into the trap of "developing" stuff 16 hours a day, essentially working on meaningless projects, until he burns out, and doesn't have much to show for it after 10 years of corporate slavery.

    18. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Google can, do you understand what it means to be an advertiser?

      A web portal? A search engine?

      I can't believe you got modded up, there must be some other reason.

      Not for the Google buying thing but for your mod... are you offering free sex?

    19. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by maharvey · · Score: 1

      I can personally vouche there are thousands of people between the ages of 15-18 that have the potential to create things like this Potential is as common as dirt, and of no value in itself. Putting it to use... THAT has value. That's what sets you apart. The kid who did this will be moving on to bigger and better things, while all those "could have beens" will still be warming their couches and dreaming their dreams.

    20. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem I have with the article is that it doesn't look at the full picture. Anyone can slap together a web app. Even if this one *looks* nice, there is a lot more to a high traffice site than the interface. How will this Zoomr thing handle 1 million users a day? Is it ready for TB's of storage? The only think I read in TFA was about a few features. That is cool on a laptop with 2 users. What happens when this photo interface needs to scale to 25,000 concurrent users? Does Zoomr have the storage, DB replication, user account managment, etc, etc all ready to go and to scale?
      I don't think Flickr has anything to worry about for now.
      The article also lacked anything technical. I would expect more technical details from a site named "techCrunch". Is Zoomr writte in PHP, Java, .Net, Perl, Old-School ASP, a couple bash scripts? What other technologies are they using? How are they ready to handle the demand of uploading 100's of GBs images on the first day? Will they have backups going as soon as users start uploading tons of images? I have tons of technical questions. Is Zoomr more of small project that could *potentially* become a big photo-web-app?

    21. Re:Awesome, but not so unique by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I looked at some of the techcrunch stuff for March:

      http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/

      and ran across "Vast".

      I think "Vast" has "buy me" written all over it, too. Maybe Google will buy Vast and apply it to other other products... Google could aggregate all KINDS of stuff:

      -- reselling movies/videos (original media),
      -- computer parts
      -- car part (not just cars themselves)
      -- second-hand clothing
      -- airline tickets

      Anyone feel Google might get into the auctioning business? I know they say "do no evil" and maybe crowding into space another biz is in might be akin to doing evil, but if Google feels pressure to "expand or die" (or submit to some other Ferengi Rule of Acquisition: "MORE is GOOD; ALL is BETTER."... But, I suppose they won't try "Once you have the Customer's money, NEVER give it back."

      Or, "It never hurts to thank the customer when you (screw them over); that way, you can come back and (screw them again).", heheh

      Seriously, tho, has anyone else dug around in techcrunch's site?

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  4. One important difference: by merreborn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Flikr can handle a slashdotting.

    1. Re:One important difference: by JediLow · · Score: 1

      Wow... yay for the power of subscribing. I decided to check out the site before the headline hit the front page, and a minute later the server slowed to a crawl. Gotta love the /. effect.

  5. But is it... by tajgenie · · Score: 3, Funny

    But is it open source? I think not! Future Bill Gates who will one day terrorize the world!!

    1. Re:But is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get the car, I'll get the shotgun.

  6. Technical issues aren't the hard part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hard bit is getting people to use the new system instead of flickr, and if the new site catches on, scaling well with the growth.

    Getting the site slashdotted is a good way of getting started on the first bit

  7. Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by humankind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Good for this kid. He's not necessarily a genius, but he is atypical IMO. Not because other kids his age couldn't do the same, but because most other kids his age aren't because they're being sedated by mass media.

    When I was 14 I was doing programming for a Fortune 500 company; when I was 15 I wrote and designed the accounting system for my city's municipal water company; when I was 16 I wrote my own BBS system, which got the attention of Bell Atlantic who then contracted with me to develop a prototype of one of the first online electronic yellow page systems. By the time I was 17, I had written software for Disney, the United Nations and plenty of other companies. I really don't think I was special... I just made the most out of my time and resources. If I had unlimited access to a Playstation or 500 channels of television when I was a teen, I'd probably be working for an insurance company or a restaurant instead of being self employed and successful doing something I truly enjoy.

    1. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      I really don't think I was special...

      If it helps, I don't think you're special either.

    2. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Neoprofin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Out of curiousity how did you get around child labor laws to work as a nonagricultural worker at 14?

    3. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Funny then that what he created will zombify plenty of others.

      Muhahahahahahahahaha

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    4. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by mattkime · · Score: 0

      ...by age 30, had you moved out of your parents basement? ...by age 40, had you kissed a girl?

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    5. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by humankind · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ...by age 30, had you moved out of your parents basement? ...by age 40, had you kissed a girl?

      I moved out of my parents house when I turned 18. I'd post the number of women I've slept with but I'm worried my current girlfriend would read this and be horified, not that I want to know how many men she's slept with either.

      But ha ha, I get your funny joke... in my case I didn't match the stereotype though.

    6. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by theNetImp · · Score: 1

      Uh, when I was 14 I worked at McDonalds, D'Angelo's a Local chicken restaurant. Those aren't agricultural jobs either. At 14 you just can't work past 6pm and can't put in more than I think it's 15hrs a week (at least in the state of MA, 17 years ago.)

    7. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by humankind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was doing a lot of subcontracting when I was younger. When I was working for the Fortune 500 company, my father got me that job and he handled it all. So I know nothing about what the law was at that time. However, when I was younger and working, people didn't seem to care about my age except they were concerned I was so young I wouldn't be responsible enough to work on something so important to their business... so I had to be that much more dilligent.

      Someone modded my post a "troll". That's really sad. I know there are people here who are big gamer fans and I didn't mean to malign those who like to obsess over sitcoms and shit like that. It's just not what I did, and I honestly think if my parents hadn't made an effort to not expose me to much TV during formative years, I wouldn't have had the skillset I have now. I'm very grateful to them for it. Some here, apparently resent it, but that's not my fault. I'm only trying to empower others, and not really brag about myself... I'm just saying, you can do what this kid has done; I know because I did stuff like what he's doing too. You just have to use your time and energy more wisely. I don't think playing Halo several hours a day is going to get you a great job... your milage may vary... but don't take it out on me.

    8. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I had unlimited access to a Playstation or 500 channels of television when I was a teen, I'd probably be working for an insurance company or a restaurant instead of being self employed and successful doing something I truly enjoy.

      I think I got your idea, but you didn't quite hit the nail on the head. See, I had cable TV and i've been enjoying videogames since I was a kid. But I learned to program nifty stuff like you, and I cracked my first videogame when I was 12. By 18 I cracked my first shareware app (curse those register screens :P ). Currently i'm working with an MVC framework for PHP that I designed myself. I work in an e-business company.

      I really don't think having videogames or cable TV will make a difference. What really matters is the education and the interest in Science that you're raised with.

      See, my dad always bought me science books when I was a kid. Science for kids, that is, with nifty graphics and all that. I really have to say his effort was worth it.

      About your talent, I really think you're a gifted individual, there are people who even with good circumstances around them, have trouble learning to program a "hello world". A potential problem with gifted people is that if they don't recognize their gifts, they might end up judging others too harshly, crushing their own self-esteem. Don't make that mistake.

    9. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by mattkime · · Score: 0

      >>I'd post the number of women I've slept with but I'm worried my current girlfriend would read this and be horified, not that I want to know how many men she's slept with either.

      Less or greater than 1? ...waitwait....a girlfriend that _might_ read slashdot? You truly are an alpha geek!

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    10. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Here I'll do one, by 7 I was programming my IBM PC with fun little screen savers, by 14 I was creating sales tracking applications for my family's two corporations, by 16 I got a job offer to relocate to Dallas, TX and work for a very large corporation (I declined), by 17 I was hacking my computer programmer teacher's computer everyday and telling him his password (he later went on to become a systems security expert, scary), by 18 I created a trans-database server (i.e. xbase->firebird->mssql->etc) replication application, by 20 I created an internal tracking, workflow, and reporting system, by 26 I'm now working for my father's 3 corporations, being the sole R&D, development, and administrative person for the new one. I'm also currently working on embedded application development for pocket sized computers for the same 3 companies. I'm sorry but where were we going with this :-P ? I think a lot of slash-dotters here have similar backgrounds, our thirst for nerdly knowledge drives us. Also, I'm married, and thusly implications about my having sex could probably go either way :-P.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    11. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How is Windows 98 working out for you?

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=177841&cid=147 51768

    12. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      Can't say for the original poster but if you parent owns a company you can start working there at 12. If you have good parents that's great - I got full time employment during the summer and breaks at 12 - how many others my age had enough money to do what they wanted? Parents didn't kill me, got payed the maximum allowed (which, amusingly enough, was minimum wage, but at 16 labor laws changed and could make more). I got the video games I wanted, the shoes I wanted, and all the otehr stupid stuff (and non-stupid stuff) a kid in middle school wants without having to beg and pester constantly.

      Now, if your parents keep the money and force you to work, that sucks. But for me it worked well and there are many others that began working much younger than 16. Though there are other things not to like in the original posters article.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    13. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      WI is 16 unless you're a farmhand that's why I asked.

    14. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by somersault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I dont think you were modded as a troll because of saying that TV is a waste of time (which is very true), it did almost sound like you were taking the piss when you said you'd worked for all those companies though. I was doing programming when I was 14, but only in 'AMOS Pro' BASIC on my Amiga. I've rewritten the timesheet system here from pretty much the ground up (the users wont notice a difference, but everything is done in databases now instead of all on spreadsheets), but since then haven't done anything I'm particularly proud of or think was challenging.

      Everything you say is very true though, but it's not easy to get out of the groove of just lazing around once you start :/ I dont watch TV but I do watch DVDs and go to the movies (which I guess almost amounts to the same, but at least I dont watch 'reality' TV shows..). Since I've got a job now anyway then I guess it's not so important to have to conquer the world in my spare time, and I'd rather spend time with my girlfriend than code up an FPS these days anyway.. though.. hmm, well maybe I can get her interested in coding and she could help :D

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      I agree that your comments were not the troll bait typically seen here. With that said, you may know a lot about programmin, not so much in inspirational speaking. Giving a list of accomplishments is one thing, name dropping is another. there is a balance, but by the time I was halfway through your OP I was getting turned off, not on. "I do not think I was special". But you were.

      With the millions of programmers out there, how many have the connections to work at the UN, or Disney. How many have the opportunity track to be at the top of the heap? I think what gets me is that by listing the accomplishments the wayy you did, you set a bar that is impossible for many, very hard for others because there is limited space at the top. You wnat to encourage, life people up? then find out where they are in life, in programming, and tell them that being the best, doing one's best will get you much further then not. Bottom line is that your post sounded more arrogant even though you may be a decent person.

      When I read the article I was amazed at this young man, not for what he create4d (which is okay), but that while working a primary job, did this in his spare time. Time will tell if it was his best, but without a slashdot effect, I would not think he'd gain so much opportunity as he has right now.

      So, you make a valid point about TV, games can impact the early steps in career development, but you missed the mark in making a positive statement. Just keep in mind thatto lift someone else up, you have to show them the best *they* can be, and not the best that you are. I've sailed for 27 years, had a fellow out the other day who jsut started to learn. He knew I was accomplished, but as we raced, I never mentioned anything about my skills, I praised his good efforts, I corrected his mistakes, and at the end of the day, he was excited about sailing , and going out again.

      Congradulations on getting so much opportunity so young in life. It is a blessing you best be thankful for.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    16. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop making the rest of us look bad, j00 b4sturd! :P

    17. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right, and I was President of the Universe

    18. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was doing a lot of subcontracting when I was younger. When I was working for the Fortune 500 company, my father got me that job and he handled it all.

      So basically, daddy handed you a job and life has been oh so great ever since. Good for you, I should've asked my dad about that between all the drunken beatings he gave me.

    19. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by continuouslife · · Score: 0

      because they're being sedated by mass media. Says the person who reads /.

      --
      Here's my witty comment about a signature. Ha. Ha.
    20. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by snowwrestler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your post was modded troll because it's self-aggrandizing, impossible to verify, and falsely humble. You must know that your single anecdote proves no substantial point about the effect of mass media on children in general, so it could be inferred that the only reason you posted it was to talk about yourself.

      If you had rigorously collected and analyzed data comparing TV to non-TV kids, that would be an insightful or informative post.

      --
      Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    21. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Omaze · · Score: 1

      Growing up in urban WI you could get a paper route at age 12 (if you grew up in the days before they went to primarily adult motor carriers). My parents took it one step further. When my older brother turned 12 they had him sign up for a paper route and then commanded me that I would help him deliver. When I turned 11, 7 months later, they said "close enough", had my older brother sign up for a second paper route, had him go and get the papers, and then I would meet him a block away to take over for one of them. When I was 12 I could officially take over the first route. At 16 the paper route wasn't enough (for them) and I was ordered to start working at the local McD's as well.

      I filed my first tax return at age 13 and haven't gotten a dime back in unemployment since (30 now).

      --
      The government itself is not stealing your liberties. Their new programs are enabling criminals who will.
    22. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...my father got me that job and he handled it all...

      ...You just have to use your time and energy more wisely....

      I think you're totally unqualified to talk about opportunities for underage professionals without connections. Connections are more valuable than experience, education or even skill.

      People get bitter when they hear stories like yours because they're the guys and girls with the CS degree who wind up working in tech support while some bigwig's kid causes them grief with buggy software. When they were that age, they were lucky to get a job at Burger King... and it's not because they didn't use their time more wisely.

      Take all the advantages your parents give you, and never be ashamed of that, but never look down on people because they didn't succeed at jobs you didn't even get on your own.

    23. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Flammon · · Score: 1

      I don't buy it. You've got a 6 digit /. UID. Then again, that's probably proving the parent's media point. While I was reading Chips n Dips, you were writing software.

    24. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, whatever works for the guy. Windows98 just requires some reboots, and in most offices, the machines are shut down in the evening and turned on the next morning. No big Deal. Windows 98 will definitely run on older machines, prolonging the life of old computers. Word Processing does not need the latest and greatest hardware.

      As Windows 98 falls into obscurity, there will be fewer worms written that will work on it. Security through obscurity will work. It's likely that his target isn't that important. If he's working for some financial institution, or data gathering company, then he'd be negligent for relying on security through obscurity.

      Except, now I truly question the quality of code he wrote for all those companies that he brags about. When I was twelve I was cracking software floppies. I also learned to program. My programming skills has improved over the years. When I looked back at some of the stuff I wrote, I knew how amateurish some of my early code was. You can still see lots of amateurish code from college graduates that supposedly learned how to program. I can only imagine the same thing coming from a high school student.

      Most college students, at least the ones who graduate from CS, have had programming experience in high school, but their code is obviously still hacked together and not well thought out. CS course still don't teach Software Design to an acceptible degree, most schools might have a single class in Software Design, but it really should be incorporated in all programming classes, not just glossed over in one class.

      There might be a few students who can truly hack together really decent code in one sitting, but the majority need guidance to put together a project. They'd just end up with spaghetti code and random hacks that might or might not work well together. That's the state of affairs in today's code. Just look at games. Just look at Microsoft. Just look at some of the less popular open source apps. Just look at the memory leak in Firefox, an immensely popular open source app. Did someone forget about how pointers work?

    25. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 1

      I think you have an unrealisticly high opinion of what it takes to get an insightful post on slashdot. But this guy is a bit of a troll. Have I ever told you about how I perfected cold fusion when I was ten. When I was 12 I had memorized the value of Pi to 300 significant digits. When I was 14 I was inducted into the CIA to secret undercover work that eventually led to the fall of the Soviet Union. But I really don't think I am special. Outside of the money glamour and endless supply of women I am just a normal slashdotter who enjoys coding remarkably useful webapps that redefine how we think about data models and secretly harbor a need to one up a 17 yr old.

    26. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm married, and thusly implications about my having sex could probably go either way

      I'm married, 29, and have an eight-year-old son, so I can prove I was having sex at 20! And also that sex the day after her period ends isn't as safe as you think...

    27. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential. Very well, where do I begin? My father was a relentlessly self-improving boulangerie owner from Belgium with low grade narcolepsy and a penchant for buggery. My mother was a fifteen year old French prostitute named Chloe with webbed feet. My father would womanize, he would drink, he would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Some times he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy, the sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament. My childhood was typical, summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring we'd make meat helmets. When I was insolent I was placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds, pretty standard really. At the age of 12 I received my first scribe. At the age of fourteen, a Zoroastrian woman named Vilma ritualistically shaved my testicles. There really is nothing like a shorn scrotum, it's breathtaking, I suggest you try it."
      Somehow this quote seems amusing in this circumstance

    28. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by chhupa_rustam · · Score: 1

      Hi-larious -- you were cracking at 12 and now you're stuck building websites with PHP? Sorry, but that's regression if I ever heard of it...or you're trolling. (I'd personally say the latter, given that you think an MVC framework in PHP is a cause for celebration.)

    29. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Someone modded my post a "troll". That's really sad."

      Hmm, maybe its because nobody believes you?

    30. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by Omaze · · Score: 1

      > When I was 14 I was inducted into the CIA to secret undercover
      > work that eventually led to the fall of the Soviet Union

      You too, huh? Maybe we were part of the same group. At age 15 (in 1991) I participated in a program called People to People: Initiative for Understanding. We were 30 high school students from Milwaukee, WI area schools who spent 30 days in the USSR to learn about their culture and the people there. Our trip started in Sochi (where I got drunk for the first time on Stoli with two Russian guys staying in the same hotel), Rostov (where one of the girls on the trip got laid with the Russian "host" who was probably about 19-20 years old), Kiev (where I toured with a really cool kid named Vova and his girlfriend), one other city (forget its name... O-something?), Leningrad (which had recently been back-renamed St. Petersburg), and Moscow (where our trip was cut short and limited to two days in Moscow, ostensibly because of the coming revolution). We were hustled through Moscow due to "time constraints". It was only after we returned to the US that we learned, 30 days later, that all hell was set to break loose in Moscow and that's more probably why they rushed the trip.

      The joke in our group was always that we were sent to Russia to instigate the revolution.

      --
      The government itself is not stealing your liberties. Their new programs are enabling criminals who will.
    31. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by RossumsChild · · Score: 1

      Can I get a big fat AMEN!?

      I got a job working for a (now bust) .com startup named "Intranology.com"* when I was 16, but it wasn't my hard work and diligence that aquired me the job--it was that I was a student and friend of a guy that was close friends with the founders of the company. My diligence and hard work kept me the job for the rest of the summer, but that had nothing to do with my aquiring the thing in the first place.

      *no, really--".com" was part of the company title registered with the incorporation paperwork--*sigh*

    32. Re:Anything is possible when you turn off the TV by humankind · · Score: 1

      I think you're totally unqualified to talk about opportunities for underage professionals without connections. Connections are more valuable than experience, education or even skill.

      I don't disagree that connections are extremely important, but unless you were born with a platimum spoon in your mouth, you still have to work hard to be respected by others and get to the point where you can surround yourself with friends and associates who have influence.

      For every person who had influential parents and associates who helped them along and ended up being successful, there is probably at least one or more others that had the same situation that choose to not fully-exploit the resources available to them. If you think it's exclusively about "connections" you're being naive.

      People get bitter when they hear stories like yours because they're the guys and girls with the CS degree who wind up working in tech support while some bigwig's kid causes them grief with buggy software. When they were that age, they were lucky to get a job at Burger King... and it's not because they didn't use their time more wisely.

      Well, I am NOT some "bigwig's kid". My parents were strictly middle-class. My father had a degree in engineering and paid his own way through college working multiple jobs and my mother worked in a shoe store. I wouldn't call this priviledged. My mother eventually went to college and earned a degree, again by working two full-time jobs while she raised her family after a divorce. I don't think my situation was typical except my parents may have had a more substantive work ethic than the average family who spends their idle time watching CSI. By the way, I had a job at Burger King too.

      I appreciate the point you're making, HOWEVER, for many many years I searched for good tech people to bring on board with my company. I understand some people have to work harder to get to the same level as others who might have had more resources. BUT I have consistently run into uber lazy tech people who thought the world owed them something they were unwilling to earn legitimately. I don't care if you're driving a Ferrari or a Schwinn, there's a certain level of responsibility and capability, trust and faith that transcends connections and resources that can put someone in line to progress as far as they want in their career. The bottom line is that these people are a rare find. And the easy way to excuse someone's laziness is to say, "Oh well, the reason I'm not making big bucks is because I don't have the right connections." NO. The reason you're not making big bucks is because you're lazy! There are too many kids out of college now that haven't learned much beyond how to make a beer bong and purchase term papers online. These are the CSCI grads who should be working at Burger King instead of Microsoft. Their fault.

  8. Have some lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice to see that someone could come and eat a "professionally done" site's lunch though. True, they'd need the financial backing and whatnot, but I think this shows that it's still possible for a new startup to come and do something better than the current king of the hill.

    If someone can get some Zooomr screenshots, maybe they can post them to Flicr?

  9. Zooomr by fanblade · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Aside from being a Flickr knockoff (and being slashdotted), zooomr sounds like it has some serious potential. If and when their servers get back online I'm definitely going to try it out. I'm salivating over GPS data within pictures, associating pictures from different users based on time and place.

    Linking users to faces in a picture sounds like the perfect blend of Facebook and Flickr, hopefully without the obsessive/compulsive behavior found on the Facebook social network. I wonder how long before Flickr turns up the heat??

    1. Re:Zooomr by Echnin · · Score: 1

      GPS data in pictures? That's just EXIF...

      --
      Lalala
  10. Alternative link by Blazeix · · Score: 5, Informative

    At this risk of completely blowing up his server, here is a testing version of his site: http://beta.zooomr.com/

    1. Re:Alternative link by eobanb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually beta.zooomr.com IS the site. Zooomr.com has just always redirected there.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Alternative link by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      At this risk of completely blowing up his server,

      Translation: "Let's fry him BWAHAHAHAHAHA! (Oh yeah I'm evil!)"

    3. Re:Alternative link by yabos · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you have just crashed his server! :D

  11. Google ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The article says you can log in with your account from several other services. All are covered by OpenID except one - Google! Did Google open up some kind of authentication API while I was sleeping?

    1. Re:Google ID? by ergo98 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did Google open up some kind of authentication API while I was sleeping?

      It looks like it's entirely bogus - you enter your gmail account and it emails you a password each time you want to access the site. You recover the password, enter it on the site, and that's your logon. Not really sure what it has to do with gmail, as the same mechanism could apply to any email address.

      Sounds pretty bogus.

    2. Re:Google ID? by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, originally the scheme DID use authentication through your Google account. It was switched to the "temporary pass" system when people brought up the issue of "do you trust Zooomr with your e-mail login?" The switch is covered in Zooomr's Blog.

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
    3. Re:Google ID? by colmore · · Score: 1

      Not interesting from a technological standpoint, but clever from an end-user standpoint.

      You'd open yourself to spamming if you took arbitrary emails, but gmail is reasonably spammer-proof. And from the perspective of the end user, it's one less login to remember.

      Actually... that's pretty damn clever, really. I'm going to rip it off.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  12. But Flickr is hackable by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be hard to truly compete against Flickr, since it offers a great deal of power that the user can find behind the simplistic interface. O'Reilly has already released Flickr Hacks . I doubt that this kid's creation is half as hackable.

    The only thing that I don't like about Flickr is that it allows one to upload an enormous amount of photos each month, but limits the free account to three albums.

    1. Re:But Flickr is hackable by oedneil · · Score: 0

      Time to upgrade to pro, then!

    2. Re:But Flickr is hackable by Mikey-San · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I doubt that this kid's creation is half as hackable.

      When you were 17, what did you have to show for yourself?

      Stop being a prick and give the kid a compliment or two. At least he produces something instead of just bitching about others' creations.

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    3. Re:But Flickr is hackable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does age have to do with anything? I created projects of that magnitude when I was 10 and I'm sure many of us can say the same. We don't sit here and toot our own horns hoping to get social approval because of our age, thats the difference.

    4. Re:But Flickr is hackable by ergo98 · · Score: 0

      When you were 17, what did you have to show for yourself?

      Not only did I have some very impressive projects when I was 17, but I didn't have libraries of Javascript and online services that I could easily "mash up", nor did I have libraries featuring every bit of functionality but the kitchen sink.

      It's easy for a "kid" to hash together a site like this because it's largely just a case of stringing together library code and available code. I'm not trying to diminish his accomplishments, but let's keep some perspective.

      And I doubt Flickr is losing any sleep.

    5. Re:But Flickr is hackable by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      I agree. When you see the guy who built his own house with his own two hands, you don't scream at him "You big losers, millions of people have built houses before!". Even something mundane, finished to completion, is often admirable.

    6. Re:But Flickr is hackable by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I was ten, to reboot the computer you held it upside down over your head and shook it. Oh wait, that was 'Etch-a-Sketch'. Holy crap, how times have changed!

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    7. Re:But Flickr is hackable by karthikg · · Score: 0

      Yes, only 3 sets; but you can be creative with tags.
      Once you put in lots of relevant tags, you don't need that many sets.
      You can view/search based on your tags

      Karthik

    8. Re:But Flickr is hackable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You owe me a new keyboard.

    9. Re:But Flickr is hackable by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      In related news... Etch-a-sketch Tech Support!

  13. i18n is cool, but easy by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The interesting thing about all of this that it was developed in only three months by a 17 year old and to top it all off, the site is currently localized in 16 languages.

    Localization systems are really easy once you know how to do them. I used to be intimidated by such things, but then I started making phpBB mods. I saw that the phpBB localization system was basically a set of arrays of text strings that gets loaded depending upon the user settings. Then the array is used as variables to drop in the appropriate text. I've since seen some better systems, and mostly I'm impressed with how simple good developers can make it.

    I put some of that into practice for Agitar, a company whose site is available in English & Japanese. I don't speak Japanese, I just added some tweaks to a Movable Type system, and voila, two fields per entry. I do the English, and any employee who speaks Japanese will enter a translation. I suspect that I can create a basic i18n framework for PHP in an afternoon.

    What would be really cool would be if he did the translations himself. Does he speak 16 languages? Or did he sit with Babelfish or Google, and nurse some automated translations into something sensible? That's the step that takes talent or hard effort. I would be impressed if he did that completely without outside help. For that matter, if he has a system in place for people to upload translations, have them verified, and be automatically put into effect, that would be impressive too. I tried such a thing, but I just couldn't find good ways to deal with the character sets and launder data that is so open-ended, without human inspection.

    1. Re:i18n is cool, but easy by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      I think this kid is a pansy. I mean, look at what this kid did when he was 14 (he co-wrote the RSS 1.0 specification).

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    2. Re:i18n is cool, but easy by GlassHeart · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Internationalization/localization is more than just translating strings. At a minimum, you have to deal with local laws, such as the lower volume cap that the iPod had to add for France. Next you need to deal with local sensibilities, such as Taiwan not liking being listed as a part of China (and China not liking Taiwan listed separately), or Pakistan not liking Kashmir listed as a part of India (and vice versa). Finally, you deal with things like icons, because some symbols might be offensive or confusing. Right-to-left languages will also throw all sorts of code into disarray. Beyond merely understandable, you also want to distinguish between UK, US, Australian, and whatever other versions of English you have to deal with.

      Good i18n and l10n is quite difficult and expensive.

    3. Re:i18n is cool, but easy by twoshortplanks · · Score: 1
      You forgot character encoding issues.

      What encoding does the EXIF data use? The data submitted by web forms? What encoding should you be sending back to the user? And what headers and declarations should you be using so dumb browsers do the right thing? And how does this all work in email too?

      And then you have to deal with the fact that despite what the specs say, not everything follows the specs. And then you're into the land of work arounds and other troubles.

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    4. Re: i18n is cool, but easy by gidds · · Score: 2, Informative
      True. Even the straight language translation can be very tricky, unless you have a feeling for languages and coded the whole thing with translation in mind.

      For example, I was working on some fairly complicated validation, which could result in a wide range of messages of the form "You can't [do some action] because [some field] is [too high|too low|zero|non-zero|etc.]" or "You can't [do some other action] because [some other condition]". My first attempt localised the strings for each bracketed bit separately; this was nice and neat, avoided repetition, kept the code short, and it looked like there was little to translate.

      Trouble is, I was thinking in English grammar; I gather some languages simply wouldn't fit into that scheme. So we ended up translating full messages, which means we need to store each combination separately: the code is much longer, and there are many many more strings to translate; but it does mean that each language has each error message in the most natural, grammatical form.

      I'm sure there are many other language gotchas, too. And of course there are the obvious issues with number formats, timezones, calendars...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    5. Re:i18n is cool, but easy by multipartmixed · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know, that explains a lot about RSS 1.0...

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    6. Re:i18n is cool, but easy by cjh79 · · Score: 1

      I would be impressed if he did that completely without outside help.

      I'm more impressed by the thought that he did it with outside help. It shows that he understands the process of delegation, or, at least, the value of resourcefulness. Both traits that are crucial for a successful business leader.

      Sure, any number of slashdotters could have coded this site in 3 months, but this kid is actually doing it and has successfully managed to generate a big buzz about his site, which is not easy and doesn't just happen by chance. I'm impressed and would be happy to see him succeed.

    7. Re:i18n is cool, but easy by GebsBeard · · Score: 1

      Also consider another huge internationalization hairball, that of dates, times and DST coverage. DST is completely arbitrary and can vary from year to year, even based on political whim. Converting between different timezones correctly at DST boundries is a PITA as well.

  14. A new kind of lock-in? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Ah, but for those of us who have hundreds or even thousands of images loaded and categorized in flickr, how easy is it to move to another service? Are we seeing the dawn of a new and exciting kind of vendor lock-in?

    I know that flickr has a helpful, open API; I just wonder if it's enough.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  15. Re:first post by themoodykid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Are you 17? If so, this is a great accomplishment and maybe somebody ought to write an article about you. On the other hand, if you're not 17, bugger off.

  16. Mitch by Nycto · · Score: 3, Funny

    At the risk of straying completely off topic, this guy looks strikingly like Mitch Hedberg.

    That is all I have to add to this conversation. Carry on.

    --

    --Nycto

    1. Re:Mitch by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      WHOAA. Dude. whoa.

      yeah, he does.

    2. Re:Mitch by lucaslucaslucas · · Score: 1

      Actually, he IS mitch hedberg. Mitch just pulled an Elvis on us.

    3. Re:Mitch by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Question: What motivated you to create zooomr?

      Kristopher Tate: One day my apartment was infested with koala bears. It was the cutest infestation ever. Whenever I turned on the light, koala bears scattered... all right...

      --
      For more information, click here.
  17. Re:Are YOU making a contribution? by Furmy · · Score: 5, Funny

    building 7 fell in exactly the same exactly symmetrical way as WTC 1 and 2

    uhhh...down?

  18. pr0n by xixax · · Score: 4, Funny

    And you mustn't upload NC rated pics because the SysAdmin is 17.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
    1. Re:pr0n by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I am working on this problem. But instead of a lame tag-based system, I've opted for a strict relational model.

      Each picture consists of one or more actions.
      Each action consists of of exactly two people (both of which can point to the same person record).
      Each person record is broken up into "static" (things unchanging throughout their life, e.g. birth name), "daily" (things true for a short period of time, e.g. color her hair was dyed that week), and "instant" (things only true for that split second the photo was taken).

      The data model is much more complete than this, and more importantly, I've found a way to actually collect the metadata.

      Let people in for free. Have them go through a custom webapp, collecting the metadata (clicking on the photo with the mouse, to grab the pixel color value for skintone), maybe as few as just a few pictures a week. In exchange, they get to search for free.

      When finished, it should be possible to search only for pictures with just one girl, whose legs are spread exactly 57 degrees in a "sitting up" pose.

      Like I said, you wouldn't believe just how much metadata I figure it's possible to collect.

      Anyone want a free account?

  19. Re:Are YOU making a contribution? by prockcore · · Score: 1

    At 17, most people are creating a first post, and others are making the world a better place.

    At 17 I believe I wrote RemorseView, an ascii/ansi viewer for ACiD/Remorse.

    I doubt I made the world a better place.. but I kept myself occupied. :)

  20. Re:Are YOU making a contribution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy shit. Nice non sequitur there! Got ADD much? :-)

  21. It seems nice but... by drrngrvy · · Score: 1

    Is it not just a melding of already existing products? If it is then what matter is it that a 17 year old did it? That said though, I'm glad he's getting the attention for having the sense to do stick it all in there in the first place.

  22. Imageshack is the best by zymano · · Score: 3, Informative

    Imageshack doesn't use the annoying sign up forms.

    If you need to show something fast and don't want the hassle then Imageshack is it.

    I use it all the time. Fast and covenient.

    1. Re:Imageshack is the best by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      I also like Imagevenue. I guess it's a matter of personal preference (and IIRC, Imageshack makes a bit more informative theumbnails), but Imagevenue supports batch uploading, custom image resizing (and not just presets), 500 K larger files, but only jpg's. Actually, Imagevenue even supports free FTP via temporary accounts you can get to batch upload even more than 10 jpg at a time.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  23. is this a PR stunt? by moochfish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to troll, but I find this whole thing a little odd.

    In the terms of service: "By accessing the web site Zooomr (hereafter known as the "Web Site"), a service of BlueBridge Technologies Group..."

    While both the summary and TFA seem to focus on it being developed by a 17 year old in three months, the website has job postings. The article seems to gloss over the fact the entire project is sponsored (owned) by some company. Is this a case of sensationalistic journalism? This doesn't seem like a case where someone hacked it out of their basement. It seems unlikely the company picked it up AFTER development started since no mention of the company is made in any journal entry. So if the company is backing the project financially, am i the only one who finds it odd that it is not mentioned in any journal entry? It's a little weird that he's the face of the project, but it could be a PR move. It definintely doesn't add up the way the article's author seems to want to imply.

    1. Re:is this a PR stunt? by kristophertate · · Score: 5, Informative

      I started BlueBridge Technologies Group close to 5 years ago. The name comes from the blue underbelly of the Coronado Bridge in San Diego, California.

      I'm working at Meetro right now so that I have a chance at living in the Bay Area. That aside, Zooomr is a solution of BlueBridge Technologies Group and is in the midst of becoming incorporated.

      Just so I can get this in without having to post multiple times, I am in-fact 17 years old.

      Kristopher Tate
      cto & founder -- bluebridge tech / zooomr

    2. Re:is this a PR stunt? by ilovepolymorphism · · Score: 1

      Who owns the mentioned company? It could be a startup by him and some associates.

    3. Re:is this a PR stunt? by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1

      Um, how does one start a company at age 12?

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    4. Re:is this a PR stunt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bbridgetech.com traces to made2own.com, which is registered to Rick James. BBridge is listed in Vista, CA (nice blue collar town, eh?) while made2own is listed in FL. Nice neat consistent professional data stream you have there. :)

      Any affiliation with BlueBridge.at or BlueBridge.de?

  24. If it's that easy, sell your Google stock... by finnif · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like how about half of the comments respond how easy it is for the kid to have created the site, or that there's not much innovation going on there.

    I often agree with both of these statements, including for Google, Y!, MSN sites mentioned in Slashdot stories. They're all a bunch of Javascript. Wowee. That's a pain in the butt, but it's not innovative. There's some server technology that's pretty cool behind Gmail and the like, but as time goes on, those bottlenecks will be solved in a more commoditized way.

    So my question to you all is, why would you own Google or Yahoo stock for more than five minutes, to ride up the next big push? It seems like there's virtually no long term value in any website's technology. Surely someone else will take the idea and improve on it at some point -- it's already happened several times over in the last 10 years. We're already seeing the fast decline in the quality of Google's results, and here come a new wave of search engine rivals knocking on the door. Impossible? Ask AltaVista.

    Or do we just live in a world where brand name is all we're investing in anymore? It's has to be branding we buy because no one actually creates products for the ages. When someone creates a "one click ordering" button, that's what they get patented. Owning the rights to a button on a computer screen like inventors once owned the phonograph, or film emulsion... that's what buying stock is about.

    I remember when a Coke used to be a nickel, dammit.

    1. Re:If it's that easy, sell your Google stock... by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because Google's got a solid reputation with the important half of the equation: making money. Getting money for Advertising is the hard part. Google's automated system nets them a lot of cash, and their reputation brings them enough customers that they automate the process. And it's not like Google isn't busy acquiring and building out new stuff. They rolled out pay per download content in what, less than a year? Their ability to move through internet technologies like a fish moves through water is why they're highly valued. Sure, plenty of people can hack up a flickr clone in five minutes that stands up to testing by their five friends. But making highly available, widely distributed systems involves something more than a couple javascripts. Google's got that part down pat. There aren't that many people out there that are talented in maintaining a cluster of the kind you need to really compete with Google. And you have to recognize, people will always be part of this equation. With hundreds of computers, at least one will fail permentently per day. If you bought quality stuff. If you didn't, oops. Yes, the hardware is being commoditized. But we're a long ways from open source easily maintained cluster computing.

      Long term, there's no value in any single investment in an open market. Returns diminish, and profits approach zero. The only way you stay ahead of the curve is to keep investing in newer stuff. Google appears to have a solid group behind them capable of doing exactly that, and doing it well enough, repeatedly. How valuable is a computer from five years ago? Or a car from ten years ago? Or a printing press from 100 years ago? How valuable is an ad campaign from 15 years ago?

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:If it's that easy, sell your Google stock... by Omega+Blue · · Score: 1

      So my question to you all is, why would you own Google or Yahoo stock for more than five minutes, to ride up the next big push? It seems like there's virtually no long term value in any website's technology. Surely someone else will take the idea and improve on it at some point -- it's already happened several times over in the last 10 years.

      The point is not in the technology. New tech and standards are everywhere. Heck, just look at IPv6. It's been out like 10 years and hardly anybody uses it. The big thing is not something but the people using that something. IOW the user base. That's why Google is big, Yahoo! is big but not other search engines. Google knows this, Yahoo! knows this. That's why they are offering additional services to retain existing users and to attract new ones.

      Big user base = big advertising income

    3. Re:If it's that easy, sell your Google stock... by nagora · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I like how about half of the comments respond how easy it is for the kid to have created the site, or that there's not much innovation going on there.

      It's easy AND pointless, that's the real issue. Who cares? Sharing pictures online is not hard nor is it worthwhile.

      Google serves an actual purpose. Increasinly badly, I'd admit, but it's still useful. Flickr and this thing are just visual blogs and as such just a waste of virtual paper.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    4. Re:If it's that easy, sell your Google stock... by finnif · · Score: 1

      Long term, there's no value in any single investment in an open market. Returns diminish, and profits approach zero. The only way you stay ahead of the curve is to keep investing in newer stuff. Google appears to have a solid group behind them capable of doing exactly that, and doing it well enough, repeatedly. How valuable is a computer from five years ago? Or a car from ten years ago? Or a printing press from 100 years ago? How valuable is an ad campaign from 15 years ago?

      Let's not confuse the products themselves with the creation of that product. A computer from 5 years ago is almost as expensive to get into building as it is today. How much does a fab cost Intel? $1b? On the other hand, when investment in a website is so cheap, how can you invest in the long term? Let's say it costs $25m for someone else to deploy a Gmail clone. That's peanuts. Compare that to the cost of building a fab line, a car company, or a fast food chain.

      I'd like to find long term investments that are longer than a year. It might be true that all companies' returns go to zero, but the time over which that happens is very different for brick and mortar companies. Google is already tapped out with their valuation, to buy it and plan on holding it for 10 years is a ridiculous strategy. OTOH, if you had bought $10,000 of McDonald's stock in January, 1980, it would be worth $553,225.80 today. Name one internet site that's as reliable as an investment as McDonald's was 25 years ago and I'll invest in it. Even then, it was obvious that McDonald's was a nearly unbeatable success story. I just don't see that in the internet business because it seems like anyone can spend a little money in a year or two and build a better product.

      Yes, Google has figured out how to monetize advertising for now. We have yet to see whether that advertising revenue is itself a bubble, caused by the sheer hype of AdWords. Personally, I just find it impossible to believe we can continue to have an entire information economy based on advertising revenue.

      That said, short term trading on Google stock is a gold mine.

    5. Re:If it's that easy, sell your Google stock... by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      If I'm not allowed to suggest Google as a McDonald's company, then I'll suggest Verisign. McDonald's success is based not on selling hamburgers, but on real estate investment. There were plenty of burger joints before and after McD, but McD's was the first to make the game a real estate play. The closest thing one has to real estate on the internet is DNS. Like all things on the internet, it's mostly a kingdom of the mind. One of the better players out there in the DNS and server market is Verisign.

      Businesswise, they've got a pretty good handle on margins, they've got plenty of offerings and new stuff on the slate. Their stock has split like twice in the past 6 years. I'd say that comes close to meeting McDonald's growth. They don't have the history that McD does, but very few internet companies could. More importantly, their P:E is only 14 or so. If you believe they'll be a going concern for the next 15 years, this isn't a bad investment. One spectacular product / idea in the next 15 years from them and they'll make McDonalds look like government securities. Of course, owning Verisign would be an implicit agreement with their business practices.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

  25. Might be... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    Application of labor laws is a relatively new concept. When I was 16, I left home, and got a job running a punch press at a die cast factory in Portland, Oregon (Winter Products). It was a big factory. They didn't ask my age, and I didn't tell them. I'm 42 now, so that would have been around '79 or '80.

    But the guy does a lot boasting, sounds like it might be tall tales...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  26. Don't be dumb... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should have used http://www.myspacegrill.com/

  27. Hopefully Not This... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hopefully we will not soon see him sprawled out in a Tiger Beat photo spread...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  28. Yahoo paid good money for flickr by pardonne · · Score: 1

    Flickr has an established user base and all, but this should still be funny for Yahoo execs. You buy flickr and tell you shareholders what a great value it is, how wonderful it is, blah, blah, blah. Then some 17 year old shows up and duplicates (actually does better than) your acquisition in his spare time :)

  29. Don't be fooled by the high-volume message by KrunchTime · · Score: 1

    It's not because the site has been slashdotted. This message was up there over the weekend. It just looks like they are taking a while to move the site to the new server. And BTW it's zooomr with 3 'o's ;)

  30. 17 year old creates internet bubble 2.0 webpage! by rm999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This reminds me so much of the internet landscape from 7-8 years ago. Add a 2.0 to the end of the internet, and people forget all the hard lessons they should have learned from before.

    My main complaint, a similar complaint from the first bubble, is a huge waterfall of sites that implement only a few unique ideas. Back then it was internet stores and advertising, today it is tagging, blogs, and letting the user interact with the website.

  31. You misunderstand what makes an entrepreneur... by spagetti_code · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great ideas are obvious - once you are told them.
    The ability to recognise a great idea and take it
    from idea to reality is a tremendous skill. Its harder
    than you think. Or to put it another way - just
    how many million dollar concepts have you turned into
    reality recently? Hmmmm???

    You may be as good a coder as this guy - but he took
    some great ideas (that you didn't have by the way)
    and developed them to reality. Interface with OpenID -
    of course! Sound bites, google maps, etc etc.
    Obvious now we know.

    1. Re:You misunderstand what makes an entrepreneur... by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or to put it another way - just how many million dollar concepts have you turned into reality recently?

      I've been working on one for the last four months, actually. Yes, some concepts are obvious, and for those concepts, all it takes is the gumption to sit still for a significant chunk of a year. Other concepts, though, aren't obvious at all. If you're curious, watch that URL - once my patents are in, it's going to start screaming what I'm up to loud and proud.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    2. Re:You misunderstand what makes an entrepreneur... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be as good a coder as this guy - but he took
      some great ideas (that you didn't have by the way)


      He didn't have those great ideas either. The vast majority of what's going on at Zooomr is stuff that other people made.

    3. Re:You misunderstand what makes an entrepreneur... by spagetti_code · · Score: 1

      Good luck to you.

      Given what you are doing - I think you will have or will get a good understanding that having an idea and writing some code is just the first part. Something that is lost on many people here.

      Then theres marketing (slashdot seems to do a good job of that), patents, creating revenue, building the business, support, releases, maintenance, bugfixing, delivery, revenue, documentation, white papers, attracting investors... Did I mention revenue? Doing this on a shoestring (which I think is *very* healthy) requires determination and inventiveness.

      A S/W engine for Nintendo DS eh?

    4. Re:You misunderstand what makes an entrepreneur... by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good luck to you. Given what you are doing - I think you will have or will get a good understanding that having an idea and writing some code is just the first part. Something that is lost on many people here.

      Yeah. Actually, writing code wouldn't even have been the first part for me, except that the basis of the product comes out of my hobby work. The startup capital requirements for this plan are in fact higher than are typical of the Nintendo DS development world, though the total cost won't be nearly as bad.

      Then theres marketing (slashdot seems to do a good job of that),

      Actually, we have a firm on retainer already.

      patents,

      About half paid for already.

      creating revenue,

      Given the nature of the business, this won't be terribly hard; coming to market is a lot more difficult in gaming than benefitting from one's market position.

      building the business,

      Yeah, this has turned out to be surprisingly difficult. Luckily for me, I have an experienced business partner with more than a dozen successful businesses under her belt.

      support, releases, maintenance, bugfixing, delivery,

      Nothing new here.

      revenue, documentation, white papers,

      Documentation and "white papers" are the last things on our mind right now, and the least of our concerns.

      attracting investors...

      Actually investors seem to be finding me, oddly enough. It comes rather as a surprise to me, but it turns out that one really needs one's patents in place before one can safely accept investment. The mines aren't where I expected for them to be.

      Did I mention revenue?

      Yes.

      Doing this on a shoestring (which I think is *very* healthy) requires determination and inventiveness.

      I'm not doing this on a shoestring. What I'm doing could not in fact be done on a shoestring.

      A S/W engine for Nintendo DS eh?

      Yep. I'm an authorized developer, and it won't be my first. It will, however, be the first one solely for my personal economic benefit. I'm sick to death of the bonehead maneuvers that developer companies make, watering their games down for the lowest common denominator then being surprised when they end up with crap. I want direct control of my work, so that I can see it through to its appropriate output. That means I can't take publisher money until the game is done, because that's the most common way to get control taken away, and to get quality stomped into the ground.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  32. Being a 17 year old myself... by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

    When finished, it should be possible to search only for pictures with just one girl, whose legs are spread exactly 57 degrees in a "sitting up" pose. ...it's nice to know you've got priorities straight here. :D

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:Being a 17 year old myself... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Talk to me in a year, and you can have a free account.

  33. And yet... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    You have no idea what the site offers. For all you know, it goes WAY beyond flickr. Actually, I doubt that it does go beyond, but I would not be surprised to see that his arch. is a great deal more flexable WRT to what the future holds. Keep in mind that Flickr was probably more of a slow hack that developed to where it is. OTH, this guy has an idea of where he is heading (he is not a trailblazer).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  34. Different times by KinkyClown · · Score: 1

    When I was eight I greated my first game. Back then it I wrote it in GWBASIC. Difficult to imagine but I think I would have been programming C# or Java if I started now and was eight all over again. Not that I would want to :D

    1. Re:Different times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George W Basic? Oh Snap!

  35. oh... so what ? by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    Ok, so the idea is not new, the implementation for many people here wouldn't be a problem, so the only reason for the hype must be this guy's age... which is again no reason to celebrate this one guy. Ok, credit has to be given, he managed to raise attention, but that's more about hie (or whoever raised the news) pr skills. 17 years that doesn' count that much young in the programming realm, not today, not in the past. Hell, some of my 17 years old friends - that was around '95 - created wonderful pieces of software (and even before, we started coding with one of my friends years before that on everything we could get our hands on), and today kids gather programming knowledge much earlier. Don't want to seem to talk from some high horse, but I have to tell, when you are sorrounded by talented people, such "news" don't seem news anymore. Of course, for the general audience it's a different matter.

    Again, I don't want to diminish or lessen this guy's achievements, I just feel that if we praise him, we should praise everybody else with such and similar and better achiements also. But we'd probably have to dedicate an entire site for these kids :].

    Anyway, I congratulate him for managing to get on slahdot :) (or is that too easy these days ? :P)

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:oh... so what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the really impressive thing about this guy is that he seems to be at least half way to commercialising his software. Few of us could say that we managed that. I know I didn't. Hacking together some little side project is a long way from launching a commerical service to end users.

  36. 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... three options: a) that's a lie, b) he's a genius, c) the code is unmaintainable. being a cynical old sod, i'd bet all my money on the third option. and no, i don't know the person in question nor do i think badly of him. just experience in the business...

  37. So? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

    It's not that complex a piece of code. The hard parts are coming up with an idea and getting people to use it. He copied someone else's idea and so far nobody uses his version.

  38. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't the title be, "17 Year Old Creates Flickr Killer"

  39. Re:17 year old creates internet bubble 2.0 webpage by Justin205 · · Score: 1

    Thank you for bringing some sanity back to this entire thing. If I had mod points (disabled the wish to moderate long ago), I'd mod you up.

    Web 2.0 is a bubble that will pop, sooner or later. I for one, as a little-known 16 year old because I don't do anything bubble-ish, am sticking to tried and true methods. XHTML, CSS, plain designs with little-to-no Javascript, that, above all, work (at least at a basic level) on any browser I've thrown at them. Of course they're 'tweaked' a bit for IE (using MS's comment if statements), but then again what design doesn't need that?

    My opinion is simple - if a design is unusable when a user disables Javascript, CSS, cookies, applets, plugins, images, popups, or anything else... Then it's a bad design. If it is usable with none of those enabled, but possibly enhanced with them enabled, then it's a good design. In basic terms: if it is unusable in Lynx, then it's a bad design. That doesn't mean it has to look great in Lynx - it just means it has to be usable on a basic level - access content, post comments, etc.

    Once again, thank you for bringing some sanity back to this - Web 2.0 is indeed a bubble.

    --
    "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  40. At 17 I was just beginning an 8 yr alcoholic binge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And no, not partying at college. Minimum-wage-all-going-toward-rent-and-beer binge.

    At 29 I've finally gotten my life back together but I'm _still_ not as productive as this kid.

    Kudos to him, I hope him all the success in the world. Once he extinguishes his server of course. ;)

  41. Recipe for success by hritcu · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Create a lame clone of a well known web site ... let's say Flikr 2. Fill it up with Google adds 3. Anonymously submit a story on Slashdot saying that the new site is a Flikr KILLER 4. Profit

    --
    If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
    1. Re:Recipe for success by sootman · · Score: 1

      5. Learn to use
      tags.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  42. Age? by resonte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Should we accredite people for something jsut because of thier age? Why is this story in the news? ...Well we can gain two things from this. For some people it might be a nobrainer on how to make your child have more potential to be succesfull, - you just introduce it to the right environment. But for the masses who don't know how to raise their child stories like these could be an inspiration to try harder, perhaps they should look at how his parents have brought him up and apply that same technique to their own children. Stories like these can also be used as a motivational factor for other people. It shows that anyone can get somewhere if they try hard enough. Well at least I'm impressed/motivated by this guy most people his age still have a localised view of the world.

    --
    \(^o^)/
  43. bla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do we really need another flickr thing....... ?
    damn... ppl really loves unnecessary crap.

  44. How did my picture land on the site? by johngalt9999 · · Score: 1

    was visiting the place for some free food, and next thing you know, i am being "slashdotted" on zoomer site. PS. I am the f00 in the white shirt.

  45. Good by pex2097 · · Score: 1

    Now more people understand that age doesn't matter.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      " Now more people understand that age doesn't matter."
      thats what I've been telling the cops everytime they find me with the fourteen year old next door.

    2. Re:Good by fuzzylollipop · · Score: 1

      you are correct, age might not matter, it is experience that does, and that is based on TIME. So time matters . . .

  46. Ok... by Tomeee · · Score: 1

    If this trend continues, Skateboard-City.com will be mentioned on Slashdot... I've just turned 17. Now, Electronic Arts, hire me already, its my 2nd year applying!

    1. Re:Ok... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

      you don't want to work there.

      Seriously.

  47. Re:17 year old creates internet bubble 2.0 webpage by wootest · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth I don't think "Web 2.0" (and I detest that name) is all about enhancing things with new technology (even if a bunch of that technology enables stuff, even helpful stuff, that's not been possible without it - reorderable draggable lists, autocompleting, and so on).

    Look at Flickr or Zooomr. *Anyone* could have created that even five years ago. It's not about new technology, it's about web people finally getting the web for themselves and doing their thing. The bubble was about conglomerates trying to shove the web into the mold of other medias, and on the other end of the chart it was about faulty business models (if "the new economy" meant that if two companies did jobs for each other worth $20 billion, they both earned $20 billion, then the stock market should have called bullshit on this from the very beginning).

    I'm not saying some people aren't making the same mistakes all over again. It *is* starting to look like the bubble with startups all over the place, but unlike last time, some of the better successes of this era are companies *adjusting* to the web, embracing how it works and building on that. And some of the leaders of it are folks that have been doing just that all along - 37signals spring to mind.

  48. Slashdot changing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't it had been "Flikr KILLER below 18!"?

  49. In my day by arosas · · Score: 1

    When I was 14 I was computing with an abacus. Later I went on to coding on a stone tablet with chisel and hammer, it was later labeled as the 10 commandments, but that's neither here nor there. I used to walk 10 miles in the snow each day to work in the mines.

  50. Scalability *is* really important by billstewart · · Score: 1
    If this site is going to become something other than a me-too that gets left behind, it'll need to deal with scaling to handle millions of users, and doing so while generating enough cash flow to survive (i.e. to keep buying hardware.) This is very hard - if you fail at scalability, your system slows down enough that new users go away and use something else, and then you don't generate the millions of users you need to be really significant...

    I find it highly credible that a bright 17-year-old can hack together a system that does good metadata stuff to make it more hackable and more user-friendly - but scalability is harder to learn. You also need to be able to do the kind of social engineering that gets lots of people interested in your system, and other than dumb luck, that's a very very hard thing to do by yourself.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  51. Lets stick with tradition... by EddyPearson · · Score: 1

    17 year old creates Flickr killer!!! Isn't that better?

    --
    You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
  52. Three months? by ader · · Score: 1

    So he spent, what, a month longer developing his site than the Flickr guys did? Hmmm, could be a lot more stable then. Nice work, kid.

    --
    Big Bubbles (no troubles) - what sucks, who sucks and you suck
  53. Lets do a survey by j.a.mcguire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who thinks they could do this? Woah, everyone?

    Not exactley impressive is it, if you did it for your dissertation you'd be lucky to get a 2:2.

    As the guy above said, must be nice to have financial support.

  54. Userid of nearly a million... by mahju · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... yup that pretty much confirms he's only 17.

  55. Gimme a minute... by haraldm · · Score: 1

    So this is just for sharing photos which are totally irrelevant to the public, like most blogs? Great piece of creativity but it doesn't exactly solve a single real problem of the world.

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
  56. Won't he be sued for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Excuse my ignorance for US law, but he has ripped off flickr, used a similar name, and wants to profit from this.

    Won't he be sued by Yahoo?

    1. Re:Won't he be sued for this? by csorice7 · · Score: 1

      In one sense, being 17 is a big benefit. Being a minor and starting up a company, man, that's a solid negotiating chip with a VC!

      CSorice7

      --
      Working to make ideas into reality. www.i4e.com
  57. Some interesting PDFs on the BlueBridge site by Corrado · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I Googled around for some stuff on BlueBridge and found out that they had a couple of PDFs lying around. It looks like some stuff from earlier projects, one being a Subway sandwich shop web site to order custom made subs. Anyway, just thought you might be interested.

    http://www.google.com/search?hs=akR&hl=en&lr=&clie nt=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q= site%3Abbridgetech.com+filetype%3Apdf&btnG=Search

    --
    KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
  58. It's not unheard of... by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 1

    There was a kid in London, ON Canada (Keith Peiris) that started his own web design company at 11 years old. I believe he's around 18 years old today...

    He received an assload of press. He met the Prime Minister. The youngest CEO in the world. He's been given awards from top companies (Macromedia).

    Personally, I'm not a fan of his work... but that's just me. The kid is kicking some ass. He has done some NHL team web sites and many local and Canadian hockey-related web sites.

    1. Re:It's not unheard of... by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1

      I know it's not unheard of, but exactly HOW does one do it? Methinks most of the credit goes to the parents on this one.

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
  59. Tags are lame but they work by Nurgled · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with complicated data models is that they require effort on the part of the user to understand the model and use it effectively. Tags work because they're simple: a user can get the concept in a few seconds and then, for every item, tag it just as quickly by typing a few words into a box. You can't beat tags for simplicity. The more complicated you make the model, the higher the barrier to entry and thus the less input you will recieve. Since most of these "folksonomy"-like systems rely on a high number of submissions to filter out junk, this could greatly impact the quality of your data.

    Of course, if you've got some clever trick up your sleeve to make your data model intuitive and quick to use then I'm all for it. Anything has to be better than keywords as a data model.

    1. Re:Tags are lame but they work by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Two things. Build a community around it, of early adopters who understand the model and can write complex SQL queries.

      And let them trade saved queries. Want something specific, tweak a query someone else wrote. Tags alone will never be able to do what this does.

    2. Re:Tags are lame but they work by CubicleView · · Score: 1

      Yes and no, for things like flickr I agree 100% the search criteria could become hopelesssly complex, at least for the average Joe Soap at any rate. However assuming that all the material is p0rnograhic in nature(though this would apply to anything though of course), you could tailor the search page with that in mind. Then it wouldn't have to just a series of dropdowns or whatever. For example everyresult set returned could have one control pic which has more tags than usual. You could open that pic and click on hair, eyes, feet, whatever floats your boat and that would act as a filter for further searches etc. In theory this could work on a more generic and broader scale to cover all of flicker or zoomer or whatever but the work required to set up the filter pictures would go through the roof as would the confusion for the end user.

    3. Re:Tags are lame but they work by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      So you've left out all the potential users who don't know SQL? Not a good way to build a community.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    4. Re:Tags are lame but they work by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's a good attitude. So learn. Or be willing to make due with tablescraps from those who do. This "you've left out" bullshit taken to its extreme just makes for dumb people.

      1984: "This GUI thing you've got, you've just left out everyone that doesn't know how to use it, it will never work!"

      There will be a basic interface eventually, but it will never be as poweful. It's going to take me alot longer to design it. I may not go through with it after all.

      But if you aren't one of those that refuses to learn, here's your first lesson... "select * from table".

  60. How does this work then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You can choose to create an account or just use one of five other credentials to set up an account (Level9, OpenID, LiveJournal, Google (Gmail)"

    What does this mean? You use your existing gmail / livejournal login for this site? If so, how's he managed to get access to their authentication engine? Or is he just hoarding passwords :)

  61. Wasn't a woman. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, it wasn't a female that created it. HAHAHAHAHA.

    Repeal the 19th ammendment.

  62. What Language by mslinux · · Score: 1

    Just curious... what did he write it in? PHP, Ruby, Python, etc.?

    1. Re:What Language by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Python.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

  63. When I was 17... by dtdns · · Score: 1

    I was running the largest BBS resource online and had been for over a year. When I was 18 I built DtDNS (a dynamic DNS service that is now celebrating seven years in service). I'm sure we all have something special we were working on when we were that age, so, why is this news again? Perhaps I'm disgruntled because when I was 17 I was getting yelled at by my parents to quit wasting my time with "that computer crap" and to get outside and cut the grass. Now I make more money than they do, hehe.

  64. What impresses me... by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... is that he followed through on a project.

    Lots of people have ideas for things, but not many have the ability to follow through on things. Especially younger folks!

    When I was about 12, I wrote about half of a BBS on my Apple II - it'd answer the phone, let a user log in, and I made maybe 5 or 6 very primitive discussion boards and a hangman game. Not a single bit of it was "innovative" in the large sense of the word, but I made it all from scratch and learned a hell of a lot from it. I stopped working on the project when my dad, thinking it would help inspire me, got me some commercial BBS product. I wound up getting demoralized - "Someone else already did it, and better than I could." (I wound up trying to write games - there were no worries about someone else "doing it first" since I wanted to "fix" Ultima III to add features [never succeeded, but I did manage to make a tile-based display that would let me move a guy around a map, make characters for a party, and sort-of fight])

    Anyway - lots of people have ideas for really great stuff, but not a lot of them do anything about it. The fact that he made it work, did some pretty nice localization - that's good stuff even if it isn't entirely original/innovative.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    1. Re:What impresses me... by triptolemus · · Score: 1

      When I was about 12, I wrote about half of a BBS on my Apple II

      You mean you modified GBBS?

    2. Re:What impresses me... by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      No, I wrote it from scratch, using Applesoft Basic because that's what I had available to me. If I'd simply been modifying an existing product, my comment that I became demoralized when I learned about "commercial" BBS software wouldn't have made much sense.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    3. Re:What impresses me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "Not a single bit of it was 'innovative' in the large sense of the word, but I made it all from scratch and learned a hell of a lot from it" was puzzling to you?

  65. Awesome, but not so unique-Harry Pumphandle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Brand recognition though, you can't whip that out whenever you want."

    It's easier if you unzip first.

  66. Just wait until the patent lawyers show up, junior by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    there are thousands of people between the ages of 15-18 that have the potential to create things like this.

    There are thousands of people between the ages of 15-18 who are about to get introduced to the harsh world of patent law too. Consider it an education in how the "real world" works, the one where a rich established company can harrass you right out of existence with relative ease with a few legal threats.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  67. Where to get started by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    So I made a similar post yesterday...but I'm basically wondering this:

    If you don't have the programming skills, but have ideas that would make good competition...where do you get started? Especially with web services development? Also, where's a good starting place to learn about the hosting you would need for something like this. I know there are cheap ways to host this much data and expensive ways, so does anybody know what kind of setup Flickr is using?

    BTW, kudos to this kid, and since I saw he posted on here, I was wondering...do you know a lot of programming languages? Or did you just learn what was required for this project?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Where to get started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The easiest way is to make friends with someone with the programming skills :). However if you want to learn the stuff on your own, there are plenty of books. For development, you don't need a fancy server, you can run everything off your own machine. Once you have a prototype, you can get funding (or decide to invest more money) and get a host.

  68. Re:Are YOU making a contribution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOW! Just read your past work -- you are a troll MASTER!! Keep up the amazing work!

  69. beh just a website by frietbsd · · Score: 1

    http://www.wcools.nl/ Look at this guy, he wrote a complete OS at an younger age.

  70. I really doubt this will be scalable by fuzzylollipop · · Score: 1

    He might have created something that "works" like Flickr, but I really doubt it is scalable to thousands and thousands of _CONCURRENT_ users and terabytes of data!

  71. Why zooomer but not 23? by adamjudson · · Score: 2, Informative

    23hq.com

    Supports the flickr API, which seems like much bigger news than the age of the authors.

  72. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do so love articles like this where they tell you nothing about what the heck it actually is and then the site doesn't work thanks to be slashdotted so you can't tell what the heck they are talking about...

  73. It's a Five Dollar Idea by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    This kid appears to have come upon a real Five Dollar Idea.

    Anyone else want to call bubble on these web-apps? It seems like everyone and his kid brother nowadays has some kind of web-app to do something social but inane that makes a lot of ad money or gets bought by Google.

  74. Re:Are YOU making a contribution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At 17, in 1985, I was chasing some seriously gorgeous skirt. ;) ...and making $5.10/hr washing dishes and loving life.

  75. Since we're off-topic and all... by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to say that your sig-line reminds of something similar about statistics:

    Statistics are like bikinis; what they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.

    --


    Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
  76. OpenID authentication by kevint241 · · Score: 1

    There's nothing preventing your OpenID server from using a SSL or TLS certificate in just the way you say your bank does. Zooomr's partner OpenID service MyOpenID does in fact just that.

    We do highly discourage use of "a window with no location bar" for the reasons you mention. You and I will probably remember that when using the service, but it is a difficult user eduction issue, granted. It would help a lot if things like Petname Tool take off.

    1. Re:OpenID authentication by Atrus5 · · Score: 1

      For end user-server communication:
      Yeah, using SSL/TLS is almost guaranteed to work. Sadly, it looks like http://www.myopenid.com doesn't redirect to https://www.openid.com unless you're logged in, breaking the phishing defense aspect of it. (The form on the real site submits using SSl/TLS, but browsers don't indicate where forms will be submitted ...)

      For consumer-identity and consumer-server communication:
      The OpenID page does not even mention support for SSL/TLS, much less encourage support for it. There's a similar silence about multiple openid.server links. I don't see how you can expect SSL/TLS to work without a good chance of breaking things.

    2. Re:OpenID authentication by kevint241 · · Score: 1

      myopenid.com's front page may not always redirect to HTTPS, but www.myopenid.com/signin does, which is what you'll see if you use your OpenID to log in to another web site.

      HTTPS has not been encouraged for consumer-server communication because it seems as if many web hosts are sadly lacking SSL-enabled http fetching libraries. So if you can poison the DNS server of the consuming site (not just the user agent's), you can attack accounts on that consumer. Solutions there would be to use HTTPS for that communicaton (but, as you say, likely to break with things as they are) or use more secure DNS (what ever happened to DNSSEC?).

      So, uh, how likely is someone to launch a successful DNS poisoning attack in order to crack accounts on your photo sharing host? No, it's not impossible, so maybe you shouldn't use it on that swiss bank account, but it's far from trivial. And is it any easier to do that than it is to attack the current standard for web service login, the e-mail confirmation? No, SMTP uses unsigned communication and DNS too.

      Which means you get something that's as secure as the current system, is *more* resistant to phishing in some ways (since you should only ever be giving your credentials to your OpenID server and not sharing your password with every blog and phpBB you run across), relieves users of the headache of password management, relieves a lot of the headache of account management for small web applications (I can authorize http://frank.livejournal.com/ to edit pages on my Instiki *without* requiring Frank to go through a sign-up process at my site), provides a namespace for account identifiers that we can build some cool trust systems on top of ... and yes, it's vulnerable to some of the same attacks as the current technology. That still sounds like a win to me.

    3. Re:OpenID authentication by kevint241 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where multiple openid.server links enter into the conversation at this point, but it's true that would be out of spec. However, future versions of the spec are expected to use Yadis for server discovery and Yadis allows defining multiple services. That should be happening Real Soon Now.

  77. This is the new reality by BeerMilkshake · · Score: 1

    In software it is fairly expensive to develop a concept, define requirements, build the prototype or first revision and encounter/resolve the issues. It is called the 'bleeding edge' for a good reason.

    Once you have a product, the cost for someone else to build a work-alike is a fraction of what it cost you.

    With such a low barrier to competition, it can be a real problem trying to make money from a first product. Your only safety is to try and stay one step ahead of the mimickers by innovating your product and serving a niche market.

  78. Re:Are YOU making a contribution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They expalined this on TLC, 9/11: Anatomy of a Disaster. The trusses that support the building were not heat trated, and were designed to distribute almost all the weight around the outer structure. When the trusses on the floors that sustained damage gave way, the shock on the trusses beneath, already weakened by heat, floor after floor failed.

    I was very interested in this when I first saw it, because I too noticed the collapse looked like that kind of planned destruction.

  79. You're not so great, bud by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
    Try again when you can put a single
    in your post.

    Oh, and get off my lawn!

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  80. Great, but...not so great. by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    Programming is hard, there's no question. There's only one thing harder: figuring out a new and unique thing to program.

    In other words, I'm impressed by his ability to code well (presumably) in a short time, but would be a heck of a lot more impressed if he had created something unique (such as the original Flickr, or whatever it is that was the original in that field) in twice the time.

  81. Re:Are YOU making a contribution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    building 7 fell in exactly the same exactly symmetrical way as WTC 1 and 2

    uhhh...down?

    No, he said "symmetrical". "Down" is already implied by the verb "fell".

    Nice reading comprehension skills there, dude.

  82. Re:Are YOU making a contribution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was making a joke.

    Nice humor comprehension skills there, dude.

  83. Needs a more . . . by Durf · · Score: 1

    . . . original namr.

  84. Re:Are YOU making a contribution? by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 1

    Why yes, yes I do have uhhh...ummm.......want to go ride bikes?

    --
    [ ]
  85. Display ads but let other pay for the bandwith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the static links point to the coral cache service at nyud.net.

    If I were the admin, I wouldn't mirror those images for him.